Slashdot Mirror


Daylight Saving Time is Super Unpopular. Here Are the Countries Trying To Ditch It. (washingtonpost.com)

Daylight Saving Time ended in the United States on Sunday, bumping the clocks back an hour. The change happened in Europe a week earlier, meaning the time difference between the continents was momentarily smaller. It's another confusing wrinkle in a confusing temporal process that confounds the world. From a story: Today, 70 countries change their clocks midyear for Daylight Saving Time, including most of North America, Europe and parts of South America and New Zealand. China, Japan, India and most countries near the equator don't fall back or jump ahead. In much of Asia and South America, the Daylight Saving Time shift was adopted, but then abandoned. It has never been observed in most of Africa. While the United States extended its Daylight Saving Time in 2005 and Florida wants to make it its standard time, other countries are moving to ditch the practice.

The European Union is weighing a plan to abandon shifting from daylight saving time midyear. "Millions ... believe that summertime should be all the time," the European Union's chief executive, Jean-Claude Juncker, told German reporters in August. Juncker was referring, in part, to an online poll conducted by the E.U., which found that changing clocks is tremendously unpopular. (As my colleague Rick Noack pointed out, however, there are methodological problems: "The largest share of participants came from one country -- Germany -- where the time switch has been a somewhat odd front-page topic for years. But any E.U. decision would also impact the 27 other member states.")

355 comments

  1. End it by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't believe I've had to endure forced jet lag twice a year my whole life, for no reason that anyone can coherently articulate.

    It would be nice if we can end it while I can still enjoy it, lol

    1. Re:End it by Rob+Lister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Based on 100 million people wasting 5 minutes changing clocks twice a year, and given an average life expectancy of 80 years, I estimate 23 lives are wasted.

      At least a few of those 23 are going to be children.

      Please, think of the children.

    2. Re:End it by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

      I highly agree. I live in Indiana, which until a little over 10 years ago, never observed DST. We'd be on EST 1/2 the year and on CST the other half. The practice seems to have no real benefit and certainly has a lot of negative side-effects (increased accidents, heart attacks, etc).

    3. Re: End it by schure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The European thing should be nuanced: the union's mandate would end, but individual nations could still decide to continue changing to DST.

    4. Re:End it by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Based on 100 million people wasting 5 minutes changing clocks twice a year,

      People still change clocks? How...peculiar. The computers and phones take care of themselves, and those are the only clocks I use these days....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on 100 million people wasting 5 minutes changing clocks twice a year,

      People still change clocks? How...peculiar. The computers and phones take care of themselves, and those are the only clocks I use these days....

      Cars often still need their clocks changed manually. My wrist watch is still analog and my wall clock is analog. Otherwise, everything's automated.

    6. Re:End it by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Based on 100 million people wasting 5 minutes changing clocks twice a year,

      People still change clocks? How...peculiar. The computers and phones take care of themselves, and those are the only clocks I use these days....

      My computers, my phone, and my bedside clock all change automatically... however... the living room clock, the microwave clock, the oven clock, the clocks in the cars, the office clock, my watches... none of them change automatically. However, I've learnt it's easier to just remember those clocks are an hour fast for four months than it is to go around and change them.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No! No nation should have a choice in this. It is stupid from any possible way to look at it. Just end it and let it die in the history books as one of humanity's most asinine, clueless attempts to changing our world around us. We are finally I the correct time. If the uneducated morons in FL want to keep the day shifted an hour then just simply start shit an hour later. Open stores at 9 instead of 8. Done. Dont be a bunch of dumbfuck nitwits and change your time because well you are dumb.

    8. Re: End it by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Is there an EU mandate for daylight savings time? I didn't know.

      It makes sense to coordinate internationally when the switch should happen, but I expected that whether to switch to DST at all was a national decision. Just like the timezone you're in.

    9. Re: End it by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      If you think an hour's bad, you've never had jet lag.

    10. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Northwest Indiana would like a word with you about DST..

    11. Re: End it by peragrin · · Score: 1

      You will convince more people to come change their clocks than businesses to adjust their hours of operations.

      Less hassle too. Since everyone moves the same time. Businesses don't have to change.

      Please think of the profits.

      Lastly if you don't know the value of DST then I suggest turning the TV off for a year. You might be surprised at what this thing g called outside is like at various points through out the year.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    12. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switching back and forth is indeed dumb. But there is no such thing as "correct time", it is all arbitrary. There is absolutely nothing that makes -5 UTC more correct than -4 UTC, so long as you are -5 or -4 all year long.

    13. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its better to have it lighter for the kids waiting for the school bus.

    14. Re:End it by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Sticking to permanent summer time is something I would vote for Adolph Hitler if he were in a position to grant me it. I would even vote for Donald Trump if he were to implement it. I have spent my entire working life hating the sudden plunge into darkness in the evening that the autumn switch causes.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    15. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars often still need their clocks changed manually.

      It amuses me that, although my car automatically syncs time with the GPS signal, I still need to toggle a checkbox twice a year to tell it I am or am not in DST time, even though my stand-alone GPS unit is capable of determining that for itself.

    16. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to put into perspective, DST is the most innocuous thing possible to kvetch about

      I agree, so why are you arguing in favor of it? :P

    17. Re: End it by Swistak · · Score: 2

      There is. There was a legislation n Poland that tried to end time saving time, and someone pointed out that EU requires all countries to be consistent. So it has to be all-or-nothing from what I know.

    18. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car, stove, microwave, HWH timer

    19. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the?!

      How is humanity trying to "change the world around us" with DST?! You do realise that the way we measure time, the concept of months, years, seconds, days, weekdays, on and on is all made up, right? Arbitrarily picked points (sorta the time you go around the sun, mostly the time it takes the earth to turn once).. along with that all divided into arbitrary measurements like 'hours' 'seconds' and so on....

      This reminds me of that time someone was/might have been lynched, when they re-sync the calendar because it drifted, and people thought the King was stealing months of their lives.

      Is that you?! Is the gubberment stealing your time?!

    20. Re:End it by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      Not to mention statistically significant heart attacks increase during spring time change.
      https://www.livescience.com/50...

    21. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The regulation states that the switchovers can occur only on this and that date. Countries are free to have it or not.

    22. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These side effects are all lies, pushed by those hating DST.

      Really. Show me valid stats. Not some newspaper article, but the stats that the article supposedly referenced. Real, actual data.

      For example, you want to say it kills people due to car accidents? Fine. Then the stats had better have been derived by looking in GREAT DETAIL at the police report, to see what the actual, real factor was. Not just "DST! SEE!!! DST CAUSED THIS, not Johnny running onto the road!"

    23. Re: End it by mcvos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But there is: the sun. Originally, noon was the point where the sun was at its highest. Of course that meant each town had a slightly different time, so with long distance communication and travel (telegraph and train), time became standardised in time zones.

      Ideally, every country would be in the timezone closest to its natural time. In practice, of course many don't. Most of western Europe actually follows central European time, because Germany. But if they now decide to standardise on summer time rather than winter time, Madrid would end up in the eastern European timezone.

    24. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd perfer to just use GMT time everywhere. Timezones are almost as useless.

    25. Re:End it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      You get jet lag when you cross to a different continent on the other side of the world. Not a single hour. Jeez, Grandpa.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    26. Re: End it by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

    27. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Indiana, which until a little over 10 years ago, never observed DST. We'd be on EST 1/2 the year and on CST the other half.

      In other words, Indiana did observe DST, they just called it something else.

    28. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! Quick, what hour GMT do you have breakfast?

      It would be entirely bogus to have to try to figure out everybody's schedule. The clock is supposed to reflect local solar time. GMT is for navigation. And I, for one, prefer to have a little daylight after work if possible.

    29. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United Kingdom tries this for two years at the end of the sixties. It was so successful that the United Kingdom went back to changing the clocks twice a year. If you think that year round summer time is a good idea try asking the Scots about it.

    30. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you don't know the value of DST then I suggest turning the TV off for a year. You might be surprised at what this thing g called outside is like at various points through out the year.

      It gets lighter later in the evening naturally in the summer. There's no reason to shift our schedules so that dusk extends through 10:30PM, and dawn is after everyone gets to work. Drive in theaters around here have to wait until really late to show anything in the summer. Children refuse to sleep at a reasonable time (and now they have school in summer).

    31. Re:End it by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Cars often still need their clocks changed manually. "

      Naw. Cars, just like ovens and microwaves show the wrong time for half a year, because nobody can remember how to change them and the manual is long gone.

    32. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dimwit. Since the rest of the countryâ(TM)s clocks changed twice a year the effective time zone Indiana was in would change. Half the year their clocks would match New York, half the year they would match Chicago, but Indianaâ(TM)s clocks didnâ(TM)t change.

      Save for a few counties around Chicago and a few around Kentucky, which IIRC did follow DST in the Central Time Zone.

    33. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's if we make DST the standard time, not if we end it.

      Anyway, people who ask to abolish DST don't have the imagination to realize that it would suck more than the 5 minutes wasted twice a year. Because masses are dumb we probably have to abolish DST, wait the the collective "wow this sucks", and immediately reinstate DST. The cycle will repeat when memory fades again.

    34. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its better to have it lighter for the kids waiting for the school bus.

      We live near the Canadian border. DST, Standard Time. It's dark regardless for the little children. Might as well get the benefit of some afternoon sun (or clouds in most cases).

    35. Re: End it by dj245 · · Score: 1

      There is. There was a legislation n Poland that tried to end time saving time, and someone pointed out that EU requires all countries to be consistent. So it has to be all-or-nothing from what I know.

      There's nothing stopping them from recommending or requiring that businesses shift their operating hours forwards and back in the opposite direction of daylight savings time. It's a little convoluted but the EU can't do diddly about it.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    36. Re:End it by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Even my '12 Dodge doesn't need to do that. If Dodge can do it, so can you.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    37. Re:End it by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thinning the herd isn't a negative side effect, it's natural selection.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    38. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly agree. I live in Indiana, which until a little over 10 years ago, never observed DST. We'd be on EST 1/2 the year and on CDT the other half.

      FTFY - both EST and CDT are UTC-5, so clocks don't change.

    39. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more than that, heart attack rates like quadruple at the "spring forward" time change (okay maybe not that much)

      https://www.reuters.com/article/us-heart-daylightsaving/daylight-saving-time-linked-to-heart-attacks-study-idUSBREA2S0D420140329

      https://healthblog.uofmhealth.org/heart-health/why-daylight-saving-time-could-increase-your-heart-attack-risk

      which really should tell everyone shoot for 9 hours of sleep on sunday nights (or maybe finally get 8)

    40. Re:End it by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      You get jet lag when you cross to a different continent on the other side of the world. Not a single hour. Jeez, Grandpa.

      Yeah, who cares about science when you can have snark?

    41. Re:End it by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      That switch would come just a bit later if it weren't for DST. We typically get over 15 hours od light during the Summer Solstice, and dropping all the way down to ~9.25 hrs for Winter Solstice. Maybe you need a safe space?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    42. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read your link: "This suggests that spring daylight saving may have affected people who were going to have heart attacks anyway, Gurm said."

    43. Re:End it by rlitman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Still better than VCRs 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

    44. Re: End it by houghi · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for you. Not because the stupidity tgat is DST, but because you onlu had jet lag only twice per year.

      Every time I go to sldeep and/or wake up with an hour difference from what I normally do, I have had it. That means every Saturday (and Monday) at least from the age of 12. This basically because of having a social life.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    45. Re: End it by houghi · · Score: 1

      China does this. They have only one time. Are you a communist?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    46. Re: End it by houghi · · Score: 1

      Except obciously that they can change the law and say it is up to the countries from now on. Portugal and Spain have different times. There are even countries around the world that run on different times.

      There is nothing LEGAL preventing to reverse an EU law. Would it be easier if none have DST? Sure, but not a must.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    47. Re: End it by houghi · · Score: 1

      Portugal is not in that timezone. Neither is thevUK or Ireland. The rest of west Europe is around the same place. Germany us jyst comvinientlt in the middle.

      Devidong e.g. France in two zones would be stupid.

      And the sun is the reason we are in this mess to begin with, so no reason to look there. All that is one line for kids to learn extra in school ."time was sun based. Not anymore." We changed using the moon for time as well.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    48. Re: End it by houghi · · Score: 1

      I had jet lag every weekend, missimg many hours of sleep.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    49. Re:End it by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

      Let's not end it, let's keep it all year. I enjoy more sun in the evening.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    50. Re:End it by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Who needs 5 minutes to change a clock? Grandma maybe..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    51. Re:End it by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Your microwave came with a manual?!?!

      --
      I tend to rant.
    52. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is your mom charging these days?

    53. Re: End it by mcvos · · Score: 2

      Well, if we're gong to abandon the sun's role in this, I suggest getting rid of timezones altogether. Everybody just follow UTC. That's going to fix a lot of headaches.

      (And yes, I said "most of western Europe. Not the UK, Ireland or Portugal, but France, Netherland, Belgium and Spain follow central European time despite being geographically mostly or entirely in the western European timezone.

    54. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I, for one, prefer to have a little daylight after work if possible.

      Then go to work earlier! but leave the fucking clocks alone. and leave them on standard time not year long dst.

    55. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct question would be, how is my Dodge contacting an outside server to get NTP time? What else is it sending ?

    56. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not all of us have fancy new cars like that.

    57. Re: End it by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      So weird to hear how hard it would be to NOT move a clock up or back an hour.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    58. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Another problem is that daylight savings increases global warming. The extra hour of sun hitting the earth raises ground temperature and the atmosphere

    59. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have breakfast when I get hungry on the day of the 2nd sunrise after the day I ate last. Breakfast is breaking a fast. It is not stuff your mouth you good consumer

    60. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Cars, just like ovens and microwaves show the wrong time for half a year, because nobody can remember how to change them and the manual is long gone.

      Have you checked the glove compartment? I've never actually kept gloves in there, but the car manual for every car I've ever had was collecting dust in there.

    61. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that ending it would be best, but if we have to have it, why not change the clocks by ten minutes every month (forward for six months, then backward for another six)? Most clocks today are either easy to change or change by themselves, so it wouldn't be much of a burden. People being late or early by ten minutes wouldn't be such a big problem as it is with an hour, and since it happens so often, people would both be unlikely to forget, and quick to realize that they had and recover.

    62. Re:End it by jythie · · Score: 1

      Maybe that includes pathing and transit?

    63. Re:End it by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      My car's clock would show 0:00 every time I started her.

    64. Re:End it by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I change my car. My alarm panel changes wrong (it "fell back" twice") so I reset it manually. Everything set automatically.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    65. Re:End it by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Some of us buy cars that last longer than 6 years.

    66. Re:End it by MaryannG · · Score: 1

      An hour's difference gives you jet lag? Really?

      --
      Social Media Handywoman at Texas Boys Balloo
    67. Re:End it by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      And some of you don't know that this isn't your daddy's Dodge anymore. Mine is going on seven years old, doing fine, and still gets lots of compliments...it's a top of the line Charger SRT8. Mercedes was running the company back then, before selling out to Fiat.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    68. Re: End it by LittlePud · · Score: 1

      GPS. My Lexus automatically adjusts the clock using the GPS time beacon.

    69. Re:End it by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Have you checked the glove compartment? I've never actually kept gloves in there, but the car manual for every car I've ever had was collecting dust in there."

      Actually reading TFM? You must be new here. Do you also read the articles?

    70. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here's the Edmund's review. Mine looks identical to this one with the exception of the red interior which I don't have.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    71. Re: End it by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The plan by many is to stay with DST permanently, rather than using standard time. That's the equivalent of saying you want to be in the next time zone over. In summer when the days are longest the choice of using DST or not is not very important, but in winter it will matter much more. The real solution here is to either get rid of time zones altogether, or have regions be more flexible about when school start and the like.

    72. Re:End it by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      People still change clocks? How...peculiar. The computers and phones take care of themselves, and those are the only clocks I use these days....

      Oh look.. Another moron who thinks everyone in the world only has clocks that synch to NTP servers.

      So no clock on your stove? No clock in your car? No clock on the microwave? What about the coffee maker? Or are you one of those idiots who thinks having a Mr. Coffee, that is part of a botnet, is a good idea?

      I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of the world still has clocks that are adjusted manually.. And yes, wristwatches are still a thing. They may not be quite as ubiquitous as they once were, but there are still tens/hundreds of millions of them out there.

      You can take your IoT and cram it.. If I didn't have to adjust the clock on the coffee maker 2x a year.... FOR NO DAMN GOOD REASON...

    73. Re: End it by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Otherwise after a decade or two after moving to Summer Time permanently they'll want to create Winter Time so that it's not so dark in some locations, and the cycle starts over.

    74. Re: End it by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This really depends upon where you are in your time zone - those in the far east of it have a very different experience than those in the far west of the same time zone. Note that many time zones deviate quite far from longitudinal lines because of politics. Ie, both eastern Main and the Florida panhandle are in the same Eastern Time zone and yet are more than a full hour apart from each other relative to solar time.

    75. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, fuck that. Just leave the clocks on DST for evening daylight, especially in tourist areas. It's all psychological. And in the wintertime we should work shorter hours anyway, if not hibernate entirely, if you don't want to fly south.

    76. Re:End it by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      for no reason that anyone can coherently articulate.

      Has nobody every said to you, "more evening daylight in the summer, when it's more likely to be used than very early mornings"? Because that's a pretty coherent argument to me. You might not agree, but it's perfectly coherent.

    77. Re:End it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you get jetlagged by an hour change in sleep patterns. In what other ways are you unable to function like a normal person?

    78. Re:End it by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Who needs 5 minutes to change a clock? Grandma maybe..

      I have eight clocks in my home that require manual change, which include the stove and microwave and front patio light electronic timer. Ten if you count the car clocks. I usually change the batteries on those timepieces that require them at the same time. Trying to get them to hang back on the wall requires a great amount of patience and finesse. It takes me way more than five minutes to update my clocks each time we have this pointless exercise.

    79. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody using UTC is stupid and will cause even more headaches. When Iâ(TM)m in London and somebody tells me not to call somebody else in Melbourne because itâ(TM)s 2am there, I know immediately why.

    80. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You donâ(TM)t live at a high latitude, do you? London isnâ(TM)t at a very high latitude (~50 degrees N), but even on summer time the sunset would be 16:45 in December. There is no after work daylight without going to triple summer time.

    81. Re:End it by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Actually, mine did. I just took it out and looked at it. It's in Korean, Chinese, Laotian, Spanish and English.
      My toaster has a manual as well.
      I actually read that one because I couldn't make the Bagel Button work, apparently I was too stupid to realize you had to use both hands to activate it, one to hold the button down while the other depresses the activation lever.
      Of course, this means the toaster must be against a hard surface or needs a second person to hod the toaster in place as trying to do so causes you to slide it across the countertop.
      Yeah, that's apparently better than how I thought it worked. Press the button then the lever, too simple, no consequences, obviously I R A Idiot...

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    82. Re:End it by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met one single person in your life that liked it? This has to be as near 100% agreement as any issue in human experience. And yet, we can't get a consensus? We can't get it on ballot? Everybody bitches about it for a week, then it falls off the table of importance and is forgotten until next time, when we bitch for a week and forget, on and on forever....

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    83. Re: End it by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Is your car 30 years old?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    84. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still far better than than the sun setting at 15:45. I think people should demand shorter working hours during the wintertime, without any reduction in pay.

    85. Re:End it by Xhris · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't travel much if you think a 1hr clock shift in any way resembles jet lag. The common joke when we travel between Sydney and Perth is the problems associated with the "jet lag" from the 2hr time change.

    86. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of even the wild animals, even they will be confronted with disrupted schedules twice a year. The car schedules, the farm animals possibly. Like, roads that were safe shortly before dawn get swarmed with an army of cars and trucks the next day. I have a theory this is stressful.

    87. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There still are cell phones that don't change their clocks automatically (those that fit in the hand and have buttons). They can last over a decade and might not have been designed to support time zone data updates nor indeed time zones at all.

      I won't if "smart" things that aren't supported will still change the time twice a year mistakenly. Then you'll have to change the clock back to the right, and do this twice a year if you don't know how to disable it (same for devices that would be able to automatically get the update, but you kept offline)

    88. Re: End it by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    89. Re:End it by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      It's on the ballot in California, and given that the election's tomorrow, the time change should still be fresh in everyone's mind.

      Caveat 1: The ballot measure (Prop 7) doesn't actually abolish DST, it allows the legislature to do it. The legislature can't do it now because DST was introduced in California by a ballot measure in 1949. Since it's up to the legislature, we might end up permanent DST, no DST, or no change at all. The proposition is worded to give the impression that we'll end up with permanent DST.

      Caveat 2: California allows vote-by-mail, ballot were sent out about a month ago. Most votes are still done in person on election day I believe.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    90. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually much worse. 230 8-year olds are sacrificed each year to the daylight saving time gods.
      Or 460 4 year olds. It's a tragedy

    91. Re: End it by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Changing the sign do take a tiny bit of work but don't fuck up how the clock work. Also as someone up late maybe earlier nights make me sleep earlier.

    92. Re:End it by Kelerei · · Score: 1

      Try an 11 hour change in sleep patterns (which I get when I travel from New Zealand to visit friends and family back in South Africa). I guarantee you, there's nothing else that fucks up your sleep patterns as much as a sudden shift of almost half a day.

      In fact, I would argue that the trip from here to South Africa is worse than the trip from here to Europe, because when flying to Europe, the time change is over a 25 hour flight, whereas flying to South Africa (via the most direct route for me, which is to first fly to Sydney and then catch the Sydney-Johannesburg flight, QF63) is a lot shorter: the longest leg (being the aforementioned QF63) has a 9 hour change in an 13.30 hour flight time -- and it's even worse on the return QF64 flight as the flight time is 2 hours shorter (QF63 has to battle some nasty headwinds, which become tailwinds for the return trip).

      Another fun fact: the Qantas flight attendants absolutely detest being assigned to QF63: those 13.30 hours are entirely in daylight since the plane is quite literally chasing the sun across the Southern Indian Ocean. On the plus side, it routes close to the Antarctic coast fairly regularly as the headwinds there tend to be less powerful than if the flight simply followed the great circle routing, which for us nerds is one of the few ways to see Antarctica short of joining a polar expedition.

    93. Re: End it by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Where I live in the USA stores most stores already have seasonal hours including big chain stores like home depot. Believe it or not, chain stores actually know when people shop and when they might get extra sales by staying open a little longer during spring planting, or when itâ(TM)s a waste of money to have the store open.

    94. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to set my car to UTC.

    95. Re:End it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Try an 11 hour change in sleep patterns

      You're doing daylight savings time wrong. :-)

      But I'm with you with the travel. As a European Australian with lots of friends in Canada I know that all to well.

    96. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a VCR

    97. Re:End it by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Fucking hell, what if you lost an arm in 'Nam?

      --
      I tend to rant.
    98. Re:End it by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      On that note I'm happy the war ended about three weeks after I joined so by the time I finished basic, it too was finished.
      But yeah, a toaster that needs two hands or two people to operate it is one of the stupidest things I ever saw. All the button does is disable one side of the toaster slots so it only toasts the inside of the bagel. Sounded like a great idea until I tried to use it.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    99. Re:End it by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Mailed ballots here in Washington State as well, but no in person at all. I voted last week.
      I wish it were on our ballot here...I know how I would have voted.

      https://me.me/i/when-told-the-reason-for-daylight-savings-time-the-old-3712687

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    100. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already ended it. I keep all of my clocks on summer time. If people just started doing that, then it doesn't matter what their government says.

    101. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well my nice wall clock, grandfather clock and watch don't change by themselves.

      I suppose if you want to live a ghetto, low-class life you can rely only upon the clock in your computer and phone. Most of us don't want to do that. Also, have fun if you ever go somewhere that doesn't observe the time change.

    102. Re: End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, 15 years old.

      Why? You gonna buy us all new cars, rich boy? Maybe your mommy and daddy can help you out like they always have.

    103. Re:End it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still an American car and American cars are garbage.

    104. Re:End it by aybiss · · Score: 1

      I take it you're not a farmer. Or a roofer. Or anyone that goes outside for work.

      And seriously, jet lag? Over an hour? How fragile are you?

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    105. Re:End it by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Hi, meet me. I like it. And I've never heard a single non-retarded reason why we should give a big "fuck you" to everyone who works outside during summer and end it.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  2. The problem with the E.U. by trevc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The largest share of participants came from one country -- Germany -- where the time switch has been a somewhat odd front-page topic for years. But any E.U. decision would also impact the 27 other member states.")

    1. Re:The problem with the E.U. by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

      Now if anyone thinks this has anything to do with people's will, they would be sadly mistaken. This would be a first in history. Get real!

    2. Re:The problem with the E.U. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the last time Germany had an idea they decided to force upon the rest of Europe, things turned out splendidly.

    3. Re:The problem with the E.U. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two points:
      1. The online survey was open to everyone. Most participants came from Germany. (BTW I took part and I'm not German or living in Germany.)

      2. The EU will de-regulate DST. If an EU country wants to keep DST they'll be free to do so.

      I'd be happy to hear what's the problem with the EU regarding this.

    4. Re:The problem with the E.U. by Mjlner · · Score: 1

      Credit where credit is due: This wasn't Germany's idea, but Finland's.

      --
      Lemon curry???
    5. Re:The problem with the E.U. by Mjlner · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The largest share of participants came from one country -- Germany -- where the time switch has been a somewhat odd front-page topic for years. But any E.U. decision would also impact the 27 other member states.")

      So what if a majority comes from the largest country? Looking at the results by country reveals that abolishing the switch is the more popular choice in all but two countries: Greece and Cyprus. In the rest of the EU, the preference was to ditch the switch, mostly by overwheling majorities, up to 95%.

      --
      Lemon curry???
    6. Re:The problem with the E.U. by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Once they settle on the exact timezones, the choice may not be so popular. Spain, for instance, is already outside it's natural time zone. If Germany decides to shift one hour to the east, then Spain has the choice of going along, which would skew their daylight hours even more, or decide to switch to another timezone, which would reduce overlap in office hours, potentially hurting their trade.

    7. Re:The problem with the E.U. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The terms of the Greek bailout worked pretty well.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re: The problem with the E.U. by houghi · · Score: 2

      The advantage would be to have the same rime ad Portugal.
      Office hours in Spain already are different. In Spain the work till 20:00 with a 3 hour luunchtime. In germany, many leve as early as 15:00 or 16:00. They start earlier.

      International companies already know how to schedule meetings around this.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:The problem with the E.U. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new around here.
      If the EU does something it is bad and oppressive. You must dislike it. If you do that, you'll get modded +5 Insightful.

    10. Re:The problem with the E.U. by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      So they want their hour of daylight an hour earlier?

    11. Re:The problem with the E.U. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's not a problem with the EU. An online poll was conducted, that in no way bound any of the MEPs to vote on what was in front of them. That process is as democratic as any functioning Western democracy.

    12. Re:The problem with the E.U. by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      One or two hours of missing overlap in office hours between Germany and Spain is not going to hurt trade in any significant manner. You are grasping at straws.

    13. Re:The problem with the E.U. by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      People always want to find a problem with the EU, even though it is actually doing quite well. GP trevc is implying that there is some overlordish Germanic rule of the EU, when quite the opposite is the case. If there is any problem with the EU, then it is that individual member states can slow down or prevent decision making for the entire bloc to a large extent. Especially when member states start "having each other's back" and abuse this power in twos does it become problematic: https://www.reuters.com/articl...

  3. DST all year round for the win by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems screamingly obvious to me that most people would prefer a little extra daylight after work. That has the most utility to the most people. Make DST year round and be done with it. There is no reason that noon has to be the time of day when the sun is highest overhead. That's just tradition for the sake of useless tradition.

    1. Re:DST all year round for the win by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      With that kind of reasoning, why not move the clock ahead by 2 or 3 hours ?

    2. Re:DST all year round for the win by SirMasterboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why change the clock? Why not just change business hours if it's going to be year round?

    3. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's easier to change the clock to determine everybody to adapt the new time than to make everybody change their schedule. Don't believe me, try to change your business schedule, then think about the effort to do that for all the business all sync at the same time... guess what they easiest and sane solution is to change the official hour.

    4. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      It seems screamingly obvious to me that most people would prefer a little extra daylight after work. That has the most utility to the most people. Make DST year round and be done with it. There is no reason that noon has to be the time of day when the sun is highest overhead. That's just tradition for the sake of useless tradition.

      The military has proven that time zones themselves are unnecessary, coordinating operations under GMT for decades now. "Daytime" being roughly 7AM to 7PM local time can easily be considered tradition for the sake of tradition as well.

      Unfortunately, getting humans to adopt GMT would kill far more people than any DST change does. Maybe we'll have a better chance going forward. I'm certain Millennial's have killed the wristwatch by now.

    5. Re:DST all year round for the win by Balthisar · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, our current work hours are tradition for the sake of useless tradition. If we all started work an hour earlier (and left that same hour earlier), the net effect would be the same. Who cares whether or not you sleep at 10 pm vs 11 pm? Or get up a 5 am vs 6 am?

      --
      --Jim (me)
    6. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And have the sun rise around 9.30 in december? No thank you.

    7. Re:DST all year round for the win by mcvos · · Score: 2

      If you want a bit more sun after work, you should just go to work a bit earlier.

      Making DST the standard time would mean that much of western Europe would end up using Eastern European Time. Currently France, Spain and the Benelux are using Central European Time, which is one hour off for them, but it's practical because of Germany. But if Germany does the crazy thing and actually moves to Eastern European Time, I think I'd prefer if we just stuck to Western European Time again. With the UK and Portugal, I guess. But using St Petersburg time in Paris is just stupid.

    8. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is no reason that noon has to be the time of day when the sun is highest overhead. That's just tradition for the sake of useless tradition.

      Noon as sun overhead is actually a very useful standard. Noon as 12:00:00pm is an attempt to anchor the clock to reality.with only a little bit of seasonal error (as compared to dawn-based or dusk-based clocks). Time zones are a creation of the railroad industry to simplify their bookkeeping. Forcing everyone to use the same daily schedule and arbitrarily changing it twice a year is just top-down sadism.

      As for when should be when, my main complaint is driving when the sun is low enough in the sky that looking east (in the morning) or west (in the evening) is unsafe.

    9. Re:DST all year round for the win by omnichad · · Score: 1

      This would be a win. Otherwise I'll just fight to keep DST and deal with a miniscule inconvenience twice a year.

    10. Re:DST all year round for the win by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      The clock and what defines "noon" is a made up construct that we then used to define a LOT of things. It's actually far easier to change the clock than it is to try to change all the stuff that's dependent on the clock.

      The biggest problem with trying to change business hours is that there will always be a group of people that refuse to participate and they blow up the whole change for everyone else.

    11. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moving at the speed of business.

      The only thing slower is moving at the speed of city hall.

    12. Re:DST all year round for the win by Viol8 · · Score: 2

      " It's actually far easier to change the clock than it is to try to change all the stuff that's dependent on the clock."

      No, it really isn't. Changing timetables or working hours or meetings times is done all the time. And whats the point of having clocks if they don't tell the actual (within reason) time? You might just as well have 10 hours labelled A -J with say G as noon. Makes as much sense as not having the clock saying noon at noon.

    13. Re:DST all year round for the win by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      They tend to do things at H-Hour on D-Day.

    14. Re:DST all year round for the win by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I bet most people would prefer to wake up with the sun more days rather than the extra sun after work.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in the summer it would be light out at midnight. The point is to keep clocks the same setting year round.

    16. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you'd have to shift your routine for that. It would be the same effect as changing the clocks, which is what we want to avoid.

    17. Re:DST all year round for the win by PPH · · Score: 1

      As opposed to 8:30? Who cares? Either way, you are waking up in the dark (grumpy old retired people who can get up whenever they want aside).

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    18. Re:DST all year round for the win by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it really isn't. Changing timetables or working hours or meetings times is done all the time.

      Many stores in my town have business hours printed on a piece of paper behind their window. It's much easier to change the clock, than it is to reprint all the signs. Also, various kinds of public transport still have paper timetables. Even if everything is electronic, changing the times would require an atomic update on the entire database, rather than an update on the global time offset.

    19. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The clock and what defines "noon" is a made up construct that we then used to define a LOT of things.

      Not to be overly pedantic, but the clock *is* based on the earth spinning around, so it's not entirely "made up". Weirdly enough, it seems the 24-hour clock was developed independently in ancient Egypt and China (though there may have been some trade allowing the idea to migrate) I think the argument could be made that, if the goal is to have a stable method of keeping time (and the only real way without machines is the positioning of astronomical bodies) then a 24 hour clock, along with a sidereal calendar, would be inevitable.

    20. Re:DST all year round for the win by nasch · · Score: 1

      I would think it's a lot easier to decree that the time has changed than to get thousands of businesses to all agree to change their hours. Just getting the TV networks to shift everything by an hour sounds difficult, though they're less and less relevant all the time.

    21. Re:DST all year round for the win by mark-t · · Score: 2

      It seems screamingly obvious to me that most people would prefer a little extra daylight after work. That has the most utility to the most people.

      Not if you measure utility in terms of health. For a period of about 10 weeks from the end of November until early February, sunrise north of about the 45th parallel (which for reference represents about 50 million Americans or so) doesn't happen until after 7:30AM, and actually as late as about 8:15AM. If daylight savings were implemented year 'round, then sunrise would happen in these areas between 8:30AM and 9:15AM. As the peak morning commute hour is around 8AM, this means that even in the depths of the winter months, if daylight savings were in effect, more people would be getting no direct exposure to sunlight in the morning, which ordinarily boosts the body's ability to make melatonin, improving sleep cycles, and provides numerous other health benefits.

      I can certainly appreciate the convenience of wanting an extra hour of daylight in the evenings after work or school, but the consequence of doing so during the winter months would certainly be accompanied by a dramatic increase in incidence of seasonal mood disorder and other health issues related to inadequate exposure to sunlight. I do not think this is worth it.

      Make no mistake, however.... I know that we should not be constantly changing our clocks twice every year, but I think we should stay on standard time, not daylight savings. In the summer, the sun already sets late enough the further north you go that an extra hour is not even necessarily really needed anyways, so there's that as well. A compromise might be to split the difference and instead only adjust the clocks by a half-hour one last time if we are to permanently abolish DST, although I think that this would still be pushing it.

    22. Re:DST all year round for the win by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      It seems screamingly obvious to me that most people would prefer a little extra daylight after work.

      Try visiting Arizona in September and attend an outdoor event at 7PM, like a local football game. Then imagine it one hour EARLIER in the day when it's even hotter.

      Then you'll understand why having extra daylight isn't always "screamingly obvious" to everyone around our geographically diverse country.

    23. Re:DST all year round for the win by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      ...Who cares whether or not you sleep at 10 pm vs 11 pm? Or get up a 5 am vs 6 am?

      If you live in a mid-northern latitude, such as around 50-60, DST is a nightmare in the summer because it doesn't get dark until close to midnight. Anyone living with small children will quickly discover they won't want to go to bed if the sun is out. I would definitely prefer to stay on Winter time the whole year so we can get some sleep in the Summer, or have time zones defined by both longitude and latitude.

    24. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like my planning.

      When is D-Day? ... shit it looks like it would have had to have been 3 weeks ago!

    25. Re:DST all year round for the win by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      While it may be easier, it is the wrong thing to do. It is a dirty quick-fix for a totally different problem. The problem is that those business hours are wrong for the current time zone. Don't cripple that by changing the time zone.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    26. Re:DST all year round for the win by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A lot of businesses have to cover core hours that their customers demand, so can't easily change their working hours. They need people to be there to answer the phone 9-5. Switching to permanent DST would help the most people enjoy evening daylight.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re: DST all year round for the win by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Millennials didn't kill wristwatches. They just collectively became adults at the same point in time when everybody started using their phones as de-facto pocket watches.

      I'm GenX. I wore a watch religiously until my watch battery died sometime around 2002 & never got replaced because it was too much of a hassle (special tool required) & I had my phone with me all the time anyway. I'm far from unique in this regard. Statistically, almost EVERYONE drifted into phone-as-watch-replacement at some point after they got a cell phone, their watch ceased to work (temporarily or otherwise), and fixing/replacing it was just too much of a hassle to bother with.

    28. Re:DST all year round for the win by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Show me a scientific published study on that because SAD is a myth, it lacks scientific evidence.

      However there have been studies looking at the health impact of changing clocks and changing clocks has a big negative impact.

      DST would be the preferred time to keep and there is no reason to make that the standard. FYI days start getting longer in January.

    29. Re:DST all year round for the win by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The problem is that those business hours are wrong for the current time zone. Don't cripple that by changing the time zone.

      They don't look wrong to me. How do you define 'correct' business hours ?

    30. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the winter, you don't get daylight after work even if you stay on DST. You would just end up going to work in the dark. If you don't adopt DST in the summer, it is light at 4:30am.

      I want to go back to the old rules for DST, or even shorten the time for DST. Make DST only for summer, start it when school ends and stop in when school starts.

      What I would really like is "work/school starts 1 hour after sunrise" and keep the clock as is.

    31. Re:DST all year round for the win by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      It seems screamingly obvious to me that most people would prefer a little extra daylight after work. That has the most utility to the most people. Make DST year round and be done with it. There is no reason that noon has to be the time of day when the sun is highest overhead. That's just tradition for the sake of useless tradition.

      Yeah, why can't we all put aside our differences and agree with me?? :)

      I might like a little more daylight after work. I also might like little more daylight when my kids walk to the bus stop in the morning. Turns out that different people have different priorities and different preferences.

    32. Re:DST all year round for the win by dj245 · · Score: 1

      If you want a bit more sun after work, you should just go to work a bit earlier.

      Making DST the standard time would mean that much of western Europe would end up using Eastern European Time. Currently France, Spain and the Benelux are using Central European Time, which is one hour off for them, but it's practical because of Germany. But if Germany does the crazy thing and actually moves to Eastern European Time, I think I'd prefer if we just stuck to Western European Time again. With the UK and Portugal, I guess. But using St Petersburg time in Paris is just stupid.

      I suspect people's opinions on this may differ depending on where they are at within a given time zone. There is a huge difference between US Central time in Alabama and US Central time in West Texas. And there are plenty of examples of US states that really should be in the neighboring time zones, but aren't because reasons.

      And even at the same longitude within a timezone, different latitudes may have very different opinions. At higher lattitudes, sunrise can be extremely early- 4:30AM in some US locations, with a sunset at 8:30PM. If I lived in such a place I would prefer to have an extra hour (or even 2) of light in the evening.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    33. Re:DST all year round for the win by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you want a bit more sun after work, you should just go to work a bit earlier.

      It's usually not done for evenings, but in the mornings so kids walking to school are safer. However, perhaps the school hours should change per season instead of all the clocks.

    34. Re:DST all year round for the win by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      There is no reason that noon has to be the time of day when the sun is highest overhead

      I think it would be super cool if the sun were highest overhead at noon, but thanks to daylight savings time, the sun's highest point seems to be about 1:30 PM most of the year where I live.

    35. Re:DST all year round for the win by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Anyone living with small children quickly discovered that the amount of light outside has nothing to do with them putting up a fuss about going to bed.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    36. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Who cares whether or not you sleep at 10 pm vs 11 pm? Or get up a 5 am vs 6 am?

      If you live in a mid-northern latitude, such as around 50-60, DST is a nightmare in the summer because it doesn't get dark until close to midnight. Anyone living with small children will quickly discover they won't want to go to bed if the sun is out. I would definitely prefer to stay on Winter time the whole year so we can get some sleep in the Summer, or have time zones defined by both longitude and latitude.

      Yup, preach!

    37. Re:DST all year round for the win by skastrik · · Score: 1

      ... There is no reason that noon has to be the time of day when the sun is highest overhead. That's just tradition for the sake of useless tradition.

      In Iceland the sun is highest around ca 13:30, always. Very nice I think.
      Unfortunately now some people want to move this closer to noon in order to make it easier for teenagers to wake up in the morning.

    38. Re:DST all year round for the win by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I'd take that bet. Most people don't really understand DST, and the Washington Post did a great article on the topic...
      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    39. Re:DST all year round for the win by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Those people would be able to get home from work before sundown, and get some actual sunshine, which for the majority isn't occurring in the morning commute anyway.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    40. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet most people would prefer to wake up with the sun more days rather than the extra sun after work.

      Heck yeah! Waking up to sunlight is so much easier than trying to fall asleep while it's still light out. And I can operate in the dark just fine in the evening. Morning darkness makes me remain sleepy.

    41. Re:DST all year round for the win by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      By the way, be sure to check the poll results at the end of the article. They don't back your claim.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    42. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that represent Washington Post readers instead of the general populous? I can't say I'm surprised seeing what I've seen from them over the past two years.

    43. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nixon tried this in the 70's, I lived during that time.

      Major problem kids were at the bus stops in the dark and there were accidents and a few deaths.
      People couldn't see them.
      Just stay on standard time and live with the skies getting dark earlier.

    44. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might just as well have 10 hours labelled A -J with say G as noon.

      Why do you think this is different in any significant way from the current system? It is all arbitrary.

    45. Re:DST all year round for the win by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Interesting, not what I would have expected.

      The author slightly is pro the DLS year round, so that maybe skews the polls, but it is not the overwhelming pro standard time year round I would have expected.

      Also, it makes me almost want to move to Alabama.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    46. Re:DST all year round for the win by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I'm s-s-so t-t-t-triggered now, you insensitive cl-cl-clod!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    47. Re:DST all year round for the win by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The extra hour of sunlight in the evening will not regulate a person's melatonin cycles the same way it does when you have exposure to sunlight shortly after waking up.

    48. Re:DST all year round for the win by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Whether you change your work schedule or a clock, what's the difference to you? Both are silly to me. The movement here isn't against clocks or work times, but rather changing ANYTHING to do with time at all. We want to stop pretending like the sun coming up earlier or going down later affects anything but plants.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    49. Re:DST all year round for the win by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It would be pointless for me to cite any such studies to you, since you appear to have already out of hand dismissed all such studies. Even if you didn't believe in seasonal mood disorder as a clinical diagnosis, however, it is impossible to discount the impact that changes to body chemistry related to improper melatonin levels and its impact on the amount of decent sleep that a person would be getting as a result can potentially have on a person's mood.

    50. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it really isn't. Changing timetables or working hours or meetings times is done all the time.

      Many stores in my town have business hours printed on a piece of paper behind their window. It's much easier to change the clock, than it is to reprint all the signs.

      If you make the change during a recession it could help create a economic stimulus. ;)

    51. Re:DST all year round for the win by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I have an uncle who moved his family there thirty years ago from Michigan. They all became rednecks. Now, I'm conservative, but they make me look like a liberal.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    52. Re:DST all year round for the win by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      It may be a cost worth paying in exchange for sunny mornings. Especially if the DLS year round crowd have their way.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    53. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...SAD is a myth, it lacks scientific evidence.

        FYI days start getting longer in January.

      Two idiotic statements by an idiot. Why does it always seem to be that how well informed a person's opinions are is inversely proportional to their desire to spew them?

    54. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prefer to wake up with the sun more days rather than the extra sun after work

      yes!

    55. Re:DST all year round for the win by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I live in Western Missouri. When I visited my aunt in Eastern Iowa, I noticed a difference in when the sun set.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    56. Re:DST all year round for the win by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      School hours should just be later, period. Studies have shown students learn better when they've had a full night's sleep.

    57. Re:DST all year round for the win by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Or you know, they can just have their event at 8 PM instead.

    58. Re:DST all year round for the win by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Yes, more daylight is good for people of all ages going to school and work. If DST goes away, it would have to be replaced with laws that tried to tell businesses when people could work... and that is never going to be popular.

    59. Re:DST all year round for the win by anegg · · Score: 1

      The clock and what defines "noon" is a made up construct that we then used to define a LOT of things.

      I respectfully disagree. The original determination of the meridian (noon) is a simple astronomical observation - when the sun is at its zenith. It is not a made up construct so much as the observation of a fact. Given that humans are basically diurnal, noting the middle of the daylight hours is useful; at that point in the day half of the time of light is over, half remains.

      The constructs came later - the creation of the hours measuring the time before and after the meridian, the establishment of the hours of "business," and finally the establishment of "DST" that forces everyone to change their previously established schedule with respect to the astronomical noon.

      there will always be a group of people that refuse to participate and they blow up the whole change for everyone else

      In other words, the function of DST is for some people (unknown percentage) to force other people (unknown percentage) to do something they don't want to do (change their active schedule with respect to astronomical noon) for a portion of the year. The questions are whether this is a minority forcing their views on the majority, or vice versa, and whether either should be able to force anyone in the first place.

      For the record, I'm in favor of 1-hour wide timezones, with "noon" in a given timezone being the average center of the daylight hours (the time shifts around slightly throughout the year) for the center of the timezone. Let people establish the schedules that they like around that fundamental clock, and don't jack people around "en masse" by jerking the clock forward and backward.

    60. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is stupid. The minutes of daylight don't change, regardless of what the hands on the clock show. Just go to work at 7 instead of at 8 or 9.
      I practically don't know people except those in public transport and banks that have fixed punch in and punch out time.

    61. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anonymously to avoid undoing moderation.

      The clock and what defines "noon" is a made up construct that we then used to define a LOT of things.

      Not to be overly pedantic, but the clock *is* based on the earth spinning around, so it's not entirely "made up". Weirdly enough, it seems the 24-hour clock was developed independently in ancient Egypt and China (though there may have been some trade allowing the idea to migrate) I think the argument could be made that, if the goal is to have a stable method of keeping time (and the only real way without machines is the positioning of astronomical bodies) then a 24 hour clock, along with a sidereal calendar, would be inevitable.

      Our time units were developed in part on the idea of the anti-prime numbers. 12, 24, and 60 have lots of factors so we can divide them up easily without using fraction. 360 degrees in a circle was chosen for a similar reason.

    62. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, timetables change all the time. Every transport company I know changes their timetable at least twice a year.

      "Many stores in your town" can survive a one-off correction. If they can't afford new signage straight away, they can handwrite the correction. Seriously, what's the lifetime of a shop sign anyway? Don't they already get changed at least every few years?

    63. Re:DST all year round for the win by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because it's easier to change the standard measure than implement a decision separately on thousands of independent entities. Mind you I'm sure you're just in the pocket of the big sign producers.

    64. Re:DST all year round for the win by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What makes your timezone so special? Timezones are nothing more than an arbitrary construct linking diverse groups to a common temporal map. We are describing a problem that extends across the entire basis of time for a given zone, so adjusting that timezone is not only the correct solution, but it's also the only feasible one and the only one which actually makes sense.

      Stop making time something it's not. It's arbitrary by location.

    65. Re:DST all year round for the win by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto, but then other people complain that their children have to go to school in the morning's darkness. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    66. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they need changing then ergo they are 'wrong'.

    67. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the message I'm getting is that the US needs more and smaller states?

    68. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Kids walking to school' is so last century. No-one does that any more.

    69. Re:DST all year round for the win by mcvos · · Score: 1

      My son does. We live very close to school, though. Other kids come by bike.

    70. Re:DST all year round for the win by houghi · · Score: 1

      And many businesses have pre-printed papers that include opening hours fr e.g. a helpdesk.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    71. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for most public transport around here:
      - there's a train every hour or half hour
      - starting at around 0500 and ending around midnigh
      in other words, changing business hours would in no way shape or form necessitate reprinting timetables you'd just be taking the 7:11 instead of the 6:11 train (or visa versa)

    72. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know politicians have been trying businesses to stagger their hours in order to reduce traffic jams for quite a while now

      only having half the businesses agree to change their hours would be a good thing, not a bad thing

    73. Re:DST all year round for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only obvious if you don't think about it.

      Perhaps people with sleep problems would prefer not having everything scheduled an hour earlier than it should be year-round?
      Perhaps children would prefer not going to school in the dark?
      Perhaps, as Russia discovered when it ran permanent DST from 2011 to 2014 (when they changed to permanent standard time https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29773559), winter mornings would be too dark?

      Yes, wouldn't it be lovely if it was light out later? But sorry, not at the expense of my morning, thanks.

    74. Re:DST all year round for the win by aybiss · · Score: 1

      You do realise that the times the sun is up change over the course of the year, right?

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    75. Re:DST all year round for the win by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Then they should go to bed at the correct time to get that amount of sleep. Moving when they get up (alone) won't fix that problem.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  4. does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it's mostly automated it's weird that people would be so upset....but sure, if it actually serves no purpose anymore then get rid of it.

    The weird thing is that this article recap doesn't mention why we're still using it, or what purpose it serves today.

    Hopefully it's not a scenario where people that don't know anything are trying to tear down something they don't understand because it annoys them

    1. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Since it's mostly automated it's weird that people would be so upset....but sure, if it actually serves no purpose anymore then get rid of it.

      The weird thing is that this article recap doesn't mention why we're still using it, or what purpose it serves today.

      Hopefully it's not a scenario where people that don't know anything are trying to tear down something they don't understand because it annoys them

      I see two excuses used for not being DST year round.
      1) Economic. Something to do with electricity usage and we're supposed to use less of it... etc... however, studies have shown the effect is actually very negligible.
      2) Children waiting at bus stops in the dark. Change school/business hours so that people don't leave in the dark.

      Switching between DST and not is hugely unpopular and it wouldn't really cause any harm to remove it.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Switching between DST and not is hugely unpopular and it wouldn't really cause any harm to remove it.

      Of course, you have to realize that people who object to moving the clock back and forth, have no experience what it is to actually go through an entire year on a fixed GMT offset. It could very well be that we decide to abandon DST, and then people realize this sucks even more.

    3. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by mcvos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Winter time is actually the standard time. Summer time is the deviation from it. You're basically moving your country from its natural timezone to the timezone east of it. (Or, if you live in western Europe, from the timezone to the east to two timezones to the east.) So while summer time all year round sounds pleasant, it's not. Winter time all year round makes more sense.

    4. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't standard time year round improve the bus stop situation?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would support getting rid of DST only if the people who whine about it promise to stop complaining. Complaining about DST causes more disruption than the actual daylight saving time change.

    6. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Indeed winter time is when noon means "Sun at highest peak".

      However, most people who want to eliminate time changes are asking for year-round DST. That's because DST is already more than 6 months of the year and business opening and closing is more based on DST than it is "winter time". Yes, that is effectively moving "a time zone to the East" but unfortunately businesses all start an hour earlier than they historically did. Who here starts work at "9am"? When did your office last start at 9am? 8am has become the standard- DST is probably to blame for that. We've already adjusted all our clocks to be "one time zone to the East," at least in the US, because of DST. It would be an easier transition to go to DST being the standard than it would be to go back to winter time.

      If we go back to Winter Time businesses won't start closing at 4 by standard, they will stay at 5 and people want that extra hour of sun in the evening. It's easier to change time zone than it is to change ingrained standard work-hours.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      8 am?! I'm still trying to get the kids to school at that time. I start work at 9:30.

      But I know there are people who want to start earlier. My wife gets out of bed before 7 in order to beat the traffic, and I've had colleagues who start at 8 or 7 even.

      And that's my point really: if you need to start early, then start early. If you want to start late, then start late. Don't try to force one view on everybody by messing with what time means.

    8. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Don't try to force one view on everybody by messing with what time means.

      Either we force one view on everybody, or we all pick our own.

      If you don't like the first, nobody's stopping you from setting your personal clocks to your own preferred offset.

    9. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Children have been waiting at bus stops in the dark for decades. That's no excuse to make a change. What's great about it is that those same children get home while it's actually still light out, and they can get some outside playtime before the streetlights come on.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    10. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switching between DST and not is hugely unpopular and it wouldn't really cause any harm to remove it.

      Of course, you have to realize that people who object to moving the clock back and forth, have no experience what it is to actually go through an entire year on a fixed GMT offset. It could very well be that we decide to abandon DST, and then people realize this sucks even more.

      Ask any adult who grew up in Indiana or Arizona and left for other states which adopted DST. They'll tell you that having one GMT offset the year-round is not only easier and preferred, but there are other unforeseen benefits, like not really needing a watch if the sun is out. Shadows can tell you a general time of day, especially noon.

    11. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by slinches · · Score: 1

      I live in Phoenix, AZ and I'm against DST. It's not helpful and even if we were to change the clock, it should be in the opposite direction. Since there's no universally better time system, let's just stick with centering days close to solar noon and let people adjust their work schedules as they wish rather than mandate it via time changes.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    12. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have spent most of my life living in areas that have observed DST.

      I have also spent around 25% of my life living in an area with a fixed GMT offset.

      I much prefer the fixed offset.

    13. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Indeed winter time is when noon means "Sun at highest peak".

      Horseshit dependent only only one specific location in each timezone and not at all relevant for large portions of the population.

    14. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So while summer time all year round sounds pleasant, it's not.

      Why not? None of your post so far backs up this statement. What is your definition of pleasant? It sure as heck isn't ensuring that the sun is at it's highest point at 1200. Pretty much no one can give a shit about that, other than owners of sundial ornaments.

    15. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Natural timezone? There is no single natural timezone for a given location. The time at which the sun is highest in the sky changes depending on the season.

      Therefore it makes sense to let each location make up their own timezone, within reasonable limits of course, and stick to it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    16. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Summer time sounds more pleasant than winter time because we associate summer with warm, pleasant weather, and summertime with these long summer evenings. Winter is cold and harsh and winter time means it gets dark early.

      But changing winter time to summer time is not going to make our winter days any longer. It just means the son won't be up until 9:45 (where I live at least). That is going to mess with our biological clocks. However arbitrary people think timezones are, our bodies have evolved to respond to the cycle of sunlight. Winter mornings are hard enough as it is. Keeping it dark for an hour longer is really not going to make them easier.

    17. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switching between DST and not is hugely unpopular and it wouldn't really cause any harm to remove it.

      Of course, you have to realize that people who object to moving the clock back and forth, have no experience what it is to actually go through an entire year on a fixed GMT offset. It could very well be that we decide to abandon DST, and then people realize this sucks even more.

      Um, no? Growing up in Indiana, which jumped on the DST bandwagon fairly recently, I can tell you without any doubt that the time change absolutely sucks. Everyone hates it. I've never heard from a single person who likes it.

    18. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But changing winter time to summer time is not going to make our winter days any longer.

      If you think this arguement has anything to do with changing the length of day then you've most fundamentally missed the point.

      the son won't be up until 9:45 (where I live at least).

      Great, so what you're saying is sunset won't be until a full hour later in the evening allowing you more daylight after work. That sounds very plesant.

      That is going to mess with our biological clocks.

      You're not a farmer, you don't get up at the crack of dawn and go to bed at sunset, and if you did you wouldn't be a farmer anyway. Literally no one in the world sets their awake / sleep time by the sun anymore, and if this is an issue for your may I recommend a set of curtains and a decent sunrise alarmclock.

      However arbitrary people think timezones are, our bodies have evolved to respond to the cycle of sunlight

      No. Your bodies have evolved well beyond that since the invention of the candle. Your biological clock actually works just fine in complete darkness or in full on daylight as well though studies have shown that it actually runs slightly slower than the average day consistently for all people and so when deprived of external stimulous after about 2 weeks you're clock is out by a couple of hours. Clocks fix that quite easily. Humans are incredibly adaptable to our environments. We live fine in areas of the world where the sun doesn't set or doesn't rise for half the year. I drive to work in pitch black and home in pitch black. In Summer I will happily sit and watch the sunset at 11:30pm if I feel like staying up late, otherwise there's no problem going to bed while the sun is still up either.

      Winter mornings are hard enough as it is.

      Get a heater. The only thing that makes winter mornings hard is the dread of cold outside the bed. But if you can't (and you legitimately might not be able to) cope with your sleep patterns not regulated by light, the fix is trivial. There's literally countless product on the market to help you.

    19. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I think you miss my point. I strongly suspect that many people, probably not in this discussion, but very likely in that EU poll, prefer summertime because of the association they have with summertime. But that's not going to work in winter.

      I'm not sure why you think an hour of daylight after work is more valuable than an hour of daylight before work. I strongly prefer it being light when I get out of bed, and certainly by the time I go out the door. It doesn't have to be light when I go to bed or have dinner or anything like that. It being dark when I get leave work is not great, but some darkness is unavoidable in winter, and I prefer it being light when I need to become active over it being light when it's time to stop.

      And no, our biological clock has not evolved since the invention of the candle. We have become better at fooling our biological clock with the invention of the candle, but that's not the same thing. Daylight still matters. Otherwise, why would we even be having this discussion?

      But our biological clock being slightly slower than a real day, also means that daylight in the morning is more important than in the evening; that's when our clock resets. We have no problem dealing with darkness at the end of our day. See how eagerly people go to bed far past dusk, or even in the middle of the night. But most people do not like getting up before the crack of dawn. Artificial light could have meant we use more of our early morning, but we don't. Instead, we use more of our evening. We don't care so much about living in darkness at the end of the day, but we don't like darkness at the start of the day when we need to get active. And that's also the thing that makes winter mornings so hard: getting out of bed while it's still dark.

    20. Re:does it still serve a purpose in those areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but very likely in that EU poll

      90% of the respondents from that EU poll were from one country and affiliated with one political party which actually gave a shit enough to advertise it. As a member of the EU, the first I heard of this poll was the Slashdot story covering the results. The poll is worthless.

      I'm not sure why you think an hour of daylight after work is more valuable than an hour of daylight before work.

      The hour of daylight before work is almost universally restricted some way. Either indirectly with the need to spend part of that hour getting ready for work (e.g. showing after a football game), socially (e.g. my boss wouldn't think highly of drinking pints in the beer garden, even if it were open), or directly such as not actually being allowed to mow the lawn or grind, cut, build, trim hedges or whatnot due to legal restrictions. And that's before you take into account any socialising as well with the predominant social activity period being after work both in terms of convenience for people as well as possibilities provided by opening hours.

      It doesn't have to be light when I go to bed or have dinner or anything like that.

      Indeed it doesn't which builds into my point. There are activities you can only do when it's light and that period doesn't work well before work as a lot of cleanup from said activities can be done after dark. On the flip side there is no reason why it needs to be light when you wake up to go to work, that's just personal preference.

      And no, our biological clock has not evolved since the invention of the candle. We have become better at fooling our biological clock with the invention of the candle, but that's not the same thing.

      For all intents and purposes it is.

      Daylight still matters. Otherwise, why would we even be having this discussion?

      Because I think you're wrong. If we both agreed on this then we wouldn't be having this discussion.

      But our biological clock being slightly slower than a real day, also means that daylight in the morning is more important than in the evening; that's when our clock resets.

      Our clock does not reset due to daylight, our clock resets due to our brain keeping it in check, you can do that with a wrist watch, and given that a lightbulb is enough to actually affect our bodies if we were at all dependent on the sun only to keep our bodies in check we would be absolutely screwed as a species.

      And that's also the thing that makes winter mornings so hard: getting out of bed while it's still dark.

      Turn on your bedroom light. Seriously who has a bedroom that lets sunlight in anyway. Holy crap I'd be up at 5am and awake until midnight if that were the case, and would cease functioning.

      Technology has solved all your problems I highly recommend solving them rather than expecting the rest of society to accommodate you.

  5. Dangerous Time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Statistically, two of the most dangerous times of year come the week after each of the time changes as people's body-clocks don't match up with the time of day. There are an increase in accidents and deaths during this time.

    I understand that there are concerns for children standing in the dark waiting for buses. Perhaps we need to make daylight savings time the standard time year round (or just make schools start an hour later and the suggested work day start an hour later).

    Let's stop the charade and just set time to a static time year round.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Dangerous Time by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      I understand that there are concerns for children standing in the dark waiting for buses. Perhaps we need to make daylight savings time the standard time year round (or just make schools start an hour later and the suggested work day start an hour later).

      You've got it the wrong way around. DST in winter would mean the sun would come up around 9:30. If you want school to start later, stick to winter time i.o. DST.

    2. Re:Dangerous Time by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      The problem is parents don't want to arrange for child care before AND after school. So school has to start early so kids can be sent there before the work day begins. Therefore you can't make school later. By the way a lot of city dwellers dismiss the whole bus stop danger thing but out in country its a very problem. Several children in my area have been injured this year already by vehicles while waiting out the bus stop.

      The problem is in unlit places drivers tend to hug the outside white line on the roads because that is the one they can see. Anyone standing to near the edge can get hit; if they are not wearing reflective or at least light colored clothing. Especially if they have head lights in the face from on coming traffic in the other direction. A little more day light really does have a safety impact!

      So DST really does work. Its also much much easier for people to wake up with the sun. Past studies have shown getting up before dawn has negative cardiac impacts. I think rather than getting rid of DST we should do it more. Lets do it twice. Lets fallback once at the start of October and again in December. Lets spring forward twice as well once in march and again in may. That will actually give everyone light in the morning.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:Dangerous Time by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Past studies have shown getting up before dawn has negative cardiac impacts

      The increase on one side is offset by the decrease on the other end. This is from the American Academy of Cardiology...

      Data from the largest study of its kind in the U.S. reveal a 25 percent jump in the number of heart attacks occurring the Monday after we “spring forward” compared to other Mondays during the year – a trend that remained even after accounting for seasonal variations in these events. But the study showed the opposite effect is also true. Researchers found a 21 percent drop in the number of heart attacks on the Tuesday after returning to standard time in the fall when we gain an hour back.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re: Dangerous Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thatâ(TM)s specifically around the dst change, the GP was I think writing more generally about getting up before dawn. To that end the data you cited supports his argument when fall back the waking hour is lighter and there are fewer cardiac cases

    5. Re:Dangerous Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but your reasoning sucks. Those problems aren't caused by lack of daylight; they're caused by stupid people doing stupid things. Fix the actual problem.

    6. Re:Dangerous Time by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Statistically, two of the most dangerous times of year come the week after each of the time changes as people's body-clocks don't match up with the time of day.

      Err no, literally the body clock has nothing to do with it and it's down to stress related issues due to clocks not matching up. This directly leads to heart attacks and accidents due to rush related mistakes.

      I understand that there are concerns for children standing in the dark waiting for buses.

      I don't. I may have in the odd days in the 1800s when the union of lantern lighters took a strike day but Nicholas Tesla fixed that problem for us.

    7. Re:Dangerous Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Statistically, two of the most dangerous times of year come the week after each of the time changes as people's body-clocks don't match up with the time of day. There are an increase in accidents and deaths during this time."

      Unsubstantiated.

  6. Stop the madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These DST threads are always super popular, but no one has anything original to say. It's the same complaints, the same arguments, the same proposed solutions, twice a year, year after year after year. Just write your Congressman already!

  7. Please by theM_xl · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's just all switch to UTC and be done with the current mess already.

    Or the 40K Imperial clock, that might be amusing...

    1. Re:Please by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Because that's even MORE confusing and people still need to have time zones to figure out when common times are. Lunch is usually around noon, but if you travel somewhere, now lunch might be at 3AM. Businesses would have to have shifting hours based on their location which they would still use time zones for, even if all the times were in UTC

    2. Re:Please by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the date would change during the middle of the day.

    3. Re:Please by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      We already had that in our history. After that, they changed the day-change to midnight. A religious problem arose from that: on which of the two days was Christ born? That is why we have two Christmas days (and two Easter days).

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    4. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an underrated aspect of the problem, IMO... both individuals and businesses keep all sorts of records organized by day because that's the most natural unit of planning. If you thought getting folks to convert to metric was hard, getting them to convert to UTC would be an unholy muck.

    5. Re:Please by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      For me, that would work okay. The date would change at 6PM my time, right when I was on my way home from work.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lunch is usually around noon, but if you travel somewhere, now lunch might be at 3AM.

      It doesn't matter, because in the grim darkness of the far future, it's always lunchtime somewhere.

    7. Re:Please by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    8. Re:Please by Kelerei · · Score: 0

      Let's just all switch to UTC and be done with the current mess already.

      So You Want To Abolish Time Zones

      To summarize (for people without the inclination to read the whole thing):

      Abolishing time zones brings many benefits, I hope. It also:

      • causes the question "What time is it there?" to be useless/unanswerable
      • necessitates significant changes to the way in which normal people talk about time
      • convolutes timetables, where present
      • means "days" are no longer the same as "days"
      • complicates both secular and religious law
      • is a staggering inconvenience for a minimum of five billion people
      • makes it near-impossible to reason about time in other parts of the world
      • does not mean everybody gets up at the same time, goes to work at the same time, or goes to bed at the same time
      • is not simpler.

      As long as humans live in more than one part of the world, solar time is always going to be subjective. Abolishing time zones only exacerbates this problem.

  8. Germany by multi+io · · Score: 1

    The largest share of participants came from one country -- Germany -- where the time switch has been a somewhat odd front-page topic for years.

    Which makes sense considering they're the ones who came up with the whole thing.

  9. Daylight Saving Time is Super Unpopular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With millennials. FIFY

    Applying logic to reasoning is not their strong point.

    1. Re:Daylight Saving Time is Super Unpopular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like there's a high probability that you're either a millenial yourself, or god forbid, one of those post-millenials... if you're somehow older than those very general terms, you probably need to do some more growing up.

  10. Fuck That! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's noon when the sun crosses the local meridian. Solar noon is the only thing that matters or makes any sense for time keeping.

    You "extra hour of daylight" horseshit is achieved by changing the start and end time of your workday, not fucking up ALL time keeping. Talk to your employer, change jobs, move, don;t be poor, do whatever you need to do for you. But fuck right off with imposing your ridiculous schedule on the planet.

    Fuck daylight savings. Fuck all the "ingenious ideas". Solar noon is all that matters.

    1. Re:Fuck That! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Solar noon is all that matters? So it's a different time 20 miles west of me? That doesn't sound the least bit chaotic and useless? I set my DVR to record, but it's 13 minutes later over at the broadcast tower...

    2. Re:Fuck That! by aybiss · · Score: 1

      ^^ Wait until you find out that even within your own country there are different timezones, let alone other countries with even more timezones and an international date line and everything.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  11. News Flash by tsqr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daylight Saving Time does not "confound the world". It does, however, provide endless fodder for those who wake up every day looking for something about which to be outraged.

    1. Re:News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you haven't explained why DST is so valuable. Let me do it for you:

      1. You're nostalgic about it
      2. You're resistant to change

      Either one of those reasons is more than enough justification to keep DST permanently, and perhaps even rearrange the deck chairs every 5 years like George W. did. It made perfect sense to him.

    2. Re:News Flash by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      You say that, but I've been getting meeting invitations all week from people at my company's international locations for an hour before I'll actually be at work thanks to DST.

    3. Re:News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the guy who doesn't schedule any international meetings or deal with screwed-up Outlook calendars.

    4. Re:News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that, but I've been getting meeting invitations all week from people at my company's international locations for an hour before I'll actually be at work thanks to programmers completely ignoring proper date and time handling.

      FTFY.

      Regardless of DST, you still have timezones to manage, and governments will still change their timezone association from time to time. Look at what Europe's about to do - sure, they're going to "kill off DST", but they're also going to have a few timezone changes to deal with as well.

      Think of it instead as biannual software testing.

    5. Re:News Flash by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Well, that and the sharp spike in heart attacks and traffic accidents positively correlated with DST shifts.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    6. Re:News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, you're a useless faggot who thinks they're better than everyone?

      How's that working out for you?

  12. Ditch Standard Time by Discgolferusa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forget ditching DST, get rid of standard time. Who cares if i go to work in the dark, I want to come home to enjoy some sunlight! During standard time in the winter I not only get the joy of coming to work in the dark, but getting home in the dark as well, because it's sunset by the time I leave.

    I'd love to have an hour of daylight to get stuff done outside when i get home and not have to wait for the weekend!

    1. Re:Ditch Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing stopping you from starting your workday earlier to accomplish your goal. You don't need to force your preference on everyone else.

    2. Re:Ditch Standard Time by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah nothing stopping me besides the company I work for...

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Ditch Standard Time by bjdevil66 · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to ditch your kids at the school bus pickup in the dark before sunrise before you head off to work in the dark. No worries there.

    4. Re:Ditch Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your company does not pay you enough to live the lifestyle you want, do you petition the rest of the world to lower their prices for things? No, you take it up with the company.

    5. Re:Ditch Standard Time by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If that worries you then you're overly worried. In fact since you're actually taking them, you're clearly a helicopter parent who needs to give them a break. They don't need you to "ditch" them. Kids have been going to the bus stop in the dark since before you and I (and I'm 60) were born. I walked six city blocks to school in Detroit for elementary school in the winter darkness...we did have "safety patrol" (kids, not adults) helping us cross but other than that, nada. As a teen, I had about a half mile walk to the bus stop in the suburbs, where we waited in the dark. Other than watching out for cars, there was nothing to be concerned with. Learn to "free range parent". Your kids will turn out much better for it.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    6. Re:Ditch Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But kids will be going to school in the dark and have a higher chance of getting hit.
      Suck it up and accept you'r going home in the dark.

    7. Re:Ditch Standard Time by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I'm not a helicopter parent at all, but I've read in past DST articles (that appear twice a year) about common fears about all-day DST - and that was one of them.

      The only facts out there on DST are:

      * People actually die a little more when DST kicks in due to sleep loss.
      * Farmers don't care about DST at all (an old wives' tale).

      The general patterns of opinion on DST are:

      People have more positive opinions about DST depending on how far north on the planet they live. Northern areas appreciate the better usage of the (more expansive) early morning daylight. Southern areas of the USA generally don't care about DST and wish it would go away because it doesn't really help anything (or in hotter climes like AZ, where they hate it). It'd probably make more sense to have DST run more along the Missouri Compromise of 1820 line than be done everywhere.

      Since D.C. is generally further north and full of Americans from the northeast, we can forget about the USA killing DST as a nation. It'll probably have to be a state-by-state effort.

    8. Re:Ditch Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say ditch both and split the difference. Shift the time by 30 minutes once, done and done.

    9. Re:Ditch Standard Time by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      There's one fact that you left out. People die a little less when DST ends, and it offsets the other end. I posted a snippet of that factoid from the American Cardiac Association elsewhere here.

      One other factoid is that it's not only latitude that matters. For example, Maine and Michigan are in the same timezone, and yet Michigan's sunrise is about an hour later. There's a nice Washington Post article (I also linked that elsewhere here) on the topic, and including a poll of about 8000 people on what we should do.

      Yes, where you live makes a big difference, and I'm all for it going state by state.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    10. Re:Ditch Standard Time by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      I was talking flex time not wages.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    11. Re:Ditch Standard Time by timholman · · Score: 1

      Forget ditching DST, get rid of standard time. Who cares if i go to work in the dark, I want to come home to enjoy some sunlight! During standard time in the winter I not only get the joy of coming to work in the dark, but getting home in the dark as well, because it's sunset by the time I leave.

      I'd love to have an hour of daylight to get stuff done outside when i get home and not have to wait for the weekend!

      And I am exactly the opposite. I want the extra hour of daylight in the morning, so I can exercise, walk the dogs, and get chores done before going to work.

      DST just robs Peter to pay Paul. For every person who wants more daylight in the evening, I expect you'll find another who wants it in the morning.

      I vote to keep the clocks at standard time, and adjust business hours to accommodate the longer summer days. Or at the very least, to adjust DST so that it starts in May, and ends in September, and actually does cover the summer months. The current insanity of starting in March and ending in November guarantees that we all spend at least two months each year stumbling around in the dark during the morning hours, because some idiots in Congress decided to "do something".

    12. Re:Ditch Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that without fiddling with the clock. If suddenly the clocked stopped working you would not wake up or go to bed at all?

    13. Re:Ditch Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During standard time in the winter I not only get the joy of coming to work in the dark, but getting home in the dark as well, because it's sunset by the time I leave.

      That has nothing to do with daylight vs. standard time and everything to do with the fact it is winter.

    14. Re:Ditch Standard Time by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. But then other people complain that their children have to go to school in the morning's darkness. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  13. Biological clocks by Comboman · · Score: 1

    It's not tradition for the sake of tradition, it's a clumsy attempt to get our mechanical clocks to align more closely with our biological clocks. Without any clocks, people naturally synchronize their activity to the sun, waking earlier in the summer and sleeping earlier (and longer) in the winter.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  14. UTC by Danathar · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I know this will never happen (It's about as likely as adopting Stardates...) but UTC for everybody would solve the problem. Fact of the matter is, people do things at different times (like eat Breakfast) at different times (actual time, not clock time) around the world. The clock time should reflect that. I'm a bit biased because I deal with international video conferences and UTC would make things SO MUCH EASIER.

    1. Re:UTC by Ksevio · · Score: 2

      It would solve some problems but cause many others since time zones would still be needed. The post office might close at 5PM (for example), but now that's going to be 11PM or 2AM - that closing time would be based on time zones, so now everyone is using time zones, but there's not even an indicator where they are.

      Better solution is to just schedule things like calls using UTC

    2. Re:UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will that really fly in a place where Tuesday becomes Wednesday in the middle of the afternoon? What would "tomorrow" mean in such a context?

    3. Re:UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it won't happen. What a stupid and confounding suggestion.

      Just get rid of the DST shift. Timezones are fine.

    4. Re:UTC by McWilde · · Score: 1

      Also ditch AM and PM! The day has 24 hours, why start over after 12?

      --
      Maybe
    5. Re:UTC by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Need bigger clocks :/

    6. Re:UTC by Dan+East · · Score: 2

      This creates far, far more problems then is solves. Wherever you go, you have to determine the geographic time frame of reference. Morning is.... 1100 hours and nightfall is 2300 hours. Without time zones, who determines the frame of reference for that specific location? I open a business, and so I check the longitude and decide that for where I am, I should open at 0421 hours. Do I round that down? Am I in some region where we can all coordinate and agree on a time frame of reference? Let's call it a "time zone" and everyone in that zone can use the same frame of reference, rounded to the nearest hour, so we can all be on the same page. Oh, whoops, we're right back where we started, but even more convoluted.

      Finally, what does everyone using UTC have to do with daylight savings time anyway?

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    7. Re:UTC by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      actually there are plenty of cultural and latitude based things that determine when a day starts, your use of calculation is laughable and so typically slashdot autist. I'd suggest you study local similar business instead about the matter.

    8. Re:UTC by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Why? My iWatch shows 24 hour times fine. :)

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:UTC by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      My watch shows 24h but also analog dial that only shows 12h

  15. Good luck with that by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why change the clock? Why not just change business hours if it's going to be year round?

    Which do you think is easier? Mandating a clock change for everyone or convincing every business to simultaneously change their operating hours?

    I suggest the former is the only practical solution.

    1. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which do you think is easier? Mandating a clock change for everyone or convincing every business to simultaneously change their operating hours?

      Clearly convincing most business to change their operating hours would be far simpler. It's nowhere near as hard as you make it out to be, and is far less convoluted than DST (which involves getting businesses to change their hours every year, twice).

      I suggest the former is the only practical solution.

      "Only"? That's a strange choice of words.

    2. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which do you think is easier? Mandating a clock change for everyone or convincing every business to simultaneously change their operating hours?

      I suggest the former is the only practical solution.

      Why? If changing is such a good idea then why wouldn't everyone want to do it? If so many businesses each have to be convinced then maybe it doesn't have such universal support after all.
       

    3. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why change the clock? Why not just change business hours if it's going to be year round?

      Which do you think is easier? Mandating a clock change for everyone or convincing every business to simultaneously change their operating hours?

      I suggest the former is the only practical solution.

      Easiest is to not require or expect all businesses to keep the same hours. Happens here plenty, and it's not a problem.

    4. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      businesses already collectively change their business hours twice a year
      they could just keep doing that without changing the clock to match

      besides traffic-wise it would actually be a win if half the businesses said we'll change our hours in winter and half didn't, as it would drastically reduce traffic jams

  16. Some traditions are easier to change by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Strictly speaking, our current work hours are tradition for the sake of useless tradition.

    Quite true but getting that to change will be nigh impossible in any sort of organized fashion. Much easier to just change the clock for everyone. Defining noon as the time of day when the sun is highest overhead is an equally arbitrary and useless tradition but FAR easier to change.

  17. Arbitrary definitions by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It's noon when the sun crosses the local meridian. Solar noon is the only thing that matters or makes any sense for time keeping.

    That is an arbitrary definition of noon. You could just as validly define 1pm or 3pm to be the time when the sun is at the highest point in the sky. Saying it has to be exactly at noon is just pointless tradition. The definition of the fundamental unit of time (the second) has zero relationship to the location of the sun in the sky. 1 second is defined to be exactly 9,192,631,770 cycles of a caesium atomic clock.

    1. Re:Arbitrary definitions by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That is an arbitrary definition of noon.

      He wrote solar noon. It's the exact and only definition of that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Arbitrary definitions by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Not really arbitrary. 12:00am/pm is the final hour after which the clock "resets", and then you start back at 1 again.
      12 signifies both noon, AKA Midday, halfway through the Earth's spin on the day side, as well as Midnight, exactly the middle of the night (so long as you're using standard time), the point at which you're halfway through the spin on the night side of the Earth.
      The clock is logically tied to the solar day.
      You could change it... but then it really would be arbitrary.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:Arbitrary definitions by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      I propose to choose 3:14 pm because pie is the highpoint of the day!

    4. Re:Arbitrary definitions by jklein · · Score: 1

      The entire timekeeping system for the world is based on the definition of 12:00:00 GMT (aka Zulu, aka UTC) as the time when the sun is directly overhead at the Greenwich Observatory in Greenwich, England. Hence Greenwich Mean Time. Arbitrary? Perhaps. But recognized by every standards body on the planet. History, my friend.

    5. Re:Arbitrary definitions by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      No, you start at 0:00 at midnight. That's the only reset.

    6. Re:Arbitrary definitions by anegg · · Score: 1

      That is an arbitrary definition of noon.

      Respectfully, no, the definition isn't arbitrary. The thing that is being noted is the fact that the sun is at its zenith. The fact that it became called "noon" is just a label. No one could have noted "the point when the sun is 1 hour (pm) or 3 hours (pm) past its zenith until the concept of hours existed, and even in that definition the reference is still being made to the sun at its zenith.

      So instead of "noon" the zenith could be called "batzamyon" (the arbitrary label). We could have then developed a 20 hour day, with hour 10 being at batzamyon. And then businesses could have started opening at 6 2/3 (with 5/6 of an hour for lunch at 10 (batzamyon)) and closing at 14 1/6. Even with all that, we would eventually have yahoos would would come along and say "Hey, I would like it to be light longer after I get off work at 14 1/6. So let's arbitrarily shift the time that we observe batzamyon 1 hour earlier with respect to the actual batzamyon (but let's only do it for part of the year - the part when it gets naturally lighter after work anyway, because its not getting lighter fast enough for us).

      So the division of time around the period of the revolution of the earth is arbitrary (hours/minutes/seconds), and what we call the time when the sun is at its zenith is arbitrary, but the fact that we can easily observe the point at which the sun as at its maximum height in the sky for a given day is not arbitrary.

    7. Re:Arbitrary definitions by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      No, 4:20 is the high point, and 12:00 is the zenith. Maybe 3:14 can be the apple of your eye of your pie o'clock?

  18. Set the time for the lives we actually lead by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It's not tradition for the sake of tradition, it's a clumsy attempt to get our mechanical clocks to align more closely with our biological clocks.

    At this point in time it very much is tradition for the sake of tradition. Since most people's daily activities have shifted towards later in the day it makes sense to change our time keeping to match that with the greatest utility.

    Without any clocks, people naturally synchronize their activity to the sun, waking earlier in the summer and sleeping earlier (and longer) in the winter.

    So what? We have clocks and are always going to have clocks so how about we set the time of day to have the most utility for the lives we actually lead?

    1. Re:Set the time for the lives we actually lead by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Since most people's daily activities have shifted towards later in the day ...

      Um, evidence of that? Clearly younger people tend to sleep in, and shift to nightlife, but that changes for the majority over 30. With less melatonin, many older adults feel sleepy in the early evening and wake up in the early morning

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  19. California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a ballot measure tomorrow to put it under state control. I don't think it technically gets rid of it yet though. The description on the ballot is clear as manure.

    1. Re:California by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      It has always been under state control. The only federal mandate is that if you change, you change on the same dates as the rest of the county, and that the entire state changes at once.

  20. EU is wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trouble with ditching the daylight savings concept is that EU's countries would benefit from different timezones. Poland and the Baltic states should stick to the winter time, while anyone west of Germany would benefit from the summer time.

  21. fuck "summertime" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    standard time should be the fucking time!

  22. LMGTFY: What is Winter Sunlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.

  23. Something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is Winter Sunlight?

  24. Move central Europe to the wrong TZ? by Kohlrabi82 · · Score: 1

    So, the suggestion to use "summertime" all the time basically moves (Central) Europe into the East European timezone (UTC+2). Why? Why not leave it in its proper timezone (UTC+1)? Because the proles think "eternal summertime" means "eternal summer"?

  25. Gawker style headlines on Slashdot are unpopular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please ditch them.

  26. fuck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm awake, I guess I'm going to work an hour early.

  27. Let's get rid of time zones while we're at it. by William-Ely · · Score: 0

    I think we should all use GMT. Think about all the electrons spent converting GMT to local time.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  28. I like daylight savings time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that I'm going against the grain here, but LIKE daylight savings time. As it is in late August we start to run out of daylight for my son's little league baseball team and have to call games because of darkness. Without daylight savings time, they'd have one less hour to play ball and would have to start at 4:30, when the coaches and many parents are still at work.

    For those who say that we should make DST year round, then my kids would have to walk to school in the dark in the dead of winter. No thanks.

    DST works for me.

  29. Obligatory reference by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1
  30. Compromise by Zorro · · Score: 2

    OK, 30 Minutes of DST all year and be done with it!

  31. Popularity isn't the issue by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    How unpopular it is, is irrelevant. There are tons of things that are unpopular but still necessary, like taxes (Sorry US, but it's true).

    The real question is whether there is a benefit to doing it. I have yet to read about one single actual tangible benefit to it. And no, the perception that you have "more daylight" doesn't count, because it's not true.

    Meanwhile, the negatives are VERY large: Increased number of accidents due to fatigue. Health problems such as heart attacks caused by the shifts. Etc.

    The whole concept of DST is idiotic, based on nothing resembling good reasoning, and should be eliminated.

    1. Re:Popularity isn't the issue by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      popularity not irrelevant when you're talking about something that requires the action of politicians. Your *reasons* are irrelevant, only popularity or lack of it matters.

    2. Re:Popularity isn't the issue by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      You're right. I keep forgetting that we now live in a post-truth world. :\

  32. Noon has no relationship to the number 12 by sjbe · · Score: 1

    He wrote solar noon. It's the exact and only definition of that.

    Solar noon has ZERO relationship to the number 12 on our clocks. We can define noon to correspond to whatever number on our clock we want it to be. For part of the year we move it to be a different number than 12 because it's practical to do so.

    1. Re:Noon has no relationship to the number 12 by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Solar noon has ZERO relationship to the number 12 on our clocks.

      Zero relationship, except for the fact that for most people on earth, they are reasonably close together.

    2. Re:Noon has no relationship to the number 12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar noon has ZERO relationship to the number 12 on our clocks.

      Right, not any more, but prior to trains needing synchronized clocks, solar noon was 12 noon everywhere.

      Standard time in time zones was instituted in the U.S. and Canada by the railroads on November 18, 1883. Prior to that, time of day was a local matter, and most cities and towns used some form of local solar time, maintained by a well-known clock (on a church steeple, for example, or in a jeweler's window).

      That's a pretty strong relationship between 12 and noon.

  33. UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Europe is going to abandon it, the UK will need to implement summer time, double summer time, GMT and winter time, just to make things more difficult.

  34. GODDAMNED DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I EVER meet Ben Fucking Franklin,
    I WILL KICK HIS ASS!

  35. Are You Really That Ignorant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The definition of the fundamental unit of time (the second) has zero relationship to the location of the sun in the sky

    This is one of the most ignorant and sad statements I think I've read on the internet in the past year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second The second is a division of the rotation of the Earth. The rotation of the Earth was discovered and is marked by the position of the Sun. Caesium is a late means of very precisely measuring the length and divisions of a second. But, it ALL starts with the position of the Sun.

    Since the dawn of man, seconds, clocks, noon... have been and continue to be based on the position of the Sun in the sky.

  36. EU Says: Millions agree with us...honestly by nagora · · Score: 1

    Well, did they actually ask them? I don't think so. Of course, being the EU, if they did ask people and got the answer they didn't want then they'd just keep asking them until they gave up and agreed so that they could get on with their lives.

    I'm all for scrapping summertime, not keeping it permanently.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:EU Says: Millions agree with us...honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they did ask. Actually, they made an online poll to ask people.
      I am all for keeping summertime permanently, and I am not from Germany.

    2. Re:EU Says: Millions agree with us...honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, did they actually ask them? I don't think so.

      Juncker was referring, in part, to an online poll conducted by the E.U., which found that changing clocks is tremendously unpopular.

  37. The world is what we make it by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Just think, willy-nilly, we change clocks back or forward a whole hour, and we don't even do this world-wide. If we can do this - change time itself, something that has such a heavy importance in every society - couldn't we change any societal norm at the drop of a hat?

    But, careful with that ax Eugene, once something's set into society, it's hard to change it, regardless how ridiculous it is.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  38. Origin of DST by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Originally, DST was politically conceived to address two anomalies.

    1) Duh, Daylight was very short during standard working hours, more daylight more productivity.
    2) Depression triggers - Change was good; more sunlight more vitamin D less moods swing

    Half a century its social media fodder for change, albeit back to no-change.

    1. Re:Origin of DST by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      with last weekends change I'll be going home from work in the dark which is depressing. shoulda stayed on the DST all year....

  39. But all the "END IT!" claims want to keep it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They merely want to end the CHANGE. They fucking WANT to keep DST. Just never change from DST.

  40. Except it would not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Switching to permanent DST would help the most people enjoy evening daylight."
    Nope. Most people won't be helped by that. 50N is the average population belt. At that lat, DST doesn't help in winter.
    And if it is THAT important to the majority of people, since earlier in the thread it was claimed that businesses have to do the core hours people want, then most people will be
    1) Working just as usual, so no saved evenings for anyone
    2) Can just as easily demand that the business change core hours from the moronic 9-5 to the noon-centric 8-4, meaning that you get home PRECISELY THE SAME TIME AS PERMA-DST. Fucking idiot.

  41. But you'd still have a light evening in winter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck is it only the summer that you need the evenings for? And that isn't increased by DST anyway.

    Idiot.

  42. They've been in the dark for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the way a lot of city dwellers dismiss the whole bus stop danger thing but out in country its a very problem.

    People out in the country have been in the dark for generations, mostly by choice. Just look at all the churches, and how blindly they vote.

    What difference does a little darkness around the bus stop in the morning really make, given that their eyes are tightly closed no matter how much illumination is (shed? wasted?) on them?

    DST forever, ban ST!

  43. Nobody stopped you getting up early. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda the point. saying that he can ignore your imposition isn't anything more than a goalpost shift. The issue isn't whether the rules can be ignored (you can right now, so why the fuck are you complaining about when you have to get up in the dark? Just ignore the rule! Get up!), it's about changing the rules to fit you and if YOUR desires aren't ours, we can just ignore the rules.

    Selfish fuckwits like you don't know or care what you're saying, all you want to know is if you're getting your own way.

  44. Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not very objective reporting, is it?

    I quite like DST. Without it here in the summer sunrise is 4:20 am, and sunset at 9 pm. That means more light when I'm asleep. And in winter, if dst was year round, sunrise would be 9:50.

    So please keep the two clock changes per year. It's really worth it in so many locations.

  45. Only have to get them to agree once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we've made them agree to the multitudes of changes to the working hours that legislation has made or the changes removing laws has driven.

    So, yeah, the insistence that businesses should wag the entire population without whom they have neither workers nor customers, is complete bollocks.

    Only question is why the fuck you morons insist on repeating it, despite this clear indication of its lack of coherent thought?

  46. No DST in Hawaii by surfcow · · Score: 1

    Also no spike in traffic accidents, heart attacks, etc.

    In a post-agricultural society, all that stuff is optional and unnecessary.

    Why do people still do it then? Tradition.

  47. slow news day by RavenManiac · · Score: 1

    Why not get rid of the International Date Line? That's more confusing than DST.

    When I flew from Sydney to Papeete, I arrived the day before I left, i.e., departed 8:30 p.m. Sunday from Australia...arrived after after 10 p.m.on Saturday--the day before--in Tahiti with no reservations because my stateside travel agent didn't consider the International Date Line. She might be forgiven since that was before airline schedules were computerized.

    Is there DST in Alaska, Yukon, Northwest territories? Lapland? it's light most of the time in Summer, and dark much of the Winter. DST doesn't make sense in central and southern Arizona, New Mexico, west Texas where it cools down to a balmy 105 degrees F. at night.

    So, what are the complaints about DST? It was for farmers and factory workers, so they say, but farmers aren't thrilled about milking cows in the dark. Oh, wait, they have lights!

    1. Re:slow news day by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Why not get rid of the International Date Line? That's more confusing than DST.

      You might want to rethink that one.. The day has to change SOMEWHERE, genius.

  48. Set it and forget it! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I only have three things to set. Alarm clock, my Mustang, and my work car. Everything else is automatic, but, that being said, DITCH IT! Set it either standard time or DST and leave it alone.

  49. Working 9 to 5. Heard of that song? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Core hours 10-3. Ever worked or been in a workplace?? Because if you have, then you already had all the evidence you whined about needing first.

  50. too lazy to change by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    most of my clocks change automatically, and those that don't, about half are wrong til the next change since I am too lazy to change them ":-)

  51. Explain your insistence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you claim "it would have to be replaced with laws that tried to tell businesses when people could work.." explain why it would HAVE TO BE. You insisting means fuck all.
    Businesses are still being told when to get up by the government telling the clocks to be changed. Yet somehow this doesn't seem to be a problem for businesses to accept.

  52. Having an idea doesn't make it a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ben Franklin is laughing at all of us from beyond the grave.

  53. I love DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love DST. You know why I love DST? It's because I don't like the Sun coming up at 4 in the morning. That's why. 5AM is bad enough (well, 4:47 on the earliest sunrise day this year). So no. Let's not ditch DST.

  54. Put it on the ballot in all 50 states by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just end it.

    Now.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  55. Ya don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya mean Nazis want the trains to run on time? Who'da thunk it?

  56. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to think all this fuss doesn't change the fact we still have 24 hrs. in a day.

  57. headline is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People don't hate Daylight Saving Time, at least not most of them. They hate changing the clock twice a year; and if they prefer one time scheme over another, they tend to prefer DST over Standard Time. Assuming of course they actually figure out which is which. DST, of course, the one that just ended, is the summer time scheme where it stays light longer in the evening. It's always surprising to me how many people think they hate DST when it's actually ST they hate.

  58. Yes, it does. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    And to think all this fuss doesn't change the fact we still have 24 hrs. in a day.

    Yes, it does.

    Last Saturday had 25 hours. A Saturday in the spring had 23.

    A standard time day is a legal construct, not a physical one.

    And do you have ANY IDEA how much that complicates automated systems (like building energy management) that have to deal with getting things to happen at the right time for production schedules? *I* do. I had to write some of those programs. B-b doesn't even begin to express it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  59. School [Re:DST all year round for the win] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    [Re: dark morning school walkers] School hours should just be later, period. Studies have shown students learn better when they've had a full night's sleep.

    True, but parents often have to drop their kids off while heading to work. Later school hours would make such difficult. (Buses seem to be going away for some reason.)

  60. Florida resident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Florida resident here, our state legislator voted to end daylight savings, it was supposed to happen this past weekend. Unfortunately, it did not happen because the Federal government believes it has the power to dictate what our clocks say. Apparently is in the Constitution in the Preamble when it says, 'the Federal government know the best time for you' and the 10th Amendment where it says ' the Federal government has all the powers, not just the ones defined in the Constitution'. It really grinds my gears.

  61. Roman and Medieval Church time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's go back to the way they used to do it. 12 hour days and 12 hour nights.

    Oh, but the length of the hours changes. Ah, those were the days, when noon was a 1500.

  62. Daylight savings time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, call it daylight savings time... pisses off all the morons who think itâ(TM)s a good idea. (It is Daylight SavING Time, dammit! they exclaim.). Then tell people who support it to eat your ass. Because they should. Because it started off as a stupid idea, then morphed into a really stupid idea, and today, has become a full-blown stupid fucking idea, and it needs to be fucking abolished because it is pointless, fucks everything up twice a year, and is a giant waste of time, energy and resources.

    Hereâ(TM)s a MUCH better idea. Change Earth from having 24 time zones to 48, setting each a half-hour apart, so that anyone living anywhere on Earth ends up having a much better chance of not being up to an HOUR off all year round, from the ACTUAL local time wherever he/she IS.

    Or you can do what I did for a time, as an experiment, and set my clocks to local time according to solar noon where I live.

    Trouble is, everyone elseâ(TM)s clocks were consistently wrong, and I eventually grew tired of having constantly to correct for THEIR perceptions of time.

  63. proof of the flaw in gov'ts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems near certain that the vast majority of people are either on the "get rid of it" side or the "meh, don't care side". I don't think I've ever seen anyone actually express the opinion "oh yeah, DST is essential". And it's been that way for decades now. But still we have it.

    The problem is once a law gets passed, there is then a huge amount of legislative inertia to get it repealed/changed.

    It's for this reason I think every law, every single law, ought to have an expiration date. The important ones will get renewed and the ones no one actually cares about anymore (or at least, the great majority of people don't care about) will lapse into automatic repeal.

  64. Solar Noon = Clock Noon by AdmNaismith · · Score: 1

    Here in the US we should, move out clocks to DST + 1hr so solar noon and clock noon are at the same time. Daylight will wax and wane as the seasons change, but there is not an excessive amount od daylight am or pm. But mostly, it's just logical.

  65. switch to utc by nten · · Score: 1

    If we all switch to UTC the businesses won't have a choice. They will have to establish new schedules everywhere out side of the EU anyway.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  66. I guarantee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that the UK won't ditch it. They'll keep crying about "how it's tradition," and they'll obstinately cling onto it.

    And the fact the EU are suggesting abolishing it makes that belief so much firmer. (The UK hates the EU.)

  67. Time zones are the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a global company and have to meet with people in wide-ranging time zones. When discussing what time work will be done, we have to be very careful to specify the time zone, but with nearly 300,000 employees, mistakes and miscommunications will happen, We should have just one time zone to simplify the lives of everyone on the planet that uses a clock on a regular basis.. All that would entail is changing the names of the times we do things. For example, suppose we set UTC as the universal time zone. Suppose further that you are in what is currently called the Eastern Standard Time zone. Instead of sunrise being at 7:00AM, it will be at 12:00PM. Instead for working from 9:00AM to 5:00PM, you will work from 2:00PM to 10:00PM. Everything relative to the Sun, Moon, etc. stays the same, only what you call the hours has changed. You can as easily say you work from Bazzumass to Cruntle as 9 to 5 if that suits your purpose.

    Of course, somethings will become anachronistic, such as references to "high noon" and "twelve midnight". One day, their meanings will become as obscure as Shakespeare's references to merkins.