I know that the corporate penetration of Macs is understandably small, and business PCs are a huge percentage of the total pie. I would like to see some statistics on the U.S. install base for home users. I would venture to guess that the 16% figure is not too far off the mark in the home market.
I guess I need to shut off hyperthreading on our app server before the users who can't sort an Excel spreadsheet have a chance to expliot the vulnerability.
If Apple were going to release a set-top box as part of a home entertainment package that needed to network with PCs, maybe this would be part of the installation.
I completely agree. If Microsoft loses, they will have strong legal precedent to go on the attack with their patents, and Linux is in the Microsoft crosshairs. They are currently running full page ads in I.T. industry mags, like Information Week, about the lack of legal indemnification for using Linux. Don't think that SCO is not having a chilling effect on Linux adoption just because they have a ridiculous case. Imagine what MS could do. IBM is the only hope, as they could retaliate against MS with patents of their own they feel MS is violating.
True, but that doesn't take away from the fact they were key contributors to making Firefox possible. Anyway, the goal here is to have an open, cross-platform, standards-compliant browser and to keep Microsoft from owning the internet. I fail to see how another popular gecko-based browser would detract from that objective.
And they could say fuck you, as there would be no Mozilla without Netscape/AOL's investment in the project during it's more important stages in development. Most of the developers who completed Moz 1.0 worked for Netscape.
I completely agree. I lived in Moscow for awhile, and the cars are generally at full speed the instant the light turns green. Very dangerous for pedestrians.
Why mirror the popular vote in the electoral college? You're just rounding off some decimal points from the popular vote. What's the advantage of this over one man, one vote?
I agree. The problem is the cube wasn't a low-priced box. Wasn't it like $1,700? I agree that a $800 headless box with these specs would sell like hotcakes before the low-carb craze.
Slashdot Mirror
The share should increase significantly when Mac OS X Leopard comes out. Just wanted to be the first to say Leopard on Slashdot.
I know that the corporate penetration of Macs is understandably small, and business PCs are a huge percentage of the total pie. I would like to see some statistics on the U.S. install base for home users. I would venture to guess that the 16% figure is not too far off the mark in the home market.
You actually deserve to get slammed for this. So he forgot one hyperlink. Type Acid2 in Google. It's the first hit.
I hope this doesn't set off more vi vs. Morse code debates.
I guess I need to shut off hyperthreading on our app server before the users who can't sort an Excel spreadsheet have a chance to expliot the vulnerability.
An "innocent" deer killed my friend's grandfather. They are a menace and must be stopped.
If Apple were going to release a set-top box as part of a home entertainment package that needed to network with PCs, maybe this would be part of the installation.
Stop the Williamsburg space elevator!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoptheelevator/
When they couldn't beat Dell on price, Gateway at least had AMD chips as a way of differentiating themselves. Then they dumped AMD; bad move.
You forgot in/out. Some geek you are.
No, you're wrong. Think Secret's misses are more rare than the hits. And most of the hits are exactly right, usually down to the price.
Who are we to debate this? Outside of immediate family, who on this forum has even spoken to a woman?
Um, the word is "nucular".
They can also destroy their environment with impunity. Hurrah for communism.
"Man will never travel to the moon."
- Clive Rodney Fark, 1962
"Man will never travel to the moon without a rocket."
- Clive Rodney Fark, 1970
My first summer job at age 14 was de-tasseling corn for two bucks an hour. Not fun.
Actually, they scaled down the Power4 to make the 970.
I completely agree. If Microsoft loses, they will have strong legal precedent to go on the attack with their patents, and Linux is in the Microsoft crosshairs. They are currently running full page ads in I.T. industry mags, like Information Week, about the lack of legal indemnification for using Linux. Don't think that SCO is not having a chilling effect on Linux adoption just because they have a ridiculous case. Imagine what MS could do. IBM is the only hope, as they could retaliate against MS with patents of their own they feel MS is violating.
True, but that doesn't take away from the fact they were key contributors to making Firefox possible. Anyway, the goal here is to have an open, cross-platform, standards-compliant browser and to keep Microsoft from owning the internet. I fail to see how another popular gecko-based browser would detract from that objective.
And they could say fuck you, as there would be no Mozilla without Netscape/AOL's investment in the project during it's more important stages in development. Most of the developers who completed Moz 1.0 worked for Netscape.
No, it's not faster than Safari, but it is fast enough and renders far more sites properly.
I completely agree. I lived in Moscow for awhile, and the cars are generally at full speed the instant the light turns green. Very dangerous for pedestrians.
Why mirror the popular vote in the electoral college? You're just rounding off some decimal points from the popular vote. What's the advantage of this over one man, one vote?
UW is the University of Wisconsin in some of our books....
I agree. The problem is the cube wasn't a low-priced box. Wasn't it like $1,700? I agree that a $800 headless box with these specs would sell like hotcakes before the low-carb craze.