Slashdot Mirror


Major Linux Hardware Donor Is a CNN "Hero"

christian.einfeldt writes "James Burgett of the Alameda County Computer Resource Center calls himself a 'tattooed freak' and a recovering drug addict, but CNN is calling him a hero (video) for diverting tons of computers from landfills, installing Ubuntu Linux on them, and giving them out to schools, non-profits, and poor people. Burgett's filmed interview is currently leading a CNN contest among videos of 'ordinary people' whom CNN considers everyday heroes, narrowly edging out the video of a man who is saving gorillas from extinction. In his interview, Burgett points out that the people working for him are also recovering drug addicts or recovering mental illness patients." Update: 10/02 23:46 GMT by KD : Reader stefanlasiewski posted a journal article describing how, bewilderingly, the state of California is threatening to shut down Burgett's ACCRC.

341 comments

  1. Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by CaptainPatent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is a hero in all of our books!

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      This is just an ideological issue, and as such, it is completly irrelevant and, may I add, fanatical. It's like saying: everyone who helps spreading GOD'S word, the Holy Bible, is a heroe. Well, (s)he may be a hero for some, for others, he may be a zero, and for some others an idiot. Nothing against Linuzzz, but there is nothing HEROICAL in distributing it, it's just a work of charity because the guy is actually working for the community distributing computers (independently of which sequency of bites there are worning on it).

    2. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by El+Lobo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heroe? Oh... I understand... his name was robert paulson, his name was robert paulson, his name was robert paulson

      --
      It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
    3. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by jmashaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is a hero in all of our books!
      Well, I believe that your sentiment is having an apparent effect on the voting:
      /.ed!

      Ironic, he did not want to win, but now thanks to us, he will probably win in a landslide.
    4. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is just an ideological issue, and as such, it is completly irrelevant and, may I add, fanatical. It's like saying: everyone who helps spreading GOD'S word, the Holy Bible, is a heroe. Well, (s)he may be a hero for some, for others, he may be a zero, and for some others an idiot. Nothing against Linuzzz, but there is nothing HEROICAL in distributing it, it's just a work of charity because the guy is actually working for the community distributing computers (independently of which sequency of bites there are worning on it). MODERATORS! He speaks of blasphemy! Moderate him down with the power the lord gaveth you!
    5. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Glonoinha · · Score: 5, Funny

      "In his interview, Burgett points out that the people working for him are also recovering drug addicts or recovering mental illness patients"
      Or as we call them on Slashdot, 'Linux System Administrators'.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    6. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Actually, he's a major supporting character in Cory Doctorow's book.

    7. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A happy Windows user and developer, And PROUD of it!"

      This isn't a dis on Windows, but why the heck are you proud of doing the same thing that 90% of everyone else does?

      That's like being proud of being able to dress yourself. You should be proud of your outstanding accomplishments, not for taking part in the status quo.

    8. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by LarsG · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or as they were called on usenet, members of the Scary Devil Monastery.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    9. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if that's all he has......

    10. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by renegadesx · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the name of the father (Linus) and of the son (Tux) and of the holy Gecko I smite this AC to an eternity of using Windows Vista

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    11. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Shag · · Score: 1

      I must say that while my august brethren are recovery-minded, the list of things from which they desire recovery most certainly does not include alcohol or any other things they may enjoy ingesting.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    12. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This isn't a dis on Windows, but why the heck are you proud of doing the same thing that 90% of everyone else does?
      You're missing the important part. 90% of everyone is working with Windows, but GP has made the rare accomplishment of being happy while doing so.

    13. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      My gut just tells me that we will find out he loaded up spyware on these PC's to get the advertising dollars to feed his...... nah, I'm just being cynical again.

    14. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s\heroical\heroic

    15. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by charlie763 · · Score: 1

      no no... he said "recovering."

      --
      Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    16. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by JohnBailey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to forget that Linux can produce daemons at will..

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    17. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed very hard when I read this.

      I am an ex-heroin addict, and now a Linux system administrator.

    18. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by fractoid · · Score: 1

      This is just an ideological issue, and as such, it is completly irrelevant and, may I add, fanatical. It's like saying: everyone who helps spreading GOD'S word, the Holy Bible, is a heroe. Well, that depends now. I don't seem to recall Abraham's God ever giving me free stuff when I really needed it. You can't say the same about these guys, though.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    19. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Skrapion · · Score: 1

      He gave you God's word, and according to Him, everybody really needs it.

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    20. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      My gut just tells me that we will find out he loaded up spyware on these PC's to get the advertising dollars to feed his...... nah, I'm just being cynical again.

      Would he have found said software in the official Ubuntu repositories, or would it be in Multiverse?
      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    21. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by CrossChris · · Score: 1

      El Lobo - is that short for "lobotomised"?

    22. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by msormune · · Score: 1

      Hey! I resent that. Booze is not a drug :)

    23. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, alcohol IS recovery... can you recover from recovery?

      Bah... recovery recursion... headache... need scotch.

    24. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Well, look at his competition. He's doing something about a serious problem.

      Gibson is pushing for legal action to stop mountaintop mining of coal, when he should be joining the fight for liquid-flouride thorium reactors (to outcompete the miners)
      Noguchi is picking up trash when he should be pushing the locality to do the job.
      Rutagarama is trying to save mountain gorillas, and while he's going about it the right way, it's a tiny slice of the biodiversity pie that needs preserved.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    25. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      So god is just another marketer...

    26. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Ah, but recovering system administrators become addicts (or mental illness patients).

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    27. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are people needed on every front. On fighting mountaintop mining AND fight for reactors. With Noguchi, maybe nobody wants to pick up trash? Would you pick up trash? Rutugarama does what he can. There are other people which care for other biodiversity pieces. One man can't do anything for everyone, he must care of what he can.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    28. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      like the old chinese proverb (which may not be chise, and may not be a proverb, ymmv) says:

      If each person sweeps in from of his house, the whole world will be clean.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    29. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lol, true dat. Alcohol is a solvent.

    30. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple dealers would not let me put in a ne HD a install Linux and donate to charity.

      These particular ones are true villains.

      Well done this guy!

    31. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Thwomp · · Score: 1

      Do not listen to this technological charlatan! Be warned that the Anonymous Coward carries the mark of the devil!

    32. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      "In his interview, Burgett points out that the people working for him are also recovering drug addicts or recovering mental illness patients"

      Or as we call them on Slashdot, 'Linux System Administrators'.

      I don't think so... he said they were recovering.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    33. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's just a work of charity
      Someday, I hope you come to understand that this is not such a little thing. There is damn little charity in this world, compared to the need.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You sed it!

    35. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      This isn't a dis on Windows, but why the heck are you proud of doing the same thing that 90% of everyone else does? Not that I'd ever proclaim myself to be proud of being able to do my job, but "90% of everyone else" have problems turning a computer on and logging in, let alone using or developing for one, Windows or otherwise.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    36. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      My gut just tells me that we will find out he loaded up spyware on these PC's to get the advertising dollars

      You might earn a few cents per install. It's not economic if you have to do it by hand, only if you can automate it and do it to millions automatically is it worth the time. Ignoring the moral issues, of course.

    37. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by thegnu · · Score: 1

      While I agree that it's not heroic in a classic sense, I do think distributing computers with Linux is extremely valuable. It gets kids used to multiple operating environments, so they don't think a computer is one way and one way only. It gets people used to an environment that's all but virus-proof. It reduces the need for windows machines, which in the hands of the unskilled, probably end up zombied and either DDoS'ing site after site or spamming the shit out of us. It gives technically savvy poorer kids the hope and opportunity to grow up and make a few hundred thousand a year so they can support their parents in their old age.

      I think it's pretty good.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    38. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to forget that Linux can produce daemons at will.. Don't forget about zombies...
      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    39. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      But he used the inverted slash of the DEVIL! BURN HIM!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    40. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by heelrod · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if it's Linux or MS or Crapple. It is the point mactard.
      damn son.

    41. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by fourchannel · · Score: 1

      lol, man that was funny

      --
      ---FourChannel---
    42. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      All you've said is true, but my point is that none of them have the amplification of effort going on that the computer guy's got.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    43. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am an ex-Linux System Administrator and current heroin junkie. But hey, at least the heroin got me off the Linux! It's hard to get that penguin off your back.

    44. Re:Anyone that distributes Linux to the masses by carlocodamus · · Score: 1

      you're a modern hero dude!! keep it up!! they should make a movie about you.. seriously.

  2. It's all about... by BUL2294 · · Score: 0

    "It's all about the Pentiums, baby..." --Weird Al

    --
    Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  3. Weird by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A guy actually doing something useful is beating out another guy doing something equally noble but less practical? Checks outside Nope, clear skies, no cats or dogs...

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Weird by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do you figure protecting half the world's mountain gorillas, at constant risk of being killed himself, isn't "useful"? With all due respect to Ubuntu, that strikes me as at least as important as supervising a bunch of Linux installs.

    2. Re:Weird by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      I had exactly the same reaction. I'm going on the assumption that there's a flying pig hidden somewhere out of sight.

    3. Re:Weird by morari · · Score: 1

      I'm going on the assumption that there's a flying pig hidden somewhere out of sight. I knew that Roger Waters was involved somehow!
      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    4. Re:Weird by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why not make stew out of you and your family? Y'all are significantly less rare and important in genetic diversity terms.

      If nothing else, the gorillas are classier than you are.

    5. Re:Weird by Otter · · Score: 1
      I'd suggest a joining of forces of the two leaders where some of these new Linux users would be made into stew, easing the pressure on the gorillas.

      There are some things even starving children won't eat, though.

    6. Re:Weird by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that they do. That's kind of the problem.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      How do you figure protecting half the world's mountain gorillas, at constant risk of being killed himself, is "useful"?

      Noble? yes.
      Useful? What use do you plan to put these gorillas to? Personally, whatever you have in mind, I think it is wrong. These gorillas should be allowed to live in peace instead of being enslaved or turned into fashionable yet durable manufactured goods. You are a bad person.

    8. Re:Weird by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 2

      Letting a unique species go kaput is a bad idea, especially if they're moderately intelligent (and primates). Psychologists, anthropologists, and people who study communication benefit a lot from these guys, and that translates into benefit for humans.

      There are also emotional/ethical angles that you may or may not care about. Even if you're purely practical, though, there are reasons to keep gorillas around.

    9. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is that so? I dare you to put your young one (if you have one) next to a starved gorilla and observe the result.

    10. Re:Weird by nilbud · · Score: 0

      You're wrong.

      --
      never let a man put his dirty how-do-you-do into your bajingo
    11. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is that so? I dare you to put your young one (if you have one) next to a starved gorilla and observe the result. Not to mention a horny gorilla!-)

      I don't think this is a gorilla vs. Linux question -- both are benefiting from the publicity.

    12. Re:Weird by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny
      Useful? What use do you plan to put these gorillas to?

      What use do you plan to put thousands of new Linux users to? At least no one is outsourcing gorillas.

      (Yet, anyway. I suppose if the Rwandan economy continues to pick up, they might get undercut by orangutans.)

    13. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like they make stew out of those gorillas to feed the starving children in Africa. No, but I can't wait till we get gorilla spareribs back!

      Useful AND tasty!
    14. Re:Weird by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to start taking yourself a little less seriously.

    15. Re:Weird by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do you figure protecting half the world's mountain gorillas, at constant risk of being killed himself, isn't "useful"? With all due respect to Ubuntu, that strikes me as at least as important as supervising a bunch of Linux installs.

      Maybe Ubuntu will find some way to show their appreciation to the runner up in their "Gracious Gorilla" release.

    16. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, those people who have been given the use of those Ubuntu computers can now go browse the internet and discover information on those endangered gorillas. I think, that's the right order. You first arm the masses with information, before you mobilize the masses to action.

    17. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really only useful to you if you are a mountain gorilla.

    18. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deathmatch 2007, Penguins v. Gorillas!!!

      In all seriousness, I'd be perfectly happy to see Gorillaz wiped off the face of the Earth.

    19. Re:Weird by Urza9814 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But they're _Ubuntu_ installs! Those things are damn near _impossible_!

      *waits to me modded troll/flamebait*
      (Hey, that statement is entirely true in my experience)

    20. Re:Weird by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the real utility of it isn't just that he's install Ubuntu, but the fact that he's doing the gruntwork to collect old computers, put them in a usable state, and redistributing them to those in need. Evangelizing for linux isn't necessarily the point.

    21. Re:Weird by megaditto · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fuck gorillas. What have they ever done for us except giving us AIDS?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    22. Re:Weird by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fuck humans. What have they ever done except fuck the planet six ways to Sunday?

    23. Re:Weird by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone could spend any time around primates and feel that anything done to protect them is impractical -- or even less practical. Perhaps not as utilitarian as one guy's mission, but considering a bunch of people with a free computer may (for all we know) be surfing for porn and trolling for sex with underage children, who is to say?

      What I find strange about the contest is that one of the four people in the running is a guy who is a "hero" for trying to keep people from mining on his property. How is that a hero? Isn't protecting your property from the activities of other people entirely based on self-interest? That's like saying that a parent is a hero for raising their children. No -- a parent is someone doing what one expects of someone who squirts out offspring.

      I voted for the computer guy and I'm just glad that some news station is affording some attention to heroes that doesn't involve some pathetic attempt to extort the photo of some dead soldier and talking about how he has died in action before going to commercial break and suddenly shifting from Britney news to a sad-face, solemn voice and slow-paced music (I'm looking at YOU Nancy Grace of CNN and Fox and Friends and 80% of the other news programs out there).

    24. Re:Weird by sauge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah.

      If life is not useful to you, it may be destroyed.

      That is a text book definition of species-centristic.

      I'll tell that the marvel of life and nature was richer before his was born. Be happy with the gorilla stuffed animal toy.

    25. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to start taking yourself a little more seriously.

    26. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Sean Hannity has a /. account!

    27. Re:Weird by karnal · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what happened, right?

      --
      Karnal
    28. Re:Weird by Otter · · Score: 1
      I'm not knocking Burgett in the least. It's an extremely useful project for all the reasons you and others have said.

      I was just amazed by the OP's comment (and someone else agreeing with him) that saving one of our closest relatives from extinction is such a ridiculous activity as to deserve a faux-cynical expression of surprise that it was deemed less important than putting some old Pentiums back into service.

    29. Re:Weird by JonathanR · · Score: 1, Troll

      So rather than let old computers die, he's prolonging their life-span, thereby increasing the global PC population, each of which is plugged into a power socket. All of these are sucking electrons from the grid, and leading to additional power generation demand. Tonnes more CO2 spewing into the atmosphere. Yay!

      Ah, the law of unintended consequences.

    30. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our recycled-computer-trained Linux-capable gorilla overlords.

      Who knows, maybe with a million of these and a million gorillas, we might get a funny new meme.

      If Carlos Mencia doesn't get to it first.

    31. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He's giving it to SCHOOL CHILDREN (among others). If you have a problem with computers and the power they use, shut yours down. (In case you're one of those obnoxious "LULZ BUT I RUN OFF SOLAR POWAR ENTIRALY!! U MUST 2!!!" people; then why not donate some solar panels to schools? Wouldn't go astray there).

      If anything, he's doing the environment a favour by keeping the poisonous toxins inside those computers going into landfills for that much longer, all while we develop better ways to get rid of them.
    32. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how many of these gorillas do we really need? And who -exactly- needs them?

      Natural selection. They're to stupid to live, dontcha think? Hello!

      What a pathetically colossal waste of time and resource.

    33. Re:Weird by focoma · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fine by me. For starters, fuck you.

      --

      - Francis Ocoma

      Please wait while Sig Request is being processed...

    34. Re:Weird by awrowe · · Score: 1

      Well whats wrong with getting this guy to give some of his old linux computers to the gorillas? They're clever enough for edubuntu aren't they?

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    35. Re:Weird by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Maybe Ubuntu will find some way to show their appreciation to the runner up in their "Gracious Gorilla" release.

      Damn, that's funny.

      Another keyboard gone, and my sinuses hurt.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    36. Re:Weird by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lol.. if it wasn't for humans you would never know about the planet getting fucked.

      And don't think that animals don't screw things up. They just don't seem to be as efficient as humans are. But they will eat everything out of existence and then move on looking for more food. They have even done this to the point that some fish have developed ways to walk to the next pond supporting life. The examples are endless if you really look at it. Humans are doing nothing that isn't somewhat natural- Using the stuff around them to live.

    37. Re:Weird by TheDukePatio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mod Parent +1 Insightful rather than funny. Us "intelligent" humans have done exactly what the parent has said...we have screwed the planet (and ourselves at times) 6 ways to Sunday.

      --
      To Alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems.
    38. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LOL - gorillas are vegetarian.

      Now a starving chimpanzee, that would be another matter...

    39. Re:Weird by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      You know if we just get it right and fuck the planet right, fuck it slow, we could wake up with some baby planets to colonize. Ever notice how colonize kinda has the word colon in it? Like where shit passes through...

      --
      Balderdash!
    40. Re:Weird by Hathor's+Dad · · Score: 0

      "Letting a unique species go kaput is a bad idea, especially if they're moderately intelligent (and primates)"

      All species are moderately unique. I hate the knowledge that "under our watch" that another animal disappeared but what trick of man dictated to us that this is "our watch".

      Sure, we are eating our own biosphere (and the resource wars have already begun) but please don't tell me we should divert more resources to watching species die than to stopping own efforts to oust them from their habitat into history via encroachment - we need to fix our own agenda before we can help other species.

    41. Re:Weird by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of these are sucking electrons from the grid, and leading to additional power generation demand. Tonnes more CO2 spewing into the atmosphere. Yay!

      Better than leaking heavy metals in a landfill, if you ask me.

      Besides if those knee-jerk, tunnel-visioned religious zealots, I'm sorry, environmentalists, would get behind nuclear power, there wouldn't be a frickin' carbon dioxide problem from more computers. But of course, that would mean not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, which violates their core principles.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    42. Re:Weird by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      Bravo!

    43. Re:Weird by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      No, think of it as a multipronged effort: helping recovering addicts and alcoholics, installing free software, giving to nonprofits and poor people.

      But to train gorillas to work alongside humans recovering from addiction, installing Ubuntu on PCs, wouldn't that be something? Or they could just smash Windows PCs, that would be a good start.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    44. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you babbling about?

    45. Re:Weird by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And don't think that animals don't screw things up. They just don't seem to be as efficient as humans are. But they will eat everything out of existence and then move on looking for more food. They have even done this to the point that some fish have developed ways to walk to the next pond supporting life. The examples are endless if you really look at it. Humans are doing nothing that isn't somewhat natural- Using the stuff around them to live.
      Please tell me this is supposed to be funny...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    46. Re:Weird by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I love people like you who seem to think that humans are some species coming from another solar system instead of one that developed naturally right here in this ecosystem. I wonder if the bacteria that changed the atmosphere to contain more oxygen ever thought the way you do.

      I do agree with your fundamental point, though: Fuck humans.

    47. Re:Weird by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 1
      I should add to this by pointing out that Burgett himself thinks it's wrong that he should win over gorillas. From his blog:

      Of the four people there only one is dealing with extinction. Dead is dead, anything else is negotiable. Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie.

      I don't know if it will help, but I'd feel like crap if I won and the gorillas went extinct.
    48. Re:Weird by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Honestly, my "Fuck Humans" statement was sarcastic, in reply to parent's post "Fuck Gorillas". I'm of the belief that humans can exist on Earth without damaging the biodiversity in place. To say "Fuck Gorillas" is ignorant to say the least.

    49. Re:Weird by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Most modern environmentalists now believe it's not enough to run school computers off solar power. The only way to appease Gaia is to sacrifice the school children, burn down the school and plant a forest there instead.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    50. Re:Weird by eln · · Score: 1

      I think he was just trying to warn you that he doesn't taste very good. He's got a lot of fat on him, and he's spent the better part of his existence marinating in self-righteousness, which can leave a very distinctive bitter aftertaste to the meat.

    51. Re:Weird by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Feckless, sub 70 IQ, hate-filled, child abusing, woman raping savages.
      Intelligence can be very subjective. While they may score sub 70 in certain IQ tests, chances are they'll excel in areas that you personally would fail dismally in. However, your post tells me exactly where such relativity ends...
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    52. Re:Weird by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      At risk of a flamebait mod or too, I'm going to go out on a limb and agree with the parent post. It's true: there are certain countries that have long-standing mutual hatred from years of conflict. The hatred builds into massive disrespect for the other people. Now this is person to person, both intelligent, both with the potential for empathy, neither exercising that potential. How can you expect them to respect a creature of a different species, especially one that won't return such respect?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    53. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thats coming from a guy name fucoma.. :-)

    54. Re:Weird by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      I also believe that humans and fish can coexist peacefully...as long as they don't support terrorists.

    55. Re:Weird by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      I think you misspelled "Debian".

    56. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw the gorilla..wait, isn't that how we got AIDS in the first place?

    57. Re:Weird by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      That was "fucking" brilliant!

    58. Re:Weird by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, the Debian installer gets further on my machine than Ubuntu's.

    59. Re:Weird by TheDukePatio · · Score: 1

      The difference being that humans have made a conscious effort to screw themselves. Animals are just acting on instinct. Yes some can be considered intelligent, but how many animals have plowed their way through forests with the mindset "Just drop all the trees, I need a condo" (yes, beevers can do the same thing), but nature recovers far quicker from those instances than it will from us spreading radiation between the Ukraine and Belarus. I'm not tree hugger, I'm dying to get a 50" plasma and just bought a new Jeep so as a consumer I'm as guilty as the rest, but I can make the decision to drive my Jeep and consume/pollute more or I can make the decision to ride my bicycle and consume the most renewable resource on the planet....human fat.

      --
      To Alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems.
    60. Re:Weird by kunwon1 · · Score: 1

      And yet, just a short time after the arrival of Homo Sapiens on this planet, it is falling apart. Nature did fine for however many hundreds of millions of years before we showed up. Anything that is inimical to nature can't really be defined as natural, can it?

      --
      Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
    61. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pig go. Go is to the fountain. The pig put foot. Grunt. Foot in what? ketchup. The dove fly. Fly is in sky. The dove drop something. The something on the pig. The pig disgusting. The pig rattle. Rattle with dove. The dove angry. The pig leave. The dove produce. Produce is chicken wing. With wing bark. No Quack.

    62. Re:Weird by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to disappoint you, but any significant increase in nuclear generating capacity will take more than a decade to implement, greenies or no greenies.

      Meanwhile, instead of leaching heavy metals from landfill (that is the worst case, should the old computer gear not be recycled), these old computers will remain plugged into the grid. Instead, heavy metals and radionuclides will be spewed from the stacks of the existng coal-fired power stations.

    63. Re:Weird by hawk · · Score: 1

      >Useful? What use do you plan to put these gorillas to?

      Why, recycling computers, of course!

      hawk

    64. Re:Weird by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Lol.. Falling apart afterwards but we will ignore all those extinct animals and plants that were hear before us.

      And of course seeing how we killed nature off, there is no around now. Oh wait, there is, how do you suppose that could be? Could it be that your just exaggerating things a little? Or that you just don't like change which btw, is as natural as nature itself.

      Lets seriously think about this for a while.

  4. He realized he'd hit bottom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when he found himself in a public washroom installing Vista for $20.

    (just kidding...keep up the great work!).

    1. Re:He realized he'd hit bottom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was for a member of congress I would have charged a lot more than $20.00.

    2. Re:He realized he'd hit bottom... by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ewww. There's things you can do in a public bathroom for money that are far less degrading.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:He realized he'd hit bottom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just ask (former?) Sen. Craig...

    4. Re:He realized he'd hit bottom... by bstempi · · Score: 1

      Senator Craig? Is that you?

  5. Good for him. Good for the schools. Good for Linux by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Getting off drugs, both him and his assistants. VERY Cool.

    Helping out schools. Cool

    Helping the environment. Cool (though some in the "movement" would gripe about the electricity consumed).

    Linux. Uber cool!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  6. Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, think of all the PC hardware and Windows sales he's thwarted.

    Ron

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Derek+Loev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just thought about it.
      My conclusion? Not many.
      "He repairs discarded computers and gives them to people who otherwise could not afford one."
      Seems like that means that he's really not diverting that many sales because the people that are taking these computers wouldn't have got one anyway. I'm not saying what he's doing isn't great, but I doubt it's a thorn in Microsoft's foot.

    2. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by casualsax3 · · Score: 1

      1000000 according to Excel.

    3. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      That's right, what he's doing is awful. By providing all these free computers, he's depriving major manufacturers of a lot of sales, which hurts the economy and causes hardworking Americans to lose their jobs. This communist is taking food out of the mouths of starving children whose parents can't find jobs. He should be locked up!

      (I hope it's really obvious that I'm kidding, but sadly some people do believe that sort of crap)

    4. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      The WTO will be around to see him shortly. You are right this is anti-competitive and a danger to the market economy^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdemocracy.

    5. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "He repairs discarded computers and gives them to people who otherwise could not afford one."

      That sounds suspiciously like the "well, I wouldn't have bought that album I just downloaded anyway, so no one's losing money" argument often used about file-sharing which many sharers proclaim and the entertainment industry strongly denies. It's not quite the same thing since nothing is getting pirated, but I wonder if the software industry would try to make a similar claim.

    6. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Bloater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they do then how long until a MacDonalds complains that they spent all that money on making the air outside their store smell *really* good only for someone to "steal some of the smell without coming in for a burger as they passed". The TV broadcasters tried it "Tivo should be illegal to use because we spent all that money on programs only for people to choose not to watch the advertisements".

    7. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A more apt parallel might be with attempts to shut down used CD stores.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Ah, good catch!

      Damn you, Garth Brooks!

    9. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by willfe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think this might do more good than that -- these people could otherwise not afford any computer at all, meaning that sure, right now, they're unlikely to run out and buy a Windows-based machine. However, they now own a computer anyway, running Linux. Now they're getting used to it, learning to like it, and when it comes time to get another machine down the road (maybe when their lives are put back together a bit better), they'll be interested in keeping the platform they're used to (meaning they're a *new* market of up-and-coming customers, who won't be trained to seek out the latest Microsoft dreck).

      --
      Read my stuff.
    10. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      YOu are forgetting that CA is a liberal state, which means they pay something like $60+ mandatory recycling fee on a computer (CPU+monitor)...

      Which means that the crackhead is billing the schools at least $60 per each piece of junk he 'fixes.' This has to be paid even if the school is unhappy with the computer and wants to get rid of it!

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    11. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by ravenshrike · · Score: 0

      you mean the following argument?
      http://www.baen.com/library/home.htm
      The first is what you might call a "matter of principle." This all started as a byproduct of an online "virtual brawl" I got into with a number of people, some of them professional SF authors, over the issue of online piracy of copyrighted works and what to do about it. There was a school of thought, which seemed to be picking up steam, that the way to handle the problem was with handcuffs and brass knucks. Enforcement! Regulation! New regulations! Tighter regulations! All out for the campaign against piracy! No quarter! Build more prisons! Harsher sentences! Alles in ordnung! 1. Online piracy -- while it is definitely illegal and immoral -- is, as a practical problem, nothing more than (at most) a nuisance. We're talking brats stealing chewing gum, here, not the Barbary Pirates. 2. Losses any author suffers from piracy are almost certainly offset by the additional publicity which, in practice, any kind of free copies of a book usually engender. Whatever the moral difference, which certainly exists, the practical effect of online piracy is no different from that of any existing method by which readers may obtain books for free or at reduced cost: public libraries, friends borrowing and loaning each other books, used book stores, promotional copies, etc. 3. Any cure which relies on tighter regulation of the market -- especially the kind of extreme measures being advocated by some people -- is far worse than the disease. As a widespread phenomenon rather than a nuisance, piracy occurs when artificial restrictions in the market jack up prices beyond what people think are reasonable. The "regulation-enforcement-more regulation" strategy is a bottomless pit which continually recreates (on a larger scale) the problem it supposedly solves. And that commercial effect is often compounded by the more general damage done to social and political freedom. In the course of this debate, I mentioned it to my publisher Jim Baen. He more or less virtually snorted and expressed the opinion that if one of his authors -- how about you, Eric? -- were willing to put up a book for free online that the resulting publicity would more than offset any losses the author might suffer. The minute he made the proposal, I realized he was right. After all, Dave Weber's On Basilisk Station has been available for free as a "loss leader" for Baen's for-pay experiment "Webscriptions" for months now. And -- hey, whaddaya know? -- over that time it's become Baen's most popular backlist title in paper! And so I volunteered my first novel, Mother of Demons, to prove the case. And the next day Mother of Demons went up online, offered to the public for free. Sure enough, within a day, I received at least half a dozen messages (some posted in public forums, others by private email) from people who told me that, based on hearing about the episode and checking out Mother of Demons, they either had or intended to buy the book. In one or two cases, this was a "gesture of solidarity. "But in most instances, it was because people preferred to read something they liked in a print version and weren't worried about the small cost -- once they saw, through sampling it online, that it was a novel they enjoyed. (Mother of Demons is a $5.99 paperback, available in most bookstores. Yes, that a plug. ) Then, after thinking the whole issue through a bit more, I realized that by posting Mother of Demons I was just making a gesture. Gestures are fine, but policies are better. So, the next day, I discussed the matter with Jim again and it turned out he felt exactly the same way. So I proposed turning the Mother of Demons tour-de-force into an ongoing project. Immediately, David Drake was brought into the discussion and the three of us refined the idea and modified it here and there. And then Dave Weber heard about it, and Dave Freer, and. . . voila. The Baen Free Library was born. This will be a place where any author can, at their own personal discretion, put up online for free any book publ

    12. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      Since its not being recycled but reused wouldn't that mean that there is no recycling fee? Savings all round.

    13. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      I quite honestly expect that quite soon once TVs, monitors and all home entertainment sets run propertly controlled and firmly DRMed operating systems, they will disable all turning off/switching channels/lowering the sound functionality as soon as a special "now a commercial is on" signal is sent. Circumventing this or selling TVs without this functionality will be illegal of course.

      Also a camera will be installed in every home to ensure no one puts a blanket over the TV or shirks their patriotic daily 4 hour of TV watching duty. Yes, this means you, citizen Winston Smith. <-- Only slightly tongue in cheek.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    14. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this isn't a present day reality?

      I have noticed what appears to be this exactly with some time warner cable boxes. It seems to stall a few seconds when flipping the channels during a commercials where it wouldn't during the program. This is usually long enough to get a product display or whatever. You think your batteries in the remote are going bad but then it works fine later when different content is being displayed.

      Of course it could just be really crappy cable boxes. I have seen it take 5 or 10 seconds sometimes and on a few occasions I noticed it lasting the entire commercial. I don't know if anyone else has picked up on this or not. I moved and haven't had cable in over a year so I don't know if it still does it or not.

    15. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Rule #1 of slangin is to give em a free taste, roll the joint/pack the bowl/install the software for the customer. Currently linux isnt "free." It is free in monetary cost but the work needed to setup a computer with linux installed is still a big hurdle for new users.

      --
      Balderdash!
    16. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the most horrible analogy I've ever heard. Think about what you said and see if it makes sense. TV broadcasters are in the business of selling advertisements; is McDonalds in the business on making the air outside their store smell really good?

    17. Re:Hero to the public, Villain to the industry... by Dan+D. · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of The Diamond Age. Opens up a world of opportunity and may someday save society from itself. Or gives access to lots and lots of spam and pr0n.

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
  7. You don't have to be crazy.. by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Funny

    You don't have to be crazy to install Linux

    but it helps!

    sorry... old joke...couldn't resist

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  8. Terminology by trifish · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The term "Linux hardware" is as non-sensical as "Windows hardware" (something I've never heard or seen either). Hardware has nothing to do with an operating system.

    1. Re:Terminology by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

      The term "Linux hardware" is as non-sensical as "Windows hardware" (something I've never heard or seen either). Feast your eyes on this: http://www.lifehack.org/wp-content/files/2007/05/20070529-windowskey-f1.jpg
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a winmodem?

    3. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "Linux hardware" is as non-sensical as "Windows hardware" (something I've never heard or seen either). When something is too old or slow to run the latest Windows that is 'secure' by Microsoft standards, you bet your ass it's Linux hardware.
    4. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You son of a bitch. Had I not needed to take a pee I would have made this point and scored the ultimate karma points. Damn you toilet!

    5. Re:Terminology by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well, no, there's not really "Linux hardware", but I guess it depends on what "Linux" is meant to be doing in the headline. I assumed that it was acting as an adjective, not modifying "Hardware" as much as it was meant to modify "Donor".

      As in, "What kind of 'Hardware Donor' is he? Oh, he's a 'Linux' Hardware Donor." I mean, it's not exactly a correct use of language anyway, but it's a headline. Headlines always abuse words in order to save space.

      In any event, the point is pretty clear. He's a guy who's donating hardware that runs Linux. The natural assumption is that it's hardware that is also capable of running Windows, since most computers are. Don't be so picky.

    6. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardware has nothing to do with an operating system. But the available drivers do.
    7. Re:Terminology by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Sure there is Windows hardware out there. Ever seen the little sticker on the front of most PCs? A sticker is hardware. It certainly isn't software.

      --
      The game.
    8. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have multiple personality disorder or something?

    9. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it still be considered a disorder if I enjoy it?

    10. Re:Terminology by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Clearly you've never had a hinge break on your Windows laptop because you installed Linux.

    11. Re:Terminology by dissy · · Score: 1

      Hardware has nothing to do with an operating system. Let me first get this out of the way...

      HAHAHAHH

      *ahem* ok, now, I would suggest you recheck (or, in this case, just check for the first time) what an Operating System actually is.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=operating+system&x=0&y=0

      operating system
      -noun Computers.
      the collection of software that directs a computer's operations, controlling and scheduling the execution of other programs, and managing storage, input/output, and communication resources. Abbreviation: OS The last three of those five options all are hardware based.
      Or if you prefer the 2nd entry down

      operating system
      n. Software designed to control the hardware of a specific data-processing system in order to allow users and application programs to make use of it.
    12. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're sufficiently prehensile to go fuck yourself.

    13. Re:Terminology by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some versions of the old winmodem leveraged windows code to do work that should been done by chips on regular modems. They only worked under windows and were supposed to be cheaper. And they were the suck.

    14. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to take that up with our messiah, Steve Jobs

    15. Re:Terminology by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The term "Linux hardware" is as non-sensical as "Windows hardware" (something I've never heard or seen either). Hardware has nothing to do with an operating system.

      Certain "software based" modems could be called Windows hardware fairly accurately.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    16. Re:Terminology by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      The term "Linux hardware" is as non-sensical as "Windows hardware" (something I've never heard or seen either). Hardware has nothing to do with an operating system

      What about that wooden-spoon winner at the Indy 500? Wasn't that Linux hardware?

      Which crashed, sadly. It's so hard to get good drivers...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    17. Re:Terminology by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you're sufficiently prehensile to go fuck yourself. That's why God has given you a left hand.
    18. Re:Terminology by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The term "Linux hardware" is as non-sensical as "Windows hardware" (something I've never heard or seen either). Hardware has nothing to do with an operating system.
      Linux hardware = hardware that can run Linux as an operating system.

      Windows hardware = hardware that can run Windows as an operating system.

      As an analogy, Linux hardware is like the mountain gorilla, whilst Windows hardware is like the common rat.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Terminology by digitally404 · · Score: 1

      Here's some real Windows hardware: http://www.helldesk.dk/keyboard-ctrl-alt-del.jpg

  9. Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got a guy out here in Hawaii doing that too. I'm about to take a couple of P3's to him that I would have just dumped before.

    http://www.hosef.org/

  10. I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get the gorrillas to start using linux. That would surely win the top prize then.

    1. Re:I know by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but what of the gorilla children. Surely as the future generation of gorilla - kind we must start them out at an early age. Some one needs to design a low cost/ low power gorilla proof laptop for third world gorillas. Like the one laptop per child, but for gorilla children as they are cuter, more endangered, and would make a better plot to a movie co-starring Clint Eastwood.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet team these two up, there has to be something you can do:

      Step 1) obtain an infinite amount of gorillas and an infinite amount of ubuntu computers and reproduce the works of Shakespeare,
      Step 2) ...
      Step 3) Profit!

    3. Re:I know by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      Or even better, get all the mentally ill and drug addict gorillas into linux-installing recovery programs. because it's well known to everyone who has tried that installing linux... cures you.

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    4. Re:I know by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      Get the gorrillas to start using linux. That would surely win the top prize then.

      I doubt you'll ever get Steve Ballmer et al. to start using linux.

    5. Re:I know by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Time to get started on the OLPG (One Laptop Per Gorilla) program then...

    6. Re:I know by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      No good, public domain already. At some point, however, they'd generate an infinitely robust DRM encryption scheme, then you'd profit...

    7. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Get the gorrillas to start using linux. That would surely win the top prize then.

      Betcha the first thing they'd do is post AC here, and correct your spelling of "gorillas" :)

    8. Re:I know by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      The Gorrilla Children would evolve into a creature far more advanced than your average Windows User? Oh no! I am a Windows User! *ducks*

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    9. Re:I know by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

      Okay, I rarely reply, but that was good!

    10. Re:I know by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      Finally, somebody who thinks of the (gorilla) children!

    11. Re:I know by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Get the gorrillas to start using linux. That would surely win the top prize then.

      I believe that is the first step

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    12. Re:I know by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      No good, public domain already.

      I'm no expert on copyright law. But, my understanding is that involves copying. Technically, if you create something that happens to be identical to the works of Shakespeare but was not a copy of his works you'd be able to copyright your creation. Of course, good luck proving that you'd never heard of Shakespeare before (unless you're a gorilla). Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

  11. Computers cause crack addiction? by eepok · · Score: 1

    Wow... I don't have sound at work, but felt compelled to watch the video anyway. With all the fade-aways and cut-scenes, had I not read the article I would have assumed that by working on a computer, I would become a narcotics abuser! 0.o

    Come on man... just one more refresh...

    1. Re:Computers cause crack addiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I didn't have sound either until some tattooed guy showed up with this really cool linux box....

  12. Oh wow, a "human interest" story I don't hate... by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, this sounds like one of those feel-good bullshit non-news stories about Joe Random Public Being a Good Person (Let's All Feel Good About It), which I hate.

    But on the other, the content isn't total bullshit. The man's doing something useful (and spreading Linux), which is pretty kick-ass.

  13. So, how long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how long until Microsoft spins this to say that you have to be on drugs or crazy, or both, to run Linux?

  14. "Hero" huh kdawson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the quotes? Just trying to troll up some attention as usual?

    Ugh, I never used to pay attention but lately I'm thinking kdawson is the new Jon Katz.

    1. Re:"Hero" huh kdawson? by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe it's because the word "hero" is referring to a specific title instead of a description of the person? Hero == someone called him a hero. "Hero" == given some title "hero" that an organization made up. To avoid confusion he should have used double-quotes around the phrase "CNN hero" instead.

    2. Re:"Hero" huh kdawson? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      It's even a girls name in a play by Shakespeare. There's no point trying to redefine the word hero into something narrow.

      Americans correcting english - how cute!

    3. Re:"Hero" huh kdawson? by deftcoder · · Score: 1

      They're just bitter. We removed a good amount of the gay French additions to the English language after we kicked their asses (with the help of THE FRENCH no less...) in the 1700s.

      Hell, I'd be bitter, too! Americanization of the world has begun, starting with our trade partners and neighboring countries. Do not resist; we will crush you.

      --
      Peace sells, but who's buying?
    4. Re:"Hero" huh kdawson? by germansausage · · Score: 1

      "Frenchmen don't even have a word for entrepreneur"

  15. Good for him by avm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good for him, on a number of levels.

    First, on a personal level, for taking control of his life back.
    Second, on an environmental level, for saving unnecessary rubbish from a landfill somewhere.
    Third, on a charitable level, for donating the results of his work.
    Fourth, on an economic level, for using free software and cast-off hardware to do something useful.
    Fifth, on a geek level, for using Linux to do it.

    My hat's off to you, sir.

  16. He says vote for someone else ;) by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interestingly, James is asking voters to vote for the other folks:

    "Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie.".

    Nice honest opinion from the Hero.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Now, if only the frontrunners in the Presidential primaries could follow his lead.

    2. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by Rakarra · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie.".

      This guy really is heroic!! James, you have my vote!

    3. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most of them are asking you to vote for the gorillas.

    4. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 0

      Now, if only the frontrunners of the Presidential primates could follow his lead.

      T,FTFY.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    5. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by Mursk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if he wins, he can always donate the money to the gorillas...

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    6. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by jmenezes · · Score: 1

      But Bush isn't running again!

      --
      Stop over-analyzing your analizations
    7. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by teslatug · · Score: 1

      Well, he could just donate the money to the guy helping the gorillas if he wins it, he doesn't have to piss it away.

    8. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      "Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie.".

      Just so long as he didn't mention the 800 lb gorilla. Being a linux advocate and all.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    9. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by loconet · · Score: 1

      If he wins, he should donate the money the other guy's cause then.

      --
      [alk]
    10. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Funny

      He said gorillas, not chimps.

      Oh, and this is my favorite pic of the bunch. It reminds me of me in the morning after a long night of drinking, wild drugs and some coyote love.

    11. Re:He says vote for someone else ;) by NereusRen · · Score: 1

      Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie. Is it bad that my first thought was: He said specie instead of "not worth a cent" because he knows that fiat currency has no intrinsic value? He's an even better fit for Slashdot than I thought!! (I guess if the gorillas are silverbacks he has both bases covered.)

      Seriously, though, it's not a coincidence that the people who deserve recognition and an award are not as likely to want it: money and fame is not what they were after. Despite this, we should still give it to them. It makes it so they don't have to worry about their own welfare and bottom line as much, and can pay even more attention to the calling that really drives them and for which they were recognized in the first place.

      In this case, I hope he can use the money and press coverage to help win his conflict with the state and anything similar that comes up later. It sounds like he's on the way to a solution with them already, but I wonder how much the "fame" he didn't want has already helped him to be able to continue doing what he really does want to do: help people and help the environment.
  17. But by joeflies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad for the Gorillas

    1. Re:But by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have no idea where this is from, because the quote was IM'd to me, so it'll have to go unattributed for now. But I think it's appropriate:

      I guess these are endangered. I dunno... seems strange to say endangered when everything is endangered. I like to say they are losing the Darwin race, but people that are really into endangered stuff don't like to hear that.
    2. Re:But by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not like his installing linux on old computers is keeping the other guy from saving gorillas; or that every computer installed leads to a gorilla not being saved. Rather it's merely that the video of the guy installing linux is slightly more popular than the video of the guy saving gorillas.

      And it's not like he's hurting the knowledge about the gorilla program because I hadn't hear of either until today. If it weren't a guy installing linux (but instead a woman making sandwiches for hungry orphans) then it would have never made it on slashdot.

      So, we can call it a win for both.

    3. Re:But by cez · · Score: 5, Funny

      hear hear... and you can bet your ass someone at gorilladot.org just learned what Ubuntu is!

      --
      Walk with Music;
    4. Re:But by MollyB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >So, we can call it a win for both.

      I see it that way, too. But the (American, at least) culture is focused on Winners and Losers to the extent that such rich meditations as yours are easy to miss. Slashdot clearly (witness the comment list) reflects this attitude, but it is nice to see more light and less heat on occasion. Thanks.

    5. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you install Linux, God kills a gorilla.

    6. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? The Gorilla theme is the only good thing in Gnome.

    7. Re:But by grammar+fascist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see it that way, too. But the (American, at least) culture is focused on Winners and Losers to the extent that such rich meditations as yours are easy to miss.

      Definitely just Americans. Or something. What was that all about?

      Anyway, here's the real issue: humans have a natural bias to assume a zero-sum game first, even where none exists. It's the source of all envy. Maybe it was a good survival trait back in the poor, nasty, brutish, and short days when competition over resources was fierce, but it's clearly maladaptive now.
      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    8. Re:But by kon23uk · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about saving gorillas so they can install Linux... After all, if a "Standard End User" can do it, then it's a cinch for a gorilla!

      --
      He was a man who didn't know the meaning of the word "fear"; or the meaning of many other words longer than 3 letters
    9. Re:But by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      It can be a real win for linux if you can save gorillas with Ubuntu.

      --
      Balderdash!
    10. Re:But by Hathor's+Dad · · Score: 0

      You anger me!

      It is far harder to quit a REAL addiction than to install software. I don't get nor care about the Gorilla angle but I can assume those who are so keenly interested in Gorilla's *generally* didn't have to get off the drugs to do so.

      Hurdle Count:

      Gorilla's: 1
      Addicts: 2 ...oh fuck it I wanted to be a marine biologist but I work with code. This guy didn't want to be a drug addict but gives away his time / life to help other people. Grow up.

    11. Re:But by argiedot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry dude. This distro is "for human beings"

    12. Re:But by maxume · · Score: 1

      Google pretty much comes up with a single hit:

      http://stuckincustoms.com/2007/10/02/the-black-rhino/

      Pretty fresh.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as long as it's not gorillase.cx (shudder)

    14. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      humans have a natural bias to assume a zero-sum game first, even where none exists. Maybe it was a good survival trait back in the poor, nasty, brutish, and short days when competition over resources was fierce

      Hey, those mod points should have been mine, you insensitive clod!

    15. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm, Sammiches!

      Hey, wait, don't mention sammiches an hour before lunch, you insensitive clod.

    16. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t! The donut fairy came by, I'm all set now. Kthxbye!

    17. Re:But by asiansteev · · Score: 1

      that's the funniest damned thing i've read/heard in a long time. thank you.

    18. Re:But by cez · · Score: 1

      Hah thanks... I'll be here all week ;)

      --
      Walk with Music;
  18. Using old computers is not very green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Think of all the power those re-purposed computers will now consume... before they are inevitably toss out anyhow.

    I say skip the energy waste and toss them out now!

    1. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say you go have anal sex with Al Gore.

    2. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by WMD_88 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Old computers do not use more power than new ones. In fact, a lot of them use less.

    3. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many items you own are green?

    4. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If these computers reduce the demand for new production, couldn't that offset the amount of energy that they'll use?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a very fine line between +1 Insightful and -1 Flamebait... but your post is clearly insightful. :)

    6. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the energy that would have been expended manufacturing and transporting brand new computers, which wouldn't have used any less energy than the old ones anyway before they, too are tossed into a different landfill because the first one is full of old computers?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:Using old computers is not very green. by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "Using old computers is not very green . . .I say skip the energy waste and toss them out now!"

      That's a rather narrow perspective of "green". There are environmental issues besides energy use and CO2 emissions. Computers contain any number of nasty materials like lead, cadmium, mercury, barium, etc. Not to mention gobs of plastic which required energy and petroleum to produce.

      I think it's hard to argue that extending the useful lifetime of a computer is somehow a bad thing.

  19. Good deal, great job.. by gamekeeper · · Score: 1

    I am glad to see/hear/read about someone whom is finally doing something good! Not only is he savin land fills, saving time and effort wasted in the disposal process, and the By-products as a result of the disposal, he is also giving back to the community that mostlikely supported him during his re-covery.. GOOD SHOW. I wish more public/private ententies had this much fore-sight into their own communities that support their business.

  20. Bill Gates was right. by valkabo · · Score: 1, Funny
    In other news, a new study today announced a stunning break through in psychotropic drug research! Repeated exposure to them has the long term effect of making Gnome and KDE appear identical to Windows.

    Shortly after this announcement, a James Burgett was found at a local Denny's dead from appearent posioned grit inhalation.

    You read that right. Inhalation. He did not chew.

  21. California doesn't like him.. by nsanders · · Score: 4, Interesting
    He's in a bit of trouble with the law too: http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/16/computer-recycler-th.html

    The Department of Toxic Substance Control of the California Environmental Protection Agency has issued the ACCRC a violation that could make it very hard for the group to stay in business. And, quite frankly, that's a damned shame.

    1. Re:California doesn't like him.. by Merusdraconis · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the dude says on the centre's blog that the DTSC have seen the error of their ways, independently of the Internet's efforts, and dialed back. For instance, they're no longer demanding that some of the old computers they're keeping around for preservation purposes need to be disposed of.

  22. I did this for a couple years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the early '90s. It was the most thankless task I ever undertook. Granted back then we were putting freeDOS or some such thing on them... lol. I say good for him for getting recognized for it. All it ever got us was bitched out repeatedly for storing machines here and there and pretty much a lot of 'We don't care if we did start this program with you guys, what do we need to waste time with these computers for!'.

    Times have changed. For the better I guess in this case.

  23. CA EPA not playing nice? by fohat · · Score: 1

    This would be the same recycling center that was recently issued a violation by the California Environmental Protection Agency...

    I hope they come out of it OK, good to see them getting more positive publicity. Reduce, Recycle Reuse!

    --
    Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
  24. Re:Good for him. Good for the schools. Good for Li by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

    Off drugs but on CNN? this is an improvement? Hey he is installing Linux and spreading the good word, for that I will forgive.

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  25. Similar... by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyone in Portland should check out FreeGeek and consider volunteering.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Similar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! Anyone know of anything like this in the Boston area? I have a bunch of misc stuff I'd like to see go into a program like this. Donating to schools has turned into more of a PIA than I'm willing to deal with.

  26. Next, Microsoft will give him... by Boomer_Zz · · Score: 0

    Free Heroin!

    And thus ends the fiasco.

  27. Re:Good for him. Good for the schools. Good for Li by rpillala · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this man is the one I'm thinking of, he's saving a lot of computers from landfills. Even those of us in the movement have heard what an ecological disaster that can be. "Reuse" is often the best thing you can do with a used item, even better than recycling.

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  28. Commanding Lead by greedyturtle · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm, he seems to have moved from a small to a commanding lead... I wonder why?

  29. even more proof...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of the usefulness of the creators' newclear power, & the planet/population rescue/mandate, harnessed by a few good folks. see you there?

    if you need to know the nature of the outcome of what you do, check the motive(s) for yOUR behavior/intentions.

  30. I donated my 486 by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... to the Yellow Network Coalition. They don't seem to be around anymore, but they would install Linux on old PCs and give them to low-income people.

    Their name was inspired by the yellow bicycles in Amsterdam, which I understand are freely available for anyone to take and ride around on.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  31. Life imitates art. Unbelievable. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    > He's in a bit of trouble with the law too: http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/16/computer-recycler-th.html
    >
    >The Department of Toxic Substance Control of the California Environmental Protection Agency has issued the ACCRC a violation that could make it very hard for the group to stay in business. And, quite frankly, that's a damned shame.

    And when I wrote Natalie's Restaurant more than two years ago, I thought it was fiction. Shit, the only thing I got wrong was that I imagined a San Francisco bureaucrat, as opposed to a Berkeley bureaucrat, and that my imaginararily-awkwardly-named "California Computer Recycling Use Fee Commission" wasn't long enough to match the actual bureaucracy's name (namely the "Department of Toxic Substance Control of the California Environmental Protection Agency").

    Because nobody, not even in the Bay Area, could be so dumb as to suggest that tossing a bunch of working hardware into a container ship bound for a crusher/smelter in China, was somehow a "more green" solution than reusing (and giving away) perfectly functional hardware so that it doesn't go into the waste stream in the first place.

    But then again, that's the difference between recycling as done by folks like the ACCRC - which is interested in reducing and reusing as well as recycling - and recycling as done by a government bureaucrat, to whom the only "green" that matters is how many taxpayer dollars can be milked out of an operation.

    So we'll sing it again when it comes 'round on the guitar.

    Can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day, diggin' through their closets and attics, findin' somethin' that still works, and givin' it to someone who ain't got one? And friends, they may think it's a movement...

  32. Wait for it, wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ballmer: "See, this just goes to confirm what I've been saying all along -- Linux is only for drug addicts and crazy people."

  33. As expected ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to be a recovering mental patient or drug addict to have the patience to install Linux.

    Saving endangered gorillas is a heaping load, if you're going to go that far save some friggin human beings! People that put hte lives of animals before humans are the worst kind of people (...with people that post comments on the Internet a close 2nd).

    1. Re:As expected ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People that put hte lives of animals before humans are the worst kind of people..."

      So I guess all those Congolese murderers are BETTER individuals than innocent gorillas?
      And I guess that we just don't have ENOUGH human beings on Earth yet too, right?

      You asshole.

      MOST of the people on Earth are making it a WORSE place for everybody, including other humans. Or hadn't you noticed this?

      I take it you think that a man who rapes a baby is somehow 'better' than an 'evil' animal? Care to explain why?

      I realise you haven't actually thought through any of this, so I'm sorry for making you actually use your brain, for a change...

      Asshole.

  34. Re:Life imitates art. Unbelievable. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Nice irony. Was that van powered by biodiesel?

    I imagined a San Francisco bureaucrat, as opposed to a Berkeley bureaucrat,

    This threat came from a State agency, who just happen to have an office in Berkeley--- not a Berkeley agency.

    Sadly, I'm not sure if the City of Berkeley is doing anything to help the ACCRC.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  35. Did they mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that you have to PAY to drop stuff off there? I live less than a mile away from their office, and when two cities, each with 3 miles, both have FREE electronics drop-offs (with the promises of recycling), I can't even consider paying to drop stuff off with this guy. And I don't care about the OS. I care MUCH more about the gorillas.

    1. Re:Did they mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several posts in this thread which say you're full of shit.

  36. The gorillas did..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you think Vista came from?

  37. Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 1

    I'm using latest stable ubuntu, I can see youtube videos, but not CNN videos :(... is there something unrecursively executable with this specific content?

    1. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by derspankster · · Score: 1

      Sounds strange, I just watched on my Ubuntu Feisty laptop. Not sure what the problem could be. I'll have to think about that one.

    2. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works for me under Firefox on Kubuntu. They use flash, so make sure to have the flashplugin-nonfree package installed

    3. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No irony there, eh?

    4. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by digital_rich · · Score: 1

      Plays for me. Using Kubuntu Feisty, Firefox, & latest Flashplayer.

    5. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by RogueSeven · · Score: 1
      He actually addresses the video codec of the piece in his blog (linked in a post above) after mentioning that he doesn't feel he deserves to win over gorilla guy:

      On the other hand there is nothing saying we can't get anything out of this. You could ask cnn to put all the other heroes videos into an open/at least not so closed codec so that everyone could see them. Being the guy who got a major media outlet to guit supporting a monopoly would be a more than adequate consolation prize. Anyway, It's playing fine on Kubuntu/Firefox for me. I wish I could be more helpful in getting yours to work, but I've made so many modifications to this baby (I'm obsessed) over the months that I couldn't tell you exactly which one did the trick for this video. There is a way, as others above have also confirmed.
    6. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 1

      Not sure what's wrong, I see the initial black square where video was suposed to apear, but 3 or 4 secs later I get the message: "The video timed out attempting to play. Please ensure that you do not have any Flash Blocking plugins active." Inside that same square. I do have flashblock installed, but allowed scripts globally to try to see this video and nothing changed... Does the binary flash player also auto-update or I'm supposed to update manually (I'm using "Shockwave Flash 9.0 r48" right now).

    7. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 1

      Ups... Flashblock was realy blocking this and there was no square to click and unblock ;(
      Disabled the flashblock plugin and it worked fine (I was just playing with NoScript plugin and forgot about flashblock).

    8. Re:Not so hero for ubuntu CNN viewers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >is there something unrecursively executable with this specific content?

      Yes, this specific content was designed without recursion in mind, at least with regards to its execution, I'm afraid.

      Hope this helps.

  38. Re:Good for him. Good for the schools. Good for Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's helping schools for the time being and prolonging the inevitable... one day, and soon, even those computers will be trash in a heap.

  39. Poll Results by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Apparently he's only hero to 1402 of us
    He's winning, but I expect more from a /.ing

    46% 1402 James Burgett
    repairs discarded computers and gives them away

    16% 482 Larry Gibson
    is fighting to protect his land from mountaintop mining

    6% 176 Ken Noguchi
    leads "litter brigades" on the slopes of Mount Fuji in Japan

    33% 997 Eugene Rutagarama
    is dedicated to saving mountain gorillas from extinction Maybe we can keep track of the poll's progess here
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Poll Results by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      If they worked together they could repair discarded gorillas and install GorillaBuntu on them and program them pick to up litter from Mount Fuji and use it to bury the mountaintop miners. And get 100% of the votes.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  40. No, he's resolving that issue with the gov'mint by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 1

    James Burgett was featured on the front page of Digg.com, where he got 2906 diggs for his blog entry about his dispute with the government (spam warning: I dugg that story). James has subsequently told me that he and the government are working things out. He is not entirely satisfied with the government's approach, but at least he will be able to continue operating his excellent Ubuntu box giveaway program. So it seems as if the attention from the popular media (Digg in that case) has taught the government that James was doing something that was sufficiently meaningful to the community that they should really try to work with him.

    Full disclosure: I do not work with / for James or CNN. I do volunteer for a public middle school in San Francisco, California that benefited from a donation of 30 Ubuntu fat clients for our Linux chubby terminal lab.

  41. Re:Similar... elsewhere too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... not just Portland! There's one in Vancouver (BC), Chicago, Olympia (WA), Columbus, etc.

    See this page for other startups near you.

  42. Re:Life imitates art. Unbelievable. by E-Lad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day, diggin' through their closets and attics, findin' somethin' that still works, and givin' it to someone who ain't got one? And friends, they may think it's a movement... It already exists. It's called Freecycle.
  43. Yes, he is resolving it with the gov'mint by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 3, Informative

    James Burgett was featured on the front page of Digg.com, where he got 2906 diggs for his blog entry about his dispute with the government (spam warning: I dugg that story). James has subsequently told me that he and the government are working things out. He is not entirely satisfied with the government's approach, but at least he will be able to continue operating his excellent Ubuntu box giveaway program. So it seems as if the attention from the popular media (Digg in that case) has taught the government that James was doing something that was sufficiently meaningful to the community that the regulators should really try to work with him. His fans in the community will continue to watch his operation to make sure that if the government does exercise poor discretion in its oversight of his operation, at least we can give them an earful.

    Full disclosure: I do not work with / for James or CNN. I do volunteer for a public middle school in San Francisco, California that benefited from a donation of 30 Ubuntu fat clients for our Linux chubby terminal lab.

  44. Re:Life imitates art. Unbelievable. by peterkorn · · Score: 1

    'course, if the judge who walked in with the seeing-eye dog was an Orca user, he'd of known all about Ubuntu as it's the place lots of blind folks use their Orca screen reader. Then there wouldn't have even been that $50 fine...

  45. Holy shit... by killerrabbit33 · · Score: 1

    I worked with that guy when I was in middle school. At that time we refurbished 486es and a lot of Mac IIcis. IIRC they have been waiting for a big break like this for a while, I hope this gets them the recognition they deserve!

  46. Caliclusterfuckian laws strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This state has some of the most fucked up and contradictory laws in existence about the whole state trying to shut him down.

    Then again I think it's more of a company seeing its future being bleak because of a pesky non-profit taking away their purpose, thus their money from the state. Probably paid an inspector off to shut this guy down.

    Less crushed electronics = less money from the state.

  47. I worked there one summer by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1
    Back when they were still installing SuSe 9.2 :).

    It was a great experience, lots of cool old hardware (I got to actually see and touch a NeXT cube!) and if you are in the bay area and have weekends or a summer to spare, I recommend checking them out.

    1. Re:I worked there one summer by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      I volunteered at the ACCRC a couple of days during the Suse 9.2 days.

      One day I went out on a nice 5-hour bike ride up and down the shoreline trail. I stopped by the ACCRC at 5:00PM to volunteer for an install fest. In one evening we churned out 200 PCs with 5 people, SuSE autoyast and some shipping-plastic wrap.

      I helped to carry the fridge up three flights of narrow stairs. Were you there for that?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:I worked there one summer by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, I managed to miss all the install fests. I went to go install the media labs on the USS Hornet though, were you there for that?

    3. Re:I worked there one summer by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      Wait...you mean somebody actually gave up their NeXT Cube? ;)

    4. Re:I worked there one summer by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1

      Wait...you mean somebody actually gave up their NeXT Cube? ;)

      Yup, they had two or three. At least one was brought in by a large, bearded sysadmin type (with the obligatory swag shirt). He'd gotten a girlfriend, and she made him give it up.

    5. Re:I worked there one summer by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so I raised the flag at Iwo Jima, were you there for that?

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  48. bewilderingly trying to shut him down? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its california, what else would you expect?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:bewilderingly trying to shut him down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all hail california, may they all have heads of hair as thick as joseph stalins

  49. Isn't he at risk of violating non-profit status? by joeflies · · Score: 1

    That article points out that "You might even collect some of the vintage electronics that comes through the door and hang on to this stuff because you think it's cool and somebody may want it someday."

    I thought that it is a violation for a charity to allow its workers to claim any donation for their own personal use? It is an unspoken perk often given to volunteers, but it is a violation to do so, from what I've read in other articles about charity work.

  50. Fat Crackhead by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Looks like I'm going to have to quit saying there's no such thing as a fat crackhead.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  51. Wait a second... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Second, on an environmental level, for saving unnecessary rubbish from a landfill somewhere.

    Overall, I agree with you, but isn't this stuff going to end up in the landfill eventually, anyhow?

    When folks talk about "landfill", I presume you mean it like a "resource", and therefore care about "conservation"... so it seems to me this guy just gives a few extra years of life to these computers before they end up in the landfill - but consuming energy before they do.

    So, ...on an economic level, for using free software and cast-off hardware to do something useful. it is a "win", but it is not free. Wouldn't the "carbon footprint" be smaller if you just trashed them now?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Wait a second... by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't the "carbon footprint" be smaller if you just trashed them now? If you're looking purely at carbon emissions, maybe, but an old computer uses about as much electricity as two to three incandescent light bulbs. Not very much carbon to be had there. Nothing like the modern 350-500W power supplies and video cards that need their own power plug. Any time one of these recycled PCs fills a role that would otherwise be taken by a new PC, we save masses of energy from manufacturing as well as a small amount due to lower power consumption.

      On an economic level, we now have a substantial number of people who can learn about PCs, and possibly even gain employment with them, who couldn't before. That is 100% win.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:Wait a second... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the "carbon footprint" be smaller if you just trashed them now?

      Maybe not.

      Assuming the people receiving these will have a computer anyway, better to keep the old one out of the landfill a bit longer. The power isn't much, compared to how much hardware is going into there. And you can get power for free (of environmental impact), sort of -- solar, wind, etc -- whereas you cannot get hardware for free.

      Assuming the people receiving these would not have had a computer, that's a sociological win, but maybe an environmental lose. Generally, I prefer the sociological win, though it's hard to have a general policy -- I don't think we should club baby seals for just about any reason, but I do think everyone should have access to a computer and the Internet.

      Based on vague rumor, memory, etc, I get the feeling that Google is doing something like this: Keep old hardware running as long as you can, it's just taking up space. When you need to expand the Google Grid, either get more space/power, or throw out the oldest hardware and replace it with brand new hardware. Also, probably tend to replace old, broken hardware with new, working hardware. I'm basically assuming that their grid is capable of being a heterogeneous environment.

      Would it be more power-efficient to throw em away? Maybe, but they have an abundance of power -- I hear they are planning to build solar roofs over their parking lots, so that people with hybrid/electric cars can plug them in. Any extra power from that could just feed straight into the grid.

      (All pure speculation -- I don't work at Google, and I have no more resources than the average Slashdotter to find out what goes on there.)

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Wait a second... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That is of course if you buy into that carbon foot print bullshit. Of course couldn't he just plant some trees in the wrong location to make up for any downfalls caused by it? Or maybe even pay Al Gore for an offset?

  52. He wants you to vote for the gorilla guy by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the aftermath technologies blog:

    I don't know how to do this but I disagree with those of you who are voting me up in the cnn poll.

    Of the four people there only one is dealing with extinction. Dead is dead, anything else is negotiable. Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie.

    I don't know if it will help, but I'd feel like crap if I won and the gorillas went extinct.

    He's right. I voted for the gorillas.

  53. How about monkeys? by antdude · · Score: 1

    The Lone Gunmen showed a monkey using Linux:

    SCENE 10

    (Back in the barn. FROHIKE carries PEANUTS in and sits him on the table.)

    FROHIKE: All right. Time for a meeting of the minds. Talk, you thief. Say something.

    BYERS: Please, Peanuts.

    LANGLY: Speak.

    YVES: He can't. He's a chimpanzee, he doesn't have the vocal cords for speech. Haven't you figured that out yet?

    LANGLY: So what can he do? Besides Grand Theft Auto.

    (YVES places a laptop in front of PEANUTS, who immediately begins typing.)

    FROHIKE: It's gibberish.

    BYERS: No. it's not. It's Linux.

    LANGLY: He's downloading some sort of voice synth program.

    FROHIKE: Wow! Way to go, Peanuts. ...

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  54. "Liberal" California by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Generally I've found that Californian "liberalism" does not tolerate people who are poor. From putting officers on duty to confiscate shopping carts from the homeless, to pushing homeless out of town. If you want to run a business that gives ex-cons and ex-addict a real job they can come to every day and make a better living for themselves, you get shut down.

    Pro-environmentalism California is entirely about special interests. If you're not a lobbyist, then your voice won't be heard. The environmental issues are driven entirely by special interest groups managed by the Elites, people and business with the money to make or break a representative's future campaign.

    It's curious that California is pro environment with it's complex and confusing beverage recycling program. When compared to states like Michigan that take 10 cent deposit on a soda can, and you get all 10 cents of your deposit back. while California has a "redemption value" which you almost never get the same amount back that you put into it. (it's taxed, and the value the recycling centers pay is sometimes below what you paid at the store). Also huge expensive recycling centers are subsidized, and are generally in bad neighborhoods so most people don't even try to collect their refund value. While in other states you simply drop off your empty cans at a participating grocery store, and they print you a receipt (at no additional charge) that you can exchange for cash or just apply to your grocery bill. Private companies foot the bill but in return they get foot traffic to their stores, so they are more than willing to pay.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:"Liberal" California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you are a conservative and clearly you are stating facts in a misleading way to smear "liberals". In fact when you put the title liberal in quotes you are perpetrating a linguistic smear from the beginning.

      Now, to the topic at hand. Although I don't know the specifics of how bottle recycling values were established, I know generally that business special interests have a huge impact on fees and taxes. Each faction fights to get a competitive advantage via lobbying and campaign contributions. So how in hell do liberals make the system so complex? How do you justify the assertion that the complexity and alleged inefficiency of the California is a liberal problem? You sling a lot of mud, but so far you seem to be in a fact free zone.

      By the way, I live in a middle class neighborhood not that far from the beach in Los Angeles, and there is a bottle recycling center a mile from my house at a supermarket that I shop at, and it is not a "bad neighborhood". In fact, because we are in the beach zone there are houses worth more then a million dollars within two miles of that shopping center. Hmm, have you ever been in California, or do you make everything up?

      So, to use your words, '"liberalism" does not tolerate people who are poor'. Let's compare and contrast: how do conservative treat the poor? Well, I happen to work in Irvine in Orange County Ca., which is a very conservative city, and let me tell you that there are no poor people in Irvine. There may be poor people who drive through on the freeway, or poor people who work as day laborers or cleaning people, but they don't live here and they had better stay out unless they are working. In fact, you attract police attention in Irvine if you commit the sin of walking. It's OK to be a teenage kid with the right trendy cloths on a bike or skate board or to be a jogger, but if you look poor and are on the street you will be having a nice chat with the cops. No homeless Irvine, no one asking for spare change. Yes, the conservatives of Irvine tolerate poor people just fine.

      I know that my Irvine example is selective, but my carefully chosen sample is representative: rich conservative don't have the poor around. For the most part rich liberals don't either, but it has to do with being rich, not being liberal.

      All told, your comment is 100% bogus. You are either a liar or a fool, as are the idiots who modded you up. But then, to be a conservative is to be a liar and a fool, so it is no surprise that you are so wrong about so many things.

    2. Re:"Liberal" California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you are liberal and trying to slander all conservatives with your post.

      Both political labels suck and we need to get over them as a society if we ever hope to get anything done again. The last 8 years have been horrific in terms of dividing this country among two mythical groups. Can't anyone just have a fucking opinion anymore without being labeled before anyone listens to them? (This goes for the grandparent post as well)

      And by the way, I live here, and I think the grandparent post is dead wrong. It has nothing to do with political viewpoint. The real problem with California is cronyism, the amazingly poor decisions pushed through with our VERY broken proposition system, and that words mean much more to everyone than action. Bureaucrats are firmly in charge and it doesn't matter what their political views are, if they don't like you, they will make your life hell. It's like the DMV every day. But I guess this is not much different than anywhere else.

    3. Re:"Liberal" California by bentcd · · Score: 1

      (...) While in other states you simply drop off your empty cans at a participating grocery store, and they print you a receipt (at no additional charge) that you can exchange for cash or just apply to your grocery bill. Private companies foot the bill but in return they get foot traffic to their stores, so they are more than willing to pay. In Norway, it works almost exactly like this, except everyone who sells soft drinks (and other bottled stuff) /must/ accept returns of empty containers. I think it's part of the contract they have with the manufacturers but it could also be backed by law for all I know. (I think containers that cannot be returned for a refund get some hefty additional pollution tax levied, so manufacturers have financial motivation to ensure theirs is part of a recycling system.)
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    4. Re:"Liberal" California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know what I am tired of this conservatives vs liberals. Both are fucking assholes only out for their personal gain.

      I wish we had a real 3rd party that was not all over being corrupt, self serving, and populated with the stupidest we have.

      the rich are our leaders and the rich are the stupidest fuckers there are.

    5. Re:"Liberal" California by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      putting officers on duty to confiscate shopping carts from the homeless
      Just wanted to point out that those shopping carts are almost always stolen property.
    6. Re:"Liberal" California by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I put liberal in quotes because I am arguing that the "liberals" that run california's government are not liberals at all. They are fake liberals. The collect votes from progress thinking liberal Joes, but actually do not hold up any liberal ideals. It's utter BS. It's the same with the neocons, they aren't real conservatives either.

      I will not respond to the rest of your post because it's based on your misunderstanding of what I said. I don't care what conservatives do in the context of california because they don't have the power. San Francisco, Palo Alto, Richmond, etc are not ran by a conservative majority. They are ran by "liberals" who obviously hate the poor given their stance on rehabilitation and the homeless.

      And yes I live in california. (SF bay area)

      (glad you could use personal attacks to attempt to discredit my opinion, nice work. not sure why you think I'm a conservative though)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:"Liberal" California by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      And there are private companies that are paid by grocery stores to collect and clean shopping carts. Why do we need to make city ordinances and put cops on the street to specifically target the poorest among us? I'd rather see some laws that target white collar crime for a change. Or maybe give more speeding tickets and get people to pay more attention on the road. Chasing down the homeless just does not seem like a priority to me.

      Also in some cities when they collect the carts they don't return them to the stores, they are sold as scrap by the city. So in those cases it's not even treated like stolen property.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  55. The truth about ACCRC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've met the gentleman whom CNN refers to as a "hero". Nice that he is getting such good press. Not so nice that he is personally obnoxious and has systematically destroyed partnerships with individuals and Berkeley businesses.

    Another fun fact: when I called them 6 months ago to say their email wasn't working (after unsuccessfully referring a friend who wanted to donate $ to them), the person who answered the phone explained to me, slowly and patronizingly , that the email address was www.accrc.org, and that it was working just fine, thank you very much.

    1. Re:The truth about ACCRC. by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      and has systematically destroyed partnerships with individuals and Berkeley businesses.

      In true wikipedia style, I declare that this [Needs Citation].

    2. Re:The truth about ACCRC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In true wikipedia style ...

      It's unfortunate that such a good idea is being executed so poorly. I personally have had bad experiences with them, so there's your citation. :/ No doubt others will come forward.

    3. Re:The truth about ACCRC. by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I personally have had bad experiences with them, so there's your citation.

      You're anonymous. How the hell is that a citation?

  56. That was monkeys, not gorillas... by schon · · Score: 1

    Monkeys wrote vista, the gorillas only use it.

  57. Re:Isn't he at risk of violating non-profit status by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hang on to this stuff because you think it's cool and somebody may want it someday. I thought that it is a violation for a charity to allow its workers to claim any donation for their own personal use? Care to show me where it says that 'somebody" means "volunteer worker", because I don't see it.

    It's pretty clear to me that he's talking about a museum (or some other organization) finding it useful for display.
  58. Re:Isn't he at risk of violating non-profit status by confused+one · · Score: 1

    And (I know this is /. but) if you read further you'd have found he had a pdp he was restoring, hoping a museum would be interested in it. That's the kind of "stuff" he's probably referring to...

  59. man, it must have sucked for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i bet he turned to linux after finding his feminine side in prison.

    1. Re:man, it must have sucked for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i bet he turned to linux after finding his feminine side in prison.

      Wouldn't that turn you to the Mac, instead?

      Unless maybe he shared a cell with an Emperor Penguin who was doing time for stealing fish from the street merchants at Fisherman's Wharf.

  60. ... and sixth ... by MacTO · · Score: 1
    ... on a social level. For helping his employees, people who were selected because they face similar challenges that he faced, build a new life.

    I think it's why he deserves a running chance against the person saving mountain gorillas. Helping people may not seem as serious as saving a species, but it's very important. At any rate, more important than giving people Linux.

  61. You are plain wrong. by tux_deamon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wrong. All electronics recycling is FREE at the ACCRC. That means, if you bring your old computer and monitor to this facility, and you are a resident of California, you pay nothing.

    Furthermore, the refurbished computers that are granted by ACCRC to nonprofits and needy individuals are granted free of cost. Zero. No dollars.

    If the recipient is not happy with the free computer they received, they can return it for no charge. Again, it's free at the ACCRC.

    There's no mandatory recycling fee either for disposing or receiving a recycled computer. There is a recycling fee assessed to the purchase of new monitors by a reseller. You basically pay your recycling fee when you buy your monitor. This is similar to car batteries. That said, if you don't buy a new monitor, and instead say receive a free monitor from an organization like ACCRC, you pay nothing.

  62. California Forward Thinking? by theophilosophilus · · Score: 1

    In response to California's threat to shut this project down, I need to comment on my experiences with the so-called "eco" state.

    I was doing the Orange County to Encino commute daily for a summer clerkship and wanted a good mileage car. As a farm state kid fascinated with the idea of biodiesel, the car I settled on was the diesel Jetta. However, to my great amazement the diesels couldn't be purchased in California. This in spite of the fact that the diesels get better mileage than hybrids. I had to go to Vegas to buy my Jetta and my first tank was biodiesel. The hybrids were awarded with car pool lane status while my better mileage, (potentially) less polluting diesel was relegated to 2nd class status.

    --
    Why have 1 person driving a backhoe when you could employ 20 with shovels?
    1. Re:California Forward Thinking? by qc_dk · · Score: 1

      The reason could be that while a diesel does indeed can use less fuel than a petrol or a hybrid per driven kilometre and produces less CO2. Diesel and in particular biodiesel in the research I have seen have a much higher rate of particulates in its exhaust as well as other poisonous gasses. I bike to work and I hate diesels. Their exhaust is much worse than that of ordinary cars. They often also smell of Fluorine.

      I do not understand this new obsessiveness over CO2 it is not nearly as toxic as many of the other gasses released by a combustion engine. Yes, it might be a factor in climate change, but we know that the other gasses are carcinogenic and that they are the cause of many types of allergies and asthma. The latest results from a study conducted in Copenhagen showed that living or working near the main roads is equivalent to smoking a pack a day and that after only 8 hours the blood chemistry of the subjects changed and after 24 hours there were evidence of genetic damage. The major culprit was believed to be the particulates.

      The only long term solution is electric/hydrogen powered cars combined with proper public transport and good infrastructure for bikers. unfortunately the electric cars are a long way off.

    2. Re:California Forward Thinking? by teflaime · · Score: 1

      Dude, California is bandwagon thinking...not forward thinking. They promote hybrids because their legislators have been convinced by the likes of Ed Beagley Jr that hybrids are the solution. They promote Ethanol for similar reasons. If you look at their track record, the California legislature is worse than the Bush administration when it comes to ignoring science advise that they don't like or don't want to actually take the time to understand.

    3. Re:California Forward Thinking? by theophilosophilus · · Score: 1

      Diesel and in particular biodiesel in the research I have seen have a much higher rate of particulates in its exhaust as well as other poisonous gasses. The studies I have seen are an almost 50% reduction in particulates with biodiesel, and almost complete reduction in sulfer.

      The only long term solution is electric/hydrogen powered cars combined with proper public transport and good infrastructure for bikers. unfortunately the electric cars are a long way off. In the US, electricity comes from coal and biking infrastructure and public transport has only limited value due to climate and population dispersion. There has to be more than one long term solution, a long term solution will be a mixture of many solutions.
      --
      Why have 1 person driving a backhoe when you could employ 20 with shovels?
    4. Re:California Forward Thinking? by qc_dk · · Score: 1

      I do not understand your climate argument for public transport and biking? The countries with arguably the most widespread use of both in developed countries are the netherlands and the scandinavian countries. Not exactly the best weather in the world. Population dispersion is more of a problem, and bikes will not be a solution for the mid-west any time soon. But it is fine for major american metropolitan areas. Manhattan would be ideal for bikes. So would many other american cities I have visited. I also think that you believe that distance is a bigger problem than it realy is. I commute 20 km by bike every day. In sunshine, rain or snow. I also have plenty of friends that commute much further(the longest is 80km) than I by bike. At rush hour it takes about the same time by car and bike, and you get a workout for free. Studies have shown that just 30 minutes of mild sports (like a brisk walk) a day greatly reduces the chance of cardiovascular disease. So from a socioeconomic viewpoint it is very smart to have good infrastructure for bikes. It pays for itself. Now i agree that i would never consider to use the bike in the US as it is today. I am afraid i would get run over in about 3 seconds. That electricity comes from coal in the US might be right, I do not know the details but i'll take your word for it. A coal power plant can be much more efficient than a car engine, especially if the waste heat is used to heat residential areas. So an electric car might pollute in the end, but probably much less than a normal car. Another bonus is that the airpollution is concetrated at the plant not at where there are most people/cars. There are also many other ways to produce the electricity: solar, wind, nuclear.

  63. How's this for cute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "girl's name" and "English".

  64. recycling not linux evangelism by FelixGordon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People tend to be missing the point here, blinded by the fact that the guy is using Linux. He's recycling computers. If half the stuff I've read from tech-waste doomsayer articles is true, this is definitely working towards dealing with an environmental problem. There's no obvious ideology bullshit here, it's recycling.

  65. One Word by photomonkey · · Score: 1

    Winmodem.

    --
    Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
  66. Re:The guy is a MORON. by pajeromanco · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steve, is that you?

    --
    Now I am sad.
  67. Site conspiracy theory by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1

    The admin of that site is probably furious at this guy or something: on my Ubuntu 6.04 Firefox 2.something, I get a "page not found" when I try to vote (noscript turned off)...

  68. Winmodem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never heard of one or seen one, uh?

  69. One word to explain the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liberals

  70. Microsoft spin on it by dave562 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can imagine the headlines coming out of Redmond already... Anyone who uses Linux is obviously a mentally ill drug addict.

  71. heheh by someone1234 · · Score: 1

    What a punishment, he is using it anyway. And Vista will be phased out in 2-3 years anyway. Windows EXtreme coming soon.

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  72. Re:Oh wow, a "human interest" story I don't hate.. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    You need some of the random "feel good" stories which basically translates into covert marketing anyways. Most of them are pushing an agenda of some sort or they are attempting to sell an idea or product.

    But more importantly, the news is more then who is fucking who over. It isn't all people getting ass raped over Nike tennis shoes or shot for a sports themed coat. And when all you hear or see is bad things, then that is what some perceive the world as. But the cruel fact is, the world isn't really like that. At least not on the scale you would get by reading all the bad stuff in life with nothing to counter it.

    Everything means something to someone. Good or bad, or which ever angle your looking at it from, it has meaning. You should chose to tolerate them instead of hating them. It might improve your outlook on life.

  73. wrong URL by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    The right one is http://www.gatt.org/

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
  74. Sounds like early adoption issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not American and I don't know anything about Californian eco friendliness. But here in Europe there have been similar problems in countries that are early adopters of eco friendly technology. They get a working system, often at a high cost, and when a better alternative is invented, there is no environmental gain in replacing it. Because there already is a working system with low environmental impact and the environmental cost of replacing it would overshadow any effect of the new system.

    Mind you, diesel used to be the least environmantal friendly fuel not long ago.

  75. Re:Oh wow, a "human interest" story I don't hate.. by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

    Everything means something to someone. That doesn't mean we should put everything on the news.

    You should chose to tolerate them instead of hating them. You know, the word "love" is often used as a substitute for "really like". Stunningly enough, this is also true of the word "hate". I don't actually hate the reports - I'm sure as hell not going to kill anyone or even lose any sleep over it (but thanks for your concern, I think).

    So, to elaborate on my prior post, what bothers me is that most of the "good thing" stories amount to "human interest" fluff pieces - which are nothing more than mindless entertainment that neither provokes thought nor enspires action. This piece has some of the characteristics of one of these stories, and I was just saying that it was nice to see some actual content.

    It might improve your outlook on life. My outlook on life is exactly where it needs to be - neither despairing, nor paralyzed with joy. Go find someone else to make assumptions about, you insensitive clod!
  76. I wish that... by webvictim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I'd come up with the idea myself. I must have thrown out so many computers in my time that could have been converted to the Linux cause with just a tiny bit of work. I applaud this guy, not only for spreading Linux to as many people as possible but also for kicking the drugs. Way to go.

    --
    When did I realise I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly realised I was talking to myself.
  77. The state is not that harsch (update) by cheros · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you read his blog you'll find an entry that identifies the State is working with him to come to a sensible conclusion so it appears that sanity has prevailed in this situation (probably generously assisted by the bad press the situation had created, but that's only an assumption).

    So it's not as grim as it appears.

    I also think his stance on the CNN vote is admirable - he has a very good point.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  78. plus - Revitalising lives as well as computers by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I think one of the most important aspects of what your man is up to is turning people's lives around. Sounds like he's not only turned his own life around but the project has also created employment and helps provide skills and training for a number of people that were in a bad way and might otherwise have just continued to mess their own and other people's lives up. It's obviously not the only project doing that, plenty of other worthy projects working with ex-prisoners and drug addicts, community gardens, furniture workshops, etc, but as geeks I reckon we've got to applaud somebody's who's refurbishing computers and also helping people as part of the process.

  79. Re:Life imitates art. Unbelievable. by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1

    I use the hell out of that. My wife and I love it, we give away stuff all the time and we also get a bunch of good things too. Really a great program, I encourage everybody to give it a shot.

    --
    "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  80. Others are real heroes by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    While I admire what he's doing, I don't find it as important as what the other three people are doing. They are the real heroes.

  81. Just appease them by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    You can't win with a government regulator. In my experience, the best bet is to just appease them until they leave you alone. Forget arguing on the basis of technical expertise, the spirit of the law and simple logic.

    Stories like this really hit a sore spot with me. Having grown up working in a small family business, you get ENDLESS streams of these fools prying into every aspect of your operations, trying to shape the world into some bureaucratic model they dreamed up in their air conditioned offices. A power-tripping regulator is worse than a power tripping cop. In my experience, the most important thing is that you bend to their POWER and threats. If their mission was REALLY workplace safety, environmental protection, consumer protection, etc. they would exercise some common sense in applying the letter of the law. e.g. It's probably better to have some Atari 2600 cartridges sitting on a shelf for longer than 30 days than to have them tossed into a landfill.

  82. edging out the video of a man who is saving gorill by m1bxd · · Score: 1

    How can this be? http://www.american.edu/TED/ice/congo-coltan.htm The conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo, formally Zaire, is complex, complicated by the struggle for power over the country's vast resources by actors within and outside Congo. In recent years, one particular mineral, coltan, has been at the center of the fight. The precious ore is mined in rebel-controlled areas at the expense of national parks and depletion of wildlife. Coltan is a key element in cell phones, computer chips, nuclear reactors, and PlayStations. The market for the mineral has greatly increased in recent years, exacerbating conflict in Congo. Sorry - I have read all the details of the guy, but is he is helping to stop new computer purchase, his is also helping the Gorillas as well!! MX

  83. Major Linux Hardware Donor joke by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Major Donor beats Private Initiative.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  84. you know who's a real hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hiro from heroes.

  85. I'm scared to think how many PCs are destroyed by borat4president · · Score: 1

    A number of large international companies including the one that I work for destroy computers that are being replaced by newer ones instead of donating them to charities or selling. The reason, according to our IT person, is that someone might sue the company if something happens to the PC it sold/gave to him. How stupid is that? A cause for campaigning, maybe?

  86. latest style Air force one shoes by zhenzhen · · Score: 0

    welcome to our website: http://www.shoesmonger.com/ We hope become your reliable shoes supplier in Putian city of China. Authentic Shoes shoes with original box,good quality and the best service to meet your need. Our products include such as Nike Shoes ,Jordan Shoes series, Air max Shoes series, air force one, Shox shoes,Sports shoes, Adidas Shoes, Timberland Shoes, Puma Shoes Ice cream shoes, lv bags, and Bape, Lacoste ,Polo T-shirt and BBC,Evisu,Redmonkey jeans, hat etc.

  87. From his Blog. by Nikoli_JC · · Score: 1

    http://www.aftermath-technologies.blogspot.com/ cnn heroes I don't know how to do this but I disagree with those of you who are voting me up in the cnn poll. Of the four people there only one is dealing with extinction. Dead is dead, anything else is negotiable. Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie. I don't know if it will help, but I'd feel like crap if I won and the gorillas went extinct. On the other hand there is nothing saying we can't get anything out of this. You could ask cnn to put all the other heroes videos into an open/at least not so closed codec so that everyone could see them. Being the guy who got a major media outlet to guit supporting a monopoly would be a more than adequate consolation prize.

  88. Re:Oh wow, a "human interest" story I don't hate.. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Well I am glad that I misinterpreted your statement.

  89. missing the point? by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    After watching TFV, I found him a hero not for installing linux (what other practical choice do you have for extremely low-end hardware anyway?), but that
    1) He's helping save the environment near me (my family in the bay area).
    2) He's hiring people who are discarded by society.

    Either of these point are more noble to me than promoting linux...I suppose I am not fanboy enough.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  90. Aside from.. by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    inventing Sunday from which one can fuck six ways?

    --
    Huh?
  91. Ok! by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    Here's to you, SCO!

  92. Re:Good for him. Good for the schools. Good for Li by Obsidian+Butterfly · · Score: 1

    Being harrassed by the California branch of Fascist Corporate America: not cool.

  93. Re:Weird the Fukawi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Africa, gorilla fuck YOU!

        And give you AIDS too.