Slashdot Mirror


WINE 991031 (Hallowine) Released

Egonis Similaris writes " WINE 991031 (Hallowine) has been released." My main personal WINE wish is to use it to run Quickbooks. Has anyone else gotten QB to work reliably under WINE?

283 comments

  1. I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100%

  2. AOL is the *best* ISP. Serious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love AOL to death! I'm sorry!

    1. Re:AOL is the *best* ISP. Serious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect you do. B1ff says he misses you and sends his regards. Call.

    2. Re:AOL is the *best* ISP. Serious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? really? oh man, I am outta here. talk to you guys in a while. *poof*

  3. VNC and Bandwidth by Louziffer · · Score: 1
    I use VNC to administrate my home firewall machine... works wonderfully.

    Only one (small, insignificant to some) caveat:

    Watch your bandwidth when using VNC. The Linux client has some bandwidth control, but no such control was coded into the Windows version. When you have the Windows client up, it can be a real hog.

    I'm hoping to hack some changes into their client code for Windows when I get some time. My wife is a Windows user, and when she's controlling the connection on the firewall from her machine the network takes a distinct hit.

    --

    LouZiffer

  4. The HL engine sucks, play Team Fortress Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust me, the engine in HL is so old and crusty!

  5. What's a virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I need one?

  6. AOL dosn't use PPP... by delmoi · · Score: 1

    AOL uses it's own proprietary communications protocol, Based on it's proprietary network. (I guess, I can't see any other reason for them to do this). That's why you have things like 'aol network interface' under windows, to allow you to connect to the net without using WAOL.

    I heard that AOL was going to switch there interface at some point in the future, but until then, don't expect to be able to get on the net. Even if you can get the AOL shell up (witch requires IE4, I believe), you still won't be able to get the rest of the box connected to the net, unless there's a linux driver out.

    You should really try to get your parents to drop AOL....

    --
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  7. Re:Other WABI limitation: 256 colors by Croaker · · Score: 2

    Actually, they released a patch that allows WABI to run on > 256 color displays. It will only use 256 colors, but it can cope with 16 and 32 bit displays.

    They also released a patch that allows sound to work. I can now get the cheesy Win 3.1 startup sound. Ah! The nostalgia! (or is that nausea?)

  8. no. you can not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pickle!

  9. AOL *does* use PPP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust me. It does.

  10. WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why run that through Wine when there is a Linux SETI client available?

    1. Re:WHY? by Deitheres · · Score: 1
      Because I like the graphics :-)

      --
      Child: Mommy, where do .sig files go when they die?
      Mother: HELL! Straight to hell!
      I've never been the same since.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    2. Re:WHY? by Psiren · · Score: 1

      Ah, you mean those pretty graphics that reduce unit processing by 50%? I'll stick with my Linux client, thanks very much ;)

  11. Re:ICQ working on WINE yet? by z4ce · · Score: 1

    LICQ has message history. Right click on the person's nick and click on "history".

    Ian Zink

  12. That is not a better one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's worse than all the other ones.

  13. Perhaps NOT, hmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it should not be "Windows Isn't a Nice Environment". Yeah?

  14. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but the only thing I ever got to run under WINE was calculator.

  15. It's not funny. Don't laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahhahahahha!!!

  16. Re:That is not true. by Spamizbad · · Score: 1

    Hes' correct however. Maybe you should think before YOU post.

  17. Damn Straight by Pheez · · Score: 1

    Hell yeah..... Get NZ and then Make dummie files of all the .dll (except Javai.dll) to get rid of that damn ad banner.

  18. Stars! by Tarnar · · Score: 1

    The epitome of resource managing, ship building, space exploring, empire games. And it's basically a Win3.11 app, so it's ALWAYS worked under Wine!

    Yay for Stars! Yay for Wine!

  19. LINUX=Linux l(caps I)nux liNux linuX ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong, but I am wrong too. It's neither of these.

  20. I had that idea 23 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I did it back then. *sigh*

  21. Re:OS/2 == Amiga... dead dead dead. by technos · · Score: 2

    I have no idea why OS/2. I work for a leasing company, and will not be the fellow actually using it. From the paperwork, it looks like they'll be high-capacity intranet/workgroup servers. The company is simultaneously early-returning the six NT boxen we leased them last year, so draw your own conclusion.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  22. Damn Straight by Pheez · · Score: 1

    Hell yeah..... Get NZ and then Make dummie files of all the .dll (except Javai.dll) to get rid of that damn ad banner. NetZero download

  23. It is incorrect that it is incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see?

  24. Re:Quickbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, pirate everything! Steal, steal, steal! Don't you at all worry that the VMWare code belongs to the people who wrote it and you have no right whatsoever to use it when it's not licensed to you. And don't you worry about those programmers at VMWare who are going to lose their jobs because thousands of other people like you were just too cheap to either pay the $99 or not use their product.

  25. ahh, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is incorrect that it is incorrect that it is incorrect.

  26. What does WINE stand for? by laktar · · Score: 1

    Does WINE actually stand for anything, i.e. WINdows Emulator? I've never seen any mention of this on the web site. If not, what does the name come from?

    1. Re:What does WINE stand for? by SgtPepper · · Score: 3

      WINE Is Not an Emulator

      Because everythings native it doesn't really EMULATE anything, it REPLACES or DUPLICATES

    2. Re:What does WINE stand for? by jd · · Score: 2
      It's a recursive acronym: WINE Is Not an Emulator.

      It'll be there, somewhere, on their website, as that's where I first found out what it meant.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:What does WINE stand for? by Deitheres · · Score: 1
      Actually, WINE stands for WINE Is Not an Emulator (God I love recursive acronyms!). It is called this because it actually does not emulate, or mimic, the Windows API architecture, it actually rebuilds it. A very fascinating concept. Hope this helps.

      Charlie

      --
      Child: Mommy, where do .sig files go when they die?
      Mother: HELL! Straight to hell!
      I've never been the same since.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    4. Re:What does WINE stand for? by smileyy · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it is like all well-named things, and is a recursive acronym:
      WINE Is Not an Emulator.

      --
      pooptruck
    5. Re:What does WINE stand for? by rde · · Score: 2

      It's a recursive acronym: WINE Is Not an Emulator.
      This is just FUD put out by microsoft. The fact that the cunning bastards made the acronym recursive shows how desperate they were to hide the truth: that WINE is an acronym coined by the DOJ that stands for Windows Is Not Explorer.

      Proof that WINE doesn't emulate Windows can be seen in the fact that every microsoft program you run doesn't install IE and reassociate jpegs therewith.

    6. Re:What does WINE stand for? by toast0 · · Score: 1

      IIRC somewhere in their documentation it explains this....
      it infact stands for two contradictory things, one of which is recursive
      WINdows Emulator
      Wine Is Not an Emulator


      go fig :)

    7. Re:What does WINE stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it says on the page that it does not stand for Windows Emulator like most people think, but for WINE is not an emulator.

    8. Re:What does WINE stand for? by perky · · Score: 1
      perhaps it should be "Windows Isn't a Nice Environment"

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    9. Re:What does WINE stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I thought *everyone* knew it stood for "WINE's Not an Emulator". At least, that's what my pet GNU told me ;-).

  27. Re:Eudora 4...? by Black+Art · · Score: 1

    I have not tried the latest version of Eudora with Wine. The last time it wanted all sorts of MFC dlls. I will have to try it again.

    I have tried to get Qualcomm to do a Linux port. No answer yet. The current version of Eudora is VERY nice. (The multi-threading is sweet!) This is something I would pay for all over again. Anything to get away from the great beast of Redmond.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  28. I don't know about QB... by Deitheres · · Score: 2
    ... but Adobe Pagemill works pretty well with WINE. It has allowed me to use Windows less and less. Also on a side note, has anyone gotten the Windows SETI@home client to work with WINE? It will connect, but it freezes at the fast fourier transform. Hmm. Well anyway. WINE is a magnificent piece of software. You should all go snag the latest version.

    --
    Child: Mommy, where do .sig files go when they die?
    Mother: HELL! Straight to hell!
    I've never been the same since.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  29. still.... see...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is incorrect that it is incorrect that it is incorrect that it is incorrect.

  30. Quickbooks with VMware. by jelwell · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried quickbooks under wine, but I run it just fine and dandy with VMware.
    Joseph Elwell.

    1. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by Clived · · Score: 1

      Hmmn Joe Good point. I'm toying with the idea of getting Wine OR Vmware. To my simple mind ;), Vmware sounds cleaner, and comments like the one you just made about Quickbooks, seems to confirm that

      --
      Clive DaSilva Email: clive.dasilva@gmail.com Ubuntu 18.10 Kernel 4.18
    2. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, while the concept of VMware is cleaner (sort of), it is a slower technique, at least in my experience... VMware is useable on a PII 266 with 64 megs of RAM (I'd imagine having 128 MB's would have helped) but it's not as fast as Wine, AFAICT... and Wine doesn't require the same amount of resources (64 megs MINIMUM for VMWare? Ouch...), again, in my experience.

    3. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and in response to my own post :), another disadvantage of VMWare is the need of a hardfile or partition for the Windows installation, not to mention Windows itself... Wine can (theoretically) run on a machine without a trace of DOS/Windows on it (I have this sort of set up on my machine and it seems to work... sometimes. ;)

    4. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by zuvembi · · Score: 1

      Yes VMWare will run more stuff, but Wine runs it faster. I found that Wine basically runs things about the same speed that windows does (if it works). VMware on my system on the other hand is kinda jerky (Dual PIII-450 - 128 MB RAM). My advice would be to try wine first and see if it works. If not do the trial for vmware and see if you like it, it's a neat toy if nothing else.

    5. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by Lee+Cremeans · · Score: 2

      VMware isn't really an emulator; it's a program that virtualises the processor you already have (something like the trick IBM VM does on System/3[79]0s, and also similar to what Win3.1/95/98 do to allow you to run DOS programs), so you can run another x86 OS inside the OS you already run. Those virtualisation tricks also (IIRC) add a good amount of overhead to the system, so it slows it down, but the hit is a lot less than actually running a software emulator (though actually, I think certain peripherals like the VGA may be emulated).

      If you're looking for something that *does* run on non-PC hardware, you may want to check out Bochs, though like any software emulation, that's very slow unless your machine's own CPU is very fast. Also, the guy behind Bochs is also organising his own "freemware" project, which is basically a Open Source clone of VMware.

      -lee

    6. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      I just stopped by their site, but without having a Wintel machine handy I can't quite tell what they're providing?

      Is it basically SoftPC for x86?

      If so, though it sounds slow, I'd LOVE it... I could do whatever i wanted to do with the system, then backup the hard disk file and have nothing to worry about... Anyone know? Or am i being off-topic here?

    7. Re:Quickbooks with VMware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah a little off topic but VMWare is cool. And a lot faster than you would think. Just try it out.

  31. well, I understand, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is incorrect that it is incorrect that it is incorrect that it is incorrect that it is incorrect!

  32. Re:That is not true. by acarey · · Score: 1

    What the heck? It _is_ true, stop saying it isn't!

    --
    -- "I believe the human being and the fish can coexist peacefully." - George W. Bush, 29 September 2000
  33. C:\windows\system.ini: "shell = progrman.exe" by delmoi · · Score: 1

    Windows 95/98 can run with the windows 3.1 interface

    Change the line "shell=Explorer.exe" in the C:\windows\system.ini file, to "shell=progman.exe". You'll need to make all those '.grp's again though


    --
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  34. Quickbooks by AstroJetson · · Score: 1

    I second that notion. Actually, I'd settle for plain ol Quicken. That's about the only reason I boot up Winders any more. Anybody know if it works w/ WINE? If so, I know what I'm doing tonight.

    --
    Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    1. Re:Quickbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, the terrible problems of piracy. It's data... data is free. Nobody can own a sequence of bits.

    2. Re:Quickbooks by jelwell · · Score: 2

      Programs that work with wine says, "In particular, 16-bit versions of Word, Excel and Quicken do work well enough with Wine for many purposes, although they are by no means flawless."

      And this page is dated Quarter 2 1996 - so I imagine Quicken works a whole lot better now.
      The official list of apps that work is at WineHQ
      Joseph Elwell.

    3. Re:Quickbooks by brokenin2 · · Score: 1
      Last time I tried, (about 4 or 5 months ago), it ran, but once you were in it, you couldn't do anything useful (like click on anything in the program, or do anything at all).

      One is forced to ask.. why not just get look into starting a GPL'd project that does something simillar, and then we wouldn't need to emulate, "not-emulate" or otherwise..

    4. Re:Quickbooks by Binx+Bolling · · Score: 1

      I gave up trying quicken in wine (Qoc au vin?) long ago. VMware is absolutely rock-solid (or as solid as whatever guest OS you use). It runs quicken flawlessly. Since neither Quickbooks nor Quicken are Free, the VMware's non-Free status should not be an issue. At $75 non-commercial, it's a bargain.

    5. Re:Quickbooks by Reid · · Score: 1

      I fired up a version of Quicken from about 1996, and it actually worked pretty well! At last! This is the first time I can say that. I admit I've skipped a few versions because of some WINE startup problem that I wasn't interested in diagnosing.

      Speaking of which, the problem I was having was timing out building font metrics or something. That was because it was having trouble with the fonts on my system. A fix I've seen is to make sure you run "mkfontdir" on all of your font directories. My problem, however, is that it doesn't like xfstt, my True Type font server. If I disable that, things are fine. Does anyone know if there's a way to get them to work together? Running mkfontdir in my windows font directory doesn't help.

    6. Re:Quickbooks by Neph · · Score: 1
      At $75 non-commercial, it's a bargain.

      Eh? The non-commercial version is now priced at US$99. The commercial version, incidentally, is US$299. I'd love to be able to use it at work, but I can't get approval at that price... Sigh.

      Steve 'Nephtes' Freeland | Okay, so maybe I'm a tiny itty

    7. Re:Quickbooks by Modrick · · Score: 1

      I get that same error. I downloaded and compiled
      the new wine but when I ran it I got this junk.

      I also have my windows font dir on my font path.


      X Error of failed request: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)
      Major opcode of failed request: 45 (X_OpenFont)
      Serial number of failed request: 81
      Current serial number in output stream: 82
      err:win32:EnterCriticalSection Critical section 0x836fa2c wait timed out, retrying (60 sec)
      err:win32:EnterCriticalSection Critical section 0x836fa2c wait failed err=102
      X Error of failed request: BadFont (invalid Font parameter)
      Major opcode of failed request: 47 (X_QueryFont)
      Resource id in failed request: 0x3400015
      Serial number of failed request: 82
      Current serial number in output stream: 83

    8. Re:Quickbooks by hab136 · · Score: 1

      I regularly run 16-bit quicken (like version 2 or something) under WINE 981108. Newer versions of WINE work, but are really funky. I usually try them out, decide I don't like 'em, then switch back to my old-but-stable version.

      I usually stay on top of new versions of software (okay, I'm a new-version-aholic), but with quicken in particular, I've stayed with the old win31 version. It holds all my finances - I want to be damn sure it's not going to lose them! Besides, I've not seen anything compelling to make me want to upgrade. Internet links? Yeah, I really want my checkbook network-aware (shudder). Really, it does the job, it's quick and small, and I doubt I'll ever upgrade.

      Anyways, WINE 981108 has been the ultimate version for me so far. Give it a try.

    9. Re:Quickbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So buy a copy of it for personal use and take it to work. There are vmware license generating programs floating around too I believe. Just grab one of those and make up a license. vmware should be GPL'd anyway.

    10. Re:Quickbooks by Reid · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what I was seeing, minus the X errors for some reason. If it's any consolation, you may get around it by removing your windows font directory from your font path. (You can use "xset -fp dir" to do that.) That worked for me. Maybe that could even be placed into a wine wrapper script. It's not exactly ideal, though....

  35. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why so?

  36. Web base alternate to quickbooks - netledger.com by shahid · · Score: 1

    It looks like www.netledger.com is a good alternate to QuickBooks. It even as an option to upload your QB datafile and populate your database on their server.
    BTW, I tried uploading my file *.qbb and it failed saying that it expects *.qbw.

    Unfortunately its not free. They charge $4.95/month.

    Has anyone tried it ?

  37. Verio is the devil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And DN.

  38. Re:Predictions: Faster or Slower from here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on a couple of factors:

    1/ In australia software can be decompiled for the use of making a compatable product. So if Win9x is decompiled probably faster.

    2/ However also less and less knowlage is known about the remaining API's and some weird API functions are going to be dificult to replicate without decompiling.

  39. Re:Telnet works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The telnet program that comes with Win9x works under wine.

  40. What is the status of the Corel "Big Plan" by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    Seems that the last thing I heard about Wine is that it had really kinda been taken under Corel's wing (with Corel's paid developers) and was working up to being a devel environment. I'm not too sure how many people remember this, but I'm curious to know what the heck is happening with all of this.

    1) I have never found a decent use for wine. I don't really use the prod apps for Win9x, and if I want to play games, it's best to go native.
    2) Corel made it sound like the wine project was going the route of making it easier to greate cross-platform code for Windows and Linux. Was this the "entire" project? Or was this just the end they were working on? Is the "main" project still emulation while Corel runs a splinter project concerned with creating an IDE and backing libs??

    What Corel was gamming on to sounded interesting, but there is definately room for both. I noticed a few posts mentioned that app support seemed to be getting worse lately. Is this the result of the "new direction", or what?

    The final possibility is that I read a press release with very little basis in reality. (as with most press releases.)

    So I'm looking for some of you "Wineeies" to come on down and school me up on the wine skinny.

    Muchas Gracias!
    ~Jason Maggard
    "If we ban hemp due to it's relationship to marajuana, we should ban grapes due to their relationship to wine."

  41. PPP by delmoi · · Score: 1

    Well, if AOL is the 'macintosh' of the ISP world, then a PPP link would be the "Windows98", in otherwords, just as easy. I've setup several dialup networking scripts without entering *any* information other then the username, password, and phonenumber. I was getting free internet for quite a while with a L/P of 'test/test'. I didn't even know what ISP I was using (Well I did, but it didn't matter)
    --
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  42. Re:Still need a few "essentials" by GreyFauk · · Score: 1

    borrow a small hd....
    unplug linux-drive
    plug in small hd...

    Install winblows
    unplug small hd re-plug as slave
    plug back in linux-drive

    boot
    copy necessary /windows/system files etc. etc
    to directory on linux drive...
    edit wine.conf
    format windoze off of small hd (don't wanna contaminate anything)
    chuck small drive back into parts box

    --
    Friends don't let friends buy Compaq's. (Dell/Gateway... same same) You want a good computer? Build it yourself.
  43. Moderators Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang it, used the last of my points on the Nanotech thread.

    Please moderate the previous post as informative

  44. Re:Wine isn't y2k compliant by Zipo+Bibrok+5e8 · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, nothing needs to know the Wine version number except the user. Is your brain Y2K compliant, or will you believe that Wine 00xxxx is a hundred years old?

    --
    -- The Brory Stool Co.: We accidentally the best stools from behind seven proxies, since 2009.
  45. Re:viruses and wine by delmoi · · Score: 2

    Well, most viruses are hard-coded to windows, I would think, and wouldn't work without the apropriate filestructure.

    On the otherhand, it would be posible for a virus writer to target Wine along with 9x and NT if they really wanted.... (of course, you still have to deal with per-user security on linux, A virus couldn't kill linux unless it ran as root)
    --
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  46. Re:VMWare does not exist for Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you an idiot? Please go to www.vmware.com. It came out for Linux first.

  47. Does VMware make wine obsolete ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the subject says it all...

    1. Re:Does VMware make wine obsolete ??? by bero-rh · · Score: 1
      No. For a number of reasons:
      • VMWare is not open-source, and it's not even free as in $0.
      • VMWare actually emulates the hardware, making it slower. If we ever get a really working wine, it'll run faster than VMWare.
      • VMWare requireS Windoze to run. I don't want to support Microsoft by buying a copy of Windoze to run within VMWare
      --
      This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
  48. SETI by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    Why use SETI?
    I thought, though I am often mistaken, that SETI was an inefficient use of processor time, and that they were sending out already-hashed-over data again because people were working through the data faster than they could collect it. Anybody know the deal?

    --

    Insert mind here.
    1. Re:SETI by Deitheres · · Score: 1
      Hmm. I haven't heard much about that. I've heard that distributed.net was coming out with some kind of thing akin to the SETI@home project. I haven't checked into it though.

      --
      Child: Mommy, where do .sig files go when they die?
      Mother: HELL! Straight to hell!
      I've never been the same since.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

  49. Wine isn't y2k compliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, when will they fix the y2k bug in the version number?

    1. Re:Wine isn't y2k compliant by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      There's no need to. It'll just roll over to 00xxxx, and when 2099 comes along, it will either be obsolete, or well-developed enough to use x.x.x version numbers.
      --------
      "I already have all the latest software."

  50. Re:Ecco Pro V4? Novel Informs? ACDSee? by jmalicki · · Score: 1

    Have you tried gqview? It is a nice ACDSee-like application.

  51. I am thinkink you not know yer games. by Toodles · · Score: 1

    Team Fortress Classic is an add-on to HL, and uses the HL engine... It doesn't make much sense to reccommend a game because the engine it uses sucks.. :) Of course, maybe you mean Team Fortress, which uses the Quake 1 engine. Naah, that couldn't be it. WHo would call the HL engine obsolete in the face of Quake Classic? :) HL is da bomb. Single Player. Not multiplayer. However, TFC more than makes up for this, being one of the best multiplayer games for a first person shooter ever. Of course, UT's almost out, so Im sure Ill have to rethink that. Toodles

    --
    Toodles D. Clown
  52. Re:VMWare does not exist for Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? It came out for running on Smart Cards first! It was a tad slow, running on a 8-bit micro, but it's neat to run Linux/BeOS/WinNT on it. You should try it. You are crazy!

  53. Re: .sig files go straight to hell by FiberSocialist · · Score: 1

    hahahahahahaha

  54. Re:Halloween Wine by HiH · · Score: 1

    What version of word/excel have you tried ? I can't get them to work ..

    --
    resilience is futile
  55. I think I do know my games sir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because HL is not based on the Quake 2 engine, it's based on the Pong engine. Sure, it's upgraded a little, but it sucks donkey balls. Now, TFC on the other hand, I think they use some sort of advanced NASA simulation engine. Really. The original TF used CGA graphics, but I was not talking about that. Ta ta.

  56. Re:Try [to compile] GnuCash by poopie · · Score: 1

    yeah. I have to agree that it was too much work to compile from src (esp on linux...), I felt like I should be getting paid...

    ... anyway once it was running it looks pretty nice, but I'd like to feel that there was significant momentum behind it before I dump all of my financial data into it.

    ... like the gtk stuff... the could ditch a lot of crud with gtk/gnome bindings, what are they waiting for? gtk1.3? gnome2.0? and a lot of the nonstandard stuff that it requires to compile doesn't seem to be well maintained either.

    Would be easier to start from scratch and write gnome-cash?

    maybe they should change the name to PatheticCash?

    gnucash: bootstrap file is /usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
    (Register #(Register foo 50-foo boolean foo something # # #f #f #f #f))

  57. Re:WINE runs on Windows good though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does, I have to agree.

  58. Re:Plausible Deniability: Denied! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please Note: I'm only posting this as a reply to this partcular message because it has a mission web site attached, and is thus likely to generate a large response.

    Everyone, please, Please PLEASE be nice when you talk to Intuit, or any other commercial (or non-commercial) manufacturer. In this particular case, remember a couple of things:

    • Intuit is in business to make money, not software.

    • The phone rep who quoted the "two calls" figure was probably just making this up, or at the very best, basing this number on their own personal recollections.

    • (OK, so more than a couple of things) We tend to exaggerate both large and small events ourselves. The CSR could have been expressing that he/she receives very few requests for a Linux version when compared to the volume of calls from PAYING CUSTOMERS who can't seem to print, or something.

    Now, I know that some of us actually are paying customers. I myself have asked for a Linux version of both Quickbooks and Quicken via both Intuit's suggestion form, and during telephone calls.

    Everyone just remember: BE POLITE!!

  59. Re:Halloween Wine by ChiefArcher · · Score: 1

    I got it to work under Office 97 RH 6.1 I used the RPM's.. ChiefArcher

  60. Re:OS/2 == Amiga... dead dead dead. by technos · · Score: 2

    I just signed a PO for five IBM servers with brand spanking new copies of IBM OS/2 Warp on them from the factory. IBM still supports it!

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  61. Re:WINE runs on Windows good though. (me too) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me too.

  62. Re:ICQ working on WINE yet? by Daniel+H. · · Score: 1

    I got ICQ 99a working under Wine 990925 or some release similar using the '-winver win95' argument. I got it to start up and everything. I could look at the history and mess around, but ICQ would not connect to the server. It seems like ICQ99a at least is getting close to working stages, just need to get it to connect to the server. Before I tried ICQ99a, however, I made sure that before I closed ICQ down in Windows for the last time I made sure it wasn't docked on the side (I don't think Wine implements that yet) and rather than being anything on the task bar not working I think the problem was more that it might have been docked on the side of the screen.

  63. MS Foxpro Support?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Entertained the idea of moving a number of desktops to X on Linux in the past. We have two custom apps written using MS FoxPro that would have to be supported. I tried running them under WINE without any luck. Never found anyone who has had luck using foxpro apps with WINE. Any new developments with the new 'hallowine' release? Will probably be trying this out next week but would like to know if anyone else has had luck with foxpro under WINE?? Thanks! Jason Klein jr_klein@all-spam.yahoo.com Kill 'all-spam' if you'd like to email!

    1. Re:MS Foxpro Support?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to run FoxBase on Xenix, and looked into porting the app to Flagship, a product which is Clipper/Fox compatible. We ended up using Fox 2.6 and SCO Unix, but Flagship looked like a good solution. Then there's Recital. There are also some GNU/open source projects, such as xbase and harbour. That assumes you're not running 3.0.

  64. Re:Ecco Pro V4? Novel Informs? ACDSee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ACDSee runs fine except when you are looking at the thumbnails the file names are over the images instead of below them. and I don't mean on top of the image I mean ON them. Other then that I was playing with it for about 30 minutes yesterday using the latest wine and couldn't find anything else wrong. I was impressed. The only good alternative to ACDSee is http://www.compupic.com/ which has a linux version available and it's very nice.

  65. Re:ICQ working on WINE yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think any "tray icon only" programs will run with wine yet. As someone has already said licq runs very nicely and has a history and all that stuff.

  66. Roblammo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Roblammo,
    Do you know how to check WINE's database survay to find out which app works and which doesn't?
    you are welcome.

  67. Windows Is Not Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...you know its not... How else are you gonna run IE5 ??

    Not flamebait..other than to say Mozilla bites & Wine is a great way to fill in while we wait for appz.

    1. Re:Windows Is Not Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wine is a great way to fill in while we wait for appz.

      Is that drinking it or running it? It should be called ISDN...it still does nothing...

    2. Re:Windows Is Not Evil by tallbloke · · Score: 1

      Of course it is:
      Go to google.com and type in

      more evil than satan

      :)

  68. Re:AOL (flamebait) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The catch is they never let you go without throwing deal after deal at you. Eventually you have to get rude and say what part of CANCEL don't you fuckers understand?! And of course the next thing you know there are AOL cds in the mail addressed to your kids...

    I would really like to see MS pop a cap into these bastards. And I hate MS.

  69. Re:OS/2 == Amiga... dead dead dead. by Dwonis · · Score: 1

    "Linux is obsolete."
    -- Andy Tanenbaum

    'Nuff said
    --------
    "I already have all the latest software."

  70. Try MoneyDance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does a lot of the things that Quicken does but GnuCash doesn't (check printing, reminders, etc). http://seanreilly.com/java/moneydance.

    It's written in Java so it's a little slower, but it gets the job done.

    1. Re:Try MoneyDance by poopie · · Score: 1

      okay.... I tried it again, and I guess it and java have matures quite a bit since the last time I tried it.

      only one problem with moneydance... it's *SHAREWARE*.... can't install it on an nfs server... :(

  71. You are all smoking lots & lots of crack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I would work nights at a 7-11 in South Central L.A. to pay for a better ISP than AOL...

    ..er, that is..if I had to. Pac*Bell DSL rocks my world. My gf has forgotten what I look like, and is probably cheating on me, I don't care. My commute has halved because I cant be away from the sweet sweet bandwidth for too long. Every storage device I own is at 90%+ capacity..filled with MP3s, warez & pr0n. My only social communication is via email..since my friends got DSL too, we never go anywhere.

    Wait, I think I'm the one smoking crack. Will someone please steal my computers?

  72. Re:Eudora 4...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a bunch of ppl at Qualcomm..according to them, no they have no plans of a unix or linux port. I hope they change their minds though. And this is lomion, im posting AC coz dont have my password here.

  73. What Corel's Doing by Ian+Schmidt · · Score: 4

    Wine has always been 2 projects in one. The actual Windows API reimplementation (WineLib) and a binary loader (Wine, or "the emulator part" as some people refer to it) which loads windows EXE and DLL files and hooks them up with the API stuff in WineLib. The binary loader itself is basically small and bugless - .EXE files are typically a lot less sophisticated than Unix ELF binaries and shared libraries so there's not much to do there in the first place.

    So, Corel has put a lot of work into the Windows reimplementation end of things, reorganizing Wine's COM support and header files so you can now compile MFC (which contains a fair amount of MS "insider coding", although luckily you get the source with MSVC++) under WineLib. They also paid Cygnus to do the anonymous struct and union patches which everyone now gets to enjoy in GCC 2.95.2. As a result of this work they now have a common codebase between Windows and Linux for their office applications.

    The best part is they've been willing to do all this work to the specs of Wine's current "Linus", Alexandre Julliard. So wine's gotten a ton of good professional work on stuff the regular spare-time developers would have taken much longer on. We now have a solid infrastructure for Win32 threading, impressive OLE/COM support, a much more debugged user interface, and lots of common controls.

    As a result it's almost more accurate to say Corel was under Wine's wing - they've had patches rejected due to conflicts with Alexandre's architectural vision, and promptly resubmitted them with everything fixed. I wish all companies involved in open source were that way :)

    Anyway, the first stage of that involvement's coming to a close. Corel naturally won't tell us their actual progress with their apps, but they are known to be working on an installer now and their recent patches have been for progressively more obscure bugs. Incidentally, their work has made a lot of other applications work much better too. ModPlug Tracker, a popular Windows tracker-style music application, now works with nary a glitch on Wine. Less than 6 months ago it was unstable and full of graphical glitches.

    And as far as claims that app support is getting worse, that's generally false. As with any large project there are frequently bugs that break certain apps, and sometimes apps work accidentally due to combinations of bugs and stop when that bug is fixed. Most people track the "official" releases instead of CVS so something breaks and they don't see that it's fixed again the next day in CVS and end up with the wrong impression :)

    -Ian, wine-devel but not speaking for 'em.

  74. Re:Not Transparent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Also remember that progman.exe and taskman.exe are just applications. They do not provide shell services like Explorer. Therefore printer spooler view, dial-up networking, fonts folder, control panel etc. will start Explorer (including its taskbar and tray) anyway, ruining the effect.

    No. They start an Explorer window, but not the taskbar or tray.

    If you're running Win98 (or an IE4 desktop?) then Explorer won't run unless it's the shell.

  75. Field Report: Intuit Technical Support by BaronCarlos · · Score: 2
    As a Tech Rep for Quickbooks, I know that the "company line" is that it only works under Windows and Mac. (Though some have gotten it to work under a Linux/Samba Network (but that took some imagination))
    I have not personally tried to work Quickbooks under any other platform, including WINE, but I DO know that there is a plan in the works for later versions of the program (Quicken also) to work under a Linux Kernel.

    Stay tuned for more details.
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"

    --
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"
    "Got Linux?"

  76. Re:WINE on OS/2: Project Odin by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    Unlike WINE, Project Odin actually converts the Windows app into a native OS/2 application. The EXE and DLL's are modified so that OS/2 can load them, and a Win32 equivalent of the DLL's is provided. Odin also has a very cool feature where it intercepts the loader and actually convers a Windows EXE/DLL into an OS/2 EXE/DLL on the fly. This lets you run your Windows apps under OS/2 in a truly seamless fashion.

    Actually, that's exactly what WINE does. Remember: Wine Is Not an Emulator, it just converts winxx executables to ELF, then links it into winelib. That's why you can't run wine on other platforms besides the x86.
    --------
    "I already have all the latest software."

  77. Re:Other WABI limitation: 256 colors by SirThomas · · Score: 1
    I really want to get this to work sice Age of Empires wants a 8 bit depth screen when using wine under Linux. However, when I try your trick, this is what I get:

    server is already active for display 0

    Any ideas how to get around this? I'm running XFree86 3.3.5 Thanks

  78. Slower by leereyno · · Score: 1

    Wine will never be a complete 100% compatible implementation of the windows API. Even microsoft cannot implement a 100% compatible implementation of the win 3.x api in 95 or 98. Their answer to compatibility problems is naturally that we should upgrade to the win32 version of program X. Wine will never achieve 100% compatibility, instead what we will see are windows applications that are designed to run on wine as well as win9x/2000. All wine has to do is get 98% or more of the way there and achieve a reasonable market share. Of course we will also see microsoft intentionally breaking their products so that they will not run on wine. Which come to think of it may actually help wine since it would be like shining a spotlight on incompatibilities and creating the need to resolve them. Who knows, if that happens wine may be more compatible than windows, or at least more stable.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  79. Re:Halloween Wine by Gorgonzola · · Score: 1

    Although I am not the original poster who said that he/she got Excel and Word running on Wine, I managed to do the same. I have a Office97 installation disk collecting dust on my bookshelf and decided to give it a try. The installer cocks up, stating that it can't read certain files on the CD-ROM, but if I run Excel straight from the disk it runs. I managed to put a bar-chart in it. Loading and saving documents doesn't work however. The same applies to Word. This was all done on a machine which has never been touched by a Windoze installation.

    --
    -- Spelling and grammar errors tend to be a sign of erroneous thinking.
  80. Re:Halloween Wine by Micah · · Score: 1

    Did you have 'Doze native DLLs on the box? Or use Wine's open source replacements?

  81. ICQ?! by cduffy · · Score: 1

    I've seen more Linux ICQ clients than... well, nevermind. Nonetheless, there are a lot -- many of which are far better than kicq. I personally use gtkicq at the moment, but will be switching to Jabber (which supports ICQ, AIM, IRC and more to come, all at the same time, or, when using its own protocol, actually has some excuse for security -- well, this may still be on the drawing board, but the release will, and an excuse for security's far more than ICQ and AIM have right now).

    As for Intuit's stuff, the 16-bit versions should work pretty well under WINE -- and I can personally vouch for the fidelity of Minesweeper's performance.

  82. Re:Wine has wrong idea: make native Linux apps bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is offtopic. Native linux apps are better than Windoze apps already. Wine has not been made to integrate Windoze apps into your Linux box. That would be saying DosEmu should be burned because it runs in real mode. Sheesh....

  83. Another lib for porting win to unix: TWINE by egghat · · Score: 1

    Has anyone checked this out? How is it related to the things Corel is doing?

    http://www.codeweavers.com/twine/index.shtml

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    1. Re:Another lib for porting win to unix: TWINE by hawk · · Score: 2

      Twin is another attempt to make windows libraries. It is backed by a company, but GPL'd.

      Twine is an attempt to mix twin & wine. However, since the licenses are different, it has to use the less-free license (GPL).

      I think this is the first time I've heard of it since the announcement of twine; I can't say for certain whether it still exists, or ever would have been possible.


      hawk

  84. How useful is it without 'Doze? by Micah · · Score: 1

    I last tried WINE in May, and tried installing several apps. They ALL failed during the installation process, with the exception of a talking dictionary program (which did work to a certain extent). I tried Visual Age/Java, Hasbro's Risk, Stardock's Entrepreneur, an encyclopedia, a couple shareware games, MS Office 4.3, and I think a couple other things.

    I have a 100% Microsoft free system and intend to keep it that way. But it seems like most people only get things to work when they have a 'Doze partition and install on that end. When are the Wine folks going to concentrate on getting installers working? If installers don't work, how is the real thing supposed to work?

    Hopefully progress has been made in that area recently. But I don't intend to try Wine again until I get a new computer with XFree 4, hopefully in January...

  85. Re:Eudora 4...? by EvlG · · Score: 1

    Eudora is probably the best email client I have ever used. I love the organization of the features and it is nice and speedy. Fortunately the damn thing isn't full of bloatware like Outlook; it just does what it does well: email.

    If Qualcomm decided to make Eudora for Linux, I am sure I am not the only one who would run out and buy it. Perhaps we need some /. action to alert them to the fact that many of us would use Eudora at home and at the office if it was available.

  86. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    In the last two upgrades, fonts have improved dramatically, and I can run Word and Excel (although printing is still a bit sticky).


    Which versions of Word and Excel can you run? Office 97 and Office 2000 require Internet Explorer to be installed, and the licensing terms for IE try to stop you running it on any platform other than Windows. This fits in with Microsoft's view that IE is part of the operating system, but it's also a way of effectively tying Office to Windows.



    Are the Wine people working on a replacement for the DLLs from Internet Explorer, so that we can run all the MS and non-MS applications that depend on it?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  87. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think before you post!!
    ahah i'm not the same guy but i figured I'd ride the stupid freakin bandwagon.

    1. Re:That is not true. by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1
      You keep on saying that. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      • With apologies to Inigo M.
      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    2. Re:That is not true. by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      *RUNS SCREAMING INTO THE NIGHT*

      SO smarty pants. What DOES it stand for HM HM!!! TELL ME WHY DON'T YOU! hehehe I feel better now.

      Maby it stands for When Its Neat to Eat.

      TOP TEN LIST of things WINE could stand for.

      10. Where Is Nuke Exploding
      9. Whats In Norms Email
      8. Windows Is Normally Exploding
      7. Windows Is Not Evolving
      6. Why Is Norm Everlasting
      5. Who is Norm Everybody?
      4. What Is miNe problEm.
      3. WINdows crashEd
      2. WINdows cashEd
      And the number one..possible choice of things WINE could stand for
      1... Wine Is Not an Emulator

    3. Re:That is not true. by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

      Well, then, what IS true?

      This is the third message you've posted like this. Do you go up to people in a crowded room and shout "NO! YOU'RE WRONG!" in their face and then run off to do it to someone else, or is this simply something you do because you can hide as an AC?

      So tell us, why do you assume that everyone who says WINE stands for "WINE Is Not an Emulator" is (a) wrong and (b) not thinking?

      --

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  88. Re:The Problem with Wine by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2
    In my personal experience with wine, the success of wine is greatly dependant upon native window files, dll's mostly.

    Not so true any more. It's possible to run useful applications on a 100% Microsoft Free(tm) system.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  89. Wine has wrong idea: make native Linux apps better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By emulating Windows, you are validating Windows. Write better native Linux applications, and then you beat Windows on its own turf. KDE/GNOME are a step in the right direction. This is the true Windows killer.

  90. Re:Other WABI limitation: 256 colors by SirThomas · · Score: 1

    Thanks! Works perfectly!!

  91. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Th1nk b3f0r3 y0u p0zT!!

  92. Th4t 15 n0t tru3!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    think! b4 U post,

  93. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    Well yea, and ICQ :) if I could get those two working right (sorry but kicq is still crap) I'd say goodbye to windows forever, welll after a found a good minesweeper clone :)

  94. Eudora 4...? by eries · · Score: 1

    Anyone had any success running Eudora with WINE?

  95. Smartdraw anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone got Smartdraw (http://www.smartdraw.com) to work? The installer works and the application kind of starts but it doesn't work from there. Didn't see Smartdraw mentioned in the list of tested applications.

  96. Win 3.x software? by jd · · Score: 2
    My SO hates the Windows 95 interface, can't find any drivers for NT for her old hardware, and can't run Windows 3.1 natively on the new motherboard she's got. No graphics driver.

    I'm trying to convince her to switch to Linux, as it'll run -much- better, has drivers for ALL her hardware, and I suspect would be more intuitive for her. She's VERY reluctant to touch it, though, if it won't run her sofware, which is largely Windows 3.1-based.

    I've looked through the software database, but it's so out-of-date, they might as well have a GIF of a question mark there, instead. But, if WINE is at (or even close to) the point of being usable, and can run banking Windows 3.1 software and Eudora, then I -may- be able to convince her to switch.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Win 3.x software? by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      In general, WINE works much better with 3.1 software than 9x. That's no guarantee, though - the only way of being sure is to test it.

    2. Re:Win 3.x software? by jelwell · · Score: 1

      WABI! Wabi will run every bit of win3.1 software out there. It was created by Sun, but now owned and distributed by caldera. Wabi is a commercial product and it ran logicworks on my box, which is a pretty intensive app. I'd be surprised if there were applications that didn't run under wabi.
      Press Release
      However, it appears caldera discontinued wabi.

      Searching around, you might still be able to get a hold of it:
      http://www.LinuxMall.com/product/00094.html
      http://eunuchs.org/linux/wabi/wabi_content.html

      Joseph Elwell.

    3. Re:Win 3.x software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could also set progman.exe as your shell for NT 4, this would give that wonderful 3.51 interface back to the user... remember give the user what they want

    4. Re:Win 3.x software? by Qeyser · · Score: 1

      Well: I seem to recall that the "Custom" Win95 install has an option to use the Win 3.1 file manager interface rather than the Win95 interface. I've never actually tried it, so I don't know if its 100% transparent, but it may be a viable solution.

      -q

    5. Re:Win 3.x software? by neuroid · · Score: 1

      Have her change the shell=Explorer.exe line in system.ini to shell=progman.exe.

      -RN

  97. Alternatives? (Try using Eudora 3.1, it works....) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name me one e-mail client for linux (fetchmail is NOT an e-mail client) that can do:

    1. multiple POP addresses
    2. Properly render HTML (or RTF) formatted mail (sadly, is getting to be nearly mandatory)
    3. Extensive filtering, sorting, folders, etc. etc.
    4. and doesn't crash.

    I tried Mahogany *segfault, core dumped*
    I tried Netscape *one POP account, sorry*
    I tried Balsa, TkRat, Pine, Elm, Gmail, even good old 'mail' None of them cut it.

    Right now I'm using K-Mail, because it does multiple POP's, but quite frankly it isn't cutting it either. I'd love to write my own, but sadly I'm only just getting started programming.

    I did have Eudora Pro 3.1 running nearly flawlessly in a past version of wine. It did mostly everything I needed.

  98. The worst thing about WINE... by dsfox · · Score: 1

    ...is the interface to the database of working applications on their web page. There is no rhyme or reason to the order of the entries.

  99. does delphi work under wine by stewart.hector · · Score: 1

    any version of delphi that is... or am i hoping for too much!

    --
    1. Re:does delphi work under wine by clawson · · Score: 1

      Why worry about this, unless you need to use Microsoft tech in your Delphi app (COM, ADO, etc.), because RSN Inprise is supposed to come out with Linux-based Delphi...drooldrool

  100. Re:AfterStep and screen shots by Foogle · · Score: 1
    Yes you can run Wine apps concurrently with X apps. There are some really cool shots of Office 6.0 apps running under Wine, right next to their Linux equivalents (Gnumeric and Abiword I think). You can find them at the Gnome website I think.

    -----------

    "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

  101. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Pretender · · Score: 1

    I'm running Word and Excel 97 SR-2. Now, I do have a complete Win98 install on the old DOS partition, including IE4, so perhaps if IE is required, they're just relying on the one that's installed over there? (I might add, IE4 almost works; I can start to view simple web pages before it kicks me to the debugger.)

    I'm not running entirely "Windowsless" on this laptop, I just never have to _boot_ Windows to get anything done. *smiles*

    I am unsure of the answer to the "replacement DLL's" question. My guess is that eventually some of that will be taken care of, at least the bits that have somehow supposedly become part of the API, if it's really necessary. But I wasn't aware that Word and Excel 97 required IE (don't know about 2000). I'm sure they automatically install it given half the chance, though (like most other MS products).

  102. No, I think I have a better one... by bconway · · Score: 1

    Here goes: WINE Is Not an Emulator...BECAUSE IT DOESN'T FRIGGIN' WORK. No but seriously, I think the team has done a great job, but this thing just doesn't work. When was the last time you got WINE working well with ANYTHING?? I think I've gotten solitaire up and working without crashing or bizarre behavior. THAT'S IT. I've _almost_ gotten a few others that came close, but almost doesn't cut it. Perhaps one day...

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
  103. QuickBooks? Last time I checked... by cduffy · · Score: 2

    ...it worked. Sort of. That is to say, you could load the program and go through some basic functions, but I certainly wouldn't try to print; Some of the layout was incorrect also.

    However, this was back around June or so, and WINE's made fantastic progress since then (but then again, when isn't it making fantastic progress?). If the Win32 version doesn't work, btw, try the 16-bit one; That often helps (it certainly did with Quicken).

    [Btw, at the time that I'm posting it, this isn't redundant. Should it become so later, I'd appretiate not being moderated down on that regard].

  104. That is not it either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, please try again.

  105. Re:Other WABI limitation: 256 colors by CommanderTaco · · Score: 1

    you should use X -bpp 8 :1 if you're already running a server on :0.

  106. Re:Newsreaders -- > Agent, I had a dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this dream while I was camping for a month or so a while back that "Dingo" was a newsreader much like agent but for linux version 2.6 had just arrived in my deam it had a text version aswell, alot of my dreams come true so you never know :).

  107. That is not it either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go away.

  108. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

    Quicken is the single most-requested app for a Linux port. Intuit could make a bundle with a port. However, if their pointy-haired types don't wanna do it, that's their business.

    What I can't understand is why some Loki-like company doesn't simply go to Intuit and say "millions of Linux users want Quicken. License the source code to us, we'll port it, and you'll make money off every copy sold and not have risked a dime."

    Anyone want to start a "Loki for business apps" company with me? :)

  109. Wow, what a looser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I couldn't find someone worse than me. I just did. Wow.

  110. AOL... by Dijital · · Score: 1

    The only REAL things that kept me from switching over is AOL. My parents pay for AOL (and I never turn a free thing down), so I use it as my ISP. Does AOL run okay with WINE?


    Dijital

    --
    Diji
    "I came, I saw, I WTF'd!"
    1. Re:AOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but if your parents pay for a piece of shit like AOL wouldn't they be just as happy to pay for a real ISP service?

      (Just a thought...)

    2. Re:AOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I know that you can without the aol software I am not sure about the dial-up. My reason of uncertainity is only that I never have used AOL with that said why couldn't you use a chat script to log into aol. I admit chat scripts are ucky but there are programs, linuxconf to name one, out there that can break down chat to a few simple expect and sends (my favorite is that I have to expect a "return:" and send a "1").

    3. Re:AOL... by technos · · Score: 1

      AOL can be coerced to work under Linux as a plain 'ol PPP link, I believe. I've never actually tried, although I have forced a sister product, Compuserve 2K, to work with little hassle.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    4. Re:AOL... by Fnord · · Score: 2

      Wine won't work for that. AOL uses some strange proprietary tcp/ip driver, but someone has reversed engineered it. I haven't tried it (I just saw it on freshmeat) but its worth a try.

      Go to http://www.foo.org/james/aol/aolip.html

    5. Re:AOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't Work. AOL does not create a PPP link when you dial up. they use wierd in house aol shit

    6. Re:AOL... by mebob · · Score: 1

      first off dual-boot....
      and I do believe it is posible to connect to aol as if it were a regular tcp/ip connecting... It probally won't be quick and easy though
      I do know that you can do so in the qnx demo floppy.. hey any one know if or when qNx will be aviable free for personal use...

      --
      =1000101
    7. Re:AOL... by Dijital · · Score: 1

      Sir, I barely trust my parents with their PC, let alone a PPP internet account. Trust me, AOL is the Macintosh of ISPs and I feel safer with my parents on it.


      Dijital

      --
      Diji
      "I came, I saw, I WTF'd!"
  111. Re:VMWare does not exist for Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VMWare for Linux does, of course, exist.

  112. Re:OS/2 == Amiga... dead dead dead. by punkass · · Score: 1

    Wow...servers with OS/2 preinstalled..for what enviroment and why? Why OS/2 and not *nix or *BSD or even NT? I've never heard of anyone buying OS/2 for serving, or at least surviving it.

    --
    "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
  113. Predictions: Faster or Slower from here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does WINE accelerate now in its successful replacement of Windows API, or will it bog down and stall out trying to guess the last 10-5% of the remaining quirks/undocumented weirdness of win32? What do you think and why?

  114. Re:Why do we need Eudora? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't there enough high quality email clients available already? Why do we need a port of Eudora? I had nothing but problems with Eudora in Windows crashing and taking up 100% CPU time whenever it was sending or receiving mail.

  115. You are incorrect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe YOU should think before you post.

  116. Non-Windows Accounting Needed by Silas · · Score: 1
    We need folks to work on non-windows/novell accounting packages so that running Quickbooks on Un*x isn't even an issue.

    Check out the WebAccountant project, an attempt at organizing folks to write web-based accounting software using Perl and Postgres. It's a little stalled right now, just waiting for some excited and creative programmers to come along and get things going.

  117. Eudora in Wine? Yes! by ChrisGoodwin · · Score: 1

    Anyone had any success running Eudora with WINE?

    As a matter of fact, I have. The latest free version with Wine990704. I haven't tried it with a more recent version yet.

    The graphics on the buttons are messed up, but fortunately each button comes up with one of those little text windows that says its function.
    --

    --
    Pretend there is some witty statement here.
  118. Re:Starsiege Tribes.. by Dr.Whiz-Bang · · Score: 1

    i can get the intro animation, 3dfx splash logo, and it brings up the game meu (real purty) but i lose mouse support in the game and cannot do anything. it also does real weird things to my video card unless i run it on a second X server, and exit with a ctrl-alt-bkspc.

    gg

    --

    gg
    Dr.Whiz-Bang
  119. Wine = What I Never Execute. by cybrthng · · Score: 3
    Wine is a great idea, but for the years its been in the running, and the changes its evolved through i don't see it ever really completing.

    There was another package that was anounced on slashdot a few weeks ago about a "winelib" type programming package that is coming so people can just cross compile.. dunno if we will see that..

    I get solitaire to run, i've had other programs run, but once they work *DON'T* upgrade or make any changes, or else it may blow up.

    I'd like to see wine start from square one. They have plenty of code to scavange through, they have a HUGE amount of the API documented and coded, but the project has evolved into such a beast that it limits out any growth in a direction that wasn't planned for a few years back.

    Make a 1.0 milestone, say in 1.0 we will support Windows 3.1 apps, in 1.1 we will support win32, in 2.0 we will support Win95, in 3.0 we will support NT or whatever it may be.. but make it work for one layer, produce a 1.0 binary, get it in use, get the quirks resolved, have the foundation, learn from your mistakes, if it needs some re-work, re-work it, and then evolve it on up (only after feature locks, and then feature planning)

    1. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by cybrthng · · Score: 1
      been using wine for a few years, as my article first stated.

      and its been a few years, and still no 1.0 release, thats why i said, cut back, make a working release, and then add on..

      most people don't wanna run software that changes versions with dates, and Wine will never be more then a toy if there is now version scheme other then just having the latest and greatest and hoping nothing changes :)

      I'm proud of the wine team, great job, i don't disagree with that, but make a version that works, send it out.. too many bugs, too many features, too many kludges and no release date make it very un-usable.

    2. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3
      I'm running Word and Excel 97 SR-2. Now, I do have a complete Win98 install on the old DOS partition, including IE4, so perhaps if IE is required, they're just relying on the one that's installed over there? (I might add, IE4 almost works; I can start to view simple web pages before it kicks me to the debugger.)

      Technically, you are breaking the licence agreement for bgIE; it says that you may run it only on Windows. Whether this is actually illegal is another matter, especially as you actually own a Win98 licence (or I expect you do :-). There was a rather inconclusive discussion about a similar topic in an earlier story.

      But I wasn't aware that Word and Excel 97 required IE (don't know about 2000). I'm sure they automatically install it given half the chance, though (like most other MS products).

      Office 97 requires IE3 or later. I've recently tried running it on an IE-less Win98 system (Revenge of Mozilla is excellent), and while apps loaded after complaining about DLLs, you couldn't do anything (like open a file) without the thing breaking. Presumably the new file open dialogue box is part of IE. After I installed IE3 things worked.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Pretender · · Score: 3

      First, Wine has made incredible strides in the last year. By incredible I mean "I can't believe how many more applications, including popular ones, work or work better now."

      Second, it's the Wine people themselves who are also working on winelib; it's sort of a serendipitous project, I believe. That's not coming along quite as quickly last I checked, but if Corel really is getting involved then maybe that will change. Not sure how that has gone.

      I have been upgrading at every release for the last six months and the only time things have ever "broken" as the result of an upgrade, it has been because they changed the options or the .conf file and I didn't pay attention. Usually five minutes later and everything's working again.

      I should point out that I no longer use precompiled binaries; the code base is sort of large but it's worth it to compile it yourself. I fixed a lot of things by doing that. (Having to stick with glibc 2.0.7 for the time being sort of forced that as well.)

      I don't think that what they're doing lends itself to nailing down the releases the way you suggest (1.0=Win31, 1.1=win32, etc.). It's hard to know what's what in the vast undocumented world of the Win32 API's. They're really doing a fantastic job these days, anyway - if you haven't tried it in a few months, try it.

      These people are the ones who make it possible for people like me, in corporate NT-only settings, to survive with a dedicated Linux desktop.

      In the last two upgrades, fonts have improved dramatically, and I can run Word and Excel (although printing is still a bit sticky).

      Hope this clears some things up.

    4. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Office 97 does not require IE 3, it doesn't even install it by default (it installs an 'Install Microsoft Internet Explorer' icon on the desktop, pointing to the IE installer). Office 2000 does, and certain releases of the Developer's and Small Business editions of Office install IE, but 97 Pro, Standard, and Smallbiz 1.0 don't.

    5. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Fnord · · Score: 2

      First of all, winelib and wine are the same project. The "emulator" that is wine is just a loader for windows binaries (pretty much just hacks windows symbols to look like elf symbols) and then links it with winelib, the reimplementation of the windows apis. Thats why you can't run this "emulator" on non-intel machines. It's not emulating anything. Thats also why programs run at full speed (no emulation overhead)


      Second. Don't make accusations about the project unless you've tried it seriously. Virtually all win3.1 apis work now. Win95 and WinNT are fairly close, so a "lets do this...then this" approach is not that great an idea. Second, from what I've seen, just about everything win32 thats not network related works (or is at least usable). I admit, I haven't found many winsock programs that work....but they're making more progress than anyone ever has in this area, even though this is completely cleanroom (unlike alot of others like the OS/2 win emulator).

    6. Re:Wine = What I Never Execute. by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      An interesting corollary to this is that winelib CAN be used on non-x86 platforms. Therefore, if you code as non-x86 specific as possible, then your application should compile on non-x86 archs too.
      can we say: WordPerfect for Linux/[AXP,PPC,ARM,etc.]? :)

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  120. You're only half right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The goal of the WINE API is to make porting Windows apps to Linux a snap. Thanks to the awesome progress of WINE, it won't be long before we see a flood of native Linux apps.

  121. Half-Life? by Rendus · · Score: 1

    I know some people report success running Half-Life in Wine, but I'm not one of them. I have the files from a fresh Win95 install available if I need any of them, and could get 98's. Anyone have a fairly detailed howto?

    Particularly, the latest release (Hallowine) manages to sort of run until the "Gordon Loading Screen", then gives me the debugging prompt.

    1. Re:Half-Life? by toolj23 · · Score: 1

      ...not too detailed but this guy got it to run.

  122. hopefull fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about the Y2K problem, I'm just hoping that Wine will fix the W2K problem.

  123. viruses and wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if you run a program in WINE that you didn't know was infected? Can it still affect Windows DLL's and Windows files the way it does in windows? Or does the virus get lost and fall down and go boom?

    1. Re:viruses and wine by clawson · · Score: 1

      Don't most non-macro viruses still depend on hooking into DOS interrupt vectors, such as the ones that control writing data to disk? If so, since these probably don't exist in WINE...
      and what about WINE running on non-X86... since the virus is going to be in X86 ASM...

    2. Re:viruses and wine by DGolden · · Score: 2

      When I attempted to run a binary infected with the chernobyl virus (off the hard disk of a guy whose bios got fried), wine trapped the illegal memory accesses and dumped me in the debugger. It was very interesting to see it "on ice"

      --
      Choice of masters is not freedom.
  124. Re:hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo!

  125. QuickBooks v5.0 and older WINE by drwatt · · Score: 2

    I was using Quickbooks under WINE with limited success. I couldn't print at all and some reports would cause it to crash. But entering and reviewing invoices was okay. This was with a April'ish version of WINE.

    --
    DrWatt
  126. Pagemill is not a windows program.... HUH? by Mithy · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about the same Pagemill that's on sale on Adobe's web site in Mac and Win9x versions?

    --
    "I am Blair of EU^H^HBorg. Surrender your currency and prepare to be assimilated."

    --

    --
    "This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."
  127. Quicken 99 works! by evilcartman · · Score: 1

    Based on a comment I saw posted on Linux today with the WINE announcement, I tried Quicken Deluxe 99 last night and it works! Far from perfectly, of course. The Quicken home page doesn't display at all, but the register and calendar stuff seemed to work fine.

  128. QuickBooks almost works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I tried WINE was about 6 months ago, and QuickBooks Pro 4.5 _almost_ worked. The screen seemed to paint properly, but I couldn't type into any of the edit fields. As far as I know (and I've never checked and I don't care too much), the 4.5 binary is 16-bit or perhaps a 16-bit/32-bit hybrid (using Win32s), so this may have had something to do with it.

  129. Re:Recursive Acronym by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    No, your thinking about GNU=(G)NU is (N)ot (U)nix
    LINUX simply is a take off from the name Linus and the word Unix.. Linus accually originally called it something based on minux.. though I forget, but the ftp site owners choose to call the directory it was stored in LINUX and the name sticked. Though it is sorta a backrym (an acronym created after the fact) like BASIC which was just indented to be a "Basic" programming language.. after the fact people said.. hmmmmm. that must stand for something and came up with some acronym.. of which I've currently blocked from memory, but I'm sure you could look up :)

  130. Re:Halloween Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word 95 works great with the new release of Wine. The last time I tried (with an august release) it would freeze when you used the open file dialoge box. This version seems very usable, I played with it for quite a while, opening files, changing things, saving them - it all worked perfectly. Excel 95 works, but the screen drawing is pretty poor. If you don't force it to refresh frequently, you end up with a mess. I would consider Word 95 perfectly usable in its current state. Excel still needs work.

  131. WINE/alpha question by Delta-9 · · Score: 1

    I have Redhat 5.2 installed on my Multia. I have talked about getting a broswer to work on that machine for some time now, without my effort and success.

    If I were to d/l this latest release of WINE:

    1. Would the Redhat 5.2 files of WINE work with my alpha installation?

    2. Assuming 1. - Would I be able to use navigator/exploder under WINE on the alpha?

    thx.

    -d9

    1. Re:WINE/alpha question by Pretender · · Score: 1

      You might have better luck trying to run OSF/1 binaries. (Haven't tried it on mine, I use lynx if I need anything.)

    2. Re:WINE/alpha question by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      if you mean Netscape or IE, then no, they will not run. Wine just loads the win32 binaries as Elf-x86 binaries. it's not an x86 emu.

      however, you MIGHT get mozilla to work. or another OSS browser. the deal is, you'd have to get Mozilla to compile against winelib under your AXP. this would make an interesting project if you are a coder.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    3. Re:WINE/alpha question by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      1. Would the Redhat 5.2 files of WINE work with my alpha installation?

      My understanding was that there was a lot of x86 specific code, therefore...

      2. Assuming 1. - Would I be able to use navigator/exploder under WINE on the alpha?

      ...no

      -Brent
      --
    4. Re:WINE/alpha question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, this won't work. Wine will not be useful on a non-intel machine, because it's not a binary emulator. The windows binaries still need an x86 to talk to, even under wine.

      Speaking of browsers though, does Mozilla compile on Alphas these days?

      /jamesb.

  132. Publishing & (be) damned groupware by johnjones · · Score: 2

    Wine hmm

    great piece of reverse engineering those actualy comitting code can brag for the rest of their lives those that moan shall ....

    (bug reporting involes actualy finding out exactly whats wrong)

    >>>ALOT of the software that runs on windows is only there because of the market demanded it now its their to stay

    >>>Groupware big word but LOTUS ownes this and the server runs on linux and solaris and AS400 and whatever BUT the client still has way to many win32 Hooks in it for them to easily port it
    (WAKE UP I WILL PAY LOADS OF MONEY FOR IT LOTUS)

    these are all I use windows for

    regards

    john


    a poor student @ bournemouth uni in the UK (a deltic so please dont moan about spelling but the content)

  133. Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by MikeMcQuade · · Score: 2

    I called Intuit just now, she said that they cannot say if there is a native Linux version
    planned.

    She did say that I was only the SECOND PERSON to
    ask for it.

    Intuit: 1-800-446-8848

    I have a hard time to believe that I am only the second person to ask for it.

    Maybe we need an open source version of QuickBooks ?




    1. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by Roblimo · · Score: 1
      I've called and asked Intuit for a Linux port more than two times myself, and I know at least another four or five people who have also asked for it, so the woman you spoke to was wrong.

      - Robin

    2. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by jd · · Score: 4

      Be fair. She was correct, to within the accuracy defined by the new ActiveErrorMargin(tm) controls, as demonstrated by William "Nobody talks to me about Linux" Gates.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can anyone pretend open source is the solve all to every problem we have and sit here and agree it is lacking basic apps? What happens when the next big app comes out? Will we need to wait 3 years to get an open source clone?

    4. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by MISplice · · Score: 1

      You may be only the second person to call but I know about 10 people who have emailed Intuit on almost a monthly basis to get them to produce a Linux native product.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -- Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They got my call. A nice /. effect would get their attention anyway!

      I hate that I have to use windoze on my notebook for Eudora Pro and Quickbooks. If those two apps could be done away with I'd be in good shape!

    6. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      Granted the Linux is still missing a few apps, but as the Linux marketshare keeps increasing this will get better -- products will be ported either by the companies or by outfits like Loki pretty routinely within the next two years or so.

      Open source seems to work best on the operating system level or in replacing old, bloated software. Cutting-edge from-scratch development isn't OSS's strongpoint, but once a project does catch up and does become modern, it's usually the best choice out there.

      ----

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    7. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      They got my call. A nice /. effect would get their attention anyway!

      Mine too. Of course, they hadn't released a Linux port yet, and have no plans in the future to do so.

      I wonder how many people need to call to get their attention? Several thousand this evening should do the trick :)

      -Brent
      --
    8. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by hedgehog_uk · · Score: 1

      Well, I must have been the first ;-)

      There seem to be a large number of Linux users who only user Windows for Quicken and would like a native port. We should get organized and petition Intuit for a port. Does anyone have an email address for Intuit - there isn't one on their web site and the feedback form there only accepts US addresses.

      HH

      (if this is posted twice, it's because I got a server error the first time)

      --
      Yellow tigers crouched in jungles in her dark eyes.
      She's just dressing, goodbye windows, tired starlings.
    9. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by drwatt · · Score: 1

      Man is that a lie! Over a year ago I personally campaigned them to help with WINE project. I, and several email accounts, personally sent them repeated requests for Linux+Quickbooks solutions every day for months.

      --
      DrWatt
    10. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by bluetoad · · Score: 1

      That's right! Only 2 calls me and the person who does our books :-) Sent email to the address on the Australian address Info@Quicken.com.au a couple of times each. Her's got answered. My last one fell into a blackhole. I just rang the US 1800 number posted here. They went off to talk to someone before palming me off to their Australian outpost.

    11. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      She did say that I was only the SECOND PERSON to ask for it.

      She meant that you were only the second person to ask *her* for it. Of course, it's not her regular duty to answer phones :)

      -Brent
      --
    12. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry for posting as anoncow, can't find my pw-- I called Intuit and asked for a Linux version of Quicken, and the sales person said that it was only the second time that someone had asked him about it. I guess they just have a ton of phone sales reps. :)

      He also told me that they don't have the newest version for the Macintosh either--I thought Steve Jobs tried to fix that situation?

    13. Re:Intuit has only had TWO calls for Linux version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I called too..

  134. Re:hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How you doing man.

    Hey, do you happen to have an old Adaptec ISA SCSI card around? I want to install OpenBSD, but the card I have in now is unsupported.

    Well, you also have to keep in my mind that I do use crack cocaine and I live in the ghetto.

    Ain't no class, but the class war,
    -bladder-

  135. Re:ICQ working on WINE yet? by ElvenKnight · · Score: 1

    I know Licq supports it, BUT.. I don't want to start an ICQ History all over again.. I've been on ICQ since 1996.. I have a LARGE history database... and I value it, even if it is on a POS chatting software that only runs under winblowz (sigh...).. Now if Licq supports the SAME ICQ Database format, or provides a means of converting it.. THEN that would be awesome and I would jump on Licq in a heart beat.. until then.. I'm looking forward to an OFFICIAL ICQ Linux release, or ICQ working under WINE so that I can continue to use the same database.


    Thanks,

    -Matthew

  136. Re:ICQ working on WINE yet? by ElvenKnight · · Score: 1

    I know Licq supports it, BUT.. I don't want to start an ICQ History all over again.. I've been on ICQ since 1996.. I have a LARGE history database... and I value it, even if it is on a POS chatting software that only runs under winblowz (sigh...).. Now if Licq supports the SAME ICQ Database format, or provides a means of converting it.. THEN that would be awesome and I would jump on Licq in a heart beat.. until then.. I'm looking forward to an OFFICIAL ICQ Linux release, or ICQ working under WINE so that I can continue to use the same database.



    Thanks,

    -Matthew

  137. Re:ICQ working on WINE yet? by ElvenKnight · · Score: 1

    yes, I've seen ALOT of comments like that.. Where people are getting ICQ to load, but not to connect. I see the same things mentioned in WINEHQ's appdatabase. I wonder if it has anything to do with them still working on the WINSOCK implemntation? How would I go about getting my problem submitted to the WineDev team so that they might see the light and start working faster on it? For me.. Its the ONLY THING still keeping me in windows.. I value communication, and sadly, I choose to have all my contacts right thru ICQ.. and its hard to switch away from that, or to give up all the features ICQ DOES offer. And it
    sounds like WINE is VERY close to having ICQ work, which is excellent news.. but lets see if we can add some fuel to the fire, as I'm sure I'm not the only want that wants to run it under wine.. :)


    -Matthew

  138. Lotus Notes under WINE by hab136 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Lotus Notes under WINE by johnjones · · Score: 1

      yeah I did this

      AND I got the installer to work and then it died basically I had to use win95 install files to get it to work the dll's were not in WINE yet

      this is great if you have win95 but I don't (@ work I have NT )so yeah it works sort of but considering that they have a client (not all the features) for solaris on sparc hardware

      wheres the linux one ???

      (please please use GTK no more athena widgets widgets widgets oh my ! sorry wi£^"^ dont get me started )

      regards

      john


      a poor student @ bournemouth uni in the UK (a deltic so please dont moan about spelling but the content)

  139. AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone gotten it to work with AOL yet?

  140. WABI won't run all windows 3.1 software by Croaker · · Score: 2

    Specifically, WABI cannot run any win 3.1 software that depends on the win32 extentions. This does leave a lot of software that can run, however. I do have 2 programs I would love to run under WABI that won't, due to this limitation: FrameMaker 5 and Pixar Typestry.

    WABI works OK, but there are a few shortcomings. Quicken 98 runs, but I cannot access the modem or network under it, for some reason, so I cannot use it for online banking (Quicken requires that you register it before you can access the online banking features. Thanks, guys). SimCity 2000 (WIn 3.1 version) won't install.

    Eventually, I plan on setting WABI up to that it will run in an Xnested server. Right now, it basically draws on the screen by itself, so its windows are always on top. Fairly annoying.

    Of course, soon I plan to have a new PC capable of running VMWare, so I can use all of my current NT programs while still running Linux...

    1. Re:WABI won't run all windows 3.1 software by demon · · Score: 1

      Not quite... WABI only implemented a subset of the Win16 API. It has nothing to do with the Win32/Win32S API (it couldn't run apps that used those either). The official compatibility list of apps for Wabi was, like, 2 dozen apps, because it implemented enough of Win16 to run them. Other than that, it was strictly a turkey-shoot. If your app of choice used an unimplemented API call, it might grudgingly work, it might work for a while and then crash Wabi, or it might just crash right off, and not run at all. It just depended.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  141. Notes client under WINE by evilcartman · · Score: 2

    The 4.x Win32 Notes client has been functional under wine for some time. Most functionality is there and the stability is pretty good too. The 991031 wine release only improves on this. Now I just have to find time to try the R5.x Notes client (which hasn't worked well with previous wine releases). See the Notes for Linux Resource Page Here for more info.

  142. winelib by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    winelib is being developed along with Wine.. the same group of people

  143. The Problem with Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Well I guess my subject is decieving because there are multiple problems with wine. Before I start ranting about these problems I would like to make it clear that there is no disrespect meant towards the developement team of wine- they are doing a good job.

    1. In my personal experience with wine, the success of wine is greatly dependant upon native window files, dll's mostly. This is fine if you are dual booting or happened to have that hd with a windows partition on it. But I switched to an all linux box and do not want to waste the space on setting aside space to install a os that I will never use just so that I can have the libraries.
    2. This one is just really a extension of #1 (oh well)- there is no truly documented alternative to native windows libraries. I have never found any information on running with wine with foreign (non-M$) libraries. I hope this problem is quickly disproven in a flame!
    3. Everbody and their dog is using wine. This is good but bad. In my experience wine is not even beta quality, which is fine, but there is such a large user base. This might just be a large scale of the bazaar model but I am afraid that the current quality of wine coupled with the user base will give it a bad name.
    4. Wine seems to have very little focus. Wine seems to be implementing new windows stuff even thought they do not have all the basic old stuff down. I speculate this is because that wine is powered to some extent by the gamers who demand the new stuff for their games are willing to either patch or bitch about it until it is implemented.
    Most people will say that the real problem is the last one that I stated, that simply has no focus. But in my humble little opinion my problem is currently the first on I stated.
    1. Re:The Problem with Wine by Ian+Schmidt · · Score: 2

      First things first. There's a file called wine/documentation/no-windows that explains in gory detail how to run without windows. If you don't compile wine from source you're missing out on a lot of the documentation.

      For the "everyone is using wine", yes that's true. I believe that anyone distributing a binary-only version of wine should be killed. People who can't even operate "./configure ; make depend ; make" should not be running wine in it's current condition.

      Wine DOES have a focus. That focus is to get the applications the wine developers use to run. Period. (and that includes the 2 dozen odd Corel guys helping out presently - their focus is the Corel Office apps).

      Therefore, if you want an app to run, you have 4 options:

      1) Fix it yourself, if you are a programmer
      2) Report it to the developers. If one of them has access to the app they might look at it. (most of them are students and can't afford commercial apps though - broken shareware/freeware apps generally get better response).
      3) Post a request on CoSource. When all else fails developers do want money :)
      4) Shut up and use vmware ;-)

      Working on wine is annoying precisely because everyone's a freaking expert and nobody actually has any clue (see also the "What I Never Execute" post above).

      Your pal,
      -Ian, wine developer since 1998.
      (my opinions are not those of the other wine developers, Alexandre, or the Corel guys, so there).

  144. Still need a few "essentials" by emag · · Score: 1

    Every time a new version of WINE comes out, I try the following apps:

    - Quicken 98 (last version to offer win3.1 support)
    - TurboTax
    - SimCity 2000

    And sad to say, later versions have had WORSE results. I realize that I could *probably* replace quicken w/ gnucash, but AFAIK, there's no replacement for TurboTax. And, well, SC2K is just SO addictive (not to mention SCC for Palm).

    Has anyone had any success with these apps? I've even tried snarfing the .DLLs from another Lose machine I have access to, and things went from bad to worse (I suspect it's because I don't have the same hardware, so some DLLs are completely fscking wrong). Since the machine I want to use all this on is wholly linux, never to be sullied by M$, I don't have the option of installing under Lose and then copying over.

    I realize that there's the option to try VMware, but I've heard Bad Things about VMware for Linux & SMP machines (albeit annecdotally, and I don't know the particular setup). Not to mention that it would entail having to sully my machine w/ Lose 95/98/NoThanks.

    It'll be nice when Wine is to the point where it's support for "foreign binaries" like java and no one needs to even think to run it (mind you, thinking is a Good Thing).

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    1. Re:Still need a few "essentials" by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      I would just like to comment on vmware and SMP. I have a vmware running on a dual PII system. Works flawlessly. There were some issues regarding speed and one other (i/o, i think), but they have been resolved. VMware seems quite dedicated to squashing bugs quickly.

  145. Try GnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    There's a GPL'd graphical accounting program called GnuCash that seems to be on par with QuickBooks. They do have screenshots, check it for yourself at www.gnucash.org.

    Actually, to my knowledge there are a bunch of open-source accounting systems for Linux/*nix. Some of them can import Quicken files. Don't know about GnuCash specifically, though. There's a general summary here for those interested.

    1. Re:Try GnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnucash is a neat idea, but it's a pain to compile. It just about needs every single non-standard software package out there. They recommend Motif, lesstif works not too good, and the gnome screenshots are just that: screenshots, nothing works yet. But I do think there is some hope...

    2. Re:Try GnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, it can import Quicken 3.0 QIF files. See http://www.gnucash.org/Docs/xacc-quick en.html (note X-Accountant is GnuCash's old name).

  146. She should be using OS/2 by LordNimon · · Score: 2
    Let's see:
    • Has old hardware that has no NT drivers
    • Can't stand the Windows 95 interface
    • Has lots of Windows 3.1 apps she wants to run

    Looks to me like she should be using OS/2. It has the world's most powerful (and very intuitive) user interface, runs Windows 3.1 apps really well, and has great support for older hardware. She can install her Windows apps onto an HPFS partition, so her disk I/O will skyrocket. She can also run any or all of her Windows 3.1 apps in separate processes, so that if one of them crashes, it won't take the others with it. She can also run the apps seamlessly on the desktop, so that she won't have to run the Program Manager but can launch them directly from the WPS.

    As for WINE, well, it's being ported to OS/2 and merged with Project Odin (formerly Win32-OS/2). The OS/2 version has a special feature that lets you run Windows binaries directly from the command line or desktop, because the EXE loader has been enhanced to load Win32 apps and convert them to OS/2 apps on the fly.

    I'd say that OS/2 is just what she needs.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:She should be using OS/2 by Wansu · · Score: 1


      I will only add that if you're going to run OS/2, run version 3 because version 4 is horrible.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    2. Re:She should be using OS/2 by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      Could you please explain that? Most people who use OS/2 consider Warp 4 to be much better than Warp 3. W4 has more features and a better UI than W3 does. There are some applications (like Netscape) which will run on W4 but not W3. The opposite is not true.

      I'll concede that W4 needs more resources than W3 does, but that's mostly because it has more features (e.g. it includes networking support). But I've never heard anyone who says that W4 is horrible compared to W3. Those are pretty strong words and they are not the consensus, so I think you should explain your reasoning.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  147. Anyone know how to get Timbuktu to run underwine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know how to get Timbuktu (a remote control application) to run under wine? It sort of ran, Installed, started, and could be used for some functions, under a very old version of wine (early 1998) but in every version I have tried ever since then it will not even install. Anyone have any experience? This is my "one application I still need windows for" situation.

  148. Other WABI limitation: 256 colors by hab136 · · Score: 1

    WABI *requires* a 256 color display. So I just start up another copy of X:

    X -bpp 8 &
    wabi -display :1 &

    Then use Ctrl-Alt-F8 and Ctrl-Alt-F7 to switch between my 1024x768x16 X server, and the 640x480x8 server where WABI runs. Don't bother running a window manager, WABI won't use it anyways.

    Xnest might be a better idea, but this works too. (might be forgetting some details, I'm at work)

    1. Re:Other WABI limitation: 256 colors by lordhades · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd use Xvnc for this...I like to keep the same xchat session running when I leave work and go home, so I run it in a vnc session. (We have an internal IRC server for communication between the techies.)

  149. VNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    VNC is Timbuktu-like program. Not as cool, but might help you here. Very cross platform! I like it anyway.... http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/

    1. Re:VNC by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

      i disagree. we use timbuktu and vnc at work and i have to say vnc is the better of the two. they both approach the problem from different angles, but i must say i much prefer vnc.

      there's nothing better than kicking someone else off in the middle of a vnc session. :)

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  150. Installing Lotus Notes under WINE by hab136 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the installer for Lotus Notes doesn't work under WINE, but the actual program does. Install it under dual-boot, or install on another machine, then just copy the \NOTES (or \LOTUS\NOTES) directory and \WINDOWS\NOTES.INI file to your linux machine.

    Really annoying, I know, but you only install once. Haven't tried the QMU/QMR patches.

  151. WINE on OS/2: Project Odin by LordNimon · · Score: 2
    Project Odin (formerly Win32-OS/2) is the OS/2 equivalent of WINE. In fact, it's using a lot of WINE code, although it previously was using Open32, which is a subset of the Win32 API as found on OS/2 Warp 4. There's quite a bit of development going on, although you wouldn't know just by looking at the web pages.

    Unlike WINE, Project Odin actually converts the Windows app into a native OS/2 application. The EXE and DLL's are modified so that OS/2 can load them, and a Win32 equivalent of the DLL's is provided. Odin also has a very cool feature where it intercepts the loader and actually convers a Windows EXE/DLL into an OS/2 EXE/DLL on the fly. This lets you run your Windows apps under OS/2 in a truly seamless fashion. It's very cool stuff, and I recommend that everyone check it out.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  152. Re:AOL (flamebait) by Wah · · Score: 0

    Has anyone gotten it to work with AOL yet?

    Yea..

    Step 1: Call 1-800-AOL-USER and say "Cancel My AOL."
    Step 2: Get a real ISP.

    I know 5 people that have tried this and it worked great for them!! :-)

    --
    +&x
  153. Wabi! by planet_hoth · · Score: 1

    Wabi worked very well with the windows 3.1 apps I've used. Email me if you want to get a hold of a copy, it can be hard to find now...

    --

  154. Installer by On+Lawn · · Score: 2

    I hate to be a party pooper but I can write a short script of every experience I've had with wine, whether it was with Civ II, Axis and Allies, Age of Empires, some pipe game, excel, GospeLink, Palm software and now Harmony (linking Palm with on line calender).

    1- I hear about major advances with such and such software
    2- I download the latest Wine
    3- running Wine I try to install software
    4- watch it fail becuase something doesn't link
    5- moan
    6- contemplate wierd schemes of repartitioning so I can run Windows to get it throught the install so I can try the program
    7- give up for another three months

    Does anyone know tricks or tips of getting programs to install under wine? I'm with a lot of people who look through the glass at people happily getting things to work and wonder what we're doing wrong from the start.
    ^~~^~^^~~^~^~^~^^~^^~^~^~~^^^~^^~~^~~~^~~^ ~

  155. Plausible Deniability: Denied! by Amphigory · · Score: 2

    See the "Plausible Deniability: Denied!" project here. The goal is to /. Intuit, and count the requests.

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
  156. AutoCAD anyone? by KlTheKiten · · Score: 1

    bummer... latest WINE rpm installed and still can't get AutoCAD r14 up and running. Maybe the new AutoCAD 2000 (natively 32bit?) will be better....

    I see the pretty splash screen, and the border w/ view window... then it siezes...

    It's too bad Autodesk dropped their unix port in favor of the win32 dll's.... I could've had a fighting chance.

    Maybe the next release of WINE will bring Acad up... then again...

    --

    ...some days you're the dog, some days you're the hydrant...
  157. Ecco Pro V4? Novel Informs? ACDSee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Will these work under the new version.?

    These are the only apps keeping w95 on my laptop.


    trikster2@hotmail.com

  158. 991031 = brand new winsock rewrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ie, Starcraft battle.net works now for example :)

  159. Only if you give it write access to your C: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    otherwise it runs harmlessly. For instance, the wine-devels all had a chuckle running the "Happy 99" virus a year ago - it showed the fireworks perfectly fine but was unable to infect anything :)

  160. Debian by guacamole · · Score: 1

    Quick question: Will this release make it into Debian potato?

  161. Re:hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sup dude

  162. Offtopic by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    Hey, you stole my idea. When I get some spare time I want to use a graphics program to graft the yellow Tux beak onto the BSD imp.

    BTW, don't real penguins have long black beaks, not short, stubby, cute yellow ones?

  163. To hell with AOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Save your parents a couple of dimes and go with NetZero.com.

  164. Re: Corel contributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Per an interview last week on linux.ie Corel has been contributing about a 1/4 of updates to winelib.

  165. Re:AOL (flamebait) by toolj23 · · Score: 0

    I second that.

  166. Have you considered reporting the bugs? by Ian+Schmidt · · Score: 1

    Read documentation/bugreports that comes with the source. If you report a bug properly it might be able to be fixed. Reporting "it doesn't work" on Slashdot doesn't really help :)

  167. Most everything with VMWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I don't think games, especially DirectX, work under VMWARE. But everything I've tried: Office97, IE, and VisualSourceSafe (I hate that name!) work perfectly. NT running under VMWARE is a complete virtual machine, with its virtual network card and address (either static or DHCP). It can even mount the SAMBA shares on the same Linux box. It chews up lots of RAM, but the performance is really quite good. Of course, it costs $$ ($100US for an individual license, $300 for corporate).

  168. Have you considered reporting the bugs? by Ian+Schmidt · · Score: 1

    Please read documentation/bugreports that comes with the Wine source and post a proper bugreport for your stuff on the newsgroup. We can't help you if you say "it doesn't work".

  169. ICQ working on WINE yet? by ElvenKnight · · Score: 1

    I know about licq, gicq, kicq, blehicq.. great. But I want to run the windows version of ICQ because I value the ICQ message history.. as much as I HATE ICQ. ANyway.. I want to have a CENTRAL ICQ Database. The only way to do that right now is to run ICQ WIn32.. Can WINE do that yet? I Checked their App database, nothing good in there, but I wonder if its possible to get it working anyway? Especially with the reimplementation of Winsock.dll?


    -Matthew
    Technetos, Inc.

  170. OK need official "Call Intuit 4 Quicken" Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seriously, this is not funny anymore. We need some infrastructure to get the word out --hey Rob?

    An ongoing petition box on the side bar --->

    would be nice.

    We need an Intuit VP of something or other to paste into the header of our emails

    AND a place for that 1-800 number to stay up for angry individual reference.

    Clearly we're going to have make a concerted effort to get Intuit to pay attention here. Some people with the resources to organize/publicize --eg. Slashdot.org-- need to step up and lead.

  171. Re:OS/2 == Amiga... dead dead dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this wishful thinking or are you prophesizing?

  172. Complete BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps only two calls to that drone, buy both myself and my roomate have called, as well as a guy at work, and my previous boss also called.

  173. Halloween Wine by ChiefArcher · · Score: 2

    This version is a GREAT improvement over all other wines I've seen..
    With this version, I got EXCEL to work (even after I placed a chart in there), WinAMP, Word, ICQ (although the network didn't work), and other programs to work.
    Plus they must have redid the font support.. Fonts were PERFECTLY clear...

    This version rocked.
    ChiefArcher

  174. Re:Anyone know how to get Timbuktu to run underwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you use VNC instead? It runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Amiga, PalmPilot, in browsers (java applet), and more.

  175. Newsreaders -- > Agent by Marooned · · Score: 2

    The one thing that linux is missing (it might change now with that Pan project) is a good newsreader/binary decoder like Free/Forte Agent.. and WINE runs that great, almost as fast as the windows version in displaying stuff, and faster at downloading (at least with cable, i dont know about anything else)..
    I downloaded this version (hallowine) and the display bugs from the previous version seem to be gone now.. i havent tried many other programs but so far this one works great..
    My two pointless cents :)

    --
    ------ Poo-tee-weet?
  176. All your suggestions are incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single one, you still can't guess what WINE stands for eh?

    1. Re:All your suggestions are incorrect. by liNA-seven-nine · · Score: 1

      yes. i can.
      --

      --
      You're a cartoon of rebel! You're all like exaggerated version of yourself! - Gerard Jones
  177. Maybe you want it to be true so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that you are blinded by the truth! The fact is it does NOT stand for WINE Is Not a Emulator. You are so think headed.

  178. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think before you post!!!!

  179. Not Transparent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some limitations of the "Old interface" option:
    * No icons on the "desktop". Minimized apps look like small title bars.
    * Ctrl-Esc task management is done via taskman.exe, which will not be familiar to a win3.x user.

    Also remember that progman.exe and taskman.exe are just applications. They do not provide shell services like Explorer. Therefore printer spooler view, dial-up networking, fonts folder, control panel etc. will start Explorer (including its taskbar and tray) anyway, ruining the effect.

  180. NO! NOT TRUE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not do that!

  181. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think before you post.

  182. Saying what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot who I am. Please help.

  183. VMWare does not exist for Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish it did though!

  184. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think before you post.

  185. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think before you post!!

  186. Pagemill is not a windows program! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's for the BeOS only.

  187. Quickbooks runs on my Playstation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really good, stable, fast, you should try it.

  188. That is not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think before you post!!!

  189. Eudora 4 is nasty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes me want to throw up.

  190. Starsiege Tribes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the only reason I have for running windows. Has anyone had any success with running Tribes under wine?

    ..thanks.

  191. Re:Recursive Acronym by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

    LINUX=Linux Is Not UniX

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  192. AfterStep and screen shots by ciurana · · Score: 1

    Hi, Everyone!

    Two quick requests, if possible:

    1. I use AfterStep as my windows manager. Can I run WINE alongside other stuff I have on my screen (i.e. Netscape, XV, whatever)?
    2. Does anyone have a screen shot of Windows and X applications running side by side? Or a Windows (any) app running under X?

    Thanks!

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu