Slashdot Mirror


In Search of the Best Programmable Universal Remote?

option8 asks: "Now that i have more components in my living room than I have room on the coffee table for their remotes, I'm looking into getting a programmable universal remote. I've looked at some of the spiffy touchscreen jobs, like the Philips Pronto and even some of the new color remotes, but it seems to me that spending more for my remote than I did on my DVD player is overdoing it somewhat. Also, all I've found are ones with windows support for building screens. Are there any out there that I can use with Linux?" There was a previous Ask Slashdot on this subject back in '99, anything new to report since then?

314 comments

  1. Beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remote controls turn you into the Fat Comicbook Store Guy.

    1. Re:Beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst episode ever!!!

  2. I'd say my wife.. by sporty · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would say my wife if she could figure out my entertainment centre. Ah, the issues of being an audiophile ;) (j/k)

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:I'd say my wife.. by silphium_laciniatum · · Score: 1

      How do you get her out of the kitchen to work the TV. Or do you have it installed over the Stove and Dishwasher.

      --

      "No one will smell that."

    2. Re:I'd say my wife.. by sporty · · Score: 1
      YOu know its gonna be wrong when i say, I have her well trained.


      Damn this is one fucked up thread :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  3. I know.. by Urungus · · Score: 1

    My mouse.

  4. Sony RM-AV 2100 by WinDoze · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a review of my choice. It's not fully programmable in that you can't add or remove buttons, but there are tons of available functions built in. The back-lit LCD is nice. And for $90, I can live with having to use a few mislabelled buttons.

    1. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up! This post provided good infomation to the readers.

    2. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by g33kb0y · · Score: 1

      I agree - the Sony is pretty slick. I've had it for about six months and my only complaint is it has a shared satellite/cable box button.

    3. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by wizarddc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have this, and I love it. You can add/remove buttons, but not make your own buttons. The LCD is split into a grid, and each grid box has about 4 different labels. You can set a button by basically pointing your real remote at this remote, and hitting the button you want to program on the universal remote, and then hitting the button you want to use on your real remote. Besides the number pad and the arrow keys, every other button is programable, even the volume buttons, such as I can set the volume buttons for the sattelite box to use the tv volume. Also, each piece of equipment can have 2 "pages" of buttons. So say you dvd remote has more buttons than the lcd screen has, there is a "secondary" button on the top left corner that swap back and forther for that device. I have my TV, Sattelite, DVD, VCR and Stereo hooked up to use this, and I'd be lost without it.

      --
      Th
    4. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought about buying this one but one thing changed my mind ... the UHF (as opposed to standard IR) extension costs almost as much as the device itself. And since the set top box for our satellite service uses a UHF remote, this becomes over-expensive.

    5. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by DaSyonic · · Score: 5, Informative
      I have one of these. I have had it for about 9 months. Here's my opinion/review of it.

      First the positives.

      • Lots of buttons, Each is individually programmable. Also support for alot of devices.
      • Backlit feature works
      • Learning function works flawlessly (It's the only other remote that can operate my kenwood - tried many learning remotes, this is the one that would work.)
      • Better than expected battery life - Still yet to have to change the batteries, with 9 months of daily use.
      • Customizable. From beeps, to backlit strength, to auto shutoff time; it's more than just a generic remote.

      But it also has some problems.

      • The buttons are small
      • Cant navigate by feel, You MUST look at the remote. I've gotten good at knowing where to press, but its easy to mess up, and often annoying.
      • Not enough macros. You can use 3, maximum
      • It's big. It doesn't fit in your hand very nicely.
      • Expensive. I got mine at Sams for a good deal though

      This is complementary to my existing remote, I still use the TiVo remote for just casual TV, but the Sony 'Remote Commander' is also by my side, and I can use it exclusively, whenever I choose. It's a good remote, and a good choice if you can live with the drawbacks.

      --

      Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
      James Brents
    6. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by DaSyonic · · Score: 2

      Check out page 35 of the manual, You can assign your cable box to another device button, say, DSP, or MD/DAT. Some device you don't use. Thats what makes this remote so good, you can do ANYTHING on it.
      Hope that helps.

      --

      Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
      James Brents
    7. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's one model that I'd like to find a remote for!


      (It's not a goatse link, honest!)

    8. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      Just my experience, FWIW:

      My experience with Sony remotes is that they are unreliable. I went through three of them (can't recall the model - it came with a Sony A/V receiver and was perfect other than reliability), including two replacements after the warrantee at $110 each.

      After studying Consumer Reports data on reliability, I've decided the only Sony I would ever buy again would be a television or monitor.

    9. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by Katan · · Score: 3, Informative
      I agree 100%. I love how this thing can either natively, or learn, just about any device that you could have in your entertainment center.


      The only few complaints I have with it are:


      The backlight is not sensitive to you using it. Its on a timer..so after a while it just turns off, whether you like it or not.

      Just seems to be a bit too big and intimidating for the casual user.

      Eats batteries like no other... gotta keep the enegizer bunny going.

      Lack of more macros.


      One thing that is really awesome about it is its 4 full power infared transmitters. I wouldn't doubt this thing will be linked to skin damage or something. After trying to use Omniremote on a Palm V, you can't underestimate having a powerful transmitter to hit your equipment at any angle.

      --
      K
    10. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      Expensive. I got mine at Sams for a good deal though


      Another place to look is a Sony factory outlet store. I picked mine up for $65, refurbished. Not bad compared to $179 MSRP.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    11. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by psxotaku · · Score: 1

      I second this review.
      I've had mine for almost 2 years and I agree with dasyonic on all of his points. I also have a TiVo and I do the same thing... I wish the TiVo remote was a learning type, my Sony one is the best feeling remote I have.

    12. Re:Sony RM-AV 2100 by DaSyonic · · Score: 2

      The TiVo Sony remote IS a learning remote! It wont tell you that in the manual, but check the TiVo AVS Forum, it talks about it... I used to have a PDF on how to use it. Unfortunatly, it doesnt doesnt work my Kenwood receiver, or I'd just use that and be in remote heaven. Sorry I cant give an exact URL, but it is possible. Thats why there's the yellow dots on the remote, each button with a dot is programmable.

      --

      Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
      James Brents
  5. Most universal remote by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I decided that all the remotes in my living room were totally useless. I threw them all out, and simply replaced them with a 10 foot pole.

    Not only does it allow me to control all button controlled equipment, but it allows me to change DVD, push the cat out of the way, and take the phone off the hook if someone wants to interupt my viewing. About all I can't do isget a cup of coffee. I use a long handled shovel for that.

    1. Re:Most universal remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same thing, except I just open my pants.

    2. Re:Most universal remote by MadCamel · · Score: 1

      Even though this is obviously a joke, it is not a bad idea. I have been using a 6ft fiberglass pole(old CB antenna) as a remote for years now, it has yet to need new batteries, and has never went out of commision. Just make sure that you rubberise the end so you don't mess your gear up.

    3. Re:Most universal remote by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > I have been using a 6ft fiberglass pole as a remote for years now

      Poke... poke...

      *bang*
      Damn! I've got to mount that DVD player more firmly!

      *crash*
      Damn! There goes another TV screen!

      *skewer*
      Damn! There goes another cat!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Most universal remote by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I decided that all the remotes in my living room were totally useless. I threw them all out, and simply replaced them with a 10 foot pole.

      But there's a lot on TV that I wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole.

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    5. Re:Most universal remote by CaseyB · · Score: 3, Funny
      I threw them all out, and simply replaced them with a 10 foot pole.

      Sounds elegant, but this wouldn't work for a large percentage of modern AV equipment.

      The full functionality of neither my TV nor my VCR is available from the front panel of the unit. I HAVE to use a remote to adjust the picture settings on my TV, or program my VCR.

      I suppose you could affix the remotes permanently to your entertainment center, and work them with the pole from the couch, though.

    6. Re:Most universal remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you could affix the remotes permanently to your entertainment center, and work them with the pole from the couch, though.

      They already make a convenient remote control that keeps them within easy reach. It's called a coffee table. Just firmly affix the remotes to the surface of the table and use your feet to press the buttons. NOTE: This will not work if you are married unfortunately.

    7. Re:Most universal remote by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      In my day tv remote controls were called CHILDREN!

      We didn't have any of these fancy 10 foot poles or nothin. We just hollered at one of the kids to change the channel, turn up or down the volumn, and everything else.

      Note: Actually *I* was the family remote control as a child :)

    8. Re:Most universal remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...decided that all the remotes in my living room were totally useless. I threw them all out, and simply replaced them with a 10 foot pole."

      Where would you find one that's 10' in length? The pope can't be much more than 5'.

      No wait...

    9. Re:Most universal remote by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      "but it allows me to change DVD, push the cat out of the way..."

      A guy at a Widespread Panic show once told me you could train a cat to change the TV channels by using a water pistol, a box of rubber bands, and repeatedly shrieking "Bad Kitty!"

      ...but he might have been pulling my leg.

  6. OmniRemote/ by wayn3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those with a Palm Pilot, OmniRemote is an excellent universal remote application. It makes Palm IIs with the 2MB upgrade card useful again.

    1. Re:OmniRemote/ by darnellmc · · Score: 1

      Yea OminRemote is very good. And probably the most programmable of them all. If you have a HandSpring Visor, the folks at OmniRemote make a special Springboard attachment for it, that increases the IR range. I think the Visor/OmniRemote combination is the best bet if you want the best programmable remote control ever.

      Now if they make a version that could program RF remotes, that would take it to the next level ;o) .

    2. Re:OmniRemote/ by Milican · · Score: 4, Informative

      And if you own a Handspring Visor you can get a springboard module for External IR. The External IR is much stronger than Internal IR, but hardly ever necessary. The only time I would recommend buying the module is for Visor Edge models. I have an Edge and it doesn't work reliably for much further than 5'. You can see Pacific Neotek's tests here.

      So I'm kind if in the market for External IR, but I'll wait til the latest version of OmniRemote comes out first (in beta now.. and has been for an eternity).

      JOhn

    3. Re:OmniRemote/ by psych031337 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      For those with a Palm Pilot, OmniRemote [pacificneotek.com] is an excellent universal remote application. It makes Palm IIs with the 2MB upgrade card useful again.

      Well, using a palm as a remote is the same as getting up and pushing the button with your live fingers. The range of that cute IR transmitter is fine for beaming vCards but don't expect it to reach through your entire living room. Fresh batteries might help, but what really is needed here is a soldering-iron-h4x0r punching in a more powerful IR bulb.
      --
      +++ath0
    4. Re:OmniRemote/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, very cool!!!
      What kind of range do you get though?

    5. Re:OmniRemote/ by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      It's $59.95 though. Thats actually more than i paid (real cash money, its a long but legal story) for my visor!

  7. Palm by BubbaFett · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess you could always use your Palm. It's about as programmable as it gets! Some Palm remote projects.

    1. Re:Palm by blazin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess you could always use your Palm.

      But I thought the whole point of a remote was not having to get up and go across the room to change the channel... Besides, I've found pressing the buttons with the tip of my finger works better than mashing the buttons my whole palm... :)

    2. Re:Palm by Red+Aardvark+House · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course you can use your palm. However, I find it easier to use my fingers to press the little buttons on my TV.

      --

      I like fire ants. They are very spicy!

    3. Re:Palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...you could always use your palm,..."

      but what would you use to jack off with?

    4. Re:Palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but usually, your palm is already in use. The remote is to get past the talking to the juicy parts...

    5. Re:Palm by awx · · Score: 1

      ok, obligatory simpsons quote!

      Homer tries to dial the plant to warn of impeding nuclear outgas:
      (Phone announcer lady's voice) "The fingers you have used to dial with are too fat. Please mash the keypad to order a dialing wand."

      --
      Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
  8. Woz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Steve Wozniak working on an Apple ][ version of a universal remote?

    1. Re:Woz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already did. Fully programmable learning remote. Serial port for computer control. Macros, timers, alarms, countdown timers and more. We are still manufacturing the remote. http://www.celadon.com. Look for the PIC-200.

      I don't mean to turn this into a big sales pitch, but since not many people know the remote is still being produced as well as how configurable it is (and programmable/controllable from a computer), thought I should say something.

      Robert Retzlaff
      Celadon, Inc.

  9. The Pilot by Deanasc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's a programmable remote control program for the Palm Pilot.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  10. Tactile Response and Touch Screen Remotes. by bigtoy · · Score: 1

    I have used one of the monster Sony touch screen LCD remotes. The big drawback to the Sony touch screen remotes is that there is little useful "tactile" information.

    With my old remotes it is easy to "feel" the number, volume, channel selector, etc. With touch screen you are forced to actually LOOK at the remote. Oh the horrors!

    Anyone have experience with a programmable touch screen remove that gives the user tactile response?

    --
    "A sample size of one is really just statistical masturbation."
    1. Re:Tactile Response and Touch Screen Remotes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found that spreading fecal matter onto the face of my touch screen remotes has been a workable solution.

      I can custom shape the physical interface to provide feedback without having to look at the remote, and when it dries it yields a surprisingly durable semi-permanent finish.

      A quick note: you may not be as successful at this after some meals, say mexican food for exaple.

  11. PDA? by dankjones · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I thought you could program PDA's to do that.

  12. Ecch. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative

    My Sony receiver came with a sophisticated remote control complete with LCD display.

    I hate it.

    I want a remote that has buttons. A lot of buttons. A whole lot of buttons. Something that doesn't make me go through 15 menus to get to the operating mode I want.

    1. Re:Ecch. by EasyTarget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There seems to be some sort of design law on this

      Very cheap units have a simple remote control with limited functionality and a few buttons. Cheap units where they want to bump the price a little has a simple remote control with limited functionality and HUNDREDS of buttons. Mid price has mediocre functionality, fewer buttons, and a LCD/swivel cover/joystick. The best stuff has high functionality, just enough buttons for that, and nothing else.

      As Terry Prattchett said in Good Omens 'He had a sound system so expensive the amp was just a heavy black cube with a volume contol and nothing else' (iirc).
      And no.. having a 'eject' button on a CD/DVD is not high functionality, it is a total waste of everybody's time.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    2. Re:Ecch. by monkeydo · · Score: 3, Informative

      My wife gave me a Sony lVL-900 6 months ago, and none of my other remotes have been out of the drawer since.

      This remote is all buttons, but it is a totally programmable LEARNING remote. You don't have to worry about whether the button you want is preprogramed because you can "teach it" It also can do 11 macros, and even though it will control 8 devices, since you can put any function on any button you can put all the stuff you need one device and not have to switch back and forth. This thrills my wife because she only has to puch one button to turn everything on to watch cable, or a DVD.

      Compared to $400 for a full GUI, I'll take the $50 buttons.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    3. Re:Ecch. by macmullin · · Score: 1

      And no.. having a 'eject' button on a CD/DVD is not high functionality, it is a total waste of everybody's time
      Clearly you don't share your home with cats that you like to aggravate. The effect of a surprise bump from the front loader on my DVD on the cat is quite a thing to see.

    4. Re:Ecch. by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      If you use Sony components this function is built in, since Sony components use discrete off and on sigals there is no dnager of turning you TV off when you just want to select it. You can however assign macros to the component buttons when you hold them down, so you can program the DVD button for example to turn the DVD on set the video and audio source, select the proper viewing mode and adjust the volume.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  13. Small kids... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny


    Are the answer, they love pushing buttons and while there are incidents of failure they seamlessly upgrade with the hardware. And they can open fridges and bring beer. They come with switchable covers, have a basic voice and language recognition system, and work off an inexhustable supply of energy. They are even turning things on before you get up, and after you've gone to bed.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Small kids... by mister+sticky · · Score: 1

      They do take some time for their firmware to debug and mature, but the best part is:
      will work for food!!

    2. Re:Small kids... by cholokoy · · Score: 1

      But there's a downside, you can only watch Cartoon Network or ZoogDisney so you can't watch SciFi or CNN or your fav local news and weather.

      --
      Return the bells of Balangiga.
  14. X10 Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X10 Makes a universal remote with support for tehir modules built in. The remote itself isn't that feature loaded, but - Hey you can turns the lights on and off.

    1. Re:X10 Remote by mattdm · · Score: 1

      They've got a better version which *is* feature-loaded:

      ur24a.

      I dunno why they bother also having the lame remote for about the same price.

    2. Re:X10 Remote by Red+Aardvark+House · · Score: 1

      The best version of all doesn't have those silly pop-under ads!

      --

      I like fire ants. They are very spicy!

    3. Re:X10 Remote by mattdm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's really unfortunate that they're such a sleazy company, 'cause they make neat geek toys. I complain to them periodically. :)

  15. Re:I got the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What buttons? There aren't any on my TV.

  16. Power strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With one click, I can turn all that AV shit off!

  17. Pronto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Philips Pronto is very much worth it. You can spend less on a remote and live with annoyances, or you can get a pronto and configure it to do exactly what you want. My only regret is I'm not insane enough to spend a grand on the color version.

    See http://www.remotecentral.com/tsu2000/index.html for a review

    1. Re:Pronto by MadCamel · · Score: 1

      My remote also dims the lights. I am using a 2Mwatt IR laser tube controlled by a Cray 2 supercomputer. Average amp draw: 700. Perks: Goes right through walls(burns holes in them!), and with the proper telescopic aiming device, and those reflectors on the moon, you can change the channels on NY Cities jumbotron in Times Square!

    2. Re:Pronto by Hertog · · Score: 1

      And it runs Linux.

      Whe I worked for Philips Semi, I found some internal pages with screenshots of the pronto running linux.

      Don't know if it ever became more than an 'inside' job tho.

      Hertog

      --
      -=- I heard rumours about an OS called "Social Life", heard of it? Is it stable? -=-
    3. Re:Pronto by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing that has always driven my nuts with macro functions on any universal remote is the fact that the remote has no way of knowing what the current state of the components are.

      For example, I have a macro for "DVD". Turn on the amp. Set amp to DVD input. Set surround to "theatre". Turn on the TV. Switch TV to DVD input. Turn on the DVD player.
      Seems like a great idea. But some of the components (TV and DVD player) have a single button/signal for power on/off. So if my TV was already on, then this macro does everything right, but turns the TV off. Damn.

      Or sometimes not all of the IR signals make it to all of the compnents. TV is on, DVD player is on, but the amp never switched to the DVD input. Damn.

      I wish I could have all of my components share a simple communications channel (hmmm, or complex, like Bluetooth :-) so I could actually control what the devices are doing, instead of just blasting out pre-determined IR codes and hoping for the best.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    4. Re:Pronto by ryanwright · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wish I could have all of my components share a simple communications channel (hmmm, or complex, like Bluetooth :-) so I could actually control what the devices are doing, instead of just blasting out pre-determined IR codes and hoping for the best.

      Well, you can buy a JDS Infrared Xpander. It will work in standalone mode (without the home automation controller) and has a common bus that allows you to hook up various sensors to your devices. Then you can program it with simple if/then/else logic, so if it detects that the TV is already on, it won't issue another power command to it. Integrate it with a Timecommander Plus or Stargate for full home automation pleasure.

      I have the Timecommander Plus & IR Xpander and absolutely love it. I can initiate macros from any device - IR, RF remotes, wall mounted touchscreens or keypads - and the JDS equipment takes care of everything, including lighting & appliance control throughout the house.

      For considerably less money, the Houselinc will accomplish many of the same tasks. However, these devices are not hand-held controllers, although you can use your computer as one. You'll still need an IR remote to control the bulk of what you want to do. Most people couple them with a Pronto, or Crestron or Phast touchscreen ($$$$$). These systems will simply take care of your macros, sensing the current status of your devices and responding appropriately. If you block out the IR ports on your equipment and channel all IR input through a complete JDS setup, you can use flags & variables to keep track of the status of each device in great detail - for instance, whether your receiver is set to CD, DVD, VCR, etc, or what channel your TV is on.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    5. Re:Pronto by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      Seems like a great idea. But some of the components (TV and DVD player) have a single button/signal for power on/off. So if my TV was already on, then this macro does everything right, but turns the TV off. Damn.
      Well, many devices have only one power button, but also have discreet codes for turning off and turning on. Far worse are pre-programed remote controls that try to do that themselves, despite the fact that you may not want them to. I have a remote control that came with my digital TV reciever that insists on toggling the power of my television when I press the power button when the digital cable terminal is selected.
      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  18. why bother? by obidex · · Score: 1

    remote controls are so 90s. the way forward is pc control. for a little under $25 you can buy all the pieces you need to emulate any infa-red control you have, and you get the satisfaction of being able to script your own interface to your life.

    at one point, i had a libretto 60ct equipped with a modified irda port controlling my tv, my lights, my blind, my vcr, my dvd player, my cd player [...] (you get the poiny).

    i think the real argument these days is not how to control your equipment, but finding new and exciting equipment to control. remote-activated dimmer switches are seriously the best invention in the history of the universe.

    this being true though, i do own a cambrideg audio a+ lcd remote, and it's remarkably good for its price. it's so satisfying to be able to hit a single button which ramps up the volume on the tv, dims the lights, draws the blind, and switches the stereo to surround sound mode...

    mmmm mmmmm

    --
    "I'm tired of looking like an ass because of people's assumptions" - Dalvenjah Foxfire
    1. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you walk from your bedroom to your computer room to turn the lights off in the bedroom? or carry around your laptop instead of using the handy switches?

    2. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right.

      So when I want to change a channel, instead of using 30 microjoules of battery energy, I'm gonna get up, wait for the PC to boot, check for today's viruses, find the right script, make sure the module is pointing the right way, type in some commands, or look at a monitor and click a mouse.

      I'm sold.

    3. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when I want to change a channel, instead of using 30 microjoules of battery energy, I'm gonna get up, wait for the PC to boot

      You still don't get it and are still stuck in the 90s.

      Here's what you're missing:

      When you want to change a channel, it's because you're watching TV. TV is an application that you run on your computer. The computer is already booted up, you're already over there, and you hand is already on the mouse. Under those considitions, using the mouse is easy.

  19. Touchscreen bad by Gary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally I'd stay away from the touch screen remotes. I find that I rely on tactile feedback too much to use them. In other words I like to feel my way to the correct button rather than look down to find where I need to press. If you do go touch screen make sure you get one that's backlit. Without tactile feedback it's hard to find the right button and it's doubly hard when you have the lights out.

    I don't have any specific recommendations but if I were going to buy a new universal remote I'd get a good ole push button type with learning capability and plenty of extra buttons. My biggest complaint with the cheaper universal remotes is that they always seem to leave off one or two buttons that I use frequently on the native remote. Get a good learning remote with plenty of programmable buttons and that'd alleviate that problem.

    1. Re:Touchscreen bad by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      Agreed, touch-screen remotes tend to be a pain to ust for casual TV/home theatre use.

      What I would love to have is a standard-looking remote, with lots of buttons, nicely laid out, but each button has a tiny LCD (or some other tech) display on it. The best of both worlds! Now I can 'learn' my remote by feel, but when I need to do something unusual (like tweak the delay in my surround speakers), I can have labels on each button, instead of needing to go by trial-and-error, or dig out the original remote.

      Hit the "DVD" button, and the "channel up" display changes to a "chapter skip" display. Hit the "Amp" button, and the "multi-angle" display changes to the "surround sound mode" display.

      Hmmm, I wonder how much will 50+ tiny little display screens cost me? Actually, a single large display with a nicely textured/moulded button overlay would probably do the trick too. And you could change the button overlay to any button style/layout you want. Hmmmm...

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    2. Re:Touchscreen bad by banka · · Score: 1

      the answer to this is to have force-feedback lcd touchscreen remotes. thus we have the flexibility of the lcd, and the tactile feedback of the oldstyle remotes.

    3. Re:Touchscreen bad by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      The Marantz RC-2000 Mk. 2 comes close to this. Its setup to support 10 different devices. Each device has the whole array of standard buttons, keypad, cursors, play controls, channel and volume, which can be operated by feel. In addition to that there is an LCD with 8 buttons next to it. Each device gets four pages of buttons, and the LCD is used for labeling them. In all you get 32 hard buttons, and 32 soft buttons for each device. Thus you can do the major controls by feel, and customize the LCD for less used options. I've yet to find a remote that had features I couldn't put into it.

      The downside is the remote costs about $200 (although I haven't priced them for some time), its a bit bulky and not that great for one handed operation.

    4. Re:Touchscreen bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I had a Pronto touch-screen for 8 frustrating months. After spending weeks designing, and redesigning, and tweaking and more redesigning my pronto screens, it was still too slow and awkward to do the simplest of tasks. Cool factor aside, I can't understand why everyone raves about them. I sold mine and purchased a Marantz RC2000mkII. Admittedly the macros are not so good, and it won't do everything I want, but at least I can stop the VCR from recording whilst watching a DVD without flicking though several animated screens, and then go though more animated screens just to pause the DVD cos the phone is ringing! Arrrrrggh.

    5. Re:Touchscreen bad by gss · · Score: 1

      well the beauty of the pronto is that you can have multiple devices on the same page. In your case you could even assign a button to do what you want, pause the vcr and pause the dvd at the same time. It does take awhile to come up with a good design for the pronto.

  20. Do you really mean it? by Pac · · Score: 4, Funny

    You found a wife that besides being programmable is also remote??

    Assuming you can override the remote part when need be, do you best to keep her, friend. You won't find another one easily (but also be aware of the universal part, it sounds a tad dangerous).

  21. Lexicon by cnkeller · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who are perhaps, more discriminating buyers, I offer the Lexicon 700t. I used to sell medium to high-end audio/video while in college and we couldn't keep enough of these (and their predecessors) in stock. Be prepared to pay though, they weren't cheap as I recall. Custom buttons with bitmaps...how cool.....

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

  22. why not get a helper monkey? by unformed · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) You don't have to carry a remote around, you just tell it what to do.
    2) You don't need to reprogram it when you buy new merchandise.
    3) It works with non-electrical things, such as "Get me a beer, Abe"
    4) Chicks dig helper monkeys.

    1. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by bigtoy · · Score: 1

      Hmm. A few reasons not to get a helper monkey:

      1. Banana's will be more expensive than batteries over time.
      2. Helper monkey poo.

      --
      "A sample size of one is really just statistical masturbation."
    2. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by nhavar · · Score: 2

      Kinda like the "Bathroom Monkey" (SNL). It's even disposable and comes in a variety of colors and sizes.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    3. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Kinda like the "Bathroom Monkey" (SNL)

      And when you're done, invite Dana Carvey over so he can demonstrate "Cooking With Monkey" (also SNL)

    4. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Nightpaw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1. Banana's will be more expensive than batteries over time.

      I didn't know that bananas had wills. And I don't what a will belonging to a banana has to do with anything or why you're speaking Ebonics.

    5. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Magumbo · · Score: 1

      But

      1. Monkeys are cute
      2. Chicks dig monkeys
      3. Monkeys love boogers. (seriously. Try feeding a small monkey a booger. They love 'em.)

    6. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by bigtoy · · Score: 1

      Oh geez. The grammar police! I am busted!!!

      OK. Here is a re-write.

      1. Bananas are more expensive than batteries.

      Hope this clears things up for the stupidly anal.

      --
      "A sample size of one is really just statistical masturbation."
    7. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already said chicks dig monkeys idiot.

    8. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Magumbo · · Score: 1

      Well, you can never overstate the fact that chicks dig monkeys. Perhaps that should have been first on the list.

    9. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by qpeg · · Score: 1

      didn't Homer do this once?
      The monkey ended up like him, I think.
      ----

      --
      How do you set this lazer-printer to stun?
    10. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Don't you guys read Steven King?

      He did an expose on helper monkeys going bad.
      After the warrantee runs out they turn evil and do bad things to you.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    11. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by unformed · · Score: 2

      Agree to an extent, but the reason it was last is because often the last item makes the biggest impression. The fact the "Chicks dig helper monkeys" is a big enough reason to get a helper monkey.

      The other reasons are just additional pluses...

    12. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray for Mojo...

    13. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was a punctuation error, not gammar. Guess you just got busted again, dumbass!

    14. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      Try feeding a small monkey a booger. They love 'em

      You've tried this? Do you room with Tarzan, or what?
      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    15. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by bigtoy · · Score: 1

      You are correct.

      Man, you gotta love being correct and an Anonymous Coward!

      ;-J

      --
      "A sample size of one is really just statistical masturbation."
    16. Re:why not get a helper monkey? by Exatron · · Score: 1

      Pray for Mojo.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
  23. only for the l337 h4x0rz by Magumbo · · Score: 1

    You want programmable? We've got programmable!

    Get yourself a lego mindstorms RCX and then replace the default firmware with LegOS. You can tinker around with the IR subsystem, and possibly even have several threads running to control multiple devices at once. Maybe make youreself a nice little menu driven interface too.

    1. Re:only for the l337 h4x0rz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderate this asshole -1 troll. Jesus.

  24. iPAQ color remote! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not just use an iPAQ running linux? (via its IRDA interface)

    1. Re:iPAQ color remote! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the range is ~20 inches. Hell, I can lean over and reach that far! It will work, though. Some guy has it working. I may write up a nice PyGTK gui for it someday.

      Cpt_Kirks

  25. Pronto by JLester · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought the Pronto was expensive too, until I bought one after installing a full home theatre system. With the complete customization and programming ability, you can make your system do anything YOU want. I have programs set so that you press one button to switch receiver inputs, switch TV inputs, change audio settings, etc. when changing to a different source. Press "Watch a DVD" for example and the TV switches to the DVD input, the receiver switches to the DVD input, the receiver switches to Dolby Digital mode, the DVD player comes on (if it is off) and starts the movie. You could also have it dim the lights and do other things if you'd like. Awesome, and you do it all with one (virtual) button. Much easier for my wife and family to operate. Ecost.Com is the cheapest I have found for buying them.

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  26. use your palm OS device by wwest4 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You can always use Omniremote for Palm OS if you have an infrared-enabled Palm. Even if you have one of the older models with relatively weak IR, you can purchase a strong IR module. The software is pretty cheap.
    see the website.

    1. Re:use your palm OS device by xTown · · Score: 1

      I never got it to work with my Palm VII. YMMV. Try the demo first.

  27. Pronto by igorl · · Score: 1

    The Philips Pronto is well worth it. Sure, I paid twice as much for it as I did for the DVD player, but the fun of programming it and the elegance of a single remote that behaves exactly as you want it to behave are well worth it.

    At the same time, I cannot justify spending ~$700 on the color version...

  28. why no standard? by Rai · · Score: 1

    why can't a/v equipment have a standard for remote control like the midi standard for music equipment.

    1. Re:why no standard? by saider · · Score: 2

      There is...kinda.

      The signalling is pretty much the same, but the codes are different. They are something like . The problem is the MFG code, and is the reason that a Sony reciever remote can't turn up the volume for a Pioneer. To their defense, if you had a Sony receiver AND a Pioneer receiver, how would the receivers know which one you want to talk to? If they did make this standard, then everyone would complain that turning up the volume for their receiver also turns up the volume for the TV.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:why no standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this has been addressed or not, but if there isn't a universal control protocol built into FireWire, the whole thing is pointless.

      That doesn't address the remote control issue (I know, wireless firewire), but it would be cool to have complete command of your stereo system from your PC without strange little IR devices and the like.

  29. What about a Palm-based device? by miracle69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recall running across remote programs for my palm in the past. I'm hitting the same problem now, as my Denon AVR 3300 remote is maxed out, and now I must use the RCA DirecTV remote as well.

    Advantages:
    1) Large storage capacity.
    2) Multi-function.
    3) Customizable interfaces/macros.
    4) Readily accessible and relatively low-cost. 5) Phone numbers of friends/pizza places on remote. ;)
    6) Ability to sync TV schedules.

    Disadvantages:
    1) Doesn't seem to work with all IR signals.
    2) Not specifically designed for task
    3) Relatively Small compared to high-end remotes.
    4) Beam strength. (IIRC, has been fixed past PALM III)
    5) Beam angle/IR port location.
    6) Program Availability. (Can't really comment too much on this, as I haven't researched it in a long time)
    7) Time required to input data. (Most programmables have codes that do the heavy lifting for you.)

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  30. JensenRemotes by _typo · · Score: 2, Informative
    I searched google for Universal Remotes.

    I found jensenremotes.com.

    Their top offer:

    - Operates Ten devices TV, VCR, CBL, CD, SAT, Audio, DVD, Web TV and 2 Auxiliary devices (Auxiliary device = a 2nd device from the list)

    - Equiped with Radio Frequency (RF) which enables the user to control devices in other rooms thru walls and floors RF range up to 100 feet

    -Home Theater ready remote controls ProLogic Surround Sound Systems

    - a few more things....

    I couldn't find info about pricing...

    --

    Pedro Côrte-Real.

    1. Re:JensenRemotes by 0xA · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't get a Jensen. I bought one about a year ago and returned it the same day, it was a complete peice of junk.

      It looks cheap, feels cheap and only has marginal support for each device (runs some functions but not all). Of course it was cheap, $40 CDN I think.

  31. Universal Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Check out the review of the Home Theater Master MX-500 at http://www.remotecentral.com. It's not a touchscreen so if has good tactile feedback, but has LCD labels on some of the buttons. Nice remote.

    1. Re:Universal Remote by nbast · · Score: 1

      I have the MX-500, and it's great. It has normal buttons for everything, and also a touch screen LCD. It has a complete list of devices pre-programmed, and you can also re-program any button you want from another remote.

      It supports 10 devices, each with a completely different setup for the hard buttons and touch screen sub menus. I've combined devices, so I only use 3 buton sets, Tivo/TV, Receiver/TV/DVD, and Receiver/CD/tuner...

      Also, I had to change the batteries just this week, and I was a bit apprehensive about it losing all the programmed info, but it didn't, and all is well. I think the batteries lasted about 10 months, but I'm not sure exactly when we got it...
      review page on remotecentral

    2. Re:Universal Remote by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I too have an MX-500 and it's great, although I have to point out that it doesn't have a touchscreen. it has an LCD panel at the top with 5 (6? 5 I think, sorry, it's in the lounge and I'm in bed :) buttons on each side. the buttons are labelled on the lcd panel.

      so while it has that standard transport buttons (play, stop, pause rew, FF etc) and the numbers, thumbpad with click to select, it also has these buttons at the top labelled with lcd. it's just a fantastic combo. it does almost everything I want from a remote control. you can punchthrough volume from (say) the amp to all your other components. you can record macro's on virtually any button, it's got a strong IR transmitter, easy menu interfave for configging it, the list goes on.

      on the bad side, you can't enter discrete codes into it via the remote itself, although it will happily learn the codes if you can teach them from another remot (lots of ppl recommend picking up a radioshack programmable remote for it just to use for teaching it discrete codes). ermm.. you can't program it from a PC. umm... thats about it afaiac.

      I got one for £115 and haven't regretted it. it controls all my kit fine. I could have used the preprogrammed button templates but hey, I'm a geek to I decided to blank it and teach it all the codes myself so I could place all the buttons on it I wanted and in the places I wanted.

      it controls my amp, dvd player, tv, vidja, tuner, md deck and tivo.

      dave

  32. Remote Central by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remote Central has reviews, forums, and for those that can use them all sorts of custom files. Its the best source for any information relating to remotes.

  33. Home Theater Master MX-500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Reasonable price, not as flexible as a Pronto, but very good. Probably the best "hard-button" remote out there.

    http://www.universalremote.com/htm/index.html

    For reviews of basically every remote worth trying see http://www.remotecentral.com/

    1. Re:Home Theater Master MX-500 by xveg · · Score: 1

      http://shop.store.yahoo.com/avpronet/index.html

      These people have them in stock for US$109.95, much better than the US$189 msrp.

    2. Re:Home Theater Master MX-500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the MX-500 for about 2 weeks and love it!

      I prefer it over the all touchpad remotes because one can use the remote without looking at the touchscreen to try and properly place fingers.

  34. IRMCTL by Cyclops · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've done a nifty program... IRMCTL which receives any infrared command through the IRMAN receiver (though it should be easy to do more receivers) and executes a shell script or a built in function.

    It's not a programmable remote, but you can say what that button you just pressed will do on your linux machine.

    Help is appreciated, for I had some ideas which haven't still showed up because I need help!

    Hugs, Cyke

    1. Re:IRMCTL by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      Then the obvious thing is to combine this with some sort of voice recognition software, and bing!

      Hack it into a Tivo to allow you to say "TV, Star Trek" and presto!

      I'm feeling let down that mad home-built Linux-powered solutions are not being suggested here. We are geeks! Geeks I say!

      Unless a TV show comes on where someone shouts "turn off" ;-)

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  35. x10 learning remote by mattdm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm very happy with my X10 ultimate remote, annoying popup ads notwithstanding. I like real buttons rather than an LCD screen -- much better in the dark. It doesn't have a huge amount of RAM, so you have to plan out what you're going to do a little bit (and make sure to reset everything when you first start, because there's likely to be junk cluttering up the memory out-of-the-box). But being able to control your lights (and talk to your computer) is pretty nifty, and it's hard to beat $25. (Again, annoying ads notwithstanding.)

    1. Re:x10 learning remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell wants a remote that spams you with pop-up ads????

    2. Re:x10 learning remote by slashkitty · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have this as well, unfortunately, it can't learn to turn on my tv (philips) and many of the Tivo buttons don't work. Controlling the
      computer and lights is a must in my book, which
      is why I still use it.

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    3. Re:x10 learning remote by mattdm · · Score: 1

      Didja try clearing the memory and reprogramming? I was convinced that it wouldn't learn my DVD player's codes, but it turned out that it just needed its memory reset -- it's worked perfectly since then.

    4. Re:x10 learning remote by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      I think I saw a popup ad once in 1997(?). I turned off Javascript and haven't seen one since. These alleged X10 annoyances sound like mere mythology to me.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  36. Re:OmniRemote by gilder · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. I played with it on my Handspring Deluxe and it can replace any remote. You can setup the screens on the PDA so there is no need for and other software. You can also do Macros. So, "Play DVD" will turn on the TV, turn on the DVD player, etc.

    Also I love my x10 (yes, yes, the pop-up add people) 8 in 1 Universal Remote. It is a good universal remote and has x10 support which is the kicker.

    gilder

  37. Re:If she's programmable, then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bitch?

    That's no way to talk about someone's wife! Take back your words right now!

  38. Radio Shack 15-1994 with JP1: The Ultimate Remote by Spire · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get yourself a Radio Shack 15-1994 6-in-1 Smart A/V Remote, hack it with a JP1 Interface, and for under $50, you've bought yourself an infinitely customizable IR remote (with X10 capability!), and with all nice tactile hard buttons to boot!

    --
    begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
  39. go outside by joss · · Score: 0, Troll

    It sounds like your life is split between a desk and a couch. I'm sure there are devices which could make your inside life even more sedentary, but if I told you, then you might actually die. It sounds like having to hunt around for a remote, or heaven forbid, actually walk to the stereo, is the only exercise you get.

    Before the condition becomes terminal, I suggest you sell your television, limit your online time to 1hr per day, and go outside. Possibly try actually talking to someone face to face, but give yourself an adjustment period first so you don't scare them away with a vampire like skin pallor.

    Of course, I'm turning into a fat useless git too, and could do with taking my own advice, but hypocricy only troubles me when I observe it in others. It's still good advice.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    1. Re:go outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #brrr# #shudder# ...scary stuff!

  40. Tsk tsk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one person has mentioned the low-tech, but superior solution: One For All Cinema 7 or the Radio Shack 15-1994.

    Do a google search for these unique devices and you'll be amazed at what they can do for the price!

  41. I know this may sound silly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone made any software for the pc that uses the IR port on the system? Makes sense to me. Most people have their pc in the room with a tv. Maybe even entertainment center. If the ir port on board isn't good enough how about a usb device or serial device. Hmmmm, Maybe I should get to work on this shortly.

    1. Re:I know this may sound silly... by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

      Not too bad of an ideas, but I don't know that too many people would want to use something as big as a wireless keyboard as a remote control...

      It just doesn't work for that one-handed operation.

  42. omniremote by pecka · · Score: 1

    i used to use omniremote with my palm vx
    my friend has the visor-cartrige version and as far as i know he's satisfied with it
    no car stealing in here...

    1. Re:OmniRemote by gilder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same company that makes the OmniRemote software, makes hardware IR extenders. See other posts. My Visor Deluxe will work fine from about 10' on everything, but my TV.

      gilder

  43. Re:First Bugger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ponce brits...

  44. One For All - Infinitely Programmable At Low Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The best remote you'll ever find is those built by One For All with a JP1 connector. There's a large group who's hacked these remotes. By programming them from your PC they're able to control almost any device any possible way you can imagine. They're also very powerful without any PC connection and damn cheap, these remotes cost as much as a single DVD, not a DVD player.

    Check out:
    http://www.hifi-remote.com/ofa/index.shtml

    You can buy a radioshack 15-1994 or Cinema 7 often for under $10 on ebay.

  45. Marantz by Deltan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Old Skool Marantz makes some impressive programmable remotes, I use one myself and control everything from the Receiver to the Digital Cable Terminal. In particular the RC5000i. Here are some of the Features...

    - Illuminated LCD touch-screen display with ''virtual'' buttons that re-name themselves according to the component selected
    - Large memory capacity to accommodate hundreds of control screens and programming of A/V systems of any size
    - Preprogrammed IR code library and exclusive MDL (Marantz Digital Learning) quickly clones your existing remote controls
    - Windows® PC programming software enables easy programming customization including adding photos and artwork to display screens
    - Rechargeable battery and companion docking station keeps RC5000i charged at all times
    Convenient Macro keys store commands that can be sent automatically in sequence
    - One-touch access to all controls of any component, via unique Marantz tab-style navigation
    - Built-in screen layouts for dozens of component types
    - Animated help files demonstrate how to program from your existing remote controls
    Programmable Instant Surf buttons jump from one channel to any other channel at the touch of a single button
    - Home panel can be personalized with a custom greeting

    1. Re:Marantz by shokk · · Score: 1

      Note, the Marantz RC5000 is the same device as the Pronto TSU2000.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  46. Simplify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the remote for again? Pop a CD in and listen to it. Watch a movie. No need for remote. Adjust the volume and leave it there. Blissful lack of clutter on your coffee table.

    1. Re:Simplify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some pr0n tends to have some talking and has to be fast forwarded...

  47. Learning curve - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Are any good for my technophobe dad?

    He screams alot when leaning so it must be easy.

  48. Bad Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators really should learn to read the Slashbox before they start giving away moderation points. Remote Central, the site this guy links to, is one of the links in the Slashbox for crying out loud!

  49. I win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I could drink myself silly this evening but chose not to!

    I'm a winner!

    1. Re:I win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to mention this: I'm 21 today.

  50. Best Remote Ever! by Helmholtz · · Score: 5, Funny
    This has to be the best remote ever ... and you can get it for only $16.99! While supplies last!

    http://shop.store.yahoo.com/spencergifts/612275.ht ml

    --
    RFC2119
    1. Re:Best Remote Ever! by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAAHA...

      i agree

      but i wish my cell phone would change the tv station, then i'd need one less fancy gadget

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  51. Knobs & Levers by qpeg · · Score: 1

    Ah, the Wonderous Years of the Universial Remote!

    We had a LOT of fun with that remote, messing with ppl's TVs, roaming from hood to hood. Of course messing with their TVs was just the innocent start, ending(?) up in running from the police, local hill billys and the taxi-mob!

    Then came the alcohol and put a stop to our imagination....

    Parrents: give your children a universial remote; they'll have the time of their life!
    ----

    --
    How do you set this lazer-printer to stun?
  52. Good ole Universal that came with Sony Receiver by dimer0 · · Score: 1

    I think any universal that can learn is okay. I actually ponied up the money to get a Pronto, and it was very cool at first - but the lack of tactile feedback SUCKS. I hate having to stare at the device to control it. I'd rather just feel for the right key and hit it. Ah well, just me maybe.

  53. Home Theater Master MX-1000 by CerebusUS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Best money I've ever spent,

    Programmable through a computer (windows only, natch) you can also have it save the learned codes back to that computer as a backup.

    Has a touch screen as well as hard buttons (touch screens suck, because you have to look at them to hit the button correctly, which detracts from the darkened room experience of movie watching)

    I saw an earlier link to remotecentral, go check out their review, it's why I bought mine.

    1. Re:Home Theater Master MX-1000 by jcpii · · Score: 1


      I'm quite willing to spend a little effort to find the buttons on a touch screen considering all the flexibility of the buttons. You can change the size, location, look of, and text in each of the buttons. Although you will have to have at least a H.S. Diploma or G.E.D. to figure out the manual, once you've mastered the remote, it will be the last remote you will ever buy. It is rugged, its OS can (and has been) updated, and you can use a computer (Mac to come soon, which also probably meens it'll work for FreeBSD!) to manage/backup the buttons and OS.

      After primarily considering the Sony, Home Theater Master, and Palm; I would recommend the H.T.M. if you just want a remote, or the Palm of you have an additional need for a PDA, but the Sony is just to expensive and awkward.

      -John

    2. Re:Home Theater Master MX-1000 by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      boy do I agree, that's what I like about the 1000, you get both the touch screen for the weird buttons, and the "hard" buttons for day to day stuff.

  54. Pronto doesn't do it all by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    Some remotes - like the one for my telly - send different IR signals on alternate pushes of the buttons. No "universal/programmable" device I've found can handle that well enough yet.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:Pronto doesn't do it all by birder · · Score: 1

      This is a learning remote not one of those type-in-a-code jobs. If you know what they are, you can manually copy the code into the pronto via the PC software. There are databases on the net that have a lot of discrete codes.

      If the original remote can send the signal, pronto should have no problems. At worst it could have different buttons set for each ir signal

    2. Re:Pronto doesn't do it all by ouija147 · · Score: 1

      Not exactly correct, they are called discrete codes and as long as you program the Pronto correctly it can handle that situation. It can be a pain to get the codes, but once you have the codes (most available from remotecentral.com), it will work great.

      The one thing that it has had problems with is some Bang & Olufsen equipment. They use some funky high frequency IR signals.

    3. Re:Pronto doesn't do it all by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

      I _know_ it's a learning remote. The point is it won't support two distinct codes on the same "button", alternating the transmission on each push. Nor will any other one I've looked at.

      Also, the Marantz RC2000 I do have won't even learn the codes for my cable box remote...

      --
      This sig left unintentionally blank.
    4. Re:Pronto doesn't do it all by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

      According to a response I got from the support forum, the Pronto won't do multiple IR codes to one "button" - alternating the transmission on each push.

      If you know different, let me know!

      --
      This sig left unintentionally blank.
    5. Re:Pronto doesn't do it all by mobius_stripper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Home Logic UR362 has this feature. Check out the bottom of page 3 on the review.

      Krishna

      --
      --- I'd love to go out with you, but I have to study for a Turing test.
    6. Re:Pronto doesn't do it all by ouija147 · · Score: 1

      Granted this solution is really two buttons, but it works for me.

      Mine is an on/off button. I do make an assumption that the device is starting in an off state. I have a page that has the discrete on code assigned to the power button. On pressing that button, I go to a page that looks exactly the same but has the off code assigned to the power button. For those times when the Pronto locks up, I have a very small button at the bottom of the page that loads the alternate page. If the device is on and the pronto locks up, the pronto will start with the page that assumes the device is off. I hit the toggle button to load the page with the off function.

      Yes it is a hack, but it is the closest I can get to that same functionality of the original remote. Maybe if the Pronto ran Linux, it would not ever lock up and this would never be a problem.

      Even with that short coming the Pronto is still my favorite remote. I mean this thing will control nearly everything. The best thing is that with the FOUR IR LEDs on front, I don't have to aim the remote at any device I want to control...not even my rear projection TV. With other universal remotes you have to point the remote at exactly the right spot on the front of th TV screen, and even then it is a hit or miss proposition.

  55. VR3 Hack by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a cool use for the Agenda VR3.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:VR3 Hack by ninewands · · Score: 1

      I seem to have seen something about a remote program in development for the VR3, but I can't find it now.

    2. Re:VR3 Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://supermegamulti.com/agenda/listcat.asp?cat=A pplications

      has a link to this site:

      http://www.kfib.org/~sam/agenda/

      which has files for an agenda remote control

  56. RCA RCU-810 by g-rage · · Score: 1

    I have the RCA RCU-810. It has backlit keys, a backlit LCD display and support for 8 different devices. I got it on eBay for less than $50. It has a ton of buttons for regular device features as well as 3 custom buttons that can be programmed to many things: 1) You can aim your original device remote at the RCU-810 and program the custom button to perform the same action as the original button. 2) You can also program the custom buttons as a "button macro". That is, you can program one button to perform the actions of several button pushes. For example, I have one button that toggles the on/off state of every component in my system. That is all.....

    1. Re:RCA RCU-810 by psychosystem · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with you on this one. This is a GREAT remote... Picked it up at The Wiz for ~$50.00, not really knowing how good it was (I didn't research and went on a compulsive electronics buying spree) and have been VERY pleasantly surprised at the versatility of this remote. You can reprogram any of the regular device buttons to do any function (ie, I have my volume buttons set up to control my receiver volume when I'm in tv/dvd/vcr mode) via IR-learning, or mapping from one mode to another. Definitely a good one to think about.

      --
      This is my Sig.
    2. Re:RCA RCU-810 by brutusbuck · · Score: 1

      The thing I always hated with past "universal" remotes was that they'd only cover about 90% of a component's functionality. If you needed to program the time on your vcr, you had to dig out its remote. The learning buttons on the 810 are perfect for those 2 or 3 really special functions.
      Got mine on ebay too...

  57. If you dont need lcd's and such, try sony RM-VL900 by mendepie · · Score: 1

    I am using the Sony RM-VL900 to control my tv, tivo, cable box, dvd/ld, amp, switch box, and other units.

    It is a good deal in that you can pick it up for $37 + shipping, it controls lots of devices, has lots of learning memory, feels good in your hand with real tactile response, and is backlit.

    I'm happy enough with it that I am getting a 2nd one.

    --

    Are you paranoid if you know that they just want to know everything you say and do?

  58. Re:Radio Shack 15-1994 with JP1: The Ultimate Remo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wanted to second this. I have a One-For-All Cinema 6 (same as the 15-1994) and my friend has the Cinema 7 (also the same). With the excellent work done by the folks over working on the JP1 interface, this remote is AMAZING. The remote does not work by default with my Dishplayer, but after building the simple interface, it works flawlessly!

  59. Greatest Solutions by huckda · · Score: 1

    1. Get Married, Have Wife Push Buttons, Fetch Grub

    2. Have kids, Have kids push buttons, fetch food while wife...(I can think of a few things for the wife here) =)

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  60. Sony RM-VL900 Remote Control by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

    Oh, my goodness! I'm in love with this thing. It's not a touch-screen unit, but it's packed with features at only $50. It runs video and audio equipment, is preset for Sony devices, has a LOT of preset codes, and learning functions. I particularly like the programmable macros, which allow one button operation of multiple devices. Almost all of the buttons can be re-programmed to any task, and buttons can have their programming shifted to another button (no re-programming to move functions). Hence, it's completely customizable.

    This thing has to be the best birthday present I got this year. Of course, I bought it myself...

  61. Universal Infrared Remote **UIR** by Napolean · · Score: 1

    screw buying a remote. build one - a receiver that is - the UIR designed by Ties Bos connects to your serial port. You can use virtually any remote control taht you already have. and then use an awesome program called IRAssistant to make your computer do ANYTHING you want it to do! and yes, even you electronically handicapped cs-ers can muster up teh soldering skills to make one. buy one at Evation.com (i think) or just go to irassistant.com and check out the hardware page.

  62. My Bounty Quest Win :- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The one I always wanted was done by Steve Ciarcia who runs the Circuit Celler web site.

    Besides... I'm the guy who WON $10,000 on Bounty Quest and I always wanted to do it.

    Check out your local library - microfilm, march 1987 Byte Magazine for a completely great hardware hack that won me $10,000 ba hahahah....

  63. One for All Cinema 7 (7800 not 7200!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get this remote, I have 2 of them and it is super cheap ($25-$30) supports tons of equipment (except no built in TiVo codes)

    It has learning and macro support and tons of "advanced codes" which means it has things like a discrete power off and a discrete power on signal. As an example, your original TV remote has one power button that just toggles the TV on or off but there are hidden undocumented codes for a discrete power off or on signal so that you can use it to make macro "scripts." I even found a code to dim the display of my DVD player to completely black out the room when watching a movie.

    It does have a limit on the amount it can learn but for true hackers you can hook it up to a PC serial port and reprogram the flash memory inside.

    Go here: http://www.hifi-remote.com/ofa/faq.shtml for more info and links to lists of advanced codes etc.

  64. Computer Controlled Living Room by shredds · · Score: 1

    Why need a remote? What about a wireless mouse and/or keyboard?
    I'm currently planning out my new apartment living room to have the appearance of a normal living room. The computer in the bedroom controls everything in the apartment, except the computer is invisible to the living room, yet it is controlled from the living room:
    -Computer (with everything that a home entertainment center can do, and then some) with TV out -> TV in living room
    -Digital Audio from Computer -> Speakers in living room (for DVD sound, mp3's)
    -Wireless mouse on coffee table (or keyboard or both)

    Now you can surf the internet, play games, watch movies, listen to music, etc right from the couch. You save a lot of clutter in the living room. None of your "lady friends" make fun of you and tell you "you are such a dork, I'm glad I cheated on you with Bob in 203" And you also don't spend a riduculous amount of money on stupid electronics which are like 1/8 the price on the computer.

    --
    can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
  65. Standards are great... or are they? by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    You mean like hitting "Play" makes any device play? Then anytime you hit "Play" your television plays, your cd plays, your dvd plays, your vcr plays...

    Unless you decide that "Play" will be a unique code for all different types of devices. Then anytime you hit "VCR Play" your multiple VCR setup (for copying, of course) plays both the source and recording vcr.

    So you make the codes unique for all devices and brands which gets you back to the situation we're currently in.

    It sucks, but unfortunately we can't have our cake and eat it without a bit of work on our part. Currently the best way is a learning remote. Ideally, the type that will allow you to hit "learn" and "play" while hitting the appropriate button on the old remote to truly learn it.

    Incidentally, if you have a multiple VCR setup with identical brand and model you're screwed when it comes to using a remote. I've seen it happen and it's quite funny when the owner finally smacks their forehead.

    1. Re:Standards are great... or are they? by Rai · · Score: 1

      true, but if it could be set on a per device basis. such as your remote can handle up to 10 devices. you set your tv as device 1, vcr is device 2, etc. all tvs code use the same codes, all vcrs could use the same codes, but it would be device-based. if you have two identical vcrs, one is device 2 and the other is device 3, it could work.

      or how about a separate control module that all the a/v devices connect to and the control module (operated via a remote) sends the correct signal to the correct device. anyone wanna invent this with me? :)

    2. Re:Standards are great... or are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a VCR that works around this problem quite nicely (assuming you have 2 or less VCRs)

      The VCR has a setting in the menu, for "VCR 1, or VCR2" and the remote has buttons labelled "VCR 1, VCR 2".. so, for two VCRs, you can control both with the same remote, and set each one to their respective numbers and things will sort themselves out.

      (it's a mid-range RCA VCR, not sure of the model # as I'm not at home currently)

    3. Re:Standards are great... or are they? by Monte · · Score: 1

      You mean like hitting "Play" makes any device play? Then anytime you hit "Play" your television plays, your cd plays, your dvd plays, your vcr plays...

      MIDI has the concept of "channels" - so if I have eight devices I tell them "You're on channel 1, you're two, you have to be 10 because you're a drum machine..."

      You could do the same with home A/V. I'd be happy if they'd just standardize the commands that change inputs so I can map a single button to each "configuration" of inputs: Watch Replay, watch Cable, watch VCR, record from Replay to VCR, etc.

  66. Re:Home Theater Master MX-500 - is the best! by JohnMehringer · · Score: 1

    I agree this company makes the best remotes and they work with every piece of electronics equipment I own.

  67. Marantz RC 2000 MkII by tfbit · · Score: 1

    I still love mine. You can get them off Ebay for around $100.

    1. Re:Marantz RC 2000 MkII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that emotion.

      AFAIK, the Marantz RC2000 is the only remote which can learn IR signals up to 1GHz. This was crucial to me since my Pioneer receiver operated in that IR range.

  68. WinAmp Remote by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 2

    Has anyone had any experience with these remote controllers, which supposedly can be used to remotely control WinAmp? They're listed as Packard Bell equipment, but there are other sites that have software that works universally with Windows applications.

    I know that in the audio/visual spectrum, the trend recently has been to hook up more traditional mixer/movie editing controllers to PC's designed around these tasks. Go figure, turns out the WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus and Pointing device) interface isn't the greatest for everything, after all. :-)

    --
    Free music from Jack Merlot.
    1. Re:WinAmp Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lirc.org is a Linux based site that has a lot of configuration files for the LIRC program. A Windows port called WinLIRC which I include on the site can use any of the LIRC configuratio files to configure your remote.

  69. Side note... best computer remote? by marcop · · Score: 2

    Slightly off topic - but I am looking for a good remote to control my computer. I currently pipe the video and audio to my TV/stereo so I can either listen to MP3s or watch VCD/DVD/DivX (I don't have a standalone DVD player). I would prefer an RF remote. Is there any out there that have a small joystick that emulates a mouse? For example, the Book PC has a remote with a mouse pointer on it, but I don't think it is sold seperately.

    1. Re:Side note... best computer remote? by emars · · Score: 1

      I use x10's MouseRemote... it allows me to control my TV, DVD, VCR and computer. You can use the software it comes with to 'capture' button clicks in any application and then control with the remote. Tres cool.

      --
      ...18...19...20 Submit
    2. Re:Side note... best computer remote? by marcop · · Score: 2

      I have seen X10's stuff, but have vowed off their product ever since they started pushing pop-ups all over the place.

    3. Re:Side note... best computer remote? by laserjet · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with you there. I have bought several things from X10, but ever since their god damned pop ads, I have been boycotting them for the last year or so. I wrote their CEO a letter too, telling them the same thing. Dirty bastards.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  70. Comsunmer Infra Red applications for linux by alpha1125 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was doing a project to interface my laptop IRDA port to control my tv, and other devices that use Infra red communication.

    The problem is, is that not all IR Ports for computers support the consumer spectrum for IR communication. But the majority does...

    So if you're brave, make your own remote, that's programmable with your computer. :)

    All you'll need now, is line of sight between your computer and the mountain of BLACK boxed devices that sit humbly infront of your family room wall.

    some useful links include...

    lirc and the windows port of it is at winlirc

    There are various clients/gui interfaces that you can use, from those links.

    if you want to reach me about this:

    lloydleung(at)hotmail.(you know where)

    NOTE: I'm still working on this...

    --
    Money cannot buy happiness, but can buy something soo darn close, that you can't really tell the difference
    1. Re:Comsunmer Infra Red applications for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the trick is NOT to build the remote control. You want something that has long battery life, easy to replace and looks good.

      What you want to do is to decode the IR signal from your off the shelf remote and use that to drive a black box which can generate whatever IR remote control you want to emulate and whatever sequence. The black box can be AC powered or even your Linux PC, as it no longer has to be portable.

  71. What if you want to go thru walls: The Answer by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We've got a Smartlinc controller. http://www.homs-smarthome.com/1144.html describes the kit we got.

    It's a touch screen X10 device that has a display end (the touch screen) and a IR blaster end. Plug both into any power outlet in your house and it'll control the IR devices you stashed in the closet (like we did.)

    This plus a Dish Network RF Remote lets us do a number of things:

    • I can control the satellite channel from the office
    • I have a remote that turns on and off the Christmas lights, two fountains out back and the porch lights
    • When somebody walks up the front walk, the IR sensor fires and the touch screen controller says "There's someone at the door".

    To be brutally honest, The touchscreen system doesn't do more than volume and power for the AV stuff in the closet. But still, it's got the potential to do LOTS of nifty things that all the X10 folk tell you about, and it meant that only the TV and speakers are out in the open.

    It was on clearance for $500. For that kind of money, I wish I had more time to do more with it.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  72. Timer anyone? by jelwell · · Score: 2

    I want a universal remote that I can program to say, "At 3pm on Thursdays change to channel 21".

    Are there any out there that support that kind of timed event?

    Joseph Elwell.

    1. Re:Timer anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought one at rat shack, can't remember the model but it will preform macros at specified times.

    2. Re:Timer anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most digital cable boxes will do that for ya, as well as a lot of TV's timer functions.

    3. Re:Timer anyone? by doogieb · · Score: 1

      The Philips Pronto is excellent at timer functions. Mine switches my sat box to BBC News 24, and my amp on at a certain volume level on weekday mornings, and my sat channel to Sky One at 19:00 weekdays for the Simpsons. When I go to bed at night, one button powers down all my kit and fires an X10 macro to deal with lights and appliances (coffee machine etc) It also holds a disc listing for my Sony 300 DVD changer and my Pioneer 25 CD changer, and fires up my selected disc within a second or two. All functionality is only limited by memory space (I've got the original 1MB, but there's also a 2MB and I think the colour one is 8) so you can have 5000 timers if they fit in the memory.....! I love my Pronto :-) Check out Remotecentral.com, download the editor program which also has an emulator, download other people's configs etc. (Windows only I'm afraid....!) and have fun!!

      --
      Doogie. If you can read this, my sig fell off
    4. Re:Timer anyone? by anon7864 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, you need to get a HP48 calculator. It has a built in clock that can execute IR commands. Check out the FAQ:


      http://www.engr.uvic.ca/~aschoorl/faq/48faq-4.ht ml #ss4.13

      Make sure you take out the space that the slashcode places in the URL.

    5. Re:Timer anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually did that one time because my apartment was going to have a pre-schedule blackout, but I wanted to record a TV program after the power was supposed to be restored. I hacked a remote control and use my HC11 microcontroller board to press the buttons at the right time. It was a quick hack using a $5 remote and an analog switch.

    6. Re:Timer anyone? by BSemrad · · Score: 1

      The Home Producer 8 can do this. I have one and it's pretty darn good. It is an RF remote with a base unit which emits IR signals so you can be anywhere in the house and control your entire system. I got mine at Best Buy for $99.

  73. JP1 Rules! by REden · · Score: 1

    I like the Cinema 7, hacked with JP1 Interface. It's intutive, even my wife can use it. It controls *ALL* of the functions of my TV, 2 VCRs, and Replay

    TV has never been better since the Replay protocol hack with 3-minute skip came out!

    The JP1 can control many UEIC remotes ( All-for-One, Radio Shack, some OEMs)

    --
    --- If it's worth doing, it's worth doing in Perl!
  74. Re:so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...does that mean I should have smoked till my lungs filled with tar..."

    no. it means you should kill yourself.

    ps- quickly!

  75. HP48s calculator or Palm Pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    both work great. HP48s and HP48sx have the strongest IR beams. You may need to modify HP48g series or Palm Pilots to use a stronger beam.

  76. You can try by HappyPerson · · Score: 1

    http://www.pacificneotek.com/ It's call omni remote and you can teach it pretty much anything your remotes can do.

  77. Psarianos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Psarianos rules for ever

  78. Re:lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out those germans lately? and never bathe to boot

  79. RCA learning remote by Angrycoder · · Score: 1

    I picked up this remote a few months ago for 50 bucks at circuit city.

    RCA 8 Device Remote

    I haven't had any problems with and am extremely happy with it for the price. It is a learning remote that can control up to 8 devices. Just about every button on the remote can be reprogrammed to preform a different function, including commands for components other than the component that you are currently controling. For example, I have the volume and sound mode switches from my reciever mapped to a couple of the buttons in DVD player mode. The only real down side to is that it can only hold 3 macros, but I find that is all I need. The LCD screen at the top makes it very easy to program the remote, but it isn't terribly useful during normal operation(only showing the component you are currently controling and the time). I don't think you can find one more powerful for the price.

    1. Re:RCA learning remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this remote too, and it's very nice. I eventually ran out of buttons because the remote for my receiver has as many buttons as this one does (a LOT), but I rarely have to grab for another.

  80. PC Remote Control by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

    Check out http://www.pcremotecontrol.com/, it has a windows program that once registered works really well (I got it to work with an old ibm aptiva remote). Also, why don't you try to make you own? I wrote a program in java using the javax.comm api that once a button is clicked on the remote it uses the java.awt.Robot to move the mouse. Granted its not a fully working remote program, but if i was willing to dump more time into it, it would be. Also check out c programming for linux... i'd imagine it shouldn't be that hard, being that from my understanding you treat the serial controller as file by reading and writing from it. Possibly using fstream in c++??? Good luck...

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  81. Sony RM-VL900 Learning Remote by jhsiao · · Score: 1

    This Sony remote is pretty good as an inexpensive learning remote.

    One of the major problems with most cheap learning remotes is the lack of memory available to learn alot of functions. This one actually has enough keys and enough memory to totally memorize the functions for a Tivo remote with it's mass of buttons (4-way switch, menus, play/pause/slow, etc). It also has macros for those that have all of their TV sound output through their receiver (can turn TV and receiver on simultaneously).

    At $40 here, it's pretty decent for the price.

    It's not the extreme high end, but it's enough to control my TV, Receiver, VCR, DVD, Laserdisc and have enough memory to copy my Philips Tivo remote.

    Reviews are here and here.

  82. X-10 Universal Remote by jwillsey · · Score: 2, Informative

    The best I have found short of the cool $200 jobbers is the X-10 8 in 1 Super illuminated Remote Control. I paid only $25. It is a Learning Remote and designed for DVD/DSS systems.

    Mine controls...
    Sony TV (Built in Code)
    Sony VCR(Built in Code)
    STD Pioneer Cable Box (Built in Code)
    Sony CD Changer (Programmed Codes)
    Sony DVD Changer (Programmed Codes)
    Sony Reciever (Programmed Codes)
    Digital Cable Box (Programmed Codes)
    X-10 appliances/Lights in House. (Build in Codes - Dimming the home theater lights from the same remote is darn cool! The illumination comes in handy after the lights go out...)

    Not only is the the least expensive Learning Remote around, but it has the navigation controls for Digital Cable/DSS/DVD.

    http://www.x10.com/products/x10_ur24a.htm

    Good Luck!

  83. Sony Rm-VL900 by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've got a Sony RM-VL900, which goes for about $60 retail. While it has limited macro capability (11 macros with 16 steps), it can control up to eight devices and each button is trainable. Plus, it's all hard buttons - no touchscreen (which is a huge plus for me since I don't want to look at the remote when I'm using it).

    Here's a review at Remote Central:

  84. control windows by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Look for Girder and uird for UNIX.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  85. RF Hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someones already noticed that remotes also come in the RF variety. It wouldn't be that hard for someone to write an RF hack for PDAs like the VIIx...

  86. My OLD HP48SX fits the bill. by mfarah · · Score: 3, Interesting
    FWIW, I use my old HP48SX calculator (which otherwise would be stored away) as a multipurpose programmable remote control.

    It's got LOADs of buttons, the feel is good, and has a built-in screen so you can play games if you get bored with TV!

    Seriously, it's been functioning this way for a time now, and has performed well.

    Pros:
    • I don't have to buy anything, except AAA batteries.
    • re-uses hardware that still functions, and is handy to have a calculator in hand when I need it.
    • You can do a program yourself to assign the keys to whatever you like, including your own quirkiness. For example, I got the four lower right buttons (in a 2x2 square) to do the same thing. Why? This was I don't have to be too precise with my finger.



    Cons:

    • I don't remember where I got the codes.
    • You can't paint the functions in the calculator (you're forced to remember them, or program a help key).
    • I don't even know wether this can be used for non-Sony equipment.

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
    1. Re:My OLD HP48SX fits the bill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had a lot of fun with this during geography. We always had to watch extremely boring documentary tapes (I don't mind a documentary, but jeez, show a good one please), and the solution we had found to get out of it and have a little fun at the same time was to program the VCR and TV into the calculator, and to make them behave "erratically".

      The teacher would press play and walk to the back of the class, and as soon as he was there we'd press stop, to make him come up and press play again. And we'd do that over and over and over (the guy had quite some punch in him to keep on pressing that play button) And then to finish it off just when he thought the VCR was going to work fine now we'd turn off the TV. As I said, we had a lot of fun.

      What we didn't expect was to come back from a week's holiday to discover that the school had replaced the TV and VCR with brandnew models, because the old ones were "broken". Oops. Oh well.

  87. Re:Radio Shack 15-1994 with JP1: The Ultimate Remo by msheppard · · Score: 2

    I checked the website for that remote, but can't find any info on X10 control, can you enligheten me, Fellow Geek?

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  88. Does any univeral remote work with the TIVO? by cowmix · · Score: 1

    ????

  89. Sony RM-VL900 by morgue-ann · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.sel.sony.com/SEL/consumer/ss5/home/acce ssories/universalremote/rm-vl900.shtml

    $60. No touchscreen- not even a little LCD like the RM-V60, but *every* key is programmable for each of 8 components (unlike some universals like one RCA that have very limited key override storage). 3 macro keys.

    It has real buttons and you can set the volume keys to control the receiver regardless of component selection.

    I control my Tivo with it and while I have to remember that TV/Video is thumbs-down, I don't have to look at it to find the button.

    Simple & cheap. If you think you need something more complicated, like another poster said you probably need to get out more. I use a complicated computer all day. When I want to watch some TiVo or DVD, I'd prefer simplicity.

  90. RCU810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently went through the process of looking for a good but cheap remote.

    To make a long story short I settled for the RCU810 by RCA.

    http://www.rca.com/product/viewdetail/0,2588,PI8 27 ,00.html?

    Programmable, learning, macros, LCD, backlit - Everything I needed. I ever got it programmed to control XMMS via my wireless keyboard's IR interface.

    I paid $50 for mine at Circuit Cirty. Its probably the best remote you can find under $150.

    For more info check out remotecentral.com.
    http://www.remotecentral.com/ureview/29.htm

    1. Re:RCU810 by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Be aware that this remote has limited memory for learned keys. For setups that are mostly "stock" that's fine, but *none* of the universals (even Sony's) seem to have built-in setups for TiVo (at least the Sony one), so you'll need to program every key by learning from the TiVo remote.

      To answer another poster's question, the Sony RM-VL900 will handle a TiVo. I came up one button short so I'm missing a function, but I can't remember what it is 'cause it's been so long since I used the real remote. I still have thumbs up&down and back-up-a-few-seconds. I think I'm missing jump-to-end or jump-to-beginning.

  91. Remote controls are for NEWBIES! by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 1
    Build yourself an infrared interface like the AIR-Link (it's on Aminet, find it yourself ;)). Link it up to your 'box' (that's l33t sp33k for 'computer') and go program some driver software for it; shouldn't be too hard. Set up scripts on your own machine to change the channel as you wish!

    Best part about it is, it's not limited to a preset number of different devices. All you need is a few infrared LEDs pointed in the right direction and the control software can control everything as long as you can tell it how exactly your target device's IR system works.

    Command-line control of your TV, now that's what I'm talkin' about... remote controls and GUI are for newbies!

  92. TheaterTouch from RTI by awallgren · · Score: 1

    This is a matter of personal preference, of course: do yourself a favor and play with a bunch of remotes before you pick one.

    My remote of choice is the TheaterTouch from RTI.

    It's main advantage is that it has a programmable touch screen interface and hard keys. The touch screen isn't nearly as programmable as the Pronto, but I don't mind that so much, because I find the hard keys indispensable.

    I owned a Pronto and found that having to constantly look at the screen to see what I was doing made for a bad user experience, at least for me.

    Another nice thing about the TheaterTouch is that it has an RF box that you can buy, which makes the remote much more useful. I've put most of my equipment into a cabinet, and strung IR emitters into the cabinet.

    Also, an excellent place to find out about remotes is Remote Central.

  93. Remote Central Reviews by cruelshoes · · Score: 1

    Give this website a try. Lots of info and reviews on many different remote styles. I bought my 'Crisp Solutions UCommand 515' after checking out the reviews there. They were pretty much right on. The few things they didn't like I think suck too(no hard buttons for one), but over all a nice remote.

  94. Re:Radio Shack 15-1994 with JP1: The Ultimate Remo by Spire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, you're the first person who's ever acknowledged my sig! Hail!

    I should have been more clear in my original post. The 15-1994 does have X10 capability, but only of the IR type, not RF. However, you can use it with an IR543 Infrared Mini-Controller (~$23) to get full RF X10 capability.

    --
    begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
  95. Yamaha's high-end learning remote... by Quickening · · Score: 1

    ...has served me well. It's the RX-V1's remote. It understood several set-top remote control protocols and I could program it (with another remote) to understand anything on my convergence PC. Numerous buttons, backlit, multi-function, and macros. I'm controlling the RX-V1, TV, TiVo, and DVD, HDTV, CD, netscape, realplayer, winamp, mediaplayer, etc on the PC with it.

    Drawback: if you hold another remote key down too long while programming, it will use up all its memory trying to record those events.

    --
    tcboo
  96. The Agenda VR3 Linux PDA by TheRealDamion · · Score: 1

    The Agenda has a full IR output along with it's
    2nd IrDA led that it can use for communication.
    This means that you can not only use linux to
    control it, it IS linux in the remote you are
    using. The screen might get a little too
    fingerprinty, but It is capable of working as the
    remote for any device.

  97. Chicks dig me when I'm drunk! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1
    There I was, at the North Georgia State Fair, when I spotted a redneck wearing a black t-shirt with the phrase, in large white letters:

    Chicks dig me when I'm drunk!

    And he even looked like a helper monkey.

    (Sorry, somehow your post struck a cord...)

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Chicks dig me when I'm drunk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... at the North Georgia State Fair ...

      What do you expect in the state of 'North Georgia'.

  98. You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i've said it well.

  99. Mindstorms IR? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen any program that can use the Mindstorms IR transmitter in a PC-based universal remote? I did some research into making my own, but it is currently beyond my ability. I'll keep playing with it, but if one exists, it would be cool. (Windows, if possible. I've been putting off the Linux switch until my next PC)

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  100. Harman/Kardon Take Control 1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gave my parents a Harman/Kardon Take Control 1000 to replace their basket of six remote controls from various manufacturers. I think this is a great remote, with only one noticable weakness. The touchscreen, which is very much like the one on a Palm, is not as readable as I'd like. In particular, the backlight is a bit weak. The software for programming the TC-1000 is great. From what I've read, the Philips Pronto is a bit more flexible, but harder to set up. I also appreciate the ergnomics of the TC-1000. It is big but well shaped, has a great rubberized roller-button for changing channels, and it has the right number and type of dedicated hardware buttons. I did find one somewhat obscure signal that it couldn't learn. There is a full review on RemoteCentral.com (http://208.42.81.123/take/index.html).

    1. Re:Harman/Kardon Take Control 1000 by briankasper · · Score: 1

      DO NOT BUY THIS REMOTE if you don't enjoy paying Microsoft for software upgrades. I contacted Harman/Kardon today to ask about upgrades, and was told that "Microsoft doesn't permit them" to provide downloadable updates. I had to pay $5 for a CD, plus S/H, for a total of $10. I doubt Microsoft will be publishing the API for this unit, which pretty much prevents anyone from writing Linux apps. Now, that having been said, I do like the TC-1000. I don't find the backlight faint, and I like the ease of programmability. My only gripe is sometimes the touchscreen thinks I pressed a different button than I really did -- you have to be a bit careful in how you position your finger. I also suggest getting 8 rechargeable AA batteries if you want to use this unit (4 for the unit, 4 hot spares). It really sucks electrons.

  101. Proposed Specs for "God Emperor Remote" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking over my drawerful of remotes, and my experience with programmables, learnables, etc., and the comments here, let's come up with a spec for Everything You Always Wanted A Remote To Do but were Afraid to Ask:

    1) IR and RF (I don't need it yet, but...)
    2) Learn from other devices, as well as library of codes
    3) "Dual D-Pad" buttons. Too many universal remotes have one "wheel" of buttons, that get used as either menus in some modes, or media control (FF, Rewind, pause, etc.), but some devices, namely TiVo, need both sets.
    4) 10 devices, with an LCD declaring which mode you're in. These should be namable!!!
    5) Macros
    6) Places to insert little cards with function descriptions for at least a few of the buttons
    7) Backlight when an easy-to-find button is pressed
    8) No slider switches -- they wear out too fast

    So far, the one I own that does everything is my Denon 2801 controller, but it's so poorly laid out, and has these teensy weensy sliders for mode, that I use it plus the TiVolator.

  102. Have palm, will travel. by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    If you have a palm device with IR, you're ready to start playing. I recently played around with a nicely written PalmOS app called (OmniRemote) from www.pacificneotek.com. I'm not affiliated with them in any way, but I was really impressed with the product. Basically, it'll turn your palm device into a sophisticated remote that can do some really neat things. It allows you to customize the interface, program codes, and even sniff codes from other remotes. Very slick.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:Have palm, will travel. by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

      I tried this program, and i hate it. The range is only about 6' unless you have an IR booster. And it eats batteies like crazy.

      --
      Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
    2. Re:Have palm, will travel. by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      Each palm device has different capabilities. On my visor platinum, battery usage isn't a factor. The IR load isn't enough to eat the batteries. IR transfers between other palms and printers is what usually eats my batteries.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    3. Re:Have palm, will travel. by mino · · Score: 1

      your crappy ass Palm

      "Say, would you like a chocolate-covered pretzel? They're a little melty but damn, are they exquisite!"

  103. Marantz RC-1200 by CityHunter · · Score: 1

    I currently own a Marantz RC2000 MK-II, it's an awesome pushbutton/LCD combo remote (was $200). They are releasing a new one called RC-1200, it's really cool looking (http://www.remotecentral.com/ces2000/photo22.htm) . I for one will be lined up to get this when available.

  104. Why not use your palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How's about using your palm for things other than pleasure. My palm V works great as a programmable remote.

    Oh yeah

    visit my website
    http://www.geocities.com/testu_nagouchi/

  105. I like the redrat2 pc controlled remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the redrat2 attached to the serial port of my linux box. It is a pc controlled learning remote. I control it via the command line using a script I wrote for Kermit. It can be found here.

  106. Universal Remote and Apex DVD players??? by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for a universal remote to replace the four I have now, but for the life of me I cannot find one that supports Apex DVD players. I'd like to have a nice remote supporting at least 8 devices, as I have a TV and VCR in another room that I wouldn't mind having in my main remote as well, and keep some room for later home theater expansion. Are there any suggestions for decent, affordable remotes like this that support Apex? I'd pay up to $90 or so, but I'd rather not pay the $300 that some super-hyper-mega-programmable remotes cost...

  107. What about the Palm Pilot! by Bartlet · · Score: 1

    I can't find the URL right now but someone out there makes an RF "amplifier" for the palm. This to me is the ultimate in universal remotes.

  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. If you like to DIY by Scrybe · · Score: 1

    Get yourself a Handspring Visor Handheld($100), and and omniremote springboard ($59). You will have to make your own screens for some of your stuff but it is pretty universal.

    --

    <This .sig left intentionally blank>

  110. Carver equipment and universal remotes by eXtro · · Score: 1

    My home entertainment system is based around Carver amplifiers etc. It uses a different IR frequency than most other vendors. I've tried a couple universal remotes but they've not worked. Does anybody know of one that will?

  111. Still the Marantz RC-2000-MkII by alanh · · Score: 1
    The best universal remote is still the Marantz RC2000MkII. I haven't used any of the 7 other remotes that came with my various AV equipment after programming my Marantz with their functions.
    • Loads of real physical buttons that you can navigate by feel.
    • 32, custom named buttons for each of 10 components.
    • Optional RF adapter so you can use it through walls.
    • "Clone" feature if you happen to own two of them.

    It has a few disadvantages, all minor, IMO:

    1. It only has 4 Macro keys available, luckily I only need one for my use
    2. It's a "learning only" remote so it takes a while to program (you can't just enter in codes)
    3. It's a little bit unbalanced with the batteries at the front end.

    It has been well worth the money to me. It comes with several of the Marantz receivers, but you can get it independently as well. It would be absolutely perfect if it had a jog/shuttle as well, but it's still the best there is right now. It is different from the MkI, which had some serious shortcomings, not the least of which was that you had to reprogram it after you changed batteries!


    -alanh

    --
    - AlanH
  112. I Do! by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    I bought one from that guy. It works pretty well, and for a good price. Then I found that the receiver was compatible with my existing universal remote, so I didn't have to use the (decent) supplied remote.

    If you're interested in controlling Winamp for free, you should investigate Girder at http://www.girder.nl . It is a hugely configurable infrared controller platform with plugins to do tons of things.

    Using this hardware, I have built a MP3 player that is controlled by my universal remote. It works great!

    If you're going for better sound, you can also check out the LP3. It's at http://www.lp3music.com . For $100 US, you get a thing that hangs off a parallel port and converts an MP3 stream into a very high fidelity output. No more shopping for super expensive sound cards! Also allows wimpy computers to play MP3s because it has its own onboard processor. Highly recommended!

  113. Build your own by mfarver · · Score: 1

    I'm planning on using a small (15 button) remote for often used functions (Tivo menu keys and volume). And a cheap, small PHP programmabletouchscreen PC and LIRC.

  114. Simple but functional by Steev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I purchased the Home Theater Master SL-9000 after much deliberation. I decided that I did NOT want a remote control with a big LCD screen because I'd probably break it :)

    I know that at some point I'm going to sit on, drop, crush, or otherwise maime my remote control. I wanted to have one that could withstand some abuse. I eventually decided on the SL-9000, which turned out to be a great investment. EVERY SINGLE BUTTON (except light) on the thing is fully and individually programmable in every one of its EIGHT modes. That's a lot of IR codes -- By far the most flexible non-LCD remote out there.

    1. Re:Simple but functional by elmegil · · Score: 1
      I'll second this. I did a fair bit of research after buying a cheap $30 model that claimed to be programmable--all of 4 buttons were programmable. The SL-9000 is a thing of beauty, and it does everything I want. The biggest problem is forgetting what some of the functions I don't use often are.

      The Sony things and their ilk with the huge LCDs are ugly, they take up too much room, and as you say, they seem way too likely to get broken somehow.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  115. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  116. Corrected Link by Red+Aardvark+House · · Score: 0

    To previous Slashdot story.

    Hope this helps.

    --

    I like fire ants. They are very spicy!

  117. Subject for a slashdot poll by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The existing poll has been hanging around for what feels like ages. Maybe we should rank the top options and put them into a poll?

    This would probably answer the question fastest, although you might end up using CowboyNeal.

    --
    -- Mike
  118. Cambridge Audio M1 by dalinian · · Score: 1

    The M1 rocks!

    I've had mine for a couple of months now (bought it for about 140$), and I've used it to control XMMS and other stuff, my other stereo system and my TV.

  119. All-for-one cinema 7 by neurojab · · Score: 2, Informative

    The All-for-one cinema 7 is the greatest remote since time began. It's got a simple interface (none of that LCD game-boy crap), it's fully programmable, it has pre-programmed and learning modes, has a nice size and weight. It's a hacker favorite- Here's the FAQ. I mean c'mon, you can't get a better remote at any price, let alone $20.

  120. Re:Most universal remote - coffee yes! by decoydog · · Score: 2, Funny

    About all I can't do isget a cup of coffee. I use a long handled shovel for that. I use a long handled shovel for that.

    Perhaps if you hollowed out the pole and used it as a straw to the coffee machine also?

  121. My Calculator by anon7864 · · Score: 1
    The HP48 series calculators have IR ports on them. They can emulate up to a certain frequency of remotes. You basically download a ROM to run on the calculator, then you can learn the other remote commands and program them to specific keys.

    Coolness factor is high on this one. No one expects to see you whip out your calculator to control your stereo.

    The only risk is that you have a remote operating at a clock speed higher than the HP48 can generate. The only way to know is by trial and error, so don't run out and pay big money for a 48 series just yet.

    1. Re:My Calculator by anon7864 · · Score: 1
      Sorry I forgot to post the FAQ:
      http://www.engr.uvic.ca/~aschoorl/faq/48faq-4.ht ml #ss4.13


      Make sure to take out the slashcode space after html.

  122. Rotel by Byteme · · Score: 1
    The Rotel RR-1090 is very sweet. I don't think anyone mentioned it yet.

  123. Use your Palm Pilot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Check out the few remote software for Palm OS.

    They work very well with tons of devices.

    1. Re:Use your Palm Pilot! by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the Palm Pilot can't send IR that far. I tried one, it was alright, but you had to be like 5 or 6 feet from the receiver. I have a TC1000 (a damned fine remote), it works at 20 feet behind the wall.

  124. I think you proved his point by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    care to argue?

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  125. Re:Radio Shack 15-1994 with JP1: The Ultimate Remo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW, this remote has been discontinued by RS.

  126. cheap but good by jglow · · Score: 1

    I've had a cheap (under $5) programmable remote from Radio Shack for probibly 3 years. Great deal, never conks out.. the numbers and letters don't wear out on the buttons (like alot of them do) and best of all, I don't feel bad if I drop it in a bucket of mop water like I've been known to do in the past.

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
  127. From the Simpsons by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Homer: "Watch me turn on the TV." BLAM, BLAMBLAM!
    Hibbert: "You use your gun to turn on the TV?"

    Johnny: "Gilligan, The Skipper and Chief Wiggum...Name 2 castamays!" BLAM, BLAM, BLAM!
    Sarah: "Clancy, use the remote." Clancy: "Oh, yeah."
    Joan Rivers: "Can we talk about Chief Wiggum? Bleah, bleah."
    *flying gun* CRASH!

    Once again, a 2-dimesional, brightly-colored cartoon is leading the way.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  128. Please change the company name to Philips by RamDyne · · Score: 1

    Please stop calling the electronics firm Phillips, the electronics firm is called Philips. Phillips is the name of the company which invented a certain kind of screw. Disclaimer: Philips is my employer ;-) -- Andreas

  129. Philips Pronto's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!! Imagine a Beowofl Cluster of a Pronto hooked up with a TiVo! That would rule a lot.

  130. ProntoPro TSU6000 by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

    The Philips ProntoPro TSU6000 is
    aiming to be the most sophisticated remote for under $1000.


    People actually pay more than $1000 for a remote?

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    1. Re:ProntoPro TSU6000 by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2

      Yes. In the high-end category, people buy whole-house control systems, which are insanely expensive and are custom tailored to each installation. One remote control for such a system costs anywhere from $1000 to $5000. Of course, they are VERY fancy remotes, not just small boxes with a bunch of buttons.

  131. Pronto opinion by rant-mode-on · · Score: 1


    Personally, I have a couple of problems with my Marantz RC5000 (aka Pronto.)

    1. As others have mentioned - toggles, and knowing the state that a device is in. Power on/off being the classic problem. Some devices support power on codes and power off codes, so you _can_ have one button that turns everything on, and another that turns them all off, but finding those codes can be 'challenging'. All too often though, you have to toggle them - and hope that all devices are in the same state to begin with, and hope that all devices see the request to invert their state.

    2. (my biggest gripe) Being a couch potato, my fingers know where the major buttons are on my normal remotes without looking at them. I can flip channels, change volume, play, stop, fast forward, reverse, and even navigate my way through teletext (when I was back in the UK, oh how I miss teletext now that I'm in the USA) without _having_ to look at the remote. The pronto has 7 physicals buttons, which are easily found without looking at the remote. The rest are programmed but require the user to examine the display to find them. Look at your remotes, and I bet you can find far more than 7 buttons on them that don't require you to look at the remote. Consequently, to change channel, I now have to press it to turn it on/turn the light on. Either find the page with the numbers on it or the page with the dedicated channel on it. Find the button(s), point the remote at the TV/cable box/video then press it. Doesn't sound like much, but its an awful lot easier with the device's original remote.

    I caughed up the cash for it for a number of reasons. I hated the array of remotes I needed to arm myself with, and could see a way out of the mess; Also the idea of tuning a device to work how I liked appeals to my programmer's nature that inspires me to make my PC behave how I like it to. Sad to say, the only time I use it now is when I can't find the crappy all-in-one remote that I got with Comcast (don't get me started on them).

    Now, what I would really like, is a cross between my Pronto's display for infrequently used options and a 'full feature' remote that has distinct buttons for power, numbers, volume, channel switching, mute, video controls, menu page switching and a couple of others, just for good measure. That would convince me to spend the readdies. Or does such a device exist now, and I completely missing out?

    Do I sound lazy? Maybe, but I'm prepared to put my money where my mouth is. Less than a year ago, I paid £250 ($350) for it. If its not against /. rules, I'll sell it to the first person who'll pay $50 + postage from the USA.

    1. Re:Pronto opinion by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      What, you're selling a pronto for 50 bucks plus shipping? If so, email me. :-)

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  132. OmniRemote - if you have a handheld by Jish · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Pacific NeoTek makes OmniRemote software for Palm OS devices. The major drawback being the lack of power in the built-in IR port.

    The solutions are their Palm hotsync module for Palm brand devices and their Springboard module for Handspring Visors.

    I have the latter and its pretty cool... You can totally customize multiple remote control layouts. I personally like 4 quadrants of the screen: volume up, volume down, channel up, channel down. BIG buttons you can hit with your finger or stylus without really looking :)

    Josh

  133. I'd rather have simplicty. by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    I wish somebody made a small, easy to hold in your hand universal remote that only did the things I do 99% of the time:

    A Power button
    0-9 buttons
    A button to toggle devices
    Play, Stop, Foward, Reverse.
    Volume up and down
    Channel up and down
    A menu button.

    Thats only 19-20 buttons, depending on how they configure it, and would satisfy me for my receiver, VCR, cable, DVD, CD, and TV. My TV remote has more that I never use.

    Anyone know of a good quality simple one like that?

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:I'd rather have simplicty. by MadAndy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget up, down, left, right and select. A learning remote we have here goes unused because there's no convenient mapping for DVD menu control :(

  134. Get a Finglonger by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    Too bad it won't be invented for a thousand years..

    -B

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  135. is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have more components in my living room than I have room on the coffee table for their remotes

    it seems to me that spending more for my remote than I did on my DVD player is overdoing it somewhat.

    If you've got that many components in your living room then it is NOT overdoing it to spend that much on a remote.

  136. Re:ATTN SPORK_TESTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, which are you going to do, you big pussy? Kick my ass or give me one of your estrogen driven sissy punches? I doubt you can knock me on my ass. If you would like to try, just tell me when and where. I guarantee I will be there.

    --
    Pummeling someone with your pink purse may be your idea of a fight, but it will only lead to pain in the end - your pain.

  137. Use the Palm by Jill+Bates · · Score: 1

    OmniRemote or like, thou you may have a range of about 1.5~2 meters but I'll say it's at least practical. These apps also allow you to construct multiple screens each for one (or more) remote controlled devices. You do the loayout by drawing buttons and train them.

    OmniRemote also got a IR enhancer hardware which can be attached to your Palm Pilot. Dunno it cost.

    However, these apps usually only work with 32kHz remotes but not the 144kHz ones, you may want to test drive the software first.

  138. Wait a sec.... You guys watch tv?! by GreyFauk · · Score: 1

    I mean... Other than watching
    a few commercials from time to time, or a
    show or two to keep up with what the US
    mind mass mentality is at... watching
    Tv is really not that great of an idea on
    a regular basis.

    Granted... I'm a die hard movie buff and
    would love to curl up and watch old
    movies for the next 30 years but that's
    not a reality I can maintain atm.

    DvD's are killer. Gotta admit I was blown
    away and was pleased to find something that
    was actually as good or better than advertised
    for a change.

    Network, Cable, Radio... Bleah... It's not good
    for you, folks... try and stay away.

    --
    Friends don't let friends buy Compaq's. (Dell/Gateway... same same) You want a good computer? Build it yourself.
  139. Re:Radio Shack 15-1994 with JP1: The Ultimate Remo by Spire · · Score: 2

    True, but it's still available in some stores, so grab one while you still can.

    The good news is that there are several other remotes that are also JP1-compatible. It's just that the 15-1994 seems to be the most popular one for JP1 hacking (this will inevitably change as the supply runs dry), and it's the one I own. It has a nice button layout and overall feel, and I find the backlighting indispensable.

    --
    begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
  140. Harman-Kardon TakeControl TC-1000 by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

    I bought this remote for $200 several months ago. All I can say is that it's a fantastic remote. Not only does it have just the right tactile buttons for channel changing, muting and volume control, but you can program it very nicely and it works very well. Also, I've gotten really good comments from people not tech-savvy about how nice the remote is and how easy and fun it is to use. To me, a low-tech person not being intimidated by an LCD remote of this calibur is more than enough reason to consider purchasing it.

    BTW, my remote has a black case, not clear like pictured here. It's probably the best $200 I ever spent.

  141. Remotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux can decoder whatever you send it for the most part. Moldy remotes like RCA and Zenith will not decode since they were analog IR.

  142. Best Remote - Palm & Omniremote! by vonkas · · Score: 1

    after having looked at a number of the dedicated remotes I have finally settled on the Palm IIIxe with Omniremote ($20). This is one astounding combination. I am surprised it hasn't come up in any serious review. To me it beats them all! Not only can it learn any command by pointing the original remote device towards the Palm but it allows you to string commands to "Macros" assign these to freeform buttons on a number of screens that you can call up in a menu. And the best is that Omniremote can trigger macros according to timers. Anyway I'm wrapped!

  143. Marantz RC-2000 MkII by samdu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Absolutely the BEST remote out there. It aint cheap, coming in at $250.00, but it is the only remote I've found that replaces ALL of my other remotes for EVERY function. It's big, but not too big, it has programmable buttons, it has macros, and its entirely backlit. Awesome remote.


    -Sam

    1. Re:Marantz RC-2000 MkII by sinster · · Score: 1

      Ya, I've got the RC-5000. Damned good remote.

      When I bought by DTS system, I started shopping for a good universal remote. The most basic feature to me is that it has to be a learning remote. I can't deal with those remotes that are preprogrammed with all the knee-jerk low-end consumer electronics. They never support my oddball equipment.

      The moment you look at learning remotes, you jump up $50 in remote price right there. And then I needed a remote that handled multiple IR frequencies, because about half my components use one and the rest use another. That raises the price again.

      Once I got up there, it wasn't really that much more money to just splurge and get the RC-5000. And lets face it, the damned thing has some serious hack value.

      --
      -- Nolite audere delere orbiculum rigidum meum.
    2. Re:Marantz RC-2000 MkII by sporkboy · · Score: 1

      I'll give my props to the 2000 definitely. Been using it for 3 years now with no problems. Replaces everything except the jog dial on one of my remotes and even that it approximates.

  144. I hate Moslems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I swear before almighty God that I hope we kill tens of thousands of those raghead bastards. I only pray that napalm and air-fuel bombs are used so that they burn alive. If there is some collateral damage, so be it. I say kill them all and let God sort it out.

    Death to Islam.

  145. great remote is the Cinema 7 IQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It is a fully programable LEARNING remote that is simple to use and to program. It doesn't have all the eye-candy LED screens so it is normal sized. You can program macro's, discrete remote codes or learn any IR from any source. Best of all it's only $30. I use mine to run my TV, cable box, vcr, Apex dvd, Kenwood home theater system.

  146. Re:French Toast! by c_g_hills · · Score: 0

    Uh, if your fucking pathetically small cock was so big, you would have found her tight. It shows what a small dick you really have, loser.

  147. Re:First Bugger! by c_g_hills · · Score: 0

    you both suck.

  148. What the fuck by c_g_hills · · Score: 0

    How the fuck did this lame article get posted? Like anyone gives a shit that you wanna buy a new remote. Slashdot sux.

  149. Palm-compatible application by man_ls · · Score: 1

    Palm-OS has an application called "Remote" that is a learning, programmable touch-screen remote using either the built-in IR port, or a $15 attachment that is around 20x more powerful. It is a $25 or so download, and they sell packages. Of course, if you don't have a palm, then this isn't a better solution.

  150. Inexpensive but Impressive by detritus. · · Score: 2

    I am extremely pleased with my One For All AV Producer 8. It packs alot of features, like the ROM upgradability to support future products, macros, IR learning, etc. Definitely worth checking out, IMO.

  151. Thanks for the pointer. by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    It just a shame that this feature has been implimented on an otherwise not particularly good device.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  152. Sony RM VL900 - No Flash, Good Solution by dvds · · Score: 1

    At under $40 this no-frills programmable remote has been very satisfactory for me. I use it to control TV, digital cable box, receiver, five! VCRs, and an RCA switch for selecting (1 of 6) S-video or composite video sources for TV aux-in. It does everything I could ask, including doing macros. I was able assign VCR remote codes to keys in such a way as to make all the VCRs behave much more similarly than with their own remotes. (I also have a DVD player which comes through the switch, but I have not put it on the remote. I don't use it much, but I think it could share keys with my receiver mode.) Cleared off my coffee table!