Slashdot Mirror


PocketPC 2003 Reviewed

Sander Sassen writes "Prior to the official launch of the Microsoft PocketPC 2003 platform next Monday, Hardware Analysis puts an Asus MyPal a620 PocketPC to the test and details what new features PocketPC 2003 brings to the table and whether it is worth it to upgrade from 2002."

167 comments

  1. hot grits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft completely revamped the rendering architecture of the PocketPC Internet Explorer which not only speeds thing up considerably but also offers support for more internet standards.

    Microsoft does not built standards compliant browsers, designers build Internet Explorer compliant websites.

    1. Re:hot grits? by ondasmom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Internet Explorer is the only browser the does follow all ITS standards

    2. Re:hot grits? by dubStylee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although I agree with you in general about IE and standards, moving from pocketPC 2002 to pocketPC 2003 is moving from IE 3.0 to IE 6.0 and by any measure, there is a huge improvement in standards support between those two versions. Try writing an ECMAscript or DOM app with Jscript (not even JavaScript) and you'll know what I mean.

  2. Ipod Harddrive by Sh0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why don't they make a pocket pc with the Ipod harddrive inside?

    1. Re:Ipod Harddrive by dubStylee · · Score: 1

      One gig compact flash cards are getting cheap.

  3. haha by Poofat · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the top of the page:

    Please register or login. There are 6 registered and 589 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 1672.32 kbit/s

    Good 'ol slashdot.

    1. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Neat! The Slashdot effect in near realtime.

      Please register or login. There are 8 registered and 756 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2596.05 kbit/s

    2. Re:haha by DarkAurora · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see your:

      There are 6 registered and 589 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 1672.32 kbit/s

      And raise you a:

      There are 10 registered and 1169 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2293.60 kbit/s

    3. Re:haha by Read+Icculus · · Score: 1

      Please register or login. There are 11 registered and 1382 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2983.19 kbit/s

      What fun! man wget.

      --
      Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
    4. Re:haha by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Can you beat my

      Please register or login. There are 11 registered and 1423 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2692.13 kbit/s

    5. Re:haha by vrwarp · · Score: 1

      Yes There are 9 registered and 1957 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2566.65 kbit/s

      --
      --vrwarp
    6. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are 10 registered and 2220 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2565.89 kbit/s

      so close...

    7. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a royal 10 registered and 2487 anonymous users using 2833.18 kbit/s?

    8. Re:haha by beaviz · · Score: 1

      Bwaha! In a short moment:
      There are 0 registered and 0 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 9501.01 kbit/s

      argh...

    9. Re:haha by ksheka · · Score: 1

      I'll call.

      I've got
      There are 7 registered and 2361 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2890.11 kbit/s

      --
      alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
    10. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the members of the /. community slacking off? The site is STILL UP!

  4. Is that a PocketPC in your pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or are you just glad to see me? Oh wait, it's Slashdot, must be a PocketPC.

    1. Re:Is that a PocketPC in your pants by drdale · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh wait, it's Slashdot, you must be glad to see MY PocketPC.

      --
      This post is dedicated to all of those /.ers who do not dedicate their posts to themselves.
    2. Re:Is that a PocketPC in your pants by sfraggle · · Score: 1
      you must be glad to see MY PocketPC.
      Only if its running linux.
      --
      were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    3. Re:Is that a PocketPC in your pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At which point both of the Slashdotters whip out their PocketPCs and link to create... a beowulf cluster!

  5. Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I heard it's going to be the first handheld capable of playing DVDs too. I don't know if 400MHz is enough to do SVCD decoding, but I wouldn't be surprised if somebody comes up with a package for that too.

    I just wish somebody would add wireless networking to the things already like they did with the tablet PCs. Those are sweet.

    1. Re:Very cool. by Doom+Ihl'+Varia · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it can do DVD decoding, it can do SVCD. They are both MPEG-2. SVCD is lower quality though so it is even EASIER to decode. Plus, you don't have to deal with decryption of the DVD data.

    2. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heard it's going to be the first handheld capable of playing DVDs too.

      Dude, a DVD disk is bigger than this device!

      Are you a troll or an idiot?

    3. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, he was making a very obvious joke!

      Are you a troll or an idiot?

    4. Re:Very cool. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Wow DVD playing.

      Perfect for a nice slim pda????

      Is it just me or is Microsoft puting in feature-ware or marketingware to fud off palm?

    5. Re:Very cool. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Yeah.
      I mean, Windows XP said it could play DVDs too..

      they never mentioned you had to buy extra stuff to get it to work.

    6. Re:Very cool. by SEGV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can already rip DVDs to a 250MB DivX that will fit on a 256MB flash card and play fine on a Pocket PC 2002 device. I like to watch Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon when I am bored.

      --

      --
      Marc A. Lepage
      Software Developer
    7. Re:Very cool. by dubStylee · · Score: 1

      I just wish somebody would add wireless networking to the things

      The Toshiba e740/750 come with built in 802.11b (or Bluetooth in Europe). And wifi CF cards are available for most other pocketpc devices.

    8. Re:Very cool. by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the codecs for playing the DivX files? Or does WMP already have that ability?

      Since the iPaq screen is taller than it is wide, can you rotate the video 90 degrees and have a more widescreen presentation?

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    9. Re:Very cool. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Check out Project Mayo. A free, open source DivX player for PocketPC devices, AKA Pocket DivX.

      It does work.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  6. Small and Big by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The changes for the end user are going to be rather small. The changes for the developers who are going to move to .NET tools for PocketPC programming rather than the hacked versions of VS6 we are using now is going to be a larger change.

    1. Re:Small and Big by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. I can't wait to use a slower toolkit like .NET on a handheld. Troll me if you want, but I use WinCE/VS/VS.NET for a living, and it's true.

  7. Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by SClitheroe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized?

    That's really the million dollar question. PocketPC 2002 is not, and it's a real shame, because it hurts the performance of those 400mhz Xscale CPU's pretty badly.

    1. Re:Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by Talez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No I think the million dollar question for this place is whether the f#@&*ing IE for PocketPC 2K3 supports PNGs with alpha channels properly yet.

    2. Re:Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the USB 2.0 high-speed or full-speed?

    3. Re:Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by topham · · Score: 1

      SOme of the newer units are running with the PXA255; which performs (my understanding) much better than the older Xscale processor. Mostly because they upped the bus speed for memory. (I have a Dell Axim with the PXA255, the bus speed is supposedly 133Mhz instead of 100, while newer PocketPCs often have 200Mhz bus speed.

      (I suspect they played it safe with the Dell design as it was simply a redesign of the prior unit.)

      But, I'm hoping the new PocketPC will help to improve things as well.

    4. Re:Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PXA250 is errataed to have its writeback cache disabled (#100, or 120, or around there). That's the main cause for the slowness. Code that makes use of memory like it's fast suffers tremendously (oxymoron there). Code that doesn't "new" every little bit, and copy memory all over the place, to and fro, runs a little faster than the old SA1110. Put it this way, the PXA250 running at 236 MHz is almost exactly as fast as a SA1110 at 236 MHz. The PXA250 at 400 MHz is only a triffle faster. The current shipping XScale is the PXA255 (a later stepping of the 250 is all it is) doesn't have the WB errataed and it's presumed Pocket PC 2003 turns the WB bit on for all cachable pages.

    5. Re:Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Next million dollar question: will Microsoft offer free upgrades to the PocketPC 2003 OS for those who purchased an Xscale device that is currently underutilized in the PocketPC 2002 OS?

      And since I'm fairly sure they won't be free, will they at least be discounted?

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    6. Re:Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by pyrote · · Score: 1

      in all honesty, last time I checked, IE for XP was not so hot on alpha either.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  8. because harddrives suck. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Check out mram and other technologies that will replace flash, RAM, and even CPU cache. Harddrives are noisy and power intensive. Far from an elegant solution.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:because harddrives suck. by Trekie8472 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Power intensive yes, but you need to put your ear up to an iPod hard drive to hear it during normal play.

    2. Re:because harddrives suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      During normal play, it's far more likely the hard drive is not on. The ipod plays music from its 32mb cache.

    3. Re:because harddrives suck. by Boltronics · · Score: 0

      You're right. I don't think noise is much of an issue. I can speak - I own a HipZip; the loudest mp3 player on the planet!

      --
      It's GNU/Linux dammit!
  9. interesting stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's some really cool stuff. I wish they had a little more detail to their coverage. I thought I read a few paragraphs and saw a few pics and that was it.

    Lots of "Clearly, this is great" without much saying of why or how.

  10. Price by jesler · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article lists the price as

    Price: +/- 350 dollar, 329 euro

    I assume they use "+/-" to mean approxiamately. If not, I'll choose the -$350 option and you can pay me to use this thing.

    1. Re:Price by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny

      You actually don't want the -$350 one because that version is made of antimatter. It's a little too hot to handle.

    2. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 informative? Someone needs to wake up in science class.

    3. Re:Price by kurosawdust · · Score: 1

      Nah, dude - that's the over/under. You bet a certain amount of money that they'll either charge you more or less than $350. Personally, I would go with "over" - word around the campfire, you know what I mean? *taps nose*

    4. Re:Price by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      +1 Informative, No

      +1 Funny, sure

      Waffle Iron, you have succeeded in proving that someone needs to chlorinate the moderation pool.

      P.S. If you see this in M2, please vote it unfair.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  11. Not really a review of Pocket PC 2003 by cloudless.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In fact it is more like a review of the Asus MyPal a620 Pocket PC. I was expecting to see the detail of new features in the new OS, but it only tells me about the new media player and not much else. I am more interested about the performance of the new OS, as it is supposed to be optimized for the Xscale CPU. By the way, the MyPal Pocket PC has a terrible name and is very ugly, don't you think? I think the Taiwanese manufacturers should hire some better designers.

  12. Yes, but... by cloudless.net · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes it is, but no benchmark has been published yet so I have no idea how good the optimization is. Developers must rewrite their applications for Pocket PC 2003 in order to take advantage of the optimizations. The review kinda sucks because it tells us nothing about the performance.

    1. Re:Yes, but... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      WEll it did say some things, in fact in the last page of the article the author discusses how there is no benchmark available.

      I have an old Casio E125, which has a 150mhz MIPS processor and 32 megs of ram. Video does play, but it is always pretty choppy and never more than 1-3 frames per second which can get annoying but you get used to it. THe author explicitly states the new Xscale optimized unit can play video perfectly... Which is a great bonus.

      PocketPC 2003 includes a new version of Internet Explorer which is not crippled in any way and also apparently much faster.

      In my experience the only time I experience slowdown are these two instances. Maybe I will upgrade, but I still have this fear yet ANOTHER processor is going to come out for the damn thing. SH3, MIPS, ARM, Xscale... now what.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:Yes, but... by cookd · · Score: 1

      Windows CE supports:

      x86
      SH3
      SH4
      Two flavors of Mips
      Arm

      Anything new added to the Windows CE lineup would have to go through a pretty long process before it got PocketPC support, so you won't see any new processor flavors anytime soon.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    3. Re:Yes, but... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      My concern is more the fact that no one makes software for MIPS anymore. I am not worried about new processors showing up so much as the fact developers seem to focus on the dominant platform.

      Originally, they said this wasn't such a big deal because the standard was going to be ARM, but now suddenly it is Xscale. Yes, I know Xscale is backwards compatible with ARM but software needs to be written specifically for it to really benefit from the additional speed.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  13. it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product by stonebeat.org · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product. but they force you to do so, by making new apps incompatible with older apps/oses. I still use my orginal PocketPC, and am quite content with it. I am guessing about 80% of the people never actually had a REAL NEED to upgrade from PocketPC

    1. Re:it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product by cd_Csc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still use my orginal PocketPC, and am quite content with it. I am guessing about 80% of the people never actually had a REAL NEED to upgrade from PocketPC

      Most people never actually had a real need to upgrade from paper and pencil. But we did it anyways. Why? Technological innovation makes certain tasks easier and certain situations more enjoyable. Pocket PC 2003 will be no different. There are many things (for both developers and end users) that it will make easier and more enjoyable. Whether it's suitable for you is simply a question of whether these things are important to you. I'd hold off until full reviews of the changes surface before making that decision.

    2. Re:it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product by dagar17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Microsoft has gone to great lengths in order to not break compatability with many products. This has also made many products (eg Windows) weaker. Thats why you can still run 10 year old windows software on windows xp.

    3. Re:it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product by sjofi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people never actually had a real need to upgrade from paper and pencil.

      And indeed most people never have upgraded from paper and pencil to PDAs.

    4. Re:it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product by ADRA · · Score: 1

      nak.

      They write compatability layers (in nt based kernels) so core OS stays the same while writing a wrapper around the legacy software.

      Any weaknesses in Windows would be clearly Higher level developer incompetance.

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:it is never worth upgrading a microsoft product by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      (Mod me down, but...) some people haven't upgraded from not logging their appointments (for example, poverty-stricken countries in Africa or the Middle East) to paper and pencil...

  14. Now at 2500KB/s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Please register or login. There are 10 registered and 2086 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2499.40 kbit/s" It's gonna blow

  15. You mean Internet Explorer for Windows by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    IE5/Mac was, at the time of it's release, the most standards compliant browser in history.

    IE6/Win isn't doing so bad either, really. I've found that most of the XHTML/CSS2 sites I author work fine in IE6/Win.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:You mean Internet Explorer for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Instead of modding down, why don't the smartasses "In the Know" reply to the post with some facts as to why IE isn't standards compliant? Just because IE has a bunch of new junk that Mozilla, Netscape, and Opera can't see doesn't mean it isn't standards compliant. Flame the webmaster or Mozilla if you want new crap.

      I see this post coming up in meta mod. Expect my vote to be unfair.

    2. Re:You mean Internet Explorer for Windows by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

      Two words, man.

      moz-opaciy:

      You want to talk non-standard compliant, there it is,

      See, I'm offtopic for saying that maybe a product released by microsoft wasn't enirely evil. As we all know, this is wrong.

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    3. Re:You mean Internet Explorer for Windows by jameslore · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll bite :-)

      IE isn't standards compliant because it breaks several W3C standards and doesn't support many of the standards it implements properly. That's a fact I'm afraid. Whether or not the behaviour in IE should be standard is up for debate (though I choose Moz).

      IE isn't too bad, outstanding issues which make it a pain in the arse include:

      1) Bollocks PNG support. Alpha channel support needs a custom tag (DXImage filter or something similar).
      2) CSS box model, width includes margins/padding size.
      3) Doesn't support absolute positioning without width/height size: e.g.

      top: 100px;
      bottom: 100px;
      width: 100%;

      will result in a box 0px (unless there's content in which case it's the content height) and 100% wide. In mozilla and compliant broswers it is a box 100px from the top of the window to 100px from the bottom.
      4) Background positioning from a origin doesn't work (see CSS/Edge for a demo, link is on mozilla.org/start/1.0).
      5) CSS 2 content generation support is nonexistant. CSS 2 support in general is hit and miss.
      6) No support for W3C event system.
      7) Lots of other small issues which slip my mind at present :-)

      Lists of CSS support/bugs tend to be fairly easy to find on the net though many are a little out of date.

    4. Re:You mean Internet Explorer for Windows by Trelane · · Score: 3, Informative

      Opacity is in the upcoming CSS3 standard, which Mozilla is helping test. Thus, it was prefixed with moz- to specify that it wasn't in a full-fledged standard.

      Actually, a bug was found in CSS2 because of Mozilla's strict standards support (see Netscape's development documents on images in a table for more info).

      The nice thing about Mozilla is that its extensions tend to be obvious. TMK, all Mozilla off-standard stuff is recognizable as such, as you have so aptly demonstated (note the "moz-" prefix). Unlike Other Browsers which implement their extensions in unrecognizable fashion (e.g. MARQUEE tag).

      Anyhow, you're not talking about not supporting standards, you're talking of adding to the stuff out there (and note that I've shown that Mozilla is being a good citizen in this respect!). For supporting existing W3C standards, nothing is better than Mozilla, and IE falls far short. Example: DOM level 2 compliance, esp. wrt. event handling.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  16. Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just use familiar with opie. You'll be happier, and have more spare change to buy things that matter.

    1. Re:Familiar by ticklejw · · Score: 1

      A bad StrongARM Linux Poem written on the spot...

      Familiar is my newest best friend
      Opie makes things look good for me
      Pocket PC's come not to an end
      For Linux on a PDA is FREE!

      --
      "Software is like sex; it's better when it's free." -Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Familiar by *xpenguin* · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? Pocket PC will cause you a lot less pain setting things up, and since it's already included in the device, you don't save any money by installing an inferior alpha-quality OS on it.

    3. Re:Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Openzaurus/Opie setup steps:

      copy 2 files to a CF card

      insert card in Zaurus

      shut off Zaurus

      hold down 'c' and 'd' keys while pressing 'full reset' button

      That's it. Difficult for a Windows die-herd perhaps...

    4. Re:Familiar by m4g02 · · Score: 1

      Just use familiar with opie. You'll be happier, and have more spare change to buy things that matter.

      I dont know what do you use your handhled for but i think GPE is much better than Opie, it runs inside the mini X server so you can do a lot of leet stuff like running Xine and Snes9x for Linux.

      --
      Sigs are for morons... Wait a minute...
    5. Re:Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried GPE as well, and do like it, but as far as PDA "stuff" goes, like PIM, I think Opie is a bit stronger. But I guess the main thing: given that Familiar, the base Linux install, Opie and GPE are all open source Linux software, they're free to use, so giving up one for another (Opie and GPE; both run atop Familiar) takes about 40 minutes for a new serial transfer :-D If you don't like one, try the other!

    6. Re:Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And if you want to go the Familiar/Opie/GPE route, transfer transfer bootloader to device, run the nice little "scrap-your-windows-install-because-linux-is-bette r" bootblaster program...

      Then begin:

      • copy 2 files to a CF card
      • insert card in iPaq
      • shut off iPaq
      • hold down the record button


      That's it. Difficult for a Windows die-hard perhaps...

  17. XHTML support? Yes! by donutz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a network connection will most likely also be used for web browsing Microsoft completely revamped the rendering architecture of the PocketPC Internet Explorer which not only speeds thing up considerably but also offers support for more internet standards. Standards that are now available in PocketPC 2003 are XHTML, CSS, HTML 4.0, JavaScript 5.5, WAP 2.0, WTLS, IPv6 and many more, which makes the PocketPC web browser compatible with the vast majority of websites found on the internet and intranets which often use some of the more exotic protocols.

    All I can say is ABOUT TIME! I don't even bother trying to do any web browsing on my Dell Axim X5 running Pocket PC 2002. It's just disgusting that they have an IE 3.x based browser running on something so new!

    I wonder if we'll see any upgrades to the browser for Pocket PC 2002, or if we will need to purchase a new device with 2003 on it. Let me guess...

    1. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      I wonder if we'll see any upgrades to the browser for Pocket PC 2002, or if we will need to purchase a new device with 2003 on it. Let me guess...

      How about I guess. Let's see... Microsoft makes about $8 on each license for Windows for Pocket PC, which they get whether you buy a new device or upgrade an old one. Microsoft also required all PPC2002 units to have a minimum size of upgradable system flash memory. Now let's look to history: Compaq iPaq Pocket PC 2000 handhelds had upgrades available to 2002, and the 2002 models are far more standardized across all companies. In addition, it's really the discretion of the hardware company, not Microsoft, since the PPC OS must be customized. Finally, if you're really that anti-Microsoft, you can load Linux on the thing and stop complaining.

    2. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by donutz · · Score: 1

      Finally, if you're really that anti-Microsoft, you can load Linux on the thing and stop complaining.

      Aha! At least there's one point in your argument where you're wrong: it really belongs to my employer, so I don't wanna screw it up by trying linux on it (well I do wanna experiment but dont wanna deal with the consequences ;)

      Seriously though, it's just my cynicism combined with the fact that whenever something new and good comes out, it seems like it's usually not compatible with what I've got. Oh well. Here's to hoping you're right, and Dell makes an upgrade available!

    3. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by thynk · · Score: 1

      you can load Linux on the thing and stop complaining.

      Or, in my case turn it into a $200 brick. The only Linux distro for PPCs seems to be for IPAQ only (and not those claming to be IPAQ compatable).

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    4. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      Or, in my case turn it into a $200 brick. The only Linux distro for PPCs seems to be for IPAQ only (and not those claming to be IPAQ compatable).

      That's Linux's problem, not Dell's or Microsoft's. Pocket PC is not designed to be an open platform, and it's not marketed as such. If you wanted a Linux handheld, you should have bought one. I was just arguing a possibility, as the platform is fairly consistant across manufacturers.

    5. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by thynk · · Score: 1

      That's Linux's problem, not Dell's or Microsoft's.

      Nope, it's my problem and no one elses. I read that this boot loader would work on Ipaqs and ran across some reviews of this Amigo PD-600C PPC was an IPAQ in sheeps clothing and made the equation that it would work.

      Yes, most of the hardware has the same specs, but it seems that most of the hardware is made in completely different ways (like you just said). I really just wanted to throw it out there that since you mentioned loading Linux on a PPC, that it probably doesn't work on anything other than an IPAQ (in my experience).

      The good news is that I did make a back up of the ROM, and that the company I work for will probably have the equipment to reflash the chip. IF I can find time to do that.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    6. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Too bad... Palms can recover from a failed flash upgrade, part of the boot code detects an invalid image and boots into debug mode listening on the serial port.

      Unfortunately for all the PPC suckers, no such thing exists -- Failed ROM upgrade = dead device.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    7. Re:XHTML support? Yes! by mobets · · Score: 1

      if you have an older one with an x-scale then yes, other wise, no. At least that is what I was told by the Toshiba rep a few months back. Apearently, all of the 400Mhz x-scale PocketPC's with 2002 don't perfom any better than the 200Mhz, but with an upgrade to 2003 you can really see a difference.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  18. Odd... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Huh I thought Pocket PC 2003 has been out for awhile because at work we've been selling a Toshiba E760 (which looks to be a E755 running Pocket PC 2003) for over a week now... I hadn't been keeping up on Pocket PC OS stuff very much so I didn't think anything of it when they came in... Of course once I saw the article I went to Toshiba's website & realized they don't even mention it... Huh, I wonder how fast I'd be fired if I wrote a review of it for the slashdot crowd & posted it tomorrow..

    --
    we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    1. Re:Odd... by gantrep · · Score: 5, Informative

      The operating system is officially released on the 23rd. However there have been several models of handhelds out for a little while that come with 2003. I've got a Toshiba like you that I got 3 days ago that came with it. It's an e355.

    2. Re:Odd... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm we got that one today at work, but I think Toshiba's site actually lsits that one & since the E355 just arrived today I hadn't had a good chance to see if it was 2002 or 2003 yet...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  19. Yes... but, the real question is: by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 0

    Can I run the application that I want to run? Or, do I have to suffer with Microsoft products? Can it run non-Microsoft apps? If not -- then why bother?

    1. Re:Yes... but, the real question is: by dubStylee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can it run non-Microsoft apps?

      I've run Perl under pocketpc OS. I've heard that Apache, and Python will also run there. There's a java VM for pocketpc. With mono and .NET there are now other possibllities too.

    2. Re:Yes... but, the real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There's a java VM for pocketpc.

      But don't get your hopes up for anything impressive. It can't handle Swing or Java2D. It's really not worth it. If you need to run Java on a handheld, better to go for a Tablet PC.

  20. oh, i'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next time some fucking fool is spouting complete untruths on slashdot, i'll refrain from correcting him, because it might be -1 offtopic.

    fucking morons.

  21. Sloppiest editing I've ever seen. by GlenRaphael · · Score: 4, Funny
    Boy, they must have been in a big hurry to get that article out before someone else beat them to the punch!

    Page 1 says "Mircrosoft" will launch the thing, and "thereâ(TM)s some changes"

    According to page 2, 2.5G is now "fully supported a offers GSM suspend/resume" while meanwhile, "on the multimedia site of things..."

    Page 5 tells us there are "a few welcome extraâ(TM)s" and "we clocked between 10 till 12 hours on the battery..."

    Quick, somebody make this guy a Slashdot editor!

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
    1. Re:Sloppiest editing I've ever seen. by ssassen · · Score: 1

      Gotcha, thanks, edited these out!

  22. still going by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    Please register or login. There are 10 registered and 2511 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2851.48 kbit/s

  23. Toshiba e355 by gantrep · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just got a Toshiba e355 and like the article says, it includes windows media player 9. The biggest thing for me anyway, is that pressing the home button brings up Home Version 2.00 with a games tab, a programs tab, a main tab and a running tab. The running tab makes it much much easier to actually close programs. I haven't noticed much else different between 2003 and 2002(I used to have an HP1910 until it stopped syncing and Best Buy replaced it with this three days ago.)

    And for any wondering about the Toshiba e355, I can transfer files fine using Synce

    And here are some specs for it.

  24. Microsoft goes out on a limb by SensitiveMale · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article "On the multimedia site of things Microsoft has wisely adapted Media Player 9 for the PocketPC 2003 platform, offering even smaller file sizes and smoother playback.

    And I heard from MS developers that they were gonna drop Media Player 9 on the PocketPC and go solely with QuickTime.

    Next we'll read that MS has wisely adapted pocket versions od Word and Excel rather than WordPerfect and 123.

  25. Palm to iPaq (student view) by 1000101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a CS major and recently switched from a Palm to an iPaq. Microsoft's PDA OS is so much better than Palm's, it's hard to imagine using anything else. At first I thought the $500 price tag was outrageous, but it has helped with my studies and organization tremendously. Bash MS all you want, but their PDA OS is by far the most versitile on the market today.

    1. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Trelane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like my story. I switched from a Palm IIIe to a Sharp Zaurus 5500. All of a sudden, I could do all kinds of crazy stuff, like browse the web with my 802.11 card, use SSH, mount shares, stream music (via shoutcast as well as via ESD or whatever), etc. all combined with the PDA features that make my life as a physics grad student much easier on top of making my life as a geek much easier. It additionally rocks, because of all the community support of Linux on the platform.

      Only problem is, Palm IIIe is ancient, and the recent Palm stuff is actually equivalent to the PocketPC and TrollTech stuff, from what I've seen of it.

      What version of Palm were you using? The handspring and Palm phone stuff I've seen rock.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    2. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I use debian and 2k at work and I do like the ipaq.

      I still feel it is a bit rough but I think that it is a good product. My fav is the microsoft reader- to me it just blows away acrobat -that and ease of installation of new programs. mind you I have never tried installing a program into a zaurus, but linux in general is still not as easy to install new programs so I will assume the same for the zaurus.

    3. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too am a CS major.
      I find that what i need for a PDA, is a PDA, no kitchen sink. The palm does appointments, notes (not taking notes, but small notes, though you could take notes, data entry would suck.) and contacts. Thats all I want out of a PDA-and palm does that w/excellent speed and stability. These uber PDA's that are out now, are superPDA's, but half-assed laptops. The points I made above are all a pda should be, and palm has that covered.

    4. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by molarmass192 · · Score: 0, Troll

      "but linux in general is still not as easy to install new programs"

      Huh? How hard is typing "rpm -Uvh [path to rpm]"? As for the Zaurus, type "ipkg install [path to ipk]". I fail to see how this qualifies as "not easy", perhaps you're referring to a point-and-click-'cause-shells-are-scary kind of easy.

      Now let me make a final point influenced by your post, people always rag about lib deps under Linux. I assume people that echo this sentiment would rather see the ludicrous Win-bloat, where every required lib is redistributed with every piece of software you install, reproduced on Linux. I don't and I'm sure most Linux user don't either. Reality is nobody is forcing you to use Linux, when you go to BestBuy, you're not FORCED to purchase a PC with Linux on it. Everybody appreciates constructive critism, but to unequivocally slam with statements not backed up by fact is useless and, yes, trolling.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    5. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by lma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree completely. I've got at least one of just about every PDA out there - several Palms, PocketPCs, even the Zaurus. Palm has a great collection of apps available, and it's much better at synchronizing with Outlook than is the PocketPC. PocketOutlook is awful compared to what's available on the Palm. Further, I get weeks of battery life out of my Palm. The one feature that I really like on PacketPCs is the way the file system appears under Windows as a USB hard drive. That one feature was almost enough to make me use the PacketPC for daily work over the Palm. But not quite. Larry

    6. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by _fuzz_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a CS major and recently switched from a Palm to an iPaq. Microsoft's PDA OS is so much better than Palm's, it's hard to imagine using anything else. At first I thought the $500 price tag was outrageous, but it has helped with my studies and organization tremendously. Bash MS all you want, but their PDA OS is by far the most versitile on the market today.

      Would you care to elaborate? Basically all you said is that it is better. How is it better?

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    7. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not him, but:

      Faster processors (help with emulation)
      Easier to port apps
      Browser is more complete
      Finally down to a decent size (my h1910 rivals most Palms)
      Just plain looks and feels better than Palm at this point

    8. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by blurzero · · Score: 1

      >>The one feature that I really like on PacketPCs
      >>is the way the file system appears under
      >>Windows as a USB hard drive.

      The Sony Clie allows you to do such, though only with the contents of the Memory Stick.

      --

      The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that, you've got it made.
    9. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by IronChef · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have an iPAQ and I love it, but let's not sugar-coat things. PocketPCs have real issues. Cruise Brighthand and you'll see a lot of people who can't get their alarms to fire reliably without buying 3rd party utilities, for example. And there are lots of other classic Microsoft oversights, like how task alarms are FIXED at 8AM, and the travesty that is Pocket Word/Excel.

      The PocketPC named perfectly, for it is a Microsoft PC that fits in your pocket. We all know what that means. Some good stuff, some not so good stuff...

      When I counsel people on buying PDAs, my advice is simple... If you just want a reliable organizer, get a Palm. If you want a tiny computer that can be very powerful (but you are prepared for it to also be very aggravating at times), you should get a PocketPC.

      I have a PPC and I will never go back to Palm, but I can sure see why people buy them.

    10. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

      So what can a PocketPC do that a palm cannot?

      - Browse the web?...Palm browsers are better than PocketIE
      - VPN?...Palm has VPN clients.
      - Office Documents?...Documents To Go does a better job of translating Word/Excel Docs than the PocketWord and PocketExcel.
      - PIM information?...Palm is the best at this. Install Agendus and it gets even better.
      - Custom Applications?...Palm has thousdands more
      - Development?...Palm has many RAD tools and C++ tools.
      - Admin Tools?...SSH, Ping, Telnet, etc are available for Palm and they are Free.
      - Battery Life?...Palm Kicks Ass.
      - Screen Quality?...My Sony Clie is excellent. Some PocketPC's are a little better.
      - PC connectivity?...ActiveSync Sucks.
      - Media Playback?...Audio is equal on Palm. Video may be better on PocketPC (I don't really use this as I focus it on being a business tool).
      - Digital Camera?...Sony Clie MZ90 has 2 MegaPixel camera.

      Please tell me why PocketPC's are better? I have tried so many times to use a PocketPC and every time I go back to Palm. My job is a Pre Sales technical for a PDA sync company that supports both platforms so I deal with this stuff everyday. Corporates somehow believe that PocketPC is somehow easier to manage, deploy and use than Palm. They have been sold bullshit by MS. /b

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
    11. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 1

      >Huh? How hard is typing "rpm -Uvh [path to >rpm]"?

      You _do_ realise that to a non-techie user,
      the above looks like unintelligible
      gibberish? As a technical writer with a
      computer science background, I endlessly
      bang my head at the inability of developers
      to appreciate that non-techie users aren't dumb,
      in the same way that non-English speakers aren't
      merely dumb when _they_ don't understand
      English.

      P.

    12. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by caffeinex36 · · Score: 1

      I have all three, a palm a blackberry and a ppc and you would have to pry my blackberry out of my dead hands!

    13. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by jockm · · Score: 1

      I've owned both Palms and PocketPCs. I can say that both platforms are YMMV. I've had to reset my Palm far more than I ever have had to do with my PocketPC.

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
    14. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I had the opposite experience. I had a palm for a while which I used for simple PDA type tasks -- calendar, tasks, mail, and small notes. Nothing too fancy. It even had a couple of silly games on it. But it worked well, was exceptionally stable (I didn't even know it _could_ be reset until my brother showed me how). And the battery lasted forever. And it was really thin, too. I could easily fit it in my pocket without any problems.

      Then, I got an iPaq. It's stability leaves something to be desired. Sure, it looks pretty, and has more power, but it's not a particularly good PDA. It's kind of a half breed between PDA and full PC, and doesn't really do either particularly well. It takes too long to turn on -- it's a couple seconds after I push the power button before I can reliably do anything (I know it's OK to use when the screen refreshes). If I turn it off in that period, it locks up and I have to reboot it. And when I reboot it, it doesn't remember simple things like the input method I prefer (the scribble variant). There are also a lot of times when I wish it was more PC like (usually when I have the wireless card plugged in and I'm trying to figure out why it doesn't work this time -- usually I just reboot it to get it to work). And I can't easily do things like SSH (I haven't found a good/Open Source SSH client for it).

      Sure, there are a lot of good things about it. I like listening to MP3s or playing old Nintendo games on it. And MS has some nice tools for developing applications for it (I wrote a program to keep track of passwords securely that I considered Open Sourcing, but didn't know if there would be enough interest).

      The iPaq has it's place, but for pure PDA type applications, I'd recommend a Palm. At least for how I was using the one I had (sadly, I had to give it back as it wasn't really mine), it worked much better than the iPaq.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    15. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it may not matter to most, but pocket pc has awesome art programs available. conduit's pocket artist, idruna's photogenics. trying to draw or edit on palmos is a waste of time. example look at the differences between pocketpc images and palmos. ive had both and prefer creating on pocketpc. more images here

    16. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by tesmako · · Score: 1
      Palm has its points though, I too am a CS major and have found one app for palm that while it isnt exactly "PDA"-functionality it is really neat.

      LyME

      It is a small subset of matlab for palm, complete with the basic plotting commands and differential equation solvers and everything. Far from a complete matlab clone but it comes as close as one could possibly need to have in your pocket.

    17. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have PDA's really become more complicated over the years? I still install applications onto my Palm by sending the .prc files to the handheld. The software is installed by simply transfering it to the PDA. I can see how that is a good thing for most people. (Personally, I still type pilot-xfer /dev/pilot -i program.prc ;])

    18. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      But why the hell do I need dvd playback for a pda?

      We are talking about pda's right?

      I originally bought my palm m100 for school. I have sevre ADHD and need a pda to alarm and remind me of projects and to keep track of todo lists.

      The palm does this perfectly. I also have FreeBSD integration with the desktop suite and the included software is great.

      What I want to know is how long is your battery life? Mine is about 2 months. Can you beat that?

      I do not need mp3 playbay, and external dvd support, or the crappy versions of pocket word or excel and IE. Without the extra keyboard they are near useless. I hate to write research papers or create spreadsheets for an macro-econimics 101 with grafitti on pocket word or excel. Shudder.

      I use the pc for all my real work and just sync it to my palm.

      This makes me want to ask another question. Can you buy a keyboard for your iPaq?

      I chose palm. Its cheap and very reliable and does what its supposed to do the easiest and I do not have to worry about upgrades like most in the MS world. It has the longest battery life. It also has the most apps and I can run java applet with it.

      Yes older versions of pocket Office for WinCE are incompatible. Hmmm wonder why that is?

      Oh, my alarm works perfectly. How does your pocketpc device work in regards to alarms?

    19. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Browse the web?...Palm browsers are better than PocketIE

      I don't know what browser you're using, but I can't convince any Palm browser to tell websites it's IE 4.0 (which you can do on Pocket PC).

      - VPN?...Palm has VPN clients.

      Yes, so does Pocket PC.

      - Office Documents?...Documents To Go does a better job of translating Word/Excel Docs than the PocketWord and PocketExcel.

      I don't use either. They're a lot better apps on Pocket PC to handle either type of document. Suffice to say, they tend to load quicker because of the faster processor.

      - PIM information?...Palm is the best at this. Install Agendus and it gets even better.

      *shrug* Depends what you're looking for. The tasks/calendar/contacts/email on Pocket PC is more than enough for me. Since I have to use Outlook at work, it also syncs better.

      - Custom Applications?...Palm has thousdands more

      There you're really mistaken. I don't know if you've been following the handheld development community, but there are just as much, if not more, Pocket PC apps out there now than Palm. You can do things on Pocket PC (like port from Windows) that you just can't do well on Palm. Considering the huge lead Palm had, you would think there would be more apps. Add in the apps created for Linux on Pocket PC, and I'm sure it supercedes Palm.

      - Development?...Palm has many RAD tools and C++ tools.

      So does Pocket PC. I can write in any of my favortie languages (C++, Perl, EVC). It'll be better with .NET, though.

      - Admin Tools?...SSH, Ping, Telnet, etc are available for Palm and they are Free.

      I've found many Free (as in speech) versions of these apps on Pocket PC (see, well, just about anywhere). There's also Terminal Services on Pocket PC, which I haven't found a suitable replacement of on the Palm. I can connect to any Windows server at work and browse it as if I was at the station. If there was a VNC app, it'd be golden.

      - Battery Life?...Palm Kicks Ass.

      True that. That's the only thing I think Pocket PC will never beat Palm on.

      - Screen Quality?...My Sony Clie is excellent. Some PocketPC's are a little better.

      Try HP's h1910 and come back to me.

      - PC connectivity?...ActiveSync Sucks.

      Depends. If you're not working with the standard MS apps, yes, it blows. If you're working with Outlook, though, there's nothing on Palm that even comes close.

      - Media Playback?...Audio is equal on Palm. Video may be better on PocketPC (I don't really use this as I focus it on being a business tool).

      That's funny. I use video AS a business tool. What better way to show a client the new Windows app we created than hook my Pocket PC up to a projector and show a PowerPoint and demo video?

      - Digital Camera?...Sony Clie MZ90 has 2 MegaPixel camera.

      I don't really care for digital cameras, but Pocket PC is lacking in this department.

    20. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      There is VNC for the PPC.

      http://www.cs.utah.edu/~midgley/wince/vnc.html

      Mind you - it somewhat sucks. Right mouse clicks are missing, but it is there. Terminal Services still works better for win machines.

  26. Office compatibility? by Boltronics · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Previously on Slashdot it was mentioned that Palm DocumentsToGo did MS Office compatibility better than PocketPC software. If this hasn't improved, other features may not matter.

    Microsoft should know better by now that Office is top priority.

    --
    It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    1. Re:Office compatibility? by martin-k · · Score: 1
      Palm DocumentsToGo did MS Office compatibility better than PocketPC software

      With software out of the box, yes.

      When you add third-party software to the picture, no - not by a long shot. See my sig.

      Martin Kotulla
      SoftMaker Software GmbH

  27. is it possible... by dfj225 · · Score: 3, Informative

    to upgrade the os on an older pocket pc? I just bought a new Dell Axim and would very much like to install Pocket PC 2003. Also, I would settle on just being able to install the updated version of IE, cause the one on there now sucks.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:is it possible... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      also...if anyone knows of any good free browsers for my pocket pc that would be great too.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    2. Re:is it possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Dell has announced that they won't be providing an upgrade and that you'll instead have to buy their X3 or X7.

    3. Re:is it possible... by thynk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just bought a new Dell Axim and would very much like to install Pocket PC 2003.

      Hmmm... I was interested in this since I order 2-4 Axims a week for work. I did a bit of digging around and here is what I found. This was on one of the Dell support pages Dated 17 Jun 03


      Thank you for using the Dell Community Forum.

      Yes, Pocket PC 2003 is real. I do not have a firm date when Dell will begin shipping Pocket PC 2003, or when upgrades will be available, or who will be eligible for free upgrades.

      One warning. I have been told that many applications that work in Pocket PC 2002 do not work in Pocket PC 2003. It appears that Pocket PC 2003 is a major Operating System upgrade and that some applications will have to be recompiled for it.

      I am at the moment testing a few applications on Pocket PC 2003, and so far I have only found one application, the game Argentum that will not run. I do not have a list of applications that will work with Pocket PC 2003, but I will try to keep you posted about any applications that I have trouble with.


      Hope the moderator of that forum isn't too upset that I quoted with out requesting permission, but to the best of my knowldge this is a open to the public site.

      It does look like there WILL be an upgrade path, that a ROM for the Axim has been developed (as this moderator had one) and that it doesn't melt your PPC when you install it.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    4. Re:is it possible... by dfj225 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      that sucks...any clue about a good free browser? or perhaps even a very good cheap browser?

      --
      SIGFAULT
    5. Re:is it possible... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Hummmm...sounds like I have a hope. I am not really worried about program compatibilty, as I mostly just use the included programs, seeing how I haven't had much time to find 3rd party ones that I like better. Can you please keep me updated? Or at least send me a link where I can remain self updated. my email address is dfj@comcast.net

      --
      SIGFAULT
    6. Re:is it possible... by thynk · · Score: 1

      Dell Support Forums - give this a try, I found it in the General Software section.

      I'm also not to worried about program compatibility, as we home brew all out own software (or 98% of it) - much to the displeasure of our IT department. The thing I'm looking forward to is the improved WiFi support - we have a hard time keeping these able to talk to the server.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    7. Re:is it possible... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      WAP: (wap sucks, but it's not MSPIE... and it's shareware for $40...) Klondike WAP Browser
      WinWAP CE

      HTML: NetFront (might be in Japanese, though...)
      ThunderHawk (but it's a subscription service...)

  28. Think bigger by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
    "I assume they use "+/-" to mean approxiamately. If not, I'll choose the -$350 option and you can pay me to use this thing."

    You're thinking small potatoes. I'm gonna go buy thousands of truckloads of these babies and retire.

  29. also comming soon, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0, Troll

    The M$ Pocket Rocket and the M$ Pocket Pal.
    Batteries not included..

  30. Quantifying the slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well .. It seems a few minutes after the story gets posted, you have about 7 /.'ers a second coming to this site on a SATURDAY night. I noticed there were about 2350 anonymous users. This must be quantified!!!

  31. PCMCIA Harddrive by cloudless.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can add the PCMCIA jacket to an ipaq and insert a PCMCIA harddrive into it. Alternatively, there is a Pocket PC from UR There with a PCMCIA slot built-in. Either way the device would be too big to be Pocketable.

    1. Re:PCMCIA Harddrive by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Umm, I use a 1 gig compactflash microdrive from IBM in my Casio E125. The power consumption is noticable, but its compactflash. The size is as small as I could ever need.

      One of the reasons Ipaqs suck is they don't have a compactflash slot. THat means no cheap flash memory, no IBM Microdrive, no WiFi card, no GPS...

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:PCMCIA Harddrive by cebarro · · Score: 1

      I have the PCMCIA Jacket with the extra battery. I have the CF jacket. I also have the slim case. Unfortunately, I have my choice of wireless OR bluetooth OR GPS. I'm waiting for my next one to have internal G and bluetooth. If I could get an internal 40 GB Drive for it too, then all I's have to plug in is GPS, and maybe have a SD slot left over.

    3. Re:PCMCIA Harddrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new PocketPC2003-ipaq (2210) does have both SD & CF-slot.

  32. Are thumbboards supported? by VikingBrad · · Score: 1
    Being a typical Slashdot reader I'm posting before reading the article.

    Does anyone know if _any_ PocketPC has a built-in thumbboard like the current Palms, Sony Clies, Handspring Treos, Blackberries et al

    To me it is a serious shortcoming and if its not in this release then the PocketPcs devices will fall further behind the PalmOS powered devices

    See Palm/Handspring Treo 600 device, the Microsoft SmartPhone is going to be left behind if they don't implement support for a thumbboard.

    Cheers

    VikingBrad

    1. Re:Are thumbboards supported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this one is sweet

      iPAQ Slim Thumb Keyboard Expansion Pack
      http://h30143.www3.hp.com/configure2.cfm?oid =20942 2#m_28

      and you can sync it with the keyboard on

    2. Re:Are thumbboards supported? by cloudless.net · · Score: 1

      Hitachi has a Pocket PC phone edition with integrated thumbboard and camera:

      Photo and introduction here:
      http://www.brighthand.com/article/CES_Hitac hi

  33. and MPs? by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    ...wasn't on the short list of audio formats supported by this version of WMP. Hmm.

  34. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about handsrping and palm? They haven't released anything (really innovative) in a long time. The tungston is really cool (read $$$) but offers basic features of a standard pocketPC. Now that handsrping has been bought by palm, are we to see less innovation in the palm os hardware? Im in the market, and need a palm, wondering when to buy is why:)

    1. Re:What about by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

      Moron... have you not heard of the Zire71 or the Tungsten|C, arguably the best Palm has done in years? The Zire was the best selling PDA last year and the Treo600 was just unveiled to the masses.

  35. yeah, but by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 2, Informative

    IE5/Mac Supports all of these, and it supports them well.

    All I was saying is that the parent poster should distinguish IE/Mac and IE/Win, since they are different products and they have wildly different levels of standards support.

    Pardon the typos, I'm extremely drunk.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  36. The big question is: by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will I be able to upgrade my iPAQ H3870 or is HP/Compaq going to be retards and make me buy a new handheld if I want it?

    1. Re:The big question is: by Combuchan · · Score: 1

      I have an iPAQ H3600 and upgraded without difficulty from PPC 2K to PPC2K2. PPC2K also supports restoration of PPC2K2 images.

      So it's hard to say.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
  37. Battery life by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Looking over the article I can't see any mention of battery life. Just something I would like to know before buying a PDA

    Rus

    1. Re:Battery life by -audiowhore- · · Score: 2, Informative

      ummmm RTFA? last paragraph of the summary and conclusion here:

      "Overall, the Asus MyPal a620 proved to be an excellent PocketPC, with great battery life, easily making it through a full day of extensive use and hours of multimedia playback. On average we clocked between 10 till 12 hours on the battery, which is a little more than weâ(TM)ve seen from popular PocketPC 2002 devices. If youâ(TM)re in the market for an affordable, yet powerful and versatile, PocketPC be sure to give the Asus MyPal a620 a serious consideration."

  38. I try to be impartial ... by terbo · · Score: 1

    I really do.
    But every time I think of all of the possibilities of an open hand held computing platform, I almost cry when I actually look
    at whats being done right now, and in the
    near future.

    Another proprietary portable operating system ...
    How long have they been getting to where this stuff is actually usable for more than one or two special applications? Then they release something that does video ... WOW ... when it should have been possible years ago ...

    Whatever ... Move on ...

    --
    If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
  39. B-Berry by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I don't know, but I've found my Blackberry rather helpful for my studies. The little thumbpad is helpful for taking down assignments and firing off quick emails to the prof before you forget. The built-in phone is great too. IMO, a little better for productivity, all utility, no fuss, no gimmicks.

    Battery life is great too, I find it lasting around 2 weeks, which is amazing considering I tend to read slashdot during lectures =)

  40. What's the situation with the Phones? by Bakaneko · · Score: 1

    I've been eyeing the Samsung i700 for a bit... Do you think it'll be upgradeable to 2003? I guess the big draw of 2003 for me from the article is the better Web browser. My companies web site makes a fair amount of use of CSS, and I recently redid all my personal websites in XHTML 1.0 with CSS...

  41. I live out of mine with pocketTN by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and the Terminal Services Client. My hardware DB(access, so its just barely a DB) is resident on the card. With that I have everything I need to support servers in 7 national and 4 international data centers, serving some 8 to 9 million email recipients. Now if someone could make WebSphere and a terminal server play nice I'd be golden :)

    I agree with you in theory on apps though....Most of our clients could in reality still be on the mainframe with 3270 connectivity and text email, but human nature being what it is...ooooo loook NEW PRETTY LIGHTS and BUZZERS....Droooool

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  42. Why not just give us some decent cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Honestly how many years do we have to wait before north america starts receiving some decent cell phones that have most of these functions.

    I've used the PocketPC and I hate it. It's a big bulky piece of crap. Give me a sleek Japanese multimedia phone any day of the week.

    Speaking of cell phones in the usa. Why does the land of capitalism lag behind the rest of the world when it comes to cell phones and cellular networks.

    Isn't "capitalism" supposed to be the fastest way to usher in innovation and progress? I bet if it weren't for Europe and Asia, the USA would be content holding 10lbs cell phones.

  43. Whew! Thought that was called ANUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whew! Thought that was called ANUS. That'd be a hard sell. Is anyway.

  44. vs6 has been out of the picture for 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacked VS6? VS6 has been out of the picture since Pocket PC was first released, way back in June of 2000. Since then it's been evc 3.0. VS71/SDA is for C# building on 2003. evc 4.0 is for native, real-man code on 2003.

  45. Re:Any Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Already available for the Palm (heh). Why wait?

    ~~~

  46. Old codger/Non-student view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These uber PDA's that are out now, are superPDA's, but half-assed laptops.

    And once-upon-a-time early laptops were called half-assed desktops.
    It's just more miniaturization happening... which is not a bad thing.
  47. Try this (if you have a Zaurus)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, say I, non-techie user, go and buy a Zaurus. The included apps are OK, particularly Opera and Handcom's suite of apps (truthfully, the PIM apps suck, though). But I hear there's this great site on the net (killefiz.de) where I can get GOBS of free apps for my shiny new toy. I head there, download one of the Opie apps, because they look pretty cool and hey - it's a Zaurus. It must work (non-techie user doesn't know or care about the difference between the Zaurus ROM and OpenZaurus). I try to install with the Add/Remove apps GUI. I get an error that says ÂSomething was wrong with ipkgÂ. That's it. So I do some searching and find that you can run the command line equivalent ipkg install... So I try that. I see a somewhat more helpful error (to a techie though, not to me, Joe User) - Âcould not link xxx lib or some other such nonsense. Suddenly, your ÂHow hard is typing... flippant horseshit doesn't help at all. At this point, I, non-techie user would think that my shiny new Zaurus was nothing more that a piece of crap.
    Notice that non-techie user tried your not-scary shell and still didn't get the results he wanted.

    1. Re:Try this (if you have a Zaurus)... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Well, in this case, if the package is broken in the first place, then there's going to be a call to support anyhow regardless of whether it's a Zaurus, Palm, or PPC. I don't see how this makes installs any less easy for properly created packages.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  48. PocketPCs by instinctdesign · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tiny computers running Windows are not a good idea, when I get upset at them there isn't anything to prevent me from throwing them out a real window...

    (to quoteth my brother)

    --
    forma3