Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: Enterprise Premieres Tonight

Ankou writes: "'Enterprise' premieres tonight on UPN. Scott Backula, you may remember him in as the lead role of 'Quantum Leap', plays Jon Archer the captain of the NX-01 which is the Enterprise predating the NCC-1701 and Captain Kirk by almost 150 years. It even takes place before the whole United Federation of Planets came about! This series will prove to be a more rougher, blue-collared version of star travel than the picture portrayed by Kirk and Picard, i.e. crew wear baseball caps and their captain is a regular 'Joe' kind of guy (possibly why they chose Scott Backula as the lead role). Only time will tell if this series will last, be the judge for yourself and see it tonight, Sep 26, on UPN at 8/7 central." I discovered last weekend that I stopped getting UPN. Who knows when, since I've never needed it before. So I will be missing it, and crying in chair, while mumbling curses directed at my cable provider.

713 comments

  1. Good series! by Kronik+Gamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This should prove to be a good series, tailored towards fans of Babylon 5 and the like. First post!

    1. Re:Good series! by Kronik+Gamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I really didn't like Babylon 5 that much, I just couldn't get into it. Star Trek has always been my favorite Sci-Fi series.

    2. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      B5 had the grittiness of "Blade Runner" that the all the other TV sci-fi shows seem to lack.

      The future is NOT supposed to be a nice or civilised place! There will always be Osamas and Saddams in the future.

      The only Star Trek episode I still have some respect for is the one in which Picard was tortured by the Cardassians.

    3. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B5's problem == poor costuming

    4. Re:Good series! by SonofRage · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I really, really, really tried to give Babylon 5 a chance but I just wasn't feelin it.

    5. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What?

      Like the skin-tight, latent homosexual leotards of the Star Trek are better?

    6. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I didn't say that ST's costumes were any better! :-)

      Give me 90210 or give me death!

    7. Re:Good series! by Pedersen · · Score: 1, Troll
      B5 really was good, though. It had the cohesive vision that all of the "new" Trek franchises lacked.

      I think what you were trying to say is that B5 had a story to tell, while the latest Trek series have degenerated into a forehead of the week makes problem of the week which has to be solved by technology of the week.

      Don't get me wrong, I love Trek, especially TOS. I just wish they'd get real stories going. Admit it, this is a space soap, and a soap needs an ongoing story. Without that, it'll be another dead week of time travel which didn't really happen. Well, I'll hope for better than that, anway.

      --

      GPL made simple: What was my stuff is now our stuff. If you improve our stuff, please keep it our stuff.
    8. Re:Good series! by SonofRage · · Score: 1

      well when you think of the original series, most of the stories seemed to have a moral to them. I like the idea of a future Earth where we have learned from our mistakes. It may be unrealistic but it's still nice. That episode (although I think it was 2 episodes) did rule though.

    9. Re:Good series! by dslbrian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since this is before the original trek, the obvious question is whether the buttons and knobs on the control panel will be even bigger than before. I would expect that the ship's clock will be an even bigger odometer too.

    10. Re:Good series! by tycage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What have you heard that makes you think this is tailored towards fans of B5?

      Are you saying that there is a basic preplanned story line that they are going to follow? I'm hoping that's what you are saying. I've not heard anything like that about it, but I've not looked much either.

      B5 taught me to love the "story arc". Before that I'd just watched sci-fi shows as a series of things that happened. How I watch sci-fi hoping that each episode will be part of a larger whole. Nothing as detailed as B5 has come along that I know of, but it has had an influence. Farscape, for example, has a nice continuing story that, while not planned out to the extent that B5 was, does seem to have a general direction each season.

      Oddly enough, Buffy and Angel both have this same kind of "seasonal arc" which I've come to enjoy so much.

      --Ty

    11. Re:Good series! by Flower · · Score: 2
      I think another thing that made B5 decent is it was intricate, the plotline was believable (no particle of the week) and what the characters did in one episode had ramifications later on and in some unexpected ways.

      Trek has dabbled in doing something like this but has always come up short. All I need to point to is the series finale of Voyager. It was the ultimate Deus Ex Machina and with the sudden and dramatic influx of future tech into the timeline there is nowhere one can go after Voyager. The Borg, if not gone, are no longer an epic foe anymore. It's sad to say but that part of Trek ended like a bad D&D Monty Haul adventure I could have dreamed up when I was 13.

      Maybe it's me but I want something more than a weekly episodic morality play every week when I get my SciFi fix. I want something intricate and thought out. I hope they do this with Enterprise. My wife and I still watch B5. Even knowing the story it's like that novel you come back to and reread. Trek has never captivated me that way. It has the background and setting to do so but never the plot or execution.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    12. Re:Good series! by saider · · Score: 2

      No doubt they will also be responsible for as many, maybe more, casualties as the consoles explode whenever the ship is in a crisis. One can only assume that the consoles got better with time. Whether this means better at not exploding or better at killing the operator is an excercise left to the reader.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    13. Re:Good series! by Em+Ellel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, lets put this B5 vs. Trek argument aside NOW. Because they cannot be compared. Not because one is better than another, but because they are way too different. It's like comparing Simpsons to West Wing. They are just not the same category/style/purpose. Trek series is Action/Adventure fantasy punctuated with a but of Drama. It's entertainment of the heart. I LOVE Trek. B5 on the other hand is Political Drama punctuated with a bit of Action/Adventure. It's a completely different animal. It is entertainment of the mind. I am a huge fan of B5. I have to agree though, set design and costumes on B5 are pretty hideous. Though at least B5 earthforce uniforms look like uniforms, instead of ST circus outfits.To add to everything, acting is so bad on B5 too. For a show based on an ensemble cast, I would have hoped they would have hired more than two real actors. But B5 special effects rock. And the story.. the story makes it all worth while. Instead of episodic heroics and scientific techno-bable of ST, you have a tightly knit story. Nothing is free and for every action - no matter how noble or idealistic - you got consequences and ultimatly responsibility. Not something you find in a lot of episodic TV. Most of the people I know who never got into B5, either stopped watching within first 2 seasons (most of which is just set-up) or saw a few episodes from all over the place, made no sense of it and ignored it. Their loss.

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    14. Re:Good series! by dougmc · · Score: 2
      Deep Space 9 had a similar arc, if you need a Star Trek arc.

      Voyager had a general direction too, but DS9 had a stronger `story' ...

      B5's was still better, of course ...

    15. Re:Good series! by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      I always found it funny that on the most modern starships an energy weapon (fired outside) can make consoles explode.

      I would think that by the 24th century (or 22nd, or whenever; exploding consoles are a trademark accross all star treks) they could master at least fuses if not some more complicated surge-protecting technology!

      I guess they need an easy way to injure/kill characters in space battles without having aliens board the ship....

      (discalimer: despite this and many other star trek critisisms I may make don't think for a second that I won't be watching every episode too ;-)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    16. Re:Good series! by Spifmeister · · Score: 1

      me and my friend have watched both, but the one that gets us talking about the issues brought up in a episode is always Star Trek.

    17. Re:Good series! by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      The last couple seans of st:ds9 certainly had some decent season-long story elements.

      I know a lot of people didn't like the soap-opera-ness and interpersonal relationships that ds9 was known for, but ds9 also had some of the best war episodes in trek history (imho). In the final season, with the entire alpha quadrant united against the dominion and cardassians, every episode leaves you waiting for more.

      Or at least it did for me... ;-)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    18. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Simpsons beats West Wing hands down. It's much more watchable and not nearly as likely to be come dated material. It's also much, much funnier than West Wing ...

    19. Re:Good series! by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Why do i get the feeling you missed the point... ;-)

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    20. Re:Good series! by dmarcov · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. DS9 tried to dabble in the idea of a continuing plot line (a real continuing plot line -- not just "Oh yeah, Capt. Picard is gone for the 2nd part of this two parter -- and you know he'll be back by the end), but never really got the hang of it. Toward the end, they could remember there was a war going on from episode to episode, but that was about it.

      The great thing about B5 was that when a character did something -- you could understand why. It wasn't just because that's what fit into the script that week. The writers seemed to actually be able to come up with real motivations that seemed plausible.

      Now that won't stop me from watching Enterprise tonight -- or even sticking with it for a season or two no matter how bad it is. I did the same with Voyager. I made it through a season and 1/2 -- couldn't stand it, and came back around the 5th season, and things had looked up a bit. Then you can just catch the good ones you miss in syndication.

    21. Re:Good series! by MaxVlast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's refreshing that when someone shares his opinion honestly and succinctly, people here are too darned dense and pre-wired to call it a troll.

      (Note to moderator: this isn't a troll. It's flamebait.)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    22. Re:Good series! by carney1979 · · Score: 1

      ...unless you just REALLY couldn't get into B5....

    23. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That's funny. I haven't heard that fuse joke about five FUCKING thousand times or anything.

      Har har.

    24. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mean Enterprise, then you're silly.

      The entire show revolved around Sa..Archer. Oops, forgot it wasn't Quantum Leap.
      We have Contact-like infatuation with one's father. Mark my words, every episode would feature some pearl of wisdom from six or seven flashbacks to his dad.
      We have time-traveling aliens.
      The phrase "Temporal Cold War."
      We have bashing of genetic engineering, from yet another Star Trek.
      We have yet another race of cloaking chamaeleon aliens that magically disappear by TOS.
      They use the transporter at the very end to save Archer. So cliche.
      "Phase pistols," "grapple," and "transporter" all in one episode.
      A woman that learns language in three days. Yeah, nice try.
      Humans, for the first time meet Klingons and GO TO THE KLINGON HIGH COUNCIL in one episode!
      Klingons couldn't write their own name backwards, very much interpret writing on cells in the body.
      If the Klingons knew of this "information"'s existence, then it was pretty unecessary.
      "Here ma'am, let me rub that ass for you." (remind me to get some spores around h0t vulcan women)
      The Enterprise apparently takes a serious ass whooping without polarized plating! Who needs armor!
      Why use language girl to find their "cry?" Certainly the same censors that pick it up provide enough information for analysis by the computer.

      The list goes on. In short, the pilot was way fucking rough.

      However, it has potential.

      The uniforms are good.
      The set design is excellent.
      The layout of the ship is more sensible than any Trek, yet, in terms of instruments and panels.
      Scott Bakula is a good actor, they just need to tone down his Rambo factor.

      Let's see some actual military composition here. Fire teams, squad leaders, weapons that don't fire plasma or particle beams (energy requirements anyone?).
      A division between ship security, ship administration, and various off-ship squads. They should run drills.
      Let's see some equipment for going out and fixing the ship. Actual vehicles capable of scaling around to carry people to do work drones can't. And while we're at it, drones to repair the ship.
      No fucking exploding panels. Forget the future, that entire fucking idea was stupid.
      Let's see squads of ships traveling in packs. They don't need to all be warp five capable star ships, but in a real fight you don't want to be one vs 50. When speed is necessary, the ship goes ahead. When it's not, they travel together.

      Potential, much of which will be tossed aside for the mindless persuit of squeezing every last drop of money out of the franchise while moralizing things the writers can't comprehend anyway.

    25. Re:Good series! by KyleCordes · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the exact timing, but for a while it seemed like DS9 had a lossy copy of D5's arc, delayed a bit. Hopefully I am wrong.

    26. Re:Good series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, B5 and DS9 for instance have nothing in common.

      They don't both occur in the future.
      Or in space.
      Or on space stations.
      They don't involve interactions of different aliens.
      They're not both driven by a single earth based military organization.
      They don't both conclude with a massive war.
      The military leaders of both aren't both messiahs or anything.
      Neither has a reoccuring cast that would provide for a long term story.
      Indeed, like comparing the Simpsons and the West Wing.

      Yup, and it's not like there's no action in Babylon 5 or anything. I don't seem to remember countless station battles inside and outside, or attacks on planets with mass drivers and star ships, or fights between various stat ships. Nope, not at all.

      Bruce Boxlietner, Andreas Katsulas, Jerry Doyle, Andrea Thompson, Peter Jurasik, Mira Furlan are all excellent.
      I never liked Michael O'Hare until after he left the show. He did much better when they steal B4 and he goes to become Valin, than he ever did while a regular.
      Most of the supporting cast did pretty well, too.
      The only good actors in any of the Star Trek series were Patrick Stewart, Brent Spiner, James Doohan, and Leonard Nimoy.

    27. Re:Good series! by KyleCordes · · Score: 1

      [when a character did something -- you could understand why]

      ... and if you didn't understand why, you had good reason to believe that it was because of some interesting bit which would be revealed in later episodes as part of the story line, not a side effect of the particle of the week.

  2. So by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 0, Troll

    That means more useless argument between nerds.

    yay!

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:So by kilgore_47 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That means more useless argument between nerds.

      ...and yet by belittleing us in this fourm you've partaken and become one of us.

      welcome!

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  3. yea i lost UPN too by willie3204 · · Score: 1

    i have americast and i will also be crying.. its okay man.. i feel your pain

    1. Re:yea i lost UPN too by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      No StarTrek on your cable?

      Its not okay!
      It will never be OK!
      Fight it with all you've got!

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    2. Re:yea i lost UPN too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unplug your cable and plug in a regular antenna you idiot.

    3. Re:yea i lost UPN too by Geekwad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, now that I'm in college, I'm not in an area that has EVER had UPN.. but never fear.. The local WB will encore every UPN episode on saturday night. Excellent. -- So check around, there may be a network that does this in your area.

      --

      - http://pakman.sytes.net/
    4. Re:yea i lost UPN too by mach-5 · · Score: 2

      Get out your coat-hangers, our UPN channel is also available through the air as well as on cable. So, you may be able to go old fashioned and pick up the station. If you are really desperate, and you find that your "local" UPN affiliate broadcasts from further away, you can run to Radio Shack or Home Depot and pick up a little directional antennae with more gain for fairly cheap.

    5. Re:yea i lost UPN too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha it's startrek enterprise is premiering on 3 channels here tonite!! hahahah...Space Channel, UPN, and CKVU

      and i get all three!! hahaaha...w00t!! but who cares its gonna suck anyways

    6. Re:yea i lost UPN too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm glad you said it because i didn't have the courage to say it so nicely

    7. Re:yea i lost UPN too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPN pulled out of my area about a year ago. The local carrier asked UPN to provide more sitcoms targeted at caucasians (I live in an area that is 99.9% caucasian) because ratings were very low. UPN dubbed the local carrier racist and pulled out of town.

      UPN sucks.

  4. Baseball hats? by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are the ceiling lights really bright or something? Why would they wear baseball hats?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Baseball hats? by al_d · · Score: 1

      I wonder why people wear them in bars too... (is that just a sign that I'm getting old?)

    2. Re:Baseball hats? by Curien · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We wear baseball caps in the US Air Force. Usually, each squadron (sometimes group or directorate, if the Sqd is small) has their own cap, with their patch on it. I would suppose that Starfleet would be a derivative of the USAF, so it does make sense.

      We don't wear them indoors, though.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    3. Re:Baseball hats? by Brownstar · · Score: 2

      While I agree that in a psudeo-naval situation such as the Enterprise the wearing of baseball caps would be out of place. I could easily see people wearing them around the ship that aren't currently working. How many people do you see in the mall, movies, school, church, middle of night that wear baseball caps.

    4. Re:Baseball hats? by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      Under most indoor baseball hats you will find a head that is lacking hair.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    5. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      their captain is a regular 'Joe' kind of guy

      Oh, no.

      Picard was great just because of his taste for culture, manners and his European "a thousand-yard-stare-out-of-the-window" angst.

      An average American "Joe" with his six-pack can-do-mentality just won't do it.

    6. Re:Baseball hats? by seanmeister · · Score: 2

      Dude, have you been on a naval vessel lately? Ball caps are standard issue!

      (US anyways...)

    7. Re:Baseball hats? by Squorch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, Starfleet is obviously a derivative of the Navy... Think about it.

      - StarFLEET (Like a fleet of ships)
      - Ensign, LT (j.g.), LT, LT CDR, CDR, CAPT, ADM, etc.
      - "Engineering" (there are no "engineering" spaces on aircraft)
      - The process of naming ships individually is a Navy thing. Individual aircraft aren't named. (compare the USS Enterprise, NX-01 with the USS Enterprise, CV-65)

      And so on and so forth... just watch most any Trek show and you'll get the idea.

    8. Re:Baseball hats? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      We wear ball caps every day in the Navy. They're standard issue. Each command usually has its own insignia on the face of the cap. Although I agree they're very unprofessional looking.

    9. Re:Baseball hats? by SirWhoopass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the B-2 bombers are named. Probablu because they're as expensive as a ship.

    10. Re:Baseball hats? by chinton · · Score: 1

      We don't wear them indoors, though.

      Would aboard ship be considered indoors?

    11. Re:Baseball hats? by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1
      Hey man, could be worse. At least you can make the Marines buy those crappy 'almost-real' lids :)


      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    12. Re:Baseball hats? by Rackemup · · Score: 2

      BUT... the Navy doesnt fly (through air OR space, it doesnt matter). perhaps starfleet is some kind of Air Navy? =)

    13. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cant fly thru space..there no "air" to "fly" through. you can cruise thru space. :)

    14. Re:Baseball hats? by Exedore · · Score: 2, Informative

      - "Engineering" (there are no "engineering" spaces on aircraft)

      What, you've never heard of a flight engineer before? Here's a partial description: "The flight engineer is a technical expert, who must be thoroughly familiar with the operation and function of various airplane components." Sounds like the same concept to me.

      Anyway, I agree that Starfleet is more derivative of a navy than an air force... just thought I'd clear up the "engineering" part.

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    15. Re:Baseball hats? by bubblegoose · · Score: 1

      When I was in the Navy we also had ball caps customized for our command. We usually wore them all of the time indoors, especially when we had a bad case of bed-head and didn't have time to comb.

      --
      I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    16. Re:Baseball hats? by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny, I seem to remember all these planes taking off of carrier decks with the words US NAVY stamped on them.

      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    17. Re:Baseball hats? by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes they do. Perhaps you've never heard of a recent invention known as the "aircraft carrier?" Navy crew, navy pilots.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    18. Re:Baseball hats? by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least it's not a beret.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    19. Re:Baseball hats? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      BUT... the Navy doesnt fly (through air OR space, it doesnt matter). perhaps starfleet is some kind of Air Navy? =)


      Those sure aren't Air Force jets taking off of and landing on aircraft carriers.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    20. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Starfleet is based on the Navy.

      Second The ship on this show should remind everyone of a submarine in space.

    21. Re:Baseball hats? by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that was the interesting thing about the guy, in Quantum Leap, while he was a normal kinda guy, he also was very intelligent too. (Making him identifiable to geeks and jocks at the same time) Hopefully his Enterprise character will be similar, otherwise its just boring.

    22. Re:Baseball hats? by i_m_sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In most sci-fi worlds Spacecraft are always deemed as Navy. Look at the recent out in space movies/books:
      wing commander
      The reality disfunction
      starship troopers
      and many more that i cannot get my sleep deprived brain to think about.

      Personaly I always thought of it as old saliors sailed useing the stars, now they sail to them. So for me useing naval terms in space is cool...
      as long as there isnt a combined sea to space movie...that could get confusing.

      --
      Adam Sane sanity is a dirty job, but somebody has to do it.
    23. Re:Baseball hats? by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      I would suppose that Starfleet would be a derivative of the USAF, so it does make sense.

      Back in the early 90's (I think it was late '92 to early '93), the Air Force actually adopted the Navy's rank insignia system. They kept the rank names (LT, CPT, MAJ, etc.), but went to the system of thick and thin stripes that the Navy uses to display rank on jackets and shirts (excepting the Navy khakis, that is).

      I thought this was pretty cool, for one reason in particular -- this makes it easier for USAF to morph (likely in a joint capacity with the Navy, hence the rank titles themselves) into Starfleet, since the rank pips on ST:TNG forward (and, apparently, from the pictures I've seen, ST:Starfleet, too, anachronistically) are based on the Navy system. (For ST:TOS, they didn't use pips, they had continuous and broken wavy stripes on the end of their t-shirts, and I'm not sure they were even consistent with it, either...)

      Of course, they also changed the cut of the jackets, so they looked more like suit jackets than uniforms, dropped all other insignia (didn't even have a prominent "U.S." on 'em), and used silver for the stripes, so everyone thought they looked like airline pilots. Lasted less than a year, I think.

    24. Re:Baseball hats? by tb3 · · Score: 1

      as long as there isnt a combined sea to space movie Oops. Space Cruiser Yamato, aka Star Blazers.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    25. Re:Baseball hats? by SonCorn · · Score: 1

      Myself, I would guess that StarFleet would be a derivative of a joint mission of the Air Force, Navy, and NASA. If you do it like that then all of your arguments become moot. This also makes the most sense. Why would 3 different agencies with the same goal go about it individually. Oh, I know, US government and all, but come on, I am sure they learned somthing in 150 years.

      --
      What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
    26. Re:Baseball hats? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Individual aircraft aren't named.
      Says who? The F-111s at at least one base in England in the mid-80s all had names. Some even had nose art, though none of it was as risque as what got painted onto fighters and bombers during WWII.

      I'll allow that not all of 'em get names (maybe the squids don't name any of theirs; as an Air Force brat, I wouldn't know), but to state that none are named is inaccurate.

      That said, the rest of your post is accurate enough.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Baseball hats? by astroboy · · Score: 1
      I would suppose that Starfleet would be a derivative of the USAF,

      Starfleet was pretty clearly modelled after the navy, not the AF. This makes sense; sure, space is `up' and so are planes, but month- or year- long missions with large crews in close quarters is clearly more a navy thing than an airforce thing.

    28. Re:Baseball hats? by jafac · · Score: 2

      No, Starfleet is *not* derivative of the USAF or the US-anything. This was *after* WWIII, remember? There was no more USA after that.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    29. Re:Baseball hats? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      Baseball hats are standard issue for Squids (US Navy) and Air Force types - when working off the flight line. Usually they have the ship or squadron doodad on the front.

      I've always felt they looked pretty dorked, but that is just a former Marine's opinion. I assume the the writers are aping the military look.

      As to the rationale - the crew are drawn from military types, who are used to wearing the damned things.

      At least they're not wearing berets. Gawd.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    30. Re:Baseball hats? by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Or one of those gay-looking visors that all the kids are wearing these days. I mean, come on - my 50-year-old Mom has been a visor afficianado from day one, so we basically have all the teenagers trying for the old lady look. It's amazing what people will do for fashion.

      Sorry, that rant was a long time coming. I think I'm done now.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    31. Re:Baseball hats? by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      I've always thought of spacecraft as being more similar to submarines than aircraft... at least the ones that obey the laws of physics.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    32. Re:Baseball hats? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      hey hey hey!

      There is nothing wrong with the Marine headgear. In this peace and feel good new era Marine Corps, it's about the only damned thing you've got to distinguish a crowd of jarheads from a mob of soldiers.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    33. Re:Baseball hats? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      BUT... the Navy doesnt fly (through air OR space, it doesnt matter). perhaps starfleet is some kind of Air Navy? =)
      Those sure aren't Air Force jets taking off of and landing on aircraft carriers.
      A photo ran with an article recently on one of the news sites (don't remember which one). The article was about the Air Force ramping up in the Middle East. The photo that was run with the article was of an F-14 taking off from an aircraft carrier.

      Morons.

      (Then again, they probably figure most people wouldn't know any better...and in that, they're probably right.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    34. Re:Baseball hats? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      We usually wore them all of the time indoors, especially when we had a bad case of bed-head and didn't have time to comb.

      Really? Wasn't that the puropose of the crew cut? For a while, I seriously considered shaving my head for that reason, then I realized by looking at my ancestor, that I'm going to be bald, anyway, so I enjoy my hair while I have it.

      --
      No sig
    35. Re:Baseball hats? by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      Aircraft are not officially named would have been a better way to put it. More to do with production numbers than tradition as dirigibles were officially named IIRC.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    36. Re:Baseball hats? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      Um. I've flown aboard C-130 and KC-10s that were named as well.

      He was speakng of commisioning a ship, giving her a name that is legal and whatnot. AFAIK, the B-2 isn't commisioned, just named.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    37. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USAF doesn't fly f-14 tomcats.

      The Navy does.

    38. Re:Baseball hats? by Flower · · Score: 2

      I think it would be funny to have someone on the Enterprise crew wear a beret. We'd have to come up with a new particle (bereton anyone?) to explain why it stuck to his head everytime he was running^H^H^H^H^H^Hetreating from the bad guy of the week. :)

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    39. Re:Baseball hats? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      This was *after* WWIII, remember? There was no more USA after that.

      Who says? We know the US wasn't completely destroyed, and in "The Voyage Home" Kirk doesn't say "I'm from North America", he says "I'm from Iowa."

      There may be a United Earth, but the US would certainly have been a major player in creating it, and a major source of it's early funding.

    40. Re:Baseball hats? by NullProg · · Score: 1

      CVN-65 not CV-65

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    41. Re:Baseball hats? by dorward · · Score: 1
      BUT... the Navy doesnt fly

      They travel in ships though (maybe not starships, but still ships).

      (BTW - watch Top Gun or Hot Shots)

    42. Re:Baseball hats? by KahunaBurger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who says? We know the US wasn't completely destroyed, and in "The Voyage Home" Kirk doesn't say "I'm from North America", he says "I'm from Iowa."

      But that doesn't nessaccarily mean anything. A united Germany citizen, a soviet East German, a pre WWII german citizen and a pre german unification Prussian could have all said "I'm from Berlin". It wouldn't mean the idea of prussian nationality would be relevant in 2001.

      There may be a United Earth, but the US would certainly have been a major player in creating it, and a major source of it's early funding.

      Thats just ego talking. The US could have been shattered into multiple warring states and had several of them break and reunite between the start of the alternate Star Trek time line and the start of the federation. Its like a British citizen durring colonial times contemplating the idea of a future UN like body and saying "The British Empire would certainly be a major player in creating it and a major source of its funding...." not thinking that by the time such a thing came to pass, large chunks of what they now think of as the British Empire would never dream of calling themselves Brits. (though they would still say "I'm from Pennsylvania". :> )

      I should really be doing something more constructive with my brain....

      Kahuna Burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
    43. Re:Baseball hats? by VulgarBoatman · · Score: 1

      Three words:

      Male pattern baldness.

      aka, "the curse" of aging errrr veteran actors playing virile young space warrior-recruit explorer dudes.

      --
      "Because I love Pat Benatar." -- Britney Spears, when asked why she covered Joan Jett's "I Love Rock 'n' Roll"
    44. Re:Baseball hats? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      All I know is, if you're in the Air Force, and they issue a uniform to you that includes a red shirt, then it's time to go AWOL.

    45. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Western Alliance, or something called something like that, fights the Eastern Alliance, or something called something like that, in the ST universe in the mid 21st century (originally it was the late 1990s, but obviously they couldn't stick with that), both sides lose, and a decade or two of chaos follows. The US is already subsumed in the Western Alliance, and there's no reason to believe from the few stories close to that time (particularly the First Contact movie, which is obviously an important source for the new show) that the USA as an institution had any kind of independence after around 2030 or so. In ST:TOS Kirk tells the AF pilot in "Return to Tomorrow" that the ship represents "United Earth," and you can hear the capital U and the capital E. Starfleet obviously is a United Earth institution.

    46. Re:Baseball hats? by ellesar1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Morons? F-14's are Navy Planes. F-16's and F-15's, the Air Force's primary fighters, aren't seen too much on aircraft carriers. They Just load 'em up with gas and send them halfway across the world to the nearest airbase.
      Get a clue before correcting people based on what you see in the news.

    47. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a pump,
      feels like a sneaker.

    48. Re:Baseball hats? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      The US could have been shattered into multiple warring states and had several of them break and reunite between the start of the alternate Star Trek time line and the start of the federation.

      Yes, and the Earth could have been covered in frog carcasses after they rained from the sky for 40 days and 40 nights.

      My point is that the fact that a World War III happened isn't proof that there's no longer a USA, so let's watch the damn show and see what happens, instead of assuming such a large amount from a single event.

      We know there was enough of the population left over to allow Zeframe Cochran to build a warp drive, and that within his own lifetime there's enough civilization left for them to still be growing corn in Broken Bow, Oklahoma, which is close enough to several important nuke targets (including Tinker Air Force base) that you wouldn't be growing anything but extra heads there if there'd been a full nuclear exchange. So let's stop making up history, and let Rick Berman make up history.

    49. Re:Baseball hats? by exor · · Score: 1

      Yes But anything is better than wearing baby blue pj's the Navy wears.

      USAF, Maries, and Army wear camo for normal work.

    50. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After states, that's why we had to pay for 50 of them even though the AF only wanted 40 something.

    51. Re:Baseball hats? by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

      Actually on a USN ship the bridge crew and pretty much anyone else on watch of an underway vessel will have ballcaps on. They usually switch to the dixie cups and combination caps when leaving or returning to port.

    52. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      That was the whole point. The article was about the air force. An F-14 was shown. F-14 != Air Force.

      Get a clue before correcting people based on what you thought you read in their posts.

    53. Re:Baseball hats? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      awww. they look sooo CUTE in their bell bottom jeans.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    54. Re:Baseball hats? by dark_panda · · Score: 2

      You mean to tell me you've never seen Top Gun before?

      J

      (my first post today and it's telling me I need to wait 20 seconds until I can post this? wtf?)

    55. Re:Baseball hats? by Guns+n'+Roses+Troll · · Score: 0

      Would you care to share what in the hell that is supposed to mean? I hate stupid fucks like you who make some lame joke that no one but you and your rimjob-giving boyfriend to undersatnd and then expect real people to find it funny.

      Die, shitscum!

    56. Re:Baseball hats? by sacherjj · · Score: 2

      You just reinforced his argument. The Headline said Air Force, but the plane was an F-14, which you also said was a Navy only plane. Hence, his statement that the headline was written by morons is correct.

      Why don't you get a clue before correcting someone.

    57. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you care to share what in the hell that is supposed to mean? I hate stupid fucks like you who make some lame joke that no one but you and your rimjob-giving boyfriend to undersatnd and then expect real people to find it funny.

      "Waffle Iron" probably assumed that since this discussion is about trek, everyone here knows that the non-primary-character wearing a red shirt usually dies. This was standrad procedure throughout the original startrek serries. Hence "I was a redshirt on star trek!", "I bet the redshirt is gonna eat it", "Don't be a redshirt", etc etc.

      Hope that clears it up!

      -kilgore_47, posting anonymously to match your '0' score and not pollute the thread with irrelevent explanations.

    58. Re:Baseball hats? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      A joint mission between the three does make sense, though from previous trek's I'm certain the Navy would be the biggest influence.

      I'm sure it will all be explained in a few hours...
      (I can't wait!!)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    59. Re:Baseball hats? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      So let's stop making up history, and let Rick Berman make up history.

      Thats really what every star trek debate comes down to in the end, isn't it? ;-)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    60. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps starfleet is some kind of Air Navy?

      Uh, an Air Navy in Space? Hrm. I'll get my coat.
    61. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *shrug*... Doesn't mean much. Berman the Revisionist has massacred all the back story of Trek anyway. That little niggle wouldn't stop him.

      Pah. NX-01 my ass.

      (Yeah, I know. It's only a TV show, it's only a TV show)

    62. Re:Baseball hats? by CmdrPinkTaco · · Score: 1

      actually there were two justifications that I have heard from a lot of Air Force guys for the crew cut. One was a roman tradition from the times of the Caesars. They kept hair short so that in a hand to hand fight the enemy couldn't grab your hair, tilt your head back and cut your throat. The other explanation was to curb infestations of lice.

      --
      Please give your mod points to others, Im at the cap. They will appreciate it more
    63. Re:Baseball hats? by lhand · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My son (who joined the Navy three months ago) told me this amusing tidbit he learned about the services: The Navy has more planes than the Air Force; the Army has more boats than the Navy. Go figure.

    64. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh yeah? Why does the enterprise go WHOOSH when it flies by then?

    65. Re:Baseball hats? by WNight · · Score: 2

      So does the navy... think of what they have to hide in.

    66. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are a stupid fucking cunt, aren't you?

      Love and kisses,
      Big-'O' Bin Laden

    67. Re:Baseball hats? by snake_dad · · Score: 2

      You should see the hat that I had to wear when I was in the blue uniform in the Dutch Airforce (most of the time I was allowed to wear green 'though..). Anyway, we called it a "cowcunt" (literal translation). Don't even try to imagine how it looked... :-/

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    68. Re:Baseball hats? by Eil · · Score: 2


      I think it's safe to say that Rodenberry (or whoever designed the rank system on ST) based it upon the US Navy. Being that the Navy is the only service with Ensigns, Admirals, etc.

      The other three main branches' ranks are standardised with respect to each other. For example, a Captain is equal to other Captains everywhere but in the Navy. The Navy rank of Captain is a much higher rank (equivalent to Colonel, I think).

    69. Re:Baseball hats? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Like the goatse guy, only in blue?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    70. Re:Baseball hats? by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      I warned you: do not even _try_ to imagine it

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    71. Re:Baseball hats? by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 1
      Would aboard ship be considered indoors?

      Depends where on the ship you are. The hangar bay of an aircraft carrier is considered "outdoors" as far as proper military attire is concerned.

      --

      --
      You sure got a purty mouth...

    72. Re: Baseball hats? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Ships. They're called ships. Boats are submarines. And the difference between a boat and a submarine is simple...ships are targets.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    73. Re:Baseball hats? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Well...there is a US Naval Space Command, and also a US Army Space Command, and also an Airforce Space Command.

    74. Re:Baseball hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Christ you're lame! How can you be posting to a Star Trek thread and not know the significance of a red shirt (as explained fairly well by Mr. Trout there).

      And then to get cross about it...wanker...

  5. UPN doesn't have it exclusively... by B00yah · · Score: 4, Informative

    at least not here in St. Louis...Our local "we run anything we want, but claim to be WB" network has Enterprise debuting Saturday...they also have rights to run other "UPN" shows, like WWF Smackdown...

    1. Re:UPN doesn't have it exclusively... by (startx) · · Score: 1

      hurray for KPLR

      *this texted added to circumvent lameness filter....*

    2. Re:UPN doesn't have it exclusively... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      at least not here in St. Louis...Our local "we run anything we want, but claim to be WB" network has Enterprise debuting Saturday...they also have rights to run other "UPN" shows, like WWF Smackdown...
      It's probably just an arrangement similar to what was done with Voyager in areas where there's no UPN affiliate...sell it to one of the other stations in first-run syndication, like was done with TNG and DS9.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:UPN doesn't have it exclusively... by alien88 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i don't get upn either, but we have a upn affilate that covers it on saturday night's.. but it sucks i can't see it tonight. UPN affilate's don't follow the same schedule, but can use stuff that permier's on UPN.

    4. Re:UPN doesn't have it exclusively... by DraconPern · · Score: 1

      Ok... This blows.

  6. Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Synithium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone notice that the commercials for this thing are less and less Star Trek and more and more Lexx meets Farscape.

    1. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by millz · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. The first time i saw a preview I was positive that it was another sci-fi show. Maybe it was the music (and the blue chick).

    2. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by CTho9305 · · Score: 0

      :-( i agree completely... the ads sucked

    3. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Spoing · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Anyone notice that the commercials for this thing are less and less Star Trek and more and more Lexx meets Farscape.

      We can hope -- though I doubt it. Besides the blue alien in the cat suit I've seen in the commercials, I doubt that Paramount will do much to match the main attraction of the other shows. Sex is important (7of9) but if that's going to be it pr0n is a better use of my time.

      Farscape, Lexx, Earth: Final Conflict, and B5 have a progression from episode to episode. None of the Treks have, except for an attempt with DS9 that really could have been stronger.

      Here's a clue for Paramount; make us care about the major characters, kill one/some of them off, and then keep them dead .

      Is this necessary? Nope. Yet, of each of the shows above, only Lexx -- an un-ST like show if there ever was -- hasn't killed off a major character perminately. If they aren't even going to try to get beyond the ST formula, I'd hope that they wouldn't even try.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    4. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Farscape, Lexx, Earth: Final Conflict, and B5 have a progression from episode to episode. None of the Treks have, except for an attempt with DS9 that really could have been stronger.

      That does hurt you in re-runs though. Of the five shows mentioned, I can only be bothered "dipping in" to Farscape and Lexx. Even the mighty B5 loses it's punch when taken out of context.

      • only Lexx hasn't killed off a major character perminately

      Huh? Kai is dead, and Zev is a vegetable. Oh, wait, you mean, stop giving them lines... ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard, expect the same of the show itself. They're trying to distance themselves from the trappings of Star Trek (they explicitly mention the cliche of "magic" technology as the solution to everything - perhaps realistic for the 24th century, but a bit too distant from the imagniations of today's audiences). They are also trying to draw parallels to the onrush of the unfamiliar in today's world: the technology is here, but not many are truly familiar with it (unfortunately, despite the benefits of familiarization).

    6. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Plus the fact that I keep seeing the ads for it on Sci-Fi.

    7. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by rosewood · · Score: 1

      Tasha Yar died, didn't she?

    8. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ST formula you mentioned doesn't exist.

      Never in Star Trek or TNG has a major character died permanantly. I can recall Dr. McCoy getting killed on that fantasy planet, and Chekov got killed atleast twice, once in a wild-west illusion of all things.

      TNG pulled a similar stunt with Tasha Yarr. Killing her off and writing her back in as her daughter is absolutely stupid.

    9. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because Denise Crosby wanted off of the show; didn't think it was going anywhere. She now regrets that.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 2

      B5 was a great experiment in Sci-Fi TV. It will influence future shows in the genre; it is influencing current shows.

      But you can't solve a Star Trek problem with a B5 solution :).

      Part of the appeal of Star Trek is the strictly episodic nature -- you tune in to a rerun, and you don't have to sit and ponder for 10 minutes "Where in the myth-arc is this episode?" You just settle in and enjoy the story.

      Would I love to see a B5-style story done in the Star Trek universe? Hell yeah. I'd love to see a B5-style story run in any universe -- it was a great example of a style of storytelling which we're drastically lacking. But I don't necesssarily expect any Star Trek show to scratch that itch any time soon.

      Instead, I watch Sopranos. It may not have a clearly defined 5-year story like B5, but each season feels like a long miniseries rather than a string of barely-related episodes....

      --
      Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
    11. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but she sucked major patoot. Worf could have rocked her any day. It was the dawn of a new era because they didn't do any more original series-type shows anymore.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    12. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Flower · · Score: 1

      And they used a time-travel paradox to save Tasha so they could bring the actress back as Tasha's half-Romulan daughter.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    13. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Yet, of each of the shows above, only Lexx -- an un-ST like show if there ever was -- hasn't killed off a major character perminately.

      Well, except for the one that's been dead the whole time. :-)

      Seriously, it's hard to kill off a main character when you've only got three. Five, if you count the robot head and the ship, but they can't very well kill off the Lexx...

    14. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1
      Never in Star Trek or TNG has a major character died permanantly. I can recall Dr. McCoy getting killed on that fantasy planet, and Chekov got killed atleast twice, once in a wild-west illusion of all things.

      Is this just a sci fi thing? I can think of several non-sci fi tv shows that killed off main characters. Successful, well-liked main characters. People were upset, but got over it.

      ...laura who still prefers Rachel over Alex

    15. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Guns+n'+Roses+Troll · · Score: 0

      Can we have sex?

    16. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Is this just a sci fi thing? I can think of several non-sci fi tv shows that killed off main characters. Successful, well-liked main characters. People were upset, but got over it.

      Only sci fi and fantasy shows have the ability to buckle under to fan pressure and resurrect a dead character. Other shows have to go into horribly convoluted and unlikely plot twists to bring a dead character back, like "long-lost twin" or "the last few episodes were all a dream," which the fans may dislike more than the death of the character. A sci fi or fantasy show can just bring in the resurrection device, and *poof* the character is back, better than ever!

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    17. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Denise Crosby wanted off of the show; didn't think it was going anywhere.

      And the show was all the better from having her gone. She was, without a doubt, one of the worst fucking actresses ever to stink up a Star Trek set.

    18. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      And the show was all the better from having her gone. She was, without a doubt, one of the worst fucking actresses ever to stink up a Star Trek set.
      Well, those early scripts wern't exactly great material to work with.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    19. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't, she fucking sucked.

    20. Re:Looks like another Sci-Fi wannabe show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They brought her back, much later, and she STILL FUCKING SUCKED!!!!1

  7. The least you could do for your new Captain... by imac.usr · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is spell his name correctly......

    (stupid lameness filter!)

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
    1. Re:The least you could do for your new Captain... by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 1

      It's a well-known fact that Taco will only approve submissions with at least one glaring spelling/grammar mistake. That way his errors don't look quite as bad...

  8. USAToday Review by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 5, Informative


    There is a pretty favorable review in USAToday that mentions among other things that this crew is a little weary of new items such as "Phase Pistols" and "Transporters"....It gets 3 stars out of 4.
    Can someone tell me why this did not get picked up by a more respectful network?

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:USAToday Review by Thanatos · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because Paramount owns the rights to the Trek franchise. ergo, United _Paramount_ Network

    2. Re:USAToday Review by Genom · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Can someone tell me why this did not get picked up by a more respectful network?

      Sure. The Star Trek franchise is owned by Paramount, who also owns UPN (United Paramount Network). Since it's their show, it's shown on their network, because if it's any good, they want the credit for it. (And if it's bad, noone will care, because UPN basically stinks anyway)

    3. Re:USAToday Review by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Informative

      The P in UPN stands for Paramount, which owns the rights to the Star Trek genre...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:USAToday Review by dinivin · · Score: 1

      (And if it's bad, noone will care, because UPN basically stinks anyway)

      But UPN now has one of the best shows on TV: Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

      Dinivin

    5. Re:USAToday Review by interiot · · Score: 2

      Buffy and Enterprise are exclusively on UPN. My local cable provider picked up UPN a couple weeks ago. I imagine UPN was hoping for this sort of thing to happen.

    6. Re:USAToday Review by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • The P in UPN stands for Paramount, which owns the rights to the Star Trek genre

      Hmm, if it's really as cheesy as it looks, does that mean I'll get the re-runs on both the Sci-Fi channel and Paramount Comedy? ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:USAToday Review by trance · · Score: 0

      Because UPN is (if i remember correctly) Owned by Paramount .. which i'm fairly sure is who ones the rights to star trek.. alot of maybes, but i think this is why (don't have the time right now to confirm that information at all though)

      --
      Art is not a mirror, art is a hammer.
    8. Re:USAToday Review by Evro · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me why this did not get picked up by a more respectful network?

      Paramount owns Star Trek. UPN = United Paramount Network. So they air it on the network they own. UPN was the network on which Voyager aired. Capisce?

      --
      rooooar
    9. Re:USAToday Review by steddyj · · Score: 1

      "Can someone tell me why this did not get picked up by a more respectful network? "
      I know that it's distressing that Enterprise is on UPN, but the fact remains that UPN stands for the United Paramount Network, as in Paramount Pictures, as in We-Hold-All-The-Rights-So-It's-On-Our-Network
      Other than being the ONLY show I watch on UPN, as Voyager before it, I can't wait to see this.

    10. Re:USAToday Review by mcoko · · Score: 1

      Because Paramount own the Star Trek Franchise and UPN

      --
      www.fotoforay.com
    11. Re:USAToday Review by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, but does UPN ever come out with good shows of it's own. I can't remember any off the top of my head (aside from the Star Trek's it produces, IMO they're all great, it's just that Voyager was not nearly as great as, well any of them).
      Still, I'll be recording the show tonight.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    12. Re:USAToday Review by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      It's on Space and the other various CHUM-city holdings up here in good old Canada.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    13. Re:USAToday Review by Drakino · · Score: 4, Informative
      Can someone tell me why this did not get picked up by a more respectful network?

      Because Viacom decided to keep Paramount shows on United Paramount Network instead of moving them to CBS. The FCC allowed Viacom to own two broadcast networks, overruling some old law stating a company can only have one. (UPN is broadcast in several places, it's a higher channel number here in Colorado Springs).

    14. Re:USAToday Review by jnik · · Score: 1
      among other things that this crew is a little weary of new items such as "Phase Pistols" and "Transporters"

      No kidding. Now, I have no idea how much Enterprise is going to play with the Star Trek canon (such as it is), but NCC-1701 was the first Federation ship with transporters that took seconds rather than minutes. Still felt like you were dying, but this time there was less chance that you actually did die.

    15. Re:USAToday Review by Jburkholder · · Score: 1
      >this crew is a little weary of new items

      weary or wary?

      someone told me they heard the crew is hesitant to step onto a transporter pad as it has a 0.5% failure rate.

      "So, um Scotty... exactly _how_ long has it been since there was a tranporter incident?"

      "Oh, we've had about 1,500 successful beamings since we accidentally dispersed Lt. Johnson over a 5000 meter area in quadrant 15!"

      "Oh good, should be quite a while yet before we can expect another interruption in surface. Landing party to the transporter room!"

      "Uh, can't we just take the shuttlecraft again this time?"

      "wuss"

    16. Re:USAToday Review by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

      Exacltly. The only reason I never watched Voyager was because I didn't get it. The only reason I never watched DS9 was because it was on at 10:30 Saturday night, competing with SNL. Seriously, if Paramount cared about the show as much as the show's profits, they'd put in a decent time and place, instead of on a second-rate channel.

    17. Re:USAToday Review by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Don't underestimate the power of the Buff. When we lost our only WB affiliate, the local Fox station started pulling double duty running WB at midnight. Eventually, they went so far as to create a cable-only WB channel for our area (ironcally about the same time Buffy was moved to UPN).

      If Enterprise is any good, and Buffy doesn't suddenly go down the toilet, UPN could wind up being the "geek network" instead of ..err ...whatever it is now. (The suck network? The ex-FL channel(#2)? The sleep-along with Voyager channel?...)

    18. Re:USAToday Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exacltly. The only reason I never watched Voyager was because I didn't get it. The only reason I never watched DS9 was because it was on at 10:30 Saturday night, competing with SNL. Seriously, if Paramount cared about the show as much as the show's profits, they'd put in a decent time and place, instead of on a second-rate channel.

      Blame your provider. It's not paramounts fault they haven't picked them up yet.

    19. Re:USAToday Review by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can someone tell me why this did not get picked up by a more respectful network?

      The demographic of 30-45 year old male virgins isn't a big money maker?

    20. Re:USAToday Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live, it's showing on 4 channels at 3 different times. It's even on City TV, which means no cable required. Excellent.

    21. Re:USAToday Review by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's another question - what's so "United" about the United Paramount Network? Were there several Paramount Networks (or other things) before UPN "united" them? Is it like The I in IHOP, where it doesn't mean anything? Or did they think they would have an advantage over "the WB" if they had three letters like the big 4 networks (or 3+Fox if you prefer)?

      Schnapple

    22. Re:USAToday Review by nmx · · Score: 1

      Nowhere Man was an original UPN series, and it kicked ass. They canned it after only one season, unfortunately.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try."
    23. Re:USAToday Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> (UPN is broadcast in several places, it's a higher channel number here in Colorado Springs)

      ... and is not avaliable on C-band Sat. :-(

  9. It premiered last night in Canada by jonfromspace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, we got something first!

    Seriously, though... I watched the 2 hour premier last night, and I will say this - It was pretty darn good. They have done an excellent job of "dumbing down" the technology, and the cast is pretty interesting. Combine that with the promis of some good-ol space violence, and you've got a winner.

    --
    I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    1. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live, and what channel was it on??? In T.O. it starts tonight on CityTV

    2. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      You bastards! We won't get it for at least six months in the UK, so I'll just have to moan and bitch about how it's not as good as The Original Series without even having the opportunity to refuse to watch it!

      Really though, is it any better (or grimier) than Farscape or even Andromeda? From what I've seen so far, the cast looks anodyne, the plots predictable and your "promise" of good-ol space violence doesn't sound as though they had actual good-ol space violence.

      Basically, I want to see Archer kick a giant lizard in the love spuds, chuck one up a seven breasted alien bimbo, fight off a Gooboid battle fleet, and then vapourise a couple of small planets just for laughs - and all before breakfast. Any chance of that?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by jonfromspace · · Score: 1

      "A" Channel in Calgary :)

      Wierd that City is showing it tonight, yet Space is premiering it on Saturday... Same owner I believe (CHUM-City)

      --
      I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    4. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, no it wasn't. And here's why (WARNING, SPOILERS!!! LEAVING WHITESPACE!)








      There.

      I almost liked it. Almost. But no, the typical Berman BS that turned me off of Voyager so thourougly.

      Let me elaborate:
      First, the Seven of Nine element is still there, only now in the form of a Vulcan Science Officer (wow, that's a new one). When the crew gets 'stumped', she pulls her great Vulcan abilities ouf of air and despite the 'inferior' human technology, she gets it done right. Just like Seven of Nine and whatever plot hole of the week her Borg abilities provided.

      Second, the 'uber-aliens'. I won't describe them , but worry not, they're lame and so amazingly Eeeevil that it makes me sick. Babylon 5 knew how to handle uber-aliens.. in that they never gave them screen time where they plot for the benifit of people who can't handle the fact that things might happen behind the scenes!

      I could say some more, but I'll leave you to puke at it yourself tonight.

    5. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by jswitte · · Score: 2, Interesting
      > We won't get it for at least six months in the UK, so I'll just have to moan and bitch about how

      Six months!! God, why is the EU suing Hollywood over DVD prices? (Not that I don't think that's a good thing(TM)) Why not sue over such scheduling nonsense as this?

      PS. I'm live in the US, but I'm getting pissed off with corporate America (mainly Hollywood and the big-media industries) and am ready for the US to be knocked off its collective pedestal for a change. At least for the corporate class to be knocked off its pedestal..

      Jim Witte

    6. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Gish · · Score: 0

      It was pretty good I have to say.
      But what was with that theme song? The intro is good with lots of images and such but the song really dosen't fit at all.
      Guess we'll have to live with that.

    7. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by wurp · · Score: 1

      Try looking around on one of the FastTrack clients. I'll bet you can find a bootleg of it soon, maybe now.

    8. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by harmonica · · Score: 2

      You bastards! We won't get it for at least six months in the UK, so I'll just have to moan and bitch about how it's not as good as The Original Series without even having the opportunity to refuse to watch it!

      That's nothing. Here, the shows are dubbed and suck big time. We never get to hear the English original version. In countries like the Netherlands there are just subtitles, so you can still hear the original. Stupid tv stations...

    9. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Sir_Real · · Score: 2

      What is FastTrack? Could you provide a link? I don't get UPN... :(

    10. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by ari{Dal} · · Score: 1

      heh. i love living in Canada.
      I saw it last night (just happened to be flipping through the channel listings and spotted it...) and well...
      I must admit the vulcan character is much too Seven of Nine for my liking (right down to the moulded breasts in the skintight spacesuit). But I think it has potential.
      It was a pilot episode after all, and it's going to take some time to mesh properly. But once it does, i can see it being quite enjoyable. I even like scott's captain (i know.. he's not a favourite, but he IS the regular army type guy that might pilot the first space missions).
      Although I wasn't totally enraptured by the first episode, I do have hope that it'll eventually become a great series.

      --
      Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
    11. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Coz · · Score: 1

      Basically, I want to see Archer kick a giant lizard in the love spuds, chuck one up a seven breasted alien bimbo, fight off a Gooboid battle fleet, and then vapourise a couple of small planets just for laughs - and all before breakfast. Any chance of that?

      Not much - this ship's popguns can't even vaporize a small moon, let alone a planet.

      I wouldn't want anything "grimier" than Farscape - some fo the effects on that show have been more than disgusting, even if entirely plausible. Andromeda has been very uneven, IMHO.

      What I want... is a show I can watch with my kids, and have the innuendo and sexual content go right over their heads while they enjoy the spaceships/aliens/shoot-'em-ups/etc. The way I did with my parents, way back when. It doesn't have to have a 5-year epic arc like Babylon 5 - it just has to be fun TV that we can talk about for the next 20 years.

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    12. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Here, the shows are dubbed and suck big time

      Where's "here"?

      OT, but did you know that when Xena: Warrior Princess gets exported to countries with conservative attitudes (read: Islamic), they zoom right in on the faces during all the action sequences so you can't see what's going on. I dunno if it's wierder that they do that, or that they bother to show it at all.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by shokwav · · Score: 1

      I liked the fact that there is a good old gun battle that you would not normally see on the other shows. Not as polished as the later UFP crews.

    14. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by wurp · · Score: 2

      Oh, sorry. FastTrack is the network protocol used by KaZaA (it's laden with spyware crap, but it's a no-brainer to use on Windows and supports multi-source downloads well), giFT (an open source client), Morpheus, and Grokster (don't know anything about these two).

      From what I'm told, it shares the files over port 80 so wget will get files from a FastTrack peer. The really great thing about it is the multi-source download. I can get full use of my bandwidth at home while I download the 300meg+ video files from multiple users. Of course, I only download bits to which I have a legal right.

    15. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Six months!! God, why is the EU suing Hollywood over DVD prices? (Not that I don't think that's a good thing(TM)) Why not sue over such scheduling nonsense as this?

      Different network, commercial reality. The price drops over time, I expect, and the UK is a pretty cheapo country. But, I know, I know, don't get me started... ;)

      On the bright side, at least we get Lord of the Rings day 1, so I won't have to hide under the bed for a couple of months. ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    16. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by nhavar · · Score: 2

      You need to be watching cartoon network then. Repleat with fun for kids and over-the-head sexual inuendo (Power Puff Girls)

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    17. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by jamesidm · · Score: 1

      kazaa/morpheus/gift

      www.kazaa.com or www.morpheus.com (i think) for windows

      search sourceforge for giFT for unix and java versions

    18. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez! Yes, Sky wont be showing it until 2002, but get yourself on Usenet. It's good for something!

      Get over to alt.binaries.multimedia or alt.binaries.startrek with a news reader than can manage multi part posting, leech the episode (Usually in MPEG-2 or DivX;-) ), UnRar them, and watch it. I did it for the entire last season of Voyager, and i'll damn well do it again for Enterprise :)

    19. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Tim+Doran · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "It was a pilot episode after all, and it's going to take some time to mesh properly."

      No kidding. Remember the pilot of TNG? Remember Jordi strolling onto the set and exclaiming "Hoooo-eee!" He only needed bib overalls and a stalk of hay in his mouth to complete the image.

      Agonizing to look back upon, but the show improved drastically and quickly.

      (Oh god - rereading this post, I've come to realize... I AM a geek! ;)

    20. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Coz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'd like to be able to watch something _other_ than cartoons :)

      We ration our daughter's TV viewing, and about 80% of her current ration is educational TV cartoons - Arthur, Dragon Tales, etc. (she's only 5). If I ever showed her Cartoon Network, I'd have to buy another converter box to get to see what I want to see during the time when she _can_ watch.

      Not that I don't enjoy the occasional episode of The Tick, or Bugs - it's just that I don't want her running around yelling "Spoon!" at kindergarden.

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    21. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's likely to be just a couple of months. Still pretty shitty, but it's not as bad as it used to be before the (normally hated) Sky satellite TV arrived. We waited about 3 years before the BBC decided to show the TNG.

    22. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by cornflux · · Score: 1
      Basically, I want to see Archer kick a giant lizard in the love spuds, chuck one up a seven breasted alien bimbo, fight off a Gooboid battle fleet, and then vapourise a couple of small planets just for laughs - and all before breakfast. Any chance of that?

      hahaha. that reminds me of Red Dwarf. ahhh... the Boys from the `Dwarf... good stuff.

    23. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by secolactico · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched Star Trek in a long, long time. Ocassionaly I catch glimpses of other ST spinoffs (Voyager, DS9, etc) but I con't really care about them, so I guess I'm out of circulations here.

      My question: What is "The Seven of Nine" element, anyway?

      --
      No sig
    24. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Sir_Real · · Score: 2

      This is going to sound stupid.... Is it legal to download this show (Enterprise)? If it's not, would it be legal if the commercials were included in the file? I'm not worried about running afoul of the law, but I am curious...

      Thanks for the reply,
      Andrew

    25. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by leonhsu · · Score: 1

      many shows will appear on canadian television earlier in the week than they do in the US. when CBC or CTV or whomever guys the rights to air it in Canada, there is often no rule about when they show the episode.

      it's even funnier when you watch a show on the canadian network, then the next day, see the "world premier" on a US channel ... :)

      --
      --
    26. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by wurp · · Score: 2

      I'm quite sure that it's not legal, considering the trouble some folks have gotten into for rebroadcasting TV signals over the internet.

      I'm not at all sure that I understand the mindset. If the commercials are included, why would you not want more viewers? Personally, I think the big media corporations have morons making their policy. I have tried very hard to understand how their policies benefit even the policy-makers.

    27. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What is "The Seven of Nine" element, anyway?


      Large breasts, nice ass, tight uniform

      Fair acting ability, nice tits, fair stories based on her character, really nice ass

      and nice tits.

    28. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm not at all sure that I understand the mindset. If the commercials are included, why would you not want more viewers?

      The same reason satellite TV is not allowed to carry the networks in most areas. The local channels want to be able to put their commercials into the broadcast, which they can't do if everyone is watching an internet recording of one particular broadcast. Any one local channel would love to offer thir channel over the internet, but none of them want any other channel to do it. So they made it law that nobody could.

      Plus, they'd have to pay the union members from both the show and the commercials more money for each additional "broadcast" of the show.

      Plus, they hate their customers.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    29. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but then again, Islam is merely intolerant hatred and fascism wrapped up in a Yashmak.

      What other people, when asked "Why is there racism and religious prejudice in the world?" would reply with "Because of the Jews"?

    30. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by ethereal · · Score: 1
      Not that I don't enjoy the occasional episode of The Tick, or Bugs - it's just that I don't want her running around yelling "Spoon!" at kindergarden.

      I imagine that she will quickly train the boys to yell "Not in the face, not in the face!" ;)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    31. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by wurp · · Score: 1

      Cocksuckers.

    32. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CBC shows no American network programming. CTV and Global do show American programming, but rarely is it on a different day, and most often at the same time so that they can broadcast over the american stations copy.

      And a "world premier" will never be shown earlier in Canada, hence "world".

    33. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by harmonica · · Score: 2

      Where's "here"?

      Germany. Where everybody learns English in school but everything gets translated anyway. :-(

    34. Re:It premiered last night in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. On the other hand, I have a choice of three, from my ISP, a dedicated news-account with another ISP, and the news server from the ISP on which I have a shell account.

      Wray for me.

  10. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inventive and interesting tv shows?

    Is anyone else tired of the same old rehashed crap?

  11. Star Trek is about Superheros... by Wind_Walker · · Score: 1, Interesting
    ...and that's what concerns me about the current series. It seems to me that Paramount and/or the creative team in charge of the Star Trek franchise is deliberately trying to downplay the essence of Star Trek as not just about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances but about being able to fantasize about superheroes.

    I argue the story of Star Trek: The Original Series is not about Kirk, it's about Spock. And from my perspective, Spock is a superhero. He can read minds. He's stronger than the average human. He has extreme intelligence and knowledge. Spock's abilities quite frequently solve the episode's problem.

    Similarly Star Trek: The Next Generation has Data, even stronger than Spock. Deep Space Nine has the shapeshifter Odo. Odo is not quite as impressive as Data, so notice that Paramount has to make emergency repairs midway in the show bringing back the character of Worf, now the unbeatable fighting knight-equivalent. And Bashir has to be souped up to have extreme intelligence.

    With Star Trek I The Motion Picture, Wesley in The Next Generation, and Sisko in Deep Space Nine, Paramount establishes quite a string of humans becoming gods/prophets.

    And then there's Voyager. The Data character is degraded into the balding holographic Doctor. Kes is the female Wesley who eventually becomes a godlike being, only she's too wimpy to do anything before she leaves. The series is teetering on collapse when Paramount finally makes the sensible decision to return to the roots and bring in a new superhero, 7 of 9. Once again we have a figure who is stronger than the average human, knows more, and is struggling to deal with emotions.

    I am frustrated by what seems to be an endless repeating cycle where Paramount continues to deny the essence of the show as being about superheroes, lets the series tank a couple of years, and then finally rescues the show by increasing the powers of the characters. I think that the claim of many fans that it takes a few years for the writers to get acclimated is a myth. The writers aren't given the raw materials to work with to produce entertaining superhero stories for the first few years, then they are authorized to use good materials, then the episodes improve. They could write a thousand stories about Harry Kim or Tom Paris or whatever vanilla characters they want and never find a groove. It's strictly a decision from above when the series is to improve, and that decision is simply whether to soup up the characters as superheroes.

    As UPN was saved by adding the World Wrestling Federation's Smackdown to their lineup, maybe they can learn what makes this show successful. It's called by the wrestling fans BOOKING. Yes, it is the responsibility of the owner/promoter to make decisions to hype one wrestler over another, to promote certain wrestlers above all others for long stretches of time. The World Wrestling Federation the past two decades has been carried first by the character of Hulk Hogan, then Stone Cold Steve Austin, and now The Rock. Perhaps with careful booking in the future it will be Kurt Angle or HHH.

    There is already another niche where people who are sort of ordinary interact in a tension-filled extraordinary situation. It's called reality television. It's Survivor, Big Brother, etc. Star Trek can't match that, Star Trek doesn't pretend to be giving ordinary people off the street a shot at fame and fortune. Star Trek has to create its fantasies in a different way. It has to be booked in a different fashion, to emphasize certain characters as superheroes.

    Don't get me wrong: I'll still be glued to the b00b-tube tonight; I always give things a shot. I'm just worried that it won't live up to expectations.

    1. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the post above about inventive and interesting things. This post does not fall into either category.

      We read it before! Give it up!

    2. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by SonofRage · · Score: 1

      I am frustrated by what seems to be an endless repeating cycle where Paramount continues to deny the essence of the show as being about superheroes

      Why do you care what Paramount thinks the essense of the show is? You say you are worried that it won't live up to expectations because they won't admit they need a "superhero", yet you give several examples of shows that started out without one and added them later.

    3. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To a certain extent, you're right. Star Trek is about the heroes doing things that are impossible in our reality.

      But what's happened in the last 20 years is that heroes have turned from "people who can do anything and never get hurt", to "people who are like you and me but pull it through just barely".

      Who's more exciting - Indiana Jones, who gets the crap kicked out of him for 75% of the movie, then starts kicking ass, or to watch Superman shrug off bullets or never get hurt? I'll take Dr. Jones any day of the week (and twice on Sundays).

      So I'm actually applauding Paramounts change of direction to more "ordinary" people who will become more than human through their trials and experiences.

      Just as long as they never need the Girdle....

      Of course, I could be wrong.

    4. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "lets the series tank a couple of years, and then finally rescues the show by increasing the powers of the characters"

      I predict thay Paramount will eventually retool Scott Blackula's character back to his previous role as a 70's blaxploitation vampire. As seen in:

      Blackula
      Blackula Returns
      Blackula Meets Superfly
      Blackula II: Wrath of Chaka Khan

    5. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by On+Lawn · · Score: 2

      Heh, sometimes AC's are good for something. Yeah I remember seeing this before also. I think he has a point, but it may be over milked by now.

      Also, Kirk is in many ways a Super Hero. In the rpg he is given a very large luck factor (helping him out in Corbomite Bluffs) and he can beat Spock in chess and is at least equal in physical combat.

      But as another person who replied to this before pointed out the most insightful idea IMHO, that Star Trek is about Super Ego, Ego, and ID, etc... and how they interact in different situations. Thats what I liked about it.

    6. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma Whore!
      Must have a file with previous ./ posts.
      Moderators should realize this is a cut & paste job.

    7. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by S810 · · Score: 1

      I have never thought about it that way before, but you have a point!

      But remember this: Star Trek is Really about Gene Rodenberry's vision of the future. His hard science and science fiction comming together in a seemless manner. There will be an equivilent to Nurse Nancy and Security Officer 4, who always dies or gets injured early on. This is what Star Trek is all about!

      --
      "I think you know what I'm talkin' about, Mr. President; We're gonna kill us a mummy!" - Bruce Campbell as Elvis Presley
    8. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by moonboy · · Score: 5, Insightful



      Nice idea, but I always thought that Star Trek (the entire franchise) in all of it's incarnations, was about teamwork . It's always been about people coming together to get the job done. Regardless of color, creed, religion, etc. This is what I always loved about it. The super hero's you speak of were all flawed in some way and could not get the job done without the entire team. Everyone contributed.

      Spock (my personal favorite) had superior strength and intellect, but at times he was too logical. This was his "achilles heel". Data, was much the same.

      Capt.'s Kirk, Picard, and Janeway (pardon me forgetting the DS9 captain's name...didn't really watch it) were the leaders that pulled together the strengths of the team to get the job done, often in the most harrowing of circumstances.

      So, I think you are right about the hero part, just not the super hero part. All of the characters were hero's in their own way. They all braved the "unknown" and faced their worst fears.

      This is heroism.

      --

      Co-founder and designer at Music Nearby: http://musicnearby.com
    9. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by 2Flower · · Score: 1

      I probably won't get modded up tremendously, but may I bow before you in respect for pointing out how well wrestling booking paralells modern day television program story planning? 'cause I'm gonna bow anyway.

      A lot of Voyager's problems actually map one-to-one to some of the WWF's biggest blunders. Injury angles (and in Voyager's case, even stories where someone dies) watered down by a miraculous last minute healing or similar cheap dodge. Bringing in outside talent (7 of 9) and giving them a push to the moon to spurn audience interest in a generally lackluster cast... the list goes on.

      Further proof that good writing = good writing, and bad writing = bad writing, regardless of what kind of show you're doing it for. Star Trek Enterprise has a ways to go to prove it's going to sustain audience interest and ratings, and they could learn a thing or two from one of the longest running shows on television that's also had to adapt with the times and adapt with its audience; the WWF.

    10. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      As UPN was saved by adding the World Wrestling Federation's Smackdown to their lineup, maybe they can learn what makes this show successful.


      Do you suggest a Star Trek crew time-warp into a Smackdown session? I'd like to hear John-Luc "The Bald Bomber" Picard talking some smack.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    11. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by tb3 · · Score: 2

      hard science Huh? You mean warp drive, dilithium crystals, force fields, transporters, phasers, time travel, artifical gravity, sound in space, or aliens speaking english? Star Trek has some good qualities, but adhering to science isn't one of them.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    12. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by BubbaFett · · Score: 1

      Voyager is heroic in the classical sense. They get lost and encounter strange things trying to find their way home. Sounds a lot like The Odyssey.

    13. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Star Trek is about breats. Big honking borg implanted globes of love!

    14. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by KelsoLundeen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember, too, the other series currently under development -- Star Trek: People Hut.

      My group is working with the Paramount trek development group -- so some of this is subject to change -- but we're aiming 'People Hut' at folks who (unlike the original poster) believes that Star Trek is about people crammed in a small, metallic space -- a space within "deep space," you might say. We do, at any rate.

      Anyway, we're also currently brainstorming and working with the Roddenberry tech-dev wing at Paramount, but People Hut -- tentatively -- is set to premier in 2004. We're thinking about taking a group of unemployed air traffic controllers -- the ones fired by Reagan about 20 years ago -- who have all sorts of dreams and longings for deep space.

      People Hut, literally, would start in the living room of one the unemployed controllers and would focus in on the lives of these folks as they get closer to building their own little ship. (Sort of like 'Salvage One' from a long time ago -- you remember that? With Andy Griffith? And the girl that was in 'Escape from Witch Mountain'? They built a ship that looked like a thimble with a balloon on it and then zoomed off for various missions.)

      Anyway, our 'ST:PH' would chronicle the lives of these dreamers. The ups and the downs of family life -- what it would mean, in other words, to be a dreamer in the era of the Reaganomics -- and how those dreams impact everyone emotionally.

      Eventually they would christen their Sunday evening meeting the 'People Hut' where anyone -- not just unemployed air traffic controllers -- would come and chat about hopes, dreams, and deep space.

      One guy -- we're not sure who -- wins the lottery in Michigan (this is pre-Power Ball, remember) and then realizes that, at long last, his dreams have a bit of financial backing behind them.

      (We're thinking the lottery pay out would be around 12-15 million -- enough to build a ship and possibly hire some then-hot-shot Soviet scientists to defect and investigate various means of plasma transport -- the stuff that the Soviets were rumored to be working on before the break-up of the USSR.)

      Probably midway through the first season they'll launch the People Hut -- PH001 -- and go on a few adventures. Maybe check out the moon a little bit more -- pick up some of the trash left behind by the previous lunar missions -- and really try to clean things up. ST:PH -- if all goes according to plan -- will have a strong socio-economic context.

      If anyone is interested, I can detail a couple more advantures. Remember, lots of this is still under development. No green lights yet. Robert Downey, Jr is tentatively slated to play Captain O'Malley -- a grizzed Irish guy who invested his entire life in air-traffic control.

    15. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      And here I thought that being a web/Linux geek and being a wrestling fan were mutually exclusive. Hats off to both of you for making me feel like less of a turbo zoom dweebie.

      --MiB (Enterprise today, Smackdown/Football tomorrow, PHP programming in between!)

    16. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course it is. A lot of great Space Opera is.

      Spock and Data are pikers compared to Kim Kinnison, and the ones who've gained "godlike power" all leave the series.

      Sisko's "power" is hearing voices in his head, but even that makes him a step above the average man.

      But isn't that the point? From Gilgamesh to Robin Hood to Dartagnan to Michael Knight, western literature is about heroes. It always has been, and the best of it still continues to be.

    17. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Wesley+Everest · · Score: 1

      Except Voyager isn't a superhero show, it's Gilligan's Island in Space.

    18. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Kirk is NOT a match for Spock in physical combat. When Kirk had to get Spock angry to counter alien spores, Spock knocked Kirk from one end of the room to the other, and would have caved in Kirk's skull with a chair if he hadn't snapped out of it. Also, Kirk's the underdog in chess. He sometimes wins because he plays "illogically"

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    19. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by tb3 · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the Voyager episode guest-starring "The Rock". (I did, too, but I saw the promos).

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    20. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by startled · · Score: 2

      I agree that it's about people who are larger than life, but I strongly disagree with your exclusion of Kirk (and for that matter, Picard). Kirk was the quintessential frontier hero, the swaggering, brawling Tom Sawyer. Spock is obviously essential, but the series clearly expressed he wasn't the "born leader" type as Kirk was.

      ST:TNG was great because it completely transformed that world view. Instead of the frontiersman, we have the intellectual, the dramatist. He's no superhero, he's more human than human-- it's no coincidence that they cast someone who'd done a remarkable amount of Shakespeare.

      Admittedly, compared to these superhuman captains and superpowerful sidekicks, the latest ST characters have been quite dull. The problem isn't a lack of superpowers, though-- you can have a strong hero without any explicitly non-human abilities.

    21. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Tsian · · Score: 1

      Why am I getting Deja Vu when reading this?

    22. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      I love this guy... he's been on here several times now making this case. I laregely agree with him, and it's interesting to see his debate grow. TV's never really had any good "superhero" shows, that didn't feel they had to wrap themselves in simile and context. I'd love to see one of comicdom's best properties turned into an unabashed exploration of super hero themes AS A SUPER HERO SHOW!!!!

    23. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2

      I think what you're looking for is *interesting* characters, not necessarily superhuman ones.

      The problems with Deep Space 9 and Voyager were not because their 'superheroes' were weak, but that they just weren't interesting enough, and the few interesting characters that did exist could not carry the show all by themselves.

      The original series had interesting characters from the beginning (and TV standards then, it must be said, were more lax.) Next Generation stumbled for a while before the writers came up with ways to make the cast -- especially Picard -- interesting people to watch.

      Andromeda is good show, and it seems to fit your 'superhero' theory well -- absolutely every member of the crew has some exceptional ability. But none of them are able to easily defeat what comes at them, and in the end none of them are exceptional members of the universe in which they live. Their abilities make them *interesting*, that's all.
      Are the crew members of Enterprise interesting? I'll find out tonight. But personally, my biggest gripe with the Star Trek universe has never been with their characterization; I couldn't stand the moralistic plots, outrageous plot twists, and insultingly stupid technobabble. I'm interested to see if Enterprise can get over those problems that have plagued Star Trek for years.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    24. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Dissident · · Score: 1

      Wow! I totally agree with what you said about the superhero thing. I'd never really noticed it before but now that you spell it out that way... Good point!

    25. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by StormRider01 · · Score: 1

      That's why most of Jackie Chan's movies are so fun, he gets the crap kicked out of him, but eventually comes back to beat the bad guys.

    26. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by 1ione1 · · Score: 1

      Your thesis is well presented, and I agree that having a "superhero" character has been a recurring aspect, but it is not, as you say, the essence of Star Trek.

      Star Trek has been about exploring frontiers. Not only space, but the challenges we see from here on Earth today. Whether it is peacefully relating to races and cultures, resolving ethical dilemmas, overcoming hurdles, or growing as individuals and as a society, pushing these frontiers is the recurring theme of the franchise.

      If anything, the superhero aspect constantly causes problems for the show. Wesley in TNG was so perfect it was annoying, and his exit was conveniently arranged. When Kes started to become too powerful, she had to leave Voyager.

      Show too many capabilities, and when the character doesn't use that capability in another setting, it becomes unbelievable.

    27. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by up2ng · · Score: 0

      (Sort of like 'Salvage One' from a long time ago -- you remember that? With Andy Griffith? And the girl that was in 'Escape from Witch Mountain'? They built a ship that looked like a thimble with a balloon on it and then zoomed off for various missions.)

      "Salvage One" was about a Junkyard owner who wanted to build his own rocket to go to the moon !

      I just realized how old I really am now that
      I see it was from 1979 !

      --
      Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
    28. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      Wasn't that supposed to be "Akbar and Jeff: People Hut"?

    29. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Caraig · · Score: 1


      Spock and Data are pikers compared to Kim Kinnison, and the ones who've gained "godlike power" all leave the series.

      Ahhh... the Golden Age. Where the brave and bold Tellurians stood firm against a starkly monstrous and supremely, incontrovertably vicious foe, flinging actinic bolts from the refractory maws of their unbelievably powerful weapons, hurling the irresistable, ponderous mass of entire PLANETS at their enemies, amidst an astounding stream of adverbage! =)

      I've very fond memories of the Lensman series. I know, I know, "Muddied thinking, youth!"

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    30. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by On+Lawn · · Score: 2

      From the constant ribbing Kirk gives to Spock, and the way Spock takes it, one would get the impression that Spock generally loses. I don't know of a posting or mentioning anywhere their play stats.

      Also, Kirk and Spock have always fought to a draw. There were times that their was an escape before the conclusion (like you mention) or where the conclusion was a contrived part of the plan (Amok Time) but that Kirk seemed to last indefinately against Spock means to me it was a draw.

    31. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure I've seen this post before. In fact, a search turned up this post. Are you joneshenry being redundant, or is this plagiarism?

    32. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by uberdood · · Score: 1

      Except science is looking into this stuff:

      warp drive - variation on worm hole theory

      force fields - /. has run several threads on experiments at the atomic/small scale.

      transporters - last year there was some article in one of the sciece magazines about quantum atomic pairs theory

      phasers - er, where have you been? army's been playing with this stuff for a while now.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    33. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by thud2000 · · Score: 1

      From Gilgamesh to Robin Hood to Dartagnan to Michael Knight ...

      Hmmm ... Michael Knight, eh? One of these things is not like the others. How about this:

      From Smokey to the Duke Boys to Michael Knight to Viper, western literature is about kick-butt cars, preferably ones that can (a) talk or (b) morph, or at least jump over stuff or go up on two wheels. It always has been, and the best of it still continues to be.

      Ahhh, it rings so true.

    34. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by S810 · · Score: 1

      There is certainly true hard science associated with Star Trek. Don't deny it. You have mentioned the Sci-Fi of ST but don't discount the True Science that was part of creating this cult classic. When Gene R. was in the design phase of this he consulted many scientists and theorists alike. Obviously it is just a TV Show intended to be enjoyed. I have a degree in Astrophysics and a passion for Theoretical Physics. I am amazed at how right they are sometimes in the correct use of terminology and theory as well as true science application. Keep in mind that I am not talking about Warp Drive or Transporters but one day this may be fact and not fiction.

      --
      "I think you know what I'm talkin' about, Mr. President; We're gonna kill us a mummy!" - Bruce Campbell as Elvis Presley
    35. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Is that like the Pizza Hut advert where Spock says, 'Captain, I suggest we HIT THE HUT'?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    36. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by east_bay_pete · · Score: 1

      I've read this before, and I don't recall you as the author.

    37. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Zoop · · Score: 1

      Interesting, in my wildest dreams, I never thought that air traffic controllers (or anyone associated with the FAA, even tangentially) would be the key to space travel.

      "What do you mean, you want clearance for class D airspace above 24,000? We'll have to fine you if you go that high, class D or no."

      Defense contractor engineers put out of work by the end of the Cold War would be at least a little more plausible, plus give them access to out-of-work Soviet scientists.

      "Damn! I need a hammer, and we're down to our last $450. Can you get them used for less than $500?"
      "Da, comrade--as fraternal sacrifice, am sellink you mine for low, low price of $200, plus bottle of wodka."

    38. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I may be on shaky ground on the chess. I don't of any specific instances of Spock beating Kirk, but, given his superior intellegence, it might not be considered worth mentioning. Kirk beating Spock, OTOH, is noteworthy because it's unexpected.

      In fighting, off the top of my head, I can't think of any Kirk vs Spock fights besides the two already mentioned. In both of them Spock was winning(though there was no conclusive ending). Kirk does have the sheer grit to keep fighting even when he's clearly outclassed, but my money's on Spock.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    39. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by MeltyMan · · Score: 1

      Yep, I think we caught 'im. Slashdot's search leaves a LOT to be desired... (key words actually showing up in the results would be nice...) Otherwise we'd have some proof. :)

      --
      "Ummmm..." ...The programmer's "Om."
    40. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Sure wouldn't mind doing some teamwork on 7of9 ;-)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    41. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      Captain on DS9 was Sisko-- a really good series, IMHO, that should be given a chance in the movies (though, like the TV show, I question how much action they can manage on a space station). And of course, I keep forgetting if Sisko lived through the end of the series finale or not.. (it doesn't help, that for whatever reason, all of the affiliates DROPPED DS9 almost entirely after the series ended instead of showing repeats ala ST:TNG; especially true in Spokane, WA). Atleast there was a half-assed tie-in with DS9 in First Contact.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    42. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by RobMahan · · Score: 0

      And the scary thing is I would actually watch this - it sounds good....

      --
      I wanted a funny .sig but all I got was this lousy T-shirt
    43. Re:Star Trek is about Superheros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The dead cry out for vengeance:
      1. Kill all Muslims.
      2. Kill all Mohammedans.
      3. Kill all Arabs.
      4. Kill all Towel Heads.
      5. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
      6. Kill all Dune Coons.
      7. Kill all Islam.
      8. Nuke their countries to hell.
      9. Nuke them again.
      10. Death to Islam.

      I piss on Mecca. I menstruate on the Koran. I shit on Mohammed.

  12. grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more rougher

    someone needs to go back to school..

  13. also boohoo by RudeDude · · Score: 1

    Yeah, too bad UPN and WB don't "qualify" to be run on DirecTV. I'm even paying extra for the "local" channels (local to the Wash DC area) and I don't get either one! I guess it's time to rig up my own antenna for tonight!

    --
    RudeDude
    Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
    1. Re:also boohoo by 4iedBandit · · Score: 1

      Well you can come over to my place and watch it over Dish Network. =) Better yet, I get the UPN "super station" out of boston. I'll get to see it 2 hours before the rest of the Rocky Mountain region. =P

      --
      "The avalanch has already started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote." -Kosh
    2. Re:also boohoo by Thanatos · · Score: 1

      I get WB and UPN via DirecTV in NYC..

    3. Re:also boohoo by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      That's why I got DishNetwork. For ~ $5 a month, I get TBS, WSBK, WPIX, KTLA, WGN and WWOR. Hell, I rarely switch to the free cable TV that comes with the cable modem.

    4. Re:also boohoo by allism · · Score: 1

      Same in Denver area...we pay for local stations, but UPN and WB are not included. We bought an antenna but the picture is ghosty and blurry...which brought up the question, was non-cable, non-satellite TV always that way? (It's been so long since either of us have watched a non-cable, non-satellite broadcast that we couldn't remember.)...or maybe due to the advent of cable, 'local' stations don't feel the need to have a roaring strong signal?

    5. Re:also boohoo by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      We bought an antenna but the picture is ghosty and blurry...which brought up the question, was non-cable, non-satellite TV always that way?

      Pretty much. You didn't say what kind of antenna you bought though. Typical $10 bunny-ears will get generally only clear-up station you can get without an antenna in the first place. If you get nothing with an antenna, then you might want to look into a roof-top antenna, or one that uses the wiring in your house as the antenna. A lot of these were marketed as secondary antenna's just for Dish users prior to their carrying/offering local stations.

    6. Re:also boohoo by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      Regular old broadcast TV is sometimes more clear and crisp than the others. It just depends on how far you are from the broadcast center and what kind of hardware you have. Spend more on a good antenna and you should get nice pics.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    7. Re:also boohoo by allism · · Score: 1

      They're not ten-dollar bunny-ears, they're thirty-dollar, !electric! bunny ears. We can't put an antenna on the roof, we live in an apartment. (We have the dish bolted to the floor of the loft, pointing out a window.)

  14. Ziggy says... by JohnnyKnoxville · · Score: 4, Funny

    there is a 1 in 10 chance this show won't survive because the hordes of Trekkies have nothing new to watch. It won't even matter if it's good.

    1. Re:Ziggy says... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • there is a 1 in 10 chance this show won't survive because the hordes of Trekkies have nothing new to watch. It won't even matter if it's good

      Uh oh Sam! It turns out that Ziggy got his calculations wrong. Trekkies are not enough to support a prime time show; they need Joe Sixpack as well, so it needs a decent hook. It can be well acted (TNG) well written (DS9), or it can have some nice T&A (Voyager post "Data in a D cup"), but it needs something more than just "The Original Series with zippers".

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Ziggy says... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to imply that Jolene Blalock isn't enough of a 'hook', then you're sadly SADLY mistaken.

    3. Re:Ziggy says... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • If you're trying to imply that Jolene Blalock [maximonline.com] isn't enough of a 'hook', then you're sadly SADLY mistaken

      She's just another blank eyed, fat uddered plastic toy, who would find that appeali... oh, wait... you've got a point. ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  15. I don't even own a TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    And neither should you. When I walk around my neighborhood at night, I can see the tell tale signs inside almost every bedroom and living room: that bluish glow of a TV. People are getting so damn lazy. Get off your ass. Go outside. Go for a hike. Go camping. Get in a canoe and paddle. Do something, anything. Not to mention that cable TV service can cost upwards of $30-$40/month for basic service in many cities. That's $360-$480/year for a service which really does nothing to contribute to your life. Read a book instead. Do something constructive. I've seen TV within the past year and it's a complete joke. That show "Friends" (and the tens of others like it) is so incredibly predictable and stupid, it's beyond me why anyone watches it.

    Go out. Meet people. Get laid. Do something. But please turn off your damn TV.

    1. Re:I don't even own a TV. by sddefrag · · Score: 0

      What does you meant by 'learn'? I dun't unberstand, I gits all my learnin from tha tellevissun.

    2. Re:I don't even own a TV. by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      and errrr what is that darn glowing box called a monitor????

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    3. Re:I don't even own a TV. by DarkZero · · Score: 1
      Read a book instead.

      Sitting on my ass reading a story is more productive and less lazy than sitting on my ass watching a story? Your pseudo-intellectual rhetoric does not hold up. TV is entertainment. Entertainment is required for humans to be happy, and if we want that entertainment to be in the form of television, who the fuck are you to tell us how we can and can't enjoy ourselves?

      To each his own. If you don't like television, don't watch it. But don't tell us what we're supposed to like and not like, according to YOUR tastes.

      What an asshole. And such a cliché one, too.

    4. Re:I don't even own a TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But don't tell us what we're supposed to like and not like, according to YOUR tastes."

      ahem... do you know what site this is?

    5. Re:I don't even own a TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, "Cletus".

  16. Why is Star Trek still so popular? by 91degrees · · Score: 1
    After 4 different series, 4 films, and over 1300 episodes, I'm impressed that Star Trek is still going strong. Not that there's any reason why not. Shatner is a skilled actor, and the storylines remain as fresh as ever.


    However, on the whole, Star Trek was simply a rehash of half a dozen other genres, set aboard a Starship (e.g Wagon Train, Lost on Space, Doctor Who etc..). None of these series lasted anywhere near as long. What was Star Trek's secret?

    1. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Funny

      What was Star Trek's secret?

      Short skirts and explosions.

      Dancin Santa

    2. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by codejnki · · Score: 1

      Dr. Who ran from the 60's to nearly the 90's. Has a HUGE after series novelisation, and the BBC is currently producing new online radio dramas. I'd say that although not nearly as visable in the US as Star Trek, Dr. Who is just as viable and just as long lasting.

      --
      "War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left"

      Steven Wright

    3. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by bwoodring · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Shatner is a skilled actor, and the storylines
      > remain as fresh as ever.

      WTF? Did we watch the same show? You're a Euro aren't you? I bet you think that David Hasslehoff is a "skilled singer" and "his ballads remain as fresh as ever".

      If anything, Star Trek succeeded in spite of Shatner chewing the scenery.

    4. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by dinivin · · Score: 1


      Wow... And I thought I was slow when it came to picking up on sarcasm.

      Dinivin

    5. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Control-Z · · Score: 1
      To me Star Trek's secret is an interesting universe, a set of "good guy rules of conduct" (the Prime Directive), and a mostly great set of characters, depending on the series.

      Then of course the writers come in, screw with the framework (like violating the Prime Directive every other episode), and either make every episode a desperate final fight for survival or a soap opera. And sprinkle in a lot of convenient technology capabilities/liabilites and too much luck. But every once in a while (for Voyager) there was a really interesting episode that was as good or better than many big-budget movies. X-Files is like that too, although 3-4 years ago every episode was very good.

    6. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by davey23sol · · Score: 2

      It's *5* series, you idiot!!


      Yep.. this is right.

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    7. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How the hell do you get 1300 episodes?

      TOS: 72 (?)

      TNG: ~150 (22/year * 7 years)

      DS9: ~150-200 (how many years?)

      Voy: ~150 (7 years)



      That looks like about 600, tops, to me.

    8. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by davey23sol · · Score: 2

      Why are you guys doing this?

      There was Star Trek: The Animated Series!!

      Why am I the only one that remembers this??

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    9. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reference, some people even like to classify such reasons.

    10. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by davey23sol · · Score: 2

      BTW... 22 shows..


      http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/trekkies/amtrek.htm l

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    11. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Shatner is a skilled actor


      He's an even better singer. His version of "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" leaves me speechless.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because, nobody wants to remember it, in response to the animated series...

    13. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Hasselhoff is man-tastic!

    14. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      The animated Star Trek, despite being under Roddenbery's wing, was not cannon. It doesn't count.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    15. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, that's _9_ films with a 10th in the works... where have you been?


      Also, if you count TAS, there were 5 series + Enterprise making a total of 6.


      ...ALSO, it's "canon", not "cannon"... unless Enterprise goes *really* far back with the tech. :)

    16. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Everyone else blocked it mentally.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    17. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by davey23sol · · Score: 2

      First of all, what the heck *IS* Star Trek cannon?? The continuity changes every episode!

      Second, I have been told by people that know better than me that certain continuity regarding Spock revealed on TAS has been followed.

      So.. you have to do better...

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    18. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Flower · · Score: 1

      So you were asphyxiating on your own vomit also? Hate when thay happens.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    19. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Mr.Phil · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yah, speechless... I'm too busy retching to say anything

    20. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1

      Also two theatrical releases in the 60s, with Peter Cushing as the Doctor.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    21. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      His version of "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" leaves me speechless.


      Actually, the passionate ending of his unique performance of "Mr. Tambourine Man" will be etched into my mind for ever... Will I ever be able to listen to other music again?

      --
      That is all.
    22. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by codejnki · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not I've got one of those on video tape some where. Cheesier than a KRAFT factory.

      --
      "War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left"

      Steven Wright

    23. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by varkatope · · Score: 1

      Speaking of "the shat" and Hasselhoff singing (badly I imagine) something equally as offensive: The theme music. cringe. Must be tailored to a tribble's ears. cringe some more.
      Promising start though...

      --
      I got a fever...and the only cure is more cowbell!
    24. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I've only seen about 5 eps, over 8 years ago.

      Still, that tops it out at 625. Nowhere near 1300.

    25. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Actually, the passionate ending of his unique performance of "Mr. Tambourine Man" will be etched into my mind for ever... Will I ever be able to listen to other music again?


      Once your mind has been deranged by Shatner's singing, you can't go back to normality.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    26. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      Because he was trolling? ;-)

      While I'm here, TOS had 79 episodes, and I *think* TNG had 179...I could check if I could be arsed, but I can't.

    27. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? by macsforever2001 · · Score: 2

      You're a Euro aren't you? I bet you think that David Hasslehoff is a "skilled singer" and "his ballads remain as fresh as ever".

      Oh those silly Europeans who worship talentless beautiful icons unlike us intellectual and very cultured Americans who worship enormously talented people like Jennifer Lopez, The Backstreet Boys, In Sync, Arnold Schwar... whatever, sports icons, and whoever else self-interested corporations tell us to like.

      P.S. Yes, I'm being sarcastic.

  17. I'll be watching. by eAndroid · · Score: 1

    And waiting. I wonder how they are going to do the previous-show crossovers this time. Maybe Seven of Nine fell into a time warp once and spent a few seasons with Bakula. That'd be cool. Or maybe Warf took a wrong turn in the DS9 wormhole and ended up being the only Klingon with a universal translator in Enterprise time.

    Hmmm.

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    1. Re:I'll be watching. by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      I remember in the comic books that Kirk visited one of the previous Enterprises in his early teens when his Dad was in the military, but the federation had been formed then. It was just after being cought stowing away on an ocean ship. Wait, maybe that was in one of the books. Anyway I could see plot potential in this since Kirk was a real punk in his teenage years.

    2. Re:I'll be watching. by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Except Kirk isn't born for another 120 years or so, otherwise it would work.

    3. Re:I'll be watching. by eAndroid · · Score: 1

      Actually Kirk showing up on the show is a really good idea. I mean, who would play young Kirk? There is lots of potential there to introduce something really exciting. Also, what if old Kirk shows up? Maybe he never died and instead made the ribbon (or whatever that was) take him to the first Enterprise.

      Also, I can't wait to see what Q does with the new crew.

      --

      I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    4. Re:I'll be watching. by decoydog · · Score: 1

      A young Kirk could show up...During a pod race, one of the JTK's engines on his pod racer starts emitting chronotons, creates a temporal distortion, and he goes straight through it to avoid a reckless-driving Anakin Skywalker to end up 130 years into his past. I beleive JarJar will also have a similar temporal accident while manipulating a warp bubble on his submarine.

    5. Re:I'll be watching. by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      Isn't that the episode when Kirk plays baseball with the kids from "Galactica 1980" who lived that long becuase of their super hero powers while Dr Who who manipulated the pod in the first place gets posesed by Vince Clortho keymaster of Gozer.

      Meanwhile a shot rings out, the maid screams and we tie it all together in chapter two.

  18. Download it! by LazyGun · · Score: 1

    well I will bet I can download it on eDonkey tomorrow.

    1. Re:Download it! by BorgDrone · · Score: 2

      Actually, I've already seen a pre-air rip.

    2. Re:Download it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What filename did you search for? I'm also TV-free.

  19. It was good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up here in Calgary, Alberta, Canada we saw Enterprise last night. The premiere was great, but I won't say much more so that I don't spoil everyone's enjoyment...However, the opening credits are horrible, nothing like all the other ST series. I hope they change it...

    1. Re:It was good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, wish I woulda known. I get the A Channel through Bell ExpressVu. :(

  20. I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 2, Funny

    I only watch Voyager for an obvious reason, in fact for two very big obvious reasons...

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chipotle and Kim...

      Spiciness from all over the globe!

    2. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I assume you're referring to the borg "implants?"

    3. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two borg spheres?

    4. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 of 9 rocks! But don't worry: they will have a Vulcan babe in this new series.

    5. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Big tits are vulgar.

      Small tits, big ass, short hair. That's sexy.

    6. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by [m1] · · Score: 0

      Big tits are vulgar.

      Small tits, big ass, short hair. That's sexy.


      you just described most of the men watching
      star trek.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    7. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh, no.

      Most men watching star trek have BIG man boobs.

    8. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst Fat Guy Insult Ever!

    9. Re:I always tought Star Trek was kinda boring by Leven+Valera · · Score: 2, Funny
      I only watch Voyager for an obvious reason, in fact for two very big obvious reasons...


      You wouldn't be talking about Seven of^H^H^H^H^H^H Forty of D, would you?
      --
      Woot w00t w007.
  21. If your cable provider doesn't provide UPN... by jaredcat · · Score: 1

    Get a satalite dish, Taco! You'll get 4 or 5 UPNs from around the country, including WSBK in Boston among others.

    1. Re:If your cable provider doesn't provide UPN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those that still have those Big Ugly Dishes - I caught the Canadian feed last night (Tuesday) on Telstar 5 Transponder 16 at 5:00pm EDT.

  22. Let's go more blue collar than that! by canning · · Score: 3, Funny
    This series will prove to be a more rougher, blue-collared version of star travel than the picture portrayed by Kirk and Picard, i.e. crew wear baseball caps and their captain is a regular 'Joe' kind of guy

    Then why didn't they get Tom Arnold?

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
    1. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by bwoodring · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good idea. Yhey could seek out new life and new civilizations in their customized RV.

    2. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by Coz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then why didn't they get Tom Arnold?

      Because maybe they wanted people to watch?

      Bakula has a solid acting career already behind him, is used to the kind of mania ST fans can generate, and does a pretty good job of portraying "competence-in-spite-of-hickness," which I'm guessing is going to be a major theme of this show.

      Humans, the new kids on the block - comin' to mess up YOUR neighborhood to! This should be fun.

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    3. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by chmod007 · · Score: 1

      SpaceBalls :)

    4. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by drodver · · Score: 2, Funny

      They tried but he wouldn't fit in the captin's chair, and there wasn't room on the set for a "captin's loveseat"

    5. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny
      • why didn't they get Tom Arnold

      Why didn't they get Tom Green. They should take him. Really, take him away right now.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by jafac · · Score: 2

      The series would have been FAR better with Chris Tucker as the Capitan.

      And Jackie Chan as his First Officer.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
      • The series would have been FAR better with Chris Tucker as the Capitan. And Jackie Chan as his First Officer.

      Heretic! Tucker isn't fit to be on the same set as Jackie! The Rush Hours weren't even canon Chan films! Rant! Rave! ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Let's go more blue collar than that! by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, God; you said the C word, now we're gonna get James Dixon in here with a 4,000 line post explaining where Rush Hour fits in with Supercop... way to go, dude. :-)

  23. Watched this last night.. by schon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It was on local TV (Canadian) last night.

    Not bad.. definitely "grittier" than the other series. Bakula did a good job of portraying Archer.

    I'd watch it again :o)

  24. Strek Trek? by phaze3000 · · Score: 0, Troll
    What's Strek Trek?

    Is this in anyway related to Star Trek?

    Oh yeah, and please remember the Internet is global. Those of us outside the US don't get to see your new 'Strek Trek' program anyway..

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    1. Re:Strek Trek? by Invisible+Agent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Excellent point! The Internet is global, so clearly people posting on Slashdot should only talk about issues which affect people in all countries. Obviously, since nobody in Europe's ever heard of Star Trek (an American television show, for those of you wondering), we should never talk about that again. Unfortunately, nobody in the Congo cares about privacy issues on the Internet, so I guess we can't talk about that either. Heck, I guess this is the end of Slashdot.

      --

      Invisible Agent
      This post is a mirror; when a monkey stares in, no hacker gazes out.
    2. Re:Strek Trek? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, since nobody in Europe's ever heard of Star Trek (an American television show, for those of you wondering)

      are you kidding?!? Star Trek 60s was on TV in europe in the 70s and after, I have seen in France the 60s series maybe 10 times between 70s and 90s!!! And I have seen 5 star trek movies in theater in France also

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Strek Trek? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Sorry you were so incredibly inconvenienced by clicking on this Read More link. You'll also have to forgive CmdrTaco for posting a story on his own damn website that interests him.

    4. Re:Strek Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you kidding?!? Star Trek 60s was on TV in europe in the 70s and after, I have seen in France the 60s series maybe 10 times between 70s and 90s!!! And I have seen 5 star trek movies in theater in France also

      Was the sarcasm not plain enough for you?

    5. Re:Strek Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, in Germany the ensigns all say "Yah, Cap'n", instead of "Aye Captain".

    6. Re:Strek Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sarcasm, the human turning test

    7. Re:Strek Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turing test you mean?

      spelling, a real intelligence test

  25. Well. by loraksus · · Score: 2

    Judging by the massive, bleeding failures that were voyager and sorta DS9, I'm not going to waste my time watching it.
    And I dunno about Taco, but UPN is on peasant vision here in portland, oregon - twice (ch 4,32)
    Perhaps you might investigate the possibility of buying bunny ears.
    Anybody know of any "trekkie" parties?

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Well. by KidIcarus · · Score: 1

      I'd give it a chance if I were you. God knows I hated voyager with a passion, but Enterprise premiered here in Canada last night and it was a LOT better than I expected it to be. Prolly the best pilot episode of any Star Trek series yet (not that's difficult or anything, but ...).

    2. Re:Well. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about 4, but 32 is WB. 12 is UPN. At least in PDX.

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re:Well. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Judging by the massive, bleeding failures that were voyager and sorta DS9, I'm not going to waste my time watching it

      Heh heh. If you care enough to post that, you'll care enough to watch it just to see how bad it is, and to give you something to bitch about. I know I will. ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's odd, I live in Portland and I get it on channel 12.

    5. Re:Well. by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

      Uh, maybe I'm mistaken, but isn't channel 32 in Portland the WB? That's what my TV says, anyway, and the fact that they call themselves "WB32" kinda supports it...

  26. blalock nude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pretty close...
    In the best scene of the pilot she and another officer need to rub themselves with decontamination jelly after an away mission.
    She has a tank top and short shorts and the air in the chamber is really cool (if you know what I mean). Lucky my wife was in the other room...

    The story was great, and the retro look and feel was well done. I think this might be the best Trek yet.

    1. Re:blalock nude by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      Still closer...
      You could just pick up this month's Maxim (at least the U.S. edition), which features Jolene Blaylock and will probably be a little easier to conceal from your wife. :-)

      ~Philly

  27. anyone get UPN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    We don't get UPN either, nor do my friends that have various mini-dish systems ...

    In fact, i don't know anyone in the northern part of this state(West Virginia) that can watch it.

    AC.

  28. You mean wary... I think by bwoodring · · Score: 1

    I'm not normally a word nazi, but weary and wary mean two entirely different things. The sentence doesn't make sense because if the technology is brand new, how could they be weary of it so quickly.

    1. Re:You mean wary... I think by CraigEwert · · Score: 1

      They could be both 'wary' and 'weary'. Imagine you are the crew. Some dope down In R&D keeps sending you idiotic new devices to test (not unlike Q from James Bond). They often fail catastrophically, so you are wary of any particular one. And you get a new batch every damn week, so you are weary of the whole 'being a guinea pig for science' part of your job.

    2. Re:You mean wary... I think by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      ...and since we're on this tack:

      you mean "respectable", not "respectful", don't you? I mean, unless UPN dissed you at some point.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:You mean wary... I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And use a comma once in a while, for God's sake.

    4. Re:You mean wary... I think by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Ohh, I'd much rather get one of Q's toys than something Q sends me ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    5. Re:You mean wary... I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't chew with your mouth full. And stop tracking mud across my nice clean floor. And stop slouching like that - it makes you look like an old man. And ...

    6. Re:You mean wary... I think by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I mean, unless UPN dissed you at some point.

      Which they have, if you've ever watched one of their shows.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  29. Stop, you're making him crying in chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Postering grammatifical erronifications upon the slashdot websight am an frequently occurancification.

    1. Re:Stop, you're making him crying in chair by defen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Don King.

  30. I suppose it's worth a try... by tuffy · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    ...but only the first half, since the a new Junkyard Wars will finally air in the second - and if it doesn't suck I can catch the rest when it re-airs saturday. If it turns out to be a good show, it might be worth the time.

    But if it *does* suck, friday's Farscape will be able to wash away the bad taste, like after that Voyager finale. I have only a couple hours of my life to lose finding out...

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  31. space above and beyond by eadint · · Score: 0

    now that was a scifi show. star trek is just a bunck of pansy assed wimps trying to feel their way through life. space was cool. get some marines involed in the new show kill an ask questions later. why not make a sci fi show that shows humanity the way it really is. were all killers at heart why not just acknowlege it

    1. Re:space above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Space:1999

      Now THERE was a show...

    2. Re:space above and beyond by eadint · · Score: 0

      that was just campy. hipys on drugs screwing eachother on the moon

    3. Re:space above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe.. but that chick that could morph into a Tiger was HOT!!

    4. Re:space above and beyond by eadint · · Score: 0

      yea you git that right but space had a pleasure satalite with hookers

    5. Re:space above and beyond by Cybrex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more. Like the t-shirt sez, "Space: No cute robots, no friendly aliens, no holodecks, NO MERCY!"

      It had its share of first season flaws, but they were much fewer and far between than the first seasons of ANY of the Trek series. The characters were also fleshed out much more, and the series as a whole displayed far superior storytelling.

      I tend to favor darker plots, and some episodes of Space were disturbingly grim. These also tended to be the episodes where the show really shined.

      Besides, Vansen was a babe (Co-ed bunks? Works for me!) and the fighters looked totally badass.

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  32. The Star Trek Crutch by faust2097 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as they avoid time travel as a plot device the show has a chance. Except for the original "Guardian of Forever" time travel has been used as a crutch when the writers get bored.

    1. Re:The Star Trek Crutch by Coz · · Score: 1

      Given that Kirk and Spock and Scotty invented the original series' time travel system, any references to it should be (1) subtle or (2) alien. The DS9 temporal cops shouldn't be showing up much.

      Now, Q, on the other hand....

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    2. Re:The Star Trek Crutch by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Hate to break the news, but apparently the pilot hinges on the introduction of some time-travelling aliens who are trying to change history for some unknown purpose. In other words, you can see those time-travelling episodes coming up from about 10 parsex away.

    3. Re:The Star Trek Crutch by Vinson+Massif · · Score: 1

      10 Parsecs?? Try ~30 minutes in! I only half-watched it from that point. It did have some other interesting breasts^W^W^W^W^W^W storylines, though.

      --
      "Remember, any tool can be the right tool." -- Red Green
    4. Re:The Star Trek Crutch by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 2

      Hate to break the news, but apparently the pilot hinges on the introduction of some time-travelling aliens who are trying to change history for some unknown purpose.

      And then a guy dressed like a pirate and a history geek from the early 80's have to get things back on track!

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    5. Re:The Star Trek Crutch by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I thought that was lame, too...but, now that I've seen the show, not really. An enemy 'from the future' isn't automatically lame, and time travel isn't a bad plot device.

      It's just a bad plot solution.

      As long as all the time travel stuff is simply the enemy having advanced tech (The tech levels between different races never made any sense anyway.) and knowing what's going to happen so they turn up at exactly the wrong moment, I'll be happy with it.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  33. You almost had me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You almost had me, until I read this:

    "Shatner is a skilled actor"

    He .... doesn't .... really .... knowhowto ... act! My ... God .. Bones .... .... how ... can .. you .. possiblythink .. that .. this .... .... requires ... anyskillatall?

    1. Re:You almost had me.. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Goddammit Jim! I'm a Troll not a TV critic!

  34. And in the UK by hereward_Cooper · · Score: 1

    When do you think it will reach the UK (IF EVER!)?

    --
    zadok.org.uk
    1. Re:And in the UK by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't both TNG and Voyager take about two years to 'migrate' to the UK. I'm sure I recall seeing TNG for the first time in 89/90..

      However, with TV as it is nowadays, I'd imagine we might get it in several months. Series seem to come across pretty quick now.. i.e. Ally McBeal, Friends, Sex and the City.. and other such quality programming.

      Anyone have some official news? I guess Sky One will be first to screen it.

    2. Re:And in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well I'm in the UK and I got it yesterday as a DivX, ripped from the Canadian premiere. It's sitting on my HDD right now :-)

    3. Re:And in the UK by qpeg · · Score: 1

      Where?! gotta have it!

      --
      How do you set this lazer-printer to stun?
    4. Re:And in the UK by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      Didn't Sky show a very short trailer for it at the end of the last episode of Voyager? It said "starts soon" or something. Or perhaps I imagined it.

    5. Re:And in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at home. like i'd put it up for public access and get the bit's kicked out of my connection.

    6. Re:And in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Sky (having asked them directly),
      Enterprise will debut in late January or
      early February 2002, on Sky One.

  35. Cable Provider? by sddefrag · · Score: 0

    1.) Turn off your cable
    2.) Tune into your local UPN network channel
    3.) Slap yourself in the face and say "DUH!"

    Why do you have to watch it on cable? Watch it localy, ditz!

  36. Its Wensday, not Tuesday... by Weffs11 · · Score: 1

    I tried to watch it las night but there was a rather disturbing movie on...

    1. Re:Its Wensday, not Tuesday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disturbing Behavior with Katie Holmes.
      what a joke.
      i never realized how bad teen B-movies were.

  37. Will it be shown in Austin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Austin and I do have UPN, but some shows are blocked out (such as ST:Voyager). I wonder if Enterprise will be blocked out as well.

    1. Re:Will it be shown in Austin? by metachimp · · Score: 1

      Use the remote to unblock the station, or ask your mom to do it.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
    2. Re:Will it be shown in Austin? by fwmartin · · Score: 1

      Argh! Don't scare me like that! Hopefully it will be shown or I'm heading down to the Alamo Drafthouse to watch it.

    3. Re:Will it be shown in Austin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have Time Warner Cable, it will be shown on Ch. 23. Not sure about the airwaves though. I suggest you check out the listings on tvguide.com.

  38. Harvey the Wonder Hamster says, "get a life!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course only the ubergeeks among us would not only be Star Trek afficianados, but make the geeky sidekicks the focus of the show - superheroes, no less. Add to that the 'Lone Gunmen' conspiracy theory that Paramount is denying the essence of the show....

  39. St. Louis Enterprise on saturday by the_dk · · Score: 1

    hey guys, you shouldn't be complaining, now all us St. Louis area nerds will have something to do on saturday night!

    1. Re:St. Louis Enterprise on saturday by ckrull · · Score: 1

      I believe the only reason it is on Saturday night is so that they can preempt it with the StL Blues games they carry. Exactly the same thing they did with B5

  40. Re:Why is Star Trek still so popular? - Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Communistic view of the future economy combined with a pseudo military dictatorship

    We all know that is the recipe for future success.

    Either that or they took a whole bunch of good ideas and combined them into something interesting.

  41. Enterprise aired here yesterday by d3cpo · · Score: 1

    Can someone please explain this to me. Yesterday on a local station in Edmonton,AB howed the season premiere of Enterprise a day before it aired anywhere else in the US not too sure about anywhere else in Canada. Are stations allowed to do this or did someone really screw up

    1. Re:Enterprise aired here yesterday by pmyre · · Score: 1

      I saw the first hour of Enterprise on "ASN" (Edmonton, Canada) yesterday. I am very happy with the results. The style and tone of this episode is less clean than standard Trek,
      witch is great.

      Watch for the twins...

    2. Re:Enterprise aired here yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it was probably filmed in Canada, with mostly Canadian extra's and of course, Canada is the home base of the WorldWide Illuminati.

  42. it's own topic icon by jaxon6 · · Score: 1

    why doesn't star trek have it's own topic icon? i'm looking at them, and i see a penguin, a chalkboard, an apple, etc.. i mean, star wars has it's own topic icon on slashdot. what gives?

    --
    Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
    1. Re:it's own topic icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because George Lucas is a bit less litigious than Paramount...?

  43. the evolution of captains by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

    Where in Canada did it air? I'm just wondering 'cause it isn't on in Toronto until tonight... (CityTV @ 8pm for you fellow Torontonians)

    I think this captain will be gay. Think about it! First they had the young caucasian captain, then the old caucasian captain, then the black captain, then the female captain. In the politically-correct chain, I think gay is next...

    --
    "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    1. Re:the evolution of captains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was on "A" chanel. I watched it 'cuz I have ExpressVU and get the Calgary station.

    2. Re:the evolution of captains by pa-guy · · Score: 0

      It was on A-channel here in Edmonton last night

    3. Re:the evolution of captains by stu42j · · Score: 1

      Well, Scott Bakula did play a homosexual in American Beauty, so maybe you're right.

    4. Re:the evolution of captains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Calgary on Channel 8, the 'A' Channel.

    5. Re:the evolution of captains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It aired in Edmonton on A-channel (local independant).

      First they had the young caucasian captain, then the old caucasian captain, then the black captain, then the female captain. In the politically-correct chain, I think gay is next

      Nope, Asian is next, then gay, then Arab, and finally Hindu/Pakistani.

      So sometime in the first season, we'll find out that Captain Archer was secretly switched at birth, and given cosmetic surgery!

    6. Re:the evolution of captains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the world is "gay" in the list?! Does the list go on as: polygamist, child-sodomizer, murderer, rapist?

      Oh, wait. Politically correct moral. Sorry.

    7. Re:the evolution of captains by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      Why in the world is "gay" in the list?! Does the list go on as: polygamist, child-sodomizer, murderer, rapist?

      yeah, then homophobe... Anonymous Coward indeed.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  44. will it last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only time will tell if this series will last,



    It's on UPN, of course it'll last. I mean, even Moesha lasted.

  45. huh? by poemofatic · · Score: 1

    Moderators!? That's not flamebait. It's good clean fun. Read the whole post, guys. It's only 2 lines long...

    --

    When in doubt, have a man come through a door with a gun in his hand.

  46. To those Canadians who have seen it... by sddefrag · · Score: 0

    How is the soundtrack? Does it suck? I can't visualize a Trek series with some pop bullshite soundtrack like I've heard is supposed to fill this sucker.

    1. Re:To those Canadians who have seen it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the openning theme sucked

  47. Scott Bakula...a real command figure by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    Scott Bakula...a real command figure if there ever was one. Yessiree, I can't wait for the ol' half-baked Quantum Leap dude to show us just what a cutting, decisive figure he makes sitting in the captains chair.

    Somehow, I get the feeling that this series is going to be even worse than Voyager was. And that, geek-heads, is a hard thing to do.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:Scott Bakula...a real command figure by demi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Scott Bakula is a poor choice. The perfect
      choice for a starship captain would be Eamonn Walker, who plays Kareem Said on Oz; but I think the Star Trek folks figured they already had a black guy, and a woman, so they could go back to white guy captains.

      --
      demi
  48. Why two hours?!? Junkyard Wars airs today by strredwolf · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm not going to watch it because the new Junkyard Wars airs tonight, and it's the first one of the new series. Besides, TNT's rebroadcasting Law and Order also, and there's always The West Wing...

    And I'm not missing Junkyard Wars for anything...

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Why two hours?!? Junkyard Wars airs today by userunknown · · Score: 1

      Junkyard wars will be rebroadcasted after a couple hours like all the tlc/discovery content. Why miss it for that reason.

    2. Re:Why two hours?!? Junkyard Wars airs today by eadint · · Score: 0

      im starting to wonder if JW if fixed it just seems like the stuff is always there.

    3. Re:Why two hours?!? Junkyard Wars airs today by tuffy · · Score: 1

      It's not fixed. Here's information about what the junkyard is like. The real challenge is making sure all the bits get bodged together right in time.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Why two hours?!? Junkyard Wars airs today by sddefrag · · Score: 0

      You watch that crap? No, seriously, you watch Law and Order and West Wing? Are you insane?! I'd rather have my intestines slowly pulled from my body cavity while watching as my brain is slowly eaten by a small puppy.

    5. Re:Why two hours?!? Junkyard Wars airs today by strredwolf · · Score: 1

      Seriously.

      And yes, I'm a bit insane. It helps in coding up a webcomic strip generator in Perl while drawing more strips staring herm characters in normal non-sexual situation while trying to keep the science in science-fiction and not getting any influences from the screwed-up world that is Star Trek.

      It's too bad B5 ended after five seasons... but then, that's by design.

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  49. Reception by caldroun · · Score: 1

    Hook up the Rabbit Ears!
    I got Directtv, and that is what I am doin'...
    You do know what I am talking about right?

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  50. Watch party Tulsa Ok by DEATH+AND+HATRED · · Score: 2, Informative

    Starbase 21 & UPN are sponsering a premier of the new Trek series Enterprise at the Cenimark theater wednesday in Tulsa Ok... on a big screen and with no admision costs. starbase21

  51. BAKULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Taco, we love you, but your spelling still sux.
    The man's name is Scott Bakula. Really.
    /whine
    1. Re:BAKULA by ThePretender · · Score: 0, Troll

      Time to search IMDb: 2 seconds.
      Time to cut and paste correct spelling: 1 second.
      The entertainment provided by yet another contributor shirking grammatical responsibility: Priceless.

      Let's just change the slogan to reflect the capabilities of the staff: GNUs for Nurds. Stuf that matturs.

    2. Re:BAKULA by ThePretender · · Score: 1

      Troll? I think not. jeez don't take it personally. it was a joke, but with more than a shred of truth in it.

      I guess we'll have to continue to live with the poor standards around here (now including moderation!).

  52. Dont Cry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont Cry, just download the episode from a newsgroup. You know some geek is gonna post this.

  53. No UPN by User1234 · · Score: 0

    I don't get UPN either but after a quick search on tvguide.com I found that Enterprise will be shown Sunday night on NBC where I live. So those that are UPNless may still get to see the show.

  54. Off-topic, but I love this show... by update() · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I discovered last weekend that I stopped getting UPN. Who knows when, since I've never needed it before.

    I just want to throw in a plug for my favorite UPN show, The Parkers (Monday night at 9, can't give a URL since UPN.com uses JavaScript for no reason). I'm perhaps the only white person who watches it as it's gotten segregated into a night of all black shows, with DL Hughley and the always-hot Moesha. Look for a knock-off show with a white cast to appear on NBC in a couple of years to rave reviews, like Friends did to Living Single.

    1. Re:Off-topic, but I love this show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, Living Single fell into the same old coupling off that kills most interesting shows.

      I did like how Tutti blossomed, though.

  55. get it from the donkey by userunknown · · Score: 1

    Edonkey2000 or some similar file swapping program will have it available eventually, if it's not out there already.

    -Mark

  56. Transporters by datavortex · · Score: 1
    I've always wanted to see a Star-Trek where the transporters are still fairly new, and as such randomly malfunction and kill people.

    That's just nifty.

    --

    He either comes off as a real interesting guy with encyclopedic knowledge,or a pathological liar with an ax to grind
  57. Star Trek has nothing to do with superheroes by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 2

    ST is about *psychology*. Kirk, Spock and Bones are the ego, superego and id (not necessarily in that order because I'm too lazy to look up my Freud). Think about it: Spock, no emotion, ultimately logical and rational. Bones, almost pure emotion, knows nothing about technology but is empathic and caring. Kirk is impulsive and sexual but also strong and willful. Remember the famous "split Kirk" episode? When they talked about it they made it sound like anybody's dark side would be strong, but is that really true? How about Spock's or Bones' dark side? Do they even have one? No, the real point of that episode is that *Kirk* has a thin veneer of civilization cover a beast within.

    ST:TNG had a different angle. It was about utopia. It was a much more political show--always coming across warring civilizations and doing diplomatic missions and so forth. I suppose characters in a utopia have something in common with superheroes--they both seem godlike. One thing they don't have, though, is exciting adventures. Which is also true of ST:TNG, which is why I rarely watched it.

    DS9 I think we can dispose of as being pure claptrap.

    --
    324006
    1. Re:Star Trek has nothing to do with superheroes by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny
      • DS9 I think we can dispose of as being pure [psychological] claptrap.

      With all due respect, I have to disagree. The episode where Jadzia Dax has a tryst with Kurzon Dax's ex-wife was a deep and significant exploration of my need to watch hot alien chicks making out.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Star Trek has nothing to do with superheroes by jafac · · Score: 2

      I think that the above post is PROOF that you can take any piece of crap, analyze it after the fact, out of context even, and read into it any old "deeper meaning" you can rationalize for it.

      I guess Movie Reviewers and Art Critics have been doing that for most of the 20th Century. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    3. Re:Star Trek has nothing to do with superheroes by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      Well put, my friend. Profound.

    4. Re:Star Trek has nothing to do with superheroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not trolling or posting flamebait here, but IMHO, ST isn't about psychology, superheroes or anything else. It's about making money. Pure and simple.

      Well, at least since Berman took over. It's a candy-coated lowest-common-denominator SF show, designed to maximise ratings and ad revenues.

      It's about showing whatever gets the best ratings and revenues. I'm sure if they thought they could get away with it, they'd just show Jeri Ryan jiggling naked on a trampoline with baby oil and an egg whisk... hey, maybe they _should_ show that! =)

      There are much better shows, such as Farscape and B5, which (although designed to make money) at the very least pay lip service to good storytelling and plausibility.

      Exhibit 'A': Voyager's 36 of D. In isolation, the plot point of bringing a Borg drone on board is sound, and presents excellent possibilities for on-going subplots. Much as I appreciate Seven's massive cans, however, they undermine the whole idea.

      Andromeda (or something similar) would've been a far more interesting and experimental show to do. Shame Paramount turned it down. Of course, at least with it in its current form, we get to appreciate Lexa Doig's massive cans instead. =)

    5. Re:Star Trek has nothing to do with superheroes by Nemesis_EBS · · Score: 1

      Redundancy aside....YEAH!

  58. Not "Low-Tech" Enough, P2P Sneakery by ksw2 · · Score: 1

    I've heard complaints (through the grapevine) that the Low-Tech feel of the show isn't Low-Tech enough. For example, the design of the ship seems more futuristic than Kirk's Enterprise.

    I think it would be nifty if they shot it on the same grainy film as the old Star Trek. Wouldn't that be nostalgic?

    Unfortunately, I won't be seeing it first-hand... I ditched TV in '97. It's times like these that I feel a twinge of regret for that decision :->

    I wonder if we non-TV types will be able to d/l mpegs from a P2P service reliably? I'm guessing that's a big probably!

    1. Re:Not "Low-Tech" Enough, P2P Sneakery by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What do you expect? We've pretty much progressed further in the thirty years since ST:TOS than they thought we would in three hundred years. Prime example: They didn't have the concept of LEDs or computer monitors back then. Hence, lots of switches, dials and chaser lights for feedback. Ooops. Also, ST:TOS was low-budget. Roddenberry wanted a film projecter behind each of the screens ringing the bridge, for cool animated readouts and library computer accesses. Until he found out a) that 12 projectors required, by union contract, 12 projectionists and b) how much one projectionist cost, let alone 12. Ooops.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Not "Low-Tech" Enough, P2P Sneakery by ksw2 · · Score: 1
      What do you expect? We've pretty much progressed further in the thirty years since ST:TOS than they thought we would in three hundred years.

      Well--yeah--I understand that perfectly well, but I think the point they have is the inconsistency. You can't forget what the Kirk ship looked like in TOS, and it breaks the metaphor when compared with Bakula's ship... and they have a point!

      I've heard similar complaints when comparing Star Wars Episode One to the already released SW films: Episode One used so much CG and effects, it appeared too futuristic for the time period.

    3. Re:Not "Low-Tech" Enough, P2P Sneakery by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Actually, I thought they did a pretty good job of allowing for dramatic license in TOS. The design of NX-01 was IMHO actually as close to the original Enterprise as they could get without looking ridiculously dated (though I thought T'Pol's viewer thingy was hilarious, and a workable tribute to the original even if it served no concievable purpose).

      What I didn't like was the greasedown scene -- okay, we know there's more pointy about T'Pol than just her ears, but really!

      /Brian

  59. No.... by squeegee-me · · Score: 2, Funny

    What you experienced was UPN feeding it down to the local affiliates via satellite, but with the solar flair with an X rating on Monday, it reflected off the northern lights causing it to shift to a frequency that was able to be received by your TV while decoding the digital signal as well. Either that or a reverse Tachion pulse caused the signal to travel back in time by 24 earth hours.

    --
    Who wants Pork Chops?
    1. Re:No.... by Frozen+Mad+Cows · · Score: 1

      Well to tell U the truth you are WRONGE!!!!

      You should look into things before you blast ur dumb mouth off...

      It was on last night in Canada, it was in the TV guid and was on the on-screen tv guid...

    2. Re:No.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, he was kidding

      >You should look into things before you blast ur dumb mouth off...

      and you should go take your pills

    3. Re:No.... by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      TV guid... ...on-screen tv guid

      What does a Global Unique Identifier (GUID) have to do with TV viewing? :)

  60. Opening Credits Video here!!!! by DreamTheater · · Score: 3, Informative

    The opening credits weigh in at 26MB, but it's worth it! Almost brought a tear to my eye... http://www.enterpriseuk.tv/e-media/series/index.as p Download it here

  61. Am I the only one by wiredog · · Score: 2

    who liked DS9? It had more character developement than TNG or Voyager.

    1. Re:Am I the only one by Private+Essayist · · Score: 2
      I loved DS9. One of the things that bugged me about TOS and TNG is that whenever they arrived at a planet, the inhabitants were implied to be the same the world over. No nuances of society, just one big consistent group of folks (if sometimes painted blue or green...).


      With DS9 we finally got to see a world (Bajor) like our own: full of different viewpoints, goals, ideals. It wasn't a homogenous society, but one fractured into various points-of-views. That depth of characterization was refreshing for Star Trek.

      --
      ________________
      Private Essayist
    2. Re:Am I the only one by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • One of the things that bugged me about TOS and TNG is that whenever they arrived at a planet, the inhabitants were implied to be the same the world over. No nuances of society, just one big consistent group of folks

      Mmm, apart from the episode where beardy Riker pulls some some deviant "chick" from an androgynous culture. Who then, admittedly, gets brainwashed back into compliance (much like the Federation do with their sinister sounding "re-education camps").

      That's the thing about Star Trek; there's very often a counter to any sweeping statement about it. Other than "Voyager was a piece of dull, lightweight, badly acted, underwritted, over deus ex machined predictable crap," of course. ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Am I the only one by Private+Essayist · · Score: 2
      "Mmm, apart from the episode where beardy Riker pulls some some deviant "chick" from an androgynous culture. Who then, admittedly, gets brainwashed back into compliance (much like the Federation do with their sinister sounding "re-education camps")"


      An excellent example of an exception to my rule, but my point stands. For the most part, the other shows just don't have the time to show the depth and breadth of a planet's society. DS9 had the time, and I enjoyed watching the writers flesh out the possibilities.

      --
      ________________
      Private Essayist
    4. Re:Am I the only one by KahunaBurger · · Score: 2

      Mmm, apart from the episode where beardy Riker pulls some some deviant "chick" from an androgynous culture. Who then, admittedly, gets brainwashed back into compliance (much like the Federation do with their sinister sounding "re-education camps").

      I think thats kinda the poit. there were some deviant individuals, to one overarcing planetwide culture. Its not like there were other cultures on the planet which accepted male/female roles to a greater or lesser extent - the idea that she could go elsewhere amoung her own kind was never brought up.

      To some extent, I see this as lazy but resonable when dealing with highly advanced worlds. If everyone can go half way around the world for work in the morning, there will likely be a homogenizing effect by the time they have spaceflight and such. (note that in B5, the "older" races were much more homoginous than the upstart humans). When they do this with non spacefaring worlds, I think its just plain lazy.

      Kahuna Burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
    5. Re:Am I the only one by exor · · Score: 1

      My Major problem with Voyager that everything bad happened to the same 2-3 actors in every show.

    6. Re:Am I the only one by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      One of the prerequisites to Federation First Contact is a stable world government and cultural harmony.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  62. Heard on the bridge by return+42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Shields at 35 percent, Captain."

    "Captain, the enemy vessel is firing again! Shields buckling!"

    "Captain, the enemy commander is hailing us. He demands our immediate surrender."

    "Captain?"

    "Captain?!"

    "...Oh boy."

    1. Re:Heard on the bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a lame joke. Hardly worth posting this reply. Oh well, I had a few seconds to waste

    2. Re:Heard on the bridge by tweek · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHAH!

      That has to be the best thing I've read all day. Especially since my girlfriend and I watched the Quantum Leap chain reaction on Sci-fi all day Sunday since it was raining.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    3. Re:Heard on the bridge by warpSpeed · · Score: 1

      "Captain, the enemy vessel is firing again! Shields buckling!"

      Shouldn't that be 'wvessle'?

      ~Sean

  63. Heard it on the radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Radio announcer: Do you really think Iranian terrorists would have taken Americans hostage if Ronald Reagan were president? Do you really think the Russians would have invaded Afghanistan if Ronald Reagan were president? Do you really think third-rate military dictators would laugh at America and burn our flag in contempt if Ronald Reagan were president?

    Concerned Citizen: Well, it might work!

    Hostage: We as a group do most importantly want to beseech President Reagan and our fellow Americans to refrain from any form of military or violent means as an attempt, no matter how noble or heroic, to secure our freedom.

    Concerned Citizen: Sure! Only it's going to be mighty dangerous for you, Cassidy

  64. I always wondered... by tycage · · Score: 4, Funny

    or to watch Superman shrug off bullets or never get hurt

    And then to watch him duck when the throw they gun at him. Why was that?

    :)

    --Ty

    1. Re:I always wondered... by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      Well, it's one thing to laugh off bullets, but getting bonked in the noggin with a gun never looks cool.

    2. Re:I always wondered... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that's straight out of someone's stand-up comedy, isn't it?

      (Gallagher?)

    3. Re:I always wondered... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      I'm quite afraid that you might be correct. I pictured Superman getting hit in the head with a gun while standing there smiling and I almost fell off of my chair laughing.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:I always wondered... by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I realise the question was rhetorical, but here's a possible answer. Maybe he doesn't like to get hit with stuff, but if he doesn't stop the bullets they could hit someone else. The worst a thrown gun could do is give someone a lump...

      Just a thought..

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    5. Re:I always wondered... by Davidicus · · Score: 1
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology
    6. Re:I always wondered... by weinerdog · · Score: 1

      And then to watch him duck when the throw they gun at him. Why was that?

      Because Christopher kept complaining about how much it hurt when the gun hit him.

      A better question would be, who throws a gun at someone in the first place? Do we really need Superman to handle someone that dumb?

      --
      There's no such thing as Scotchtoberfest!
  65. There are stills and a video clip by Mtgman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    on startrek.com It looks like this episode will be the first contact of the humans and the Klingon Empire. There is great tension in the video clip between Archer and the human commanders and the Vulcans who believe the humans aren't ready for interstellar diplomacy yet. They will obviously be proven right and the war with the Klingons will ensue as a result of Archer's actions.

    I'm looking forward to watching the episode which relates what Jean-Luc Picard later referred to as "A poorly handled first contact [which] led to decades of war with the Klingon Empire."(said in a episode where Riker and a couple of other under-cover agents investigating a planet that is a candidate for contact were discovered, don't remember the episode name, but it was a decent one)

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
    1. Re:There are stills and a video clip by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny
      • I'm looking forward to watching the episode which relates what Jean-Luc Picard later referred to as "A poorly handled first contact [which] led to decades of war with the Klingon Empire."(

      OK, but based on Voyager precedent, it'll be an honest misunderstanding that Archer will work tirelessly and earnestly to avoid and then repair.

      Compare with DS9, "Way of the Warrior" (paraphrasing slightly for effect...)

      • Gowron: Bwah ha ha, I have half the Klingon fleet with me! Surrender your station or face war!
      • Cisco: Come ahead if you think you're hard enough.
      • Gowron: ...? Er? Is this thing on? Did you hear what I said?
      • Cisco (chanting): You're going home, in a starship ambulance...

      Just once I'd have liked to have seen Voyager show that kind of panache.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:There are stills and a video clip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Sisko, not Cisco. He was a captain, not a line of routing/switching/firewall products.

    3. Re:There are stills and a video clip by RAVasquez · · Score: 1

      The TNG episode was, in fact, called "First Contact." It's the one where Bebe Neuwirth plays the hospital worker who boffs an alien (i.e., Riker), thereby assuring publication in that planet's equivalent of the National Enquirer.

      --

      --- Work, worry, consume, die. It's a wonderful life. -- Bill Griffith

  66. Wait till ratings lag. by Aziim · · Score: 1

    Then we get to watch Rock layin the Smack down on Scott Backula. I would perfer seeing Rob Van Dam give a 5 * frog splash to a Klingon.

  67. Willing to give it a chance, but . . . by hardburn · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm really willing to give this series a chance. I don't think Voyager was "horrible" like a lot of people do, though it certainly wasn't as great as Next Gen or even DS9. Does anybody beleive that if this show gets canceled, there will be a massive fan mail campain like there was when the orginal series was on the chopping board? I don't think there will be.

    The inheiriters to Gene's vision get two more chances to save Star Trek from destruction. The first is the "Enterprise" series, and the second is the new upcoming movie. Fortunatly for them, the next movie is an even-numbered one (odd-numbered trek movies have been cursed since the first one, while even numbered ones are great).

    One bad omen: Some of the promotional ads for "Enterprise" are using some pop crap for background music. Star Trek has a perfectly good composer, Jerry Goldsmith, who is as good as Star War's John Williams. They really ought to USE HIM! When "Enterprise" comes on, and I hear the opening credits being sung by N'Sync, I will shut off the TV, rip the tape out of the VCR, and burn it (the tape, not the VCR . . . on second thought, the VCR goes, too).

    --
    Not a typewriter
    1. Re:Willing to give it a chance, but . . . by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      When "Enterprise" comes on, and I hear the opening credits being sung by N'Sync, I will shut off the TV, rip the tape out of the VCR, and burn it...


      Well you are in luck, it's sung by Rod Stewart. Worse luck sure, but luck nonetheless.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    2. Re:Willing to give it a chance, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      even numbered ones are great


      Yeah, except for 4 and 8.

    3. Re:Willing to give it a chance, but . . . by doconnor · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry too much about the music. It's usually one of the last things done in a production and probably wasn't ready when they did the ads. They probably just through something together.

    4. Re:Willing to give it a chance, but . . . by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Interesting theory... Unfortunately for you, 4 was one of the most successful in the series, and is a favorite among many fans. Now, you personally may not have enjoyed it, but if 10 turns out to like 4, the studios will be happy. As for 8, compare 8 to 7 and 9, and tell me which the best Next Generation movie so far has been.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    5. Re:Willing to give it a chance, but . . . by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact number 4 is one of the top one hundred films of all times (in sales). I know people who don't even care for Star Trek, but they loved "the one with the whales".

      Though I much prefered 6.

      --
      Not a typewriter
  68. CmdrTaco: Get thee a Dish! by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2

    Hit Dish Network's web site, find your local dealer, haul ass over there, buy whatever receiver model amuses you (I'd pick between the HDTV and PVR versions), and get it hooked up and activated before 8pm. It's doable. (Sears sells them under the JVC name too, but an independent dealer is probably better.) Dish Network carries TWO UPN stations in their Superstations package (and THREE WBs!), so even if one of them is playing some lame sports game instead of Trek you're covered. I've been a Dish subscriber for almost 5 years. Highly recommended. You can probably get the Detroit network stations too, or better yet, the NY/LA East/West combo if you're not in a local broadcast area. You will need line-of-sight to the southwest (in Michigan), 30 degree angle IIRC.

    1. Re:CmdrTaco: Get thee a Dish! by Scrybe · · Score: 1

      I must agree. I went to sears last week and picked up a DishPro 301 complete system for $199. Dish network is currently having a promo for $9 a month which means that over 1 year i will save $263.88. in my vbook that's better than free. also the dishpro301 system I got came with double dual LNB's which means that I can later add another reciever (like the 6000 for my HDTV) at only the cost of the reciever. If I need more than that I can get a $99 multiswitch that will let me use 4 or a $199 multi that will lt me use 8. If you do get a dish all you need to supscribe for is the america's top 100 for $9 and the superstations for $4.95. I set the whole thing up in an afternoon, and that includes my first attempt which didn't have a LOS to the SAT's so I had to move the dish.

      --

      <This .sig left intentionally blank>

    2. Re:CmdrTaco: Get thee a Dish! by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      Or just go to http://www.mini-dish-affiliates.com/t.asp?id=3887 and get a DirecTV system for free+shipping (like $15 or so). Worked fer me.

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
    3. Re:CmdrTaco: Get thee a Dish! by Scrybe · · Score: 1

      An afterthought. If you can't get installed by tonight StarTrek://Enterprise/BrokenBow is on friday as well.

      --

      <This .sig left intentionally blank>

    4. Re:CmdrTaco: Get thee a Dish! by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Does DirecTV even have a UPN channel?

      Dish Network used to give you the receivers if you ordered $50+/month in programming, which is what DirecTV still does. Buying the receiver then paying $9/month is the same kind of subsidy. Take your pick, but I like Dish Network better.

    5. Re:CmdrTaco: Get thee a Dish! by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      DirecTV is picking up UPN and WB around the begining of the year. When that happens, I'll toss my antenna in the trash and be happy. :)

      I dunno about other markets, but the easiest way to find out is to do what I did: call & ask.

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
  69. Trek can't match big brother? by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    When I sit down to watch TV I'd rather see some way-out aliens, exploding spaceships and time travel than a bloke making a sandwich. But perhaps I'm just a loser.

  70. Will the real Scott Bakula please stand up? by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Ankou writes: "'Enterprise' premieres tonight on UPN. Scott Backula, you may remember him in as the lead role of 'Quantum Leap',

    MAY remember him???

    Besides the spelling error, I SERIOUSLY doubt anyone who reads /. doesn't know who Scott Bakula played. *grin*

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:Will the real Scott Bakula please stand up? by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      You have a good point, I remember all to well. Ever since seeing I-man I could never look at him without thinking of him being able to run long distances at full strength, heal from bullet (and lazer) holes as long as he can recharge from sunlight.

    2. Re:Will the real Scott Bakula please stand up? by petej · · Score: 1

      Of course. Who among us could forget Mary Jo's idolent first husband from Designing Women?

  71. Evolution on PBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My I suggest watching the Evolution series on PBS. For a bit of real science. They are showing parts 4 and 5 of the 7 part series tonight. You can always tape Enterprise.

  72. Re:That's ok Taco by Bonker · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Like this *isn't* going to be all over Morpheus by about 11:30 this evening.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  73. How to pick up local stations in a pinch by HongPong · · Score: 3, Informative
    I discovered last weekend that I stopped getting UPN. Who knows when, since I've never needed it before. So I will be missing it, and crying in chair, while mumbling curses directed at my cable provider.

    I have employed the following method to varying degrees of success. I suggest to CT and anyone else who needs broadcast stations to simply unfold a paper clip and jam it in the coaxial pin hole. On a regular analog television you'll be able to get strong local stations if you aren't within heavy walls. A lengthy bit of wire also works. I don't know if slashdot's very proprietor would be willing to lower himself to the paper clips, but hey...

    On 9/11 in the big library at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities I at least got sound as the news rolled in.

  74. One time having DirecTV sucks by hieronymous72 · · Score: 0


    DirecTV doesn't carry UPN at all! Luckily the cable feed coming into my house still works or I'd have to find another way to watch it.

    Come on DirecTV get it in gear and negotiate to carry UPN!! I like 7 days as well so I'd like to see it for other reasons too.

    --
    "All I ask is for a chance to prove that money can't make me happy."
  75. Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, I'm not the most objective individual on this subject, and I really didn't like the direction Trek went after Gene died, and the odds are, if you didn't like Voyager or DS9, you won't like Enterprise, because it's the same creative team.

    However, before we premiered Next Generation, we were dismissed pretty much out of hand before anyone had seen a single episode...and we ended up running for 10 years, not sucking most of the time, IMHO.

    So I'll be watching, excited as hell that there's new Trek on TV, and hoping against hope that it doesn't suck.

    1. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      The odd thing is that many fans feel the third season of TOS is best, which was after Gene backed off a little and had help.

      TNG got better and better throughout it's run, IMO, although it's a shame what they did to your character.

      However, I really think Berman et. al. are starting to "get it", and Enterprise has a real chance. Yes, Voyager sucked; but I think they understand why.

      If they can just avoid time travel, and REMEMBER that they don't have a Prime Directive, maybe they can recreate what made TOS great. Let's give 'em a chance.

      (Of course, Wil, you know that the folks who hate DS9 and Voyager usually hate you, too, and will use your endorsement as another reason to hate Enterprise, right? :-) )

    2. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to hell, Wheaton. We hated Wesley, and we hate you.

    3. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Coz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm... this gives ideas for the next big net pool...

      - Odds on Berman inviting Wheaton to be a guest star?

      - Odds that that guest star is a villain?

      - Odds that it's not even the leader-villain, but some kind of flunky-villain who hangs around and follows the leader?

      - Odds that the flunky-villain dies a particularly horrible death? (Say, explosive decompression?)

      Hmmm... from my probability courses, the odds on that first one make the rest almost sure bets... once the first comes to pass.

      Ah, Will, we hardly knew ye!

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    4. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

      The odd thing is that many fans feel the third season of TOS is best, which was after Gene backed off a little and had help.

      Third season has some good episodes, but it also contains some of the worst. Does "Spock's Brain" ring a bell? (I can HEAR the groans of most TOS fans from here just at the mention of the episode!) But I kinda wonder if it was Gene letting go of his baby a bit, or if it had more to do with the character development occuring naturally (as with TNG, etc.), and with the writers finally learning a bit of what worked, and taking the time to get some consistency and deeper work into it.

      --

      Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    5. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear God, you're Wil Wheaton? Man, you should have bailed from Trek sooner. You're type cast. But you already knew that...

    6. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we don't.

    7. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go visit wilwheaton.net and you'll understand :)

    8. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, on his website, it says this:


      You're lame, Wil Wheaton. I hated Wesley, and I hate you


      At least he's got a sense of humour. Hope he still has some of his salary from Star Trek in capital somewhere.


    9. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, this is cool : Wesley Cam

      Your comment violated the postercomment compression filter. Comment aborted

    10. Re:Give it a chance. It may surprise you. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Hey Wil, neat site. But scary stuff: is this true? "Later on we found out that 8 years ago, he was not only booed on stage, but he actually had death threats". Fuck, that can't be nice (even if they're from 44 year old virgins who live with their parents)

      This cracked me up: "He said he would have LOVED to have had a cameo in Galaxy Quest as a crazed fan being right in the face of the kid telling him how much he hated him on the show!". And yet "your" character, Laredo, was presented as a fan favourite. How the times they do change... ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  76. Star Worlds [Re:Strek Trek?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and what is this "Star Worlds" thing I keep hearing about? Something about these bad guys in football helmets, and little beeping trashcans?

  77. poorly handled first contact... by MadMaximus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could Picard have been alluding to the fact that an Earth farmer shot the first Klingon that came to Earth? I'd say first contact doesn't get any more poorly handled than that :)

    (I saw the premier last night on A Channel in Canada, sorry if I spoiled anything)

    1. Re:poorly handled first contact... by Mtgman · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm not sure that would have ticked off the Klingons. To a warrior race, losing one person in unknown territory would be no big deal in my opinion. Of course I didn't know HOW the Klingon got injured(thanks for that spoiler BTW :P ) so that might have made a difference too.

      Steven

      --
      -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
    2. Re:poorly handled first contact... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Supposedly the insulting part is where Archer insists on putting the poor Klingon on life support and returning him to Qo'onos. Had the Klingon been left to properly die, wouldn't have been a problem.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:poorly handled first contact... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That was inexcusable! Archer should have known better. He should have watched the shows!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  78. Re:That's ok Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this offtopic? It's funny, you twit.

  79. A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not too familiar with the Star Trek universe but I enjoy watching the various shows now and then. One thing I have learned is that Vulcans have a pretty long lifespan. IE, Mr. Tuvok from Voyager also served under Sulu from a couple human generations ago.

    My question is this: since Vulcans live so long, is there any chance that Mr. Spock could make a cameo appearance on Enterprise? I have no idea how old Mr. Spock is, so I could be way off base.

    1. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, too young; but his father would be about 10 years old, maybe a little younger; and his elderly aunt (? some kind of relative) T'Pau some say was going to be the main Vulcan character at one point in the story development, but they replaced her with T'Pol.

    2. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by KahunaBurger · · Score: 1

      My question is this: since Vulcans live so long, is there any chance that Mr. Spock could make a cameo appearance on Enterprise? I have no idea how old Mr. Spock is, so I could be way off base.

      The actor is WAY too old now. They had to do a lot of stuff to explain the fact that the actor aged at the same rate as the rest of the crew, remmeber ST III? He would have been a teenager in that time if alive at all. The actor who plays Sarek is probably to old to appear as a young vulcan ambassedor as well. Sorry.

      Kahuna Burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
    3. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Putting Mr. Nimoy aside for a moment...what about the actual Spock character? Is he old enough to fit into the time frame of this new show? Sure, he'd be younger...I'd recommend the guy who played Methos on the Highlander series to play a younger Mr. Spock.

    4. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      The actor who plays Sarek is probably to old to appear as a young vulcan ambassedor as well.

      Mark Lenard (1927-1996) isn't just too old, he's too dead. Were you thinking of somebody else?

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    5. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      Nope.

      In "Journey to Babel", McCoy said that Spock's father was (I think) 104 years old in Kirk's time. I figured if "Enterprise" was 100 years earlier, we might see Sarek as a kid.

      However, now, it seems, "Enterprise" is set 150 years earlier, so Sarek hasn't been born yet.

    6. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by Fixer · · Score: 1
      And why the hell was he only first officer?? Are all Vulcans mumbling morons when compared to humans? I mean, look: You spend a couple of human lifetimes solving the same damn problems over and over, you're gonna end up pretty skilled at it. Don't they learn?

      Yeah, it's just a fantasy series, I shouldn't expect logic and rationality.. but it still irk's me. And that teleporter.. why not just drop explosives right next to a target ship, rather than mounting them on a sub-light delivery system? Or how about warp missiles? And who designed their computer security system, Microsoft??

      TOS had great plots, and I still enjoy watching it. A couple of TNG episodes matched, but never exceeded it, in my never humble opinion. Voyager / DS9.. The mere thought causes me to return my dinner to the keyboard.

      "Physics" of StarTrek.. I gotta go clean up this puke.

      --
      "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
    7. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      And that teleporter.. why not just drop explosives right next to a target ship, rather than mounting them on a sub-light delivery system?

      Um...duh...because you'd have to drop your shields to do it? Not a very smooth thing to do in a firefight.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    8. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by KahunaBurger · · Score: 1

      Mark Lenard (1927-1996) isn't just too old, he's too dead. Were you thinking of somebody else?

      If thats the actor who played Sarek, no. In 1996 I was graduating college and rarely read the paper and didn't have a TV. He wasn't enough of an icon for me to have heard through the grapevine.

      Kahuna Burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
    9. Re:A visit from Mr. Spock perhaps? by KahunaBurger · · Score: 1

      Putting Mr. Nimoy aside for a moment...what about the actual Spock character? Is he old enough to fit into the time frame of this new show? Sure, he'd be younger...I'd recommend the guy who played Methos on the Highlander series to play a younger Mr. Spock.

      Given that Spock's human mother was still arround and relitively healthy in TOS, I doubt Spock could be that old. The charecter of his father could appear as a young abassodor or staff to one, in all likelyhood...

      And while theoretically there is always Q, any episode with him would ahve to end with wiped minds, etc, to maintain any continuity.

      Of course, there is one more charecter we know has the capacity to appear... Guinan.

      Kahuna Burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
  80. Download the opening and closing scenes... by antdude · · Score: 2

    Right here, but I think those two download sites are overloaded! I believe the video file is in MPEG format. I still can't download from either site. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  81. Trek V: GenX in space? by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Star Trek universe is the reflection of our
    universe, with science fiction props to
    illuminate understanding of ourselves. The 35 years
    of shows- more like 45 if you include the initial
    scripts and lifetime of the fifth series- span at
    least three cultural generations of Americans:
    The pre-boomers, the baby boomer yuppies, and now
    the GenX. The show has always focused on 30-something
    adults of the era it was filmed.

    The orignal trek series was like "Combat in Space"
    or the generation of the baby boomers. They even
    made fun of boomer culture like hippies and
    peacniks in some of the episodes. The pre-boomers
    were conventional, pro-establishment types.

    The second and third series, New Generation and
    Deep Space Nine, were "Yuppies in Space" or pure
    baby boomer. The main characters were educated,
    priviledged and aloof. The fourth series, Voyager, was
    transitional with late-boomer officers and a GenX junior crew.
    The independence of the latter was a source of conflict in the show.

    Andromeda is the first all-GenX sci-fi show.
    GenX'ers are more creative and independent and
    fully tech savy. I presume the fifth Trek series
    will be another GenX series.

    1. Re:Trek V: GenX in space? by davey23sol · · Score: 4, Funny

      DAMN IT!

      Mod this down if you will, but this is *NOT* the FIFTH Trek series.. this is the *SIXTH* trek series.

      You can see the episode guide of Star Trek: The Animated Series here.

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    2. Re:Trek V: GenX in space? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Not only that, but it featured the Kzin, from Larry Niven's Known Space universe. I've never seen it, but I understand that the episode was written by Niven, and follows the same basic plot as one of his short stories (forgotten the name) about a powerful gun left behind by an ancient, extinct civilization.


      I'm probably the only person in the world who has it, but the original Star Trek Roleplaying game was made after the animated series, but before TNG, and so features prominently many bits of Trek lore from TAS.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:Trek V: GenX in space? by InfoVore · · Score: 2, Interesting
      GenX'ers are more creative and independent and fully tech savy.

      You ARE kidding, right? Just because a few million kids learned to download mp3s and surf the web, you are more tech savy than earlier generations? I have news for you, EVERY generation has had their tech-savy core. That core is always surrounded by a larger but less knowledgeable group of enthusiasts. The technology varies by generation. In the 20s it was AC electricity, in the 30s it was radio, the 40s were automobiles & aircraft, the 50s were TV, the 60's were transistor electronics and space tech, the 70s were integrated circuit electronics, the 80s were personal computers, the 90s were the Internet.

      In each generation for the last one hundred years there was a core technology which transformed people's quality of life. In each generation, there are new and interesting technologies which capture the imagination of that generation. In each generation, there existed a core of young and enthusiastic developers and early users of that technology. The only thing changing is the technology.

      It is arrogance, hubris, and ignorance of the highest order to assume that THIS generation is more "tech savy" than earlier generations.

      Those who ignore history, are doomed to sound foolish.

      IV

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    4. Re:Trek V: GenX in space? by The+Paradox · · Score: 1

      this is *NOT* the FIFTH Trek series.. this is the *SIXTH* trek series.

      Sheesh. The animated series sucked. I couldn't even tell McCoy and Scotty apart.

      And *anyway* TPTB at Paramount called it Series V before the cat called Enterprise got out of the bag. And we all know that Berman and Braga are gods, especially Braga.

      On an utterly unrelated topic, did you know that a pic of Braga in his nice leather jacket and scowl makes an excellent dartboard?

      --
      Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
  82. Yes, that's what I said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, sitting on your ass is more productive. It improves your reading speed and, if you choose reasonable books, your vocabulary. I've rarely, if ever, learned new words from watching television. Let's face it, the crap on TV is geared towards the mentality of an elementary school student. The plots are horribly predictable. There is little to no intellectual thought provoked or provided.

    My point is that if you're entertained by what's on TV, you're probably not very smart.

    You also said I was a cliche asshole. What cliche did I use? I think if anything my viewpoint is anything but cliche, at least judging by how many people ask me if I saw "so-and-so" last night on TV.

    Do whatever you want, I don't care. I'll continue to experience the outdoors, read classic literature, and non-fiction and learn things. You can continue watching the moving picture tube and discuss the latest plot twists on your inane pseudo soap opera sitcoms.

    1. Re:Yes, that's what I said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It improves your reading speed and, if you choose reasonable books, your vocabulary.

      TV improves your TV watching skills, books improve your book reading skills. Your point is... ?

      > I've rarely, if ever, learned new words from watching television.

      Then you've rarely, if ever, turned on PBS. Or TVO in my neck of the woods.

      >Let's face it, the crap on TV is geared towards the mentality of an elementary school student.

      Why don't you turn on PBS or TVO? You'd find shows (like my) that are much more complex than "man fall down... funny".

      >The plots are horribly predictable.

      I didn't know shows like nova had a "plot" per-se.

      >There is little to no intellectual thought provoked or provided.

      [SARCASM] Wow, for someone who (self-proclaimedly) reads so many books and considers themselves particularly intelligent, I like how you backed all your opinions up with so many facts. [/SARCASM]

      >My point is that if you're entertained by what's on TV, you're probably not very smart.

      My point is that if you can read then you should have been able to read a TV Guide and find out what PBS and TVO have in store for you.

      >What cliche did I use?

      The "TV Rots brain cells" style cliche. You did, however, add some sauce to it.

      >I'll continue to experience the outdoors, read classic literature, and non-fiction and learn things.

      Let's rephrase that, since you are seemingly a classical literature afficando, you'll be learning _old_ things that no longer affect our culture.

      Which shows, since every Tom, Dick & Harry (oooo My own cliche) knows that American culture is often available via poorly written satire nightly on TV.

      >You can continue watching the moving picture tube and discuss the latest plot twists on your inane pseudo soap opera sitcoms.

      And you can continue reading inane soap opera style plots in your classical literature. I fail to see the difference.

      BTW: Just give PBS a shot. You might learn something modern for a change.

  83. Series Finale by Mad+Man · · Score: 0

    After accomplishing his mission to save the Federation, Dr. Sam Beckett leaps out of the body of Capt. Jon Archer...

  84. UPN Affiliates in W. MI by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    In case you want to try the "paper clip" antenna idea, the site (which was not /.'d just now) list affiliates in Grand Rapids (WXSP ch 18) and Traverse City (WFOX ch 33,40,45). I think a paper clip and a coathanger might be necessary for UHF, though. Most of hicks here in rural areas us throw the UHF antenna out with the TV's package...:-(

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  85. Are you sure it is 150 years? by alman · · Score: 1

    IIRC, it is going to be 90 years before Kirk.

  86. Re:You mean respectable ...I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since somebody else already started in on it ;=)

    A less respectful network would have added hobbits and Harry Potter to the show.

  87. Enola Gay by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Others have mentioned named aircraft in a rather anonymous way, but there is one whose name is well-remembered.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  88. hmm by SlamMan · · Score: 1

    "Who knows when, since I've never needed it before. So I will be missing it, and crying in chair, while mumbling curses directed at my cable provider. "

    or you could get out that funny metal thing called an antenna.....

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  89. Filter needed by binarybum · · Score: 1

    Damn. Why isn't there a "Star-Trek Prequels" filter?

    --
    ôó
  90. Since you've seen it already by WinDoze · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it begin with Scott Bakula "leaping" into the body of a starship captain, only to be confronted by a screaming Klingon and sighing "Oh boy"?

    1. Re:Since you've seen it already by MikeyLikesIt! · · Score: 1
      Does it begin with Scott Bakula "leaping" into the body of a starship captain, only to be confronted by a screaming Klingon and sighing "Oh boy"?

      Well I missed the first 5 minutes yesterday, but the music that is played with the closing credits is kind of reminiscent of the Quantum Leap theme... In fact, it's REALLY corny...

      --

      I dunno... What do you wanna do?

  91. Interpretive Dance by nhavar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love it. See Star Trek in all it's forms is really a peice of art. Normal shows aren't because at the end of the show everyone talks and they've basically all see the same movie. The interpretation will be identical. True art gets interpreted differently by each individual viewer based on something inside the viewer that the piece of art speaks to. I've heard the interpretation of Star Trek described as "Self, EGO, ID (Freud)", "the three stooges", "racism", "team work (the three muskateers)", "hero worship", "morality play", "wwf".... I think it's hilarious how many different ways people can interpret and read things into the Star Trek franchise. Of course there are the people who can't just leave things at entertainment value and who must always search for "the deeper meaning". And of course sometimes there is a purposeful "deeper meaning".

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    1. Re:Interpretive Dance by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 1

      True art gets interpreted differently by each individual viewer

      Does that mean Rorschach ink blots are art?

  92. Already Premired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Have Already seen it because in canada it has already premierd it is very good though it seems funny that their tech is more advanced than Kirks

  93. Trekkie, Now it is time for a boner. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It pleases me that Trekkie will once again have a boner. Perhaps he will propagate.

  94. Engineering space on aircraft by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Nor did the PT boats. One needs to look at the mission here. PT boats and aircraft are both designed for short or short-ish missions, and therefore come home for the type of care that you need an engineering space for.

    Carriers, battleships, destroyers, and the like stay at sea for weeks or months. They have to be capable of greater repairs on-the-spot.

    But there was at least one aircraft that had 'engineering space', the B36. It had walkways through the wings, and sufficient space around each of its 6 prop engines. You could take one engine offline, feather its prop, and do some fairly extensive work on it while airborne.

    It depends on the mission.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  95. Re:Good series... for me to poop on!! by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

    This "story arc" you refer to is nothing more than a substitute for good writing. It's a cheap way to keep viewers, and in my opinion many series suffer as a result. These are the kinds of programs that will be forgotten in ten years. Only the ones with star trek in the title will be remembered because they have an endless supply of dimwitted fans who will watch them no matter how poorly written they are. There are seldom any individual episodes with decent storytelling because they are only giving you enough of some drawn out story line to sucker you into watching the next episode.

    Sorry, but I don't have enough time in my life to worry about digesting an entire season of some lame ass series just so I don't miss some "key" portion of an unnecessarily drawn out continuing story. This whole trend is almost as bad as sitcoms with their "serious" episodes, i.e.:'This week in a very special Home Improvement Tim deals with infidelity with a Tooltime groupie because his wife became a fat cow from having a bunch of kids", for chrissakes lighten up... it's only a sitcom.

  96. Not much faith in the new series' success by alumshubby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not too long ago, a fellow Trekker and I discussed the prospect of a series based 150 years BTOS (before The Original Series), and we we both dicouraged when we saw our first view of the NX-01 -- clearly much more advanced-looking than even the post-refit NCC-1701 of Star Trek -- The Motion Picture.

    I vaguely recall seeing now and again in a series espisode or movie some passing references to earlier, pre-Constitution-class Enterprises, all the way back to the USN aircraft carrier and beyond. Some of those designs, while not terribly inspiring visually, still conveyed a sense of foraying into the unfamiliar.

    Coming from an earlier, less technologically sophisticated era, the ship should have looked less rather than more streamlined and fluid, even a bit clunky, conveying visually the idea of less advanced starship design in the earlier era. The production-design people have gotten this basic concept completely backwards. To make an analogy in terms of US naval warships, it's as if somebody wanted to make a movie about the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana harbor, but lacking any pre-World-War-II battleships because they'd all been sunk at Pearl Harbor or scrapped at the end of the war, the movie's producers used an ultramodern Aegis guided-missile cruiser as a stand-in and hoped nobody would notice or care.

    By violating the canon, the series' producers have made a conscious fundamental goof with the biggest visual element of the series, presumably just to have some cooler eye candy. Maybe they'll suck in a younger generation of viewers this way, but to my mind, they've forgotten to "dance with them that brung'em," as we used to put it in Texas. And that kind of egregiously flawed decision making on such a basic, early choice gives me little reason to expect the other aspects of the series to be any better than a rehash of other Star Trekism.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    1. Re:Not much faith in the new series' success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from an earlier, less technologically sophisticated era, the ship should have looked less rather than more streamlined and fluid, even a bit clunky, conveying visually the idea of less advanced starship design in the earlier era. The production-design people have gotten this basic concept completely backwards.

      Not necessarily. To make the leap from air to space, what are things going to be based on? What we have already - aircraft design.
      Compared to late XX aircraft design all the versions of Enterprise have looked ungainly. I can see a certain generation of hull designers still stuck in the aviation mentality designing lovely streamlined spacecraft using the "TLAR" (That Looks About Right) method which guides most preliminary aircraft design today, especially if spacecraft are assembled planet-side and then sent up. Assembling the craft at, say, a space station/Starbase would obviate this requirement. Aerodynamic design and streamlining are absolutely useless where there is no atmosphere to cause drag.
      Enterprise, as it never has to exit or re-enter an atmosphere could just as well be a cube - but it wouldn't be as attractive to the TV-viewing public.
      -- CLB

    2. Re:Not much faith in the new series' success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You are aware, aren't you, that the relation you posit (more streamlined = more advanced) is completely bogus?

      You see, the thing is, you don't need streamlining in space! I suppose a bit of remedial basic science instruction is in order, since they probably aren't teaching this stuff in school any more, and lord knows that Trekkie shows and fan material ain't gonna teach it. Out there in space, there's a distinct lack of air. No air means no air resistance. No air resistance means no reason to streamline.

      The only reason to streamline a spacecraft is if it needs to fly around in an atmosphere as well as space, and then it will look a heck of a lot more like an airplane (or a lifting body) than anything else, much like the Space Shuttle. And even I, an ardent Star Trek hater, know that The Original Series' version of the Enterprise literally cannot fly around in the atmosphere (that's why the show's creators put transporters on board). So there is no need for the Enterprise to be streamlined.

      Real reason this show will suck: because it's Trek. It can't help it. The original series was the only one with anything really worthwhile, despite all the campiness. Modern trek is fluff, suitable only for those who can't handle real science fiction (and no, I'm not talking about B5, though B5 was certainly a better effort by far than any Trek to date). Trek is full of bad characterization, bad acting, bad science, bad science fiction, bad special effects, and is simply rotten all the way through.

    3. Re:Not much faith in the new series' success by dkh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Its not really all that shocking or disturbing. Capabilities and sensibilities of what looks "right" change over time. Have you watched an episode of TOS lately? If they made a show that, with nearly 35 years perspective, looked "older" and more "primative" then the original show, it wouldn't stand a chance, people would think some high school kids were screwing around with a camera.

      Its ficition, it requires a certain suspension of disbelief. They changed the klingon's appearance and everyone survived that and manage to put that great sudden anatomical shift out of mind. Its about the story.

      Unfortunately, it is about the story, and while TOS looks primative from todays standards the storys were actually quite good, and if not good, at least somewhat unique. TNG and Voyager were just pathetic in their reliance on the same tired plot devices and spending nearly all their time explaining why they couldn't do somehting that we had seen their technology easily over come in the past.

      Maybe this one will bring back some interesting stories. I'm pessimistic though, I loath time travel stories, at least those that aren't done "right", Voyager never did them right.

    4. Re:Not much faith in the new series' success by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Out there in space, there's a distinct lack of air. No air means no air resistance. No air resistance means no reason to streamline.

      Didn't you hear the "whoosh" as the Enterprise went by? Your primitive 21st century grasp of space doesn't match what we've seen (and heard!) from the future.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Not much faith in the new series' success by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • we we both dicouraged when we saw our first view of the NX-01 -- clearly much more advanced-looking than even the post-refit NCC-1701

      The TOS era CA was never intended to enter an atmosphere (except for the saucer section being used an emergency "crash then walk away" lifeboat). At the time that it was conceived, deliberately not streamlining it was a stunningly bold concept. In that context, the Intrepid class was a step back to the "old fashioned" streamlined design shown in the NX ship.

      All that said... I completely agree. The NX ship looks totally wrong. In fact, it looks like an ADB New Light Cruiser from Star Fleet Battles. Wrong, wrong, wrong! Ick! Eww!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  97. Other reviews of the Premiere by Cy+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    WIRED: Star Trek: Bakula to the Future

    Scripps/Howard: Operation: Enterprise

    The San Francisco Examiner: Living in the now

    New York Daily News: Bakula's Bold New 'Enterprise'

    Also, MAXIM's cover girl this month is Jolene Blalock, who plays Vulcan Sub Commander T'Pol. Presumably this is the same T'Pol that in ST:TOS Amok Time oversees Spock's Pon Farr ceremony. Many of the Trek fan site are speculating on just how long it will be before her character experiences the Pon Farr with no Vulcan males around and only Capt. Archer present to address her needs.

    1. Re:Other reviews of the Premiere by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the MAXIM link should be here instead.

    2. Re:Other reviews of the Premiere by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, the Vulcan who oversaw Spock's Pon Farr ceremony was T'Pau.

      And isn't it only Vulcan males who experience Pon Farr? In The Search For Spock, Saavik tells David that Pon Farr is the Vulcan male puberty, which implies that it does not happen in female Vulcans. Or perhaps female Vulcans go through a seperate, but similar type of thing?

    3. Re:Other reviews of the Premiere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Originally it was T'Pau, but was changed to T'Pol to avoid having to pay royalties to the original screenwriter (union contract).

    4. Re:Other reviews of the Premiere by staeci · · Score: 1

      maxim.com does not go where you expect it to...

      --
      'Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson...'
    5. Re:Other reviews of the Premiere by jvl001 · · Score: 1

      Try Maxim, unless JB is now the cover girl for Viagra.

      --
      /. is to journalism as graffiti is to a bathroom wall
  98. A Channel is EDMONTON based with Calgary affiliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to burst your bubble...

  99. TV? by supabeast! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Call me rude, but people still watch TV?

  100. Here's hoping by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Berman is so inept, he never seems to have understood Roddenberry or if he did he tries to avoid it (probably thinking it doesn't garner rating). But I think Bakula has great promise, he seems to understand the human condition much better, and if he actually has something to say about this production... it might, just might be possible to catch the lightning in the bottle again.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  101. NAVY doesn't fly?!? by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

    The U.S.N. has more aircraft than the U.S.A.F. Way more if you include the Marines who function under the Navy. Also Roddenberry's original concept of Star Trek was to be a sort of Horatio Hornblower in space, you can't get much more Navy than that.

  102. formats and universes by KahunaBurger · · Score: 2

    Would I love to see a B5-style story done in the Star Trek universe? Hell yeah. I'd love to see a B5-style story run in any universe -- it was a great example of a style of storytelling which we're drastically lacking.

    Funny thing is, now that the 4 season arc* is over, I'd now like to see a star trek or even outer limits type story in the B5 universe. The grand theme was great, now lets see an anthology type show delving into the little moments in the less explored areas, organizations and charecters.

    *don't even try to tell me there were five seasons, I can't HEAR YOU LALALALA!

    Kahuna Burger

    --
    ...will work for Chick tracts...
    1. Re:formats and universes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fifth season was bad, but so was the first. Of course both are important for the development of the characters.

    2. Re:formats and universes by xQx · · Score: 1

      If they had condensed the whole first half of the fifth series into 2 eps, it woulda been allright.

      God those psi corp wars were PISSING ME OFF by the end.

      ... But yeah, would love to see the BAB5 universe from another perspective. Basically BAB5 is the equilivent of DS9... need a TNG perspective :)

  103. This proves it will suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have the woosiest theme song ever. It sounds like Richard Marx or something.

    Star Trek is for pussies. It's sad, but it's true.

  104. Just mumbling to yourself? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Guess what Taco, If you CALL your cable provider instead of sitting there mumbling, you can get your UPN back.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  105. That's nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should hear Nimoy's rendition of "Proud Mary" (Yes, the CCR classic)

    It's not as popular in masochist circles as Shatner's "Lucy..", but it's just as horrible.

  106. Re:Yes, that's what I said. DUH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Asswipe,
    You can do both, you know. You can enjoy TV and literature. I happen to enjoy TV, literature, magazines (serious and tabloids), etc, AND, I'm actually smart (member of Mensa).
    You tree-hugging fanatical anti-TV freaks are as wacked-out as the morons you claim us to be.

  107. Agreed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't they get Tom Green. They should take him. Really, take him away right now.

    Agreed - I can see the pitch now:

    "Mr Green, we're sending a bunch of people out to explore the universe, and we'd like you to go with them."

    "Who's going? Oh, well, let's see, the first launch will contain mostly telephone sanitizers, accountants, and managerial consultants."

    "Ahh, yes, I can see how you'd think that you don't fit in with that group, umm.. we're sending you to entertain them! Yes, that's it! They'll need entertainment on their trip, and you've been selected to go."

  108. Please! by Adnans · · Score: 2

    Let that title song of be a one-off one?! I mean, who wants to listen to a crappy Bon Jovi style theme song everytime an episode starts?!! :)

    -adnans

    --
    "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
  109. BATMAN! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    Hey, heroes can be made by wit, daring and bravery, not just by gamma rays and the planet Krypton. One word: Batman.

    Semi-low-tech environment. Cowboy attitude. Sounds familiar.

    Oh yeah, this could be a good thing.

    -grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:BATMAN! by MeltyMan · · Score: 1

      SPIDERMAN: the best of both... radioactive, yet witty as well. :)

      Can we start a flame war? Nevermind, I'm sleepy.

      --
      "Ummmm..." ...The programmer's "Om."
  110. Re:I watched it last night!!! Not on UPN. by Spifmeister · · Score: 1

    I live in calgary, I do not have UPN, and I watched it on Global on Tuesday

  111. Wha?! Star Trek: Enterprise?!?!?! by esoterus · · Score: 1

    I thought it was Battlestar Bakula! Damn it!

    --
    Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
  112. Well, Duh by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

    It's very simple, they puts the characters in extraordinary circumstances against unrealistic odds and 9 times out of 10 every important character needs to be alive at the end of the day. Without superior abilities everyone of those ships would have been destroyed before the end of their first season.

    Human beings simply aren't suited to the Star Trek universe unless they can pull out the Hand of God(TM) in the form of alien powers or uber tech to save their asses every once in a while.

    Also the series provide a framework for telling lots of different stories. Some about people in a serious and realistic way. Others are just excuses for huge space battles. Once in a while they even have insightful satire of modern concerns. I think it's hard to say that the series as a whole are actually about anything. To me they seem more like a vehicle for invention that gets used in many different ways.

  113. What UPN *really* stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Urban
    Peoples
    Network

  114. How many times has this exact comment been posted? by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't even think this guy came up with it! This is an amazing case of karma grabbing!

    Here is an earlier copy of this same post by another user.

    I am amazaed that the /. community is so quick to mod up repeat posts like this while at the same time jumping all over the editors if a story goes up twice. At least the editors aren't repeating stuff on purpose.

    Maybe we should all be on the lookout for the next Star Trek story to go up. We can race to see who can copy and paste this superhero post the fastest and earn precious karma. It could be a "superhero first post" contest.

    Of course, maybe the post is GPL'ed, in which case this reuse is all ok. :)

  115. Tuesday Premiere - Calgary, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also saw it premiere last night in Calgary, Alberta. Would like to see it again but do not get UPN.

    As always, it's hard to tell from the premiere how the show will turn out. When I think back to the original Star Trek and to Next Generation, the early shows turn out, in reptrosect, to look terribly unpolished compared to later episodes.

    I was not much into Next Generation until well into the second year but episodes in later years turned out to be some of the finest television ever, as was true of the original series.

    The key to the success of Enterprise will be the acting (especially the development of the characters) and what social commentary the producers can weave into the episodes - why I like the original series so much even to this day. That is why(the original) Star Trek and Next Generation were so "successful" and that other shows much less so.

    As for the comments re the "latest" Enterprise looking too streamlined and developed, chalk that up to advances in production. It's hard to go backwards once each new standard is set.

    Overall rating: has potential and only time (and good writing) will tell. Good start though and Bakula is an enlightened choice.

    A hint: check out the pictures hanging on the wall behind Bakula in one or two scenes.

    Final comment about our newest Vulcan: what a rack!

  116. Re: some kind of Air Navy by CodeShark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Long time sci-fi tradition. Observe:
    • Space = a 3D Ocean
      the medium in which things travel, battles take place, etc.
    • Planet = land masses
      Things that you go to for whatever reason,{trade, conquest, negotiating, R&R, etc.}
    • Stations = Outposts
      Smaller, strategically placed defensive or trade locations (DS-9, Babylon 5, etc.)
    • Capital "launching" ships=Aircraft Carriers
      Not so much on the Star Trek Series, but Galactica, Star Wars, some on B5)
    • Large Spacecraft="ships of the line"
      For example NCC-1701A = Constellation Class Cruiser, NCC-1701D= Galaxy Class Cruiser although they probably more closely fit the current definition & capabilities of a battleship, Voyager might be the rough equivalent of a small cruiser or large frigate, DS-9's Defiant is probably most like a Destroyer, but if equipped w/Cloaking technology becomes an attack submarine,
    • the runabouts, fighters, etc. correspond to PT-Boats and launched fighter aircraft, and finally
    • Photon torpedoes = Explosive ordinance (torpedoes or large shells, phasers = bullet type weapons
    Put all the ships together and you have a fleet, (for example the USA's Atlantic Fleet, based mainly out of NYNY and Norfolk, VA, or the USA's Pacific Fleet, based out of Pearl Harbor, San Diego & Seattle). This is different from the USAF where the divisions are more by the mission of a particular type of aircraft, i.e SAC = Strategic Air Command, MAC = Military Airlift Command & TAC = Tactical Air Command, etc.

    There are probably a dozen more analogues, but you get the idea.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  117. Re: Canada often gets Star Trek 1st by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Heh heh...and we got to see the the sexy vulcan chick and the engineer slather cold, wet, slippery de-contamination gel on each other 1st too...woo hoo! (judjing from T'Pol's umm..."thermometers"...it must've been cold...heh heh)...but I digress...

    Interestingly enough, it seems to be a tradition to show Star Trek shows a day in advance in Canada...

    When the original series was first played, the CBC received and broadcast their print of each episode one day prior to it's debut in the US. Subsequent series were syndicated and shown on various other independent networks and stations, sometimes a day in advance. I remember DS9 and Voyager in particular being shown here the day before it was on a US station.

  118. Comic book store guy says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "worst... episode... ever"

  119. Re:Stealing my idea by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When STNG first came out, I thought it would be cool to have a series showing what it would be like to be a rookie at the lowest rank on the Enterprise. Stuff like replicators that didn't always work right: "I wanted a Gornburger, not this Klingon worm crap.". Or low resolution holodecks. Or "Do I smell burning ham - or did Kirk singe himself again? Hey, what's with this red uniform?"

  120. ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the Japanese officer looks Korean. D'oh, the actress is!

    Geez. You think these days, Hollywood would get these things right. Esp because there's a long history of hatred between the Koreans and Japanese.

  121. New York lost UPN9 (and seven other stations) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transmitters had been atop the WTC. They're rerouting (painfully slowly) to Empire State Building. Stations still programming, and cable customers see them fine.
    Over-the-air TV is down to CBS2, some UHF Spanish channels and some UHF New Jersey PBS stations

    1. Re:New York lost UPN9 (and seven other stations) by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      Actually, for me, 50 miles or so from NYC, everything is back up except channel 13 PBS...

      CBS 2 was the first back on the air since they already had the Empire State Building set up as backup, then by Monday (I was away from TV Friday-Sunday), everything was broadcasting again except 13.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  122. Re:Why popular? - Archetypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek has remained popular because of its use of archetypes, tapping the mythic imagination with its heroes and quests. ST:TOS had the most clear-cut archetypes. Rather than being about superheroes, as suggested elsewhere on these boards, ST has succeeded when there are strong archetypes. Some non-fans have complained that characters in ST are too one-sided, but this is actually a strength in the series. ST has failed to be interesting when it muddles the people into ordinary run of the mill personalities. It succeeds when it has strong archetypes: The Warrior, The Hero, The Wise Man/Wise Woman, The Trickster, The Shadow, The Wanderer, The Shapeshifter.

    ST:TOS survives still because of its powerful core -- Kirk, Spock, McCoy. Kirk is the hero/warrior, and it would be hard to confuse him for anything else. He is aided, as in traditional mythology by The Wise Man -- in this case Spock -- and by McCoy, who in this case has the role of Wise Woman, embodying the feminine aspects of wisdom -- healing, emotion, compassion to Spocks detached intellect. ST:TOS is a fine balancing of these three different forces. The other series have floundered until they have strenghted the archetypes in the cast.

  123. Spock's Brain by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    I still love the original show. It's still far more intellegent and well written than many of the new shows. Best of all, it never had to explain itself as an advanced brotherhood of evolved humans, it just went along as if that were a given. I love it when people tell me "Spock's Brain" was the worst Star Trek ever. Some people just don't get it.

    After a disappointing run with Voyager (a show that somewhat rises above such crap as Babylon5) I hope that the writers for Enterprise remember the one rule that always made Star Trek special.

    It's about the humans!

  124. Craft design by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's as if
    somebody wanted to make a movie about the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana harbor, but lacking any pre-World-War-II
    battleships ... , the movie's producers used an ultramodern Aegis guided-missile cruiser as a stand-in and hoped nobody would notice or care.


    Amusingly, the real Aegis missile cruiser design was originally criticized on the grounds that it didn't have enough weapons showing. Aegis ships use a vertical launch system, nothing of which is visible except a small hatch on the deck. No bristling missile launchers like USSR ships of that era. Members of Congress actually berated the Navy about this.


    The same thing happened with submarines in the 1950s. There was considerable resistance to building submarines that looked like bland cylinders. Nautilus, the first nuclear sub, still had a destroyerlike deck. All later US Navy subs, though, were dull, boring, but effective tubes.


    In battleships, the most attractive design ever was the streamlined Yamato of WWII. The designers claimed that the streamlining was to keep the shock waves from the 18-inch guns from damaging the ship. The Yamato, like most WWII battleships, didn't accomplish much militarily, and was sunk by aircraft in 1945.


    Once a technology is far enough along that
    a broad range of workable designs are possible,
    there's no obvious correlation between a finished-looking design and when the artifact was built.


    Look at rockets. The V-2 was the most nicely shaped rocket ever built. Since then, rockets are almost always simple tubes. But look at the Space Shuttle at launch, the wierdest collection of big shapes ever to fly.

  125. Tasha died 3 times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once to the black oil alien (no, not Xfiles).
    Once in the dimensional shift episode, where the enterprise C from 20 years ago came to the present Enterprise D and Tasha went over to help before the C went back in time.
    And then again as her own Romulan daughter. Something tells me there was a fourth time she died too, but that may just have been a SUperman episode :p

    1. Re:Tasha died 3 times. by Flower · · Score: 1
      Just to be anal about the entire thing. :) Tasha didn't die when she went back in time with the Enterprise C. She was captured by the Romulans and that's how the daughter thing came about. IIRC, Tasha dies trying to escape from Romulous.

      I can't remember if the daughter buys it or not. I don't think she does.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    2. Re:Tasha died 3 times. by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      Did anyone see the actress on that one episode of NYPD Blue? She's gotten all fat and nasty. Too bad - to think she left ST:TNG to be killed on Pet Sematary.

      Schnapple

  126. Star Trek is NOT about heroes... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Star Trek is about anonymous ensigns in red shirts who accompany Kirk on the away team and die horrible, screaming, bloody deaths.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  127. Ever get the feeling there is a "geek demographic" by gunnk · · Score: 1

    and that the advertisers really want our attention? How else can it be that Star Trek Enterprise is in the same time slot as Junkyard Wars?!?!? (Not to mention Good Eats for those of us that like a little science with our food). Add my fondness for the Amazing Race (okay, a weakness, I admit it!) and it looks like I need to buy a second VCR...

    --
    Life is short: void the warranty.
  128. Re: Six Months by dorward · · Score: 1

    It should be on Sky One early in the new year.

  129. Obligatory grammar flame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "more rougher"

    I hope it's more better, too.

  130. Re:not cannon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *ahem* The word is spelled "canon", not cannon. Unless perhaps you loaded all the vcr tapes into a large barreled gun and shoot them somewhere using black powder....

  131. DishNetwork for those without UPN ($15/month) by just+someone · · Score: 1

    We lost UPN this weekend.
    When I told the sysadmin, he went out got a dishnetwork system at sears and has east and west coast feeds for UPN (he says it's part of the superstation package). Took him and his son 20 minutes to setup, and for $200 he got the sat stuff. For the first year he gets a 21.99 credit off his service which means he's paying $15/month.

    Told the cable co I was leaving if they did not solve it by today. I'm going to sears tonight.

    Canceling cable, but keeping the cablemodem service. I'll kill that and put the cable modem up for sale if they ever put a filter to block out the basic channels. Otherwise I'm take the $10/mon increase in cablemodem cost as cost of seeing the local channels.

  132. Star Trek was a MORALITY PLAY by DG · · Score: 2

    The Original Series Star Trek really had nothing at all to do with superheroes or the like. It was Gene's morality play, a means of examining 20th century problems and issues.

    The whole space travel thing was just to make it easier for the settings of each issue to be different each week - a new planet, a new problem to be examined. And each of those problems reflecting a problem relating to the 1960's - racism, war (cold and overt), the place of technology in society, and so on and so forth.

    Ever notice how all other worlds in the Trek universe are so one-note?

    Even the characters were broken down into metaphors - Spock was cold science and reason, McCoy emotion and compassion, and Kirk was Everyman, walking a line between the two.

    Some have even broken this down on Freudian lines, with each of the Big Three representing Ego, Superego, and Id.

    It was never intended to be taken at face value, any more than Aesop intended one to believe in talking foxes.

    The later series lost track of this (especially Voyager) and degenerated into parodies of themselves - although DS9 managed to have a pretty powerful story arc, once it found its centre.

    It'll be interesting to see where this series goes.

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  133. Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    However, on the whole, Star Trek was simply a rehash of half a dozen other genres, set aboard a Starship (e.g Wagon Train, Lost on Space, Doctor Who etc..). None of these series lasted anywhere near as long. What was Star Trek's secret?

    Answer:
    Uhura
    Deanna Troi
    Jadzia Dax
    7 of 9
    T'Pol

  134. If you don't get UPN, be sure you check... by LupusUF · · Score: 1

    If you don't get UPN and you wish to watch the show, be sure you check your other channels. I don't get UPN, but my provider puts popular UPN shows (such as voyager...and now Enterprise, Buffy, and Roswell) on WB. They often show at different times...for example Enterprise will be shown Thursday at 10:00pm (so the WB can show the Indian in the cupboard tonight) but, they are shown eventually. Check http://www.tvguide.com , for the listings in your area.

  135. Also... by ender- · · Score: 1

    Enola Gay
    Others have mentioned named aircraft in a rather anonymous way, but there is one whose name is well-remembered.

    As is "Glamorous Glennis..." although perhaps not quite as recognized by the average joe.

    Ender

  136. WRONG.... by just+someone · · Score: 1

    Not up here. Cable didn't drop it, the local station did.

    The nearest UPN feed is now in LA, about 200 miles away.

    Still the cable co's fault for not getting their shit together and getting another UPN station.

  137. Maxim Slashdotted. by BrickM · · Score: 1

    How appropriate.

  138. Are YOU a Karma whore? by Glorat · · Score: 1

    My moderator points will follow the person who can tell me when and where this series will appear in the UK!

    1. Re:Are YOU a Karma whore? by sacherjj · · Score: 2

      Actually they won't. Since you posted, you cannot moderate. Good try though. :)

  139. Drive To Canada Taco. :) by Etriaph · · Score: 1

    CityTV in Toronto is airing the premiere tonight from 8:00PM - 10:00PM. Space: The Imagination Station is doing their Premiere on the 30th. Guess it pays to have basic cable in Canada. :)

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
  140. Tolkien analogy by albin · · Score: 1

    Aside from the questionable quality of the writing, the period they're starting to tell stories from in the ST universe reminds me of the Silmarillion/Books of Lost Tales by Tolkien. It's the background material that served to deepen the original, more popular and more "recent" (in its own timeline) material. The problem is, I'm afraid a TV show won't be given the indulgence that a Tolkien with a Lord of the Rings behind him was given, so the "Enterprise" material may lack the deep mystery and cobwebbiness of its analogue. Anyway.

    --
    A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg. -- Samuel Butler
  141. Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers) by Quarterly+Editor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Enterprise debuted here in Calgary on Tuesday night, and I was impressed with the pilot.

    For my background, I never enjoyed the original series, and found TNG much improved after Gene passed away and the Berman team took over.

    The intro song has, for the first time, WORDS! This was startling and disappointing, until I found myself liking the song. Anyone heard it before?

    We are provided with a glipse of post-First Contact politics. This includes a growing resentment of the Vulcans for with-holding technology and a passionate desire to be atonomous as a sepecies. This is especially evident after an accidental first contact with the Klingons. The Vulcans themselves appear to be a bit "off", in that they are not as 'emotionless' and they are obvious manipulators of the human leaders.

    New technology abounds in the form of phasers, transporters, medical supplies and other things I can't recall.

    The new ship is rushed into a mission early into the episode, and this quickly scuttles what up to that point was helpful character and relationship development.

    I enjoyed seeing the new set and costumes. The camera views the character much closer in than the previous series, likely b/c the feeling of smaller quarters is desired. I enjoyed seeing a necktie for once in a star trek series (that wasn't from the hologram or time-travelling mission).

    The plot was usual star trek, with 1st act that includes intro of Conflict #1, the external conflict; Conflict #2, the internal conflict; and quite often including last night Conflict #3, the Bigger Picture slash sure to be a recurring Conflict; followed by a partial resolution of conflicts which quickly becomes much much worse (the 1 step forward, 2 steps back plot); then acts of heroism, technological wonder, and unexplained scientific/human ingenuity makes everything better, or at least mostly better.

    Other noteworthy bits:

    The discovery of the ship's "sweet spot", which I hoped would lead to a committed explanation of artificial gravity

    Stopping on (planet began with R, I think this is where Troy and Riker spent a weekend, or something like that?). Sort of an underground brothel/strip club.

    The intro of the Suliban race, a shapeshifting race that appears to be the worker bees for a Temporal Cold War

    The Klingon homeworld, called Chronos... why? Did I miss something during TNG and DS9? How is it that the Klingons can live without electricity, but can still fly at high warp speed.

    Anyway, Enjoy the pilot,

    Dennis

  142. "Oh Boy!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what happens when Captain Archer struggles with the Prime Directive? Won't he get it all mixed up with the string theory and "striving to put right what once went wrong?"

  143. Re: Canada often gets Star Trek 1st by Doctor_D · · Score: 1

    Something in the back of my mind said I should have turned my cable on last night and watched CBC from Windsor. But I'll just suffer and catch UPN out of Detroit. *shrug*

    --
    "If you insist on using Windoze you're on your own."
  144. You've got a point by MajesticFiles · · Score: 1

    I remember being a die-hard TOS fan...refusing to even watch the premier episode of STNG. Now of course I'm a STNG fan and leery of the new series. However I will watch it, and try and remember how dorky Farpoint looks in relationship to the later episodes of STNG.

    I'll be shocked if the first episode is awesome, but I'll keep watching. Gene lives on through these series afterall. And after the space opera that was Voyager, I have to believe that they've learned some lessons!

    --
    AOL IM? ICQ? Yahoo Chat??? Bah! I use Bitwise baby! http://www.bitwisechat.com/ My BW ID: virginia
  145. Klingon homeworld by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    The Klingon homeworld, called Chronos... why?

    The Klingon homeworld is Qo'noS. Not sure exactly how that's pronounced, but I would guess that it sounds something like Chronos.

    1. Re:Klingon homeworld by Quarterly+Editor · · Score: 1
      Ahhhh, that's right. I forgot that.

      I think they even pronounced it like "Chronos" on the show, but they were having a hard time saying "Klingon" too.

      Dennis

    2. Re:Klingon homeworld by servo8 · · Score: 1

      "Chronos" is the correct pronunciation if you want to go by previous Star Trek episodes/movies.

    3. Re:Klingon homeworld by connorbd · · Score: 2

      The "kr" pronunciation actually is a corrupted pronunciation of a sound that's something like a guttural (ch in german, H in Klingon) and a hairball; an Arabic or classic Hebrew (not modern; the pronunciation has changed) speaker would have no problem with it (it relates to the q sound in Semitic langugages), though they might break out in fits of giggles.

      /Brian

  146. Another Star Trek variant? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no quality entertainment down here"

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  147. Re:A Channel is EDMONTON based with Calgary affili by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He never claimed that, Edmonfucker.

  148. Poor CmdrTaco by genkael · · Score: 1

    What, poor Taco can't afford an antenna for his TV?

    --
    GeneralKael -- Slacker Extraordinaire
  149. How far into the show... by McDoobie · · Score: 1, Redundant

    until we here the words "Oh boy."?

    I know, I really do know....everyone IS a smartass.

    McDoobie

  150. Star Trek Redux by albamuth · · Score: 1
    Take any episode of ST:TNG, probably the best of all the series, and re-shoot the entire episode, except from the perspective of six ensigns or civilian passengers. So Picard, Riker, et. al. show up only as background characters whereas the real story is a human story between these six, very human, but throughly developed characters.


    It will be called: Star Trek: Friends.

    --
    [pink beam of light]
  151. No UPN? Here are your alternatives. by fm6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I discovered last weekend that I stopped getting UPN. Who knows when, since I've never needed it before. So I will be missing it, and crying in chair, while mumbling curses directed at my cable provider.
    UPN syndicates its shows in markets with no local affiliate. Usually broadcast on the weekend after the network showing. Go to ClickTV and search for "Bakula". Don't search for "Enterprise", you'll get a zillion rerun hits.

    If you're still blacked out (as in Holland, MI -- sorry Rob), I'd suggest contacting all the local stations that carry a lot of syndicated content. That sort of agitation is rather appropriate -- the first Star Trek series lasted an extra season because of it.

    Not that I really care about "Enterprise". I seem to be the only slashdotter who realizes that this will be a dud. Same "creative" team as Voyager, even more potential for logic-free stories. (The bad guys are time travellers, for crissakes! Every time the writers get stuck, they'll declare a pardox.) But it is essential that all America should witness Buffy's return from the dead!

  152. Who would've thought... Wesley Crusher's here! by TerryMathews · · Score: 1

    Didn't know you were a Slashdotter. Welcome to the club. Just remeber: karma is your friend.

    --
    -- Terry
    1. Re:Who would've thought... Wesley Crusher's here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're Terry Mathews? Dude, why'd you sell Newbridge?


      I bet you've never heard that before. :-)

    2. Re:Who would've thought... Wesley Crusher's here! by TerryMathews · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but Dr. _Matthews_ was the founder of Newbridge Networks. One too many t's.

      --
      -- Terry
  153. The Grammar Nazis Win! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    "And we'll be able to explore those strange new worlds ... and seek out new life and new civilizations," said Cochrane, in a recorded speech given 32 years after the end of First Contact. "This engine will let us go boldly ... where no man has gone before."
    They unsplit my favorite split infinitive! It's a said day.
  154. That Vulcan female by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Spelling issues aside, it's my understanding that the the original concept had this Vulcan being the same character as the lady from "Amok Time". They later decided to make her a separate character.

  155. Re:poorly handled first contact... (moderatly OT) by Jerf · · Score: 1
    That was inexcusable! Archer should have known better. He should have watched the shows!

    LOL! I have this fantasy where in Star Trek, any Star Trek, someone's digging around in the historical archives and comes across... Star Trek, the Television Show.

    I also fantasize about somebody in the huge number of time-locked cartoon strips (Foxtrot, Kevin & Kell, Dilbert probably qualifies by now, Peanuts wasn't quite time-locked but time passed around 10x too slowly) discovering that time isn't progressing. (I also think it'd be cool to do a fan strip where a number of these strips get together to do something about it...)

  156. Age does not wither Mr. Spock. by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Age is just not an issue. ST writers rely more and more on time travel gimmicks these days. So in the event (alas, unlikely) that Nimoy decides to make an appearance, we just have to send the Enterprise-Null through a time warp, so they can help him finish the democratization of Romulus. How long has that thing been hanging fire?

  157. Navy vs Air Force in Science Fiction by rhammack · · Score: 1

    I think the reason most SF uses navy terminology, etc. is a basic extrapolation.
    Navy: Large ships, large crews, long deployments, crew lives aboard ship, Ship visits ports / resupply infrequently.

    Air Force: small craft (relativly, anyway)small crews, short deployment / mission, crew lives on base, etc. even a large plane rarely stays airborn for more than 24hrs (with in-flight refueling)

    Which one sounds more like your typical SF show?
    Space Ships (as opposed to fighters, etc.) stay out of port(space station, world, etc) for relatively long periods of time, have large crews living onboard, etc.

    The Navy has evolved customs, traditions, regulations, etc. specifically to deal with this type of mission - The Air Force has never needed to.

    --
    "Theory is when you know everything but nothing works. Practice is when everything works but no one knows why. In our
  158. JarJar/BooBoo effect by simetra · · Score: 1

    My main complaint with DS9 was what I called BooBoo... the cutesy little feringy bartender -- oops - I mean Barkeep in the cutesy-pseudo-medieval-lingo Trekies use.
    This cutesy-comic-relief-agent (CCRA) is perhaps most obvious in JarJar Binks; the main reason I have not seen and never intend to see, the Phantom Menace. I mean, hey, that's what R2D2 was for.
    So Anyway.... is this new series also cursed with a CCRA? Please let me know so I can save myself the agony.
    Thanks

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  159. Re:Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

    The intro song has, for the first time, WORDS! This was startling and disappointing, until I found myself liking the song. Anyone heard it before?


    I haven't seen the show yet (I'll be watching it in the theater tonight. Yes, theater - one of the local stations made a deal with a local place to show it on the big screen - COOL!), but, I've seen the intro - the song is Rod Stewart's "Faith Of The Heart". Not typically my style, but, it fits the concept of Enterprise fairly well, and is one of his better works.

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  160. Re:Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers by glenmark · · Score: 2, Informative
    The intro song has, for the first time, WORDS! This was startling and disappointing, until I found myself liking the song. Anyone heard it before?

    Have to admit that I felt a bit uneasy hearing a popsong in the trailer. Although "Magic Carpet Ride" was used to good effect in First Contact.


    However, technically, this is not the first time lyrics have been associated with a Star Trek theme song. According to Steve E. Whitfield's excellent book, The Making of Star Trek, Roddenberry penned lyrics for the original them, although they were not used.


    The lyrics are as follows:


    Beyond

    The rim of star-light

    My love

    Is wand'ring in star flight

    I know

    He'll find in star-clustered reaches

    Love,

    Strange love a star woman teaches

    I know

    His journey end never

    His star trek

    Will go on forever.

    But tell him

    While he wanders his starry sea

    Remember, remember me.


    --
    *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
  161. Re:How many times has this exact comment been post by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

    Or maybe you care a little too much about a website.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  162. Calling all Canadian DivXers!!! by osjedi · · Score: 1

    Since Canada got first crack at Enterprise, did any of you DivX it? Some of us with no UPN access are dying to see it. Is it in the wild yet? Where would one look? Anyone?... Rah, Rah, we love Canada.
    Pullllleassssse...... :)

    --
    -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
    1. Re:Calling all Canadian DivXers!!! by xQx · · Score: 1

      Here Here.
      Australia won't get it for about 2 years.

      It's 8pm in aus now. I'm expecting it to be on edonkey in the morning.

  163. It was the best of times, it was the worst of time by AbandonAllHope · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the show yet, but I hesitantly admit to being worried after seeing the previews UPN has been airing. I was struck mostly by explosions, risque female body parts, and a theme song that sounded like a less talented Dido. I swear to god, if this becomes Star Trek Dawson's Creek style I will myself seek out new ways and new inventions to slowly torture Rick Berman. He will boldly go to a world of pain where no one has gone before.

    --
    Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here
  164. Still more reviews by bartyboy · · Score: 1

    Worst episode ever. Rest assured I was on the internet within minutes registering my disgust throughout the world.

    --CBG

    1. Re:Still more reviews by ethereal · · Score: 1

      CBG: ...I had a mouse!

      "Boy, today's been my day for Simpsons quotes", he said, as he wasted time to avoid the postercomment compression filter. Amazing how much ASCII art slips through, but my Simpsons one-liner fails.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  165. Is that how niggers speak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't know, as they never say anything worth listening to.

    Filthy plane-crashing bastards.

  166. Enterprise sounds like fun by b0yc0tt2000 · · Score: 1

    Too bad we're all going to miss it.

    Enterprise is produced by Paramount Pictures. Paramount is on the board of directors of the MPAA. There have been many discussions here on the evils of the MPAA. Those evils include prosecuting people for trying to exercise their fair use rights under U.S. copyright law.

    We're not helping our selves if we continue to pump money into corporations who use a portion of their profits to try to take away our legal rights.

    If we don't help our selves, we deserve what happens to us.

  167. Too bad UPN doesn't do HDTV by -tji · · Score: 1

    This series is filmed with HDTV cameras. It's too bad UPN doesn't broadcast any HDTV, this would be the perfect content for it (other than sports).

    I like all the CBS and ABC shows being broadcast in beautiful 1920x1080 HDTV. But, give me sci-fi any day.

  168. Re:Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers by Jenova_Six · · Score: 1
    The Opening Title Theme of Enterprise is a Rod Stewart song?!?!



    AAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!



    Jenova_Six

  169. Re:Stealing my idea by Galvatron · · Score: 1
    You mean... sort of like the episode The Lower Decks, which focuses around low ranking crewmembers, one of whom gets killed, and none of whom ever have any idea what's going on?


    Don't remember any malfunctioning holodecks though.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  170. Star Trek: Been there, Done That by kwashiorkor · · Score: 1

    I watched it last night on A-Channel in Edmonton. It wasn't that bad, but it wasn't that great either.

    I'm not a Trek fan by any means. I don't really enjoy anything but the last few seasons of Next Generation, and I find those to be simply tolerable. However, this new incarnation didn't turn my stomach in that same way that DS9 or Voyager routinely did (when I bothered to tune in).

    My big beef was with the crappy dialogue. I was surprised that the actors didn't revolt. I'd love to be able to quote some of it, but if you watch the US premier, be sure to keep it in mind.

    The sets were great. They feel far more rugged and less polished. Nice changes in my opinion.

    The subtle touches were also quite nice. No food replicator, but rather an actual cook and mess hall, and real steaks in the captains dining room. Archer brought along his pet dog. The engineering bay was reminiscent of a submarine (starkly mechanical).

    What I didn't like is something I'll call "Vulcan ex machina". To many solutions pulled right out of her ass at the last minute to bail out the crew. Much more of that and I won't even notice when the series fades from memory.

    They've also really gone the extra mile to try and recreate the triad relationship of Kirk/Spock/McCoy. In this case it's Archer/T'Pol/ and the engineering guy, not the doctor.

    All in all, it's 2.5 out of 5. Hopefully it'll get better as I do see a lot of potential here, however make note of the fact that they couldn't even make it out of the series premier without reversing the polarity of something or other. Go figure.

    --
    -- kwashiorkor --
    Leaps in Logic
    should not be confused with
    Jumping to Conclusions.
  171. Live Chat on irc.webmaster.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    channel #trekweb.com!

  172. Re:A Channel is EDMONTON based with Calgary affili by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually its run out of Winnipeg with Alberta operations out of Calgary, however neither is an affilate of the other. Been like that since the start even though it has a higer profile in edmonton because of the oilers broadcast rights.

  173. Re: Canada often gets Star Trek 1st by cmeans · · Score: 1
    William Shatner (Captain Kirk for those of you under a rock) was born in Canada...maybe they did a deal...to let him leave :)

  174. One word. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    http://www.dishnetwork.com/

  175. Hmm. What's with the design. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I really hope the show, (which I will be happily viewing in about 30 minutes), doesn't use the same designs as we've been given glimpses of in the still photos which have been going around.

    That space suit S.B. is wearing looks like it was designed, both in line and color, by the same people who brought us the Cardassian(sp?) aesthetic.

    And that ship is stupid looking. It has design elements from every enterprise since Kirk's ship right up through the future. I was sort of hoping for a logical pre-future design. I thought the picture in the German TV guide was supposed to be a fake; but then I see promos with the same silly ship. Sigh.

    Honestly. What's so wrong with firing the old design team and getting new people with fresh perspectives?

    (Aside from the Machiavellian aspect of it all.) The design people are probably ACTRA.

    Ah well, here's to hoping! In anther 25 minutes, we'll all get to see!


    -Fantastic Lad --Trek is my only addiction. Really.

  176. Too late Guys Saw it last Night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was on last night, 25th on the A channel an independant channel out of Alberta, Canada.

    Saw it on the dish.

    Better than I expected, must admit the theme song, yes theme song with words even, threw me at first. But very shoot'em up and better than most ST movies.

    Looks like they may take a B5 approach to storylines with plots and characters fleshing out over several stories. Will have to wait and see.

    Since I was the only one at work that saw it last night, everyone else is watching tonight, I had to limit my comments to the basics.

    G

  177. Maximized! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Also, MAXIM's [maxim.com] cover girl this month is Jolene Blalock,
    Right now, the webmaster at Maxim Pharmaceuticals is scratching his head, 'cause their web site stats are spiking for no particular reason. If you want to know what a semi-naked Vulcan looks like, go to maximonline.com.

    And be ashamed. I have as dirty a mind as the next geek, but this business of hiring people on the sex appeal is another Bad Sign. OK, Jeri Ryan is a decent actress (though not as good as Jennifer Lien). But every time she pranced on camera in those high heels and that body stocking, I wanted to scream. Hey Janeway, how come the Maquis converts have to wear uniforms, but not the Borg? Hey Borg collective, how come you got rid of her extra hand and eye, but not ... no, don't go there.

  178. Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The theme song I just heard was very cheesy.. hope the show doesnt suck as much.

  179. new theme song blows chunks by alienated · · Score: 1

    it's now the first commerical break, and i was totally enthralled until the theme song.

    my lord, it sounds like it was done by some out-of-work hairspray-metal band's lead singer. if i have to listen to this for seven years, i'd actually contemplate watxhing Lexx instead (shudder).

    --
    ----- Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas. --Army of Darkness
  180. Enterprise Theme Song by Volfied · · Score: 1

    DS9 - Emmy winner best theme song
    VOY - Emmy winner best theme song
    Enterprise - Rod Stewart?!?!?!?

  181. Music by niloroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, so far the opening was rather good, with hte exception of the music. I was not sure if I was suposed to pull out my old Poison World Tour shirt, and light my lighter, or head to Audiogalaxy and download one of the old ones to play over it. I always sort of liked the fact that the opening songs had not lyrics. hopefully this was just for the premier.

    Justin

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Music by OuiPapa · · Score: 1
      Yah the music sucks! I didn't expect anything as great as Voyager's, but I didn't want Eighties' hair-and-spandex associations, either!


      And they got on my nerves with their attitude. But I prepared to give it time (and saw it motivated by the context that they'd described), but they quickly justified it by the end.


      Now, where do I find pics of that Lara Croft-y, Seven substitute, vulcan babe? ...

  182. Moe than you probably want to know...:-) by Aldreis · · Score: 1


    I was also asking myself about that.. And ( Google IS my best friend ) found this "biography":-)

    Biographical Data

    Assimilated at an early age, Seven of Nine [ pics of the actress at her fan site ] remained a part of the Borg Collective for eighteen years, serving most recently as Tertiary Adjunct to Uni-matrix 01 within the Collective.

    Seven of Nine served as the liaison between the Borg Collective and the Federation Starship Voyager during the war with the malevolent Species 8472.

    Her specific function was to assist Federation Captain Kathryn Janeway and Lieutenant Tuvok in developing a biogenic weapon that would defeat Species 8472, which had been attacking the Borg Collective in their realm within the Delta Quadrant.

    Seven of Nine had several confrontations with crewmembers of the starship Voyager, most notably when Commander Chakotay (in temporary command as Captain Janeway recovered in sickbay), depressurized the deck which the Borg were located on, ejecting all but Seven of Nine into space.

    Despite these difficulties, the alliance between the Borg Collective and Voyager proved successful, and with the success of the biogenic weapon, Species 8472 withdrew from Borg space and returned to their own realm.

    Seven of Nine attempted to gain control and assimilate the Starship Voyager once Species 8472 had been defeated, but her link to the Collective mind was severed when Commander Chakotay utilized Borg technology to appeal to her human side.

    Seven of Nine was taken to sickbay, where her human genes began to re-emerge. Captain Janeway decided to keep Seven of Nine aboard Voyager, since she was responsible for severing her link to the Collective.

    Captain Janeway's hope is that Seven of Nine will choose to remain with aboard the ship, since they can offer her the one thing that the Borg Collective could not... friendship.

    Now severed from the Collective, and with her human genes resurfacing, Seven of Nine's body began to have violent, life threatening reactions to this process.

    Her Borg implants began to re-assert themselves, attempting to preserve her assimilation, and Captain Janeway ordered the Holographic Doctor to remove her Borg implants entirely.

    The Doctor, having studied Borg implants extensively from previous encounters, was successful in removing her implants.

    Once this process had been completed, Seven of Nine's human genes were able to regenerate and she was restored to near total humanity.

    She has reluctantly decided to remain onboard the starship Voyager, realizing that being amongst a group of humans is the most suitable place for her to re-discover her own sense of individuality and humanity.

    Seven of Nine has been a major part in the design and construction of the state-of-the-art Astrometrics Lab aboard the starship Voyager, where she currently spends much of her time.

    Introductory Medical Notes:

    The Borg formerly known by the designation "Seven of Nine" has been disconnected from the Borg Collective mind through the neutralization of the upper-spinal column neurotransceiver.

    In total, I have extracted eighty-two percent of her Borg hardware implants. The remaining bio-implants have been stabilized and remain critical to her life support.

    I have also stimulated her human metabolism and immune system, though the Borg Nanobots in her bloodstream will more than suffice until she has stabilized.

    Hair follicles have been repaired and stimulated. Her left eyepiece has been replaced by an artificial organ replacement, simulating her own organic eye.

    Starfleet records indicate that Seven of Nine was formerly Annika Hansen. Annika's parents were last reported to be leaving a remote outpost in the Omega sector, headed towards the Delta Quadrant in a small vessel The Raven.

    It is possible that the Hansen family were the first humans to be assimilated by the Borg.

    Current Assignment: U.S.S. Voyager - no formal duty assignment.
    Full Name at birth: Annika Hansen.
    Borg designation: Seven of Nine Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix01.
    Place of birth: Tendara Colony, Stardate 25479.
    Date of Assimilation: Approx.18 years prior to Stardate 50984.3
    Place of Assimilation: Delta Quadrant.
    Marital status: Single.
    Species: Human.

  183. Well, duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nostalgia may be good and all, but there ain't no way Paramount is going to be dumb enough to try to make a series with that in mind. That'd kill the series a lot more than your perceptions of inconsistant depictions of the future between TOS and Enterprise. Believe it or not.

  184. Re: Canada often gets Star Trek 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CBC doesn't carry it in Canada, I saw it on A-Channel last night

  185. Re:Baseball hats hide baldness by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    It has occurred to me that an unusually high number of military personnel, particularly Air Force, lose lots of hair compared to the average joe. What exactly causes this?

  186. Re:Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers by kindbud · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Roddenberry penned lyrics for the original them, although they were not used.

    For good reason.

    The lyrics are as follows:

    The Vogons may have something to worry about.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  187. Get Rid of Cable & DirectTV and get DishNetwor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UPN and Enterprise on 3 channels.

  188. Reruns? by Bill+Daras · · Score: 2

    For some reason I thought it was going to be on at 9pm, so when I woke up from a nap around that time, I found that I had missed it.

    Will the pilot be re-run before next week's ep? I'd like to see it before I dive into the rest of the series.

    Thanks

  189. Ummm....did we change the channel? by MKDrum · · Score: 1

    What was with that "healing salve" scene with the Vulcan and the Earthman....it seemed to be a little....explicit, especially for Star Trek.
    Those seemed a lot more like a porno than a sci-fi show to me.

    --
    Mark Covington
    1. Re:Ummm....did we change the channel? by bps300 · · Score: 1

      yah. wasn't it great!!!!!!!! :-D we need more of that

    2. Re:Ummm....did we change the channel? by ITWeasel · · Score: 1

      I had to admit, the rub down got my attention. The only reason it looked questionable, is because she was smuggling some might fine raisins. I will admit, there were more body parts to be seen on that episode than curves on Seven of Nine. So let's admit, it was good, and let us hope that is was for character building purposes only. :)

  190. Caucasian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caucasia is a region in central asia, what the fuck are you talking about? I think UPN had a point in your case.

    Posting anonymously as my karma is too precious for guys like yourself.

  191. Re:Stealing my idea by slickwillie · · Score: 2

    I guess I missed it, was it a NG episode?

  192. Klingon Blood by NickisGod.com · · Score: 0

    Damnit! Klingon blood is pink! Didn't they watch Star Trek 6?!?

  193. Iwant the monolouge by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    I really wanted to hear Scott do the "Space the final fontier bit..."!

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  194. Just watched it. by BravoXL · · Score: 0

    It was good, and I think it will be a good series. Very close to NG levels. It's bice to see a series of this quality after DS9 and voyager which were both pretty bad. I really enjoyed all the charaters, none of them got on my nerves which happend alot with voyager. I'm looking foward to this series.

  195. first post ... after the show by 1Oman · · Score: 1

    how are they going to explain the war with the klingons after that mushy klingon loving ending.

  196. Star Trek :NG by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1

    It was O.K. but I can't wait to see all the old Star Trek Next Gen. episodes on TNN
    Seeing the old Undiscovered Country movie was cool to.

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
  197. Music and erotica by N3P1u5U17r4 · · Score: 0

    What's with the crappy theme music?!! And what was that whole erotic decontamination scene?

    --
    You're Just Jealous Because The Voices Are Talking To Me.
  198. vulcan chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude that vulcan chick is hot!

  199. Enterprise == Spacewatch by nedron · · Score: 1

    If you didn't enoy the jiggle factor of Voyager, give this one a pass. It bears even less relation to the original Star Trek than the previous series have had and there was a pointless "ointment" scene that definitely places this series in the T&A column.

    In fact, about the only thing this series will be good for is as a lead in to SU2.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  200. NIPPLES! by BlueWire · · Score: 1

    My god, Vulcans have nipples!

    --
    Yes, but whats that got to do with the price of tea in D'ni?
    1. Re:NIPPLES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, i can't believe we all watched a half-naked women with erect nipples massage her breasts with oil during prime time. my jaw nearly dropped. that image is burned into my retina!

  201. What did everyone think? by Robert1 · · Score: 1

    I for one thought it was very professional in both special effects and actors. A great first episode.

    1. Re:What did everyone think? by orpheus2k · · Score: 1
      For a premiere, first rate. No truly awkward or embarrassing (for us) moments that pilots and first episodes typically suffer through (except for the regrettable theme music, of course. Wow. Easily the worst I've ever heard).

      They jumped right into the story without a lot of drawn-out exposition, though I do hope they back-fill us in throughout the season more on what the past century has been like. Thankfully it didn't take place right at the point after First Contact -- how boring would that have been, to watch them spend most of their time on Earth and uninhabited local systems.

      <hormone filter>
      O.K. Big-time yowza on the rubdown scene. Kudos to the writers for contriving a scenario that grants us a thoroughly unexpected but totally hot oil rubdown scene featuring the stunning T'Pol. Whew. And she's so logical!
      </hormone filter>

      I thought the climactic scene with the mysterious temporally-enhanced Sylloban (sp?) was a bit confusing and hastily edited. It didn't really explain very much -- I can only assume this is a group the crew will encounter again.

      This points to an intriguing development in the Star Trek universe (or pre-development, I guess). That of factionalized species -- the Sylloban have their 'good' and 'bad', instead of a species being for the most part wholly one or the other at any one point in time. I never saw much of Voyager, so maybe that occurred there, but at any rate it definitely enriches the complexities of contact and conflict.

      Beyond T'Pol being an unmitigated geek babe, she's going to be a great first officer for Archer. They clearly have prejudices that they are working through, and character growth being such a rare quantity in the Star Trek universe, this ensures that the show can hang on interesting inter-personal relationships as well as battles and exploration. (Of course, TNG did this; my point is just that it bodes well for Enterprise).

      And, finally, Mr. Bakula. Not much to say, other than they couldn't have casted anyone else. He's a rock-solid choice as captain, he never overwhelms the screen nor seems buried by it.

      Bravo, Paramount. High hopes for this one, and they have set the bar high right out of the gate.

    2. Re:What did everyone think? by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Er...

      Jolene Blalock: Jeri Ryan without the acting talent. 'Nuff said.

      I liked the rest, though; there were some weak spots (how is it that the human crew didn't mutiny on T'Pol when she pulled rank?), and it just didn't feel very Trek, but I did generally like it. The big-screen camera work is something new for Trek, and it works amazingly well. The Suliban are a little weird; I assume there will be much more.

      To those who complained about plot weakness, lack of character development, etc: get over it. Get over it now. The Trek folks have broken the Roddenberry mold completely with this one and are starting from the very beginning with the idea of an ongoing story (remember, Gene didn't much like continuity; he wanted every original Trek story to be self-contained). Granted, that doesn't excuse the Infamous Greasedown Scene (unless there will be some romantic issues for those two characters, which I'd say is unlikely). But it's a good beginning, and I'd say that's all it was intended to be.

      The Enterprise NX-01 is a nicely designed ship; I don't fault them for not making it a copy of Captain Pike's Enterprise for two reasons:

      -The ship was clearly designed primarily with human expertise; we're going to make it look like what we're familiar with, and that's what the producers did. That means identifiable displays, not just random switches.
      -Maybe the TOS thing was an aesthetic thing. It certainly looked as 60s as TNG did 80s.

      /Brian

      That said:

  202. de-splitting the infinitive by flanker · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice Scott Dracula's dad's speech had "...to go boldly..."

    :)

    --
    Left shift 1 for e-mail...
  203. Just saw it. by Repvblic · · Score: 1

    I think that visually it's stunning, in the same way I found DS9 beautiful: It portrays technology without an overabundance of overly shiny things. Things that almost look real, a nice turn from the bright and shiny (for the 30 minutes of each episode it wasn't shot to hell) Voyager, and an interesting contradiction to the apparent technological backwardness of TOS. (Which I've been able to explain away. The TOS takes place during a time in when the humans, confident in the toys it's been playing with for the last 150 years can manage themselves, allow for more computer control than at any other time depicted. Of course, they turned back towards more fine control placed back in the hands of the crew after a period of time...)

    R.

  204. Re:man did you see those nipples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pointy as those ears. (Score:-1)

    Huh? It's fucking true! I love UPN :)

  205. Bush! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That dumb, vacant look... George W. Bush is boldly going where no man has gone before!

    1. Re:Bush! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah dude! The dumb pilot in the pod looked just like W.

  206. Star wars overtones? by N3P1u5U17r4 · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else think that it had Star Wars overtones? For example, the space bar with all the different aliens and the taliban... i mean suliban pods... that looked like imperial fighters without the wings.

    --
    You're Just Jealous Because The Voices Are Talking To Me.
    1. Re:Star wars overtones? by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Very Star Wars, very Bab5 as well, not very Trek at all. But that's okay; they were going for a different feel. (Though I'd prefer not to have to see "Darth Sidious" again...)

      What I would love to have seen was TOS done in this style, though; I do like the movie-like filmwork. I could do without Jolene Blalock, but I think we all could...

      /Brian

  207. Re: some kind of Air Navy by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

    Methinks the Federation Starfleet are more like unto the US Coastguard merged with NOAA and NASA than any DOD subclass.

  208. What a geek wants....what a geek needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well for all you people who missed the show, or saw it, here is the no BS shorthand of the show:

    The Theme: It's cheezy 80's metal balad sounding. My god it's sounds out of place in a show set in space! Who came up with that idea? Silly. The intro looks very UN trek. It's all "hip" n shit with layers and overlays with funky effects. I kid you not brothers. Gone is space and emmy award winning humable intro tunes.

    The cast: Not bad. The Vulcan has TATA's that make 7 o 9 look like a 12 year old. My it was cold in the little blue room....so very cold! All I can say is if ever week we need to see her get all oily and semi nude in a VERY cold room, fuck the dam transporters!
    Backula is ok. The supporting cast is small. 4 by my count. Seems they learned a thing or two about bigass casts.

    The ship: Uhhh ok, it's set in the past, so why does it look like a a ship from DS9? Where is the gleaming white paint!? Were the years of TOS just a short span of the future when people thought it would be neat to paint ships off white?

    The inside of the ship: Uhh again, where are the office like walls? The nice big buttons!? The static wall displays? The need to press a button to open doors now. Man they were so silly backward in the future!

    The good: No translator! Weeee! Aliens talk funny! teehe! Not so easy for aliens to sound like they from da bronx no mo. Beam outs? They say no but they do it. Seems to hing on plot when it will work. Nothing new since EVERY star trek show plot point depends on some jerk getting it to work "in... the.... nick.. of time!"

    No sheilds! But the hull can be pol-la-rized. And that seems to act excatly likes sheilds! What a suprise.

    The aliens: Look like the aliens in DS9 or voyager. Ho hum. The universe of star trek has always had silly aliens. I am an alien. I have rubber on my nose.

    The big bad guy seems to be a alien who is masked in shadow and who, get this, is fighting a "cold war" from the future?. I don't like where this is going. Did not one of the writers ever see Timecop? I smell something stinky!

    The show: It works. This is not the starship Macntosh of the future, more the Amiga OS ship of the past. The vulcans come off as bad guys. The doctor seems like the love chid of the EMH of voyager and Nelix.

    Fun facts: People from earth are "so damm sick" of vulcans damm logic! Don't ya know. We know. We know.
    Warp 4 is hellafast! People still use baseball caps and not in a kitchy way. People say ass and son of a bitch. Vulcans have nice nipples.

    I think I may like it. I am looking forward to the crossover when 7'o9 needs to strip in the little blu room with Ms nipples of Enterprise! Woo! Tickle fight anyone?

    Jebus

  209. A Ship of Klingons... by hylas · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think that Paramount needs to get away from their earthcentric view of Star Trek altogether. There's lots of cool species populating the Star Trek universe, and few of them would be burdened by ST canon.

    I dunno how interesting it would be to the rest of you, but I'd like a show featuring a bunch of bloodthirsty Klingons flying around, dispensing a little bit of Klingon Justice to some uppity . No need for universal translators there - everyone speaks "disruptor." The moral dilemma of the week problems would be more interesting too, but never anything that couldn't be solved with a bat'leh.

    Finally, the thing that's always bothered me about humans since TNG has been that there aren't very many political factions. The Klingons have lots of factions and intrigue. In fact, the sad thing about the ST writing in the last ten years has been their silly reliance on pseudo-physics, chemistry, and pop-psychology. Shakespeare wouldn't recognize Paramount's apparent idea of drama as being all that dramatic. In fact, I think a show about Klingons could say more about the human condition in an hour than a show about some whiny human liberals and a fistful of temporal distortion problem would say in a season.

  210. Sisco, and don't you forget it. by xQx · · Score: 1

    Captain Sisco, (pronounced the same way as that company that makes little green boxes) was the name of the DS9 captian.

    I really wanna see the big Q in the new series :) ... since the big Q of our time has just been purchased by HP, I'd hate to not see any more of the Q of trek's time.

    He even made his way into series 7 voyager. Let him in :) ... If voyager can explain why Q didn't just beam them back to the alpha quadrent, SHURELY Enterprise can make up piss weak excuses why Q can't join their crew :P

  211. The DS9 Story Arc by xQx · · Score: 1

    The last few seasons of DS9 didn't have a bad story arc...
    except that WAS only brought on BECAUSE of Bab5's success.

    I'm a big fan of the B5 story-arc... but if the writers of Enterprise haven't worked out an arc by now, it's too late.
    The nice thing about B5 was that things mentioned in ep1 didn't pan out until series 7 (for example, in Ep3, Garaboldi is reading in his paper that 'The Psi-Corp doesn't like the newly elected president and his alien ties' ... which is then shown when homeguard and psi-corp kill the president in series 7) (sorry if you're half way throught the series :P

    It was thought out from start to finish. No other TV series has managed that yet. B5 was more like a 52 hour long movie than a TV series. (Yes, I did watch it a second time on tape... took me about 2 weeks :) )

  212. Re: Lexx by xQx · · Score: 1

    They killed off the brain eating chick :)
    That was in one of the movies though... did she make it to a series at all? I can't remember.

    Kai was dead through the whole series, what are you talking about? :) ... Thats gotta be the ONLY series that they actually made the concept of an invincible supporting characture WORK.

    And Zev, oh my Zev Zev :) ... They sure could do to kill that fuckin' robot head off with its DAMN annoying poetry. MORE OF Kai singing the Brunnen-G fight song (We-All-Ay-O... from the begining theme)I recon :) (I wish I could get that solo he did in front of the beaurocrats on Fire in MP3. He sounded awesome)

    But yeah, how can you kill off one of the charactures in a show with 3 main chars?

  213. Re:Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
    • I was impressed with the pilot [...] I never enjoyed the original series, and found TNG much improved after Gene passed away and the Berman team took over. [...]

    Thanks for the context! It really helps; I am now utterly convinced that I'd rather gouge out an eyeball and scrape my thumbnail around in the socket rather than watch Enterprise.

    All I can hope for now is that Comic Book Guy will agree with me...

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  214. Re: triad relationship of Kirk/Spock/McCoy by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

    They've also really gone the extra mile to try and recreate the triad relationship of Kirk/Spock/McCoy. In this case it's Archer/T'Pol/ and the engineering guy, not the doctor.

    Also, the there is a clear analog for Scotty in the person of Weapons Man Lieutenant Malcolm Reed who has a somewhat British/Commonwealth accent.

    I'd say that Communications Specialist Ensign Hoshi Sato, is a beefed up Uhura character, more along the lines of the role she played in the movies rather than in TOS, which often wasn't much more than glorified receptionist.

    Then you have Mayweather filling in the junior bridge officer slot of Chekov and Sulu combined, perhaps with a bit of Tom Paris/Harry Kim thrown in. But why was it that Mayweather was instructing Tucker in how to fly the alien ship? Why was Tucker flying the alien ship in the first place if he is an engineer?

    The doctor 'Phlox' I think is filling more the role of Neelix from Voyager. Note how he is introducing the crew to all these alien medical treatments much as Neelix would get the crew to eat alien foods.

  215. Re: Risa by The+Paradox · · Score: 1

    Stopping on (planet began with R, I think this is where Troy and Riker spent a weekend, or something like that?). Sort of an underground brothel/strip club

    Risa. The terraformed pleasure planet with many many scantily dressed native gals.

    Yea, Riker's kind of place. Though I can't quite see it as Troi's. :)

    --
    Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
  216. Re:poorly handled first contact... (way OT) by aridg · · Score: 1

    LOL! I have this fantasy where in Star Trek, any Star Trek, someone's digging around in the historical archives and comes across... Star Trek, the Television Show.

    Mel Brooks did it, in Spaceballs. IIRC, they even went through the Spaceballs videotape to figure out what was going to happen...

    I also fantasize about somebody in [a] time-locked cartoon strip (Foxtrot, ... ) discovering that time isn't progressing.

    http://www.ucomics.com/foxtrot/viewft.cfm?uc_fn= 1& uc_full_date=20010925&uc_daction=X&uc_comic=ft

    (In linked strip, Jason responds to a comment about Dad growing up, "Whoa. Did I just stumble into 'For Better or For Worse'?")
    FYI, "For Better or for Worse" is perhaps the *only* strip I can think of where the kids age in real-ish time.

    I love self-referential humor...

  217. Phlox is a Neelix clone by way2muchsense · · Score: 1

    He's not even a good Neelix. They really need to do something about that ASAP.

    Of course the idea that Phlox uses stuff like alien leeches and such to fix people up is interesting.

  218. OT Re: Baseball hats? by lhand · · Score: 1

    Spoken like a true submarine sailor!

    Actually, according to Chapman's Piloting, Seamanship and Small Boat Handling a boat is any vessel less than 65 feet long, a ship is 65 and over. And I've heard a Navy saying that "you can put a boat on a ship; you can't put a ship on a boat; subs are always boats."

    My son did say boats. You know, it could be that the Navy has more ships than the Army...

    But what do I know. I just have a little dinghy :)

  219. Re: some kind of Air Navy by CodeShark · · Score: 1
    Probably accurate.

    BTW, in my navy analogues, other than describing how groups of ships as "fleets" I was specifically trying to avoid referencing a USA-centric navy. Trouble is, I do not know the names for any other nation's fleets if they are currently maintaining them in multiple oceans like the USA does.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  220. Re:Stealing my idea by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    Yup, Next Generation. Fairly late, maybe 6th or 7th season? Around the time when they were setting up the Cardassians as the villains to base DS9 on. I thought it was a pretty decent episode. I have a friend who thinks it's the best, but he's more into the whole Cardassian/Bejoran (sp?) thing than I am.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  221. That's really not fair. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I'd like to point you to the wonderful example of Farscape, which has had an ongoing story arc and is beautifully acted, written, and directed.

    I am hoping against hope that the writers will take some examples from that show and learn how to construct an overarching storyline.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:That's really not fair. by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

      I agree but that's the exception rather than the rule.

  222. Re:Baseball hats hide baldness by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
    Testosterone?

    Male pattern baldness is caused by a susceptibility of hair follicles to the effects of the male hormone, testosterone.Since testosterone also causes aggressiveness (as well as many other things, good and bad), it's not really surprising that many military types are balding.

    (However the reverse is not always true...the susceptibility is optional and genetic.To go bald you need to have fairly high levels of testosterone AND the genes for testosterone-induced hair loss.So it doesn't mean that people with full heads of hair are necessarily wimps...they just may not be genetically inclined to lose hair.)

  223. Re:How many times has this exact comment been post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe you're just a wanker...

  224. Re:Bit of a Review of Pilot (with partial spoilers by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

    Yup...he only wrote them so he could grab half of Alexander Courage's royalties.Sad but true.

  225. Klingon genetics by Solak · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who is confused by the Klingon makeup (silicone prostheses)? Why do these pre-TOS klingons not look like the TOS Klingons?
    When I was watching, I dismissed it as "They've decided to treat the TOS Klingons' difference as a weakness in the make-up technology, and we'll ignore it for the storyline". But later, I remembered that in the DS9 time-travel episode which revisited "the Trouble with Tribbles" episode, there are actual lines in the script where the humans (Bashir and I think O'Brien) question Worf on this difference. He refuses to explain, saying that it is something that they do not discuss.
    Therefore, the storyline admits to a (genetic?) change in Klingon appearance between TOS and TNG. I have a few theories of how this could make sense, but every one has a hole in it. Anyone care to explain it to me? It's pretty sorry to see such a logic hole right off in episode 101, scene 1.

    --
    :Solak.