Just because something has been in use for a long time doesn't mean it is in any way good.
If you can extract the existing data and use it with a "newer" application, it may be a good thing.
There should be some oversight concerning software purchasing/provisioning for a civil purposes.
There isn't a real reason to have multiple municipalities using different software packages for the same purposes. This seems like a valid reason for state wide single sourcing.
I feel like you have forgotten how important credit scores are in the US.
If you add in "social scores" which I'm pretty sure are accounted for somewhere in your experian/credit karma,,, ratings, you may be a potential future recipient of unknown influences on your ability to make purchases on credit,
I tend to prefer to buy based on my ability to pay in full at the time of the purchase. Especially when I can get a discount for paying in cash.
You could just build fast drones loaded with explosives and aim them at aerial targets or ground targets. Also probably won't turn into the floor wax desert topping the F-35 has.
I can see how both sides have a stake in this issue. It is the Starbucks prerogative to play music that supports the businesses overall goal of making money, however questionable their musical choices are (Hamilton soundtrack?!?), however, it's also important that the employees have the right to not work in a torturous environment.
In this case, I propose that if Starbucks is going to loop repetitive music in their stores to the possible detriment to their employees, then Starbucks allow employees to wear discreet Bluetooth earbuds that play the music of their choice. There, win-win.
How about noise cancelling blue tooth headphones? You could probably still hear orders.
you could build out an enclosure with 7,1 sound and about 5 to 7 50+ inch 4k UHD televisions for this price... Maybe even a seat with a built in subwoofer.
1) Is not that hard. When the GDPR came into effect, people feared that a lot of non EU sites would opt to simply block EU traffic instead of taking steps to comply. In practice I have only seen one such site... as it turns out, complying with the GDPR is not hard or costly for most sites, and for many it takes no effort at all. But this is different. I expect a lot of smaller operators to block EU access or at least block them from uploading anything.
But this is much worse: it's a first step to a priori censorship. MEPs are already contemplating using these filters to also stop the spread of terrorist ideology. Which at some point will also include extremist views. Which at some point will also include populist views. Which at some point will also include "fake" news. Which of course already includes any opinion not "fitting the narrative" of those in charge.
Well burning books to keep people ignorant doesn't work anymore. So this is the next worst thing they could do,/s?
Especially when I can get a discount for using cash instead of the seller having to pay a transaction fee if a credit card or some other method of payment is used.
If you need to staff a phone 5 days a week, going to 4 days makes no financial sense, you're just a warm body we want to keep in the seat as long as possible for the least amount of money.
In staffing requirements like this, not everybody has the same 4 work days.
Slashdot Mirror
would also have checked all the coal plants that have been shutdown. If you add all them in, you could get closer to 100% contaminated.
Just because something has been in use for a long time doesn't mean it is in any way good.
If you can extract the existing data and use it with a "newer" application, it may be a good thing.
There should be some oversight concerning software purchasing/provisioning for a civil purposes.
There isn't a real reason to have multiple municipalities using different software packages for the same purposes. This seems like a valid reason for state wide single sourcing.
If you want to convince your "citizens" that they are fine, just censor the Internet. Seems to work fine for North Korea and China.
That being said, censorship of the Internet should be treated as a crime.
I feel like you have forgotten how important credit scores are in the US.
If you add in "social scores" which I'm pretty sure are accounted for somewhere in your experian/credit karma,,, ratings, you may be a potential future recipient of unknown influences on your ability to make purchases on credit,
I tend to prefer to buy based on my ability to pay in full at the time of the purchase. Especially when I can get a discount for paying in cash.
good content.
Are people still using reddit? I have 3 or 4 subs I look at a couple times a week but I haven't posted anything there in 8 years/
Which for some reason has a 5 IMDB rating.
You could just build fast drones loaded with explosives and aim them at aerial targets or ground targets. Also probably won't turn into the floor wax desert topping the F-35 has.
the taxes are when you buy something for $85.4 Billion.
I've never had the opportunity to buy something for that much.
Why not add a suffix indicating speed and bandwidth instead of wasting characters with the word Gen?
I can't wait until I need one of these cables and try to figure out which is which on a site full of third party scammer like Amazon or eBay. /s
I can see how both sides have a stake in this issue. It is the Starbucks prerogative to play music that supports the businesses overall goal of making money, however questionable their musical choices are (Hamilton soundtrack?!?), however, it's also important that the employees have the right to not work in a torturous environment.
In this case, I propose that if Starbucks is going to loop repetitive music in their stores to the possible detriment to their employees, then Starbucks allow employees to wear discreet Bluetooth earbuds that play the music of their choice. There, win-win.
How about noise cancelling blue tooth headphones? You could probably still hear orders.
just forgot to buy the data from Bookface. /s
when rivers feeding the Great Lakes used to catch fire?
I mean drugs in the water are bad, but at least the fish get a nice buzz. /s
For the interested:
https://www.environmentalcounc...
you could build out an enclosure with 7,1 sound and about 5 to 7 50+ inch 4k UHD televisions for this price... Maybe even a seat with a built in subwoofer.
but they really mean that their jobs are safe from being replaced by small shell scripts or primitive AI services.
And some wonder why employee loyalty is so low...
Like: "FCC Falsely Says Gutting ISP Oversight Was Great For Broadband"
More like:
" FCC Says Gutting ISP Oversight Was Great For Broadband Providers"
Not so much for their customers.
1) Is not that hard. When the GDPR came into effect, people feared that a lot of non EU sites would opt to simply block EU traffic instead of taking steps to comply. In practice I have only seen one such site... as it turns out, complying with the GDPR is not hard or costly for most sites, and for many it takes no effort at all. But this is different. I expect a lot of smaller operators to block EU access or at least block them from uploading anything.
But this is much worse: it's a first step to a priori censorship. MEPs are already contemplating using these filters to also stop the spread of terrorist ideology. Which at some point will also include extremist views. Which at some point will also include populist views. Which at some point will also include "fake" news. Which of course already includes any opinion not "fitting the narrative" of those in charge.
Well burning books to keep people ignorant doesn't work anymore. So this is the next worst thing they could do, /s?
1) A way to block EU access to my servers
2) A large retainer for lawyers to issue copyright takedowns for any EU access to my comments on any social media, which I own the copyright to.
3) A tax shelter for all the sweet sweet profit.
Because Fortnite Fyre Festival kinda rolls off the tongue.
At least it only cost $15-25 and people weren't trapped there without food or water...
movie Day After Tomorrow.
May be time to move the habitat again.
Sooooooooooo:
"...support for Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5, and 2Gbps LTE (but not 5G; that’ll be in another S10 variant arriving later this year)."
Which is pretty much all I need to know. If I'm buying a phone at this price, it's going to be used for 5+ years which means nope.
Although 2x-4x the memory and equal memory to what I have on my laptop is pretty neat, if you need that on a phone.
when you pry it out of my cold dead mattress. /s
Especially when I can get a discount for using cash instead of the seller having to pay a transaction fee if a credit card or some other method of payment is used.
Democratic Party in the US.
In fact the "attacked" sites don't even seem to be EU democrats.
I wonder if the people being attacked because they have something in common, like using Microsoft tools to provice web access. /s
that I want to see.
A few Kt or Mt worth? OK
If you need to staff a phone 5 days a week, going to 4 days makes no financial sense, you're just a warm body we want to keep in the seat as long as possible for the least amount of money.
In staffing requirements like this, not everybody has the same 4 work days.
With my luck, I'd have off Wednesdays. /s
would move to 4 12,5 hour work days ao their expectations of 50 hours a week from salaried workers could continue.
The place before that I was working 60-80 hours in a 6 day work week, but at least I got overtime.
actually tells why the guy is being heard by the Supreme Court.
TLDR? The US postal service are assholes.