Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: Which Tech Giant You Can't Live Without?

In this week's column of NYTimes, Farhad Manjoo writes about the five largest technology companies in the world: Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft and Alphabet, the parent company of Google. As he notes, these companies have become the most powerful firms of any kind, essentially inescapable for any consumer or business that wants to participate in the modern world. This brings us to two questions:
1. Of the five aforementioned companies, tell us one whose services you don't need for work and for personal use. (In short, the company that doesn't matter to you.) Here's a poll where you can cast your vote.
2. On the same note, which company's services and products you can't ditch (for work / personal use)?

269 comments

  1. None of them. by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can get my PC from intel, my monitor from Samsung, my OS via Linux and internet through some sort of fascist company.

    I don't need those 5 at all.

    1. Re:None of them. by someone1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should add google.* to your banned host list, and see how far you get on the "internet" :D

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    2. Re:None of them. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I have an Apple computer, but almost everything I use could run on another system (though needing something that runs *NIX dev tools and Microsoft Office would probably leave me using some form of virtualisation). Of the others on the list: Facebook? Don't use them. Google? Don't use them for search, do have an Android phone but most of the Google code is replaced by other things, wouldn't mind if they went away. Microsoft? I use MS Office, but if they went away then that wouldn't be too sad (though none of the PowerPoint competitors have an equivalent of SmartArt, which is a shame). Amazon? They're convenient, but they're just a retailer: there's nothing that they sell that I can't buy elsewhere (I suspect that some things I use run on AWS, but they could probably migrate away).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:None of them. by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      You know...I lived a good portion of my life before any of these companies existed.

      Ok, I guess I heard of Apple in my teens, but they weren't the behemoth they are now and didn't have that much influence on society.

      But seriously, I grew up in a city, with a family, friends, and normal life....without any of these companies and I can tell you, I never felt back then my life was lacking in any form.

      Today?

      Well, I do appreciate and use the resources of many of these companies...but I do find that some of them also creep me out with the data mining and surveillance they have on my and everyones' lives.

      I find that FB and other social media, while being helpful in so many ways, is also seeming to increase the divisiveness in society, especially in the US. I know there are underlying problems, but I think FB and other social media are compounding these problems.

      Google has some great stuff, but I very much dislike their data gathering on me, my life and preferences.

      So, I could (and have) lived without any of these companies.....and did just fine.

      I don't use FB, never have...so, no loss there. I could probably get by without Google, but the one thing I'd miss is YouTube.

      I do use Amazon a lot, it's my primary purchase destination, but ever since they started collecting tax a couple months ago on their direct sales to my state, I've been using them less. If they clamp down on the 3rd party sellers on Amazon and make THEM also start collecting tax, I'll likely drop using them as often. Might as well buy local at that point.

      So, I guess my answer to the question is "Meh"....I've lived without them before and life was just fine.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:None of them. by Maritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This whole thread will be a fanboy shit-slinging-fest.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think YouTube is the only thing I would miss as well. I was never one for drama or entertainment but YouTube is an amazing resource of educational videos. Sure, I used to watch those on PBS but I really enjoy some educational YouTube throughout the day.

      I am disappointed to see PiedPiper is not on the list. I would miss pipey.

    6. Re:None of them. by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Same over here. I haven't used Windows since 2004 and never used any Apple product (and use Linux since it existed), I barely use a Facebook account to read an article (yes, article, not stupid "posts") once a year, I use OpenStack and not AWS, and I could well shop somewhere else on Amazon (I already shop on taobao.com / alibaba). The only thing I use is Google search and maps, but really, I could go with duckduckgo and OSM. I wouldn't miss any of these these big companies if they stopped.

    7. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Google routes to null here, along with lots of other Alphabet domains and any I find.

      You think you need googleapis, but you don't.

      Nor do you need any of the rest of them. It's all in your mind.

      But then, you can get away without using sugar, tobacco, booze, petroleum-based fuels, and quite a bit more. Just depends on how industrious you are.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    8. Re:None of them. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      I think YouTube is the only thing I would miss as well. I was never one for drama or entertainment but YouTube is an amazing resource of educational videos. Sure, I used to watch those on PBS but I really enjoy some educational YouTube throughout the day.

      I agree, I really do use YT as one of my primary sources of how to learn something new.

      It was a fun thing before Google bought them....and with Google's attempts at making everyone on YT a Google+ or whatever they are doing now member...they have actually made it worse in some respects.

      My YouTube account is old enough to pre-date the Google buy. I've refused to join G+ when they wanted that, and to this day, while I have my account and can post videos, I cannot comment on even my own videos, much less others.

      I live with it.

      I read what hoops I would have to do to enable my posting ability again, and it just seemed too complex and I read it might actually, if done incorrectly, cause my account to be disabled or even dropped....

      So, I live without comments on there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re: None of them. by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DuckDuckGo.com and they don't bubble your searches either. There's nothing worse than showing subjective results and advertisements pertaining to your personality. You can turn cookies off, but they get more intimate with your computer than that; it won't help. No wonder assholes keep getting into office. Facebook is guilty of the same exact thing with their news articles. Anyone feel free to humor me; find a conservative and a liberal and tell them to google the same topic at the same time and see what happens. DuckDuckGo keeps things objective and private. It also doesn't need JavaScript to run and they have a .onion version for Tor users. So, no you don't need Google at all. When in doubt and need an alternative, ask a Linux user.

    10. Re:None of them. by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you're looking at it through historical context - we've lived without internet, without cellphones, even without cable TV, and managed to actually survive! But if you're looking at it in the context of today, you've likely started relying heavily on one or more of these companies and it would likely be extremely inconvenient, if not impossible to do your job, without one or several of them.

      I'll agree that facebook is the most useless one there, and if facebook disappeared from the face of the planet, the lives of hundreds of millions of users worldwide would actually likely improve.

      I've come to rely on google for a lot of things. Certainly searching the internet is one of them, but gmail, google voice, sharing calendars and documents with my family has been extremely useful. So, on a personal level, losing Google would hurt the most - although I'd manage.

      As far as work goes, we work with proprietary software (and I'm not complaining, as it includes great API access for us programmers); it only runs on Windows. I would love to see a port somewhere else, but that's not likely. We also rely a lot on Microsoft's cloud services and office products to share things (the way I do in my personal life with Google). If MS were suddenly to cease to exist, we'd switch to products on Linux (we've evaluated them, and they just weren't ready for prime-time yet, but we'd learn to live with them if they were the only option).

      I also use Amazon a lot - I have prime, and I've never looked back. I'll take free two day shipping over wasting gas, causing extra pollution, adding to the traffic problem, and spending a couple of hours going to the local big box store and choosing something from a much more limited selection. I don't care about sales tax. I'd be paying that locally anyway. Prime videos and music are a nice added bonus.

      So there's none of these companies I couldn't live without, but I don't think that's really the question. We use the word "need" very loosely these days, and it depends on context. I don't "need" internet service at home... but I do "need" internet service at home if I want to work remotely. But I don't "need" to work remotely, it's just a perk. I don't "need" any of these companies. I "need" them to do some specific things that I don't really "need" to do.

      And slashdot actually has polls, so WTF would someone go offsite to take this survey? Unless, of course, you like being the product. Wondering how many ads are on the linked page.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    11. Re:None of them. by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Apple? I like macOS for bread and butter computing, but I won't be destroyed if I wind up using a Dell or Lenovo.
      Microsoft? There isn't much out that will scale as well as AD, so perhaps someone (Novell?) would put out a good LDAP offering that can handle things. Other than that, a good Puppet infrastructure could replace SCCM.
      Amazon? Azure and OpenStack items could replace AWS, and someone could make an API interface to map all AWS calls to the other cloud providers.
      Facebook? Easiest to replace. If they disappeared, G+, VK, WeChat, could step in. Eventually MS or another big company would fill that gap with a very usable offering.
      Google? I'd say the hardest to replace, but the search engine could be replaced with Bing, the cloud services with AWS or Azure, Gmail with office.com, the Play Store with Amazon's Android store, and perhaps MS could make a variant or fork of AOSP.

      The real company that would be a pain to replace would be ARM, even though they don't make any chips themselves.

    12. Re: None of them. by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

      I use Linux as well. Matter of fact, I got a nine year old laptop right now running 32-bit PAE kernel 4.11 with up to date software just fine. It's really sad how businesses really on these companies for communication and don't even realize the privacy concerns workers may have. Also, everything is cloud and AI now, which just places even more dependency. If these companies disappeared tomorrow, economies around the world would collapse. There are FOSS alternatives to everything. I also personally don't need any of these companies for work or play.

    13. Re: None of them. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Tell me about duckduckgo's email service, and calendaring system, and cloud document services. I'm interested in switching. I could easily live without Google's search service.... I could live without Google at all, but we're really talking about current levels of reliance on any of these companies, and I don't think you get as much "for free" from anyone else (I know it's not free, I know I'm the product, but I'm OK with that trade off to the extent that I use the service).

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    14. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about duckduckgo's email service, and calendaring system, and cloud document services.

      They don't hav'em, and that's what's cute about DDG. ;)

    15. Re:None of them. by TWX · · Score: 1

      I've actually started migrating-away from Amazon. They have a local presence and I get charged local sales tax if I buy from them. It makes more sense to buy from other vendors that don't have such a presence if I'm doing catalog purchases, especially if those other vendors also offer free shipping.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    16. Re:None of them. by TWX · · Score: 1

      And how is this different than any other thread?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    17. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up your own mail server, cloud service (WD MyCloud) and if you can't figure out a calendar alternative, well, I'm wasting my time here.

      Or just give your life to Google for the handful of shiny trinkets they give you in return.

    18. Re:None of them. by TWX · · Score: 2

      I used Altavista.digital.com back in the day, I used mapquest, I used Yahoo maps.

      I switched to using Google for a search engine when Altavista's results got bad or when it closed, can't remember which at this point. I switched to Google's maps because they were easier to read than Mapquest's or Yahoo's.

      Should a truly better competitor for these kinds of functions come along then I would consider them. I'm not exactly thrilled with Google/Alphabet's direction, they seem to be getting a little big for their britches.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    19. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about duckduckgo's email service, and calendaring system, and cloud document services. I'm interested in switching. I could easily live without Google's search service.... I could live without Google at all, but we're really talking about current levels of reliance on any of these companies, and I don't think you get as much "for free" from anyone else (I know it's not free, I know I'm the product, but I'm OK with that trade off to the extent that I use the service).

      They don't have one, but there are lots of services out there that respect your privacy. Unfortunately, they *gasp* cost a few bucks a year to use instead of being financed by selling your data.

      Or you could run your own email server. It's really not that hard, initial setup can be a bit tedious, and getting the big email providers to accept email from your server is hard, but doable.

      These are all solvable problems

    20. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree here.

      Although I feel the spirit of the question may rest on an interpretation of necessity, I must say I could easily live without any of them, and not in the context of reverting back before services/products they provide existed. I don't use Apple or Facebook (actively, I have a placeholder account because society demands it) for starters, so there's two off the list.

      Microsoft is the next easiest to eliminate from my life. The only Microsoft products/services I really use are Office and Windows. Windows I don't need at all, I only use it because others do or demand software specific to it (Office being the key example).

      I'm an Amazon Prime member but I typically do it just to save cash. It turns out it's a bit more economical for me to use Prime than local shops. If I decided to spend a bit more locally, Amazon wouldn't be a necessity. For novel items, there are typically speciality merchant competitors. I don't use any other Amazon products/services.

      Google is the most entrenched in my life. I use search habitually but I've also used Bing and have plenty of useful results, as does Yahoo. Quite honestly, I use Google out of habbit more than any other reason. I currently use Chrome but could use Firefox/Opera happily--this too is used out of habit now. I own a Chromecast but after testing new Roku options, I'll probaby switch next time I need a new tv add on. Gmail I have no specific attraction to, it could be any email service other than integration. YouTube is great for educational videos but alternative video hosting services could quickly step in. Maps would be a bit more difficult but there are other routing applications out there, Google is sort of king for me here but Garmin would be fine.

      In my opinion, the question really boils down to mobile phones. When it comes to the mobile phone market, you've got the three crucial players: Apple, Google, and Microsoft. There are some alternatives but departing one of these companies for mobile phone technology (be it hardware, software, and or online services) would be difficult.

    21. Re: None of them. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      It's not worth it (for me, anyway). That's the point. I realize what the trade off is, and it's worth it to me. It's not that I don't value my privacy, it's that the kind of information Google is getting from me is fairly innocuous, and if I had anything important; data I didn't want shared, proprietary things I need for work, for example - then I wouldn't be using Google.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    22. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use google at all. I wrote my own search engine using a $20 AWS server and common crawl data. It's a lot slower, but provides more accurate results.

    23. Re:None of them. by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      In other threads you are more likely to learn something useful.

    24. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not worth it (for me, anyway). That's the point. I realize what the trade off is, and it's worth it to me. It's not that I don't value my privacy, it's that the kind of information Google is getting from me is fairly innocuous, and if I had anything important; data I didn't want shared, proprietary things I need for work, for example - then I wouldn't be using Google.

      I guess we have different definitions of 'innocuous'

      If you use Gmail, Google knows the content of every email you've ever sent and the content of every email you've ever received.

      If you use Maps to get directions, Google knows when you asked, and where you were the whole time you were navigating.

      If you use Search, then Google knows everything you've ever searched, whether you're signed in to Google or not.

      If you use their DNS, then Google knows every site you've ever visited while using it

      They can and do report information to government agencies upon request

      Individually each of these things might seem innocuous, but combined, they paint a fairly complete picture of who you are, who your contacts are, what you and they are doing, and where you go (both in meatspace and online).

      I guess what I'm saying is that we must be operating under different definitions of 'innocous'

    25. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For cloud document services, use dropbox paper, also free for under a set number of gigs (which shouldn't be a problem). There's a ton of great free calendar services.

    26. Re:None of them. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      But then, you can get away without using sugar...

      I hope you're only referring to refined sugar...

    27. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Read The Case Against Sugar by Taubes if you have question. Sugar is addictive as opoids, perhaps more so, and dietary overconsumption leads to horrific results. Read the book.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    28. Re: None of them. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Like I said, it's a trade off, and I've not given them any information that I'm not comfortable giving them. Why do I care if they scan my email for keywords? I don't care if they know what restaurant I'm going to... in fact, I happily set my home and work locations to make things even easier. If someone wanted this information, it'd be fairly easy to figure out anyway. Like I said, I wouldn't put financial or personal medical information in a gmail.

      I have comcast for internet service, and when their DNS went down I switched to google. Someone from comcast contacted me (through their forum) and said "you know google tracks where you're going?" and I responded "1) I'm not going anywhere without DNS, and 2) so does comcast."

      As I stated, I know this stuff isn't "free," and if there was something I wanted to keep private, I wouldn't be using these services, but otherwise Google is far more convenient than paying for, setting up, and maintaining a handful of alternatives that "promise" to protect my privacy, but also with no guarantees.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    29. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without AWS, there probably won't be much of an internet to surf these days.

    30. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      googleapis is the most problematic part of googles nefarious web, to the point I ended up setting up local virtualhost for a few bits like jquery, the rest is absolutely trivially easy to ignore.

    31. Re:None of them. by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      I already do, it's called No Script with the addition of Disconnect with Google added to blacklist. If the site does not render, I do not go there. Problem solved

    32. Re:None of them. by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Not only do I not need Facebook, I would actually pay money toward making it (and similar sites) go away forever.

    33. Re:None of them. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Given the image, that does seem to be refined sugar.
      Also, overconsumption is the key word. I don't think having a diet completely free of sugar, in any form, is good either.

    34. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'll take free two day shipping
      I don't think you understand what free means.

    35. Re:None of them. by ewibble · · Score: 1

      I would do fine, there are other companies that provide the same thing, and if there wasn't a company would soon come in and fill the gap. The question was not do these companies provide valuable services, they clearly do. The question is could you live without them, and the answer for me for all of them is I could live without them. In fact at worst it would be mildly inconvenient.

      I think for most people if you removed Apple, Google, and Microsoft you would l loose smart phones (or the operating system they run on) (I suppose you could go with blackberry) but since I don't own a smart phone, that wouldn't effect me at all, and most people can live with without a cell phone, people have done it for thousands of years.

    36. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      There are several genotypes that are more susceptible to sugar and carbohydrates. Until you know which one you're a member of, you're in a grey area. By the time you find out, you're pre-diabetic, have high A1Cs, or may have already stressed your pancreatic beta cells.

      Most individuals living today consume 10x-3000x+ the level of carbohydrates that their GGgrandparents did. '

      Without a doubt, you can live very very well on a diet of protein and fat-- remember that excess protein is converted to carbs, and dietary fiber renders a reasonable amount of energy as well. So, yeah, zero sugar is fine. It's incredibly addictive. Look at the next ten people you see for any questions-- especially if you live in the USA.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    37. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's several ways to interpret the poll question. Does "giving up" one of the tech giants means that you personally simply refuse to use their products, but everyone else still does? Or does it mean that the tech giant magically disappears from the face of the planet, and everyone relying on them is left in a lurch?

      So, for instance, I'd be happy to give up MS products forever. However I can't easily do it any time soon because my job, and almost any other job I might apply to and be qualified for, uses MS products in some capacity, usually for Office, Outlook, etc. So refusing to use MS products at all will make it very hard for me to make a living, even though my "real work" involves programming on non-MS platforms. However if MS the company magically stopped existing tomorrow and everyone had to either live with existing MS software with zero support (let's assume all the source code for MS-ware disappeared in the process, or somehow MS decided to commit suicide and refused to sell any more licenses or allow anyone to use their source code for anything), or start looking for alternatives, that'd be a great day for me, even if there's some short-term pain at work.

      And yes, "need" can be interpreted in many ways. You don't "need" internet service at home at all, you can just do work stuff at work and use a coffee shop for surfing, as many people do. You don't "need" internet outside of work either, you can just not use it at all for personal stuff, as some people do (particularly old people). You don't "need" it at work either; even if your work depends on it, you can get another job that doesn't need it, like stocking shelves or digging ditches or flipping burgers. You don't "need" to work at any of those jobs either; you can just become homeless and live on the street, as many people do. You don't "need" to live on the street or at all, you can just die, as many people do voluntarily.

      Anyway, back to the original topic: this could really be re-done as several different questions: 1) Which tech giant would cause you the most pain if they and their products magically disappeared all of a sudden? 2) Which tech giant would cause you the most pain if you alone were forbidden from using their products, while everything remained the same for others? Which tech giant would you miss the most (because of personal preference/opinion) if they 3) magically disappeared or 4) you weren't allowed to use them? And also, which tech giant would you be most willing to give up if 5) you could will them to magically disappear or 6) you alone had to give up their products?

      For me, #1-4 would be Google, #5 would be Microsoft, and #6 would be Apple. I'm not completely ecstatic about them, but Google stuff I actually use a lot (esp. Android--phone), so losing them would affect my life the most. I'd love to see Microsoft magically disappear, but I can't afford to refuse to use their products ever as they're used by too many employers. But Apple I could refuse to use right now, because I don't use any of their stuff anyway. Facebook is a close #2 to Apple, but I occasionally use it with family members, and Amazon I do buy from sometimes, though not as much these days because the counterfeiting problem has gotten so bad and their prices aren't that great any more, their shipping times aren't great, and I refuse to sign up for Prime.

      Another factor is: in the above scenarios, how do various open-source products they've released factor into it? If I refuse to use Apple stuff, does that mean I can't print any more since CUPS is owned by Apple? I would think that open-source stuff that's "in the wild" and not directly generating profits shouldn't be affected, but again this just shows the question is complicated. If this stuff were included, I'd have to change my #5 answer to Facebook since I don't use Hack, HHVM, etc. But wait, what if they've contributed to some other project that I do use? Can I not use that project, even if their contribution is small? Does their contribution magically disappear?

    38. Re:None of them. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You know...I lived a good portion of my life before any of these companies existed.

      People used to live before the invention of a telephone. Now try getting a job without uploading some PDF document to some website along with your email address, LinkedIn details, and right for people to pry into your life.

      Times change. We did a lot of things in the past we wouldn't be able to do anymore. You may not use google, you may not like google, but if you block google you may find your life needlessly difficult e.g. just today I asked the address of a restaurant and I get as a response a google link with a maps reference.

      Sure you can get around it, just like sure your friends will consider you that annoying guy who's hard to communicate with.

    39. Re: None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is the next easiest to eliminate from my life. The only Microsoft products/services I really use are Office and Windows. Windows I don't need at all, I only use it because others do or demand software specific to it (Office being the key example).

      Yeah, but what if the scenario is that *you* have to give up all Microsoft software, but no one else does? So that means that if your employers uses Windows, Office, Outlook, etc., you're no longer allowed to do your job, and you can't work any place else that uses these things. This is a very different scenario than *everyone* suddenly not being able to use MS software.

      Personally, I'd love for the latter scenario to happen, but the former is pretty untenable for me because most jobs use Windows/Office/Outlook if they don't involve software development on Windows.

    40. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      See, this really shows how bad these poll questions are, because people interpret them differently, and small differences in interpretation result in huge differences in responses.

      You talk about these companies "disappearing", but that's not exactly what they're asking, is it? It's vague. Is the company disappearing altogether, or are you just required to not use their products any more? If the company magically disappears, do all their products disappear too from the face of the planet, or is there just a smoking crater where their offices were, with all their assets gone, but everything that's sold still out there? (i.e. can you still continue to use Windows if MS disappears tomorrow, but you won't get any more updates? Are other entities who have the Windows source code allowed to make their own version of Windows now?) What about open-source stuff? Does all that stuff that was contributed suddenly disappear?

      You mention ARM. If the company itself disappears, that's not a big blow because the chips are all made by other companies and the designs are already out there; the only problem would be future designs, but surely someone else would just start making derivatives of existing ARM designs (unless that's not allowed somehow even though the company no longer exists). But if it also means all chips based on ARM IP suddenly disappear, then that's something altogether different because suddenly most modern technology will stop working.

    41. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Great, I'd like to see how you get along without any sugar in your bloodstream.

    42. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Not really listening or reading, were you?

      You absolutely can. Your dietary intake of veggies (not starchy ones like potatoes), give you sufficient quantities of carbohydrates to live all day long. You fuel on the fat. Your body knows how to burn fat instead of the raw carbo-power of sugars, even "complex" carbohydrates.

      Read the book, mentioned up-thread. It will open your eyes, then look in the bibliography to understand its sources. It's called science, not industry hype.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    43. Re: None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You don't need GMail; there's lots of other email services out there (but many require payment), or you can set up your own on a server. You really don't need "cloud document services"; just use LibreOffice if you don't want to use MS Office. But the calendaring system I'll admit is very useful because of its integration with Android IMO, since it results in reminders notifying me on my phone when I'm out. That can be replaced too, I'm sure, probably with some other 3rd-party app and web calendar service (which would probably require payment), but unless such a thing already exists (I don't know, never checked), it seems like this would be the hardest to replace if you use it a lot.

      Going without Google search is easy these days though. DDG works quite well for me, and even Bing (as much as I hate MS) works OK most of the time.

      The Google product I'd probably miss the most, once I safely transferred all my email out of GMail, is Google Maps. (And don't say "switch to Waze" because that's owned by Google too.) IMO, this is probably their most useful thing of all these days. Being able to search for businesses in the area, then with one or two taps being able to get turn-by-turn navigation there, including routing around traffic, is very useful and not easily replaced by any other service I know of. Sure, I can use the nav system in my car, or some other 3rd-party app, for GPS navigation if I know the street address of my destination, but getting that address is half the challenge, and Google Maps makes it really easy.

    44. Re: None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Newer laptops have better CPUs with lower power consumption. You should upgrade to something that's 3-5 years old. It'll still be dirt-cheap on Ebay, but a significant upgrade from what you have now.

    45. Re:None of them. by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      About the same... I never had an apple product, I am in Canada so amazon sucks, facebook is useless, I am using linux, but I must say google is pretty useful...

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    46. Re: None of them. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I know I don't "need" anything Google is offering, I'm saying it works good for me, it's convenient, and I already realize that I'm "paying" for it. Having it all in one package makes it even better/easier. My problem is in offering an alternative search engine to show that you don't need Google - choosing a different search engine is the easiest part of giving up Google.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    47. Re:None of them. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you understand what "pedantic jerk" means, though.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    48. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with duckduckgo?

    49. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already have a large part of google/doubleclick ad networks blocked at home, although it is about time to update my block list.
      I've been experimenting with duckduckgo for some time and have moderate success, email that I care about is already routed to my hosted mail server.
      My personal cell phone runs android but I'd be happy with anything as long as it makes phone calls and receives text messages.
      Work Cell is an iPhone because it was the free option, I was fine with the Blackberry that received email, texts, and made phone calls, was forced into upgrading it.
      The only Microsoft products I have in house are an Xbox OneS (Cheapest 4k bluray player at the time), a Windows VM for debugging an issue with Apache on Windows, and the girlfriends laptop that came with windows.

      It's not perfect, but I find very little breaks with this setup

    50. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll take free two day shipping over wasting gas, causing extra pollution, adding to the traffic problem, and spending a couple of hours going to the local big box store and choosing something from a much more limited selection."

      Right. So you'll just have that item shipped via air freight, and then via truck, which of course uses fuel, instead of supporting your local business. That sounds much more ecologically sound. Brilliant!

    51. Re: None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do agree even if it didn't quite seem that way. I use their stuff too a lot: Android, GMail, Maps, Calendar particularly. I try to use DDG for search but frequently go back to Google depending on what it is. It's convenient, but I'm just pointing out how many of them wouldn't be *that* hard to do without, and that for me at least, Maps is probably the one I'd miss the most (assuming I have time to pull all my email out of GMail; I really should do that sometime just to have a backup anyway).

    52. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You need to take a biology class. No, you can't survive without sugar, unless you're some kind of alien or something. Your body converts everything (carbs, protein, etc.) into glucose in your bloodstream to feed your cells, and your cells convert it all to ATP. Your body's energy source is literally glucose, a sugar. You can't survive without it.

      Since it appears that whatever shitty school you went to didn't teach you any biology (I learned this stuff in public high school bio in the US, not exactly world-class education), here's a Wikipedia article for you:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    53. Re: None of them. by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

      I use Protonmail for email (uses two passwords; one for logging in and another for that actual email box; they cannot recover if you lose it). I also have this rare material called paper for schedule keeping; it works everywhere. I gave up letting Google know what I am up to when I realized its security is only as good as it is convenient for them and whomever has the authority to say otherwise. And, I like to keep my documents printed or on a hard drive. It doesn't make any sense to rely on cloud computing when there are FOSS software like LibreOffice. Heaven forbid you can't do something on your phone other than use it as a phone. IF I do need cloud storage, I use HubiC; 30GB for free and not based in the U.S. or U.K., just how I like it because their privacy laws and practices are a joke if nonexistent (talking to you UK). If you need more security, Tresorit works really well too. For web browsing, Chrome could disappear and we will still have enough developers for Firefox (add-ons are much better anyway) and Chromium. Widevine might disappear, but so long and thanks for all the DRM. For DNS, there are plenty of other options, including DNSCrypt.

      To "someone1234": I usually run NoScript and uBlock like a boss and I can tell you that I block most, sometimes all, of Google's scripts and the Internet still works fine for me. You can even curl or text-browser your way into your email if you know what you are doing. Most server maintainers don't even use GUI at all. So in a way, Google doesn't even need Google to manage Google.

      Most people look at Google as a search engine and not an enterprise, even though in our social circles it may not seem that way. As a search engine, no one needs them but lucky for them and investors, it has become a household colloquial expression for "internet search." There isn't a single service that Google provides that there isn't a FOSS or non-API alternative to. They are the masters of developer convenience and created a platform to get people dependent on them much like Micro$oft is doing with their cloud services. I will miss YouTube, but still say good riddance. Though if Google does go, Facebook and Micro$oft need to leave too. They already have too much power as it is.

    54. Re:None of them. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You should add google.* to your banned host list, and see how far you get on the "internet" :D

      I block all that googlesyndication crap and the like and it's far fewer sites than one might think. Any site that won't load at all if you block that stuff can die in a fire anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    55. Re: None of them. by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

      One of these days when 32-bit is no longer a viable option, I'll think about it. But by then, I will probably just run Linux on my 2014 MacBook and get another 4-5 years out of it. Though, I can tell you right now, you won't notice the speed difference with the custom Linux distro I made, so a better CPU would only make a few things "smoother," but that is usually because newer laptops have better GPU for graphics and 64-bit allots for better graphics processing. The laptop I have only has 128 MB of video RAM. But, I can still use Blender with up to 150K faces before the lag gets too much and GIMP and Inkscape haven't given me trouble yet. I'm not a computer gamer beyond a few emulators anyway. A PAE kernel allows a 32-bit user to have more RAM access, but I have had Firefox, GIMP, LIbreOffice, PCSXR, and Kodi opened at the same time just to see what it would do, and it barely went over 2GB of total RAM. I did roughly the same thing to a 1GB of RAM laptop I had and it got up to 800MB; thank god for swap. The load averages were fantastic too.

    56. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Dude, you and your source are very far behind the actual physiology of nutrition. You get more than enough carbs eating veggies. Excess protein converts to carbs. To diet, read about ketosis, as it's the basis of Adkin's, Paleo, and so many other successful diets. Why? Because they cut carbs to a very reasonable amount. Notice now: I didn't say eliminate them. But the amount of one Cliff Bar is more than you need for TWO DAYs worth of carbohydrates. Really. Look.It.Up.

      Very seriously, you need to get the update. Start with Dr Bernstein's The Diabetes Solution, or any book by Gary Taubes. You'll be glad you did.

      Then, start to understand why your body stores fat (it burns it) and how insulin works. You'll be miles ahead, and highly enlightened.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    57. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're really dense aren't you? I don't care what you eat, if it's an energy source it'll be converted to glucose.

    58. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Please, please, before you embarrass yourself further, get the update. Yeah, it takes work and takes reading what the fat/protein/insulin/glucose(other sugars, too) cycle is and how your pancreas deals with the aforementioned. Your cellular biology is but a discrete datum within a larger but understandable algorithm. Really. I'm not joshing, and I've been a deep researcher for 20yrs. Read the aforementioned material to understand it algorithmically, instead of as a binary, discrete component. You get glucose for your precious cells, but eating carbs and sugars is also contained in aforementioned information. Then you'll know: You can drop carbs, and be healthier for it. You get all the nutrition you need from veggies and protein consumption and fat. Read it. Please.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    59. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're entirely missing the point. You said way above that you don't need sugar, so I quipped that you can't survive without it in your bloodstream, and then you went on a rant about diets and nutrition, which is entirely beside the point. Your body synthesizes glucose (a sugar) from your food, and that's how your cells are fueled; this is Biology 101. That's the whole point of my silly quip. You can eat nothing but protein (which is basically what my cats do, they sure as hell don't eat any sugary foods), and if you're a mammal your body will convert that to sugar so your cells can use it. It's that simple. It was meant to be nothing more than a joke, not a debate about nutrition and dieting.

    60. Re:None of them. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      No. You have your fingers in your ears. Or eyes. Your body survives more on fat and protein; synthesizing glucose is as you say, bio101. But you don't need to eat sugar, or consumer carbohydrates by mouth. You'll get mightily constipated if you don't eat some fiber, but that's another thread.

      Sugar is horrifically addictive. I'm sorry I misidentified your quip. Sometimes, deep in the depths of defocusing to watch a slashdot rant, my humor escapes me. I'm caught instead in the morass of diffusing industry propaganda, and sometimes my finger is itchy on the trigger. Bad excuse, but it's the only one I have.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    61. Re:None of them. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this definitely isn't the first time I've seen a joke fly over someone's head on here :-)

    62. Re:None of them. by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that glucose is a kind of gluten, so he's right that you should avoid it. Especially the GMO glucose because it's full of chemicals.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    63. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water is full of chemicals... it is a chemical.

    64. Re: None of them. by xokapuz · · Score: 1

      Don't put all eggs in one basket ;) Use something else for calendar/email/cloud. I'd even suggest self-hosted solution, like Nextcloud.
      It won't solve the email problem, but it's easy to install calendar/contacts/cloud storage on your own server

    65. Re:None of them. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Now try getting a job without uploading some PDF document to some website along with your email address, LinkedIn details, and right for people to pry into your life.

      Hmm....I've yet to, in my entire professional life ever have had to be on "linkedin" or upload some PDF to a website in order to get a job.....?

      (I'm not on any social media, hasn't been a problem to date.)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    66. Re:None of them. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't get hung up on the specific company I mentioned. The point is the same. Saying something was fine in the past is not a validation that it will be fine in the future.

      Did you manage to get a job without a phone number or email address too?

      Trends are certainly changing with regard to social networks. Maybe you'll be lucky and out of the workforce before shit like that actually starts being considered mandatory.

    67. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to some extent maybe but there are always people like me - pretty much the only way I communicate with my mother is facebook and without it I wouldn't be able to get a hold of her if needed, she wouldn't see pictures and videos of my daughter, etc. doing all this via email wouldn't really work right and before you have a smart response about it they don't have phone services - she uses a shared community wifi setup because she lives on the top of a mountain.

    68. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're right on one thing: "not exactly world-class education"

      I'm afraid the rest of your post is incorrect.

    69. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to fear missing out anyway if your diet contains pasta, bread, cereals in general, rice, potato. These foods seem to be made of starch basically. Seems like in France we just cycle between these (like every other meal is pizza or pasta or fries).
      Other cultures seem to do something similar but with a lot more corn/maize. Like Mexican, Texan or US food, or.. North Korea.

      Starch doesn't taste like sugar though.
      If you weed yourself out of refined sugar, you'll find it yucky eventually. Serves me well as I don't find satisfaction in e.g. a chocolate bar, due to it lacking nutritive content. Although if I really wanted one, my favorite is the snickers bar thanks to the peanuts in there. (Likewise I never had a peanut butter and jam sandwich, but if I went to the US this would the kind of "junk" sugar-laden or kiddy food I would look for)

      So, starch doesn't taste like sugar.. then you can make out the natural sugar content of tomato, or even fried onion (my impression). Fruit starts to feel really sugary. In particular, raisin juice might as well fully qualify as a junk food. Other juices much the same. So I wouldn't be surprised if someone downs a gallon of pure juice every day and ends up with diabetes.

      Like most people, I eat too much filler and not enough vegs.

    70. Re:None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reeked of the ad for CO2 : "They call it pollution. We call it life."

      It has the same problem as your post that got people to jump on you. I wish this ad explained the joke :)

    71. Re: None of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A laptop is also about the keyboard, the display, the cooling. It should be possible to "upgrade" to something worse.
      Although, I can commend e.g. the Ivy Bridge CPU and its on-die graphics. Used some great Dell laptop with that one, great build and keyboard too but unfortunately the 14" display was crappy and a lower grade than 2009 15.6" displays.
      I like using desktops : at least it's my fault if the cooling, display or keyboard are crappy,

  2. That's an easy one... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    IBM

    1. Re:That's an easy one... by hij · · Score: 1

      I was more excited to see Oracle absent from that list. I *wish* I could do without them. Unfortunately, management feels otherwise.

      --
      Believe nothing -- Buddha
    2. Re:That's an easy one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Valve.

    3. Re:That's an easy one... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      None of these companies would exist without IBM. I'm pretty sure all of the major banks and exchanges still run big iron (Mainframes). Try and buy something from Amazon without money/credit. Just because they aren't consumer facing doesn't mean they aren't relevant.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:That's an easy one... by Creepy · · Score: 1

      DEC had some inroads into banking as well, but yeah, IBM AS/400 jobs are still out there because banks are reluctant to move off of their expensive servers they bought in the 1980s. I know a guy making over a million dollars a year maintaining an AS/400 installation and he previously worked on a DEC banking system (both ran COBOL). He lives in Silicon Valley and his cost of living is absurd, too. When he took that job they offered him $800000 a year and 20% down payment on a house to move there and that was barely worth it.

    5. Re:That's an easy one... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Valve.

      Not Valve. Where would I buy $60 video games for $5 each during Black Friday weekend?

  3. "Caste your vote" by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's a poll where you can caste your vote.

    Anonymous Coward's votes are clearly Dalit.

    1. Re:"Caste your vote" by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Don't be so critical. It was obviously a typo of only one character. Give 'em a break.

      > Here's a poll where you can caste your vote.

      Should have been:

      Here's a pole where you can caste your vote.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  4. Alphabet by McGruber · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've never owned any Apple products, avoid buying from Amazon, think Facebook is a huge waste of time, and got rid of my last Windows (W2K) computer a few years back.

    But my Android phone is indispensable and I find that duckduckgo's search results aren't as good as google's results.

    1. Re:Alphabet by godrik · · Score: 1

      Same here. I haven't used MS products except for some basic compatibility with MS users in over 10 years. I don't have a Facebook account and I am very happy not to have one. I have never used apple products nor anyone in my family.
      Amazon and Google are the remaining ones. I probably could do without Amazon, as I mostly use their retail business and not really their cloud business. And retail has dozens of competitors, maybe not quite as good, but up there.

      Google is a harder one to live without. Their search engine really works well; I haven't seen a good competitor. Their mapping app is also pretty good, and much better than OpenStreetMap (despite I love them). Android has its flaws, but it works and allow compatibility across many devices, so it is hard to pass. I am no fan of youtube, but it also get the job done.

  5. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be honest, the world runs on Windows and Office. Linux simply isn't capable of meeting the needs of most users.

    1. Re:Microsoft by diesalesmandie · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest, the world runs on Windows and Office. Linux simply isn't capable of meeting the needs of most users.

      Maybe not at the moment, but when Linux gains more traction (and it probably will eventually, more games than ever are being developed to be Linux compatible, to give one use case example) there will be more reason to develop those "must have" features. Remember, programmers are giving up their precious time to open source; there has to be an incentive for giving up that time, increased adoption is definitely an incentive IMO.

      --
      This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
    2. Re:Microsoft by Spacelord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the world runs on Windows and Office

      That may have been true in the 90s but it hasn't been the case for a looong time. The web runs the world these days and it's easy to get by without Windows and Office. There are plenty of alternatives. People just stick to Windows out of laziness and because it's what most other people have.

      If Office and Windows were to disappear tomorrow, people would just standardize on something else and they would get by just as well.

    3. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in my house. I actually prefer LibreOffice over MS Office, and Thunderbird over Outlook, and Linux over Windows. Sure, there are some things that require Windows, like a lot of the AAA games, but a dual boot can handle that. However, I will not go to Windows 10 if that became the only Windows option. I would just have to lose those games. In business, the specialized programs are only being made for Windows, unfortunately. I don't consider Office to be a reason to stay with Microsoft, since I believe important files should be stored in an open format, instead of a proprietary format. There are plenty of people, and even some businesses that could run on Linux and open source products.

    4. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quit holding onto your old world. (and this from a programmer with grey hair and a comp sci degree from a year beginning with "19")

      there are more devices running Linux on Earth than any other OS.
      there are more smartphones running Android than iOS and Windows combined.
      recently, the tides changed and now MORE people access the Internet with their smartphone than with their desktop.

      so no, i would not say "the world runs on Windows".

      I'd say "Windows still holds a larger market share of the desktop PC and office applications space". that's all.

      THE WORLD RUNS ON LINUX. but have fun worshipping your aging, dying god.

    5. Re:Microsoft by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh bullshit; you're an idiot.

      Linux works just fine, and much better than Windows in fact for most cases, the problem is software and document compatibility. Document compatibility with LibreOffice is good, but not 100%. And so many important 3rd-party applications run on Windows (which may or may not work in WINE). That's why most users stick with Windows, along with sheer laziness or apathy.

      If MS suddenly disappeared tomorrow, and for some odd reason everyone was somehow given 1 year to migrate everything they had to non-MS software before it all magically stopped working, people could easily switch to Linux for their desktop OSes (and servers too of course), and to LibreOffice and Google Docs (and others) for their office software. There'd be some pain in the transition of course, but companies would spring up to aid in the transition for a price, and all the 3rd-party Windows-only software would very quickly be ported to Linux and/or Mac. There'd probably also be a lot of work put into improving document compatibility with MS-OOXML by some companies seeking to profit by selling converters.

      The main thing that'd really suck about a future with Linux on the desktop is that so many distros push Gnome3 instead of one of the better desktops like KDE.

    6. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main thing that'd really suck about a future with Linux on the desktop is that so many distros push Gnome3 instead of one of the better desktops like KDE.

      I've grown very comfortable with MATE and Cinnamon, but I do like KDE also. I think I tend to stick with the previous two because many of the programs seems to be designed with Gnome in mind. As far as I'm concerned, Gnome3 can follow Unity into the grave.

  6. Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could get by just fine without Apple, and Amazon for that matter. Google is necessary, though - Android devices are affordable and pretty good (and just getting better), and GMail will take over for Yahoo! Mail when that goes under. If Linux would get less fragmented and less stupid (systemd, Unity, blechhh!), maybe Microsoft could go away - but that's decades in the future.

  7. That's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use FB, or any of the social networking sites they acquired, but I admit I do use products/services from the other four on a daily basis (or weekly, in Amazon's case).

    I could probably do without Microsoft if Apple lowered their prices on laptops, but they never do.

  8. The Only Answer by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    None. Zero. They could all go bankrupt and it would be business as usual for me after some slight adjustment.

    As soon as the tech giants learn that people couldn't live without them (despite whether it's true or not), that's when they always start creeping into nefarious territory with their policies to push their profits higher.

    I'd also like to add that Facebook was caught performing psychological experiments on their users that included attempting to make users extremely sad.

    Fuck Facebook. I left them YEARS ago and haven't looked back. Now when I talk to friends I meet up with, we have something to talk about because they have no idea what I've been up to AND I have no idea what they've been doing lately.

    Other than Facebook I'm indifferent to every other large business. I'll buy products that have high quality longevity and are a value to me. The second they tamper with the quality, I lose trust in them and move on to some other product.

    I've exited entire markets of products just because none of the offerings were valuable to me. My wallet thanked me for that.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:The Only Answer by the_skywise · · Score: 5, Funny

      *blinks*

      A TWO DIGIT USER?!?

      It's like meeting a celestial! :)

    2. Re: The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being mfh's cock holster.

    3. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He died like, four years ago. You are replying to his /. post-generating app, which is prepaid to run for another six years.

    4. Re:The Only Answer by caferace · · Score: 4, Funny

      Makes *me* feel like a youngster.

    5. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The New York Times @nytimes Breaking News: Days before his firing, Comey asked the Justice Dept. for more money for the FBI inquiry into Russia http://nyti.ms/2pwTFwW

    6. Re:The Only Answer by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that they left an option out of All of the above., but I think your post pretty much covers that.

    7. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      He died like, four years ago. You are replying to his /. post-generating app, which is prepaid to run for another six years.

      If that response was auto-generated, then I'd say we have proof that AI is quite advanced.

    8. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stupid. The kind of stupid a sub 3-digit UID poster can muster and is indicative of why Slashdot is a has-been site for tech news.

    9. Re:The Only Answer by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear!

    10. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your the stoopid one you ahole

    11. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could get by even on the Internet without any of them. That said, I have a Kindle and buy an occasional ebook from Amazon, though there are other sources. I kicked Windows out of my life a few years ago and haven't looked back. I don't have a "smart" phone, and only use Google search once in a great while, when DuckDuckGo doesn't get the results I need, which is rare. I have never owned anything from Apple, and don't intend to. I avoid data mining sites like Facebook like the black plague! Without Amazon I would still be able to get an ebook reader and ebooks, and could get along without Google search.

    12. Re:The Only Answer by c · · Score: 4, Funny

      It definitely puts things in perspective. If only you'd signed up a few hours earlier...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    13. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These companies are attempting to destroy our very way of life. Fuck them all.

    14. Re:The Only Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First post for account in December 2008. He bought that UID when slashdot was auctioning them.

    15. Re:The Only Answer by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      and me an old fart

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:The Only Answer by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      It definitely puts things in perspective. If only you'd signed up a few hours earlier...

      Hours? It was 1997. A new site that had a signup option was lucky to get a signup per day. I sure didn't. I'd been on the Internet four years by then. I wasn't about to sign up for some random site that would probably be gone in a few years. Besides, FreshMeat was much more pertinent to my interests.

    17. Re:The Only Answer by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

      Don't I know it.

    18. Re:The Only Answer by c · · Score: 1

      Hours? It was 1997. A new site that had a signup option was lucky to get a signup per day.

      Slashdot was already extremely popular by the time they added user accounts, and they went pretty quickly. I don't think I waited more than a week, and look where I ended up.

      I got a short user name as a consolation prize, so I'm not at all bitter. At all.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    19. Re:The Only Answer by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      Yes, slashdot was quite the rage. Sad to see that it is now reduced to clickbait articles surrounding US politics

  9. Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run my own mail servers and infrastructure. I am not a fan of giving any information up to various west coast companies. While I obviously own hardware manufactured by them I make sure it's pretty much snipped and doesn't phone home - a few well placed routing table entries take care of that.

    When I am out and about I only allow connection back to my own infrastructure at home. So all I really need is Comcast. I'm happy to do everything from etch my own boards to make my own CPU in an FPGA and tinker around without giving Silicon Valley a piece of my existence.

    I wish I had an alternative to Comcast. That's the only game in town for Internet in my area. And it's fairly unreliable (goes down a few times a week). Such is the consequence of living in an area with old wiring.

    1. Re: Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You expect us to believe that you made your own CPU and etched your own motherboard?

      No. No, I am gonna need some evidence, if you want me to believe you.

    2. Re: Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You expect us to believe that you made your own CPU and etched your own motherboard?

      For simple circuitry I certainly do etch my own PCBs. Many do. A motherboard? I send out more complex PCBs. But I guess you think the circuit boards in your devices just "magically appear?" I'm an EE so designing a PCB isn't so hard. Oh, and sometimes you can automate your life quite nicely with good old fashioned analog circuitry. As in: I want my lights around my property to come on at night: It's a few op amps, a CdS, and a triac. How is that so hard to believe that someone can put that together in an evening?

      As for making my own CPU? In an FPGA -- it's pretty easy. In fact it's pretty much done by every sophomore in college.

      The point is: None of those west coast "tech" (data mining) companies are really needed to have a pleasant life.

    3. Re: Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you.

      as a comp sci graduate of UF, where we had to build a functioning CPU and yes we sometimes etched motherboards, i was saddened to see the post from someone so close-minded that they think tech just pops into reality out of thin air.

      i amazed my friends recently when i found a circuit diagram online for a guitar peddle, then built it by hand and it works and you can amplify your guitar with it.

      don't people understand that companies like Apple and Intel are just made up of EE and comp scientists who are humans? there's no magic. (0_o)

      anyone can build hardware who is smart enough to program a computer.

  10. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are all fighting each other for the honor of having the title of "most evil", so i dont need any of them.

    1. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I am certain of, if Oracle did not buy Sun Microsystems, we would be better off today. I feel as though anyone else buying Sun would have yielded better for everyone.

      Oracle buying Sun killed Open Solaris, which was a bad thing. However, that caused OpenOffice to get forked into LibreOffice, which has been a good thing. Still, I wish Oracle hadn't bought Sun.

  11. How about Food? by sinij · · Score: 1

    To me, companies like General Mills, Tyson and so on are by far more important than software companies. You got to eat first.

    If we look strictly into tech - CISCO and the likes, they make networking gear keeping Internet running. Followed by chip designers - that will be AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, ARM. Followed by crypto and PKI companies, like OpenSSL Foundation, RSA, and Entrsut. Crypto is really difficult to get right, starting fresh there would be a huge setback. OS is not that important in grand scheme of things, if necessary we could have most things running again within a year if we had to start fresh. I know people who could probably cobble boot loader and a compiler in a week working directly in assembly. So Microsoft, Apple and other software-only companies are highly replaceable. The only reason they exist is because a whole bunch "on computers" patents.

    1. Re:How about Food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If food companies went under, other food companies would immediately jump in to take their place.

      It's a thought experiment to show that basically every company is replaceable.

    2. Re:How about Food? by sinij · · Score: 1

      Sure, but you could equally argue that if, for example, Google went under, Microsoft and Bing would take over. The idea behind "do without" is unlikely scenario that somehow it disappeared and no direct replacement is possible.

      For example, without Facebook would mean that it disappeared and somehow people forgot how to create social networks and entice people into narcissistic navel gazing online.

    3. Re:How about Food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about shelter and sex?

      Those are pretty important to the human race, too.

    4. Re:How about Food? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Does masturbation count as sex? Otherwise most slashdot readers are left out.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:How about Food? by epine · · Score: 1

      Sure, but you could equally argue that if, for example, Google went under, Microsoft and Bing would take over.

      FTFY.

    6. Re:How about Food? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Humans can survive without sex. It's not even necessary for reproduction (and never has been; you could always inseminate artificially, with a turkey baster if nothing else). And with the way most American women look these days, I can understand why many American men wouldn't want to bother....

  12. In the poll I asked others to explain votes by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I put in Alphabet/Google because my company provides a Chrome Extension as a development tool for our product. If Google went away, I'd be fucked.

    The initial voting was interesting with Amazon getting exactly ZERO votes. I'm an Amazon customer but life would go on if they went away and I guess everybody else feels that way.

    1. Re:In the poll I asked others to explain votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you got the poll backwards. The poll is: "Which tech giant would you give up first?"

    2. Re:In the poll I asked others to explain votes by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The initial voting was interesting with Amazon getting exactly ZERO votes. I'm an Amazon customer but life would go on if they went away and I guess everybody else feels that way.

      I wasn't very surprised, except for Kindle, Echo and a few other unremarkable products they're 99% just an e-tailer and some other company would fill the void. I also like my local grocery store, but it's quite obvious I'd find another even if I wouldn't be that happy with location, selection and prices.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:In the poll I asked others to explain votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, they would find someone to replace Amazon if it weren't there (just the same with any other tech company). But that's not what they voted for. Low votes for Amazon means that Amazon as not the tech giant they would give up first. The poll asks "Which tech giant would you give up first?"

  13. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've hated Apple since elementary school when I forced to use inferior Apple II hardware that paled in comparison to the Ti-99/4a I was using at home. When there was Mac, I had an Amiga. Since then, I've come to know a lot about the company, the hardware, Steve Jobs, and how they do business. They disgust me on every level. To this day, I've never owned or purchased an Apple product and I never will. I only ever interact with their hardware or software when I've been asked for technical support by friends and family. iTunes always failed to impress and I haven't had the need to install Quicktime since the Window 98 era. Fuck Apple and the legions of idiots who willingly bend over and give them access to their wallet. They sell purposely overpriced hardware that is hard to service (ram soldered to the motherboard? Go fuck yourself) and limit user choice to maximize profit far and above any other company on Earth. Never Apple!

    1. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO are you saying that you can't live without apple because then you'd have nothing to complain about? Or did you not read the question properly?

    2. Re:Apple by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      The problem is with the word "need," which we use far too loosely. If we "need" cellphones at all then we are a pretty sad society. Just because something is extremely useful doesn't mean we "need" it. If apple never existed, if google never existed, if we only had the cell phones of 15 years ago, we'd somehow manage. A better question would be "the loss of which one of these companies would be the most disruptive to your life?"

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Apple by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Least disruptive to me: Microsoft. As a Mac user, I haven't used any Microsoft products for any nontrivial amount of time since I took an assembly language programming course before the turn of the century. They could disappear tomorrow, and I wouldn't even notice apart from the uptick in friends asking me to recommend alternative office suites.

      Most disruptive to me in the short term: Google. If Google Analytics suddenly went away, it would literally bring the Internet to its knees with stalled connections, no matter what platform you use.

      Most disruptive to me in the long term: Apple, because eventually I'll need new hardware.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  14. BIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Société BIC S.A.

    1. Re:BIC by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Société BIC S.A.

      I have NO idea what this means.

      Anyone with a translation?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:BIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manufacturer of ubiquitous BiC brand roller pen. If you are USian, you may substitute e.g. PaperMate.

  15. All dispensable, but Google I'd miss the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, they're all dispensible, but the one I'd least like to give up would be Alphabet, due to Google Search. Searching without Google pretty much sucks. I sometimes try others, and they're noticeably worse. I also use Android, but it sucks. Android only wins by being the best, not by being any good.

    I shop at Amazon every 1-3 months. They could be replaced, but it would be more effort. I know people who would miss AWS a lot, but I doubt they would have a hard time replacing it.

    Apple, I could personally live without, but I use 'em at work. We get very little support from the company, though. If they company died, we'd have enough time left on our 10.7 and 10.11 machines to smoothly migrate to the web (desktop-agnostic, so probably Linux).

    Microsoft and Facebook are completely irrelevant and if they disappeared, I wouldn't know about it until someone else told me. Those companies don't contribute anything at all.

  16. You've got to move by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. If we can't 'do without them', then break them up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the very definition of a monopoly - we can't 'do without them'. Another indicator is that they are all 'gushing money'. It is just a transfer of wealth from people who need it to people who spends capital on (mostly) crazy crap.

  18. Middle Age Minority Immigrant Professional I think by Brigadier · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple - Don't Need
    not a fan boy, and though I work with CS I'm happy with the MS compatible product

      Amazon - Don't Need, but Really Like
    What can I say as a guy, and a parent (see bulk diapers, toilet paper, detergent), and clueless shopper, they have become an asset. e.g. I bought my son a nice watch for his 16th birthday. I first attempted to go to the down town Los Angeles jewelry district. I had my negotiating cash in hand but realized immediately I had no idea what qualified as a good watch. Amazon to the rescue every offer was counter offered by the Amazon cost on my phone. Ultimately I purchased the watch on Amazon for less $10.

    Facebook - Hate It
    Humanity would be better off without it. I've watched all my associates become attention whoring narcissistic children. between that and eye catching adds funneled through friend likes it's kinda sad.

      Microsoft - Use It
    Being in an engineering/architecture field it's required, the only alternate to Office has been Google Apps (see docs) I actually used this in a professional office until people could no longer deal with the accountants whining about there precious icons. (we went back to office). Yes I've tried the linux office apps think they work great but in my professional life this is a pipe dream

    Alphabet - Need It (this could be google subliminal suggestions)
    What can I say they whore my information but it works and it's cheap (see $100 android phone). I also just discovered the cool features in google photos. lossless uploads and automatic sorting. After 10+ years of Film, DSLR this is sooo convenient.

  19. None by corychristison · · Score: 1

    While I do not necessarily use every tech giant out there personally, I feel like if you took one away it could adversely affect how the markets have grown, and we could be living in a very different time.

    One thing I am certain of, if Oracle did not buy Sun Microsystems, we would be better off today. I feel as though anyone else buying Sun would have yielded better for everyone.

  20. Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loathsome company, horrible product.

  21. Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

    Without a credit card we are back to paper billing, bank transfers, trading in fucking seashells.

    "BUT WHUT ABOUT THE BITCOINZ!?!?!"

    Not until I can pay my water bill with bitcoins will it be ready for mass consumption. Once Bitcoin reaches the low level of utilities then it'll be ready for primetime.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by sinij · · Score: 1

      This is just not true. Without credit card companies we would still have bank exchanges, wire transactions, debit cards and so on. Actually, without CC companies retail economy would grow 3% overnight, or about how much these companies suck up in transaction charges.

    2. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

      debit cards are tied to one of the major vendors. You COULD get one from your bank as an ATM card but that's getting harder and harder to do.

      There's no way in hell to manage any form payment system without having one of the big 4 as a vendor and support. Paypal is getting closer.

      --
      Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by will_die · · Score: 1

      Yea there is, plenty of other countries to it with bank transfers. The problem is international transfers can still be a pain and you have to deal with no instant validation.
      Or we just switch back to writing checks.

    4. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by sinij · · Score: 1

      In US, credit cards dominate. In the rest of the world - not so much. Actually, credit card companies are the key reason why US lags behind in adoption of CHIP + PIN and TAP to PAY.

    5. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by Misagon · · Score: 1

      I need a debit card only because the banks in my country are trying to kill cash.
      I was doing fine without it for many years.

      Bank transfers for paying bills: Internet banking works great. Most of them are automated, under my control.
      Bank transfers for buying stuff from people on the Internet: works great as well.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    6. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't Visa/MasterCard/AmEx three different companies? If any one of those companies were suddenly destroyed, the industry would go on like almost nothing happened. Even if all three were lost, new companies doing the same thing could emerge pretty quickly. (And yeah, maybe bitcoin would becoem an option for paying your water bill. All it takes is for someone at the water company to decide that they want the money.)

      That isn't anything at all like some the "tech giants" (I'm mainly thinking of Microsoft and Apple here, with a touch of Google) where all your shit might be completely dependent on proprietary code (or code that uses proprietary APIs) which can't just be quickly ported to a replacement OS.

      If Microsoft went away, some companies would be truly fucked. They would go out of business in the time it would take to modernize.

      Destroy MasterCard, and nobody else is fucked. Anyone who relied heavily on MasterCard could just switch to VISA or AmEx pretty quickly, couldn't they?

    7. Re:Visa/MasterCard/AmEx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I know Visa and Mastercard as debit card companies. No idea if they do credit cards.

  22. Big 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux user.
    No social media.
    Will dump Android the minute there is an alternative.
    FOSS apps only.

    That browser stuff is hard to get around, please give suggestions.

    1. Re: Big 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you DIAF.

  23. No MS, Google, Facebook, Twitter etc by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

    I can live very well without any of them especially the (anti-)social media companies.
    Microsoft was the last one I gave up. Boy did I feel good and still do tbh.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  24. Need Or Required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the question is the former then the answer is none of them. Otherwise I'm required to use Microsoft products at work. I don't use any Apple, I can't stand MS products (exception being their SQL server and Server OS), Amazon I rarely use unless I'm buying a vinyl, I have no Facebook account, Alphabet's search engine has gone to crap...I guess out of all of them YouTube might be the only one I actually like even if I can live without them.

  25. Apple by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    A world where the only viable phone was an android and the only viable system running the defacto standard desktop app (MS Office) would suck. Apple provides a unique and viable competition. I don't think it would be possible today to start a new "apple". Though one has to give MS credit for finally innovating a bit with it's surface series.

    One can't quite say the same about microsoft. If microsoft went away the hegemony of the Office app series would fade, probably for the better of everyone. Though there would be a period where there was a tower of babble in the bussiness and govt document exchange world as people moved on to a new standard. On the whole it probably would be good to chuck off the embrace and extend legacy and get back to stable standards in interchange formats. So in the long run it would turn out better.

    Facebook is a giant empty shell. Nothing it provides is innovative. It just has the virtue of working in a space where a monopoly has an advantage. It would be instantly replaced and after a bitter battle someone else would replace its role.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  26. Smartphones & Apple vs Alphabet/Google + Faceb by Zocalo · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing that if you do have an Android or iOS based smartphone then either Alphabet or Apple will be your indispensable choice accordingly, but if you are an Android user then Apple is probably your most likely first pick for the one you could do without. That was certainly going to be my choice, until I thought about it a bit more. Then I realised that, as an Android user that doesn't care much about Apple, they're mostly harmless since you generally don't need to go near their ecosystem, whereas Facebook will try to track you even if you haven't opted to use their services and they are far more pervasive on third party sites. So, for me, no pain from going without Apple, but a definite upside if Facebook were to just go away.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  27. SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Damn, I wish SCO was still around. Many of those companies rely on Linux, which of course is built upon significant amounts of SCO UNIX source code.

    1. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to bed Darryl, you're drunk again.

    2. Re:SCO by sheph · · Score: 0

      Still. Drunk still.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
  28. Can do w/o Amazon, Love my GMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use GMail and its associated calendar multiple times a day. I mostly prefer Google's search, though DuckDuckGo does a great job, and Bing is a distant third. The only time I visit Amazon is out of curiosity, though I think I have ordered books as local book stores close (yes, I patronized them until they got shut down to build condos -- welcome to Toronto). Apple -- don't care. Microsoft -- well, I use a Windows laptop for some stuff, so I guess I need them around. Facebook -- ugh, but it's the only way to stay in touch with many of my friends.

  29. I don't need any of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I most certainly don't need Apple. I use products and services of the other four, but if they went away tomorrow, I could easily do without them. I make a conscious effort to keep it that way.

  30. Oh my. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    I confess to using Gmail (for convenience) and purchase the occasional item from Amazon but that's it but I don't even interact with the rest. If they all vanished, I would be just fine. Does this mean I'm not participating in the modern world?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  31. From least to most used. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I use no Apple products. I'm surprised this is here actually. I assume most people with Android phones and Windows PCs don't. Sure, there are the Apple TV and iPad users but the former are in a competitive market and the latter are becoming more niche-interest as people switch to using their phones.

    Google's services are all replacable with other services that will be at least adequate. Amazon is a useful company to buy from but there are other online retailers. Microsoft is a tricky one, but I do only use their major products as a consumer. My work involves developing for Linux based embedded devices, on a Linux machine. I use Windows for gaming and there's some software which is native. I dare say I could switch to Linux and Wine since I'm mainly a retrogamer.

    So that leaves facebook. Nothing would give me more pleasure than facebook ceasing to exist. It's crack. I'm there because all my friends are there. Without facebook we'd find another means of communication.

    1. Re:From least to most used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use no Apple products. I'm surprised this is here actually.

      It's really about Mac OS X, not iOS. There exists offices full of Macs. To those people, Apple is "their Microsoft." So just imagine the (approx 10x) larger group of offices full of Windows machines. What it'd be like for them to lose Microsoft, is what it'd be like for that smaller group to lose Apple.

      (Of course, in both cases you can replace them. But how long does it take? Will you be able to stay in business during the interval it takes to port your software to another OS? Do you even have the source code to the stuff you need to port?)

    2. Re:From least to most used. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      True. Was really looking at my own usage - taking the title literally. Business usage is different, and even where I am, the UI guys use Macs. I suspect facebook (and maybe Amazon?) are less important to businesses.

  32. Only Microsoft by iampiti · · Score: 1

    I do use all of them save for Apple. But the only one I couldn't leave behind is Microsoft: In business they still have a few very entrenched products.e.g: Office. Despite all the alternatives it's what most businesses (big and small) usually end up using. In a business setting few dare editing Office format files with Libreoffice since they might not work on Office.
    At home I depend on Windows to be able to run my videogames. I could certainly buy a Playstation but I have lots of games that only work on Windows and they're usually cheaper on PCs that on consoles too.

    1. Re:Only Microsoft by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that first-person shooters just plain suck with a controller. Keyboard+mouse FTW!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  33. Life Before the Internet by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Even if it blocked the entire internet I'd still manage to live. You do realize there was life before the internet right?

    1. Re:Life Before the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct, just like there was life before morphine. i'm not saying the Internet is as important as morphine. but my point is, would you want surgery today or 200 years ago when all they gave you was whisky and a thing to bite down on?

      the question, while worded as "you can't live without", wasn't literal. not having google won't make you die.

      the question is really about..."which tech giants are like morphine?" or "which tech giants made life better or more efficient and therefore you don't want to live without them?"

    2. Re:Life Before the Internet by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      There was life before indoor plumbing too.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Life Before the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on your nick I would expect you to be the expert on that.

  34. Ask any country where they are all banned by Gabest · · Score: 1

    Are they still alive I wonder...

  35. AOL by ichthus · · Score: 1

    Why isn't AOL on the list? I'm still rocking my dialup account on AOL, and I think it's all I'll ever ne(SAD&~~~~

    CARRIER LOST

    --
    sig: sauer
    1. Re:AOL by sinij · · Score: 1

      Why isn't AOL on the list? I'm still rocking my dialup account on AOL, and I think it's all I'll ever ne(SAD&~~~~

      CARRIER LOST

      Dear Sir,

      I hereby notifying you in writing that your post is defacing and infringing on my "no carrier joke on computer" patent. You will be shortly hearing from my la`+#$%NO CARRIER

  36. Mostly just Inconvenient by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

    Nothing is irreplaceable. At the moment, several would be inconvenient. I use Amazon for shopping, Google for personal email/shared documents, and Microsoft for my work OS / Office suite. It's not saying that these couldn't be replaced, but would be rather annoying to train everyone at work on Linux and to use something other than Excel, I wouldn't have one centralized space to buy stuff - but that is easily remedied. However, iTunes can burn in hell.

  37. Re:Middle Age Minority Immigrant Professional I th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy at the watch shop should have thrown you out of the store. His shop isn't a free Amazon showroom. If everybody followed your example, there would be no brick and mortar stores left, and you'd be whinging about how you can't see physical items before you buy them.

  38. None, not even one not on this list. by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

    I need air, water and food, in that order.

    Next stupid question.

    --
    Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    1. Re:None, not even one not on this list. by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      yeah, the rule of 3 :)
      3 minutes without air, you die
      3 days without water, you die
      3 weeks without food, you die
      but 3 years without facebook or microsoft? nothing happens

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  39. The cementary ... by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is full of indispensable people.

    The same goes for companies. Life existed before them. Life will exist after them.

    What is even funnier is that all the examples are companies that do things that are pretty bad for the customers. So it is liker asking what finger or toe you would miss the least.

    Apple: Abuse of copyright and trademark
    Amazon : Abuse of workers
    Facebook : invasion of privacy
    Alphabet : Invasion of privacy
    Microsoft : They ain't GNU

    I am sure you can come up with a few more things they do. Yes, what they do is legal. That does not make it moral and are bad for the customer. So why would I favor one above the other if I would love to see them all leave?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:The cementary ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft : Invasion of privacy

      FTFY

      (prove yourself = trapped)

  40. The one that makes food & water! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a serious question? We can live without any 'tech giant', you can't live without food & water...what the hell is this insistence that 'tech' is somehow 'vital' to our existence? It's important, fun to have but seriously it isn't a requirement for living a life.

  41. Facebook by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I don't like Microsoft, but as long as I'm employed, I doubt I could escape them.

    I could use Android, but I prefer Apple.

    I'd really be hard-pressed to get rid of gmail, and I have a lot on Google Docs.

    I can't think of any good alternative to Kindle and Amazon rules online shopping.

    Facebook can FOAD. I have little use for it.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Facebook by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Also my answer. Work supports Android (Alphabet/Google) and iOS (Apple) mobile apps and we have both Azure and AWS cloud backends (Microsoft and Amazon, respectively). That means Facebook is the odd man out. We use Facebook, but losing it wouldn't kill any products or services we offer. The same information is on Twitter and other sources.

  42. Microsoft by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Microsoft: Not only do they make the OS's that we use, but they also make the business software that we use (retail point of sale). We're satisfied with all of them. If Microsoft suddenly went away, we'd have to choose from some not-as-good alternatives, and would hurt our business.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  43. Tech giants by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Can't live without:
    Apple: main computer for daily use (personal and work). Safari, Mail, Pages, etc.
    Alphabet: GMail (email used for various websites, great spam filters). YouTube. Chrome for websites that choke on Safari.
    Netflix: my only entertainment source (limited selection compared to the USA but still worth the price).
    Microsoft: only used for gaming. I don't use Office or anything else from Microsoft. It's just the OS that happens to be required for most games.

    None at all:
    Facebook: No account, I don't use it. Don't care.
    Amazon: limited selection in Canada, prices are average, shipping costs are usually too high. Not interested in Prime, I pay enough monthly fees as it is. I usually buy either locally or from other websites.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  44. reality most make my life better by netsavior · · Score: 1

    I write code using an oracle-owned language, which I deploy on an Amazon-owned infrastructure, which interacts with Microsoft desktop machines (90% of my userbase). I use libraries developed by Google (less and less nowadays, but still I use guava sometimes) I certainly use google to find answers to problems.

    That is how I make 100% of my income. I mean, before Google and Amazon and java, I still made 100% of my income in software, so presumably I would continue to do so even if these megacorporations ceased to be, but as of right now, 100% of my income is undeniably tied to these 4 companies.

  45. All of them? by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    Alphabet/Google - Yeah, it's hard to not use Google
    Facebook - so far I haven't had a need to set up an account and don't feel like I have been negatively impacted
    Microsoft - I haven't used Windows in more than a decade, but I'm sure I interact with MS products via ATMs and things like that.
    Apple - as a consumer this one is pretty easy to avoid (see Android under Alphabet/Google)
    Amazon - I know a few people who still distrust shopping online and don't use Amazon. So it is possible, but it's so convenient!

    So, in my view Google is really the only one that is the most difficult to avoid. The rest are fairly easy to not use.

  46. The poll doesn't match the article post. by waspleg · · Score: 1

    The article says which one "can't you live without" and the poll says "which one CAN you live without" (paraphrasing).

    So, I predict other people will fuck up their answers like I did and pick the one they wanted to keep and not discard first.

  47. I need the ones that start with "A" by rbeezo · · Score: 1

    *Need it Alphabet = Innovative; modernized search, free mapping, Youtube, Chrome, good cloud apps, good phones, enabling low cost computing devices, pioneering self driving cars, Amazon = Reinvented online shopping, Amazon Prime, Amazon Web Services, drone delivery please! Apple = I like my iPhone; Android is an adequate OS, but no company supports their legacy phone hardware as long as Apple does. OSX is solid. I could easily use a Mac for 99% of everything I need to do on a computer *Don't need it Microsoft - Even though I use it EVERY DAY, there are some great alternatives, especially in the consumer space. ChromeOS does 95% of everything I need on a daily basis. Facebook - I have never used it and I don't care to

  48. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me: Microsoft for gaming and Google
    My grandpa: none

  49. Tech Giants aren't just companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The tech giant that I cannot do without: Richard Stallman

  50. Google by campuscodi · · Score: 1

    Google

  51. Watts filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they sell the water filters that keep me alive. I don't know if they manufacture them theirselves.

  52. Use some, don't need any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the list, I see a few services I use, but none I need. I occasionally use Facebook, but wouldn't mind it it disappeared tomorrow. I use YouTube and Google Maps, but there are alternatives to both I could happily use instead. I don't think I use any Microsoft or Apple products or services.

    Amazon is probably the one of the group I find most useful, but since I pretty much just use them for books (and ebooks), Amazon can be replaced by any local book store or library, just with a little more effort on my part.

  53. None of them by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I'd miss Google Search and maybe Gmail but I could live without Alphabet AKA "Google's EU antitrust shield". Amazon is convenient but there are plenty of other places to buy things online. My life would be markedly improved if Apple, Facebook, and Microsoft went away.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  54. Alternatives to a single failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the technology we use is more of a hive collective, with no one failure being disastrous, I'm going to say none.

    Google... I could replace my use of it with another search engine and both docs and android have multiple competitors

    Microsoft... I use the OS (windows 7) daily but again there are alternatives

    Apple... pretty much the same, use it daily, but there are alternatives

    Is there really anyone else?

    The few pieces of tech I can't do without are not tech giants by any means, and do have alternatives, which would be very costly (time and money) to implement

  55. Which One by tquasar · · Score: 1

    I do not own any Apple products, I don't use Facebook or other social media. I connect using email, phone, and texting. I also walk or drive to meet people at a restaurant or bar. Dinosaur Tom

  56. Don't need Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They produce nothing that I use in my personal or work life. I do need Microsoft as all my stuff is from those guys. Not saying I love it all but it all works the way I need it to work.

  57. Hydro Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No electricity, no nothing.

    1. Re:Hydro Quebec by JcMorin · · Score: 1

      Maybe one day with solar panels you may be able to be free... but Québec winter is soo harsh that's it's almost inconceivable.

  58. Cue Richard Pryor: NONE OF THE ABOVE! by Chas · · Score: 2

    I could do very well without any or all of the above companies.

    None of them offer any services I'd particularly miss.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  59. Depends on your definition? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    I lived perfectly fine before using their products, I could live perfectly fine without them again.

    But which ones would I be severely annoyed at losing? Spotify is probably the most important one, Youtube comes second.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  60. Decisions, decisions.... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    I'm torn between Digital Equipment Corporation and Sun Microsystems.

  61. I can live without all of them by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I do a lot of Windows programming, so if Microsoft went away I'd take a short-term hit. But only short term -- I'd just switch to whatever took its place.

    The rest of them are entirely optional.

  62. Apple is by far... by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    ... the most disposable. Everything they do can be replaced easily. Then comes Microsoft. Facebook is a somewhat special case, in that they are irreplaceable at what they do, but what they do can be eliminated (and I often wonder if we'd be better off without them) Amazon is like Facebook, except that what they do (or what we do via them - shop for stuff we need) isn't irreplaceable, Google is on top of the pile, as they are how we find everything else. Tomorrow, I might sort them differently.

  63. My fun list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't *need* any of these, but Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Google all add something to my life, to a varying extent. Probably Google quite a bit, and Facebook least of these.

    Not a Microsoft person, though. Don't use Windows, I would go Linux or even Chromebook before I did that. Office is obviously far, far better than the alternatives, but for current work I could get by with any Office Suite, and use Google Office quite a bit.

  64. Google, Microsoft by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

    The problem with avoiding Google is that their search engine really is the best. I mostly try to use other ones that respect privacy, but if they aren't giving me the information I want I'll switch over to Google, because it really does work best.

    I don't own a Windows computer, but I sometimes have to use Windows at work. That's true for a lot of people.

    Amazon is easy to avoid. Anything they sell, you can also get from lots of other online stores.

    Apple is easy to avoid, as long as you aren't also avoiding Google and Microsoft. If you can't use either Android or iOS, that's hard. If you can't use either Windows or macOS, that's hard. (I know, use Linux, but that isn't always a good option.)

    I already don't use Facebook, so I guess that's easy. I know, I'm making it harder for myself to keep up with friends. Just like in the old days before we had social networks. That's a choice I've made.

    So you can avoid any of these companies, but do you want to? I avoid Facebook because they're evil, and I avoid Windows when I can because I dislike it. I don't try to avoid Apple or Google, except that I try to limit how much information Google knows about me. And I use Amazon a lot. They aren't a monopoly, they just have a great selection of products at reasonable prices with good customer service. You can shop other places, but most people default to Amazon for good reasons.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  65. The Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot, of course.

  66. How loose is the definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of tech company?

    I think the only ones that I'd miss are companies like Level 3, NTT, etc, considering how much of the internet they backbone.

  67. 4 out of 5, but not critical by xokapuz · · Score: 1

    I use Apple's iCloud mail, because it's fast on MacBook, but my main mail is in Protonmail
    Google's Music, because I can't keep all songs on my laptop, but it's good to have your own collection uploaded somewhere...and for free.
    Amazon's Kindle, but only e-reader itself, so there are alternatives.
    Microsoft's Skype... sadly Skype was bought not by Google, I wish it dead =)

    But if some of these companies will disappear, I will be only happy. Maybe only not Amazon, I like their Kindle e-readers :D

  68. Amazon and Apple are optional for businesses by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Of these 5, Amazon and Apple are now optional for businesses. Maybe Facebook too if you sell B2B.

    Anything Amazon sells in its web services is now also available from Google. Anything Amazon sells is available elsewhere for similar cost.

    Apple is only needed if you absolutely want to publish your own i-app. If you just do business through a website, though, they're a luxury.

    You still need Google for marketing your offerings, and you still need Facebook if you market to consumers (although other social media is becoming more relevant/cost-effective), and you still need Microsoft (Office) if you exchange business-related docx, xlsx and pptx files.

  69. Nobody can duplicate what Google does by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 2

    - Apple - don't use it at all
    - Amazon - I use it, but don't depend on it
    - Facebook - only check once in a while when I get a notification that one of my family members posted something. If Facebook disappeared, there are other services that work just as well.
    - Microsoft - I use Windows a lot, but these days, there are alternatives that work about as well. Who really cares about the OS, when all you do is browse the Web and check your email!
    - Google - Nobody can duplicate what Google does with Search. Not even close. I remember life before Google.com. It was a lot harder to find out things I wanted to know. Google is almost magic. Bing and Yahoo don't even come close. MapQuest and Garmin don't come close to Google Maps and Navigation. Without Google, I'd be lost, figuratively and sometimes literally! There is no adequate replacement for what Google does.

    1. Re:Nobody can duplicate what Google does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Google - Nobody can duplicate what Google does with Search. Not even close. I remember life before Google.com. It was a lot harder to find out things I wanted to know. Google is almost magic. Bing and Yahoo don't even come close. MapQuest and Garmin don't come close to Google Maps and Navigation. Without Google, I'd be lost, figuratively and sometimes literally! There is no adequate replacement for what Google does.

      I, personally, think this is more because of the market capture than because of superior technology. Now that google is dominant, websites are written with Google-ability in mind. This makes it extremely hard for anyone to create a decent replacement, even if their search technology were somehow better. Better, means most like Google. Google can't lose.

      Personally, I don't use google at all. startpage.com and duckduckgo for search (yes, I know startpage.com is a google proxy). Why else would I need google? Gmail is the only thing I really miss, but it's not worth the privacy invasion to me.

    2. Re:Nobody can duplicate what Google does by swillden · · Score: 1

      Now that google is dominant, websites are written with Google-ability in mind.

      How does one write a website for google-ability? What would one do differently to write a bing-able web site?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Nobody can duplicate what Google does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really suggesting that Googles MAPS are their unreplaceable asset? Apple, Bing, Yahoo, Mapquest, and a zillion others do a VERY competent job of maps.

      I'm mostly with you on search, but I would recommend that you try out Bing if you haven't in a while. It's definitely NOT any good at finding anything technical, but when you just want to know "regular people stuff" (who was that guy in that movie, when is the next lollapalooza, what is Britney spears birthday) It actually does a better job. DuckDuckGo is pretty good, but it has it's own issues.

    4. Re:Nobody can duplicate what Google does by xokapuz · · Score: 1

      Sad, but true. Google search is #1, but there are wrappers, like startpage.com.
      Can't agree about the maps. Google Maps is getting worse and worse. I use it only when I can't find some organization in OSM. Apart from that, OpenStreetMaps are wonderful and a good replacement for Google's product

    5. Re:Nobody can duplicate what Google does by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Google was amazing when it first came out, but I find their search rather poor nowadays. Pages and pages of irrelevant results because Google thought I wanted X despite me searching for Y. Sure, there are ways to trick Google into searching for Y, but it seems like Google likes to break those tricks whenever they become popular.

      I much prefer Duckduckgo, as it seems to consistently provide better results than Google. It's not perfect, and if you ask me it's not as good as it once was either, but it's worlds better than Google. One nice thing with Duckduckgo is that if there only only a few or no pages that match my query, Duckduckgo isn't afraid to tell me so. Try the same search with Google, and you'll get thousands of off-topic hits, with the handful of pages Duckduckgo found buried in them. Almost like Google feels they have to inflate their numbers or something.

      Even Bing returns better results than Google nowadays, and Bing isn't even all that good.

    6. Re:Nobody can duplicate what Google does by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to me that your experience with Google seems so different from mine. I almost always find what I want in the first 5 results. Bing, not so much. Haven't tried DuckDuckGo, mainly because I have no reason to try something else.

  70. Boycott the cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cloud services are a trap. The more you dig yourself into them, the harder it is to get out. I use the programs that I want, on my devices, the way I want. My data is mine. If I need cloud services for syncing between devices, I can set up my own cloud system.

    It seems that every company has stopped caring about making anything, and now only cares about how they can get customers to pay for something every single month for the rest of their lives.

    1. Re:Boycott the cloud by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I disagree.... they still make things, but a profit driven company (which is pretty much all of them) cares about getting people to give them money, that's the way it works, and that's the incentive for making things. I fail to see the problem.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  71. Re:Middle Age Minority Immigrant Professional I th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft - Use It
    Being in an engineering/architecture field it's required, the only alternate to Office has been Google Apps (see docs) I actually used this in a professional office until people could no longer deal with the accountants whining about there precious icons. (we went back to office). Yes I've tried the linux office apps think they work great but in my professional life this is a pipe dream

    This hasn't been true for at least a few years now. Office on Mac is excellent now IMO. I hate windows. I'm an engineer, and thank God I've started at a company that doesn't believe this nonsense. First day, they asked if I wanted a Mac or Windows machine. Nice!

  72. Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without their bloatware inflation, I would be unable to get 10-year old hardware for an apple and a song in order to get all my computing and sound processing jobs done (obviously using GNU/Linux which doesn't check all my file accesses for viruses and copyright violations).

  73. Re:Middle Age Minority Immigrant Professional I th by Brigadier · · Score: 1

    Well this was a jewelry exchange designed to allow single source competition (see tons of sales booths within an open area). Normally I would agree being a proponent of the local small business. However this gentleman was reselling store brand (sears) as new unique with an unreasonable markup. Amazon gave me the advantage of knowledge:
    a. value
    b. quality
    c. product origin.
    This took away his advantage which he used maliciously.

  74. I don't use Facebook or any MS product by swillden · · Score: 1

    I don't use Facebook or any MS product *now*, so that much is very easy.

    Apple... I do have a Macbook, which I like, but I could replace it with a high-quality laptop with a good Linux distro without any qualms. I don't use any software which doesn't run on Linux.

    Amazon would be tough. I buy tons of stuff from Amazon, including monthly subscribe & save items, etc. But i could do without it.

    Google, heh. I use Android devices (phone, tablet, watch), and Chromebooks, and Chromecasts, and Nexus Players. I have Nest thermostats, smoke alarms and security cameras. I have a non-trivial investment in apps, books and movies on Google Play. I use Chrome, though that would be easy to change. I make heavy use of Google search & maps, though I suppose those might not be too hard to replace with Microsoft's or Apple's versions. Vast numbers of documents, spreadsheets, etc., personal and professional, are in Google Docs. The primary way I message people is via Google Hangouts (more than SMS). All of my photos are in Google Photos (though they're in other places as well). I use Drive for my offsite backups. My personal email domain is handled by GMail. That would be a PITA to move.

    At the end of the day, I *could* do without any of them, but leaving Google would require a huge amount of effort and be extremely painful.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  75. Google - The Father of All! by aluck19 · · Score: 1

    I can't live without google. Its father of all the companies for sure.

  76. That was easier than expected... by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

    Facebook: Facebook not existing would actually make my life better because then I wouldn't have to hear condescending "Oh, you're not on Facebook" comments from... everyone ever.

    Apple: I don't use any of their products. (Though I like that they provide a check on the Microsoft and Google platforms.)

    Amazon: I'll answer this as soon as I'm done buying something on Amazon.

    Microsoft: Professionally, no getting around this. At home, the number of things keeping me on the Windows platform is vanishingly small. (Basically a combination of Ubuntu getting better and more things supporting it and Windows getting worse.)

    Alphabet: Losing Search and Android would be troublesome. All the other services I use have reasonable replacements from other companies.

    1. Re:That was easier than expected... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Facebook: Facebook not existing would actually make my life better because then I wouldn't have to hear condescending "Oh, you're not on Facebook" comments from... everyone ever.

      Sounds like you're doing it wrong. The condescending comments should be from you.

      "Oh? I didn't hear that celebrity gossip. No, I don't use Facebook."
      "Yes, I've heard Facebook's site is slow. I can't say if I feel that way, I don't have a Facebook account. No, I just don't have any interest in it."
      "I'm sorry, I couldn't tell you how to change that on Facebook. I don't use Facebook myself."
      "No, sorry. I can't give you my Facebook info. I don't have an account. I just would rather do other things online"

    2. Re:That was easier than expected... by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

      Most people respond well to "Oh, I don't use Facebook." While a follow up question of "Why not?" isn't enough to elicit condescension, a good condescending remark shuts down people who want to push it.

      Over the last half decade or so, my friends self-sorted into two groups: The group the makes having Facebook a prerequisite for friendship and the group that does not. Surprisingly, most of them ended up in the latter group.

      The real problem is my extended family. "Well, you'd KNOW that if you were on Facebook." is a common refrain. Comments like that make me glad I live three timezones away from them.

  77. IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and maybe NCR or Cray or HPE. You use their computers a lot and you may die if they do. A 'computer' in your home is mostly a toy.

  78. Intel - Need their network cards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel - Need their network cards!

    I've been network blocking all the cloud stuff for years - no google, apple, facebook, twitter, microsoft, yahoo, or pretty much any other centralized services used directly.

    Self-host almost everything from cloud storage to email - not using "tech giant" products ... except Intel CPUs (could use AMD), but I've got to have Intel NICs. There are many reasons that BSD users understand.

    If you want a family social network, use RetroShare. It is private, encrypted, self-replicating, and cross platform. What's not to like?

    No Apple?
    To my knowledge, I've never paid Apple a penny, not $0.01. Haven't used any Apple products since the late 80s.
    Bought a Nexus4 phone directly from Google, but Google and I have a disagreement about lifespan for $400 hardware. They think 3 yrs, I think 10 yrs. It wasn't my money that purchased the phone, but they won't be getting any money from me.

    Hitachi might qualify for HDDs in my Can't live without list. Seems they are the only HDD makers not totally screwing up quality these days.

  79. I don't want big IT companies. by dweller_below · · Score: 1
    The question presupposes that Big IT is desirable. The real questions are: Have I benefited from the lack of competition and choice? Is the slowness of innovation created by Big IT in my best interest? Have powerful corporations EVER served and protected me and mine?

    I don't believe that Big IT serves my needs or interests. It cripples my abilities. It limits my choices. It creates powerful political pressures that wish to enslave me.

    I don't need or want Big IT or any other powerful corporation. I would be better off without Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, and Oracle.

  80. Slashdot or ASML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if Slashdot went bankrupt, that would affect you personally. Who needs Intel? If ASML foreclosed, that would affect the computer world badly.

  81. Same as it always was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it hasn't changed in DECADES. Microsoft and Apple is all I need (like it or not). Bring back Alta Vista and Lycos! Google is for kids.

  82. Back in the 1900s, I got along without any of them by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    I'll rank these companies by descending utility to me personally:

    Google
    Apple
    Amazon
    Microsoft
    Facebook

    Certainly, for most of my life I didn't have any of these services available to me. But those were the days when the news sites I used the most had to be printed out on big sheets of cheap paper and delivered house to house by small boys. When I shopped for anything, I had to drive around to different stores looking for the item and comparing prices. To look something up, I had to drive to a public building called a "library" and search in printed books - and have any of you young whippersnappers ever seen a Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature?

  83. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the big 5 went down tomorrow, permanently. I don't think I'd miss them at all, except for a short period of adjustment while websites sort out there depencies on code hosted on external CDNs. However, there are too many people who have way too much dependency on them. On the other hand, it's probably not making their lives any better and possibly even worse. On the whole I think society would be better off without them in the longer term.

  84. Re:Middle Age Minority Immigrant Professional I th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this was a jewelry exchange designed to allow single source competition (see tons of sales booths within an open area). Normally I would agree being a proponent of the local small business. However this gentleman was reselling store brand (sears) as new unique with an unreasonable markup. Amazon gave me the advantage of knowledge:
    a. value
    b. quality
    c. product origin.
    This took away his advantage which he used maliciously.

    Couldn't agree more. People who go to the Birkenstock store , try some on, then go buy them online for $15 less should be shot. But, in this case, it's hard to feel any sympathy for sleezy watch salesmen.

  85. Just two by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I don't use Apple, Facebook or Alphabet.

  86. Take stock of your techsploitators, but for real by varmint+jerky · · Score: 1

    As Bob once said, you gotta serve somebody. But it's probably not a bad idea to take stock of your techsploitators every now and then, if for no other reason than you might need to jump ship when they do something that isn't advantageous to you. However, this is an amazingly naive article at best. There's absolutely no mention of cloud services! Seriously, how can this dude think driving to Target somehow counts as "giving up" Amazon when AWS powers so much of the world's online presence? He forgot about iCloud, he forgot about all the other Google services he most certainly uses, etc etc. And guess what, there's at least one more multi-conglomerate you forgot about: your ISP which you probably pay more to over the long term than any of the Five. Call it the scary six (or more likely seven since he probably pays for both wired and wireless like many of us do).

  87. hungry.... by magarity · · Score: 1

    Monsanto :(

  88. Opportunity costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First lets throw Apple, Amazon and Facebook in the trash. Zero use, unworthy of consideration.

    Microsoft has recently released numerous memos explaining to the world their disposition as an untrustworthy malware vendor. While I very much still believe Microsoft has the best products in some categories it's prudent both personally and professionally to cut your losses and move on. There are sufficient number of "good enough" solutions going in the right direction while Microsoft lunges head first in the wrong direction the math is starting to add up more and more. Noting a significant uptick in customers moving to Linux abandoning Win32 is out of the question right now however I'm unsure if this will still be the case a few years from now.

    This leaves Alphabet soup. I like Google search yet not convinced easy answers are actually worthwhile. Slight modifications of behavior like collecting more official reference material locally, search providers for SO/Wikipedia and scraping a handful of list archives would likely yield a more optimal outcome v simply always following path of least resistance.

    Today Alphabet's "Don't be evil" draws more laughter than believers. Considerable damage has been unleashed over the years from intentionally or not bankrolling industrial scale shit scraping sites and link farms to decimation of managed directories, SEO weaponization, monopoly/monoculture in the search space, popularity based ranking and progressively insane and outrageous data collection schemes this firm is engaged. In all seriousness dejanews was in many ways more useful to me than Google is today. Physical phone book is in many ways more useful v. Google... If I had to chose between SO+Wikipedia and Google ... Google would lose... handily.

    In the grand scheme of things simply following the path of least resistance never leads to the best outcomes.

  89. Don't need them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already Live without Apple as I don't like their prices. Yes I'm a damn cheapskate who feels $20 is as much as I'm willing to spend on a smart phone. Don't use Microsoft, switched to FreeBSD after Win10 was released and I block all access to facebook as I certainly don't need their effen spam.

    I rarely use Amazon for anything though I'm married to Gmail - got my account in 2003 and simply can't live w/o it anymore.

  90. Personally or Professionally? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Professionally, part of my job involves using Android, iOS, AWS and Windows. So, professionally I would be okay with FaceBook going away. Actually, I'd be fine having to support fewer platforms. As long as they give me time to migrate away, I don't really care which of them remain.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  91. Facebook by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 1

    Useless ... except they have some cool PHP VM tech that will outlive them.

  92. cue the snobs.... by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

    So glad so many people here don't use any of those company's products. (yeah, right)

  93. Google/Alphabet is the by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    only one of those that is really important to me. I already have nothing to do with Amazon, and very little to do with MS or Apple. Facebook is convenient for keeping in touch with certain people, but I could live without it. Google(Alphabet) you'll have to pry from my cold dead hands.

  94. But you can live without banks by Solandri · · Score: 1

    You can even live without money - barter for stuff.

    I'd pick one or all of these companies. Industrialized farming is what's allowed the population in developed countries to far outgrow their food production capability when it was grown by manual and animal labor. Without them, I'd either be dead of starvation, or working on a farm instead of in tech.

  95. Ranked in order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From most to least disposable:

    1. Facebook. Tried it once, got rid of it after a few months. I think.

    2. Apple. I've never bought anything from them.

    OK, those were easy to get rid of. The last 3 are a bit more of a challenge.

    3. Alphabet. I've been online since before Alta Vista. Some other search engine would fill that role. I'm not using their email or any other service. I'd miss YouTube though. Getting rid of Alphabet would be just a minor inconvenience.

    4. Amazon. The 21st century Sears. This one would actually hurt. I haven't ordered that much, but when I have it's been a pleasant experience. With Alphabet and this gone, we're back to using Alta Vista to find some random web site that might be a good place to order... sort of a 1999 online shopping experience; not the end of the world though.

    5. Microsoft. Switching from their IDE would be a much bigger hassle than switching search engines or having to shop a bit differently. The development environment is the one thing that keeps me in it, and "I'll look into something else" has been something I've said for years. I've used alternative browsers, searches, and even shops that aren't Amazon affiliates... but I'm loathe to much up any development I still do. Maybe some day I'll decide that I just never want to program again. Then this might be no. 3 on the list.

  96. Linux Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RMS is a bit to weird for my taste.

  97. Lenbnart Poettering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giant doesn't even come close to describing him. Colossus. Titan. Lavatorian. Behemoth.

    He's all of those, and more.

  98. Fuck them all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on the internet before most of them. Apple only beats me by 3 years. I can run freebsd to do everything I need, with no influence of microsoft in redhat linux as well.

  99. Microsoft would be the hardest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets face it, there are other stores besides amazon, but none that are anywhere close to being as good. There are other search engines that are almost as good as google. iPhone/android has always been a toss up. Microsoft has a VERY hard to replace position on 2 billion PCs and basically every enterprise around the world. It's not that they can NEVER be dislodged, it just takes a lot longer than the others. As evidence, people have been giving away Linux desktops for free for almost 20 years, and people still don't want them.

  100. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as there are options, they are all replaceable.

  101. nun of em really by JackSpratts · · Score: 1

    like broadcast and cable, i've already dumped fb and haven't looked back; obviously don't need google for search, youtube? not a big fan, gmail-i have plenty of alternatives; ms can be swapped with linux and a word equivalent; android can bow to whatever and amazon, well, that's a bit tougher but doable. i use it a lot, meaning serveral times a week but i won't need prime if i'm not shopping there, have not allowed alexa in the house and it's been months since i watched one of their shows so i'll use another internet shopping service and actual brick 'n' mortar purchasing. honestly manjoo, it's not the first time i've noticed but seriously, you need a life. a real life. there's an actual world out there. you kinda depress me.

    - js.

  102. This comment says... by fatp · · Score: 1

    Slashdot!

  103. Intel and Nvidia by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    They are the few brands than make things that work. Placing ads and OS can be replaced.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  104. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all posting here...

  105. The Snowden effect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was suspicious of them at first, then after Snowden I made a point of getting rid of the last of them.

    Apple: Never got into it.
    Amazon: Used it a few times. Not heavy.
    Facebook: I was aware this was a privacy nightmare from the start and never signed up.
    Alphabet: Didn't get Gmail because of their policy of scanning emails for ads. Kicked Search to the curb after Snowden.
    Microsoft: Stopped using windows over a decade ago. Stopped using hotmail post snowden.

  106. Why just one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already live without Apple, Facebook and Microsoft.

  107. Facebook FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Facebook account for all of three months before I deactivated it after finding it to be boring and pointless.

    I really do no understand why this fad has not already come to an end.

  108. First? Facebook. Last? Microsoft. by grimfate · · Score: 1

    From least to most important:
    5. Facebook: I gave up on Facebook several months ago, I don't use WhatsApp and barely touch Instagram. The only service of theirs I use is Messenger and even that is hanging on by a thread, with only a few friends I use it to talk with. Opinion of company: Low.
    4. Apple: Apple is not my first choice for devices or services. While I do have a handful of Apple devices, they barely get use and my life would hardly be impacted by abandoning them. My only interest in Apple would be as a platform to develop for, considering its large install base. Opinion of company: Medium.
    3. Amazon: Because I do not live in the US, shipping from Amazon is way too expensive for my taste, so Amazon is a last resort. I usually get my products from my local online megastore, and if that fails, I usually choose Ebay before Amazon. If shipping to my country was free or comparable to local shipping, I'd be tempted to put this at #2. Opinion of company: High. (I'm sure they're evil like every other big company, though.)
    2. Google: I don't use Gmail. I would be fine using Bing. I am contemplating getting an Android phone, but only because iPhone 7 was disappointing and Windows Mobile is dead. And Google+? LOL! Only reason Google is so high is because I can imagine abandoning all products and services from Facebook, Apple and Amazon before I abandoned YouTube. (I am not loyal to the YouTube brand; there's just no decent YouTube competitor. If one appears, I will be more than happy to jump ship.) Opinion of company: Medium.
    1. Microsoft: I use Windows for my OS, Outlook for my email, OneDrive for my cloud storage, Xbox for my console gaming, Visual Studio for my programming, and if I were rich enough I'd have a Surface Book and a Surface Laptop. And, while none of these are perfect, I am perfectly fine with these products and services. The only Microsoft product I use and will be abandoning is my Windows phone. Opinion of company: Medium-High. (I enjoy their products, but when they don't have competition, they tend to suck. It just so happens to be a point in time when they have a lot of competition.)

    1. Re:First? Facebook. Last? Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, if I need some weird shit there's usually ebay. Amazon and local clones trip me up when they have 3rd party vendors while most (?) of their stuff is 1st party and thus I'm wondering what the fuck is that. With ebay, everything is 3rd party.

  109. The bold look of Kohler by tepples · · Score: 1

    If American Standard went under, more people would buy Kohler toilets.

    1. Re:The bold look of Kohler by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I've had both, and there's nothing like an American Standard.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:The bold look of Kohler by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      When we redid our downstairs bathroom, we replaced a Kohler with an American Standard, and now it's my go-to for going.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  110. Need for a stable fee payment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to tell you, but I believe setting up your mail server is complicated.

    Let's say it's not a problem though (you find a recent tutorial, do the little things so that spam filters like you) then you need a domain, and you need reliable payment for that. Hosting, and you need reliable payment.
    I think we would need some kind of escrow service or system, not unlike micro-financing, as it is for small or even very small payments.

    Even in the first world you have the poor, unemployed, people that will become either of these at some point, or perhaps more commonly people who make a family live, and live paycheque by paycheque or hand to mouth, or whichever way you may say it.
    In a former slashdot discussion I spent a post complaining about that, here I am trying to suggest a solution. Perhaps there would have to be such services for the US, others for the EU or individual countries ; perhaps such a service may be almost global anyway like famous payment processing companies or escrow companies you may think of. I don't know well about legal issues of a service company about money.

    Anyway, what I'm saying is I have no idea if I'll be able to pay $19.99 on May 13th 2019 at 2:30 UTC, but if I can chip in $10 this week because I did well or avoided spending it on whatever, then that will do. I will then afford to not lose my domain or hosting or low end VPS at some arbitrary future date for an arbitrary underlying reason.

  111. Javascript requirement by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    > It also doesn't need JavaScript to run

    Google also, for all its evil parts, to its credit also does not require JavaScript to run. When I heard that they were moving to a JS based search, it annoyed me. It's one thing to give suggestions while you're typing, but what's the point of showing search results if you haven't even told them what you're searching for yet?! They could have totally broken old non-JS search, but they did not.

    Also, Google Image Search works without JS. This is deliberate, because JS-based image search is totally different from non-JS. I'd argue that non-JS works better (for me) than JS-based.

    Finally, they don't annoyingly hide-by-default their FAQs so that you have to have JS turned on just to be able to read a Google help answer.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Javascript requirement by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

      For me, using Google without JavaScript breaks the ability to preview images.

  112. Voltron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saves us from bad guys.