I so dislike this attitude of 'I am not going to change' instead of looking at the methods and technologies and see how they can be of use to you. Some might be great for your organisation, some not. But dismissing everything on forehand is just so stupid and the reason some organisations are stuck in old, unmaintainable and inefficient IT environments while the world moves on.
In the Apple eco system you don't have to pair your headphones again and again. You just choose the headphones at the device you are using, iCloud syncing has managed it for you. As I think about it, it actually is more convenient in that regard than a plug.
That is not the point. There is a loose coupling between the VM and the application. Which means you are never 100% sure your application runs in the environment it was intended for. With containerisation the application always runs in the environment it was intended for regardless of the infrastructure/vm's. Kubernetes is about devops, not about infrastructure.
I always read about those apple problems, issues etc. And only had a defective battery one time in an iPhone, while I have and have used many apple devices, including the laptops with those key problems. Cross fingers, should go to the casino.
This is a consolidation of power for facebook and other big companies. They used this expansion technique to get big, now by taking away this method you block other innovative, maybe less evil technologies to ever become that popular. This technique used to be the main driver for growing.
Yes, that would make it a lot saver for the average iPhone user..... Come on, that would have a dramatic impact on security, most people don't even think about security or care until they get hit.
We already have three major operating systems for client devices. There is no problem with having more OS's, but we don't want a monopoly across lines of devices. So MS succeeding in the mobile market would be a problem, the same as if Apple or Google would become enormous in the desktop/laptop market. So I am glad MS did not succeed in the mobile market, that would have given them a major advantage. More OS's would be fine, but it totally depends on dominance across all client devices.
Gates, having made millions of jobs lost through software was never an issue, but now its robots taxes should be payed. I think taxes are a bad method either way, but this is very hypocritical.
At the about same time 3D was introduced streaming became successful. The physical media was abandoned. 3D is not or very limited available on streaming solutions almost solely on physical media.
The last time I bought in-ear headphones I had to choose if I wanted them for an iPhone or a Samsung phone, what standard are we talking about? And even then the remote is still very limited, this will change now.
If this solution of Apple leads to hq audio over wireless earpods I am for it. I really like standards, but current standard bluetooth wireless audio earpods don't deliver.
1. Digital audio means DRM audio:
That has already happened, You aren't really digitising a headphone jack signal, right?
2. Wireless headphones and speakers are fine, not great.
Don't use them, use a dongle.
3. Dongles are stupid, especially when they require other dongles.
If you don't like dongles, use lightning or wireless.
4. Ditching a deeply established standard will disproportionately impact accessibility.:
Let's keep hanging on standards, that is always really helpful. I can see the innovation in moving HQ DAC to the headphones. Now customers can choose if they care about audio.
5. Making Android and iPhone headphones incompatible is incredibly arrogant and stupid. .....
6. No one is asking for this.
No one was asking for an iPhone.
that you can't harvest 333 minke whales sustainable than it is too late...
"Japan has resumed its controversial lethal research whaling because it wants to determine how many minke whales can be harvested sustainably while studying the environment"
Fact is, that his (and other hackers) actions have ruined the fun of a lot of consumers. I really dont understand why this is endorsed. Consoles are a good example of having the need for a closed environment, openess enables extreme cheating, which you dont want in a gaming environment.
Nobody has advantage from having this console broken other than pirates and cheaters. Any cheapass pc will run linux better than the ps3.
I really despite the opening up of the PS3 platform. I see a lot of people cheering the hacks and cursing Sony for trying to minimise the damage, but I want a closed platform just like many other players of my kind want a non tampered environment. This opening up for homebrew also enables cheaters of the worse kind, in gaming there is a need for a closed platform.
While this site is totally for open software en open hardware and I largely agree with that, I think gaming consoles are a use case for closed hardware/software. Not because of the threat of piracy, but because of the ability to not allow software cheats. I personally moved (and I know a lot of other players did) from PC gaming to console gaming because the amount of cheating through software hacks on the PC platform. So I understand the wish for homebrew but I do think gaming consoles should be a closed environment just to have a reasonable fair gaming environment.
I am aware that there are others ways of cheating and glitching that are also available in console gaming, but they are never as worse as an aimbot.
Got the move and it is a very satisfying solution. Quick movements and a lot less lag than I thought it would have. I am not even a big fan of motion gaming but this solution works great because of its reliability, and that is actually what you want in gaming. The technology might not be the hottest, but if you make a movement you want it registered, missing your motions is makes gaming a lot less fun. Tabletennis and gladiator are great because of that reliability. Sure the current line-up aint great, but that doesnt dismiss this solution for motion gaming.
Slashdot Mirror
I so dislike this attitude of 'I am not going to change' instead of looking at the methods and technologies and see how they can be of use to you. Some might be great for your organisation, some not. But dismissing everything on forehand is just so stupid and the reason some organisations are stuck in old, unmaintainable and inefficient IT environments while the world moves on.
In the Apple eco system you don't have to pair your headphones again and again. You just choose the headphones at the device you are using, iCloud syncing has managed it for you. As I think about it, it actually is more convenient in that regard than a plug.
That is not the point. There is a loose coupling between the VM and the application. Which means you are never 100% sure your application runs in the environment it was intended for. With containerisation the application always runs in the environment it was intended for regardless of the infrastructure/vm's. Kubernetes is about devops, not about infrastructure.
I see no ipad support. Probably one of the things why you still would be developing native on iOS (swift/objective-c) is because of ipad support.
I don't think an AI assistent/friend is that problematic. I do think a child having this relation to an AI designed to sell stuff, is a bad idea.
I always read about those apple problems, issues etc. And only had a defective battery one time in an iPhone, while I have and have used many apple devices, including the laptops with those key problems. Cross fingers, should go to the casino.
What could you possibly gain by that ? We need more players in the technology world, not less.
This is a consolidation of power for facebook and other big companies. They used this expansion technique to get big, now by taking away this method you block other innovative, maybe less evil technologies to ever become that popular. This technique used to be the main driver for growing.
Yes, that would make it a lot saver for the average iPhone user..... Come on, that would have a dramatic impact on security, most people don't even think about security or care until they get hit.
We already have three major operating systems for client devices. There is no problem with having more OS's, but we don't want a monopoly across lines of devices. So MS succeeding in the mobile market would be a problem, the same as if Apple or Google would become enormous in the desktop/laptop market. So I am glad MS did not succeed in the mobile market, that would have given them a major advantage. More OS's would be fine, but it totally depends on dominance across all client devices.
Gates, having made millions of jobs lost through software was never an issue, but now its robots taxes should be payed. I think taxes are a bad method either way, but this is very hypocritical.
At the about same time 3D was introduced streaming became successful. The physical media was abandoned. 3D is not or very limited available on streaming solutions almost solely on physical media.
The last time I bought in-ear headphones I had to choose if I wanted them for an iPhone or a Samsung phone, what standard are we talking about? And even then the remote is still very limited, this will change now.
If this solution of Apple leads to hq audio over wireless earpods I am for it. I really like standards, but current standard bluetooth wireless audio earpods don't deliver.
1. Digital audio means DRM audio :
.....
That has already happened, You aren't really digitising a headphone jack signal, right?
2. Wireless headphones and speakers are fine, not great.
Don't use them, use a dongle.
3. Dongles are stupid, especially when they require other dongles.
If you don't like dongles, use lightning or wireless.
4. Ditching a deeply established standard will disproportionately impact accessibility.:
Let's keep hanging on standards, that is always really helpful. I can see the innovation in moving HQ DAC to the headphones. Now customers can choose if they care about audio.
5. Making Android and iPhone headphones incompatible is incredibly arrogant and stupid.
6. No one is asking for this.
No one was asking for an iPhone.
that you can't harvest 333 minke whales sustainable than it is too late... "Japan has resumed its controversial lethal research whaling because it wants to determine how many minke whales can be harvested sustainably while studying the environment"
According to an article on the HP site! http://h30565.www3.hp.com/t5/Feature-Articles/Telecommuting-Creates-Happier-and-More-Productive-Employees/ba-p/1834?jumpid=reg_r1002_usen_c-001_title_r0001
Fact is, that his (and other hackers) actions have ruined the fun of a lot of consumers. I really dont understand why this is endorsed. Consoles are a good example of having the need for a closed environment, openess enables extreme cheating, which you dont want in a gaming environment. Nobody has advantage from having this console broken other than pirates and cheaters. Any cheapass pc will run linux better than the ps3.
I really despite the opening up of the PS3 platform. I see a lot of people cheering the hacks and cursing Sony for trying to minimise the damage, but I want a closed platform just like many other players of my kind want a non tampered environment. This opening up for homebrew also enables cheaters of the worse kind, in gaming there is a need for a closed platform.
While this site is totally for open software en open hardware and I largely agree with that, I think gaming consoles are a use case for closed hardware/software. Not because of the threat of piracy, but because of the ability to not allow software cheats. I personally moved (and I know a lot of other players did) from PC gaming to console gaming because the amount of cheating through software hacks on the PC platform. So I understand the wish for homebrew but I do think gaming consoles should be a closed environment just to have a reasonable fair gaming environment. I am aware that there are others ways of cheating and glitching that are also available in console gaming, but they are never as worse as an aimbot.
Got the move and it is a very satisfying solution. Quick movements and a lot less lag than I thought it would have. I am not even a big fan of motion gaming but this solution works great because of its reliability, and that is actually what you want in gaming. The technology might not be the hottest, but if you make a movement you want it registered, missing your motions is makes gaming a lot less fun. Tabletennis and gladiator are great because of that reliability. Sure the current line-up aint great, but that doesnt dismiss this solution for motion gaming.