Slashdot Mirror


Beto O'Rourke's Secret Membership in America's Oldest Hacking Group (reuters.com)

One thing you might not know about Beto O'Rourke, the former Texas congressman who just entered the race for president is that while a teenager, O'Rourke acknowledged in an exclusive interview to Reuters, he belonged to the oldest group of computer hackers in U.S. history. From the report: The hugely influential Cult of the Dead Cow, jokingly named after an abandoned Texas slaughterhouse, is notorious for releasing tools that allowed ordinary people to hack computers running Microsoft's Windows. It's also known for inventing the word "hacktivism" to describe human-rights-driven security work.

Members of the group have protected O'Rourke's secret for decades, reluctant to compromise his political viability. Now, in a series of interviews, CDC members have acknowledged O'Rourke as one of their own.
Slashdot interviewed members of the Cult of the Cow in 1999 -- which gave bizarre answers.

163 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. He would get my vote (fist post?) by turp182 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On this alone. The last Presidential race was a shit show of insane proportions (I voted, but not Dem/Repub).

    First post?

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by tomhath · · Score: 1, Troll

      The last Presidential race was a shit show of insane proportions

      You ain't seen nothing yet. I wonder if next he's going to brag about how he slept his way up the political ladder. Oh wait, that was Kamala Harris. Or lie about his minority heritage? Nah, Elizabeth Warren already has that angle covered.

    2. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The last Presidential race was a shit show of insane proportions" Yes, a shitshow comrade, yes. You cannot trust elected government, trust stronk man comrade. Putin got rid of bad election shitshow, very happy!

    3. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Warren never lied about anything. She overshared responding to an attack (her employer wrongfully listed her as a minority, she said she wasn't but mentioned in passing that she had heard there was Native American blood in her family via a distant relative, and was promptly attacked for it - despite it turning out to be true. And then she was attacked for it being true, because people were treating her proof as being something to do with providing she was a minority, which she never claimed, rather than her proving the family story was accurate.)

      Warren is politically incompetent based upon this episode, but it's inaccurate to call her a liar, just probably not Presidential material... at least, she wouldn't be in a world where the phrase "Presidential material" means anything at all, which based upon the last election is not the universe we live in.

      God I hate this timeline.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      which she never claimed

      She sure as fuck did.

      Warren's 1986 registration card for the State Bar of Texas could put an end to all that. The Washington Post obtained a copy of the signed document in which she wrote that her race was "American Indian." This supports the two critical charges against her: that she knowingly and personally claimed Native American heritage, and that she did so for the purpose of career advancement.

    5. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fauxcohontas got into Harvard Law School as a minority hire, due to her falsely claiming to be Cherokee. Harvard proudly touted her as the school's first woman of color. No kidding, this really happened. Without it, does she get in? Who can say? We can only say that when she got in Harvard was desperate for people just like her.

      She also contributed recipes to a cookbook called, and I am not making this up: "Pow Wow Chow". Yikes. Can you imagine? That's a career-killer for anyone but a Democrat. What if you found out one of your friends had contributed to a cookbook with an offensive name like that? Would you cut off all ties?

      But that's not even the best part of the story. She plagarized two of the recipes from a French chef. Because that's what Harvard graduates do. The dishes? Why, those traditional Cherokee meals of Cold Omelets with Crab Meat and Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing. If there had only been some clue that a French chef was copied!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by engineereeyore · · Score: 2

      Seconded. Haven't found a candidate yet that wasn't a criminal. At least Beto has the redeeming attribute of being a hacker! My favorite t-shirt is a 2016 election shirt with the statement, "I vo(mi)ted!"

    7. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between claiming minority status and writing that you think you have native American blood on a student card. Her DNA test showed that actually she was correct in believing she had, and didn't lie on that either.

      Her student ID wasn't the source of the controversy, it was that she was listed as being in a minority by her employer.

      You deliberately have your head up your ass on this.

      1/1024 from the one DNA researcher she selected is complete bullshit.

      How about a BLIND test with a multiple, well-recognized-as-competent researchers?

      Warren didn't merely "claim minority status", she laid claim to minority setasides - using them to get ahead while simultaneously denying actual Native Americans access to the slots she took.

    8. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What has Beto done in his life that makes him worthy of being president? He was a rich prep-school kid who started a failed rock band, did drugs, got arrested, married a rich wife, and failed at everything he tried .... until politics. And then he lost the vote.

      Who is this guy and remind me why I should care about him?

    9. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      Guess you missed the Texas bar registration in her own handwriting where she listed her race as non-white. Any argument that a politician is not a lying sociopath is doomed to failure

    10. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by fropenn · · Score: 2

      Why is "Pow Wow Chow" offensive? There are still Pow Wows held around the country and, presumably, attendees would need to eat.

      Recipes are generally not copyrightable, although passing it off as your own if you knowingly took it from someone else is a crappy thing to do.

    11. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The term "Pow Wow" is offensive if used in any setting besides Native American ceremonies. Especially by someone wearing redface. It's like going around calling people "Chief".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Hmm...wondering if Beto will have any help from the "Cult" or just hack the election himself?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I look forward to seeing your blood flow.

      Trump fans are a friendly sort, no?

      Listen, pgmrdlm, promise us that if you plan on shooting up a grade school or something that you'll talk to a counselor first. Please.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      The term "Pow Wow" is offensive if used in any setting besides Native American ceremonies. Especially by someone wearing redface. It's like going around calling people "Chief".

      Lighten up Francis.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What has Beto done in his life that makes him worthy of being president? He was a rich prep-school kid who started a failed rock band, did drugs, got arrested, married a rich wife, and failed at everything he tried .... until politics. And then he lost the vote.

      Who is this guy and remind me why I should care about him?

      Well, not only did Beto lose an election, Beto lost it to probably the most unlikable politician in the US: Ted Cruz.

      That takes work, I tell you.

      Ask Hillary how hard you have to work to lose an election to an unlikable jackass.

    16. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful
      My reply to this has disappeared, so repeating:

      There's a difference between claiming minority status and writing that you think you have native American blood on a student card. Her DNA test showed that actually she was correct in believing she had, and didn't lie on that either.

      Her student ID wasn't the source of the controversy, it was that she was listed as being in a minority by her employer.

      (One of the most abusive types of moderation is to make people think you're arguing something that you're not, by removing clarifications. If you're thinking of abusing your mod privileges here, do me a favor: kill yourself instead. You are a net negative to people on this planet, you make things worse, and you should be utterly ashamed of yourself.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      None of these guys are Trump fans. Both of them (the supposed progressive AND the "trump fan") are russians.

    18. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Fauxcohontas got into Harvard Law School as a minority hire

      Incorrect. She got into the faculty based on her stellar grades. Neither was her minority status used during her admission.

    19. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      (I voted, but not Dem/Repub).

      So, you didn't vote? I mean, you may as well have written "I wish for puppies for all" in a bottle and tossed it in an ocean.

      Grown ups choose among the options they have, and not choosing is not choosing.

      And if you could not see a huge difference between the two major party candidates, you're insane . You can like one or the other, but they are very different. And by "you can like one or the other," I'm not implying they were equal. There was a clear correct choice.

      In this case, not voting for one of the 2 party candidates with 40+% of the vote each is voting for the winning candidate. So those holier than thou 3rd party voters in this election essentially voted for Trump. It's the way our elections work. I say we change it to a straight plurality required. That would make things a lot more interesting, especially on a state by state basis.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    21. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Warren has earned a tenure in 1981 from University of Houston Law Center. She had more than enough qualifications to get into Harvard purely on merit. Compare it to the Cadet Bone Spurs who got into university because of his father's money.

    22. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by markdavis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >"Her DNA test showed that actually she was correct in believing she had"

      Sorry, but her DNA test showed that she had less than the average amount of Native American blood than the average several-generational white American has.

      I am so tired of identity politics.

    23. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Remember that Trump reset the bar to the presidency very low. Trump didn't do much on his own except manage to go bankrupt in the casino business, which I gather is very difficult to do. He's mostlly just a self promoter ex reality tv star with a penchant for making one-sided deals (he doesn't think it's a good deal if both sides come out ahead). He had zero experience in politics besides inventing the birther conspiracy and some earlier short-lived presidential campaigns (mostly self promotion).

      So the current state of affairs is that you no longer need to do anything to be worthy of being president in order to become president. Even further, actually having some political experience is likely to be considered a negative factor!

    24. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Wow, nut job anti-American weirdo is the calling card of the last Republican primary. Everyone these days is anti-American, they're all pro one half of all Americans and anti the other half of Americans.

    25. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I tried to go back in time and prevent the Dewey presidency, but look where that left us!

    26. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The fact that choosing a third candidate is guaranteed to make your vote worthless implies that we don't have a democracy. Also proof that we don't have a democracy is that in Texas and California we're constantly being told that our votes count for nothing in the presidential race despite being the two largest electorates.

    27. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      What has Beto done in his life that makes him worthy of being president?

      His weak chin and buckteeth are safe and non-threatening.

    28. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      These days, that could be closer to what the founding fathers wanted than what currently happens. But there is a chance we could fix that by removing Winner Take All. And I think that should be tried before anything else.

    29. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Birtherism was invented by the Clinton campaign. Trump used it later on to troll Obama.

    30. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by msauve · · Score: 1

      Get your vote for what? Spinning some false claim about belonging to a group which existed long before he was born? He wasn't part of the "oldest group of computer hackers," unless he went to MIT in the 1960's, at least a dozen years before he was even born.

      1337 haxor, more like.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    31. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There is no evidence except for Trump's mouth that Hillary's compaign staff started this. There was some Hillary supporters who pushed this, but that doesn't mean campaign staff and certainly does not mean Hillary herself. The birther conspiracy was a minor issue and completely done with and forgotten about when Trump resurrected this in 2011 and became the primary cheerleader for the birther conspiracy until he ran again for president. Trump was the one who kept showing up on news shows and talk shows pushing the conspiracy. He can't just apologize by blaming Hillary for this.

    32. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm all in favor of changing voting laws to make it so voting for a 3rd party isn't a worthless. But it is now.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    33. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Gerrymandering does not effect a statewide race, because it's...statewide.

    34. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To make sense of your objection, you have to be ignorant of the difference between mean and median.

      She is part of a very small minority. The overwhelming majority of white Americans have zero native blood.

    35. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by quantaman · · Score: 2

      My reply to this has disappeared, so repeating:

      There's a difference between claiming minority status and writing that you think you have native American blood on a student card. Her DNA test showed that actually she was correct in believing she had, and didn't lie on that either.

      She didn't just claim Native American ancestry, she identified herself as Native American. All based on a family story of a Native ancestor several generations ago.

      That would have given her 1/8th ancestry? 1/16th? less? Sure if you've got one fully native parent, maybe even a grandparent, but a rumoured distant ancestor? What about those 15 European ancestors. I have Charlemagne as an ancestor, am I Frankish now?

      Imagine an actual Native American, dealing with all the discrimination and disadvantage that comes with that, seeing a extremely successful white woman walking around claiming to be native based on a family legend. You can hopefully understand why they got pissed off.

      Her student ID wasn't the source of the controversy, it was that she was listed as being in a minority by her employer.

      It wasn't her student ID, it was her Texas Bar application. And she was listed as a minority by her employer because she told them she was a minority, as she told many others including the authors of a Cherokee cookbook.

      There's a lot of evidence that she was deliberately identifying as Native in professional contexts. If they didn't actually counter her as a minority hire outside of a press release it's probably just because they realized there was something fishy going on and they didn't want to get in trouble if someone started asking questions.

      (One of the most abusive types of moderation is to make people think you're arguing something that you're not, by removing clarifications. If you're thinking of abusing your mod privileges here, do me a favor: kill yourself instead. You are a net negative to people on this planet, you make things worse, and you should be utterly ashamed of yourself.)

      Get off it, you have no business being outraged, you're deliberately ignoring inconvenient facts and context.

      Warren has some decent policies, and she's been a decent senator, but she did something really sketchy when she was younger.

      That doesn't mean she shouldn't be President, people can do stupid things, own up to them, and learn. But pretending she did nothing wrong when her story keeps shifting and there's so much evidence against her won't cut it.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    36. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by quantaman · · Score: 1

      What has Beto done in his life that makes him worthy of being president? He was a rich prep-school kid who started a failed rock band, did drugs, got arrested, married a rich wife, and failed at everything he tried .... until politics. And then he lost the vote.

      Who is this guy and remind me why I should care about him?

      No one is worthy of being president. The proper questions are:
      1) Can they get elected president?
      2) Would they be good at it?

      As for #1, probably, he's got the charisma but does he have the depth to make it through the Democratic primary. The Democratic primary is a bit more elitist or discerning depending on your political affiliation. You basically need to sound smart to last and I'm not sure he's proven that yet.

      #2, who knows. It's a weird job. You need a level of expertise to properly evaluate your options and choose a course. Was Obama a good President? I thought he was brilliant and made thoughtful decisions. But he also failed to use his biggest asset, his ability to give speeches and appeal to large segments of swing voters. He was also supposedly a bit of an introvert who wasn't great at hobnobbing.

      If Clinton won the primary and became the President maybe she would have prevented the GOP from going into lockstep opposition. Beto blandly charming a few Republican legislators (and their voters) might make up for a lot of policy shortcomings.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    37. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      "Pow Wow Chow". Yikes. Can you imagine? That's a career-killer for anyone but a Democrat.

      Potus repeatedly makes off-color Native American jokes in front of them, while he's hosting them.

    38. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Let's see, No neckbeard... lives above ground... Sorry, he's not checking any boxes for me.

    39. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I think you've got it backwards but it's been a long week...

    40. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...they're all pro one half of all Americans and anti the other half of Americans

      They're not "pro" anyone but themselves; the difference is some of the Republicans are - almost - honest about being sociopaths, while the Democrats almost universally lie through their teeth, promising the fucking moon and delivering even more corruption.

      This from an independent who hates all the motherfuckers...

    41. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      You missed a key detail: O'Rourke was running as a Democrat in Texas.

      The last Democrat to win a Senate seat in Texas was Lloyd Bentsen in 1988. O'Rourke lost, but he lost by an unusually narrow margin (2.6%; compare against the usual 10-20% margin for the Democrat in those races); whether you consider that an accomplishment, or just a reflection of the times and the unlikeability of his opponent, is up to you.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    42. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "it is because of God, Greed, Gays, and Guns."

      So you're saying that contempt for religion and for the millions who profess it; preference for the "rights" of corporations over the rights of the people they plunder; support for the most schizoid policies of the militant GayBLT agenda; and the unconstitutional & unamerican push to disarm the common people - you're saying these are the reasons Corporate Progressives are widely detested by ordinary working people?

    43. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by David+Gould · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Much like with Bernie Sanders and his "trouble with Black voters", those who are desperate to tear down Elizabeth Warren latched onto something that was "not especially popular", exaggerated it into "super UNpopular", and have been obsessively trying to spin it into bring her "major (perhaps fatal?) weakness".

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    44. Re: He would get my vote (fist post?) by David+Gould · · Score: 1

      > "God I hate this timeline."

      Have you been having lots of "Mandela Effect" moments too?

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    45. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      I too tire of identity politics.
      But I tire more of assholes who didn't pay enough attention in school to understand what the fuck an average is.

    46. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Those same articles you posted pretty solidly debunk the opinion you've been calling fact all over this comment section: That her hire had anything to do with her background, or that she even knew the school listed her as any specific background.

      I can google too, but I try to read more than the headline before I post them as corroborating evidence, lest I look like a jackass. You don't like looking like a jackass, do you?

    47. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      And just to be clear,"Pow Wow Chow" recipes are a deal-breaker, but if she were to brag about grabbing dicks or wanting to date her boy child that would have sit well with conservatives?
      I think we're experiencing some cognitive dissonance, or at least some partisan bias here.

    48. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      She didn't lie? You must be the most gullible person on Earth!

    49. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DethLok · · Score: 1

      "What do you expect from the party that endorses killing live born babies and calls it "abortion"?"

      Uh, citation, please?

    50. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by DethLok · · Score: 1

      So, you accept that she has native american blood?

      So, she's part native american, then.

      QED

    51. Re:He would get my vote (fist post?) by mjwx · · Score: 1

      What has Beto done in his life that makes him worthy of being president? He was a rich prep-school kid who started a failed rock band, did drugs, got arrested, married a rich wife, and failed at everything he tried .... until politics. And then he lost the vote.

      So what you're saying is that this guy has lived a normal, flawed if not a little privileged American life... Doesn't that make him ideal? A person who's actually had to face and overcome failure, deal with disappointments in life, got a woman to say she liked him because she actually liked him, not for his money.

      Surely the best person to understand the people is a person who's had to deal with the same trials and tribulations as ordinary people.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. And just like that.. by auximage77 · · Score: 2

    he secured the votes of a small generation of people, some that might be people that probably would never vote.

    1. Re:And just like that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the oppositie just gained a butt-load of ammunition. Most of the population doesn't know what hacktivism is and would just hear "hacker" and think "criminal". Although, considering the choices last race that might not be that bad for him.

    2. Re:And just like that.. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Playing to his base and only to his base in a checkbox-ticking manner that inherently makes most people who would not have voted for him dislike him even more.

      It worked for Trump.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:And just like that.. by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Already happening. Google Beto & you get some news stories as the top results. CNBC reports on him being in the CDC, some local paper reports on his fundraiser, Fox News reports on the murder fantasy stories he wrote for CDC.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  3. Beto Created the cDc! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Beto, better known by his hacker name 0t3b, was not only a member of cDc, but the founder. After flashing an EEPROM with gamma radiation, 0t3b slammed the chip into his arm where the gamma radiation linked the chip to his bloodstream giving him uber-leet superpowers. 0t3b could now hack the gibson using only his voice and gesture controls.

    Seriously, watch out for this guy. You think a Russian agent in the White House is bad? 0t3b is literally where Russian and Chinese haxorz wannabees go to learn their skillz.

  4. Who's "Beto"? Oh yeah, "Robert Francis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some Irish-heritage person claiming to be Hispanic go garner idiot votes? Why is that a good thing?

    Geez, next thing you know some lily-white millionaire is going to pretend to be a Native American to get ahead.

    All this cultural appropriation has to stop!

  5. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More than admitting you had, say, secret back-channel communications with the Kremlin, or say, laundered money for the Russian mob for decades, or, you know, met with Russian intel connected oligarchs in secret, observably...

    As if nobody is watching, that's the kicker... and then implausibly deny/admit it in one breath when someone asks?

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html

  6. Not a Republican by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he was a Republican, you'd be hearing:

    - He's the son of a judge
    - Went to boarding school
    - Dodged burglary and DUI charges
    - He married into a Billionaire family

    But he's a Democrat, so nothing matters. Different standards. It's so important that he be judged by different standards the media won't even give you the information you need to make any other judgement.

    1. Re:Not a Republican by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Good job you know Beto personally, otherwise you'd never have gotten that information.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Not a Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. This is literally an article about how he was a hacker - something that Slashdot may respect but most of America thinks equals criminal.
      2. What are you talking about, all of those things are not only well-reported, they're well-reported AND well-whined about by Republicans that they're not well-reported.
      3. Different standards, right, which is why Beto has had overwhelmingly negative press coverage.
      4. Seriously, try to think beyond your partisan prejudices. You've got a narrative, and you're letting it control the things you see and hear.

    3. Re:Not a Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he was a Republican, you'd be hearing:

      Hacker
      Terrorist

    4. Re:Not a Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he was a Republican, you'd be hearing:

      - He's the son of a judge
      - Went to boarding school
      - Dodged burglary and DUI charges
      - He married into a Billionaire family

      But he's a Democrat, so nothing matters. Different standards. It's so important that he be judged by different standards the media won't even give you the information you need to make any other judgement.

      You forgot:

      He's an Irishman who was refused admission to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus:

      El Paso Lawmaker Can't Join Hispanic Caucus

      EL PASO — When El Paso voters elected Robert “Beto” O’Rourke to Congress last year, his supporters said they chose a fresh and progressive voice to champion issues critical to the border community.

      ...

      O’Rourke, whose nickname is popular among Latinos, is not a member because he lacks Hispanic heritage. ...

    5. Re:Not a Republican by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Grain of salt, I know nothing about him at all. I look forward to learning though, and it takes time to type this much.

      #1 - Son of a judge, he was born into that. Not his fault.

      #2-Went to boarding school, not his fault. The well-to-do prep their children as they see fit and are financially able to do so (great reason for Euro medical care and college education systems actually). Even if you starred in Full House.

      #3 - Are you an angel?

      I wasn't in my younger days, I won't speak to current days.

      He openly admits this, and it was 20 years ago:
      https://www.politifact.com/tex...

      Did you ever scratch a car? Skip a class? Have a drink and then drive?

      #4 - This is tougher. Rich and powerful ally with the same. Since the Middle Ages and before (Egypt, and before, single family affairs though).

      Party affiliation is irrelevant to me. Actually it isn't, I want anybody not in the mainstream to be successful.

      Any citizen of the US should have at least the services provided the three million people we keep in prisons or jails.
        Prison is socialism, and we are good at it (best in the world, better than China!). Think about that for a minute..

      Regarding his upbringing, FATE is where, when, and to whom you are born into the world. It limits or expands possibilities.

      So it goes.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    6. Re:Not a Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, it is pretty well spread across Texas. That is why a number of of us are like wtf. The opinion here is he is corrupt:

      Abused eminent domain against the hispanic community for his father in law's profit
      Has a record of DWI and Burglary

    7. Re:Not a Republican by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Poor critical thinking from a named member, insightful response from an AC. What is going on here; this isn't my Slashdot! Where are my hot grits and Cowboy Neals?

    8. Re:Not a Republican by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Poor critical thinking from a named member, insightful response from an AC. What is going on here; this isn't my Slashdot! Where are my hot grits and Cowboy Neals?

      Netcraft confirmed that Natalie's beowulf cluster in Soviet Russia would have the answer to that. But only if it ran Linux.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    9. Re:Not a Republican by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Not an angel but burglary and DUI? No, nowhere even fucking close to those.

    10. Re:Not a Republican by chispito · · Score: 1

      1. This is literally an article about how he was a hacker - something that Slashdot may respect but most of America thinks equals criminal.

      Yes, now watch how the media narrative changes: It's STEM!

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    11. Re:Not a Republican by turp182 · · Score: 1

      https://www.politifact.com/tex...

      Yeah, DUI. Burglary, was a charge and was dropped. Sounds like it should have been trespass per the article.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    12. Re:Not a Republican by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neal would approve.

    13. Re:Not a Republican by Kohath · · Score: 1

      2. What are you talking about, all of those things are not only well-reported, they're well-reported AND well-whined about by Republicans that they're not well-reported.

      We mentioned it once a few years ago. What more do you want? Now on to hour 7 of our round-the-clock Stormy Daniels coverage.

    14. Re:Not a Republican by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The article isn't about him being a hacker. It is about him being an early member of a group that was later associated with hacking.

      The closest to hacking he got was sharing pirated games, and he also says when he went to college he realized it was wrong and stopped.

      He started college in `91. The group wasn't really associated with hacking until `99, when a member released Back Oriface.

      They were a writing club into blood and gore and offense. That's actually about it. It was like blogging, before the internet was even public; a place where you could write any sort of weird fiction you wanted, and share it with other humans, and not get in trouble. That was a bit new of a concept.

    15. Re:Not a Republican by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      #2-Went to boarding school, not his fault.

      Maybe not his fault but deep down all rich people are assholes and they mostly come from a long line of assholes.

    16. Re:Not a Republican by quantaman · · Score: 1

      If he was a Republican, you'd be hearing:

      - He's the son of a judge
      - Went to boarding school
      - Dodged burglary and DUI charges
      - He married into a Billionaire family

      But he's a Democrat, so nothing matters. Different standards. It's so important that he be judged by different standards the media won't even give you the information you need to make any other judgement.

      Sure there's a double standard.

      Warren tried to explain away her identification as Native American as just wanting to meet people with native ancestors, then the Washington Post investigated and blew that explanation away.

      Fox News found out that Trump had an affair with a porn star and paid to cover it up, and then they covered it up as well.

      Have left leaning media outlets gone a bit easy on O'Rourke so far? Probably.

      But you really don't want to start complaining about a double standard.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    17. Re:Not a Republican by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, the Republicans are here to let us know he is a furry and wants to run over children:

      https://www.washingtonexaminer...
      http://www.fox10phoenix.com/ne...

  7. Windows Hacker!?!? by Temkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh great he's a Window's guy... No way I can vote for him now...

    1. Re:Windows Hacker!?!? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Hey, some of us used Windows in high school too. Oh, wait, Linux was released during my college orientation week. Nevermind, as you were.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Windows Hacker!?!? by gosand · · Score: 2

      Oh great he's a Window's guy... No way I can vote for him now...

      To be fair - what else were they going to hack?

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:Windows Hacker!?!? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      To be fair - what else were they going to hack?

      SunOS. SunOS had a TCP/IP stack and a version of NFS running in 1985.

  8. BFD... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Was his involvement in the group from the days when high school kids (or younger) could wreak havoc with Windows using a Word Basic macro? If so, then who cares?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:BFD... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, before that mostly.

      It was from when they were just BBS nerds.

      They weren't hackers. They were phone phreaks, though, and he admitted to stealing phone card numbers to make long distance calls.

      Abusing phone cards, pirating games, sharing text files that would get them in trouble with their parents if anybody found out. That stuff.

      He says he quit all that when he went to college, which was in `91. Word became a big success when Win 3.0 was released in `90. It seems to be `93 when the WordBasic macros came in, from then until `97.

  9. I just read his wikipedia.... by Maelwryth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And my compliments to whoever wrote it. He seems like the sort of person I dream of being in charge. Unfortunately, I am not an American so it is possible they aimed at the wrong demographic.

    --
    I reserve the write to mangle english.
  10. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    It doesn't seem like its a hard disqualifier. Mudge was at CDC and L0pht and went on to DARPA and Google.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  11. This is bad news by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    Our industry and community seems socially inept and has brought us such innovations as the destruction of privacy, the propagation of hate, and the commercialization of false information. And I'm supposed to feel better about Beto because he's a part of that shit?

    Not looking forward to the primaries, none of the candidates are ideal, Warren's incompetent even if her heart's in the right place, Harris has that slick tells-you-what-you-wanna-hear Obama like quality, Sanders is the Democrat's Ron Paul, and everyone else is just... urgh. Beto? Unless he backtracks and distances himself from ever being associated with jackasses like me I'm not seeing a great reason to vote for him.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:This is bad news by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      urgh. Beto? Unless he backtracks and distances himself from ever being associated with jackasses like me I'm not seeing a great reason to vote for him.

      Well, he is young, he is apparently VERY social media savvy.....and decent looking guy.

      That alone will prompt a ton of millennial to vote for him even before he starts pushing for socialistic type issues.

      I'd be worried about him....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:This is bad news by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Nobody's young who runs for President, there's a minimum age of 35. Yes, there's a lower age of the scale, but let's not call people "young" without qualifying it, candidates for the Presidency are required by the constitution to be either close to middle age or older.

      I raise that because it does point out an inherent bias in our government. It's not the only one, but it's there.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:This is bad news by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      Do you know why it's there? The Founding Fathers were paranoid about monarchs, or anything that smelled like a monarch. For example, a political dynasty.

      Back in the days, the only real way to become well-known at a young age and across the country was by being the son of a politician. The Founding Fathers put the age limit in to give others a chance to catch up through their actions, in order to prevent dynastic families. It made a lot of sense at the time, given their situation and their experiences with monarchs. It doesn't prevent dynasties completely, but it does change how they occur. John Quincy Adams was elected president 24 years after his father's term, but John Quincy also had a pretty solid career in foreign policy beforehand.

      I am curious as to if a 25-year-old wildly-popular musician, actor/actress, or sports star would stand a chance of getting elected nowadays if an amendment was passed to eliminate the age qualification.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  12. Me too by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I still think his changing his name to pretend to be Hispanic is super stupid, but I relish the thought of a for-real hacker becoming president and having inside access to pretty much every government computer network...

    Too bad there is zero chance of a white male of any dirt getting to be the Democratic candidate.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He never changed his name. Beto is a nickname given to him when he was a child.

      Its like when people call you Shithead, it is your nickname.

    2. Re:Me too by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Regarding the Dems, it appears the party chooses the candidate... At least that's what happened last time (they gave up the Presidency doing this, they didn't let the people choose, they manipulated the system).

      Both parties suck but they have a lock on the elections (read up on the debates, they control who participates).

      Dems will win if they put a semi-likable moderate up.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    3. Re:Me too by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or, more to the point, do people honestly believe that Beto carries himself like he-himself is a hacker?

      You've got a point. He's not getting plowed and trashing a hotel or anything.

      Seriously, how many hackers have you met?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Me too by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They just need to pay attention this time. Last time in the secret cabal it was more like "I don't have any friends who hate Hillary, how about you guys? No? Ok, let's nominate her since we all think she's likeable and she's certainly more moderate than Bernie."

    5. Re: Me too by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding?? I went to DEFCON 3 times and.....met a bunch of people who couldn't program. No joke.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Me too by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      He wasn't a "hacker," he joined an underground BBS group that was into writing morbid, bloody, and offensive fiction. And sharing pirated games. The group was named the Cult of the Dead Cow. It was just a writing club.

      Then a couple decades much later, one of the people from that group released Back Oriface, so they got associated with hacking/cracking. But that has absolutely nothing to do with this guy.

    7. Re:Me too by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If Trump had more than half a brain he would not run at all, damn he will get hammered and the Trump name will be tarnished for decades to come, might as well call himself Mudd https://www.phrases.org.uk/mea.... Not that he killed a US president but the Don Don the orange orangutan has most definitely tarnished that position and the rest of the US administration, by filling it with neocon psychopaths. Only an idiot with a truly bloated ego would run with that track record, yeah, the only reason Trump won, was because he was running against that only real deplorables, the Klinton Krime Klan and he promised to lock the bitch up and failed (yeah, we know it was all bullshit, all along, try it again, make yourself look the fool).

      The republicans should probably run with Chuck Grassley, won't win but wont look bad either, sort of a safe political loss and blame Trump, really just pile it on. The Democrats, pretty clear Tulsi and Bernie, 2020, who takes the lead kind of arbitrary and it would work well if they ran together and let the public decide who takes the lead, who is President and who is Vice President, would be an extremely popular move (well that's enough regime change, ;D).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Me too by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Regarding the Dems, it appears the party chooses the candidate... At least that's what happened last time (they gave up the Presidency doing this, they didn't let the people choose, they manipulated the system).

      You're right that the "party" had a choice. You're right that the party had plans to subvert the will of the party's rank and file membership.
      You're however dead wrong that they gave something to Hillary that she didn't simply win.
      Their bullshit shenanigans didn't change the outcome- the Democratic electorate wanted Hillary by a fucking *massive* margin.
      Was that for better or worse? I don't pass that judgement.

      You however, should stop making shit up to fit a narrative that makes you feel better.

    9. Re: Me too by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      I was invited to speak at one by precisely those kind of people. It was clear to me it was just a big marketing jackoff.

  13. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and his thoughtful and nuanced policy positions

    What exactly are those? I went to his website https://betoorourke.com/ which contains absolutely nothing on his positions. There are only links to a store (one of which is placed prominently), applying for a job in his campaign, and a donating to his campaign. Is this serious?

    This guy isn't exactly giving me a reason to even consider him as a serious candidate. Also, he couldn't even beat the Zodiac killer so by the transitive property of politics that I've just invented, he wouldn't unseat Trump, so I'm not interested.

  14. Enough of the "Beto" stuff by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Where does he get off assigning himself a Spanish nickname. He is just about as Latin as tuna casserole.

    1. Re:Enough of the "Beto" stuff by will_die · · Score: 1

      It is a nickname that was given to him by one of the families maids/servents, Beto being spanish for Robert.

    2. Re:Enough of the "Beto" stuff by christophla · · Score: 1

      Rafael Ted Cruz.

    3. Re:Enough of the "Beto" stuff by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

      He is just about as Latin as tuna casserole.

      The word "tuna" actually derives from the Spanish word "atún". And, while it's the wrong latin, casserole does have Latin etymology.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Enough of the "Beto" stuff by turp182 · · Score: 1

      There a photo of him here from when he was 5 or 6 wearing a shirt that says "Beto", a shortening of Robert.

      https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...

      So it was an "assigned" nick name that stuck.

      My sons name is Wilbur but we call him Wib. This was my grandfather's name and nickname, but the nickname is the only thing people that knew him called him. My middle name is Wilbur as well (I use the full word, not the nick name, it's a first name sort of change).

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  15. "Beto" just makes the hair by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    on the back of my neck stand up. Reminds me of Bill Clinton "I smoked pot but did not inhale" comment, same thing happened when I heard that, like right! he did not inhale!, weasel words! Why couldn't he just say yes I did! Heck I could care less.

    Beto may very well win since he is a darling of the left/media.. Only then will we find out who he really is.
    All I know is I won't vote for him, but that hardly matters.
    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:"Beto" just makes the hair by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Why would you make up your mind 18 months ahead of the election?

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:"Beto" just makes the hair by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Knowing who you won't vote for is a lot easier than knowing who you will vote for.

      For example, I'm not willing to vote for anybody with a slashdot account.

  16. Whine, whine, whine... by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And our (Virginia) Lt. Governor is credibly accused of forcing a woman down to suck his dick and the same people who wanted to all but literally nail Roy Moore (Republican) to a literal cross over accusations are shrieking "due process!!11!" or trying to just pretend there's no reason to even investigate.

    1. Re:Whine, whine, whine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      shrieking "due process!!11!"

      Who exactly is doing that? Or is it just faux news telling you that everyone is.

      Patrick Hope plans to introduce articles of impeachment, and nearly every democrat of consequence has denounced him.

      From your favorite lefty news source, the NY Times:

      Virginia Lieutenant Governor Faces Eroding Support From Democrats After New Accuser Speaks

      https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/08/us/politics/meredith-watson-justin-fairfax.html

    2. Re:Whine, whine, whine... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      Censure and move on.

      Did you know far-left group MoveOn.org literally got their name from telling everyone we should not pay attention to the fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist? That was their motto. A literal rapist, and they said, "Censure and move on." Believe all women my ass.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  17. Re:I expected the Chaos Computer Club by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    I too was expecting the Chaos Computer Club, since it looks like they predate CDC by about 3 years. Did the writer not even do a minimal amount of research before submitting the article?

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  18. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

    What exactly are those? I went to his website https://betoorourke.com/ which contains absolutely nothing on his positions.

    Beto is as useless as Kate's boyfriend in the movie Hackers. His entire job is standing on tables making captain obvious proud with motherhood and apple pie rhetoric.

  19. Brought to you by his PR firm by dbzero · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this is believable. He's so relatable. I'm sure someone will get around to posting a paragraph to his wiki page of his programming exploits from his hacking days.

    1. Re:Brought to you by his PR firm by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The promotion isn't his PR firm.

      A journalist is getting ready to publish a book on a group of early Church of the Dead Cow members who agreed to be interviewed and named. He is one of those people. He agreed to it and did the interview early during his Senate run.

      So naturally it is the PR firm of the journalist's publisher that is cashing in on his run. I have no idea if it helps him or hurts him, but I do know that the PR firm probably doesn't care.

  20. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by bobbied · · Score: 5, Informative

    Between this, skateboarding as an adult, and his thoughtful and nuanced policy positions I think this Beto guy is pretty good.

    Being a Texas voter who was paying attention to his policy positions as he lost to Cruz, I can tell you his positions may be nuanced, but they are NOT thoughtful. What they are is focus group tested, trite policy statements which when you press them are really just a mishmash of liberal talking points. Once he gets off his stump speech scripts, he totally breaks down on content, so if you press him on details, he doesn't have them to give... Or more to the point, won't actually be pinned down on the details, because the devil is in the details and there is no way it works when you start talking detail.

    However, Beto.. AkA Robert... Does have a stage presence that is hard to match. He comes across as a natural on stage, plays to the audience well, looks good and knows how to give a speech. Reminds me of Dan Quale. He will appeal to the young crowd with his hobbies and stuff, but where the trappings are good, the substance is kind of bland.

    However, the issue here is will he win the primary. I think the answer is no, not this time around. I see him finishing up at best #3, behind Sanders and Biden, but I'll not be surprised he's out long before the likes of Warren and Harris. So Beto is in this for 2024, everybody knows he's not got a prayer in 2020.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  21. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Does the POTUS need to get security clearance the way any other government employee would or do they get it for free by being elected? I'm pretty sure by admitting you were involved in computer hacking would jeopardize that.

    As all classified information is only classified under the authority of the POTUS (i.e. under an executive order), if you get elected to the presidency, you ARE THE authority and can grant yourself any and all accesses to classified information. So, your election is your clearance, effectively.

    This also means that the POTUS can declassify any information they wish any time they chooses. It's all classified under his/her authority anyway.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  22. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    POTUS only gets mid-level clearance. He's mostly a figurehead for the masses, not a Constitutional CiC.

    The Espionage Act of 1917 saw to it that the bureaucracy implemented compartmentalization and took actual control.

    But go vote and get a sticker ... you're totally in control.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  23. Pretty sure it's just the first you know of by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    But hey, you n00bZ think that 2K of RAM is small.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. Big plus from my viewpoint by zuki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Finally someone who might get technology. On that alone, I'd give him a chance FFS... instead of being stuck with the pontificating tribe elders who only see a 'series-of-tubes'.

    1. Re:Big plus from my viewpoint by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Finally someone who might get technology. On that alone, I'd give him a chance FFS... instead of being stuck with the pontificating tribe elders who only see a 'series-of-tubes'.

      That hacker status is a double edged sword. It could be just as easily used to promote him as being tech savvy as well as being used to demonize him for being one of those scary hackers who wants steal your kidneys via the interwebs.

      Personally I am on the "great .. he has a clue" side of the fence when it comes to technology.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Big plus from my viewpoint by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2

      Yea, that was my thought... this is actually a great thing in my book! The media and people who didn't grow up in that culture will try to hang him on it, though. It's going to be a bumpy ride for him in the primaries.

  25. Back Orifice! by jelwell · · Score: 1

    I remember Back Orifice. I hooked up Doom to Back Orifice with some custom C code. doom Hack. You could kill monsters that represented processes on remote machines.
    Joseph Elwell.

    1. Re:Back Orifice! by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      I remember that! It was a totally cool idea! loved it. they should have used it in one of the many movies using computers... at least then it would have been something that really existed.

  26. He ran a BBS? by Hentai007 · · Score: 1

    Haha tacoland, how Texas scene of him.

    I wonder what software he ran? I'd bet telegard.

  27. Early April Fools? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    I had to check to make sure it wasn't April 1st, when /. notoriously goes to shit. I find this fact remarkable. I'm not sure if it makes him in touch or a criminal, but that kind of technical literacy in politics in interesting in it's own right.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  28. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by will_die · · Score: 1

    The President(also Vice President, Members of Congress, Supreme Court Justices, or other constitutional officers) do not get secuity clearances, because they are constitutional offices there is can be no other requirements. However the practice of need to know still applies to everyone, even the President(but to a limited amount)
    Immediate family members of the President don't need security clearances but are considered to have be authorized to have full clearance. This is usually just spouses but historiclly has been children.
    Finally since the authority for security clearances come from the President they can exempt people from the need to have them yet still have access to the classified material.
    One of the benefits of all of that is that if you don't have a security clearance and are accessing classified material, you are not subject to all the laws dealing with the handling of that material. So if you were passing classified material in your personal email and the President declared you exempt to those rules it would be legally ok.
    As for the hacking depending on the level, just because he was a member does not mean he did any actual hacking, the statue of limitations for most of those crimes in five years.

  29. Re:Not a Republican-facts not in evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The parent was only pointing out the double-standards of left wing 'journalism'. He made no judgments about the candidate.

  30. Ah... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Now I want to punch him square in the mouth. It's personal, b&tch.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  31. Re:I expected the Chaos Computer Club by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    Hacking Windows ? Oh well, the real early hacker groups were hacking way before that. Think Commodore days. Think acoustically coupled modems.

  32. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look at the quotes from his speech yesterday. He was off script and sounded exactly like Trump.

    Seth Meyer even read his transcript in Trump's voice: https://youtu.be/CuXlBSuQbMo?t...

  33. What was his screen name? by will_die · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what his on-line or screen name was? With him running a BBC he must have had one and might have had a different one while messing in the hacker groups.

  34. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at the quotes from his speech yesterday. He was off script and sounded exactly like Trump.

    Seth Meyer even read his transcript in Trump's voice: https://youtu.be/CuXlBSuQbMo?t...

    So you're saying that Beto is eminently electable for 2020?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  35. Re:cDc by nadass · · Score: 1

    He invented the Internet. (Not to be confused with the OTHER guy who invented the Internet.)

  36. And this has exactly what to do by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    with her political policies?

    I'm willing to take a candidate with a few warts when they're as on point with everything else as Warren. She's the one who got us the CFBP. Her opponents in the GOP OTOH are the ones who gutted it. Policy matters.

    Also, missing from that little story is that it did NOT advance her career. It had no bearing on her application whatsoever. She was just a dumb college kid who liked to think of herself as Native American. Like when your Aunt tells you she was descended from royalty.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:And this has exactly what to do by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      She got in to Harvard Law because of her race. Fortunately, our elite colleges have no record of racial preferences or corrupt admissions practices.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  37. This is my problem with Beto by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    everything I've heard him say sounds exactly like what I heard from Clinton (both of them). He's also backed down from Medicare for All, which is a deal breaker.

    To be blunt, if I wanted another right of center candidate I've got Harris for that. But Beto knows this. He's not running for President, he's running for the VP on a more progressive ticket. He's Biden 2.0.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is my problem with Beto by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Isn't it hard to run for VP as Biden 2.0 while running against Biden?

  38. Re:Bill, Trump's a traitor. Your idea is to forget by Megol · · Score: 1

    Some people in the USA should learn the definition of traitor, that's for sure.

  39. Cult of the Dead Cow interview by thomst · · Score: 3

    The September 1999 cover story for the late, great Boardwatch Magazine was my interview with Sir Dystic, which took place at the house in the Oakland Hills he shared with a half-dozen other members of the Cult of the Dead Cow.

    Note that the link points to my own website, because no other web archive of the magazine from that period exists, afaik. But here's the Caltech Library citation for the article, in case you have any doubts about its provenance ...

    --
    Check out my novel.
  40. Hack the Planet! by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    Hack the Planet!

  41. Hmm ... all attempts to appear cool have failed so far ... er, uh, what about this, I'm a 133t hax0r! Yeah, that's it!

  42. Re: Shithole Country You Say?? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's not a good system. But it is the system that exists.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  43. Re:I expected the Chaos Computer Club by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Well, in my defense, I was making the mistake of posting before 1st cup of J.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  44. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Off the top of my head he advocates for - decency in the way we treat eachother

    Let's just deal with that one point. Advocating for feeling good is not a policy position. Every sane person wants that. How does he propose to legislate how we treat each other?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  45. I want specific policy by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    not a list of accomplishments, even if they're ones I can relate to. I don't need reliability, I need policies that help me and mine.

    Bernie gets my vote because of Medicare for All (among other things). That Bernie's been a civil rights activist is secondary to that.

    I look at it this way: I wouldn't vote for Jesse Jackson just because he was a civil rights activist, and I won't vote Beto just because he was a programmer.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I want specific policy by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I would have voted for Bernie. Wanted to actually, but didn't have the chance.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  46. It wasn't an employer by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it was her State Bar Registration Card. I've yet to see anyone say there were any concrete advantages to that. Hell, I've known some Native Americans, if anything it hurt.

    She was a goofy lefty college chick who wanted to believe she was an Indian princess. She grew out of it. I wish the rest of the country would. Her stance on banking regulation could spare us another recession if we'd only listen.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It wasn't an employer by quantaman · · Score: 1

      it was her State Bar Registration Card. I've yet to see anyone say there were any concrete advantages to that. Hell, I've known some Native Americans, if anything it hurt.

      There's some subtle bits with how stereotypes work.

      There's a bunch of secondary characteristics associated with the negative stereotype: hair style, clothing, idiosyncratic vocabulary, etc. The characteristics might not be bad on their own, but they're bad if they're associated with the stereotype. For instance, a white person might be fine talking about their love of rap music during an interview, but a black person should probably avoid it.

      That's why a native person might not want to identify themselves as native, it gives the other person a negative lens with which to start viewing these otherwise innocuous things.

      But Warren isn't native, and she doesn't really have any of the characteristics typically associated with negative stereotypes around natives. So when she identifies as Native people get to be diverse by associating with the Native without actually having to deal with those negative stereotypes.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  47. It's got nothing to do with being a Republican by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Beto is a favorite of the Establishment. The same folks who gave you Hillary like Beto. He's right wing on virtually all issues you can get him to comment on.

    The reason you can't get any straight answers out of him on policy is because voters are tired of the Establishment. If Hilary hadn't cheated and if her buddies at MSNBC hadn't orchestrated a campaign to ignore Bernie we'd be saying "President Bernie" right now and passing Medicare for All.

    The Establishment doesn't want to pay for you and me to have heathcare, so the buried Bernie and promoted Hillary. They're trying to do the same with Biden/Beto. Don't fall for it. It's another snow job.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: It's got nothing to do with being a Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can't have Medicare for all without bankrupting everyone until you fix the underlying, pervasive corruption and monopoly problem in the healthcare/pharma sector.

    2. Re:It's got nothing to do with being a Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should do some research on the healthcare plan Hilary was pushing in the 90s as first lady. She tried.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Your complaints about Hillary and Beto are the same complaints many people lodged at Obama during his campaign and during the early years of his presidency. He turned out to be perhaps the finest president in the history of this country. Politicians have to be shrewd. If you just elect idealists, you end up with Jimmy Carters—great people, lofty goals, and the inability effect change. I love Bernie, but he would make a shitty president.

  48. Re: Shithole Country Electoral Construct You Sat? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    That's racist! You're discriminating against him for being old! somebody should dox this guy!

  49. and we should care why? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    Beto is a tool.

  50. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Security clearance for certain things is a given with the job. Like getting a desk in an office setting. I know a few people that most would think could never get a high security clearance.

  51. Re:Does the POTUS need to pass security clearance? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    As all classified information is only classified under the authority of the POTUS (i.e. under an executive order), if you get elected to the presidency, you ARE THE authority and can grant yourself any and all accesses to classified information. So, your election is your clearance, effectively.

    Exactly. There was more than a bit of whinging about this fact when Bill Clinton was in office. I heard repeated many times "he would never have gotten a clearance if he wasn't elected president."

  52. Re:Not even close by NeuroBoy · · Score: 1

    That was my initial reaction as well... Though I suppose one could probably slice thin-like-inlaw-ham the definitions that we might apply to groups from that era...

  53. Re:Cult of the Dead Cow... that takes me back by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    He is reknowned as a fundraiser.

    That's his accomplishment; he raised a record amount of money for his senate run, and he's a Democrat from Texas which makes people feel dreamy.

    I expect his popularity already went down as an actual candidate; a lot of people were preemptively supporting him now in anticipation of him being a candidate in `28. A lot of those people wouldn't have said such nice things about him in public if they knew he was running this cycle, in a crowded field.

  54. "Oldest" Hacking Group? ORLY? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Venerable? Yes. But oldest?

    Wikipedia says cDc was founded in 1984. But it also says Chaos Computer Club has that beat by three years. And there are, or were, lots of others.

    For instance: DECMUG (Digital Equipment Corporation MisUsers Group), which, though small, was well established by about 1973 IIRC.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  55. Re:I expected the Chaos Computer Club by mentil · · Score: 1

    The phone phreaks that stole documents from AT&T to make their own boxes, were the real early hackers.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  56. His name is very confusing by TimothyHollins · · Score: 2

    If he's the Beto, when do we get the Release Candidate?

  57. Pathetic by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

    Politician: I'm a rockstar/actor! General Population: OMG I LOVE YOU Slashdot: Lol dummies Politician: I skateboarded and was a member of a script kiddie group nobody heard of or cares about. Slashdot: OMG I LOVE YOU!

  58. cDc first? What if 2600? by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    2600 existed prior to cult of the dead cow. The 2600 group started publishing the hackers quarterly the same year cDc was founded. But existed many years before that.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!