Slashdot Mirror


User: Spazntwich

Spazntwich's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
750
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 750

  1. Re:Passing the buck on India Rejects One Laptop per Child Program · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think they're still working on their "one missile per child" campaign.

    Though before that gains any momentum they'll probably need to complete their "one functioning missile" campaign.

  2. The biggest irony of this entire story is... on When Doing PR For Anti-Spam Firm... Don't Spam · · Score: 1

    the submission itself is spam.

    Notice the odd resemblence between the submitter's URL and the linked story.

  3. Re:I don't understand what is going on here on MySpace's Trip to The Top · · Score: 2

    Maybe Slashdotters just plain don't read.

    That would explain quite a bit of what goes on around here.

  4. Who cares? on Definition of Planet to be Announced in September · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's great that some random internationally sanctioned body is going to announce some arbitrary definition of a planet, but what does this mean to those of us who only care about a LIFE SUPPORTING planet?

  5. Moore's law = all technology ever? on System Integration Leads to MegaFunction Gadgets · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what I'm to gather is that a new technology advances at rates different from ones set forth in arbitrary "laws" relating to different technologies?

    AMAZING

  6. Worthless article. on Wii Graphics 'Better Than At E3' · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How does crap conjecture and speculation on the Wii's power keep making main page slashdot?

    Who cares until Nintendo releases real, hard numbers?

  7. Re:A Cautionary Tale on Proposal to Implant RFID Chips in Immigrants · · Score: 1

    He was making a joke.

    About sex.

  8. Re:AOL!!!111 on Law Enforcement Requests for Net Data Multiply · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the federal government is there to protect us from foreign threats and invasions.

  9. Piquepaille is still a shit-eating spammer. on Robotic Telesurgery by Remote Surgeons · · Score: -1, Troll

    But at least he's posting direct links to the articles in his submissions now.

  10. Too bad for them. on Sarbanes-Oxley Costs Exceed Benefits · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But laws like this wouldn't really be necessary if businesses had followed the laws in the first place, huh?

    Too bad it only takes a few bad apples to ruin it for everyone.

  11. So uh... on ODF Plugins and a Microsoft Promise of Cooperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did Microsoft take the time to clarify exactly which features their Office suite offers that Open and Star offices don't?

    Gosh, not that I'd like to insult the integrity of a company with such a spectacular record of interoperability and standards compliance as Microsoft, but I really just can't think of anything obvious that their closed document format offers beyond lack of compatibility with anything but their own products.

  12. Fuck his celebrity status. on Ebert Reviews 'Silent Hill' · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    The man is a codger who only gets people's ears because of his name and the fact that he's been doing this for a while.

    His opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's in this day and age.

    Wake up Ebert: The world and especially the film industy have moved on, and you're just a dinosaur waiting to die that actual film-goers mostly ignore.

  13. Re:No suprise on Wildlife Defies Chernobyl Radiation · · Score: -1, Troll

    The continued existence of people like you who are otherwise retarded yet maintain a semblence of normalcy and even occasionally a spark of something that would be called brilliance by a less observant man is a testament to this very fact.

    God bless evolution.

  14. Re:As a golfer on Golf's Digital Divide · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    I'll impact your rectum, faggot.

  15. Re:What the fuck? on The Epic Ebert Videogame Debate · · Score: 1

    Wow, the saddest part of this debacle is I'm an English major. Blame my lack of sleep and hurried typing so as to get the comment out as quickly as possible, I guess.

    Or blame me being an idiot. You wouldn't be the first, you won't be the last, and you aren't necessarily wrong.

  16. What the fuck? on The Epic Ebert Videogame Debate · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is this even a debate? One of the definitions from dictionary.com for art is listed as "The conscious production or arrangement of sounds, colors, forms, movements, or other elements in a manner that affects the sense of beauty, specifically the production of the beautiful in a graphic or plastic medium."

    Going by that definition, videogames are MORE APTLY called art than a photograph, painting, sculpture, or anything else considered art by the mainstream. If you consider that a videogame combines the elements of sounds, colors, forms, movements, AND other elements for the production of the beautiful in a graphic medium, it seems logically sound to count at least some as art.

    Of course all videogames aren't art. It's the same concept behind not considering a headshot art, or some jackass banging his hands on a piano as art.

    This debate is asinine.

  17. Re:It's obvious to the non-arrogant on Closet Slashdotters: The 'Intellectually Curious' · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'm happy as Oprah's vagina in France you've made this outstanding thread in which all of the outstanding and intellectually superior Slashdotters can come to voice our satisfaction about being better than everyone else.

  18. A problem of audience. on Microsoft's Security Disclosures Come Under Fire · · Score: 2, Funny

    A good analogy, but perhaps a bit inappropriate considering slashdot's users.

  19. Shot in the dark: on Why Is Data Mining Still A Frontier? · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Either
    a) There's not enough money in it to make it worthwhile

    or

    b) It doesn't work.

  20. If this becomes common... on Your Digital Inheritance? · · Score: 1

    how long until there are non-"inheritance" clauses in the TOS for porn site accounts?

  21. Duke Nukem is a nigger. on Duke Nukem Forever Reviewed · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hence him taking forever to get anything done.

  22. Re:What a shitty submission. on Self Contained Water Cooled Radeon X1900, Retail · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't complain if he waited until they ran benchmarks, tried overclocking it, or had some actual news to report.

    You know, the kinds of details that usually make it into a news article. This is "Hey, look. It's a videocard with a waterblock on it. Betcha never seen one of them before!" and the fact that it's shameless self-promotion only makes it worse.

  23. What a shitty submission. on Self Contained Water Cooled Radeon X1900, Retail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "article" is a shitty little blurb with a few pictures. Not a single performance number or any bit of useful information.

    My first instinct? Check the link for the submitter's webpage. Oh, what a coincidence.

    Look, I'm not one to normally complain about poor stories and worthless submissions, but this one takes the cake. It's the most obvious grab for clicks and advertisement revenue that's been posted on /. in a while.

    For shame, CowboyNeal.

  24. Re:Is there something Sony should be learning? on Sony DRM and the New Digital Hole · · Score: 1

    If you're going to make a "Sony is dying" post, would you mind providing a bit more documentation of said impending death than the various BSD is dying trolls provide?

    Come on, at least a netcraft quote.

  25. Is there something Sony should be learning? on Sony DRM and the New Digital Hole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There probably isn't. I guarantee you that in a corporation this large, the beancounters have already run through the numbers plenty of times to decide that this is their most economically viable course of action.

    I'm not saying corporations are always right or always do the right thing, but when it comes to making money, Sony usually gets it right, and I don't think one self-important slashdotter speculating otherwise carries much weight compared to a financial beast that's been generating astoundingly large piles of cash for the past long while.