As I said, I include sewer charges. Water comprises more than half of the bill and it still costs more than DSL.
Given that you can't separate water from the sewer charges (at least in Pittsburgh), reasoning about them separately makes little sense from a consumer's point of view. Even if your water predominantly goes in beer, you still pay for the sewer service.
I don't know where you live, but in Pittsburgh I pay more for water (including sewer service) for a house of 3 than I pay for DSL. Water is a municipal service and there is no competition.
Microsoft is doing this. Or at least Microsoft Research is. Take a look at the Singularity project. However, it's a research prototype, so don't expect this in a product anytime soon.
You're still using the 2MB cache, regardless of what's printed on the screen. The kernel reads version and model bits from the processor on boot and tries to look up the cache size in a table. If the table isn't updated to include the magic numbers for your fancy new processor, you simply get an incorrect printout.
There's a very good technical reason for this: Intel and AMD have completely different performance counters on their processors. Each counter has its own microrachitectural- and implementation-specific bugs and quirks. As an example, the P6 performance counters look nothing like the P4's (both in the architectural interface and the implementation). The counters certainly aren't gospel and Intel is lucky when they can correctly use their own implementations (see the copious errata and footnotes on Intel's performance counter docs for details).
Asking Intel to put its name on a product that supports the AMD counters, with their own undocumented bugs and quirks, is asking a lot. They didn't build the Opteron, they don't know how it really works, and AMD certainly isn't going to tell their arch competitor their trade secrets. If this weren't the case, there would be far better performance analysis tools than there are today.
From an average user's standpoint, it's a horrible choice for GNUCash IMHO. Scheme is certainly not (and was never intended to be) a scripting language.
>I'm not sure how many extraneous libraries GnuCash 1.9 relies on...
If it's anything like the 1.8 version, it relies on at piles of esoteric packages. Why this program has significant portions written in scheme (of all things!), I will never understand.
I use the program, but it requires extraordinary care and maintenance. There was an issue with debian package dependencies sometime last year which completely broke gnucash for weeks. It's simply poor software design. Now I run it within a vmware player image which never gets updated, so I can be sure that it'll start tomorrow.
Slashdot Mirror
Concerned? Apple could turn it into a marketing opportunity.
If the phishers can login and access your bank account to withdraw money, why can't they also read the last few transactions from the webpage as well?
I didn't get it either. Urban dictionary can help.
As I said, I include sewer charges. Water comprises more than half of the bill and it still costs more than DSL.
Given that you can't separate water from the sewer charges (at least in Pittsburgh), reasoning about them separately makes little sense from a consumer's point of view. Even if your water predominantly goes in beer, you still pay for the sewer service.
I don't know where you live, but in Pittsburgh I pay more for water (including sewer service) for a house of 3 than I pay for DSL. Water is a municipal service and there is no competition.
Microsoft is doing this. Or at least Microsoft Research is. Take a look at the Singularity project. However, it's a research prototype, so don't expect this in a product anytime soon.
Reddie, you've done a heck of a job.
Are you kidding? Emacs IS its own operating system.
You're still using the 2MB cache, regardless of what's printed on the screen. The kernel reads version and model bits from the processor on boot and tries to look up the cache size in a table. If the table isn't updated to include the magic numbers for your fancy new processor, you simply get an incorrect printout.
>> Imagine what would happen if people could manually make bar codes or checks easily....
It's not hard to make bar codes and checks if you are the least bit enterprising.
More likely the sci-fi writing of a NASA crackpot.
> It should be based on content. If all you see is a list of search categories and lots of ads, it's typo-squatting.
Zonk would beg to differ with you.
... but engineers are still trying to get four legs to not look like a hysterical, deranged beast.
> The Home Secretary today stated that rising health care costs could be murderous to the nation's podiatrists.
Why? Patients can no longer foot the bill?
There's a very good technical reason for this: Intel and AMD have completely different performance counters on their processors. Each counter has its own microrachitectural- and implementation-specific bugs and quirks. As an example, the P6 performance counters look nothing like the P4's (both in the architectural interface and the implementation). The counters certainly aren't gospel and Intel is lucky when they can correctly use their own implementations (see the copious errata and footnotes on Intel's performance counter docs for details).
Asking Intel to put its name on a product that supports the AMD counters, with their own undocumented bugs and quirks, is asking a lot. They didn't build the Opteron, they don't know how it really works, and AMD certainly isn't going to tell their arch competitor their trade secrets. If this weren't the case, there would be far better performance analysis tools than there are today.
Not a problem. The trend will die out.
From an average user's standpoint, it's a horrible choice for GNUCash IMHO. Scheme is certainly not (and was never intended to be) a scripting language.
>I'm not sure how many extraneous libraries GnuCash 1.9 relies on...
If it's anything like the 1.8 version, it relies on at piles of esoteric packages. Why this program has significant portions written in scheme (of all things!), I will never understand.
I use the program, but it requires extraordinary care and maintenance. There was an issue with debian package dependencies sometime last year which completely broke gnucash for weeks. It's simply poor software design. Now I run it within a vmware player image which never gets updated, so I can be sure that it'll start tomorrow.
>if you cant figure out how to write patnet your self,or are to lazy, u don't deserve it
QED.
There are at least nine spelling, grammar, and punctuation mistakes in the quoted sentence.
Suppose the ads were served with ajax. Then you could claim it as a (profitable) example.
And he has Porter Goss read them outloud.
>On the other hand, it might be a way to get kids to school.
You've heard about that childhood obesity problem, right? Not going to happen.
You're in luck now: the FBI is thinking about lowering its standards for drug use. Figures.
A few that come to mind:
Evaluation
Extraction
Examination
Extermination
Use your judgement.
In South Korea, this might just work. They're crazy about functional ringtones out there.