Can't try it at the moment, but I'm pretty sure that the Amiga and PC releases of Maniac Mansion and Zak McKracken supported mice. Using the keyboard for shortcuts was optional. While the C64 supported mice, I do not know whether these games supported them on this platform. I remember using a joystick for these games on the C64.
Many games are too boring to play to the end even once. They lack story, or the challenges are repetitive in nature (Shoot that alien! Now shoot that alien! And that must be an entirely different alien, even though it looks exactly like those I shot before it, but it's still moving!...)
It is an interesting challenge to see whether you still remember the solutions to all the puzzles in the LucasArts games. If you do, playing these games is like participating in an interactive movie, but often with way more alternatives. I still like exploring large and complex environments when I find the time. Leave linear first person shooters to the masses and give me a new Fallout, Wasteland, or Elder Scrolls. Zak Mc Kracken 3D?
The LucasArts games were made with love and programmed thoroughly. I mean, while many games in that era were difficult to set up, the LucasArts games usually scaled better with faster hardware and enjoyed patches for years, long after other manufacturers would have dropped similar games. Also, the philosophy of death-free play that encouraged explorative playing style without a gazillion load-attempt-reload. The LucasArts games still serve as an ideal that is difficult to reach for many productions even despite much larger costs.
Buffer overflows, heap corruption and many similar bugs are found easiest by someone who has access to the source code and can understand it. However, not all problems can be laid on the developers. Phishing is a problem that developers that can hardly prevent. Also, users need to understand URLs (http://www.google.com.somewhere.else). At some point, users are always forced to trust software they did not write, and on a modern computer that has been used for a while, no one can assure that no malicious code has been installed, whatever antivirus vendors say. However, users need to be able to detect signs of infections.
Despite all that, clearly more security by design is needed. Reading about all the patches for Windows, Flash, Adobe Reader and Java makes me sick -- instead of building new features that are rarely needed into these systems, security should become a top priority for high-profile software. Simple mishaps put millions of users at risk. While Microsoft has at least instated measures (secure development lifecycle), similar efforts by Adobe, Oracle and Apple seem to be lacking.
Looking at trains, ground-based vehicles that need to transport fuel are flawed by design. If we had electric cars that took electricity from an overhead line, these cars would be far more efficient for many reasons. Electric cars are normally twice as efficient as combustion engines. Also, many things that increase weight, and thus fuel consumption, are not needed in electric cars. This includes the fuel tank and gearbox. Going further, mounting the vehicle overhead on tracks would allow to integrate the overhead lines into the tracks, further reducing weight and aerodynamic resistance. It would also remove the risk of cars bumping into pedestrians and bicycle riders (may be more of a European problem).
If the arts were in steady decline over at least the last thirty years, technology has been on the rise.
The knowledge gained may still prove to have a long life, and it still counts as a monument to the generation(s) that made it possible.
Microsoft is embracing the ARM world by bringing its operating system to the platform.
For many people, the Microsoft label alone will be sufficient to buy such systems.
Over time, Surface RT will be extended by people writing software for the system.
Ultimately, Microsoft will be able to leverage power given to them by the customers to
extinguish at least the Android platform.
They may be able to reconquer their monopoly. Is that something, we, as customers should want?
Honestly, isn't Slashdot about news for Nerds and stuff that matters? So why do we keep discussing operating systems? The far more interesting stuff is built on top of the operating system, and the operating system merely serves that. I don't use the operating system to draw in 2D or 3D, I don't use it to write software, and I don't use operating system to write mail and posts.
Current operating systems offer file systems and hardware abstraction, and have done that for decades. We should be discussing where we want to take technology, not where it lead us in the past. How can we find better metaphors for storing data than a folder structure? How can we improve collaboration between different applications? How can we make more intelligent machines? Let's keep dreaming, and find ways to make these dreams come true.
This isn't to belittle the efforts of Linux, Microsoft or Apple, but just to put stuff into perspective. Operating systems are overrated. When people care about code being able to run on several operating systems, that just proves my point.
In real life, with real mines. Terrible results. While we did find most of the mines, it turns out that people are terrible at safely locating them. Lots of dead bodies, limbs, etc, everywhere.
I suppose the best way is to offer help, and say that you can help best if the kid chooses a similar career as yours. If there is interest, giving a good book can do lot. Later, you may be able to help prepare for tests or give career advice.
If the kid is not interested, let him or her pursue something else, but don't feel bad about it - after all, you offered help.
Back in the eighties and nineties, you could achieve a lot with a little effort - now most often it takes groups of people to achieve little advances, and earlier opportunities are well-covered with patents. Still, we take pride in our work, and need a new generation to continue work on our projects, or these projects will die.
I would propose to give your students something of practical value. Before you jump into programming with them, make them understand that they should start to program only when necessary. For example, many people underestimate the power of spreadsheets. If you can express a program as a single function, mark all cells in a spreadsheet, and copy the formula into that block, what you get in essence is a Turing machine with limited storage. Meaning: this can compute anything the human mind can compute. And often all that is needed to solve recurring mathematical problems is a well-designed spreadsheet. This will teach them a lot about programming already: they will have to deal with the fact that certain dependences between cells would lead to infinite loops, and how to solve mathematical equations using assignments.
Whether you want to teach this with Microsoft Office or with Open Office may not matter from a theoretical point of view, but please keep in mind that they own Open Office for life time, without need for ever purchasing an update.
I see only good things about this. Satellites that become defunct can easily be tracked, actively reduce space junk, and are decelerated faster if they enter the high atmosphere.
Then use batteries only to bridge gaps between road segments with overhead lines. Or go even further: integrate overhead lines into rails mounted at a height of 4m to eleminate any threads that cars pose to pedestrians.
I am seriously sick of breathing in exhausts of people's cars who come to visit to my city or being nearly overrun by them while I live in a place where all essential spots can be reached by bike, on foot or by tram.
Slashdot Mirror
The Ashley Madison guy - that's 'gotta be an awkward interview, you know.
"Why did you leave your previous place of employment?"
Haven't we read those often enough? "Things didn't work out, and we mutually agreed that it was time to move on."
> Apple's era of naming OSs after big cats is over. The Mavericks wave is rolling in
So we will eventually see a MacOS Longhorn?
"These are not the droids you are looking for."
"Yuck, no thanks, keep your s..."
Except for those getting paid for saying otherwise...
Can't try it at the moment, but I'm pretty sure that the Amiga and PC releases of Maniac Mansion and Zak McKracken supported mice. Using the keyboard for shortcuts was optional. While the C64 supported mice, I do not know whether these games supported them on this platform. I remember using a joystick for these games on the C64.
Many games are too boring to play to the end even once. They lack story, or the challenges are repetitive in nature (Shoot that alien! Now shoot that alien! And that must be an entirely different alien, even though it looks exactly like those I shot before it, but it's still moving!...)
It is an interesting challenge to see whether you still remember the solutions to all the puzzles in the LucasArts games. If you do, playing these games is like participating in an interactive movie, but often with way more alternatives. I still like exploring large and complex environments when I find the time. Leave linear first person shooters to the masses and give me a new Fallout, Wasteland, or Elder Scrolls. Zak Mc Kracken 3D?
The LucasArts games were made with love and programmed thoroughly. I mean, while many games in that era were difficult to set up, the LucasArts games usually scaled better with faster hardware and enjoyed patches for years, long after other manufacturers would have dropped similar games. Also, the philosophy of death-free play that encouraged explorative playing style without a gazillion load-attempt-reload. The LucasArts games still serve as an ideal that is difficult to reach for many productions even despite much larger costs.
... always.
Buffer overflows, heap corruption and many similar bugs are found easiest by someone who has access to the source code and can understand it. However, not all problems can be laid on the developers. Phishing is a problem that developers that can hardly prevent. Also, users need to understand URLs (http://www.google.com.somewhere.else). At some point, users are always forced to trust software they did not write, and on a modern computer that has been used for a while, no one can assure that no malicious code has been installed, whatever antivirus vendors say. However, users need to be able to detect signs of infections.
Despite all that, clearly more security by design is needed. Reading about all the patches for Windows, Flash, Adobe Reader and Java makes me sick -- instead of building new features that are rarely needed into these systems, security should become a top priority for high-profile software. Simple mishaps put millions of users at risk. While Microsoft has at least instated measures (secure development lifecycle), similar efforts by Adobe, Oracle and Apple seem to be lacking.
OK, anyone up for raising the money for a flight to Mars as a Kickstarter?
Looking at trains, ground-based vehicles that need to transport fuel are flawed by design. If we had electric cars that took electricity from an overhead line, these cars would be far more efficient for many reasons. Electric cars are normally twice as efficient as combustion engines. Also, many things that increase weight, and thus fuel consumption, are not needed in electric cars. This includes the fuel tank and gearbox. Going further, mounting the vehicle overhead on tracks would allow to integrate the overhead lines into the tracks, further reducing weight and aerodynamic resistance. It would also remove the risk of cars bumping into pedestrians and bicycle riders (may be more of a European problem).
OK, please refrain from hacking and crashing our simulated universe. Thank you.
If the arts were in steady decline over at least the last thirty years, technology has been on the rise. The knowledge gained may still prove to have a long life, and it still counts as a monument to the generation(s) that made it possible.
We need to increase the power output of the sun. Side effects: negligable.
Microsoft is embracing the ARM world by bringing its operating system to the platform. For many people, the Microsoft label alone will be sufficient to buy such systems. Over time, Surface RT will be extended by people writing software for the system. Ultimately, Microsoft will be able to leverage power given to them by the customers to extinguish at least the Android platform. They may be able to reconquer their monopoly. Is that something, we, as customers should want?
... Microsoft's "embrace, extend, extinguish" in the mobile world?
Honestly, isn't Slashdot about news for Nerds and stuff that matters? So why do we keep discussing operating systems? The far more interesting stuff is built on top of the operating system, and the operating system merely serves that. I don't use the operating system to draw in 2D or 3D, I don't use it to write software, and I don't use operating system to write mail and posts.
Current operating systems offer file systems and hardware abstraction, and have done that for decades. We should be discussing where we want to take technology, not where it lead us in the past. How can we find better metaphors for storing data than a folder structure? How can we improve collaboration between different applications? How can we make more intelligent machines? Let's keep dreaming, and find ways to make these dreams come true.
This isn't to belittle the efforts of Linux, Microsoft or Apple, but just to put stuff into perspective. Operating systems are overrated. When people care about code being able to run on several operating systems, that just proves my point.
http://www.heise.de/ct/schlagseite/2012/19/gross.jpg
Translation: Water! Water! Sensors detect a waterlike substance! And where there's water, there could be life, too ...
It would be possible to set up kickstarter auctions for games, after contacting the copyright owner. I would like to see MechWarrior 2 open sourced.
In real life, with real mines. Terrible results. While we did find most of the mines, it turns out that people are terrible at safely locating them. Lots of dead bodies, limbs, etc, everywhere.
Please mod this anything you want, but not funny.
I suppose the best way is to offer help, and say that you can help best if the kid chooses a similar career as yours. If there is interest, giving a good book can do lot. Later, you may be able to help prepare for tests or give career advice.
If the kid is not interested, let him or her pursue something else, but don't feel bad about it - after all, you offered help.
Back in the eighties and nineties, you could achieve a lot with a little effort - now most often it takes groups of people to achieve little advances, and earlier opportunities are well-covered with patents. Still, we take pride in our work, and need a new generation to continue work on our projects, or these projects will die.
Is this useful for cooling my superfast graphene processors?
... to the point where I can boot XBox 720 discs on my PC, even without booting Windows first.
Anyone remember how some games on the Amiga loaded very fast because they did not boot an OS first?
Why do we need competing platforms from Microsoft? Windows 7, Phone, Xbox?
I would propose to give your students something of practical value. Before you jump into programming with them, make them understand that they should start to program only when necessary. For example, many people underestimate the power of spreadsheets. If you can express a program as a single function, mark all cells in a spreadsheet, and copy the formula into that block, what you get in essence is a Turing machine with limited storage. Meaning: this can compute anything the human mind can compute. And often all that is needed to solve recurring mathematical problems is a well-designed spreadsheet. This will teach them a lot about programming already: they will have to deal with the fact that certain dependences between cells would lead to infinite loops, and how to solve mathematical equations using assignments.
Whether you want to teach this with Microsoft Office or with Open Office may not matter from a theoretical point of view, but please keep in mind that they own Open Office for life time, without need for ever purchasing an update.
I see only good things about this. Satellites that become defunct can easily be tracked, actively reduce space junk, and are decelerated faster if they enter the high atmosphere.
Then use batteries only to bridge gaps between road segments with overhead lines. Or go even further: integrate overhead lines into rails mounted at a height of 4m to eleminate any threads that cars pose to pedestrians. I am seriously sick of breathing in exhausts of people's cars who come to visit to my city or being nearly overrun by them while I live in a place where all essential spots can be reached by bike, on foot or by tram.