It's pretty much a Galaxy S without the phone guts. Sadly, it hasn't come out yet, and it will come out with FroYo (although they have stated that, just as the Galaxy S, it will get Gingerbread).
And how would you represent the internal processing of a robot as an engineer?
It's perfectly plausible that what you were seeing was the equivalent to a tail -f/dev/log.
I know that when I was playing with face recognition I would overlay relevant debug text over the live feed of the camera to help me easily see when I fucked up something.
The site is provided on an “as is” basis. At times, this website may not be available or may be affected by faults or maintenance, or by conditions outside our control. No warranty is given about the quality, functionality, availability or performance of this website or any content on this website. To the fullest extent permitted by law, all warranties, terms and conditions implied by law in relation to the performance of this website or otherwise are hereby excluded. FlightProSim reserves the right to modify or withdraw content of this website at any time.
You must not damage, interfere with or disrupt access to this website or its content, nor do anything that may impair its functionality or interfere with another person's access to or use of this website or its content. You must not use this website or content in any way that is unlawful or damaging to FlightProSim or any other person.
Too early? If anything the summary gives you the idea that it came too late. But I digress.
Only time will tell if Android 3.0 is any good, but as long as nothing extremely unlikely happens, Android isn't going anywhere: it has a sizable market presence and some of us even like it. As long as I can add my home-made apps to my handsets/tablets, I'll keep using Android. It can only get better.
And isn't that a problem with the public transport available to you then? I travel 20 km each day all in subway or bus. I get from one point to the other in one hell of a big city in about an hour.
You would rather people be left without options than allow your idealism to be dented. This is the same radical behavior used by left and right purists who can't get shit done because they don't comprimise. I suggest you step back and look at your ideas from a birds eye view and evaluate it more logically.
This isn't a matter of idealism. I don't see what is so radical of thinking that public transportation should be efficient and cheap enough for one to be able to move across a city without the need of a car. If people that have problem driving are pretty much stranded, then there is an problem that isn't solved by throwing cars at it.
Another point is out-of-shape or old people: I know some older people here who have switched from manuals solely due to the soreness in their leg from driving in that same traffic.
May be that's a sign that they shouldn't be driving?
I'd rather other drivers not be focused on the pain in their leg and be more focused on the road. No, telling them to get in shape is not an acceptable option: two of these people were in major accidents that weren't their fault, and have medical reasons they can no longer maintain strong muscles.
I've never understood the American insistence of driving everywhere, even within cities where you do have other ways of transportation that require no mental nor physical involvement to use, leaving both your hands and mind free to do as you please with that time.
After a lot of thought, I actually reached the opposite conclusion as you. One of the core objections leading to the U.S. Revolutionary war was "No taxation without representation." That's a principle I think most people would still agree makes sense. And since I believe corporations should have no influence on government, I can't simultaneously justify to myself wanting to tax them.
I just had a thought. How about turning the "no taxation without representation" thing around and having "no representation without taxation"?
Wouldn't that turn into "no representation without money"?
Wait, what would be the difference with what we have now?
Slashdot Mirror
Don't worry, I did! :D
Wait...
What about the Galaxy Player?
It's pretty much a Galaxy S without the phone guts. Sadly, it hasn't come out yet, and it will come out with FroYo (although they have stated that, just as the Galaxy S, it will get Gingerbread).
Are you telling me that a game about Alien Police Pigs and a guy in a tight shirt shooting freezing or shrinkin' rays isn't a documentary!?
Is a song worth a dollar?
They are using IPv5!
The Recruit had a computer virus capable of spreading through the fucking electrical outlets.
And how would you represent the internal processing of a robot as an engineer?
It's perfectly plausible that what you were seeing was the equivalent to a tail -f /dev/log.
I know that when I was playing with face recognition I would overlay relevant debug text over the live feed of the camera to help me easily see when I fucked up something.
That's the Other John, Romero. Carmack is the great one.
Thus ruining space for everyone and making me finally realize humans in general are worthless shitheads.
You are going to wait for full out world war for that? I passed my threshold quite some time ago.
Sorry for the delay, I was having lunch.
protecting against the same threats that they've faced for the last 10 years. SQL injection, phishing, malicious attachments, social engineering.
10 years? Those attacks have existed for as long as those technologies have existed.
See
(Google won't go further than the '90s, but you get my drift.)
Damn! It isn't identical treatment, it's the same treatment!
Look!:
Too early? If anything the summary gives you the idea that it came too late. But I digress.
Only time will tell if Android 3.0 is any good, but as long as nothing extremely unlikely happens, Android isn't going anywhere: it has a sizable market presence and some of us even like it. As long as I can add my home-made apps to my handsets/tablets, I'll keep using Android. It can only get better.
Ahem...
Students get fine and/or jail time for skipping class in the USA!?
Since when that should be a fireable offense?
I think she should be able to say whatever she wants to as long as she doesn't fall into libel. Sadly, that is beyond a lot of people.
Of course, registering a .com is highly regarded as evil nowadays.
I mean, who uses ActiveX anymore?
Just to let people looking into this, it's Google Apps. I'd recommend you have a registered domain before you begin.
The legislation lays out penalties for failure to comply with such orders.
Does it lay out penalties for misuse of such powers?
And isn't that a problem with the public transport available to you then? I travel 20 km each day all in subway or bus. I get from one point to the other in one hell of a big city in about an hour.
You would rather people be left without options than allow your idealism to be dented. This is the same radical behavior used by left and right purists who can't get shit done because they don't comprimise. I suggest you step back and look at your ideas from a birds eye view and evaluate it more logically.
This isn't a matter of idealism. I don't see what is so radical of thinking that public transportation should be efficient and cheap enough for one to be able to move across a city without the need of a car. If people that have problem driving are pretty much stranded, then there is an problem that isn't solved by throwing cars at it.
Another point is out-of-shape or old people: I know some older people here who have switched from manuals solely due to the soreness in their leg from driving in that same traffic.
May be that's a sign that they shouldn't be driving?
I'd rather other drivers not be focused on the pain in their leg and be more focused on the road. No, telling them to get in shape is not an acceptable option: two of these people were in major accidents that weren't their fault, and have medical reasons they can no longer maintain strong muscles.
I've never understood the American insistence of driving everywhere, even within cities where you do have other ways of transportation that require no mental nor physical involvement to use, leaving both your hands and mind free to do as you please with that time.
I'm now 450 hours behind on viewing and I haven't even added Lost yet.
Do yourself a favor and don't. If you do, assume that it got cancelled midway through. You'll enjoy it much more.
After a lot of thought, I actually reached the opposite conclusion as you. One of the core objections leading to the U.S. Revolutionary war was "No taxation without representation." That's a principle I think most people would still agree makes sense. And since I believe corporations should have no influence on government, I can't simultaneously justify to myself wanting to tax them.
I just had a thought. How about turning the "no taxation without representation" thing around and having "no representation without taxation"?
Wouldn't that turn into "no representation without money"?
Wait, what would be the difference with what we have now?
One to hold the device, another to interact with it using all your fingers.
I regularly use my Galaxy S using only my thumb.
I'm an idiot, it's right there separated from the rest in its own box.