Slashdot Mirror


Millennials Unearth an Amazing Hack to Get Free TV: the Antenna (wsj.com)

From a report on WSJ: Dan Sisco has discovered a technology that allows him to access half a dozen major TV channels, completely free. "I was just kind of surprised that this is technology that exists (alternative source)," says Mr. Sisco, 28 years old. "It's been awesome. It doesn't log out and it doesn't skip." Let's hear a round of applause for TV antennas, often called "rabbit ears," a technology invented roughly seven decades ago, long before there was even a cord to be cut, which had been consigned to the technology trash can along with cassette tapes and VCRs. The antenna is mounting a quiet comeback, propelled by a generation that never knew life before cable television, and who primarily watch Netflix , Hulu and HBO via the internet. Antenna sales in the U.S. are projected to rise 7 percent in 2017 to nearly 8 million units, according to the Consumer Technology Association, a trade group. Mr. Sisco, an M.B.A. student in Provo, Utah, made his discovery after inviting friends over to watch the Super Bowl in 2014. The online stream he found to watch the game didn't have regular commercials -- disappointing half of his guests who were only interested in the ads. "An antenna was not even on my radar," he says. He went online and discovered he could buy one for $20 and watch major networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS free.

564 comments

  1. Free TV? Who knew? by Zecheus · · Score: 1

    The anecdotes in this article are quite funny.

    1. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you even want to watch TV anymore? Even if it is free to air, why commit to someone else's schedule? And if you want the latest ridiculous bullshit propaganda, you can find those TV stations and their crap on youtube.

  2. If you color the tip of the antenna with a by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 4, Funny

    green marker, it greatly improves the picture quality.

    1. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by James+Carnley · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the joke for those of us who didn't grow up with antennas?

    2. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can you explain the joke for those of us who didn't grow up with antennas?

      The joke is about CDs (compact discs) and coloring the edge of the CD to improve sound quality.

      http://www.snopes.com/music/me...

    3. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It is a reference to when CDs first came out and people were still making the switch from analog taped to digital. Many "audiophiles" who didn't understand the new technology were taken advantage of when they were convinced they could purchase special high priced markers and Mark the edge of the CD to "reduce the noise from bouncing ambient light" and improve the sound quality. It was later claimed the same effect could be achieved with a regular Sharpie (which was true since the effect was LITERALLY nil) and all of us who understood the technology laughed and cried, sometimes simultaneously.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      This hack only works for Bruce Banner.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those audiophiles would have claim they can even hear the difference.

    6. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      All of the ones about whom I was writing, which is why I used quotes around the word :^) It is probably fair to say that it was more than half. The power of suggestion is quite effective in such subjective matters.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, using certain markers on the edge of CDs and DVDs might actually make the sound WORSE. If you use the wrong kind, you run the risk of the marker solvent eating away at the glue or other protective parts, thereby increasing the speed of oxidation. True it would still take years to have a real impact, but humorous nonetheless.

    8. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the explanation for those of use who didn't grow up with CDs? (Just kidding, I grew up with an antenna TV that had a sonic clicker for a remote and physical solenoids that you could hear clunking when the channel changed. Actually I had a TV before remotes existed, but the sonic remote holds a dear place in my heart.)

    9. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      All of them. That sort of thing is what keeps Monster Cables in business.

    10. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the old Zenith Space Command remotes were pretty cool.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenith_Electronics#Remote_controls

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    11. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the explanation for those of use who didn't grow up with CDs? (Just kidding, I grew up with an antenna TV that had a sonic clicker for a remote and physical solenoids that you could hear clunking when the channel changed. Actually I had a TV before remotes existed, but the sonic remote holds a dear place in my heart.)

      Oh, yeah!

      We had both of those things. A rooftop antenna with the "clicker box", AND a Zenith TV with the Ultrasonic, tuning-fork remote.

      Good times, good times...

    12. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does improve the listening experience, when it kills the DRM:
      https://news.slashdot.org/story/02/05/14/0040215/post-it-notes-vs-copy-inhibited-cds

    13. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We always had remotes, they were called kids. Junior, change the channel to HeeHaw for me.

    14. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by mikael · · Score: 1

      A long time ago on USENET, people claimed that they could improve the signal/noise ratio of their CD's by painting the rims green with a magic marker. A pen called Balonium was the one that the "experts" recommended.

      http://www.tomsguide.com/forum...

      https://www.audio-forums.com/t...

      "Do a web search for "Barry Ornitz" and "CD Optical Impedance
      Matching Fluid" to find the origin of this substance.

      Note especially that it was published on April 1st. "

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    15. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those audiophiles would have claim they can even hear the difference.

      You mean "Audiophools" right?

      The best way with them is to say the more money you spend (not the more broke you are - there's a difference), the better anything sounds. That's all that matters - money spent.

      If you can't spend a dollar now on something, then you really should've and you're missing out. And you'll be missing out until you spend that dollar on the gizmo. After which we have gizmo B which you also need, but you're missing out because you don't have the money.

    16. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you explain the joke for those of us who didn't grow up with antennas?

      The joke is about CDs (compact discs) and coloring the edge of the CD to improve sound quality.

      http://www.snopes.com/music/me...

      I still use an antenna. Internet provider keeps trying to sign me up for cable, and their unnecessary boxes, I ignore. Have a Netflix subscription for any movies I may want. Next to go the landline - use as a backup as cell service spotty at my location. No one ever calls except spammers.

    17. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer "audiopiles".

    18. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Megane · · Score: 1

      Ironically, one of the dumber DRM schemes for audio CDs could be defeated by using a magic marker to color over the DRM data.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    19. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Megol · · Score: 1

      Well I consider myself an audiophile however I'd never buy monster cables (unless they have some real advantage - like how they look, how flexible they are etc.), tiny stickers to place near interconnect cables, special stones to place on the expensive equipment etc. Much pseudo-science and magical thinking in some circles.

      What I do is buy reasonable priced headphones with good sound reproduction (currently using Philips Fidelity X1 somewhat modified) and a good source e.g. my current system is a MSI GS60 which uses a dedicated headphone DAC/amplifier design avoiding the analog processing of the normal audio codec. I actually replaced the standard headphone cable (something I've always considered suspect as designing a cable isn't hard) as they simply weren't good in a previous system, could hear a difference in blind A/B testing and measuring the response/resistance/capacitance showed that they should indeed produce audible distortions. The replacement? A cheap ass cable selected more for flexibility than anything else but didn't have the same reproduction problems. Doubt that I'd need it now with the current setup (the DAC/Amp are capable of driving difficult cables without problem) but still...

    20. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the gold-plated Monster Cables for superior video fidelity!

    21. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      And you didn't even need to be in line-of-sight!

    22. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Meski · · Score: 1

      Thought it was the (Panasonic??) green line tuning system. (where you fine tuned it for narrowest green stripe on the screen)

    23. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those audiophiles would have claim they can even hear the difference.

      If they didn't have a stock 20-minute long diatribe about how they conducted their own triple-blind placebo-controlled trial to prove they can tell the difference on Edison cylinders of Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries", then they have to hand in their "audiophie" card.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    24. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there were any business' selling $100 "cd pens"

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    25. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So THAT's what these things are for! Friend of mine still has two, I always wondered why he kept those noisemakers around.

      Isn't even a sonic one more agreeable for your ears? In volume AND pitch?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Paywalled by nicholasjay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Article is Paywalled. Alternate Source?

    I grew up using an antenna for all of my TV needs. Now I have a TiVo Roamio OTA with a lifetime subscription (which I got a for a couple hundred dollars) for all of my DVR and app (Netflix, Hulu, etc) needs.

    1. Re:Paywalled by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I grew up using an antenna for all of my TV needs. Now I have a TiVo Roamio OTA with a lifetime subscription (which I got a for a couple hundred dollars) for all of my DVR and app (Netflix, Hulu, etc) needs.

      Same here, although I found the Tivo interface with Amazon Prime, Netflix somewhat clunky and sloooooww.

      I only use the Tivo OTA Roamio to DVR my over the air stations, and I also have Tivo Minis that connect to it for each room with a TV.

      I use an Amazon FireTV for my streaming....much better for Netflix and Amazon Prime (it works with 4K offerings too). I also have Playstation VUE on it for my old 'cable' news stations, etc.

      But I found the Tivo set up with 4 tuners was less $$ than a DIY set up, and was plug and play for the most part.

      Going this route, I dropped my TV payments from about $113-$118/mo on ATT Uverse to $35/mo I pay for the Playstation VUE, although I do see a $10/mo rate increase coming there.

      I don't count my internet into the equation as that I have a business connection, and would have internet regardless of TV needs. That is $69/mo with Cox Business Cable.

      I recommend folks looking to cut the cord and stream, to look into getting a business connection. It has NO data caps, no ports blocked, often with at least a low level SLA....and it doesn't really cost any more than what they're gouging residential people for for ISP service.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Paywalled by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

    3. Re:Paywalled by nicholasjay · · Score: 1

      Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

      "There's no batteries to run out!", they exclaimed.

    4. Re:Paywalled by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      In a few more years they're likely to "discover" a hack on their smartphone that allows them to actually talk to people rather than text them. As a bonus they'll realize that they don't have to pay anything extra for it either.

    5. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, found news stand, bought newspaper, I've been tapping and swiping it for half an hour now and it still shows the same page. Halp!

    6. Re:Paywalled by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      I recommend folks looking to cut the cord and stream, to look into getting a business connection.

      Assuming one has an ISP willing to provide business service to residential areas.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    7. Re: Paywalled by bestweasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried one of those. Fairly low resolution but huge screen size for a portable; manual zoom and the other controls are basic but work well, though not when it's windy for some reason. Easy to read in bright sunlight but sadly there's no backlight. Water resistance is poor though I saw someone using one as a makeshift hat in a downpour! Annotations can be made with an ink or graphite stylus. Cut and Paste works but is messy and Copy is quite slow. I've had mine for several weeks and as far as I can tell, it never needs recharging. I can't get the updates to work though.

    8. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same problem with some of those plastic screens on the receptions desks on hotels. The pictures just don't move or interact. I guess they must be broken.

    9. Re:Paywalled by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      My only ISP option is Comcast. If I can survive with 25 Mbps connection speeds or less, the overhead of a business account vs. residential is tiny. But above that level, the price difference grows rapidly. It's common for me to have two people in the house playing Minecraft while three others stream video, so I don't think 25 Mbps will work.

      We have a Tivo Bolt, and the performance of Amazon Prime and Netflix is fine on that. I don't know if I'm more tolerant of slowness than you, or if the Bolt has better performance.

    10. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better... you can steal all the books you want...
      There are these buildings, usually hidden next to schools and court houses that they call, I think, leberias? Librareas? Library, yea' I think they are called Library.

      It's soooo funny.. They let anyone read all the books, magazines, and such for FREE!
      I just don't understand why the one in my town has not been raided yet?
      I mean, it just CAN'T be legal for a person to consume information without paying for it right?

    11. Re:Paywalled by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Assuming one has an ISP willing to provide business service to residential areas.

      Of course they do...have you not heard of "home businesses"...?

      ;)

      There's lots of them out there and they need service....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Paywalled by clovis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

      "There's no batteries to run out!", they exclaimed.

      Oh, no no no, not printed newspapers.

      Those things can catch fire.
      Just try it. Spread one out on the floor or sofa and just light one corner of the thing. See what happens. You'll want to be able to put it out, so be sure to have a full bladder before you begin.

      When I was a kid, all we had to play with was fire. And we were glad to have it.

    13. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Article is Paywalled. Alternate Source?

      Let me guess: reading the article costs exactly the same as a table-top antenna for receiving digital television.

    14. Re: Paywalled by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      You joke, but I have long-pressed words in physical magazines in the expectation of getting a pop-up definition.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    15. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next up,a generation that does not act Superior to younger generation like ageing is a skill.
      I am over 50 and this is repetitive.

    16. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were doing this with smartphones when they first came out. They would go to a university bookstore, look at the books on their subject of learning, and photograph the pages they needed to use. Thus the book publishers started shrinkwrapping their books in plastic with the downloadable course materials in a CD.

    17. Re:Paywalled by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      No but my tablet works in the dark by itself i'd have to have a flashlight and a newspaper to read in a dark room.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    18. Re:Paywalled by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah i've been using libraries for years and still don't understand how they work.

      The local one even lets you borrow ebooks now :)

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    19. Re:Paywalled by Megane · · Score: 1

      My amazing hack was to feed the antenna (which has been in the attic of this two-story house since at least 1979!) into the input of the distribution amp that the cable company put in a box on the side of the house. Instantly the whole house gets free TV.

      The next hack (after summer ends) would be to put another antenna up there, and wire them together to try to get a distant (but in-market!) channel in a different direction.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    20. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When I was a kid, all we had to play with was fire. And we were glad to have it.

      You had fire? You lucky, lucky bastard. When we were kids, fire was not yet invented.

    21. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have CableOne as the only ISP in my area. I've been bumped up twice to more expensive residential plans because of the bandwidth requirements of my job and their ridiculous bandwidth caps. I'm already paying $230 a month for internet and cable service (about $75 for the cable, so $165 JUST for internet), but the cheapest business plan they offer is over $500 a month.

      I don't have issues with blocked ports or questionable activity in general with my service, but it fucking sucks to not have any options. I live in a rural area.

    22. Re:Paywalled by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > put another antenna up there, and wire them together to try to get a distant
      > (but in-market!) channel in a different direction

      Doesn't work. Or more precisely, it's a LOT more complicated than just feeding two antennas into a diplexer to combine them into a single cable.

      Using a diplexer to combine VHF & UHF from an antenna with DVB-S from a satellite dish works, because the frequency band of the signals coming from the antenna doesn't overlap with the frequency band of the signals coming from the dish.

      Using a diplexer to combine an antenna tuned to VHF with an antenna tuned to UHF works, because the two frequency bands are still separate, both antennas are pointed in exactly the same direction, and the manufacturer can precisely balance the impedance between the two.

      Using a diplexer to combine two VHF+UHF antennas pointing in different directions usually makes matters worse. Assuming you're able to properly match the impedance between both antenna circuits (not guaranteed), there's still the matter of multipath interference.

      Suppose you have two antennas... one aimed northeast, and one aimed west. To the northwest and north, there's a cluster of skyscrapers or a mountain. You want to watch channel 35, whose transmitter is 15 miles northeast of you.

      If you connect only the antenna that's aimed northeast, and it's a directional antenna, you'll probably get a good, strong signal. Some of channel 35's signal will reflect off of the skyscrapers or mountain at an angle, but your northeastward-pointing antenna won't even see most of those weak reflections.

      HOWEVER... your antenna that's aimed westward IS going to scoop up some of those reflections. Because radio waves propagate at the speed of light, the reflected signals will arrive a fraction of a second later than the ones traveling in a straight line. If you combine the signals from both antennas, you'll NOW end up with a signal that has strong multipath interference. With analog TV, multipath interference causes ghosting. With digital TV, it either makes no difference at all, or leaves you with an unwatchable signal that stutters and breaks up.

      Moral of the story: if you have two antennas, give each antenna its own dedicated cable all the way to the tuner. Combining the signals from two antennas into one cable using a diplexer rarely works well.

    23. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEAR GOD!!!! We need more research to find out if they are more dangerous than lithium ion batteries. If these paper things spontaneously combust in a suitcase they could down an airplane!!!!!!

      We need to find the source of this "paper" stuff people keep talking about and destroy it so that no man, woman, or child will have to suffer first degree burns.

      A quick research and I have discovered the only way to stop these fires is using a very dangerous substance called Dihydrogen Monoxide. Dihydrogen Monoxidestuff has been present in all cancer cases and every years kills tens of thousands of children. You can find all the facts about Dihydrogen Monoxidestuff at http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html.

      Grab your pitch forks and LED torch lights (we do not want a fire after all) and meet me down at the city hall. We will make them understand the danger of this paper stuff.

    24. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid, all we had to play with was fire.

      Growing up in 5000BC could not have been easy.

    25. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work ISP tech support. We used to offer such service, but discontinued it because no one bought it. Funny enough though, whenever there's a problem they all scream about how they need their internet because they're running a business. You'd think with all these 'businesses', someone would have bought the business class service...

    26. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halp! Does anyone have an ad-blocker that works with newspaper? I am so sick of the ads and I understand that they need to be there to keep the price of the newspaper low, but let the others read the ads, I do not want to see them. They are very intrusive and are there on almost every page I view. They seem to be tracking my location too, which is creepy; most of them are for businesses right here in my city! Some of them seem to be offering deals that are too good to be true as well, which is always a red flag. How can I be sure that is I call the number listed, I won't get some kind of virus?

    27. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's like 500 megabytes of data there, and photos too! There's information on sports, and business, and even foreign stuff!

    28. Re:Paywalled by clovis · · Score: 1

      > When I was a kid, all we had to play with was fire. And we were glad to have it.

      You had fire? You lucky, lucky bastard. When we were kids, fire was not yet invented.

      Yes, there was. But back then we called it "jailbait".

    29. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swipe lighter, the next page will come up.

  4. This is not news, news for nerds, or interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck.

  5. Using a TV antenna to watch TV by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they said that MBA's were useless. Sure showed them.

    1. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by dysmal · · Score: 2

      I wish i had mod points for this!

    2. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by msmash · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used one of mine :)

    3. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But your comment negates the mod. Unless your leet /. employee status overrides that.

    4. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      Whoooosh!!

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  6. Is this sarcasm? by clonehappy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

    an M.B.A student

    Oh, nevermind.

    1. Re:Is this sarcasm? by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast [expletive] TV?

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time. It's not like kids are born knowing how to wash clothes on a washboard either. Some of them don't even know how to wash clothes with modern technology by the time they go to college. I've known brilliant people who didn't know how to use a mop because nobody had ever taught them.

      --
      Real lawyers write in C++
    2. Re:Is this sarcasm? by clonehappy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I get it, but this guy isn't that much younger than me. Maybe if it was a 15 year old kid or something...I know what a telegraph is even though I've never even seen a telegram let alone used the equipment!

    3. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its like radio with moving pictures!

    4. Re:Is this sarcasm? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.

      In this day and age, with information literally at one's fingertips, there is no excuse for not being informed on a multitude of subjects. If you don't know something, you look it up.

      There are many things I didn't know how to do, but guess what, I learned on my own, either by asking someone who was doing the thing I wanted to know, or read a book (pre internet) or now, DuckDuckGo it.

      Perhaps if people such as the one in the article would get out more and experience the world they wouldn't look like such dumb shits to the rest of us.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

      Sadly, this is a real phenomenon, and it isn't limited to Millennials.

      My folks had a couple in their mid-40s over for dinner a few years back (2014ish, I think). At some point during the conversation it came up that my parents used an antenna to watch TV, rather than subscribing to cable. The wife insisted that TV channels aren't available for free, so no matter what my parents called it, what they were really doing was stealing TV from the cable companies. It took my parents and her husband a good 20 minutes to convince her that it was not, in fact, a form of theft and that OTA TV is, in fact, freely available to anyone willing to put up an antenna.

      Mind you, this woman was old enough that she wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home, since it wasn't widely available during her childhood. The fact that she didn't remember that or know that it was still a thing was astounding.

      So yes, these sorts of people really exist, and it's not just MBAs.

    6. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio? what dat? Like Rdio or SoundCloud or something?

    7. Re:Is this sarcasm? by JeffOwl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't "before" anybody's time. Broadcast TV has been available continuously for the guy's entire life.

    8. Re:Is this sarcasm? by LatePaul · · Score: 2

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.
      In this day and age, with information literally at one's fingertips, there is no excuse for not being informed on a multitude of subjects. If you don't know something, you look it up..

      In order to look something up you have to know it exists.

    9. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gilgaron · · Score: 5, Funny

      So... how long did you wait to start mailing her invoices for the radio subscription in her car?

    10. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        I've known brilliant people who didn't know how to use a mop because nobody had ever taught them.

      Yeah, but I take it he/she knew that mops existed. The idiot in question was surprised that broadcast TV existed. He's 28. That's stupid.

    11. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast [expletive] TV?

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time. It's not like kids are born knowing how to wash clothes on a washboard either.

      Even back in 1989 I encountered a college student who only knew how to make popcorn with a little bag that goes in the microwave.
      The thought of a pot with a lid, and oil, was completely novel to her.

    12. Re:Is this sarcasm? by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      In order to look something up you have to know it exists.

      You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

    13. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND the widely publicized transition to DTV was only 8 years ago.

    14. Re:Is this sarcasm? by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      Even more to the point..

      Broadcast TV is just now competitive in terms of amount of content being available OTA. Back in the 70's, we had access to only 3 channels (1 for each network) and no DVR capability where I grew up. So, when cable came along, it has several orders of magnitude more content available. Throw in a VCR on top of that and OTA made little sense. It was not competitive.

      Now.. since OTA has gone digital, they have introduced digital subcarrier channels. Where analog could only have 1 channel, it is not uncommon for there to be 4-5 channels available on the same frequency.

      Use Amazon, Netflix, and Hulu for the premium content, then use OTA for the dozens of channels. (I now live in northern Colorado and I have 56 channels available OTA. I am located in a fairly rural area).

    15. Re:Is this sarcasm? by unixisc · · Score: 0

      Precisely! Somehow, a 28 year old doesn't qualify as a millenial. A millenial would be anyone in their teens, up to 20. People who were born around 2000

    16. Re:Is this sarcasm? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Seconded (sorry, I posted above or I would have used mod points).

    17. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Before your time? I'm the same age as this guy and I remember adjusting my rabbit ears to get better reception. I think he's just an idiot.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    18. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      I know these are all arbitrary distinctions anyway, but technically Generation Y === Millenial. Being born in the early 2000s is the end of the Millenial generation.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    19. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kid is 28. Broadcast TV is not before his time.

      Just stop

    20. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, his "discovery" is probably not that T.V. antenna technology exists but that there is so much content available for free that can be picked up with an antenna.

    21. Re:Is this sarcasm? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Americans are stupid. Keep this in mind if you are marketing to them. Call a clothesline a solar powered or wind powered dryer, and charge more.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    22. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get it, but this guy isn't that much younger than me. Maybe if it was a 15 year old kid or something...I know what a telegraph is even though I've never even seen a telegram let alone used the equipment!

      Hell many of the houses in my neighborhood still have old TV antennas on their roofs, I don't how many are still in use but they are there plain to see and most kids are inquisitive enough to ask what they are for.

      They sell HDTV antennas at the hardware stores (of course most of these millennial hipsters are renters anyway and even many of these so-called "makers" have never set foot in one) and in the electronics sections of Target/Walmart/etc do sell them there as well for set-top use.

      There is really no damn excuse for someone over the age of 25 not knowing about OTA TV. At that age I still expect them to know what a floppy diskette is even.

    23. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.

      Broadcast TV is a current technology.

      The issue is that we have so much more technology than we need, and we have become so affluent, and so wasteful, most can afford to remain completely ignorant of the less expensive options.

    24. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

      Sadly, this is a real phenomenon, and it isn't limited to Millennials.

      My folks had a couple in their mid-40s over for dinner a few years back (2014ish, I think). At some point during the conversation it came up that my parents used an antenna to watch TV, rather than subscribing to cable. The wife insisted that TV channels aren't available for free, so no matter what my parents called it, what they were really doing was stealing TV from the cable companies. It took my parents and her husband a good 20 minutes to convince her that it was not, in fact, a form of theft and that OTA TV is, in fact, freely available to anyone willing to put up an antenna.

      Mind you, this woman was old enough that she wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home, since it wasn't widely available during her childhood. The fact that she didn't remember that or know that it was still a thing was astounding.

      So yes, these sorts of people really exist, and it's not just MBAs.

      She would be correct in England though.
      http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/

    25. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I was moving to my new house, my millennial cousin came with me to the moving van rental store. It was a hot day, so on the drive home he complained that the van didn't have air conditioning. I told him to open the window. He fiddled around with his door for a minute, then declared "The windows in this van don't open." I had to explain how to roll down the window with the hand crank. He'd never been in a car without power windows.

    26. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd say that's more an example of how effective the MPAA/RIAA have been at brainwashing people into thinking that they should have to pay for every movie/TV show they watch and every song they hear. Because if you don't, it's piracy!

    27. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She probably has satellite radio and is paying a subscription

    28. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.

      Before their time? The technology has been in continuous use for over 70 years. It has not disappeared and knowledge of it lost. Steam engines were "before [their] time". The telegraph was "before [their] time". But broadcast TV, definitely not "before [their] time".

    29. Re:Is this sarcasm? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Now.. since OTA has gone digital, they have introduced digital subcarrier channels. Where analog could only have 1 channel, it is not uncommon for there to be 4-5 channels available on the same frequency.

      Where you live, perhaps. Where I live, you could get 6 channels with the old analog system, and you're lucky to be able to get two since the digital switchover.

    30. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Exactly! So one for FM and one for AM... if that works then may as well send one for AUX.

    31. Re: Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus1 is right. It's people who came into adulthood around the millennium, not born around it.

    32. Re: Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read the title of the story out loud in the car to give my wife a laugh, and our 12 year old son said, "Seriously? What an amazing idiot."

      He's never seen them ("rabbit ears") and I don't think we've ever talked about it, but he knew exactly what they were and what they were used for.

    33. Re:Is this sarcasm? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      The joke goes like this: an engineer is first day on a job. A foreman comes to him, hands him a broomstick and says "Sweep the floor. From here to over there.". "But, ... but ... I'm an engineer!", "Sigh, okay, give it here, I'll show you".

    34. Re: Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares about England??

      (In this case, that is. Typically, we love you guys.)

    35. Re:Is this sarcasm? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah - my brothers' 8 year old daughter was digging through some old stuff and found a VHS of Disney's Beauty and the Beast. She's recently seen the live action movie and excitedly asked "Do we have anything that can play these big fat DVD's?".

      To be honest I'm surprised she even knew what a DVD was.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    36. Re:Is this sarcasm? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      In order to look something up you have to know it exists.

      You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

      Little known fact about wikipedia - go to any random page and click the first link, and then the first link in the page that loads, and repeat the process. After around 15 clicks you end up at philosophy :-)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    37. Re: Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 23, definitely always knew about broadcast TV. A 28 year old definitely should know, especially when all that noise about switching to digital happened.

    38. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be using it wrong it took it took 38.
      from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I used https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... to start.

    39. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can confirm. Before the internet was mostly used to make money, it was mostly used to share information, and the WHOLE internet was like this. I still remember downloading a 240x200 or so video of a professor pouring liquid oxygen into a BBQ of coals. Took a long time to download at 28.8 but it was worth it! I miss the old internet. If it wasn't for the awful bandwidth, I think I prefer the internet when failure to understand what parity is meant you didn't pass the access test.

    40. Re:Is this sarcasm? by mikael · · Score: 1

      It's kind of funny. My dad used to have a large boombox style AIWA radio which took all types of metal oxide tape cassettes. There were different types of metal oxide tape, which by adjusting a particular level would provide optimum sound quality. When these appear on collectors pages, they don't know what all the different levers are for.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    41. Re: Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

      Broadcast TV, at least in the US, is censored. They don't broadcast fucking.

    42. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go to somewhere like Maplins, they sell portable satellite dishes for campers that can be packed away in a suitcase. Looks like something that could be wired up to a PC with a satellite board.

    43. Re:Is this sarcasm? by mikael · · Score: 1

      I sometimes I could make a map of Wikipedia and Wolfram Mathworld and find the shortest path between two concepts using Google Maps.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    44. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite saying is: ignorance is not a position of strength.

      Not being informed makes you ripe for exploitation.,

    45. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I'm in my forties and cable has been available for as long as I can remember. So a person in his/her forties could have grown up with cable TV only, especially if they grew up living in an apartment.

    46. Re:Is this sarcasm? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      No. If you are at all educated - an MBA, for whatever it's worth, is a damn master's degree - there is no excuse for thinking TV didn't exist until streaming services started online. We're not talking about a 10 year old, we're talking about someone in their mid 20s or so. And not knowing how to use something is not the same as not knowing something exists. AND does this mean the person never watched any movies or tv shows what that showed people from pre-2009 watching TV via antenna? AND - biggest and here - does this mean he's never had a car and listened to the radio? This is fake news to generate page views for ad revenue.

    47. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brilliant people who didn't know how to [...] because nobody had ever taught them.

      People? Are you talking about computers, highschool kids or what?

      Brilliant people teach themselves.

    48. Re:Is this sarcasm? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes but within 10 clicks you always end up at the same place: An article about Hitler.

    49. Re:Is this sarcasm? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I remember when my daughter was little and came across a rotary telephone in a box in the garage. Her comment: "so that's why we say 'dial the phone'!"

      It hadn't occurred to me how weird that phrase must sound if you've only ever seen touch-tone phones.

    50. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    51. Re:Is this sarcasm? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I agree with this.
      We should start calling antennas piracy too.

      Then there is the BS of refusing service to people who have actually paid for your product.
      Such as the current blocking of netflix VPN users and HDCP copy protection, copy protection in general.

      Then there is the poor treatment of paying customers
      The unskippable anti piracy warnings and ads on blurays and dvds that you don't see on a pirated copy, DRM that makes your game run slow but the cracked versions run better (Rime). (Rime was released DRM free shortly after as a result tho.)

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    52. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm in my forties and cable has been available for as long as I can remember.

      I never said it was unavailable. I said it wasn't widely available and I was correct in saying so.

      It wasn't until the mid-1970s that cable finally passed the milestone of being available in half of the markets being served by OTA TV. By the end of that decade (when this woman would've been about 10), cable was just shy of being into 16 million homes (20%). Cable didn't get its big break until the Cable Act of 1984, which is about the time that I'd guess this woman would have been entering high school. By the end of the 1980s cable was in 53 million households (58%), so while it's entirely probable that her family had cable by the time she graduated high school, it's unlikely that she grew up with it.

      I'll grant that I should have phrased it as "this woman was old enough that she likely wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home", but otherwise, I stand by what I said. Even if we ignore the fact that she grew up in a small town (rural markets were generally the last to be served), the odds of her having cable on her tenth birthday would still only be around 20%.

    53. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The "wikipedia excursion" is an example of what is, for me, the great value of the internet: it's a huge array of linked sources. Following a series of interesting-article links is how:
      - I learned of linux, and how to install it, what apps to run, and more
      - l figured out how to melt aluminum in a charcoal-fired furnace and cast parts in sand molds
      - I learned to install wired Ethernet around my house
      - I figured out how to change my clutch, timing chains, and head gasket on my car

      Finding something you didn't set out to look for is an amazing benefit of the net.

    54. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least once a week I have to step some idiot thru the idea that 1) yes, you can pick us up with an antenna 2)the standard for reception is an element antenna outside above the roofline, so no you're not being cheated when your 'digital' pie-plate antenna you bought from Amazon doesn't pick up the tower 40 miles away and 3) yes, there is a separate box at the cable company for each TV station - so one of them *can* be broken when "ALL THE OTHER STATIONS WORK JUST FINE, IT'S JUST YOU, THAT'S WHAT THEY TOLD ME!".

    55. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Subm · · Score: 1

      > You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

      Wikipedia? I think you meant porn.

    56. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Mind you, this woman was old enough that she wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home, since it wasn't widely available during her childhood.

      I'm not sure why you'd think that. Cable was widely available during the 70's, with millions of subscribers.

      Not to say that sort of ignorance isn't rather amazing, but it's very likely that she grew up in a cable-TV household.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    57. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Megane · · Score: 1

      And they're all unencrypted, so not only can you DVR them (if you can find a DVR that doesn't assume that everyone uses cable), but you can put DVR software on a PC and have them dumped into plain old MPEG-2 transport stream files that you can keep or trade with other people.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    58. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I already responded to someone else regarding this topic, but the short version is that cable was only available in half the markets in the US by the mid-70s, and it was only in 20% of households (16M) by the end of the '70s.

    59. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XM, my friend... XM ;)

    60. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those plastic tube cylendars that predated records and are like 120+ years old are fucking way before my time, but I've fucking heard of them. Same with 8tracks, cassettes, CDs, DVDs, VHS tapes, Betamax tapes, laster discs...

      This isn't a technology that was from a century before the author. The dude is fucking 28. He was a fucking *ADULT* when the news about everyone needing to move to HD antennaes was plastered all over the news, television, radio, and everywhere else. Remember, there was a massive deadline for it and you could get discounted or even free antennae if you beat the deadline? Even fucking great grandmothers knew about it. It was EVERYWHERE.

      And that wasn't the end of OTA. That was the beginning of HD OTA being pretty much universal in the US. And this guy was a fucking ADULT during that. So if he somehow forget about all of that in the last decade, he's a fucking mind-numbed retard who grew up in a spoiled household where his parents presumably had enough disposable income that he never knew anything other than cable television... and never had friends who knew anything other than cable television.

      I mean jesus, this isn't about being a millenial (hello - millenials are 40 years old and under right now - millenials are old enough to have been buying records and then cassettes). This is just about an ignorant spoiled retard assuming his lack of common fucking knowledge about the world around him is matched by everyone else.

    61. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except OTA broadcast isn't before his time. The guy was a fucking adult when HD OTA became a huge thing. Remember about a decade ago when it was spammed literally everywhere and there were massive discounts or even freebies to get HD antennaes, before the deadline of most stations cutting off non HD broadcasts OTA?

      And thatw asn't when it was dying. That was when it was making the big push to HD!

      He had to be the kind of person who l iterally does not read or absorb ANY news about ANYTHING to have missed it.

    62. Re:Is this sarcasm? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I barely remember my Dad's car having a CHOKE when I was a kid. I thought it would be something I'd have to learn about when I started driving. By the time I was driving, nothing had a choke. I'd have to google what you do with it. I vaguely recall that it has something to do with adjusting the carburetor to make the car start and/or run better when it first warms up--but I wouldn't know when/when not to use it without researching. I wager that even on Slashdot there are some people reading about the choke for the very first time, right here, simply because they're too young to have seen them and are not that interested in old cars.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    63. Re:Is this sarcasm? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

      Oh shit, dude, if I'd only had 5 moderator points, I'd have thrown them down the Wikipedia Rabbit Hole you brought up. :)

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    64. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia? I think you meant porn.

      No, (s)he meant Wikipedia. Stop projecting. :-)

    65. Re:Is this sarcasm? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      It shows however that providing TV service for a monthly fee gets so much more attention from some prospective buyers that they did not know they could get a good enough result from a free OTA service.

      Next time someone says "let's release some frequencies that only a minority uses anyway" perhaps there will be some extra resistance from those who found out don't need to pay for TV every month.

    66. Re:Is this sarcasm? by mmdurrant · · Score: 1

      I tried this a few times and got there within 15 every time. Then I found this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... It's a loop. A trap, even.

      --
      I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
    67. Re:Is this sarcasm? by sudon't · · Score: 1

      This isn't "before" anybody's time. Broadcast TV has been available continuously for the guy's entire life.

      Yeah, but who uses it? I wasn’t even sure broadcasting went on anymore, although I’ve never really been a TV watcher, (I don’t have cable, either).

      But kids, here are some tips from the 1960s: Wrap tinfoil around the antennas to increase reception. You can also get some extra antenna cable and hang them out the window. Rabbit ears want a lot of manipulation! For best reception, you want an external antenna on the roof. If the channel knob comes off, or gets lost or broken, keep a small pair of pliers on top of the set. If you want something more permanent, attach a small pair of vice-grips. If the picture goes all fuzzy, smack the side of the set. Begin by smacking it softly, working your way up until it works. When smacking the set stops working altogether, you’ll want to open up the back and reset all the tubes, (pull ‘em out, and plug ‘em back in). Don’t forget to unplug the set first. Hope this helps!

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    68. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Children today don't know what a rotary phone dial is either. they have never seen one, so why should they?

    69. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.

      What does "from before your time" mean? Anyone not know about the existence of the horse-drawn carriage?
      It's not easy not to know about wristwatches.
      How would you react to someone claiming to have just discovered the conventional oven?

      And then you move the goalposts to not knowing personally how to use a technology.

    70. Re:Is this sarcasm? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      My uncle is pretty sharp. He had a non-working toilet because he didn't know how to make the chain from the lever to the flap valve shorter. It was "broken" for months. A 1 minute fix.

    71. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Let's look up TV options. Type in "TV Service" and Google suggest etc will usually reference something like "without cable" within the first 4 suggested search terms. Hopefully most people would read that far....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    72. Re:Is this sarcasm? by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      I saw this and thought "Really?" From the front page of wikipedia chose https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 11 clicks brought me to Philosophy. I'm impressed.

    73. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1
      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    74. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      And do you know why it used to be "ring the phone"?

      because in the days before dials, you cranked a generator that created voltage that would "rang" the operator (ring a bell or light a light to indicate your line was live) so they could connect you to whomever you wanted to call.

      Not that I was alive anywhere near that time period, but I know about them, and telegraphs, and other early modes of communication. It's something you should simply learn through your education system, if for no other reason than to know the progression of technology.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    75. Re:Is this sarcasm? by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      You just need a better antenna. With Digital either you get the signal 100% or you get nothing.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    76. Re: Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me it's the 8-year-old boys playing Pokémon and the forever texting 12-year-old girl. They became the smartphone facebook teenage idiots, much possible if they were born in 1991 or 1992.

      Someone born in 1982 or later grew up with the NES, the VCR, Ninja Turtles and paper ; being interested in Pokémon is a sign of being retarded or a pedophile.

    77. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried it. I always end up at auto-fellatio and penectomy!

  7. April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this whole "article" has to be some sort of joke.

    1. Re:April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2
      I couldn't help but triple take when I saw that it was a Wall Street Journal link. From reading the summary I was certain it had to be from the Onion. I mean...this piece of gold:

      ...Mr. Sisco, an M.B.A. student in Provo, Utah, made his discovery after inviting friends over to watch the Super Bowl in 2014. The online stream he found to watch the game didn't have regular commercials -- disappointing half of his guests who were only interested in the ads.

      That's 4 jokes in one right there. I'm actually disappointed that this WASN'T an Onion story.

    2. Re:April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      LOL. Entertaining Superbowl ads are a thing of the past, judging by the last few years.

    3. Re:April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this whole "article" has to be some sort of joke.

      I can't find anything about it on http://www.snopes.com/ should be mentioned even if false.

  8. Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get a HDHomeRun and you can watch broadcast TV from pretty much any modern device. Each one has two tuners, and they can be split across devices. Want to record? Connect a cheap NAS. Want more than two channels at once? Just get another one -- they work in tandem.

    Been using these for about a decade now and couldn't be happier. The quality is even better than basic cable because you don't need to deal with their re-encoding antics.

    1. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Get a HDHomeRun [silicondust.com] and you can watch broadcast TV from pretty much any modern device. Each one has two tuners, and they can be split across devices. Want to record? Connect a cheap NAS. Want more than two channels at once? Just get another one -- they work in tandem.

      I actually look into this, and found that the cost to buy a computer and put something like MythTV on it or whatever, to get DVR capability along with the HDHomerun (I used to use these awhile back)....was GREATER and more of a hassle than to just buy a Tivo OTA DVR/tuner unit...

      The Tivo comes with 4 tuners, 1TB DVR storage and lifetime "service"...for about $399.

      I set up one of these with Tivo mini units throughout the house for every TV I have...for my over the air needs. I used Amazon FireTV for streaming Playstation VUE, Netflx, etc....

      But do look into the Tivo OTA unit....it was plug and play, 4 tuners and less $$ than the DIY route with HDHomeRun.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by TypoNAM · · Score: 2

      I've been using a HDHomeRun dual-tuner since 2007 with mythtv on my home linux server, a schedules direct subscription (since 2010) for guide information, and basically just using VLC and MPC-HC for playback via "Direct Download" URLs from mythweb interface. The setup has worked out very well for me.

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    3. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by PhotoJim · · Score: 5, Informative

      The advantage of the HDHomeRun solution, at least with Plex (if not with its own software) is that you get unencrypted feeds recorded on your hard disk. You can do what you want with them - you can generate DVDs or Blu-Ray discs from them, stream them, put them on a flash drive and share them... it's not trapped inside your box.

    4. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The advantage of the HDHomeRun solution, at least with Plex (if not with its own software) is that you get unencrypted feeds recorded on your hard disk. You can do what you want with them - you can generate DVDs or Blu-Ray discs from them, stream them, put them on a flash drive and share them... it's not trapped inside your box.

      Very valid point!!

      I did like having that capability back when I was running HDHomerun with MythTV back in the day.

      I found, however, that I rarely if ever had any need or want to capture for keeping anything I got off of OTA TV.

      I'm gonna have to look more into PLEX. I'm not terribly familiar with it, other than my friend has a server set up that I hook into occasionally, but thought it was only for pre-recorded content.

      I was actually looking to maybe put my CD/Music collection that I have ripped into FLAC onto a PLEX server (they run on linux, right?) and use that to stream to my living room good stereo...from FireTV box over HDMI to the Marantz AV receiver, out....I'm thinking that would be a pretty darned good signal for my set up.

      Anyway..rambling....but I'll have to look into Plex more.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I found, however, that I rarely if ever had any need or want to capture for keeping anything I got off of OTA TV."

      NOVA, American Experience, Frontline, and any number of other PBS programs that come on after I've gone to bed. Windows Media (on Windows 7) works great with the HDHomeRun. Not sure what I'll do when MSFT stops providing automatically updated program listings for local TV stations, but for now, it's been terrific.

    6. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by darkain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I picked up one of these tuners about a year ago, but without the added option of recording. Nobody in my house cares enough about TV to record, so it wasn't an issue. Most of our content is either PBS or available on Amazon Prime or some other streaming service. We mainly wanted it for live broadcasts (such as local sports or news)

      With a rooftop mounded antenna, surprisingly, my house is currently picking up 56 stations. The absolute minimum cost for cable in my neighborhood right now is $20/mo, which is exactly the same channels as the broadcast list, except we get a few extra international and religious stations, and are missing some government stations.

      The HDHomeRun was around $80, plus another $20 or so for the antenna, and another $20ish for wiring. That is the same as about 6 months of wired service from the cheapest local option for nearly identical content. This was simply a no-brainer!

    7. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      NOVA, American Experience, Frontline, and any number of other PBS programs that come on after I've gone to bed. W

      OH, don't get me wrong, I do DVR/Record stuff off OTA, hence my Tivo, but answering the earlier post, I don't find that I need to keep these programs I record OTA. With those it is pretty much watching it once and delete.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest reason to go with MythTV? Auto commercial detection and skipping.
      It's TV the way it was meant to be.

    9. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The advantage of the HDHomeRun solution, at least with Plex (if not with its own software) is that you get unencrypted feeds recorded on your hard disk. You can do what you want with them - you can generate DVDs or Blu-Ray discs from them, stream them, put them on a flash drive and share them... it's not trapped inside your box.

      You can download anything you want from TiVo in standard mpeg format so long as it has not been marked copy protected. Nothing OTA is.

      You need your MAK you can get from TiVo menus and decoder software to decrypt the stream (http://tivodecode.sourceforge.net)

      There are a few front ends available with UI's to automate the process of downloading from now playing.

    10. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Yes, Plex runs on Linux (and other OSes - I run my instance in Linux). It's slick.

    11. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you buy a TiVO and lock yourself into a shitty service when you can pick up a Channelmaster and avoid the service cost? It's fucking retarded, really.

    12. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a HDHomeRun [silicondust.com] and you can watch broadcast TV from pretty much any modern device. Each one has two tuners, and they can be split across devices. Want to record? Connect a cheap NAS. Want more than two channels at once? Just get another one -- they work in tandem.

      I actually look into this, and found that the cost to buy a computer and put something like MythTV on it or whatever, to get DVR capability along with the HDHomerun (I used to use these awhile back)....was GREATER and more of a hassle than to just buy a Tivo OTA DVR/tuner unit...

      The Tivo comes with 4 tuners, 1TB DVR storage and lifetime "service"...for about $399.

      I set up one of these with Tivo mini units throughout the house for every TV I have...for my over the air needs. I used Amazon FireTV for streaming Playstation VUE, Netflx, etc....

      But do look into the Tivo OTA unit....it was plug and play, 4 tuners and less $$ than the DIY route with HDHomeRun.

      You're all set now, but for others reading who also don't want to go to the effort of rolling their own an alternative is a TabloTV whole house DVR. IMO, it's worth springing for the 4-tuner model.

      I put an antenna in the attic (pesky HOA! pesky location!), ran coax to the Tablo, attached a 5GB USB disk & connected the DVR to the home network. Now I can control recordings from anywhere (if away from home, I prefer to VPN in to do this, rather than poke a hole in my router), and watch on any device on the home network. Generally I use a roku for watching on a TV (I won't connect my "smart" TV to anything).

      This was slightly more expensive that the Tivo approach, but (a) 5GB rather than 1GB for recordings & (b) no quotes necessary around lifetime in lifetime subscription ($150 for my lifetime, not the device's).

      Been using it for 1.5 years now, and still a happy camper.

      (Oh, and I can also transfer recordings off the device for those that I want to archive forever.)

      IMO, having the extra storage capacity is very important. It changes how you approach recording & watching TV. For example, it supports recording a whole season & then binge watching. Also, I can record (more or less) every new show & only bother watching it later if it gets good reviews and doesn't get cancelled mid-season. When I setup my rig, $5TB was the biggest available cheap USB drive. If buying today I'd spring the extra $$ to buy a 8TB drive (best buy has one for $200).

      The one place the Tablo is weak is when watching live TV (live). Because of how it works, there's a lag when you change channel & it seems to have some playback bugs that are (sometimes) exposed with live TV. We worked around with a coax-splitter & using the signal direct from the antenna to the TV ... which is what we use when watching live TV. (But frankly we rarely watch live TV.) I suppose a HDHomerun would be an alternative work-around if you didn't already have coax everywhere. Either way, the work around has the additional benefit that you can be watching live TV whilst recording 4 different channels. Meh.

    13. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      I have HTPCs on every TV (3 in total). If you watch local sports the OTA broadcast are MUCH higher quality than the cable company's compressed crap.The HDHomerun is great it has 2 turners. So 2 TVs can watch or 1 TV and recording. My cheapest cable package is $48/mo. No question a deal for me.

    14. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      "The Tivo comes with 4 tuners, 1TB DVR storage and lifetime "service"...for about $399."

      I have two TiVo's (actually three if you count the old Series 1 in storage but that's no use without an external tuner now) and the big problem I have is that TiVo's service provider here in the antipodes is dropping it. So, I've got two boxes with lifetime service which will stop working in October. There are some people working on chipping the units to allow them to be hacked and then use a local source of guide data but I'm just about ready to give up on this. TiVo was good while it lasted but the amount of stuff on broadcast TV I actually want to watch these days is slow small I don't think I'm going to miss it. All the good shows moved onto subscription services years back.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    15. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      You have to buy a box? I use old parts to build Myth setups. You can get by with a 1 TB hard drive, and you don't need much processing power. The main reason to build a Myth box is for the automatic commercial skipping. Once it is built and setup it should run until the hard drive gives out.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    16. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > it's not trapped inside your box

      This is a HUGE, under-appreciated advantage. It's a lot harder to "cut the cord" (or switch providers) if doing so means losing the all of the recorded TV shows locked into your current DVR. With a cablecard-ready HDHomeRun, you can subscribe to Comcast for a year using a cablecard, record shows using Windows Media Center, then cancel Comcast at the end of the year and spend the next 2 years watching shows you recorded... then resubscribe to Comcast for another year once you're eligible for "new subscriber" pricing again.

      Up until around 2012, the only way to get a cablecard-compatible PC tuner was to buy a complete, certified HTPC from someone like Dell (at staggering cost that pretty much destroyed the economics of doing this). At some point, CableLabs quit requiring that the ENTIRE system be certified & approved, and allowed you to build your own computer running Windows 7, attach it to something like a HDHomeRun Prime, and use it to record copy-protected shows. The recordings themselves are still inextricably bound to the computer used to record them (at least, if they're flagged COPY_ONCE by the cable company), but the cablecard only governs whether or not WMC is allowed to RECORD them... once they're recorded, they're yours to enjoy forever, as long as the computer itself doesn't break.

      If you have an old computer (or moderately high-end laptop from sometime after 2008) that already has Windows 7, you can pick up a used HDHomeRun Prime on eBay for around $90 (more, if you're in a hurry... less, if you can deal with losing a few auctions until you get lucky). For another $10-25, you can buy an official Windows Media Center remote & USB IR receiver on Amazon. For another $125 or so, you can add a 3 or 4 terabyte USB hard drive, and have probably 4-20 times the recording space you EVER got to have with a DVR leased from the cable company.

      Once you have the hardware, subscribe to cable with one outlet, no box, no DVR service (the guide data comes from Microsoft for free), and a single cablecard. For other TVs, go on Craigslist and buy a used XBOX 360 for around $40-50, which you can then use over your home's LAN as a media center extender (to watch shows recorded on that DVR, or even watch live TV using one of the HTPC's tuners). As an added perk, if you have an older amp that can decode Dolby Digital over SPDIF, but doesn't have HDMI inputs, the XB360 is one of the only ways I know of to get DD5.1 surround sound via SPDIF from Netflix. Win-win.

    17. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Not sure what I'll do when MSFT stops providing automatically updated program listings for local TV stations

      You might have to edit the registry to get guide data from someone besides Microsoft, but it's not hard to do, and there's already at least one company that will independently provide guide data for around $25/year.

      In retrospect, it's pretty amazing how Windows Media Center has taken on a life of its own and remained viable literally YEARS after Microsoft officially abandoned it, thanks mostly to the fact that they made it so open-ended and user-extensible to begin with. IMHO, WMC is probably one of the best products Microsoft has ever made.

      Personally, I wish SlingTV would just pay SiliconDust to write them server code to emulate a HDHR Prime, coupled with a virtual WMC tuner that connects to SlingTV over the internet as if it were a HDHR Prime. Then, SlingTV customers could just use WMC as their DVR. I'd venture a guess that probably 99% of the client-side code could be recycled from the HDHR Prime's drivers, and writing the server-side code at SlingTV's end would be fairly straightforward (compared to the server-side code they've ALREADY had to write to make the service exist at all).

    18. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Hi

      Do you know if this sort of setup could work if I wanted to have a HDHomeRun tuner in one country and the streaming device elsewhere? I don't fancy setting up a satellite dish for watching TV only very occasionally...

      Thanks!

    19. Re: Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to stream your music I would suggest looking into Subsonic over Plex. I have. I have both and Subsonic is much better for music. Cheers

    20. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by almitydave · · Score: 1

      I was actually looking to maybe put my CD/Music collection that I have ripped into FLAC onto a PLEX server (they run on linux, right?) and use that to stream to my living room good stereo...from FireTV box over HDMI to the Marantz AV receiver, out....I'm thinking that would be a pretty darned good signal for my set up.

      I have Plex Media Server running on my Linux server doing exactly this. My Roku LT and XBox 360 can play the music directly with their built-in media players (no special app required), as can any Android device with VLC.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    21. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier - and cheaper - to install a splitter or two and run cheap 75 ohm coax around the house?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    22. Re: Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I put an antenna in the attic (pesky HOA! pesky location!),

      Good news. Your HOA cannot legally prevent you from putting up an antenna. If they do they'll be in violation of federal law.

  9. Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

    Yes, if you want to sit through 18 minutes of advertisements (average) per 60 minutes of programming, sure, use broadcast television. If you work out the amount of television / streaming content the average person consumes versus the cost of fully-paid streaming, then your "savings" put the value of your time at far less than that of a fourth-world sweatshop worker. But whatever floats your boat.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      It's 2017. Who watches anything in real time?

      I skip the ads, and I usually speed up the playback to 1.5X, so a "60 minute" program usually takes well under 30 minutes to watch.

    2. Re: Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watch a decent amount of PBS and there are no advertisements.

      That said, if it's downtime and you feel like watching tv, why calculate your time-worth? I don't monetize every moment of every day.

    3. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do know that those breaks are good times to go to the bathroom, wash the dishes, make the bed, start a load of laundry, etc.

      Also that a PVR works with it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by msauve · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. A cheap Roku TV (<$150) and a 16G USB stick, and you can pause OTA TV for up to 90 minutes. Start your show, pause it, go off and do other things for 30 minutes, then come back and FF through the commercials.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by slack_justyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with streaming per se. I love Netflix, big Stranger Things fan, but the argument that I'm "saving" something by skipping ads I feel is quite silly to me. It was time that I originally planned to be non-productive. I planned on that time to yield nothing. So getting back the 18 minutes that I would have spent in ads still yields me $0 since that's the value I placed on that time originally. I just don't get this notion that every second of someone's life has some dollar and cents attached to it. We're not 100% productive beings, in fact that's very much the core reason we've invented things to increase our productivity.

      If putting a price on every second someone is alive is your kind of thing, then more power to you. I'm not calling you wrong in any sense of the word because I just feel that this isn't one of those things that has a "correct" answer. It's just a matter of how one values their time. I'm sure there's pros and cons to either perspective, but I vote with my dollars based on how much I enjoy the content, not the lack or presence of ads.

    6. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Most people watch sports in real time, but that's about it. True sports fans hate watching a game that's been recorded, because it's too easy to find out who won.

    7. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who pays you for your free time? Can i get on that list too?

    8. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by darkain · · Score: 1

      "Commercials" are called "Designated Piss Breaks" - learn to use your time more effectively!

    9. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      I 100% agree on time savings, but many of us don't use the antenna for watching the commercial-laden network TV shows (I pay for Hulu Plus for the no commercial versions for the 2 or 3 network shows I actually watch).

      The antenna is just great for picking up network stations for local news broadcasts, the local PBS stations for the kids and occasional documentary (Frontline, etc.), and the occasional surfing across the nostalgia channels (MeTV, Heroes, JusticeTV, etc.) And for that rare, can't miss broadcast not on a cable station (the annual Super Bowl, etc.), it works great.

    10. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you want to sit through 18 minutes of advertisements (average) per 60 minutes of programming, sure, use broadcast television.

      I hooked up one of our TVs to an antenna recently to get the local channels. Wish I hadn't have bothered. After a decade of living commercial free, I couldn't go back to watching TV that had commercials on them. It was so horrible. I can't believe that I used to watch shows like that.

      I'd rather just not watch TV than watch a show filled with commercials every few minutes.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if you are doing nothing productive you have more time enjoying content instead of watching ads. that should be worth something.

    12. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Sports hold lots of people off from cutting the cord. You'll miss some games, but the best matchups for college football are broadcast. So, it is a relevant and cost effective way to get some forms of entertainment even with commercials.

    13. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      You do know that those breaks are good times to go to the bathroom, wash the dishes, make the bed, start a load of laundry, etc.

      The problem is, you can do all the above, and the commercial break hasn't ended yet!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    14. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with streaming per se. I love Netflix, big Stranger Things fan, but the argument that I'm "saving" something by skipping ads I feel is quite silly to me. It was time that I originally planned to be non-productive. I planned on that time to yield nothing. So getting back the 18 minutes that I would have spent in ads still yields me $0 since that's the value I placed on that time originally. I just don't get this notion that every second of someone's life has some dollar and cents attached to it. We're not 100% productive beings, in fact that's very much the core reason we've invented things to increase our productivity.

      If putting a price on every second someone is alive is your kind of thing, then more power to you. I'm not calling you wrong in any sense of the word because I just feel that this isn't one of those things that has a "correct" answer. It's just a matter of how one values their time. I'm sure there's pros and cons to either perspective, but I vote with my dollars based on how much I enjoy the content, not the lack or presence of ads.

      Qucik econ 101 lesson:
      Utility is a measurement of happiness. It is measured in money because money is short-hand for "value". And tehre is a thing called "oportunity cost" which means that if you have a limited resource that can be spent on several things you must account for the benefit of the best overlooked alternative when valuing each choice.

      If you are gaining $0 watching TV you are doing it wrong. You should do something more fun that will generate some positive utility.
      Also If you gain say $1/hr watching adds (between amusement, and learning about products you might want, etc.) and $6/hr from watching the show you sat down to watch, the ads are costing you utility because you could be watching the show instead of the ads.

    15. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That applies to my wife and myself (more so her ;-} ), but I get greatly annoyed when the digital signal drops out in the middle of play, which happens most when it is windy, even though though the antenna is inside - guessing the trees waving around affect the signal?.

      In the old, old days, when most TV was analog, it could get fuzzy in bad weather, but there usually would be enough image/sound to get some idea of what was happening in real time, and with sports that is what counts. I HATE DIGITAL OTA almost as much as cable, so we have sort of compromised on getting PlayStation VUE for when football (American style) starts in late August through to the NCAA basketball Final Four weekend in early April, then just get by with OTA-only through the summer since we don't care about the sports that are most active then such as MLB, NHL, NBA, etc.

      Even so, we have to scramble sometimes to search out which service is streaming the games we are interested in since those seem to bounce around any given team that we follow between the likes of ESPN, Fox Sports, CBS Sports, NBC Sports, etc (and even Twitter!), along with the occasional local station's OTA broadcast . And any of those can have the digital garble blocks mess up at any time (regardless of weather...).

      I do keep the nearby OTA station's weather/news channel frequently on throughout the year in the background (muted) to keep track of weather when it is "interesting" (i.e. blizzards, floods, tornadoes, heat waves, etc). Otherwise we "splurge" on movie DVD's (BD if we must...) when they are past their release pricing peak since not many appeal to us anyway, and the good ones are worth watching more than once, and whenever we feel like it.

      RO

    16. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a pavlov dog.....

      You what else works. Pressing the pause button when I need to go pee or get a beer.

    17. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much do you get paid for watching TV? I don't watch much of it, but when I do I chalk every second up as wasted time.

    18. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick life lesson 101 : no one cares

    19. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent point -- but in skipping ads, you are saving something. Not time, necessarily, but certainly a measure of sanity.

    20. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      but certainly a measure of sanity.

      Trust me when I say, all things in my life considered ads need to up their game on their attack of my sanity if they wish to compete with the folks I work with. And on that note, I am all behind the idea that meetings with the group of non-technicals that develop the requirements for our software projects, are broken up with intrusive ads.

    21. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I never watch live TV. I use Mythtv to automatically skip commercials. I was watching TV with my mother and I couldn't believe how bad commercials have gotten.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    22. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what else is good for doing all those things?

      The pause button... Ads are nothing but a waste of space-time man!

    23. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      One reason for TV channels that break up is the fact that lots of TV stations use insanely long MPEG2 GOPs as a way to decrease the bitrate of their main HD channel & free up more bits for their SD subchannels. Historically, 15-frame GOPs were the generally-accepted norm. Nowadays, stations commonly use GOPs with 60 frames or more.

      MPEG2 has 3 kinds of frames... I, B, and P. An I-frame is basically like a JPEG image... it contains all the data you need to display it. B and P frames are derived from adjacent frames, and individually require significantly fewer bits to encode than an I-frame.

      So... suppose you have a broadcaster whose main channel is 1080i60, with 2 or 3 480i60 subchannels. To make room for those subchannels, the broadcaster might use 60-frame GOPs. Since 1080i60 has 30 real frames per second, this means that if a burst of RF noise corrupts the first frame after an I-frame, the picture could conceivably be corrupted for two whole seconds before it gets another I-frame and is able to recover.

      I've never seen it done "in the wild" by an actual broadcaster, but in theory, there's a way to make this more tolerable. Basically, you make the GOP longer, but encode redundant bands of complete data into the B & P frames (spread around, so each frame in the GOP has different bands). That way, if a frame gets badly corrupted early in the GOP, the details will fill back in (kind of like the old Apple II "venetian blind" effect) starting with the next frame, instead of remaining corrupted until the next I-frame.

    24. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is only true if you value your entertainment at $0 - which is plainly false.
      If you really did value entertainment at $0, you wouldn't pay for Netflix.

      So, you saved 18 minutes, whatever you choose to do with that time is yours - if you really want to, you can look at adverts, you know if you really wanted to. But equally, you can choose not to. It's now your time again, not the advertisers.

      The only way you're worse off now is if you were going to buy something similar to one of the adverts, and by not seeing that advert you ended up buying a lesser value product. In all your years of watching TV, how often has that happened.

    25. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So getting back the 18 minutes that I would have spent in ads still yields me $0 since that's the value I placed on that time originally"

      But, after watching 3 shows with ads, those 18 mins per show would let you watch a 4th episode in the same amount of time. With the bonus of not being subjected to annoying ads that you didn't ask for in the first place.

      "I vote with my dollars based on how much I enjoy the content"

      If you enjoy the content being regularly interrupted with something else, so be it. I prefer to watch a show without being told to buy crap I don't want every 5 mins.

    26. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combine skipping commercials with binge watching, and you'll see it all adds up to significant time.

      You can watch a whole season's worth of a show without commercials in fewer evenings than if you had commercials included, so saving 20-22 minutes for each 1-hour show can easily give you back an entire evening per week.

    27. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't about money. It's about something far more valuable. Time. We only get a limited amount of it in our lives. Add up all the time you have spend watching commercials in your life. That could have been used doing something more worthwhile.

  10. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't terrestrial analog television switched off many years ago in most countries?

    1. Re:Wait... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      This is digital. HDTV is ... digital.

      And you can still get old format analog too.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  11. what's old is new again by klashn · · Score: 1

    this is hilarious! what is old is new again. Now think back to something that's fallen out of favor and capitalize on it!

    1. Re:what's old is new again by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! Did you know you can get basically Pandora for free? And more than likely your car already has the equipment for it!! I usually plug the iPhone in before I start the car up, but one day I totally left it in the cup holder forgetting to plug it up. I thought that the silence would have been a cue for me to plug it in but boom! Music was playing when the car turned on. I looked at my phone, looked at the console of the car, back at the phone, back at the console. I just couldn't understand what this new "FM" device was! But it's basically free music. I got to work, turned off the car, waited a second, turned it back on, and boom the FM device was back!

      Anyway, I wonder if Apple will ever build an app that allows me to access my "FM" device account? Also, is the membership built into the price of a car? I just don't understand how a streaming service can exist without me paying for it.

    2. Re:what's old is new again by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Dude, you won't believe it but there's another music streaming device built into your car: push on the AM/FM button! Just make sure to open ports 540 to 1600 on your car router.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:what's old is new again by Paul+Carver · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds interesting. I do see an "FM" button in my car but the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons appear to be missing. Any suggestions on how I can permanently block specific songs from playing or make other songs play more frequently on this "FM" device? Oh, and where's the "search" box? Obviously with Pandora I just type in the name of a song or artist on the qwerty keyboard, but it's not clear where the corresponding UI is in my car.

      I tried pressing the "FM" buton but it seems to play quite a lot of crap that I don't want to hear. It definitely needs some serious thumbs down input.

    4. Re:what's old is new again by slew · · Score: 1

      Dude, you won't believe it but there's another music streaming device built into your car: push on the AM/FM button! Just make sure to open ports 540 to 1600 on your car router.

      That streaming device doesn't stream music, it just streams a bunch a windbags whining about the government or talking about some sporting even that may or may not even be live... Kind of like if someone was doing a dictation of a sub-reddit, but generally less entertaining...

    5. Re:what's old is new again by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the other 25% of it streams music.

    6. Re:what's old is new again by porges · · Score: 1

      I just couldn't understand what this new "FM" device was! But it's basically free music.

      The FM is for "Free Music". The AM feature is for "Angry Men".

  12. A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The only problem with OTA HDTV in Silicon Valley is that all the clear channels are in foreign languages. English channels are whitewashed in static.

    1. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The only problem with OTA HDTV in Silicon Valley is that all the clear channels are in foreign languages. English channels are whitewashed in static.

      Just turn on SAP n00b. Secondary Audio Programming. It's a setting on your TV menu. Guess what SAP on a Spanish or Japanese channel is ... wait for it ... it's English!!!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So use your genius-level brain and learn that foreign language. You mangle English so much for which it almost sounds foreign, askance.

    3. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So use your genius-level brain and learn that foreign language.

      Why? I haven't watched TV in 20+ years. Heck, my 48" HDTV doesn't even have an OTA TV turner.

    4. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      then it isn't a tv, it is a monitor.

    5. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      OTA channels are all digital these days so they won't be whitewashed in static, they'll have digital artifacts/blockiness.

    6. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > So use your genius-level brain and learn that foreign language

      It would help a lot if foreign-language channels ALSO had subtitles (I personally can read Spanish pretty well, but suck at understanding spoken Spanish, unless the speaker is another American who learned Spanish as a second language). Until fairly recently, not even popular primetime shows on Univision and Telemundo had subtitles. Apparently, despite collectively having a greater market share in Miami than ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox, they were legally classified as "minority" stations & exempted from having to provide subtitles like English-language stations have been required to do since the 80s. And even now, it's obvious that most of their subtitles are done with speech-recognition software and have no human proofreading at all.

  13. Sarcastic & Condescending by thechemic · · Score: 0

    Antennas are cool and all, but did the headline have to be sarcastic and condescending to millennials?

    --
    Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    1. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Very much so.

      Any halfassed "geek" knows about this. You might as well have an article talking about how someone learns a CAT5 line is faster than WiFi through 4 walls.

    2. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe the headline for the next article will be "Millennials get butthurt whenever you mention them"

    3. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by fropenn · · Score: 1

      I agree! We wouldn't put up with the same comment being made about a religious, ethnic, or gender group, so why is it okay to say it about an age group?
      (Note: I am not a millennial according to most definitions, but as a general rule I despise most "generational" research.)

    4. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep

    5. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this isn't about millennials. It's about some random guy who happens to be a millennial. Why didn't the mention any of the other aspects of his life that define who he is: religion, skin color, income level, dietary preferences, attached or detached ear lobes, etc.? Him being a millennial really has nothing to do with this.

    6. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Antennas are cool and all, but did the headline have to be sarcastic and condescending to millennials?

      When the level of ignorance exceeds a certain threshold, the end result is often sarcasm.

      That concept is way older than antennas or Millennials.

    7. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      We wouldn't put up with the same comment being made about a religious, ethnic, or gender group, so why is it okay to say it about an age group?

      Err..I have no problems saying anything about any group if it is true.

      Geez, you get too politically correct, and there becomes a real danger of anything being actually said.

      There are observable differences between groups of people on this earth, and there is nothing wrong with pointing it out.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re: Sarcastic & Condescending by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      Wifi inside of wires? Preposterous. And what the hell is "CAT5"? Sounds like a classification for crazy cat ladies...

    9. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not PC to make fun of somebody based on religion and shit.

    10. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Him being a millennial does have to do with it.

      His age has to do with what technology was around as he grew up.

      My son doesn't know anything about pay phones. I bet a young black kid doesn't either.

    11. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd put up with anyone saying anything about any group.

      Quit being a little bitch

    12. Re: Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a new bulldozer class, similar to the CAT D6R XL.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh boy oh boy oh boy!
      Millennials Millen nials Mi llennials Millen nials Millenni als Millenn ials Mil lennials Millenni als Millennials Millennials
      Millennials Millennials Millennials Millennials Millennials
      Millennials Millen nials Millennia ls Millenn ials Millennials Millennials Millennials
      Millennials Mille nnials Millennials

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    14. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you say Brown haired blue eyed guy learns about antennas for the first time?

      No? Why not? Its not relevant?

      Same thing here. You might like to think yourself smarter then an entire generation, but that does not make it true slugger.

    15. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Him being a millennial really has nothing to do with this.

      It has EVERYTHING to do with the story. Imagine if I was talking about my "discovery" of animal-pulled cars...

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    16. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      There's only three things older than sarcasm, in the following order:
      1. sex
      2. money
      3. politics

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    17. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're equating these two things? 1) a light-hearted poke at millennials, 2) racism If so that's really incredible, even for a millennial.

    18. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you say Brown haired blue eyed guy learns about antennas for the first time?

      No? Why not? Its not relevant?

      Same thing here. You might like to think yourself smarter then an entire generation, but that does not make it true slugger.

      I was wondering why they didn't point out whether he was cis-gendered or if not, what exactly.
      He kind of sounds "questioning", but it's not for me to say. That's the reporters job to find out for sure.

    19. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politics preceded money.

    20. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money was invented to pay for sex.

    21. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Err..I have no problems saying anything about any group if it is true.

      Me either. The problem is that almost none of what I hear said about millennials is actually true (or, at least, is no more true of them than any other generation).

    22. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree! We wouldn't put up with the same comment being made about a religious, ethnic, or gender group, so why is it okay to say it about an age group?
      (Note: I am not a millennial according to most definitions, but as a general rule I despise most "generational" research.)

      It reminds me of the good old days where if there was a negro somehow involved in anything, the news always pointed it out.
      If it wasn't mentioned, then it was a white person.
      Oh, wait, did I say "good old days"? I meant forever.

    23. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money was invented to pay for sex.

      You're probably right about that.
      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/04/150416-basic-instincts-chimpanzee-mating-sex-science-animals/

  14. quality has improved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern HD antennas are amazing. Of course us older millenilals grew up in a world with lots of antennas, and the technology has improved dramatically. They used to be awful and snowy that you had to constantly adjust unless it was mounted on your roof. Now, it's definitely worthy as a cable alternative especially in a world with Hulu and Netflix.

    1. Re:quality has improved by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      The antennas haven't changed. Only the contents of the signals have changed.

      In fact, old analog antennas still make great TV antennas, as long as your channels haven't shifted from VHF to UHF (as has happened in some markets). Even then the old antenna will still probably work well enough in many circumstances.

    2. Re:quality has improved by Mr.+Competence · · Score: 1

      I hooked up the old OTA antenna in my attic and get dozens of channels. HDHomerun, NPVR, MCE Buddy, Comskip and Kodi complete the set.

      --
      Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
    3. Re:quality has improved by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Is an empty Pringles can VHF or UHF?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: quality has improved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I kludged together the standard 4-bay bowtie UHF antenna with coat hangers, wire, nuts, washers and screws, all mounted on a piece of 1"x2" scrap I had. The only thing I had to root around for was the 75 to 300 ohm transformer (balun for the radio guys out there), which the oldsters will remember as the dangly bit used to hook up cable to the screw terminals in older TVs. Signal strengths of 95-100 for all channels, which luckily were all in one direction.

    5. Re:quality has improved by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Pringles cans are resonant at about 2.4 GHz, so really high UHF. Not the ideal frequencies for TV channels, although if the signal is strong enough, even a paper clip will work.

    6. Re:quality has improved by slew · · Score: 1

      Is an empty Pringles can VHF or UHF?

      Scale is a bit off... You need a bigass pringles can for VHF or UHF.

      Pringles can work pretty good for 5GHz, but UHV is 1GHz and VHF is only 100MHz... (wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, so 1/5 the frequency is 5x the wavelength so you do the math).

      FWIW, the way a cantenna (aka waveguide antenna) works is you need a can with a circumference large enough to let the desired wavelength in (to avoid cutoff, but not too much larger) and long enough to make 3/4 of a standing wave mode so you can tap the standing wave at 1/4 wavelength off the closed end with your antenna tap... If the can is of the right dimensions so that the dominate mode in the can is the frequency that you want to receive, you get lots of antenna gain with this setup.

  15. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For real.

    "We interviewed some dumbshit kid and he said some dumbshit things! Millenails are turning society on it's head!"

  16. Commercials for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Correction, it allows one to watch commercials on networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS for free. Awesome.

    1. Re:Commercials for free by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      So it's better than paying for an Internet connection and being forced to waste bandwidth for ads on YouTube?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  17. In the UK, we still use them... by rklrkl · · Score: 1

    In the UK, "digital terrestrial broadcasting" still requires the use of an antenna, which is usually mounted somewhere on the roof. Although it's called "Freeview", you still have to pay an annual TV license (and almost all non-BBC channels have adverts). You get a selection of HD channels and even more SD channels, but if it's even more free channels you're after, something like a sat dish is probably the way to go in the UK.

    1. Re:In the UK, we still use them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it's called "Freeview", you still have to pay an annual TV license...

      At least you don't need to pay your annual licence anymore (after 1971) to listen to the over-the-air "free" version of pandora/spotify (aka radio)... It just blows the mind of your average millennial MBA...

    2. Re:In the UK, we still use them... by limegreen · · Score: 1

      but if it's even more free channels you're after, something like a sat dish is probably the way to go in the UK.

      That's the way I went - a Sky dish repurposed with a FreeSat box. Picture quality on the main channels is great, even in SD.

  18. UK TV Licence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not free in the UK. You still need to buy a TV licence. The sad part, is that you can still purchase a black&white licence!

    1. Re:UK TV Licence by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Black and white license? The UK government is racist! What about yellow, brown, and red people?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  19. I use this too by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I've cut back all the extra cable channels I never watch, and it even gives me songs and anime in Spanish and Mandarin and Japanese.

    It's super cool. Who knew that your local PBS station broadcasts on three frequencies, or that all the soccer games are on Telemundo in higher quality (1080p) instead of the lower definition 1080i you get from Comcast? And then you turn on SAP on the Spanish soccer game and you hear English!!

    It totally rocks!

    Add Crunchyroll Premium to that and you're a winner!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I use this too by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Don't lose your head over the whole Crunchyroll thing. Do they have Puella Magi Madoka Magica?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:I use this too by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Don't know. Can barely keep up with what they have.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:I use this too by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Damn. I guess my joke went way over your head.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  20. What happens when he talks on his iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does his head explode from the cognitive dissonance?

    "Talk?!?! On a iPHONE?!?!?"

    Because you KNOW he has an iPhone...

    1. Re:What happens when he talks on his iPhone? by dysmal · · Score: 1

      You don't talk on your iPhone silly. You talk into your Apple Watch!

      Actually... that would spiffy if there were a show where a person talked to their watch to communicate. Apple should patent that because no one EVER would have thought of that!!!

    2. Re:What happens when he talks on his iPhone? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      A TV show where a person talks into a watch? Don't be a Dick.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:What happens when he talks on his iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, but only because you have to be ^| |^ that old to remember that reference.

  21. In other news..... by RadioD00d · · Score: 1

    You can use a toothbrush to clean your teeth, and there's a thing called a comb which is very handy for arranging your hair.... This story belongs on the Onion. I'd mod it for sarcasm, but I'm commenting...

  22. Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

    Enjoy the ads, which take up half your viewing time and assume you are an idiot. I would not say I am "grateful" for our online marketing overlords, per se, but at least there's a slim chance that streaming ads are relevant.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Enjoy the ads, which take up half your viewing time and assume you are an idiot. I would not say I am "grateful" for our online marketing overlords, per se, but at least there's a slim chance that streaming ads are relevant.

      They make OTA DVRs, you know, so you can record your programming and watch it afterwards, skipping through the ads.

    2. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Personally, I dramatically prefer untargeted ads over targeted ones. Targeted ads just remind me that I'm being spied on.

    3. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

      Personally, I dramatically prefer untargeted ads over targeted ones. Targeted ads just remind me that I'm being spied on.

      Well, enjoy the Brawndo spots.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard of Brawndo before your reply (so I guess it was targetd?), but sure, why not? I have never found an ad that was useful or interesting, targeted or not, so they're all the same in terms of enjoyability.

    5. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

      It's from the film Idiocracy.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    6. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course! I missed that reference, and yet I still managed dress myself this morning. Wonders never cease.

    7. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course! I missed that reference, and yet I still managed dress myself this morning. Wonders never cease.

      Easy, there. I wasn't trying to get you all riled up, I was just trying to explain myself. Not everyone is out to pick a fight--even online.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    8. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      No worries, I didn't think you were picking a fight, and didn't take offense. I was just trying to express my genuine dismay at missing a reference that I totally shouldn't have missed.

  23. More than half a dozen by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I count 36 OTA channels in my current lineup. That's about as many as I got on my first cable service in the 1980s. Admittedly, most of the channels are crap, but so are most of the channels on cable.

    My favorite way to set it up is to get one of those huge outdoor antennas and just throw it on top of the fiberglass in the attic, generally pointed at the transmitters. I've always gotten flawless reception that way (much better than rabbit ears), without having an ugly lightning magnet on the outside of the house.

    1. Re:More than half a dozen by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      I built my own antenna and bolted it to some supports in the roof. It works gangbusters for pulling in channels 40+ miles away and only cost me about $20 in materials, plus a couple of hours to put it together and get it mounted. Mostly of the cost was the spool of aluminum grounding wire (intended for lightning rods).

      The plans

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:More than half a dozen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I count 36 OTA channels in my current lineup."

      I've got you, and just about everyone else here, beat. At home, I'm on Cable, a geological necessity. Many hills, much snow.
      But when I'm on my boat...
      I bought a $69 Polaroid 12VDC LED TV, and stuck a powered ATSC Antenna, ($30 on sale at Fry's), 46 feet above Sea Level, on top of the mast, next to the Marine VHF Antenna.
      I'm picking up Channels not even listed; a couple of them are Pirates. One shows K-Pop Videos 24 hours a day.
      And then I discovered Northbay TV, KZHD Channel 49, Santa Rosa. Funded by a certifiable Lunatic who made his Millions creating Apple Software, Northbay TV just shows programs that he is interested in, and he has interesting tastes.
      And he hosts "Creature Features" on Saturday nights with the full cooperation and blessing of the Bob Wilkins estate. Last Saturday was a truly dreadful movie, "Horror Express", with Telly Savalas, Peter Cushing, and Christopher Lee. His weekly Guests are Bay Area Film Makers. His was the first Station to broadcast John Stanley's "Nightmare In Blood".
      Yes, of course they Stream as well. In HD. Watch the Gigabytes fly by.

      However, I much prefer to watch Live, OTA, at my Teak Navigation Station.
      Just how many here even have a Navigation Station, much less a Teak one? When not use as a TV, the Polaroid serves as a GPS Mapping Monitor for the iPad. (Get one of the Cellular ones; they have the GPS Chip. I never activated the Cellular bits. I use Navionics with the NOAA Maps.)

    3. Re:More than half a dozen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My problem is that even before digitization, I could only get one tv station in at kind of acceptable quality, two in at very poor quality, and there was one I could kind of see through the snow. I haven't tried since, but I live in the sticks and the situation has surely gotten worse for me, not better.

      So I can't get cable even if I want it, and I'd like an alternative I don't have to pay for, but an antenna ain't that.

      Luckily I can get internet access through a WISP, and watch Netflix. If not for that I'd have to do something with my life

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:More than half a dozen by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      There are any number of cheap amplified antennas, most of which are powered by the USB jack that most modern TVs have in back. Adding this to our TV bumped it from two or three sketchy-at-best channels to upward of 70 crystal clear ones. If you're at all interested in trying out OTA again, you might have better luck with something like that.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:More than half a dozen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've used television amplifiers before, they don't have the power to overcome this kind of interference. You can only polish a turd in a cryo environment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:More than half a dozen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want actual good plans look at the antenna research & development forum at digitalhome.ca
      http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/186-antenna-research-development/

    7. Re:More than half a dozen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go over to TVFool.com and see what's available. Anything with an NM (noise margin) of at least 15dB is at least theoretically receivable.

    8. Re:More than half a dozen by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Those guys are still nuts over the Grey Hoverman, which I found to be supremely disappointing. It was no better than rabbit ears when I tried it.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:More than half a dozen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GH works well on my roof. I'm a few KM away from the transmitters but behind a mountain.

    10. Re:More than half a dozen by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I was hoping (for your viewing enjoyment) that it'd be like "huh, I should try that... OMG IT WORKS!"

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    11. Re:More than half a dozen by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Just to reinforce what you're saying: yes, you can get a ton of free channels if you're in the right place and have the right antenna setup. When we moved into a small condo building a couple of years ago I noticed that there was a coax connection on the wall. I plugged my TV in and scanned for channels just on a lark. Well, from what I recall, it found about 160-180 channels! I'm in the Los Angeles / Orange County area about 35 miles from the transmitter antennas, and came to find out that our 4-story tall building has a full-size antenna on the roof that looks like it was professionally installed.

      Like you said, the majority of the channels is junk, but it's still worth the effort, I think, to try the best setup you can get if you are interested in getting free TV. If you follow the cord cutting news (cordcutternews.com is what I usually read, but there are also subreddits, etc), you will see that more and more OTA channels are being added fairly regularly. I think that this is a real trend, however small, of moving away from paid TV back to free OTA TV.

  24. Onion? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

    I feel like this is an onion story that WSJ picked up accidentally.

    --
    You are all a bunch of idots.
    1. Re:Onion? by kybred · · Score: 1

      I feel like this is an onion story that WSJ picked up accidentally.

      I thought the same thing.

  25. Rabbit ears? by Shrubber · · Score: 1

    The Wall Street Journal article still managed to screw it up. Antennas known as rabbit ears were for receiving UHF channels. The antennas that pick up network broadcasts were never called that.

    1. Re:Rabbit ears? by RadioD00d · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm, no. Early televisions had dual telescoping antennas in a dipole configuration, for reception of VHF signals (channels 2-13). What you're thinking of is the 'bowtie' configuration that was used for UHF - that came later. The early dipoles were called 'rabbit ears' because you adjusted them at various angles to improve reception. Now, get off my lawn!

    2. Re:Rabbit ears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only partly true. Rabbit ears pick up VHF frequencies 3 to 13 and there are still some stations broadcasting HDTV in that band. The original way to pick up UHF frequencies 14 to 68 was a round loop antenna. I no longer have one of those, but the rabbit ears still work.

    3. Re:Rabbit ears? by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 2

      Close. Rabbit ears were for VHF, and that round / bow tie antenna was for UHF

    4. Re:Rabbit ears? by msauve · · Score: 2

      No, rabbit ears are VHF dipoles, made with 2 telescopic elements. Turn them to point them, adjust the length for the frequency.

      The corresponding UHF antenna is a "bow ties" (and often just a loop).

      Network broadcast stations were on both VHF and UHF.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Rabbit ears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true at all. The long straight elements were for VHF frequencies, and that's all some rabbit ears had. UHF channels normally used a small circular antenna, which was initially connected directly to separate UHF input terminals on the TV, back in the day. Later, the straight VHF and circular UHF elements were combined into a single unit.

    6. Re:Rabbit ears? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Network broadcast stations were on both VHF and UHF.

      We are a network affiliate! We complete with other network affiliates, not some punks broadcasting out of a closet! - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098546/

    7. Re:Rabbit ears? by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Actually the channels were 2 through 13 (not 3 through 13). I believe VHF low (2-6) has since been dropped, but someone can correct me if wrong.

    8. Re:Rabbit ears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is wrong. The long dipole "rabbit ears" elements are for VHF frequencies and broadcasters still use VHF frequencies for HD TV (at least the higher frequencies.) Antennas with "rabbit ear" elements are available today, and will likely be for a long time; not all broadcasters have abandoned VHF bands and have no reason to do so.

    9. Re:Rabbit ears? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I thought rabbit ears were only used for the Playboy Channel?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:Rabbit ears? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Badgers! Badgers! We don't need no steenkeen badgers!

    11. Re:Rabbit ears? by the_denman · · Score: 1

      Channel 5 WOI-DT out of Des Moines still actually transmits on Channel 5, which can cause some issues for non VHF antennas. To help get around this they also have WOI-LD transmitting on channel 50 at a low power for the Des Moines Area. https://www.antennaweb.org/Sta...

    12. Re:Rabbit ears? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I just wrapped a coil of foil to bridge the two rabbit ears when I wanted to watch UHF.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Rabbit ears? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Rabbit ears are for VHF. Bowties or loops are for UHF.

    14. Re:Rabbit ears? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The TV we had when I was a kid had a channel 13 on the VHF dial.

    15. Re:Rabbit ears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And remember: "We got it all on UHF!"

  26. In another 5 years by drewsup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they will discover "radio" and forsake the AUX in jack they all live by...

    1. Re:In another 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AUX jack? Apple made sure that won't happen.

      But they will likely discover a new pastime:
      pennies.

    2. Re:In another 5 years by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that in five years all the companies will have had the courage to remove the AUX inputs from their devices.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:In another 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and catch a nasty rash of right wing evanglical con merchants.

    4. Re:In another 5 years by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      And for sure they will discover that with ham radio you can talk just like with skype! Having them to embrace ARRL will be the last straw for a dead hobby.

    5. Re:In another 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they can sing emotive songs how the radio killed the internet star.

    6. Re:In another 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link. I've been a Ham since I was a piglet.
      Ham Radio is still pretty big in the Racing and Cruising communities. Once you get out of the Marina, Marine VHF, (And often 2 Meter Ham as well...), is pretty much useless, and Marine SSB sucks. All Commercial Radio-Communications suck.
      I have an ICOM 718 on my boat, it has the FM Card, and I rarely take it out of Low Power mode. Yup, I've chatted with Australia with less than 10 Watts on 20 Meters. I use Sleeve Antennas on the Backstays, and a manual tuner.
      Internet on Ham is s-l-o-w, but doable. In fact, pretty much most of the ongoing research in new Ham Tech is happening with the Cruisers, where low power consumption, small size, light weight, and hackability are paramount.
      The Cruisers do tend to be older than the Racers, and more affluent, but still Mobile. They ain't 80 year old landbound geezers in wheelchairs. Well, not many of them are.

      In certain ways, Ham Radio is like Sailing. Every decade or so, it is declared to be dying, that young people just aren't interested, and that it is too complicated and expensive. This has been going on since maybe the end of WWII... and Sailing and Ham Radio are still around.
      My backup Radio on the boat is a Ten-Tec Powermite that I built from a kit when I was 11. It has been upgraded of course; I reworked the Front End to get rid of that pesky 70653 MOSFET, and the Back End to handle lower-Z 'phones, and it has an internal 100WH Lithium Battery that lasts for days before recharging off the Solar Panels. It's more fun than the ICOM; I'm still holding at around 15WPM, banging a Brass WWII vintage Key.

      This year, there are more Licensed Ham Radio Operators in the US than ever before; most of the recent ones are young, and they mainly hang out on 2 Meters or higher because a Transceiver costs less than $30. Yes, many of them are Lids, Kids, and Space Cadets, but many may remember the Bucketmouths on CB Radio that migrated to Ham, because getting a Ham Ticket was a genuine achievement. They are now the Elmers.
      Ham Radio is not exciting these days; it takes real effort to electrocute yourself now. But it is still very interesting, and new people are discovering it every day.

    7. Re:In another 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a long post to tell basically nothing, apart what you have in your ham radio station and to show you are very obsessed with it. Do you understand why ham radio is dead ?!?

    8. Re:In another 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I'm obsessed with my Boat. You obviously just skimmed and missed the part that there are more Hams now in the US than ever before, but it's a different kind of Ham Radio than it was five decades back when Tubes ruled, which entirely different than it was a Century ago, when there were no Tubes.
      What is dying is the ARRL, which that link was really all about. According to QRZ Polling, only one in six Hams in the US are members; at one time it was closer to one in two. And according to things like Membership Voting, there are really only about 5000 active Members. That's out of about three quarters of a Million Active US and Canadian Licenses. Those 5000 members are overwhelmingly Old, Male and very Conservative.

      I mentioned Cruising before. Many Cruisers have Ham Rigs on their Boats. The majority do _not_ have Licenses, and of those that do, they rarely use their Call Signs. Part of this is a desire for privacy, and a part has to do with the fact that a FCC License means nothing in International Waters. They almost always go by Boat Name.

      A final bit about Ham Internet: Do it right, and it's Free. Slow, but Free. No monthly Comcast fees. The Telecoms, ISPs, and Commercial Radio Services _hate_ this, and have locked up proprietary Patents on much of the Technology. But there are Open Source alternatives. Because that's the Ham way off doing things.
      They also hate the Ham Frequency allocations, as well as the 17 Million IPv4 addresses allocated to Ham Radio decades ago.
      There is a lot of potential Profit there if Morons like you keep on spreading the rumor that Ham Radio is dead.

      Captcha: spectrum

  27. Not for me by kqc7011 · · Score: 2

    I would switch to a over the air antenna, but I live where the nearest broadcast tower is over 60 miles away and line of sight to that tower is blocked by hills. A neighbor down the block had a antenna hooked up to a TV in his garage, three channels (one major network, one PBS and one off brand) were watchable and it worked fairly well most of the time. He ran cable and a receiver into the garage and took down the antenna. Now he can watch what he wants. The downsides of living away from a major metropolitan area still have not counteracted the upsides of not living in one.

    --
    Passionately Indifferent
    1. Re:Not for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The downsides of living away from a major metropolitan area still have not counteracted the upsides

      I would switch to a over the air antenna

      Tell us more about why you would watch TV if you could, maybe because THERE IS NOTHING ELSE TO DO out there?

    2. Re:Not for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dig a hole, stick a tower in it, put a motor and an antenna on top, pour cement around it, wire the motor to a dial, and connect the antenna to your TV. That's what we did when I was a kid living in rural PA. Just make sure your tower is taller than the tree line.

  28. Hipster? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Does this mean using TV antenna is a hipster thing now? Would that make all us old fuds hipsters before hipsters were cool? Or do you to be using the antenna ironically?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re: Hipster? by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 2

      The old fuds version of hipsters was when in the 80s, you had teens and movie stars dressing like they were from the....50s (punk leather and slick hair) and pop stars using the same music formula but with electronics. So....nothing has changed. Literally at all. We're going to have to have a WW3 and then another economic boom to reminisce over to end this shit.

  29. Millennial Manifesto violation by geekmux · · Score: 1

    You might be shocked about someone discovering OTA programming in the year 2017.

    I'm more shocked over the fact that he didn't know about a free product, which is a clear violation of the Millennial Manifesto.

  30. Digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to get about 10 channels through my old antenna - sometimes with a little snow, but serviceable. But when things changed over to digital, I found that I get only a single digital channel in the boonies of NH. Digital is all or nothing, and what I get is pretty much nothing.

    1. Re: Digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're better of with just Internet and Kodi.

  31. Bow-tie by PuddleBoy · · Score: 1

    I strongly recommend the bow-tie type of antenna. Works very well and doesn't break the bank (I think it's about $35 on amazon).

    If you get a smallish one, be sure to be aware of where your local broadcast towers are and point it towards those.

  32. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by fortfive · · Score: 2

    But it's about those wacky millenials!

  33. Not just millenials by dysmal · · Score: 2

    My girlfriend is 42 and was raised with cable TV and she never knew about using an antenna until she met me. The commercials suck but that's what the mute button is for.

    The only down side I've found is that if you have spotty reception, it's choppy (kind of like buffering). Whereas pre-DTV spotty reception was static but tolerable.

    1. Re:Not just millenials by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The commercials suck but that's what the mute button is for.

      No, no, no! That's when you surf to another channel.

      At least until they come up with Blipverts...

    2. Re:Not just millenials by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem with the conversion to DTV is that because the signal is better at the same broadcast power, they reduced the output power for all stations so as not to conflict with other service areas. The end result being as you said, crappy reception if you aren't very near the transmitter.

    3. Re:Not just millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is often an errors per second counter somewhere in the menu, use this to fine tune your DTV signal.
      It's pretty common for people to get the signal close, but then in rainstorms it goes because the error rate goes up slightly breaking the threshold.
      Using the error rate thing lets you get the positioning better even past the threshold for all errors to be corrected - which is something people used to analog TV need to remember! (It's not quite like the good old days!)

  34. Too bad... by quetwo · · Score: 1

    Too bad the FCC just held an auction for a lot of the spectrum that these TV stations use. In many markets, half of the stations you can get over the air with "bunny ears" will go dark or cable-only within the next year. The spectrum is being sold off to the cell phone companies.

    1. Re: Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to the lower spectrums? That's just to have longer range, not to kill off digital TV. Besides, makes you wonder what they're doing with analog.

    2. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the FCC just held an auction for a lot of the spectrum that these TV stations use. In many markets, half of the stations you can get over the air with "bunny ears" will go dark or cable-only within the next year. The spectrum is being sold off to the cell phone companies.

      For data. For streaming. For streaming video. Can't they just sell off Ham and CB radio instead?

    3. Re:Too bad... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Too bad the FCC just held an auction for a lot of the spectrum that these TV stations use. In many markets, half of the stations you can get over the air with "bunny ears" will go dark or cable-only within the next year.

      If you are talking about white space, the spectrum is only in places where the stations aren't. Otherwise, citation please.

    4. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAM and CB radio are needed when there is natural disaster that takes out the power lines and cellphone networks. Then they can relay messages using a base station and a portable power generator.

    5. Re: Too bad... by quetwo · · Score: 1

      No -- last summer the FCC allowed stations to enter into an auction for their active frequencies. This was for all stations that had an active UHF or VHF license. Many decided to participate in the auction and sell off their license.

      A consequence of this is that with half of the stations going away, the remaining stations' licenses will be consolidated and pushed to a lower frequency, with the higher frequencies then being re-assigned to cell companies. In places like Chicago, they are going from about 14 broadcasters with about 30 some virtual channels to about 7 broadcasters with about 16 virtual channels. The rest will go offline or just cable-tv only. I know in my area (Lansing, MI) we've already had two stations go dark since the auction finished (WHTV and whatever 50 was).

      Analog is dead and has been. A few low-power stations still have analog licenses, but anybody who has purchased a TV in the last 10 years hasn't been able to pick them up since very few come with NTSC OTA tuners anymore.

    6. Re:Too bad... by quetwo · · Score: 1

      Last summer the FCC allowed stations to enter into an auction for their active frequencies. This was for all stations that had an active UHF or VHF license. Many decided to participate in the auction and sell off their license.

      A consequence of this is that with half of the stations going away, the remaining stations' licenses will be consolidated and pushed to a lower frequency, with the higher frequencies then being re-assigned to cell companies.

      A 3-second google search comes up with the FCC site with all the details : https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/... with a list of all the stations going dark on this report : https://auctiondata.fcc.gov/pu...

    7. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, Internet access is infinitely more valuable than terrestial tv, what a waste of frequency.

    8. Re:Too bad... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      A 3-second google search comes up with the FCC site with all the details

      Thank you for the link.

      with a list of all the stations going dark on this report

      It is not quite the apocalypse that you make it sound like. The vast majority of those stations that are listed as "go off air" are also CSA "yes". A channel sharing agreement means they become another data stream on an existing broadcaster. I wouldn't call that "going dark" or "cable only", I'd call that a reasonable accommodation to the demand for more mobile services. Yes, if you never rescan for channels on your OTA tuner it will look like they "went dark", but once you do that scan you'll most likely (baring propagation issues) find them again.

  35. What's next.. radio? by bill.pev · · Score: 1

    No way!?!?

    How big a CPU do you need for this new "Rabbit Eye" technology?
    My dad talks about old TV from back in the day. Next you'll be telling me we can still get radio in our cars!

    [Personally I think it was all downhill once they took the build requirement out of the ham radio license exam.]

  36. digital channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50 miles west of Chicago, I get about 40 digital channels, most with perfect pictures from my attic antenna.
    Free, but some channels are in Spanish and Polish !

    The transition to digital was painless and good,
    more channels, better picture.

    1. Re:digital channels by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      50 miles west of Chicago, I get about 40 digital channels, most with perfect pictures from my attic antenna.
      Free, but some channels are in Spanish and Polish !

      The transition to digital was painless and good,
      more channels, better picture.

      I wouldn't exactly call it "painless", but probably overall a good thing.

      I still feel like certain channel frequencies should have been left operational if only for public safety and emergency purposes. You do not need transistors to wire up a black-and-white analog signal television receiver.

    2. Re:digital channels by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly call it "painless", but probably overall a good thing.

      Yeah, maybe. I suppose it's a good thing that it made it impossible to receive most of the stations anymore without either spending a lot of money on cable or spending a lot of money on roof antennae and boosters. Seriously, in my area (which is urban), those are your only two options unless you happen to live in one of the small areas that can actually get realistic digital reception.

    3. Re:digital channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not need transistors to wire up a black-and-white analog signal television receiver.

      Please. Who in their right mind would want a tube-based TV?

      Tubes deteriorate and burn out. (quite similar to ligthbulbs.) Which is why they aren't used in consumer products. Time to change a tube in the TV again? Guess which one?

      Also, much heavier and power hungry than transistors.

  37. Are people that stupid? by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes they are. When I first saw this ad I had to rewatch it several times because I couldn't believe what I was seeing. "Thanks to a federal government mandate, broadcasters must broadcast their shows... for free!" (I have a DVR - which doesn't always play nicely with antennae if you need to adjust them to get a signal! Which is why I naven't completely cut the cord from cable myself yet!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  38. Better option - build your own! It's super easy by bjdevil66 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was posted here on slashdot years ago... I followed the instructions and it worked EXTREMELY well. When I hooked it up, it picked up 30-40 stations around the Phoenix metro area without a glitch. I used a scrap piece of 2x4, so I put the ugly thing up in the attic, and my entire house can hook into it. Less than $10 out of pocket (needed some washers, screws, and a UHF/VHF transformer from Radio Shack.)

    Coat Hanger HDTV Antenna

    1. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by PPH · · Score: 1

      What is this 'Radio Shack' place that you refer to?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      and a UHF/VHF transformer from Radio Shack

      All you need for DTV is a balun. The stations are all moved to UHF and the channel number is nominal historic label, rather than a frequency designator (much as phone number portability disconnected phone numbers from geographic locations).

      Now that the Shack is dying you can pick up TV baluns at hardware stores - for similarly low prices.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a UHF/VHF transformer from Radio Shack.)
      Coat Hanger HDTV Antenna

      Sorry to tell you this, but ....

    4. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VHF is still in use for DTV. After the transition, some channels were moved back to the VHF band, in the U.S. at least. It's true that the channel number does not necessarily match the RF channel assigned.

    5. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      VHF is still in use for DTV. After the transition, some channels were moved back to the VHF band, in the U.S. at least.

      OK. So it just happened that all the stations where I am are UHF.

      That just means that, if you happen to live within range of one of those (and want to see it), you may need to add the couple extra elements to bring in the VHF signals.

      = = =

      One nice thing about DTV is that it's OFDM with FEC. That means multipath just makes the signal stronger, rather than creating ghosting and degrading the image. So the antenna generally doesn't have to sort out off-path signals to achieve error-free reception and can be very non-directional. In turn, that means that a simple antenna can pick up good signals from many directions. Frequency allocation generally keeps any TV stations you can receive (without strong amplification) from interfering with any others ditto at any given place, at least in the US (though you may find a few fringe-range stations that share an air channel with something nearby.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  39. Sales of antennas will up 7% by Cha0s_Agent · · Score: 1

    What's that, like 10 antennae?

  40. Rotary Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next someone will discovery this can hook up a rotary box to their rooftop antenna and get more channels. God millennials are dumb.

  41. Wait until they discover CRT monitors by Cito · · Score: 0

    CRT monitors have better quality still compared to lcd's

    We still use CRT's for graphic design since you get true black and higher resolution.

    CRT have no "native resoution" grab a .24 or .22 pitch crt and crank that resolution as high as your card can go.

    you'll fry your video card before you'll out do the resolution on a crt

    1. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you haven't had a new LCD in the last ten years. Go buy a bottom-of-the-line IPS monitor and compare it to your CRT. The TFT screens are indeed shit, but IPS is much better.

      Of course, this is quickly going to stop being the case as modern displays ship with default settings such that the sharpness must be turned all the way down in order to get an accurate reproduction of the signal. Extrapolation from that trend tells us that in a few more years, monitors will exist which are still applying a sharpness-enhancing algorithm even when the sharpness is turned all the way down, and thus the old CRTs will once again be providing a better picture merely because they don't molest the signal before displaying it.

    2. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IPS still has shit contrast and mediocre colors compared to a reference grade CRT.
      OLED can be as good as a CRT but they're a bit on the pricey side still.
      Time will tell if Samsung's QDOT stuff is any good.

    3. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, because I fried a CRT with a video card back in the days of manual XF86 configs.

    4. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You got a 4K CRT lying around?

      You're so color blind that you can't see the grey film of phosphors on your CRT screen?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      That used to be true, but is no longer. A high quality LCD beats the pants of of a high quality CRT.

      Also, CRTs absolutely have a native resolution: you can't display any image at a resolution higher than the density of the phosphor dots.

  42. This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disappointing half of his guests who were only interested in the ads. "An antenna was not even on my radar,"

    Says a lot about the USA today.
    Adverts are the devil incarnate IMHO.

  43. Full retro by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Well at least millennials will get to experience the joys of constantly re-positioning an antenna to get a decent signal. The difference is they can tweet about it to the word instead of complaining about it to the people in the room.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Full retro by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I don't need to do that since I bought an amplified fractal antenna - box about the size of a large laptop with a wall wart that I keep under the TV though high probably would be better, I get stations 75 miles away even.

    2. Re:Full retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Well at least millennials will get to experience the joys of constantly re-positioning an antenna to get a decent signal. The difference is ...that they already have plenty of experience doing that with their phone.

  44. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reads like an Onion article

  45. Article is annoying but accurate by jandrese · · Score: 2

    OTA TV has gone through something of a resurgence after the switchover to digital. There are way more channels on the air today then there were 10 years ago. This happened at the same time cable started raising their prices unsustainably so people are coming back and finding all sorts of channels that they would actually watch. Combine this with inexpensive online streaming options and Cable's $70+ monthly price point is a bad joke.

    In my area we have all of the big networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, CW, 7 PBS channels), plus Cozi, MeTV, Charge, Comet, TBI, Bounce, Justice, GetTV, Grit, Escape, MyTV, Movies, HgI, Retro, ion, ThisTV, and a ton of foreign channels. The only things I'm missing even a little are FX and AMC.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Article is annoying but accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a tiny antenna a few years ago and was surprised to find that I got 70 channels. (Atlanta area) It was much better than expected. I rarely watch it, however.

    2. Re:Article is annoying but accurate by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I found that a simple piece of wire shoved into the center connection of a coaxial jack usually worked, even with DTV. Ghetto, yes, but who goes around checking the back of people's television sets, and why would I care what they thought anyway. I haven't owned a TV set in years and I don't miss it as a Hulu subscription and Youtube is more than enough for me, and I would rather not spend most of my waking hours loading up on the moronic crap that is usually broadcast anyway. I have a good old fashioned radio just in case for really big emergencies

  46. And because reality doesn't have to make sense ... by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    My favorite part of this story is that they're doing it so they can see the commercials. Cable company execs are probably losing their minds over this.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  47. All that hassle to see commercials? by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

    Anyone who is 'disappointed' not to see commercials on TV needs to re-evaluate her/his life. Or is this a new 'millenial' hipster trend?

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    1. Re:All that hassle to see commercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tuned into the Indy500 to see how Alonso was doing, couldn't believe the amount of adverts on US TV.
      It was more like watching an advert show with the occassional racing break thrown in.

    2. Re:All that hassle to see commercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was for Superbowl commercials.

  48. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll assume Mr. Sisco was hatched recently. That would explain why he has no parents to talk to or any friends that could tell him about the PFM (Pure fucking magic) protocol that allows Radio and TV signal to travel in thin air (insert open mouth emoji thing).

  49. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 2

    I wonder how many TV show execs have forgotten about over-the-air broadcasting and will be surprised to hear this.

    On the other hand, you need to be in a good location to receive a view-able signal. While we still have an antenna on the roof of our house, we located in a marginal area for reception. With analog broadcasting, just meant a little random "snow" in the image. Now that broadcasting has gone all digital, we get a lot of freezes and "pixel blocking", making the image unview-able. (I still try the antenna signal a few times per year. At night, with clear skies, I can get a marginally view-able image - at best.)

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  50. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    But does it have layers?

    Lunch is over, time for a parfait.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  51. Not farfetched by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, an acquaintance was between jobs, controlling his budget, and had dropped his cable subscription. He knew about broadcast TV, but the thought of getting an exterior antenna (more money), mounting it on a roof, wiring it, aiming, etc. was daunting. I told him that where I lived, a plain old FM dipole antenna was sufficient to pull in all of the major local channels, since FM radio is close to TV channel 6. I could get sufficient signal for testing a new TV, say, just by pinning the dipole to the ceiling in the correct orientation. I had several FM dipoles sitting in a box, from various receivers I'd had over the years. I gave him one of mine and he was back in business, at least for the basics.

    Years ago, I built a log periodic VHF antenna out of some random wooden stakes, some string, and some extra wire I had, put it in an unused upstairs bedroom, and aimed it at the nearest large city's towers. That was more than sufficient and cost practically nothing. We renamed the room the antenna room.

    1. Re:Not farfetched by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Or you can get a prepackaged flat antenna for around $15 that you can stick on the wall with a command strip...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    2. Re:Not farfetched by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I went through the antenna building phase too. They worked, but even when it's behind the TV a 2x4 with some clothes hangers and wires hanging on it just isn't appealing.

      I just bit the bullet and bought a Mohu Leaf a few years back and not only does it look better, it also works better than any of the homemade antennas I ever made.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  52. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Yea Millenials... For the most part it isn't that they found a new discovery, it is just with the Antenna they can watch local show, and use streaming services for the rest.

    The way it was written made it seem like it was really a new thing... However there are few things about the newer technology that we should realize.
    1. Most New TVs do not come built in with an Antenna.
    2. Old TVs with Antenna normally will not support our current digital standards.
    Both 1 and 2 means the person will need to make a conscious decision to go with an Antenna. Vs. the good old day which it was the default state of having a TV.
    3. Late Boomers and Early Gen-X who birth the Millennials with their wonderful middle class life style and salaries and cost of living mostly designed for the middle class, could afford Cable TV so their kids grew up with Cable TV as the normal for life.
    4. These Millenials are starting to move out of their parents house as the economy is getting better and college debts are getting paid. So they getting their own place, and will need to get their own TV's and other things, thus making a decision on what to use.
    5. Cable TV has gown down the tubes. (No pun attended) BBC America Plays mostly Star Trek, and Doctor Who. Lifetime keeps on playing My 600 lbs life... All the channels seems to be stuck on a binge watch loop, which I don't want on my broadcast TV, that is what streaming is for. I want to see variety, so if I am board I can channel surf and find something new. Back in the older days, Cable TV had variety, BBC America played British Shows. Discover had educational content. History channel had historical documentaries.....
    6. Local Channels are still competitive. Being the Cable stations stink, the Local Channels are still producing new content. So you get the channels you want to view over the Antenna.

    This story isn't how Millenials are discovering the Antenna, but are choosing it over the alternatives.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  53. The Dodo bird wasn't killed by stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This evidence is proof. Idiocracy will rain supreme. Maybe humans are the next dodo?

  54. Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception in the TV settings, and you have to download a code. The code is free, but it probably won't always be.

    Avoid manufacturers that do this.

    1. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by PPH · · Score: 1

      And some manufacturers' OTA tuners are shit. Fortunately, there are stand-alone DTV tuners with great sensitivity and multipath rejection. Some that have a PVR function when an external disk drive is added.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, a 12.99 OTA tuner with USB recording does the job (very slowly, but then 13$)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    3. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      They probably do it because they know that most purchasers don't actually USE the OTA tuner, but they're required to provide it by law. By requiring a free code, they can get away with only paying royalties to MPEG-LA and/or ATSC for the TVs that have the feature enabled. AFAIK, those royalties aren't cheap, so being able to avoid them for most of the TVs they sell can save the manufacturer quite a bit of money.

    4. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I saved my Voom Satellite TV boxes when they went under... I'm now using two of them on secondary TVs in the house. Their ATSC tuners are FANTASTIC.

  55. Just fell out of my chair laughing my ass off by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Once again, I'm 'cool' before something was 'cool' to start with.

    TEN YEARS AGO, roughly, I dumped cable, and built an HDTV antenna, with supplies from Home Depot, Ace Hardware, and the Dollar Store (plastic cutting board, to cut insulators out of). I was unemployed and decided to cut my expenses. One of the best decision I ever made.

    These days I have a commercially-made antenna with twice as many elements. Also a great investment. Need to add a small VHF antenna and a diplexer to it though, for the two channels that are still in that band.

    ..and NOW they're seeing the light? LOL. Welcome to the OTA Broadcast Master Race, Millennials! ;-)

  56. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by phoenix_orb · · Score: 2

    Get a powered signal amplifier

    They are $25 bucks on Amazon for a decent one.

    I lived rurally for many years. Makes a hell of a difference.

    --
    Blah Blah Blah.
  57. The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that everything is so restricted and monetized in today's world that they don't understand how broadcast could possibly exist and be free.

  58. Re:And because reality doesn't have to make sense by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    Superbowl commercials have been a *thing* for a long while now. It's been the carrot dangled in front of non-sport watching spouses and friends for a good decade, or two.

  59. Reads like the Onion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying...

  60. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a way also to record this new fangled antennae signal to disk with a perfectly legal hacking hardware https://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/ a hacker controlled piece of software . https://www.mythtv.org/

    They don't want you to know about this tip.

  61. Not unless they're forced by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    You couldn't get me back to radio kicking and screaming. I don't need no stinkin' payola fueled music. If all else fails I've got 30 gigs of ripped CDs on a 64gb card in my phone. Plus I've got podcasts for all my hobbies/political leanings.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not unless they're forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've got 30 gigs of ripped CDs

      You mean Certificates of Deposit? Why would you rip up something valuable like that? /s

  62. patience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it sucks having to wait for a specific time for a show to come on. streaming has spoiled me. (the sunday news shows are the only thing i'll tune to the antennae for anyway.)

  63. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I urge anyone who's considering going the antenna route to check with neighbors to find someone else who tried. My wife and I own a summer house in a location that's in the NE US, but (as we now know) may as well be on the moon in terms of antenna usability. We were considering buying one, when I noticed a couple of neighbors with outdoor antennae. I asked, and everyone said they were totally useless due to the distance and terrain involved.

  64. Antenna and Digital Signals by TimSchutte · · Score: 1

    I have DishNetwork, and the signal craps out during rain or snow. Thankfully, I still have a 'rabbit ears' antenna that works fairly well. But in the old days of analog TV, if the signal wavered, I got a little snow. But with today's digital signals the picture stutters, tears and gets all sorts of weird effects! Give me an analog signal anytime!

    1. Re:Antenna and Digital Signals by dysmal · · Score: 1

      Ditto on the analog signal. I can handle a little static (AM radio for sports games) but the stutter can be maddening.

  65. Totally believe it by rbrander · · Score: 1

    Please stop expressing disbelief, people.

    I got a nice antenna at Radio Shack when my wife and I got pissed at the ninth time our cable company raised the monthly a few bucks and we realized it had gone up over 20%, vewy, vewy quietwy. ("Elmer Fudd increases", we called them). It was a period of our lives when that extra $100+ per month was significant. So for anybody where >$1000/year is real money all the time, the shock is that more people haven't discovered this, so I hope that article gets wide play.

    That was about 3 years ago, and everybody who's seen the antenna asks about it and expresses surprise that it exists, that we have one, that we get along with that as enough. This is people old and young. People haven't forgotten the *technology*, but they have forgotten the *practice* of using an antenna.

    It always gives me a chance to express one of my favourite rants, which is that OTA broadcasts have a *regulated quality*, so they always look good, whereas all the private media, (where the provider owns the transmission infrastructure, be it cable, phone or satellite), are allowed to throw you any resolution JUUUUST good enough to keep you from cancelling. 8Mb/s for the Superbowl, sure, but for less-popular shows, they'll run the bandwidth down until somebody's nose is a single big pixel....and back up 10% when people actually leave.

    When idealogues rant about privatization and government can't do anything right, I just show them OTA transmissions. TV quality has been publicly regulated and privately regulated and you can see what it does.

    1. Re:Totally believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an enemy of profits? Who gave you such ideas?

  66. Won't work in Canada by Lirodon · · Score: 1

    Firstly, due to federal policy, all broadcasters are effectively discouraged from operating digital subchannels on their stations, despite the fact that we use the same television standards as Americans, by requiring a multitude of regulatory hurdles to be cleared before you can get permission to do so. Furthermore, due to almost all major broadcasters being vertically integrated with pay television providers, there is little incentive to actually invest in over-the-air television beyond mandatory carriage in the markets where they do end up operating, since it's more profitable to collect subscriber fees for a "new" channel where 90% of the content is literally just recycled from its sister channels, forcibly bundled alongside 2-5 more channels (despite being required to do so, providers also discourage a la carte options by making them as unattractive as possible and giving them little promotion). Hence, we do not have the wide array of options over-the-air as there are in the U.S. or the United Kingdom (given how consolidated the networks are here, maybe a model closer to Freeview could work here). Additionally, because the majority have pay TV here, broadcasters largely cut down on their OTA transmitters during the digital transition to save costs..

    1. Re:Won't work in Canada by rbrander · · Score: 1

      Ummm...I'm the previous poster. I started off in Calgary, where I got just 2 channels really well, a 3rd most of the time (could be dodgy during day, better at night, which isn't much of a problem).

      In Vancouver, it's better: crystal-clear on all the three major Canadian networks 7x24, plus 3 more-local channels, two of which I admit are useless to me as an English speaker, though I sometimes wish I knew what the hell they were talking about on "The Harpreet Singh Show"; you never see such animated conversations on Kimmel. But especially for the local Asian populations, I think those channels are a nice bit of local community building.

      I'm not sure what you were expecting beyond the 3 major networks, I assure you that's all we had in the standard-def "rabbit ears" broadcast days.

    2. Re:Won't work in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hence, we [canada] do[es] not have the wide array of options over-the-air as there are in the U.S."

      What are you talking about? if you live in a major city you get plenty of OTA options. I myself get 15 channels in the GVRD with barely line of sight to the mountains. I get ctv, cbc, global, everything you would want from "local" TV. For the rest there is bittorrent.

      of course i never watch it because of the ads, but if you want to watch the olympics, live sports or new years countdowns, OTA works great in major cities in canada. Maybe in the USA you get 30 plus channels, but really 15 channels should be enough for anyone.

    3. Re:Won't work in Canada by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >I'm not sure what you were expecting beyond the 3 major networks, I assure you that's all we had in the standard-def "rabbit ears" broadcast days.

      Ha! I'm from the 'burbs of Toronto, and got stations from Hamilton, Toronto, and Buffalo. 10 base channels: 5 CBLT (CBC) / 9 CFTO / 11 CHCH / 19 CICO (TVO) / 41 CIII (Global) / 47 CFMT / 57(prev. 79) CITY from Canada, then 19 and 23 (American PBS), and 29 Fox.

      Maybe more, those are just the ones I can remember. But you know what? I still remember going around and around the dial looking for something to watch that wasn't an ad.

      I don't miss FTA anymore than I miss cable.

    4. Re:Won't work in Canada by Lirodon · · Score: 1

      It only works in Canada if you live close to the border. I used to live near Detroit, now I don't. The only major networks the closest city to me actually has OTA, are CBC (English and French), CTV, and Global. City is cable only (having taken over the province's "educational" broadcaster), and CBC doesn't even have a station anymore in the province's second major population centre (Saskatoon) because the CBC said they would only convert their originating stations to digital in digital transition markets, and not rebroadcasters (it was technically just a translator of CBC in Regina but with Saskatoon commercials). That's only five channels OTA in Regina, and two in Saskatoon, all with only one channel each (in a perfect world CTV could run CTV Two on subchannels, but less they incur the wraith of the CRTC). The closest U.S. city I could theoretically pull from is Williston, North Dakota, which is around 150 miles south. "wide array" includes not only major networks, but independents, as well as those digital subchannel networks.

    5. Re:Won't work in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't the CRTC ban analog television to make room for more cellular networks and now only digital television transmissions are allowed? So broadcasters are not discouraged from using digital transmission, they are required to do it and shut down their analog transmitters as of 2011.

      The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) initially decided not to enforce a single date for ending analog broadcasts, opting to let market forces decide when the switchover will occur. It subsequently reversed its position, on May 17, 2007, setting an analogue shutoff date of August 31, 2011, just over two years after the American transition date of June 12, 2009. Mandatory markets with a transmitter that does not transition to digital by the deadline will lose the over-the-air signal for the corresponding station permanently or until a digital transmitter is brought on-the-air for that station in that area.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_terrestrial_television_in_Canada

      So, ya, good luck with that analog TV receiver in Canada millennials.

    6. Re:Won't work in Canada by Lirodon · · Score: 1

      Yes, we transitioned to digital OTA television (ATSC), but the CRTC doesn't let broadcasters use digital subchannels willy-nilly unlike the U.S. The CRTC, on the other hand, has been progressively deregulating aspects of specialty/cable TV (unlike the U.S., all cable channels also must be licensed)

  67. Yeah by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Where are my hourly stories about what Trump has done today? Slashdot might as well just repost all his tweets as stories. That way I get up to the minute Trump news scattered with week old tech news.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  68. Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    joys of constantly re-positioning an antenna to get a decent signal.

    One of the benefits of analog signals is that they "degenerated" more gracefully than the compressed digital signals now in use for broadcast in most areas.

    The analog signal may be snowy or have streaks under poor signals, but you could still see most of the image. With compressed signals, signal loss often results in ungodly distortions from a Cubists' nightmare. Faces can look really grotesque as the cubist distortions move with the head's movement. When I first saw it I questioned the contents of my salad and drank lots of water.

    1. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by sconeu · · Score: 1

      This.

      This was almost exactly my commentary when the analog signal was finally killed.

      Analog degrades gracefully.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I've always found noise in analog signals to be less distracting than noise in digital signals.

    3. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I imagine seeing this would scare the bejeezus out of a toddler. Even as an adult, I feel unnerved when the signal breaks up and it looks like someone's face is being held under some weirdly textured cloth, and it's like they are struggling to break free. Skipped key frames (which causes this, if I am correct) in a video stream can lead to some very bizarre visual effects.

    4. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      At least the snow storm of the analog signal of yore was not nearly as scary as a modern compressed digital signal breaking up. Nightmare Fuel indeed!

    5. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I think because the brain is trained to filter out the snow that you usually see in an analog broadcast, because our own eyes give a snowy picture! (caused by "floaters" in the eyeballs among other things). This is most noticeable in a completely dark room. Digital break ups causes boxes and other jarring, unnatural artifacts to appear on screen and often causes the picture to freeze as well. Way harder for our brains to filter out.

    6. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is a shame that they did not keep the first few channels of either VHF or UHF analog for this reason.
      I also think that we should do the same with the roll out of digital radio.

      It is a matter of national security. If, after a solar flare, EMP, or other unknown cosmic event that degrades/destroys radio and other infrastructure, it is analog, not digital that will be the first communication technology that works well enough to get information to the public.

      Also, there is the billions of $$ worth of old equipment that would work with the limited analog.. But consumer protection was the LAST thing on the mind of the congress critters.

    7. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by mikael · · Score: 1

      The freakiest thing I saw was a gardening show when the JPEG blocks from the flowers got transplanted onto the faces of the gardeners leaving just their eyes and mouths. I had nightmares for days afterwards.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Even with non-HD digital cable displaying without any transmission garbles, the compression artifacts are bad enough that I can't watch it for more than a few minutes.

    9. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I kind of got used to it (desensitized), but I was also quite freaked out at first. I was in a little restaurant with dodgy TV reception and lost my appetite because of some of the really freaky distortions. I had to toss half my food.

      I've read about the bad side of other's LSD trips, and this matched it pretty well. I hope somebody sues: this is Bad Tech.

  69. Next up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millennials declare they discovered a cure for a healthy life: that there's such thing as free water.

    And it tastes better,

    1. Re:Next up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free water isn't free. The property owner pays for it in taxes.

  70. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    In the UK, we have Freeview "digital" TV. The old analog terrestial signals were shut down and everyone forced to get a digital decoder box for reception. They also had to get a larger aerial plus signal amplifier. The good side was that you could get dozens of channels, but these varied from region to region as different transmitters carry different stations.

    Linux does have digital TV and you need a USB DVB-T signal converter in order to receive and record video on a Linux PC. That requires a channel scan to be done first (w_scan).
    https://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/i...

    Some USB receivers have mini antennae, but I've never found them to work in any location, not even in the countryside or a downtown hotel.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  71. Tinfoul! by McLae · · Score: 1

    Tinfoil makes the signal clearer. But only if you fold it just right. A lost art....

    1. Re:Tinfoul! by rbrander · · Score: 1

      Not lost! It combined "inherent body capacitance" with modern dance, and was assigned to the youngest family member, since kids under 10 prefer to watch the TV from arms-length to start with.

      My interpretive dance entitled "Getting Batman and the last half of Man from UNCLE to come in because the bastards scheduled them against each other" still draws appreciative reviews at family reunions to this day.

  72. Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only LUDDITES watch LUDDITE TV with a LUDDITE antenna! Modern app appers only app apps with other apps!

    Apps!

  73. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    I have tried half a dozen different antennaes, with and without the amplifier. Our reception is little better than UCPenguin describes. And we live at the edge town; not out in the boonies or up in the mountains. Digital broadcast sucks.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  74. Advice for beginners who use linux by shoor · · Score: 5, Informative

    All of my TV watching is OTA broadcast. I used to record analog with TV capture cards. I also used them to 'digitize' my old VHS tape recordings so I could get rid of the VHS tapes. (Digitizing preserved the recordings, and also allowed quicker access since I didn't have to fast forward to watch something recorded on the tail end of a 6 or 8 hour tape.)

    When the USA switched to digital by mandate, I had to adjust. It took some doing and maybe I can offer some useful tips. A lot of stuff is European which uses a different system than the USA which uses ATSC. So, if you're European, or if you're searching the 'net and come across some European software like say kaffeine, beware.

    MythTV gets a lot of attention. I never got it to work and it seems like overkill to me anyway. What I use is me-tv. That's an unfortunate name because if you google me-tv you get a lot of false hits.

    Me-tv doesn't work well with ubuntu (something about gui libraries.) It also doesn't work very well with pclinuxos. But it works very well with Mint and Devuan! It's not really good for watching 'live'. But, you can start it recording and then watch the recording while it's being recorded with vlc or mplayer or something like that, and, depending on when you start watching or how far you've skipped ahead, you may be only seconds behind the live broadcast. Also with those players you can pause, go back, whatever, while it's continuing to record the program.

    When you've installed me-tv and first start it up, you do a scan and it finds the local TV stations. Then edit the channels list it created. Also be sure to edit the preferences as the default settings can be pretty wrongheaded, like starting a recording 5 minutes in advance and continuing after you've specified it should stop. You can put it in your 'startup applications' with the invocation /usr/bin/me-tv -s -m. This way it will start up automatically in the background and quietly record programs you have specified. But, if you're using a USB stick that has custom firmware this might not work because the OS has to find and configure the USB before it starts me-tv. My pcHDTV hardware has no problem because it's hardware support is build into the kernel, but with my Hauppauge TV stick, I have to worry about timing.

    Some stations will broadcast several programs at once and you can record several at a time if they use the same base carrier signal. If the station is broadcasting in full HDTV you get a nice high res picture. If they multiplex several shows, which happens a lot for local community and religious stations, you'll get a lower res picture. But there's a lot out there. If you like some of the PBS programs like 'Nova', it's nice to get the high resolution videos of nature. (Just so you won't think I'm too much of a culture vulture, I also watch 'Supernatural', and see it in all its 1280 by 1024 glory.)

    If you use a hauppauge tv tuner stick you have to copy a small file to /lib/firmware to get it to work. For my particular hauppauge the file name is xc3028-v27.fw, but it probably varies dpending on whihc model you have. Besides hauppauge, I've used pcHDTV which works 'out of the box' on newer systems.

    I hope this saves some of you some of the pain I went through getting all of this to work.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
    1. Re:Advice for beginners who use linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What I use is me-tv. That's an unfortunate name because if you google me-tv you get a lot of false hits.

      When you lead with an acknowledgement that most Google results are false hits, you might consider including a proper link so we don't have to wade through the bad ones. Just a thought.

    2. Re:Advice for beginners who use linux by shoor · · Score: 1

      Y'know, it's been awhile since I tried searching for a me-tv website. I just did, with "me-tv linux" as keywords. I came up with a slew of sites that seemed to be relevant, but I didn't know which to recommend. I just download what Mint or Devuan has. The last time I checked, me-tv wasn't being maintained and looking for a volunteer. If it had been written in C, I might have considered taking on the job myself, but it's written in C++, originally by some cobber from down under.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  75. Unfortunately, won't work for me... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broadcast TV used to work fine almost everywhere where I live until the networks switched from analog to HD. Now I only get three channels...in Spanish. Sigh. I've tried everything from positioning to signal boosters - I have the hardware for a pretty sweet broadcast TV receiver setup. Regardless, I'm unfortunately located just outside the range of strong broadcast TV signals. Analog TV would still arrive but be a bit snowy (i.e. tolerable). HD, on the other hand, requires near-perfect signal strength and so I get nada.

    Killing off Aereo was one of the dumbest things that the Supreme Court ever did. I was looking forward to them coming to my area. Now, because of the idiotic Supreme Court decision, I can't even legally have a friend who lives much closer to the antennas redirect a signal to me over their Internet connection.

    1. Re:Unfortunately, won't work for me... :( by PPH · · Score: 2

      Try a directional high gain rooftop antenna. Perhaps one with a built-in RF amplifier. I can pick up Seattle stations from about 60 miles away, down in a valley.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  76. Not worth the $20 by Shotgun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina, there is very little to see OTA, unless you want to watch reruns of 60's sit-coms (Green Acres, The Beverly Hillbillies, etc) or westerns, so interspersed with adds for senior citizens (literally: "I've fallen and I can't get up", walk in bath tubs, scooter chairs, etc.)

    I've watched a bit for nostalgia (that's what was on daytime TV when I was a kid), and the cheesiness was unsettling, but it is not something that I would call "entertainment".

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Not worth the $20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man that sounds like a dream to me. All I want to watch is TVLand these days.

  77. Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the Wall Street journal becoming The Onion?

  78. Another secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another dirty little secret is that at least around here, the quality (i.e., avoidance of compression artifacts) of broadcast TV is better than what Comcast offers, and that's not even taking into account reliability.

  79. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "I wonder how many TV show execs have forgotten about over-the-air broadcasting and will be surprised to hear this."

    And how surprised they will be if they discover that all those stations stream their program free over the internet.
    Not need to spend money on rabbit ears.

  80. DirecTV suprised I knew of this years ago by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Setting up the account was asked if I wanted local TV and said No, theres an antenna input in it's rear. Was told how surprised I'd be at many didn't know they could do that.

  81. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    In the UK, you also need a TV license if you use one and the companies that sell them are required by law to notify the TV licensing agency of your address when you do. You'll then be harassed by the company that the government outsources license fee collection to until you either pay, let them inspect your house to verify that you're not receiving broadcast TV, or take them to court.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  82. That's what DVRs and commercial skip are for by alispguru · · Score: 1

    I recently upgraded from a 10-year-old TiVo HD to a Bolt. Both of them allow fast-forward commercial skipping, and the Bolt's SkipMode makes commercials disappear completely.

    Yes, monthly service is expensive, as is lifetime service. TiVo was kind/desperate enough recently to move my lifetime service from the old machine to the new one for $100.

    I never watch commercial TV live.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  83. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most TVs in the Analog era did not come with an antenna either. You either had the coax connector or going even older school the flat cable 300ohm separate vhf / uhf screw terminals. The only analog era TVs I ever remember with built in antennas were portable hand helds, or "portable" smaller than 13" or so TVs. Even some of those were't truly built in. They had a hole on the top of the TV that the antenna fit into, and then a cable pigtail from the antenna to run down to the coax or screw terminal connectors on the TV

  84. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    1. Most New TVs do not come built in with an Antenna.

    Most old TVs did not come with a built-in antenna. You used rabbit ears externally.

    Being the Cable stations stink, the Local Channels are still producing new content.

    Other than local news programs or a few really bottom rate local celebrity shows ("Rick Dancer TV", e.g., or "Betty Snowden", both local to here. One Portland station has a version of "Today" that is much better, but they're the exception to the rule.), local stations produce nothing but profit by showing either network programming or by striping reruns of popular network programming. Or infomercials.

    So you get the channels you want to view over the Antenna.

    Depending on conditions, I get anywhere from four to six channels. Four of those (the always ones) are four streams of PBS programming from the transmitter about ten miles away on the local mountaintop. The others are occasional CW and Fox.

    Yes, get an amplifier, it "works wonders" one person said. Amplifying noise results in noise. Amplifying the local signal results in distorted signal that doesn't decode properly. I love digital OTA.

  85. Ruh roh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear WSJ,
    Evil H4x0rz have fucked with DNS and pointed WSJ,com at The Onion's servers. Yer Welcum,
    Best Regards,
    Anon Coward

  86. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I haven't been able to get a decent OTA signal since the switchover (if I can get a signal at all). On the other hand, that got me to pretty much stop watching TV, so there's an upside.

  87. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can can also make whole pots of coffee for less than a dollar instead of buying it buy the venti for $4+

  88. Which ISP is hostile to telecommuters? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Could you name and shame the ISP that refused business service to you when you told the ISP you want a business connection because you work from home?

  89. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    Most old TVs did not come with a built-in antenna. You used rabbit ears externally.

    Wha? I remember pretty much all TVs coming with a built-in antenna, usually of the telescoping variety. Cheap ones would come with an external antenna you had to snap on.

  90. A $750 DVR by tepples · · Score: 1

    I only use the Tivo OTA Roamio to DVR my over the air stations

    A lot of people don't have $750 in a single month to pay for a $200 TiVo DVR and a $550 All-In Plan. The All-In Plan alone could pay for several years of the difference between home Internet-only service and home Internet with bundled TV.

    1. Re:A $750 DVR by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people don't have $750 in a single month to pay for a $200 TiVo DVR and a $550 All-In Plan. The All-In Plan alone could pay for several years of the difference between home Internet-only service and home Internet with bundled TV.

      Not sure what your'e talking about.

      The Tivo Roamio, 1TB with lifetime plan was only about $399 for me awhile back.

      Just checked on amazon Tivo same $399 price.

      Looking at the Tivo website: Yep, scroll down to bottom of page, only Same $399 all inclusive price...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:A $750 DVR by Meski · · Score: 1

      Is Tivo still running there? (they're cancelling the service here (AU) from the end of October))

  91. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Wha? I remember pretty much all TVs coming with a built-in antenna, usually of the telescoping variety.

    Only some portable TVs. The good, sturdy ones that came in a large wooden box had connectors on the back for an external antenna. That's because the tube amplifiers inside needed more signal than an internal antenna could provide.

  92. Re:caveats about using a usb stick by shoor · · Score: 1

    I'm replying to my own post because I feel I should have explained more about using a USB stick, which is probably what a lot of people would do.

    In my experience, the OS has to boot up and load the firmware before you even plug in the USB stick. This means, for example, that if I set up my computer to turn on in the middle of night (setting this up in the BIOS) just so it can record a late night movie, I have to use my pcHDTV card. Because I won't be there to plug in the USB stick after the thing has booted up. Also, having me-tv autostart won't work. If I plug in the usb stick after me-tv is running, me-tv won't see it. I have to kill me-tv and restart it.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  93. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Free? no not free at all. Added benefit yes and after the net neutrality rules get thrown out its going to cost a lot more to get those shows, corporations profits first everyone else who cares.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  94. Seriously? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    I'm not a millenial, I'm a full-blown X-gen (born in 1971), and have been cord-free from 2009, (if it wasn't for the free cable TV my employer gave me for free, I'd be a cord-never. Even then, I had a VHS deck hooked up to an antenna for free TV. I've been recording and watching OTA for the last 10-15 years, and it's not that expensive. Buy an OTA antenna (not the preamplified shit), and some kind of DVR (channelmaster or build your own, One machine is running BeyondTV, I'm building a MythTV one), pair that with a Netflix subscrition and all the related online services, and I've got more TV hours to watch than I'll live.

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  95. ATSC virtual channel numbers by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought that with ATSC virtual channel numbers, stations could just move to an available frequency in the UHF band and keep their channel number branding.

    1. Re:ATSC virtual channel numbers by quetwo · · Score: 1

      True -- assuming that they didn't sell off their broadcasting license -- which quite a few did. A list of all the stations going dark is at : https://auctiondata.fcc.gov/pu...

  96. needs more avacodo toast angst by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This should be "How Millenials are Killing Cable TV with this ONE WEIRD TRICK"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:needs more avacodo toast angst by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      But then no one here would read it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  97. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Zecheus · · Score: 1
    Try the tvfool.com to find the distance from the sources in your area to your antenna's mount. Then, find an antenna which is rated for that distance. Sometimes a powered amplifier is needed to boost signal. In some installations, a rotor mount is useful. A directional antennas can support longer distances. Some locations can be in range of sources from multiple directions.

    For the 29% who don't know OTA TV is free, you should also know there is no such thing as an 'High Definition Antenna'

  98. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    They also had to get a larger aerial plus signal amplifier.

    We didn't all have to.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  99. Living Across The Pond... by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Living Across the Pond in rainy old England, this comes across as an April Fool 123 days late. But then suggestions in 2016 that Trump would win would also come across as April 1 jokes too.

    --
    John_Chalisque
  100. HOLY CRAP! by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    Next they might discover the special box where you can get music and news absolutely free and you don't have to subscribe to anything to use it! Some of these exotic devices can run off of a single "AAA" battery! The only downsides is that you can't change the playlist, and there are usually commercials, but I bet the millennials will crap their pants in amazement when they discover radio!

    1. Re:HOLY CRAP! by Megane · · Score: 1

      Some of those devices also play silver-colored discs that can contain music and can even be played without an internet connection!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  101. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Get a powered signal amplifier

    They are $25 bucks on Amazon for a decent one.

    I lived rurally for many years. Makes a hell of a difference.

    The problem with amplifiers is that they amplify both the signal and the noise.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  102. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 3, Informative

    Make sure your antenna receives UHF in addition to VHF. Lots of older antennas were VHF-only (channels 2-13).

    Remember that the digital channel number shown on the screen now doesn't necessarily correlate to the actual radio channel. In our area, digital channel 7 (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) is transmitted at the pre-digital channel 21 frequency band.

    An outdoor antenna with an outdoor amplifier is also recommended for fringe or rural areas.

    Broadcast TV works pretty well in our rural area. Lots of people have dumped $60-120/month satellite subscriptions.

  103. I saw Super Bowl LI OTA, via an antenna by rickb928 · · Score: 2

    ...because Centurylink had a 36+ hour total outage in my area, starting Saturday night.

    To this day no explanation, no apology, no rebate or refund for service not delivered. When my 'contract', triggered by signing up for automatic pay, expires, they will see me gone. I would rather have DirecTV than Prism ever again.

    Ever. I just won't pay extra to leave.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  104. this has to be a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An antenna was not even on my radar," he says

    Can't have been a very good radar then, can it?

  105. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, so you really did mean antenna, not tuner?

  106. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

    Or ignore them. I've been getting letters addressed to 'The Legal Occupier' for years telling me they are starting an investigation, proceeding with an investigation or even 'an agent will be visiting your address on this date'. I ignore them all and have yet to have a visit from anyone. I guess putting a letter in the bin every few months could be considered annoying, but not sure I'd count it as harassment (it does bring me pleasure though, so maybe I'm just odd).

    If they want into my house they can bring me the court order otherwise they have no more legal right to enter my house than any other random stranger. For the record I have bought a couple of antenna in the last couple of years from Amazon (for someone else, I don't watch over the air tv) but I can't say its made any difference to their 'investigations'.

  107. Dear Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the old days the over-the-air broadcasts in the US had 9 minutes of advertisements per hour (15%), versus today of 16 minutes (26.7%). Also you could see three hours of cartoons every Saturday morning from about 7am to 10am, it gave kids a reason to wake up early. And before the mid 1990's they were not lame edutainment series, but awesome cartoons designed to sell kids awesome toys.

  108. But how can you reliably record OTA TV? I can't by cshay · · Score: 1

    I only use antenna TV for NFL football. I would use it for ALOT more viewing if I could reliably record it, but I can't.

    You see, the major networks have antennas located in 3-4 different locations in my area.

    In order to watch a station, I must first aim the antenna in the direction of the antenna. Then I must do small tweaks because if it isn't exactly right, the signal goes in an out. (and this being digital, we aren't talking about a little snow). And inexplicably the "perfect" location for the antenna seems to vary from one day to the next.

    And of course one station uses VHF (rabbit ears) and the rest use UHF (bow ties), but that's just one more headache I won't get into here.

    Anyone in my situation and did you manage to solve it so that you can set up a DVR reliably?

  109. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    "I wonder how many TV show execs have forgotten about over-the-air broadcasting and will be surprised to hear this."

    And how surprised they will be if they discover that all those stations stream their program free over the internet.
    Not need to spend money on rabbit ears.

    Shhhh!

    Don't remind them; or they'll start making us USians get a "TV License" like the UKians have to...

  110. watch major networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS; people watch that crap?

    I guess it's better than the reality TV wasteland of MTV and A&E, but not by much.

  111. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Make sure your antenna receives UHF in addition to VHF. Lots of older antennas were VHF-only (channels 2-13).

    Remember that the digital channel number shown on the screen now doesn't necessarily correlate to the actual radio channel. In our area, digital channel 7 (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) is transmitted at the pre-digital channel 21 frequency band.

    An outdoor antenna with an outdoor amplifier is also recommended for fringe or rural areas.

    Broadcast TV works pretty well in our rural area. Lots of people have dumped $60-120/month satellite subscriptions.

    Speaking of this, most of the indoor "DTV" antennas sold into US markets concentrate on UHF reception almost exclusively. If they get VHF at ALL, it's generally an afterthought.

    Unfortunately, where I live, one of the major network affiliates (the CBS one) is still broadcasting on VHF, and the "DTV" antenna I purchased just BARELY picks it up. Flat terrain, no tall buildings or other things between me and the transmitting antenna, and the transmitter is only about 15 miles away.

    So, do you (or other Slashdotters) have any suggestions regarding an INDOOR, amplified antenna that gets good reception on what's left of the VHF band, and the other UHF-bands that DTV in the U.S. is using? Bonus points if it passes the FM Radio Broadcast band, too...

  112. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    Not an indoor antenna, but the RCA 751 is only 3 ft long and works great. It can be mounted on a wall, under the eaves of a house. It even comes with the mount, which is identical to the common sat TV mount.

  113. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    I don't think this is your issue, but I've been using rabbit ears since HDTV was introduced. My Gen I TV/Tuner had horrible reception. My Gen II TV/Tuner circa 2007 was much better. My last TV tuner(2011-ish) is even better at capturing signals. I'm not sure what they did to the tuner chip, but if you have an old TV, a newer one may have better reception with the same rabbit ears.

  114. And you can record shows by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    I'll plug the ChannelMaster DVR... uses your external HDD, so you can use that spare one pulled from your lappie when you converted to SSD. The program guide is optional (over your internet) but free, and no ongoing fees unlike Tivo, which was the dealbreaker for me.

    Note very well: has some internet streaming options including Sling and Youtube, but you CANNOT record those, just the OTA TV.

    1. Re:And you can record shows by Megane · · Score: 1

      I had the older version of their OTA DVR. It was sad when Rovi (the company that brought us Macrovision) suddenly shut down the OTA TV Guide service. It was great having two weeks of guide data. Now you're lucky to get 24 hours. Why? Because TV set manufacturers suck, and some older (and probably not-so-old) TV sets can't handle that much guide data, so stations don't send much.

      I just checked, and all but three of my local stations have 24 hour guide data. Of the other three (at least 8 sub-channels total) one has 36 hours, and the other two have 72 hours of data.

      Sure, I could subscribe to a feed for my MythTV, and reading the EPG data on my Hauppage cards sometimes hoses it such that I have a cron job to detect it and reboot, but free is free, dammit.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  115. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by hey! · · Score: 2

    Boomer here. You sound like a Gen X'er who's having a little difficulty with the generational succession thing; let me help you out.

    On the plus side, your're older and wiser now. Congratulations. That's something you should feel proud of.

    On the minus side you are no longer cool. You are the opposite of cool. It happens almost overnight. Yesterday you and your cohort were on top of the world, the center of attention, the apple of the media's eye; but when you woke up to day you didn't realize it, but you'd become the generational equivalent of a fish left out on the counter over a hot summer's night.

    So the millennials have discovered something you've known all along. You laugh, and look around and notice nobody is laughing with you. That's because you haven't figured it out yet: knowledge isn't cool until someone cool knows it. And that's not you. Nor for practical purposes anyone else over 30.

    Now I suppose you could console yourself with the idea that the millennials will learn this very same lesson, but I say wish them well and let them enjoy their fleeting moment as the center of the universe, because soon you'll be feeling the icy winds of mortality at your back. That's a reminder to focus on what's important.

    And what people think of you just isn't very important. What people think of other people is even less so.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  116. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Yup, I was thinking it read like an April Fools story.

  117. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    That's why my mother got satellite, because when the broadcasters went digital she no longer got reception for anything except one channel that was spotty. Analog works great, and it has a gradual loss of quality instead of a rapid dropoff that digital has. She wasn't in a position to experiment with powered antennas or installing them, or even knowing they existed.

  118. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    I remember that. Bought a TV card from Dixons, had to fill in the pink form at checkout. Got the spelling wrong, and of course my address received a notification from TV Licensing. Fortunately, already had a license. But changed rented apartments anyway.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  119. Im old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm old enough to remember days before cable, during and now the post cable days.

    Funny as this is, digital over the air is a really great complement to your netflix/prime subscriptions. Watch your local news or maybe a few stupid shows while you make dinner and before getting into something worth paying attention to

  120. Herp derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We knew about it, the poorer of us grew up with it, we just don't use outdated shit like that to watch trash TV and suffer through life alert ads.

  121. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must live in Podunk then. I live in a major city and get broadcast TV just fine.

    Also, millennials are fucking idiots.

  122. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I thought you were joking but I just looked it up and yeah, in the UK you have to pay £147 for a colour and £49.50 for a black and white TV Licence. That is absolutely idiotic and unbelievable. It's just completely and utterly baffling at how retarded shit is in the UK and how enslaved British people are.

    Who the fuck do they think they are trying to extort money from people for passively receiving signals that are already passing through their home? Maybe if they don't want people "stealing" their precision TV broadcast, they should stop broadcasting publicly.

    I'm glad we don't have any of that nonsense here in the US. Anything that is broadcast over the airwaves is fair game and cost free (excluding the cost of buying receiving equipment), including TV, AM radio, FM radio and even police radios.

  123. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For several good reasons.

    KTEH
    PBS
    NHK
    KNLA (gotta have my Nirvana in Fire)

  124. Or build your own Open Source antenna. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    He went online and discovered he could buy one for $20 and watch major networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS free.

    Or build your own for even less. Like for $10 if you buy all new parts rather than use stuff that's lying around.

    With the analog-to-digital transition now pretty much done in the US, (and the nominal channel numbers no longer related to the actual frequencies, like portable phone numbers being unrelated to the phone's actual location), essentially all the TV stations are in the UHF band.

    Perhaps the best broadband antenna design for UHF is the "Gray Hoverman", which was open sourced by the patent holder and can be built quite cheaply. Google it and you'll find lots of how-tos. Since you only need UHF you don't even need to do the extra-element tweaks to get VHF signals. Just build the basic double-tripple-u.

    I'm in Silicon valley and all the stations I can get at all here (with one exception) moved to one of three towers. One north of me (in San Francisco), one south (on the hills near Fremont - and a naked-eye object from my yard), and one over a ridge to the north-east. With most of them either north or south I also left out the reflector, so the antenna would be bi-directional. (And the major lobe is broad, so it gets the third tower's signals as well.) Threw it together with a hunk of wood, a few screw, a couple lengths of #14 copper wire from some Romex I pulled in the last remodel, and a balun. Stuffed it behind the TV set and it gets all the stations just fine.

    (With one exception: A legacy analog VHF station in the mountains south of San Jose, run by a church. It's on analog channel 6 so that the audio can also be received by FM tuners - just right for shut-ins who want to attend the services virtually.)

    A nice thing about digital TV is that signals don't get crummy as the strength drops. They are either received correctly or drop out intermittently or completely. So you don't have to have your antenna get really good reception to get really good results on screen. Sticking such an antenna in the attic is just fine - and what I'd have done if the reception in the TV room was weak enough that some stations were flakey or missing.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  125. skipping History Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't give them an excuse. The only way they didn't know about broadcast TV is if they skipped history classes! Why do we know about washboards, panning for gold, morse code, sailing ships, star navigation, making fire without matches, etc

  126. Lostech by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

    This makes me think of the word "Lostech" that I learned from a game when I was a teen. I have adopted it into my vocabulary and it is amazing how much once state of the art wondrous technology is getting lost to time as it is replaced. Think of the Vacuum Tube that lead to transistors and microchips. They almost seem like magic now (even though I know the basic physics behind them). Or the Cathode Ray Tube that lead to color tube TV's being everywhere at one time and now you can hardly find one as they have all been replaced by LCD's or other flat panels.
    http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Lost...

    --
    Nevermore.
  127. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Not an indoor antenna, but the RCA 751 is only 3 ft long and works great. It can be mounted on a wall, under the eaves of a house. It even comes with the mount, which is identical to the common sat TV mount.

    Hmmm. It's a Yagi; so very directional. Great for range; but I need something a little more omnidirectional...

    And more "indoor" ;-)

  128. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Yes, antenna. Typically, there were two telescoping antennae that would pull up out of the TV's cabinet to form rabbit ears.

  129. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Yes, but even with those, antennae usually came with them. At least, in over 90% of the sets that I saw when I was younger.

  130. My own anecdote by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    I'm not millenial - I grew up with an antenna and we could barely get PBS in a big city (so the first 100 times I saw Monty Python's Holy Grail on Betamax tape there was a lot of interference - it was normal back then)

    But I hadn't used an antenna in about 25 years and didn't believe I could get reception - the websites that purport to tell you if you can and what kind of antenna you should get didn't have a whole lot of data for my area.

    But Amazon tempted me one night after a few beers and I spent $15-20 certain that I'd return it almost as soon as I got it. It claims to have a 50 mile range and I'm about 60 miles outside the metropolitan market. I was surprised - I got 25 "channels". Now granted most of that was religious and home shopping crap but I get Fox and one of two PBS stations and Antenna TV - No ABC, CBS or NBC which I never watched even when I had cable.

    What I've discovered is that there isn't anything on PBS that I couldn't already get on demand online. I've either been asleep or forgot to watch The Simpsons and all the other animated crap on Fox (basically the only reason I watched Fox) and Antenna TV sure has a ton of commercials although it was kind of fun watching old episodes of Hazel and I Dream of Jeannie.

    Just checking now:

    PBS: Some kids show
    FOX: Commercials
    Antenna TV: Commercials

    And this is how it is almost every time I tune in.

    5 years without cable TV and if I happen to be bored, awake, at home and remember to I might watch Bob's Burgers and The Simpsons and whatever else they air for a couple of hours on Sunday but so far that doesn't seem to be very convenient for me. But I could record it, right? Well, I guess I could - somehow, but
    I don't even bother to watch The Simpsons online even though I think I can. I stopped watching even before I dropped cable TV.

    Between Netflix and Amazon I have more than I can ever watch and the list just keeps getting longer. I finally watched Season 1 of The Wire - took me about 10 days because I don't have the time or patience to sit and watch 13 hours of TV in one sitting. That's 15 year old stuff and while I didn't have HBO for most of that time it shows how far behind I am.

    So even for free (minus the one-time cost of a cheap antenna) I'm not really into watching broadcast TV anymore.

    What I found really funny though is that I found myself trying to stop the "stream" before I turned the TV off. But I don't have to do that anymore - it's just always there! In fact I can't do that.

    1. Re:My own anecdote by shoor · · Score: 1

      I get a fair number of stations in my area. I don't spend a lot of time watching TV but there have been some guilty pleasures. I discovered 'Community' by accident that way. Sometimes there's an old movie I want to see, and the quality will be better than on youtube or wherever. I watched "Time of their Lives" on Svengoolie for instance. (Bud Abbott of Abbott and Costello was actually a pretty good actor it seems.)

      Broadcast TV is just another thing that's out there where casual browsing turns up a nice tidbit now and then.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  131. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are the opposite of cool. It happens almost overnight.

    Indeed. I remember the day it happened to me!

    I am amused by all this millennial hate. The generational wars have always been with us and will always be with us, and they're always stupid.

    As a wise (older and deeply uncool) man once told me: every generation thinks:

    1) That they invented sex
    2) That the generation before them are corrupt idiots
    3) That the generation after them are lazy idiots
    4) That their generation is the last reasonable one before the collapse of civilization

    All of those things are just as true now as they were a thousand years ago. Which is to say, not even a little bit true. But it amuses me to see the tradition carrying on.

  132. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    In that case get a satellite dish. There should be plenty of free to air satellite programming available.

  133. This is news? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > an Amazing Hack to Get Free TV

    Yeah, yeah, I've seen the spam. And the infomercials, and the ads in Facebook. All pretending like this is, like, a new and wonderful thing that people have just discovered.

    Someone said it just the other day. I despair for humanity.

    (It so happen, in our area, that most of the local channels originate from a huge cluster of antennas on a nearby mountain top. A farmhouse-grade TV antenna picks up 20+ channels including sidebands. I guess that millennials don't know this shouldn't be surprising.)

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  134. Stupid is as Stupid does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will not survive this generation

  135. You get what you pay for. by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

    The only thing I've watched that was available OTA in the past year, was off and on a little of the Super Bowl.
    Nothing on the OTA networks interests me.

    There's not much worthwhile for free.

    For a generational reference, I'm over 50. I don't have a land line phone. I have basic cable because it's cheaper to get basic cable and internet, than just internet.

    1. Re:You get what you pay for. by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm in the same demographic, but my reaction is almost the opposite. I dumped cable about five years ago, because I realized that a substantial majority of what I did watch was broadcast for free already. There are a few things I miss (mainly BBC America), but none of them added up to being worth what I was paying for them. Not even close!

      I don't watch a lot of TV in any case, but I'm still watching and enjoying a handful of hours a week, and it's not down much from when I had cable.

      I'd actually have to say that I think the average quality of broadcast TV is higher than the average quality of cable shows. Even if you ignore the craptastic cable channels that nobody watches.

      I have basic cable because it's cheaper to get basic cable and internet, than just internet.

      Well, ok, then. That's a damn good reason to keep cable. If that were true in my case, I'd still have cable as well. But I got fairly substantial savings by dumping cable. Possibly because we still have traces of competition here: I can have any ISP I want as long as they're Comcast or AT&T. :)

    2. Re:You get what you pay for. by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

      I have Comcast. They price it so just internet costs as much as basic and internet.
      I mostly watch Netfilx and HBO. I stream HBO, not part of my cable plan. OTA holds little interest.
      These days internet access is most important. The cable is just a way to get internet.

  136. An MBA candidate told my students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raspbian was a programming language, plus many other inaccuracies.

    Needless to say, none of my students signed up to attend that particular university.

  137. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    I was having similar issues due to living in suburbs where houses are built 8 - 10 ft apart. I was about to throw in the towel and look for an exterior antenna when I took it off the wall and placed it on the floor (concrete slab foundation). To my amazement I've never had so good reception. It rarely glitches these days.

  138. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always amusing when Americans illustrate their inability to understand alternative solutions to problems. I happily pay for a TV license to avoid the blight of advertising and marketing, which is slowly eating everything from the inside out - like, for example, any form of meaningful journalism in the US of A.

  139. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by cstacy · · Score: 1

    In the 60s, we connected our TVs to the large antenna outside the house on the roof. In the 70s, TVs started coming with telescoping rabbit ears. (Both the low-end random TVs and the high-end Sony sets had the built-in rabbit ears.)

    I'm not sure who had the separately purchased rabbit ears, which usually were mounted on a little box with a dial control (which maybe varied something electronic in the box and/or physically rotated the antenna). I think it was for when you were in a bad reception area and the normal antenna didn't work (and you were not connecting to the outside antenna).

  140. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    It originally started with the original valve based TV sets. In order to tune your TV into the radio transmitter signal, you had to adjust the very basic radio reception circuit boards which themselves gave off harmonic signals. Due to negative feedback loops, you could end up jamming your neighbors TV set. So "TV licenses" were invented. You got a little card to fill out with your name and address, and if anyone had problems with their TV, the technicians would know where to look. And it was convenient for the authorities to keep track of technology and to keep the BBC on a leash.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  141. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like a boomer who wrecked our fucking economy and robbed the government coffers for your own gains. I refuse to listen to you asshats. That cold wind of mortality can't become the icy grip of death fast enough for you guys. We tired of your stupid conservatism. We're tired of your hate and nostalgia about how awesome shit used to be. Shit always sucked. You are what's wrong. Don't lecture us about change, you are the ones who refuse to adapt to the times.

  142. Millennials are that STUPID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they really that stupid that the don't know what an antenna is? Really? Wow.

    Blame mom and dad for raising such stupid life forms.

  143. question by shentino · · Score: 1

    Is this all digital tv or are there still some analog stations?

  144. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Megane · · Score: 1

    Some USB receivers have mini antennae, but I've never found them to work in any location, not even in the countryside or a downtown hotel.

    I recently read that the reason they don't work well is that they need a ground plane. Notice how they have a really nice magnet? You need to stick that to a big piece of metal, like the roof of a car, for the antenna to work properly. Otherwise you might as well just jam a long piece of wire (like 2m-5m) into the connector and move it around until you get good reception.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  145. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you get no commercials?

  146. Ugh. Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To say that I am sick of millennials 'discovering' things the rest of us have known about for decades would be an understatement beyond all reckoning. Their parents should all be shot for raising them in such a bubble. Most annoying generation? Absolutely.

  147. Been on Antennas for years! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    I have been using antennas to get over the air FREE tv for over 12+ years. I NEVER paid for Cable. I get over 14 channels free over the air. In larger cities in my motorhome I can get 20+ channels. All for free! And since they are all digital - the quality is pretty darn good!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  148. Re:And because reality doesn't have to make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to watch the (Viagra, prescription drug, schlock cutlery, life insurance for seniors, etc.) commercials? During prime time, on major networks, the commercials seem to be limited to 15-20 minutes per hour (also on PBS), but off-peak they can be over 1/2 of the time, especially on the off channels, but also to a significant degree on the networks. To PBS's credit, they bunch all the commercials (pardon me, enhanced sponsorship identification) at the end of the show, so you figure that the 1-hour show will last 45 minutes then you can do whatever for 15 before coming back (if you want to) for the next one. Commercial TV still interrupts the show every 5 or 10 minutes, just like when us curmudgeons were kids.

  149. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So hook up a few of them in different directions or locations.

  150. Magic? by n329619 · · Score: 1

    Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

    It's not magic?

  151. Roamio OTA 1 TB has the only cheap AIP by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm talking about these tables. Why is it that the All-In Plan is so much more expensive for every model other than the Roamio OTA 1 TB?

    1. Re:Roamio OTA 1 TB has the only cheap AIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Roamio OTA is, wait for it, for OTA broadcasts only. I know, a real shock what with the misleading name.

      The Roamio Pro unit you refer to is for cable and streaming apps.

    2. Re:Roamio OTA 1 TB has the only cheap AIP by tepples · · Score: 1

      What cost does TiVo incur by adding cable support compared to not doing so that justifies the huge price difference?

  152. FILM at 11! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

    FILM at 11! Used to be that, before videotape camcorders appeared in the early 1980s, the local news was filmed. The news anchors of the 6:PM news would say, "Major car crash at..., film at 11." It would take until 11:PM for the film to be developed, dried, and edited.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  153. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UK fee is cheaper than most of the EU. They're so lucky...

  154. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    > All of those things are just as true now as they were a thousand years ago.

    A thousand years? As soon as writing was invented, it was used to complain about how this newfangled writing will ruin everything.

  155. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by William+Baric · · Score: 1

    Gen X'er here. I stopped thinking "being cool" was "cool" when I became an adult. Don't you think it's time for you to also become an adult?

  156. Re: Propaganda by xarragon · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this is true, but people commonly seem to be upset about alleged "free riders" in any situation where they are getting hurt. There sure is a lot of propaganda to this end, no matter what area (piracy, taxes etc).

    From what I have heard (and seen on South Park) about cable operators in the US, they probably got a lot of butt-hurt.
    Soothing the pain with excuses about how they "..would not have to do this to people if it wasn't for those dirty free riders"!

  157. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    That's crazy. So do you pay for radio too? Is there a cool breeze licensing fee for when the wind blows? How about a tanning fee for when the sun shines? Rain fee for when it rains and waters any grass or plants you may own?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  158. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Rande · · Score: 1

    They are like HMRC, don't ignore them and they don't bother you (much).
    Just took a phone call to tell them that I didn't own a TV and then every year or so do a declaration online that I still don't have a TV (or in the last one, watch iPlayer).
    They've never shown up to my house in the 10+ years that I've not had a TV license.

  159. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name one of those television models then.

    I remember full-size televisions ALWAYS having Belling Lee coax, type "F" coax or twin lead connectors for the aerial/antenna.

  160. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from portables, no television had built-in antennas. Antennas were attached to a base, which clipped on to the television, so you're confused and thinking that the clipped on antennas were actually part of the TV when they weren't.

  161. No one cares in South Asia... by ashvagan · · Score: 1

    Because TV cable here costs $4.50 with over 150 channels.

  162. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    But it is really hit and miss as to whether it would work or not , depending on whether you were on a high floor of a building as well as on a hill.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  163. also Kodi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see any mention, so I thought I'd add that Kodi (formerly XBMC) seems to be the way to go now for FOSS media centre software. To be honest, I haven't tried it myself, but it will be the first thing I try when I get a round tuit one of these days...
    see also

  164. Utter drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking as a millennial who has always used broadcast TV, this sort of condesending tripe article can only be expected from Boomers. Frankly the sooner they're gone from positions of power the better.

  165. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Correct. The license fee goes to pay for the BBC which is commercial-free.

  166. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    The license fee pays for the BBC programming (though a lot of BBC programming also benefits greatly from selling it to US networks). Shows like Doctor Who are paid for by this, and are broadcast commercial-free. It also goes to fund the BBC news.

    While I don't live in England any more, I appreciate greatly this "socialized" TV. Thanks to this business model, the BBC produces quality commercial free TV and news without a significant political bias... though they do have a slight lean toward the current governmental makeup but it tends to not be extreme except for certain shows.

  167. How to deal w/ multiple bcast antennae locations? by cshay · · Score: 1

    The major networks have antennas located in 3 different locations in my area.

    In order to watch a station, I must first aim the antenna in the direction of the antenna. Then I must do small tweaks because if it isn't exactly right, the signal goes in an out. (and this being digital, we aren't talking about a little snow). And inexplicably the "perfect" location for the antenna seems to vary from one day to the next.

    And of course one station uses VHF (rabbit ears) and the rest use UHF (bow ties), but that's just one more headache I won't get into here.

    Anyone in my situation and did you manage to solve it so that you can use a DVR reliably?

  168. Re: This is not news, news for nerds, or interesti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many TVs had a mounting hole where the rabbit ear antenna could be mounted. With the increasing popularity of UHF the additional loop antenna was mounted either directly onto the screw terminals or, if your TV was fancy, clipped onto one of the rabbit ears.

  169. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    At which point you get shows like Top Gear that are basically 90 minute car commercials.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  170. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Lately they seem to have acquired a heavy LGBT bias, that has even invaded Dr. Who. Expect the first female Dr. to have plenty of lesbian scenes.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  171. You'd be surprised . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    My oldest came back from college, years ago, and was giggling over a fellow student who had "discovered" a "Green Clothes Drying Method".

    Better known as a clothesline. . . .

  172. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you only get one OTA channel? That's pretty fucking lame. I get like 60+.

    Also, shouldn't that mean that anything the BBC broadcasts is public domain? I mean it's paid for completely by taxation, so it should be.

    We have KCET and PBS here, which have several channels each, perhaps 7 or 8 channels total, all without commercials and all supported by donations, not extortion.

  173. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by greenzrx · · Score: 1

    Do you still need a license to watch ITV, or other independent broadcast channels that DO have commercials?

  174. Fueling inter-generational derision? Unexpected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fueling inter-generational derision? Unexpected.

  175. these geezers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok I wasn't sure if this was a joke until I hit "antenna was not on my radar" .... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  176. The Old Solution Is the New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in my 30's. I grew up on only the channels the antenna on the top of my parents house could pick up because they didn't want to buy cable. After cable modems became available, I bought the service myself and paid to have the installation done. It was great and I got a slew of TV channels along with it.

    Fast forward now. I don't have time to watch the 1000s of channels on TV. When I do have time, I am interested in catching up on the shows I want to watch and the local news. Three years ago, I bought my first place and had a cable modem installed. I bought an indoor/outdoor antenna and signed up for Netflix and Amazon Video and never looked back. I haven't had cable TV and don't need it. And the HD TV from over the antenna is so much more vivid than a standard cable account I get from my local cable provider anyway.

  177. Semi-Fix [Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro]] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Skipped key frames (which causes this, if I am correct) in a video stream can lead to some very bizarre visual effects.

    It probably should switch off incremental rendering if a key frame was not received correctly. Just leave the last good image paused until a good key frame arrives (with regular sound pace, assuming good sound).

    Maybe they should also send a lower-res key frame (LRKF) in case the regular one comes messed up. Don't put the LRKF adjacent to the regular KF because signal gaps tend to bunch together. Maybe put the LRKF about 1/3 the way thru. Example:

    KF // regular key frame #23
    IU // incremental update
    IU
    LRKF // low-res key frame version of #23 at 1/3 of cycle
    IU
    IU
    IU
    IU
    KF // regular key frame #24
    IU
    IU
    LRKF // low-res key frame version of #24
    IU
    etc...

    (IU frequency is only an example and may vary per picture complexity.)

    This way if KF#23 is messed up, the screen pauses until it reaches LRKF#23 as a consolation prize. The chance of both KF#23 and LRKF#23 being messed up is relatively small. If they both are by chance, then the pic just pauses at the last good set (KF#22 + IU's) rather than force render the incremental updates like the current standards seem to.

    A bad KF would then just usually cause a slight pause for 1/3 of a cycle and then use a somewhat blurry key frame (LRKF) image for the other 2/3.

  178. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    After the first year you should've been telling them to fuck off and stop harassing you.

  179. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Get a decent antenna, trying half a dozen crappy antennas isn't going to help get a good signal. A decent long range antenna will cost you upwards of $100. Then put it high enough to have line of sight to your transmission towers and tune appropriately. I was receiving off-axis digital broadcasts from over 70 miles away at the last house, no problems. My current residence is closer, and the antenna is going up this weekend.

    IOW, the digital broadcasts are fine, it's likely your antenna or cabling that's the culprit.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  180. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    I bought a good long-range antennae, just under $100, has mounts for placing it in the attic, and could even go outside if the weather isn't horrible.

    It gave the exact same performance as the plastic square one you tape to the wall. Granted it was in the same general place as that plastic square one, but the performance shouldn't be just as bad, in just the same way, as all the others I tried.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  181. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    First, the first antenna I bought was $130. It didn't work super well but still gave reasonable reception. The clamps and attic mounting stuff was another $30. I then switched to a $80 ($40 on sale) outdoor antenna, but that thing was HUGE (about 7x9 ft square, and 3 ft in height. It still fit in my attic. It captured everything.

    The next obvious question is: do you have clear line of sight (electromagnetically) between your antenna placement and your towers? No radiation shielding in your attic tiles, no power lines or other broadcasting antenna near enough to line of sight or the house itself to cause interference, no water towers, hills, tall buildings, bridges, etc? Because there's no reason a decent antenna shouldn't be able to pull an OTA broadcast signal from 80+ miles away given a clear line of sight.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  182. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Interesting comments in this thread, all began when millennials discovered antennas. Boomer here, old enough to remember aiming the antenna at one station but get ghosts on the others. Was too poor and lazy to install a rotor (which always break down the evening when showing a good movie, and weather terrible and lost the ladder). Nowadays amazed to watch these 60s shows like Batman and all the details I never saw. Still hate when they tilted the camera for the crooks hideout.

    Regarding generations, someone on a forum went on a endless diatribes how millennials are destroying the car industry, housing market, etc by not buying any of these things. I responded (a quote from one of you slashdotters), "Hey Socrates, youth still terrible these days?"

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  183. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    5) That the whole world is flawed, and needs to be radically transformed

    6) That Conservative ideas are stupid

    7) That their college professors know what they are talking about (later, they discover, those who can't "do", "teach")

    8) That Management is EASY, it's just barking orders at people

    9) That the best strategy is to live hard and die young

    10. That people like Che Guevara are cool! (They are actually murdering sociopaths)

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  184. Re:Free TV? Who knew? + Rant about newspapers ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a DVB-T USB thing for linux and it doesn't work, though I only tried the absolutely tiny antenna included with it (one penis length) and not bothered to try plugging into the antenna plug in the wall.
    The issue is, you spend an hour doing crap in the command line and you don't know if it works or not as it shows random numbers or lack of numbers, and when you try to run a GUI program supposed to decode TV or radio you don't know if it works or not either, because you don't know if it's compatible.

    My first goal was/is to receive FM radio which I assume should be easy since it's analog and I know the frequencies exactly. Any phone can receive radio using a jack cable as antenna (phone doesn't receive radio? you shouldn't have bought it), radio receivers and CD/USB etc. players receive radio by plugging a fork into the antenna plug on the back.

    I had forgotten about it. Need to find my antenna cable - used to be you could find them everywhere, like e.g. old newspaper. I once had to go outside and pick a newspaper in the trash (going as far as the closest metro station), instead of picking it on the ground or at home - the old saying being, you use newspaper to clean a mirror.
    I've just noticed that in a 90s movie, there was at some point a newspaper the protagonists retrieve as the maid/cooking aide has informed of some news which turns the whole thing around. She had used the newspaper to contain the vegetable peels.
    Packing glassware? Use newspaper.

    Next step in canceling recurring auto-billed fees would be the Internet subscriptions. So that millennials (which I don't know if I'm one or not) can buy newspaper. One of the causes of fake news is we don't buy newspapers. It might be too late for old media to recover, but as we stopped to buy newspaper so as to pay for Internet instead, it's no wonder journalists got no money and the evil billionaires and corporations stepped in to buy journalism power for pennies on the dollar.

  185. Check TV FOOL.COM BEFORE BUYING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Type in your ZIP code on tvfool.com to see what channels are available and where they're coming from. Then use a compass to AIM your antenna at that souce!

  186. Cant find Antenna app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it iOS and Android compatible?

  187. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #2, #3 - is true; the older you get, the lazier you get; the more your vig depends on getting paid for not working.
    #4 - is true; when you're older generation is parasitically living off the young, due to extension of life.

    die, already, you corrupt, lazy parasitic octogenarians.

  188. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    For the record I have bought a couple of antenna in the last couple of years from Amazon (for someone else, I don't watch over the air tv) but I can't say its made any difference to their 'investigations'.

    I think The Raven was talking about Set-Top Boxes, DVRs, etc. rather than antennae. An antenna isn't capable of receiving and decoding a TV broadcast signal.

    Your approach to the "money with menaces" letters is correct. They do send round doorsteppers - at least in town. And their doorsteppers do not have right of entry. So no matter how foul the weather outside, the correct response is "get off my property and come back with a search warrant" and the police officers to validate and enforce it". The "validate" bit is important - you'll comply with the law, but do not trust the doorsteppers themselves. The "police officers" bit is important - the police do not have the resources to attend (PCSOs are not police officers, BTW). And the "search warrant" bit is important because it would destroy any hope of profit for the doorstepping company from the encounter.

    IME, they send the doorsteppers round on dark and stormy nights, and will appeal to you to "let us in to get out of the weather. Don't - once they're in, they can search and seize. Refuse entry, point-blank, then order them off your property, then shut the door in their faces.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  189. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    So do you pay for radio too?

    The radio reception license was folded into the TV license fee around the mid-1980s, IIRC. You can't purchase a separate radio license any more - I tried in the mid-1990s.

    There is no cool breeze licensing fee or tanning fee, since possession of cool breeze receptors or melanocyte cells were not considered as spying equipment during WW2. (That's why radio receivers were registered devices during the War, extended to add TV in 1948.)

    In the mid-1990s, when the water utilities were sold off for profit, they tried to sue people who installed water butts to collect the rain water from their roofs for use in the garden. They came pretty close to succeeding too, but in his summing up the judge started going down the path that the water utility (Severn-Trent, I think it was) had established it's ownership of all rainfall from the moment it touched a roof or the ground. But the utility company barrister saw the trap that was being primed and withdrew the case with seconds to spare. The trap being that, if the water utility owned the water as soon as it touched the ground, then they were liable for any damage that it caused - such as by running through leaky roofs or drowning people in rivers. But yes, they (the privatised, for-profit) water utilities did try to establish what would have been a "rain fee".

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  190. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Yes. The license is for the possession (not use, possession) of equipment capable of receiving and decoding broadcast TV signals. UHF or VHF, doesn't matter, it''s not specified. Frequency is not specified (and varies from one transmission tower to the next, to reduce interference in overlap areas).

    People tried the "I only use the TV to watch ITV" defence repeatedly in the 1960s and 70s. It has never been accepted, because the legislation was written to cover any equipment regardless of what (if anything) was being broadcast. And the legislation used to cover radio reception equipment too, until the mid-80s when they gave up on that.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  191. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    The first year that I had my own address, but no TV (and therefore, no TV license. Or radio license either.) I got the letter, and returned it stating "I have no TV, but would you send me information about how to get a Radio License" (I knew they'd stopped doing radio licenses). In subsequent years, when I got the letter about "according to our records, you have no TV license..." I wrote back that "your records contain the information I sent you in [first year] which answer your query." Which covers me, but would require them to admit that they don't have a record-keeping system worth pissing on.

    I'd get a visit from the doorsteppers about 1 year in 2.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  192. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Lots of people have dumped $60-120/month satellite subscriptions.

    So high? When I had satellite (3 years ago now), it was £37/mo, so about USD 45/mo?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  193. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In France there's a check box you use when you're doing your taxes ("conveniently" assuming you have a TV : you need to check the box to say you don't have one)

    Interestingly, you don't have to pay the TV license if you're 65 year old or older.

    Amazingly law was clarified years ago to say you don't need to pay for receiving TV on a computer. I think you might even use a 40" computer monitor with a DSL set top box and they won't bother you even though it's even closer to using a TV.
    There are next to no inspections i.e. these days they may employ like two inspectors for a department.

  194. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living in PAL/SECAM land with a central government known to be very top down about these things and much everything else, TV was of amazing quality! Except the sixth channel, only at our home.

    Nowadays I can watch some older shows on illegal streaming at 240p, or perhaps fluctuating between 144p and 360p depending on bad wifi. Before that it was downloaded xvid, which is a bit better. Before that there was .wmv at very low bitrate or early divx of amateur VHS recordings posted to the internet.

    So, it's the other way around for me as I watched stuff on SECAM 576i as a child! Of course legal TV and DVD about match it. Not necessarily though, the CRT TV sets had good color, roughly same colors from one set to another (no hue control, you could set the saturation on late 80s / early 90s set and of course brightness/contrast). Speakers were decent too (not always). So it takes a calibrated LCD with no light bleeding I suppose, and half decent sound which is not impossible but rare in contemporary TVs/monitors.
    Low bitrate legal TV will still not look as good as best condition analog TV. When DTV first came out, it was MPEG2 SD and did look good but had some MPEG2-size compression artifacts sometimes so it was both a bit better and a bit worse. We watched both, tended to use the DTV only for the new channels - which were mostly cheap, like they filmed one or two TV hosts in a broom closet converted to a studio and had a digital VCR to air cheap 80s crap.

  195. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Europe or just my largeish country a fair bit smaller than Texas it kept being the roof antenna forever and to this day. It can simply expected anywhere you might buy or rent to dwell into be it a 200-year-old house, 70s ghetto or 2010s brand new or renovated thing.

    I've looked out my window right now and could see five antenna masts. Hum, seven or even eight if I take a closer look as some are a bit obstructed unless I stand higher. Two or three antennas per mast. If I were in a high rise I might likely count hundreds if not more.

    Made for a rather easy transition to DTV as very many places, likely a majority did not need any antenna tweaking! of course some needed to be done in other places.
    Still that silly hassle of using two remotes - made a come back as MPEG2 was deprecated, so e.g. a friend has a 16:9 fluorescent lights LCD TV with a separate crappy tuner box while another has a 16:9 LED LCD TV which works on its own.

  196. OTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a millennial. Maybe an "older millennial" but I remember going over to Grandma's house and them having a console CRT with an antenna that had big dial that would move the antenna to get better signal. I must of been 8 or 9 years old. When I got my first apartment, I had dish satellite for about a year. The quality sucked and HD channels were limited (This was around 2006) I went to OTA and never looked back.

  197. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by prizrak · · Score: 1

    You must be new here...

  198. Free TV? You get what you pay for... by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

    One minute of content, three minutes of advertisements.

    News shows are laughable, being mostly Weather and Traffic reports, with obsequious celebrity gossip and sports fanboy drooling, with very little in the way of useful news reports about important subjects. The constant barrage of stories about killings, traffic accidents, and fires don't really count as news and only serve to keep the populace in a constant state of fear of one's neighbors.

    Many so-called new stories are thinly veiled advertisements for local businesses, masquerading as news. The FCC apparently no longer requires TV and radio stations to air real political debates or to give all candidates access to unpaid time to inform the population of their viewpoints and proposed political policies.

    On the other hand, there is no shortage of paid political attacks on all of the candidates during the nearly full-time campaign cycle.

    Unscripted "reality" shows are now the go-to summertime replacements for what used to be reruns of written dramas.

    Unlike Netflix (which has no advertisements and is well worth the monthly fees, IMO) and the other paid internet services, the paid cable services give you many channels, but most of them provide you with advertisement-laden excuses for actual content for the privilege of paying for their overpriced bundles of boring and unwatchable cat-and-dog videos and home shopping programs.

    Give me a good library any day!

    --
    PlaynBass
  199. Not Just Mellenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some changes have been good and this is one of them. Who needs TV anyway - 54 year old Gen Xer.

  200. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you really do type without any thought at all don't. What's the matter, couldn't afford your brain licence.

  201. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    Make sure your antenna receives UHF in addition to VHF. Lots of older antennas were VHF-only (channels 2-13).

    Before analog broadcasting ended, we had 2 (analog) UHF stations - 23 and 58 - that we could receive better than the VHF stations.

    I tried adding a UHF booster amp at the top of the mast. It only exacerbated the problems, (We live in one of the northern suburbs of our area. The TV stations are in the southern suburbs. I'm assuming our neighborhood is a victim of the combined RF noise of the intervening city.)

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  202. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not your generation. It's just you. You're the fucking idiot.

  203. If its free its for me by theupdown · · Score: 1

    I think I might get my own antenna when I move out. It would mostly be for novelty as I don't really watch cable. There are a few shows I like to watch live so the cost of setup seems worth it.

  204. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I haven't been able to get a decent OTA signal since the switchover (if I can get a signal at all). On the other hand, that got me to pretty much stop watching TV, so there's an upside.

    yeah...we basically did the same thing. Digital OTA was such crap that it was quickly dropped. Fully predictable

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  205. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    "You can't purchase a separate radio license any more - I tried in the mid-1990s."

    Is your name Eric and do you have a cat detector van?