Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Nears $17,000 After Climbing About $4,000 in Less Than a Day

As economists attempt to make sense of Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency rocketed above $17,000 for the first time moments ago, adding about $4,000 to its price in fewer than 24 hours. Security reporter Brian Krebs tweeted on Thursday, "Closing in on $17k per bitcoin now (mind you, it was almost at $16k less than an hour ago. This is totally fine." Late Wednesday, finance author Ben Carlson wrote: Bitcoin has achieved something I've always wanted to see in the stock mkt - a reverse 1987 (20% gain in a single day)

289 of 464 comments (clear)

  1. More important quote from Krebs by Luthair · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Rational"? Really? I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Rational"? Really? I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Every time I look at this chart I think: "Tulip bulbs"... of course there is once again no shortage of people telling me this is completely sustainable and will go on forever.

    2. Re:More important quote from Krebs by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      I'm calling the top at no later than next Sunday evening, possibly sooner. CBOE launches futures, big boys go short, game over. Will be one hell of a ride down, possibly quicker than any major crash in history. Wild swings, too, day traders will make a killing if they're smart. I'm going to get some popcorn.

    3. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Rob+Y. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This quote says it all:

      Bitcoin has achieved something I've always wanted to see in the stock mkt - a reverse 1987 (20% gain in a single day)

      It's all speculation - driven on by cheerleaders on the sidelines in the financial speculation media business. Kind of like the Trump campaign/presidency is all a substanceless shitshow driven on by cheerleaders in the news shitshow business.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    4. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "As economists attempt to make sense of Bitcoin"

      I can assure everybody that no true economist is trying to make sense of Bitcoin.

      Bitcoin con only go up for as long as people can manage to max out their credit cards, steal granny's savings, etc., to buy some.

      This is not infinite.

      After that it comes down. Hard. A few people will get very rich, a lot of people will get poor.

      (Remember: Bitcoin only redistributes money, it doesn't ever create anything of tangible value)

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's perfectly possible that the rich people are offering large sums for small quantities of Bitcoin to push up the price then dumping large quantities when everybody sees it.

      (aka: "Pumping and Dumping")

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re: More important quote from Krebs by orlanz · · Score: 1

      This raise may even be a hedge against that as players double down to cover shorts to be and keep profits they have.

      But I dont expect to see a lot of shorting coming up. I dont see ppl lending coins and losing the ability to sell. Nor do I see brokers floating coins to sell & cover shorts.

      Pretty much everyone is looking for the last sucker and no one wants to put themselves at a disadvantage nor fall to the back of the line.

    7. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Pascoea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean comparing two things that achieved something nobody thought could or should happen? Seems reasonable to me.

    8. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      The inherent value of fiat currency was shown in Zimbabwe.

      I think toilet paper was worth more "in the end" because it did its job better.

      Pun intended.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    9. Re:More important quote from Krebs by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      After that it comes down. Hard

      Or it comes down and stabilizes to some reasonable value, which could be higher than current price.

      Bitcoin only redistributes money, it doesn't ever create anything of tangible value

      Depends on how you define value. Frictionless moving large amounts of money across the world is a unique and useful property. How much tangible value does a bar of gold make ? Sure, there's some industry demand, but we have 50 years of industry demand sitting in vaults. Surely, it would make more sense to leave the rest in the ground until we need it.

    10. Re:More important quote from Krebs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I pay ~$14 ($100 HKD) to wire any amount of money, anywhere, and it is guaranteed/confirmed within 1 business day. That's not frictionless? Log in on my phone, enter the amount, enter the recipient's account, and push a button. Done.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    11. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think that when you talk about whether or not the price stays that high, you're going to find a variety of opinions, and more bearishness than you might imagine.

      But, just like tulip bulbs, Bitcoin is also sustainable, and a good idea, and useful. Or rather, it'd be useful if it weren't quite as volatile. ;-)

      As a generic Bitcoin fan, these initial few years of stories about how many dollars it exchanges for, aren't very interesting and they're a mere footnote in the greater story of creating a currency that governments can't control, but which also can be transmitted quickly across the world without needing any particular service provider. Bitcoin is the money we've always wanted... or will be, if it ever fucking settles.

    12. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      We are to the point where the question is "has the general public started buying into BC" once we hit that point its time to start looking for the exit. If it is still just Chinese businessmen trying to get their money out of the country so the government can't grab it, we may still have a way to go before it stops.

    13. Re:More important quote from Krebs by tattood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      (Remember: Bitcoin only redistributes money, it doesn't ever create anything of tangible value)

      The NYSE and NASDAQ only redistribute money also. Do they not create anything of value?

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    14. Re: More important quote from Krebs by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "no true economist"

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    15. Re:More important quote from Krebs by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I know the global economy would be much more efficient if the money I was paid last week appreciated in value by 30%.

      Bitcoin works as an investment. It utterly sucks as a currency.

    16. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      All investment vehicles go up 20% per week forever. Don't you know anything about economics?!

    17. Re:More important quote from Krebs by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's a great claim. Except it's not true. Double digit transaction fees mean it's not frictionless at all (and keep in mind that money doesn't just go into someone's pocket, it literally goes up in coal fired generator smoke somewhere in China).

    18. Re: More important quote from Krebs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In that case go ahead and buy some more, what's stopping you? You can always borrow from the bank to buy this "money".
      Put your money where your mouth is.

    19. Re: More important quote from Krebs by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Nothing stopping you betting against it. Put your money where your mouth is.

      You seem to be overlooking a HUGE obstacle to betting against it (at least in any sensible manner). Lets say I'm convinced it's going to 1 cent, and you are convinced it's going to $1million. If you "put your money where your mouth is" then (if you are right) you've got nothing to lose and no risk. Even if the prices crashes all the way down to 1 cent and then rebounds all the way to $1 million, you make out on the profit you expected.

      On the other hand, if I "put my money where my mouth is", even if I'm correct about the result, I'm still at huge risk of losing everything I have. If the price shoots all the way up to $1million before crashing to 1 cent an hour later, I'm screwed even though I'm right. That's because before I can realize my predicted profit at 1 cent, I get margin called at $1 million (if not well before), and unless I have 50 times as much money as my original investment that I can sink in to cover my shorted position, I lose it all. So even though I'm right, I walk away empty handled.

    20. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I pay ~$14 ($100 HKD) to wire any amount of money, anywhere, and it is guaranteed/confirmed within 1 business day. That's not frictionless? Log in on my phone, enter the amount, enter the recipient's account, and push a button. Done.

      At what exchange rate? I send money around a little bit, the 'no fees' line mean they rape you on the rate they give you.
      Another issue is why do you accept 1 business day as ok? So you send on a Friday you have to wait until at least Monday? Blockchain transactions are done in seconds anywhere in the world. Last issue is if for whatever reason your local government decides they don't want to allow you to use your money how you see fit, what are your alternatives.
      Decentralised currency has use cases. And while those use cases exist there will be a market.

    21. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Every time I look at this chart I think: "Tulip bulbs"...

      Of course because tulips and decentralised digital currency are exactly the same thing.

      of course there is once again no shortage of people telling me this is completely sustainable and will go on forever.

      Where are these people? I read a bit about Cryptocurrency, and I've never seen anyone ever say that.
      What they do say is that decentralised currency is disruptive, and in a currency market worth trillions, so the potential market of such a technology is in the trillions of dollars. BTC is currently about $300B MCAP, so if you follow the logic there is more room for growth.

      But go back to tulips if that is more your level...

    22. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Remember: Bitcoin only redistributes money, it doesn't ever create anything of tangible value)

      A couple of points.
      One, regular money only redistributes money yet it is also a thing. So the concept of a thing that redistributes money is proven
      Two, Blockchain is better at redistributing money (and more importantly auditable transactions) than existing systems. Think Fax v Email. Three, BTC is only one of 1000+ blockchain type currencies. Other varieties do actually provide different uses such as Power Ledger, which was designed specifically to trade units of energy in the electricity generation market. This is a real thing being used by real people and businesses. There are literally dozens of these types of application that have use.

      For a technology site I find it odd that so many people here don't actually understand the technology behind it.

    23. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly possible that the rich people are offering large sums for small quantities of Bitcoin to push up the price then dumping large quantities when everybody sees it.

      (aka: "Pumping and Dumping")

      It's possible, but this is true for any market. And you can check volumes one any exchange, so unless you think 'small quantities' is billions of dollars, you hypothesis isn't matching the observations

    24. Re: More important quote from Krebs by orlanz · · Score: 1

      If you truely believe the stock market is a zero sum game, then there is no point in this discussion. You have already made up your mind about some thing you do not understand.

      If you leave out the popular stocks and the ones that everyone talks about & watches all the time, then yes there is actual value in the stock market. Stocks like Walmart, Berkshire, Coca-Cola, Johnson&Johnson, etc have very little speculation in relation to their prices.

    25. Re: More important quote from Krebs by orlanz · · Score: 1

      What they do say is that decentralised currency is disruptive

      How? I have seen this said too and it doesnâ(TM)t really make sense. Itâ(TM)s a nice little game and games have value but I donâ(TM)t see it as something significant to be disruptive.

      I see Bitcoin as a very poor currency. It has limited, non-replaceable units, and inefficient transactions.

      Imagine a village that exports leather. Why does Target selling the coat need to know about the $1 worth of bread the cow herder bought that morning from his local store? Why does the world need to know about the 100k transactions that happened within the village to put $3000 worth of leather on the weekly train?

      Sure there is something to be said for the block chain replacing the county records for determining who owned and owns the car or house. But as a society do we really not trust the records office enough to say that we as participants in the market ALL have to agree with on every ownership change of said assets? Seems overkill.

    26. Re:More important quote from Krebs by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2

      > use cases

      Use cases are abstract. It's all theory. Who accepts cryptocurrency? The way things are going, who even understands it? Who even bothers? It's just entertainment to hear the numbers.

      Suppose I have a car dealership. Now or soon I can sell a car for the low low price of 1 BTC. In this theoretical world, how do I use the cryptocurrency? What's the economics? People are driven to own cryptocurrency but not to spend it anyways, because it's so deflationary. Today I can buy a car. Tomorrow I can buy a house. The day after it's good for a yacht. But if I have a yacht and you have a bitcoin, you don't get near my yacht until I secure the purchase of something even more valuable, like a fighter jet, for that bitcoin. That way I don't hold the bag. The bitcoin is a medium that deflates a future purchase but it takes a lot of work to eliminate the risk. You would think that having done the work to earn some pocket change, you don't want another full time job just to spend it.

      One day I'll tell the kids they don't know the value of a BTC, the way they scatter them around.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    27. Re: More important quote from Krebs by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I am calling the top around $21,000.00

      At that level the smallest bitcoin is worth $0.001 and it stops being useful for transactions under $100 dollars.

      Of course that is being rational

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    28. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      what was it bitcoin achieved?

      Bitcoin Nears $17,000 After Climbing About $4,000 in Less Than a Day

      You didn't even have to read the summary, all you had to do was read the headline. Show me anything else that people are willing to pay money for that has grown in price that much in one day. We can argue all day whether it's worth $17,000, or how spectacular the crash will be when the non-techies realize what they are actually buying and bail out en-masse, but that doesn't change the fact that there are currently people willing to plunk down a small fortune on nothing more than bits and bytes.

    29. Re:More important quote from Krebs by ne7minder · · Score: 1

      Exactly, my comment was going to be "What are tulip bulbs going for these days?"

    30. Re: More important quote from Krebs by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "If you truely believe the stock market is a zero sum game"

      If you're treating it like a casino (day trading, etc) then yes, it _is_ a zero sum game.

      Which is not what it's there for, nor its actual intended use.

      There does need to be some brake on abusive rapid trading. Electronic noise or something injected into the timings (jitter, etc).

    31. Re:More important quote from Krebs by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Given what the Winkelvoss twins have been up to, I'd imagine this is exactly what's going on.

    32. Re:More important quote from Krebs by ThePawArmy · · Score: 1

      (Remember: Bitcoin only redistributes money, it doesn't ever create anything of tangible value)

      I wish more people understood this point.

    33. Re: More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      How? I have seen this said too and it doesnâ(TM)t really make sense. Itâ(TM)s a nice little game and games have value but I donâ(TM)t see it as something significant to be disruptive.

      So because you don't understand it, it can't be real?

      I see Bitcoin as a very poor currency.

      Don't get caught up with just Bitcoin. There's thousands of other coins and tokens out there that all have different strengths and weaknesses.
      And they great thing with crypto currency it is software, so if you do identify a weakness, you can modify it to fix it (as BTC is about to do with the lightning network)

      It has limited, non-replaceable units, and inefficient transactions.

      Like gold? BTC will probably not replace cash, but it could very well serve as a good replacement for Gold. There are however many many other crypto coins that could replace cash. This is the great thing, rather than just cash, you can design a transaction network specifically whatever you are dealing in. We just had one here backed by our govt built purely to transact units of energy in the electricity generation sector. Another one was specifically for identity transactions to replace govt issued ID. The applications are endless.

      . But as a society do we really not trust the records office enough to say that we as participants in the market ALL have to agree with on every ownership change of said assets? Seems overkill.

      It's the same argument as imperialism vs democracy. Do you not trust your king to act in your best interests? The technology now exists where we no longer have to rely on a central authority to validate a transaction. This is extremely powerful and will change the way we do things. This is why it is generating a lot of interest.

    34. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Use cases are abstract. It's all theory. Who accepts cryptocurrency?

      Banks already use it for interbank transactions, here is a new crypto backed by a government to transact units of energy, and this is another specifically for Internet of Things which is supported by Cisco, Bosch, and Foxconn.
      This is real, right now today and isn't going away

      The way things are going, who even understands it? Who even bothers?

      Just like cars in 1900's, or TVs in 1940,'s or the internet in 1990's you mean?
      That argument never works out well with new innovative technology.

      In this theoretical world, how do I use the cryptocurrency? What's the economics? .

      Eventually most people won't have to understand it, just like they don't understand how PCI-DSS compliance works for the credit card they use everyday now.
      Right now there is a technological barrier to entry, just like the Internet in 1990 was hard. But the people who build and support the technology, and the applications that let regular people benefit from the technology will profit from it, just like every other major technology breakthrough in history.

    35. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Given what the Winkelvoss twins have been up to, I'd imagine this is exactly what's going on.

      Because who needs evidence when we have our imaginations...

    36. Re:More important quote from Krebs by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to think conspiracies here ... the way nobelprize winning and other oldworlders seem to have started a media campaign ... its a bubble, its not green (as if fucking cows and horseshit is or biofuel doesnt need to be burned in a combustion engine LAWL ... how much co do eight billion people fart and breathe out every day ... do sapients breed faster than bitcoins) all that in a very short while combined with this extreme bubble stinks of meddling by ancient vampires like jp morgan ... they got the cash to do it ... build it up, then wreck it in one massive sale (make a shitload and scare everyone off , back into "safe investments" where you get "A WHOPPING" 0,15% and all you have to do is stick a million on hold for 10 years !!!!!!!!!!! it reeks of a setup, its a bubble allright but it smells of old world interference these people would stop at nothing to keep control, they have proven that time and time again, ruining a few thousands of families with a shitload of cash in it would be the least of their concern ... just like funding the nazis and effectively world war 2 ... NO PROBLEM ! we'll lend you the money to re-build, AFTER we come save your ass but for some reason the obnoxious generation XYZ (and what comes after) wont give up that easily i think ... but if i WERE holding BTC at this moment the least i'd do is retire all fiat money i invested in it so its impossible to lose even one cent, then keep the rest and see what happens . greed kills, esse makes people jump from towers

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    37. Re: More important quote from Krebs by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      You ever wire someone $ 0.50? Strawman.

    38. Re:More important quote from Krebs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The current exchange rate of the day. HSBC doesn't discount. If the exchange rate on that day is 9.187 HKD to 1 EUR, then that is the rate of the transaction. You pay $100 HKD for the wire transfer. That's it. Unlimited money amount.

      As far as transaction time, I call bullshit. Blockchain itself says they average about 900 minutes, which would be about 15 hours. So a business day. Of course, when HSBC sends the confirmation to my client (or vendor) that I just wired $XXXXX to them, they typically take it as "credit" because the BANK told them the money is coming - not me. That's as good as a letter of credit. Likewise, so do I. When I receive confirmation of the wire transfer started, I consider the transaction "done" and start the process. And that happens within a few minutes of the wire transfer being started. So - quite a bit faster than Blockchain - per Blockchain.

      And good luck using that decentralized currency in China, or soon-to-be several major economies who are choosing to ban Bitcoin and other "crypto" currencies. If you cannot send it at all, then how is it better? At least from HK, or the USA, I can send USD or HKD to any country anywhere, any time - without any restriction.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re:More important quote from Krebs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? I guess you didn't know that Beijing banned BTC. It's probably permanent. But hey, pump your modern day tulip bulbs and pets.com equivalent!

      PS: you attribute two statements to me; I claim the second (banned in China), but please show me where I stated the first. Failure to do so simply proves your trolling!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    40. Re:More important quote from Krebs by Gussington · · Score: 1

      The current exchange rate of the day. HSBC doesn't discount. If the exchange rate on that day is 9.187 HKD to 1 EUR, then that is the rate of the transaction.

      Ok I used to work in a bank. The exchange they advertise already has margins to built-in to cover the fees. Other exchanges might have higher or lower rates depending on their margins.

      As far as transaction time, I call bullshit. Blockchain itself says they average about 900 minutes, which would be about 15 hours. So a business day.

      Not sure where you went to school, I downloaded the CSV from your link an calculated an average of 115 minutes.
      Also worth noting, confirmation times are dependent on how many confirmations you require (ie smaller transactions may only need one, therefore take 10 minutes, larger ones may want 20 which could take an hour+).
      Also worth noting, transaction times can be improved by offering higher fees, so you have the choice of faster or slower confirmations.
      Also worth noting this is only Bitcoin which has a slower network than many other coins, eg for Litecoin it's 2.5 minutes.
      All of this is better than waiting 1 business day which could mean as much as three days and you have no control over it.

      And good luck using that decentralized currency in China, or soon-to-be several major economies who are choosing to ban Bitcoin and other "crypto" currencies. If you cannot send it at all, then how is it better? At least from HK, or the USA, I can send USD or HKD to any country anywhere, any time - without any restriction.

      And do you know how your bank will be transferring to other banks overseas? That's right your bank probably already using blockchain for this, or has a prototype underway. Don't get caught up in the Bitcoin specifics, blockchain is taking over the finance world.
      Blockchain will allow regular folks to bypass the banks, which if you were alive in the GFC is a huge leap forward.

    41. Re:More important quote from Krebs by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      The USA is the biggest importer and user of cocaine, yet both the importation and the use of cocaine are banned there.

  2. So... by Kierthos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to crash hard, and probably fairly soon, and people will react with "We could not have foreseen this at all!"

    And I will be over here, laughing at them.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re:So... by MouseR · · Score: 1, Funny

      I still dont understand how anyone gives any value to that.

      Is there a CryptoFraud For Dummies available?

    2. Re:So... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      This is going to crash hard, and probably fairly soon, and people will react with "We could not have foreseen this at all!" And I will be over here, laughing at them.

      The Winklevoss twins won't be fooled again!

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful
    4. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Knowing it will crash, and knowing when it will crash are two very different feats. Saying it will crash is practically axiomatic, and in the mean time if your sitting on the sidelines you may have missed opportunities that may have led to profits even if you held through a crash.

    5. Re:So... by MikeDataLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Every market will crash. Event the best investment will go south if you wait long enough. There are no horse and buggy companies anymore. Eventually grows and then fades.

      The only thing that matters is getting in and out at the right time.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    6. Re:So... by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      3 to 6 months maximum. The higher it gets before the crash the more painful it will be. I just hope it's not big enough to hurt outside of its ecosystem.

    7. Re:So... by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      I don't have 17 large handy and free to spend on a cryptocurrency today. I didn't have 12.5 large handy and free yesterday, to buy that same one Bitcoin.

      So, I'm going to sit back and laugh. Because someone out there (likely more than one someone) is gambling foolishly on continued value jumps. Yes, some people stand to make a tidy profit on this. Some people are going to stay on this a little too long. Sure, that's a danger with the stock market too, but the stock market typically does not fluctuate this much. (To this scale, I mean.)

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...if your sitting on the sidelines you may have missed opportunities that may have led to profits even if you held through a crash.

      Buying in now guarantees you will be left holding the bag, as there is no way the true final price after the pop will be anywhere near 17,000.

      But good luck!

    9. Re:So... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think that most credible investment firms are not heavily plunging into Bitcoin.

      I'd really like to think that.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    10. Re:So... by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      This is a good point. If you had bought two weeks ago, you could cash out now and be quite ahead. Even if you had bought at 9K you'd be doing well. The problem is that most of us don't have that sort of money sitting around. And at this point, it seems like quite the gamble to try and buy in. However I thought that when it hit 9K as well, so what do I know.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    11. Re:So... by MrDozR · · Score: 2

      You can buy any fraction of a Bitcoin on most exchanges, you don't have to go all in and buy ONE.

    12. Re:So... by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      It will crash before that Parabola goes to Infinity. And the "missed opportunity" logic you present if why the Greater Fool Theory is governing it. Are 4 Surges enough to cause it like a rat plague? If so then it'll happen soo. But if not it'll happen as it approaches Infinite for obvious reasons.

    13. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 1

      You can buy in at any fraction of a BTC, you don't have to buy/sell a whole bitcoins. Just watching the ticker on GDAX you can see there are a lot of trades sized less than 0.1 BTC.

    14. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that most of us don't have that sort of money sitting around

      1 Bitcoin is internally represented as 100 million basic units (the "Satoshi"). You can buy any number of Satoshis, so it's possible to buy 0.001 coins for instance.

    15. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or bitcoin could go to $1,000,000. I am a financial advisor and given how technologically amazing bitcoin is and how it is the future of all money, I'm betting on it hitting $1,000,000 before the end of 2018 and selling ALL my gold bullion, penny stocks, and tulip futures to put into bitcoin and I am now advising all my clients to do the same.

    16. Re:So... by nealric · · Score: 1

      Well, there actually are horse and buggy companies around. But they are quite the niche.

      Example: http://www.buggy.com/

      Also fun reading: http://www.popularmechanics.co...

    17. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People said that at 100, and at at 1000. Reality is no one knows where this is going to end up. I could just as easily see it be at 10 or 100,000 by the end of next week.

      If you have a crystal ball, feel free to short BTC right now and make a fortune. My point remains, it is easier to say it will crash than say when it will crash or what fair value is.

    18. Re: So... by Khyber · · Score: 1, Troll

      Plenty of exchanges have a minimum buy in. Trades are not buy-ins. Please retake basic stock market classes.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re: So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Please retake basic stock market classes.

      Why ? Bitcoin is not a stock, and the Bitcoin exchanges don't function like stock markets.

    20. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 2

      No one knows what it will crash to though, it could run up to 50k and crash back to 20k, which would be a sizeable crash, but would mean the bubble hasn't actually started yet.

    21. Re:So... by syn3rg · · Score: 3, Funny

      "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future."
      --Yogi Berra

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    22. Re:So... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's like any other investment or gambling, some people win and some people lose.
      If you'd bought yesterday and sold today you'd have made a decent profit, who knows where the price will go tomorrow. It's fun to watch.

      I hold a small number of bitcoins, had them for a long time and didn't pay anything for them so i'm waiting to see where the price goes, but even if it crashes i won't make an overall loss.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:So... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Regardless of what it goes to, BTC is so unstable that it is less of an investment than a gamble.

      My biggest worry about this hype is that is kills cryptocurrencies completely, if BTC falls over.

      Bitcoin is a "v1.0" currency. The fact that you have to run through 150+ gigs of blockchain transactions, and it can take days to have a transaction succeed is worrisome, and these numbers are not going down. One cannot really use it for microtransactions unless one tacks on an additional percentage to get parties to put the transaction at a higher priority than normal.

    24. Re:So... by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      It's crashed loads of times but the underlying trend, underneath all the booms and crashes, still appears so far to be exponential.

    25. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One cannot really use it for microtransactions

      No, not if you want every transaction on-chain. The blockchain is an expensive resource.

      You will be able to do microtransactions on the Lightning Network, where they will be done off-chain, and then only occasionally settled on the chain.

    26. Re: So... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any minimum for Coinbase. I know you can buy a lot less than 0.1 BTC (because I did). Assuming CB hasn't crumbled under the traffic.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    27. Re:So... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Life is full of missed opportunities. Bitcoin—as it exists today—isn't scalable, since the cost per transaction increases as the system grows, rather than decreasing as you'd expect in a well-functioning system. While it will most likely survive this upcoming crash, it may not. And if not this one, then it could be the next or the one after that and so on.

      If you know a crash will occur and have reason to believe that the system won't survive one of the upcoming crashes, holding your currency through a crash is an extraordinarily risky venture. Sure, there's money to be made if the system recovers, and I'm not saying that people should avoid risk, but some sucker will eventually be left holding the bag when the system crashes for the last time, so weigh the risks and decide whether the possibility of being that sucker is worth it to you.

      Or, put differently, treat it no differently than any other high-risk commodity or stock. Diversify and be smart.

    28. Re: So... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      It doesn't make sense to buy so little that the amount you get is dwarfed by whatever the fees are.
      Minimum buy is a POLICY of whatever service you are using AND your own good sense to
      buy at least enough that you have a useful transaction that the fees aren't a significant fraction of.

    29. Re:So... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      You don't need "that sort" of money. I don't have anywhere near 1 bitcoin, and at this rate probably never will, but what I do have is worth a lot more than when I bought it. Whether that will still be true by the time I get home this evening is anyone's guess. :p

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    30. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      If you have reason to believe Bitcoin won't survive, you shouldn't be holding it at all. Trying to time the peaks and crashes is just a fool's game.

    31. Re: So... by devman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Incorrect.

      You can literally deposit $170 to GDAX (coinbase) right now (if it were not crashing) and buy 0.01 BTC, there is no minimum to open a trading account on coinbase.

      To trade on equity markets you could go open an account with Fidelity, Schwab, or Robinhood (if app only is your thing) right now with no minimum and go trading to your hearts content.

    32. Re:So... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      as there is no way the true final price after the pop will be anywhere near 17,000.

      Why? The true final price could be 100K. To make such bold claim as 'final' price will not be near 17K,
      you need a prediction. If you have a prediction, then the value of it is based on how well you can explain your prediction based on true info you've analyzed.

    33. Re: So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      You could leave your bitcoin on the exchange to avoid the transaction fee.

    34. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 1

      Exchange trades generally happen off chain so there are only commissions to worry about (25 bp on GDAX for takers). If you want to withdraw BTC to a private wallet, yes that will have transaction costs. Moving USD via ACH to and from banks is free.

    35. Re:So... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

      It has a Tulip-Bulby feel to it, doesn't it?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    36. Re:So... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Except when you look at how it can crash.

      What happens when the value drops x%? Transaction volume goes up. How quickly will those transactions be added to the blockchain? Who controls that process? Currently the blockchain is at just under 500k transactions per day, and appears to have a significant backlog in confirming transactions.

      The hype looks like it is posed to last a bit longer, but some people are really going to get caught with their pants down the way I see it; there is no easy de-escalation strategy.

    37. Re:So... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      People complain when I mention Tulip Mania, so instead I will tell a joke

      Jeremy Sloan asked his son Michael what he'd like for his upcoming sixth birthday. Michael said he wanted a hamster, so Jeremy visited the local pet shop and found the perfect hamster. The little guy was in the peak of health, so he bought it on the spot. He also bought a cage with a wheel, some food and a water bottle. As he was paying for the birthday present, the store owner said, "Any problems whatsoever, just come back here. I live right above the shop and I'll help you out any time you want."

      Jeremy put the hamster and cage in his car and drove home. He left them in there until his son had gone to bed so that he wouldn't see them when he brought them in. Michael's birthday was the next day, so Jeremy got up early to wrap the presents and to check on the hamster. He was horrified to see the hamster was dead at the bottom of the cage; it's legs stiff in the air. He knew his son would be distraught as the boy had talked about nothing else for weeks. Quickly, Jeremy put on his coat and drove round to the pet shop and knocked on the owner's door. He explained the problem and the owner was quite understanding and gave Jeremy a new hamster, refusing payment for it

      Jeremy asked, "What can I do with the old one? I don't want to bury it as the cat may dig it up and I don't want to throw it away in case my son sees it in the bin"

      The shop owner replied, "What I do is mix up a strong sugar solution - about 1.5 kg of sugar to a litre of water. Bring that to a boil and then add the hamster. Simmer it about two hours, stirring periodically. It makes quite a nice jam."

      Jeremy looked a little bewildered, but says thank you and raced back home. He gave the new hamster to Michael who was absolutely thrilled with it. He dashed off to play with it the rest of the day. Jeremy decided it was a good time to get rid of the dead hamster, so he tries the pet shop owner's recipe. He finds the sugar in the pantry and brings the water to a boil. After a couple hours, the mixture has become jam-like so Jeremy takes a spoonful, blows on it till it's cooler, and tastes it. It's absolutely disgusting. He's so revolted that he throws the rest of it out the kitchen window, into the flower bed below

      A couple days later, Jeremy noticed that daffodils were springing up under his kitchen window, right where he tossed that awful concoction. "That's odd", he thinks to himself, "I've never had daffodils before"

      Next day, his son asks him to take him to the pet shop to get some more food for his hamster. So Jeremy and Michael go to the store, and while Michael is looking at new hamster toys, the owner asks Jeremy, "Did you try that recipe I gave you?"

      "Yes, but it tasted so awful that I threw it out the window. Odd thing is, I've got daffodils springing up there now."

      "Daffodils?" asked the store owner, "Are you sure? You usually get tulips from hamster jam.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    38. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 2

      Exchange transactions occur off chain. Only when you take BTC off the exchange does go to the block chain for recording.

    39. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Totally on point, GPP Keirthos(sp?) didn't even know this simple, basic fact. So many completely unqualified non-investors spout shit about a "bubble" without even checking the goddamn RSI first. Not to mention those cocksure armchair investors who don't know the difference between Ponzi and Pyramid schemes, yet they're 100% sure that Bitcoin is one of them.

      (I mean, yeah, BTC is hugely overbought right now compared to it's history, but the volatility of the damn thing means that temporary conditions like this won't last long.)

    40. Re:So... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's say you do that.

      This morning, 0.001 Bitcoins would have been worth about $13.70. Right now, that same 0.001 Bitcoin is worth about $15.65. (It's down from it's earlier high.)

      That's $1.95 in difference.

      What's the cost to cash out? Okay, I don't know that. So I can't say how much of that $1.95 you'd lose to that. (And that's not even taking into consideration any costs associated with mining that Bitcoin, if you were even the one mining it.)

      But nobody's retiring on $1.95.

      Even if you had 1 whole Bitcoin, that would only be $1950. Still not enough to retire. Sure, that's not the goal of every transaction. No one reasonably looks at a single stock market transaction as "this will set me up for life".

      Sure, there's currency speculators involved in this. It's a given. And they might have enough money behind them to make some serious money on this. But most people? They can't. They don't have the money lying around to invest/speculate in this at the scale where any profit would mean more than a down payment on a new car.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    41. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And watch the exchange have a MtGox like incident.

    42. Re:So... by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      Here is what's scary. They're making bank on all the transactions right? Do they hold enough bitcoins that they can manipulate the market? If they can will they push the price up by keeping coins or try to sell off their coins?

      I would sell small amounts of them as long as the price was going up but stop if the price was going down. Then I'm cashing out when it's going up but naturally constricting it when it's going down (because they still earn transaction fees, in bitcoins, so they still gain bitcoins)

    43. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yeah, VISA, Mastercard, Discover and AMEX have been doing this forever.

    44. Re:So... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I would actually like to short BTC now. At this rate of acceleration it could pop before the day is out.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    45. Re:So... by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      It will crash next Sunday. Or earlier. Definitely not later than Monday, trust me. CBOE is launching futures Sunday evening. What do you think the big boys are going to do with those? Go long or go short?

      Tak tak tak tak tak tak tak........ wheeeeeeeeee!!!

    46. Re:So... by tungstencoil · · Score: 1

      I had to talk a family member out of investing. He is retired, and thought "tungstencoil knows about computers, I'll ask him." I hope he heeded my advice, not because he is guaranteed to lose money (in fact, had he bought when he asked me and sold now, he'd be making some cash) but because neither he nor I is smart (stupid?) enough to predict the future on this.

      Doesn't matter what it is, investing heavily into a single asset or even market space carries significantly more reward/risk, and that's not great for the typical retiree.

    47. Re:So... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the chart is going to look like Burj Khalifa. Just like the tower, it's actual height will not be known until after completion.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    48. Re:So... by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      I was just talking to my paid investor who knows about this shit.

      She said to avoid it like the plague. Sure you could have made some money at one point. But now it's just a bubble waiting to crash. There's no regulatory backbone to the thing.

      4K in 24 hours... at least with tulips you could eat them.

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    49. Re:So... by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      My biggest worry about this hype is that is kills cryptocurrencies completely, if BTC falls over.

      maybe you haven't noticed, but the OPPOSITE is happening.

      because it hasn't fallen over yet. Duh.

    50. Re:So... by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

      My investor told me not to invest when it was $700. What would you think about that advice?

    51. Re:So... by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      You are so right.

      People are thinking they can get in on $100, and end up with thousands or more.

      Ain't going to happen. maybe if you bought 100 bitcoins when it was $100 a coin. But now, only the people with deep pockets can really do that.

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    52. Re:So... by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      3 months?

      3 days will be more like it. No more than 4.

    53. Re:So... by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      But they are quite the niche.

      And you make my point for me.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    54. Re:So... by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      Unless you have a very high risk tolerance (by which I mean that you could afford to lose the money), I would say that your investor gave you very good advice.

    55. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      But nobody's retiring on $1.95.

      I'm amazed how you can get from "you can buy fraction of a bitcoin" to "but you can't retire on $1.95".

    56. Re: So... by joao.cordeiro · · Score: 2

      But even so. Why would a drug supplier accept something that cannot be used in any material way and is not backed by any strong entity as a payment for it's supply?

      It's not like the dollars have disappeared from the market...

      Even if they need to clean the money, they don't need to make the transaction with bitcoins, they can just buy them and then sell them at the same second.

      And it's not like they don't have other, more stable, crypto currency around..

    57. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      If you want to short, you can go right ahead:

      https://support.bitfinex.com/h...

    58. Re:So... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      ( temporary conditions like this won't last long.)

      LOL!

      It's not difficult math to understand:

      All bitcoin can ever do is redistribute wealth (ie. somebody buys, somebody sells). That's it. There's nothing of any actual value anywhere in the system.

      The total value of Bitcoin is therefore limited to how much of their savings people are willing to gamble on it. This in turn is limited by how much spare money there is out there. I don't have an exact figure for that but I know it isn't infinite.

      When nobody has any money left then it will crash, permanently. Just like tulip bulbs. A lucky few will be very rich, everybody else will be poorer (or even in debt).

      It's math 101.

      --
      No sig today...
    59. Re:So... by infolation · · Score: 1

      "Yabba Dabba Dooooo!!!!"
      --Yogi Bear (market)

    60. Re:So... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      So how much will you bet?

      --
      No sig today...
    61. Re:So... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      maybe you haven't noticed, but the OPPOSITE is happening.

      So far, so good... right?

      --
      No sig today...
    62. Re: So... by joao.cordeiro · · Score: 1

      Not really.. it's all about the timing. When you but stock of any company you can assume it will probably not be around in 100 years. But your investment has a scope of 3 years so you are ok with it.

    63. Re:So... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Why? The true final price could be 100K.

      True, but I'd bet against it. I'm already reading stories of people maxing out their credit cards to buy Bitcoin.

      --
      No sig today...
    64. Re:So... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      My issue with Bitcoin has always been the same, can it be easily liquidated?

      It's worthless to me if I cannot liquidate that asset and turn it into physical goods I actually want, when I want

      Sure, it'd be really cool if I spent $1000 purchasing bitcoins 5 years ago .. that would be approximately $1.3mil now.. if I could unload them.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    65. Re: So... by joao.cordeiro · · Score: 1

      It kind of started already. Steam said today that they will no longer accept Bitcoins as payment. If more larger online stores follow, Bitcoin will be dead in hours.

    66. Re:So... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The problem is that no exponential growth can be maintained indefinitely. And the higher up that curve things are, the sooner the correction will come.

    67. Re:So... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Just in case it isn't clear: The crash will be permanent because the lucky few won't put the money back into the system. They'll keep it. The system cannot recover.

      --
      No sig today...
    68. Re:So... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Paper dollars are printed out of thin air backed by housing and wall street fraud.

      Gold backing and silver backing are long gone.

      The petro dollar scheme is linked to oil which is being phased out albeit slowly.

      The game is not exactly the same, but they have a lot in common.

      In the end printing $65 billion a month of US dollars backed by nothing is a bigger racket.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    69. Re:So... by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      me too... I just sold mine.

    70. Re:So... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Not just drugs, but also many other illegal things.

      Its allows privacy or the illusion of it where as credit cards transactions are all tracked.

      The dark web is full of different "products" that are illegal in some countries and not others.

      That is the new market place, BTC is the currency for now, and this will continue even
      after they try their futures scam like they do with fake paper gold dumping on the markets
      at a ratio that exceeds real physical gold on the planet by 500 to 1.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    71. Re:So... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      It is not overbought if it is the most common method of exchange for the dark web,
      and the dark web happens to be the largest and fastest growing segment of
      the unregulated economy.

      The dark web and bit coin are linked, and this is capitalism without government meddling for now.

      I expect a crackdown when they realize the "FULL" implications of what I said above.

      The rigged economy is being bypassed.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    72. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      You are wholly wrong. Theres a minimum you need to purchase to not get fucked in processing/transaction fees unless you feel like waiting forever.

    73. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      how much spare money there is out there. I don't have an exact figure for that but I know it isn't infinite.

      There's trillions. And if need be, more can be printed at the flick of a switch.

    74. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      How come the gold crash wasn't permanent ?

    75. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      that would be approximately $1.3mil now.. if I could unload them.

      That's not a big problem. There's about $2 billion worth of bitcoin traded in a day. Your $1.3 million could be sold over a few hours without causing a crash.

    76. Re:So... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      If wanted to bet against it, you can open a short position right now.

    77. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is the simplest ad safest way to buy drugs today.

      I went to my crack dealer last night and offered to pay him in BitCoin and he threatened to kick my ass

    78. Re:So... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      In short it went parabolic today. Happy day for everyone that entered a short position a few hours ago. I wish I could say "thanks for the money" but alas I didn't catch the tide on the way out. It will be interesting to see how far it drops by tomorrow.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    79. Re: So... by devman · · Score: 1

      Exchange transactions occur off chain, and are usually expressed as basis points of value. GDAX for instances charges a tx fee of 25 bp for liquidity takers, but is free for liquidity makers.

    80. Re:So... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Of course you can "get in"
      The smallest amount is something like a 0.000000000001 bitcoin. Worth ... hm, 20 cents? To lazy to do the math.
      But why would you want to get in?
      To realize your friend in europe get rich when BC rose from 8k to 17k, while you were asleep?
      And the you get poor because it drops while you sleep again from 17k to 4k?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    81. Re:So... by nine-times · · Score: 2

      In abstract, sure, but that's an oversimplification. It's like if people were talking about the dangers of heroin use, and you said, "Well it's not really bad for you since we all die eventually."

    82. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 2

      There is $1.3MM in buyer liquidity in the top $200 of the order book right now on GDAX and that is one exchange.

      Translating the above, you could put a market order to sell $1.3MM all in one go and it would only move the market ~$200 down from where it is now.

    83. Re:So... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I quite agree, which is why I've stayed out of it. Perhaps a later incarnation of it or a different cryptocurrency will fare better, but I'm not getting in on Bitcoin, as it exists today.

    84. Re:So... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I got in with $100 and nearly doubled that. I'm not quitting my day job anytime soon, but I might easily walk away with a nice return on my investment.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    85. Re:So... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      My mom asked me about bitcoin. I told her that it could go either way. She could make a bunch, lose whatever she put in, or anything in between. As long as it's a small amount, I don't see any problem with it.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    86. Re:So... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy bitcoins because the risk/reward ratio didn't suit me. Given that risk appetite guess where I stand on shorting it..

      I can still predict that it's going to crash, burn and hurt a lot of people.

    87. Re:So... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Thanks, didn't know that.

      However, would any exchange want to actually hold BTC at risk, beyond half of their own float?

    88. Re:So... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Sure, because the exchanges have proven so secure. And if you're going to just bank through a processor, why not just use VISA or Mastercard?

      The OP is correct: bitcoin is an interesting experiment. We might end up using blockchain currencies, but bitcoin has some fundamental problems that are going to have to be resolved.

    89. Re: So... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Might want to tell that to the Dutch, because due to food shortages in WW2 they ate plenty of them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    90. Re:So... by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      How much would you have bought and when would you have pulled out if you did buy?

      If you doubled your money and pulled out at $1400, would you still be kicking yourself?

      If you'd still be holding it, you have balls of steel.

    91. Re:So... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      People like gold. It's pretty. It's been used as money for as far back as we've had money. People want it.

      Numbers on a digital ledger aren't pretty, haven't been used as money for very long, and people don't care about it except for speculation.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    92. Re:So... by GNious · · Score: 1

      The stock-market is going to crash.
      The housing-market is going to crash.
      The gold-market is going to crash.
      The futures-market is going to crash.
      The fossil-fuel-market is going to crash.
      The cereal-market is going to crash.
      The drugs-market is going to ... oki, perhaps not that one, but all others are going to crash, eventually. Trick is to figure out _when_.

    93. Re: So... by joao.cordeiro · · Score: 1

      I don't think you get it... The dollar is backed by aircraft carriers, nuclear missiles, tanks, and oil control. It has nothing to do with the value of it but with the ability to enforce that value upon the world.

    94. Re:So... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      This is going to crash hard, and probably fairly soon, and people will react with "We could not have foreseen this at all!"

      And I will be over here, laughing at them.

      In the mean time we're all laughing at you. How does that make you feel?

    95. Re:So... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      People complain when I mention Tulip Mania,

      The problem is that so many people who know nothing about either Tulip Mania or Cryptocurrency throw this phrase around like it's some sort golden pass to predicting the future. And it's getting tedious.
      It's at the point where I soon as someone mentions tulips it's like a big flashing sign that says I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about but I'll offer my opinion anyway.

    96. Re:So... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I would actually like to short BTC now. At this rate of acceleration it could pop before the day is out.

      You can, but we know you won't because we know your type. All talk, no action....

    97. Re:So... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      The problem is that so many people who know nothing about either Tulip Mania or Cryptocurrency throw this phrase around like it's some sort golden pass to predicting the future. And it's getting tedious.

      It's at the point where I soon as someone mentions tulips it's like a big flashing sign that says I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about but I'll offer my opinion anyway.

      That's funny. I feel the same way every time some bitcoin fanboy mentions fiat currency, deflationary currency, any a myriad of other phrases, all while acting like bitcoin is some magic pill to cure all that ails you even though they don't seem to understand what the ailment is, or if it really even exists in the first place. Kind of like they're saying "what? My intestines are filled with bacteria? That's terrible!!!! Give me something to kill all that bacteria so I'll feel healthier!!!!"

    98. Re:So... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Actually it's because I'm a Gen. Y'er so I don't have excess cash to gamble with. If I did, I would've made some money this morning.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    99. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 1

      The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. Again it is easier to say it 'will' crash, more difficult to say 'when' or to what value.

      Predicting it will crash is axiomatic, it has no usefulness as a thesis.

    100. Re:So... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

      To be fair, this market only needs to keep going a few minutes to achieve that one :)

      Predicting it will crash is axiomatic, it has no usefulness as a thesis.

      Not strictly true. There are people arguing that Bitcoin is gaining value rapidly because it hasn't yet reached its stable price point.

      It's also possible for the price to remain volatile without ever actually crashing.

      That's what I'm predicting wont happen. I think it'll lose around 80-85% of its value within two days. Sadly I just don't know when.

    101. Re:So... by devman · · Score: 1

      Supposedly GDAX only holds 2% of the float in hot wallets, the rest is in cold storage. Every bitcoin traded on the exchange can be withdrawn though, it would just take some time to bring wallets online if enough people wanted to mass withdraw. While they are in the exchange, trades just become notations on an asset ledger for who owns what. When you withdraw to you own wallet is when your actual ownership gets recorded to the block chain.

    102. Re:So... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      The problem becomes that the higher it goes, the more publicity it gets and the more you start getting granny investors being sucked into the bubble.

      The adage in the 1920s was when the elevator boy is giving stock tips, it's time to get out.

    103. Re:So... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I feel the same way every time some bitcoin fanboy mentions fiat currency, deflationary currency, any a myriad of other phrases, all while acting like bitcoin is some magic pill to cure all that ails you even though they don't seem to understand what the ailment is,

      Probably true, every side has its idiots. The difference is that even if you don't understand blockchain, the bitcoin fanboys are getting rich off it. What are the tulip fanboys getting for their effort?

    104. Re:So... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Actually it's because I'm a Gen. Y'er so I don't have excess cash to gamble with.

      You don't have a job? Being young is precisely the time you should be gambling, as the older you get the less risk you should take.

      If I did, I would've made some money this morning.

      If you truly believe it, throw your next paycheck on it.

    105. Re:So... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Having a job as a Gen. Y'er doesn't pay enough to leave you with excess cash. My next paycheck won't leave me with any.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    106. Re:So... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Having a job as a Gen. Y'er doesn't pay enough to leave you with excess cash. My next paycheck won't leave me with any.

      You seem to be confusing your personal circumstances with every single person born after 1980.
      A guy at the desk next to mine bought $100 worth of BTC in 2013 to buy some drugs on Silkroad. He chickened out and left it sitting there, it's now worth $50k. He's Gen Y.
      Sometimes you get lucky, sometimes you have to work, but blaming everyone else for your situation won't get you anywhere.

  3. This is excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is excellent to see! Now when it crashes out in the near future it will affect even more people, and it will be even more painful! This is exactly the kind of lesson that people need to experience to truly learn about the danger of speculative bubbles! They'll be better off for it.

  4. IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by Shogun37 · · Score: 2

    In 3...2...1. Then, watch the currency go into free fall.

    1. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by olsmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are (or maybe already have) going to allow trading of Bitcoin futures. If you strongly feel it is destined to crash, you can make a lot of money here.

    2. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      I believe NASDAQ plans on introducing trading on Bitcoin futures in the first half of 2018. That's assuming that Bitcoin doesn't crash and burn before then.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by grnbrg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would the IRS care, as long as you are following the rules?

      If anyone thinks they are going to make their Bitcoin millions and not pay the government their cut, they're an idiot.

    4. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by perpenso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I believe NASDAQ plans on introducing trading on Bitcoin futures in the first half of 2018. That's assuming that Bitcoin doesn't crash and burn before then.

      The crash is not scheduled until after the put options are in place. :-)

    5. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it crashes before then, buy in at the crash price... Being traded on NASDAQ will add legitimacy to bitcoin and likely cause another bubble.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I'll buy on the second bounce. First bounce is always to get the "stupid" money out, the second gets all the "smart" money out. That's when the intelligent money gets back in.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Actually, CBOE is launching bitcoin futures next Sunday evening (Which is Monday morning for the Tokyo market). That will be the top of the bubble if it hasn't started to crash before then.

    8. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by Cederic · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... seems to disagree with you.

    9. Re:IRS/Secret Service Crackdown by laughingskeptic · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is fragile. Once options in place, there will be the incentive to short bitcoin and then induce a crash. The availability of the options market will effectively cause the crash.

  5. will doop when some trys to cash out a big chunk by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    will doop when some trys to cash out a big chunk also even just 1 coin will trigger lot's of IRS paper work.

  6. Cue the Price is Right! by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    Ah, the old Cliffhanger game.

  7. Investment advice by xavdeman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm buying popcorn stocks. Everybody's going to want to grab some when Bitcoin crashes.

  8. So I am going in now by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

    As the increase is exponential, the moment I am going in is now. Just put all my belongings into it as well as maxed out my cards and took several loans. This is my ticked to become rich.

    With my calculations it will reach 150.000USD in two weeks. There is no way I can lose money. Right?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:So I am going in now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your scenario is unlikely, but possible. It would not surprise me if you were destitute in two weeks, and it would not surprise me that you are going to wish you actually did this. It would surprise me if nothing happened at all though.

    2. Re:So I am going in now by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It would by no means surprise me if a lot of people already did that.

      Consider: Loan interests are at an all time low, reaching 1% in some cases. Per anno. Here you can get 20% interest. Per day.

      You think there aren't already people who started gambling everything they have and then some with the idea "just a few days and I'll have enough..."

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:So I am going in now by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I'm sitting here at the sidelines. In my own house. That still will be mine tomorrow.

      And then I'm gonna take a loan and buy his.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:So I am going in now by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It would not surprise me if you were destitute in two weeks, and it would not surprise me that you are going to wish you actually did this.

      I think one of the mistakes people make is in trying to judge these things in hindsight. Basically, they look at where things are now, and think, "The smart thing would have been to sink my life's savings into bitcoin a few years ago, and now I'd be a millionaire."

      But that's not true. I mean, it might be that you'd be a millionaire now, but that doesn't mean it's the "smart thing". It's a dangerous gamble. In hindsight you know that it would have paid off, but that doesn't mean it would have been a smart decision at the time.

      It's like betting on the winner of the Super Bowl 5 years from now. Sure, if you somehow knew who would win the Super Bowl 5 years from now, you could probably get great odds by placing your bet now and make a boatload of money. However, since it's so entirely speculative, there is no team for which betting that they'll with the Super Bowl in 2023 is a smart bet.

      This creates a paradoxical asymmetry. At almost every moment up until now, it would have been a profitable investment to put all of your money into bitcoin, looking at it now, in the past tense. However, at every one of those moments, it would have been a poor investment to put all of your money into bitcoin, looking at it at the time, in the present tense.

    5. Re:So I am going in now by rhazz · · Score: 1

      Just put all my belongings into it as well as maxed out my cards and took several loans.

      Oh, is this you?

  9. Steam no longer accepts them by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 3, Informative

    it seems the expense of transactions is making them useless for their actual purpose. for the hundredth time I'm declaring that the end is nigh :)

    --
    This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    1. Re:Steam no longer accepts them by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah. I mean, according to https://www.coindesk.com/price/ it's gained over $2000 in value today. But it could just as easily drop $2000 in value tomorrow.

      When it fluctuates that much in the short term, there's much less incentive for businesses to use it.

      "Oh, I accepted this fraction of a Bitcoin as payment, but it just dropped so much that I lost money."

      - or for the holders of Bitcoins -

      "Oh, I just spent that fraction of a Bitcoin as a payment for this product, but it just jumped so much that I effectively overpaid for the product."

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by reanjr · · Score: 2

      Yesterday, we saw the first successful test of the Lightning network built on top of Bitcoin. This layer largely addresses the transaction price and scaling issues. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the news that kicked off this rally acceleration.

    3. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by reanjr · · Score: 2

      No there isn't. Businesses mostly use payment gateways that sell the BTC immediately. There's no risk of price fluctuation to the business.

    4. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Classic part of a bubble is people fearing they missed out and buying high.

    5. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Valve cited this yesterday as the reason they are no longer accepting Bitcoins as a payment option.

      "As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method on our platform due to high fees and volatility in the value of Bitcoin."

      http://steamcommunity.com/game...

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      >. Businesses mostly use payment gateways that sell the BTC immediately

      The last time I saw this model, it was where you'd give USD to a gateway and get a credit measured in Bitcoin at the current exchange rate. Then you'd find an online store to buy something, also measured in Bitcoin (though really a USD amount converted using the current exchange rate). Then the gateway would pay the online store in USD.

      So you give USD to someone who gives USD to someone, but you PRETEND that you're using Bitcoin. And the middleman takes a cut for the service, either using the exchange rate or (thanks to Bitcoin's volatility) by delaying or retroactively processing the exchanges to make them more favourable.

      So... a credit card company, only without the credit, regulation, purchase protection, or wide acceptance. But much faster than actually using Bitcoin, since the vendor and the payment company can settle up instantly instead of taking 10 minutes to never.

    7. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      In the sense of "They're not going to not get their money's worth", you're correct that there's no risk. Steam are reporting, however, that the fluctuations are causing direct problems in terms of clawing back the right amount from customers:

      Historically, the value of Bitcoin has been volatile, but the degree of volatility has become extreme in the last few months, losing as much as 25% in value over a period of days. This creates a problem for customers trying to purchase games with Bitcoin. When checking out on Steam, a customer will transfer x amount of Bitcoin for the cost of the game, plus y amount of Bitcoin to cover the transaction fee charged by the Bitcoin network. The value of Bitcoin is only guaranteed for a certain period of time so if the transaction doesnâ(TM)t complete within that window of time, then the amount of Bitcoin needed to cover the transaction can change. The amount it can change has been increasing recently to a point where it can be significantly different.

      The normal resolution for this is to either refund the original payment to the user, or ask the user to transfer additional funds to cover the remaining balance. In both these cases, the user is hit with the Bitcoin network transaction fee again. This year, weâ(TM)ve seen increasing number of customers get into this state. With the transaction fee being so high right now, it is not feasible to refund or ask the customer to transfer the missing balance (which itself runs the risk of underpayment again, depending on how much the value of Bitcoin changes while the Bitcoin network processes the additional transfer).

      So, customers are getting routinely (unintentionally) ripped off, given one price, then forced to either pay a higher price, or accept less money back than they originally paid.

      That is overall a risk to the business, as that directly damages the business's reputation and the degree to which anyone wants to do business with them.

      The system is failing. And the BTC advocates are so enthusiastic about the gains they made by treating BTC as an investment vehicle that they aren't addressing the fact it's completely failing as a currency. And, you know, it's going to fail as an investment vehicle too if it has no legitimate use.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Steam no longer accepts them by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      or the hundredth time I'm declaring that the end is nigh

      So... you were wrong 99 times before?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      it's completely failing as a currency. And, you know, it's going to fail as an investment vehicle too if it has no legitimate use.

      Lightning Network should allow it to be used as a currency.

      But even without use as currency, it can still be a good investment. Nobody uses gold as currency, but still they invest in it. It's still cheaper to send 1 BTC to the other side of the world as it is to send the equivalent in gold.

    10. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      No there isn't. Businesses mostly use payment gateways that sell the BTC immediately. There's no risk of price fluctuation to the business.

      Presumably it's the owners of the payment gateway that are taking the risk, and charging their users whatever fee they think is necessary to cover the potential costs of the risk?

      If so, the client businesses can still suffer if the gateways' risks (and therefore their fees) get too high.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I thought it was high at 500. That looks like a bad decision. Until the bubble bursts. But who knows when or even if that happens.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    12. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Yea, I've known about bitcoin about 7-years and considered it bullshit the entire time, so I know even had I bothered to use PCs to mine when it was easy I would have sold it all years ago.

    13. Re:Steam no longer accepts them by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like "I spent this fraction of a bitcoin, but transaction fees were 3 times that amount".

    14. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Yes. So, how do you price a game in bitcoin? If a game is $39.95 USD, how much bitcoin do you charge for it, if the value of 'one bitcoin' is fluctuating by four thousand dollars over the space of a week?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    15. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I suppose you price it at $39.95, and do an on-the-fly conversion to whatever the equivalent is in Bitcoin at the moment the user clicks the "buy game" button.

      What that says about Bitcoin's utility as an exchange currency is left as an exercise for the reader :)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    16. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Yes. So, how do you price a game in bitcoin? If a game is $39.95 USD, how much bitcoin do you charge for it, if the value of 'one bitcoin' is fluctuating by four thousand dollars over the space of a week?

      Is there anything that has a stable value? Any way to link a crytocurrency to gold, for instance, so that transactions are ***priced*** in gold rather than in so many coins. That way, business can be conducted as though gold was exchanged, and cryptocurrency would be usable, a radical concept.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    17. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Gold fluctuates, because it has the same problem that bitcoin has; people mistake it for having intrinsic value, rather than for being a convenient placeholder of value.

      No currency has a stable value, but if your game is $39.95 USD last week, and $39.95 USD this week, the difference in the purchasing power of that $39.95 USD between those two time periods is vanishingly small. Apparently, that game should be priced 0.00262 bitcoin today, and 0.00369 bitcoin last week.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    18. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can do that, but the transaction fees are pretty daunting on the scale Steam sells things on.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    19. Re: Steam no longer accepts them by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I am completely sure the bubble will burst sometime. I'm also completely sure that, if I were to do any speculation based on that, I'd miss the right time and wind up losing money.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. Re:Economists "attempt to make sense out of" by Kierthos · · Score: 1

    Yes, but at least if you bought tulip bulbs, you could point to them and say "Those are indeed tulip bulbs. They are physical. They exist. They're right there."

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  11. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    How does one go about cashing in a bitcoin to collect said $17,000?

    Someone gives you their wallet address. You transfer your bitcoin to that address, and they transfer the $17000 back to you.

    Usually, this is done with an exchange as middle man, but the principle stays the same.

  12. Idiot commentator by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Late Wednesday, finance author Ben Carlson wrote:
    Bitcoin has achieved something I've always wanted to see in the stock mkt - a reverse 1987 (20% gain in a single day)

    Whoever wrote that is an idiot. No we do not want to see that kind of volatility in the market, positive or negative. That is NOT a good thing. Any time something skyrockets that fast in price it is pretty much invariably because something weapons grade irrational and/or criminal is going on. This is what happens with pump and dump schemes and those rarely end happily.

    1. Re:Idiot commentator by e4liberty · · Score: 3, Informative
      BTW, to reverse a 20% loss you need a 25% gain. That's volatility!

      (x * 0.8) * 1.25 == x

    2. Re:Idiot commentator by will_die · · Score: 1

      It depends on who you are. If you write about finances and economic theory you most defiantly want to see it crash because it will allow you to gather some data and test some theories.

    3. Re:Idiot commentator by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      Late Wednesday, finance author Ben Carlson wrote: Bitcoin has achieved something I've always wanted to see in the stock mkt - a reverse 1987 (20% gain in a single day)

      Whoever wrote that is an idiot. No we do not want to see that kind of volatility in the market, positive or negative. That is NOT a good thing. Any time something skyrockets that fast in price it is pretty much invariably because something weapons grade irrational and/or criminal

      l is going on. This is what happens with

      pump and dump

      schemes and those rarely end happily.

      What if... the Slashdot effect of thousands of amateurs exiting BitCoin would cascade into a run on BitCoin that would burn the pump and dump criminals responsible for this, the CDO & CDS scams, Madhoff, dot.com, the housing bubble, the rent-backed-securities bubble...?

    4. Re:Idiot commentator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Whoever wrote that...

      Ben Carson wrote it. It says so right there...

  13. All those nicehash bitcoins being cashed out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My mining profits were stolen, and all I have left is an electric bill and worn out GPUs.

  14. Not sure what to make of it by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I guess my question is this...how much of the increase is driven by people trying to throw money at anything that will get them a huge return? Or, when do financial advisors start recommending Bitcoin futures for Grandma's lump-sum pension payment?

    I can't see this ending well because all it is is a speculative bubble. There's real money tied up in it, that's for sure, but in the end you don't even own stock in a company or a valuable commodity. All the cheerleaders are saying that the stock market is a casino anyway, but even if the market drops 30%, you still own stock. If Bitcoin drops 30%, you'll have to hope that it comes back so you can get your money out. Since it's not really based on anything, it's purely driven by having enough people pouring money in to keep the price high.

    1. Re:Not sure what to make of it by geekmux · · Score: 1

      All the cheerleaders are saying that the stock market is a casino anyway, but even if the market drops 30%, you still own stock. If Bitcoin drops 30%, you'll have to hope that it comes back so you can get your money out.

      If you put your actual money into an investment and it drops 30%, you have to hope that it comes back up so you can recoup your original investment. That applies to any investment, no matter what it is.

      It's all a damn casino. At the end of the day, a company crashing vs. bitcoin crashing can create the same end result; a pile of worthless shit.

    2. Re:Not sure what to make of it by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      but even if the market drops 30%, you still own stock.

      Stock prices have gone to zero before.

    3. Re:Not sure what to make of it by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      The difference is risk. How likely is it that Amazon, Google, or Apple will go out of business or that their stock price would drop to a 10th of what it is today? Now wrap all these stocks into a mutual fund with 100 other companies and what's the likelihood that they will all collectively drop to a 10th of what they are today? Now, compare that to what you think the likelihood of Bitcoin dropping from $17000 to $1700 is?

      During the 1929 crash the market dropped by 89%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... There are safeguards in place to help prevent a mass sell-off now. There are no safeguards in bitcoin. A better comparison for bitcoin is commodities like gold and silver.

      In the market, when it does crash, the best thing you can do is keep your money in there, every bull run starts with a crash and every crash has recovered, eventually.

    4. Re:Not sure what to make of it by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      A big part is driven by the "underworld", China, likely Russia, and likely DPRK. The "investors" dumping money into Bitcoin are a very different group with diverse interests. When you add in the prospect of bitcoin futures... it all gets really foggy... really quickly.

      The transaction volume of the crash is what I expect to destroy it, but time will tell.

    5. Re:Not sure what to make of it by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >every crash has recovered, eventually.

      How's your Beanie Baby portfolio?

    6. Re:Not sure what to make of it by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Stock prices have gone to zero before.

      They have in Idiocracy, but that's just a movie. Why would anyone want to sell a stock for zero and pay transaction fees to get nothing in return? Pennies, yes. Less than a penny, sure. But never zero.

    7. Re:Not sure what to make of it by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Every stock market crash has recovered. I'f you're doing long-term investing, the correct thing to do in a crash is buy. That's partly because stock has actual value loosely connected to the value of the company issuing it. Individual stocks have crashed and burned (including some of mine in my more speculative days), but a halfway decent mutual fund is as safe an investment, in the long run, as you're likely to get.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  15. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by kelarius · · Score: 2

    You have to use an exchange like Coinbank or Bitfinex, they'll take your bitcoins and offer you whatever other currency. Thing is that these exchanges often have restrictions on when, how often, and how much you can exchange, often they have queues that you have to wait in to actually exchange your currency. If you're a new user, you can usually expect to wait a while to drop your bitcoin for some other currency, and you can usually expect to have a limit on the amount you're allowed to convert. The exchanges do this to help prevent a crash via a flash selloff, and to some extent it's successful, however eventually consumer faith in the future of the value on Bitcoin is going to drop off (I mean really, $17k?) and when that happens those same protections are going to make the crash all that much worse for people involved.

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
  16. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by devman · · Score: 1

    You sell it on a BTC exchange for USD or EUR and then send the proceeds to a bank.

  17. Stability by Jfetjunky · · Score: 1

    With the inordinately low volume of bitcoin and its inherent instability, I can't see it gaining a foothold anywhere significant. Its value is fluctuating so widely, any major business would be crazy to accept it now. How are you supposed to budget and forecast against a currency that fluctuated 65% in a week?

    To big businesses, it might as well be monopoly money. Trying to work that against cost of goods sold, operating expenses, etc is in now way worth the effort.

    1. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Low volume? More dollar value changes hands in Bitcoin every single day than in just about any stock on the planet.

  18. Waiting for the bubble to burst... by The123king · · Score: 1

    *insert gif of MJ eating popcorn*

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    1. Re:Waiting for the bubble to burst... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1
      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  19. Pop! Pop! by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Sell NOW!!! It's useless as currency at this price with high transaction fees. This bubble is going to pop hard and fast and probably before Christmas.

    1. Re:Pop! Pop! by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's going to pop. The question is at what price, and what happens after that. In 2013, it popped from $1300 to $200.

  20. BTC increase by identity_pi · · Score: 1

    This is really concerning. The https://www.identitypi.com/ team thinks that this cryptocurrency will crash as fast at it rises.

    1. Re:BTC increase by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

      ^^ Site is not secured right, and is a sales portal to their identity tracking crap. Beware.

  21. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by grnbrg · · Score: 1

    Capital gains taxes aren't that complicated.....

    (sale value - (purchase value + trading fees)) * tax rate.

  22. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    Places like coinbase.comallow you to do just this.

  23. Re:Economists "attempt to make sense out of" by grnbrg · · Score: 1

    Which is not how the tulip bubble happened. You couldn't point at anything, as what bubbled was a poorly regulated tulip futures market.

    Tulip mania had more in common with the 2008 mortgage crisis that with Bitcoin.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    just wait for that IRS audit

  26. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Its funny because actual stock exchanges pay some traders to trade in segments to ensure liquidity.

  27. Tulips baby. by darthsilun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. -- George Santayana

    1. Re:Tulips baby. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And those who can remember the past are condemned to watch everyone else repeat it!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Tulips baby. by fredrated · · Score: 1

      No one remembers the past.

  28. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by raywes88 · · Score: 1

    I can't speak about amounts that large, but, I've purchased a few amazon gift cards (varying amounts $50-$100) using xmr.to (I mined monero for a bit just because) and a service like gyft. Which I've then used to buy tangible things. Of course that's not cashing thousands of dollars worth of BTC out directly into your checking account.

  29. Re:Mental image... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    In my dreams it's worse. He's singing in Dutch, there.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Re:Economists "attempt to make sense out of" by Xylantiel · · Score: 2

    Economists don't need to "make sense" of it, they are perfectly familiar with asset bubbles.

  31. Ignorance runs rampant by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Last I checked it was over 19,000 dollars. Come on now guys.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
    1. Re:Ignorance runs rampant by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Check again. It's around 15-16k now.

  32. Black Tulips by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    (title) - we've been here before.

  33. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by CodeHog · · Score: 1

    Awesome replies from folks. Having not mined bitcoin but having a basic understanding of it, isn't it cost prohibitive to mine coin on your own devices? Won't the cost of electricity for these devices be higher than the actual amount mined? I thought I read where it's taking longer and longer to mine.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  34. My 0.02 by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin is a recipe for epic financial disaster.

    1. Re:My 0.02 by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >Bitcoin is a recipe for epic financial disaster.

      As surprisingly large as Bitcoin has become, it's still peanuts compared to anything that could affect the markets.

      The tragedy will be at the individual level as the last of the greedy fools comes to the realization that they're the LAST of the fools, and have been left holding the bag.

      Now... how long that takes, and how big the bag is when it happens... no idea. What I do know is I will have absolutely no sympathy for anyone losing their shirt when the crash comes. I will consider those people to have economically auto-Darwinated.

    2. Re:My 0.02 by kelarius · · Score: 1

      >Bitcoin is a recipe for epic financial disaster.

      As surprisingly large as Bitcoin has become, it's still peanuts compared to anything that could affect the markets.

      The tragedy will be at the individual level as the last of the greedy fools comes to the realization that they're the LAST of the fools, and have been left holding the bag.

      Now... how long that takes, and how big the bag is when it happens... no idea. What I do know is I will have absolutely no sympathy for anyone losing their shirt when the crash comes. I will consider those people to have economically auto-Darwinated.

      This, more than anything. Bitcoin hasn't penetrated into mainstream financial markets at all, so if/when it implodes it won't affect the market at large. What worries me is that Bitcoin Futures has the power to change that, it offers an in for investment bankers and hedge fund managers to start speculating in bitcoin, which given their penchant for greed and the current wild west regulatory situation in cryptocurrencies, could create a recipe for disaster.

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
  35. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Nice try at affiliate marketing, but nobody here is that gullible.

  36. Pop! by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Future headline: Pop!

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  37. Re:FTW!! by omnichad · · Score: 2

    Any Bitcoin exchange that's still running. Once the crash starts, they will likely shut down very quickly - because they would have to buy BTC that will be worthless by the time they can move it.

  38. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    The paperwork will include explaining what all your other proceeds were when IRS demands records from the exchange.

  39. ... the Dutch... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    ... and after the rise you can cashout of BitCoin and invest in tulip bulbs....

  40. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Where the IRS smells money they will come after you. All they need to do is require the exchanges to report all accounts with proceeds in excess of ~$10k for the last n years, and they will send you a bill for everything you sold. (They don't deduct the cost of the bitcoins in that bill.)

    It is a very stressful letter to get. Got one back in 2003 and it scared the living shit out of me.

  41. Assets and secondary markets by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why ? Bitcoin is not a stock, and the Bitcoin exchanges don't function like stock markets.

    If you are buying bitcoin hoping it will appreciate in value relative to the dollar then it is a secondary market and as such it functions almost identically to a stock market as a practical matter. Bitcoin is just an asset like gold or beenie babies or pork bellies or frozen concentrated orange juice. Any discussion about the "value" of bitcoin is by definition in relation to how many dollars you can get for it which is no different than asking what the current price of a stock is in dollars. Stocks are assets and so is bitcoin.

    1. Re:Assets and secondary markets by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      We were discussing the minimum amount to buy.

  42. Re:Economists "attempt to make sense out of" by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Economists don't need to "make sense" of it, they are perfectly familiar with asset bubbles

    And their perfect familiarity brings with it perfect understanding that by definition asset bubbles don't "make sense." Sometimes wry humor just doesn't work in writing.

  43. Re:FTW!! by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin exchanges don't buy BTC. They just facilitate trade between two parties. One brings the BTC, the other brings the USD, agree on a price, and the exchange swaps their assets around.

  44. Exchange rate risk by sjbe · · Score: 1

    No there isn't. Businesses mostly use payment gateways that sell the BTC immediately. There's no risk of price fluctuation to the business.

    "Immediately" doesn't mean what you think it means. We're talking minutes to hours here which in the financial world is a far cry from "instant" and that means substantial exchange rate risk. On an asset that is fluctuating by double digit percentages within a few days that can mean a very substantial difference in value from the start of an exchange transaction to the finish. Saying there is no risk of price fluctuation is quite simply wrong.

    1. Re:Exchange rate risk by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      We're talking minutes to hours here which in the financial world is a far cry from "instant" and that means substantial exchange rate risk

      No, the payment processor keeps a modest amount of bitcoin. As soon as you make a payment, say for 0.01 BTC, they can sell 0.01 of their own stash on the exchange at the exact same time, minimizing the exchange risk. To compensate for residual risk, they charge a commission.

  45. Re:FTW!! by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Regardless, the same would apply. Though I'd be surprised if the exchanges aren't doing any of their own buying of BTC in the process during the bubble. They would know before almost anyone else when to sell - and they could prioritize their own holdings.

  46. Risk by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Lightning Network should allow it to be used as a currency.

    Doesn't work if the exchange rate moves too quickly.

    But even without use as currency, it can still be a good investment.

    If you have a high tolerance for risk then maybe. You might have better odds in Vegas though.

    Nobody uses gold as currency, but still they invest in it.

    Gold has tangible uses aside from serving as an investment vehicle and it isn't generally very volatile relative to the dollar over short time periods. Hard to say the same about bitcoin.

    1. Re:Risk by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      You might have better odds in Vegas though.

      Vegas is rigged, and is pure chance. The bitcoin protocol is open, so you can study it, and you can ponder the implications and growth potential.

      Gold has tangible uses aside from serving as an investment vehicle and it isn't generally very volatile relative to the dollar over short time periods. Hard to say the same about bitcoin.

      Gold had thousands of years time to settle down. Bitcoin is brand new, and people don't know yet what the proper value is. At some point, the price of Bitcoin will also calm down.

    2. Re:Risk by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      At some point, the price of Bitcoin will also calm down

      I don't think that this will end up being the case. Bitcoin will always require a ludicrously complex and expensive network in order to actually exist. If no-one is willing to spend money on hardware, electricity, storage and bandwidth to actually run the network, then bitcoin will literally cease to exist. Gold, on the other hand, is a physical object that can change hands physically. That this is not how gold is normally traded today is not important - the fact is that if you own gold, you own gold, and you can pick it up and store it in a big (or more likely, small) hole in your back yard. It won't even rust, sitting there in the ground. It'll just be gold forever.

      Bitcoin is a bunch of numbers, sitting in a huge chain of hashes, sitting on thousands of hard-disks plugged into computers all around the world. But that hash chain must be modified in order to move the coins around, and that takes CPU power, and we're already seeing the crippling limits that this places on the liquidity of bitcoin itself. Regular fiat currencies, as bitcoin enthusiasts love to point out, are *also* numbers sitting in computers, but they are backed by governments, and more importantly exist for the purpose of controlling economies. Despite the protestations, economic control through the manipulation of fiat currencies is literally the only thing that makes capitalism actually work.

    3. Re:Risk by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Vegas is rigged, and is pure chance.

      Those statements are contradictory. In fact, Vegas tends to be squeaky clean (it's heavily regulated) and based firmly on chance. The games favor the house, which pretty much has to be true for a casino to continue to exist, and I haven't heard of a casino pretending otherwise, Individuals can win money, but due to the law of large numbers the casinos are virtually guaranteed a reliable share of the bets.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  47. Get Rich Quick or die trying by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I guess my question is this...how much of the increase is driven by people trying to throw money at anything that will get them a huge return?

    All of it. This is a bunch of people trying to Get Rich Quick. That much is obvious. WHO is driving it is a different question. My guess would be some combination of irrational exuberance and criminal enterprise. In financial terms bitcoin is a small and thinly traded asset and moving a market like that is child's play in the world of finance.

    Or, when do financial advisors start recommending Bitcoin futures for Grandma's lump-sum pension payment?

    Probably never unless they are trying to rob grandma.

  48. Re:Mental image... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    For this particular story, what immediately started playing in my head was "All around the mulberry bush, the monkey chased the weasel..."

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  49. Re:Economists "attempt to make sense out of" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    If economists - the same people who are totally cool with infinite growth in a finite world - can't make sense out of something, you know it's real bad.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  50. Re:Usefulness of Bitcoin? by ahodgson · · Score: 1

    At $17K you could make money mining at home today. You have to do it on specialized ASICs (the most popular are from Bitmain). You'd never actually mine any bitcoins, but you'd join a pool and get some BTC as pool payouts.

    If you like having a 1.6kw device that sounds like a jet turbine running in your house for the next 8 months, that is.

  51. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  52. Wha?? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin has achieved something I've always wanted to see in the stock mkt - a reverse 1987 (20% gain in a single day)

    Ben Carlson is either nuts or only cares about the short-term gain of his own stock holdings. In terms of the big economic picture, nobody should want to see a 20% gain in the stock market in a single day.

  53. Tulip Bubbles, Mermaids and Unicorns by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com...

    The main argument against is __something that didn't happen in reality__

  54. Re:FTW!! by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Why would they have to buy BTC? People are not going to try and move their BTC out. If they sell, it's to someone else who's buying. The exchanges just pocket the transaction fees.

    They may suspend trading temporarily due to built in circuit breakers to protect the market. But they're not going to lose money. (Except on paper, with all the BTC they are holding themselves).

  55. The best scenario for bitcoin holders by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    The best realistic scenario for bitcoin holders right now is a correction back to the $8-10K range and a saner move forward. This is looking like a flameout if not a supernova at the moment. I'd bet the developers are on their knees praying for a correction while simultaneously trying to decide how to rush a solution to the energy problem.

  56. Dutch Tulip Mania by supercell · · Score: 2

    This is the Dutch Tulip Mania Bubble all over again. No question. http://www.thebubblebubble.com...

  57. What don't people understand? by BlueCoder · · Score: 2

    There is no basis for the inflated price. It's like junk bonds now; no rational thinking. I wouldn't be surprised if a government was behind it. The price will obvious self destruct and go down below market at witch time I probably will buy some for shits and giggles. I wouldn't be surprised if it went down to $200 per coin. The true value of bitcoin is in the number of people that hold onto them and won't sell them.

  58. Re:FTW!! by omnichad · · Score: 2

    Can you just read the reply to the other person who already asked the same question? The answer is the same. The exchanges will shut down due to a lack of buyers.

  59. M-M-M-MONSTER BUBBLE! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon, pop goes the weasel!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  60. I just cashed in by dhaen · · Score: 2

    I had some residual left in Bitcoin from early 2016 (note I use the singular). I'd forgotten about this until the recent boom publicity and realised that just like Tulip Fever, it is based on nothing and may not climb much further. Anyway, I'm a happy bunny with the payout (x34). It will probably climb a bit further but many will lose in the crash.

  61. Short? by trevc · · Score: 2

    Is it possible to short bitcoin so I can make money when it does crash?

    1. Re:Short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      It will be soon, but you don't want to. Remember the saying...the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. Even if BTC drops to $1 next December, between now and then it could go to $50k, $100k, or possibly even higher. Nobody will let you short it that long unless you've got massive capital to back your position. So what will happen is you will get margin called and forced to liquidate your assets and give up your position and then miss out on the eventual crash.

      Getting rich shorting bitcoin is a nice thing to think about, but a terribly risky thing to actually do.

    2. Re:Short? by Njovich · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, just Google it.

  62. What's the intrinsic value of bitcoins by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    In other words, what sustains its price if there aren't any tangible assets supporting it? I guess you could claim that it's value is whatever somebody is willing to pay for it but that's awfully close to sounding like a ponzi scheme. It may be me but this feels like the dot com bubble earlier this century when companies with no sales had ridiculously high valuations based on forward looking sales estimates or other such nonsense, big words meaning nothing. Pets.com, any one?

    1. Re:What's the intrinsic value of bitcoins by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      The only difference would be pets.com had some office furniture and whatnot so there was some underlying tangible asset.

  63. What is the intrinsic value of bitcoin? by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 2

    Companies typically have tangible assests and sales to support their stock prices. What is supporting bitcoin's valuation. I suppose one could argue that it's price is whatever somebody is willing to pay for it but that seems awfully close to being a Ponzi scheme. This feels like the dot com bubble that blew up at the beginning of the century when internet companies had ridiculously high prices without having any sales. Pets.com anyone?

    1. Re:What is the intrinsic value of bitcoin? by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Pets.com had assets. Yeah, they were a tiny fraction of what they were valued at.

      The difference is that bitcoin has nothing.

  64. re: NYSE and NASDAQ by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    The difference is, the stock markets represent people's monetary investments in businesses, who actually do employ people, manufacture things and provide services of value. When you buy Bitcoin, it doesn't put capital into business ventures.

  65. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Yes, I completely agree.

    The problem is people not being prepared. My situation was in the dot.bomb I had a massive (for me) capital loss covering 2000 and 2001. The IRS sent me a bill for all the sales I did to cover margin calls. Since I didn't file a return covering the capital gains, they assumed that my basis was zero, so I owed $$$.

    I imagine much the same kind of thing happening to other inexperienced investors, some of whom might actually pay the bill. (I was going to run for the hills until I actually got an explanation of what I needed to do by calling the IRS.)

  66. Re:Putin is laughing... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Chinese hackers. Chinese miners control enough of the horsepower that they can completely manipulate the blockchain.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  67. Re: NYSE and NASDAQ by Zaelath · · Score: 1

    Depends if you define drugs and illegal arms trade as "business".

  68. actual purpose by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

    Was the actual purpose to replace every transaction in the world, or to provide the foundation for a new system to replace the existing banks, and especially the SWIFT system for interbank transfers?

  69. Re: NYSE and NASDAQ by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    The difference is, the stock markets represent people's monetary investments in businesses

    Yes and no. I draw a distinction between investing in, and being invested in, a company.

    Example: If you buy stock in Smidge Industries LTD, that means someone is selling that stock. If SIL is selling that stock, then you are investing in that company. Your money goes to the business.

    If, however, SIL is not selling stocks at that time, then you're buying from someone else. Your money does not go to Smidge Industries LTD, and they do not tangibly benefit from the transaction. However, you still own stock in SIL, so you are invested in the company.

    But in the second case, your financial transaction means nearly nothing to the company. I say nearly, because with enough activity it can affect the price of the stock which, in turn, helps or harms the company's ability to raise more money by selling more stock if it chooses to do so. And since the vast majority of the stock market is transactions that don't involve the companies that issued the stocks being traded, I'd argue that the stock markets don't truly represent people investing in companies as much as they represent people being invested in companies.
    =Smidge=

  70. I like by jf_moreira · · Score: 1

    to see what some people say: "I will be there laughing when it crashes". But I like more the profits I have being making with BTC. In less than a month already recovered my initial investment, took up my dividends and am using to pay for many things around my home. So, for me, it's just great and I invite everyone to get in. Due to the volatility risks are high and profit is high so it's your decision... Or you can just laugh like the dude said. :)

  71. Re:will doop when some trys to cash out a big chun by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    My dealings with the IRS and letters have been very smooth. The one time the mistake was theirs, I explained it. They sent back a letter saying that I was right, they were going with my figures, and how to appeal that decision.

    If you sold bitcoins and made a profit, file that in your income tax return. If not, they've got a legitimate beef, and you need to correct them.

    Keep records, like you should for all investments. If you don't try to pull a fast one on the IRS (never recommended), you'll be fine.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  72. It Went Up; Then It Went Down by DERoss · · Score: 1

    On 8 December 2017 at around 01:54 UTC, bitcoin was over US$17,147. Less than 11 hours later -- 8 December 2017 at around 11:35 UTC -- it was less than US$14,100. That is a drop of 18% or 1.84% per hour.

  73. "There is no try, only do" by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    As economists attempt to make sense of Bitcoin

    Some try, and succeed.

    Some try, and can't even get a good understanding of the facts, before publicly embarrassing themselves by expressing ridiculous conclusions and opinions.

    And some might even understand it well enough to know that what they're saying, good or bad, is not supported by facts. But that doesn't stop them.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  74. Re: NYSE and NASDAQ by abies · · Score: 1

    To play devil's advocate here, by buying stocks second hand, you are providing liquidity, which makes a lot more people invest in original companies on stock market, because they know they will be able to get out of position in case of financial need. So, you are not investing in SI LTD directly, but you are, in indirect sense, enabling investments in all companies on the market.

    It gets considerably more fuzzy with various derivative products. Still, I like to think that pure stock market is 'good', even if you are trading stocks which are already present on exchanges and all the 'lets get rich by moving empty money around' things are more on derivative markets (possibly also FX?).

  75. Re: NYSE and NASDAQ by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    The very notion of "Liquidity" is bullshit, especially in this situation.

    Either someone is gonna buy the stocks you're trying to sell or nobody will. Buyers and sellers are essentially commodities. A stock doesn't become more "liquid" if A sells to B, or if A sells to B who then sells to C, or if A sells to C directly.
    =Smidge=

  76. Re:you're just more and more clueless by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Then last week, several major Chinese bitcoin exchanges including BTC China announced they would end trading by the end of the month amid reports Chinese regulators planned to shut down the exchanges.

    Now we know why you are an AC, so you don't show your ignorance. BTC is ending trading and the exchanges are closing in China.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  77. Re: NYSE and NASDAQ by abies · · Score: 1

    The very notion of "Liquidity" is bullshit, especially in this situation.

    Either someone is gonna buy the stocks you're trying to sell or nobody will. Buyers and sellers are essentially commodities. A stock doesn't become more "liquid" if A sells to B, or if A sells to B who then sells to C, or if A sells to C directly.
    =Smidge=

    Sorry, I disagree here. Stock where 1000 units is traded each day (A->B->C->D->E....->Z) is a lot more liquid that one which where 1000 units got traded once during a month (A->Z).

  78. Re:you're just more and more clueless by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Did you READ the articles I linked? China has banned Bitcoin exchanges and use of Bitcoin within its borders. Good luck trying to spend Bitcoin in China, and if you're caught trading it inside China? I hope you like Chinese prison...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  79. Re: NYSE and NASDAQ by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    It's cute how you insert an arbitrary time base.

    Liquidity is about how easy it is to convert an asset's value, not how often. Frequent trades are not necessarily a good indication of liquidity; If at any given time there is no buyer for your stuff, then it's not liquid at that moment. You might think that frequent trades means more opportunities to sell, but it can also be that the market is saturated and any one specific seller might have a hard time finding a buyer.

    All frequent trades like what you're describing can really tell you is it's not something worth holding on to for very long, which would be worrisome.

    In either case, however, this does not help the business that issued the original stock unless and until they issue more stock of their own, and in absolutely no case are you investing in that business if you don't buy the stock directly from them.
    =Smidge=