I'd much rather see innovation instead of government regulation. I didn't vote for President Trump. However, on this issue, I hope we can be a bit more flexible in what ISPs and various information providers can do.
We don't know how many miles have been driven autonomously.
"The company said Autopilot-enabled cars had covered 130 million miles without a fatality, compared to a national average of one fatality every 94 million miles."
And, remember, we are talking about a glorified cruise control that simply has to stay within the lines.
We definitely don't have the data Teslas is claiming that we have.
There does seem to be some logic in that argument. However, the question is about this particular feature. Has it killed more people by existing (or never having existed). We don't actually have any autonomous offerings out there, so there isn't really anything to dissuade.
I don't think being a journalist allows you to trespass. However, if there were to be such an exemption, I would expect that it would only be given if the journalist were truly just a neutral observe.
Being a somewhat sceptical individual, this really doesn't help my view on environmentalists in general. It seems that what governments and organizations tend to latch onto these bad ideas, applying magical thinking to fill in the gaps.
I would much rather see well reasoned approaches to making our lives better. Any of those around (the more non-political the better)?
I don't think Carnegie meant that you should do stupid things with your money. There are probably an enormous number of things that $3 billion can be better spent on rather than as noise in an already-well-funded area.
Slashdot Mirror
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Do they count hydrocarbon exports in this? If I'm not burning any myself, but I'm selling them to others, is that any better?
So, what you're saying is that Trump wants to keep smart immigrants in the country?
Also, I assume that, if it breaks, the car company is liable for any pedestrians hit (or if it isn't load enough, or the wrong tone, etc.).
I'd much rather see innovation instead of government regulation. I didn't vote for President Trump. However, on this issue, I hope we can be a bit more flexible in what ISPs and various information providers can do.
I'm guessing no bailouts this time...
Venezuela II
Only if it is SMT (Seattle Mean Time).
Wouldn't it just be cheaper to pop one of these out of an Internal Space Station window and see if it works?
It is made illegal to communicate your idea to the person you intend to communicate it with.
Uber can't force drivers (contractors) to accept fares. Otherwise, they'd be employees.
"...marked relationships between socio-economic deprivation and [poor] broadband availability in cities"
Face, meet palm.
We don't know how many miles have been driven autonomously.
"The company said Autopilot-enabled cars had covered 130 million miles without a fatality, compared to a national average of one fatality every 94 million miles."
And, remember, we are talking about a glorified cruise control that simply has to stay within the lines.
We definitely don't have the data Teslas is claiming that we have.
There does seem to be some logic in that argument. However, the question is about this particular feature. Has it killed more people by existing (or never having existed). We don't actually have any autonomous offerings out there, so there isn't really anything to dissuade.
Red headline (with no responses) during the debate...
He better get those servers secured. We wouldn't want to leak any classified documents. Hey, wait a minute... :/
Inside abortion clinics?
http://www.rcfp.org/browse-med...
https://www.rcfp.org/browse-me...
I don't think being a journalist allows you to trespass. However, if there were to be such an exemption, I would expect that it would only be given if the journalist were truly just a neutral observe.
Climate change simulations?
I think the republicans are more blameworthy here. They actually chose their candidate.
Being a somewhat sceptical individual, this really doesn't help my view on environmentalists in general. It seems that what governments and organizations tend to latch onto these bad ideas, applying magical thinking to fill in the gaps. I would much rather see well reasoned approaches to making our lives better. Any of those around (the more non-political the better)?
Cool, so this didn't happen?
I think central new agencies are a product of the left. Don't expect one with a Trump presidency.
I don't have a cable subscription. So, no.
I don't think Carnegie meant that you should do stupid things with your money. There are probably an enormous number of things that $3 billion can be better spent on rather than as noise in an already-well-funded area.