I would agree that it does not. Which is why the person was not detained. However your and my definitions of "reasonable" are not relevant. In a practical sense it really only matters what the SOCTUS thinks about it. And the SCOTUS has demonstrated in the past that they are on the "ends justifies the means" bandwagon. The counter argument, which I think has some flaws, is that the phone is a container, it contains data, and that all other containers are subject to search, why not the phone? If someone comes in with a box that can't be opened for inspection, it can be seized. By the way, if you are trying to say that unlocking of a phone is the same level of intrusion as an anal cavity search then I don't know how to address that.
Not sure what you are getting at, but the Supreme Court has held on many occasions that the government has a "compelling interest" in keeping people safe which outweighs a "minor inconvenience" to the people. Yes, they actually say this as if ensuring convenience is the reason we have a constitution. This is the justification for allowing such things as immigration checkpoints well inside the border, DUI checkpoints, safety (i.e. license and insurance) checkpoints, etc...
FedEx has not ended the use of contractors for delivery. They have changed the way the implement the program. What Amazon is doing here is actually similar to what FedEx is doing. The biggest change is that they are requiring contractors to set up a business with multiple vehicles and drivers.
What this doesn't say is if the peers are actually people who know her and work with her as opposed to random people in the same general job classification.
This is a good point. If the response level is high enough and the management knows how to analyze the data it could be useful. Frankly, If a restaurant has plans to lay off staff, the survey data is as good a place to start as any. Definitely better than seniority.
Actually, it isn't the bullies that become the shooters. It is the kids that are bullied, for years on end. Every time the bullied kid goes to the administration, nothing happens to the bullies but the bullies do take it out on the victim. If the victim ever fights back, the administration punishes the poor kid and coddles the bullies. Now the victim is marked as a trouble maker and no hope of ever getting any help with the issue. And after he is bullied for years, after the administration has treated him like the bad guy for years, after years of doing nothing wrong but taking the abuse of both peer and adult, after he feels he has no way out he explodes. Of course these kids don't usually lack money, so I'm not sure if this would make any difference.
Where I live even fast food pays above minimum wage. In my experience with people, anyone with the intelligence and discipline to get through university or vocational training (not exactly a high bar) doesn't sit and work at minimum wage jobs, they get raises and promotions and better jobs, even without the added education. This idea that huge numbers of people are stuck at minimum wage only for lack of tuition and sustenance is BS. Now, some depressed areas don't have a lot of opportunities, but more training isn't going to help that.
Give me money and nobody gets hurt? That's the plan? How many actual shooters are indigent? Of those that are, for how many of these "mentally unstable" people would a little money actually make a difference?
You are buying into the hype. This isn't meant to send him to prison. This is meant to get him to take a plea deal while impressing upon him that this was serious. Any halfway decent lawyer will see that the kid serves no time in proper jail. Since he apparently thought this was OK, he is in need of something. Exposing the ignorance of his teachers is not a good excuse. You could use that for so many cases, you can't make "it was easy" a mitigation.
Please, the school can do nothing to him. Worst thing they could do is expel him, BFD. He needs more than that, though 14 felonies is overkill. One felony charge in juvenile court would be fine, sealed when he turns 18. Of course this is just to get him to a plea bargain. If he has a competent lawyer this won't ruin his life.
Avatar was derivative and showy without substance. Avatar got the only Oscars that picture deserved, Art Direction, Cinematography, and Visual Effects.
I didn't see anything in the article that said this was because of an untested update. All I saw was a bunch of speculation from "experts" who don't actually have first hand knowledge of the situation.
It is a typical troll headline. It isn't selfishness because the drivers do not know, and in fact, as the article makes clear, NOBODY really knows, the full overall effect yet. One could argue that if we all knew it was bad overall and still did it to help ourselves it would be selfish. But the majority of drivers have not read this, and will never read this. Most drivers probably believe that using the apps helps relieve congestion.
This goes way back, but at some point the courts ruled that the Rotary clubs couldn't discriminate against women and their ruling pointed out two things, associations with business (which this certainly has) and that they are generally open and not very exclusive, even going so far as to allow non-members in their meetings, I have no idea if that applies or not. In the end the courts won't take any action on this absent someone with standing (how would a man prove his is harmed by this?) making an issue of it and even then they have been known to say things like "there is a compelling interest" in allowing historically marginalized communities to do things that majority or "in power" communities might not be allowed to do.
Increase dues to cover it, and negotiate increased hourly rates to offset the employer not paying the insurance. Let them manage the pension too. I'm sure they would be happy to take that on as well.
I suppose if you thought you could watch over his shoulder enough to ensure he was actually doing what you hired him to do, and no more... But I think we've demonstrated over the years that we really aren't very good at that.
The full $1K was for people that had worked there 20 year. People who had worked there for fewer years received a lesser bonus but still got something. I think 2 years was the minimum.
And by the way, Walmart would have laid off those people either way.
Yes, of course I have. I've also seen them dropped and broken. I've seen other brands dropped and broken too. My Motorola has been dropped a number of times, no case, and the screen is still in tact after 2.5 years. The corners are dinged up a bit though. Guess I'm lucky.
I'm with you except for the poet part. Have you read German poetry? The Germans I know don't even like German poetry. Maybe I could at least see an argument for opera or symphony, but Poetry?
Oblig Ice station Zebra: "The Russians put our camera made by *our* German scientists and your film made by *your* German scientists into their satellite made by *their* German scientists."
Slashdot Mirror
I would agree that it does not. Which is why the person was not detained. However your and my definitions of "reasonable" are not relevant. In a practical sense it really only matters what the SOCTUS thinks about it. And the SCOTUS has demonstrated in the past that they are on the "ends justifies the means" bandwagon. The counter argument, which I think has some flaws, is that the phone is a container, it contains data, and that all other containers are subject to search, why not the phone? If someone comes in with a box that can't be opened for inspection, it can be seized. By the way, if you are trying to say that unlocking of a phone is the same level of intrusion as an anal cavity search then I don't know how to address that.
Not sure what you are getting at, but the Supreme Court has held on many occasions that the government has a "compelling interest" in keeping people safe which outweighs a "minor inconvenience" to the people. Yes, they actually say this as if ensuring convenience is the reason we have a constitution. This is the justification for allowing such things as immigration checkpoints well inside the border, DUI checkpoints, safety (i.e. license and insurance) checkpoints, etc...
Why would anyone do this?
FedEx has not ended the use of contractors for delivery. They have changed the way the implement the program. What Amazon is doing here is actually similar to what FedEx is doing. The biggest change is that they are requiring contractors to set up a business with multiple vehicles and drivers.
What this doesn't say is if the peers are actually people who know her and work with her as opposed to random people in the same general job classification.
This is a good point. If the response level is high enough and the management knows how to analyze the data it could be useful. Frankly, If a restaurant has plans to lay off staff, the survey data is as good a place to start as any. Definitely better than seniority.
Actually, it isn't the bullies that become the shooters. It is the kids that are bullied, for years on end. Every time the bullied kid goes to the administration, nothing happens to the bullies but the bullies do take it out on the victim. If the victim ever fights back, the administration punishes the poor kid and coddles the bullies. Now the victim is marked as a trouble maker and no hope of ever getting any help with the issue. And after he is bullied for years, after the administration has treated him like the bad guy for years, after years of doing nothing wrong but taking the abuse of both peer and adult, after he feels he has no way out he explodes. Of course these kids don't usually lack money, so I'm not sure if this would make any difference.
Where I live even fast food pays above minimum wage. In my experience with people, anyone with the intelligence and discipline to get through university or vocational training (not exactly a high bar) doesn't sit and work at minimum wage jobs, they get raises and promotions and better jobs, even without the added education. This idea that huge numbers of people are stuck at minimum wage only for lack of tuition and sustenance is BS. Now, some depressed areas don't have a lot of opportunities, but more training isn't going to help that.
Give me money and nobody gets hurt? That's the plan? How many actual shooters are indigent? Of those that are, for how many of these "mentally unstable" people would a little money actually make a difference?
You are buying into the hype. This isn't meant to send him to prison. This is meant to get him to take a plea deal while impressing upon him that this was serious. Any halfway decent lawyer will see that the kid serves no time in proper jail. Since he apparently thought this was OK, he is in need of something. Exposing the ignorance of his teachers is not a good excuse. You could use that for so many cases, you can't make "it was easy" a mitigation.
Please, the school can do nothing to him. Worst thing they could do is expel him, BFD. He needs more than that, though 14 felonies is overkill. One felony charge in juvenile court would be fine, sealed when he turns 18. Of course this is just to get him to a plea bargain. If he has a competent lawyer this won't ruin his life.
Avatar was derivative and showy without substance. Avatar got the only Oscars that picture deserved, Art Direction, Cinematography, and Visual Effects.
I'll be more worried when I hear China threaten to go "Thermonuclear" than I was with Jobs.
I didn't see anything in the article that said this was because of an untested update. All I saw was a bunch of speculation from "experts" who don't actually have first hand knowledge of the situation.
It is a typical troll headline. It isn't selfishness because the drivers do not know, and in fact, as the article makes clear, NOBODY really knows, the full overall effect yet. One could argue that if we all knew it was bad overall and still did it to help ourselves it would be selfish. But the majority of drivers have not read this, and will never read this. Most drivers probably believe that using the apps helps relieve congestion.
Primary: Rep. Collins, Doug [R-GA-9] CoSponsors: Rep. Jeffries, Hakeem S. [D-NY-8]* Rep. Issa, Darrell E. [R-CA-49]* Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]* Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10]* Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-4]* Rep. Demings, Val Butler [D-FL-10]* Rep. Holding, George [R-NC-2] Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21]
This goes way back, but at some point the courts ruled that the Rotary clubs couldn't discriminate against women and their ruling pointed out two things, associations with business (which this certainly has) and that they are generally open and not very exclusive, even going so far as to allow non-members in their meetings, I have no idea if that applies or not. In the end the courts won't take any action on this absent someone with standing (how would a man prove his is harmed by this?) making an issue of it and even then they have been known to say things like "there is a compelling interest" in allowing historically marginalized communities to do things that majority or "in power" communities might not be allowed to do.
Increase dues to cover it, and negotiate increased hourly rates to offset the employer not paying the insurance. Let them manage the pension too. I'm sure they would be happy to take that on as well.
I suppose if you thought you could watch over his shoulder enough to ensure he was actually doing what you hired him to do, and no more... But I think we've demonstrated over the years that we really aren't very good at that.
The full $1K was for people that had worked there 20 year. People who had worked there for fewer years received a lesser bonus but still got something. I think 2 years was the minimum. And by the way, Walmart would have laid off those people either way.
Yes, of course I have. I've also seen them dropped and broken. I've seen other brands dropped and broken too. My Motorola has been dropped a number of times, no case, and the screen is still in tact after 2.5 years. The corners are dinged up a bit though. Guess I'm lucky.
Yes, judging by the number of times I've seen Verizon workers going on strike I'd say they are probably not the best place to work.
Fair enough, but this is about a "right" (though I disagree with the use of that term) and gaming and streaming video are not essential.
Deletes 30 million files, demands ransom, claims to be "good" Right then!
I'm with you except for the poet part. Have you read German poetry? The Germans I know don't even like German poetry. Maybe I could at least see an argument for opera or symphony, but Poetry?
Oblig Ice station Zebra: "The Russians put our camera made by *our* German scientists and your film made by *your* German scientists into their satellite made by *their* German scientists."