Here's the short ruling you requested: Congress granted copyrights, exercising a directly enumerated power. And they also have the power of the purse, and never attached instructions to not copyright papers from that science.
Iirc the government cannot force a backdoor or a weak standard, export aside, because the SC ruled citizens retain the right to encrypt as part of the right to speech, for encrypted speech is speech in and of itself.
The Supreme Court ruled the government could not use nascent IR scanners to "see" through house walls without a warrant, and that's a freaking passive scanner.
An active one like X-ray is a clear and blatant violation. This one is not even close. These people should literally be sent to jail.
They work well as revenue generation, they don't stop criminals from doing illegal things.
I have no idea how registration will even stop or hinder drones flying where they shouldn't. Put fear into people they will be found out if the drone crashes? Blast an ID wherever you go?
Nah, the tech is there to do virtual avoidance areas. Bad guys will ignore it, or registration, anyway.
Which reminds me. Is it too late? I wanted to ask him about his immigration policies with respect to central american countries, should they accept Americans?
Look out! I think the orange marker of the rectangle with the triangle in it is the last known location of a gelatinous cube with a partially-dissolved shield in it.
They fight over less than nothing for each customer -- look at all the contract buyout plans where another company will buy out your current contract (pay your early termination fees) and give you a better deal on top of it . Yes that $83 means a lot, multiplied by millions. They fight over years of negative profit per customer.
This is all about just forcing truth into claims of "unlimited" in advertising. No, you don't get to advertise unlimited-asterisk-pay-no-attention-to-the-little-man-behind-the-curtain-until-after-you-sign.
We are currently in a state where we are shifting our private info, our "papers" in 4th Amendment terms, outside our houses and into the hands of others, and anachronistic Supreme Court rulings have held we have no expectation of privacy in such things held by 3rd parties.
This needs to change, given people view themselves as holding a virtual presence out there on the nebulous Internet and in the computers thereon. It may need another amendment, but the Supreme Court could clear it all up tomorrow.
Basically is it a DMCA violation AKA anti-hacking law crime, to use a password you legitimately know to use the computer system for things you weren't supposed to.
This really stretches it too far if you ask me as there are other remedies before applying a hacking law. But they went too far long ago by allowing companies to use DMCA to hide copies of copyrighted things you bought from your own sight, like firmware. "Your car's computer can read your copy you own, but you can't."
Proper free trade relies heavily on a strong government that protects property rights from thirves and mafia and kickbacks, without turning into one giant dictatorship that amounts to the same thing.
Somalia (failed states with warlords) and dictatorship and communism all fail for the exact same reason -- people are not free to pursue economic interests without interference by people with guns demanding a slice.
That Republicans (or libertarians) "want Somalia!" shows how far down the leftist echo chamber rabbit hole his cognitive processor has tumblr'd.
If your reaction to this story is, "Rats! We need a different way to stop them then!" then you have a problem.
One should merely ask do they meet reasonable safety and insurance concerns? and move on with life. Regulatory capture by entrenched interests is in nobody's interest, and the fact these services are so popular just emphasizes how a nominal democracy can stray from the actual wishes of the people without a loud drumbeat to watch and interfere with the scurrilous, behind the scenes crap.
Did the suggested official moderator appear and cheat the system? Did, after a number of days, some bizarre wave of contradictor-censors zweep through?
Slashdot Mirror
On the other hand, slowing down a cure by a few years might very well kill more through inaction than all the lives saved due to caution so far.
What is an annual lag of, say, an unrealistically small 2% worth, compounded annually for 70 years? M8llions of lives? Tens of millions?
Caution only saves some over lawsuits and disconfirming field results. However, it looks a lot better in front of a camera.
Perhaps the brushing and flossing is the problem, gross as the alternative is.
Parallel construction is a violation. It's just not detectable usually. It should be illegal.
Be careful what you wish for. This will help open the way to a host of banking type regulations, especially about transparency and reporting.
Muliple in the sense you use a plural 's' when saying things like "zero dogs".
Here's the short ruling you requested: Congress granted copyrights, exercising a directly enumerated power. And they also have the power of the purse, and never attached instructions to not copyright papers from that science.
Rimes homophones with rhymes.
Well, if government changes its mind long after serious money is spent, the government should pay for it.
I don't know if it will, but it should.
I had a super-eruption recently. Let's just say Daisy Ridley was a fiiiiiiine choice for Star Wars.
Whew! So it's only 600 or so cubic miles.
Thank god.
Iirc the government cannot force a backdoor or a weak standard, export aside, because the SC ruled citizens retain the right to encrypt as part of the right to speech, for encrypted speech is speech in and of itself.
The invention turned out to be nothing of the sort, and supposedly his sister had been trying to stir shit up w.r.t. Muslim oppression.
The Supreme Court ruled the government could not use nascent IR scanners to "see" through house walls without a warrant, and that's a freaking passive scanner.
An active one like X-ray is a clear and blatant violation. This one is not even close. These people should literally be sent to jail.
Well, what should happen to a company that trusted a government's promises, only to have the legal rug yanked out from under them?
Smacks of retroactive legislation. Anyone should be able to ask if a certain action is legal or not, and proceed accordingly.
Going forward, the rules should change. Going backward, with respect to penalties, no.
Also, gosh Daisy Ridley is purty.
They work well as revenue generation, they don't stop criminals from doing illegal things.
I have no idea how registration will even stop or hinder drones flying where they shouldn't. Put fear into people they will be found out if the drone crashes? Blast an ID wherever you go?
Nah, the tech is there to do virtual avoidance areas. Bad guys will ignore it, or registration, anyway.
Which reminds me. Is it too late? I wanted to ask him about his immigration policies with respect to central american countries, should they accept Americans?
Look out! I think the orange marker of the rectangle with the triangle in it is the last known location of a gelatinous cube with a partially-dissolved shield in it.
They fight over less than nothing for each customer -- look at all the contract buyout plans where another company will buy out your current contract (pay your early termination fees) and give you a better deal on top of it . Yes that $83 means a lot, multiplied by millions. They fight over years of negative profit per customer.
This is all about just forcing truth into claims of "unlimited" in advertising. No, you don't get to advertise unlimited-asterisk-pay-no-attention-to-the-little-man-behind-the-curtain-until-after-you-sign.
Plus it's another revenue stream for government!
We are currently in a state where we are shifting our private info, our "papers" in 4th Amendment terms, outside our houses and into the hands of others, and anachronistic Supreme Court rulings have held we have no expectation of privacy in such things held by 3rd parties.
This needs to change, given people view themselves as holding a virtual presence out there on the nebulous Internet and in the computers thereon. It may need another amendment, but the Supreme Court could clear it all up tomorrow.
Basically is it a DMCA violation AKA anti-hacking law crime, to use a password you legitimately know to use the computer system for things you weren't supposed to.
This really stretches it too far if you ask me as there are other remedies before applying a hacking law. But they went too far long ago by allowing companies to use DMCA to hide copies of copyrighted things you bought from your own sight, like firmware. "Your car's computer can read your copy you own, but you can't."
Proper free trade relies heavily on a strong government that protects property rights from thirves and mafia and kickbacks, without turning into one giant dictatorship that amounts to the same thing.
Somalia (failed states with warlords) and dictatorship and communism all fail for the exact same reason -- people are not free to pursue economic interests without interference by people with guns demanding a slice.
That Republicans (or libertarians) "want Somalia!" shows how far down the leftist echo chamber rabbit hole his cognitive processor has tumblr'd.
If your reaction to this story is, "Rats! We need a different way to stop them then!" then you have a problem.
One should merely ask do they meet reasonable safety and insurance concerns? and move on with life. Regulatory capture by entrenched interests is in nobody's interest, and the fact these services are so popular just emphasizes how a nominal democracy can stray from the actual wishes of the people without a loud drumbeat to watch and interfere with the scurrilous, behind the scenes crap.
For the past two days, this post was +5.
Did the suggested official moderator appear and cheat the system? Did, after a number of days, some bizarre wave of contradictor-censors zweep through?
Release the details!
It is akin to intellectual property, so property-related words are fine to use in this context, as they always have been.
Perpetrators, of which some you no doubt support, self-describe as "pirates".