Slashdot Mirror


PC Shipments Hit the Lowest Level In a Decade (cnbc.com)

PC shipments are at the lowest levels since 2007. From a report: Gartner said this week that the PC market declined 4.3 percent during the second quarter. The research company said that shipments were at the "lowest quarter volume since 2007," noting the market dropped for the 11th quarter in a row. The report is in stark contrast to another from IDC in April which said that the PC market grew for the first time in five years. Gartner said HP has the largest global market share with 20.8 percent of the market. HP is trailed by Lenovo which has a 19.9 percent share, with shipments down a substantial 8.4 percent since last year. Dell, Apple and Asus finish out the top five players. In the U.S., Gartner suggests Apple's shipments were down 9.6 percent from last year. The research firm didn't give an explanation for why that might have occurred, though Apple was late to refresh its computers with the latest Intel processors. Upgraded Macs just hit the market last month.

137 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Frost piss. by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows 10 did it.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    1. Re:Frost piss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just Windows 10 since this apparently includes Crapples. The iOS-ification of OS X into "macOS" helped.

      Seriously, why would anyone want a new PC? The older ones that still run Windows 7 are better than the newest ones that are stuck with Windows 10 and the latest Apples are all complete shit. Is anyone surprised by this?

    2. Re:Frost piss. by Nexion · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is part of it. Offerings are pointless these days as there is no compelling reason to get a new computer. They aren't much faster than that of five years ago from a user perspective, and as you pointed out killall the common OS offering is dismal. Macs just keep humming along, and it isn't like they were high performance to begin with. If you are a OSX user you have become accustomed to crappy graphics and you aren't about to drop thousands upon thousands to get something a hair better only to never be able to upgrade your video. So, screw it. Get a set top game box for your gaming and hang on to your old system. It likely already does everything you need, and will likely continue to meet your needs for the foreseeable future.

    3. Re:Frost piss. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you say the latest Macs are shit? Are you talking about the non-upgradable RAM soldered to the motherboard, the low-end dual core i5/i7, the weak GPUs (if any), the pointless expensive toys (touch bar), the five years without upgrades for the Mac mini, MacBook Air and Mac Pro, or the fact that OS X started going downhill after 10.5?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Frost piss. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      We're running Dells we bought in 2009 or thereabouts, upgraded to Windows 10 (I know I know). Other than the odd PSU or hard drive blowing up, the machines seem to be working fine for what they are; workstations dedicated to word processing, email and a bit of browsing. I wouldn't want to open really large spread sheets on them, but other than that, they do the job. Every year that we don't have to buy replacement hardware is basically money in the bank for us, and we have a replacement budget in place for total failures like the motherboard. I would expect that in the next year or two these units may begin to fail, so we're looking at new purchases in 2018-19, at which point they'll be ten years old.

      And when we talk about replacements, we're not likely talking about new desktops, but rather going to PCs-on-a-stick like the Lenovo Ideacenters. Again, for many of these computers, we're really talking about wordprocessing, email and browsing, and the advantage of these units is there almost disposable, and providing they last three or four years (we've had some test units running without issue 24 hours a day running videos and slideshows on large flat screen monitors for over a year now), we'd still be ahead of the game on the hardware side.

      So our medium and long term strategies don't involve replacing $400-$600 desktops with similar models. We'll still be buying laptops for the road warriors and certain departments, like finance, where a bit more muscle is needed to run spreadsheets, will still see traditional PCs, but our days of buying a bunch of $500 Dell or HP desktops or towers on a regular refresh are pretty much done, and really, I would expect by the time we do do our big upgrades in 2019, small form inexpensive PCs will probably be a helluva lot more capable. Who knows, maybe in four or five years maybe we won't be buying Windows machines at all.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Frost piss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you talking about the non-upgradable RAM soldered to the motherboard, the low-end dual core i5/i7, the weak GPUs (if any), the pointless expensive toys (touch bar), the five years without upgrades for the Mac mini, MacBook Air and Mac Pro, or the fact that OS X started going downhill after 10.5?

      You forgot dropping the magsafe power connector, the overpriced SSDs and the reliance on dongles to connect anything. And don't forget the insane price: even if you were to overlook all the other shortcomings, a fully-kitted MBP 15" clicks in at nearly $5,000; that's insane, even for an Apple product.

      I've been in the market for a new MBP for a couple of years, but all those shortcomings leave me happy that my 2010 model has been upgradable to some degree.

    6. Re:Frost piss. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is crappy graphics on OS X?
      Eve Online looks on OS X the same as on Windows, so does world of warcraft.
      Neither my Mail.app nor Safari.app need a special graphics card.

      Never saw crappy on any computer since 20 years anyway, in what strange world do you live?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Frost piss. by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Kids use phones most of the time. At home they use pads and Xbox/PS4 for games, movies and YouTube. They have MIGHT have a school ChromeBook. That is it. All of the bases are covered. The only kids in to "PCs" are the gamers moving into Steam and PC games. A stand alone PC is just not needed any longer to use the net.

    8. Re:Frost piss. by Nexion · · Score: 1

      Eve Online runs horribly on OSX. I wouldn't move anything of value through space, and particularly not performing a booster delivery to Jita. It is running via wine or cider. World of warcraft didn't push the graphics card very hard that I had over a decade ago. OSX runs Minecraft outstanding, but then again... not pushing very hard are we? Civilization looks great, sometimes laggy, but who cares as it is turn based. At home three out of four computers are Macs. I love macs. I write this to you as a developer at work on a Mac.

      Still try to play a modern FPS game on it and pay attention to your frame rate. You aren't running in "extreme" graphics mode, and why? Because you would be playing through photographs. Want to upgrade? Sorry kid, buy this 5000$ entry level pro desktop wind cannon that can't have it's graphics upgraded. Two years from now you can buy a marginally better version of the same. I'm not saying Apple sucks. In fact they are my workstation of choice. They just need a desktop I can upgrade the graphics card on without paying the apple tax.

      Gah, I detected your veiled sarcasm late. (._.)

      nvm sly guy

    9. Re:Frost piss. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not really. It's just that the average person really doesn't need the equivalent of a 1980's supercomputer sitting on their desk for reading e-mail and surfing the web. It used to be that you required a PC to do anything related to computing, and that's just not the case anymore. I was talking to my parents the other day, and told them that when they were ready for their next computer, they should probably just get a simple tablet and hook up a keyboard to it. Anything more for them is just unnecessary overkill, and does more harm than good. They're in their 70's, and are intimidated by technology, so the simple capabilities of a tablet seem best for them.

      Personally, I'm running a 6 year old PC as my main development machine. It was a high-quality PC at the time, costing over $4K. GPU is outdated (I opted for quiet operation rather than the most power), but since my own game isn't really pushing any hardware limits to speak of, that's fine. It's still as snappy as ever. I'll honestly don't even know when I'll consider upgrading, so long as it keeps running.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    10. Re: Frost piss. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The problem is that over the last five or six years the hardware has become so good that it's become harder to build software that can break it. And in some ways Microsoft's push towards mobile has meant they've done a lot of work to reduce the resource footprint of Windows, meaning that newer versions of Windows have to some extent reversed the tendency of the OS and its software to consume RAM and cycles. If the competition with iOS and Android have done one thing, they've forced Microsoft to build an OS than be scaled downward.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:Frost piss. by karmatic · · Score: 1

      I finally upgraded from my 2012 MacBook Pro a couple days ago. I got a name-brand Windows 10 laptop.

      I did it because Apple has nothing compelling about them anymore. They innovated (for the time) by rolling out a high-res laptop screen. I bought, and then spent the next 5 years having no reason to change anything (until my laptop started dying).

      This time around, I saved the money. 4k screen, pen support (useful to me), decent battery life. Done.

    12. Re:Frost piss. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      if it has thunderbolt 3, you could use an external GPU in there, and get about 80% of the desktop performance from the card.

      Not perfect, but doable.

    13. Re:Frost piss. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      True... I'm reinstalling my brothers laptop from 2010 right now. The disk was developing bad sectors, and we dumped a 500GB SSD in it. That's going to keep it rolling for another few years. It's got a quad core Sandy Bridge i7, 16GB RAM and now an SSD... Batteries can still be had for the laptop, so even that is covered.

      I personally started just buying second hand machines. Lenovo X220? 159€ for a nice base configuration... Add in a small SSD and 16GB RAM and you have a really nifty portable machine for less than 400€. There simply is nothing that beats that kind of price/performance in the "new" market.

      I've been saying for year we're at the "good enough" level... now, it's not only that, it's that several year old machines are "good enough".

      Yes, I know, some of you do huge simulations, tons of virtualization, etc.... I'm talking for normal users, not you guys...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    14. Re:Frost piss. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I dual box EvE on my 2014 13" Mac book Air just fine.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:Frost piss. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We've purchased a couple of refurbished Thinkpads. Very nice units, very rugged, and with the extra battery capacity, and they were about $300CDN (about 240 Euros) a piece. They're off-lease units, so a few scuffs here and there and no dead pixels. From what I can see the whole refurb market is in real growth. That isn't new computer sales, of course, but you can get a pretty good machine for a lot less than a new one, for most people these kinds of machines are more than they'll ever need.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    16. Re: Frost piss. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      There's ONE supposedly-upcoming laptop that genuinely excites me -- the Razer Valerie ( https://www.razerzone.com/proj... )

      * 3 screens

      * mechanical clicky keyboard (as-yet unknown how satisfying it'll be, but still likely to be a huge improvement over everything besides *maybe* a Thinkpad)

      Everything else available now or in the pipeline is uninspiring, glued/sealed Apple-like crap that's a step down from what I have now (Precision m4800), or at best, an uninspiring step sideways.

      People will start buying new laptops every 2-3 years again when manufacturers start making real leaps forward and break the stagnation that's gripped the industry for at least 6-8 years. And Microsoft chucks Metro in the trash & gives us "Aero Diamond" (with realtime-raytraced translucency & refraction).

      Windows 8 made a bad situation worse, but the downward spiral of crap netbooks, tablets, and $299 walmart laptops have done even more damage.

    17. Re: Frost piss. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Firefox has really gone to shit over the past few years. When IE 6 was the norm, Firefox was the clean, shiny, compromise-free new browser, and IE was a hot mess of legacy kludges. Now, Firefox is the lava-hot mess of legacy kludges... except that NOW, the alternatives all suck too (just in slightly different ways... like Chrome's refusal to let you block thirdparty cookies or disable autoplaying sound/video... or Edge's continued flakiness).

    18. Re:Frost piss. by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 1

      MOD THIS GUY UP!

    19. Re:Frost piss. by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I am hoping to keep my 2012 macbook pro going, but doubt I will get a mac when it dies. I got 16 gb of ram in 2012 and in 2017 I can max out a macbook pro with.....16gb of ram. Why would I plunk down that much cash for a machine that is barely faster than what I currently own? Apple needs to up the ram in its "professional" laptops to something I couldn't get 5 years ago if they expect me to put money into buying a new one.

    20. Re:Frost piss. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What is crappy graphics on OS X?

      The crappy GPU and VRAM configuration?

    21. Re:Frost piss. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's a combinations of factors, as you point out unlike a few years ago older machines still perform the tasks that people want to do just fine so if you already have one that works there's no reason to replace it...

      Another factor is that previously buying a pc was people's only way to access the internet, which is what many people bought them for despite being a terribly unsuitable tool for most people. Nowadays, many more devices are usable for internet access and are far more suitable for the vast majority of users. I know many people who regularly access the internet and seem to spend their whole lives on facebook, yet they don't even own a traditional pc.. Only a phone.

      The desktop pc will return to its niches, enthusiasts and specialised business sectors. Everyone else will use less complicated devices which don't require specialist knowledge in order to operate safely.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:Frost piss. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      You make a lot of good points, but it's because when you buy a Macbook Pro, it has no ports that will work with the majority of hardware I can buy at Best Buy or NewEgg unless I get adapters and dongles.

      That and they just look and feel cheap now. No keyboard travel, no magsafe, no light-up logo, no startup chime, no accessories in the box anymore. The machine just screams no frills budget cost cutting machine, yet costs 5 times as much as a comparable PC.

    23. Re:Frost piss. by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Bang on, especially that they were seen as only way to do things. Several threads to pick up.

      Firstly, unless you've a graphics-heavy job, why buy an expensive Mac? If you are a light internet user, why live your life in fear of Windows viruses?- recent ransomware headlines have underlined this.

      A _decent_ tablet costs 50% of all web traffic now non-desktop. So you don't literally need a p.c. somewhere in your life to be able to fully interact with the web, which was the case even in 2015.

    24. Re:Frost piss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ^ This ^

      I am a gamer and used to buy a new machine every year (parts for one anyway). I have not gotten a new machine since they stopped supporting W7 (and also moved their draconian updates in to W7 too).
      I only run Linux now and only play games that run under Linux. They do not need as much hardware as Windows gaming so I don't have to buy new gear.

      Microsoft should just throw away all the crap they have made since Windows XP. Rollback and start again. Maybe listen to their customers this time around?

    25. Re:Frost piss. by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Came to say the same; you beat me to it.

      I really, really want to upgrade my PC [7 years old with small upgrades - video mostly along the way] or buy completely new kit, but what operational system to run? Install Win7 again? Soon it will be unsupported.....Linux is cool but I am simply unwilling [ATM] to spend the time learning cause I don't have much time....

      I am so fed-up with the endless jig of learning new UI's every few years, tweaks to protect privacy, enhance performance, fight bloatware or even have actual control of your machine....it feels like endless war, you know. 20 years ago I'd have the time, will and energy to fight [and we did fight, did we not:)] but now...just give me a working honest solution I will pay you premium price. Nobody on the market at the moment , and I do mean nobody offers you this....

    26. Re:Frost piss. by Angeret · · Score: 1

      "Windows 10 did it." gets a "+5 insightful". Not being disparaging here because you're absolutely spot on, but perhaps Slashdot needs a "+5 that was fucking obvious". It hasn't helped any seeing the direction Microsoft has been going since they spewed out Vista. They won't be happy until they can force all Windows Users onto some form of monthly rental OS. Throwing out crumbs of a better operating system so they can justify making people use a spyware laden social media launcher isn't a good idea, neither was the brilliant plan of making DX12 a Win 10 only thing. Great, capture the gamer market then turn bloody expensive gaming rigs into glorified Xboxes. With spyware.

    27. Re:Frost piss. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Any refurbished professional grade HP laptop(elitebook anyone)

    28. Re:Frost piss. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Never saw crappy on any computer since 20 years anyway, in what strange world do you live?

      Why didn't you just sign of your post with "disregard that I'm talking out of my arse"

      It's much shorter to write.

    29. Re:Frost piss. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Mine is about the same age, I think. The only reason I am thinking in buying a new PC is that the small form factor becomes possible.

      I am not a gamer, I do have 3 4K screens and all they do is desktop stuff, basically.

      My first one was a 364DX. I then bought a new one about every 1.5 years and the speed difference was obvious. Did that for a while till it was every 4 years. The last one I bought was not really noticeable in speed once I configured the ad blockers and my own DNS server (using mvps hosts, it filters out a LOT(*)) the speed is great in usage. The bottleneck in speed is now me, as a user and not the machine.

      Having a faster machine would be like comparing a old beetle and a Ferrari in heavy traffic. You will get there at the same time.

      Yes, I have installed newer verions of my OS and run now Debian Jessie with XFCE. I am sure it will be ok for several more years

      Most people will only use a browser and not much more.

      (*)Added advantage is that other devices at my home use the same DNS server, so they are a lot faster as well when I am at home due to the blocking of a lot of things where the domains point to 0.0.0.0

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    30. Re:Frost piss. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      What is crappy graphics on OS X?
      Eve Online looks on OS X the same as on Windows, so does world of warcraft.

      Dishonesty or whitewashing detected. :)

      I have played Eve Online in OS X, Windows, and Linux. As long as you have a decent gfx chip, you are good and everything looks mostly the same (OpenGL vs DirectX does cause some minor changes). If you are relying on Intel integrated graphics, Eve is unplayable except at the lowest of resolutions with the smallest amount of eye candy. Granted, Eve Online is best played through a spreadsheet, but if you want to see anything, you need to have a nice discrete gfx chip.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    31. Re:Frost piss. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I'll honestly don't even know when I'll consider upgrading, so long as it keeps running.

      It will be a few more years, then the power savings will make it worthwhile. If you run Linux or other Free OS on it and do not care about the cost of power, you should not need to "upgrade" until you experience hardware failure.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    32. Re: Frost piss. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Chiclet keyboards don't necessarily *have* to suck, as long as the keyswitches are well-designed & high quality. A modern Thinkpad chiclet keyboard is still a net improvement over 97% of current non-mechanical keyboards (but inferior to the best laptop keyboards circa 2000). Modern laptop keyboards suck mainly because their switches are shit. Compaq (pre-HP) laptops used to have *fantastic* keyboards (at least, on their enterprise-class laptops like the Armada circa 2000).

    33. Re:Frost piss. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Besides the fact that such a crappy machine is easily available for $260, what kind of idiot would buy a 128 gig SSD at any price in 2017? What kind of idiot would buy a machine with only 8 gig that can never be upgraded? For that matter, why would you buy a dual core i5. Quad core i7's are cheap cheap cheap these days. Laptops with 16 gig ram, 1TB HDD+ 512 gig SSD and a quad core i7-7700 are cheaper than that mac you think is so reasonably priced.

      You really need those 2 TB3 useless ports? Well my $260 laptop has actual useful ports like USB3, HDMI, and an SD slot. So why to Apple idiots only want to compare to a machine spec for spec identical to their gimp junk while ignoring the 500 ways a cheap PC surpasses the mac. Hell, your SSD is soldered in. If your computer fails in any way, you can't even recover your data from a working SSD without paying Apple an obscene amount for data recovery. There are just no words for how stupid you have to be to buy such a machine.

    34. Re: Frost piss. by leslie.satenstein · · Score: 1

      My PC dates from 2008. It supports Sara 2 drives, dvd R/W and it has 8 gigs Ram. I upgraded the processor to a Quad core unit. I run Linux and use the WPS office suite. Aside from high replacement cost, will it give me more Linux features? Like the guy with a 10 year old car, I may upgrade just to please my peers. It's a typically stupid move, but we have to satisfy our ego.

    35. Re:Frost piss. by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      Overpriced memory vampire mastodont Os'es aside ... and reading what is answered below i wonder is this about pc's for dummies like (for instance crApples) people who dont know what side of a screwdriver is used to cut the meat and which part to write with including craptops which indeed is quite the expense since its all soldered shut, you need to be a micro-electronics vocore haxxor to upgrade those, né ? Or does this include statistics on sales of components to people who are either budget-aware ... able to hold a screwdriver without poking eyes out or simply have so much money they think 10 fps if visible past 100 by adding a fourth 1080 ? thats not clear ...
      i dont have any thats not built from scratch except my little vocore but that would be really hard since soldering is not my thing. Windows should indeed be scrutinized for being sold "as-is" and not modular like linux ... every drive i run linux from i have a separate script to run after install that removes and adds components/software according to what i intend to use it for, two of my three systems run celeron cpus without glitching (they dont run windows ofcourse) each part is handpicked, my webservers is also celeron with 8gb of ddr4 ram a 120gb ssd and a quite decent multimedia board which probably helps when i do batch image resizing (and stuff) on the machine itself ... runs like a breeze and if i upgrade to the next thats somewhere between $50 and $100 but considering the number of visits i dont see why i would. im drifing offtopic (i do that a lot im sorry) if i couldnt get separate parts b/c "the pc market" crashed what would i do ?
      watch tv?
      read a book ? lmao
      i want to extend my vote for windows-lite-for-gamers once more, stripped of everything that eats memory (like the desktop and about like well umm ... everyrthing, i dont need printers and 1000 whatever background processes to run steam and origin dx 11 games) priced at $50 per license (transferrable ofcourse, after all if you buy a car its not like its no longer yours if you switch lanes) and so ... (i went on and on and on, the crowd was snoring in the end no one remembered what it was about and microsoft came up with a devious masterplan to couple windows AND office in one pack for the small price of your soul and yo momma (and a second mortgage) yea ... probably has a lot to do with it mhm

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    36. Re:Frost piss. by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Try running Elite: Dangerous on OS X - you literally cannot land on planets because Apple never bothered to implement OpenGL compute shaders on OS X, and there probably are not enough players to justify porting the game to Metal...

      (The workaround would be installing Windows, where compute shaders are supported just fine in DirectX - on the same hardware...)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    37. Re: Frost piss. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      A modern Thinkpad chiclet keyboard may be one of the better chiclet keyboards out there, but it's terrible even compared to cheap membrane keyboards like the Microsoft Wired 200 which is a pretty typical $15 desktop keyboard, and ditto for a real mechanical keyboard. It's also rubbish compared to the keyboard on my R-series (what was the low-end Thinkpad from 2006). I assume a big part of it is the drive to ridiculously thin laptops. A chiclet keyboard probably lets them shave off 0.5 mm, and making it crappy probably another 0.2 mm or something like that.

      I'm just hoping the Thinkpad Retro that supposedly is coming out later this year really has a "retro" keyboard. In which case I'll almost certainly buy one because decent laptops with a good keyboard is otherwise almost impossible to find (and that MSI GT83 is ridiculous).

    38. Re:Frost piss. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Oh, I actually wanted to try it.
      Forget about it, though.
      Thanx for the warning!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    39. Re:Frost piss. by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

      Kids use phones most of the time. At home they use pads and Xbox/PS4 for games, movies and YouTube. They have MIGHT have a school ChromeBook. That is it. All of the bases are covered. The only kids in to "PCs" are the gamers moving into Steam and PC games. A stand alone PC is just not needed any longer to use the net.

      I disagree. For high school and middle school, my kids need a PC at home to write essays and reports/projects. From what I've seen, kids prefer a phone and a laptop, and are much less interested in desktops or tablets.

    40. Re:Frost piss. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I dual box it on an 2014 built Mac Book Air 13" ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    41. Re:Frost piss. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Show us any manufacturer still using dual core i5/i7 CPUs in 2017. Or even in 2016 for that matter.
      And that Iris Plus 640 GPU is nothing to be proud of. Sure it's no GMA950, but still.
      And that LPDDR3 RAM may help with the battery life but it also means you cannot add more memory, ever.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    42. Re:Frost piss. by not+flu · · Score: 1

      10.5 was a bad one, I remember the first time I used it I saw my third ever kernel panic in less than 10 minutes. It was so bad Apple advertised 10.6 as having no new features (with the implication that it would actually work this time). So either it was downhill since 10.4 or since 10.6. I'd say 10.6.

  2. Price vs Functionality by Tempest451 · · Score: 1

    Typing this on a custom-built PC, I know how much the components can costs. Most people aren't gaming on PCs like they used to and it becomes harder to justify the gaming quality if you have to drop a couple grand to get it. Most people are surfing the internet or for work. It also doesn't help that consoles are eating into gaming market, so the PC is looking more and more like a simple utility than a luxury item, but they still sell for luxury prices.

    1. Re:Price vs Functionality by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I've been building computers for myself for close to 25 years (starting when I used to drool over 286 motherboards with 1MB of RAM!) and I've come to realize that the last computer I built (a good 6 years ago now) is probably the last one I'll ever build. It's still running, and running well, and is more than fast enough for my needs. All I've done to it over the past half decade is replace/upgrade its storage. An i7-930 with 24GiB of RAM is a pretty quick little beast for any day to day operations.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Price vs Functionality by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

      I probably didn't need to replace my 2008 system as it still works just fine for most of what I do at home (mostly systems type stuff with lots of VMs on my R710), but I did get a pretty hefty kickback from the government last year so I initially spent about $2,900 on a new system that included a 43" 4k LG type monitor. Then added more bits over the year bringing it up to $3,600.

      With the power I have now, for my more simple needs (I play a few older games and am looking forward to the Starcraft Reboot), it'll last a few years :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  3. I've never understood the saying: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Companies exist purely to make as much money as possible."

    What kind of greedy bastard coined that expression? Why would a company necessarily need to exist ONLY for that reason? Why can't the reason be to allow its founder, as well as people close to him or whoever he likes, to live comfortably while doing something honest and decent that improves this rotten world slightly? I'm not saying that they should deliberately make bad business decisions -- simply that there is nothing whatsoever that DICTATES that they MUST "cut corners" and constantly expand and push lies and do all sorts of evil acts for the pure sake of increasing profits.

    I will never understand it. I honestly believe that I wouldn't become that greedy if I ever managed to build up a company. In fact, I would make it a hallmark of my business to NOT be like the others, while also not coming up with nonsense such as donating money to charities in the company's name. I'd simply sell a honest product or service and never cut corners.

    There is zero reason that any company needs to expand all the time, beyond a certain startup point. No universal "law" exists other than pure greed and evil. I couldn't go to sleep at night knowing my company is doing evil things under my management. It's both sickening and baffling that this is just accepted.

    1. Re:I've never understood the saying: by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You don't understand because you haven't done it. You're just guessing, try it and learn something.

    2. Re:I've never understood the saying: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What kind of greedy bastard coined that expression? Why would a company necessarily need to exist ONLY for that reason? Why can't the reason be to allow its founder, as well as people close to him or whoever he likes, to live comfortably while doing something honest and decent that improves this rotten world slightly? I'm not saying that they should deliberately make bad business decisions -- simply that there is nothing whatsoever that DICTATES that they MUST "cut corners" and constantly expand and push lies and do all sorts of evil acts for the pure sake of increasing profits.

      Your comments would fall to deaf ears of the share holders. They don't care as long as the infractions caused by the company doesn't affect the share value. Now even privately owned companies will inherently be for profit, as making a loss will cause problems with your credit, but they can have a longer window for profit than the quarterly.

      So the comment "Companies exist purely to make as much money as possible." is effectively true for both cases.

    3. Re:I've never understood the saying: by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      In fact, I would make it a hallmark of my business to NOT be like the others, while also not coming up with nonsense such as donating money to charities in the company's name. I'd simply sell a honest product or service and never cut corners.

      I buy my computers from a small, local custom PC builder who operates this way. Super high-quality components (they constantly evaluate reliability and stock the components that perform the best over time) and excellent service, with the ability to precisely customize a PC to my needs. As long as they keep up the excellent performance, I'll never buy a PC from anywhere else. The catch? You pay significantly more for a PC than if you just buy some mass manufactured product from Dell.

      What you're describing is certainly possible for small, independently owned businesses. When a company gives up control to go public, they also cede control to the wishes of shareholders, which may not be the same values as its founder. Stay private and you can run a company however you like.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:I've never understood the saying: by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      He's talking about watching pr0n. I think.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:I've never understood the saying: by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Because that is how you think people must be, you are condemning yourself.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:I've never understood the saying: by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      So why "go public" to begin with? That's the whole point. You just assume that this must be done. Why?

      No, I don't assume it "must be done". Please don't put words in my mouth.

      I haven't been in that situation, so I can't speak as to the mindset of those who do it, but I suspect it's a desire to grow the business and become more successful. Or, if you want to view it negatively, you could call it a combination of greed and ambition. They essentially sell their company to the public for a large infusion of capital, and in return, control is ceded to a managing board of directors and the shareholders at large.

      But not all companies go public. The vast majority of small businesses are privately held, of course, and there are even a number of very large privately held companies as well. Some go halfway, and after going public, retain a controlling interest in the company, giving them more control over how its run.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    7. Re:I've never understood the saying: by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      What company doesn't have "share holders"? Think about it. A publicly listed company, means you can buy a "share" (a part) of that company. So, publicly listed have by definition "share holders".

      A private company, which means: wholly owned by someone (or a family... or...). Think about it: they own 100% of the company... Or in other words: they own all "shares" (parts of the company). Hence, private companies, have -by definition- also shareholders. They're just the owners.

      Can you propose a system where companies do not have "share holders", aka "owners"? I mean, one that works, not one involving gulags and planned economy (and even then, technically, the state would own the company and would be the "share holder", since they too, own all parts).

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    8. Re:I've never understood the saying: by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      "Companies exist purely to make as much money as possible."

      What kind of greedy bastard coined that expression?

      What kind of troll asks that kind of off-topic question? Ohh, yeah. An AC.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    9. Re:I've never understood the saying: by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Another reason for an IPO is to let investors cash out.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Most people don't need a new PC by qzzpjs · · Score: 2

    Most consumers are probably happy with their current PC's. They edit the odd document, use email, browse the web and that's it. A 12 year old Windows XP machine can do that very well still. Unless the machine actually dies, buying a new one is not on their mind or in their budget plans.

    Even for companies, the current hardware they have works well enough for probably 90% of their employees. Upgrading hardware is not going to give them any increase in productivity so why buy anything new unless the old machine dies.

    1. Re:Most people don't need a new PC by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. At home, I'm running a 10 year old AMD Phenom X4, and it's only gotten noticeably slow in the last year or so (although DOOM didn't run great last year).

      At work, we just upgraded our four-year old 2.6 GHz, i5 dual-core Lenovo laptops with... new 2.6 GHz, i7 dual-core Lenovo laptops.

      Year-over-year performance improvements simply aren't that important these days. The massive core counts recently announced by AMD and Intel may, on the other hand, make an upgrade attractive...

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
  5. No longer a home appliance by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    PC's are alive and well in business, but shrinking at home. They are too expensive and too much trouble to maintain for consumers, in part because Windows is a POC.

    The younger generation can type on virtual (mobile) keyboards as fast as most PC typers such that they don't need a PC for email etc.; and tablets can have plug-in keyboards.

    1. Re:No longer a home appliance by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The younger generation can type on virtual (mobile) keyboards as fast as most PC typers

      It doesn't count if their accuracy is terrible, even WITH autocorrect.

    2. Re:No longer a home appliance by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

      I do completely agree with your conclusion about Windows and consumers.

      However, I respectfully disagree on your assertion about mobile typists. The world champ types at 88 WPM. I type between 90 on a crap keyboard and around 110 on a mechanical keyboard with lowered keyweights. I touch type, and I'm nowhere near the fastest (which is 150 - 170 WPM).

    3. Re:No longer a home appliance by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Not just kids. My wife has a laptop that's probably opened the lid on three times in the last six months, and now she complains that every time she does, it has to download dozens of updates. Mostly she uses her phone and tablet, and she's not even sure she wants a new tablet, except sometimes she likes to watch movies, particularly when she's sick and in bed, so maybe we'll upgrade to a decent 8" tablet. Even I crack open my notebook a lot less than I used to. Most of my email is done on my phone these days, it's just a lot simpler.

      The reality is a lot of the casual and entertainment aspects of computing which I used to do on my PC is now being done on my portable devices. The way people use computers has shifted a great deal in the last seven or eight years, so I imagine the consumer computing purchases have fallen through the floor. From what I can tell a lot of companies aren't chomping at the bit for new hardware. My company does a lot of government work, and I've seen a lot of government computers in my travels still running Windows 7. The road warriors will tend to get the new hardware, and I've certainly seen a lot more Surfaces and thin-line Dell notebooks and the like, so I imagine there are segments of the market that our doing well.

      The other thing i've seen quite a bit of is the off-lease and refurb resellers doing a very good trade. You can buy a pretty decently speced desktop or notebook on the refurb sites, and we've purchased a few refurb computers here and there.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:No longer a home appliance by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I use my current PC far more than my tablet. I just don't need a new PC. My current machine is fine.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    5. Re:No longer a home appliance by tquasar · · Score: 1

      I have a desktop my son built with what were top shelf gaming components. It still works after 20 years but my ASUS Q302 laptop is my daily driver.

    6. Re:No longer a home appliance by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      You're spot on except 'u' and your lowercase sentence. Phones expand both for you, so nobody actually sounds like that anymore. But yes, we're moving to a more forgiving mode of communicating, and I'm all for it.

    7. Re: No longer a home appliance by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see *anyone* -- young OR old -- type 100+wpm (and few errors) with anything less than a good, tactile mechanical keyboard. At least, not without lord of autocorrect Eris...

    8. Re:No longer a home appliance by jezwel · · Score: 1

      PC's are alive and well in business, but shrinking at home.

      There will come a time very soon where PCs will be shrinking in business too. Currently it's just a replacement schedule when lifecycle management dictates that keeping older devices is more expensive than buying new ones, but the horizon has virtual desktops on non-Windows devices in docks (mobiles typically, to reduce the number of devices). MS will still get their Windows user payments (now via Microsoft365 it looks) so no loss of profit there.

    9. Re:No longer a home appliance by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Mostly she uses her phone and tablet, and she's not even sure she wants a new tablet, except sometimes she likes to watch movies, particularly when she's sick and in bed, so maybe we'll upgrade to a decent 8" tablet.

      Why not a 10" with a full HD screen for video, unless that would be too unwieldy for bed use.

      Most of my email is done on my phone these days, it's just a lot simpler.

      The reality is a lot of the casual and entertainment aspects of computing which I used to do on my PC is now being done on my portable devices.

      Yep, I found that I don't even need to turn on the PC for basic browsing/email like I used to, thanks to the tablet (10" Lenovo A10-70f). Heck I'm even replying to you on it, with a bluetooth keyboard. (Logitech K480 which I picked up for 11 bucks and is much more pleasant than I expected)

    10. Re:No longer a home appliance by strikethree · · Score: 1

      The younger generation can type on virtual (mobile) keyboards as fast as most PC typers

      It doesn't count if their accuracy is terrible, even WITH autocorrect.

      Lol. You speak truth; however, my experience with autocorrect is that it introduces more errors than it fixes. Very frustrating when the word "damn" gets changed to "Damon". I guess I just do not speak politically correctly enough. Ah well, I am older and will die off soon.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  6. Re: Obvious really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My custom build from 2012 still tears through most things. I could build a new one, but why?

  7. everybody's poking at their phones by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Samsung Galaxy s7 fortold in PROPHECY !

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:everybody's poking at their phones by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, get your facts straight - it was the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 detonating, not the S7!

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  8. Useless article by Misagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TFA does not link to the original data, and it is referring to results of only the last quarter.
    Does it count only brand-name PCs or the industry as a whole? Are they counting revenue, turnover or number of units sold?
    It does not say. Therefore you can't really infer anything from it.

    The gaming PC community is the one most willing to spend a lot of money on new computers. That community is thriving.
    While a good gaming PC today costs about the same as a gaming PC did twenty years ago, low-end PCs for office work have gone down in price considerably and there is little incentive to upgrade.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  9. Linux and roll your own PCs by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, there's no reason to freak.

    Ask yourself about the CPU and GPU sales instead. How many motherboards are shipping?

    Boxes don't matter. There's no value added anymore.

    Besides, where I am we're all just rolling blade servers. PCs are for last decade.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Linux and roll your own PCs by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      How many kids have at least one Raspberry Pi? How many millions has the raspberry pi foundation sold again?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Linux and roll your own PCs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The stats don't define "PC", so the stats are useless. They used to exclude laptops, then included them. Do they include embedded systems, or only "home PCs"?

      From the quotes provided, they only include built systems by top-tier home PC makers. So it's hard to tell what's being measured.

    3. Re:Linux and roll your own PCs by Desler · · Score: 1

      And you represent a tiny fraction of the market. Most consumers are not rolling their own

    4. Re:Linux and roll your own PCs by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I stopped rolling my own about six years ago. There was a point at which the savings couldn't justify the effort anymore.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Linux and roll your own PCs by caseih · · Score: 1

      And how many Pis and other SOCs are lying unused in drawers? Well over half I'd guess. I have several that I always meant to use in projects but never did.

    6. Re:Linux and roll your own PCs by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Three in the drawer. Someday, I swear... someday I'll finish those projects.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  10. Remind me by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Remind me, when was Ryzen released? In earnest, I mean. PC sector is undergoing some switches.

    Additionally, it appears that some of the larger OEMs have finally gotten the message that SSDs for the system mount / OS drive is mandatory, and that going with larger SSDs is better; although, it may be some time before you see a Samsung 960 PRO NVMe of an appropriate minimum size (1TB+) standard on anything.

    Now if they can offer better networking (10GBe, or even 5GBe would do), better audio (never use integrated audio, save on a laptop, and even then...; sticking the SoundBlaster logo on something meant more 20 years ago, there are other contenders, perhaps HT Omega? that might be worth looking into...). And a shift away from iGPUs, which are great if you like using a terminal all day, but will have trouble handling 1080p streams from Crunchyroll (well, Flash may be to blame as well, and compiling in the background...but a dGPU used on the same setup seems to alleviate these problems).

    And RAM is cheap, even the good stuff, especially in bulk. No reason not to load up the system with something decent, and take sales away from your competitors.

  11. Performance plateau by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A dual core box from 10 years ago is still plenty of power for what most people are doing. It still browses fine and plays YouTube without any problems as well. No big shocker there. Sure we have cores into double digits but clock speeds aren't any faster. Software has become bloated at the same pace. Go back 20 years to 1997. Your browser renders pages as quickly today as it did back then.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Performance plateau by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'd like to see some numbers on numbers of homes that have a PC, instead of just sales. PCs stay useful longer, the hardware seems to last longer, and brand new ones are expensive and arguably less useful. (Or at least have a learning curve, which is a big negative to many people.)

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    2. Re:Performance plateau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Your browser renders pages as quickly today as it did back [in 1997].

      I _wish_.

    3. Re:Performance plateau by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Are you actually using a 10 year old box? I just replaced my 10 year old machine because the wait for the screen to refresh when scrolling got too annoying. The fact the the motherboard only recognized 3 Gigs of memory might have had something to do with it but the $500 I spent for a new acer was well spent. With an i5 processor, 16 Gigs of memory, 2 TB data drive and 96 Gig SSD I'm ready for the next ten years.

    4. Re:Performance plateau by toddestan · · Score: 1

      My laptop is that old. Granted, I only use it when I need something portable, but when I do all I've got is a first-gen Core 2 processor and 3GB of ram, though the SSD helps a lot. Otherwise, I'm using my desktop, which is "only" five years old now, with no plans on replacing that anytime soon.

  12. Re:Obvious really. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People may be, but the big drivers of PC sales, particularly in the over $500 range or businesses, and in particular the enterprise, and quite frankly the extra cycles and RAM that come with newer desktops don't really confer much advantage for many applications. It's one thing if it's the guys in the engineering department who need hefty workstations, or the guys editing videos or running financial simulations, but the bulk of most offices are people churning out documents, emailing and working on fairly modest spreadsheets, and most of the hardware put out in five or six years ago (or even longer, as I can attest), can do that without issue. Even if you're making money hand over fist, why would you replace perfectly good hardware? Not replacing hardware means you make even more money.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. Duh. by saccade.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I cringe every time I read one of these stories. It's not the 1990s anymore. The market for PCs is fully saturated, and any purchases are generally for replacement. Specs no longer double every 18-24 months, so replacement is needed only when something breaks or the GPU is no longer supported by the OS. I owned my last PC for seven years, and the current one will easily last that long.

    1. Re:Duh. by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Yea, I built my previous one in 2008 and it is still running (girlfriend uses it occasionally). I had enough Windows 10 problems with it that I rolled it back to 7 and built myself a new system last year, just because I can :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:Duh. by crow · · Score: 2

      Yup. This has been the case for over a decade now. Even in the corporate market where there are policies letting you get a new PC with no questions asked if you current one is more than four years old (for example), most employees don't ask because getting the settings just the way they want them on the new system will take forever--they probably don't remember half the things they've changed. The typical upgrade cycle is more like eight years. Laptops are upgraded more frequently, as the mobile systems really have been seeing more improvement, but still there's not a lot of incentive if the old system is working well.

      And that's for situations where to the user the replacement is free.

      For home users, most people who aren't pushing the limits with gaming won't even start thinking about replacing the system until it's ten years old or something breaks.

      Now imagine if, say, Dell and Microsoft partnered to run ads showing how you can hook up your new Dell PC to your old system, and it will magically transfer every application and setting over so that you start with the same desktop you've known for years, only everything runs much faster. (And imagine they developed the software so that was true.) That would do something to push the upgrade cycle, and would sell a lot more units. (This would also apply to the small business market, but not the enterprise market where they have standard images from the IT department.) [By the way, the last time I upgraded a Mac, this is exactly how it worked. It was perfect. Apple should advertise how easy it is to upgrade to a new Macintosh.]

    3. Re:Duh. by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      It's also true that nobody but gamers, artists, and hobbyists actually needs to own a PC anymore. Many people just need a laptop, and some just need a phone.

    4. Re:Duh. by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this is true. My gaming PC is 5 years old now, and the only parts on it that were seriously out of date were the graphics card (Radeon 6870: AMD stopped offering driver updates for it), and the hard drive. I upgraded those two parts with a GeForce 1060 and an SSD, and it's still as good as any modern PC that costs less than $700. The original Core i7 processor in it posts benchmarks comparable to a modern day Core i5. Why would I bother upgrading that?

    5. Re:Duh. by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's also true that nobody but gamers, artists, and hobbyists actually needs to own a PC anymore.

      The flip side of this is that with PC component prices rising due to lack of economies of scale, the sticker shock of needing a PC might end up dissuading someone who gets buy with a phone and a tablet from becoming a gamer, artist, or hobbyist in the first place.

  14. Not news by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    This has been a trend for quite some time. And the causes are the same: Lackluster jumps in performance in the last 10 years, and the rise of the Portable Personal Computer (PPC, Smartphone.)

    Naturally no one is going to bother to buy a new PC when all their current one needs is a memory and GPU upgrade.

    I've spoken with people still running Core2's for their gaming rig, just slap a nice GPU in there and enough memory, and for gaming.. it's plenty.

    Getting people to buy their very first PC is also agonizingly difficult now. How do you talk someone into investing in this big clunky box when their PPC does everything the big clunky box does?

    PC manufacturers needs to take a good hard look at the SoC and SBC offerings and make them into very tiny personal computers to replace the clunky boxes we have now. The only reason a PC case needs space anymore is for extra drives and a GPU. SSD's are making HDD's obsolete in a hurry, and integrated GPU's are getting pretty competitive now.

    1. Re:Not news by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This has been a trend for quite some time. And the causes are the same: Lackluster jumps in performance in the last 10 years, and the rise of the Portable Personal Computer (PPC, Smartphone.)

      I think it's more that the performance has mostly outpaced the need. Like you can now get 8/16 core CPUs at consumer-ish prices, NVMe-based PCIe cards that make normal SSDs look slow, 64-128GB RAM, but like... why? The only real killer product for consumers is the GPU and even there a single 1080Ti will play almost every game at 3840x2160 with Very High/Ultra quality at 60+ FPS. If you just want 1080p gaming with decent quality or play games that are more fun than GPU intensive like say Overwatch, DOTA, Rocket League, CS:GO etc. pretty much any graphics card will do. The performance jumps have been there, the applications haven't really found a way to use it to make a practical difference.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Not news by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      The only real killer product for consumers is the GPU and even there a single 1080Ti will play almost every game at 3840x2160 with Very High/Ultra quality at 60+ FPS.

      This is exactly what I said. And the really sad part of it all, is Core2 based systems are still just fine for HIGH END gaming, as long as you got the killer GPU in there. These games, still, don't really need 239482 cores, or high frequency on the CPU. It's just not really very demanding on the CPU for games. GPU is where it's at. And that is absolutely destroying PC sales. And making NVIDIA tons of cash. Ask NVIDIA or AMD how the PC market looks, and I bet they're gunna say it looks fantastic, we're selling the hell out of GPU's.

      Hell, even my personal i7, it's rare to ever see it hit more than about 20% cpu usage (across 8 logical cores) playing even the most demanding games. Gaming still does not exploit multi-core processing, cuz it doesn't need it. GPU is where all the heavy lifting is done.

  15. We should be tracking video card sales by perpenso · · Score: 1

    My 7 (8?) year old 64-bit Athlon X2 3.1 GHz 8 GB RAM BYO PC is just fine running Windows 10.
    Admittedly it just had its 3rd video card upgrade. Everything else is "original".

    We should be tracking video card sales :-)
    Yeah, yeah, more laptops these days.

    1. Re:We should be tracking video card sales by w42w42 · · Score: 1

      Me as well - though I've gone through one power supply and two hard drives. I am contemplating an upgrade, though I am waiting for the latest batch of processors and SSDs to shake out.

    2. Re:We should be tracking video card sales by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I've got a similar machine, HP/Compaq CQ5320F was originally an Athlon X2 2.8 GHz with 3GB of RAM. But the motherboard can take a Phenom X4 (I've got the 2.8GHz 925 in it)

      I eventually upped the RAM to 4GB. the specs were vague on how much it supported, but I found out this version of the motherboard can handle more than 4GB of RAM so I upped it to 8GB

      I've upgraded the GPU three times. Onboard is Nvidia 6150SE, which I originally upped to a GT220 (1GB GDDR3 version), then to a GT640 SC Rev 2 (1GB GDDR5) and currently to a GTX1050 Ti SC (4GB GDDR5). I'm a Linux user and the only really 3D taxing software I use is Second Life, so that explains why I tend towards HTPC centric/entry level NVidia cards.

      The machine has served me VERY well alongside the PS3/PS4.

    3. Re:We should be tracking video card sales by perpenso · · Score: 1

      The box I mentioned actually dual boots Windows and Linux. :-)

  16. CPU speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When year after year most processors top out at around 3.5 gigahertz, it's hard to get excited to upgrade. Yes more cores, more instructions per cycle but really only incremental improvements. For many (most?) users there isn't anything that compelling to prompt an upgrade.

    My home office has an i7 950 clocked at 3.5 GHz (4 cores, 8 threads). Sure I'd like something a little more current but I don't see anything that offers earth shattering improvement. My bucks have been going to better drives and better video.

    1. Re:CPU speed by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I assume you're not using a stock Intel heatsink. I have to throttle mine to 1.6G or it hits 80 [Celsius] if I run 4 mencoders in parallel.

      I know what the solution is, but that involves making a decision. Well two, actually.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. I no longer need to upgrade every 1 to 2 years by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    At my shop I got a 6+ year old Dell XPS 9000 i7 920 which I used for my personal computer then then about 5.5 years ago I set it up as my POS system at my shop. Works just fine...

    I got a Dell Inspirion 1710 Laptop that is 10 years old and all I needed was to add a SSD drive to it and its work perfectly at the kitchen table for browsing the internet.

    At home I got an AMD 10 5800 which is about 3-4 years old and still doing what I need it to like photo/video editing/and playing games. If it wasn't for Ryzen I'd probably keep it for a few more years but it'll be set up as a HTPC.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Gartner, IDC, yadda yadda yadda by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    What does Netcraft say? Which did they confirm?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Gartner, IDC, yadda yadda yadda by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      BSD isn't dead, there are plenty of BSD machines out there. You can even buy them at your local enormo-mart....they're called PS4's.

    2. Re:Gartner, IDC, yadda yadda yadda by tepples · · Score: 1

      Not to mention Macs and iPads, which use part of the FreeBSD userland.

  20. how about dcent hardware by jmccue · · Score: 2

    No one seems to want desktops these days, but for laptops -- go back to 4:3 screen resolutions. The 16:9 resolutions SUCK PERIOD.

    I have no intention of buying any brand new laptop until screen ratios get back to what it was.

    1. Re:how about dcent hardware by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      Even better, 3:4 screen resolutions (not for laptops, obviously). For now, old supplies last -- I've just snagged an used but mint condition "professional" 1600x1200 one for $40 (only flaw: it weights like 5 tons so a regular mounting arm wouldn't hold it). Too bad, once such monitors degrade, we'll be fucked with only 16:9 crap left. Useless in landscape, can't be reasonably placed in portrait either.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:how about dcent hardware by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I'm using two 1920x1080s in an over-under configuration. As long as I don't need a display uninterrupted from top to bottom, it fills my needs for lots of pixels. No need to deal with the problems of CRTs: heat, weight, aging, and distortions.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:how about dcent hardware by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Actually, this monitor is LCD. A LCD that weights 17kg (I'm not joking! -- just checked with a personal scale).

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  21. Re:Virtualization and DIYers by ls671 · · Score: 1

    the biggest namely Linux KVM which battles against the vSphere. AWS/EC2, Oracle Cloud, Rackspace.

    are you confusing kvm and qemu?

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  22. Windows Troubles [Re:No longer a home appliance] by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    consumers don't care about [Windows] maintenance either

    They don't, and that's part of the problem: it requires too much babysitting and preventative work to keep running right.

    Malware is a big problem, especially when the PC is not configured properly or people visit too many shady sites or install shady software. PC vendors put all kinds of crap-ware on them and if you don't remove it, bleep often happens down the road.

    About a year ago my Windows 7 PC couldn't get Windows updates; a bad update file jammed further updates. It took me several hours of trouble-shooting to finally resolve it. If I had ignored the problem, like most consumers would, security patches wouldn't come through and it would probably get breached within a few months.

    There's other oddities I won't go into here.

  23. The Blame List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why I haven't upgraded:

    • 1. BAD GUY: Microsoft. Their obnoxiousness on Windows 10 and built in spyware has been too much. I'm not upgrading to that piece of shit and now my development is all for the web anyway. HEY MICROSOFT: You're idiots. Instead of giving people a reason to upgrade you gave them a reason to NOT upgrade.
    • 2. BAD GUY: Shit laptop keyboards. Older laptops have better keyboards than than chiclet "Island" crap. HEY MANUFACTURERS: No one gives a fuck about "thinner" any more. Try "better" instead.
    • 3. GOOD GUYS: Intel and AMD have made CPUs so powerful that even a 5 year old CPU has more than enough juice.
    • 4. GOOD GUYS: Cellular Phones. Fine for anything but typing. See 2.

      Conclusion: Unless you're a gamer your old PC is fine.

    1. Re:The Blame List by tepples · · Score: 1

      You can skip out on 1 and 2 by buying a refurbished ThinkPad with GNU/Linux from Technoethical.

  24. junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unless you want to spend big money, the run of the mill computers in the stores are too slow and underpowered, and standard laptop screens are too low res. I'd never buy any of them until the price of more powerful computers comes down.

  25. Duh... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Let's see, Intel and AMD's offerings have been complete shit until very recently. your 10 year old i7 is absolutely fast enough and in some instances as fast as a i7 computer from 6 months ago.

    Only recently did both chip makers get off their asses and offer any kind of a performance boost that will make a difference and get people interested in buying a PC.

    Watch sales to double in the next 12 months.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Duh... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      There were no i7 CPUs, ten years ago. Close, but not yet 10 years ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Duh... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      your 10 year old i7

      No such thing, the first i7's were released until November 2008.

      in some instances as fast as a i7 computer from 6 months ago.

      That is because the fuckers at Intel slap the i7 brand on damn near everything from low clocked dual-core ultra-mobile parts to high end desktop monsters.

      Progress has definitely been slower than in the past and intel's "mainstream first" strategy has left the high end market confused but nevertheless a Broadwell-e i7 will be substantially faster than the corresponding original i7.

      Whether you will notice that speed of course depends on what you are using the computer for.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Duh... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The only real performance increases as i7's go was from the first generation to the second generation. Otherwise, the only way they've made them significantly faster is piling on the cores. Going from a quad-core Sandy Bridge (2nd generation) to a current quad-core i7 gets you maybe a 50% boost in performance. It's just not worth it, unless you're willing to pay for the 6-core and 8-core versions, and even then that only matters if whatever you're doing can take advantage of the cores as the single thread performance isn't that much improved.

  26. Re:Windows Troubles [Re:No longer a home appliance by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    You've just described why I pay the Apple Tax. The lack of tech support for family members alone is worth every cent. Every time I have to help out someone with a PC it takes hours to load updates, remove malware or PUPs, and restart...restart...crap clean...malware bytes...scan...restart... I blame the idiots around the world attacking the system, but the overall experience sucks. We have one windows machine, in full Quad Core glory with a huge graphics card for gaming. Bought it off the seconds rack at Microcenter, resolved the wifi problem that got it returned, and now get 60 fps at 1080 lines...which is sufficient. I don't have to maintain that one....

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:Nailed it! by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    I was in the market for a Skylake chip when MS announced their forced windows 10 scheme. I quickly went out and bought a Devil's Canyon i7. It's running windows 7, and I'm going to have this computer for a long, long, long time.

  29. Re:So you're saying that... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Most likely yes...
    Your 6400+ was cutting edge in 2007, but it's several generations behind and 10 years old... Modern mobile processors are likely more powerful while using a fraction of the power. There's no technical reason why a modern phone couldn't connect to an hdmi display and bluetooth keyboard/mouse and do everything that your 2007 desktop can.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  30. Re:Lack of Windows 7 support in new pcs is the rea by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    So... You have turned off the "Diagnostics Tracking Service", right? All users obviously do that. In the last month, I reinstalled two Windows 7 machines (first one, with a recovery disk restoring to a Windows 7 without service pack, the other with an install DVD that went up all to SP1). Before updating, I set the Windows Update settings in such a way it would not install recommended updates (only important).

    I still ended up with "Diagnostics Tracking Service" on both machines. Granted, it's easy to disable but it means it's marked as an "important update" and cannot be avoided.

    Unless you disabled that service, you *are* being tracked... assuming it's the only one that does. We don't know for certain.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  31. Re:The IBM Personal computer? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    IBM PC has maybe 512 MB of memory

    How is a 16-bit CPU going to address that amount of memory, even with segmentation to 20-bit... ;-)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  32. Dell does not want to sell me one... by samuel.progin · · Score: 1

    I was about to order a laptop from them. Their website for my country is bugged, so that I cannot order it. They did not answer the ticket I raised, and their call center give a middle finger. I will not fight further to spend 2k...

  33. half-information by AkumaKuruma · · Score: 1

    these figures only cover pre-built computers, such as HP/Dell/Apple. This does not take into account home PC users that build their own computers from parts. Granted the DIY market has suffered past couple months due to crypto-mining eating up all the midrange video cards, as well as newer technology being released, which has caused some folks to "hold off" buying

  34. Re:So you're saying that... by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's no technical reason why a modern phone couldn't connect to an hdmi display and bluetooth keyboard/mouse and do everything that your 2007 desktop can.

    Other than that emulation of an x86 executable on an ARM processor is slower than running it natively on an x86-64 processor.

  35. I for one... by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    The past monthI had to buy a new laptop. I ended up buying an used T450 on e-bay, instead of a new T470, because the model from two years ago was more than enough for my needs, and it was almost $1k cheaper. I've been a serial buyer of PCs since the concept existed, and, being on the power user end of the spectrum, it's the first time that such a thing has happened to me. Always I had to have the new whatever, be it 16Mb RAM, or a color screen, or USB... This time that would be M.2 NVMe SSD (the acronyms are starting to pile up), and USB 3.1. But you know, the difference is not so big in daily use, for a laptop at least. I can live with SATA SSD and USB 3.0. And in a couple of years, get the novelties at a reduced price.

    Also my wife wanted a sexy extremely light ultrabook like the Zen, but she has ended up with my old laptop. Another unrealized sale.

    What I mean is that those are two purchases that don't appear in the statistics, simply because good enough keeps being good enough for longer.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  36. Learning programming by tepples · · Score: 1

    Getting people to buy their very first PC is also agonizingly difficult now. How do you talk someone into investing in this big clunky box when their PPC does everything the big clunky box does?

    Four words: Advanced Placement Computer Science. Phones traditionally haven't been very useful for learning programming. Even when docked to a Bluetooth keyboard and HDMI monitor, their security models are hostile to compilers.

    1. Re:Learning programming by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      Four words: Advanced Placement Computer Science. Phones traditionally haven't been very useful for learning programming. Even when docked to a Bluetooth keyboard and HDMI monitor, their security models are hostile to compilers.

      Yeah, that's about the same as telling me my car doesn't have enough gas to get to where I'm going. I'm going to get more gas. In the case of PPC's, root the thing and boom, in case of Android PPC's, you got full linux distro and compilers at your fingertips, literally.

      No sympathy for iPhone people, you bought into the walled garden. Now you get to live in it.

    2. Re:Learning programming by tepples · · Score: 1

      In the case of PPC's, root the thing and boom

      Good luck for someone who's just beginning to learn how to program to learn how to root an iPod touch, iPhone, or iPad. And even on a device that runs Android, a root often means a full wipe.

      in case of Android PPC's, you got full linux distro and compilers at your fingertips, literally.

      You are referring to things like the "GNURoot Debian" and "XSDL" apps, right?

      No sympathy for iPhone people, you bought into the walled garden.

      If a child received an iPod touch, iPhone, or iPad as a gift from parents or other relatives, how exactly did he or she "buy in"?

  37. Use Snap to get two 8:9 viewports by tepples · · Score: 1

    Would you prefer an 8:9 aspect ratio, 12% taller than it is wide? If so, take your 16:9 display and snap a window to fill half of it. That's one advantage of a laptop over a tablet: split screen is a standard window management feature.

  38. Computer Is Smarter Than Me by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    I do not have the ability nor the inclination to get more advanced computer power until some breakthrough point is reached. For example Libra Office does a wonderful job. Chess on computer is so strong it can be discouraging. I have unlimited high sped net so surfing the net is not going to be better. i'm not into games so i don't need that type of gear. All in all if a PC dies on me i can get a good, used replacement under $200. so the industry needs to drop the next really big thing in front of me to cause me to buy stronger computing hardware.

  39. Who needs to buy a new computer every year...? by jaunty · · Score: 1

    I bought a seriously good PC from Dell, about 5 years ago, for my wife's bookkeeping business. Also got one of their 27" widescreen monitors at the same time, so put a reasonable graphics card in the PC, and increased the RAM to the max at the time (24GB). Hard drives are standard spinning drives, but really large, and with some redundancy factor as it also contains a RAID card and an extra drive for backup.

    She's still happier than hell with it. Lots of serious horsepower (accounting programs and large spreadsheets is what she works with) to handle anything. Fantastic "no tired eyes" screen resolution back then, and still a good performer now.

    What is a newer computer going to give us that we don't have now?

    --
    Why did I post this? Ask me now!
  40. We're teched up... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Hardly need a PC with what phones can do today :-)