exactly, I recently upgraded to a 1.6G and I still haven't figured out why. Basically it was for other motherboard features, but I seriously do not use any of that computing power.
To the origional poster, use mozilla it's generally faster. I use it really quickly on my 800mhz laptop w/ 256M ram, I've never noticed it playing catch up. Granted I don't use CrapXP OS, but I do run KDE which does tend to eat 2-3% cpu constantly for assorted things.
C: write it to the W3C specs and send a bug report to MS if it dosent work.
oh, thats not an option? hm, no wonder all the 'web designers' think it's the superior product... er should that be "no wonder everyone that thinks it's a superior product is a 'web designer'"
I can see your point but I have to disagree. It's more like a mutual fund, you dump your money into the pool and expect it to be used apropriatly. If you find out they aern't doing what you like, you use a diffrent pool.
OTOH if you sent them a check saying "for WTC fund" and they used that for gun control, I would find that mildly disturbing.
As a permanent BSD user (workstation/server everything) I have to say windows is alot harder than BSD.
I spent well over 30 minuites trying to figure out how to get my network setup in WinXP when I tried it, and I couldn't for the life of me get IP masqurading to work. These are basic functions of the network stack, and they should take no longer than 3 webpages to figure out.
OEMs ship windows because thats what thier users demand
if only that were the truth. OEMs ship linux because of a great marketing department, legacy dos apps, and inertia. OEMs origionally shiped windows pre-installed because of some great price deals, and now they have to because of strong arming. If what you say was true, os/2 would have been shiped until at least the release of win98, which it was not.
because its a peer to Internet Exploiter 6.0. I'm prety sure thats what was in the back of everyones mind for this 1.0 release.
Until now IE has been better, now they have an equal number of bugs (if there was a bugzilla for IE it would have all those rendering 'features' listed as bugs, why is it diffrent when its mozilla instead of IE?). Come 1.1 and it will be better than IE.
yeah, but now that NS is back in the game; AOL is finally getting rid of IE (they have been 'about' to do that ever since 97 or so it seems), and IE isn't the *ONLY* browser you can use to actually view web pages (as it has been until last year or so in moz development), that might start shifting again.
I personally find IE having 95% of the marketshare disgusting anyway. If 3ds max has 95% of the marketshare, thats fine, as they have a great program. IE on the other hand provieded identical service to the competition, and won big because they cheated. The absolute worst is they completly ceased all forward development as soon as netscape was dead.
whats gona suck is when US soccer degrades to Football level. BTW who is the moron that goes 'were making a new sport, lets name it identical to that one in europe, and rename our version of that since we dont play it'
well duh, we just randomly gave them more money than they have ever even imagined before, for a crisis that definatly didn't require that much money.
I'd expect them to manage it with thought, and using it in other red-cross programs is the apropriate action once an apropriate amount is spent on WTC.
I personally find it about 500 times easier to navigate the logically assigned sub-menus than it is to navigate the 40thousand options under 'security' or whatever its called in IE nowadays.
Slashdot Mirror
Now, I'll be the first to say that we need a cohesive, third party, solid rating system for chips.
otherwise known as MIPS.
exactly, I recently upgraded to a 1.6G and I still haven't figured out why. Basically it was for other motherboard features, but I seriously do not use any of that computing power.
To the origional poster, use mozilla it's generally faster. I use it really quickly on my 800mhz laptop w/ 256M ram, I've never noticed it playing catch up. Granted I don't use CrapXP OS, but I do run KDE which does tend to eat 2-3% cpu constantly for assorted things.
my mafia is chinese
actually just put a cisco an card in bss mode' you will get well over 100 meters if no water/conrete/metal in line of site
Just find another gay techno geek. (100% serious)
Unfortunatly it's a bit more complicated once you involve the other sex (everything always is).
amazing
:)
I give it +5 interesting
keep it up
mods: please refrain from killing my karma, thanks
I also am impressed, the progress you guys made is astounding
C: write it to the W3C specs and send a bug report to MS if it dosent work.
oh, thats not an option? hm, no wonder all the 'web designers' think it's the superior product... er should that be "no wonder everyone that thinks it's a superior product is a 'web designer'"
I can see your point but I have to disagree. It's more like a mutual fund, you dump your money into the pool and expect it to be used apropriatly. If you find out they aern't doing what you like, you use a diffrent pool.
OTOH if you sent them a check saying "for WTC fund" and they used that for gun control, I would find that mildly disturbing.
at last... now we know what those silly mice were trying to compute. Apparently the perfect choss game can be reduced to the number 42.
As a permanent BSD user (workstation/server everything) I have to say windows is alot harder than BSD.
I spent well over 30 minuites trying to figure out how to get my network setup in WinXP when I tried it, and I couldn't for the life of me get IP masqurading to work. These are basic functions of the network stack, and they should take no longer than 3 webpages to figure out.
OEMs ship windows because thats what thier users demand
if only that were the truth. OEMs ship linux because of a great marketing department, legacy dos apps, and inertia. OEMs origionally shiped windows pre-installed because of some great price deals, and now they have to because of strong arming. If what you say was true, os/2 would have been shiped until at least the release of win98, which it was not.
because its a peer to Internet Exploiter 6.0. I'm prety sure thats what was in the back of everyones mind for this 1.0 release.
Until now IE has been better, now they have an equal number of bugs (if there was a bugzilla for IE it would have all those rendering 'features' listed as bugs, why is it diffrent when its mozilla instead of IE?). Come 1.1 and it will be better than IE.
yeah, but now that NS is back in the game; AOL is finally getting rid of IE (they have been 'about' to do that ever since 97 or so it seems), and IE isn't the *ONLY* browser you can use to actually view web pages (as it has been until last year or so in moz development), that might start shifting again.
I personally find IE having 95% of the marketshare disgusting anyway. If 3ds max has 95% of the marketshare, thats fine, as they have a great program. IE on the other hand provieded identical service to the competition, and won big because they cheated. The absolute worst is they completly ceased all forward development as soon as netscape was dead.
I didn't check that particular one, but all RFC's have always rendered correctly for me ever since around .9.x
it's not good enough for me.
I tend to use the internet while in the sanitation facilities more often than I don't.
:)
In case you wanted to know, I'm using my toilet while writing this post.
Yep, thought you did
so full of holes I could strain pasta with it
At least it's not writen in perl. Then how could you tell it from the pasta your straining?
I have a radeon8500, I just renice it and I think I set a framerate cap once upon a time (I don't play often -- read ever).
I've found I generally can't see anything above around 35fps, so there is really no point in wasting my computer to pump frames out I can't see.
whats gona suck is when US soccer degrades to Football level. BTW who is the moron that goes 'were making a new sport, lets name it identical to that one in europe, and rename our version of that since we dont play it'
I crack up laughing when I hear them
they all scare me
/cry
Similar situation here, it's not that rare.
well duh, we just randomly gave them more money than they have ever even imagined before, for a crisis that definatly didn't require that much money.
I'd expect them to manage it with thought, and using it in other red-cross programs is the apropriate action once an apropriate amount is spent on WTC.
I personally find it about 500 times easier to navigate the logically assigned sub-menus than it is to navigate the 40thousand options under 'security' or whatever its called in IE nowadays.
haha
/me opens the paper tomorow morning and sees the frontpage headline "AOL/TW switching to the hardware buisness"