NFS on OSXS is a couple clicks away from sharing your files with the world if you don't know what you are doing.
Also, where AFP hurts is in the dealing with many tiny files. Get a large file, fast enough server, and fast enough network and your internal hard drive will be the limiting factor on a file copy.
I would imagine that their automatic light sensor is not turning on their lights, and their drivers have forgotten to turn them on, as they can see fine.
It happened to me all the time in my Chevy before I got my VW. I do miss the automatic lights, though. That was a feature in the next up car.
I doubt it. They have people that work for them to fix carburetors. Remember, it is the job of the executive to delegate responsibility to those that know how to do things, then coordinate between delegates. It is entirely appropriate for a VP of marketing/sales/technology/legal to not know how to change a carburetor. However, they would be able to get it done if someone were to ask them to do it.
There is a difference now. In the 90's, Apple's market was shrinking, and it was an experiment to see whether licensing will reverse this. It didn't.
Now, Apple's market is growing. At some point (now), it will be impossible for Apple to reasonably manufacture every computer for every Mac user. Case in point...
I would pay for a Toughbook-style mac and a tablet-style mac. I understand that Apple has no interest in producing these for me. However, it would be nice if Panasonic could license OSX to put on their machines and offer it as a option. I'm buying the toughbooks and tablets anyhow, they just don't have OSX on them, which means that Apple doesn't get any of the funds that I have spent on them.
Both of these sub markets do not directly compete with Apple, and both of these sub markets carry a premium above and beyond that of a normal laptop, which means that they aren't really competition at all.
Because to support the Android OS, you must support all types of hardware that it runs on.
Here are the options... - Support the lowest common denominator (P1) - no multitouch, even on multitouch android-based phones. Apple doesn't worry. - Ignore the P1 - So your app will work on _some_ android phones, but not others. Consumers get confused. Apple doesn't worry. - Create a single touch, and a multi touch version of your app. The UI development suddenly doubles. Developing an app for Android now has a higher cost than the iPhone. Consumers get confused. Apple doesn't worry.
While I am deeply disturbed by the behavior of Apple, and hope that the courts compel them to change their minds, much like they did for Verizon recently; I can't see Android being much more than a spot in history, by Google's design.
While I don't have any intellectual authority to comment either way on the therapy, I wonder what data you have to back up these claims that this type of therapy not only does not work, but makes individuals worse?
I realize this is slashdot comments, and that there are lots of people making comments about things they have no real knowledge of, but this is borderline ridiculous.
How can you say this? A second variety was butchered by Screamers. They took the idea and hollywoodified the ending, where the original would have done just perfectly. And the ending is the whole point of "A Second Variety"
Screamers was in no way faithful to "A Second Variety". The whole point of ASV was to prep you at the ending, which was hollywoodified into crap in the movie.
You realize that at some point you have to buy your Zune and allow others to walk up to the cash register to buy their products too, right?
Depending on where you are, your "line", may even involve someone with perishables behind you getting antsy because you're keeping them from getting home and putting the ice cream in the freezer.
Only if they went back to their roots and made complex, musical songs rather than the drivel that they've come out with since the Black album (and I know that some consider the Black album the start of the drivel.)
Solving the "Sim City 2000" problem is simple. A laser fires back from the ground to the satellite. An array of sensors allows the laser to slightly realign the satellite to the receptors. Power is immediately cut if the satellite ever loses contact with the laser.
Now, a laser may not be the technology that is used, it may just be a less powerful microwave, which would alleviate issues with clouds/airplanes/ducks etc... However, the idea is the same: if the beam is not perfectly aligned the beam won't fire.
Slashdot Mirror
You do realize that netinfo was phased out as of 10.5? Those of us running Leopard have dslocal, which is a nice set of flat files to work with.
For more information, I will turn to Joel Rennich, who knows a hell of a lot more about this than I do:
http://www.afp548.com/article.php?story=LeopardServerReview-LocalDirectory&query=netinfo
NFS on OSXS is a couple clicks away from sharing your files with the world if you don't know what you are doing.
Also, where AFP hurts is in the dealing with many tiny files. Get a large file, fast enough server, and fast enough network and your internal hard drive will be the limiting factor on a file copy.
00 Those that don't know Binary
01 Those that do
10 Those that think they know binary, but don't know that 10 is the third numerator.
Just remember, you can always write in Cowboy Neal.
Have you ever heard of Compaq?
Who buys their gas on eBay?
Get one of those "Move Over" window stickers. They'll get the hint.
I would imagine that their automatic light sensor is not turning on their lights, and their drivers have forgotten to turn them on, as they can see fine.
It happened to me all the time in my Chevy before I got my VW. I do miss the automatic lights, though. That was a feature in the next up car.
Mine had two logic board replacements in a month for this problem.
I doubt it. They have people that work for them to fix carburetors. Remember, it is the job of the executive to delegate responsibility to those that know how to do things, then coordinate between delegates. It is entirely appropriate for a VP of marketing/sales/technology/legal to not know how to change a carburetor. However, they would be able to get it done if someone were to ask them to do it.
There is a difference now. In the 90's, Apple's market was shrinking, and it was an experiment to see whether licensing will reverse this. It didn't.
Now, Apple's market is growing. At some point (now), it will be impossible for Apple to reasonably manufacture every computer for every Mac user. Case in point...
I would pay for a Toughbook-style mac and a tablet-style mac. I understand that Apple has no interest in producing these for me. However, it would be nice if Panasonic could license OSX to put on their machines and offer it as a option. I'm buying the toughbooks and tablets anyhow, they just don't have OSX on them, which means that Apple doesn't get any of the funds that I have spent on them.
Both of these sub markets do not directly compete with Apple, and both of these sub markets carry a premium above and beyond that of a normal laptop, which means that they aren't really competition at all.
make sure to use different variations of both. foo2, bar493, and a couple baz's are all valid.
...I thought that was the CIA?
You're thinking on the wrong side of the law.
Because to support the Android OS, you must support all types of hardware that it runs on.
Here are the options...
- Support the lowest common denominator (P1) - no multitouch, even on multitouch android-based phones. Apple doesn't worry.
- Ignore the P1 - So your app will work on _some_ android phones, but not others. Consumers get confused. Apple doesn't worry.
- Create a single touch, and a multi touch version of your app. The UI development suddenly doubles. Developing an app for Android now has a higher cost than the iPhone. Consumers get confused. Apple doesn't worry.
While I am deeply disturbed by the behavior of Apple, and hope that the courts compel them to change their minds, much like they did for Verizon recently; I can't see Android being much more than a spot in history, by Google's design.
While I don't have any intellectual authority to comment either way on the therapy, I wonder what data you have to back up these claims that this type of therapy not only does not work, but makes individuals worse?
I realize this is slashdot comments, and that there are lots of people making comments about things they have no real knowledge of, but this is borderline ridiculous.
How can you say this? A second variety was butchered by Screamers. They took the idea and hollywoodified the ending, where the original would have done just perfectly. And the ending is the whole point of "A Second Variety"
Screamers was in no way faithful to "A Second Variety". The whole point of ASV was to prep you at the ending, which was hollywoodified into crap in the movie.
You realize that I figured that you had really sweaty feet until that last line?
Oh come on. If you want to list a crappy PKD movie adaptation, you should list Screamers. A Second Variety was so much better. Especially the ending.
You realize that at some point you have to buy your Zune and allow others to walk up to the cash register to buy their products too, right?
Depending on where you are, your "line", may even involve someone with perishables behind you getting antsy because you're keeping them from getting home and putting the ice cream in the freezer.
Only if they went back to their roots and made complex, musical songs rather than the drivel that they've come out with since the Black album (and I know that some consider the Black album the start of the drivel.)
Solving the "Sim City 2000" problem is simple. A laser fires back from the ground to the satellite. An array of sensors allows the laser to slightly realign the satellite to the receptors. Power is immediately cut if the satellite ever loses contact with the laser.
Now, a laser may not be the technology that is used, it may just be a less powerful microwave, which would alleviate issues with clouds/airplanes/ducks etc... However, the idea is the same: if the beam is not perfectly aligned the beam won't fire.
Well, I got halfway down the page of comments, then finally got sick of looking and searched for the word.
No-one has mentioned that NBC has tried this type of thing before.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viper_(TV_series)
And I see one hit for the most recent advertainment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Rider_(2008_film)
The nice thing about Apple is that they generally do both.
Mac
PC