Slashdot Mirror


Trump Tells Apple To Make Products In the US To Avoid China Tariffs (thehill.com)

hackingbear writes: President Trump acknowledged in a tweet that "Apple prices may increase because of the massive Tariffs we may be imposing on China," but suggested the issue was not with the tariffs themselves. "There is an easy solution where there would be ZERO tax, and indeed a tax incentive. Make your products in the United States instead of China. Start building new plants now," Trump wrote. The U.S. is threatening to impose 25% tariffs on all $500 billion worth of Chinese imports over issues such as intellectual property theft.

While Apple et al are still making their products in China, Trump didn't offer Apple a place to find the millions of laborers needed to make their products, given that the official unemployment rate is at a historic low of 3.9%. Manufacturers also need to compete in the labor market with garbage companies who need to find American laborers willing to recycle their own trash -- a job once imposed upon China as a condition to enter the World Trade Organization and enjoy advantageous tariff rates. China is gracefully giving back those jobs as the U.S. is complaining of unfair trades.

297 of 568 comments (clear)

  1. Or, they could buy them in Canada... by dlingman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't there an 800$ tax/duty etc free limit on importing items from abroad? If they buy their iPhones from Canada, and the cost is under $800 US...

    1. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More anti-Trump propaganda by the Arab-owned machine, Slashdot.
       
      Unemployment isn't at 3.9% and never has been. It may still be 10% or 20% depending on the rampant redefinitions that have neen going on since the Obama era. Oh, if you haven't been able to find a job after a few months, obviously you have given up, so we aren't going to count you. It's just like faking the CPI to get the inflation rate number to be what they want it to be: it's a big con game.
       
      And while we're on the topic of con games, Apple needs "laborers" as the "editor" puts it. The Slashdot editor's implication is that Chinese de facto slave labor shouldn't be replaced by American labor. Where will it come from? The free market, you insolent fool. If someone is working three part-time jobs and averages $9/hr in Tennessee between Amazon and working as a waiter at two restaurants or has the option to do something more productive like assembling iPhones for $13/hr, full-time with overtime, where do you think those jobs will come from?

    2. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      C'mon, be nice to BeauHD. He sits on the toilet all day long reading Vice, and every now, he manages to release a few explosive diahrreal farts. Heck, he had to drop out of community college because of this..do you think he *KNOWS* anything?

    3. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, could you have packed more trolling in a single post?

      The best line was logistics. So we can manage to import phones and bring them to the heartland, where most of our food comes from, btw, but we are incapable of shipping phones out of those same places. But we can ship a gazillion tons of food out. Lololololol

      Try again, son. A good effort, though.

    4. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Has your country improved measurably since the reduction of union power from the 80s onwards?

    5. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by link-error · · Score: 2, Interesting

          You left out the biggest question in my mind...

        "Trump didn't offer Apple a place to find the millions of laborers needed to make their products"

        Millions of laborers? Huh?

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    6. Re:Or, they could buy them in Canada... by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      For any other manufacturer, this would probably work, but Apple's phones (at least their flagship model) are ridiculously expensive. The iPhone X starts at $999 according to Apple's own site. Even the base model for the iPhone 8 Plus is $799, so if you have to factor in tax or you want to upgrade the storage capacity, this plan wouldn't work.

    7. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by movdqa · · Score: 2

      There's the VAT in Canada. We have a lot of Canadian shoppers coming down to our malls in my state. Had a ton of them vacationing here too.

    8. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Trump didn't offer Apple a place to find the millions of laborers needed to make their products"

        What Apple really means is they can't find enough laborers willing to work for slave labor rates in the US. And why would Trump be responsible for finding laborers for Apple? Isn't that Apple's responsibility? If Apple is upset over the tariffs eating into their profit margins they should come up with a better reason than not being able to find enough workers. The truth is Apple could absorb the tariffs and still make tons of money. The manufacturing and shipping costs for a $900 iPhone is less than $20 dollars per unit. And since Apple has just been updating the iPhone and not producing anything new they have not had to re-tool their manufacturing assembly lines or re-train the existing laborers. That is a hefty profit margin. That's how you become one of the richest corporations on the planet.

      And this isn't the first time Apple has stuck their proverbial foot in their mouth. They made a big production over refusing to obey a Federal Court warrant requiring them to assist in gaining access to a dead terrorist iPhone. A phone the dead terrorist didn't even own. His employer owned the phone and gave the government permission to access the phone by any means necessary. Apple said obeying the court order would require too many resources and the cost would be prohibitive. Then they pushed the idea that accessing the phone might not even be possible because of Apple's top notch security. This was Apple's attempt at creating a marketing campaign touting their security and protecting the user's privacy. So after all this BS a 3rd party accessed the phone without help from Apple in less than 3 days. So much for touting their top shelf security measures.

    9. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      So wages and living standards have improved dramatically and public infrastructure is in great condition?

    10. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 2013 MotoX was made in Fort Worth, Texas.

      I own two. Most people own zero.

      That's what "Made in America" is worth to real Americans. The phone was one of the best of the year, and nobody cared about it. They just wanted the latest made in China crap.

    11. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by reanjr · · Score: 1

      GST is a VAT.

    12. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by MagicM · · Score: 1

      Unemployment isn't at 3.9% and never has been. It may still be 10% or 20% depending on the rampant redefinitions that have neen going on since the Obama era.

      I was interested, so I looked it up. The current rate of "official unemployment" plus "discouraged workers" (those who have stopped actively looking for work for more than four weeks) is 4.1%. Within the current definitions, the highest current unemployment rate is 7.4%.

      https://www.bls.gov/news.relea...

      If you have any links to good information on the redefinition of "unemployment" please share.

    13. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      In 1950, the minimum wage was 45% of the median household income. In 2016, it was 25%.

      You know every wage between 25% and 45% would be between 45% and 100% of the median income if the minimum wage were equivalent to the 1950 rate? Businesses aren't charities, and they generally don't pay above-minimum wage if they reasonably believe they can easily replace workers. This also means people who were making 70% of median can make less and still be distinguished from their poorer compatriots.

      That's not to say we should use the median income. If we increase the minimum wage whenever it stands below 1/4 of the per-adult GNI, it would be 36% of the median household income--and permanently coupled to productivity per working-age adult. Growth then means wage growth as well, and middle-income wages don't stretch over time to below-minimum-wage levels (i.e. a lower-middle-income wage in 2016, such as $14/hr, may be less than the equivalent 1950 minimum wage).

      Structure.

    14. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by Rhipf · · Score: 1

      No GST is a Goods and Services Tax, VAT is a Value Added Tax. The GST is applied whether there is any added value or not. :-)

    15. Re: Or, they could buy them in Canada... by missneht · · Score: 1

      Apple could quietly start manufacturing in the countries that Trump manufactures his products in, which he is not imposing tariffs on. Of course moving manufacturing could also be expensive.

    16. Re:Or, they could buy them in Canada... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      In order to qualify for "Canadian phones", the final assembly must be done in Canada.
      The final assembly issue won't work for USA, as the sub-assemblies will still be Chinese and subject to the tariffs.

      This is the president's dream, but I bet it will not come to pass. Apple's pockets are extremely deep. Trump could be convinced otherwise.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Rock and hard place by stikves · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some electronics require rare earth materials to manufacture, which currently are sources from China or other countries. Those have export restrictions from China: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , and they ask the products to be manufactured there.

    US now asks products to be manufactured here, and will add additional taxes (tariffs) if this request is not complied with.

    So Apple and other manufacturers are split between two bad choices. They will have to weigh which one is less worse, and go in that direction. In all cases it will most likely be the consumers that suffer.

    1. Re:Rock and hard place by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1, Troll

      Right. Just imagine what an iPhone would cost now if it was built with US labor wages and protections in factories with US (especially pre-Trump) environmental controls and protections.

    2. Re: Rock and hard place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heaven forbid you have to pay for American workers and their disgusting demands of a living wage, safety regulations, and health care.

      I'd happily save a few bucks if it only means a few dirty chink children die.

    3. Re: Rock and hard place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You really just complained about not being able to rely on essentially slave labor so you can buy the latest Apple stuff more cheaply and your country and society be damned?

    4. Re:Rock and hard place by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Right. Just imagine what an iPhone would cost now if it was built with US labor wages and protections in factories with US (especially pre-Trump) environmental controls and protections.

      One of the last, if not last, assemblers of TVs is closing because the tariffs on components has made it impossible to compete. Trump, as usual, has come up with a tweet worthy solution that is unworkable. A more likely solution wold be to ramp up production outside of China in non-tariff locations. Much of the actual value in the iPhone is made elsewhere and shipped to China, only final assembly is primarily done there. Until Apple manages to fully automate that it is still labor intensive which makes US manufacture expensive unless you do a WalMart; something I doubt Apple would do. One thing for certain, no matter what pple does Trump will declare victory and claim he has won biggly.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    5. Re: Rock and hard place by BeanThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have a point, but we could partly solve this by dropping the patent system (the average smartphone has over 250,000 patents covering it), then instead of obscene profits all going to a tiny handful of mega-wealthy shareholders, we could have products made in America that are also still affordable, as getting rid of the patents would cause a huge drop in the price of the products, which would (A) offset the increase that goes to paying a living wage to American workers and (B) help keep the products comparably affordable to said middle-class workers.

    6. Re:Rock and hard place by Gavagai80 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those rare earth materials are present in the USA. Trump is hard at work ripping up environmental regulations so that we can enjoy strip mining throughout America.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    7. Re:Rock and hard place by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Key word: "currently"

    8. Re:Rock and hard place by Njovich · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wow, are you a time traveler from 2010? Because that's when it became clear that China couldn't leverage the rare earth monopoly. Rare earths are everywhere, and the China/Japan rare earth embargo in 2010 was immediately overcome by Japan, it did zero damage.
      The two dollars worth of metals in a phone could double price and it wouldn't matter, not that they'd actually double as there are plenty of other suppliers. Now the actual chip & electronics manufacturing capabilities of China, combined with reasonable quality affordable staff, that's a lot harder to replace.

    9. Re:Rock and hard place by pots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple just got a ton of money from that giant tax cut. We're going to be paying for Apple's tax cut for decades, they can afford to lose out a little on their already very comfortable profit margins.

    10. Re:Rock and hard place by Goldsmith · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mines in California used to provide most of the world's rare earth metals. The ore is still there, the mine still works, and we have tons of the stuff. The mines have struggled with bankruptcy after being undercut by mines from China in the early 2000s.

      Fundamentally, the problem is the subsidy of rare earth mining and use of environmentally irresponsible processing in China artificially lowering the price of the metals in China. The export ban was an effort to focus the advantage of those policies on down-stream manufacturing in China after crippling their biggest competition (mines in the US). In the article you linked, there's reference to recent US industry proposals that we do the exact same thing here, nationalizing and re-opening the California rare earth mines.

    11. Re:Rock and hard place by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      With consumer electronics, and increasing cars, there is no made in one country. Parts are sourced from all over the world. Tariffs are going to add to costs no matter where it is made because a lot of stuff is going to have to be imported no matter what.

      One relevant criticism of the tariffs is the actual cost of work done of assembling the Apple product is a tiny faction of it's value. For a $2000 computer it might be less than $100.So taxing the full value can be considered unfair, as the conservatives always like to say.

      What I find interesting is that lots of industries do not face such complications. For instance apparel can be sourced more easily that cars or electronics, and assembled in the USA. However, as simple as it is to make clothes in the USA, Trump and his family still chooses to make the clothes in Mexico and China.

      So, as Trump chooses not manufacture in the US, and in fact regularly imports workers from other countries instead of hiring local workers, we can only assume that he knows, as president, something we do not. Like maybe US workers are inferior.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:Rock and hard place by jeti · · Score: 1

      Apple could import phone components and assemble them in the US to avoid tariffs. Things like "Component A: iPhone without back cover" and "Component B: iPhone back cover". Final assembly like that is sometimes done in Turkey to avoid EU tariffs.

    13. Re: Rock and hard place by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The problem is that what you propose isn't technically impossible and no one is arguing that it's technically impossible. It's going to be much more expensive and it won't happen overnight. That's the problem.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re: Rock and hard place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple did a study at the beginning of Trump's administration. Even they said they could manufacture here without appreciable cost increases.

    15. Re:Rock and hard place by Koby77 · · Score: 5, Informative
      The TV assembler that you are referring to was called Element Electronics, in South Carolina. They were kind of a fraud.

      https://www.postandcourier.com...

      But the trade group heard about Element, and it bought a couple of sets. When they opened their boxes — draped with pictures of the American flag — they were startled to see “made in China” stamped on the back.

      So in 2014, they filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, accusing Element of misleading marketing. They described the company’s practices as “red, white and blue-washing,” since a product can’t be called “made in America” if its parts are all foreign.

      Basically, they had the entire TV manufactured and assembled, then shipped to their South Carolina plant already in the box in which it would be sold. American workers opened the box, tested the TV to ensure that it worked, and packaged it back up. For this, they tried to imply on the packaging that it was made in the USA. And they also took government subsidies.

    16. Re: Rock and hard place by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      I said very clearly let's drop "the patent system". It's right there in my post. Your reading skills are sh-t.

    17. Re:Rock and hard place by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now the actual chip & electronics manufacturing capabilities of China, combined with reasonable quality affordable staff, that's a lot harder to replace.

      Any manufacturing capability China has can be easily replicated in America, esp. by a company like Apple with their seemingly infinite financial resources, what can't be replicated here are low wages, lax environmental and worker protections.

      --
      Ken
    18. Re:Rock and hard place by Koby77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm skeptical that there is a labor shortage. Simple supply and demand rules of economics tells us that if there is a labor shortage, then the price of labor should increase. Small increases are normal due to inflation, and I'm glad if there are a few companies forced to shell out a few more bucks to its workers, but so far I haven't seen any huge amounts that would indicate a "labor shortage".

    19. Re:Rock and hard place by IcyWolfy · · Score: 2

      There is likely a labour shortage for the physical labour required.
      Standing on feet all day, working with or around toxic materials. (Solder, lead, plastic-dust, etc)
      Limited to no moderation in work-load, just work full speed until a mandated 15min break.

      There is already a labour shortage in the farm-picking industries.
      Many of the workers being illegal, or seasonal workers.
      In California, there was a news report in the LA times last year about one farmer trying to hire Americans by paying $20/hr. Most quit within a week because the work was too difficult.

      So, while there is not a labour shortage across the board, in specific industries there very well could be.

    20. Re:Rock and hard place by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Unless the assembly is fully automated, the number of people required to offset the China production would be easily 500k (domestic consumption only), and likely close to one million.

      You couldn’t just do it overnight; you would need to design products tailored for automation, build the factories, and hire the people.

      Tesla struggles to find people in Reno for the gigafactory, and they only have something like 15k employees there. What happens when you go an order of magnitude or two larger?

    21. Re: Rock and hard place by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So why don't they?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    22. Re:Rock and hard place by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      So Apple and other manufacturers are split between two bad choices. They will have to weigh which one is less worse, and go in that direction. In all cases it will most likely be the consumers that suffer.

      I expect Apple will just decide to wait out the Trump presidency.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    23. Re:Rock and hard place by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Some electronics require rare earth materials to manufacture, which currently are sources from China or other countries.

      A lot of those minerals can be mined in the US, it's just not economical to do so. At least until China started restricting export and the trade war got going.

    24. Re:Rock and hard place by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      In California, there was a news report in the LA times last year about one farmer trying to hire Americans by paying $20/hr. Most quit within a week because the work was too difficult.

      Because it is too difficult. One, with the drive from where people typically live to the rural farm, the cost of gas alone eats up a lot of that $20. Then there's the sunup to sundown work schedule with no bathroom facilities nearby. The only way to do that kind of work and really make money at it is to be single or okay with living separate from your spouse, young or used to hard labor, share a hotel room or some other sleeping arrangement with several people to split the costs and to travel with the harvests.

      There's a reason farming has always turned to slavery of one kind or another.

    25. Re:Rock and hard place by lgw · · Score: 1

      A million workers? WTF? It doesn't take a week's worth of labor to assemble an iPhone. It doesn't take a tenth of that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:Rock and hard place by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Foxcon's iPhone factories employs over 1 million people for worldwide production. Add 40-hour work weeks, mandatory breaks and meals, sick time, holidays, and a lower talent level for workers and 1 million for US production doesn't seem entirely unreasonable. But still, at even 10% of that number where would you find the workers?

    27. Re:Rock and hard place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So it is OK for the Chinese to strip mine for rare earth metals, and then build the Iphones with slave labor and then ship those Iphones overseas on Nigerian flagged vessels staffed with cheap labor from the Philippines to be consumed by snooty white liberals who hate racism, but If Americans mine for rare earth metals on American soil, and then build those Iphones in America using American labor, and then ship those phones on trucks driven by Americans to be sold to Americans who can afford to buy them because they make stuff, then that is racist and damaging the environment.

      Got it.

    28. Re: Rock and hard place by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      Because Apple is playing the long game. Their bet here is that the cheeeto's tantrum ends before long, so why make the "investment"?The reason for it might well evaporate before they could even spool up production.

    29. Re: Rock and hard place by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Taxes aren't like donating to a charity, where they should just be happy that you pay. You either pay the taxes you owe or you don't. A company that makes as much money as Apple SHOULD pay the most taxes.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    30. Re:Rock and hard place by lgw · · Score: 1

      Far more than 1 million unemployed in the US - closer to 20 million if you add in people who are working part time but want full time work.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:Rock and hard place by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      The export ban was an effort to focus the advantage of those policies on down-stream manufacturing in China after crippling their biggest competition (mines in the US). In the article you linked, there's reference to recent US industry proposals that we do the exact same thing here, nationalizing and re-opening the California rare earth mines.

      Molycorp was a private corporation. The nationalization you speak of was nothing more than smoke blowing out Trump's ass. Note that the Mountain Pass mine may indeed be reopened, and operated by its new Chinese owner after being bought out of the Molycorp bankruptcy. Yah, Trump really sticking it to China, impressive.

      The Chinese embargo was quickly abandoned when it became clear that the effect would be to bring many marginal REE operations back online. Worse, and not fully anticipated by the Chinese strategists, it spurred undersea exploration. The Japan Sea discoveries may or may not be developed in the near future, there are significant engineering and environmental issues to overcome, but they already serve to forestall further attempts by China to corner the market.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    32. Re:Rock and hard place by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Apple might send him one of those exploding iPhones for Christmas.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    33. Re:Rock and hard place by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      I did not know about the "semi-infinite" supply of REE in the Sea of Japan (characterization from Science News); that is interesting.

      I did not mean to imply that I thought nationalization was a good idea, just that China's role as the supplier of rare earths is a function of politics and investment rather than capability.

    34. Re:Rock and hard place by molarmass192 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except Trump knows cell phones, nobody knows cell phones like him, let me tell you, you know, he has a cell phone. Has had one right from the start of phones. He knows what it takes to build one, and he's not buying it. We can create good, no great, jobs, let me tell you, for American people. It's people who make a difference, little people, like the people who build things. These are going to be the best, and Trump knows best better than anyone, cell phones the world has ever seen, and American's are going to build them, and export them to China, and those tiny Canadians. We're going to be the hugest cell phoning creating country the world has ever seen, and we're going to have it now. It's simple, mark his words, we ... will ... build ... them, and it's going to be great, and the phones are going to be great. The best the world has ever seen. He knows cell phones, not like that crooked Hillary, has anybody see those mail servers, but we're going to build those cell phones. The fake news will tell you cell phones can't be done, but Trump knows for a fact, he's seen it, that they are built here, and they're great, let me tell you.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    35. Re:Rock and hard place by schnell · · Score: 1

      Far more than 1 million unemployed in the US - closer to 20 million if you add in people who are working part time but want full time work.

      Sure, but how many of those people are willing to move for a new job? Just looking at the data offhand, the unemployment rate in Imperial County, California is 19.3% while the rate is only 2.7% in Santa Clara County, California. If people won't even go that far for jobs, why would we expect the millions of Rust Belt unemployed to go to the theoretical new Apple factories in Nevada or South Carolina?

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    36. Re:Rock and hard place by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's almost as if there might be a better place for Apple to build a factory, if they want US workers.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    37. Re: Rock and hard place by houghi · · Score: 1

      Oh, like the US funds corn. I get ot now. So is funding good or bad?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    38. Re: Rock and hard place by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Because then they'd have to pay tax on their profits.

      --
      No sig today...
    39. Re:Rock and hard place by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You're the only one talking about racism. And badly. You seem really confused, which might explain why you're complaining about people helping you.

    40. Re: Rock and hard place by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      No company on earth is going to spend billions moving their production lines if they're going to end up paying as much or more to make the same thing. That has nothing to do with the US working class.

    41. Re:Rock and hard place by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      And this is a perfect example of politicians writing a law to "fix" a problem by giving in to lobbyists, and instead they make a bigger problem. Can't import raw earth metals? Fine, just move all manufacturing to the source of the rare earth metals. Always loopholes waiting to be exploited when myopic politicians listen to even more myopic lobbyists.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    42. Re:Rock and hard place by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The TV assembler that you are referring to was called Element Electronics, in South Carolina. They were kind of a fraud. https://www.postandcourier.com...

      But the trade group heard about Element, and it bought a couple of sets. When they opened their boxes — draped with pictures of the American flag — they were startled to see “made in China” stamped on the back.

      So in 2014, they filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, accusing Element of misleading marketing. They described the company’s practices as “red, white and blue-washing,” since a product can’t be called “made in America” if its parts are all foreign.

      Basically, they had the entire TV manufactured and assembled, then shipped to their South Carolina plant already in the box in which it would be sold. American workers opened the box, tested the TV to ensure that it worked, and packaged it back up. For this, they tried to imply on the packaging that it was made in the USA. And they also took government subsidies.

      I agree they aren't exactly the poster child for US assembly; but they do illustrate the broader impact of tariffs as the cost of materials and components used to build things in the US make US companies uncompetitive with imports. This is happening when raw material prices rise; such as for a nail manufacturer, and finished products come in tariff free or at a lower rate. The government could slap on more tariffs, but that is just a tax increase on everyone and lead to bad economic results.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    43. Re:Rock and hard place by aquacrayfish · · Score: 1

      This sounds racist too.

    44. Re:Rock and hard place by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      How would they move and locate a job? Will they hire homeless people, or are you too dirty and smelly without a place to live and wash clothes?

    45. Re: Rock and hard place by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Eh, I often point out that WalMart could pay 16% CIT for all I care and Apple can pay 48%. The difference is WalMart keeps under 3 cents on every dollar as profit, while Apple keeps over 20 cents.

      WalMart is equivalent to lots and lots of mom-and-pop shops all over the place, except with bigger stores, less operational overhead, and smaller CEO salaries (the WalMart CEO earns $4 per employee per year, while a corner store owner with two employees and a $60k salary earns $30,000 per employee per year). You look at the "retail sector" and you see huge numbers; WalMart is just a portion of that and has profits in proportion.

      Apple has profits way the hell out of proportion with anything sane. So does Microsoft.

    46. Re:Rock and hard place by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Why do you keep calling it 'slave labour'? It's not. The workers there are definitely paid less than in North America, but by Chinese standards the money is fine. The people that work at Foxconn and other such factories leave the rural farms and head to the big city, work in a company like that for a year or two, and send a lot of the money home (since while they're working, they live in a company provided dormitory). After they're sick of it, they leave and get a different job in the city. China isn't growing by leaps and bounds by the populace earning nothing, these people are earning a real wage.

      The conditions in those factories aren't as bad as they're often made out to be; the suicide rate isn't any higher than that of the population at large. I suspect that if you go to a North American meat processing plant or coal mine, you'll find the conditions are just as bad or worse.

      I'm not gonna spend a lot of time sticking up for China or multinationals, but at least criticize the right things.

    47. Re:Rock and hard place by thunderclees · · Score: 1

      "Rare" Earths are really not so rare.
      Its just that processing them in environmentally destructive.
      The PRC can refine these inexpensively because they just dump everything on the ground creating environmental hell holes like "Xinguang Number One Village".

    48. Re: Rock and hard place by terrycarlino · · Score: 2

      Perhaps because American workers aren't available in company dormitories to work on last minute changes to the iphone?

      That is at least what Apple claimed when Obama asked Apple why they couldn't bring jobs back to the U.S. At least according to that bastion of conservative values the New York Times.

      So the truth is that Apple likes being able to use slave labor to construct it's phones, because it's easy.

      “Companies once felt an obligation to support American workers, even when it wasn’t the best financial choice,” said Betsey Stevenson, the chief economist at the Labor Department until last September. “That’s disappeared. Profits and efficiency have trumped generosity.”(NYTimes 2016)

      Except it's not generosity is it? It's not generosity for a company to obey health and safety laws and pay people a decent wage. It's not ungenerous for people to stop buying crap made by corporations in slave labor factories in places without effective health and safety and environmental laws.

      Let Apple eat the cost of the tariffs or raise their prices to compensate. maybe that will actually get customers to look at the conditions under which their phones are made or at least make them stop pretending that Apple is a virtuous company.

    49. Re: Rock and hard place by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Not much more, if anything. Labor cost isn't the problem, and Apple could take a hit on the 46% profit they make off each iPhone without too much worry.

      The real issues are supplies, supply chains and international sales. First, some raw materials are currently only available in China and are export-controlled in their unprocessed forms;

      And you don't see how export control, by China, to make manufacturing in other locations impossible, as anti-competitive and worthy of tariffs?

      Labor is not the issue. The issue is that the means of production sufficient for global consumption exist already and only in China; there is no compelling reason for Apple to burn a ton of cash to build surplus production facilities in America.

      Great. Then let them and their customers pay the tariffs. The situation did not develop naturally. It developed as the result of collusion between the Chinese government and Apple (and the benign neglect of the Globalization cabal (R and D) in Washington.) I have no sympathy for them and their customers.

    50. Re: Rock and hard place by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Because Apple is run by private-school Progressives who viscerally hate the American working class.

      As a public school progressive, sadly, this rings all too true.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    51. Re:Rock and hard place by nasch · · Score: 1

      That was pretty good, but needs something about how he won the election. ;-)

    52. Re: Rock and hard place by redlemming · · Score: 1

      I hope that you realise that by dropping the patent system as a whole chances are that America competiveness will get worse, not better. Instead of being copied just by unscrupulous Chinese industries products will be copied by the whole World. I don't think America is ready for this escale and type of globalization.

      Actually, there is considerable evidence that the patent system is a net loss for everything other than pharmaceuticals, and foreign countries with highly regulated health care - whether single payer or otherwise - just force the pharmaceutical companies to charge a lot less as part of their regulated health care. The net effect is the US consumer ends up paying for the patent instead of people in the other countries, which can't be good for the USA (17.5% of GDP versus 9-11% - an enormous difference).

      The patent system also leads to excessive concentration of wealth.

      Like copyright, it occasionally benefits ordinary people, but on the whole does far more harm then good (as currently implemented).

      See The Captured Economy by Brink Lindsey and Steven Teles.

      Since there are massive legal and governmental ethics problems with the current US patent system (read through prior discussions on Slashdot to understand why), it's also a system that exists (as currently implemented) in violation of the US Bill of Rights. Again, this has been discussed at length previously on this forum.

      The dual rights to ethical government and ethical practice of law are universal and inalienable rights in any society based on the rule of law - and thus protected by the 9th and 10th Amendments (rights retained by the people, rights reserved to the people). Those rights are routinely being violated by US government and the US legal profession (and third parties) with respect to patent and copyright.

      Having the government and the legal profession routinely violating the highest law in the land can't possibly be good for the economy. Just think about the compounding that happens through business logistics chains to protect businesses from abuse of the system (such as liability insurance, special procedures, special software, and the associated training expenses). This works a lot like compound interest, but the compounding is from one node to the next - and logistics networks are graphs not trees, so there is feedback.

      These legal and governmental ethics problems are essentially a hidden regressive tax that makes everything more expensive, and hurts the poor far more than the rich - leading to increased crime and more expensive welfare, plus enormous amounts of human misery. Equality of outcomes is both unattainable and undesirable (incentives matter), but the system we currently have is a huge mess with a lot of room for improvement.

    53. Re:Rock and hard place by HappyPsycho · · Score: 1

      what can't be replicated here are low wages, lax environmental and worker protections.

      I remember a campaign promise to reduce regulations (2 removed for every one added). Now mix in that he has a friendly legislature who would also be interested in such changes and I wouldn't count on these points remaining true.

  3. This is kind of hilarious by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On paper we're at full unemployment. But funny enough there's a ton of resentment around not having jobs in America. Of course, everyone knows the unemployment stats are nonsense. But we act like they're not.

    This leads to some crazy political theater. For one thing we've got economists trying to come up with excuses about why wages aren't climbing despite "full" employment. And now we've got Trump needing to explain to businesses where they'll get workers needed to run factories when on paper those workers already have jobs. I mean, I suppose Trump could argue that he'll do mass immigration. I'm sure that'll go over swell at his monthly rallies.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: This is kind of hilarious by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Yet those people who have dropped out the labor force aren't dying of hunger - America has one of the lowest rates of malnutrition deaths in the world - which makes one wonder if stronger welfare systems are helping support people who aren't working as compared to 30 or 50 or 100 years earlier? It's an open question, I'm not sure. Something/someone must be supporting these people.

      There are also people employed on the black market that aren't officially in the labor force (eg drug dealers).

    2. Re: This is kind of hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The labor force participation rate includes retirees. In an aging economy with more retirees and fewer young whippersnappers on the retirees' lawns, the participation rate has to drop.

    3. Re:This is kind of hilarious by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unemployment numbers are meaningless if they fail to consider the labor participation rate (which itself isn't the full picture). There are still a lot of people without jobs that have essentially given up on finding one. What we should be looking at is the number of hours of labor that are being worked. It doesn't matter if you've got two jobs on paper if they're both being filled by the same person because they can't get a 40 hour position any longer.

      Tariffs are beyond idiotic as a solution to our economic issues and even if Trump does somehow manage to enact them, they're not going to survive beyond his presidency. We should be going in the opposite direction and removing all tariffs. If China or some other government wants to subsidize a local industry, let's import the hell out of those products. I'd be over the moon to get some other country's tax payers to foot the bill for the goods I purchase.

    4. Re: This is kind of hilarious by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the labor force participation rate crashed in the recession and hasn't even recovered to it's carter-era level since then

      Indeed, the baby boomers who took early retirement in 2008 have not flocked back to the workplace. Many of them are in their 70s. To get them participating in the workplace again you're going to need to completely gut social security and medicare. I know, they're working on that.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:This is kind of hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a free market and therefore this is an easy answer: you pay them more than your competition to get superior workers.

      This whole article is a dumb concept: there are not millions of workers at Apple's [third party] factories. There are thousands of workers though.

      And do not confuse angst with illegal immigration with anti-immigration. Any person worth talking to is for immigration, but of people that will improve our country by bringing skills or ideas that improve it. Chances are, if you have no ethical dilemma with breaking a law as literally your first act of "joining" a country, then you are willing to break other laws that may prove to be inconvenient. Beyond that, the path to becoming an illegal immigrant is horrific. Encouraging it is literally encouraging more rapes and money going to criminals.

      Bringing in cheap, easily replaced, effectively slave labor is not the superior position: it's only a slightly less racist position than people hating immigrants because they're "other" races (or wholly based religions). The pretentious attitude that pro-illegal immigration proponents have is miserable. The idea that we "need" these people to come into our houses to be our maids and field workers is despicably racist. All immigrants regularly start at the bottom of the food chain, but it is disgusting to effectively see that is their end goal.

      We should want immigrants to come in and assimilate. At that point everyone wins. With illegal immigration, the only side that wins is the people employing slave labor that they will discard if the wind changes direction.

    6. Re: This is kind of hilarious by nnet · · Score: 1

      Something/someone must be supporting these people.

      Yeah. Crime.

    7. Re:This is kind of hilarious by gtall · · Score: 2

      "Of course, everyone knows the unemployment stats are nonsense." Really? could you please point us at the references for this statement so that we all know as well?

    8. Re:This is kind of hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Making decisions based on facts and data? You filthy socialist! Everyone knows we are all better off with what Trump knows is intrinsically white. #MAGA

    9. Re:This is kind of hilarious by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      If tariffs are so horrible, how is it that China, Japan, Germany (more with non-tariff barriers there) and so many other countries have done fantastically well by using them?

      Buy American, hire American. This is what the US government *should* be doing. Why have they been falling down on the job for the past 40 years?

      Plus, think of the harm being done to our greatest competitor, China. Without our gargantuan market to dump their cheap junk on, they'll have severe problems at home. They'll be less available to interfere with our plans for global domination.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:This is kind of hilarious by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Even U6 is tracking to be at record lows not seen since the dot.com boom, currently at 8% while the low was 7%. In other words, 3 million more full time employees would put us under a very unsustainable low unemployment level.

      We need to work on making the economy more resilient and balanced, not deluding ourselves about “creating jobs” at the peak.

    11. Re:This is kind of hilarious by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Of course, everyone knows the unemployment stats are nonsense." Really? could you please point us at the references for this statement so that we all know as well?

      It's wrong that everyone knows that the unemployment stats are wrong. But it's not wrong that they are wrong. Try googling something like "why unemployment rate is not an accurate measurement" for enlightenment. And learn to internet, already.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re: This is kind of hilarious by John_Sauter · · Score: 2

      the labor force participation rate crashed in the recession and hasn't even recovered to it's carter-era level since then

      Indeed, the baby boomers who took early retirement in 2008 have not flocked back to the workplace. Many of them are in their 70s. To get them participating in the workplace again you're going to need to completely gut social security and medicare. I know, they're working on that.

      I am a leading-edge baby boomer, just turned 73 years of age. When I was laid off in 2008 I collected unemployment until it ran out, then took early Social Security. I worked in the gig economy until I was able to return to the labor force in 2015. Even with Social Security, Medicare to cover medical costs, and two pensions, I don't make enough to make ends meet, even though I live in suburban New Hampshire.

    13. Re: This is kind of hilarious by John_Sauter · · Score: 2

      Something/someone must be supporting these people.

      Yeah. Crime.

      Many people are gainfully employed at jobs not recognized by the government. This is called the underground economy. Crime is certainly included, but when I hire kids off the street and their friends to help me clean out my store, I do not report their earnings to the IRS.

      A friend of mine once told me that he worked security at a flea market. At the end of the day he got a check for his wages, with deductions taken according to law. If he walks away with the check, every thing is above-board. However, if he wished he could cash the check on the spot, in which case he would receive more than the face value.

    14. Re:This is kind of hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We should be going in the opposite direction and removing all tariffs. If China or some other government wants to subsidize a local industry, let's import the hell out of those products. I'd be over the moon to get some other country's tax payers to foot the bill for the goods I purchase.

      Right up until there's nothing being made in your country anymore because all the manufacturers outsourced and no one has a job, but hey at least you could buy stuff for cheaper for 30 years! The saddest part about this is that we as tax payers did fund the founding of many of these companies by investing in the basic research that made them possible, and then let them move away so that someone else could reap the profits.

    15. Re: This is kind of hilarious by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Well it's good he's trying to address the $20 trillion of debt he created, but it would be much more effective if he didn't treat the U.S. like trailer trash with a credit line and continue to seek handouts for his welfare queen friends.

    16. Re: This is kind of hilarious by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You're nearly there - now you just have to show that number means what you think it does, and you've got yourself an argument!

    17. Re:This is kind of hilarious by thunderclees · · Score: 1

      We went to no, less tariffs and then went past that.
      The US subsidies the export of labor and manufacturing already.
      This is part of the reason why it is so "cheap" to send manufacturing to the PRC, Vietnam, etc. and to outsource.
      That also helps is that these countries basically have slave labor and no environmental considerations when it comes to dumping.
      Besides, US trading partners never really lowered their tariffs and played games with taxes so it became one way.

    18. Re:This is kind of hilarious by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Relative numbers are meaningful however. If manufacturing has *added* 327,000 jobs in the last 12 months, that's how many people are making probably significant contribution to their household income. Of course the question is how many jobs went away, but you can imagine if it's anywhere near say 50,000 we'd hear it.

  4. History by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This happened before in Europe.

    In the early 80s it was a three way fight for home video recording. You had VHS, Betamax and the Phillips Video 2000 system. The first two were all Japanese machines, the latter were made by Phillips in Europe.

    The Phillips format was technically great. But it came third in that race. Philips got the EEC (precursor to the EU) to put massive tariffs on Japanese machines to make them cost the same as Phipps' ones, but all that did was increase profit margins for Japanese companies and relieve price pressure on their manufacturing.

    In the end Phillips started selling VHS machines, but got screwed by their own tariffs because they had to buy the mechanism in from Matsushita who made it in Japan.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:History by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Video 2000 was kinda wonky with it's reversible tapes which could store 8h in SP. The other fun thing about it was that the write protect tab could be switched on/off instead of just broken off like in VHS. Of course that probably made it hideously expensive to manufacture.

    2. Re:History by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The main innovation was a crystal discipled tracking system that made the picture more stable, especially when paused or in fast forward.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:History by kenh · · Score: 5, Informative

      You literally have no idea what a tariffs are, do you? If you understood tariffs you couldn't have written this sentence:

      Philips got the EEC (precursor to the EU) to put massive tariffs on Japanese machines to make them cost the same as Phipps' ones, but all that did was increase profit margins for Japanese companies and relieve price pressure on their manufacturing.

      An EEC/EU tariff is a tax the EEC/EU collects as certain goods cross the border, the funds collected do not go back to the manufacturer, For example, a US tariff on iPhones manufactured in China collects an amount of money equal to 25% of the cost of the item and puts it in the federal government's coffers. The 25% tariff does not go back to China, Foxconn, or Apple.

      The purpose of a tariff is to increase the price foreign goods allowing domestic producers to better compete on price, agree with it/disagree with the intention, your statement belied a complete lack of understanding of how tariffs work.

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:History by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Um..., as far as I know, there are no domestically produced/manufactured Apple iPhones, so adding tariffs on them only increases the price. I'm not sure if there's US manufactured content in an iPhone, such as semiconductor parts, though the engineering design is housed in the US. Would the tariffs on Chinese manufactured devices and their parts designed by US workers increase unemployment among the US workers or just increase the cost of those devices in the US?

      There's another problem with moving manufacturing to the US. If the US cost of manufacturing a product now made overseas increases what happens to sales of that product overseas? I'm not sure how many iPhones are sold outside the US, but a price increase could decrease non US sales requiring further price increases to maintain Apple's profit margins.

      Economics is complicated.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    5. Re:History by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      It was also the last VCR or hard disk recorder or whatever that I could program to record... If only they made one that you could program with cron jobs...
         

      --
      ---
    6. Re:History by gweihir · · Score: 1

      We had Video 2000 in school. The picture VHS delivered was utter crap in comparison.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:History by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's another problem with moving manufacturing to the US.

      There's also the reality that other countries impose their own excessive, punitive tariffs on manufactured goods from the US.

      Tariffs aren't uniquely American.

      --
      Ken
    8. Re:History by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Informative

      You don't understand the situation in the EU at the time. Often the manufacturers owned the retailers too. Panasonic and Sony both have their own chain of shops to this day.

      The sale price was wholesale price + % margin. If the wholesale price goes up the sale price goes up. And these were not cheap items, VCRs back the were in the 500-1000 UKP range.

      This is basic economics. The margins on items at he cheap end of the scale are almost always lower. By keeping prices high for every machine on the market with the tariffs the Japanese manufacturers felt the inevitable price pressure and VCRs became more and more commoditized later than they otherwise would have. There is a lot less pressure on price and margin at the 500+ level than at the 50+ level.

      By 1984 even Philips were making VHS machines, and getting screwed by their own tariffs.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:History by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      There's another problem with moving manufacturing to the US.

      There's also the reality that other countries impose their own excessive, punitive tariffs on manufactured goods from the US.

      Tariffs aren't uniquely American.

      Absolutely correct!

      Why would we believe other countries wouldn't impose tariffs on US made iPhones? China surely would do that to protect its domestic cell phone producers. And, the total market for cell phones outside the US is likely larger than the US cell phone market.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    10. Re:History by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Philips got the EEC (precursor to the EU) to put massive tariffs on Japanese machines to make them cost the same as Phipps' ones, but all that did was increase profit margins for Japanese companies and relieve price pressure on their manufacturing.

      That is not how tariffs work, so no it didn't.

      What they actually did was use a VER which was not a tariff (there were already tariffs of course).

    11. Re:History by citizenr · · Score: 2

      Yes, I also watched Techmoan ;-)
      This is not the full picture. It is a fact Japanese manufacturers flooded the world with cheap subsidized electronics in order to take over consumer market segments. EEC measures simply went into effect too late to matter. Limp dick US was too corrupt to do anything, even actual penalties were never enforced.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Right from the horses mouth https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/...
      and 1 hour long "Frontline: Coming From Japan [The Fall Of The US Television Industry] (1992)" video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    12. Re:History by unapersson · · Score: 1

      We had one at home, only one local video shop did rental tapes. Fun times.

  5. Or assemble them anywhere else but China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why United States?

    1. Re:Or assemble them anywhere else but China by thewolfkin · · Score: 2

      Why United States?

      so the coal workers have something to do all day.

      --
      Just another second banana
    2. Re:Or assemble them anywhere else but China by Kohath · · Score: 1

      There's a country that just reached a trade deal with the US: Mexico. Apple could manufacture in Mexico.

    3. Re:Or assemble them anywhere else but China by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if Apple did bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. (they won't, but let's play along) as a result of all of this. There are already all kinds of new jobs available in the U.S. and those coal workers don't want to take any of them. They can have their jobs back when they start paying the farriers money so that horse-drawn carriages can haul their coal to power plants. I'll empathize a little bit with someone that's lost their job, but that goes out the window when there's mounds of opportunity and they can't be bothered to even try.

    4. Re:Or assemble them anywhere else but China by kenh · · Score: 1

      There's a country that just reached a trade deal with the US: Mexico. Apple could manufacture in Mexico.

      Mexican wages are too high, I suspect. Foxconn is already in Mexico, and there are areas close to the border that have ZERO tariffs for goods made there and imported to US.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:Or assemble them anywhere else but China by kenh · · Score: 1

      There are already all kinds of new jobs available in the U.S. and those coal workers don't want to take any of them.

      Opening a lot of factories in Appalachia, are we?

      I suspect if you'd offer an out-of-work coal miner in West Virginia the means to relocate his family to a region with a growing economy they take one of your imaginary manufacturing jobs. Open a factory in a coal mining town full of unemployed coal miners, and they'll likely take those jobs.

      Unlike white collar jobs, blue collar manufacturing jobs rarely come with relocation packages.

      --
      Ken
    6. Re: Or assemble them anywhere else but China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It has been fifty years. Quit bitching about a coal mine closing. Unlike foreigners who live in a desert country, there is no law preventing you from emigrating to work a farm in the south or a non union southern autoplant.

      The buggy whip making factory closed too. It didn't reopen. Get over it. Move to a Republican voting town where jobs exist, or vote for the Democratic party to get a basic safety net.

      But please quit bitching about coal jobs. Even if we burn all the coal, we aren't going to be digging it out by hand. We use hundred ton load, computer controlled trucks to strip mine the far mid west flatlands where it is cheaper to get coal. A modern mega mine can be run with a hundred people. It doesn't take fifty thousand with pickaxes anymore.

    7. Re:Or assemble them anywhere else but China by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Well tough shit for them then. Maybe don't have a family if your job is obsolete?

      The blowback for these people being a "Yuge" part of Dumpsterfire's support base is going to be devastating to that region. Support and sympathy are already evaporating.

      As the Republicans are fond of saying, those people should pull themselves up by the bootstraps and figure out how to learn or move.

      They don't want to learn?

      Fuck

      Them.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  6. Prices increase either way. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apple prices may increase because of the massive Tariffs we may be imposing on China - but there is an easy solution where there would be ZERO tax, and indeed a tax incentive. Make your products in the United States instead of China. Start building new plants now. Exciting! #MAGA

    Good lordy Trump is such a moron.

    Does he truly not realize that consumer prices will rise with either model?

    1) Build in China with tariffs: Consumer prices increase.

    2) Build in the USA with American wages. Consumer prices increase.

    1. Re:Prices increase either way. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in both cases only in the US muhuhuhuaaaa!
      In Europe and Asia they stay the same, theoretically. But I guess Apple would adjust its prices everywhere.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Prices increase either way. by BeanThere · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Trump is just negotiating. The thing you have to understand with Trump (that 80% of the public don't get) is that 80% of his statements that get hyped in the dumb media as "controversial" are actually just part of him negotiating ... Trump knows that the last thing China wants economically is for significant amounts of US manufacturing to leave China. That's part of negotiating, you strengthen your hand by saying things like this, to increase your leverage in negotiations, to get more of what you want out of future arrangements.

    3. Re:Prices increase either way. by Thelaststraw · · Score: 1

      Or you just get on Ebay and buy an iPhone direct from China. No tariffs, no taxes and free shipping. (I feel like at this point I should post some sort of spam link, but I'm too lazy so if you want to see one, I'm sure your search engine of choice can serve you up some.)

      --
      Nothing to see here, move along please.
    4. Re:Prices increase either way. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that if he didn't realize this (it's hard for someone who's run a business to be that daft, but Trump does make it believable) he's had economic advisors telling him.

      It doesn't matter what he believes as long as his political base believes that Trump is going to lead them to their imagined fantastic version of America that all of this is supposed to create. They should probably just go back to church and pray. I'm much less convinced of tariffs doing any good for our economy than I am of the second coming.

    5. Re:Prices increase either way. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Then you like get something that looks exactly like an iPhone, when you boot it it still looks like an iPhone, when you are on the home screen all icons still look like an iPhone.

      As soon as you open an app, you realize it is Android.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Prices increase either way. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      That's true, as far as it goes, but there's something important that you're ignoring: in the first case, all of that money goes to China, and in the second, it stays in the US.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:Prices increase either way. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      He doesn't seem to know what a supply chain is either. To build a tariff free iPhone in the US would require new mines, many factories, infrastructure... Assuming Apple decided to build all that they would pass the cost on to the consumer.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Prices increase either way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you get a better phone, too? Great.

    9. Re:Prices increase either way. by gweihir · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I do not think Trump realizes anything. He is living in his little fantasy world, where he understands everything (because he is a "stable genius") and makes the rules. As this is so incredibly far from actual reality, he will never realize that he is, in fact, a semi-moron that fails at basically anything he touches. Typical used-car salesman that never gets anywhere in life. If he had not inherited large, he would never have been anybody.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:Prices increase either way. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      China knows that there is zero risk of "US" manufacturing leaving China. Hence they can easily out-escalate the US. Trump is to dumb to be able to understand that and what happens at the end of this process.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:Prices increase either way. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the government (both federal and state) would give Apple far more incentives beyond the lack of tariffs, if it meant building industries in states that would welcome it and hirling local workers.
      Besides, why do you believe that the sales price of a product has anything to do with the cost of its manufacture? The price of something is all and only about demand and what they can get away with.

    12. Re:Prices increase either way. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      This isn't about Apple.

    13. Re:Prices increase either way. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Why do you even believe that the consumer price of a product has anything at all to do with the cost of its manufacture? It is all and only about demand and what inflated pricing Apple can get away with.

    14. Re:Prices increase either way. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > an item like an iPhone likely has a 40% markup

      I'd be amazed if that was true. I'm gonna guess its consumer pricing is at least 5X over what it actually costs Apple to go from zero to a boxed product on their store shelf.

    15. Re:Prices increase either way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, empty threats are totally how you win. Also don't forget stiffing your contractors. That's also a winning move.

    16. Re:Prices increase either way. by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Trump knows that the last thing China wants economically is for significant amounts of US manufacturing to leave China.

      And China knows we have term limits on the presidency. In the end, it's the US consumers who will get screwed. As Yoda might say: Elections, consequences they have.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    17. Re:Prices increase either way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      0 result so far. NK has actually started their nuclear weapons program again.

    18. Re:Prices increase either way. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I always love these "Most people don't understand that Trump just sounds like a moron who went bankrupt several times and couldn't even make money with a casino, but really he is a negotiation wizard and very stable genius who went bankrupt several times and couldn't even make money with a casino" comments. Pure gold.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    19. Re:Prices increase either way. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Trump didn't engineer the improved relations between the Koreas. Kim did that. He pushed to it the brink, proved that the US couldn't do anything now he has nukes on missiles, and then sued for peace when his own power and future were secured.

      At best Trump's role was "useful idiot".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re: Prices increase either way. by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      His "negotiating" seems to be working out more like an episode of Maury than disciplined businessman.

    21. Re: Prices increase either way. by houghi · · Score: 1

      So he is gambling that the Chinese care for short term issues.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    22. Re:Prices increase either way. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Negotiating happens at the negotiating table, by people who understand what is being negotiated. This is merely someone who knows next to nothing about trade posturing for his base, or possibly another one of his ill-though-out rants to whoever annoyed him that day.

      This is not how adults negotiate.

    23. Re:Prices increase either way. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That was China pressuring NK to work with the SK government, not Trump. And as Trump's "deal" included absolutely nothing (no monitoring, no timeline, no commitments for NK), him making it is entirely moot, as all it achieved was making Kim look like a normal world leader and not the murderous dictator he is. If that's your idea of success, I weep for you.

    24. Re:Prices increase either way. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a self-made billionaire? Trump meets neither criteria. Just ask Warren Buffet, who actually does meet that criteria.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    25. Re:Prices increase either way. by teg · · Score: 1

      Apple prices may increase because of the massive Tariffs we may be imposing on China - but there is an easy solution where there would be ZERO tax, and indeed a tax incentive. Make your products in the United States instead of China. Start building new plants now. Exciting! #MAGA

      Good lordy Trump is such a moron. Does he truly not realize that consumer prices will rise with either model? 1) Build in China with tariffs: Consumer prices increase. 2) Build in the USA with American wages. Consumer prices increase.

      Tariffs are bad, but do note that prices on iPhones etc. aren't set to match production costs - it's not exactly the marginal cost of producing one more device. The prices are set to what Apple believes will give it the most profit, given the current market. So for these products, the end result of such a tariff - all the effects on world trade, people losing their jobs etc aside - could just be a lower marin for Apple. If they could have raised the prices 100 USD without tariffs, they would probably have done so.

    26. Re:Prices increase either way. by teg · · Score: 1

      I always love these "Most people don't understand that Trump just sounds like a moron who went bankrupt several times and couldn't even make money with a casino, but really he is a negotiation wizard and very stable genius who went bankrupt several times and couldn't even make money with a casino" comments. Pure gold.

      He didn't go bankrupt. A couple of his companies did. If you're involved in many businesses of that kind - hotels, restaurants etc - some will go bust.

      If you want to criticise his business sense, better to focus on the con Trump University. Or that if he had put the money he got from his father in stock market - index funds and thus just get average returns - he'd have more than three times as much money. In other words, he's been doing way below average with the money he got - not exactly a huge success or a good businessman.

      .

    27. Re:Prices increase either way. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That was a lot of words to argue semantics before agreeing with me, but if "his businesses" went bankrupt and he is the owner, then that is what people mean when they say he went bankrupt.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    28. Re:Prices increase either way. by teg · · Score: 1

      That was a lot of words to argue semantics before agreeing with me, but if "his businesses" went bankrupt and he is the owner, then that is what people mean when they say he went bankrupt.

      I just don't agree with the people he's a bad person because some of his companies had some bankruptcies. There are a lot of reasons to think he is a bad person, a couple of failed businesses aren't.

    29. Re:Prices increase either way. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You keep doing it. He is a failure, a narcissist, and a scumbag who is doing everything he can to rape and pillage the country. Why people realize this simple truth is completely immaterial. What is important is that they do.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    30. Re:Prices increase either way. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      A "moron" who managed to attain a $3,1 billion net wealth through business ventures, and win a presidential election with odds stacked against him. Yes, clearly he's a complete moron. Fact is you (and most Slashdot readers) don't like him simply because he's the political opposition, why don't you just admit that instead of making up BS and fake-news post hoc rationalizations and excuses for why he is supposedly flawed. Just say, "I don't like him because I support the other political party, he's done nothing really wrong though".

    31. Re:Prices increase either way. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      So Trump's $3.1 billion net wealth just landed in his bank account how exactly, the bank made a mistake and transferred someone else's money into his account? He found a huge pile of gold in his yard? I wish I was such a business failure as Trump. Having some bankruptcies means nothing - 80% of business ventures fail.

    32. Re:Prices increase either way. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      You just don't like him because he's your political opposition. That's all you need to say, you don't need to make up strings of ad hominem and fake news.

    33. Re:Prices increase either way. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      So a lie gets upvoted, but this bit of actually true news get downvoted, just because it's politically inconvenient. Hope the metamoderators are paying close attention.

    34. Re:Prices increase either way. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Google "monkey dart trump buffet", you fucking idoit. Everyone with an ability to form a thought is welcome. You can go fuck yourself until you kill yourself.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    35. Re:Prices increase either way. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Imagine my surprise that you couldn't have possibly googled and then read the links to become informed before replying.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  7. Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Republicans love taxes.

    Amazing how Trump has transformed the Republican party into being everything they used to be against.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Now we know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it's because they're hypocrites and retards .... to own the libs, of course.

    2. Re:Now we know by ckatko · · Score: 1

      So you're saying... Trump is a Democrat and we should support him, since he's against the GOP?

    3. Re:Now we know by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      He's a Trumpican, the Chaotic Neutral of political parties.

    4. Re:Now we know by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Trump is not anything but an admirer of himself. I doubt he even has any meaningful friendships.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      So you're saying... Trump is a Democrat and we should support him, since he's against the GOP?

      Here is what I am saying. Republicans tell us they are against taxes. Trump puts tariffs on Chinese good, which ar exactly taxes.

      Republicans have always consiudered Russia a mortal enemy. There is only one world leader that Trump has not had a word of dissent for. Putin.

      There are others. And the Republican party has not lifted one finger to disagree witrh him.

      And as former George W Bush said If you are not with us, you are against us.

      Core values of the Republican party have been usurped, And the spiineless cowards of the Russian fifth column do not block it, so they support it.

      If you are a Republican you are pro Trump. If you do not opppose a person who eliminated your party's core values, You have adopted those values.

      Any questions now about what I am saying?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They are poopy-heads. Haw haw. 4-year-olds applaud your insight

      As you prove.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      A tariff is not a tax, and has, in fact, been constitutionally supported for much longer.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_1789

      Well then you disagree with Trump himself - He calls it a tax.

      Anyhow, looks like the Republican party is on to a big thing according to you. Just call everything tariffs

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If Obama threatened China with tariffs, you would have jumped up and down and peed your pants a little.

      China has been abusing trade due to the West's "asleep at the wheel" style of management for a long time.

      I'm an independent, and the party doesn't mean much to me.

      Nope, anti-competitive laws and taxes are terribly regressive, and very counterproductive.

      It is why I call y'all crypto-conservatives. You have been groomed for so long that you can go against your core principles and become the very thing you hate. And your pavlovian grooming won't even let you see the 180 degree course change you just took. Interesting to see how the taxes are always bad crowd are giddily cumming in their pants at this - to use your style.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Trump isn't a Republican.

      You need to tell the Republican Party, who doesn't oppose him, and I've been seeing a lot of Republican Candidates braying about how they "Stand with Trump."

      The party has changed in a remarkably short period of time to reflect whatever Trump wants them to reflect, and to do his bidding,

      And remember, they purged their party of moderate candidates, so looks like a lot of conservatives will soon have to conform or be cast out.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's a tariff not a tax.

      Sincerely, Sarah Huckerby Sanders

      Almost got me there!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Now we know by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That being "against the GOP" is considered being 'a Democrat" sums up a lot of what is wrong with American politics.

    12. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You kidding? The GOP establishment hates Trump as much as you do. .

      If the organization doesn't stand in a person's way, if they enact all that he demands, then their hatred, for all it's internal sound and fury, signifies nothing.

      I do not disagree that the GOP establishment hates him. But it is an interesting bit of brinksmanship they are playing. If say, his Supreme court nomination swings the vote, and Roe V Wade goes down in flames, the holy base loses on of their hot button issues.

      As an independent voter, at one time I was a reliable vote for Republican candidates. But that was at t ime when science wasn't a bad word (remember President Bush Senior, who called himeslf the Environmental President without irony? Remember when the Republican party did not try to weld religion to thye government?

      But now, the Republican party is staking it's future on the 35 percent of Americans who are their base. I realize that a minority candidate can become president due to a quirk in our system, but last time I checked, you have to win more than 50 percent. They are no longer quite sane, and have a leader who they allow to lead them unimposed that is even more kookoo for cocoapuffs. But until they stop him, they are him.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Doh! I'm worthless tonight. I wrote: "But now, the Republican party is staking it's future on the 35 percent of Americans who are their base. I realize that a minority candidate can become president due to a quirk in our system, but last time I checked, you have to win more than 50 percent." What I meant to write was:

      "but last time I checked, you have to win a majority in all the other races."

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:Now we know by legojenn · · Score: 1

      conform or be cast out.

      Now I'm just waiting for Alex Lifeson to say "Subdivisions!".

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    15. Re:Now we know by aquacrayfish · · Score: 1

      You should add a caveat for the spineless Republicans too scared to do anything about it. I understand the larger point, however, that there's no active resistance.

    16. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      conform or be cast out.

      Now I'm just waiting for Alex Lifeson to say "Subdivisions!".

      I was hoping someone would catch that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:Now we know by nasch · · Score: 1

      The only reason they're pretending to go along is votes.

      Which demonstrates that they don't have any actual principles, they just want power, and are willing to do whatever is necessary to get it and keep it.

    18. Re:Now we know by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You should add a caveat for the spineless Republicans too scared to do anything about it. I understand the larger point, however, that there's no active resistance.

      Spineless Republicans - but there I go repeating myself! 8^)

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  8. Find millions of laborers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt that they need that many. In the U.S., a million Chinese laborers become 999,000 robots and 1,000 robot technicians.

    1. Re:Find millions of laborers? by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      No, that is not the case at all, in manufacturing like that everything that can be automated, already is automated. You still need ungodly amounts of laborers to do the things nobody has figured out how to automate. It's not as simple as carting in a robot and flipping a switch, enormous amounts of effort go into automating even the simplest of operations and bunch of things, there is just no feasible way to automate at all. The problem is sheer number of sequential assembly steps that must succeed and cumulative yield losses that occur along the way. There is not a single smartphone manufacturer on the planet that could automate from start to finish without thousands of laborers in between. You know these tiny screws that hold every smartphone together? Nobody has figured out how to insert them using a robot and end up with an acceptable yield rate. That's just an example of problems in automation, not even the hardest hurdle.

    2. Re:Find millions of laborers? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Hey, he brought some steel jobs back with the taxes. Many more where lost because of it, but still.

      OTOH we get a Harley Davidson factory in Europe, so that is nice.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  9. Good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just get ready for $8000 iPhones.

  10. But their per version $100-200 price increases by oldgraybeard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    every 2 years or so does not count. Since it mostly goes to increase their crazy high profit margin. Don't get me wrong I am all for profit margins. But to point at the tariffs and say that is the problem that will cause higher prices is a bit bold. The prices will go up no matter what. TBH I don't think it will affect Apple much their market will sacrifice most anything to have the latest greatest Apple device/gadget and I say good for Apple.
    As I sit here with my old mobile phone that does everything I want. It is all about choice and needs.

    Just my 2 cents ;)

  11. No, no it isn't 3.9% by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    given that the official unemployment rate is at a historic low of 3.9%

    No, no it isn't. The current U6 unemployment rate as of August 2018 is 7.40, and even that fails to count many people. Anyone who reports the U2 unemployment rate is repeating a blatant and willful lie, which makes them at best an accessory to that lie. Do your research.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are also some other "unofficial" rates, like this one that pegs the "true unemployment around 21.2%. They add in "long-term discouraged workers" that were removed by BLI in 1994. My guess is this 21.2% is in large part the Trump die-hard base members; people who have been unemployed for so long the Feds don't even count them as real people anymore. That's 53M over-18 people.

    2. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by kenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My guess is this 21.2% is in large part the Trump die-hard base members; people who have been unemployed for so long the Feds don't even count them as real people anymore. That's 53M over-18 people.

      You really think the majority of Trump's base are long-term unemployed adults? Let's think about that - you think millions and millions of long-term unemployed adults with no means other than government handouts, are die-hard trump supporters cheering him on to wipe out the very programs they personally rely on to survive? Conventional wisdom is that those without other means of support tend to fall on the democratic end of the political spectrum.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by psycho12345 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, yes, because those long term unemployed adults are called retirees, who dropped out of the workforce, either voluntarily or forcibly during the recession. They do depend on Social Security and Medicare, mainly the latter, because many do have either pensions, or good retirement funds, but drug costs and medical costs will obliterate anyone's retirement fund in a heartbeat. And yes, they are cheering him on to destroy those 2 programs. Hence the unironic quote "Keep the government out of my Medicare". And yes many many boomers who are retired are hard core Trump supporters.

    4. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by Paul+Carver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, yes, because those long term unemployed adults are called retirees

      Hold on a minute. So Trump is lying about unemployment because he quoted a rate that doesn't include RETIREES?

      Your comments about drug and medical costs are irrelevant. I'd love to see major changes in the US Healthcare system, but anyone who calls a number "unemployment" when it includes retirees is full of shit. If somebody retired and then ran out of money and started looking for work then they're unemployed, but you can't just say that everyone who is not working is unemployed. At least not if you want to keep the word "unemployed" as a bad thing.

      Unemployment means #1 you want to work and #2 you're able to work. If you don't meet both those criteria then you're not unemployed regardless of whether you don't have a job.

      And if the only "work" you're willing to do is work that no one is willing to pay you for then you don't qualify as wanting to work. I do things that require skill and effort but that no one would be willing to pay me to do but I also do things a company IS willing to pay me for. If I CHOOSE to only do the former and not the later then I should NOT BE counted as unemployed.

    5. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You really think the majority of Trump's base are long-term unemployed adults?

      Yeah, that was a bit of an exaggeration on the part of the parent poster, but not a big whoop.

      Let's think about that - you think millions and millions of long-term unemployed adults with no means other than government handouts, are die-hard trump supporters cheering him on to wipe out the very programs they personally rely on to survive?

      Partisan tribalism makes for powerful cognitive dissonance - on both sides of the aisle. See Craig Nelson's "I've been on food stamps and welfare, anybody help me out? No." quip as an example. But that's nothing compared to Democrats, who constantly gripe about Republican voters who vote against their own interests. Because no one does a better job of stabbing their base in the back, or hurting working class or poor people, than the Democratic Party. It wasn't Reagan who passed NAFTA and signed draconian crime bills in the 90's, and it wasn't Bush who stood by as banks stole millions of homes and deported a record number of immigrants.

    6. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You really think the majority of Trump's base are long-term unemployed adults?

      No. The median income of Trump voters was $10k/yr higher than the median income of Clinton voters. There is however a significant group of the permanently unemployed which votes for Trump. They are wholly dependent on social services to exist, but they believe that voting for Trump will change that, because they think he's going to make America great for them again by kicking out all the brown people. They don't understand that wouldn't make America greater, nor will it actually happen, but they're voting for him anyway. They don't understand that red states are welfare states — Texas aside, and it's getting more blue every day as old white guys die.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:No, no it isn't 3.9% by NeoTubNinja · · Score: 1

      You really think the majority of Trump's base are long-term unemployed adults? Let's think about that - you think millions and millions of long-term unemployed adults with no means other than government handouts, are die-hard trump supporters cheering him on to wipe out the very programs they personally rely on to survive? Conventional wisdom is that those without other means of support tend to fall on the democratic end of the political spectrum.

      It may not be a majority, but to think they don't represent some of this percentage is willful ignorance. You seem to asserting that the decisions of Trump supporters are derived from a place of logic and not from a place of emotions.

      Conventional wisdom is that those without other means of support tend to fall on the democratic end of the political spectrum.

      Conventional wisdom also says you probably shouldn't trust a candidate for president who isn't willing to show their tax returns when everybody else has for the last 40-or-so years or who can't string words together without sounding like a drunken homeless guy with more than a few loose marbles, but look where that got us. There are plenty of poor white racist Trump supporters out there who can blame the colored guy for doing EXACTLY WHAT THEY THEMSELVES DO, but don't see the hypocrisy.

      You can't possibly be asserting that southern states like MS, NM and AL who rely heavily on financial aid and tend to always vote Republican don't have ANY Trump supporters hurting their own interests, can you? Maybe even a not-so-insignificant portion?! Oh well though ... it's 2018. Words don't mean much anymore. Just keep on believing whatever I guess.

      https://wallethub.com/edu/stat...

  12. Re:Recycling solution: by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    I was just going to suggest Trump supporters are unlikely to believe in recycling anyway LOL

  13. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    In most cases, no. Recycle the very few materials where it makes economic sense. For the rest, stop pretending.

  14. not happening by supernova87a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry Trump, "Those jobs aren't coming back": https://www.nytimes.com/2012/0...

    Even if the factories could be built here for a reasonable cost, even if the ecosystem of manufacturing suppliers could be recreated here, even if there were enough people looking for work, Americans would not want to take jobs working at such factories even at average factory wages.

    Try to bring those jobs back here and welcome to $2000 iphones.

    1. Re:not happening by kenh · · Score: 1

      FFS the factories in China are optimized for an inexhaustible supply of low-skill, low-wage workers, perhaps Apple could tap into their massive corporate holding and push their engineers to design iPhones and other products that don't require manually-intensive assembly?

      Just because iPhones are made in sweat shops now, doesn't mean they have to be made is sweat shops going forward.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:not happening by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Cost of living is different in US and China, so numerically same salary will be really good in China while being quite shitty in US. While such a situation exists there will always be economic incentive for transnational companies to move manufacturing and other jobs to China and India. Who will win? Trump or invisible hand of market?

    3. Re:not happening by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes, America is going to have some stiff competition.

      China has:
      Labour so cheap it's reviving the economics of slavery.

      China doesn't have:
      Effective unions.
      Effective environmental regulations.

      Little wonder many economies simply outsource their labour and pollution there.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:not happening by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Except those jobs WILL come back if companies here can't find any other legal option.

      Definitely not a Trump fan, and I'm not even a fan of tariffs. But we've essentially handed over a whole LOT of industry that we used to handle here in the USA ourselves, back when we got our on high-horse and decided "Our people have gotten too SMART to do laborious factory jobs! Give those to OTHER countries!"

      Now, we've found out just how much we stand to lose when we let other people build our stuff and sell it back to us. All of our ideas (the "value" we supposedly have over the others because we're so smart) is lost as soon as nations that don't respect intellectual property rights steal and clone it.

      If Apple felt forced to build iPhones in America? Meh.... you know what? They're in a better financial position to make that work than practically any other company. They've got loads of cash they're sitting on, so they can do the R&D to automate the processes they've relied on Asian workers to do. The prices might go up,but they CAN'T charge more than the market will bear. So $2000 for a phone? Probably not gonna fly. So they'll have to take short-term losses to tool up to build them at a more affordable price-point as they move forward.

  15. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Because: facts. If you want to "believe", you're welcome to your religion and you may pay to recycle privately.

  16. He said it, now it will Happen! by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally, Trump told Apple what they needed to do. That was the problem with Apple, their management was totally clueless and had no idea what to do. They probably did not even have a meeting on the subject.

    Now that Trump has finally spoken up and now they know what to do!

    </sarcasm>

    1. Re:He said it, now it will Happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep the "Do nothing" will be the sensible bet.

      Read an op-ed that suggested the R may offer Trump an out, resign and be given immunity, or risk the mid terms and potentially be impeached and imprisoned. Hell I am sure they could do a proper medical and find a medical reason for his resignation.

      Problem being Trump is probably so far gone he will not recognise the risks or take advice. His paranoia is such that he would think good advice is just someone else out to get him.

    2. Re:He said it, now it will Happen! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Well I wish they'd listen to someone because they seem to be clueless.
      Well, someone other than Musk. Mr. Darth Vader of management.

  17. Why? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Since when do Apple or their users care about prices?

    1. Re:Why? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      We always care about prices.
      That is why I have my 8 year old trusty iPhone 4S ... just replaced the battery for something like $10.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry to say you are not the kind of customer apple wants.

  18. the price of the mac mini can go up by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    with the same very old of date hardware.

  19. Sure, soon as Trump starts using American workers by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems he wants everyone else to pay more for domestic labor than he does. Most people feel the same way - in theory they want to support American workers, in pratice they don't want to pay for it either. Can't have it both ways.

    https://www.newsweek.com/trump-hire-40-foreign-workers-mar-lago-1011011

  20. Re:Build in USA with robots by arth1 · · Score: 1

    You're applying a 3rd world solution (labor) to a 1st world manufacturing problem. In USA you should be building with robots not laborers, and robots don't ask for wages.

    No, but the people who program the robots ask for salaries, and the ones servicing them ask for contracts.

  21. If I were China by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd really stick it to the US. Just shut down all exports to the US, pending trade talks. We would really feel that.

    Trump is playing a very dangerous game with the dragon.

    1. Re: If I were China by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Someone pointed out that in an import/export imbalance relationship, the country that does the exporting feels the pain more quickly and deeply. Presumably, if China blocked all exports, manufactured goods would become more expensive in the US or hard to find. However, on the flip side many companies in China would have severe cash flow and revenue problems and go bankrupt, leading to massive unemployment, etc. Bad for one side, worse for the other.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:If I were China by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      China is not the only other country in the world. If China stops selling stuff to the US, Americans would just do business with somewhere else. I'm not saying the price would necessarily be as low but probably close, given the large volume of demand and likelihood of multiple sources of competitive vendors.

    3. Re:If I were China by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Yawn. yet another spineless passive-aggressive liberal troll making entirely emotion-based attacks on people while hiding behind AC.

    4. Re:If I were China by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Sure. China can shut down 9% of their economy and it will not impact them. And it is not like the products are fungible and able to be bought in other nations or produced in America. After all, America, and the west, no longer have Iron/Steel mills, plastic injections, electronic board making, chip making, etc. None of this goes on over here.


      Yeah, I hope CHina does EXACTLY what you suggested.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:If I were China by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      China can shut down 9% of their economy and it will not impact them

      Where did you get this number from Windy?

    6. Re: If I were China by houghi · · Score: 1

      Oh, and you think the Chinese governement cares more for their people than the US one does?

      The Chinese have always looked more at long term goals. They do not need to be worried if they are elected in 4 years or not.

      They easily take decissions where suddenly millions of people nmeed to move. And you think they care if a few thousand people will have a hard time?

      OTOH prices in the rest of the world would fall.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re: If I were China by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I don't know if they care more or less than the US government, but the Chinese government definitely cares what the people think.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re: If I were China by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      I don't think China would necessarily feel the level of pain from being cut off from US market that people think they would. US isn't the only kid on the block who's importing Chinese goods. Yes it would hurt, but I think the Chinese can tolerate the ouch a lot longer and lot more diligently than the US could. It would be a political bloodbath over here if China cut us off completely, prices would skyrocket for practically everything. Shortages might even ensue. The population of the US has no stomach for a REAL TRADE WAR.

      Alas, *if* China did as I suggested, I don't think the result would be a sudden drying up of Chinese goods in US stores. Business people aren't stupid, they would find workarounds. Probably already setting up workarounds. Like exporting goods to Canada or Mexico, then bringing them into the US from there, avoiding tariffs on Chinese goods. So in the end? This is just blab and typical political hot air. China isn't going to back down because.. they don't need to, and there's no incentive to do so.

      In the end it's just two governments artificially inflating the prices for goods and the real losers are everyone who now needlessly pays more for those goods. Companies don't give a flying f. This isn't hurting them, they just pass on the difference in their end product pricing.

    9. Re: If I were China by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      We can look at a practical example instead of using intuition. Remember a couple months ago when ZTE nearly went bankrupt because of sanctions from the US?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  22. How did tariffs increase Japanese profit margins? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Isn't a tariff just a tax you impose on goods as they enter your country? Wasn't the problem with the Japanese electronics that they were cheaper?

    Also, as I recall those tariffs were pretty reasonable. The Japanese gov't was heavily subsidizing it's electronic industry to target foreign industries. The tariffs were in response to that. The reason Japan still came out on top, at least for a lot of American electronics (sorry, I'm a Yank) is the American stuff was kind of crap. And American cars were laughably bad at the time.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  23. They're still on Brand by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Sure, if you pay close attention to what they're doing (tariffs, imposing regulations on states to protect corporations in defiance of the 10th amendment, record H1-B labor imports, etc, etc). But if you don't care about policy (or only care about the two big wedge issues, gun control and abortion) they're still on point. They still use rhetoric of low taxes & small government.

    The trouble is swing voters. Swing voters don't usually pay attention to policy, they pay attention to how the candidate makes them feel. That's why the beer poll exists and why it's damn near impossible to win without it. And it's why we got Trump (well, that an Hilary was the worst campaigner in human history).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They're still on Brand by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you pay close attention to what they're doing (tariffs, imposing regulations on states to protect corporations in defiance of the 10th amendment, record H1-B labor imports, etc, etc). But if you don't care about policy (or only care about the two big wedge issues, gun control and abortion) they're still on point. They still use rhetoric of low taxes & small government.

      Remember though, Republican politicians do not care about wedge issues other than maintaining them as wedge issues. If abortion becomes illegal, it is no longer any use. And gun control especially. Not only is it a wedge issue, but a lot of Republicans get foreign money laundered by the NRA funneled to them.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  24. Re:Recycling solution: by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Yes. Trump supporters have their own alternate facts also.

  25. Seriously? by kenh · · Score: 1

    Trump didn't offer Apple a place to find the millions of laborers needed to make their products, given that the official unemployment rate is at a historic low of 3.9%.

    Are you really arguing that a) it takes literally "millions" of workers to produce cellphones, and b) we can't bring manufacturing jobs back to America because we lack "millions" of workers?

    Perhaps without an infinitely large minimal wage-earning workforce, Apple might choose to change it's manufacturing process to leverage more automation? Just a thought.

    --
    Ken
  26. Re:Build in USA with robots by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    In USA you should be building with robots not laborers, and robots don't ask for wages.

    Electronic devices like iPhones are already almost entirely built by robots. Robots cut the circuit boards to size, pick and place the components on the boards, and wave solder those components. Specialized testing hardware performs hardware-level verification to ensure that all this happened correctly. The only things that humans do are:

    • Load new component reels into the pick-and-place robot.
    • Stick the board in the case (*maybe* with screws).
    • Plug in the digitizer/screen stack.
    • Fasten the self-stick battery to the back.
    • Plug the battery in.
    • Snap the case together.
    • *Maybe* screw in a couple of screws to hold the bottom of the case together.

    These are things that can't easily be done by robots. Everything that can easily be done by robots already is.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  27. wrong on tarif by aepervius · · Score: 1

    to put massive tariffs on Japanese machines to make them cost the same as Phipps' ones , but all that did was increase profit margins for Japanese companies and relieve price pressure on their manufacturing

    Your explanation is incorrect , or at least this is not what hapenned. Tarif do not "increase profit" for manufacturer, as the tarif is paid on the importer side and directly to the governement. In fact manufacturer only sell the same price as before. If you export a 10$ widget and somebody put a tarif on 50% in the US, what it means is that you STILL sell it at 10$, but the tax import office take 5$ in addition from the importer when the goods are declared. Thus a tarif could not have helped manufacturer increase profit.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:wrong on tarif by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      These were video recorders, with the Philips ones costing in the region of £500-1000 back then. That's 1982 money, so add inflation.

      The tariffs were designed to push the Japanese VHS machines up in price to that level. The retailers didn't reduce their margins, they kept them at say 100%. The margin was dictated by things like how reliable the machines were, and thus how much they could expect to pay out in warranty repairs and replacements, as well as other retail costs. And since many of the retailers were owned by the manufacturers that meant more profit for them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  28. Re:Recycling solution: by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    In most cases, no. Recycle the very few materials where it makes economic sense. For the rest, stop pretending.

    Like beer cans. Something Trump supporters should be intimately familiar with.

    https://www.beveragedaily.com/...

  29. "Start building new plants now" by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Production plants don't spring up overnight... even if Apple were to do this, by the time the production plants in the USA were ready, consumer demand for Apple products would have long since completely acclimated to the increased cost a, and the price wouldn't suddenly go back down just because they are building in the USA... given that the USA does not have the ability to produce some things as cheaply as China can, it is unlikely that even if they COULD move production to America overnight, prices would still probably not go down (and may very well increase).

    Trump's apparent objective to make America great at everything while other countries will continue to specialize will result in the USA dividing its own resources too finely across too many industries to continue to be the best at anything.

  30. Re: There is no 3.9% unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    China is really good at throwing lots of low skilled manual labor at projects such as manufacturing. Quality control is another issue entirely.

    You have clearly never visited China and seen the quality of typical Chinese manufacturing. Or their electrical grid. Or really pretty much anything they do. Third rate and would never be allowed in this country because we have standards. The stuff they ship here is the top 10% stuff going through QA and even then go read amazon reviews on Chinese made electronics. Fast, cheap, right. Which two do you think they chose?

  31. BS, piled higher and deeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It took decades to destroy the US electronics manufacturing industry. The workers in it were high school grads. Today, they work at Burger King. It would take at least a decade to build a functioning consumer electronics industry.

    What is lacking is not labor, but knowhow. Knowhow is the stuff that is not in books or journals, but resides in the heads of people who know how to actually build stuff. It can take decades to build knowhow, and that's exactly what the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, and Taiwanese have done, at the expense of the US. Lack of knowhow is why the US is currently incapable of building the Saturn V rocket, despite having all the documents ("blueprints") that specified it.

    Rare earths are only a temporary problem. Rare earths are not rare, but you can't build a mine overnight.

    The real problem with Trump tariffs is that they were done without thought about the strategy of rebuilding those industries. If the industries cannot be rebuilt, then all the tariffs do is increase costs.

    1. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Reminds me of when BMW (I think) started to make cars in the US. The main problem they had was worker and engineer skill. They ended up to have to transplant German engineers and line-workers (!) to get at least the critical components on an acceptable quality level. Of course, that basically killed the advantages of manufacturing in the US.

      The second problem with the tariffs is that China understand the problem and can out-escalate Trump. And when they call his bluff, he and the US have a ton of egg on their faces. In the end, this will make the US significantly weaker.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of when BMW (I think) started to make cars in the US. The main problem they had was worker and engineer skill. They ended up to have to transplant German engineers and line-workers (!) to get at least the critical components on an acceptable quality level.

      really? How about a link to this.

      The second problem with the tariffs is that China understand the problem and can out-escalate Trump. And when they call his bluff, he and the US have a ton of egg on their faces. In the end, this will make the US significantly weaker.

      Really? What is the problem and how will the Chinese out-escalate Trump?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, we have far more ppl in it than you realize. For example, we still build computers and networking devices in America. I know that in Boulder CO, they still have lots of specialized electronic manufacturing happening. BUT, to be honest, this is going to be automated quickly.
      We are one of 2 nations that produce the bulk of RAM, though China just stole a bunch of tech on that.

      I agree with you that we need a better strategy on this than what Trump/CONgress seem to be doing. In particular, we need a lot more automation.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Really? Are you stupid?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      no, but you are a liar.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Oh? Got any proof of that?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Sure. You refuse to back up what you claimed. You are a liar.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:BS, piled higher and deeper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You seem to be ignorant as to the definition of what a "liar" is. (No surprise, really.) Here is a hint: It refers to the belief in the validity of the statements made by the person making it, not to whether proof is given and not even whether the statement is true or not.

      With that, I will now call you a fuckup and ignore you henceforward. You are not worth talking to.

         

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  32. No one is moving jobs to US because of Trump by jader3rd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pretty much everything that Trump has done, without approval from Congress, is going to get undone once he's out. So every company is just going to keep things in place, because it would be suicidal to invest in a move, only to have the reason for doing so undone before the move is finished.

    1. Re:No one is moving jobs to US because of Trump by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Why would a future US government *not* want to keep jobs here in our own country? Isn't the entire point of having a government in the first place to give our own people an advantage? To take care of our own?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:No one is moving jobs to US because of Trump by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      No doubt a lot of the Environmental items will be rolled back. Hopefully, trump will do a sane taxation policy, or the next guy will.
      However, assuming that China/US Trade war finishes before Trump is impeached, I doubt that there will be anything to rollback.
      As it was, it was the GOP in 2005 that fucked up our taxes to get businesses to move combined with many of the CHinese illegal actions.
      Now, Trump is getting them to move back. With some smart tax change, he can keep them here.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:No one is moving jobs to US because of Trump by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Why would a future US government *not* want to keep jobs here in our own country? Isn't the entire point of having a government in the first place to give our own people an advantage? To take care of our own?

      That's fine for a US government to do so; Trump taking action unilaterally is not the US government. That's why it's a safe bet it'll get undone. Because right now, not only are the other countries able to enact retaliatory tariffs there will also be WTO fines (in the hundreds of millions if not billions) for breaking agreements. Also, think about why Nixon "opened up China" in the first place? Going to war with someone your economically integrated with is very rare; which is why integrating your economics is the best way to establish peace between two parties. Nixon didn't want a US vs USSR and China war. By integrating the Chinese economy with the US's Nixon was hoping at a minimum China would stay out of a war, and at best align with the US against the USSR.

      Preventing war is a good way to take care of our own.

    4. Re:No one is moving jobs to US because of Trump by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I doubt that there will be anything to rollback.

      You get the list of every unilateral action Trump took which are costing us WTO fines, and just undo them.

  33. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1
  34. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    There’s never been a prolonged shortage of raw materials. And every time someone predicts such a shortage, they end up being laughably wrong.

  35. Delay by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    On paper we're at full unemployment. But funny enough there's a ton of resentment around not having jobs in America. Of course, everyone knows the unemployment stats are nonsense. But we act like they're not.

    Labor stats aren't nonsense. They are nonsense when used improperly, which is what most politicians do.

    For one thing we've got economists trying to come up with excuses about why wages aren't climbing despite "full" employment.

    Because of inflation. Inflation is growing faster than wages. The federal reserve has been allergic to raising interest rates to combat inflation and this is the result. It's not an excuse, it's a reason.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  36. Re: Build in USA with robots by fubarrr · · Score: 2

    >Load new component reels into the pick-and-place robot.

    Believe me or not, this what our company had huge problem.

    Not a single man was found for a trivial $60k job to tender a pick and place machine. Oregon, Washington, BC - not a single legit response in 6 month.

    I can't imagine to have this issue in China. In Shenzhen you can find a programmer for every chipshooter imaginable in 1 day for such salary.

  37. Re:There is no 3.9% unemployment rate by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Cheap I'll give you but build quality? you clearly have no actual first-hand experience of Low-budget Chinese manufacture.

  38. Re:OUTSOURCE THE PRESIDENCY by gweihir · · Score: 1

    You know, that could be a rare case where outsourcing actually improves the product.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  39. Re:How did tariffs increase Japanese profit margin by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    There were accusations of dumping. Some argue that it was really just the Japanese managing to cost reduce faster than everyone else. Japanese systems of the day do show some interesting cost savings that Philips machines didn't... Even the Philips tapes had big brass rollers in them, when VHS and Beta had both adopted an all plastic design.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  40. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We don't know how you ended up with Bozo the Clown for your president...

    The media went all in to elect Hillary. They promoted Trump and changed the subject to Trump every time anyone talked about anything else during the campaign. They did this to ensure Hillary's opponent would be Trump, because they were sure Hillary could beat Trump. But they didn't understand that Hillary is terrible — really, really terrible in many different ways. Americans are also tired of being lectured to by people who hold them in contempt. Long story short, Trump won, Hillary lost. Hope that helps.

    ...but he is an embarrassment to your country in pretty much the entire rest of the world.

    Cosmopolitan vanity has negative practical value. There's zero reason to believe that foreigners' opinion of the US matters at all, and Americans who court foreign favor are the ones would should really be embarrassed.

  41. Re:How did tariffs increase Japanese profit margin by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    The ones with brass rollers still work.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  42. Re:Recycling solution: by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Agree that Hillary was a pretty awful candidate. Electing Trump instead was not a "look how smart we are" moment though.

    As for foreigners, America used to have lots of friends in the world. Now you have people who tolerate you out of necessity.

    I'm sure that will recover in time once you have a normal person in charge again though.

  43. Yeah Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Don't you dare to touch our hundreds of billions of profit, we are AAPL and GOOG !" also
    "We stash these profits in tax havens, because we have megalomanic traits".

    In other words: Trump is 100% right to stop this nonsense.

  44. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Agree that Hillary was a pretty awful candidate. Electing Trump instead was not a "look how smart we are" moment though.

    Vanity again. The other girls in my middle school class can't even!

    Meanwhile, economy is going great, Americans have jobs and a reason to feel good about their economic prospects for the first time in 10 years.

    As for foreigners, America used to have lots of friends in the world. Now you have people who tolerate you out of necessity.

    I'm sure that will recover in time once you have a normal person in charge again though.

    Yeah. I don't care. No one else in the US should care either. Foreign countries claim friendship or don't, and they pursue their own agendas. They'll never choose what's good for the US over what's good for their own people — and they shouldn't.

    Are diplomatic smiles genuine or forced? What difference does it make? None.

  45. Obama already tried by sdinfoserv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Obama sitting next to Steve Jobs at a meeting asked "when are the jobs coming back", referring to the million Foxconn workers. Jobs responded, "never, that ship sailed". China has no labor laws. Just prior to the release of the phone 4, a flaw was found the required every single phone unboxed, fixed and reboxed . To make the marketing date all "employees" (slaves?) were forced to work round the clock to fix every single device so Apple could make the marking date. Also, Foxconn has workers as young as 14 chained to desks, workers live in "barracks", and conditions are so grueling, Foxconn installed nets around it's buildings to catch suicide jumpers. Next time you love your little icrap gadget, think about kids chained to their desks so you can blissfully listing with a your ibuds connected. No way any US based company could get away this.

    1. Re:Obama already tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i used to believe all that until I read "Factory Girls" and a bunch of other material about China by people actually there. i know people who work in factories in the US, and honestly conditions in China are better in some places than they are in alot of the USA. id rather be a FoxConn worker in China than a meat packing worker in Iowa or even a Welder in the midwest. The Foxconners are not slaves either, they come from farming villages with no opportunities and the money they send to their families lets their siblings go to school and it also provides them with opportunities their parents couldnt have dreamed of. the 14 year old thing is possible, but its also been lied about by Mike Daisy. And if you think kids dont work in the US your'e just wrong.

      Let me also point out that in the dormitories at these factories, they dont have to deal with gun violence, which is something I have to deal with in my middle class apartment complex in America. They also dont have to own cars, which sucks down a significant percentage of workers income in the US and results in 30,000 deaths a year.

      By the standards of human rights, we in the US have slavery inside our prisons which are contracted out to private companies.

        etc etc etc

      China has some things that are horrible, like their legal system, lack of free speech, etc, but China is more than the worst cases of human rights abuse - its like pretending that America is an episode of Sopranos or every court case is like the Reality Winner case, and there is nothing else going on in the entire population.

    2. Re:Obama already tried by DMJC · · Score: 1

      What about the Americans in the Appalachians who have no opportunities? Why can't Apple offer those Americans a job? Everything you can say about Chinese poor moving into work applies equally to Americans. There are millions of Americans living in third world squalor who can't get out of it because their local economies are in tatters. Why shouldn't America try to do something for those people?

    3. Re:Obama already tried by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      In other words, the goal should not be specifically bringing jobs back to America, but taking jobs away from cheaters.

      Too bad the MAGA crowd would never tolerate that. For them, it's the hardball pitch of USA jobs or no jobs at all. No progress will be made with that policy.

    4. Re:Obama already tried by Nocturrne · · Score: 1

      I've been to Foxconn and other factories many times - you are full of shit. It's true, working in a factory is not fun, but the conditions are very similar to western standards now. The new problem is young people don't want to work in factories anymore.

    5. Re:Obama already tried by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yep.... I think about that. And every time, I'm reminded that the problem is due to a Socialist / Communist government that's made life that miserable for the common citizens.

      I feel no guilt about owning or using my iPhone X in a nation that has always had laws in place that ensure OUR people don't have things that bad.

      As it's OFTEN said, if Foxconn didn't have those contracts with Apple, there would simply be MORE misery in China because people would starve, or not have basic shelter, because there was no place for their pre-teens or teens to go work to help the family by earning something.

    6. Re:Obama already tried by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      This is nothing new. What do you think happens to the children of women who give birth in prison? Do you think penitentiaries have daycare and schools?
      Children are pulled away from their parents when they go to prison and always have been.

    7. Re:Obama already tried by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Obama already tried by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Believe me, if it was that simple, it'd already be done because there's a large workforce available to tap at low wages and low cost of living. My fiance is from the area you speak of, a town whose mine left 20 years ago and now the only real employment outside of places like McD's and Aaron's is in the hospital and in the prison. Drugs are rampant, teen pregnancy is horrible with the low desire to focus on abstinence and welfare babies are a real thing. It's not the ghetto of a large city, its an old mining town that's 98% white with similar problems and similar need for solutions.

      The cities' disenfranchised have an advantage though, they have infrastructure. There is little to no reason to produce anything in Appalachia if you don't have to because you have to import the materials and create infrastructure on very uneven and difficult ground, plus the snow lock issues you suffer in the winter. These towns were built where they were only because of the natural resources available, outside of that they do not function well when competing with other locations. The only remaining major possibilities for these locations include utilizing the already present rail hubs for distribution facilities or if someone solves the holy grail of employment sourcing with decentralized gig economy style telecommuting at the level and expansiveness of Amazon. Outside of that, the only answer for people in these areas is often to flee if they find an out, perpetuating the cycle.

  46. Re: Make 'murika Greedy Still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is "fuck you, I got mines"

    You forgot the S

  47. Re: Build in USA with robots by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to do Perl programming, I had to move from Pittsburgh to Tucson, AZ because there were no Perl positions in Pittsburgh and had to move half-way across the country because they could find no one locally for the position. If you are Shenzhen, there are thousand chip programmers because there are literally a thousand companies with those sorts of jobs, of course there is no problem with finding someone there!

    I can imagine most people would not know what a "pick and place machine" is. Why would people apply for a job just because a company is offering a salary? Most companies don't respond to most job applications and why waste time for applying for positions they barely know anything about? Where is the responsibility of the company to train and educate people they wish to employ?

  48. SIgh by ledow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It would cost Apple more to make the iPhone in the US.

    Probably twice as much, if not more.

    Now, most of the iPhone cost is nothing but profit, so they could in theory absorb it but... why would they? If they could absorb it, they'd own the entire phone market by now by just cutting their ridiculous phone prices.

    They'd also have a couple of years of utter mayhem as they built factories, hired workers, moved stock and parts, etc etc.

    Much as I hate Apple, it's a stupid idea. The reason that companies *don't* already do everything themselves in the US (or most of the first-world nations) is because it's just too expensive for them to do so. And people likely wouldn't pay the prices they'd have to charge, or their shareholders would revolt at suddenly cutting their (stupendous, sickening) profit in half overnight.

    Trump doesn't get economics at all. And he certainly doesn't get trade.

    Sure, Apple moving back gives you taxes and jobs. And then China will have no money from you, less incentive to be favourable in their trades, more expensive for everything you DO need them for (which is an awful lot, not least landfilling those phones once they're dead).

    And if they were to, say, have a huge electronics manufacturing industry, they could make your life hell overnight, not least by making you source and produce every chip from somewhere else, but also having to compete against their phones that do more for less money. With almost no effort at all.

    1. Re:SIgh by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Nope.
      You do not understand manufacturing.

      If Trump/GOP does this right, they can bring back manufacturing from China back to the west. Not just America, but Europe, Canada, Australia, and even Japan/S. Korea. And all of our nations need to quit depending so much on China.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  49. Re:Recycling solution: by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meanwhile, economy is going great, Americans have jobs and a reason to feel good about their economic prospects for the first time in 10 years.

    That is true in most places. The long recovery from 2008 is not a Trump exclusive

    They'll never choose what's good for the US over what's good for their own people

    Those are not necessarily mutually exclusive things. Or didn't use to be anyway.

  50. Re:Recycling solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They promoted Trump and changed the subject to Trump every time anyone talked about anything else during the campaign. They did this to ensure Hillary's opponent would be Trump, because they were sure Hillary could beat Trump.

    Or... and stay with me here, they promoted trump because as the first reality show candidate all the drama and over-the-top absurdity made them tons of money. As Les Moonves famously said, "It May Not Be Good for America, but It's Damn Good for CBS"

  51. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, economy is going great, Americans have jobs and a reason to feel good about their economic prospects for the first time in 10 years.

    That is true in most places. The long recovery from 2008 is not a Trump exclusive

    The improvement steepened though. And that's versus the literal end-of-the-world predictions from the cosmopolitan vanity people.

  52. Re:Recycling solution: by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    Hillary could have won and we'd have 1% growth that is revised down to .9%. uhh, I mean .8%.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  53. Re: There is no 3.9% unemployment rate by NormalVisual · · Score: 2

    You have clearly never visited China and seen the quality of typical Chinese manufacturing.

    The Chinese are neither worse nor better than anyone else at manufacturing. Cheap, crappy products that come from manufacturers there are such because of the price and quality constraints they were contracted to build at. Specify a higher quality standard and pay for it, and they're just as capable as anyone else of turning out a quality product. The Fender (Fender, not Squier) bass that I own was made under contract by Farida Guitars in Guangdong, China, and is every bit as good as the (more-expensive) basses that Fender makes in Mexico at their own plant. Fender's U.S. instruments *are* generally better than either the Chinese or Mexican instruments, but they also cost 2-3 times as much for the comparable product and even then QC can be kind of spotty at times.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  54. Re:Recycling solution: by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    You and your "ordinary Americans" of which you speak have directly harmed me and my friends and my peers. And even without the economic and, in some cases, physical attacks, I get around the internet, and I see the invective that they spew:

    - "libtard"
    - "snowflake"
    - "moonbat"
    - "San Francisco values" used as a slur against Nancy Pelosi (Particularly scummy because her whole damn job is LITERALLY to represent the values and wishes of her constituents, ie. San Francisco. So either they have a profound ignorance of the constitution and what the House of Representatives is for; or they want to eliminate our representation and make us second-class not-quite-citizens.)
    - "Peoples' Republic of California"
    - "sodom by the Bay"
    - "Californians/New Yorkers aren't 'real americans'"
    - "It's okay for NK to have nukes, as long as their missiles can only reach as far as California."
    - celebration of the electoral collage shenanigans that disenfranchise millions of our voters.
    - "Fine people" in the ranks of the swastika-bearing, gun-toting, pedestrian running-over, Charlottesville mob.

    And it goes so on and so on and so on. You make it pretty clear that you lot hate my living guts and want to see me and mine at least kicked out of the country, and ideally dead.

    And you're surprised and butthurt and dismayed that some of the antipathy is returned? Cry me a bloody river.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  55. Re: Make 'murika Greedy Still by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

    I thought the new creedo was "Fuck you. I got mine, now give the people yours".

    That's more like it.

  56. Re:Finding millions of laborers is easy by DMJC · · Score: 1

    The reality is that America remains the largest or second largest consumer market on the planet. If Australia tried to do tariffs we would be screwed because we don't have the buying power that America or China has and our economy is entirely reliant on exports, metals/food. However. The USA has this power. Because there are 300 million consumers inside the United States. Tariffs will work. Only 11-13% of the US economy is exposed to external trade. (Google Trade as % of GDP USA) 87-89% of the US economy is based on trade inside the United States. At worst 13% of US GDP gets lost, but it won't even be that bad. The USA is limiting the trade war primarily to China at the moment. Because of the lack of reliance on outside trade, and because of the robust consumer economy inside the United States the tariffs are capable of bringing jobs back to America. The globalists are not being honest with people about the US situation. If America cut off Australia's imports, Australia would instantly be plunged into a depression. If Australia cut off America's imports the USA wouldn't see much difference at all. America has a great trading power and they need to start using it. Trump is doing the right thing. We need action taken now before the Chinese move militarily to take over the world. They are already making moves to take over Australian territory in Antarctica and they are trying to colonise the South Pacific, using loans to ensnare nations in debt and then build military bases. America needs to bring the tech industry back. Obviously China is still going to have tech capacity. But many western nations refuse to buy networking equipment from China on national security grounds. If America starts making technology again there are many companies that will refuse to buy Chinese tech on any level.

  57. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Yes. Exactly like that. Keep telling ordinary Americans you hate them.

  58. Re:Finding millions of laborers is easy by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Good write up, but slight wrong. America is the world's largest importer. Period.
    We import around 2.4 Trillion out of ~19 trillion GDP. So, yeah, around 10-13% of our economy is imports. Oddly, since china imports only 130 B from AMerica, China is only .7% of our GDP.
    OTOH, We import ~.6T from China, with their economy being 11 Trillion. So, we impact over 5% of their economy.

    THis is NOT something that China can win. The question becomes, what will Trump do? Will he act like W in Afghanistan/Iraq?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  59. Re: Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Neither of those are raw materials, nor do they have anything to do with recycling.

  60. Building the phone in U.S. would not lower tariffs by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2

    The assembly of the iPhone is a small portion of its costs. All of the significant parts such as processors, displays, chipsets, etc. are made by TSMC, Samsung, etc. overseas and would still be subject to tariffs. So moving assembly here would do little to decrease the costs of the tariffs. And because we would be forced to use more robotics to keep costs reasonable, it would also do little to create jobs.

    And, does he really think anyone wants to be building factories while his tariffs are in effect? Most of what goes in a modern factory is made overseas and subject to, guess what, Trump's tariffs.

    Moreover, why encourage Apple to move the least sophisticated, lowest skilled portion of the work here? Is that what Trump feels would restore our allegedly lost greatness? How about encouraging home-based chip and display manufacturing? The only US foundry working on 7nm just gave up. Intel is behind on 10nm. The only possible source for Apple's new processors is, guess who, Taiwan.

  61. Re: Building the phone in U.S. would not lower tar by DMJC · · Score: 1

    Taiwan is not China despite the rhetoric out of the PRC and USA does not need to have tariffs on Taiwan, South Korea or Japan. Specifically it is Chinese Labor dumping and Chinese price manipulation that is the problem. Let China sell to India and Africa. America has trade with huge chunks of the world already. If other nations want China they can deal with the defence and economic consequences of dealing with China. Many countries are already waking up to Chinese sovereign interference and are moving to take action. Trump just got out in front of the issue.

  62. No reasom to worry about lack of labor in the US! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this one's a red herring. You've got all these advancing technologies that will really improve efficiency by taking humans out of the equation. Everything from the McDonalds kiosks so people can self-order food to the future of self driving trucks, removing the need for human drivers. Why complain about these improvements taking jobs away if other things you could do here are being held back on because of the fear we won't have enough people to do it?

    IMO, as you bring back factories to America, you're going to bring them back in a modernized format. The idea Trump wants America back in the 1950's or whatever is kind of stupid. He just wants things to be produced here again, and our excuse for not doing it, to date, has been the flimsy one that 'It's just not profitable to make stuff here anymore, when nations like China can do it so cheap!" There's always been a major hidden cost in letting them build our products, though. That's been their tendency to steal our intellectual property and build knock-offs of whatever product we come up with. How much is THAT costing an American business in lost profits?

  63. China is not lowest cost anymore by Nocturrne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It wasn't that long ago that Nokia and Motorola had mobile phone factories in the US - I was there in the 90's. Many computers were also made in the US before. The manufacturing of mobile phones is becoming more and more automated. Even in the Foxconn factory (I've been there too), they are using fewer and fewer workers. The main things making the cost of manufacturing in the US higher than China are regulations related to pollution and taxes. The labor cost in China is getting very close to the US - close enough that it is already making no sense to make some things there and then ship them all the way to the other side of the planet.

    China stopped being the lowest labor cost place to manufacture for many industries, years ago. An analysis in 2016 found the cost to assemble iphones in the US would only add roughly 5% to the cost - this was 2 years ago. My only point is entire industries that were in the US and EU 25yrs ago could be moved back home.

    https://www.technologyreview.c...

  64. Re:It was bush removed the regulations by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    It was the repeal of Glass Steagall in 1999 that directly paved the way for the 2008 crisis, by removing the firewall between depository and investment banking. Who was president in 1999?

  65. Re:Building the phone in U.S. would not lower tari by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    The most critical and expensive parts for Apple's phones are now the A11 and OLED displays. I read a breakdown a while ago that indicated that due to the display crunch, over half of the current iPhone's production costs (which are less than half the consumer cost) were in the display module and the processor.

    The A11 requires a 10nm process and is currently made by TSMC. There is no working 10nm process in America. Intel's 14nm is roughly equivalent, but that would be a significant redesign for what would be an obsolete product by the time you did it. Anything new they decide to do will be on a 7nm process or better. They could perhaps design for Intel's ever-upcoming 10nm process, but Intel won't have spare volume anytime soon. There is no indication on Samsung's sites that I could find that their Austin facility has anything better than their current 14nm in the works. That is inadequate for iPhone 8 or above products.

    The OLED displays have no significant manufacturing in America that I know of. The cost of LG's new OLED display factory in China is $4.7 billion according to one source I just flew by. That would likely be double or triple in America and take years to bring online. Not happening.

    They could use Intel's radio. That's something. Perhaps they could find some memory made here.

  66. Re: Recycling solution: by Brujis · · Score: 1

    The recovery was only long because of Obama. His moronic policies stifled the already extant recovery and led to the softest recovery since the economic failure of the new deal.

  67. Re:How did tariffs increase Japanese profit margin by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Offering retailers secret refunds thru offshore (swiss) bank accounts doesnt sound like cost reduction, more like good old bribes ala Intel in ~2000-2005.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  68. Re: Build in USA with robots by citizenr · · Score: 1

    > trivial $60k job to tender a pick and place

    Because this is a >$100K engineering position. You dont "tender" machines, you program them, you need EE with manufacturing/supply chain knowledge.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  69. Re: Build in USA with robots by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    This is not an EE level position. I taught 18 years old boys to do that in one day. Command format is trivial for low speed population: go to bin A, pick, go to X Y and drop - that's it. Only for stuff like optical calibration and like you need a specialist.

  70. That was kind of the point ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... I mean, you don't have to like it, but it's hardly shocking. That was kind of the point of the tariffs.

  71. Re:Finding millions of laborers is easy by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

    Lots of "If's"

  72. Re: Build in USA with robots by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    So did you guys sponsor a program with the local trade school then? High school and trade school is nominally supposed to produce folks capable of picking up those skills on the job fairly quickly, even if it doesn't always.

  73. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the people 10,000 years from now won't be saying : I wish people had recycled plastic and paper.

  74. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I go out of my way to help my friends. Personal friendships aren't like national alliances at all. National leaders have a responsibility to always do what's best for their own people. Individuals can prioritize others over self.

  75. Re: Build in USA with robots by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    No, we didn't

  76. Too Late, Trump! Since 2013, They Already DO!!! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Since at least 2013, Apple DOES at least Assemble some of their Products in the USA, and are actively taking steps to increase those numbers:

    https://www.statesman.com/busi...

    https://www.apple.com/newsroom...

    https://www.businessinsider.co...

    https://www.apple.com/newsroom...

  77. Re:Enjoy your $10000 iPhone by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Keep sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "LALALALALALA I'M NOT LISTENING!!!" all you like but you know I'm right. Seriously how much longer can you hold your nose against the stench that Trump has brought to the country? He says "I'm going to drain the swamp!" then turns around and builds a cesspool in it's place. You jackasses need to get off this whole 'stick it to the libtards' shit and wake the fuck up.

  78. Re:Recycling solution: by Kohath · · Score: 1

    "And, the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because, the Cold War's been over for 20 years."

  79. M.O.R.O.N by cj9er · · Score: 1

    I think we need an android upgrade for POTUS, the current model seems to be malfunctioning

  80. Build plants in Mexico by rhyous · · Score: 1

    This solves or decreases two problems:
    1. Illegal Immagration from Mexico decreases - It puts jobs in Mexico. A lot of them. Improves the Mexico economy. Because so many more jobs are in Mexico, and because the economy imrpoves, the number of illegal aliens decreases significantly. Now you don't need to build a wall between Mexico.
    2. With less immigration, there are more jobs in the US, even though the Apple Jobs didn't come here, the result is actuall more jobs, because when you add a job in Mexico, you keep the entire family in Mexico, where, so you remove not just one illegal immigrant, but with families, there are two adults, and with children, that is a lot of future jobs that stay.

  81. I already asked nicely... by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    What did you say here Windy...

    Where did you get your 9% number? Your ass?

  82. Re:No, no it is 3.9% by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Anything other than this site is BS:
    https://data.bls.gov/timeserie...

    It's 3.9%. That's what the last administration used, that's what they all used. BLS has the largest sample size of any survey, so it's valid.

  83. Re: happening by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Sorry, those jobs are coming back

    https://www.usatoday.com/story...

    Don't believe the NY Times.

  84. Re: Build in USA with robots by citizenr · · Score: 1

    and then wonder why half the inventory has tombstones

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  85. Re:No, no it is 3.9% by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Anything other than this site is BS:
    https://data.bls.gov/timeserie...

    That's not a site, that is a page. https://data.bls.gov/ is a site, and another page on that site shows the U-6 rate as 7.4%. However, we know that the U-6 does not actually count all of the unemployed, by design, so we know the number is higher than that.

    It's 3.9%. That's what the last administration used, that's what they all used.

    The U-3 has always been a lie, and a deliberate one.

    BLS has the largest sample size of any survey, so it's valid.

    In that case, I'm at least glad to hear you will accept their figure... which is 7.4%.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  86. Re:Recycling solution: by Agripa · · Score: 1

    America used to have lots of friends in the world.

    Nations never have friends. They have interests.

  87. Re:Recycling solution: by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Nations never have friends. They have interests.

    It is in your interest that you are in others interest as well.

    Call it what you like, but without it all you have is enemies, and nations sure do have those.

  88. Re:No, no it is 3.9% by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Anything other than this site is BS:
    https://data.bls.gov/timeserie...

    That's not a site, that is a page. https://data.bls.gov/ is a site, and another page on that site shows the U-6 rate as 7.4%. However, we know that the U-6 does not actually count all of the unemployed, by design, so we know the number is higher than that.

    Pedantic, much? Heh

    It's 3.9%. That's what the last administration used, that's what they all used.

    The U-3 has always been a lie, and a deliberate one.

    BLS has the largest sample size of any survey, so it's valid.

    In that case, I'm at least glad to hear you will accept their figure... which is 7.4%.

    So, if we use the U6 numbers (which I don't think anyone uses) https://data.bls.gov/pdq/Surve... (seems to be, alter back to 2006), it seems we were in depression numbers under Obama. Never the less, we are in a historic low. Still I'm amazed at how the Democrats really trashed the country right after 2008. That took some work. Combine that with the fact that Obama couldn't even pass a budget the entire 8 years he was President is nothing short of the worst in history. Can't blame it on the Republicans, he owned Congress his first two years. There is no excuse.

  89. Re: How did tariffs increase Japanese profit margi by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Philips is out of business?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.