Slashdot Mirror
Right-Wing and Fake News Writers Are Now Going After Elon Musk (qz.com)
Fake news galvanized US president-elect Donald Trump's supporters, and sullied his enemies. Now it may be Elon Musk's turn. Quartz adds: The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX has his fair share of detractors, but a new era in a public relations battle to discredit him appears to be taking shape. Bloomberg reports that hard-right groups are lining up to back misleading websites and fake journalists who attack Musk's business empire. Many of the attacks on Musk begin with something factual: His businesses were built, legally, with the help of billions in government contracts and incentives for renewable energy and space transport. But they go on to accuse Musk of fraud and wasting taxpayer dollars; some compare him to a convicted felon. At least three conservative sites have run negative pieces about Musk -- by a nonexistent writer named "Shepard Stewart" -- that include "Elon Musk Continues to Blow Up Taxpayer Money With Falcon 9" and "Elon Musk: Faux Free Marketeer and National Disgrace." Two later retracted the stories. "There's a very obvious precedent" for this, says Sam Jaffe, managing director of Cairn Energy Research Advisors. "That's Hillary Clinton." Musk tweeted this week, "Can anyone uncover who is really writing these fake pieces?"
Folks that can't stand reality conflicting with their hate-based fantasies.
The same argument applies far more to Lockheed with their joint smoking fighter. Instead of going after real waste these cowards are attacking the little kid in aerospace.
Wait - not everything on the Internet is true?
to collect all of the bullshit into one post so the grownups don't have to waste time wondering what the hate groups are spewing.
I'm not sure what the motivation is for these attacks. Musk hasn't been particularly political and mainly stayed out of this election. As far as I can tell, the primary motivations are one of two things. Either one, the people behind this are simply hateful and without a major target like Hillary must choose another, or two, they hate Musk because much of his work (electric cars, solar cells, even wanting to use methane for rockets because methane is a potentially renewable resource) has been to deal with issues related to global warming. If the second is the motivator, then it says something really fascinating: that there are elements of the right which not only are convinced that global warming is some sort of evil hoax, but that they actively hate people who disagree with them and are trying to take steps to destroy someone who is trying to help. If that's the case, it is truly a frightening example of the depth that people can sink to, and the levels they'll go to not just ignore facts they don't like but to actively try to harm people who try to deal with those factual issues.
WTF? Didn't you guys get the memo? Fake news was last week. This week it's hacked voting booths. Next week will be hacked fake news sites. Week after we will be voting for fake new hackers (they're actually middle aged).
We're entering the "Nothing is true, everything is permitted" stage of history. It's gonna be a fuckin' riot.
Personally, I can't wait for CG to hit that sweet spot where one can make an absolutely convincing replica of anyone and make it do or say anything. Because who needs an objective reality anyway?
Then again, AI replacing the human thought process is going to be pretty sweet too. IT'S NOT MY FAULT, THE COMPUTER TOLD ME TO DO IT!!!
Oh boy, oh boy, we're living in the future folks. Hurrah!
Defamation, slander and libel laws are already on the books. I'm sure Mr. Musk can and will take care of himself.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
A pseudonym isn't a real person. Does Richard Bachman exist? He is listed as author on multiple published several novels.
I doubt this is about pushing any agenda, Fake news drives large amounts of hits/click bait, which in return drives advertising revenue. Their are people all over the world who have realised this and their entire job is to generate fake news, not for any agenda, simply profit. The more controversial and topical the more likely to earn money. Up until a few weeks ago it was all about Hillary and Trump, now they need to move on.
I am a right winger. We like Elon Musk. He produces a quality product at a decent price. He is against over regulation in his industry. This fucking epidemic of stories about fake news this week is ridiculous. The Liberal media lost big, predicting a Hillary landslide, and they NEED a scapegoat to blame for their own idiocy. Trust in the media is at an all time low, and people aren't fooled by the MSM putting on a different hat and calling themselves "impartial fact-checkers" anymore. So the new plan is to declare any website we don't like as "fake news" and tie them into the other demonized group we made up, the "alt right". They are the enemy and they must be stopped.
Did you really just point to two of the biggest fake news sites to use them as evidence that a fake person exists?
I think you missed the point of this whole "fake news" controversy. These twenty-something goofballs start a fake news site to make money off the alt-right, and alt-right news sites who don't do any fact checking immediately pick up the stories.
In the past few days, there have been several interesting interviews with some of the people who run fake news sites. The reason they say that fake news doesn't work on the Left will blow your mind.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Musk has flaws and his businesses have flaws, but they should be faced and corrected. There is no use for a smear campaign, or for ass-kissing on the other end.
Makes you wonder who is funding all this. (yeah, not too hard to guess)
The mainstream media like CNN, NBC and The New York Times are the fake news. Seriously, their coverage of Donald Trump's campaign was so disgustingly biased, dishonest and untrustworthy. And the fake polls showing Hillary with a huge lead when they polled more democrats than republicans?! This election was the final nail in the coffin of the mainstream media for me. Sites HATED by the mainstream media, like Breitbart, are real truth based media to me. I'm very glad that Trump won the election even though I'm not an American and don't live in the USA. The true intolerant, hateful, race bating, and violent people are the left wing democrats. You wouldn't know by following the main stream media, but when you go to real news sites like Breitbart you find out about violent liberals beating the shit out of Republicans for voting for Trump, or trying to making things up pretending to be a victim of Trump supporters only to be exposed as a liar. They're mad that the woman funded by Saudia Arabia, the most misogynistic and homophobic country in the world, didn't win the election after she STOLE the nomination from Bernie. Bernie wins a state, Hillary gets the delegates.
Yes! ... but we're not talking about Trump here.
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
You have to realize just how much the recent election shocked the shit out of the media. Wow, there is a whole world out there and they have NO IDEA what is going on. They have been living in a bubble and that bubble was burst, badly, on election night. They are deep hurting and this isn't any kind of fake crocodile tears hurt. It's for real and they are going to engage in the kind of defense mechanisms that humans engage in when they are hurt this badly.
So, what should their reaction be to the fact that the world doesn't conform to how they think? Take a long, hard look at themselves and change? Or double down, adopt a fortress mentality, and deny that there's anything wrong? Label these dissenting voices "fake news" and strive mightily the MSM's chief weapon, credibility, to discredit them.
If you just laughed at the idea that the mainstream media is credible after the shit they pulled in the election, then you know what I'm talking about. They were 100% backing Hillary and the whole world saw it. They had themselves convinced that she had a 93% chance of winning and they believed it. After a shock like that, who can blame them for reacting this way? They have a lot to lose. Not just their million dollar salaries, but their entire way of life and worldview is being threatened. Why not attack the truth-tellers? It has a chance of working, and anything's better than actually facing the cold hard truth. Facing the truth is last resort after everything else has failed and the MSM is a long way from that. They have powerful resources and are not about to give up.
Better to get your news on controversial topics from news sources like Infowars or Breitbart. These sites have a huuuuuge audience, larger than the mainstream media, and they report stories that the MSM refuses to cover. Think about it: when powerful people tell you to ignore news sources, what should you do? (A) Obey and be a good little drone. Or (B) take it as proof positive that these news sources are broadcasting very inconvenient narratives that they really don't want you to know. Hell, I used to think Alex Jones was a crazy man, but damn if they're trying to suppress him then he MUST be saying something important, otherwise he'd just be ignored! Read for yourself, evaluate for yourself, if you think they're full of shit that's your decision. But read them yourself, don't let the MSM tell you what's credible and what's not, because their credibility is bullshit! Make up your own mind!
One side says, "don't pay attention to those others, they're fake!" and the other side says, "consider us, we'll tell you things the other side is hiding, just make up your own mind." What do thinking people do in this situation?
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Musk and his scientific/engineering teams landed a rocket vertically- more than once. Something that NASA engineers said could not be done and was impractical. They were wrong.
Show me something like that from the right wing guys. Anything? What have they accomplished? Anything? Bueller?
Might be Tucker all over again. But every single thing Tucker designed ended up in modern automobiles. Every single thing NASA has designed has resulted in a new products. And every single thing Musk develops will also end up part of a product.
So right wing guys? What do you have to show besides rhetoric? Have you designed anything? Built it? Passed a science class and applied the information?
If the alt-right wants to start a war against science- good luck. We make better weapons.
Another consultant who stuck it out.
"We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
So far. Maybe.
Did you really just point to two of the biggest fake news sites...
Be careful. When you paint with a broad brush, you run the risk of getting paint on sites you probably like, such as motherjones, etc. There are some real echo-chamber nutcase sites out there, like infowars. It's a mistake to throw all the sites you don't like in the same heap with them. Fever swamps like infowars need draining, not more roughage heaped into the stew.
Fascists are still worse. And, there is no evidence of any "leftist" conspiracy outside of your padded room.
Surely, it couldn't have been all of the FACTUAL information obtained from Hillary's email server, and the DNC's and Podesta's hacked accounts that "galvanized" the Trump supporters. And, of course, it couldn't have been Hillary's march toward globalization and the further degrading of US sovereignty. No, it was the FAKE NEWS boogeyman. OOoohhhh!
Here's a clue: Trump won the presidency because of the continued efforts of the leftist media to muddy the waters with lies, and play interference for Hillary. Welp, we don't like being lied to, and it was apparent where the lies were coming from and who they were meant to benefit. So, on election day, we said "FUCK YOU!" to the liars. We said "Fuck you" to the perpetually scandalous Hillary, and we said "FUCK OFF" to the infantile, shrill, triggered little assholes that continue to plague the streets in protest of the process they claim to support.
And now, as we repeatedly hear the drums of "fake news" and "hate speech" beat to the rhythm of the same lying lefty news orgs, we see it for what it is: an attempt to silence the voice of opposition. Racism, hate, white supremacy... it's so sad that these words have lost all meaning. These words call out ugly ideals and behavior, but the klaxon blowhards of the left have been crying wolf for too long. Now, it's time to eat crow, motherfuckers.
sig: sauer
In the Tesla crash in Indianapolis a few weeks ago, one of the riders in the car was trapped in the battery fire and died, slowly, in the heat. What a hell of a way to go.
I haven't seen that much national coverage of the accident. But geez. Trapped in a metal can with 10,000 Galaxy Note 7's...
I think you missed the point of this whole "fake news" controversy. These twenty-something goofballs start a fake news site to make money off the alt-right, and alt-right news sites who don't do any fact checking immediately pick up the stories.
In the past few days, there have been several interesting interviews with some of the people who run fake news sites. The reason th doing it. Alsoey say that fake news doesn't work on the Left will blow your mind.
I heard about this story yesterday on NPR, about an alt-right fake-news writer living in Los Angeles.
TL/DR: Jestin Coler (the fake-news writer) claimed that he does it to show how easily hoodwinked people are by fake news, but when pressed, he admitted he could make lots of money doing this. A few interesting quotes from his interview:
The whole idea from the start was to build a site that could infiltrate the echo chambers of the alt-right, publish blatantly false or fictional stories and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction.
[...]
We've tried to do similar things to liberals. It just has never worked, it never takes off. You'll get debunked within the first two comments and then the whole thing just kind of fizzles out.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Guy that rich can afford *real* assassins.
That isn't from ***outside*** of the padded room of the root post; original research by amateur journalist conspiracy theorists is self-reinforcing not validated.
I miss hearing about Reagan, he made sense even though he had only been a movie star previously. Trump will be a poor quality photocopy if he even tries the job.
Can you find something legitimate?
Damn, the denial is strong with you. You just tried to discredit original research. Do you even realize how denialist that is? If doing your own research isn't good enough, then damn what is?
Did you even read the article? Please do, it's important. The subject admits he's a leftist and confirms he's running a false flag operation. Read the whole thing from top to bottom, it is well worth five minutes of your (and everyone else's) time. Especially read the byline.
By Laura Sydell
NPR
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Hello,
News sites (fake or otherwise) should be extremely cautious of running salacious news stories about Elon Musk, given that fellow tech mogul Peter Thiel helped sue a media outlet into oblivion. Presumably, Elon Musk has the same capability.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
Dexter is a good dog.
Maybe you should get a job writing fake news.
The real news reports attribute the deaths to hitting a tree at a high rate of speed. The car didn't catch fire.
Hard to fix stupid.
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
You're wrong, the Tesla did catch on fire and the remaining parts of the battery exploded violently.
The fact that you seem to see the world as "everything good comes from the left, and everything bad comes from the right" is proof that you've already been trained to think what you're told to think and never question it. If you truly think the world is so cut and dry, you are a fool.
It's two step program: 1. publish a fake story that the alt-right will pick up and amplify. 2. Denounce the alt-right for believing the story. The problem is that step 2 appears to be missing.
The interesting thing about that story is that the only source of information that it is a leftist plot comes from the man who publishes lies for a living.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
I frequent those forums and I've literally never heard anything about Elon on them.
There is this thing called "reading comprehension" -- you REALLY need some practice at it. Look at where those claims came from, check out who stated them.
I'm not sure anyone is even doing anything. Some guy I've literally never heard is said to have written 3 critical articles that I've never seen before.
As best I can tell, everything right now is about /u/Spez and pizzagate, if there's anything going on about Elon, it's kinda weird that I'm reading about it here first.
You really are a candidate for fake news writer.
Try reading the article slowly and move your lips as you read... sometimes it helps.
The car did not catch fire.
Some of the batteries were separated from the car and caught fire:
The crash left the Tesla in pieces strewn over 150 yards, requiring firefighters to douse multiple fires caused by small batteries and magnesium, Reith said in a news release.
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
Read it slower, you missed the part where responders were prevented from working due to the exploding pieces.
Perhaps this is clearer for your to understand.
So, where does it say that the car caught fire?
(Hint: It doesn't. You're making that part up.)
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
The fact that you characterize a person not based on their decisions but on your impressions of them shows that you have no awareness of your personal bias. Your training to not think needs to be undone. I recommend education.
It was obvious. Read this.
Also since you demand explicit statements, read this, linked from the other article and using even more explicit statements about the fire in the car and from the battery pieces as distinct, and preventing responders action.
Still... just part of batteries caught fire. The car didn't catch fire. Look at the pictures. The car is not burned.
You're still making stuff up.
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
So now after 3 articles, 2 of which explicitly state that there was a unique and larger fire in the car, you refuse to acknowledge it? Fuck off!
Right. Because bringing a car with a driver who falls asleep while using Autopilot to a complete stop in the middle of a rural interstate at 3am so someone else can rear-end them at 80mph is obviously safer than keeping the car moving along at the speed of typical traffic and staying in its lane.
A stopped car on a mostly-empty limited-access highway is just about the deadliest road hazard imaginable.
The accident in Florida happened because the driver didn't understand that something that's reasonably safe to do on an interstate isn't necessarily safe to do on a country road with cross traffic.
The truth is that the vast mass of the public is stupid and taken in by false narratives. The mainstream media has been benefiting from this for decades. The fact that someone else cracked the code and found an alternative delivery system is the "problem" here, not the existence of dishonest media.
Jayson Blair. Dan Rather's "fake but true" documents. Brian Williams in general...the list goes on and on and on. Hell, Walter Cronkite was often giving out palpable untruths in regards Vietnam on the evening news when I was a kid. The problem then was that we didn't find out the stuff was actually untrue until 25 years later with the research tools available via the Internet.
HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
Who needs facts when you can just say "Fake News" and "alt-right"?
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
fake it till you make it. There was a time not too long ago that their hate-based fantasies were reality. Many of them look back to a time when they had higher social status and several economic advantages. When people talk about white privilege that is what they mean.
Trump proves the clock can be turned back. It doesn't even take that much. All it took to put Trump and a whole bunch of alt-right into power was apathy on the part of Blacks and Latinos who couldn't get excited over Clinton like they did for Obama...
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I've noticed over the last 15 years that news reporting appears to deliberately incite rage in it's consumers. I conclude the reason is because happy news doesn't cause interaction that can be measured, while outrage causes people to post comments, link, and send to friends. These actions can be tracked, and if it can be tracked, it can be monetized. An example is Info Wars site. Most of their news is extremely slanted and almost seems to jerk the froth out of their average reader's mouth, while simultaneously reporting things dishonestly. When one bothers to fact check and independently confirm their stories, it is my opinion that they are almost without exception false to fact or put in the worst light possible. Nor is it confined to such fringe lunatic sites, this is found in Fox, Breitbart, Drudge, and to a lessor extent in CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, PBS, and NPR.
TL;DR: News is worthless. They all have an agenda and they all push it.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
Reagan was governor of California. Compared to Trump, he was uber-qualified.
When lying in order to win control of policy results in a majority being overruled by a minority, for the express purpose of removing the liberties of the more powerless of citizens, creating an alternative 'reality' of fake facts, nothing can be accomplished
Even the need for simple self-correction is gone thanks to people like Faux's Roger Ailes, creator of such lies as "Benghazi" and "WMD found in Syria but no one can locate it now"
Care to demonstrate any FAKE news from NY Times?
They have made mistakes (Judith Miller and WMD for example) and issued retractions and apologies
Not Fox
Not newsmax
Not Freerepublic
Not Infowars
Not Limbaugh
Not Beck
That is what separates the real from the illusion
A total lack of accountability
"Fake news galvanized US president-elect Donald Trump's supporters, and sullied his enemies"
And the last pretense of objectivity flies right out the fucking window. It's "news for nerds" not "politically motivated lies."
We've tried to do similar things to liberals. It just has never worked, it never takes off. You'll get debunked within the first two comments and then the whole thing just kind of fizzles out.
This sounds a little too exactly-what-liberals-want-to-think-about-themselves. I would be really surprised if this is true.
Electric vehicles and solar power are a massive threat to the internal combustion engine and fossil fuels. This is about money as much as it's about politics. One question is whether it's being done to manipulate the share price for short term profits or to damage Musk and his businesses in the long term. Probably both, because why not?
You can objectively come to this conclusion by deviating from their idea of normal. The left will tolerate you. The right will punish you.
No one is normal, the only difference between us is our willingness to conform to an ideological standard.
But perhaps in a world devoid of intrinsic relativism, in a righteous world I suppose, that scenario would paint the deviant as an objectively bad person in need of reform and training. No doubt, there are many righteous people online spreading the word for their faith, warning us of the coming cultural apocalypse.
I don't believe it was the liberal media who outed Sean King. The fact that he's still quoted a lot by liberals kinda belies that bolded text.
publish blatantly false or fictional stories and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction.
And then what? They don't care about facts. Blatantly false or fictional stories that were immediately debunked were what got the fascists to power. Because the majority really is that stupid.
The people that starve won't be the folks that put Trump in power...
The people that will likely suffer the most under Trump are the working class people that voted for him. He plans to cut taxes on the wealthy, cut business taxes, and generally make taxes more regressive. If he starts a trade war, it will likely destroy more jobs than are created, and good paying jobs in high end manufacturing and technology, will be replaced by low wage jobs making the plastic junk that Walmart currently imports from China.
Like you I've never seen any of this "fake" news anywhere I frequent. So I followed the links to one of these "fake" stories. Here is what I found:
From the Slashdot summary you click the link and end up at a news site called Quartz. Wikipedia characterizes Quartz as a site that "targets high-earning readers who traditionally read other left-leaning publications," a bit of the left wing echo chamber, in other words. In the Quartz story you find one link to what is described as a fake news story at a site called The Daily Signal. The Daily Single is a Heritage Foundation deal; a piece of the right wing echo chamber. The story itself is categorized by The Daily Signal as "Energy / Commentary," and — indeed — it reads like commentary, making no pretense at being news. The last paragraph:
It’s past time for the American people to stand up to Musk and demand that our legislators and other elected officials bring him back to earth before spending one more dollar of our money. He’s wasted enough of it already.
Pure commentary.
I conclude that this Slashdot story is fake; the one "fake news" story being cited by Slashdot via Quartz isn't a news story at all; it's political commentary, labeled as commentary and reads like any other piece of commentary. If this is what the left is hanging its hat on I say go for it; your delusions aren't helping you at all and I hope you continue to indulge them.
Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
"In the Tesla crash in Indianapolis a few weeks ago, one of the riders in the car was trapped in the battery fire and died, slowly, in the heat. What a hell of a way to go."
This did not happen.
You can make up things if you want but that's called fake news
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
With equal justification, you could write:
Right now, they are subjecting us to an endless stream of baseless accusations of "white nationalism" and "anti-Semitism" against their political enemies. I'm not even going to bother listing the never ending stream of fake stories coming out of left-leaning media, including Quartz, a publication pushing advertising at rich lefties (the target audience for Teslas, hence no surprise why they are defending him).
As for Musk, of course, he is a major crony capitalist; his business wouldn't exist without massive government support. If you think you are justified being pissed off at Wall Street or Exxon, you are just as justified being pissed off at Musk's businesses.
True: while progressives and fascists are politically and historically closely related, fascists are clearly worse than progressives.
Correct, there is no "leftist conspiracy", any more than there is a conspiracy of bankers, oil companies, or GMO producers. Rather, it is everybody acting out of self-interest. It just happens to be the case that the self-interest of journalists and media doesn't coincide with the truth or the interests of the public at large.
When I tell people that, as a gay immigrant, I didn't support Clinton and have left the Democratic party, I am frequently subjected to abuse and insults by leftists, being called anything from a shill to a self-hating faggot. Question left-wing dogma on gun control, affirmative action, abortion, or climate change, and the abuse gets even worse.
I have experienced nothing comparable from US conservatives, libertarians, Christians, or independents, even as an openly gay, vegetarian atheist; their attitude is generally "not quite what we believe, but how nice for you"; the worst they'll do is hand you a Bible.
In case you missed it, NPR tracked down a major source of fake news
That is, a left-wing agitator produces large amounts of right wing bullshit online and then left-wing media use that to support their view that there is a massive problem with fake news and "alt-right" views.
This is similar to to the fake post-election hate-crime-wave that we are supposedly experiencing, and to the death threats people fake on Twitter. The left wing outrage machinery is largely fed by self-created fake stories.
GM got subsidized loans from US govt too. And Tesla paid back its loans early.
Credits for electric cars are turning into a disadvantage for Tesla, since the market for credits is oversaturated so they only get 50 cents on the dollar, and they are only valid for a limited number of cars which Tesla is rapidly approaching.
SpaceX is getting lucrative contracts from the US Govt, indeed. But if SpaceX didn't take them, some other company (or country!) would. SpaceX just gets the contracts because they are the cheapest. Free market at work, there.
Meanwhile the oil industry keeps getting subsidies that are orders of magnitude larger than those for renewable energy. Even more so if you count the price of pollution.
NPR tracked down one of the fake news sources. It was basically some guy who figured out how to use the traffic to make $10,000 to $30,000 a month.
That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
The thing that kills me about Tesla is that I see a bunch of rich folks driving them around, subsidized by the tax dollars of the masses.
If you really like the idea of electric vehicles, you'd be working on little tiny craptastic bikes that could be affordable commuter options for folks making minimum wage (price them cheaper than the bus, and give credits only based on income).
Maybe we should push this as separate story out on slashdot
https://slashdot.org/submissio...
Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
Far-Right, New-Right, Tea-Party, Alt-Right, Hard-Right... What's Next: Neo-Right!?
Throughout history, the English world has referred to political or social groups that espouse populist ultraconservative and extreme nationalist ideologies as far-right groups or parties. But, recently I have observed an explosion of new terminology being invented to try to distinguish the multitude of far-right groups - all of which share the same ultraconservative, ultranationalist rejection of modern egalitarianism. It is almost as if far-right groups are jostling for position to see who can pronounce themselves to be at the furthest right of the left-right socio-political ideological spectrum.
It may be that if one splits hairs, one may identify unique characteristics that distinguish the different groups' neoreactionary philosophies - and many people will point these out to confused detractors like myself. Far-right groups have as much right to exist and espouse their ideological views as any other socio-political group... but, for the sake of clarity, lets stop inventing completely new terminology to describe how much further to the right one group may be than the ones that came before it.
Never since the formalisation of the struggles for independence, self determination and emancipation by the long suffering subjects of British, French and Portuguese colonies have we seen the emergence of so many political and social "movements" as we have seen in recent far-right politics of America. Calling one's social, political or pressure group a movement, no matter how well funded it is, does not automatically bestow upon it a mark of legitimacy if it is not borne out of the organisation of legitimate grass-root and civil societal formations that will sustain it as a movement long after the big cheques stop flowing because the socio-economic issues that are the fuel of real movements very rarely follow the ebb and flow of the electoral cycle. So, enough already with the "it's a movement" when referring to the shiny new vehicle a particular group may be using to rally its supporters behind its latest socio-political ideological project.
Okay... I'll get off my soapbox now and shut up.
Now that "fake news" has become a well-known term, it is already being used by people in an attempt to discredit opinions they disagree with.
Here's one of the articles criticizing Musk, Tesla and Solar City. Where it quotes facts, the facts are true. However, it also includes a great deal of opinion, mainly that the government subsidies Musk's companies receive are excessive, and a prime example of cronyism.
The facts are quite clear: Tesla and Solar City only exist because of the massive subsidies they have received. Are those subsidies justified? Should they continue? Some people apparently do not want to have this discussion.
Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
Correct, there is no "leftist conspiracy", any more than there is a conspiracy of bankers, oil companies, or GMO producers.
OPEC means nothing to you?
Sure everyone acts in their own interests, but people in power have the means to execute their interests a lot more than the noisy rabble.
As a right winger you don't agree with left wing policies, pretty obviously.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
their attitude is generally "not quite what we believe, but how nice for you"; the worst they'll do is hand you a Bible.
So every single Conservative is happy, friendly and welcoming, while all Liberals are hateful, spiteful and evil?
Here's a tip for you, there's loonies on all sides of the fence. Your chosen team doesn't have a monopoly on virtue. And the fact that you think it does says more about you than them.
Welcome to Corporate America. In Argentina we have elected a guy who convinced everyone he wasn't going to pass the crisis down to the lower classes, and amid his first government actions he cut the export taxes to mining down to Zero, penalized the unions by pushing a tax reform which makes you pay more if you negotiate a raise above their projecred inflación numbers (which are obviously rigged downwards), and criminalizes social protest. Whatever USA gets in terms of asymetrical social growth, It has been tester in Latin America previously.
Do you actually understand what those words mean? She is a writer, sometimes of fiction and sometimes as a journalist. That does not imply that everything she writes is fiction. She admits nothing, says nothing about false flag operations.
Are you just really bad at reading comprehension or is this some kind of delusion?
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Is why the the right wing would want to attack Musk. He's an entrepreneur, he's creating a LOT of jobs and intellectual property and he has a distinctly libertarian streak. Why are they attacking the guy?
For the life of me, I can't figure out why people are in denial about Russia's involvement in attacking our electoral process.
Sure, you can find Macedonian teenagers, and idiots in California who claim that "only conservatives fall for fake news" and that it "doesn't work with liberals" (...) but that's a side show.
Start here, and read it until you grasp what is going on:
Russian propaganda effort helped spread 'fake news' during election, experts say
The flood of "fake news" this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.
Russia's increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human "trolls," and networks of websites and social-media accounts echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers. The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of international tensions and promote fear of looming hostilities with nuclear-armed Russia.
Two teams of independent researchers found that the Russians exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment, as an insurgent candidate harnessed a wide range of grievances to claim the White House. The sophistication of the Russian tactics may complicate efforts by Facebook and Google to crack down on "fake news," as they have vowed to do after widespread complaints about the problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
Then continue here:
A collection of articles on Russia influence operations in the United States:
The threat from Russia
22 Oct 2016
How to contain Vladimir Putins deadly, dysfunctional empire
FOUR years ago Mitt Romney, then a Republican candidate, said that Russia was Americas number-one geopolitical foe. Barack Obama, among others, mocked this hilarious gaffe: The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because the cold wars been over for 20 years, scoffed the president. How times change. With Russia hacking the American election, presiding over mass slaughter in Syria, annexing Crimea and talking casually about using nuclear weapons, Mr Romneys view has become conventional wisdom. Almost the only American to dissent from it is todays Republican nominee, Donald Trump.
http://www.economist.com/news/...
---
Belching smoke through the Channel, Russian aircraft carrier so unreliable it sails with its own breakdown tug
22 Oct 2016
The ageing Russian aircraft carrier that sailed through the English Channel escorted by the Royal Navy has been plagued by years of technical problems and is accompanied everywhere by a tug in case it breaks down.
The plumbing is so bad on the 55,000 ton Admiral Kuznetsov that many of its toilets cannot be used, while it has had repeated problems with its power and a string of accidents, naval experts said.
The Soviet-era warship is leading a flotilla of eight naval vessels to the eastern Mediterranean, where its aircraft are expected to join a renewed assault on the rebel-held city of Aleppo.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...
---
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
21 Oct 2016
Donald Trump
Trump's entire campaign was based on this fact.
And the guys who provide these fake news stories to alt-right websites aren't con men. They're just giving the alt-right exactly what it wants.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Sounds like libel or slander to me. And as this is not political speed, it isn't protected, there's far less to hide behind.
I don't know what is wrong with the far right that they want to shut down ... oh wait, it's the petrochemical industry isn't it. Solar power and electric cars aren't their favourite things.
NYT executive editor Dean Baquet recently released a letter to its readers on the subject of rededicating itself to truth, and you can't rededicate yourself to something you are already dedicated to, and I quote:
"As we reflect on this week's momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you." - Dean Baquet, Executive Editor, New York Times.
NYT is a bunch of biased fucks, but they've pathetically admitted it and promised not to do it any more. They did this because subscriptions started to plummet when its readers found out how big of a circle-jerk fantasy their reporting was about the election. Its damage control, and an empty promise. They've rededicated themselves to pretending they are honest for a moment.
"His name was James Damore."
Maybe, just maybe, it would be useful to reconsider these incidents with the point of view that it's *never* right for a police officer to kill a person. That can't be correct - I understand. But it's a good starting point. Then in each case ask whether the police used lethal force to prevent further lethal violence, which is just about the only reason I see to authorize it.
Out.
Reagan was an actor. Compared to Trump, he was über-qualified.
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
You prefer sources that tell you that they're never wrong. Smaaaaart.
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Jesus, that's what you're resorting to? Deeply pathetic.
I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
LOL! Trump didn't sell Putin our uranium.
motherjones's investigative reporting is right up their propublica and is no way comparable to infowars.
The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
All I can grasp from that quote is that, somehow, working for NPR.org is in and of itself a damnable act.
"See?! SEE?!!! She is a Digital Culture Correspondent for NPR's All Things Considered, Morning Edition, Weekend Edition, and NPR.org!!! Don't you sheeple understand what that means!??!?!?
SHE'S A LIBRUL!!! ONE OF THEM FOLK WHO HANG IN LIBRRR-EYES AND USIN SECRET WORDAGE TO CONFUSE YOU AN MEK YU THINK YU STOOPIDBRAN!!!"
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
"how do you explain Trump rallies?"
With the fact that there are perfectly reasonable reasons to support the giant Oompa Loompa over Hillary?
besides union busting and arming a whole bunch of people with little or no training (buddy of mine is a gun nut and has taken a few classes, you'd be surprised and terrified by how many people think it's both legal and OK to shoot somebody because they made off with your TV).
1. End the war on Drugs. Of course the cops are violent. They're not cops, they're soldiers.
2. Put a stop to wealth inequality. There's no fine for a fix it ticket. It's used to keep poor people out of wealthy peoples neighborhoods and prevent them from using the services paid for by property taxes. It, like our drug laws, are how we keep poor people cordoned off in their own miserable little world.
And you're right about why gun laws started passing. But you're also ignoring why they weren't passed sooner. Wages went up and the cost of guns went down. Blacks could _afford_ guns. Until then money was our gun control. It's money. It's always about money.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Nah, it's just you failing to exercise a bit of intellectual curiosity/honesty and actually read the last article she wrote, which, amazingly enough, just so happens to be about the subject at hand. One of several relevant excerpts:
Tell me a little about why you started Disinfomedia?
Late 2012, early 2013 I was spending a lot of time researching what is now being referred to as the alt-right. I identified a problem with the news that they were spreading and created Disinfomedia as a response to that. The whole idea from the start was to build a site that could infiltrate the echo chambers of the alt-right, publish blatantly false or fictional stories and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction.
Do you have trouble with terms like "generally" and "frequently"?
(1) I'm on neither political team.
(2) The fact that both parties have large numbers of deplorables doesn't mean that they are interchangeable in every respect.
(3) Howitzer86 claimed that "The left will tolerate you. The right will punish you." I'm pointing out that my experience is the opposite: I have found the left to be much more frequently to be nasty, bigoted, and intolerant of people who they disagree with than the right.
What exactly about that makes you think that the author of the article is running a false flag operation? Sure, the guy running the fake news site is, but the author of the article is just reporting on her interview with him. It's not even clear what flag you think she is flying.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
âoeThereâ(TM)s a very obvious precedentâ for this, says Sam Jaffe, managing director of Cairn Energy Research Advisors. âoeThatâ(TM)s Hillary Clinton.â
Jaffe says that whoever is behind the attacks is aiming at Musk personally because they fear he could go into politics. He cited the allegations of fraud (emails) and negligence (Benghazi) levied at Clinton during the presidential campaign, charges that cemented the publicâ(TM)s perception of her as shady. âoeItâ(TM)s the exact same thing as Musk. Thereâ(TM)s a portion of the political spectrum that is scared to death of Musk as politician. They see him as a threat. Theyâ(TM)re starting that process.â
That's absurd. Sure, like many other famous people, Musk might be considering some political role in the future. But if these attacks exist, they're targeting him for a near future reason not some nebulous political agenda. I'd look at his business interests instead.
I notice that one of the alleged "fake news" stories is a singular attack on SolarCity and specifically mentions an election for the Arizona Corporation Commission. Apparently, there has been a split between the members of the commission with one member, Robert "Bob" Burns demanding to know how much money was donated to fellow Republicans from an Arizona utility. It apparently escalated to the point, that three Republicans ran for office as a bloc in 2016, apparently to block Burns from getting reelected (and failed). SolarCity supported Burns's campaign by running ads.
The incumbents are former House Speaker Andy Tobin, appointed in January by Gov. Doug Ducey, and Bob Burns, a former state Senate president who has been on the commission since 2013. The two show little affection, and have battled over Burnsâ(TM) effort to force the stateâ(TM)s largest utility to disclose whether it spent $3.2 million in the 2014 commission election. Arizona Public Service has neither confirmed nor denied it spent the money to back Republicans Tom Forese and Doug Little, who won.
Gray, Melvin and Tobin are running as a team, meaning they can boost their spending power by airing combined ads. Dunn, Burns and Tobin are privately financing their campaigns, while Melvin and Gray are using public money through the Arizona Clean Elections Commission. Democrats Bill Mundell and Tom Chabin also are using public funds.
All four candidates said Burns should drop his effort to force APS to reveal whether it spent in the election, which would constitute a major change in practice from decades of hands-off approaches of the election of commissioners who regulate monopoly utilities.
âoeThis is not about the Corporation Commission â" this is about Bob Burns now trying to get media attention and you guys are giving it to him,â Tobin said in an interview. âoeBut at the end of the day, heâ(TM)s the only guy getting any money at all.â
Tobin was pointing to advertising benefiting Burns that is paid for by an outside group funded by nonregulated company SolarCity. The company has been battling utilitiesâ(TM) efforts to change how rooftop solar customers are paid for electricity they sell back to the utility.
My issue is with the statement "The left will tolerate you. The right will punish you." I'm saying that my experience is the opposite: people on the left are much more frequently bigoted and intolerant towards people who "deviate from their idea of normal" than people on the right.
That is, Democrats and Hillary supporters in my experience frequently become defensive, abusive and insulting when I tell them that I don't like their candidate, whereas Republicans and Trump/Cruz/Bush supporters generally just say "I understand your view, even if I disagree with it" when I tell them that I don't like their candidate.
Well, I'm neither. I'm a classical liberal, which means I'm socially liberal and in favor of free markets and small government. That view used to be tolerated in the Democratic party, but not anymore.
A "conspiracy" involves a secret plan. Is there anything secret about OPEC? No. OPEC is a legal, transnational cartel that pursues policies that enrich their authoritarian governments at the cost of everybody else. So, thanks for illustrating my point: you don't understand what a conspiracy actually is. That's why you mischaracterize criticism of the left as if people were charging that there is a "leftist conspiracy".
People aren't charging US media with a "conspiracy" when they accuse them of political bias and corruption, they are charging US media with bias and dishonesty based on naked economic self-interest. You know, kind of like OPEC.
It's not about emotion, it's about $$$. The people doing these fake stories are doing it because they are getting paid to do it. The ones paying them to do it see an angle to either make more money by throwing dirt at Musk's ventures or are doing it to protect an existing revenue stream.
With humans it's always about power, sex or money. Frequently all three.
And therefore... (wait for it)... liberals are smarter than conservatives! QED, it's obvious!
(Flattery always works with liberals)
If it weren't for Elon Musk and Tesla, we would still be asking "Who killed the electric car?"
That question was effectively answered a decade ago in this documentary.
The answer? The auto industry, the oil industry, and the George W. Bush administration.
Tesla, Nissan (Leaf), Chevrolet (Bolt) and no doubt others to come will show that the plan did not succeed.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
I don't think he's being attacked online just because Elon Musk is at odds with right-wing hate based fantasies. And I don't think it's because they're scared he might run for political office, as the article suggests. This seems to be a very skillful, well orchestrated campaign. It almost has to be because he's talking about UBI, a Universal Basic Income - and that goes against the right wing's current thinking.
Chelsea Clinton owns TheBlaze whom Glen Beck front-lines for./p>
ROTFL. No, Chelsea Clinton does not own TheBlaze. It is owned by Mercury Radio Arts, aka Glenn Beck.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
I'm hardly a fan of Glenn Beck, but I must point out that he has been sounding more contrite since he left Fox.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-...
http://www.salon.com/2016/11/0...
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Dude, I have no idea what word fragment in this thread you're clinging to in order to try to pretend you're confused, but I suspect in your better moments you like to present yourself as slightly more intelligent than this. It's crystal clear which of the two people is running a false flag operation, and which of the two is reporting on it.
Stop it with the distractions and engage the subject matter if you dare: What are your thoughts about a lefty running a fake alt-right news site with the stated goal of then "debunking" its very own fake stories after they spread?
The people that will likely suffer the most under Trump are the working class people that voted for him.
But they didn't, that's a myth. The median income of Trump voters was $10,000 higher than Clinton voters. Only a very loud, very ignorant, yet minuscule minority of working class people voted for Trump, especially given the low overall turnout. The majority of working class people didn't bother to vote. They didn't see any point to it.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
The fact that you seem to see the world as "everything good comes from the left, and everything bad comes from the right" is proof that you've already been trained to think what you're told to think and never question it.
If you hold liberal values, then that's true. It doesn't mean that everything that comes from the left is good, though; that's where the logic fails. Another place you can fail is thinking that the Democrats are leftist when they are centrist.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
The thing that kills me about Tesla is that I see a bunch of rich folks driving them around, subsidized by the tax dollars of the masses.
Those rich folks were already subsidized by the rest of us. They were polluting more than necessary with their gas guzzlers.
If you really like the idea of electric vehicles, you'd be working on little tiny craptastic bikes that could be affordable commuter options for folks making minimum wage
Affordable? Sure. Realistic? No. Not in most of the USA.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Actually, the relationship between intelligence and political leaning is complicated. One study indicated that conservatism is associated with cognitive rigidity and therefore difficulty with intellectual challenges. Another indicated that intelligence tends to be associated with a stronger tendency to weigh more factors when rendering an opinion about something, and therefore it tends to make people more moderate (i.e., centrist.) In other words, that cognitive rigidity tends to steer people towards more extreme ends of the spectrum. And yet another showed intelligent people can display mixed tendencies in both directions. Also, cultural and historical context can have an influence.
https://www.psychologytoday.co...
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Taxes can be cut safley if goverment spending is also cut. Problem solved
It's crystal clear who is reporting.
However, whether or not it's a false flag operation, or merely a fake news network is not at all clear. You have to believe the person who publishes lies for a living that it's not just fake news, but instead it's a false flag operation. Occam's razor suggests that the person just publishes fake news as a way of making a living and there is no false flag element to it.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
The Left fact checks.
Sorry but that's just total bullshit. Some people with left leaning political views may fact check but there are so many gullible naive ignorant twats ranting on about gender pay gaps, rape culture, online harassment and other bullshit without the slightest understanding of the basics facts or the truths they reveal.
And therefore... (wait for it)... liberals are smarter than conservatives! QED, it's obvious!
As a liberal, I don't believe this is true. It's not intelligence; it's emotional engagement that makes you gullible.
So it's a matter of circumstance we're looking at here. Conservatives believed in the last election that they were at risk of losing their country. They truly hated and feared Hillary Clinton, and that made them gullible. Well what about liberals and Trump? I think the problem is that fake news couldn't get traction because Trump himself had already saturated his negatives. Before people could take the bit in their teeth they would be distracted by real bad news, or go back to seething over reality.
People in general are sheep because they allow themselves to be emotionally manipulated.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Has anyone been locked up for being an opinionated conservative? What is it that you do (or wish to do) that carries a risk of that?
As for boycotts and name-calling, that's freedom baby.
I'm not saying it isn't possible to have a pleasant debate experience with conservatives, I work in an industry dominated by them and I've had my own - but I pick my battles and I speak in their political language - it might help that I'm not economically progressive, so right away we agree on a lot of things.
In any case, I don't rub my beliefs in people's faces to try to look cool or smart. I wait for them to talk to me about it and then we can have a useful conversation, and I never ever call anyone racist.
But in those conversations, while they're smiling at you and "handing you a bible", remember that their leadership is forever plotting to take away your right to openly be yourself, and using your existence to bolster their "gay agenda" narrative in order to scare their party faithful and divide the public.
People say the liberals "won the culture war", but I think that war is still ongoing. Conservatives won what matters - political hegemony. The rest is sure to follow.
To understand where I'm coming from, start by ignoring Trump, Milo, and even Bannon. Ignore the weirdos that are there just to look appealing to free wheeling Millennials. Look at the people Trump hires or surrounds himself with. People like Pence, Giuliani, Priebus, and formerly Christie... these are the ones with real political power and they have a track record of doing things that hurt the very people they're expected now to work for under the veil of Trumpism.
I am forced to admit, however, that when it comes to division for the sake of securing political power, both parties are guilty. I am very unhappy with the Democrats and the MSM right now, and I've never really been that pleased with them and their willingness to lie in order to super-charge the truth. But I still believe the liberals have it right. If you talk to a liberal and they freak out and call you a self-hating racist, that's because the MSM is forever on over-drive trying to get them more worked up about Trump than they should be.... there's a lot to be concerned about, but it's not about Trump being a dictator, or Trump being a fascist, or Trump being the second coming of Adolf Hitler. The truth is more insidious than that. I think when your publication turns yellow like that it risks de-legitimizing your entire message. When the entire MSM is doing it, people like us are left to come to our own conclusions.
I respect your viewpoint and understand where you come from, and I expand on this in my first reply. The source of my suspicion of Republican motivation has nothing to do with Trump, and more to do with history and the people Trump currently surrounds himself with.
I also make an attempt to explain your experience talking to liberals. I've seen it too. It isn't great, but I think it's due to the media's current hysteria surrounding Trump and the alt-right.
Make no mistake this is serious and these people are paid.
The question is, paid by who? He's not just threatening the energy and automotive industries, as SpaceX also happens to be a major problem for competing launch entities, such as the ULA, Russian, and the PRC.
We're talking the statement: "You can objectively come to this conclusion by deviating from their idea of normal. The left will tolerate you. The right will punish you." That statement has nothing to do with whether Pence, Giuliani, or Priebus advocate policies that are useful or harmful to this or that group; it has to do with whether ordinary progressives, social democrats, libertarians, or conservatives will "tolerate" or "punish" you in response to being different, like whether they'll scream at you or disinvite you for Christmas or unfriend you on Facebook.
That's the Democratic and progressive party line, and if you disagree with it, progressives will treat you as a pariah and insult you. But there is actually little reason that the positions these people take on gay rights, abortion, religion, etc. matter much, and to the limited degree that they do, progressives arguably get it wrong.
I disagree. Progressives and democrats have been particularly guilty of hijacking the political discussion with issues most people simply don't care much about: income inequality, government funding of abortions, gay marriage, gay wedding cakes, climate change, financial regulation, gender pay gap, etc. What people actually care about hasn't changed much: economic growth and national security.
Evidence of "fake news" sites have been trending since before the election, but not this "right-wing bad guy" rubbish, it was CNN, MSM, etc. airing blatantly misleading information in place of important news that was surfacing about Hillary literally on a daily basis at the end of the election. The extent they went to suppress what was in her emails was orwellian. Slashdot hasn't been safe from the propaganda either. A lot of people here still think Trump is the biggest news of today. I hate to be the one to say this, but you're literally programmed to think he's your enemy. Wake up and remember Snowden. You're being herded like sheep by propagandists.
Its amazing with all the news stories that agree how smart liberals are that they continue to lose right?
During the election Slashdot was one of the few level headed places about Trump, not outright trusting him but at least not becoming deranged with wild apocalyptic theories or fawning praise like everywhere else. Now he's won and all of a sudden he's the author of all evil despite haven't really done anything except doing half of what he said he was going to do and walk back on some of the things people here hated him the most on. It feels we're backsliding into the bad old days when the crowd that eventually moved to Digg and Reddit was still here and every Republican candidate took their turn being the Great Satan who was going to end the world. And lets not forget that evil 'alt-right' and 'fake news' that didn't exist until the election and now is behind every tree and under every rock. ..
True. In some way they will be held to account by reality for their ignorance in allowing either Clinton or Trump to be nominees. Too many good people doing nothing...... And Clinton / Trump is the price they pay for it.
Only boring people are ever bored.
History shows us one thing with new technology. Other people will oppose it. They will lie, often do whatever it takes to stop it. I'm sure he has already anticipated an attack, perhaps just not this type of attack. If he's on the up and up, I hope he comes back. OTOH, if he's sucking us dry for all we're worth, burn 'em. Stop the Fraud.
Do I go with "The left is crazy with their fake renewable scams burning up taxpayer money and their bogus global warming" or do I go with "The right is crazy with their big oil conspiracy to swindle the public for billions and destroy the planet"? I just can't decide which crazy to go with these days. I guess I'll just keep getting my news from GodlikeProductions. They seem to have a handle on crazy.
And guess where by far the most prolific sources of fake news come from
The left, the source of many (if not all) false flags for the last year.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.