Slashdot Mirror


Virtual Keyboard

Archfeld sent a strange piece of technology called the Senseboard which is a portable keyboard, except that there's really not any keys. Or a board. And it can communicate via RF for all your strange wearable applications.

248 comments

  1. Cool, but... by jawad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cool, but I value tactile feedback. The lack of feeling of me actually *pushing* a button will just feel weird. I wonder if it's something you'd get over, though.

    1. Re:Cool, but... by Zurk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      its easy to set up a small rubber pad with the key symbols stuck on it so you get tactile feedback with a rollable non electronic pad which you can carry around.
      just unroll it on the nearest surface and start typing on the rubber. tactile feedback and true spillproof keyboard with no electronics. just chuck it in a washing machine to clean it.

    2. Re:Cool, but... by meara · · Score: 1

      (There no reason you couldn't have an unconnected, roll-up pad to use for tactile feedback / key-spacing if you really needed it.)

      The problem I see is convenience -- those hand grips don't look any less bulky than the rollup keyboards you can already get for PDAs, so this thing is going to have to be much FASTER to catch on.

      And, of course, if it's really that fast, it will replace our regular desktop keyboards and the added mobility will just be the icing on the cake.

    3. Re:Cool, but... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's similar to the problem the military had when testing out the F-16, which has electric controls- the stick didn't move at all. Pilots kept complaining about it, so they put a little play into it, even though technologically they didn't need it. People like physical responses to the things they touch.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    4. Re:Cool, but... by n6mod · · Score: 1

      I value keyboard feedback, but I wonder if that's only because I actually have to press the keys.

      That said, a rollable rubber pad will give me truly horrible feedback, and if I was happy with something like that, I'd just buy this.

      The senseboard looks very cool, though it appears totally vaporous at the moment.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    5. Re:Cool, but... by Buran · · Score: 2

      This is the major problem I have with the Final Fantasy film. All those floating keyboards are nice and nifty to see on the screen, but I never saw any hint of any sort of tactile feedback. Perhaps it's because the entire film was computer-animated with no human actors, but I just couldn't get comfortable with those keyboards.

      Some other problems were revealed, too, such as ...

      What happens when the power goes out? How can you reactivate a barrier field in an emergency if you've knocked out the power to your generator, so your keyboard has just vanished? Imagine that you're an operator at, say, a Chernobyl-like plant and you can prevent disaster if only you can hit the big red "ABORT" button ... that just vanished as you reached for it. It's true that you shouldn't even be using a computer in a case like that because the entire system is probably powerless, but it still makes me uneasy.

      Something as simple as that brief 15-second scene should serve as a warning to anyone thinking of using one of these.

    6. Re:Cool, but... by ragnar · · Score: 2

      That is the same rationale for why old IBM keyboards click when you press the keys. People who used typewriters for years couldn't stand the quiet behavior of typing on a computer, so they added a click for the user feedback. Voila, the typists were happy again.

      I don't know if this technology will take off, but for those willing to unlearn some old habits and learn new ones, it could be very cool. Consider that our current typing makes use of very trained gestures. We can learn new gestures, right?

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    7. Re:Cool, but... by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      I still use an IBM keyboard from 1982 just because I love the feedback. Now, I was only born in 1981 so I never had my start on a typewriter... but the quiet, non responsive feel of most modern keyboards is annoying, I make frequent mistakes, and I can't type as fast... I can type fast as hell on my 12 lb IBM keyboard

    8. Re:Cool, but... by AlecC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Way back when, my company made a product for use in an operating theatre by surgeons in mid operation. So it had to be usable with bloody gloves and capable of tolerating aggressive cleaning. It was hard plastic, with no feel at all. It ws absolutely horrible to use. It could be used as the system keyboard, but everybody needing to do more then about 10 keystrokes would unplug it and use a decent keyboard.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    9. Re:Cool, but... by Merk · · Score: 2

      Actually, more than just complaining about it. When doing a tight roll pilots would press against the stick with all their might. I've heard that observers could actually see the planes twitch in a regular beat in response to the heartbeat in the hand of the pilot flying the plane, presumably because they were pressing so hard.

  2. as Chief Wiggum would say: by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    hmmm, i'll just type this up on my invisible typewriter.... do dee doo do do

    oh yeah... and first post too

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  3. Crashed economy... by perdida · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    They can't sell any full workstations anymore, so they're selling peripherals instead.

    1. Re:Crashed economy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peripheral psychology pushing put power to your freudian friend down under

  4. First post? Probobly not by DanCracker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm still trying to get a hang of virtual reality, now real reality is becoming virtual. Get me off this crazy ride called cyberspace.

    --
    "I hope they legalize drugs so you hurry up and fucking die." Charles Bronson (the band, not the man)
  5. musical applications? by davejenkins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How cool would it be to play the piano on my desk? Someone may have figured out a way to make money on all of those people playing 'airguitar' everytime Led Zeppelin comes on the radio...

    1. Re:musical applications? by Van+Halen · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh lovely. This is a new one - apparently slashdot substituted someone else's entire comment instead of mine, even though it looked fine in preview. I'll try once more before giving up. Here is my original comment:

      It's already been done.

    2. Re:musical applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently something you like to stuff up your ass, motherfucker

  6. Amazing... by chronos2266 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The applications of this product are endless.

    Imagine if you were a mechanic under a car and needed to type up some sorta note or reminder into your computer.

    No more grafiti for PDAS :) Itll up the usability and practicality of PDAs and wearable computers in real world situations.

    Can't wait to get one.

    1. Re:Amazing... by VA+Software · · Score: 1

      You could get one of those small voice activated digital recorders. Then you wouldn't have to take your hands off of your spanner.

      --

      ---
      http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
    2. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Do you need two hands to hold your spanner?

    3. Re:Amazing... by VA+Software · · Score: 1

      I do when my nuts are tight.

      --

      ---
      http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
    4. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't know about you but I haven't had to look at my keyboard sense grade school... so I wouldn't have a problem typing on an invisible keyboard. The only question that I might have for this this is if you can flop your paws down... type something out. Then reach up and play with equipment and go right back to typing a moment later. I work with mostly hardware myself with a lot of computer entry stuff on the side. This would be a godsend for me... then I can use just about anything for a keyboard. Tables... floors.... the sides of tables.... the undersides of tables.... the top of sensitive equipment.... the computer screen. Right now I have to unbury the keyboard evertime I have to use it.

    5. Re:Amazing... by H310iSe · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I can use just about anything for a keyboard"...
      ...belly of my girlfriend, head of the annoying guy in the next cubicle, top of a conga drum ...
      but really, what happens if you have an itch on your nose? with my luck scratching my neck would type rm -rf

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    6. Re:Amazing... by pmumble · · Score: 1

      My question is whether you need a platform to type at all. From the looks of the device you wear,it's just sensing something in your wrist. Probably the movement of tendons.. or? It would be nice to not need a surface at all.

    7. Re:Amazing... by AlecC · · Score: 1

      sort of like the thai dancing which includes very precise finger movements, but faster. Which leads to the question of how much you can code into the movements of ten fingers. For example, you double the number of "keys" by allowing up as wll as down. And can we increase the number of "keys" by overlapping them?

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  7. Ssomeone has to say it.... by bahtama · · Score: 2, Funny
    Someone has to say it, so I'll take the bait.

    "Talk about your vaporware!" :)

    I need the clickity-clack feedback from my keyboard, I might get used to it, but I doubt this will ever catch on. Maybe it should come with a piece of paper printed with a keyboard. :P

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by eclectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the paper idea is a pretty good one. That way, you'd have something to reference too visually if you "got off track".

      I wonder how the unit is centered, ie, if I move both of my hands 1 inch from the other, am I going to be typing on different keys, are is the "center" based around each hand. This would be useful for people who like to actually type farther apart than the normal keyboard allows.

    2. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by Cyber+Bear · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "I need the clickity-clack feedback from my keyboard"

      Well, just wait for the arthritis to set in and listen for your knuckles cracking....

    3. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by kettch · · Score: 2

      hmmm... as Dilbert put it, maybe there are times when you don't want your computer to know where your hands are.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    4. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by Shihulad · · Score: 1

      I have to look at the keyboard to type now, if you take away my keyz...Dammit, I may have to learn..*caugh*to type without looking...maybe ill just stop useing the computer...

    5. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by Shihulad · · Score: 1

      besides, forums such as these are laden with type-o's as it is. just look to the subject of this thread, i cant imagine a forum like this filled with ppl who are "virtual typeing".ack!

    6. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by Funkitup · · Score: 1

      Combined with 3D eye goggles and headphones you wouldn't need paper at all. And, more importantly, you would never even need to get out of bed!

      This is surely not vapourware, this is the future of sofware development platforms ;-)

    7. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      And, more importantly, you would never even need to get out of bed!

      Well, to do that you'll also need a catheter.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    8. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, to do that you'll also need a catheter.

      Or a noseplug.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Ssomeone has to say it.... by snoozer20001 · · Score: 1

      It looks as though the sensors merely sense muscle movement in your hands. So it really wouldn't matter where your hands are, as long as you're making the correct fingerstrokes.

      --
      This space available at a low monthly rate...
  8. As long as there's at least some aural feedback. by dwlemon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps the "click-boing" of a Model M could be played with every sucessful keystroke.

  9. LP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last post!, since I got hosed by the timeout on "reply" and "post". Darn you slashcode!

  10. not strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how can you consider this stranger? i have thought of such device many times, but more in the line of a glove.

  11. Hey hon, mind if I use your breasts as a keyboard? by laetus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This is great. Now geeks can program AND have sex!

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  12. I wonder... by Quebec · · Score: 1
    Even if I'm using a keyboard hours a day
    for more then 10 years I still sometimes
    needs to checks where my fingers are...


    I wonder if a drawing of a keyboard on the table
    or a picture could be use as a reference. That
    would make me more comfortable with this invention.

    1. Re:I wonder... by BoBaBrain · · Score: 1

      Or better still, to save you drawing a keyboard on your desk, you could use an old keyboard...

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
  13. Hrm by rmadmin · · Score: 1

    I think this is pretty awesome, but I'd be concerned about how accurate it is. I can usually tell when I nail a wrong key, and I can tell I've already hit the backspace about 5 times typing this.

    So instead of being able to type while your looking at something, you'd have to keep looking at the damn screen correct? I think this would be more of a pain in the ass than anything else. Unless of course your in a chat room or something.

    Backspace used: about 25-40 times

    1. Re:Hrm by ragnarok · · Score: 1

      Backspace used: about 25-40 times

      Learn to type!

      (Backspace used: once - missed the wakka)

      --
      Search first, ask questions later.
  14. We're all insane by geophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not all that long ago, if you saw someone walking down the street, talking to someone who wasn't there, and typing on a keyboard that wasn't there, you'd wonder what institution he escaped from.

    Now, it's just an alpha geek talking on his cell phone and checking his email (with a monitor embedded in his Oakley's no doubt).

    1. Re:We're all insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mimes are people that don't have the tech gears to do virtual reality. They don't have voice recognization in their little universe either.

    2. Re:We're all insane by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • an alpha geek talking on his cell phone and checking his email

      I'd pull you up for being sexist, but then I took a look at the copy:

      • "SenseboardTM VK is perfect for businessmen typing e-mails and other documents away from the office"

      Ahh. To quote the great philosopher Harold Enfield: "Women! Know your limits!" ;-)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:We're all insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is exactly the reason I would wonder what institution he escaped from...

    4. Re:We're all insane by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Ok then, an Alpha geek talking on ITS cell phoen and checking SOMEONE ELSES email.

      Better ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  15. As if by SolidCore · · Score: 0

    Great, I allready have a hard enough time getting my mother to find the crtl or delete key...

  16. The Ontological Argument: an alternate history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a little known fact that "Ontological Argument" was in fact a much loved part of that medieval panel game "I'm Sorry I Haven't A Creed" which was billed as "the antidote to ecumenical councils, in which four Church Fathers are given silly things to do by the chairman, Gerbert of Aurillac". In the "Ontological Argument" round, each contestant in turn would say something gnomic like "God is that than which there is no greater" or "existence is more perfect than non-existence" until at some point one of them would say "And thus God exists!", at which point the audience would cheer and clap and the round would be over. Supposedly "variations" of the game existed, with unexplained extra rules such as reverse straddling or pillar saints being wild.

    Another popular round was "Chain of Causation" (for some reason known as "Cheddar Gorge" in England). This would start with the chairman naming some everyday commonplace such as a turnip or the Black Death, then the first contestant would name something else supposed to have caused it, the second contestant would name something supposed to have caused the first contestant's cause, and so on, with the contestants trying to avoid naming anything which was near enough to a deity or Supreme Being to be deemed the First Cause. When one made that mistake (or the chairman got bored) a hooter would sound and the round was over. There was an especially fine version of it done in Rheims cathedral when the Blessed St Willy managed to say "chasuble" in a silly voice as his cause on three successive turns.

    There was also "Limericks" where the chairman would supply an initial line such as "When St Antony was walking his pig" and the four contestants had to supply a line each to produce a limerick which was humorous but not heretical.

    Other typical rounds were "One Gregorian Chant to the tune of another", "Letters to the Corinthians (expurgated version)" and pairs of contestants playing well known folk airs on shawm and sackbut, or singing alternate words of hymns. It usually ended with the names of late arrivals to a theological convocation.

    At some point in most games the chairman would say "I'll be handing out penances, because penances mean pardons. What do penances mean?" and the audience would shout back "Pardons", at which point the chairman would mutter in an exasperated fashion about cloth-eared audiences.

    The show was finally cancelled by the Puritans, who didn't hold with people enjoying themselves. Such a shame we have nothing like it today.

  17. Question: by Wind_Walker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Will the keyboard have a configurable layout? Remember, not everybody in the world still used the outdated "Qwerty" format...

    Also, without seeing the keys, how would I know if it is the long-backspace button, or the shorter button (which I hate!)?

    Also, there is a definate tactile feel to pressing the keys; you can *tell* when the button is depressed. This feature is difficult to replicate.

    This would really cause problems with respect to picking up the "board" and quickly working on it. Believe it or not, sight *is* important.

    This device will never get off the ground, for my money.

    1. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and how exactly is QWERTY outdated? Remember that Dvorak rigged his studies.

      And if QWERTY was really meant to slow people down, they sure did a poor job of it. 'e' and 's' and 'a' are close together as well as 'r' and 'u' and 'i'.

    2. Re:Question: by myster0n · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe he shouldn't have used the word 'outdated'. But it's a fact that not everybody in the world uses QWERTY, even if you forget Dvorak. For example, the French use AZERTY, the Germans use QWERTZ ..., not to mention languages where the alphabet is not or partially derived from latin.

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    3. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you consider the manufacturer is Swedish, and that the Swedes have three extra letters + other differences in their keyboard layout...maybe they might recognize the need (?)

    4. Re:Question: by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Point taken, but still the majority of keyboards in current use are QWERTY. Therefore, the largest market to shoot for is QWERTY. Once you've got that sewed up, then you can look at other variants.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  18. And when we're through selling this... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    ... we can sell the Invisible Robot (TM).

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:And when we're through selling this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the invisible wearable computer that was once worn by an emperior...

  19. Speed Typing by Renraku · · Score: 1

    I do type in the air anyway when I'm bored. Just imagine how fast you could type if you practiced for a while..probably near 200wpm. And I thought my 140wpm was nice (sure pissed off my high school typing teacher).

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  20. Typing style by kalifornia · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I have to learn how to type correctly? I have somewhat mastered the "index finger" typing style.

  21. Try it on a train by Ethelthefrog · · Score: 1

    "Mummy, what is that man doing?"

    "Don't worry, dear. There are some odd people in the world. If all he is doing is typing on his knees, you needn't worry"

  22. Looks cool and I want one but... by uchian · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't this be really bad on the fingers, since there's nothing for them to "bounce" off after each keypress?

    1. Re:Looks cool and I want one but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out' the box....can you say carpel tunnel syndrome?

      You can point your hands and fingers in any direction you want...you can type against an orange or a mousepad if you need to...that's the point.

  23. that's gonna look strange... by turbine216 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...picture this - you're sitting in the boardroom, your boss to your left side, and the prospective multi-million dollar client across the table from you, and you're taking notes on your palm pilot...

    PECKING AWAY AT YOUR INVISIBLE KEYBOARD.

    And you thought the Sega Activator made you look stupid.

  24. But does it work? by slamb · · Score: 1
    Sensors in the units measure the finger movements and artificial intelligence and a language processor determine appropriate keystrokes or mouse movements.

    Artificial intelligence? A language processor? "Appropriate" keystrokes or mouse movements? This sounds like a fancy way of saying "it guesses a lot".

    1. Re:But does it work? by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 1

      Not as stupid as it sounds...

      The Avigo PDA by Texas Instruments had something like this - You had big on-screen buttons like "ABC", "DEF", etc. and you just tapped the set that had the letter you wanted. I.E. If you wanted to type "Hey" you'd tap GHI, DEF, WXYZ. And the Avigo would try to figure it out based on a list of words it knows matching that pattern, its context, etc.

      It sounds silly, but it really does work, despite the "guessing" that's involved. I used my Avigo for well over two years, and 90% of the time it got the words right. And if not, I could teach it new words. I liked it a LOT better than Graffiti on the Palm that ended up replacing my beloved Avigo. Graffiti is okay, but honestly, there really are better solutions, and the Avigo's was one of them. If this "air keyboard" works as well and on similar principles, then I think it will be a decent alternative to Graffiti just because of that.

      That's the one thing I miss about that little machine, it's a shame it didn't creep over into the PalmOS arena. Here is a screen shot of the on-screen keyboard for the Avigo, and a brief description of it.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    2. Re:But does it work? by jguevin · · Score: 1

      Nokia cell phones can do this, it's called "predictive text input."

    3. Re:But does it work? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you but I type a lot of things that are not in the dictionary what about commands? ls is not a word would is use its AI to think you typed is or something else??? It can't fly if all it uses AI cause people type things it not going to recognize

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    4. Re:But does it work? by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      Of course you can type a lot that's not in the dictionary. But this device is targeted at people taking notes, typing documents, etc. This isn't meant to be a be-all and end-all replacement for keyboards, it's simply to make typing common things on a PDA, etc. easier. If you're going to be working at a Linux prompt on your Palm or something, obviously this isn't going to be for you.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    5. Re:But does it work? by mr3038 · · Score: 1

      Siemens phones can do this too. It's called T9 and I think typing 100+ L[etters]PM with this isn't hard dispite the fact I'm using my thumb only. Not too bad if you think that all the keys take like 1 square inch combined (siemens S35 I have)... Of course you can forget typing C code or shell scripts with it.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  25. Obligatory Doug Adams reference by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2

    What happens if someone throws a pencil through the keyboard's on/off zone?

    1. Re:Obligatory Doug Adams reference by achurch · · Score: 2

      What happens if someone throws a pencil through the keyboard's on/off zone?

      The sensors register "FORMAT C: (enter)".

      And then when the pencil rebounds, the sensors register "YES (enter)".

    2. Re:Obligatory Doug Adams reference by Andrewkov · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't matter .. They device is measuring finger movements .. it doesn't have an optical sensor or anything like that ... Of course when you flinch back from the flying pencil, it might get confused!

    3. Re:Obligatory Doug Adams reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "on/off sensitive airspace"
      The man had a way with words...

    4. Re:Obligatory Doug Adams reference by houseof666 · · Score: 1

      he did have an education in astrophysics

      --
      I know what his secret is. He found a way to end SPAM. It involves Lasers, GPS, and Traceroute.
    5. Re:Obligatory Doug Adams reference by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Funny
      What happens if someone throws a pencil through the keyboard's on/off zone?

      There is a certain other Slashdot reader who was playing with the Mac's speech recognition for a time when we worked in the same office in a faraway land back in 1993. It was hooked into the menu manager, and any command available on a current menu (including the systemwide apple menu) was executed if spoken.

      The crowning pleasure of my long and varied life came from adding a system shutdown alias to the apple menu, and then walking up behind him and announcing "Shut down" to his computer while he was having staredowns with the monitor.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  26. Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by starslab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Smells very strongly of Vapor.... No details, and bogus claims of "Artificial Intelligence".

    We can't do AI on big-ass supercomputers, you expect me to believe these little wristpade have AI in them?

    I'll believe it when I see a product on the shelf.

    1. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can visit them at Comdex:

      Events
      Visit us at COMDEX Fall 2001 in Las Vegas, November 12-16

      A SenseboardTM prototype will be exhibited at COMDEX, Booth L2539, the Swedish Pavilion (Floor Map PDF-format)

    2. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by TwP · · Score: 2
      Agreed.

      The list of buzzwords on their press page caused my head to swim! Just a brief quote:
      SenseboardTM contains sensor technology, artificial intelligence, bluetooth, a DC-port and a language processor. SenseboardTM is easy to use, requires no training, and does not decrease typing speed or accuracy. SenseboardTM together with a PDA, a Smart Phone or a Wearable Computer and a Head Mounted Display provides the user with a full-size computer that fits in a pocket.
      Just below that quote on their press page, they say that they will be demonstrating their product daily at COMDEX in LasVegas this week -- November 12-16. Are there any Slashdotters at COMDEX right now who have seen this thing in action?
    3. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by slithytove · · Score: 1

      it all depends on how you define AI of course, but what i think they mean is that it uses fuzzy logic and spelling and gramatical checkers to determine the likelyhood that 3rd to last keystroke was an a rather than a z. it doesnt take a supercomputer to know that vapor isnt spelled vzpor.

    4. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by glebfrank · · Score: 2

      Smells very strongly of Vapor.... No details, and bogus claims of "Artificial Intelligence".

      We can't do AI on big-ass supercomputers, you expect me to believe these little wristpade have AI in them?

      There's AI and AI. Things like handwriting recognition are typically based on AI technology (neural networks.) In this case,they are probably using something similar to try to come up with the best guess on what was it you typed.

      AI doesn't necessarily mean Commander Data.

    5. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by donglekey · · Score: 2

      I smell it too. AI is always a dead giveway. It is usually more on the artificial side than the intelligence side though.

    6. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 1

      We can't do AI on big-ass supercomputers, you expect me to believe these little wristpade have AI in them?

      Keep in mind that their use of the term "AI" is just buzzword-ese. But the basic idea of what they're talking about is not impossible.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    7. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      it doesnt take a supercomputer to know that vapor isnt spelled vzpor.

      But it does take a fairly good-sized dictionary if this thing is to be of any real use. Those little straps look pretty small to me; they have to include a power supply and transmitter as well as the program logic and the dictionary, not to mention the actual hardware motion detectors and such. If the thing weighs 5 pounds on each hand, it won't be very useful to anyone.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:Vaporous... Very, Very Vaporous by Anzya · · Score: 1

      The point with Bluetooth is that the transmitters are small and doesn't demand much power. So the problem with power supply isn't that great. As for the dictionary and the program logic. It is reasonably to think that they put that in the PDA. If you them in the "straps" then it would be a hassle to manually update the dictionary.

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
  27. Typing Mistakes by jonestor · · Score: 1

    The amount of typing mistakes will probably go up 10 fold with this thing, since there is no visible keyboard.

  28. That's scary ... by taniwha · · Score: 2

    just like you can't tell whether someone's talking on a phone, or just to their own personal daemons in the street these days .... pretty soon on the bus you wont be able to tell whether they guy next to you is working .... or having a good time

  29. Man, where's the "%" key...? by MadCow42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great... if you can FULLY touch-type. What about the other 99.995% of us that can't?

    Sure, I can type 80wpm without looking at the keyboard... until I need to use some weird character that I don't use 400 times a day...

    I guess you could roll out a printed keyboard to use if you had to... I can just see someone carring around a dirty napkin with a keyboard scrawled on it now... q:]

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by Scritch · · Score: 1

      Your .sig file indicates Perl programming. Do
      you never predaclare your hashes? Never
      dereferenced a hash ref?

      for my $key (sort keys %$href) {
      }

    2. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      It's an attachment to Palms and such. Just use the stylus for characters you don't know the location of.

    3. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not something I use often enough to touch type... To tell the truth I usually have to look at numbers themselves, or take a couple stabs at them and be quick on the backspace key (except 9 and 0, and maybe 3 and 4, which I have a better "hit" rate at because of #$() ). % was just an example.

      I wonder what it would type if you lifted your hand to pick your nose...? q:] (just kidding!!!!)

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    4. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by Proteus+Child · · Score: 1
      Great... if you can FULLY touch-type. What about the other 99.995% of us that can't?

      Now I feel old.. I remember my parents teaching me to touch-type because it was the fastest way of getting things done on a keyboard (started off with a toy mechanical typewriter and moved on to a C-64 with Bank Street Writer later on). How common is it for people on the Net to not be able to touchtype these days?

      --

      Proteus' Child

      Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

    5. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by John+Whitley · · Score: 2

      Well, it does seem rather lame for full touch typing..(and I do touch type) but I'd *love* to try out this tech for a modified "hands-free" chording and/or gesturing style interface. Especially with this tech further minaturized, so that only thin band or fingerless "cycling glove" look was requried.

      Imagine the now-famous IBM wearable with this as the "keyboard". Now add some positioning hardware so that you could point/gesture w.r.t.the projected image.. and that little IBM device becomes oh-so-much more usable (and private) than with speech-only input.

    6. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by jgennick · · Score: 1
      How common is it for people on the Net to not be able to touchtype these days?
      I think there are lots of us who touchtype just fine except for some of the less-frequently-used characters, which was the point the original poster was trying to make.
    7. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by rabidcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it needs holographic projection as well so it's a visible virtual keyboard.

      Then anybody can type like Washu...

    8. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by rark · · Score: 2

      but chances are you know (if you spend any real amount of time typing on a regular basis, which I expect is probably the case for the majority of slashdot readers) *about* where the key for various 'odd' characters is. Then you just feel around a bit, sort of a tactile version of hunt and peck.

      Chances are, if you use the key enough that this is annoying to you after the first few weeks, you use it enough that you'll remember it next time.

    9. Re:Man, where's the "%" key...? by armb · · Score: 2

      > Great... if you can FULLY touch-type. What about the other 99.995% of us that can't?

      Get your VR glasses to show you a keyboard?
      (Though actually I think a chording device might work better than a flat board in that sort of context.)

      --
      rant
  30. -Less everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clockless chips, boardless keyboards???? What is this world coming too??? Could a slashless dot be next?

  31. Where's the Python Foot? by ellem · · Score: 2

    This story does have a Python foot somewhere right?

    Did Homer Simpson invent this thing?

    So I just type where the keys would be if there was an actual keyboard under my fingers? Say I don't really know the layout of keyboard very well... would I carry a thin piece of cardboard?

    Is there a guitar module?

    I am still lokking for that foot. Where's that confounded foot?

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  32. A great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If only my virtual girlfriend would let me buy one...

  33. Oh great... by chinton · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sensors in the units measure the finger movements and artificial intelligence and a language processor determine appropriate keystrokes or mouse movements. What kind of AI? If I type in my bosses name on the virtual keyboard, will it display "Brain Damaged Lazy Bastard"?

  34. Pretty cool, but... by Uttles · · Score: 2

    It seems a little weird. I mean it could be great technology, but there's just a sense of comfort in pressing shift-/ to get the ?. I like to press the keys and feel that I've pressed correctly. That instantaneous feedback helps me type efficiently. Without that physical feedback I think it would much more difficult.

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every person who has complained about no feedback slowing their typing speed is brain damaged. JUST HOW FAST DO ALL OF YOU WRITE ON A PALM OR VISOR WITH A STYLUS?! The idea is that you can type faster with this than you can write. The fold out keyboards are bulky and aren't quite full size if I remember correctly.

    2. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      The fold out keyboards are bulky and aren't quite full size if I remember correctly.
      You don't. The keys on the board I have for my palm are larger than those here on my desktop board.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    3. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever!!

  35. Well, by owenferguson · · Score: 1
    Does anyone have any further specs on this? It looks like the kind of thing I'd go for, to compliment my HUD, but would it interface with a desktop PC? How about drivers? Will it connect with my NINO? How open will the coding be = will people be encouraged to create 3rd-party aps (like piano or air guitar aps?)

    Of course, this isn't anywhere as cool as the in-desk LED-based keyboard used to control MCP in Tron, but it's cool none the less.

  36. Interresting gadget... by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1
    Now that's a gadget i would like to try at some points. However, anyone noticed that the thumb doesn't seem to be mapped with this device ? If you look closely at the main pic on the linked page, you can see the thumb is outside the device.

    That's kind of necessary for fast typers who use all their 10 fingers to type.

    Complete specs would be interresting though, as a picture doesn't prove anything.

    1. Re:Interresting gadget... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      That's kind of necessary for fast typers who use all their 10 fingers to type.

      Just nine. I use only my right thumb on the space bar. Never my left. I just realized that now, in fact. Odd, as I am actually left-handed. It must be the way that I learned to type.

      I learned to type back in the "old days" in the school typing class. On manual office typewriters, in fact. tap tap tap tap *ding* reach-up and pull the carriage return back tap tap tap tap tap. Typing is one of the few high school classes that I took which I can honestly say that I use every day of the week. Aside from basic skills like reading and spelling and basic math and such, of course. Typing was truly the smartest "skills" course that I ever took.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  37. This is how it will be by interiot · · Score: 2
    One step better: Tie this to your reality-enhancing goggles so you can actually see the transparent virtual keyboard.

    Another step better: Instead of something in the palm of your hand, use small transmitters glued to each of your fingernails, so you can quickly switch back and forth between typing and doing something else.

    1. Re:This is how it will be by crywolf · · Score: 1
      One step better: Tie this to your reality-enhancing goggles so you can actually see the transparent virtual keyboard.



      This was my thought too, tie it in with transparent VR goggles, with images of Johnny Mnemnonic in my head.



      For that matter, why stick with a conventional flat keyboard? Rotate your hands 90 degrees, duplicate some of the middle keys on both sides for ease of use. And definately allow custom movements. finger_snap=keyboard_on, hand_clap=keyboard_off. (smart-ass comments to follow)

      --
      CAUTION: Product may be hot after heating
  38. Dilbert And NG by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    Some people might not want their computers to know where their fingers have been...

    It always bugged me that on Next Generation keyboards/control panels were nearly always completely flat.

  39. Cool! by oGMo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Friends and I have always thought something like this would be nifty---something like a virtual keyboard you could type in the air---although when I saw this announcement I wondered if it would actually be as practical from an HCI standpoint. After all, there's no real tactile feedback to tell you if you've hit the right "key," as far as I can tell. This sort of feedback is important, moreso than visual feedback (since unless you can't touchtype, you don't need to see the keyboard: try typing in the dark), especially to avert Repetitive Stress Injury.

    On the other hand, just to test the concept, I tried "typing" on a flat surface, and it seemed fairly intuitive. This is probably better in this respace than an "air keyboard", since you at least feel the contact of the desk. (Assuming you can't type in the air with this product, although there doesn't seem to be a reason why not, they say "any flat surface".) Now what would be nifty is a roll-up guide you could "type" on to get both visual feedback and a soft touch. This would solve hunting and pecking problems, too. :-)

    I'd really love to have one of these, since they seem to solve most portability problems, and since it seems you can tweak the virtual keyboard's size (layout, etc.), it'd make the ultimate evolution in keyboards. (No more need for a "flex" keyboard, just mold a surface...)

    Nifty.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  40. Neat, but... by GISboy · · Score: 1

    if we spill coffee/soda or some sort of beverage on our hand/invisible kbd/table will we still freak out?

    I can see it now..."AAAAaaaa...oh, wait, nevermind".

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  41. OT: Paramount Theatre in Seattle requires IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of you living in the Seattle area, you may want to contact The Paramount as their website blocks access from non-IE browsers. I tried to connect to theparamount.com and got this message:

    The STG [Seattle Theatre Group, parent company of The Paramount and The Moore Theatre -me] website works with Netscape version 4.0 and 6.01 and Internet Exlorer [sic] versions 4.0 and 5.0. Please upgrade your web browser and come back to enjoy our website. Thank you!

    I was using Moz0.9.5 under Linux. I tried Netscape 4.77 and got the same message. When I tried Konqueror with the identifier string changed to "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)", it worked fine.

    I sent an email to webmaster@theparamount.com and to isen@axisweb.com (Axis is their web design company, 'isen' is Axis' Director of Operations).

    Please send email to them if you care.

  42. So...umm who'll be selling them? by Nilatir · · Score: 1

    And how long after COMDEX will it be until it's not vapourware?

    --

    "We were half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold."
    -- Hunter S. Tolkien
  43. Interesting Product... by Ryan_Terry · · Score: 1

    ...But the web site seemed a bit slim on the details. How exactly does it work? Does it look at where your fingers are? I about 40 wpm with my two fingered approach, and I'd hate to have to learn to type for something like this. I have a Fujitsu Stylistic 3500 and this would be an attractive addition if it actually worked.

    --
    MessEdUp
    .sig
    #/var/www/v
    1. Re:Interesting Product... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I about 40 wpm with my two fingered approach,

      i suspect that the device requires you to type "properly" using the established touch-typing protocol as it will likely use the fact that your right index finger moved up and to the left to determine that you typed a y, and so on. I doubt it would be able to monitor your whole hand position to allow for two-finger typing.

      But then, what do I know.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  44. won't help by blueskatz · · Score: 0, Troll

    Archfeld sent a strange piece of technology called the Senseboard which is a portable keyboard, except that there's really not any keys (Archfield used Federal Express to get it to the Slashdot editors overnight? Or did he submit an article about it? Oh, and this is a run-on sentance.). Or a board (Verb?). And it can communicate via RF for all your strange wearable applications (Really? The Virtual Board can communicate via RF in place of all my strange wearable applications?).

    This is too easy.

  45. I habr onw by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny

    ^I habr onw, it id v3ry cppl. I an usinf it right noq! Bit I an mot a veru good tyoist. :-)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  46. Re:Hey hon, mind if I use your breasts as a keyboa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no they can't.

  47. rsi vs learning? by xeno · · Score: 2

    Ok, I see a wee bit of a problem with this.

    A virtual keyboard based on finger movement would have to rely on a software learning mechanism that tuned itself to your physical idiosyncracies. I mean, without a physical keyboard to hunt and peck on, the little finger of your left hand is going to move a different distance between the imaginary A and Q keys than your right index finger is going to move betwen the J and U keys. A sufficiently good learning mechanism would probably account for tuning itself to your hand movements continuously, so that your error rate would go down even as your typing patterns shifted over time. (Of course, this results in equipment with function profiles in software that make it unusable by anyone else.)

    Or not.

    More likely, you will be the part of the equation that conforms to the constraints of the software. You will have to learn how to be very consistent in your finger movements, without a physical keyboard to guide you. After a training period (just as you would do for voice recognition software), you would have to be quite consistent, even in different positions, desk heights, and times of day (tired or not). This screams "RSI" to me. Repetitive motion in a guided environment is one thing, but having to make precise repetitive motions in free air or against a flat object that provides no feedback would mightily increase the stress put on your fingers.

    Thanks, but I already have a surgery scar on one wrist that makes people think I tried to off myself, I don't care to repeat the experience. I'll wait until the Senseboard software is well-reviewed and proven to be continuously adaptive. (Then I'll have an excuse for wearing funny gloves and dark glasses with a piece of wire hanging off them, while playing pocket pool on the bus: "Oh no, Miss, I have a proposal due this afternoon...")

    Jon

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:rsi vs learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus H. Christ...

      I can't believe you guys are bitching and moaning about something you can't even begin to understand. You are simply guessing and conjecturing about how this thing *might* work. It could very well be quite a clever device.

      What if it worked *perfectly* right out of the box? What if it worked completely differently than your narrow-minded "Oh, it's sensing your finger movements and positions and...". DUH, that's the most OBVIOUS solution, but maybe it doesn't work that way. What if it instead analyzed the electrical impulses in your hand muscles and fathomed your intended keystroke from that?

      Jeez, up until today I thought that Slashdotters were a little more imaginative and intelligent, but they're just as quick to seek out the most obvious brute-force methods as Joe Schmoe garbage man might.

  48. Multipurpose.... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    Cool. Looks like an invisible keyboard/brass knuckle combo!

    The downside could be local gangstas see you "air typing" and mistake it for gang signs.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  49. What's the point... by mblase · · Score: 2

    ...of having a virtual keyboard for a Palm handheld computer, if you can't hold the keyboard while you're using it?

    Another cute idea, but I can't see it taking off. Either the popular folding keyboards or some modified Graffiti-ish entry system like Fitaly seem to work much more "handily."

  50. Comdex by dszd0g · · Score: 1

    Their Web site stated that they would be at Comdex. Has anyone here actually tried the product?

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    1. Re:Comdex by Hyler · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are at Comdex. And it won a Best of COMDEX award, Best New Technology.

      --
      It's its. They're their, there. You're your. Who's whose? A looser loser, though those two too threw through the trough.
  51. Tactile feedback not necessary.. by itsnotme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well all of you complaining that you need the tactile feedback and the clicking noise generated by it.. well think about this.. its QUIET so that means you can use it during class ( if youre a student ) so you could have your palm and this and be able to take notes on your palm quietly and not bother anybody else ( granted you'll look a little silly and probably have a coupla more errors in your typing than usual ) but its a nice data input device that will be able to type anyplace.. Plane sound good? dont have enough room in your seat to type with a full sized keyboard so this will work quite nicely.. its also compact so its easy to lug around too..

    So I dont think all this bitching is warranted, granted you're going to have to have a keyboard layout in your head to type accrately and get used to typing without visual cues.. and if this is all its supposed to be then it'll be a very cool and useful thing..

    1. Re:Tactile feedback not necessary.. by Bobuhabu · · Score: 1
      Plane sound good? dont have enough room in your seat to type with a full sized keyboard so this will work quite nicely.. its also compact so its easy to lug around too..

      Not to be nit picky but, do you bring your desktop computer on a plane with you? If so, let me know what airline you're flying.

      On another point, how is this more convenient then a palm portable keyboard? at least for PDA's. I mean the size of the device looks larger than the keyboard when its folded up and that's without carrying around some sort of paper guide as others have suggested

      So lets summarize, in my opinion, totally useless although the technolgy is definately cool

      --
      Bobuhabu
  52. Hmm by Man+of+E · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wonder how the keyboard "knows" when I'm actually trying to press on a key, versus when I'm just resting my fingers in the home position?
    What if I need to grab a drink? What if I briefly wave my hands around? What if I scratch my head because I don't know what to type next?

    I'm not sure that the language recognition and "artificial intelligence" they proclaim this thing has would make it comfortably usable, even for short periods of time. Too many little inconveniences, and things you'd have to stop doing while having a keyboard permanently attached to your hands.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
    1. Re:Hmm by Man+of+E · · Score: 2

      Speaking of which, why not just grab an infrared keyboard and strap it to your wrists? That way, you can use any surface at all as a keyboard! Wow!
      Make it collapsible and small, and you have a better product with the same tagline. Except that it's stupid.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    2. Re:Hmm by kettch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe it'll just print things like *scratches head* *waves madly* *picks nose*, or other things...

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    3. Re:Hmm by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe it'll just print things like *scratches head* *waves madly* *picks nose*, or other things...


      *Stop that dave*

      *Dave, what would Karen think?*

      *Dave, you'll go blind you know*

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Hmm by houseof666 · · Score: 1

      Also, what would the 'language recognition' do if I suddenly decided to start typing in, for instance, german, or italian, or c?

      --
      I know what his secret is. He found a way to end SPAM. It involves Lasers, GPS, and Traceroute.
    5. Re:Hmm by andrewspace · · Score: 1

      I have spent some time thinking about this particularly tricky issue: AI and keyboard negative typing. :-)

      First, what AI are they talking about here? As I understand it, AI is a term that is used freely. A great deal can be written into software that _looks_ intelligent, but really is just a reflection of the programmers.

      Second, we can't overlook the fact that this will be extremely useful technology. Consider its use in medical concerns alone; people do lose the finer use of the hands with aging.

      The way to make me most interested in buying one is to produce a way for me to see it in my eye, and pick up my thought-commands and see it executed by the computer! Until then, I'll just keep tying until they refine it a bit.
      :-)

  53. complete baloney. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, kids, April Fool's is in April.


    Based on the form-factor of this device, it intuits the positions of your fingers by feeling your tendons. And pardon? Hello? Thumbs?


    Sorry, but it's either a hoax or a strange new form of chording keyboard.

  54. Douglas Adams Strikes Again by dwdyer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Imagine the effort it will take to not type, if every movement is interpreted as a potential keystroke. I was reminded of this passage from the Hitchhiker's Guide:
    A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio wavebands for news of himself. The machine was rather difficult to operate. For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive - you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same programme.
    --
    -dwd-
    1. Re:Douglas Adams Strikes Again by slamb · · Score: 1

      Heh. Deja vu.

  55. The lack of seeing the keys is easily solved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that lack of seeing the keys could be solved simply by carrying around a piece of paper or something with the keys. Or something stronger that can be folded up.

    Or something even possibly connected to the bottom of these things with each half of a keyboard.. talk about ergonomic, you could type in any hand position you want. and with a small head mounted display, Itd be superdope.

    1. Re:The lack of seeing the keys is easily solved. by msm1th · · Score: 1

      Or something stronger that can be folded up

      Like, for instance, a portable keyboard?

  56. What about cost? by MrWinkey · · Score: 1

    Yes the cost will be high at first but how high? A lot of people will be intrested in this right away and a few have to get sold so the technology gets cheaper right?

    --
    Vote early. Vote often. Vote CowboyNeal.
  57. Wow! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    It's got to be good if it incorporates artificial intelligence!!

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  58. slash sucks an ass again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice job slashbot

    1. Re:slash sucks an ass again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. In order to drive up hits, they have sunk to only posting four types of articles:

      (1) Linus is great. Microsoft is bad.
      (2) Weird technology with no hope of having practical usage.
      (3) They are making it harder for me to steal music/software/whatever.
      (4) Jon Katz

      I thought this might be different. I looked at the site. No demos, No product trials, Nothing but advertising.

      They manufacturers announced they were going to be at Comdex. I figured someone would have attended and given a report. No luck -- Just a bunch of fanboys.

  59. COWARDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear fear on the board..

    People afraid to look silly when communicating with thier electronics.

    If you pick one of these up, you are probably pretty damn geeky anyway.. people probably already laugh at you.

    Who cares what they think. Make it good and I'll use it. Damn the social repercusions.

  60. This is BS till it is proven useful and cheap. by mokyar · · Score: 0

    The product talks about the idea, which sounds fine. But the 'key strokes' need to be sensed correctly at a very very very high rate and the device needs to be implemented in a cheap way. Otherwise it is dead!

  61. Nice.. by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    This is something I've been waiting for, for a long time.

    I've been thinking about ways to reduce the footprint of a laptop while retaining efficient input. One idea I had was similar to this -- when your hands approached the screen, an on-screen keyboard would appear that you could type on. You wouldn't have any touch feedback (electric shocks? ;)), but maybe noise or visual feedback would be enough...

    Those laser displays that project directly onto your retina would be cool too. Imagine this combined with a device that actually projected the keyboard (with live feedback) onto whatever surface you were using to type on...

    If they had a nice durable webpad with either of these kinds of input, I'd be very happy!

  62. Re:Hey hon, mind if I use your breasts as a keyboa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Uh huh. Dream on geek-boy. These things wont work with palmela and her five sisters. Besides, you've probably developed your one-handed typing to a point where you can do 100 words per minute anyway...


    :)

  63. Forget working from home, try work from bed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No honey, I'm NOT! I'm just checking my email under the covers"...

  64. Air Keyboard by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 2, Funny

    Senseboard + MIDI = Real air guitar

    In the voices of Bill and Ted: "Excellent".

    --
    When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
  65. They didn't even point out the best benefit... by allism · · Score: 1

    next time I spill coke in my keyboard, it'll still work...and I'll never have to take the keys off my keyboard to clean out that strange goop that seems to collect between the keys again...

    1. Re:They didn't even point out the best benefit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't think that goop inbetween the keys is coke...

  66. I might be mistaken, but . . . by Anonymous+Poodle · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't really accurate voice recognition software make this sort of thing obsolete?

    1. Re:I might be mistaken, but . . . by T-Lex · · Score: 1

      It would if you wanted to talk to your computer all the time... I think I'd prefer silent interface myself...

  67. Dilbert by agdv · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you an engineer too?

    No, I'm a moron. Common mistake.

    -some Dilbert comic strip on similar devices

  68. IBM Clicky keyboard by Genady · · Score: 1

    They can have my old monster IBM clicky keyboard when they pry it from my cold dead fingers, besides you can't bludgeon co-workers to death with this thing.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    1. Re:IBM Clicky keyboard by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Wait until the brass knuckle version comes out...

  69. Doesn't anyone remember their childhood fables? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The Emperor's New Clothes"
    by Hans Christian Andersen

    "What a marvelous technological advance!"
    "What an engineering coup de grace!"

    Doesn't anyone see what these Senseboard Technologies AB guys are doing to us?

    Duh!

    ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  70. Typing Style by ElDuque · · Score: 1

    Of course we all realize that this doesn't work for us that use the accelerated-hunt-and-peck method. I remember the "home row" vaguely and of course it seems like it would be faster, but hey, you can't contain these fingers in any "home row"! They were born to roam free about the keyboard!
    Seriously, how many people on Slashdot use the home row method that would actually work for this thing? It'd be a good poll, that's for sure. Or would the "Artifical Intelligence" be able to figure out which keys I am pressing no matter what style I use..?
    This is definitely a Cool Thing, but it has a long way to go before people start using them (especially for coding, I would think....How hard is it going to be to hit the right direction of curly brace each time??)

  71. Interesting, but is it workable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not being able to see the keyboard, ever, is going to make typing difficult. I assume when you 'initiate' it, it creates a keyboard based on where your hands are at that precise moment, so what if you shift slightly, you can't reorient yourself to the keyboard because you can't see it. Regardless, it's an amazing technology, in my opinion, and there are a few ways to overcome the problem.

    First of all, just carry around a piece of paper with a keyboard on it, and just have the key zones correspond to the printed keyboard. You could carry around a thin, dead-tree keyboard in a pocket easily.

    The far more elegant solution would be to use it with a wearable display that created a keyboard in your field of view at the appropriate place. Of course, that would require a camera, and some fairly sophisticated visual processing, but it could be done.

  72. Ergonomics? by Zspdude · · Score: 1

    It still doesn't seem to solve the problems of tendonitis and carpal tunnel. People won't necessarily type with better hand on a table than on a keyboard. My bets for the keyboard of the future will be placed on a concept which eliminates the typing motion completely, or at least drastically reduces it. It's a great concept, but it solves a problem of convenience and not the major reason keyboards will one day become extinct.

    --
    What's in a Sig?
  73. Just think of the applications for this technology by kindbud · · Score: 2
    • TV remote
    • Steering wheel
    • Doorknob
    • Toilet
    • Firearm
    • Sex toy
    • Dog leash

    The mind boggles!
    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  74. Simpsons are going to love this by ecampbel · · Score: 1

    The artificial inteligence feature sounds a little sketchy to me. I wonder how accurate it will be.
    Newton Guest Stars on the Simpson

    --

    Sig goes here
  75. Hmmm... by T-Lex · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm just not as attached to the aural and tactile features of my keyboard as you guys are.

    This sounds like a great device, and I want one already... The only problem is it doesn't really look like it exists. Their contact page is an error, and you can't order one anywhere. Additionally, there's no video of a working model on there. Maybe this is someone's PR homework?

  76. Think outside the keyboard by byrd77 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The coolest thing about this is not emulating an old fasion 101/4 key keyboard, it's the potential to input in new, creative ways.

    If you want to re-define your keyboard to be basketball shaped, have at it. There is some potential for great ergonomic improvements here.

    Also, think of the potential for virtual instruments, art, the possibilities are endless.

    Given all this, I hope they leave the interface open, so everyone can contribute.

    --
    - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
    1. Re:Think outside the keyboard by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I've been coming up with ideas for various "key" arrangements for years. Most of which would be totally unfeasable for any physical object to model. This sort of thing, if we users can teach the neural net new layouts, would be great.

      Imagine just hanging your hands down at your sides and twitching your fingers and wrists to type. There could be a scheme for a wearable that allowed typing with your hands in your pockets, so as to be unobtrusive.

      People are naysaying this thing hard, and they have good reason, since it probably has a ways to go before reliability. However, in a few more generations of development these things should be great, and until then there are a couple of niches that might like them.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  77. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There goes my sarcastic "Oh yeah right just wait while I note down that little nugget of wisdom" *taps in the air* line :(

  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. Look into my eyes when I am conversating with you. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This might be really cool for portable applications. Imagine how much thinner a laptop could be if there didn't need to be a keyboard. (Or a mouse for that matter--let's say they put a piece of plastic that doesn't get dirty against the display, and make that into a touch-screen. People like me would rarely use that anyway (mice suck, IMO).) Then get rid of the keyboard, making the laptop about 1/4 to 1/2 inches thinner. That would be totally awesome. Hey, why not get rid of the power button and put something like what the Apple Cube or whatever it was called--there was no button, just a place where you touch the case and the computer would turn on or off. There was even a light that gets brighter when your finger comes close to the thing. Maybe the "buttons" could be silk-screened onto a flat surface on the computer and all have lights behind them that get brighter as your finger gets closer. That would be like something out of Star Trek. And there would be far less mechanical components in the laptop, making it last longer. Hey, why not get rid of the mechanical hard drive and put a solid-state drive in there. Currently, such a drive will read at extremely high speeds (much faster than any mechanical drive) and write at speeds about as fast as a mechanical drive. (I read that in two or three months' ago Circuit Cellar, I think.) Each "page" on these drives wears out after 10,000 to 1 million writes, but normal hard drives wear out after a while too. The rule is the same: back up your data. Besides, some of the better drives out there will automatically distribute the write load around on the drive so that it will last longer and stuff. Well, back to the keyboard thing. Oh, I was talking about removing mechanical components. Imagine if you could take almost all mechanical components out of the laptop. (The only things I can think of that need to remain mechanical are the CD-ROM and floppy drives. And the speakers, perhaps, I guess those are mechanical.) So you'd end up with an ultra-quiet, ultra-light (and ultra-futuristic-cool) laptop that will probably last longer than what is currently used today. Oh well.

  80. Senseboard: sounds good but works poorly by Eutope · · Score: 5, Informative

    I saw the virtual keyboard on the comdex floor. It sounds like a great concept, but did not appear to function with a high degree of speed and accuracy. THe basic concept is interesting -- using neural networks to correlate the electrical signals from muscle movements with corresponding strokes on a keyboard, but more work needs to be done on the algorithms. The 2-man team behind the board is hoping to develop a product by march that could be used by anyone without training. But in the demo, only one person on the development team was able to use the keyboard, which seems to indicate that it will be more difficult to create a system that will work for a large population of users without training. That said it is an interesting concept that needs more work, and will probably require each user to train the keyboard for their movements, much like people do with continuous speech recognition programs today.

  81. This rocks! by DotComVictim · · Score: 1

    Hey, now I can play air guitar and have it control a MIDI instrument!

  82. Let's give this a shot here... by x136 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, I am not a touch typist, but I'll give this a shot.

    [plugs in virtual keyboard]

    Qokw. rthsi isd xc00; IK KUV SD'Adeh@ jooiw kne,l klweok; osoi j ihkwe isdkl oidkl asjn trhs>? Nnkle.

    Hmm. doesn't work too well. I'll go back to my old way.

    [loads up speech recognition program]

    Their, that setter. Eye ill just stack with speech recognition. It's just work batter. New paragraph. New paragraph. NEW PARAGRAPH!

    I hate technology.

    --
    SIGFEH
  83. Oh, please. by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    You're getting pedantic. "Artificial intelligence" doesn't mean a thinking computer, despite what "singularity" believers may say; it means a computer doing something which seems intelligent. The baddies in any computer game you care to mention are controlled by what most people would term "artificial intelligence".

    What they mean here is that the wrist-pads work out which keys you're "pressing". They choose to call this AI, partly for the buzzword value, partly because that's simply what it is - as the word is generally used.

    Er, would the moderator care to point out the insight in the parent? (HIBT?)

  84. Nice! by Cheetah86 · · Score: 1

    This invisible keyboard will go perfect with my 'invisible bug fixes' from microsoft!

  85. Quiet? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    Have you ever sat in a class where someone's drumming their fingers constantly on their desk? Believe me, it's more distracting than using a good old-fashioned pen...

    1. Re:Quiet? by itsnotme · · Score: 1

      I'm deaf aka hearing impaired.. so Uhh no? :-)

  86. hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorta like the virtual slashdot database...

  87. Bad Idea, try a twiddler instead by weaselgrrl · · Score: 1
    From a CHI standpoint, they must handle some notion of "virtual" tactile feedback, else, how will I know where my fingers are? I can touch type quite fast on a keyboard because my fingers can FEEL the keys. I can feel the ridges on the sides of keys and indents in the middle and thus I know when I my hands are sliding out of position. I can feel the bumps on the "J" and "F" keys with my index fingers, letting me know that I am back in home position. But I often need to glance down when I am trying to strike a non-standard key. Oh yes, I have been touch typing for 20 years. What will the poor person do if they don't touch type? Most people I know don't.

    As for the noise factor of keyboard clatter, I have a 2-lbs sub-notebook that is nearly silent. The sound of the air filtering system in most lecture halls or boardrooms is much louder.

    If people want a SMALL keyboard that is pretty quite, they should instead try a chording "keyboard" like the Twiddler. It's quite, small, unobtrusive and it is easy to learn how to use it with a training program.

    --
    I spent all of those years as Anonymous Coward and all I got was this lousy number (204976).
  88. Help for CTS-afflicted people? by MikeyNg · · Score: 2

    I'm sure that everyone who reads /. knows someone who has or has had carpal tunnel syndrome. With this, you could literally type with your hands anywhere, so it should be relatively easy to find an ergonomic position.


    In fact, couple this new input method with a dvorak keyboard, and you'd be rocking. They could even throw in a few additional chordal "sequences" to really get some additional functionality out of it. This is some neat stuff from a user-input side. Free your mind, folks!

    --
    Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
    1. Re:Help for CTS-afflicted people? by Man+of+E · · Score: 2

      Yes, but you don't have the little springs inside a real keyboard that make your fingers bounce back. So any ergonomic benefits would soon be outnumbered by the damage you do to your fingers in another way.
      I see this mostly as a tool for note-taking, rather than as a full keyboard replacement. There are many other funky-shaped ergonomic keyboard replacement prototypes out there, and the only advantage that this system has over them is that it's more portable. And has infrared.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
  89. better solution by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    www.handykey.com

    cheaper, better, easier, has mouse too.
    Oh and two important things....

    No drivers required(makes it 100% linux compatable)

    and isn't vaporware.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  90. I don't mean to be funny but... by rcs1000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this an obvious hoax.

    There is no way the image shown can tell when I press a key, or indeed where my fingers are with any degree of accuracy.

    I spent two years playing with human-computer interfaces and quickly came to the conclusion that short of something physical to 'press' then users wouldn't know where keys where, and sensors (particularly placed where the 'knucklebands' shows are) wouldn't know with any degree of accuracy where my fingers were.

    The lack of an AVI or any kind of press review just adds to my scepticism.

    *r

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
    1. Re:I don't mean to be funny but... by GeHa · · Score: 0

      A /. reader with a enough critical sense to get the joke... amazing! Congratulations! Now there's two of us, plus of course the guy seeing his server load go ballistic, who are laughing.

      --

      ------
      sigs are a total waste of bandwith, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio is lower than 1:10.

  91. Imagine... by Adrian+Voinea · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of virtual keyboards...
    someone had to say it...

  92. Sounds Cool by Grond · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reading through at +3, I see that most of the respondents have a pretty negative attitude towards this device. If it's real, then, wow...I mean, this is the sort of thing that webpads and the like need. Sure, a stylus is nice for most things, but if you need to write more than a little bit, you need a keyboard.

    What's more, I think, is that one of the big size-limiting factors of making laptops much smaller than they are is the need for a keyboard. Imagine if you had a webpad style laptop that had a built-in mechanism for propping it up, and you'd just strap on the virtual keyboard doohickeys and away you'd go. By losing the keyboard, laptops could be almost half the size and a little bit lighter (admittedly, laptop keyboards don't weigh much, if you've ever taken a laptop apart, the keyboard weighs just a few ounces).

    Also, I'd like to point out that when stuff like the "Smart Dust" project gets posted, people rave about how this would make for a great virtual keyboard, but when this shows up, most of the responses are along the lines of "well, even if it is real, it would suck." What the heck?

    Furthermore, to all those people complaining about how they can't touch type and therefore it would be useless: maybe you should take a proper typing class or get a copy of tuxtype or mavis beacon or something. Touch typing is a valuable skill. At the very least it'll improve your ability to use vi/emacs/whatever. :)

    1. Re:Sounds Cool by mr3038 · · Score: 2
      one of the big size-limiting factors of making laptops much smaller than they are is the need for a keyboard

      I think the real size-limiting factor is display. I mean, look at ads, they're advertising 15" displays for laptops and such. A quick question: how small device can contain 15" display? A device with 8" diameter? I don't see much need for this device as long as our displays are flat solid squares. After I have hi-res display built in my glasses I might be more interested. If I have to carry large display with cover I can use that cover as keyboard like nowadays. If I accept low-res PDA display I can use graffiti or stuff for input too.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    2. Re:Sounds Cool by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think the trend is for laptops to get bigger and bigger. My friend bought a 15 inch laptop that weighed 7kg just 2 mths ago.

      Personally, I prefer something like 10 or 11 inch, but hardly anybody makes those here.

  93. How about by loconet · · Score: 1

    How about support for a normal desktop box?, It odesnt mention anything abou that uh?. Would be nice to stop the keyboard noise while other ppl in my house are sleeping and im coding at 3:30am.

    --
    [alk]
  94. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore parent's comment. I didn't know that a website about air guitars is the same as the goatse man.

  95. Right out of Einstein's Bridge (c) 1997 by chrisvr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The first time I saw these virtual keyboard things, I immediately said "Hey-- I read this in a science fiction story once!"

    After a bit of searching, I found it-- the exact concept exists in _Einstein's Bridge_, by John Cramer-- came out in 1997.

    Here's the bit that discusses the idea:


    He opened his briefcase and removed the magic glasses and the data cuffs. He switched on the small computer inside and made sure that its sensor flap was extended outside when he latched the briefcase lid, then slipped it back under the seat in front of him. He pressed a switch recessed in a thick earpiece of the magic glasses, then put them on. He draped the flesh colored data cuff around his left wrist, just in front of his wrist watch, and secured it with the Velcro joint underneat. He repeated the process on his right writs and activated the calibration process, flexing finger, twisting wrists, and bending elbows.

    The glasses produced a display screen presented vertically in front of him and a horizontal keyboard etched in bright lines in midair. He reached out, grasped the screen, and moved and stretched it until it filled the full area of the seat back in front of him, then positioned the virtual keyboard to a more confortable position at the surface of the tray table. He called up the report he'd been working on earlier and began to type and revise.

    ...

    He held up the flesh-colored objects in his lap. "These are data cuffs. They go around my wrists and measure my hand and finger positions by monitoring the movement of tendons in my wrists with Doppler-shift ultrasonics. They send the information to the computer over another infrared link. The glasses were making the image of a keyboard on the tray table. When I typed, the cuffs detected my finger motions, the computer correlated them with the locations of the keys it was drawing, and the words I typed appeared on the computer screen that I saw on the seat back."



    Thought it was a facinating idea when I first read it-- seems fairly useless without the "magic glasses"...
    1. Re:Right out of Einstein's Bridge (c) 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one pair of magic glasses coming up:
      http://www.mvis.com

  96. NOOOO! by andrei+sama · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Sensors in the units measure the finger movements and artificial intelligence and a..."

    Hey! I've seen the Matrix. It's only a matter of time before that AI turns on me and soon I'm punching my mother in the face. No thank you, AI Virtual Keyboard.

    --

    ---------
    Sometimes there's no other way to win, except by falling.

  97. just imagan a room of people playing quake with em by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

    it would be funny...

    Also it said MouseInput on the web page, my dreams of having Quake on a PDA will finally relized.

  98. the trick to this.. by BryceH · · Score: 1

    ..is teaching people to type instead of pecking at the keys

    --
    "Shut up brain or ill stab you with a Q-tip" Homer Simpson
  99. I still think HalfKeyboard is a better idea by webinstinct · · Score: 1

    I don't work for them, nor do I own a stake in the company
    But I do like their idea better. What I hate about HalfKeyboard is that you have to buy one for the desktop, one for the PDA ( and if you have Palm V and VII, you need to get two keyboards). Otherwise, it's a better solution even for those who need any kind of feedback from the keyboard or to look at the keys.

  100. comdex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has anyone checked out there both at comdex that is going on right now.....

  101. Reminds me of an idea I had... by foqn1bo · · Score: 1


    Actually, it was an idea that my housemate and I dreamed up when we were thinking about realistic ways to interface with a wearable computer when using a HMD. We figured that having a virtual keyboard would be nice except for the problem of not being able to see keys, so the gloves/sensors would track the hands vertically/horizontally and display a pair of virtual hands floating over a virtual keyboard in your virtual reality head display. Pheyw. You would have to select a standard position to keep your hands in, but that probably would be a good idea, for comfort's sake. I don't know if the above-mentioned product does that or not, but it would be cool if something did. Personally we weren't thinking too seriously, we just thought it would be a gas to see modern businessmen standing on streetcorners typing on invisible keyboards. Har Har.

  102. Senseboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the product name a misnomer?

    I'm thinking more along the lines of "Sans-board" ;-)

  103. Check out a local restaurant by nhavar · · Score: 2

    This subject touches on something that I saw at a local restaurant the other night. As my wife and I sat and ate the wait station was just behind us. Hanging on the wall at about average human eye height were two touch screens. One touch screen managed clock in and the other tables and orders (from what I could see). Throughout the course of the evening we saw waiters and waitresses wander by the station (had a prominent SQUIRREL logo on the display) and interact with the touch sensitive screens. The interesting part to see is how adept they were at navigating with either a pencil or their finger.

    Personally I own and have used an ePods webpad for about a year now. It's not the top of technology and so the screens can be a little slow and response to commands lags. The one thing I have found though is that repetitive tasks are a breeze because I know exactly where the button is going to be before it shows up on the screen. This allows me to quickly touch through a series of commands without really needing to wait on the display to refresh. I thought that it would be skill only a tech head would pick up on. I was wrong.

    Watching the wait staff that night I noticed about 6 of them, some taller and some shorter than the average height the screen was set to, breeze through screens just like I did. One very impressive girl spoke to another waiter while punching in her information. Most transactions were done and the wait staffer had walked away before the screens could go all the way through. That night I only saw one guy fumble on the screen and have to back step to hit the correct button.

    My point is that there are all of these people here on the site bemoaning the fact that they learned to type by touch, and how do I remember where the special keys are, and what happens if I scratch my ass, and all of the other bullshit scenarios for why this tech will not work. I say it will work, I've seen similar things working already, I've used something similar myself. I also say it won't be the ULTIMATE solution. Just like QWERTY isn't to everyones taste and some people still have this bad habbit of liking Windows. Voice recognition is great but it's obtrusive in a meeting and non-functional in loud environments, Graffiti makes you relearn writing (shouldn't have to do), gestures are great but limited in use, and mind reading is still a ways away. So there are going to be times when voice is usable, and handwriting recognition is a good option, and times when a "virtual keyboard" is going to be much more than adequate.

    Without the pioneering consumer the pioneering product will never be

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  104. Virtual keyboard, ok, but by GISboy · · Score: 1

    a virtual mouse is a no-no...I imagine like an optical mouse you can't do a flic-shot in Quake3.

    Virtual joy stick...humm, perhaps with interactive porn that is where their hand would be anyway...(ahem, uhhh, so I've heard)...and the "twist action"....oye.

    Reminds me of a friend of mine:
    "Well, my wife gave me a Thrustmaster for my birthday. It is a really stiff stick. (pause)
    But what would you expect from a company called Thrustmaster!.

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  105. A First Step by DarkZero · · Score: 1
    A lot of people criticize this technology, but it's actually very revolutionary, as long as you combine it with something. This sort of thing will be invaluable when paired with HMDs or those sunglasses with a monitor display reflected into them. If you're an anime fan, just think of Washu's setup from Tenchi Muyo. This is the first step toward getting that sort of thing. A full keyboard and monitor that you can bring up WHEREVER YOU ARE, instead of having to deal with a little Palm screen or a small, bizarre hand device mimicking a keyboard for your wearable computer.

    This is a big first step toward getting that. Just as big a step as those stories about nanotechnological breakthroughs that will make processors faster in the future are for processors.

  106. Murder weapon by josh253 · · Score: 0

    Well thats nifty and all, but it would be hard to kill someone with one of these. They just don't make things like they used to.

  107. two fingered typists? by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    nuf said.

  108. Insane and proud by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Nothing new. A long time ago, I was standing in line at a supermarket, discussing the end game of Adventure with a friend. I forget the details, something about a bomb and an oyster. Got some interesting looks. Nowadays, of course, people would have known we were talking about a computer game, even if they didn't know which one. But back then... Got some weird looks.

  109. Games? by Cef · · Score: 1

    One of these (one side and mouse, or both, using the second "like" a mouse) could be a pretty good controller for games. Admittedly Tribes2 would have issues, as would games that use a lot of keys (well, unless you can touch type), but for those FPS's that require not too many keys, it could be a lot more comfortable than a Claw, the MS Strategic Commander, etc. You could possibly run Tribes2 with a modified keymapping, and/or in combo with a traditional keyboard.

    It'd be interesting to see how fast they react to movement, and how good a response they could give. If they work off muscle movements, they could also be a boon for disabled people.

    BTW: Re: How would it know when you are typing or not. It probably would only work when the pads have pressure applied to them, in the classic "wrists down" approach for touch typing. All those hunt and peck typists would have problems though. (Admittedly it'd be a great way to kill your bosses productivity!)

  110. Re:CmdrTaco BANNED FOR LIFE from Taco Bell!!!!!! by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

    heh, makes you think about those caulking guns they use to dispense the guacamole and sour cream...

  111. learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it would be a good idea for it to have a learning ability (like voice rec software). you put them on and hook them up the the computer, then type on your regular keyboard for a few days and let the little guys figure things out.

  112. Re:"Virtual" has a deep history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like it or not, this is a great troll. by the way, all trolls suck my dead father's cock you bitches. you may now suck my fleshy anus.

  113. Occam's razor by xeno · · Score: 2

    I dunno about you, but I haven't lost much by betting that technology development ventures are usually lazy, sloppy, and cheap. Experience reinforces that view on a very regular basis. MAYBE they thought up something revolutionary, and I'd love to see it if they did. But it would be foolish to assume that this virtual keyboard (or any other whiz-bang doodad) is revolutionary.

    Analyzing electrical impulses in my hand muscles? Riiight. Do you have any clue about the variability that would be involved in producing usable positional data and predicting intended movement? Would it work if I was sweaty? Agitated? Please. It'd be far easier to go with mechanical position measurement, and do the rest in software. Without knowing more about the device, the simplest answer would be a good bet. (Thank you, Occam.) As I said before, if they've done a good job of writing continually-adaptive algorithms, then I might be interested. But I won't hold my breath.

    Jon

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
  114. What a load of rubbish.... by MisterPo · · Score: 1

    Looking like new version of that NES Powerglove, this device looks well crap. The whole half-baked idea of wireless/touchless input device is not new at all. Cant help but think the inventor took clues from 80's "Icon" Jean-Michel Jarre who played a stringless laser harp. He was pretentious prat if ever I saw one.....

    Unbelievable what people will try to sell....

    Po

  115. Another interesting virtual device by t0qer · · Score: 1

    http://www.fu-fme.com/

  116. Re:Hey hon, mind if I use your breasts as a keyboa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you be any more of a wanker?

  117. HOAX by mshurpik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >I spent two years playing with human-computer interfaces

    I didn't and I still thought this was an obvious hoax. I mean, let's be honest here. There's a photo of a guy with wrist straps and a fifty-word blurb indicating that the straps perform some sort of magic.

    What makes me sad is that the best score is 2 of anyone calling this a hoax. That leads me to believe that in the 12 hours since the original posting, not a single mod point was devoted to the TRUTH.

    Go slashdot! Liberate me from marketroid tyranny!

  118. This is old, but still catches them off guard by ndogg · · Score: 1

    (I assume you have a roommate or something in which other, non-computer-literate person(s) are around your computer while you are not.)
    Do this, install Festival on your machine. Later, ssh in, and have it start saying stuff from 2001. This works even better if you have a microphone and recording an IceCast stream so you can have a conversation.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  119. Golden Boy by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1

    Hey, if Kintaro learned how to use a computer with a paper keyboard, I bet you could too!

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  120. I just torched a building downtown... by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    ...and I'm afraid I'll do it again!


    Wiggum: Oh, yeah, right. I'll just type it up on my invisible typewriter! Dum de dum...

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  121. fake by Norbert+de+Jonge · · Score: 0

    Come on guys, do you really expect this thing to work? And did you check out the rest of their website? It's made in about one hour, just to make it to Slashdot. Tsss...

  122. How do I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How am I going to hunt and peck with this contraption?

  123. Nice new toy by CheezeyWheezy · · Score: 1

    this is definitly a cool new toy.. that is.. if it works.. i would buy it, and use it every day.

  124. Techno Rage by darketernal · · Score: 1

    With keyboards like this, how would you be able to whack your monitor with it in frustration? I mean, your hands offer increased dexterity and precision, of course, but there's nothing like bashing your monitor with a nice large keyboard.

  125. Final Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now all we need is hologram interfaces and it'll be like final fantasy!

    when do we get the green boingy stuff you can jump from planes onto?

  126. Smells like Vapour by SmartSsa · · Score: 1

    ... Vapourware! I just can't see people actively using that... it's just too hollywood-movie-ish. Sure it's cool, but how many people can actually type properly without looking for keys?... (yeah, i can...:))

  127. Idea stolen from Chief Wiggum? by ColonBlow · · Score: 1
    --
    free online diet tracking.
  128. That glove thing by Vidboy · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to the keyboard on a glove? I don't remember the last time I saw it (At least 3 years ago), but it seemed like a cool idea at the time. Better than this at least.

    The principle was that you wear a special glove with sensors or buttons in the fingers, and there's a special hand motion for each character. The preliminary model let someone get up to about 200 wpm or so.

    It seems good, but I'm not sure why it folded...maybe someone else knows?

    --
    Your village called: Their idiot is missing.
  129. Obvious question by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

    In the picture, there is a guy sitting with his hands in front of a PDA. My question is this: how do you keep your fingers on the "home row" ? How do you even tell where it is? Looks to me like I'd be typing like this:

    S Ssf RCscmprl zOg hr Srth Srinhj Adijr

    You ever sat down and started typing away furiously on your keyboard only to look up a few seconds later and find that your fingers had shifted to the left by a key?

    I just don't see this as being practical.

    Now... if you combine this with some VR display (like the computers in "Final Fantasy: Spirits Within") that displays a 'virtual keyboard' underneath your fingers --- maybe it could work.

    Otherwise, I would rather spend my money perfecting speech-recognition because this thing isn't going to go very far.

  130. Ya cynics! by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 2

    Sheesh...this is one of the coolest input devices to appear in a LONG time. Look at what's on your desk right now: CRT, windowing GUI, keyboard, mouse, all tied together by a spaghetti of cables...practically unchanged for the last FOURTY YEARS! Awwww, you'll lack a little tactile feedback - wah. This is just a half-step forward (still a durn QWERTY keyboard) and you so-called "computer geeks" are whiny and fearful of the change. HMDs, datagloves, speech I/O, and other forward-moving tech, all merely niche fringe devices (only the PDA has moved us foward) lost to people glued to their CRTs. How disappointing...

    Gimmie one of these nifty units ASAP! When's it out? Price? Need beta testers?

    Let's move technology FORWARD, and not just refine nearly antique technologies!

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  131. No tapping! by Mattsson · · Score: 1

    Ho hum...

    Wonder if it's possible to configure it to ignore me tapping my fingers. :o/

    Maybe something that will ignore tappings at the same bpm as the playing mp3. ;o)

    --
    /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  132. Cartoon character version? by dcsmith · · Score: 1

    If they don't release a special version for cartoon characters (three fingers and a thumb), we'll never see it popularized in animation...

    --
    This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  133. Re:Look into my eyes when I am conversating with y by bughunter · · Score: 2

    Great idea, but unless you're aiming for the ruggedized computer market, there's no incentive to make a laptop with a lifetime greater than the time it will take for the model to become obsolescent. Which, for a PC, seems to be only two or three years, depending on your application of it.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  134. On top of that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is someone going to invent a device that optically scans a DVD/CD? It theoretically sounds easy enough: map the spiral, scan it, unwrap it, look at the bits, and decode them.

    Imagine the day when computers have no moving parts at all.

  135. strange demo 'feature' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I d/led the Mac demo, and had an odd time. My keyboard is mapped to the Dvorak layout. When I typed the 'left' half of the keyboard, it was ordinary Dvorak. When I typed the 'right' half of the keyboard, it was QWERTY. That eliminates such useful letters as C, R, N, S, T, and L.

    ...so much for winning at Wheel of Fortune.

  136. But will it be open???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their website mumbles "patent pending" a few times. Assuming that they end up with similar competitors, will they be apprehensive about releasing open source drivers? Will they attempt to sue open source coders for hacking their patent via the DMCA?

    Part of me still thinks this is a DieCorp-esque prank product.

  137. bad typing habits by kidlinux · · Score: 1

    What about those of us (ie: all of us ;) who don't have perfect typing habits? For example, I rarely use my right pinky finger for anything. Would this device pick up on my ring finger doing the pinky's work?

    --
    -kidlinux.
  138. small review at techtv by Kraft · · Score: 2
    --

    -Kraft
    Live and let live
  139. Paper computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... Combine a paper looking keyboard(as long as you dont feel like its a zx81 keyboard), a paper computer(damn cant remember the URL but they are attempting to develop processors using a sillicon based ink) and add a OLED display... Whoa... Paper computer...

    Hmm... I wonder how far this can go...