Slashdot Mirror


Your Digital Inheritance?

eldavojohn writes "I wrote a journal entry musing on the idea of passing on accounts and digitally stored information from generation to generation. Has anyone done this or inherited anything? Does anyone else plan to do this? Is there a slip of paper in your deposit box at the bank with websites, account names and passwords?"

370 comments

  1. best fake quote ever ... by bwthomas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone gather round! I'm going to open grandpa's tarball ...

    1. Re:best fake quote ever ... by zaft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Finding Grandpa's p0rn could be rather disturbing... especially for Grandma!

    2. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Asshat+Canada · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...especially featuring Grandma.

    3. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Funny

      In all seriousness, don't joke about that.
      I have a "friend" whose grandfather died, and when he had to help his mother clean out his grandfathers stuff, there were erotic pictures of my "friend's" grandmother (At least the pics were from the 40's, and not from when she was 80). Traumatizing.
      But it does bring up a good point- Perhaps have a box where you keep your porn that says "throw out w/out opening if I die" or at least have a deal with a friend that whomever dies first, the other will do a porn sweep.
      One of the reasons I have always hoped that I get a message from God a day or two before I die, is because I would freak out if I had to look down (or up) after death and watch my mother in law clean out my wife and my sex toy stash.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    4. Re:best fake quote ever ... by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would freak out if I had to... watch my mother in law clean out my wife Yup, that'd freak most people out.

      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
    5. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the first episode of Coupling:

      What are porn buddies? Do you watch porn together?

      No, when Steve dies, the first thing I do is go to his house, and remove all the porn. He'll do the same for me.

      So, you destroy all the porn from his house before his family get there?

      Not destroy - REMOVE!

    6. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Fag, when used as an insult implying someone is a homosexual, is spelled with two G's. i.e. FAGG
      Anyhow, someday, when you get married (or at least see a woman naked), you will see that you can have an exciting and fulfilling sex life based on love, but sometimes toys can make it even more exciting. (Remember, when you end up with an actual woman, keep this in mind- the vagina is actually between her legs- I know you may think it is on the front because that is where the hair is....)
      The liberator pads, nipple clamps, lingerie, bodystockings, chin dongs etc. can add a lot of excitement to a marriage.
      Monogomy doesn't have to be monotonous!!!!

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    7. Re:best fake quote ever ... by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      So your wife doesn't know about that? You don't use the things together? Sounds like you don't have a healthy sexual relationship. You should see a counseler.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    8. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      1: "Only the Sith deal in absolutes."
      2: "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
      Hmm...


      3: Only an idiot quotes a now worthless hack like Lucas for political ideas.

    9. Re:best fake quote ever ... by bohemian72 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      That reminds me of the first episode of the BBC sitcom Coupling. A character, Susan, is trying to find out a little about this guy she's interested so she asks her coworker who's a friend of his. She asks how well he knows him. He says "We're porn buddies."
      "Is that some sort of code, were you two in prison together or something."
      "No, no no, once upon a time we exchanged flat keys."
      "Are you sure this isn't some sort of code."
      "In the event of his death, I run over and remove all his porn before his family can come and find it. And he'd do the same for me."
      "Let me get this straight. If he dies, you destory all his porn?"
      "Who said anything about destroy?"
      "You can't seriously mean you'd keep the porn!"
      "Well, that's sort of a fringe benefit."

      I didn't get that exactly right, but it was close enough.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
    10. Re:best fake quote ever ... by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      This sort of contradicts your earlier statement. Why would it freak you out to see her clean out the stash? If you use the things together it shouldn't be a problem right?

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    11. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      I wrote a bad sentence.. I was thinking if my wife and I die together, like in a car wreck, and my mother in law cleaning out our stash....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    12. Re:best fake quote ever ... by crosstalk · · Score: 1

      But still even if just you die, and it is one thing for your wife to clean out the things, but if as usual the in laws come to help clean out never good for them to find things. I think I need to get a porn buddy

      --
      An armed society is a polite Society
    13. Re:best fake quote ever ... by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Oh. I see. Makese sense :)

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    14. Re:best fake quote ever ... by GoodOmens · · Score: 1

      I'm willing my +10 Uber Saber to charity.

    15. Re:best fake quote ever ... by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "Perhaps have a box where you keep your porn that says "throw out w/out opening if I die""

      Wow, what a waste. Do you know what vintage porn from the 30's and 40's is worth? I would love to have inherited my grandfathers porn collection.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    16. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: "Only the Sith deal in absolutes." is an absolute, idiot.

    17. Re:best fake quote ever ... by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      > or at least have a deal with a friend that whomever dies first,

      Have you ever seen the British TV Sitcom "Couples" they actually discuss such a thing called "Porn Buddies". If one dies the other has to empty that guys stash before anyone else gets to the house.

    18. Re:best fake quote ever ... by thc69 · · Score: 1

      There was an episode of The Man Show with a fake commercial for a porn-removal-on-death service...but a half-assed effort doesn't produce any google results that look like it. Oh well.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    19. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      This is why you have a designated porn buddy. Someone who will take care of your stash if you should die. Friends are good, but family members are better (next of kin being notified first and all of that).

      --

      Question everything

    20. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Savatte · · Score: 1

      I would freak out if I had to look down (or up) after death and watch my mother in law clean out my wife

      Are you saying you would freak because you missed the opportunity for a hot, pseudo-incestuous 3-way?

    21. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a cigarrette?

    22. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen "fag" spelled with 2 G's. The Urban Dictionary has 1 G significantly outnumbering 2 G's. Could be a local thing.

    23. Re:best fake quote ever ... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You appear to be confusing "vintage and collectible erotica", which perhaps should be preserved -- with "amateur home videos" (... er ... photographs?... er... slides? of your own grandmother.

      It might have some historical interest, and perhaps it should be preserved. I'm not really convinced of that; I think the departed's wishes should be respected... and in the event they didn't mention it in their will... I dunno... I still have a hard time beleiving they want their amateur private porn to be published and sold by their grandchildren.

      I for one would be decidely uncomfortable publishing it, and trying to make a few bucks off of it, regardless.

    24. Re:best fake quote ever ... by kennygraham · · Score: 0
      I for one would be decidely uncomfortable publishing it, and trying to make a few bucks off of it, regardless.

      If you say so... *cough* commie *cough* ;)

    25. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leave of the last G for GAY!!!

    26. Re:best fake quote ever ... by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 1

      My mother had an affair for about two years with a married German businessman (she was divorced herself) and she had a friend of hers destroy his letters after she died of breast cancer. I guess that's the female equivalent of the porn buddy system. Maxim

    27. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you don't have a healthy sexual relationship. What?!? Of course we have a healthy sexual relationship! I mean, we always talk after sex... except when there is no phone handy!

    28. Re:best fake quote ever ... by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      if my wife and I die together, like in a car wreck, and my mother in law cleaning out our stash....

      if you are both dead, then why would you give a fuck who finds what?

    29. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new day in slash dot history has arrived when chin dongs and nipple clamps are being used in conversation that does not involve tearing a nerd in half for his lack of social skills.

      Mark this day on your calendar, it will go down as one to be remembered :)

    30. Re:best fake quote ever ... by scottv67 · · Score: 0, Troll

      she died of breast cancer

      Not making light of your mom's passing, but how does one die of breast cancer? Are you saying that the cancer spread to other parts of her body after being first detected in her breast tissue?

      Had a gf that was successfully treated *before* it spread past the lymph nodes and into the rest of the body.

    31. Re:best fake quote ever ... by porkUpine · · Score: 1

      We actually had to do this last year... I had a good friend who died unexpectedly at the age of 33. He was divorced and lived alone. Right after he died we went to his apartment and did a 'porn sweep'. This guy had the biggest collection of porn I have ever seen! He wasn't a very computer 'literate' person so his PC required no password and he stored all of his smut in a folder on the desktop.
      His mother and ex-wife came over later that week to start cleaning out his place... all they found was clean computer, and ONE playboy :) They brought his kids, so it wouldn't have been good to have the 9 year old see daddy's copy of JUGS on the coffee table right next to a roll of paper towels and a tube of KY...
      All of my friends now have a 'porn' agreement. As soon as we die one of us will either remove the HDD from the decesaed persons computer, or wipe the porn if they have access.

    32. Re:best fake quote ever ... by shmlco · · Score: 1
      "...there were erotic pictures of my "friend's" grandmother (At least the pics were from the 40's, and not from when she was 80). Traumatizing."

      How is knowing your grandmother once liked sex traumatizing? After all, how do you think you got here? Immaculate Conception?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    33. Re:best fake quote ever ... by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the reasons I have always hoped that I get a message from God a day or two before I die, is because I would freak out if I had to look down (or up) after death and watch my mother in law clean out my wife and my sex toy stash.

      Pah! Why feel ashamed of your porn/toy collection?

      Dildoes number heavily among the oldest known human artifacts - even the single oldest well-preserved artifact, the "Venus of Willendorf", some scholars have argued may have served as an artificial phallus (go ahead and look at the "hair" on it and tell me it doesn't resemble some form of sex toy, "ridged for her pleasure"!).

      I have porn. I have toys. I have no shame regarding them... If my own mother found them while plant-sitting, I'd proudly say that yes, I use them to great personal/mutual pleasure with my SO.


      I just don't get how a sexually reproducing species turned into a culture of such pathetic prudes! Humans... Like... Sex! We spend a disproportionate amount of time seeking it, we spend virtually all of our free time from our late-teens through late-twenties doing it, we'll lose sleep and food over it. Wherein lies the "shame" of having "accessories"?

    34. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha senior porn sweep...

    35. Re:best fake quote ever ... by cfuse · · Score: 1

      Grandpa said: "It was the best dry sex I'd ever had!"

    36. Re:best fake quote ever ... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would I care who finds out? The same reason i have a ton of life insurance. Just because I am gone, doesn't mean that I want to say "a hearty fuck you" to everyone I cared about. I care how I am remembered, and more importantly, I don't want to cause my family (including inlaws) undue stress if I die. It is called caring about others- I am sure that you feel the same way.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    37. Re:best fake quote ever ... by thempstead · · Score: 1

      Its "Coupling" not "Couples"

      t

    38. Re:best fake quote ever ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Depends upon the type of cancer. Some cancers grow so fast and spread so quickly that by the time you have symptoms you're toast. Early detection is the key, of course, although it didn't help my uncle who died of lung cancer ... as I recall (and this was over twenty years ago so I may have it wrong) it was something called "oat-cell carcinoma". It metastasized very, very fast and he went through a hellish six months of radiation and chemotherapy and died anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  2. Kinda by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    They'd find my DVD backups.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Kinda by daitengu · · Score: 1

      They'd find my DVD, game, and CD "Backups" too.

  3. Sounds like a movie plot. by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, as the elder hacker ages, he hands off his identity to the young hacker who has learned his 733t ski77z!

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by qwijibo · · Score: 5, Funny

      They already did that movie. It's called "The Princess Bride". Sure, they had pirates instead of hackers, but according to the RIAA they're the same thing.

    2. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      Neuromancer.

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    3. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      "Actually in fact, I am not the Dred Pirate Robinson, and neither was the one I inherited the name from."

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    4. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a confession to make. I am not the Dread Slashdotter AKAImBatman. My name is Bob. I inherited this account from the previous Dread Slashdotter AKAImBatman, just as others will inherit it from me. The man I inherited it from was not the real Dread Slashdotter AKAImBatman, either. His name was George. The real AKAImBatman has been retired five years and living like a king in San Francisco. The name, you see, is the important thing for inspiring the necessary fear. No one would surrender to the "Dread Slashdotter Bob," so the name passes from generation to generation.

      *sniff* Now you know the terrible secret.

    5. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I am not the Dred Pirate Robinson

      *cough*Roberts*cough*

      I don't think you want to be confusing Princess Bride with a Disney Movie.

    6. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 0

      Oooh, can I be next?
      George said I could be next.
      Pleasepleasepleasepleaseplease!

    7. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by dwandy · · Score: 1
      175092: You know, as the elder hacker ages, he hands off his identity to the young hacker who has learned his 733t ski77z!

      907337: So is that your father's UID?

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    8. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      I almost want to change my name to The Dread Slashdotter Steve now.

    9. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

      How do you know this wasn't my fathers UID?

      --
      The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

      - Douglas Adams

    10. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Who's your Virtually-Inherited-Daddy?

    11. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by ScottLindner · · Score: 1

      Beautiful!

      --
      Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
    12. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest I have read in a while. Submitted it to Wikiquote

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    13. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I've been dying to post that one for awhile, but I couldn't figure out how to work it in until now. The only downside is that everyone realizes it's a joke. It would have been funnier if I'd managed to string along a few newbs. :-P

    14. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      So now I'm confused. Are you the NeuAltGrendel?

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    15. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by SuperRob · · Score: 1

      I assure you. This IS my UID. :)

    16. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Rovastar · · Score: 1

      What he will inherit a broken keyboard where E's appear on the screen as 3's, etc...

    17. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      By cyber law, the AKAImBatman who walks calls forth the power of ten slashdot trolls.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    18. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by garaged · · Score: 1

      is it a joke ??

      now im depressed, first santa, now you ?

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    19. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Where's mfh when you need him?

    20. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by HeliumHigh · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, mind if I ask you about franchising opportunities?


      If not, I wonder if this really cool name I just heard would be taken. Spartacus isn't a very well known name is it?

    21. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by kalel666 · · Score: 1

      Better that than his fathers IUD.

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    22. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard that name in ages. I used to love that movie when I was a kid.

    23. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by marcop · · Score: 1

      All that effort and your slashdot ID is relatively high. Pathetic.

    24. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      The real AKAImBatman has been retired five years and living like a king in San Francisco

      Are you sure that isn't "living like a queen..."?

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    25. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's odd. I could say the same thing about me... except the fact that the previous Anonymous Coward may or may not be living like a king in San Francisco. I don't think he or she or whoever it is has retired for five years, either - the title seems to be handed off as about often as topics are posted here on Slashdot.

      Of course, imagine my surprise everytime I find out the title's been given to me -again.- Damn, that's annoying.

    26. Re:Sounds like a movie plot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off Topic but its on Channel 5 at 18.10 on sunday 9th in the UK

  4. My Digital Legacy by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else plan to do this? Is there a slip of paper in your deposit box at the bank with websites, account names and passwords?

    Why yes, in fact, there is!
    And imagine their surprise as my offspring open up my safe deposit box only to find a piece of paper with my Slashdot login & password and a note about trying to only post comments that are informative, insightful, interesting, or funny.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:My Digital Legacy by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      We can pass on low slashdot numbers? Cool!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:My Digital Legacy by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Depends.

    3. Re:My Digital Legacy by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Imagine a /. account being in continuous use for 150 years. (Imagine /. being around that long.) Digital accounts obviously can have a life independent of their owners. I wonder how many low number /. accounts have actually been sold on Ebay.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    4. Re:My Digital Legacy by powerlord · · Score: 1
      "... I wonder how many low number /. accounts have actually been sold on Ebay."


      Brings new meaning to the term "Estate Sale".

      "Next up for bid, this wonderful Slashdot account. Only slightly tarnished with an a Karma rating of Excellent, and a six digit ID. If this isn't your cup of tea, we'll be auctioning off an authentic World of Warcraft account. These are very popular with the "retro set" as Blizzard has graciously kept one sever running for die-hard fans, even though they have not allowed new accounts to be created." :)
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:My Digital Legacy by whoop · · Score: 1

      Wonder what a 3-digit account id would go for...

    6. Re:My Digital Legacy by SuperRob · · Score: 1

      *Insert Obligatory Sanitary Undergarment Joke Here*

    7. Re:My Digital Legacy by Surt · · Score: 1

      There's at least one guy in the 2-digit ids who acknowledges he bought the account as a birthday gift to himself in his sig.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:My Digital Legacy by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      This kind of Ask Slashdot reminds me of the story a few years back when a family was trying to recover email from either Yahoo or Hotmail of their departed dead family member. Yahoo wouldn't release the email because they argued it was private and had no obligation to release it to the third party. I don't know how the legal wranglings eventually worked out, but last I heard the family was stuck trying to guess the password.

  5. Taxes by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can inherit it, the government will want to tax it. It's a bit worrisome that someone who inherits a website, or even an online identity, with a good reputation and lots of traffic will one day have to pay a percentage of a value the government arbitrarily assigns.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    1. Re:Taxes by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's only a concern if your online identity, email address, and so on is somehow worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. Inheritance has to be extremely high in order for it to actually be taxed, and realistically, the vast majority online properties that are really that valuable are owned by corporate entities.

    2. Re:Taxes by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      It's a concern to all if you consider that the income tax started out only taxing the top 0.01% and now taxes Everybody to some extent. This present cap is temporary. If history is a teacher (and it is) it is perfectly valid to wonder and worry how your digital property will be be taxed even when you're wormfood.

      BTW, just curious- is there some where you can point me to verify this "hundreds of thousands of dollars" cap you speak of?

    3. Re:Taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what the original poster was refering to in the "hundereds of thousands of dollars" bit on a single property. But in the 2005 tax year a Estate had to have a total value of over $1,500,000 in order to be taxed. This number is suppose to go higher for the 2006 tax year. Now, thats on the value at date of death, any icome earned by the holdings of the estate ( dividends, interest, bus. income after death) will be taxed just like ordinary income (for the most part), although this income is often picked up by the beneficiaries and taxed at their level, not necissarily at the estate level.

      for reference, an estate files IRS form 706 if needed;
      http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i706.pdf [PDF]
      the cap is listed there.

    4. Re:Taxes by Illserve · · Score: 1

      How would you tax a 3 digit /. ID?

    5. Re:Taxes by 2short · · Score: 1

      You mean, we, as a society, will want to tax your inheretance after the first 1.5 million dollars if you don't qualify for any of the exceptions protecting family farms and other family run small businesses? Awfully sorry about that, but yeah, we want to tax that. Just because your parents are crazy rich doesn't mean you and your descendents get to sit on your asses forever.

    6. Re:Taxes by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      How would you tax a 3 digit /. ID?

      Tax? I think you'd give the holder a disability cheque!

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    7. Re:Taxes by jrieth50 · · Score: 1

      Yea. Word.

    8. Re:Taxes by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      >holder a disability cheque!
      holder? my employer doesn't even know they own my slashdot karma.

      wow, now posting from work may be valuable to the company!!!

    9. Re:Taxes by lgw · · Score: 1

      Kind of off topic, but: we should never have taxed estates, we should tax inheritance (that us, tax at the receiver, not the sender). Many societies over many centuries have realized the danger of allowing wealth to continue to accumlate in a single individual over generations (traditionally, the eldest son). If a 5 million dollar estate is split amoung 20 grandkids or charities or whatever, that shouldn't be a concern, but if it's all left to a single heir, taxes are more appropriate, as that creates a larger inequlity in society.

      Here's an extremely insightful analysis of the issue by Gary Becker (who has a Nobel Prize for economics).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Taxes by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      Won't the inheritance tax only tax the inheritance, which is received only once and therefore only be taxed once? If you really wanna sock it to my rich grandma, consider the FairTax which really taxes wealth (consumption) not like the income tax which only taxes income, and not necessarily wealthy folks, like those who just happen upon a fat stack of cash, or those who escape it thru loopholes and special interest deals.

    11. Re:Taxes by 2short · · Score: 1

      I don't want to sock it to your rich grandma, she may have earned the money; I want to sock it to you, who I know didn't!

      Anyway, I skimmed that site, and conclude I am rightly suspicious of anything that calls itself the "FairTax", though I aleready knew from you "wealth (consumption)". Wealth is not consumption. Wealthy people do not consume more proportional to their greater net worth, not even close. A national sales tax wouldn't sock it to your rich grandma; she probably doesn't spend any more than twice as much as my poor grandma.

      I do like that their first point about what they are going to do is "Abolish the IRS". Because the "Department Administering the Fair Tax" will be better...

      Switching from our current patchwork of various taxes to just a national sales tax would be disasterous. It would garauntee the very problem I was alluding to the inheritance tax helping with: Those who are sufficiently wealthy could sit on their buts, using the interest on their wealth to support themselves and their descendants while becoming steadily wealthier, forever. Well, until those who aren't rich get fed up with it and change things by vote or violence.

    12. Re:Taxes by klenwell · · Score: 1

      Sit on his ass forever? Looks like this guys working his ass off... so he can sit on his ass forever.

      Of course my grandma's so rich, she just buys ass on the free market.

      --
      Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
    13. Re:Taxes by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      "Because the "Department Administering the Fair Tax" will be better..."

      Disclaimer:
      I fell compelled to point out that I am in no way affiliated with the above, or any other revenue service!

      Signed. Captain DaFt

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    14. Re:Taxes by 2short · · Score: 1

      At least someone spotted the acronym...

    15. Re:Taxes by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      I want to sock it to you, who I know didn't!
      This is a joke, right? You didn't just seriously use a nominative pronoun where an objective pronoun should have gone, did you?
      And how do you know I didn't?

      Wealthy people do not consume more proportional to their greater net worth, not even close.
      Got any figures to back that up? While you were skimming the site, did you happen upon the figures from the MIT and Harvard economists?

      Either you're acting as a parody of fools or you're really being serious. If it's the latter, let me know when you're more read up on what you're talking about.

    16. Re:Taxes by 2short · · Score: 1

      "This is a joke, right?"
      No, it's a test. I always include at least one gramatical error in every post to see if people will seize upon irrelevancies.

      Saying "I want to sock it to you" is mostly a joke. I'm just pointing out why I think the inheritance tax is particularly fair, as taxes go.

      "And how do you know I didn't?"
      How do I know you didn't earn your rich grandma's money that you stand to inherit? Am I misunderstanding your question, or are you being pointlessly difficult?

      "Got any figures to back that up?"
      Yes. I do demographics for a living, and have a large number of figures to back that up. For non-luxury expenditures, households in the 95th percentile of net worth spend on average about twice as much as households at the poverty line, despite making 5+ times as much. Luxury expenditures add a bit to that, but still don't come close to making up the difference. This is easy to see by the fact that poverty-line households spend all their money; while wealthy households clearly do not.

      "While you were skimming the site, did you happen upon the figures from the MIT and Harvard economists?"
      No, nor does your link lead to any I can find. There are some links to university websites right near some other stuff that asserts the FairTax is good, it looked to me like I was supposed to assume some connection. Doesn't matter though, I'm not impressed by appeals to authority, and several of the economists I knew at Harvard were crackpots in any case. Give me a realistic theory why a sales tax doesn't move the tax burden away from the wealthy toward the working class, like it is pretty universally understood to do, or forget it. And then explain why all those other economists, including many at those fine institutions, got that wrong. Alternatively, you could argue why such a move of the tax burden is a good idea, in which case I'll probably disagree, but at least it would be interesting.

      "let me know when you're more read up on what you're talking about."
      Sure, bucko. You question my suggestion that consumption is not proportional to wealth, and I'm the one that needs to read up more. No matter how many times your web site calls it "Fair" and even "Progressive", sales taxes put more of the tax burden on lower-income earners than our current system, or even flat income taxes. Even most people who argue for them understand this.

    17. Re:Taxes by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      I always include at least one gramatical error in every post
      Nice. I'll start making posts with 5 facts, one of which will always be lie, just to see who catches it. It'll be fun.

      How do I know you didn't earn your rich grandma's money that you stand to inherit?
      Oh I see, in this hypothetical you were assuming that I'd be inheriting my granny's money. An understandable mistake, but an incorrect assumption nonetheless.

      spend on average about twice as much .. despite making 5+ times as much.
      So it's not enough for you that under the FairTax, they spend more and thus would be paying more taxes while the poor are completely relieved of any tax burden up to the poverty line. No, for the FairTax to work, the rich must spend as much as they make- from each according to their ability and all that, eh?

      nor does your link lead to any I can find
      Fine, I'll do the digging for you:
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
      Start with #6-it should be particularly interesting to you, although it's more heavy on facts than on figures.
      Those are all the ones I could find that would be somewhat pertinent to this discussion. Searching around will show you lots of other aspects that you may find interesting as well.

      Give me a realistic theory why a sales tax doesn't move the tax burden away from the wealthy toward the working class
      I take you haven't heard about the prebate part of the plan that removes all tax liability up to the poverty level?
      Have you considered reading The FairTax book?

    18. Re:Taxes by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Oh I see, in this hypothetical you were assuming that I'd be inheriting my granny's money. An understandable mistake, but an incorrect assumption nonetheless."

      I constructed a hypothetical for the purpose discussing the inheritance tax, and I'm wrong that I intended there to be inheriting going on? Right, pointlessly difficult it is.

      "So it's not enough for you that under the FairTax, they spend more and thus would be paying more taxes while the poor are completely relieved of any tax burden up to the poverty line. No, for the FairTax to work, the rich must spend as much as they make- from each according to their ability and all that, eh?"

      You said the FairTax taxes wealth. For that to be the case, we would have to assume the rich were going to spend not just what they made, but everything they had, which obviously wouldn't be good, and which obviously they won't. The FairTax taxes consumption.

      "Fine, I'll do the digging for you: [link, link, link ...]"

      Yes, those are the pages I was reffering to that say the fair tax is good. There is no indication of their authorship, though nearby are links to the top-level home pages of prestigious universities. I see no suggestion that any particular Harvard or MIT economist supports the FairTax. Nor would I be convinced if one did. Your choice of authorities to weild was particularly amusing to me; haveing myself spent some time hanging around the Harvard Economics department, I know you can find people there to support all manner of crackpot schemes ("From each according to his means..." for example.) Still, even with 11 links instead of just one, I don't see that they found one to support the FairTax.

      "Start with #6-it should be particularly interesting to you"
      #6: 'Why the FairTax is good for young and low-income failies' For the record, I'm old and loaded. If my analisys of the fair tax is correct, I would personally benefit enormously from it in the short term (in the long term, I think our economy would collapse, and thus it would be worse for me overall)

      "I take you haven't heard about the prebate part of the plan that removes all tax liability up to the poverty level?"
      Yes, I heard that part. I think it's insufficient, and that the FairTax would still move the tax burden down the income scale relative to the current scheme.

      While this back and forth bickering is fun and all, it's not going to convince me the FairTax is worth considering. If you actually want to convince people to consider your ideas, you need to answer their questions. My questions are "Who pays more?" and "Why is that a good idea?"
      Your website has many papers about why the Fair tax will be good for various classes of people; i.e. why they will pay less. It also claims it is revenue neutral. Well, if it's revenue neutral, and anyone pays less, someone must pay more. Who is it? My not very deep analysis suggests lower-middle class workers pay more, the rich pay less, and the very rich, much less. Now, I've actually talked to people who though this was a good idea, and while I disagree and think historical examples back me up, at least they were claiming this was desirable. You, and the website you are so fond of, seem to be instead claiming it's not the case.
          Well, OK, we could discuss that, but I'd really like to know: In your anaysis, under the FairTax, who pays more than they do under our current system, and why is that a good idea?

    19. Re:Taxes by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      The FairTax taxes consumption.
      And one acquire things to consume with...income? Not necessarily. With resources - ie, wealth (unless you're the government, or a thief, in which case it is done with force).

      you can find people there to support all manner of crackpot schemes
      This doesn't mean that there cannot be someone among the crackpots might have a good idea.

      I don't see that they found one to support the FairTax.
      Just as an example of one of the many places you'll find them supporting it, if you take the time to do some reading:
      From Dr. Jorgenson of Harvard's Department of Economics, in this document
      "If we had enacted a FairTax ten years ago, we would each be ten percent better off today."
      But like you said, this does nothing to convince you. Some folks are pretty set in their ways...

      For the record, I'm old and loaded
      In that case, you may find #5 more interesting.

      in the long term, I think our economy would collapse
      That's interesting- why do you think that?

      Yes, I heard that part. I think it's insufficient
      You think the prebate is insufficient? Why? And what would be "sufficient" in your opinion? More to the point, how do you define sufficient in this case?

      While this back and forth bickering is fun and all
      I wouldn't call it bickering, and it's more than useless fun. It's a productive dialouge for exchaning ideas. Thru this record of communication, I'm getting an understanding of why people oppose the FairTax, while others (and maybe you) are coming to learn why one should support it.

      who pays more than they do under our current system, and why is that a good idea?
      First, I'd refer you to #8, then to go a step further and answer your question about where does all the money come from to make it revenue neutral: It comes from those who don't pay income taxes now- drug dealers, the porn industry, special interests and income tax loophole exploiters and the like. As they begin paying taxes thru the national retail sale tax, they pick up the slack that they've been eluding in our current system.
      As for why is this a good idea- because it's fair.

    20. Re:Taxes by 2short · · Score: 1

      So "Who pays more?" is:

          Criminals - I think everyone can get behind that, but I don't think there is all that much money there.
          "Special interests and income tax loophole exploiters" - sounds good, but who exactly are we talking about? Which loopholes? There's lots of ways to get tax advantages- spending money on education or giving to charity for example. Is that who pays more, college students and the generous?
      It seems to me criminals are just going to evade your sales tax (as some of them do with existing sales taxes alredy). Heck I can think of a dozen ways to avoid your sales tax that you aren't going to stop without a massive and expensive enforcement agency, and wasn't "abolish the IRS" one of the big advantages?

        As far as loophole-exploiters, we could deal with them by closing the loopholes, assuming they are bad loopholes. Whether to convert from income to sales tax is an entirely seperate issue.

      Who pays more via a sales tax vs an income tax is widely understood to be the lower end of net worth. The author of your website clearly understands this, they are sure to put out lots of stuff about how this is good for the low-income folks, and they get right out their labeling the current system "regressive" and theirs "progressive", because they know people like me are going to point out that, in fact, sales taxes are regressive as compared to income taxes.

      I think the exemption up to the poverty line is insufficient because it will still leave the merely low income, if not actually poor, with much more of the tax burden than they currently have. After all, our current system has exemptions for people under or near the poverty line.

      "'For the record, I'm old and loaded'
      In that case, you may find #5 more interesting."
      No, that's about why it's good for the elderly and poor. Overall, the proponents of this plan seem to spend a lot of time trying to talk about why this will be good for low-income people... I can't imagine why. Oh, except of course for the fact that anyione who made it beyond econ 101 can tell it's not.

      "As for why is this a good idea- because it's fair."
      Naming it that does not make it so. Pretending for a moment we could all agree on what was fair, the fairest tax policy is not necessarily the best.

    21. Re:Taxes by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is all that much money there.
      (1) The underground economy is estimated to be around $1 trillion annually. Taxing any part of a $trillion is still a big number. (2) The Fairtax will collect revenue from 45 million foreign visitors annually. (3) the Fairtax will collect revenue from 11 million illegal aliens---and they won't be receiving the offsetting prebate.

      "Special interests and income tax loophole exploiters" - sounds good, but who exactly are we talking about?
      Companies, labor unions, and other organizations who spend billions of dollars each year to lobby Congress and federal agencies. Special interests who retain lobbying firms, many of them located along Washington's legendary K Street. Others have lobbyists working in-house. Clients (Organizations Paying for Lobbying) in 121 profiled sectors & industries numbered 1411 in 2004, 545 (incomplete total) in 2005, lobbying alone for TAXATION/INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. For 2005, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES there were a total of 4854 clients.

      Heck I can think of a dozen ways to avoid your sales tax that you aren't going to stop without a massive and expensive enforcement agency
      There will be a registration procedure that is required to make untaxed purchases. The risk of cheating and getting caught increases when government agents only have to keep an eye on 18 million collection points rather than 130 million income tax returns. The whole tax story is contained on every cash register receipt for everyone to see. Totally transparent!! Will there still be cheating? Sure, but will it compare to the $350 billion in uncollected taxes left on the table each year by the 110,000 IRS employees that cost us taxpayers $11 billion per year in their salaries and wages? I don't think so.

      sales taxes are regressive as compared to income taxes.
      You need to break free of income, wealth and soak-the-rich thinking. Under the FairTax, it's all about consumption, not production. How much you earn, how much you have and how much of it you spend is irrelevant. You have money, you spend it. Spend more money, pay more tax. Progressive. It might take a while to get used to the idea.

  6. What Inheritance - I am married by computer_redneck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Since Women outlive Men my wife gets everything anyways.

    Thats why I gave her a list of all my logins and passwords anyways.


    Impeach Bush

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BF
    1. Re:What Inheritance - I am married by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impeach Bush

      trouble with your wife?

    2. Re:What Inheritance - I am married by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Impeach Bush

      trouble with your wife?


      Actually, it was his illegal nanny.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  7. If this becomes common... by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

    how long until there are non-"inheritance" clauses in the TOS for porn site accounts?

    1. Re:If this becomes common... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you pay for pr0n? you silly, silly boy!

    2. Re:If this becomes common... by I_Strahd · · Score: 1

      I have "heard" that you pay by the month for these types of services.
      This would only be an issue if you had a lifetime membership. At least that is what I heard.

      Strahd

    3. Re:If this becomes common... by itscolduphere · · Score: 2, Informative

      how long until there are non-"inheritance" clauses in the TOS for porn site accounts?

      Hell, there probably already are. It can actually be a real pain to leave something non-tangible to somebody after your death. A car is easily transferred, but a membership or subscription often isn't.

      Example: my wife's grandmother had like 10 or 11 months left on her Dish Network subsciption. My father-in-law should theoretically have inherited it (he's the one who takes care of everything not specifically mentioned in the will). However, he was informed that Dish's policy is that they would not add that 11 months to his membership...the only way they'd pass it on is if it went to a new subscriber. In other words, they weren't willing to pass along the time remaining on a pre-paid contract unless it would gain them something (another customer)...otherwise that money (hundreds of dollars) was flushed down the toilet.

      The lesson: don't assume that pre-paid memberships can be passed along in the event of your death. Also, when you're chances of dying at any given time are significant, go monthly.

    4. Re:If this becomes common... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that really a source of concern for you? Are you worried that you may get your father's porn account by inheritance, and not be able to use it? Are you worried that you may gift your fine boy your own account for porn and he wouldn't be able to use it?

      Or a better question, would you really want to use your father's porn account? Does anyone even pay for online porn any more? Because if you pay for something you can get for free, you're a sucker anyway.

    5. Re:If this becomes common... by bogd · · Score: 1
      I don't know about that... At the moment, you have this: "for your convenience, if you do not cancel before the FREE trial is over, we will extend your membership (and, of course, bill your credit card)".

      I can just see it now: "...and if you happen to die, we will bill the credit cards of your next-of-kin. For your convenience, of course!"

    6. Re:If this becomes common... by Elvis+Parsley · · Score: 1

      The "lifetime" part of that would seem to nicely avoid any "inheritance" problem.

    7. Re:If this becomes common... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      >if you pay for something you can get for free, you're a sucker anyway.

      free?
      Their are plenty of girls that can get whatever they want, just to show some B00Bs, but I sure would prefer they be suckers.

  8. Generation without a past by jigjigga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    havent had it happen, but I have an archive of "my stuff"- being basically I have created on a computer since in middle scool (when computers replaced pen and paper for me). One day I'll be able to find all of that stuff and rummage through it. Could be cool. I feel sorry for the people, among my generation, who dont backup anything they make on a computer... because I know they dont produce anything on paper... A generation with no past is bad news.

    1. Re:Generation without a past by somersault · · Score: 1

      The past will be online, as long as servers keep running.. but yes I would hope that people save what they create.. it's much easier nowadays to transfer information (for example I dont have the sourcecode to a game I wrote in Amos BASIC on my Amiga, but I found a random website online that had the compiled version which I once submitted to 'Amiga Format' :D), so easier to keep backups.. and it would be a shame if people lost everything they made (though I cant help but be cynical and just think that most people using computers these days maybe spend most of their time just downloading music and playing games? hehe.. I know I'm being oversimplistic, there are lots of people on deviantART who use computers to make art/writing etc). I wondered if I even had anything worth keeping, but I do have some old code, and I've got all the photos I ever took backed up (well apart from the ones I deleted on the cam).

      This generation has a lot more information stored on them than others really, but yes, what kind of 'past' is that?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Generation without a past by gitargr8 · · Score: 0
      A generation with no past is bad news.


      According to Orwell: "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

      So logically no past = no future... no wonder time travel is impossible...
    3. Re:Generation without a past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My take on file deletion: Imagine if you kept everything you have ever bought in your life and put it in the house/apartment/basement you live. Sure the memories are nice, but God forbid if you should ever find anything useful.

      A simple life is a good life.

    4. Re:Generation without a past by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Just because it's not documented, doesn't mean it didn't happen. I think not keeping a diary on paper or on the computer is the standard, instead of the exception, not just since the advent of computers. Some people are just more sentimental than most.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    5. Re:Generation without a past by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Human history has been disappearing for as long as it's been happening. The records of the past are always subject to the ravages of time. Carved rocks break or weather. Various forms of paper burn, blows away, rot.

      I honestly don't think our digital media is any more or less tenuous than the rest. In fact, we're probably recording vastly more data than we ever did before. We could stand to lose quite a bit higher percentage of recorded data now and still break even, I would guess. What's probably going to be a bigger problem, as pointed out by another poster, is how historians will dig through all the archived crap out there.

      (This reminds me of Vernor Vinge's take on this subject in A Fire Upon the Deep , where archives from various civilizations were scattered around the galaxy (at least outside the Slow Zone) with massive stores of data: history, knowledge bases, net postings, porn (my assumption), and other things.)

    6. Re:Generation without a past by v1 · · Score: 1

      Is there a slip of paper in your deposit box at the bank with websites, account names and passwords?

      Actually, yes there is. Well, it's not in a safe deposit box yet, but that's on my List of Things To Do. Currently it resides as a text file on my computer, in a place my relatives are informed about. It contains a lot of useful information that people just don't think about until they're dealing with the death of a friend or loved one.

      - Logins and passwords for well... everywhere that I have logins and passwords. Includes username, password, and url.
      - credit card numbers, expiration dates, and PIN numbers (useful for cancelling cards AD!)
      - list of "commonly used low security passwords" - the passwords I might use to sign up for a temp account to post a comment on a forum etc.
      - checking and savings account numbers, TIN and PIN numbers for my bank cards with customer service phone numbers

      With this list whoever gets to clean up after me will be able to go cancel out all those accounts or do whatever with them.

      As for the porn, well if they're any good at guessing 42 character passwords they can have at it, because that one's not written down anywhere.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    7. Re:Generation without a past by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

      My only problem to getting access to my past is getting hold of a working 5.25" diskette drive but all the floppies are accounted for and present.

      I seem to have misplaced the cassettes I had for the ZX-81 and Spectrum but I have the cassette player. Recently discovered that I have lost the ZX printer but I still have 5 rolls of paper for it.

      What is amazing is how the stuff on the 3.5" floppy disks are still quite readable.

      One of these days I'll get around to transferring them to DAT tape for longer term storage.

      --
      No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  9. Kind of.... by Itninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a good friend pass away a few years ago. I knew all his passwords and stuff, and have poked through his Hotmail account from time to time, just for the sentimental value.

    Interestingly, he still about 50-100 spam emails per day.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Kind of.... by TheRealBurKaZoiD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My best friend passed away almost seven years ago. A couple of months after the funeral I was surfing the web when suddenly his screen name on my AIM list lit up as if he had just signed on! Totally freaked me out, until I found out it was his wife checking his email. It would happen every so often until finally I had to remove the entry from my buddy list, and I even went so far as to block the screen name. I know she took his death really hard, but I found it to be exceptionally creepy. I think she paid his account for a few years after that, just to keep the screen name.

      IMHO, it's better to walk away from death than to wallow in it.

    2. Re:Kind of.... by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What, you didn't send the spammers remove notices? I sent them all remove notices to let them know I 'died' *wink* *wink* and now I don't get any spam at all.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Kind of.... by qray · · Score: 2, Funny

      I knew all his passwords and stuff

      So is this his slashdot account or yours? ;-)
      --
      Q

    4. Re:Kind of.... by bdleonard · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the answer is a clear, unequivocal "YES"

    5. Re:Kind of.... by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Funny
      Interestingly, he still about 50-100 spam emails per day.
      He still? He still what? He still sends 50-100 spams per day? That'd give new meaning to the term "zombie."
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  10. No way by OglinTatas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I even have my hard drive encrypted so if I should die suddenly, no one has to search through my porn. One's porn says a lot about a person, most of which should probably be left unsaid.

    1. Re:No way by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Meh, that's too much work to deal with when you're alive. As long as you can trust your loved ones to abide by your last wishes, put "format hard drive plz" in teh will.

    2. Re:No way by Crizp · · Score: 1

      In addition, who cares what happens to themselves after they're dead? Unless you believe you're up in heaven afterwards looking down to people, that is. You're dead. You don't care.

      "Oh no, my memory might be tainted!" You don't care. You're dead :)

    3. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even have my hard drive encrypted so if I should die suddenly, no one has to search through my porn. One's porn says a lot about a person, most of which should probably be left unsaid

      mine says: "that guy was into asian chicks....and golden showers"

      posting anonymous for a reason.

    4. Re:No way by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't save any porn which would likely create a bad image of me.

      Still have a couple gigs of it, though...I laugh, imagining my family exploring /home/shortcircuit/.../d . What an awesome, horrible prank.

    5. Re:No way by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      yes and no, we're genetically wired up to care about our "legacy" so the expectation of what will occur after your death can affect your life in the present, and as a consequence it's not unreasonable to take precautions about how such affairs will be handled so you can have peace now

      granted what actually happens doesn't matter, but it's a mistake to think that the expectations have no consequences because they do

    6. Re:No way by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      Ahh, if this were not the case, the world would be a better place. Millennium of repression wiped away.

      Won't happen overnight, yada yada yada.

    7. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like Oglin Tatas, I can imagine that people have a pretty good idea of what your about.

      Remember... *eye contact* when talking to the ladies.......

    8. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eye contact with what? :P

    9. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't bother.. Anymore.. Long ago I did encrypt few cds with some Linux loopback encryption/steganography software. Didn't even write the long passphrase in the clear anywhere.. One can only guess how that all turned out: Forgot the passphrase, and the software used is probably obsolete anyway.

      So, now I don't bother with encrypted writeonlies. With Windows 2000 I did try encrypted file directories for storage, but that turned out to be another mistake. The Windows installation bombed and restoring the encrypted files was a bit tricky..


      ...Of course, in the end saving anything for a long time is probably pointless. I probably won't dig up any of the old stuff in the future anyway. *Packrat?*

  11. Hmmm by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I imagine I would give all my music to my sister- but when I lent her a laptop a year or so ago, she guessed my password on the first try (It is actually a fairly strong 14 character password that would stand up to a dictionary attack), so I guess she could get whatever she wanted if I die :)
    My music is the only non software thing that I have paid for, file wise, on my computer.
    But truth is, I sincerily hope all my software is obsolete by the time I die!
    Anyone remember the case of the guy who died in Iraq, and his parents wanted his Yahoo password to see what was in there for sentimentality? I believe Yahoo ended up having to give the password to his parents...
    When I was deployed however, my wife and I sent some emails that I definately wouldn't want my parents seeing, so I think this guys p-word should have stayed private....

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:Hmmm by flynt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did she guess a 14 character strong password? Even if it was a word, the chances are extremely remote she'd guess on the first try. I bet there was a keylogger on your system, or some other means besides chance. Too unlikely.

    2. Re:Hmmm by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, after she divorces you all those hot emails make great court fodder.

    3. Re:Hmmm by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was the name of my grandparents house (they lived on the east coast and for some reason beach people out there name their houses, this one with an american indian name) and a number that she know I would use (no it wasnt 69)

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    4. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the definition of a weak password :-)

    5. Re:Hmmm by Gattman01 · · Score: 1

      I know my sister's passwords all contain "42".

    6. Re:Hmmm by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      That's a 14 character password, but it isn't "strong".

      Strong would be mixing upper/lowercase, using non-alphanumeric characters, etc.

      Something like H()uSEn@mE1123

    7. Re:Hmmm by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Did they involve the sex toys? ;)

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    8. Re:Hmmm by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      My password is so strong, I'll tell someone and then they'll forget it.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    9. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *My* password is so strong, I can smell it for days after I've typed it.

    10. Re:Hmmm by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      so you're an overweight 40-something with long greasy hair, beard, large overhang, you sit in a server room all day with no shoes on. Stop kidding yourself about it being the password that smells and go have a shower....

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    11. Re:Hmmm by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Do you think your parents don't know? or ahve never said that kind of stuff to each other?

      Of course they have. Have some confidence in others. Maybe that email would still ahve value to them?
      Besides, your dead, you won't care.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Hmmm by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Its the simple situation of "yes i know, but i dont KNOW!" My entire family would rather keep it that way. Ive written a note that would be found saying "Dont go reading my private correspondance" hmmm, I wonder what kind of dead man switch you could do. some virus that is used to kill their computer saying "I told you not to fucking read my stuff"

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    13. Re:Hmmm by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The House name had non alpha-numeric characters in it... that was why it was strong, and I capitalized the first letter...
      Not the strongest of passwords, but it was mainly to keep my college roommates at the time from using it.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    14. Re:Hmmm by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      You're kidding. That's the number to my luggage!

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    15. Re:Hmmm by Gattman01 · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Only an idiot would that as a code for their luggage!

      Mine's 12345....

    16. Re:Hmmm by Surt · · Score: 1

      It surely must have been a catchphrase she knew was his favorite. If he told her in advance it was 14 characters, and it was possible for her to guess, she might thereby have guessed it.

      ie, if she knows he runs around quoting dirty harry all the time, surely his 14 character password was:

      doyoufeellucky

      Though you might question whether or not this was really 'strong'.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    17. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Now I know your password, sucker!

      So... Who are you and where did you're grandparents live?

    18. Re:Hmmm by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Its the simple situation of "yes i know, but i dont KNOW!" My entire family would rather keep it that way"

      then they won't go reading through your emails.

      I have known parents of decseased friends, and in those cases, they would have rather found nasty emails, then never to have accessed the accounts.

      Just my observations.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Hmmm by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      But truth is, I sincerily hope all my software is obsolete by the time I die!
      Well, I can understand your reluctance to upgrade to Vista (or any later version of Windows), but you know, there are other operating systems out there.

      ;)

  12. I am screwed by iXiXi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am quite sure that mine would be quarantined due to virus or file corruption. A true eulogy to my life experience with MS products.

  13. In case of my death... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the case of my death, I have a document labeled as such in my data collection. There are some instructions and passwords. This file is encrypted with the key held by my lawyer.

    I also have plans of sending out a "dead man's switch" email.

    The worst things I have seen are the web pages of the recently departed. There are static pages out there that only the owners can change due to privacy and passwords.

    1. Re:In case of my death... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse is AOL. I have a friend that passed away about 18 months ago and they are still charging his mother for the account and won't cancel it because she is not the owner. She has sent a death certificate but AOL says that this is irrelevant...only the person who opened up the account may close it. If she stops payment they will send it to collection. She is still fighting them as of today.

    2. Re:In case of my death... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Worse is AOL. I have a friend that passed away about 18 months ago and they are still charging his mother for the account and won't cancel it because she is not the owner."

      I don't get it...if the grandmother is not the owner, then why are they charging HER for the account? Doesn't make sense.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:In case of my death... by Moqui · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I call bullshit. Having a relatively indepth knowledge of the escalation process at AOL, this would not happen. Perhaps one rep telling her that she wasn't the owner and thus, could not modify an account maybe, but if it got to the point of "sending in a death certificate", it would have moved well up the chain of customer service.

      Also, why would she be billed for this account? If he set it up, on his card, as the owner (which is the crux of your statement), what is she involved for? If it was her card, the account would be in her name, and your statement would also be invalid.

      If you are going to try to come up with something witty to rag on AOL about, at least make it credible.

    4. Re:In case of my death... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that there needs to be some sort of "virtual porn buddy" system, so that if you don't log into your system, or if you (or a friend) triggers it, it goes and wipes the smut off of your system, and maybe once done, relaxes the security settings somewhat so that it's easier for your relatives to go through your stuff.

      I'd definitely want my family to get my digital photos, written documents, etc., but I'm not really sure whether I want them going through my email archive if I get hit by a bus tomorrow. However, I keep it backed up because it's stuff I might want in the future (or that I wouldn't mind someone reading in 50 years, I just wouldn't want it to become public while it could still negatively impact other people).

      Maybe the solution is just to have your buddy program encrypt everything in some way that it can't be decrypted for 50-60 years. I'm not sure how you would do that, without involving some offshore server someplace that was set to email the key at a predetermined time down the road, though.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  14. wow by earthstar · · Score: 2, Funny
    A slashdot story linking to /. journal !

    What next,a story linking to a /. comment?

    1. Re:wow by SoCalDissident · · Score: 1

      Next is a /. story that links to Digg, which of course links to some sort of blog, which links back to the original /. story. One of my comp sci teachers once said something the effect of "You don't need to understand how it works to do recursive programming." Of course, I replied that I outta do great in the class then, cause I hadn't understood much up until that point. I ended up taking the class twice.

  15. I think this kind of thing is neglected... by kneeslasher · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...which is very unfortunate. In previous times, it was accepted that any papers one did not burn or destroy, one's children would inherit, thus receiving valuable information about their antecedents. These days, on the other hand, more and more of people's lives are being lived on the net: with very little to show for it.

    A while back this very issue surfaced where a US soldier was killed in Iraq. Yahoo refused his family access to his account and the clock started ticking for account deletion. I don't know what became of the problem, but it does highlight the difference between a locked safety deposit box which one receives when one's grandfather snuffs it and the current digital equivalent. I very much doubt the soldier would have minded his family reading over his final few letters if he was no longer around.

    I think there should be an "opt out" scheme whereby if one dies, by default, one's relatives can send in proof of the death and be granted access to accounts (email and otherwise). If one specifically decides otherwise the account could be deleted as per normal.

    Most users of the net are young and therefore haven't gotten around to this type of thinking.

    1. Re:I think this kind of thing is neglected... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think there should be an "opt out" scheme whereby if one dies, by default, one's relatives can send in proof of the death and be granted access to accounts (email and otherwise).

      Sounds nice, but that idea is utterly defenseless against fraud.

    2. Re:I think this kind of thing is neglected... by kneeslasher · · Score: 0

      Possibly a "next of kin" box at the time of signing up to the account?

    3. Re:I think this kind of thing is neglected... by witchgirl · · Score: 1

      The real problem with that "opt out" scheme would be to be able to identify the real owner of the accounts as far as email goes at least. Unless everyone uses their real name and information when setting up email accounts now?

  16. Longevity by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long do CDs last (industrial pressed/CDR/CDRW) before photovoltalic decay?

    1. Re:Longevity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDRWs last about 4 years. a HDD backup is still the way to go. .. and YES someone thought of it.. and more.. ME... just never did anything about it.

    2. Re:Longevity by Surt · · Score: 1

      I've seen estimates suggesting the average is around 20-25 years, and never seen anyone claim that they will last more than 35 years. CD-Rs are estimated much shorter, usually less than 15 years. If you have anything really important stored on such media, I would consider at least a migrating hard drive backup for it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Longevity by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      The Optical Storage Technology Association basically dodges the question, but they do drop this interesting tidbit: "The unrecorded shelf life of a CD-R or CD-RW disc is conservatively estimated to be between 5 and 10 years."

      That's a quote I've never heard from any manufacturer, and it really serves to give me pause. I think any archival life you hear from a manufacturer should be taken with a big grain of salt. If you're storing really important stuff on CD-R, I think it might be wise to both keep multiple copies (on different brands of discs) and re-copy them every few years onto fresh media.

      What I tend to do is to move backups onto newer, higher-capacity media as the technology evolves, while retaining the old copies. The first backups I made were onto floppies. Eventually I rolled them up onto Zip disks, and a few years later I burned those onto CD. Each time, new data got added to the old -- usually I just copied the old files to a folder on my hard drive, then backed up the hard drive -- so the size grows over time. Not that long ago, I put the CD-Rs onto DVD-Rs. I'm not sure which one will last longer, but I'm hedging my bets. Most recently, I installed a headless computer off-site, and keep my Documents folder (which includes all the old stuff) mirrored there.

      It seems excessive when you add it all up, but really I've just been moving along with technology over the past 15 years or so. The key thing is, I haven't thrown anything out. Somewhere, back in a closet, I've probably still got the floppy disks that I used for my first backups. It's tempting to throw the old media away, but you never know if the new format you just decided to use is going to be the next "clicking Zip" format of death.

      Interestingly, what this also means is that it's the oldest information that's the most likely to be recovered, since it's written down in the most places. I probably have 10 copies of old papers and stuff that I wrote on our first computer, on as many different types of media. Stuff that I created last week is saved (obviously) only on the newer backups.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Longevity by misfit815 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've experienced CD lifetimes of less than a year. I have a 6-disc changer in the trunk of my car. Of course, there's frequently a mix of purchased and burned CD's in it. When I've left a burned CD in too long, though, it begins to deteriorate, generally beginning with the first track. I would assume this is related to the environment it's in. It's a trunk of a car parked outside in Indiana, where local averages run from 17F lows in January to 85F highs in July. Tack on variable humidity and such, and it's obviously a very bad place for a CD. I would also assume that it's not the player, since purchased CD's never have this problem. Rather, the composition of the CD-R's must be more susceptible to the environmental conditions. In any case, I can detect wear on a CD-R after probably 1-2 months of being in the trunk.

      --
      Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
    5. Re:Longevity by Froboz23 · · Score: 1

      Something odd just occurred to me. Couldn't you CDR RAID an important archive? Similar to hardrive RAIDing, you could save the data bits across multiple CDRs, with an extra CDR for a checksum. Then, if any CDR failed, you could rebuild it from the others.

      Or you could just make 2 copies. But where's the fun in that? ;)

      CDR decay can be minimized by keeping the CDRs in an optimal storage environment. Some info about shelf life and optimal storage conditions can be found in the Wikipedia entry for CDRs. If you know if any other good links, please post them.

      Another good idea is to share archive space with your relatives. I plan on sharing vital data with my parents and brother, things like digital audio recordings of my now late grandfather. That way, if one harddrive fails, I can retrieve the data from my relatives.

      --
      Take off every Sig. For great justice.
    6. Re:Longevity by magetoo · · Score: 1
      Something odd just occurred to me. Couldn't you CDR RAID an important archive? Similar to hardrive RAIDing, you could save the data bits across multiple CDRs, with an extra CDR for a checksum. Then, if any CDR failed, you could rebuild it from the others.

      Or you could just make 2 copies. But where's the fun in that? ;)

      Exactly, there's no fun in that.

      I've thought about it myself, you could use something like parchive to make parity blocks and burn them to a "parity" CD/DVD. Shouldn't be too hard to script something together in Python... It won't be a direct analog to RAID, but who cares. And you wouldn't need to muck around with some big restore/untarring procedure, the original data will still be there as plain files.

      Ideally, you should probably automatically generate parity blocks/discs whenever you burn a CD/DVD. Something like, say, 10-15% overhead isn't going to hurt much, at least when you're cleaning out lots of stuff.

      Hmm. I should sit down and sketch out something to do this. I'm sure I'll get around to it some day. :-)

  17. The mind reels by ktappe · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Imagine all the different media formats that lawyers will now have to keep in their offices to read inherited data for their clients. If we'd started digital inheritances earlier, lawyers today would need 8" floppy drives, 5 1/4" floppy drives, Syquest drives, punch card readers, etc.

    I guess that's not so bad; we aging I.T. types can soon get jobs in legal offices maintaining their legacy equipment.

    -Kurt

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    1. Re:The mind reels by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      You can bet your booty that there is a lab of machines out there in a government lab somewhere that has every computer type and drive type known to man in order to read long lost disks recovered from stashes, coffins, lairs, or whathaveyou. Interesting to think about, especially since there essentially -must- be one somewhere. I'd love to see it.

    2. Re:The mind reels by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      err that was redundant. scratch one of the 'lab's...

    3. Re:The mind reels by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I work in a lab that is in a lab.
      The common area requires badge authentication to enter, while the two restricted areas require further authentication.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:The mind reels by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      From the legal offices I've seen, the real problem is buying them current equipment. They sure like their DOS machines and WordPerfect at the local legal office.

    5. Re:The mind reels by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suspect that the Government just outsources it to these guys, or somebody like them. The company I was referring to (eMag) was also the very last manufacturer of 9-track, open reel data tape systems. So they've got the gear there if you ever want to recover data from your old 3420 tapes, they're probably the go-to people.

      I do think it would be a neat idea, though, if we had something like the Library of Congress for computing. Or at least data storage. Manufacturers, send in two units of your storage device, and one set of associated signal-processing equipment which produces a standard output. Keep them in some big warehouse somewhere. Maintainance would be a bit of a problem, I suppose (I'm thinking of some old open-reel decks I've seen where the rubber parts have slowly "melted" into puddles in the bottom of the cases). Oh, well -- you have to admit that would be a cool facility to visit, though.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  18. The NY Times actually had a story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In either 2004 or 2005, The New York Times had a story on this topic. It focused on people who had inherited password-protected computers (but not the passwords) and their frustration at the fact thay may never know what treasure (or trash) lay within.
    That story prompted my wife and I to write down all of our user names and passwords and store them in our safe.

    1. Re:The NY Times actually had a story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend Keepass (from sourceforge) and write your passwords (and usernames, urls etc etc) in that. Then you only need to put a single password (and/or usb keydrive with a key) in your safe.

    2. Re:The NY Times actually had a story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone with physical access to your computer has access to any and all unencrypted data. It doesn't matter if there is a password on the accounts on the machine. It doesn't matter if there is a BIOS password. All those can be reset.

      Also, many supposedly password protected documents (word, excel, zip, etc...) can be easily cracked. If you don't know how, you can easily buy software that will crack it.

  19. Subpoena by Krach42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather not leave my account names and passwords in a safe deposit box that could be subpoenad if the feds ever had a reason to.

    Considering that they can subpoena your diary, and use it against you in a court of law, the only place safe to keep your passwords is in your head. And then, what with keyloggers, it's only safe if you don't use it also.

    --

    I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    1. Re:Subpoena by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      On screen keyboard with random window location, use your mouse.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Subpoena by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      On screen keyboard with random window location, use your mouse.

      Yes, but this falls prey to the very same over-the-shoulder attack that is why we print * in some password fields, and in the most secure password fields, nothing at all (since then they can't even learn the length.)

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    3. Re:Subpoena by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you trade off optical security (shoulder surfing) for mechanical security (keylogger).
      At home or at my office I am unconcerned with shoulder surfing as by my workspace layout no-one can be behind me without my knowledge. I am, however concerned with keyloggers.
      In the case of a public computer I am concerned with everything, and consequently do not authenticate to anything at all.
      I run a server with a CGI app that allows me to paste URLs, blobs of text, or upload files. It will download the URL, store the text, etc. so that's how I take notes when at the uni library (or anywhere else for that matter).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Subpoena by sinucus · · Score: 1

      If you are an american citizen that is not a secure method. The gov. has the right to request all keys/passwords if a judge has so ordered. You must pass over the key/password or face jail time. The only way to hide information from the gov. is to make sure they don't know it even exists. I ran across this website a while ago and it's just what I'm talking about. http://www.truecrypt.org/

    5. Re:Subpoena by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but malware has been found in the wild that will screen capture, say, a 100x100 pixel area around your mouse cursor every time you click. As soon as a technique becomes widespread enough, it starts an arms race.

    6. Re:Subpoena by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      The gov. has the right to request all keys/passwords if a judge has so ordered.

      I suppose if they have a warrant I'll have to comply, same as if they had a warrant to search my computer, as long as they follow due process of law.

      But if they only had a warrant to search my safe deposit box, and then they find all my keys/passwords in there, then they have probable cause to go get a warrant to search those. Keeping them to myself and in my mind is probably the best way to keep the existence of something hidden.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
  20. Website by donutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Is there a slip of paper in your deposit box at the bank with websites, account names and passwords?"

    What about a bit of money invested with instructions specifying that that money is to be used to continue payments for web hosting/domain registration for any website(s) that you have now and want to continue on after you're gone? This is something that I've considered, but to date, haven't acted on.

    If you have a blog, maybe it'd be worth considering a plan to have it export it to static HTML and just having that hosted at Geocities/GooglePages, unless you plan on posting from beyond the grave. :)

    1. Re:Website by gronofer · · Score: 1
      Keeping websites going after your death is going to be difficult. I doubt whether my own relatives would be up to the task. A website is not like a book, which once printed is preserved for years.

      For a website perhaps what is needed is to join a collective dedicated to preserving the sites of its deceased members.

    2. Re:Website by Pojodojo · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe you can purchase a domain for 100 year now, for a modest sum of around $1000 US.

      I am not sure about hosting, but if you got that covered, you could definatly spread your word from beyond the grave.

      --
      arrrg, (like a pirate)
    3. Re:Website by Surt · · Score: 1

      unless you plan on posting from beyond the grave. :)

      And therein lies the fun of the computers I set up to begin posting automatically in the event that I die. I figure that should result in some real freakouts, until somebody tracks them down physically.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  21. Slashdotted by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Dammit, the story's slashdotted! Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Slashdotted by earthstar · · Score: 1
      Good thought !

      Wonder , if all stories on /. on a day , linked to articles/journal within /. ,wouldnt Slashdot experience the SD Effect !!

    2. Re:Slashdotted by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      heh, no you can't slashdot slashdot.

      For one thing, when a site gets slashdotted, every single hit got served up by slashdot first. There isn't any magical multiplier that makes a slashdot page equal ten story hits, although if you click refresh madly you can imitate this.

      Also, you can't slashdot say google. Anything bigger than slashdot's servers will simply see an increase in traffic, and handle it.

      The problem comes up when a small server on a small pipe which is used to hundreds of hits per hour starts getting thousands per second.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    3. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're totally wrong.

      Regarding slashdot - certainly come pages may be cached more aggressively than others. It's not unreasonable for the home page to be pre-generated and served directly from memory without every hitting the disk; while someone's journal may need a dozen sql queries to create it.

      And regardng Google, certaily some Google features (google's voice search under google research) would clerly not survive a slashdotting; since they have limited resources (in this case, computers with voice-phone-line-connectors) assigned to them.

    4. Re:Slashdotted by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's main page is cached. Pages with comments (such as this page, and journal pages) aren't.

      Many people who read Slashdot do so only for the articles, not the comments. Many don't bother visiting a comment-enabled page. However, in this case, everyone who clicks on that article is going to a non-static, non-cached page.

      Slashdot is definitely seeing a higher load than usual, today. I imagine their IT staff are using it as a stress-test.

  22. Googled after you die... by hhr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a public blog that I've been keeping since 2000. I don't hype it or advertise it. I do post to it regularly. It's full of good memories. Sometimes it's usefull for answering questions like "What hotel did I stay at when I was on vacation last year?"

    After six years, it has a lot of content. Content that I don't want to go away just because I die and fail to sign onto my account. I plan on including the account name and password in my will, so that my decendants can maintain the account.

    It makes me smile to think that people may be able to google my life's blog after I die. I'm sure that 90% of those people will roll their eyes and think "Ughh. Not another stale blog." But still...

    1. Re:Googled after you die... by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      I like that idea too.

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re:Googled after you die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm sure that 90% of those people will roll their eyes and think "Ughh. Not another stale blog." But still...

      More like 99.999999999%

    3. Re:Googled after you die... by Jaiden · · Score: 1

      This just in.... hhr still dead.

      --
      this sig has been rated E for Everyone.
  23. Somehwere in the distant future... by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...one child will receive the coveted "Floppy Disk of Power", unlocking all my secrets... sadly, the floppy will have been stored with my refrigerator magnet collection...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Somehwere in the distant future... by glass_window · · Score: 1

      And when they pull it out, they'll be confused what it is. All they'll know it as is that "save" icon in Windows.

      Tragically, there will be no way to use it without learning to build a floppy drive from scratch that somehow can connect to their data matrix, but even the thought of an "external storage device" will elude them.

    2. Re:Somehwere in the distant future... by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      Anyone worthy of carrying the FDoP simply must have the knowledge and skills to perform a low-level disk analysis and recovery.

      It's part of the mystique, you see.

    3. Re:Somehwere in the distant future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but I'm sure they'd much rather receive the HARD Disk of Power.

  24. Family domain name by sundiver90 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am interested in good answers to this as well. Before yahoo, gmail, etc. I was moving jobs and decided on getting a family domain name so I could keep the same email address. Now that domain hosts email for most of my family. I'd like to put the domain name in my will along with instructions to transfer it since I'm the point of contact.

  25. Ah yes, a truly magical moment by moochfish · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Son... I want you to have my porn when I'm gone."

    1. Re:Ah yes, a truly magical moment by sarge+apone · · Score: 0

      "I may not be around when you become a man, but I leave my desktop Virtual Jenna to guide your way."

    2. Re:Ah yes, a truly magical moment by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      ...and to my loving wife, I leave my spam.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Ah yes, a truly magical moment by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      Alas, a completely hypothetical moment too... your typical slashdotter passing on his pr0n collection to future generations? Come on...

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  26. Digital testament by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I have a small paper with instructions for my family to say goodbye to my online friends and post about my death, just in case.

    Regarding online goods, I have none, save a few anime fanfics i've written, but those are online for everyone to see.

    But I doubt game accounts would matter. Games get obsolete pretty quick, and the current state of information is awful. The best I can pass to the next generations is work contributed to open source projects - it's like investing for the future generations.

    1. Re:Digital testament by aldragon · · Score: 1

      A small paper? Why not a script to automatically contact online aquaitances via irc, jabber, e-mail, or whatever you usually contact them with :)
      Then have a small paper on how to activate that. Much more user friendly ;)

    2. Re:Digital testament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the service I use for that.

  27. A good idea to plan for... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    If you have lots of important information (pictures, music, diaries, archives, etc) on an external site, **do not assume in any way** your loved ones will be able to get access to them when you pass on. Most all sites * do not* have a policy around this, and will probably end up flat out refusing you, or just deleting the info.

    If you are the kind of person who stores los of stuff externally, the best thing you could do is keep a hard copy of everything to pass down. If this is not possible, keep a hard copy of the passwords for the sites and entrust it to your attorney or simmilar.

    It would be nice if there could be some legislation put into place surrounding this - if a company is presented with a valid death certificate, the estate should have access to all that person's data. However, this is not the case now. and the government is too busy worrying about HDTV DRM to bother with trivial matters like this.

    1. Re:A good idea to plan for... by Crizp · · Score: 1
      It would be nice if there could be some legislation put into place surrounding this - if a company is presented with a valid death certificate, the estate should have access to all that person's data.

      I like the notion of having your privacy even in death. That some things should not necessarily be known by others unless the person wants it. "Alas, poor Crizp, I don't know him all that well."

  28. Horsefeathers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US Gvmnt only taxes estates over 2 million dollars of everything that doesn't go to spouse.
    There are many ways to reduce your estate below 2 million dollars.

    In practice, nobody will even provide an accouting for Grandad's yahoo email account. If they did; they'd value at near zero dollars.

    If Grandad's website is actually worth something and his estate to his children is in excess of 2 mill, oh well. Why are bits and bytes different than any other asset in this case?

    You (Mr. Insightful) worry about strange stuff.

  29. Where's My Estate? I'm not tellin' by prozach99 · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what this is for? http://www.wheresmyestate.com/ Anyway, when I'm dead what do I care if people have trouble accessing my digtial assets? Actually I think that making it a challeng is more fun, almost like a scavenger hunt for the kids.

    --
    The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them. - Albert Ein
  30. What about inheriting DRM'd files? by snowwrestler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not likely to live to see copyright expire on the iTMS songs in my iTunes library, but my kids might. Yet no DRM system I'm aware of makes allowance for passage into public domain.

    Copyright must be limited; apparently it can be a hell of a long limit, but Constitutionally it must be limited in the U.S. And everyone knows that digital files don't age--as long as you keep them on fresh media they will sound just as good (if not better) 300 years from now. Yet there are no limits placed into DRM systems, nor sunset provisions to remove the DRM when the copyright expires.

    This seems to me to be a system that actually prevents compliance with a Constitutional mandate. Why hasn't this been an avenue of legal challenge to DRM yet?

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by mpontes · · Score: 1

      Because if you could unprotect DRM'd files just by setting your PC clock to 2100, DRM would be pretty pointless, wouldn't it?

      --
      Bored? Browse Slashdot with a +6 modifier for Troll comme
    2. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Surt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because DRM has nothing to do with copyright. Imagine the corresponding technology with books: they might put a glaze on every sheet of paper to make it impossible to photocopy. Just because the work passes into public domain doesn't mean they have to go out and deglaze every book, it just means it becomes legal for you to copy the book if you want to and can. The can being the interesting part of the equation. If it should still prove to be impossible to copy the book ... well then I suppose the company that can reproduce the book will continue to do so at a profit. And that's the beauty of DRM: it will allow companies to continue to profit from their works even long after copyright has expired.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Mike_K · · Score: 1

      This seems to me to be a system that actually prevents compliance with a Constitutional mandate. Why hasn't this been an avenue of legal challenge to DRM yet?

      Because this hasn't happened yet, and courts don't like to deal with "just in case" issues. Not to mention the Supreme Court ruling that seemingly perpetual extensions to the copyright term are Constitutional. I have a huge problem with this one as well - people who paid to use the media covered by copyrights are essentially entering a contract: I'll pay you for this now, but you'll make it freely available to me in X years. Congress is breaking this contract with their extensions.

      I am actually looking forward to the day when a very old tune is sold on iTunes or the like, and the copyright for it expires. I've read the DMCA, and I think it only covers works which are covered by the copyright. Would the courts accept the argument that the DRM for this work should be broken and shared in the open because it's not covered by copyright anymore, or would they accept that since the files aren't covered by copyright, the DRM that protects them should be openly broken?

      m

    4. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not likely to live to see copyright expire on the iTMS songs in my iTunes library, but my kids might. Yet no DRM system I'm aware of makes allowance for passage into public domain.

      That's right, because the purveyors of DRMed material are not going to allow any of that material to enter the public domain. Endless copyright extensions is the name of the game. Don't think that it's some kind of oversight on their part -- remember that if the content's copyright expires, then it would no longer be a DMCA violation to break the DRM. It's all part of a two-prong legal and technical approach to ensuring that nobody is ever able to avoid paying over, and over, and over...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is this - it wouldn't be illegal to figure out a way to copy it through the glaze. It IS illegal to break DRM.

      And allowing companies to control their work after copyright expired is a PROBLEM, not a good thing. Copyright could have just been made forever in the beginning if that was a good idea - the point is that people CAN'T control everything forever - they have to keep creating.

    6. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by funkatron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet there are no limits placed into DRM systems, nor sunset provisions to remove the DRM when the copyright expires.

      I think you'll find that most DRM systems have provisions for removing the DRM, theyre just not provided by the same people that made the DRM to begin with.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    7. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Surt · · Score: 1

      I was speaking from the corporate point of view of course. And the long term plan is obviously to drop copyright entirely, and rely on unbreakable DRM to protect their interests forever. They won't even need DRM cracking to be illegal in any way, it will simply be impossible, so unless we write laws to protect ourselves from this outcome, media companies will have nothing to worry about.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that most DRM systems have provisions for removing the DRM, theyre just not provided by the same people that made the DRM to begin with.

            That's possibly the funniest thing I have read all day, hehe.

            Subscribe to 31337 DRM Solutions today!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by legirons · · Score: 1

      "And that's the beauty of DRM: it will allow companies to continue to profit from their works even long after copyright has expired."

      Which is why, since DRM publishers don't uphold the "public domain" end of the copyright bargain, neither should their readers uphold their "monopoly on copying" which was once used as payment for publishers' contributions to the public domain.

      They want to play hardball? Fine. Make anything with DRM legal to copy the moment it's released - let publishers rely on encryption rather than law if that's what they want.

    10. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Surt · · Score: 1

      But, legally speaking, they're fully upholding the contract: it becomes legal to start copying as soon as the copyright expires. It just turns out not to be physically possible.

      And yes, your strategy would suck for them, in the short run. But in the long run, DRM will be totally secure, and we'll be screwed.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Consider this: If something takes over 20 or 30 years to come into public domain, isn't there a high probability that we'll have computers sufficiently advanced to break past types of encryptions? Technology will allow the DRM to be circumvented long before the copyright expires....I hope.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    12. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      considering nowadays most "secure" systems don't last a full year i'm not too worried.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    13. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by rk · · Score: 1

      Short of Sony and them putting an armed robot guard to follow every one us around to make sure we don't violate their restrictions, I don't see how any DRM scheme can be totally secure.

      Of course, this puts a somewhat alarming spin on why Japanese technology companies seem to be obsessed with robotics...

    14. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by Surt · · Score: 1

      The security comes when it is no longer legal to buy non drm enforcing hardware, and all the old drm violating hardware breaks down. Note that this will likely take at least 50 more years, if not more. But once that happens, envision the world:

      You want to play your drm media. the license is used to decode the stream just in time at your drm speakers/headphones. No where do you get access to the unencrypted digital stream. The speakers that do the translating are even hardened to prevent any sort of soldering strategy.

      So now there's no way to intercept the digital stream, what about re-recording the analog output of your speakers? Unfortunately, you can't do that either, because watermarking noise (inaudible to humans) will prevent any legal recording device from recording this analog output. Even worse, should you manage to somehow circumvent this protection with an illegal recording device, you're still screwed because the watermark uniquely identifies that it was your copy that was illegally re-recorded, and by this time the legal atmosphere holds you responsible if your copy of a work is illegally re-recorded.

      That's your (scary IMO) DRM future, where breaking DRM has approximated the level of literal impossibility.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    15. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "This seems to me to be a system that actually prevents compliance with a Constitutional mandate"

      The mandate doesn't say that every copy ever released while under copyright has to be accessable without restrictions after the copyright expires.

    16. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by ManOfMidnight · · Score: 1

      The mandate doesn't say that every copy ever released while under copyright has to be accessable without restrictions after the copyright expires.

      Exactly. When the copyright expires, you'll be able to purchase a non-DRM'd copy of the file for $.99 at the iTMS. I dunno about you, but that's not good enough for me!

      --
      A proud provider of services through the Microsoft Reboot Engineer Certification since 1997!
    17. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by AoT · · Score: 1

      I'm not so with you on the grim outlook for the future. I mean, even if they legally mandate DRM machines in western countries other places will still build open computers. And if not, we'll have some hardware hackers that'll do it. All it takes is for one person to break it, then it's wide open.

    18. Re:What about inheriting DRM'd files? by cortana · · Score: 1

      The places that refuse to cave in to the demands of our govern^Wcorporations will have sanctions and tariffs imposed upon them. If they want access to our markets, they must comply with our requirements.

  31. Porn, stupid! by chris_eineke · · Score: 0, Redundant
    passing on accounts and digitally stored information
    I want my son to inherit my porn collection. Softcore, hardcore, hent..

    well, uhh, maybe that's a bad idea after all.
    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  32. I already passed it on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No need. Since I subscribe to the free information philosophy just about anything of value I create passes
    into the public data pool as a matter of course, whether it's words I write, code I hack, music I make, or photos I take. Data is so ephemeral anyway, and the world is so fickle to it's value. As a matter of historical record
    some seemingly trivial rubbish becomes very interesting, while once treasured gigabytes of data becomes worthless
    within months or days. I hope the internet archive machines will keep alive some interesting ideas and bits of art and code I create or collect, if it has value, but beyond that I don't care. I hope my grandchildren will be too busy
    living their own lives to care about going through mine.

    Everything else I dont want to go that way, personal private data, gets to meet shred -u -f and dd if=/dev/urandom of=byebyefile. My right to NOT have that data picked through by vultures is far more significant than my need to pass things on. Inheritance is tried up with 20th century notions of 'ownership'. That's so yesterday! ;)

  33. you're planning on dying? by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Why not just put some money in a savings account with instructions for it to be used to resurrect your corporeal body when the principal is sufficient?

    Personally, I left a note in an infrequently used book at the library asking that any good samaritan time traveller rescue me.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  34. This is a real issue in the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo has denied the family of a dead soldier access to his yahoo email account. I'm not taking sides on this, but it is a real issue. http://news.com.com/Yahoo+denies+family+access+to+ dead+marines+e-mail/2100-1038_3-5500057.html

    1. Re:This is a real issue in the news by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Been there, actually. I ran an ISP with 30K+ customers, and the inevitable happened several times. One time a subscriber wound up murdered after wanting to become a police informer for drug deals. The cops called wanting access to the email account for leads. Another time a subscriber died I don't know how and the family wanted access to the email account so they could "inform his email correspondents." I got the impression it might have been a case of suicide. It wasn't any of my business to ask. They had no power of attorney in the second case, and no subpoena in the first case. And this was well before probate when you could make the case someone "inherited" the account. (So do who pays for the account for the year of probate? Am I required to keep it open just because they can't settle the estate? Yet our privacy policy CLEARLY stated e-mail was a privacy issue and nobody but the subscriber could gain access to the account.

      So here people are yelling "PRIVACY is my RIGHT!!" out of one side of their mouth, then this happens and they say, "Well, no, we REALLY didn't mean it this time." out of the other side.

      So, hypothetically, what if your dead person had a bunch of incriminating stuff stashed in email? How bout 'child porn,' for example, or details of a sordid affair. Do your rights stop because you're dead? (Well, they can't prosecute you at least, but maybe your estate.)

      This issue is a little trickier that it may seem at first glance. Rock and a hard place if you ask me. It was probably the worst kind of policy issue I had to deal with. Thank goodness that ISP is gone now and I don't have to deal with it.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    2. Re:This is a real issue in the news by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Do your rights stop because you're dead?"
      yes.

      "Yet our privacy policy CLEARLY stated e-mail was a privacy issue and nobody but the subscriber could gain access to the account."

      thats great, if the people wanting that information had that agreement with you. And if the dead guy complains, well, we got bigger problems on our hands!

      However, needing a sunbenea, or power of attorney is a good policy. OTOH, I used to pick up my grandfathers mail after he passed on, and All I needed was a death cert.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by DG · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, is discovering that dear ol' Uncle DG had a 3-digit UID anything like finding a box of old IBM stock or something?

    Do famous UID's appreciate?

    Will CleverNickName's progeny inherit a ton of /. fans?

    How manu UIDs have shuffled off this moral coil? Should there be a virtual graveyeard for the UIDs of the deceased?

    Is there historical value to the early musings of UID so-and-so, who went on to become the first Supreme Hegemon of the Terran Aliance?

    Will far-future biologists marvel at the distended rectums of the typical 21st century human?

    Will far-future anthropologists wonder at the pantheon that included Commander Taco, CoyboyNeil, and Natalie Portman? Will they re-enact the sacred ritual of pouring hot grits into one's shorts?

    The mind boggles; truly.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by Cromac · · Score: 2, Funny
      So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID?

      Put it on Ebay and find out, stranger thangs than that have sold for absurd amounts, why not a low /. UID?

    2. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      So, is discovering that dear ol' Uncle DG had a 3-digit UID anything like finding a box of old IBM stock or something?

      It all comes back to your Karma. If you have good Karma, you pass it on. If you have bad Karma, they may not want to associate with it at all.
      P.S. nice UID.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a buck for your UID...
      No?
      then I'll give you $100 for it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Now I understand why it's not a good idea to be able to change nicks here... :)

    5. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      Put it on Ebay and find out

      I think this has already happened, with somebody in the low hundred's trying to sell their account based on how high their karma was... So the boys decided to screw with him and wrote a mod that varied his karma randomly each time somebody clicked his user page. Hilarity, apparently, ensued. I googled for a link to the stroy, but didn't find it... Sombebody else who is feeling nostalgic might post a link in reply to this if you're really lucky...
      --
      Who did what now?
    6. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The user I remember doing that was Fascdot Killed My Pr, who signed up not long before I did (his UID is 5 digits, not 3). There's a blurb about the auction here, but Fascdot hasn't posted in years, so whoever bought the account (if anyone) never did anything with it.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:So what's the value of a 3-digit /. UID? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I say, if you can't have a short user ID, then you should at least have a short user name.

      (were one character nicks ever allowed?)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  36. more important than some would think... by Churla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At the moment my wife knows that for any given site I have an account on there's a list of probably account names and a list of probable passwords. A few she remembers the combinations for. These are mostly financial in the case something unforeseen should happen to me (Like the other Illuminati realizing I talk about them on websites).

    More and more I see the reality that family websites, and other hosting/presences become heirlooms after time. My in-laws already like that my wife and I put some photos up on a website for them to be able to get to, I can see that expanding. Eventually the family website might be the magical thing that is passed down from matriarch to matriarch within a family the way the photo albums are now. Someday my son or daughter may be maintaining the old site and see blogs I posted and get all misty eyed like I do about the stopwatch my grandfather left to me.

    Now my porn? Well that I will be encrypting.. for all the reasons mentioned above.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  37. eep by Bizzeh · · Score: 2, Funny

    they would probably arrest my kids, and my kids kids, and my kids kids kids for the mounds of illegal software i have :)

  38. porn! by F�an�ro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    During the funeral:
    "And now, as expressed in his will, all the porn on Dale's computer will be shown to the mourners."

    Now that's a way to go!
    If I ever work up the guts I might put something like this in the will.

    got the idea from this comic
    (which I hereby shamelessly plug, because they deserve to be slashdotted)

    1. Re:porn! by BenjiTheGreat98 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A friend and I have an arrangement: If one of us dies the other one has to break into their house and steal all the porn before parents/grandparents find it while going through the belongings.

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:porn! by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      Better give each others affidavits stating something like
      "I hereby give XY permission to break&enter my home in the case of my death"

      Or, just wire your porn stash up to blow :)

    3. Re:porn! by eander315 · · Score: 1

      At one second per picture, my funeral would be approximately 3 days long. Even I couldn't sit through that, and it's my porn!

  39. Yes, there is. by a9db0 · · Score: 1

    Sort of.

    We just went through this when we updated wills. We made sure to make a list of each others web accounts and access credentials. That way if anything happens to either or both of us our survivors won't have issues around access to financial accounts, utilities, subscriptions, etc.

    Now I need to figure out who to leave my Slashdot account to.

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
    1. Re:Yes, there is. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Now I need to figure out who to leave my Slashdot account to.

      Your youngest. What Slashdot needs right now is a 5-year-old with a 5-digit Slashdot UID.

      I'm the youngest I know about...a 22-year-old with a 5-digit UID. I wish I could find out when exactly I created the account...

  40. Creepy, stale pages of the dead by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Did you ever visit the webpage of a person you know is dead? It's kinda creepy.

    You know that those keystrokes left behind were written by him. His creation. And the person who wrote this is no more. No more content added. Never again.

    Sure, it would be a hell lot more creepy if there WAS content added some time after he died, but still...

    But somehow I wouldn't want my blog, my page, my accounts simply vanish without a trace. Or go stale and idle forever. I'd like to see them continued, if only for a last statement by a friend to tell the people who actually express interest in my inane rambling why it suddenly came to a halt. Nothing blows more than writing a comment on a page, only to find out a week or two later that the one it was intended for will never read it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Creepy, stale pages of the dead by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 1

      This is why I've been trying to convince my friends to start contributing to my website's Wordpress install. I have this fear of dying early, and I don't want my coveted website to drop from 3 viewers a month to 0.

      You do run into the trouble of upkeep, though; who's going to pay for the hosting, or the domain name renewal? If the price escalates, would it be a burden on the heir? Would they feel it's a disservice to my memory to simply run it as a local server?

  41. Probably not to my family by celardore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I were to leave any of my 'online property' to anybody, it would most likely be one of my friends. Mum & Dad wouldn't know what to do with my stuff. My friends might like to poke through my various php, and other, projects I've done over the years.

    I own a couple of domains, one is celardore based, and the other is my IRL name. It would be cool to leave some money behind - say enough for domain registration of my IRL name for 100 years, and then have the URL on my tombstone. After it runs out? I won't care.

    1. Re:Probably not to my family by Surt · · Score: 1

      But if I understand you correctly, you will care for the first hundred years after you die?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Probably not to my family by celardore · · Score: 1

      I'll have paid for it. So at least someone better be caring on my behalf!

  42. Reminds me of vanity Ham callsigns by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    This kind of reminds me of ham radio callsigns.

    At least here in the US, the "choice" vanity callsigns are the ones that are either short, or use Morse Code letters that are particularly easy to type (sort of the Morse equivalent of having a mnemonic phone number), or both. It's not uncommon for people to hang on to callsigns like that until they die, and then they go back out into the system and are available for re-use after two years. I don't know how common it is for them to get passed down from one generation to the next, but they do get reused by other Hams.

    It's pretty easy, if you have a good vanity call, to figure out who's held the sign before you, and who among them are SK ("silent key" = dead). I've even heard of people getting notes from friends of previous owners of their calls.

    I always thought it was neat. If they keep this up for a while, it won't be long before all the short callsigns have several generations of history attached to them.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  43. Go ahead, punch me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with digital inheritance is that digital media isn't very durable...

    That's why I'm going convert my hard drive to punch cards before I die.

    1. Re:Go ahead, punch me by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm responding to a joke by an AC, but there's a good point here.

      I compose and record music. I struggle with certain kinds of DRM and copy protection, because I would seriously like to be able to put my tools and my work in a time capsule and have it be usable to future generations.

      I understand that digital media can be volatile. Plastics evaporate. Magnetic bits realign. Etc. I can handle that, because that makes *me* responsible for the media.

      What I *cannot* handle, is any form of crypto that "protects" my work, or "protects" the software needed to reproduce my work. If it's tied to a certain piece of hardware, if it needs to call home, or if it prevents me from making a copy, it is completely unacceptable to me. I take it as far as considering it to be an abridgement of my own rights if the tools and media are not open to me, particularly if they are closed through hard crypto.

      I started a Masters Thesis on the work of Bach (I'm a Music Theory major). One thing that fascinated me was the amount of detailed understanding that we can derive from Bach's manuscripts, both the ones he created himself and those that were copywritten. For example we're able to deduce whether Bach had a particular composition complete in his head before he sat down to compose, or whether he sketched out a framework and filled it in over a period of time. We have a pretty good sample, and he had different processes for different kinds of musical ideas. It's even possible to make deductions based on the way he started drawing the staves. Open to debate, to say the least, but regardless of where you stand on the controversy, it is very fascinating to have some visualization into the thought processes of a composer, particularly, Bach.

      It's unlikely and ironic that anyone 500 years from now will be able to look with the same level of detail at the writing processes of our contemporaries. It's not even clear that our media will *last* that long, even most contemporary paper and ink self-destructs. When you add DRM to the equation, you introduce yet another risk: That mathematics will not happen to have advanced to a point where current cryptosystems are rendered ineffective. Imagine a future archaeologist needing to break a 1024 bit public key system... I'm not the sort of optimist that believes future generations will know how to do such things in their head by third grade...

      rant off.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Go ahead, punch me by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Imagine a future archaeologist needing to break a 1024 bit public key system...

            Staggering, but only in today's context. Who knows what the future will bring? Just like the ENIGMA messages were cracked in a few days despite complete failure back in the '40's. Perhaps tomorrow's technology will make it trivial to circumvent our current encryption methods.

            Then again maybe not - I basically agree with your argument. Constant copying is the only way to ensure the survival of information - hey it worked for DNA for billions of years...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Go ahead, punch me by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

      You raise an interesting point.

      I'll add one thing to your mind though, hopefully.

      The Dark Ages are called that partially because a lot of knowledge was lost. We simply do not know and may never know what happened at certain points in history.

      The key I think to information safety is to have curators who keep it alive.

      A good example might be wikipedia, where people are actively collecting and preserving information.

      A bad example might be a time capsule, because it goes dormant for a while and then when it is finally opened there is a large chance that parts of it will be damaged or that perception of the information contained will have changed. This includes digital works that are no longer decipherable (like punch cards would be to most folks, or printouts of programs in "dead" languages (insert your own examples here))

      So for information to survive we must have active libraries of information. If it goes dormant it risks being lost for all time.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    4. Re:Go ahead, punch me by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      Just wait until someone finds a way to predict prime numbers, then pretty much all encryption could be cracked without effort...

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
  44. I'd like to... by AsherMaximum · · Score: 0

    I will certainly leave my digital pictures. I would say software, but that would be obsolete by then. I would like to think I'll have a little AsherMaximum jr. to give my gmail account to, but who know if he'd even want it. Of course if a got a family name domain (right now i just have AsherMaximum.com, later i migh get a .name with my last name), i would pass that on. There isn't really that many peopl who are old enough to be thinking about a will (we'll, lots are old ebough, but most aren't!), not many people who die and have this kind of stuff have a will. As this generation ages, i bet we'll see more of digital inheritance.

  45. OGame and passing accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OGame is top Multi Massive Online Game (strategic galaxy conquest). There are over 2 million players (very popular in europe).

    Top accounts on servers never die, they get passed around.

    Generally what happends is when good players lose their fleet they give up on the game, but pass the torch, the account, to someone else.

    My roommate had account on one server, but once he got employed he could not dedicate the amount of time required to keep the account within top50. So he passed it to some good player that lost his fleet (I guess since the other guy lost his fleet he might not have been that good).

    My brother is now playing on two accounts, his own, and one he inherited (its ok, the two accounts are on different servers). He didnt want to play the inherited account, but was mercilessly attacked (I guess some other players wanted to put vengance on the account). So my bro did the only thing he could, work hard on the inherited account and beat anyone who tried to attack him. The inherited account is now top 1000 and was outside of statistics.

  46. Google AdSense Money by p0 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what policies they have... Many people are earning a good amount of $$ with AdSense and they would definitely want to pass it on if they can.

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  47. A conundrum indeed by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 1

    I was once asked for help in acquiring passwords from somebody who recently died. The person ran a website and message board for victims of parental abuse and they tried to help others come to terms and move on. The deceased had two sets of parents and was on poor terms with all of them. Nobody knew much about the parents and given the site, that was kind of understood that you don't want to bring that out. The friend wanted to maintain the site after the death but didn't get any of the access information. The host refused to hand it over.

    This site had email hosting as well, and the deceased admin referred to it as a backup on the hotmail account. So I suggested they try to reset the password. If they knew enough about the admin, they should be able to handle the secret question.

    It asked for the father's middle name.

    --
    No I'm not trolling.
  48. No worries, really. by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 1

    Really, it isn't very likely that our generation will show up as big black hole i human history. Even though we percentually use computers and volatile media alot more than previusly. In actual numbers we create a lot of more media than before. It's more likely that historians some generations forward will have big problems going trough all the data than having problems finding any.

    Somehow I suspect that even hundreds and thousands of years from now much of our data will be avaible in some form.

    1. Re:No worries, really. by pikine · · Score: 1

      Somehow I suspect that even hundreds and thousands of years from now much of our data will be avaible in some form.

      Don't worry. The way Microsoft obsessively keeps backwards compatibility in their operating systems gives it a good chance that you'll be able to run DOS programs in hundreds and thousands of years.

      --
      I once had a signature.
  49. I almost did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sometime last year, i came very close to just going away. The docs looked worried. I wasnt feeling like I would make it, and it was depressing(!). I am not rich, and I just wanted to ensure that suff wouldnt be lost. so I wrote the whole thing down, kept it in my box, marked it, and considered setting up a last timed email or something. But yes, you realize when you are close to it, these things dont really matter and you want the passwords to be the simplest. you trust everybody then.

  50. Online Communities by daitengu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm a sysadmin for some very large online communities. At the very least, my wife knows which communities I frequent so in the event that I should meet some sort of untimely demise, she can notifiy those people I talk to on a regular basis.

    This actually happened with one moderator at one of the forums I frequent, She passed away suddenly and someone in her family notified the admins on the site. We got a huge collection together and sent a whole bunch of money to her family.

  51. Domain names by zerofoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can now register domain names for 100 years. Is it possible to inherit a domain name?

    I can picture it now:

    "Being of sound mind and body, I do herby bequeath MutantGoat.com to my heirs....."

    -ted

    1. Re:Domain names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can now register domain names for 100 years. Is it possible to inherit a domain name?

      Why not? Domain names are bought and sold all the time. Inheritance is just a transfer of property.

    2. Re:Domain names by jimwelch · · Score: 1

      Oh NOOOO!, not the dreaded Intellectual Property Inheritance! IPI
      The horror of it all!

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    3. Re:Domain names by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      register domain names for 100 years. Is it possible to inherit a domain name?

            It's called a corporation.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  52. This is a real issue in the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yahoo has denied the family of a dead soldier access to his yahoo email account. I'm not taking sides on this, but it is a real issue. http://news.com.com/Yahoo+denies+family+access+to+ dead+marines+e-mail/2100-1038_3-5500057.html

  53. 2 cents worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last fall (2005) I was doing F.E.M.A. intake registrations at shelters in Louisiana. The struggle most applicants had with address, social security #, a good contact phone number,.... Basic information needed to input a claim and contact the applicant was mind boggling.
      It left me wondering if they were scamming or mentally deficient, until my own brain began to work.
      These folks had left home in a rush, with no more than what was in their pockets at the time. Their friends and relatives were scattered across the country in like circumstances.
      Who has a good phone number and knows where you are?
      Is your own cell phone going to work and how/where do you pay the bill?
      Is there a chance in hell you can remember your insurance agents #, policy #, and claims office number?
      It made me VERY careful about keeping a TXT. file on the thumb drive on my keychain. Give some thought to what info you might need. Encript it if you are paranoid, but hey, they already have your car keys.

  54. Pass something useful by mapkinase · · Score: 0

    1. Your moral values
    2. Your personal example of doing good and fighting evil
    3. Small practical tricks that will help him in real life.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Pass something useful by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      2. Your personal example of doing good and fighting evil

            What about us evil folk you insensitive clod?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Pass something useful by mapkinase · · Score: 0

      Rule 1. There is no "evil folk"
      Rule 2. Everyone has some degree of evil (I feel it rising in me right now)

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    3. Re:Pass something useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 3. Small practical tricks that will help him in real life.

      You mean like the URLs of your favourite porn sites?

  55. My Life Bits by UniAce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check out the My Life Bits project.

    From the description: "MyLifeBits is a lifetime store of everything. It is the fulfillment of Vannevar Bush's 1945 Memex vision including full-text search, text & audio annotations, and hyperlinks. There are two parts to MyLifeBits: an experiment in lifetime storage, and a software research effort."

    Too bad it doesn't seem to be publicly available at all, let alone for Mac OS X or Linux.

  56. in a word... by Davey+McDave · · Score: 0

    ... no. But I can just see people getting sweaty palms as they discover who got daddy's moderator points on slashdot..

    --
    I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
  57. I use quantum encryption .... by ytr · · Score: 2, Funny

    to store all my secrets in a 1 pixel gif on my website.

    1. Re:I use quantum encryption .... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      All I gotta do is check the comment data, huh?

  58. Coupling - "porn buddies" by runlvl0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Susan: That er, that Steve guy; how well do you know him? Are you close?
    Jeff: Close? We're porn buddies!
    Susan: Porn buddies?
    Jeff: Oh, yeah.
    Susan: Is this code? Were you in prison together or something?
    Jeff: No, no, no it's simple; it's a safety precaution, like a scuba driver swims with a buddy in case he runs out of air.
    Susan: Okay, okay. Are you telling me that a porn buddy stands by with oxygen?
    Jeff: No. Many years ago, me and Steve exchanged house keys--
    Susan: Are you sure this isn't code?
    Jeff: It isn't code.
    Susan: Alright.
    Jeff: In the event of Steve's death the first thing I would do --upset though I will be-- is go straight to his house and remove all the pornography before his parents can find it.
    Susan: You're kidding!
    Jeff: And he's pledged to do the same for me. That's how close we are!
    Susan: You two have seriously made plans to destroy each other's dirty mags?
    Jeff: Who said, "destroy?" Remove.
    Susan: you wouldn't keep them?
    Jeff: It's a perk.
    Susan: Oh, Jeff.
    Jeff: That's the beauty of it, you see. Your best friend's dead, but there's a bright side!

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
    1. Re:Coupling - "porn buddies" by adam613 · · Score: 1

      What's that from? It's a quote worth repeating :)

    2. Re:Coupling - "porn buddies" by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Coupling
      Enjoy. :)

    3. Re:Coupling - "porn buddies" by borawjm · · Score: 2, Funny

      So who cleans out the porn for the guy who doesn't die first? He would have double the amount of porn to be found.

    4. Re:Coupling - "porn buddies" by magefile · · Score: 1

      It's like a pyramid scheme, except the last guy wins. Actually, they have a word for it. Maybe this specific case could be called a pr0ntine?

    5. Re:Coupling - "porn buddies" by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Only if it's donated to charity in the end...

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  59. I'd rather my digital data not be found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thus why all my pr0n is on encrypted DVDs!!!

  60. Ick so low tech and no fun... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mine is in a 32meg USB thumb drive sealed in a 35mm film can that is in a sealed ziplock baggie buried in a geocache. My children get to go on a really fun wild hunt for that info.

    The fun is that there are 3 more caches with only Lattitude and longitude for the next cache....

    I so love screwing with people 50 years from now.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by hacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, in 50 years, the location of those 35mm cannisters will be plowed under to make way for a parking lot or a building or some other item to further corporate interests. So much for your inheritence ;)

    2. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mine is in a 32meg USB thumb drive sealed in a 35mm film can that is in a sealed ziplock baggie buried in a geocache."

      If you put your disk encryption key on that drive, then you can set the PC to delete its key at the first sign of unauthorised entry to the home (whether by burglars or by the SS) without having to worry about recovering your data afterward

    3. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      They'll have an even harder time trying to find a computer with a USB port...

    4. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That's funny because a few weeks ago I was out wandernig around and found what appeared to be a film canister inside a sealed baggie covered with dirt. So I carried it to the nearest trash can and disposed of it. Keeping the world clean, by golly! :)

    5. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said the geocache was on land?

    6. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      You're screwing them more because of the USB interface lol.

    7. Re:Ick so low tech and no fun... by wondafucka · · Score: 1
      My dad told us kids that he etched a treasure map to the bottom of his cess-pool.

      We were all adults when he moved and told us this. My sister still firmly believes that when he passes away, she's going to find treasure.

      The only thing she'll find is the best practical joke ever.

  61. Inherit this by metamatic · · Score: 1
    If you can inherit it, the government will want to tax it.

    If they try to tax my allergy to kiwi fruit, I'll sue for health endangerment.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  62. No, see this is what to do... by arcite · · Score: 1

    Before I left Canada to come and work here in Africa for a few years I backed up all my stuff (writing, digital photos ect...) put them on a couple cdrs, and got a safety deposit box. The surprising thing was that the boxes in the bank vault barely fit the cds. I guess they don't have many people putting cds in safety deposit boxes. This was a few years ago now, so maybe they have changed that. Ofcourse the real cool part is getting that funky looking safety deposit key. You can pretend you're a mobster and have a few million stashed away for a rainy day...err not really, just some useless files from uni. But a man can dream can't he???...

  63. how to archive/preserve: tips by rjnagle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi, I've thought long and hard about this. (I'm actually in the middle of having a will made to take this into account). Let me say that there's not a lot of good options and almost no archiving services exist for handling personal digital content. You really need to document your intentions clearly (preferably on the webpage you produced it on--Creative Commons Attribution license, for example), because it is hard to depend on people following these intentions after you die.

    Lawyers who prepare wills are loathe to touch copyright issues in your will (especially when the financial value is hypothetical). That requires getting a copyright attorney. The best thing to do is appoint a dependable/knowledgable executor or trustee (see below).

      My suggestions:

    1)sign a durable power of attorney to a close friend or family member. That gives them access to bank acccounts and web acccounts. (I don't think executors can do this without a court order). Usually you can download a form from the net for free.

    2)Emphasize to executors and family members about the first thing they need to do when you die: FIND OUT WHO ARE THE WEBHOSTS AND ENSURE THOSE THINGS CONTINUE TO BE PAID. Nongeeky people are clueless about this. (also, it might be good checking into webhost policies for handling nonpayment of webhosting).

    3)A yearly zip file consisting of contact information of friends, account info, and passwords would be a good idea. I'll leave it to slashdotters to figure out how to safeguard this.

    4)I'm a writer/content producer and I created a testamentary trust for someone living after me to archive my creative content. That said, unless you pay lots of legal fees to draw up something more elaborate, it's hard to depend on your executor or trustee to handle the archiving duties well. The best way to ensure that "sensitive information" doesn't get tossed aside or shared inappropriately is to bequeath your computer equipment to someone with the discretion and technical proficiency to know what needs to be done.

    5)I should reiterate the necessity of making a good list of people to contact after your death. My siblings and parents have absolutely no idea who needs to be contacted. Some of these contacts would be in a better position to know what to do and what kinds of online content you have.

    6)obviously media backups are a good idea.

    --
    Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
  64. perhaps make copies of the copies? by arcite · · Score: 1

    Perhaps we should get into the habit of backing up all our data on the latest technology every few years. Floppy > cd > dvd > ??? Usb? just kidding...

  65. Planning ahead for my digital remains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watching the troubles my father had settling my mother's estate after her death, my father being a sharp man but the law and murphy being a huge pain, I planned ahead a lot more carefully for my own demise.
    Account information for everything I want people to know about is in documents attached to my will with specific people designated to take care of my computers and my online existence, including my porn. :) Everything else is encrypted with instructions to specific people to destroy it. Earlier posters have it right, online firms can be unflexible, a pain to deal with and in their automation relentless. They don't care if you are dead, they keep billing you, or the people you leave behind. Plan ahead if you care about the people who will be cleaning up the bits of your life.

  66. what if you want to give the FILES by rakerman · · Score: 1
    Scenario: you own a bunch of legally purchased music files. You want to give them to someone before you die.

    Result: somewhere between difficult and impossible. The current systems literally have no provision for ownership of a file to pass from one account to another.

    See e.g. impractical.

    I don't want to give people access to my accounts after I pass away, I want to pass on the legally purchased files that I accumulated. Isn't it a major problem that this currently isn't supported by DRM systems?

  67. A current topic for me by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Informative

    My mother died a few years ago and my father died last year. Fortunately death wasn't a taboo subject in our family and also my parents believed in preparation. My father left us a document detailing all of his accounts, the web sites associated with them, the logins and passwords, etc. There were a couple of gaps but it was mostly complete. He had also detailed the relevant stock prices as of my mother's death which saved a lot of time in tax preparation and allowed us to quickly identify which assets should be sold to limit tax liability.

    My parents had established trusts which vastly simplified handling of the estate. I had transfered his memorial society membership and pre-selected a cremation facility so when he died, we just had to make one phone call and transport, cremation, death-certificates, etc. were all handled.

    Still, the whole death thing has been a learning experience.

    When things have been done correctly, handling things is a breeze. The house and larger accounts were in the trust and we were properly named as successor trustees on the accounts. Disbursing them was simply a matter of providing a death-certificate, disbursal instructions and a couple signatures.

    When the Ts aren't crossed and Is not dotted, things are more of a problem. My father had a small checking account on which he forgot to list beneficiaries. Although it amounts to less than 0.1% of the estate it was more work to deal with than the large accounts.

    Email and electronic access presents an interesting problem. Just try to close a paypal account when you don't have access to the email of the deceased. Fortunately, I had my dad's laptop (and he was using my email server to handle his mail) so I was able to "forget" the password and ultimately to cancel the account. It also allowed me to unsubscribe from his mailing lists and made it easier to transfer control of various web accounts.

    Check caching is a pain, too. Turn in your FastTrak transponder, cancel the landline, insurance, cell service, internet service, etc., and submit final insurance claims. Suddenly you will get a bunch of checks made out to the dead person. When you notify financial institutions that a person has died they freeze the accounts and cashing checks made out to the deceased is an exercise in paperwork. You also have to track down things that are on autopay. Then when you cancel them you may ultimately find money appearing in accounts that you thought you had closed. While not "legal", I was told by an attorney that things are a lot easier if at least one financial institution doesn't know the person is dead. Tell them only after you have deposited all the checks.

    My advice....

    If you care for your loved ones, take a moment in the next couple days to make a list of all of your accounts. Then verify the beneficiary information on all of them.

    Make funeral arrangements. In our family this was easy since none of us are into forking over cash to the "death mafia" and so have opted for the least expensive cremation available through the local memorial society. When my neighbor died (expectedly at 90+), her son suddenly realized that he didn't know what to do next so he called the fire department. It's nice to have things pre-arranged so you aren't stuck thinking, "now what am I supposed to do" at an already difficult time. It also makes you less vulnerable to fast-talking funeral arrangers.

    If you have assets in excess of $100,000 (in California, anyway), establish a trust. And assets != net worth. You may owe $599,000 on your $600,000 house but the asset still exceeds $100,000 and your loved ones will have to slog through probate which is a royal pain involving $$$, lawyers, courts and time. It's also all open to the public. With a properly drawn trust your successors may not need a lawyer at all and your business will stay private. (We have an attorney for the occasional question but have handled nearly all the estate ourselves.)

    Given the overwhelming amount of time required just to deal with a house and two lifetimes of collected stuff, I'm extremely thankful that we aren't dealing with probate, too.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:A current topic for me by WebCudgel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just started a website a few weeks ago, BeforeYouAreGone.com and would love to get stories of people who have gone through this. It helps to let people know of some of the headaches their loved ones will face if they don't prepare ahead of time. The website will be used to get the word out that, just like our real life, we have to prepare our online life for our passing. Would love to hear from you (just email me if you're interested in contributing).

    2. Re:A current topic for me by Radice+Utente · · Score: 1
      Condolences for your loss, and congratulations on your family's foresight and plnning. This is some truly useful advice and information.

      I had a similar experience when I lost my dad last year. He left us a paper file with a list of passwords, account numbers and access codes, and the combination to the gun safe -- no apologies there, those guns represent a significant portion of my legacy, and as far as I know, none was used to kill anyone -- with the possible exception of a battle-scarred WWII-era M1 Garand rifle which I consider a gem in the collection for that very reason.

      He did, however leave one password out of the mix. It was an old cc:Mail Remote account and all the files are encrypted. I tried all his "standard" passwords, but none of them works. Based on the environment the cc:Mail account was from, I don't expect anything earthshaking (or traumatic, for that matter), but there might be something of interest. I passed the files on to a computer science scholar type who is playing with them as an exercise in codebreaking.

    3. Re:A current topic for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I went through this 15 years ago with my mom. Even though she and my sister had set everything up in a trust, mom still couldn't resist doing a few things her own way. This resulted in probate in two states. @#$%@#$ Nevada!

      Also the will was set up to specifically exclude anyone who contested it. Naturally, my brother contested it - the only way to do this was to allege fraud and collusion between my sister and me. So resulted in nearly seven years of court battles, until his case finally fell apart by attrition.

      And people would wonder why I'd be rude on usenet sometimes.

      So I've paid my domain for the next 10 years. That should be just after I die.

    4. Re:A current topic for me by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

      My condolences to you as well. It's not fun.

      Ah, yes. The safe. My dad told us the combination of the fire-safe and I guess he assumed we would remember it. It wasn't among the things written down so after trying all the likely combos I had to have it drilled.

      Funny story. My dad was with my sister and me when he died and I decided it would be prudent to get some things out of the house so the weekend after he died I drove the 800 miles round-trip to pick them up. On the way back I called my sister and joked that, given the fact that I was carrying a couple boxes of silver and silverware, human ashes (mother), a couple guns and ammo, a box full of drugs from both parents and a safe I couldn't open, it would be a bad time to get pulled over. Fortunately my 20+ year run of not being stopped remained uninterrupted.

      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    5. Re:A current topic for me by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

      Yikes! I'd hate to have to deal with that kind of battle.

      I'm very fortunate that things are relatively uncomplicated. Neither parent was ever divorced and we have sufficient cash available so we aren't faced with the not-unusual problem of "we'll be getting a few hundred grand when we sell the house but right now we can't pay the tax/insurance/mortgage (actually, the house is paid off which further simplifies things).

      But most important of all, we get along great so the biggest "problem" is just coordinating schedules to go to the house and get it ready for sale.

      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  68. All My Heirs will need to do... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    All My Heirs will need to do...

    ..is figure out a series of intricate puzzles, each more complex than the last. For example, one of my secret questions is:

    "One by One and Two by Two, He Tossed Them, Human Hearts to Chew!"

    I know why I chose it... it's because Tim Curry, playing the voice of Captain Hook said it in that old Peter Pan cartoon show they had on Fox.... but even I do not know the correct answer to this question. (It isn't Peter Pan, Captain Hook, Alucard(1), Alexander Anderson(2), Percy Bysse Shelley, Tim Curry or 'V' for Vendetta(3) in case you were wondering.)

    (1) and (2) Hellsing Codenames are Peter Pan and Captain Hook, respectively.

    (3) The Poem name is "The Masque of Anarchy," which would fit, "I do not have a name, but you can call me 'V'" to a T (in the comic, anyway).

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  69. Passwords, Continuity of small business by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    It's interesting actually, as I'm sure many small businesses are run this way. If the sole staff member of a one-man shop disappears, will anyone be able to get into those servers and recover the data and get value for it? Or will someone just pull the plug on your equipment not knowing what to do. Can someone get into your customer list? Where is your customer list? What is its format? What is the intranet address? Username/password? Root password? What amounts are owing on each account?

    People who start their own business maintain a lot of information in their head, and very little on paper. As you expand to many, you start to see the need to document and share information. Document what you're doing, have password lists, and have more information.

    What happens if you get injured. Who will make sure your clients don't all leave for a few weeks that you're unable to manage a computer?

    This information needs to be documented even as a one-man shop in order to get value from it for your loved ones or even your own benefit due to permenant or temporary absences.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  70. I've seen this happen. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine passed away after a battle with cancer, and her website was the last thing left of her to the public. Her site was something of a central repository for not only her personal things, but also some reference material that was quite useful to her church. I offered to archive and host her site indefinitely, but before I could do anything about it her domain name / hosting account happened to run out, and nobody who wasn't her could do anything to renew it. I believe the domain is still owned by a goddamn domain squatter these days, and the content vanished with her own computer, which had been reformatted and passed to someone else. Ever since then I have my account info, passwords, and backups of major stuff written down and stashed away somewhere safe. I also warn people against letting domain name providers host the sites they're connected to, since having access to either the host or the name would have let us keep something rather than losing it all in one fell swoop.

    1. Re:I've seen this happen. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Websites I consider valuable I go over with a little program called SiteSucker, which will spider the site so I can keep it on my own media. For instance, back when Pokey the Penguin went about 3 full years without a single update, I thought to myself what a shame it would be if all this material were lost so I made my own archive and kept it on my HD.

      HD space is cheap, and I think it's well worth it to keep some to keep my favorite sites from disappearing.

  71. the student becomes the master... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You may leave this monestary when you can snatch the data out of my hand, Grasshopper."

  72. Why bother? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That implies that there's anything of value to pass on. When was the last time you had to access something +10 years old that only existed online?

    If it's information, hard copy it and put it with the will.
    If it's the family photo JPG archive, burn a DVD (or get prints) and put it with the will. (or in a box for Christmas!)
    If it's my bank account, forget on-line access. The trustee's gonna be doing a lot of paperwork anyway...

    I just don't see anything online that I'd pass on to my son that can't be stored in a long-term physical format.

  73. BeforeYouAreGone.com by WebCudgel · · Score: 1

    I started a website just recently to discuss all of the potential issues and problems related with inheritance of digital property called http://www.BeforeYouAreGone.com. I had considered these issues too and feel that this was the best way to start discussing them.

  74. Yep - Hard To Find Film by jeff_schiller · · Score: 1

    I plan to leave my kids copies of my film collection in digital format, mostly some old/rare stuff that's not available except via private collector trade. I've got most of it burnt to my hard drive and I back them up once a year to DVD-Rs (until something better comes along). If I keep it up and maintain the rigor, they'll be able to pass the stuff on to their kids...

    1. Re:Yep - Hard To Find Film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I wonder what happened to dad's old vintage pr0n. Saw it once at a stag party, looked '30s.

  75. password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a password you insensitive clod!

  76. my offsite backup provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...has a section on their sign-up form that allowed me to specify a few persons who could be contacted after my death and given my data that I keep on my offsite backup filesystem (at rsync.net).

    I listed my wife only, but they have two slots, and they contact in the order that you list them. You can see the signup form here:

    rsync.net/products/order.html

    I would think this _will_ become more and more common, and the clueful (read: unix-related, tech) businesses are already doing it...

  77. It should also be of note... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    ...that's highly inaccurate, but at the time(s) the income tax was nearly that limited, we didn't even have interstate highways. We were also paying for wars as a relatively new experience--and we've for all intents basically been engaging in new wars, with new veterans needing to be supported and pensioned off, well, ever since the Revolutionary War so this "golly, but that was raised to pay for 'the' war" line is pretty silly. Aren't we fighting one right now? How about five years ago (Afghanistan)? 15 (Gulf I)? 30 (Vietnam)? 60 (WWI)? 90 (WWI)? 105 (Spanish-American, Philippines)? 120 (Indian)? 140(ish) (Civil War)? 150 (Mexican-American)? 190 (War of 1812)? See a pattern? There were many more in there, but the big ones happen like clockwork and the money to fight them has gotta come from somewhere.

    So, through the late 1800's to the end of WWII a huge amount of the federal government's revenue to pay for these things was gleaned from customs receiverships, which have long since been disbanded as a part of decolonization under the Trusteeship Council of the United Nations. Tariffs continuted, but under GATT and later the WTO, those have been dropping off into oblivion. If you think that the IRS is abusive (disregarding the fact that every developed nation has something nearly identical), what we used to have was outright criminal. It isn't surprising that the income tax would grow in the context of getting rid of the long-standing practice of international extortion.

    1. Re:It should also be of note... by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      If by "that" in "that's highly inaccurate" you mean the 0.01% figure I just pulled out of my ass, then yes it is highly innacurate, but such is the nature of hyperbole designed to get a point across, which is sadly so hard to get across these days to certain folks.
      And yes, I do still think the IRS is abusive, disregarding what other nations use because we are not other nations, and regardless of the Roosevelt Corollary, which is not of what I speak. I speak of the FairTax, which seems to be much better idea than inheritance taxes and income taxes and all the others it replaces.

    2. Re:It should also be of note... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      The point I was making was that regardless of how you collect the tax, it will take the same _amount_ of tax and that the increase in the proportion of income tax can be directly related to the drop in revenue by other means (primarily, customs receiverships). That doesn't attack "FairTax" at all. It's a fact, rather than merely "truthy" like your .01% reference. I prefer facts to truthiness, thanks.

      I've had the F.T. argument too many times. It has nothing whatever to do with my previous comment and, frankly, it bores me. Suffice it to say, while what we have now is overly complex, consumption taxes alone are overly simplistic as taxation is not merely about revenue collection. It is also about encouraging certain economic activity while discouraging others. Make your case there, not with hyperbole and "because it's, like, simple and stuff."

    3. Re:It should also be of note... by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      The point I was making was that regardless of how you collect the tax, it will take the same _amount_ of tax
      So right here I was thinking "Great, finally another person who gets it and going to express understanding and go on to say "it will take the same _amount_ of tax only this way will make it glaringly unavoidably obvious to every American just how big the tax burden is..." but sadly no...

      Sorry to hear you are bored by the idea of tax reform. Indeed it is a boring subject for most to listen to (especially those who have not matured enough to care about such things) and nearly impossible to speak about it captivatingly. But it is important, I assure you. Personally I prefer to just refer ppl to the book (which I don't have with me else my self-damning hyperbole would have been more palatable I'm sure). I highly recommend reading it to anyone who doesn't understand the idea fully.

  78. Just happened to me. by rlgines · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This just happened to me. My mother passed away last month. She was extremely active in genealogy research and was therefore very active on-line. Fortunately, before she passed away I knew her passwords for her computer (... well I built it and she never changed that one). I also knew most of her on-line passwords ... or was able to guess it.

    The only password that gave me fits was her churches financials which she kept on her computer. Of course the congregation wanted their giveing reports for last year. That one was fun.

    I used her address book to notify some of her most frequest E-Mailing buddies of her passing and I still check her E-Mail on a regular basis to see if there and any more genealogical contacts that come through.

    Even though my mother was far less computer literate than the typical slashdotter...it was amazing how much she had in the on-line world. Had I not known her passwords, much would have been lost or unknown.

    Learning from this, I am planning on making sure that I can pass on my locked information to the appropriate people. ... and no, I have no pr0n to pass on to my children.

  79. Porn Collection by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    I so love screwing with people 50 years from now.

    That's why I'm going to keep my porn collection intact.

  80. Inheritance and Greed by nuggz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All this inheritance stuff keeps reminding me of peoples greed.

    On too many occasions the offspring sue the deceased estate to overturn the will and get "what's rightfully theirs". In many cases the elderly have to fight for the right to control their own property against their overzealous offspring.

    Digital inheritance will start a whole new fight over the IP of the deceased.

  81. Take this seriously by wbean · · Score: 1

    This question deserves to be taken seriously. I know of a case where a gentleman died and left no record of his passwords. This affects both your local computer and network accounts. It can take a lot of time and energy for relatives to get into important data on a computer, if it's possible at all.

    Furthermore, if you have your own servers, a supoena isn't going to get anyone access to them without the password. In my case that would mean that my Web sites would go on without change until someone pulled the plug - and that's assuming they could figure out where the server is physically - it's not in my house.

    I have a master list of accounts and passwords in a safe location and my kids know where it is.

  82. Dead Man's Swtich by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    What you need is the digital equivalent of a dead man's switch. Something that only triggers once you are dead and then sends all your passwords etc to one or two family members. You could do this with some kind of timed email. There are sites that let you send emails into the future. You just type a message and specify a date on which it will be sent. You could set it to email every month and then make sure you cancel the message every month. Once you die you wont be able to cancel the message and voila!, it will be sent. There is probably some business potential in this. You need a service that makes the dead-man's switch concept simple.

  83. screw digital inheritance by tralfamador · · Score: 1

    i've gotten my girlfriend to promise to wipe my computers out before my family sees them should i die unexpectedly.

  84. Maybe ... by s0l3d4d · · Score: 1

    I could think about my dad one day inheriting some items of my digital past ...

  85. Remote RF monitor snooping by Kadin2048 · · Score: 0

    I forget the name of the system, but if you use a CRT display or possibly even a LCD display that's taking an analog signal as input, it's possible -- or so I have heard -- for someone a significant distance away with a good antenna to recover the image on your screen, by monitoring the baseband video signal being fed to and radiated by the monitor.

    There was a lot of interest in it a few years back, I remember somebody even had a collection of fonts that were supposed to be resistant to it. (They were fuzzy and slanted and generally hard to read, the idea being that the distorted image you'd get on the receiving end of one of these systems would make it completely illegible.)

    Anybody remember what it was called?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Remote RF monitor snooping by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Tempest program

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Remote RF monitor snooping by palndrumm · · Score: 1

      Presumably you're talking about van Eck phreaking, which was featured quite prominently in Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon.

    3. Re:Remote RF monitor snooping by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Yes, although the name I had on the tip of my tongue but couldn't remember was TEMPEST, which NetworkBoy pointed out.

      The surge of interest in it a few years back may well have been due to its mention in Cryptonomicon, I'm not sure. I just remember reading a lot about it, and seeing several programs that had options for "TEMPEST resistant fonts" or stuff of that nature. (The program I'm thinking of in particular was a Mac password-management database program, so by design it had to display passwords onscreen.) Seems as though interest has died down of late.

      It would seem that the term "TEMPEST resistant" is actually a misnomer, since (according to Wikipedia, anyway) TEMPEST actually refers to the USG/NSA standards for hardening equipment against such monitoring, not the snooping system itself.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  86. Password Storage by lukej · · Score: 1

    In my case, I presume all my data is 'somewhere' (my servers, 3rd party websites, etc). I don't go to lengths to archive/encrypt it. But my survivors will need access to it. So this gets back to the simple question of secure username/password storage.

    I use Passowrd Gorilla. One master pass, to encrypt the rest, and most of the entries have 'notes' like the URL of the applicable site or server. Of course I leave the master password with my S.O. and/or anyone who I trust not to use it till neccessary.

    Lots of other projects out there for the same purpose, but I like P.G. since it does TK & Windows, isn't Net dependent, and other features like autosave.

  87. UID 56 bought on ebay... by douglips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A 2 digit slashdot UID went for $115 two years ago.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=118075&cid=997 7887

  88. Digital Inheritance? I'm still waiting for by jeddak · · Score: 1

    ....my digital allowance.

  89. Dupe by sethaw · · Score: 1

    Its been awhile but this is essentially the same discussion as we had before .

    What Happens To Your Data When You Die?


    It even incudes the same jokes about finding grandfather's porn collection.

  90. i have a friend... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    I have a friend that inherits his customer's pr0n collections all the time ...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  91. Interesting this should come up. by robertjw · · Score: 1

    Recently I started a blog. The primary purpose of which is to leave some kind of public record of my thoughts, attitudes and view of the world (no matter how ridiculous) to future generations. My motivation for doing this. I now have a nephew that just turned 2. Allthough I anticipate being around for a long time yet, life is always unsure. I lost my maternal grandfather when I was 8 and maternal uncle when I was in Jr. High. My grandfather was a WWII veteran that fought in both the European and Pacific theatre, as well as an all around good guy. There are so many stories of his that I'll never hear. I hope that, even if I only make it 6 more years, until my nephew is 8, I can leave something of myself behind for him and other nieces, nephews, children and grandchildren that are to come.

    Now, as another precaution, I recently acquired a bank box and intend to put an archive of all my development work, passwords, etc.. in there. Probably more in case of a disaster than for an inheritance. One question I do have for anyone reading this, can I write to min cds or mini dvds with my CD/DVD writers? Where do I find media? The bank box that comes free with my account is only 4" across and a 6" CD/DVD isn't going to fit well.

    1. Re:Interesting this should come up. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      you should be able to burn them with your normal burner and any reasonablly large supplier of computer stuff should stock em. Specialist CD suppliers certainly will.

      they are quite a bit more expensive than regular discs though and don't store anywhere near as much (for a CD its arround 200 megabyte iirc not sure about DVDs)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  92. No worries after death by RKBA · · Score: 1
    "I would freak out if I had to look down (or up) after death and watch my mother in law clean out my wife and my sex toy stash."

    One advantage of being an atheist is that I realize I will be looking neither up or down after I'm dead, and that in fact there will be no "I" to care about anything once I'm dead. I may worry about things while I'm still alive, but not after I'm dead.

  93. immortal but migratory information by grikdog · · Score: 1

    What a bizarre concept! Stable url's? It may be true that information resides somewhere on the internet forever, but if it's useful, chances are it's not going to be revealed (to you) by Google. At a guess, I'd say 99% of the curious url's I collected over the last five years are kaput.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  94. Institutional Policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, it's not only a matter to consider for your own personal effects. Think about how your employer, school, etc. might handle this. I work in higher ed. What happens when someone dies? Do you hand over their email to their heirs? Who's property is it at that point? You're not necessarily doing anyone a favor by giving a student's bong filled correspondence to their parents. Without a clearly identified beneficiary, it's not at all clear what should be done.

  95. I plan to leave my website running on automatic... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Automatically paid for via bank transfers, automatically collect money for shareware, music or other services, even automatically adapt itself to environmental changes (OS upgrades, etc.). I plan for my website to LIVE ON long after I'm gone, and make a fortune for itself in the process.

  96. Or.... by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

    How about you don't have the porn in the first place!? IMHO it does more harm that it does good. Besides, I'm perfectly happy getting all of my sexual release with my spouce. I honestly don't need the porn and have none. I could die tomorrow and everyone could look through all of my stuff (including my browser cache) and I would have no worries about what they may find.

    I know, I posted something against porn on slashdot... let the flaming begin.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    1. Re:Or.... by leenks · · Score: 1

      Not everyone gets all the sexual release they need with their spouse. Not everyone is in a relationship with a matched sex drive.

  97. Passwords 101 -- long is NOT the same as strong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just FYI, a "strong" password should contain ALL of the following:
    * Uppercase
    * Lowercase
    * Numbers
    * Punctuation

    Those are the four "food groups" (charsets) of a strong password. Don't neglect any of them unless you have to (in which case, you're dealing with an idiotic password scheme and almost certainly dealing with insecure software). Limit yourself to 8 characters ONLY if the password scheme requires it (e.g. ye olde *nix passwords).

    The password should also be 8 or more characters long, not written down, and not directly based on ANY word in ANY language. As you've discovered, if it's guessable (esp. by a human) it is *NOT* "strong" in any way shape or form. No offense, but 14 chars or not, I have to believe it would succumb to a dictionary attack in a reasonable amount of time.

    The way I would generate them is something like this:

    1) Take a phrase. My example will be a password for a pirate game, so I'll use the phrase "Land ho, matey!"

    2) Condense it via some rule. For the example phrase, I will use:
    L& = Land
    h0, = ho,
    m8y! = matey!

    3) Only truncate it if you have to. I'd use L&h0m8y! if I were stuck with 8 chars, otherwise I'd use all 9. The trick, of course, is to find an appropriate phrase and a good way to crunch it down.

    Anyone who wishes to may redistribute this advice in any form. Just don't edit it to give people bad advice.

  98. You leave the kinds of things you believe in. by twitter · · Score: 1
    All this inheritance stuff keeps reminding me of people's greed. ... Digital inheritance will start a whole new fight over the IP of the deceased.

    What greed? If you have lived free, everyone will have what's worth having already. Digital records allow sharing that physical objects never enjoyed.

    I don't have any non free software or other silly junk written in dissapearing ink. I used MSDos, Windoze 3.1, 95 and 98 before I learned my lesson. They sit in a closet, to be looked on in 50 years as curiosities. I doubt anything will run them and free software works better than newer of the same. My wife and 4 year old girl use that better software.

    Because of that they can help me build the digital record we can all look back on and share. I've got about 20 GB of pictures in a simple digital photo album. Some of those pictures are scans of parent and grandparent photo albums. Anyone in my family can have it now, so digitization has increased the worth of the collection for everyone. These albums and the stories they told me are worth much more than the physical things they left, which will rot away. I imagine my email will be more interesting that reams of old letters, because email is easier to store and search through.

    It's inconceivable that that kind of information would be hoarded but people have strange ideas.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:You leave the kinds of things you believe in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Windoze

      That's hilarious. What does it have to do with the topic again?

  99. Yes by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1
    "Is there a slip of paper in your deposit box at the bank with websites, account names and passwords?"

    Yes! It indicates something along the lines of destroy my computer and all of the data on it, format the disk, many many times, install crap over it (windows would work), format it again, then burn the damn thing before running it over with your car.

    So, in short, my (insert the word data, but scratched out) pr0n is mine, not to be had by anyone else. Save your selfs and do what I said :-p

    All joking aside? I don't have anything worth passing down. My email is a bunch of spam, and my more important files are pass codes to download things at tufat.com or similar things. Plus, the various programs I've downloaded and their keygens will probably be out dated. (Mr. FBI dude: This is just an example, I don't -really- have any of those horible thing...)

    --
    Scott Swezey
  100. Not for lack of understanding. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    Tax reform in general is not limited to that particular tax reform idea in particular.

    Opposition to that particular tax reform idea does not equal a lack of understanding of either.

    Boredom with the endless drone from people who see no other alternative but that particular "solution" is an indication of neither. It's just after the billionth reading of the talking points, one simply doesn't need to hear it again...and again...and again.

    Take it as a given that "most" people ARE for tax reform, ARE interested in it and ARE open to the discussion. But, don't expect them to sign on to ONE idea just because it has a nifty name and a website,

    It's the FT folks that are being stubborn. They have THE solution and aren't interested in hearing anyone else's ideas or criticisms. Politics is about compromise and that platform is uncompromising, ergo, it will fail.

  101. Ugh by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Here is one for ya...

    My great uncle died when I was 10. He had everything written up, set up perfectly etc. He owned a house, a few cars, and operated an antique shop out of his house in rural Mississippi.

    Well, he died on the morning of January 1st at a hospital in Memphis. However his car was stolen the morning of his death (Memphis has a LOT of crime). Unfortunately my parents pulled a lot of important documents from the house (small town - every one knew he was in the hospital) in order to protect them and they were in the trunk of the car when it was jacked.

    AND, they had all of his blank checks in there too.

    These theifs had hit the jackpot. For two years after his death they wrote hundreds of thousands of dollars in bad checks. They also got legit IDs in his name and reordered checks and then got credit cards in his name etc etc.

    Talk about a CLUSTER!

    Anyway, 10+ years later my family (my dad was executor) is STILL getting calls from creditors looking to collect, and the direct marketing lists keep sending us dozens of mailings with his name on it.

    UGH!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum