Slashdot Mirror


User: nhavar

nhavar's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
391
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 391

  1. Re:Asimov, Verne on Science Fiction into Science Fact? · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The term robot actually comes from a 1920's play by Karel Capek called "RUR, Rossum's Universal Robots" and is a derivitive of the Slavic word for "work". Therefore Asimov simply popularized the term. Asimov would have been about 3 when the phrase Robot was first used and 7 I believe when 'Metropolis' came to the screen. So these may have had more of an influence on his writing than anything else.

    People keep brining up Jules Verne and the Nautilus but debunking the 'nuclear' aspect because the engine burned salt. What people fail to mention is the process it used to 'burn' the salt could it have been a nuclear reaction. Additionally noone mentions that the ship gets the salt from the surrounding water through either some desalinization process (too long) or a shorter electrochemical process like a catalytic converter. Parrallels to these processes would be the ramjet/scramjet that collects it's fuel from the surrounding atmosphere and current fuel cell and hybrid engines that are designed to convert simple water into base elements for consumption.

    There also has been no mention of the "fulgurator" which holds more than a passing resemblance to a nuclear missile/atom bomb.



    "Water is the coal of the future. The energy of tomorrow is water broken down into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity. These elements will secure the earth's power supply for an indefinite period."
    Jules Verne -- 1874



    Please anyone correct me if I'm wrong on any of these points

  2. Re:No thanks. on XBox Released · · Score: 2

    Last I saw XBox would play DVD's and CD's and a little hacking and emulator love and you could play PC, PS1, SNES, SEGA, ATARI, and probably eventually PS2 games on the unit. Sorry but as far as PS2 blowing it away I've yet to any games on the PS2 that are as good as the games I've seen for XBox.

  3. Check out a local restaurant on Virtual Keyboard · · Score: 2

    This subject touches on something that I saw at a local restaurant the other night. As my wife and I sat and ate the wait station was just behind us. Hanging on the wall at about average human eye height were two touch screens. One touch screen managed clock in and the other tables and orders (from what I could see). Throughout the course of the evening we saw waiters and waitresses wander by the station (had a prominent SQUIRREL logo on the display) and interact with the touch sensitive screens. The interesting part to see is how adept they were at navigating with either a pencil or their finger.

    Personally I own and have used an ePods webpad for about a year now. It's not the top of technology and so the screens can be a little slow and response to commands lags. The one thing I have found though is that repetitive tasks are a breeze because I know exactly where the button is going to be before it shows up on the screen. This allows me to quickly touch through a series of commands without really needing to wait on the display to refresh. I thought that it would be skill only a tech head would pick up on. I was wrong.

    Watching the wait staff that night I noticed about 6 of them, some taller and some shorter than the average height the screen was set to, breeze through screens just like I did. One very impressive girl spoke to another waiter while punching in her information. Most transactions were done and the wait staffer had walked away before the screens could go all the way through. That night I only saw one guy fumble on the screen and have to back step to hit the correct button.

    My point is that there are all of these people here on the site bemoaning the fact that they learned to type by touch, and how do I remember where the special keys are, and what happens if I scratch my ass, and all of the other bullshit scenarios for why this tech will not work. I say it will work, I've seen similar things working already, I've used something similar myself. I also say it won't be the ULTIMATE solution. Just like QWERTY isn't to everyones taste and some people still have this bad habbit of liking Windows. Voice recognition is great but it's obtrusive in a meeting and non-functional in loud environments, Graffiti makes you relearn writing (shouldn't have to do), gestures are great but limited in use, and mind reading is still a ways away. So there are going to be times when voice is usable, and handwriting recognition is a good option, and times when a "virtual keyboard" is going to be much more than adequate.

    Without the pioneering consumer the pioneering product will never be

  4. Re:Of course they can be estimated. on Can Software Schedules Be Estimated? · · Score: 2

    I'd like to add a few items to the list.

    • many Project Managers/Analysts when designing an app create documentation that is unreadable to the people actually writing the code. The design is often either too abstract or missing needed details. Project Managers have a tendency towards nice pretty design docs that look nice in a slide presentation or work well with marketing materials.
    • many projects are started at the marketing end of the business. This causes problems because often marketing assumes what the customer wants and requests it's building before specifically being asked by the customer. Some call this being "pro-active" but it often results in features that the customer rarely if ever uses, while the customer ends up waiting for that not-so-flashy feature that they asked for a year ago. Additionally the marketing people have a tendency to sell an idea or premise that may not be easy to implement or require rewriting significant portions of an application in order to function correctly. Lastly the marketing team typically decides what the release cycle should be based on their own voodoo mathematics (sales figures, implementation dates, contract renewals, etc.) In the end there's very little room for push back or date correction from the Project Manager or the Coder due to the fact that customers have already "been sold on the timeline". This push then usually results in one of two things a) a buggy product b) a reduction of the features (sorry we had to skip something to get it in by the date you asked for)
    • most projects are miscommunicated. Sometimes this is referred to as "the customer not knowing what they want", but often it ends up the person taking the request has misinterpreted the customers wants and not clarified it. There can also be semantic issues between the customer and the designer causing features to be designed in that are not correct and at testing time will be called out by the customer and cause a redesign or rewrite of the code. Another problem closely linked is the failure of some companies to follow procedure in the hopes of "expediting" an implementation. EX: Business documents are created but some last minute touches are missing that the customer must give before the project can be started. Since the information is "non-critical" the customer is given some time to gather the information. In the mean time the docs are shipped off to the designer/coder without having been signed off on by the customer. Coding begins and at the last phase of coding the information that was needed from the customer is still absent. When asked the information will be available two days before roll out. Twenty-four hours before roll out the customer forwards the information to the designers. The information is either inaccurate, the wrong information, or does not fit within the original design framework. When pressed for the correct information and shown how it fits in the application the customer balks and says that's not what they requested and cites the UNSIGNED business requirements as "We didn't sign off on that yet."
    • many projects are handled by multitaskers. These people are programmers/analyst/project manager/technical support/business liaisons. Their actual job title often has nothing to do with their actual role in the company. Because of this they often get left out of important meetings or invited to ones that have no bearing on their actual duties. This and supporting the customer often takes up a significant, and difficult to estimate, amount of time. Often when supporting a customer the task falls outside of their area of duty and given the fact that many others are in the same "mismatched" job descriptions then the person in need of support gets bumped around to four different departments tying up their time also. This mismatch job description problem also causes problems when attempting to schedule resources for projects because the project manager will need to know (and never does) all of the persons duties in order to correctly identify the persons availability for the project. Additionally the project manager will need to know the skill set of the person being scheduled. The person being scheduled will often have a title or be in an area of the company that would suggest a certain skill set and this is very often inaccurate. This problem often leads to the wrong person being scheduled into the project and then that person needing to learn a skill or fudge their way through to get the project done.
    • Contract work and documentation: I've seen many many contractors brought in to work on "last minute" projects. One particular contractor was very good about documenting his code and very methodical in his design work. Unfortunately he had a flair for the obtuse. Every object and piece of code he created was abstracted so that it "might be" "someday" used differently. This created problems when other people attempted to use that code or when standards changed. Whole structures of code had been built and used to hold the simplest pieces of data (I.E. Monetary values). When those structures became deprecated it became harder to switch to the new code because we could not go back and rewrite the old because of time issues and casting/converting from the old structure to the new structure was difficult or a lengthy process. Additional problems arose from the use of bleeding edge code and items that were still on some ways theory. Many of the less adept coders simply choked on figuring out the code and had to spend extra time deciphering it into something they could easily understand. Other contractors also came on and like some full time employees these contractors didn't have the training or time for proper documentation. This often meant that once they left and someone had to go back and "fix" any of their code it would take extra time to decipher it.
    • Many projects have problems with abstraction and modularity. Within a large project a person might be given a task that seems fairly simple and straitforward. They complete their task in the time allotted, unfortunately because they did not know where the object would attach in the grand scheme of things they failed to format some value correctly, or pass some object or catch some exception. Or because they did not know the audience the product would be used by they did the interface improperly they then have to go back and in some way redesign or recode. While this might be less frequent another common result is the duplication of effort. One project is started to fulfill a need that another party has already fulfilled for someone else. For example: the company that I work for decided to create an intranet application to provide internal users the ability to check on customer information. The decision was made that web applications would be the way to reduce support needs and consolidate functions. The problem being that after creating our intranet application another team was set up to duplicate many of the features for the internet. The structure was already there, services already in place to get the same customer information that would be needed externally. It was presumed that since they were dumbing down the interface/front-end that the services would like wise need to be dumbed down. This was all done not understanding that our core components were already designed with this in mind. Once it did come to light it was decided because of the amount of money already spent that the duplicate project would proceed. Because of the way people are given projects in the company and basically told they don't need to know about other projects the "internet group" was doomed not only to create a duplicate product but also to repeat many of the mistakes and replicate many of the problems that the intranet group had already run into. Not having the knowledge ended up costing the company millions and drained off resources from other projects pushing them behind also.
  5. Re:I heard.... on McNealy Calls for National ID Card Too · · Score: 2

    why fake one when it's easy enough to steal. If the quick check criteria is visual appearance you simply find someone who has the same general appearance as you and steal their ID. The majority of the time you won't even be asked for any proof of your existence and it will be business as usual. IE when was the last time someone checked your signature or ID when you used a credit card.

  6. Re:Office XP on StarOffice 6.0 Beta Available · · Score: 1, Troll

    hmmmm... doesn't mozilla to this too. I guess two can play at that game eh?

  7. Re:Seems valid to me on TiVo Infringes On Pause Patent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great. We're on the same page then.

    I want to rename these type of patents the "Jules Vernes" or the "Leonardo DaVinci" patents. Can you imagine how rich either of those mens ancestors would be today if they had patented their ideas. Think of it helicoptors, tanks, nuclear power, nuclear subs, space travel, machine guns. Even though they were the "inventors" of such concepts the machines themselves were not feasable during their lifetime. So is it feasable to think that a company can patent a process or invention that they cannot feasably prototype or produce and then wait around for someone else to do all of the work to actually create the item and then swoop in and rake in the reward.

    One company might do all of the real work in producing the product thinking that they have an obvious process that's not patentable, therefore they never do the patent search, therefore they never know there is a patent or a licensing issue. I guess it comes down to intent in both cases. Did TiVO or any of the others know of the patent and attempt to avoid licensing? Did the patent holder attempt to avoid enforcement until the patented product became widely used? I think this goes back to that issue of British Telecom trying to rake in royalties over the hyperlink. Scary stuff.

    I do believe in the original intent of patent and trademark law. I just wish these companies did also.

  8. Re:Seems valid to me on TiVo Infringes On Pause Patent · · Score: 2
    No to most of us the problem isn't the patent in and of itself but in the timing of it's enforcement. Tivo and the concept of pausing live TV has now been around for a couple of years at least not to mention the time it took to develop and that the information would have been in the marketing material and press. So why is it that a company that creates a concept 1) never develops it 2) waits 9 years to begin to enforce it's patent after the technology has already been adopted by multiple vendors.

    My personal belief is that if you don't defend that patent from day 1 then you are not entitled to any reimbursement whatsoever. This would stop all of these holding companies and patent vultures from waiting for tech to be incorporated into everyday life and then trying to step in to reap all of the benefits by screwing everyone.

  9. Re:ATI All In Wonder on TiVo Infringes On Pause Patent · · Score: 2

    actually it does use the disk.

  10. Re:Memory loss on Raising the Kursk · · Score: 2

    Well according to the russians it collided with an American sub. So where is the American sub? Limped home? Does this mean American subs have a sturdier construction? Unlikely. Most like what happened is a miss fire of a torpedo which tore a whole in the front end of sub sending it to the bottom of the ocean along with it's trainee crew. It would of course look better for the Russians if they had someone to blame it on :)

  11. Re:Extracts from the media player license agreemen on Microsoft Du Jour - Talks, Upgrades, Salaries · · Score: 2

    MS is working to market itself and it's format to the Music and Movie industry. They can't very well market themselves as a product that dis-allows "PIRACY" if their product allows other products to circumvent a "secure" format. The use of "secure" in this case is a wide open word that reduces the need to constantly redefine the EULA every time a new format pops up or MS rebrands one of their products. MS is also attempting to fall into the Napster-microscope-in-the-ass-lawsuit-fiasco. Think about if MS allowed for the playing of "secured formats" that someone didn't have a license for despite the fact that they had technology to stop this. The music and movie industry would be all over them trying to sway judges to get 100% compliance or shut the company down. Again this goes right back to the CYOA policy that most companies keep, because there are other companies out there gunning for any chance to take them out (AOL/TW, Oracle, Sun) digging through trash, scouring EULA's, decompiling code hoping to find some little "Sun sux!" or "if(appName.equals("AOL")){BSOD();}".

  12. Re:why not get a helper monkey? on In Search of the Best Programmable Universal Remote? · · Score: 2

    Kinda like the "Bathroom Monkey" (SNL). It's even disposable and comes in a variety of colors and sizes.

  13. Interpretive Dance on Star Trek: Enterprise Premieres Tonight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love it. See Star Trek in all it's forms is really a peice of art. Normal shows aren't because at the end of the show everyone talks and they've basically all see the same movie. The interpretation will be identical. True art gets interpreted differently by each individual viewer based on something inside the viewer that the piece of art speaks to. I've heard the interpretation of Star Trek described as "Self, EGO, ID (Freud)", "the three stooges", "racism", "team work (the three muskateers)", "hero worship", "morality play", "wwf".... I think it's hilarious how many different ways people can interpret and read things into the Star Trek franchise. Of course there are the people who can't just leave things at entertainment value and who must always search for "the deeper meaning". And of course sometimes there is a purposeful "deeper meaning".

  14. Re:It premiered last night in Canada on Star Trek: Enterprise Premieres Tonight · · Score: 2

    You need to be watching cartoon network then. Repleat with fun for kids and over-the-head sexual inuendo (Power Puff Girls)

  15. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN on Microsoft FrontPage License Prohibits Anti-Microsoft Speech · · Score: 2

    The misinformed article is probably talking about either a specific componenent and content or about the logo program. I dislike reporters who report "a reader informed me" as FACT. If a reader informs you then research it and post it as fact and not as rumor. MS is just protecting it's rights of trademark and copyright, and while most people here don't agree that anyone should have those rights they do still exist. Note that there are laws that allow criticism and sarcasm about a company, person, government, or product. This allows for reviews and parody, which differ from disparagement. Disparage is primarily to lower in rank or character using words that cause harm or resentment. Therefore MS is attempting to reduce the number of people using it's logo/content/product to spread discontent about it's product.

    I don't see any harm done.

    The Frontpage 2002 EULA (in it's entirety):

    END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE. IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This Microsoft End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual person or a single legal entity, who will be referred to in this EULA as "You") and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software product that accompanies this EULA, including any associated media, printed materials and electronic documentation (the "Software Product"). The Software Product also includes any software updates, add-on components, web services and/or supplements that Microsoft may provide to You or make available to You after the date You obtain Your initial copy of the Software Product to the extent that such items are not accompanied by a separate license agreement or terms of use. By installing, copying, downloading, accessing or otherwise using the Software Product, You agree to be bound by the terms of this EULA. If You do not agree to the terms of this EULA, do not install, access or use the Software Product; instead, You should return it to Your place of purchase for a full refund. SOFTWARE PRODUCT LICENSE The Software Product is protected by intellectual property laws and treaties. The Software Product is licensed, not sold. 1. GRANT OF LICENSE. This Section of the EULA describes Your general rights to install and use the Software Product The license rights described in this Section are subject to all other terms and conditions of this EULA. General License Grant to Install and Use Software Product. You may install and use one copy of the Software Product on a single computer, device, workstation, terminal, or other digital electronic or analog device ("Device"). You may make a second copy of the Software Product and install it on a portable Device for the exclusive use of the person who is the primary user of the first copy of the Software Product. A license for the Software Product may not be shared. Alternative License Grant for Storage/Network Use. As an alternative to the rights granted in the previous section, You may install a copy of the Software Product on one storage Device, such as a network server, and allow individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Software Product from other Devices over a private network, provided that You acquire and dedicate a license for the storage Device upon which the Software Product is installed and each separate Device from which the Software Product is accessed and used. A license for the Software Product may not be used concurrently on different Devices. General License Grant to Install and Use Subscription Product. The following licensing terms apply to You instead of the license grants in the previous two paragraphs if You licensed a subscription-based Software Product (a "Subscription Product"). You may install one copy of the Subscription Product on a single Device and use the Subscription Product for the term of Your subscription. You may also exercise the additional license rights described in the paragraphs below, but only for the term of Your subscription. The initial subscription period begins on the date You first activate Your copy of the Subscription Product and ends three hundred and sixty five (365) days thereafter. You cannot use the Subscription Product after Your subscription expires unless You renew or extend Your subscription. By renewing or extending Your subscription, You will be entitled to continue using the Subscription Product for a specified period of time beyond the date when Your previous subscription would have otherwise ended. All the terms and conditions of this EULA will continue to apply to Your use of the Subscription Product during any subsequent renewal periods unless otherwise specified. After the expiration of Your subscription, You can continue to open, view and print any documents You created with the Subscription Product. Additional License Grant for Media Elements. The Software Product may include certain photographs, clip art, animations, sounds, music and video clips (together "Media Elements"). If so, the following terms describe Your rights to the Media Elements: o Except as specified in the next Section, You may use, copy and modify the Media Elements and distribute copies of the Media Elements, along with Your modifications, as part of Your software product(s) and service(s), including Your web site(s). o You are not licensed to do any of the following: o You may not sell, license or distribute copies of the Media Elements on a stand-alone basis or as part of any collection, product or service where the primary value of the product or service are the Media Elements. o You may not use or distribute any of the Media Elements that include representations of identifiable individuals, governments, logos, initials, emblems, trademarks, or entities for any commercial purposes or to express or imply any endorsement or association with any product, service, entity, or activity. o You may not create obscene or scandalous works, as defined by federal law at the time the work is created, using the Media Elements. o You must indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise from or result from the use or distribution of Media Elements as modified by You. o You must include a valid copyright notice on Your products and services that include copies of the Media Elements. o You may not permit third parties to distribute copies of the Media Elements except as part of Your product or service. Additional License Grant for SharePoint Team Services. The Software Product may contain a copy of the Sharepoint Team Services. If so, You may install one copy of such software on one Device and allow an unlimited number of individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Sharepoint Team Services from other Devices provided that You acquire and dedicate a license to the Software Product for the Device upon which the Sharepoint Team Services are installed. Reservation of Rights. All rights not expressly granted are reserved by Microsoft. 2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS. Academic Edition Software. If the Software Product is identified as "Academic Edition" or "AE," You must be a "Qualified Educational User" to use the Software Product. If You are not a Qualified Educational User, You have no rights under this EULA. To determine whether You are a Qualified Educational User, please contact the Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399 or the Microsoft subsidiary serving Your country. Mandatory Activation. You may not be able to exercise Your rights to the Software Product under this EULA after a finite number of product launches unless You activate Your copy of the Software Product in the manner described during the launch sequence. Copy Protection. The Software Product may include copy protection technology to prevent the unauthorized copying of the Software Product or may require original media for use of the Software Product on the Device. It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of the Software Product or to circumvent any copy protection technology included in the Software Product. Not for Resale Software. If the Software Product is labeled "Not For Resale" or "NFR," then, notwithstanding other sections of this EULA, Your use of the Software Product is limited to use for demonstration, test, or evaluation purposes and You may not resell, or otherwise transfer for value, the Software Product. Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly. You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software Product, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation. Separation of Component Parts. The Software Product is licensed as a single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one Device unless expressly permitted by this EULA. Trademarks. This EULA does not grant You any rights in connection with any trademarks or service marks of Microsoft. No rental, leasing or commercial hosting. You may not rent, lease, lend or provide commercial hosting services to third parties with the Software Product. Support Services. Microsoft may provide You with support services related to the Software Product ("Support Services"). Use of Support Services is governed by the Microsoft policies and programs described in the user manual, in "online" documentation, or in other Microsoft-provided materials. Any supplemental software code provided to You as part of the Support Services are considered part of the Software Product and subject to the terms and conditions of this EULA. You acknowledge and agree that Microsoft may use technical information You provide to Microsoft as part of the Support Services for its business purposes, including for product support and development. Microsoft will not utilize such technical information in a form that personally identifies You. Software Transfer. Except as specified in this Section, the initial licensee of the Software Product may make a one-time permanent transfer of this EULA and Software Product only directly to an end user. This transfer must include all of the Software Product (including all component parts, the media and printed materials, any upgrades, this EULA, and, if applicable, the Certificate of Authenticity). Such transfer may not be by way of consignment or any other indirect transfer. The transferee of such one-time transfer must agree to comply with the terms of this EULA, including the obligation not to further transfer this EULA and Software Product. Subscription Products are non-transferable. Termination. Without prejudice to any other rights, Microsoft may terminate this EULA if You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this EULA. In such event, You must destroy all copies of the Software Product and all of its component parts. 3. UPGRADES. Standard Software Product. If the Software Product is labeled as an upgrade, You must be properly licensed to use a product identified by Microsoft as being eligible for the upgrade in order to use the Software Product. A Software Product labeled as an upgrade replaces or supplements (and may disable) the product that formed the basis for Your eligibility for the upgrade. You may use the resulting upgraded product only in accordance with the terms of this EULA. If the Software Product is an upgrade of a component of a package of software programs that You licensed as a single product, the Software Product may be used and transferred only as part of that single product package and may not be separated for use on more than one Device. Subscription Based Software Product. The following terms apply to You instead of the terms in the previous paragraph if You licensed a Subscription Product. If Microsoft releases any upgrades or new versions of the Subscription Product during the term of Your subscription, You will be entitled to receive a copy of such upgrade(s) or new version(s) at no additional cost, except for any applicable connection charges, taxes, duties and shipping costs if You select fulfillment by mail. Such upgrades shall be considered part of the Subscription Product and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this EULA unless otherwise indicated in any license agreement that accompanies such upgrade or new version. 4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the Software Product (including but not limited to any images, photographs, animations, video, audio, music, text, and "applets" incorporated into the Software Product), the accompanying printed materials, and any copies of the Software Product are owned by Microsoft or its suppliers. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the content that is not contained in the Software Product, but may be accessed through use of the Software Product, is the property of the respective content owners and may be protected by applicable copyright or other intellectual property laws and treaties. This EULA grants You no rights to use such content. If this Software Product contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may print one copy of such electronic documentation. You may not copy the printed materials accompanying the Software Product. 5. BACKUP COPY. After installation of one copy of the Software Product pursuant to this EULA, you may keep the original media on which the Software Product was provided by Microsoft solely for backup or archival purposes. If the original media is required to use the Software Product on the Device, you may make one copy of the Software Product solely for backup or archival purposes. Except as expressly provided in this EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of the Software Product or the printed materials accompanying the Software Product. 6. U.S. GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued on or after December 1, 1995 is provided with the commercial license rights and restrictions described elsewhere herein. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued prior to December 1, 1995 is provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS as provided for in FAR, 48 CFR 52.227-14 (JUNE 1987) or DFAR, 48 CFR 252.227-7013 (OCT 1988), as applicable. 7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS. You acknowledge that the Software Product is of U.S. origin. You agree to comply with all applicable international and national laws that apply to the Software Product, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, as well as end-user, end-use and destination restrictions issued by U.S. and other governments. For additional information, see http://www.microsoft.com/exporting/. 8. APPLICABLE LAW. If you acquired this Software Product in the United States, this EULA is governed by the laws of the State of Washington. If you acquired this Software Product in Canada, unless expressly prohibited by local law, this EULA is governed by the laws in force in the Province of Ontario, Canada; and, in respect of any dispute which may arise hereunder, you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal and provincial courts sitting in Toronto, Ontario. If this Software Product was acquired outside the United States, then local law may apply. Should you have any questions concerning this EULA, or if you desire to contact Microsoft for any reason, please contact the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country, or write: Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399. 9. LIMITED WARRANTY LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED IN THE US AND CANADA. Microsoft warrants that the SOFTWARE PRODUCT will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying materials for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of receipt. If an implied warranty or condition is created by your state/jurisdiction and federal or state/provincial law prohibits disclaimer of it, you also have an implied warranty or condition, BUT ONLY AS TO DEFECTS DISCOVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY (NINETY DAYS). AS TO ANY DEFECTS DISCOVERED AFTER THE NINETY (90) DAY PERIOD, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow limitations on how long an implied warranty or condition lasts, so the above limitation may not apply to you. Any supplements or updates to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, including without limitation, any (if any) service packs or hot fixes provided to you after the expiration of the ninety (90) day Limited Warranty period are not covered by any warranty or condition, express, implied or statutory. LIMITATION ON REMEDIES; NO CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES. Your exclusive remedy for any breach of this Limited Warranty is as set forth below. Except for any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if the Software Product does not meet Microsoft's Limited Warranty, and, to the maximum extent allowed by applicable law, even if any remedy fails of its essential purpose. The terms of Section 11 below ("Exclusion of Incidental, Consequential and Certain Other Damages") are also incorporated into this Limited Warranty. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to you. This Limited Warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may have others which vary from state/jurisdiction to state/jurisdiction. YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. Microsoft's and its suppliers' entire liability and your exclusive remedy shall be, at Microsoft's option from time to time exercised subject to applicable law, (a) return of the price paid (if any) for the Software Product, or (b) repair or replacement of the Software Product, that does not meet this Limited Warranty and that is returned to Microsoft with a copy of your receipt. You will receive the remedy elected by Microsoft without charge, except that you are responsible for any expenses you may incur (e.g. cost of shipping the Software Product to Microsoft). This Limited Warranty is void if failure of the Software Product has resulted from accident, abuse, misapplication, abnormal use or a virus. Any replacement Software Product will be warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period or thirty (30) days, whichever is longer. Outside the United States or Canada, neither these remedies nor any product support services offered by Microsoft are available without proof of purchase from an authorized international source. To exercise your remedy, contact: Microsoft, Attn. Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, or the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country. LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THE US AND CANADA. FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTIES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR PARTICULAR JURISDICTION, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR WARRANTY BOOKLET INCLUDED WITH THIS PACKAGE OR PROVIDED WITH THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT PRINTED MATERIALS. 10. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. THE LIMITED WARRANTY THAT APPEARS ABOVE IS THE ONLY EXPRESS WARRANTY MADE TO YOU AND IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTIES (IF ANY) CREATED BY ANY DOCUMENTATION OR PACKAGING. EXCEPT FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTY AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, MICROSOFT AND ITS SUPPLIERS PROVIDE THE SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (IF ANY) AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY (IF ANY) IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OF ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OR RESPONSES, OF RESULTS, OF WORKMANLIKE EFFORT, OF LACK OF VIRUSES AND OF LACK OF NEGLIGENCE, ALL WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE, AND THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES. ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF TITLE, QUIET ENJOYMENT, QUIET POSSESSION, CORRESPONDENCE TO DESCRIPTION OR NON-INFRINGEMENT WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE. 11. EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL INJURY, FOR LOSS OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY INCLUDING OF GOOD FAITH OR OF REASONABLE CARE, FOR NEGLIGENCE, AND FOR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY OR OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES, OR OTHERWISE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. 12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY DAMAGES THAT YOU MIGHT INCUR FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL DAMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE AND ALL DIRECT OR GENERAL DAMAGES), THE ENTIRE LIABILITY OF MICROSOFT AND ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING (EXCEPT FOR ANY REMEDY OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT ELECTED BY MICROSOFT WITH RESPECT TO ANY BREACH OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY) SHAL BE LIMITED TO THE GREATER OF THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE OR U.S. $5.00. THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS (INCLUDING SECTIONS 7, 8, AND 9 ABOVE) SHALL APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This EULA (including any addendum or amendment to this EULA which is included with the Software Product) is the entire agreement between you and Microsoft relating to the Software Product and the support services (if any) and they supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral or written communications, proposals and representations with respect to the Software Product or any other subject matter covered by this EULA. To the extent the terms of any Microsoft policies or programs for support services conflict with the terms of this EULA, the terms of this EULA shall control. Si vous avez acquis votre produit Microsoft au CANADA, la garantie limitée suivante vous concerne : GARANTIE LIMITÉE Microsoft garantit que le Produit fonctionnera conformément aux documents inclus pendant une période de 90 jours suivant la date de réception. Si une garantie ou condition implicite est créée par votre État ou votre territoire et qu'une loi fédérale ou provinciale ou État en interdit le déni, vous jouissez également d'une garantie ou condition implicite, MAIS UNIQUEMENT POUR LES DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS DURANT LA PÉRIODE DE LA PRÉSENTE GARANTIE LIMITÉE (QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS). IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT QUANT AUX DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS APRÈS CETTE PÉRIODE DE QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS. Certains États ou territoires ne permettent pas de limiter la durée d'une garantie ou condition implicite de sorte que la limitation cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous. Tous les suppléments ou toutes les mises à jour relatifs au Produit, notamment, les ensembles de services ou les réparations à chaud (le cas échéant) qui vous sont fournis après l'expiration de la période de quatre-vingt-dix jours de la garantie limitée ne sont pas couverts par quelque garantie ou condition que ce soit, expresse ou implicite. LIMITATION DES RECOURS; ABSENCE DE DOMMAGES INDIRECTS OU AUTRES. Votre recours exclusif pour toute violation de la présente garantie limitée est décrit ciaprès. Sauf pour tout remboursement au choix de Microsoft, si le Produit ne respecte pas la garantie limitée de Microsoft et, dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel, VOUS N'AVEZ DROIT À AUCUNS DOMMAGES, NOTAMMENT DES DOMMAGES INDIRECTS. Les modalités de la clause Exclusion des dommages accessoires, indirects et de certains autres dommages sont également intégrées à la présente garantie limitée. Certains États ou territoires ne permettent pas l'exclusion ou la limitation des dommages indirects ou accessoires de sorte que la limitation ou l'exclusion cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous. La présente garantie limitée vous donne des droits légaux spécifiques. Vous pouvez avoir d'autres droits qui peuvent varier d'un territoire ou d'un État à un autre. VOTRE RECOURS EXCLUSIF. L'obligation intégrale de Microsoft et de ses fournisseurs et votre recours exclusif seront, selon le choix de Microsoft de temps à autre sous réserve de toute loi applicable, a) le remboursement du prix payé, le cas échéant, pour le Produit ou b) la réparation ou le remplacement du Produit qui ne respecte pas la présente garantie limitée et qui est retourné à Microsoft avec une copie de votre reçu. Vous recevrez la compensation choisie par Microsoft, sans frais, sauf que vous êtes responsable des dépenses que vous pourriez engager (p. ex., les frais d'envoi du Produit à Microsoft). La présente garantie limitée est nulle si la défectuosité du Produit est causée par un accident, un usage abusif, une mauvaise application, un usage anormal ou un virus. Tout Produit de remplacement sera garanti pour le reste de la période de garantie initiale ou pendant trente (30) jours, selon la plus longue entre ces deux périodes. À l'extérieur des États-Unis ou du Canada, ces recours ou l'un quelconque des services de soutien technique offerts par Microsoft ne sont pas disponibles sans preuve d'achat d'une source internationale autorisée. Pour exercer votre recours, vous devez communiquer avec Microsoft et vous adresser au Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, ou à la filiale de Microsoft de votre pays. DÉNI DE GARANTIES. La garantie limitée mentionnée ci-dessus constitue la seule garantie expresse qui vous est donnée et remplace toutes autres garanties expresses (s'il en est) mentionnées dans un document ou sur un emballage. Sauf en ce qui a trait à la garantie limitée et dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, le Produit et les services de soutien technique (le cas échéant) sont fournis TELS QUELS ET AVEC TOUS LES DÉFAUTS par Microsoft et ses fournisseurs, lesquels par les présentes dénient toutes autres garanties et conditions expresses, implicites ou en vertu de la loi, notamment (le cas échéant) les garanties, devoirs ou conditions implicites de qualité marchande, d'adaptation à un usage particulier, d'exactitude ou d'exhaustivité des réponses, des résultats, des efforts déployés selon les règles de l'art, d'absence de virus et de négligence, le tout à l'égard du Produit et de la prestation des services de soutien technique ou de l'omission d'une telle prestation. PAR AILLEURS, IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION QUANT AU TITRE DE PROPRIÉTÉ, À LA JOUISSANCE OU LA POSSESSION PAISIBLE, À LA CONCORDANCE À UNE DESCRIPTION NI QUANT À UNE ABSENCE DE CONTREFAÇON CONCERNANT LE PRODUIT. EXCLUSION DES DOMMAGES ACCESSOIRES, INDIRECTS ET DE CERTAINS AUTRES DOMMAGES. DANS LA MESURE MAXIMALE PERMISE PAR LES LOIS APPLICABLES, EN AUCUN CAS MICROSOFT OU SES FOURNISSEURS NE SERONT RESPONSABLES DES DOMMAGES SPÉCIAUX, CONSÉCUTIFS, ACCESSOIRES OU INDIRECTS DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT (NOTAMMENT, LES DOMMAGES À L'ÉGARD DU MANQUE À GAGNER OU DE LA DIVULGATION DE RENSEIGNEMENTS CONFIDENTIELS OU AUTRES, DE LA PERTE D'EXPLOITATION, DE BLESSURES CORPORELLES, DE LA VIOLATION DE LA VIE PRIVÉE, DE L'OMISSION DE REMPLIR TOUT DEVOIR, Y COMPRIS D'AGIR DE BONNE FOI OU D'EXERCER UN SOIN RAISONNABLE, DE LA NÉGLIGENCE ET DE TOUTE AUTRE PERTE PÉCUNIAIRE OU AUTRE PERTE DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT) SE RAPPORTANT DE QUELQUE MANIÈRE QUE CE SOIT À L'UTILISATION DU PRODUIT OU À L'INCAPACITÉ DE S'EN SERVIR, À LA PRESTATION OU À L'OMISSION D'UNE TELLE PRESTATION DE SERVICES DE SOUTIEN TECHNIQUE OU AUTREMENT AUX TERMES DE TOUTE DISPOSITION DU PRÉSENT EULA OU RELATIVEMENT À UNE TELLE DISPOSITION, MÊME EN CAS DE FAUTE, DE DÉLIT CIVIL (Y COMPRIS LA NÉGLIGENCE), DE RESPONSABILITÉ STRICTE, DE VIOLATION DE CONTRAT OU DE VIOLATION DE GARANTIE DE MICROSOFT OU DE TOUT FOURNISSEUR ET MÊME SI MICROSOFT OU TOUT FOURNISSEUR A ÉTÉ AVISÉ DE LA POSSIBILITÉ DE TELS DOMMAGES. LIMITATION DE RESPONSABILITÉ ET RECOURS. Malgré les dommages que vous puissiez subir pour quelque motif que ce soit (notamment, tous les dommages susmentionnés et tous les dommages directs ou généraux), l'obligation intégrale de Microsoft et de l'un ou l'autre de ses fournisseurs aux termes de toute disposition du présent EULA et votre recours exclusif à l'égard de tout ce qui précède (sauf en ce qui concerne tout recours de réparation ou de remplacement choisi par Microsoft à l'égard de tout manquement à la garantie limitée) se limite au plus élevé entre les montants suivants : le montant que vous avez réellement payé pour le Produit ou 5,00 $US. Les limites, exclusions et dénis qui précèdent (y compris les clauses ci-dessus), s'appliquent dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel. La présente Convention est régie par les lois de la province d'Ontario, Canada. Chacune des parties à la présente reconnaît irrévocablement la compétence des tribunaux de la province d'Ontario et consent à instituer tout litige qui pourrait découler de la présente auprès des tribunaux situés dans le district judiciaire de York, province d'Ontario. Au cas où vous auriez des questions concernant cette licence ou que vous désiriez vous mettre en rapport avec Microsoft pour quelque raison que ce soit, veuillez contacter la succursale Microsoft desservant votre pays, dont l'adresse est fournie dans ce produit, ou écrivez à : Microsoft Sales Information Center, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington 98052-6399.
  16. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN on Microsoft FrontPage License Prohibits Anti-Microsoft Speech · · Score: 2

    mod this up

  17. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... on Further Updates On Terrorist Attack · · Score: 1
    "Next week you will be able to buy commemoritive $5 coins minted by The American Mint which will be leagal tender in Libiria."

    It's actually America's Mint not the American Mint that mints these particular coins. And next time you want to post something you might run it through a spell checker because you just made yourself sound like a complete and utter moron ----"freedomes striped down to fight a nonvisable enamy" --- run Forest, run!


  18. Re:use of illegal video encoders on Further Updates On Terrorist Attack · · Score: 2

    A> Commercial availability does not equate to being legal. Many items are "commercially available" but have restrictions on them as to be warranted illegal (IE radar detectors, beer, etc.) Linux for quite some time was not a commercially available product... does that make it illegal and since it has the original code that was available during this non-commercial period is that illegal also?

    B> Can you prove what you say about hex edited code. I have seen several people make this claim and not one has been able to substantiate it with code, proof, a site, or a lawsuit from Microsoft to back up the claim. If DivX were in fact "stolen" pirate ware MS would be all over DIVX.COM.

    C>And since when does anyone (especially on Slashdot) consider Microsoft or Intel either trustworthy or respectable?

  19. Re:E-word on Further Updates On Terrorist Attack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And exactly what freedoms are we talking about giving up? Right to privacy - you'll still have it, when your at home... in private. Right to free speech, you'll still have it. Right to congregate, right to bare arms, right to freedom of religion... exactly which right is it that you think you might lose from this? No matter what laws they pass I don't believe that I'm losing any rights afforded to me by the current constitution so what constitution are you going by? Are you afraid that you might be detained at an airport for a more thorough search, would that be an inconvenience? Yes. But there is no greater inconvenience than death.

  20. Re:oh boy.... read this: on Further Updates On Terrorist Attack · · Score: 2

    This is a false quote this is not an original quatraine from Nostredamas it is a made up quatrane that was used to prove a point about how easily Nostredamas and predictions could be applied. Search the net again or the newsgroups and you'll find this out.

  21. Re:use of illegal video encoders on Further Updates On Terrorist Attack · · Score: 2

    please say your just being an ass here and trying (not succeeding) to make a joke.

  22. Re:Sea change: smaller cities, more sprawl on Our New Pearl Harbor · · Score: 1

    Understand that now with our large cities we are at 88 people per square mile. That's 7 acres per person. Which in theory sounds fine until you attempt to understand how much biomass would need to be cleared to provide that space, housing, infrastructure, power, water, waste, etc. Then you have to take into account how much biomass is needed for food production and you will quickly see that 7 acres per person dwindle. This planet can only continue to support us if we consolidate our cities and encorporate nature into them. Archology. Sprawl is not the answer and is not rosie at all. We'd be signing our own death warrant it would just be a slower death with less fanfair.

  23. Re:someone predicted this 'holy way' last week on More Links And Reports On Terrorist Attacks · · Score: 2

    Only problem I see is that he did come back at 4:45pm or so and post again, so all his prophecy is shit. He didn't go away like he said and now he's gonna get his poop inspected with a microscope and some small tweezers because people in the newsgroup have already turned his ass in.

  24. Re:Pearl Harbor Comparisons are pathetic on Our New Pearl Harbor · · Score: 1

    Well not exactly. See while we in the US do not consider this a military issue but a terrorist issue. The terrorist, whether US or abroad, see this very much as a military action against military targets. They see every victim not as innocent but as guilty as sin otherwise they would not have been in the place that they are. Additionally they look at the death of children as payment for the "sins of the father". Terrorists, military, killers, murderers, whatever must justify every action, they must seperate themselves from the task at hand. They must dehumanize the person to be killed, create the target in their mind as an object not as living, breathing, loving, - human. Do not think that someone does not consider this a military action just because we don't define it as one.

  25. Monopoly vs. Cross Market Saturation on AOL Time Warner Netscape CNN... and AT&T? · · Score: 1
    Everyone is talking about monopoly, monopoly, monopoly. What I want to understand is why we don't have laws that limit a company from competing in too many markets. IE: what happens when the entity that provides a significant portion of your TV schedule also controls a significant portion of your magazine content, newspaper, internet media, home video, movies, radio, music, games, sports, books, cartoons, theme parks, trade publications. Let's say that then that same company begins to control the pipes through which you get most of the above and that they own the majority of the pipe that feeds all information out, even competitors information. Websites, IM, e-mail, cable outlets, ISP access, etc. Does anyone seriously think that they will not use all of those resources in unison to leverage their own agenda? What would be the effect, given the ease of swaying people's opinions, if they implemented such a task? The majority of people might easily be swayed to think like that entity because they were bombarded with "evidence" that it's the right thing to do. Then we get into people making excuses for that entity saying things like "they are only doing what the market will support", "they are very customer focused", "if it weren't for them we wouldn't have 'X'", "why can't everyone leave them alone, they're not killing anyone", etc. etc. Sentiment turns into votes and pressure on the government. Tie that pressure to the amount of palms being greased throughout the government and you can see that a company like this might be able to easily survive and pursue whatever agenda they choose.

    Unfortunately we've allowed such companies to exist by doing things backwards. The government allow the AOL/TW merger on the stipulation that they would enact certain remedies. Most of which have not come to fruition.If they should not or should the new company decide to circumvent those remedies it will be very difficult for the government to push back and fix the problem without millions of dollars of investigations and court costs. So why didn't the government say "before you merge you have to do A. B. C.". I mean before I let my kid play games he has to have his room in order. Why didn't the government hold the companies to the same premise, "get your business in order and then we'll talk". Because AOL/TW fastracked the issue through "experts" and lobbying. By showing that a delay would be "detrimental to the economy" and "fiscally damaging".

    So what's the best rule of thumb that we can go by. How many markets should one company be allowed to compete in before it's considered "anti-comptetive"?