Why is it there? Was MS trying to cater to Mac users, accustomed to one mouse button? It makes no sense.
s quite useful. Whenever Word flags a word as misspelled, I can just tap the arrow about twice and press the context menu key. I'm actually quite annoyed at the implementation of smart tags because when they pop up, I can't use the context menu key to access the options. It's also different from normal right-clicking because the context is based on the typing cursor or other focus, not the mouse cursor.
Or, in my case turn it into a $200 brick. The only Linux distro for PPCs seems to be for IPAQ only (and not those claming to be IPAQ compatable).
That's Linux's problem, not Dell's or Microsoft's. Pocket PC is not designed to be an open platform, and it's not marketed as such. If you wanted a Linux handheld, you should have bought one. I was just arguing a possibility, as the platform is fairly consistant across manufacturers.
I wonder if we'll see any upgrades to the browser for Pocket PC 2002, or if we will need to purchase a new device with 2003 on it. Let me guess...
How about I guess. Let's see... Microsoft makes about $8 on each license for Windows for Pocket PC, which they get whether you buy a new device or upgrade an old one. Microsoft also required all PPC2002 units to have a minimum size of upgradable system flash memory. Now let's look to history: Compaq iPaq Pocket PC 2000 handhelds had upgrades available to 2002, and the 2002 models are far more standardized across all companies. In addition, it's really the discretion of the hardware company, not Microsoft, since the PPC OS must be customized. Finally, if you're really that anti-Microsoft, you can load Linux on the thing and stop complaining.
Apple's open rendezvous seems idea for communication between diverse devices capable of many tasks. I believe iTunes can share over the service, which makes it empirically possible to implement it for MP3 sharing across a home network.
Unlike copyrights, patent terms are very limited and nonrenewable.
Incorrect. Patents are renewable under limited circumstances, particularly where the company or individual can prove that significant investment or research went into the intellectual property.
What I've always objected to is that we can ONLY assign single letters like "F" instead of something that would make sense like "MyWorkToDo".
You can map physical drives to folders on another drive or add a link under "My Network Places". I encourage people to use "My Network Places" instead of mapped drives for your reason as well as others. I, personally, would like to see the entire file system, local and network, accessed through CIFS/SMB. "\\localhost\Shared Documents" blurs the lines between the network and local file system, which both makes users less disoriented and application writing easier due to not having to support local and network file access APIs.
In war driving about 14,000 access points in the northwest the results are fairly consistent with the numbers the article mentions
The problem with measuring some companies is that their access points come with unique default SSIDs. One is Proxim Orinoco. The default names on their APs are based on the serial numbers printed on the bottom. BTW, "tsunami" is usually Cisco in my experience.
Re:Wind Farms don't work
on
A Mighty Wind
·
· Score: 1
Ok, theres an obvious solution to this... build a damn mesh cage around the propeller blades.
...because wind mills wound never create a vacuum strong enough to trap a swallow. Actually, it's simply a matter of weight ratios.
I was always under the impression that clean amplification had to do with a clean, stable power source, not high voltage. Also, why does voltage matter for more power-hungry electronics? Amperage is the measure of load. Homes have exponentially increased power comsumption, yet the answer has been higer amperage wiring, not extensive high-voltage circuits. Finally, how does 42V DC convert much easier to 120V AC? Don't you still have to use an inverter?
Not only would the RIAA's noise:signal ratio in searching rise, but if even one claim is successful, it opens the RIAA up to a world of hurt.
It increases the S/N ratio for everyone, not just the RIAA. Remember that they first proposed putting dummy tracks on the web. This just does the work for them. On the legal side, however, I'm not so sure what the implications would be.
2.4GHz is unregulated because it sucks for long range. It's absorbed by water and other common compounds on earth. Additionally, Bush would catch flak for doing something that severely hurt business.
I hate to be a grammar freak, but the reference to "they" in the posted story could be Novell or SCO. Each interpretation means exactly the opposite. While it wouldn't make sense for SCO to disclose an amendment that gives Novell ownership, that requires reading and thinking about the story, which we all know won't happen here.
The following are simply examples that support my argument. More examples exist.
Why does it do this? Are you suggesting that shops that use mixed products cannot simply download and install Mozilla? Or whatever browser they want to use?
Yes (to the second question). Outlook Web Access works far better in IE. Any other browser runs a far less functional "down level" version. In other words, the best Exchange situation is Windows servers, laptops, and desktops. Anything less decreases the return on investment in the software. It's hard to justify paying for software that has significant features that won't be used. Most improvements in Exchange since 5.5 (IMO) have been in web access.
And why would they want to avoid Windows just because it has IE integrated (vs. standalone)? Does the presence of IE somehow ruin their business?
I'm really referring to the combination of formerly separate packages that each cost money, like Office, Windows, and separate server packages. If Microsoft has a $300 package and a $200 package, and your business only needs the $200 package, then fine. When Microsoft combines the products and the sole product combines the functionality of the first two as well as the price, the new, expensive package has less value. Microsoft has done this with several products, like ISA Server (in some ways), Exchange, and Office. Likewise, not using the integration features of separate Microsoft packages hurts ROI and TCO.
By bundling everything in together (probably with a mail client), M$ no longer have to worry about the opposition packages.
MS will have to worry about offices making the decision now. As much as integration helps future sales to MS-only shops, it stifles sales to shops that use mixed products. If I owned a business, such integration would make me wary of buying into a complete MS solution for fear of future commitment.
Slashdot Mirror
My HP LaserJet 4000N can, even though I don't actually use the COM connection. It's just a different protocol and cable.
s quite useful. Whenever Word flags a word as misspelled, I can just tap the arrow about twice and press the context menu key. I'm actually quite annoyed at the implementation of smart tags because when they pop up, I can't use the context menu key to access the options. It's also different from normal right-clicking because the context is based on the typing cursor or other focus, not the mouse cursor.
That's Linux's problem, not Dell's or Microsoft's. Pocket PC is not designed to be an open platform, and it's not marketed as such. If you wanted a Linux handheld, you should have bought one. I was just arguing a possibility, as the platform is fairly consistant across manufacturers.
How about I guess. Let's see... Microsoft makes about $8 on each license for Windows for Pocket PC, which they get whether you buy a new device or upgrade an old one. Microsoft also required all PPC2002 units to have a minimum size of upgradable system flash memory. Now let's look to history: Compaq iPaq Pocket PC 2000 handhelds had upgrades available to 2002, and the 2002 models are far more standardized across all companies. In addition, it's really the discretion of the hardware company, not Microsoft, since the PPC OS must be customized. Finally, if you're really that anti-Microsoft, you can load Linux on the thing and stop complaining.
Apple's open rendezvous seems idea for communication between diverse devices capable of many tasks. I believe iTunes can share over the service, which makes it empirically possible to implement it for MP3 sharing across a home network.
The slightly broken English on their main page kind of takes away from the elegant image they seek.
Incorrect. Patents are renewable under limited circumstances, particularly where the company or individual can prove that significant investment or research went into the intellectual property.
I sure hope the memory served if it was $100/MB.
You can map physical drives to folders on another drive or add a link under "My Network Places". I encourage people to use "My Network Places" instead of mapped drives for your reason as well as others. I, personally, would like to see the entire file system, local and network, accessed through CIFS/SMB. "\\localhost\Shared Documents" blurs the lines between the network and local file system, which both makes users less disoriented and application writing easier due to not having to support local and network file access APIs.
That's probably more applicable than you intended: File System Check
The problem with measuring some companies is that their access points come with unique default SSIDs. One is Proxim Orinoco. The default names on their APs are based on the serial numbers printed on the bottom. BTW, "tsunami" is usually Cisco in my experience.
...because wind mills wound never create a vacuum strong enough to trap a swallow. Actually, it's simply a matter of weight ratios.
...under a ladder. (Throws salt over shoulder)
I was always under the impression that clean amplification had to do with a clean, stable power source, not high voltage. Also, why does voltage matter for more power-hungry electronics? Amperage is the measure of load. Homes have exponentially increased power comsumption, yet the answer has been higer amperage wiring, not extensive high-voltage circuits. Finally, how does 42V DC convert much easier to 120V AC? Don't you still have to use an inverter?
You'd rather spend time with your application than your wife?
It increases the S/N ratio for everyone, not just the RIAA. Remember that they first proposed putting dummy tracks on the web. This just does the work for them. On the legal side, however, I'm not so sure what the implications would be.
Day of the Thumb: The new retro game from LucasArts.
At least X-Box gamers will no longer be able to reproduce (not that they stood any significant chance before).
Outlook 2002 lets you use IMAP and Exchange concurrently.
I think you mean "10 kinds of people".
2.4GHz is unregulated because it sucks for long range. It's absorbed by water and other common compounds on earth. Additionally, Bush would catch flak for doing something that severely hurt business.
Try 3DMark03.exe. It should run faster on nVidia cards.
I hate to be a grammar freak, but the reference to "they" in the posted story could be Novell or SCO. Each interpretation means exactly the opposite. While it wouldn't make sense for SCO to disclose an amendment that gives Novell ownership, that requires reading and thinking about the story, which we all know won't happen here.
Why does it do this? Are you suggesting that shops that use mixed products cannot simply download and install Mozilla? Or whatever browser they want to use?
Yes (to the second question). Outlook Web Access works far better in IE. Any other browser runs a far less functional "down level" version. In other words, the best Exchange situation is Windows servers, laptops, and desktops. Anything less decreases the return on investment in the software. It's hard to justify paying for software that has significant features that won't be used. Most improvements in Exchange since 5.5 (IMO) have been in web access.
And why would they want to avoid Windows just because it has IE integrated (vs. standalone)? Does the presence of IE somehow ruin their business?
I'm really referring to the combination of formerly separate packages that each cost money, like Office, Windows, and separate server packages. If Microsoft has a $300 package and a $200 package, and your business only needs the $200 package, then fine. When Microsoft combines the products and the sole product combines the functionality of the first two as well as the price, the new, expensive package has less value. Microsoft has done this with several products, like ISA Server (in some ways), Exchange, and Office. Likewise, not using the integration features of separate Microsoft packages hurts ROI and TCO.
MS will have to worry about offices making the decision now. As much as integration helps future sales to MS-only shops, it stifles sales to shops that use mixed products. If I owned a business, such integration would make me wary of buying into a complete MS solution for fear of future commitment.