Hey, neat. You put that there to illustrate the 'bias' point? In the UK, Australia, and maybe some countries that were colonies of the UK until recently it's Maths for Mathematics. Nice, no?
When I was young and foolish I made a search on GoDaddy for a domain. It was to be my first. I searched for it every day, because I was afraid it would get snatched just before I managed to put up the money. On the third day, the domain was parked. Then it was unparked (or whatever) 5 days later. By that time, I'd chosen another one. Mea culpa, but yeah, it happens.
My mistake. I'm not on the Apple side here. I meant to say that the story claims that the problem is Greenpeace going after Apple and making that out to me. Also, ha ha:D
I get what you mean, but when people say, "Some people have to use Vista" they mean, "In some corporate environments, some person will choose that the company must use Vista everywhere."
Here's an interesting article: http://www.unshod.org/pfbc/pfrossi2.htm
I wear sandals myself, because I learnt my lesson the hard way a couple of years ago. It's easy to get a cut in the skin and then that can get infected. I got leptospirosis like that, sort of. Ah well.
Actually, I wonder if there are any people out there who would stop a kid from frying a bug with a magnifying glass and then turn around and watch this episode without any qualms. I bet there are lots.
Ah, but many US corporations had no problem dealing with Nazi Germany until after the US started fighting them, so they *are* keeping in line with that policy if you apply the "no better than..." thing.
I've always wondered why people were 'taught' Office. It sounds so ridiculous. Or maybe you do some fancy stuff, because in school our questions were like, "What is the shortcut key for Italics?"
Indeed, in context, the small changes don't seem to need to be 'protected' by the GPL. Agreed.
At that point I was just talking about just "giving back" without this context.
Do both! If that's the reason governments are not helping with this, then they need someone new to do the administration. There's no reason they can't assist with both.
Just for reference, let's see how much a C-5 Galaxy costs: $ 165 million. How many are around? ~100. There's $16.5 billion spent on transport planes. No offence to any C-5's.
On a debian based system. dpkg allows you to just write all your selections to a file. Something like dpkg get-selections > file, then dpkg set-selections file. I don't remember the exact syntax, but this is trivial. Also, on debian systems,/var/cache/apt will have all your packages if you set the cache to be large, but if you really care about having all your files, just copy every file from here to another location whenever you install stuff. Then you just do a dpkg -i./* and watch the magic happen.
Caution: I'm no linux guru, just a user. There are probably easier, faster ways of doing this.
The problem is, the GPL advocates believe in "keeping the code free", so to speak. By licensing the code BSD they can no longer do that. Another solution would be for OpenBSD to use the code as GPL.
See, the conflict here isn't over giving back to those who helped make that code. It's about giving to those who won't. The BSD gang is saying, "Here, we made the most of that. You really should give minor changes back to us, and also to anyone who would want to just take the code and close it." In any case, I thought the real problem here was the fact that one dev removed part of a BSD licensed file which is unchangeable? Wasn't that reverted though, very quickly?
Slashdot Mirror
Hey, neat. You put that there to illustrate the 'bias' point? In the UK, Australia, and maybe some countries that were colonies of the UK until recently it's Maths for Mathematics. Nice, no?
When I was young and foolish I made a search on GoDaddy for a domain. It was to be my first. I searched for it every day, because I was afraid it would get snatched just before I managed to put up the money. On the third day, the domain was parked. Then it was unparked (or whatever) 5 days later. By that time, I'd chosen another one. Mea culpa, but yeah, it happens.
As a matter of fact, just download a couple of Linux ISOs, or update all your software and you're screwed.
My mistake. I'm not on the Apple side here. I meant to say that the story claims that the problem is Greenpeace going after Apple and making that out to me. Also, ha ha :D
I get what you mean, but when people say, "Some people have to use Vista" they mean, "In some corporate environments, some person will choose that the company must use Vista everywhere."
Sorry, Adobe got there before you :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ColdFusion
As far as I know, the problem isn't that Greenpeace went after Apple on false ideas, the problem is they went only after Apple.
You misunderstand Free Software. Look it up.
Indeed, all those formal settings where he gets attacked by sunglasses ninjas being an example of how he doesn't care for being professionalism.
Here's an interesting article: http://www.unshod.org/pfbc/pfrossi2.htm I wear sandals myself, because I learnt my lesson the hard way a couple of years ago. It's easy to get a cut in the skin and then that can get infected. I got leptospirosis like that, sort of. Ah well.
Actually, I wonder if there are any people out there who would stop a kid from frying a bug with a magnifying glass and then turn around and watch this episode without any qualms. I bet there are lots.
Remove it, it's a meta-package, won't hurt you at all. I've heard you can dist-upgrade without it also.
It's all the talk about economics...
So, the internet is a series of tubers then?
Ah, but many US corporations had no problem dealing with Nazi Germany until after the US started fighting them, so they *are* keeping in line with that policy if you apply the "no better than..." thing.
Considering that it's a parked page, another scourge of the Internet, I don't think jollyreaper cares much.
I've always wondered why people were 'taught' Office. It sounds so ridiculous. Or maybe you do some fancy stuff, because in school our questions were like, "What is the shortcut key for Italics?"
Indeed, it does appear as though you might be a mite tired. Sorry :)
I find it hilarious that people were so concerned about him deleting comments that his own bot made. Ha ha.
Indeed, in context, the small changes don't seem to need to be 'protected' by the GPL. Agreed. At that point I was just talking about just "giving back" without this context.
Do both! If that's the reason governments are not helping with this, then they need someone new to do the administration. There's no reason they can't assist with both. Just for reference, let's see how much a C-5 Galaxy costs: $ 165 million. How many are around? ~100. There's $16.5 billion spent on transport planes. No offence to any C-5's.
On a debian based system. dpkg allows you to just write all your selections to a file. Something like dpkg get-selections > file, then dpkg set-selections file. I don't remember the exact syntax, but this is trivial. Also, on debian systems, /var/cache/apt will have all your packages if you set the cache to be large, but if you really care about having all your files, just copy every file from here to another location whenever you install stuff. Then you just do a dpkg -i ./* and watch the magic happen.
Caution: I'm no linux guru, just a user. There are probably easier, faster ways of doing this.
In Linux, you may be able to replicate that behaviour using an xnest. http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=14072
Sorry dude. This distro is "for human beings"
The problem is, the GPL advocates believe in "keeping the code free", so to speak. By licensing the code BSD they can no longer do that. Another solution would be for OpenBSD to use the code as GPL. See, the conflict here isn't over giving back to those who helped make that code. It's about giving to those who won't. The BSD gang is saying, "Here, we made the most of that. You really should give minor changes back to us, and also to anyone who would want to just take the code and close it." In any case, I thought the real problem here was the fact that one dev removed part of a BSD licensed file which is unchangeable? Wasn't that reverted though, very quickly?