Slashdot Mirror


China's Superior Technologies

paRcat writes "Still think China is a land too far away from everything? This article compares some of China's common uses of technology to what we're accustomed to in the West. With the genius traffic lights and the cell phone coverage... I'm kinda jealous."

692 comments

  1. Statistics by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you consider the growth of infrastructure in China to the rate of upgrading in the west is it any wonder they are ahead?

    They are clearly putting in far more effort than any western government to modernize their country.

    A government for the people, what a novel thought.

    1. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      China a "modern country"?
      With a "government for the people"?

      Hello? Is there anybody home?

      In China you get into jail for saying what you think. People are imprisoned and tortured. Human rights violated. How much a nerd does one need to be in order to trade cellphone coverage for freedom?

      (Amnesty International's report on China is worth a read: http://web.amnesty.org/report2004/chn-summary-eng)

    2. Re:Statistics by jlar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The GDP per capita was $5,000 in China (2003). This does not mean that all of China is poor but it does mean that in general China is not as rich as western countries. I would therefore contend the image that the author of the article paints of a throughout modern chinese society. In fact large parts of China are poor and underdeveloped.

      Of course this statement might not be true in 10 years time or so due to the quick rate of economic growth in China - and of course this does not mean that the chinese are not doing stuff that we can learn from. But it does mean that the impression conveyed by the author of the article is a gross misrepresentation of the facts.

    3. Re:Statistics by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They are clearly putting in far more effort than any western government to modernize their country.

      This is one of the tradeoffs between free markets and command economies. Although free markets are great from the point of view of moving quickly to a local optimum in resource utilization, their coverage and consistency are spotty. Command economies tend to pick winners too early and their implementations can be inefficient and hang around too long, but they usually achieve complete coverage and relative consistency.

      The best of both worlds is when you "let a thousand flowers bloom" in the early stages, pick a winner for full implementation, and revisit the infrastructure choices on a regular basis to reopen debate. Of course, ideologues of either stripe would usually disavow this solution, as that might force them to widen their narrow models of the world - far too painful to comptemplate!

      --
      That is all.
    4. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A government for the people, what a novel thought.

      Why yes, that is a thought you're allowed to have in China.

    5. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look at the name of the author of the article and you see why such misrepresentation of the facts happened... Maybe someone is just dreaming about his country!?

    6. Re:Statistics by VagaStorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      How much a nerd does one need to be in order to trade cellphone coverage for freedom? This is a trick question, right :)

    7. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last time I checked, hundreds of of povery-stricken Chinese people arrived at our Vancouver port looking for a better life.

      A government for the people? Think again!

      And when was the last time the Chinese got to vote for their government and future? It's dictatorship over there, with maximum cencorship and rampant violation of human rights.

      Get real!

    8. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever being in china or live in china?
      China has become much free than what you think in
      recently years.

    9. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The so-called advantages China has over Canada is a joke. They're just some stupid perks.

    10. Re:Statistics by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

      I think communism in our new ages have a better chance of success in China than in USSR. Because of all the new technologies and cheap computing it's easier now for a government to run "more" efficiently than in the 80's stocks and production through all the country. Also the fact that they decentralize decision-making to some "private entrepreneurs"(friends of the government) also help. So I think that they are becoming stronger each day but I hope that the citizens will gain more freedom.

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    11. Re:Statistics by pilybaby · · Score: 4, Insightful
      In China you get into jail for saying what you think. People are imprisoned and tortured. Human rights violated.
      You can be imprisoned indefinatly with no reason given and with no access to a lawyer - here in the UK, and the Patroit act does pretty much the same I believe.

      I'm so glad we're free.
    12. Re:Statistics by garaged · · Score: 1

      You think there is a lot of freedom on america's countries ??

      I dont, specially in USA !!

      Sure there are not a lot of killings relating to sayin what you think, but what about saying that a politician is corrupt ??, give some probes of that and you get killed right away, and the worst thing is that the police finds a lot of pot in your apartment, and evidence of your involvment with narcotrafic

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    13. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who would trade cellphone coverage for a little freedom deserve neither.

    14. Re:Statistics by ChronoZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amnesty International's report on the USA is worth a read as well: http://web.amnesty.org/report2004/usa-summary-eng

    15. Re:Statistics by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Having been to China I can tell you that they have NO problem with IDEA's that are actually good.

      Would they have a hard time switching to a better system, yes, are they open to the idea, Also yes.

      It's really simple, they would listen to Gnome Chompsky but Kick the living crap out of Michael Moore. Why? Because one actually knows something about politics.

      They take politics rather seriously over there, tryouts can be a bitch though :)

    16. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what?

    17. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Patriot act is basically giving the same powers the DEA has had for decades and apply it to terrorism.

      Do yourself a favor and only post about that which you know.

    18. Re:Statistics by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Get a small clue. The fact that you can say that you do not like it shows how free you are. Do you know anyone that has been arrested? Are you really afraid? Sure standing up saying that you do not like the Patriot act "and I do not" is important but saying that that the US or the UK has the same level of freedom as China is.... Well stupid.
      Yes oppose the Patriot act. Work to get it overturned. But do not equate it with China.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    19. Re:Statistics by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should also check the one on France and Germany. Infact you should check on it for what every country you live in. IF you can not get to the website then you know you have some real issues. Can the people in China read the report on China?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    20. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you

    21. Re:Statistics by Karn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Living under a benevolent dictatorship is not freedom.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    22. Re:Statistics by glockenspieler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you know anyone that has been arrested? Jose Padilla? Ahmed Hamdi?

      Lets be clear about this. This administration would like to have the power to keep United States citizens in detention, without access to counsel or judicial review. Why have they not been able to? Because the Supreme Court said they could not. So the system works right? We'll see. Bush named Thomas as one of his favorite justices. IIRC, Thomas was the only one of the justices that said, "Yes, the executive branch should have the ability to do this to US citizens without oversight."

      The question is not whether you are too paranoid, its whether you are paranoid enough. The biggest weapon of mass destruction right now happens to be sitting in the White House.

    23. Re:Statistics by LWATCDR · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Do you know anyone that has been arrested? Jose Padilla? Ahmed Hamdi? "

      You know them? They are friends of yours? Or are they people you know about that have been imprisoned? I was asking if you personally knew of anyone.

      As I said talk about it oppose it in any legal way you can. Even protest it in a peaceful way. The truth is you know and I know and everyone reading this knows that you do not fear that you will be locked up for speaking out. Why do you diminish the pain and lack of freedom that the people in China have to live under just to try and make yourself a marter?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Statistics by Harassed · · Score: 1

      Looking at the results of the US election, maybe not letting the people choose which idiot^W leader they should have is a good thing :)

    25. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know them? They are friends of yours? Or are they people you know about that have been imprisoned? I was asking if you personally knew of anyone.
      Oooh, nice dodge. Grandparent gave a great reply to your original question and you throw in a semantic twist that nullifies it. Excellent job.
    26. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd better move out of good ol' U.S.A. now then.

    27. Re:Statistics by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No dodge I meant the know in the literal sense I did not say do you know of anyone. I said do you know anyone. No semantic twist involved at all.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    28. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If is necessary to personally know somebody that has been imprisoned to be able to say that the freedom in US became a lie since the patriotic act, then I ask to you: You personally know somebody that lives in China and that has been imprisoned for saying what think?

      The problem is not if somebody was imprisoned or not, but if the government has the right to make it when it to want.

    29. Re:Statistics by evangellydonut · · Score: 1

      notice that's in purchasing power parity terms... ie adjusted for cost of living... however, there are some things you can PPP your way out of...for example, the auto industry, which won't take off unless the per-capita income is USD5,000... Regardless, with a 9% growth per year, Chinese economy would've expanded 7x during the time that it takes US to double... with 2.5 decades of expansion behind, everyone's looking at the year 2020 to be the time when China really becomes a major force.

    30. Re:Statistics by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I do.
      A friends of mine the Chows. Mr. Chow spent 8 years in prison because he was a christian. He and his wife managed to get to out of the country after he was released. I went to school with there son. Very nice family even though their English is not great. I always told them that it did not matter since their English was much better than my Chinese. I have another friend that lived in the USSR and is jewish she has told me some interesting stories about some of what her family members went to but I have never meet them. Next question?

      I have no problem with saying the Patriot act is wrong. I have a problem with saying that the China is as free as the US when it clearly is not. I encourage people to speak up for what they believe but I feel that people are using this to grind an ax and are lieing to further their own political agendas at the expense of others. I have a friend that is actually living in terror because he honestly believes that Bush is the same as Hitler! Making absolutly STUPID claims like the US is now as bad as China does two things.
      1. For the people that know that this is NOT TRUE it can make them wonder if the other things that people are saying about the Patriot act are also lies and maybe it is not so bad.
      2. For other it makes them think that they are going to be lined up and shoot or have tanks run them down or end up in death camps. And yes there are some people that are living in terror for no good reason.

      Yes oppose the Patriot act but be truthful. It does take away from due proccess and could be used to victimize innocent people. I feel it is unconstituional and provide little to no extra saftey. But it has not be used to reduce the US to a police state.

      Frankly the left is victimizing the truth and being as reactionary as they claim the right is. Lieing and exageration by the left will tend to push the US more too the right until it is bad as the left claims it is now.
      Stop using scare tatics and lies you are not helping.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    31. Re:Statistics by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both of you need to try to be a little relative.

      Just as you say he cannot personally know anyone who has suffered at the hands of the Patriot Act, neither can you say you personally know anyone in China who has suffered at the hands of their government.

      The truth, as always, lies between both statements. No one individual's suffering is worth more or less than another's. Abuses have occured in both countries. None of the abuses are excuse-able. However, in spite of them, there are plenty of people in both places who just aren't feeling the overwhelming sense of doom that others project onto them.

      Many Americans think the Patriot Act is a "good" thing, others see it as the beginning of the end of all civil liberties. Many Chinese think the suppression of groups like Falun Gong is a "good thing", while others see it as a state mandated termination of religion. The differences are purely subjective, based on cultural, national, and personal differences. This is the world . . .

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    32. Re:Statistics by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      The only people in english 'prisons' without trial are asylum seekers, they are free to return to there own countary but want to stay here, and they are deemed a significant danger to the populace.

      You can't have evidence against them, and you can't let them out on the public because of the significant threat, so there's nothing a trial could do, they just sit there waiting for there asylum application to be denied or accepted, while politicans twiddle there thumbs unsure what to do.

      Or at least that's how I understand it. America the patriot act doesn't deny american citizens the right to trail, it just means that the trial is allowed to be totally closed, with no one even allowed to know it's happened, which is pretty dodgy as it stands.

      Outside of america, the american goverment has never shown it's high moral code alas, which just gives more fuel to the reteroric of the terrorists.

    33. Re:Statistics by penteren · · Score: 1

      The answer to that would be no. I just tried, and I'm posting from China.

    34. Re:Statistics by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      Actually, most countries that don't have land line infrastructure are going straight to cel. This means that communication within the country is easy and will be harder to control, but the whole damn place still has firewalls built against the outside world--something that western corporations have been all too willing to help them with.

      The rest of the improvements are largely the result of having tons of cheap labour, and a long entrenched social ethic of service. This isn't Chinese government propaganda (the reporter is talking about things he's experienced), but I'm sure there are a lot of things neither he nor any westerner is allowed to see.

      China is mellowing, and will probably grow out of its Maoist period. I think the Chinese have had their share of 'glorious revolutions' with astronomical body counts. But it's still a pretty fascistic place, and the amount of money it has been shoveling into the American Fed is cause for alarm. It gives China a big stick to hit America with that few Americans are aware of, and the bigger the deficit, the bigger the stick.

    35. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In China you get into jail for saying what you think.

      Also in the U.S.
    36. Re:Statistics by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Sorry but if you don't find it EXTREMELY disturbing that the USAPATRIOT act bitch slaps 4 out of 10 of the Bill of Rights, then you are either ignorant, severely misinformed, or stupid. The mere fact that they CAN imprison you for an indefinite period with no legal representation is just as bad as any similar law in China. Just because they have been doing it longer doesn't make us any better. Land of the free my ass. All it takes, my friend, is for the government to wake up one day and decide you're a terrorism risk and bye bye. Enjoy your express trip to Guantanimo Bay. Did I mention that they don't give a shit about the Geneva Conventions there? Oh, that only applies to arabs, right? lol

      Oh, but I'm so free because I can speak out about this! Are you really that stupid? You do realize that the patriot act allows them to strip any of us of that right at any moment they choose, right? Just because they haven't yet doesn't mean they won't.

      This country and any other country with such laws is NO BETTER than China. If it makes you sleep better at night to think otherwise, enjoy. But you're living in a fantasy world. Start praying that Bush doesn't decide to become Hitler or Stalin someday. You might just disappear.

      *wonders when all the morons in this country will wake the fuck up and figure out that their rights have been analy raped with no lube*

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    37. Re:Statistics by Rick+BigNail · · Score: 1
      And when was the last time the Chinese got to vote for their government and future?

      They do have small local elections. All candidates are from one party though.

    38. Re:Statistics by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      If you consider the growth of infrastructure in China to the rate of upgrading in the west is it any wonder they are ahead?

      They're not ahead. If you ever decide to go outside your own county, you will see that each country can do some things better than everyone else. It's all a matter of having different constraints.

    39. Re:Statistics by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      We also have to realize... Over there you have nearly 10 times more people in a square mile then you do in America. They can afford to do things like better cell phone coverage, and faster Internet (Fibre Optics Baby!) but they get much better ROI on these things...

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    40. Re:Statistics by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      You know them? They are friends of yours? Or are they people you know about that have been imprisoned? I was asking if you personally knew of anyone.

      Yeah, if you do know them and if your skin is brown, there a couple of government officials would love to talk to you.

    41. Re:Statistics by tloh · · Score: 1
      You know them? They are friends of yours? Or are they people you know about that have been imprisoned? I was asking if you personally knew of anyone.

      Why should that matter? Are you suggesting only the people you know personally deserve to be protected?

      Why do you diminish the pain and lack of freedom that the people in China have to live under just to try and make yourself a marter?

      I don't know how much either of you really know much about China. But I seriously doubt you know much about "pain and lack of freedom" in the daily lives of people whose culture and lifestyle are not necesarily the same as yours. It is pretty arrogant of Americans to always act on the assumption their way is the only way. I'm not trying to trivialize the reality that problems do exist in China. But the kind of uninformed and inflammatory rhetoric that emerges on Slashdot time and time again is a futile solution. Get a clue people, the world is full of things you don't know and may not understand. But you make life very miserable for yourself if you recoil in fear and distain everytime you're confronted with something that makes you uncomfortable. I've always thought intelligent people have a natural sense of natural curiosity. How has China managed to steer toward capitalism while avoiding democracy so sucessfully? Doesn't anyone wonder just how far you can go in the Chinese system before you turn head?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    42. Re:Statistics by Tailstuxtophat · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! Goes back to an earlier post about "trading freedom for celphone coverage." All these doodads we're talking about are obtainable if we really want them, it's just that our process is a bit slower (Read:Holy-bleeping-SLOW). It's just that China's top down administration can and does implement improvements on a wider scale. Our infrastructure changes have to go up the ladder before they come back down again, and personally I don't mind the delay too much.

      Anybody want to pay for the installation of 7000 new upgrades stoplights?

      --
      Methinks thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee.
    43. Re:Statistics by tloh · · Score: 1

      Grandparent has watched too much TV and movies about corrupt public officials who appearantly infest the US govn't and legal system. Can't blame him. Our entertainment industry does a banged up job of serving as cultural ambassador to the rest of the world. I remember reading about an american police commissioner who was hired as a consultant to Chinese law enforcement. The first thing he did was to make them watch "Dirty Harry".

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    44. Re:Statistics by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "neither can you say you personally know anyone in China who has suffered at the hands of their government."
      actually Yes I can.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    45. Re:Statistics by edbarbar · · Score: 1

      Why should that matter? Are you suggesting only the people you know personally deserve to be protected?

      Come on. All the guy is saying that there is a big difference between the theoretical (some might say imagined) consequences of the patriot act and the actual effects.

      Personally, I also reject the notion that one life is worth ten thousand lives. It's a silly idea promoted by Star Trek in which Kirk was constantly willing to put the entire ship at jeopardy for Spock.

      The constitution is pretty clear that people can't be held without due process. Do you really think a law that could circumvents this part of the constitution could last?

      Now, do you think in China such a law could exist for a long time?

      Do you think that the US government could get away with mowing down and killing US citizens like they did the students in Tiananmen square? My understanding is that the students thought they would be free to leave the square, but I've heard one (only one) first hand account that they were brutally gunned down and were not allowed to leave.

      --
      Ed Barbar, President and General Manager, Furnit USA
    46. Re:Statistics by Epcoatl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you realize of course that a majority of those poverty stricken Chinese people usually go back after making enough money. There are some immigrants who come to the west for political, cultural as well as economic opportunity, but many more come just to make some money so they can go home and make more. That's why China's the fastest growing economy in the world. It's like 1.3 billion people woke up one morning and were like "Holy crap, we're communists, we aren't allowed to make lots of money. That's change that, right freakin' now." And there ya go...

    47. Re:Statistics by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Well it is a big stick, but it wouldn't exactly be great news to the Chinese if that stick came down. China selling the US bonds and exchanging them for their currency (forget the name of it) would drive up its value and thus the cost of producing Chinese goods and hurt China's position to sell to the US.

      In fact, as long as the US does lots of importing, countries that rely on importing to the US are dependant on the US having a strong economy. It's not in the best interest of China to hurt the US economy so it doesn't have the money to import. For that reason, some people say that the US is actually in the stronger position. I disagree; I think the position is just about even (the stick dropping would hurt both countries) but China has a slight advantage because they control when/if it happens.

    48. Re:Statistics by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      I think a bomb should explode in Washington tommorow.

      Do you see where this is going?

      For the most part the Chinese government is open to outside ideas. However they are attempting to establish unity in a country constantly under assault from American propaganda.

      If American TV was full of communist propaganda you wouldn't be particularly surprised if your government reacted, would you?

      You clearly have no perspective.

      Once again I hate American's.

    49. Re:Statistics by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Since China's currency is locked to the American dollar. (Which means they are dealing with constant DEFLATION [Think about it]). So basically nothing can help the value of their currency without also helping the value of American currency.

      To a certain extent their growth is slowing the decline of the American dollar.

      Actually China is a relatively cheap manufacturing center with decent working conditions. Furthermore China's needs (as described by American Consumerism) still far outweight their production.

      China will have a resource driven economy for a while, fortunatly now there are the six dragons of the far east which they can trade with.

      Basically China has it made America is in the crapper, and you're dragging my contry down as well.

      As for the U.S. having a strong economy, you don't. Made in America means crap now, your government's policy of setting up regimes to produce cheap goods and labour is all that maintains the standard of living of American's and gives your country an "export" balance (If you buy something for 17cents and sell it for $12 it looks really good on paper).

      Basically America is supported by it's military, and it's media and advertising.

      All of which will fall in the next 20 years followed by a period of poverty unseen in American history, at the end of which you might make a comeback, though you'll probably be speaking Mandarin or one of the Indian dialects when you do.

    50. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical U.S. point of view - and why not? Completely free to choose the sedatives of your choice, it's easier to take in the daily dose of fear spread from every media giant in the country - makes it easier to close your eyes to Guantanamo, to Abu Ghraib, easier to forget Vietnam, Hiroshima, Nagasaki...the only country to use such weapons against civilians. Orwell ring any bells? Wouldn't do much good even if you people read it ten times over: so blinded by what you're taught every night on TV, you would fail to notice the frightening similarity if it hit you in the forhead.
      But China has nuclear weapons, so it's not easy to play the "world policeman" the same way as in Afganistan, Iraq and possibly one or two other countries now that it seems the Cheef Cowboy is here to stay.
      Didn't think it possible that - in the 21st century! - a superpower could act so blatantly purely out of greed for oil and the rest of the world - along with U.S. citizens - just sits back and watches as countries crumble under a massive and overfunded military force. Yeah, you've really earned the right to moralize about the injustices happening in other countries...
      Btw, just heard that another man was executed by lethal injection in Texas...never mind, he was probably guilty...

    51. Re:Statistics by tloh · · Score: 1
      Come on. All the guy is saying that there is a big difference between the theoretical (some might say imagined) consequences of the patriot act and the actual effects.

      I appreciate the spirit of your argument, but I'd like you to consider the thought that percieved threat no matter how imaginary can be dangerous also. People who are scared do irrational things with much less reservation. Our nation allowed Senator Joseph McCarthy's communist witch hunt to ruin countless lives of honest to goodness American citizens during the height of the red scare. More recently, how many /.ers can forget the events which percipitated "Tales from the Hellmouth"? It's embarassing, but yeah...we still live in that society of fear and ethno/cultural-centricity.

      Now, do you think in China such a law could exist for a long time?

      Now, THAT is an interesting question. It is exactly the kind of thinking we should be doing. Rather than making self serving comments like "China is so screwed up. We are so much better.", wondering "What if..." opens up endless possibilities. If for no other reason, it lets one think about the situation. Then maybe we would be motivated to actually learn and find out for ourselves what the system is really like in China instead of relying on hearsay and gossip.

      Do you think that the US government could get away with mowing down and killing US citizens like they did the students in Tiananmen square?

      To answer your question in the strictest sense, yes. I refer you to the shooting at Kent State. . The sad thing is other than the scale of the tragedy, the circumstances are almost identical. Students criticize government with demonstration. Students are killed or injured by federal troops. I am not a China apologist. I don't condone what happened in '89. But it angers me when people use tragedies like this to win political arguement. Dragging out the skeletons in other people's closets to incite negative feelings might give the incitor some sense of power, but it is ultimately useless in solving the real problem. So I ask again: How did China get like this? Where is it going? Is there anything others (read: we) can do to move it along in the right direction? Perhaps most significantly: What does China teach us about ourselves? How are we different? Similar?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    52. Re:Statistics by j3110 · · Score: 1

      Herrrooo,

      It is the new millinium and China is still there, so I'm guessing they have as much right to the title of "modern country" as anyone else. Considering they do have great technology, some stolen, I don't think you could consider them any less technologically superior than the US. I don't know on what grounds you could say they weren't modern.

      All governments are for the people. That doesn't mean they always do what is best for the people, which is what I think you mean. Just because all our civil rights violations are foreign doesn't mean they don't exist. When they get big enough, they usually get exposed. I don't think it's any better that we supply weapons to groups that suppress women and religious freedom. Saudi Arabia certainly rivals China, and we give the government so many arms that they should be able to supress their population for many, many years. If Bush wants to talk about the US being hope, at least he can do is talk to his friends in Saudi Arabia about maybe not supressing it's population with the weapons we sell them to the point they feel it's neccisary to fly planes into our buildings.

      So... don't forget the price the world pays for the American Dream(TM). I like the way the US stirs shit up and when the wind blows back it's way, get's all pissed off. That's about what terrorism amounts to, a back draft. I don't see a war on heart disease, which is a real killer. 3000 lives is small change in comparison, and all this war has done is to tell people that if their loved ones didn't die from a terrorist attack, the government doesn't really care as much. In fact, the government will try to block more advanced research like stem cell research because a particular religious group doesn't approve of it.

      --
      Karma Clown
    53. Re:Statistics by danila · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you about this from experience. When making a transition of that magnitude, the government absolutely must maintain a very strong grip on things. Or the country would be royally fucked. I live in Russia and in late 1980s China was regarded as a hopeless nobody, while Russia was believed (at least in Russia and China) to become a democratic capitalist powerhouse. What happened next is that Russian government lost control and the country went down the shitter.

      In the meantime, China maintained political control, relinquished the economic controls only gradually and didn't let anyone fuck with the order by stopping violent uprisals such as the Tiananmen square (it wasn't a student protest, as many were led to believe by Western propaganda).

      So today China is booming and blooming, while Russia lies in ruins. And the main reason for that is that the Chinese managed to maintain the order. I would happily trade my ability to use unfiltered Internet and ability to criticise the government (which doesn't change anything anyway) for living in a powerful country that I can be proud of.

      P.S. A lot of things Chinese government does make perfect sense, such as prosecuting Falun Gong (which actually is a totalitarian sect, just like Scientology, only it's also opposed to the current government).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    54. Re:Statistics by edbarbar · · Score: 1

      To answer your question in the strictest sense, yes.

      Yeah, we learned about Kent State in college, and my reaction to it is the same. Tragically, a guardsmen lost his cool and accidentally or otherwise pulled his trigger, which caused a short lived panic among other guardsman. I don't think the Kent State guardsmen had the government's permission to kill the Kent state protesters. That's the sense I'm talking about.

      In Tiananmen it was quite a deliberate action, and I'm sure the government made the decision.

      [On bringing up Tiananmen] Dragging out the skeletons in other people's closets to incite negative feelings

      This sounds strange and racist to me. Do you mean I can't point out that a bunch of my fellow human beings were killed by the brutal Chinese government because they are Chinese, or even more strangely, because they are somehow owned by the Chinese government?

      incite negative feelings might give the incitor some sense of power

      First, I think you are confused about the topic. You keep trying to convince people that China's human rights record is somehow similar to the US's. In debating against you, I use the good practice of actually bringing up concrete examples rather than making airy abstract reasoning.

      Second, you say "skeletons in the closet." That refers first of all to secret things. China did this for the world to see. "This is what we can do to our people to maintain control of our governmnent." Also the phrase refers to things long ago (that's why they are skeletons). Tiananmen happened 15 years ago. Now, if you knew someone who deliberately brutally murdered someone 15 years ago, you might still be wary of them. But when it comes to a government, which is even slower to change, it's as if it happened yesterday. So I think it is quite relevent, and is no skeleton but a good indicator of the Chinese government's character.

      Third. From the Chinese nationals I've talked with about Tiananmen, one thing that amazes me is the acceptance of it. There is no outrage. This confounds me. How can it be? If, as you say, this is something to be ashamed of by the government, why aren't the people outraged?

      [how long a law taking away human rights could exist in China] Now, THAT is an interesting question.

      Now you see, this is a very big difference between the US and China. In the US, the citizens are allowed to have guns. In China, opposition is not allowed. Freedom is granted by the government, is the sense I get. So, I would say until it becomes expeditious for the Chinese government to do something about it.

      Here in the United States, the answer is a little different. The answer is "When the ACLU sues you," or ultimately "when the armed US citizenry gets fed up."

      --
      Ed Barbar, President and General Manager, Furnit USA
    55. Re:Statistics by tloh · · Score: 1
      Yeah, we learned about Kent State in college, and my reaction to it is the same. Tragically, a guardsmen lost his cool and accidentally or otherwise pulled his trigger, which caused a short lived panic among other guardsman. I don't think the Kent State guardsmen had the government's permission to kill the Kent state protesters. That's the sense I'm talking about.

      Based on the description of events at wikipedia, I'm not as inclined to think it was such an accident. The students who were killed or wounded were too far away to pose as a physical threat to the troopers who shot them, so self defense goes out the window. Additionally, I quote: " ....the Guardsmen suddenly turned on the crowd and fired a 13-second fusillade of between 61 and 67 shots......Only one of the four students killed was participating in the protest... This most certainly does not describe an accident stemming from a missunderstanding. 13 seconds are a long time, 60 some-odd shots are a lot of bullets. The Guardsmen were sent onto campus by the government. They performed their duties with what seems like deliberate purpose. I can't speculate on the exact orders they were given, but I found it odd that no mention was made of disciplinary actions taken against Guardsmen who violated any orders to *not* shoot the students. Other sources reveal that there had been one hearing and an additional trial where the Guardsmen were cleared of responsibility for the shooting. So on the surface, it seems due process was observed and a legal resolution was carried out. Think what you will, but this seems no better than the sham trials China puts it's political disidents through to give the sembalence of justice.

      This sounds strange and racist to me. Do you mean I can't point out that a bunch of my fellow human beings were killed by the brutal Chinese government because they are Chinese, or even more strangely, because they are somehow owned by the Chinese government?

      Yes, it is very strange that you should think that. No government owns their citizens, Certainly not the Chinese. I don't recall saying only the Chinese have skeletons in their closets. Every nation, every government has done things they are not proud of. One could just as well talk about the "brutal" US invasion of the sovereign country of Vietnam, or the "unjust" oppression of the Afgans in the 80's by the Soviets army. Were these events racially motivated? hardly. They were responses to percieved geo-political instability. To avoid loosing focus on the subject, I think we need to understand the actions of the Chinese Government as responding to percieved domestic instability. Beijing was in a state of emergency. Martial Law was declared. Thousands of people died, but it wasn't random, wanton killing. The soldiers who carried out the attacks in Tiananmen Square were not psychotic bloodthirsty berserkers. They were diciplined military personel charged with a task and carrying out their orders to the extent which were necessary. (In this sense, they weren't too different from the Guardsmen at Kent state.) I know it doesn't make it excusable, but it compels us to accept the fact a deliberate series of events occured which lead to certain deliberate decisions and the events which percipitated. The question is: How were those decision made and why? Not in the context of an American who is used to living with the legacy of a North American New World socio-historic heritage but in the context of a group of leaders saddled with the baggage of China's modern 20th century history.

      First, I think you are confused about the topic. You keep trying to convince people that China's human rights record is somehow similar to the US's. In debating against you, I use the good practice of actually bringing up concrete examples rather than making airy abstract reasoning.

      Which topic am I confusing? You're partially right here. I do believe that by virtue

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    56. Re:Statistics by edbarbar · · Score: 1

      I'm not as inclined to think it was such an accident

      You think the Ohio govt. ordered the guardsman to fire? The national guard didn't do a very good job, 'cause they only got four of them with their 60 bullets. Obviously it's impossible to know anything, but the likelihood of this is tiny, and not worth arguing. Tiananmen and Kent are not similar incidents.

      [Beijing was] responding to percieved domestic instability

      Exactly. Beijing felt their power was threatened, and the power was shifting to its people, so they killed them. You then try to draw parallells to this kind of action and executing murderers. Executing murderers is a way to keep the citizenry safe, but it doesn't protect politician's political power. You should stop trying to draw relationships where they are completely different things.

      China-haters . . . /I>
      Keep spitting this innuendo out. We have a saying in America "call a spade a spade." What it means is that you name things for what they are. I don't hate Chinese people, they are people just like me, with the same love of child, fear of death, inate intelligence, etc., but I do hate the Chinese government. I hate the idea of subservience to the state. I hate the penal system over there, in which a person who stole a small amount of money was put in prison for 15 years, and there one of his many trivial tasks was mowing the lawn along with his fellow prisoners. Not mowing as in with a lawn mower, but mowing as in picking individual blades of grass. The message is obvious. Do not think, do not thwart the state. Be subservient to it. That way, our band of hoodlums can continue to maintain control.

      [Tiananmen] this isn't over yet by a long shot

      I'm not going to hold my breath. It has been several thousands of years.

      Apparantly 38 million were killed under Mao Tse Tung. Anecdotally, I discussed this thread with a friend today, and his (chinese) wife, who works for an import export business. She personally knew someone who was executed for stealing from the Chinese government. Another anecdote is a person put in jail for 10 years during the cultural revolution. Somehow, this person holds no bitterness towards Mao Tse Tung. True, my history is weak insofar as China is concerned, but I suspect that the lopsided power of the state for thousands of years there has lead to a culture of resignation and acceptance that for some reason individual rights must be subservient to the state. Until recently, this led to a culture of stagnation. It's not the Chinese people: look at Hong Kong, look at Taiwan. It's the government and its influence to make a culture of resignation.

      Look, it is obvious that you have strong feelings for China. Great. You seem to have a lot of energy, and love of China and its culture. So open your eyes. See the gang of hoodlums that control its people for what they are, and then do something about it. Stop trying to reach for strange relationships that don't exist as a way of excusing these barbarians.

      --
      Ed Barbar, President and General Manager, Furnit USA
    57. Re:Statistics by tloh · · Score: 1
      You think the Ohio govt. ordered the guardsman to fire? The national guard didn't do a very good job, 'cause they only got four of them with their 60 bullets. Obviously it's impossible to know anything, but the likelihood of this is tiny, and not worth arguing. Tiananmen and Kent are not similar incidents.

      I respectfully disagree. While it *is* pointless to argue how many students the guards killed. The motivation and consequences of the shooting is not trivial. The Ohio Govt. may not have ordered the guards to shoot, but their complacence in the aftermath of the event is equally reprehensible. Regardless of whether it was an accident or not, why was no one brought to justice for the death of four students? did those guardsmen get away with murder?

      Exactly. Beijing felt their power was threatened, and the power was shifting to its people, so they killed them.

      There *WAS NO* power shift to the people. The protesters at Tiananmen was a semi-organized mob. What little leadership existed was running the protest. If the student leaders had made any effort to develope a plan to *replace* the government, then your comments would make sense. But if you check the documented history, most of the activities were geared toward petitioning the government to reform and evolve. As it was, the leaders in Beijing was the recognized as the legitimate power holders and expected to act as such. This doesn't mean the students got what they deserved. But perhaps they should have anticipated and avoided confrontation.

      You then try to draw parallells to this kind of action and executing murderers. Executing murderers is a way to keep the citizenry safe, but it doesn't protect politician's political power. You should stop trying to draw relationships where they are completely different things.

      You have grossly misunderstood my comments. At no point do I mention murderers. I was talking about individuals convicted of crimes under the US legal system. Surely you are not so naive to believe the US judicial system is flawless? It is a fact that innocent people are freed from wrongful convictions on a regular basis. These folks have had their human rights violated. Who knows how many more there are still languishing in jail needlessly?

      I don't hate Chinese people...

      I don't doubt that, but I didn't say "chinese-haters", there is a distinction between China-the country and Chinese-it's people. By the way, would you care to provide documentation on that lawn thingie? So far as I know, Lawns as a landscape ornament has never been a thing in China, at least not near institutions of incarceration. In rural areas like where I lived, however, wild grass are often cut by hand for farming and livestock.

      I'm not going to hold my breath. It has been several thousands of years.

      huh???? what are you smoking?

      Anecdotally....

      If hearsay and propaganda are all that you're aware of your comments are not going to be very credible. It truly is a pitty so few Americans know the acurate history of modern China which so many has painted as an adversary. There is no "lopsided power of the state for thousands of years." The China of antiquity ended in 1911 when the Nationalist party set up a republican government to administer the country. They failed however due to corruption and lack of leadership. China had already been weaken by rampant colonialism by European (and American) imperialism, they just could not muster the needed resource or motivation to set things right. Most of the population, which was rural, had fallen on hard times without strong national leadership to repel deeply entrenched foreign agression. Not only did the Nationalists fail to return the country to the Chinese, the Japanese Invasion of Manchuria happened around this time. It was at this time Mao Zedong and the Communists began organizing the rural peasants and gave them what no previous government had given them: leadership and direction. After generations of foreign domination and

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  2. Come on, superior technology? by CodeHog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of these items were not technology related. Slipcovers for coats and purses @ resturants? Nice, but I'm not counting that as points to superior technology. Gotta admit that stoplight timer technology sounds good.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    1. Re:Come on, superior technology? by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      technology isn't just computers. it can be coats and the materials they are made of or how they are made. all, uses of things can be technology. technology is a broad term

    2. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      extra banking hours definitely does not count as technology, and that made it to the list. What an idiotic story this is.

    3. Re:Come on, superior technology? by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gotta admit that stoplight timer technology sounds good.

      Oh, everyone has stoplight timers now. I think this is the programming:

      if (LATE_FOR_WORK)
      green() || construction();
      else if (ON_TIME)
      red(minutes(5));
      else
      red();

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    4. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thailand also uses this technology in many parts of Downtown Bangkok. The first time that I waited for a crosswalk signal watching the countdown timer, I was impressed. I was even more astounded when the crossing signal itself had a countdown "bar." (but no actual timer).

      I have seen the latter used in nearby Seoul, as well. I guess the Chinese are exporting these technologies?;)

    5. Re:Come on, superior technology? by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Stop light technology wouldn't work in the US, people would try to time it and which in return will cause people to run red lights.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    6. Re:Come on, superior technology? by itwerx · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...which in return will cause people to run red lights.

      Oh yeah, they never do that now... :)

    7. Re:Come on, superior technology? by maxume · · Score: 1

      He said superior technology. I don't think people spend all that much time worrying about thier purses while in most restuarants in the US...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Come on, superior technology? by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      Gotta admit that stoplight timer technology sounds good.

      To a certain degree we already have this here. I've seen many intersectons in the SF Bay Area that have countdown timers for the pedestrian crossings.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    9. Re:Come on, superior technology? by tgd · · Score: 1

      The stoplight technology is there as a pollution/gas saving measure. I noticed parked in traffic there most people seem to shut their engines off until its close to turning green again.

    10. Re:Come on, superior technology? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Not with cameras they won't. Not sure if they have them in China where they have these lights, but that's the solution.

    11. Re:Come on, superior technology? by acrid_k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the early 90s I was in a small factory city in South West China. The town was a mass of concrete; an artless, treeless, birdless place dominated by factories. The only luxury goods available were cigarettes and rice wine. Once at the train station one of the locals lectured my friend (a Swiss guy who spoke fluent Mandarin) on how China was leading the world technologically--while the *steam* trains pulled in and out of the station. The local airport even had half a dozen bi-planes sitting on the tarmac and the soldiers had WWI era rifles. In the special economic zones you no doubt have something much closer resembling the standards of the West (and the seeds of the Communist's downfall). One city near the border with Hong Kong protected its appearance, replete with skyscrapers and the reflecting glass that dominated Western architecture in the 80s, with a massive mandatory carwash. Every vehicle coming into the city from the country was forced to go thru the carwash. The carwash also doubled as a inspection point as ordinary citizens needed permission to enter the special economic zone.

    12. Re:Come on, superior technology? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      technology isn't just computers. it can be coats and the materials they are made of or how they are made. all, uses of things can be technology. technology is a broad term

      Exactly. I was looking at a technology time-line in relation to my 93 year old grandmother's time-line and was surprised to see things like the zipper on the list. But after all, technology is more than things with wires.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    13. Re:Come on, superior technology? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Thailand also uses this technology in many parts of Downtown Bangkok. The first time that I waited for a crosswalk signal watching the countdown timer, I was impressed.

      They've had 'em in Washington DC for years. Just the crosswalk timers, though, not the wheeled-vehicle ones like you see all over Asia.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    14. Re:Come on, superior technology? by ad0gg · · Score: 1
      Camera's help, help get revenue for the government. Here in LA they found that a red light camera was "mis-timed" and gave out 10,000 tickets to people who didn't run the red light. You can always tell a red light camera intersection from a regular intersection by yellow light times. Yellow light times on camera enforced intersections are insanely low, if you don't slam on your brakes when the light turns yellow, you'll run the light.

      My favorite is that red light cameras have no way to catch people with brand new cars(Aka higher income demographics). Since all you get a little piece of paper and no plates. There's no way to figure out the owner of the car. I went 1 year before I actually putting on my plates, I know lot people who've went longer. Since its just a fixit ticket if you actually get caught, and no one checks. Also red lights camera's appear in lower income areas. You won't find them Santa Monica,Thousand Oaks or any other well off city.(Note: I said city, bev hills is part of LA city) Those cities do have cameras at their lights but they are regular monitoring cameras.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    15. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Well, yeah, exactly. "Some restaurants have hooks for clipping bags to under the table"? Common practice in pubs and restaurants in the UK for years.


      We have cheap pay-as-you-go phones over here. The most expensive is probably about £50-£60, but they start at less than £20. Calls are very cheap, and coverage is practically universal, even in incredibly remote parts of Scotland.


      Although we don't have funky traffic lights, most of the pedestrian crossings in the large cities have a countdown to when they are next going "green".


      Our public transport sucks. I shall say no more.


      Most cities have electronic signs to tell you which car parks have spaces (and how many spaces there are).


      The theatre seating thing sounds cool. A lot of theatres in the UK do something similar on their websites.


      Maybe you should just come to the UK?

    16. Re:Come on, superior technology? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it should be some kind of and invention of SOME sort. Banking hours, as already mentioned, are a social aspect not a techological one. Also, I wouldn't count ubiquitous adoption of a technology as an additional technology itself. (for example ubiquitous use of cellphones, and less annoying purchasing methods for those cellphones (no stupid monthly plans) is not the same thing as better cellphone technology. Again, that is a social thing, not a technological one.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    17. Re:Come on, superior technology? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      People try to do that anyway. The difference is that now they are more dangerous since they are guessing how long the light has to go, instead of seeing it displayed with certainty.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    18. Re:Come on, superior technology? by ChrisPee · · Score: 1

      Indeed, some of China's truly superior technologies were overlooked: 1) Roasting 2) Braising 3) Stir-frying ...

    19. Re:Come on, superior technology? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      When you first start your engine you produce more pollution per second than you normally would after it's been running for ten seconds or so. Therefore shutting off your engine at a red light and then restarting it might not actually pollute less than just leaving it on the whole time. It might actually be worse. You would need several minutes of downtime with the engine off before it actually becomes less pollutive that way.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    20. Re:Come on, superior technology? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      You would need several minutes of downtime with the engine off before it actually becomes less pollutive that way.

      Exactly. Red lights suck. :)

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    21. Re:Come on, superior technology? by lazy_playboy · · Score: 0

      Even when starting a warm engine?

    22. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only luxury goods available were cigarettes and rice wine.

      I can show you many places in America where this is also true. Not necessary rice wine but other spirits.

      while the *steam* trains pulled in and out of the station.

      I would never knock anyone who employs the use of steam power. If it isn't broke don't fix it. Good steam powered trains can easily be upgraded to other forms of fuel like alcohol or natural gas / propane. I would never say diesel is superior to steam.

      The local airport even had half a dozen bi-planes sitting on the tarmac and the soldiers had WWI era rifles.

      The last time I looked my local airport has 1/2 dozen bi-planes. They are used as crop dusters and for tourists wanting to see the sites from the air. WWI era rifles I have not seen in a while though. WW-II rifles are a diffrent story.

      Every vehicle coming into the city from the country was forced to go thru the carwash. The carwash also doubled as a inspection point as ordinary citizens needed permission to enter the special economic zone.

      Sort of like how cars going into California are required to stop and you can't import home grown fruit? Actually I'm shocked that they don't have a mandatory carwash. Given the importance of California's agricultural industry this wouldn't be unwise at all. You don't need special permission to enter California though.

    23. Re:Come on, superior technology? by mellon · · Score: 1

      Actually, this isn't true. Hybrids take advantage of it. The reason that you think this is true is that it *is* true that your engine produces dirtier exhaust while it is *cold*, and only produces cleaner exhaust when it is warm. In fact, the main problem with turning your engine off at the stop light is that if it's a big engine, you may not get sufficient charge when moving to cover the cost of turning it over, and that in turn means that over time your battery will drain.

    24. Re:Come on, superior technology? by FiveRings · · Score: 1
      They did cover cell phones...
      You can use them in elevators, subways and parking garages. They work in Tibet, at the Great Wall, in remotest rural China,
      I can barely get reception in my apartment, let alone elevators or garages.
      --
      *Your ad here*
    25. Re:Come on, superior technology? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Not really true. The reason engines are very polluting at startup is that they are cold, so combustion isn't happening at the right temperature, and the catalytic converter is cold and doesn't really work well.

      If you shut off at a red light for a minute, however, the engine doesn't have time to cool appreciably, and so will be just as clean running as it was before you stopped.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    26. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Algorithms count as technology. It is not too far a stretch to call business practices technology.

    27. Re:Come on, superior technology? by athanis · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that China today is a completely different universe from a decade ago. Press freedom is slightly more open, accountability of the higher officials is steadily improving and the GDP groowth has been unbelievably fast.

      It's seriously a kinda American thing, to think that China is still a backwater 3rd world country. Although it is officially Communist, nobody really lives that way. There are so many private enterprises and foreign investment that it's no surprise China is a "world manufacturer".

    28. Re:Come on, superior technology? by psetzer · · Score: 1
      Steam engines aren't bad at all. They're harder to learn how to drive, but they aren't impossible. All you need once you have the train and the tracks is a source of clean water and a source of something that burns. Coal isn't all that you can run a steam engine on, and it'll always be cheaper than oil. In fact, the most powerful train engines have been steam. Only recently have the Diesel Electric engines really begun to out do the Big Boy.

      Biplanes aren't all that weird. They allow for a much greater wing area without a large wingspan, and are common for cropdusters and the such, and WWI era rifles aren't that bad, if well maintained. And if you're off in some place that nobody's going to invade sometime soon, why give the soldiers top of the line equipment? That's the problem in Iraq. The reservists were equipped with the assumption that they wouldn't be used to fight a war somewhere else unless the regulars were completely wiped out or already committed somewhere else. With an army as big as China's, if you want any money left over for other things, like running a country, you're going to have to skimp in some way.

      China isn't pre-WWII backward in most respects as you're implying. They have a finite amount of resources, and they try to allot them in the most efficient manner possible. Having a controlled economy means that someone up high will make many of these decisions. It's instructive in how they chose to allocate things, deciding that cell phones were more important than newer trains. This isn't to say that either system is superior, but it gives you insight into what the current rulers feel is important at the moment.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    29. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Epcoatl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, early 90's, that's your problem. There's been a vast sea change in the past decade. Any area of China between Hong Kong and Tianjin will have undergone major change in this past decade. You should go back now and see what changes have occurred. I'm willing to bet you'd be quite surprised.

    30. Re:Come on, superior technology? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. However, on same days in winter I have seen the engine cool off surprisingly quickly after it is stopped, although it has to be windy out for this to happen (The wind probably has more to do with it).

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    31. Re:Come on, superior technology? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      This may or may not be because of better technology. If it's a matter of china using some better technology that gets better coverage per dollar spent, then it would be. But if it's just because they spent more on building more transmitters in more locations, then it's, again, a social difference, not a technological one.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    32. Re:Come on, superior technology? by mellon · · Score: 1

      Yup, let's hear it for air-cooled engines! :')

    33. Re:Come on, superior technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard for Westerners to imagine the pace of development in Asia. I lived in Taipei in the 80s and Hong Kong in the 90s, and I could swear that new skyscrapers would go up every few months.

      It's kinda how you go "Oh, a new Starbucks." In Asia, it's "Oh, a new skyscraper."

  3. Existing infrastructure by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Look at Eastern Europe - ramshackle tenements, with satellite dishes. No payphones, everyone has a cell phone. Look at Japan, new high tech everything.
    It's easy when you start from nothing. The Eastern bloc had Soviet-era crap (meaning no progress since 1945) and Japan was bombed flat. China stopped being utterly backwards only recently, so it makes sense that any new investments are cutting edge. Try upgrading 300 year old streets, sewers and other infrastructure in cobblestone historic districts in Boston, MA, or Providence, RI, and its a different story. I live in one of the oldest, wealthiest areas of Providence, RI, and I can't get DSL, because my local loop has the oldest, shittiest copper in the city. When I lived in the ghetto side of Providence, a DSL install was a snap and I had killer speed. Why, because it was brand new stuff.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I wholeheartedly agree with you. It is easier to start from scratch I would argue however it is not the whole story in China. Most of the major cities are thousands of years old. The authoritarian government just has no qualms about tearing down what they need to in order to build up. If there is an apartment, historical district, or anything objection those people can go cry to someone else. There is something to be said for authoritarian systems. Now you are right much of the Chinese cuntry side was/is very vacant.

    2. Re:Existing infrastructure by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What about Western Europe? There is much more existing infrastructure in the Western European countries than in the U.S. However, they also seem to embrace technology faster than the U.S. I feel it is due to population density. The U.S. has a low population density. The denser the population the greater your market in a particular area. No surprise that technology hits those types of markets sooner than later.

    3. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      so, we just need bin ladan and friends to bomb us to the stone age so we can get to upgrading everything.

      i'm guessing in about 10-20 years we will be reading how advanced Iraq's tech is and be wondering why i still can't get [next great thing after DSL] in my area.

    4. Re:Existing infrastructure by gnoos · · Score: 1

      the UK's been around a bit longer than Boston and we manage to have DSL?

    5. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not only what you have to replace that matters, but whether you have the *means* to do it.

      The Japanese, Chinese and East Europeans may have had to start from scratch but progress can only be made if they have the money to afford it. Japan was not bombed flat btw. I think they were hardly touched except by Fat Man and Little Boy (The atomic bombs).

      Besides, you can always replace old stuff with new if you want to.

    6. Re:Existing infrastructure by stubear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Large portions of Western Europe were bombed to the stone age during WWII and have been able to build more modern cities from scratch. Look at the urban sprawl and some suburban communities around the US and you'll find the same phenomenon. The US has cities that date back to the original colonies and their infrastructure is just about as old. Add that to the fact that we have laws which protect history to the detriment of progress in some cases. Mix in the problem that we are, as should have been quite evident in this last election, a Federal Republic (basically we're a loosely knit group of 50 countries known as states) and Federal laws are limited due to State's Rights which data back as old as the infrastructure and cities that can't be updated due to historical relevance and you have one big catch-22 that makes progress difficult.

    7. Re:Existing infrastructure by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      I think they were hardly touched except by Fat Man and Little Boy (The atomic bombs).

      Tokyo, Nagoya, Kobe, Osaka, Yokohama...all bombed pretty well flat.

    8. Re:Existing infrastructure by arose · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's easy when you start from nothing. The Eastern bloc had Soviet-era crap (meaning no progress since 1945)
      We had a lot of... imported technology. :D The technology side wasn't really that bad, the economics and lack of freedom is what sucked. Not that those areas are perfect now...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    9. Re:Existing infrastructure by antiMStroll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who moderates this stuff? China and Europe have personal residences and restaraunts older than your counry. Boston's a swaddling baby compared to them.

    10. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were hardly touched except by Fat Man and Little Boy (The atomic bombs).

      As I remember, parts of urban Japan were extensively damaged during WWII. No, I'm not talking about Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

      Yes, if I got off my fat ass, I could research that...

    11. Re:Existing infrastructure by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      This is true. But keep in mind that a lot of Western Europe (Germany especially) got reduced to rubble during WWII, everything had to be rebuilt from the ground-up. In Eastern Germany especially, they're still repairing damage from 1945, so it would make sense that as long as you're rebuilding the telephone system, that you might as well rebuild it with the latest hardware.

    12. Re:Existing infrastructure by scowling · · Score: 1

      Japan was not bombed flat btw.

      Joking, surely. The US firebombed Japan severely in WWII, destroying some cities completely and killing every single human in those cities. Dozens and dozens of cities were targeted, with destruction rates of 30-100%.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    13. Re:Existing infrastructure by aspidis · · Score: 1

      While existing infrastructe surely matters, it does not matter significantly in terms of such things as the nearly ubiquitous cell phone coverage in China. In this country, I will lose a signal on the fringes of major metropolitan areas (I live in New York City). But when I was in China, I too was impressed by the efficiency and ubiquity of the cell phone network. For the US to have a comparable network would not involve rebuilding the current cell phone infrastructure, rather it would require an upgrade to the current infrastructure. The difference between the US and much the rest of the developed world and a few developing countries like China is that these other countries invest much more heavily in the public infrastructure than the US. By any account, especially for a country as wealthy as the US, the public infrastructure in this country is poor and greatly underfunded.

    14. Re:Existing infrastructure by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Look at Japan, new high tech everything. It's easy when you start from nothing.
      Same reason the German and French trains run on time but the British ones don't. Britain's railway infrastructure survived WWII, industrial revolution-era bottlenecks and all. The French and Germans were able to build from scratch. I'll bet that Chinese Maglev train doesn't have to share its tracks with local commuter trains, freight services and squeeze onto two-track sections to get over any victorian viaducts.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    15. Re:Existing infrastructure by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      There are many 1000 years old streets in China.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    16. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many surviving cities, towns and roads in China that existed before Europeans arrived in America. Boston would be young compared to those, I reckon.

    17. Re:Existing infrastructure by Cromac · · Score: 1

      You've also got about 3,000,000 people in London vs 590,000 in Boston to spread the cost of upgrading to. How much of the UK's infrastructre was rebuilt after the bombings 1940's?

    18. Re:Existing infrastructure by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the Southern United States. We didn't have much down here until after the 50's. I fail to see your point. European countries are the size of our States. Then why aren't the Southern Cities just as wired tech wise. Having lived in Europe I can tell you that I have seen technology just emerging in the US that was available 3-4 years ago in Europe.

    19. Re:Existing infrastructure by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The other advantage China, Japan and Eastern Europe have is a good school system.

      You would be hard pressed to find a Japanese or Chinese adult who was ignorant enough to consider Japan "untouched" by WW2 strategic bombing.

      One of the dilemmas that US planners encountered when picking nuclear targets was: "Who should be bomb?" Not much was left by August 1945.

      The jet stream over Japan makes high altitude precision (by WW2 standards) bombing next to impossible. Not to be deterred, however, the US Army Air Force essentially gutted Japanese urban areas by dropping white phosphorous, aviation fuel and firebombs on Japanese cites, which consisted of mostly wood buildings.

      The resulting firestorms killed millions. The B-29 raids over Tokyo produced a column of flame nearly 20,000 feet high... the glow could be seen from Iwo Jima nearly 600 miles away.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    20. Re:Existing infrastructure by bombadillo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Large Portions of the U.S were not even developed until after the 1950's. Very few U.S cities date back 300 years. Europe is full of old cities. Europe also has laws which protect their history. In America we have "Historic" buildings that were built 50 years ago. Europe goes through the same struggles as the US when it comes to historic buildings. Even more so since their structures have more history and in some cases could have been owned by a family for several generations. Yes the U.S has reminence of a Republic. 100 years ago the U.S. was refered to as a Republic not a Democracy. However, our Republic is much more tightly knit than the EU. Try living outside of the U.S with non Americans and you will see that every Country has similar problems and struggles.

    21. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I live in one of the oldest, wealthiest areas of Providence, ... When I lived in the ghetto side of Providence ..."

      You went from the ghetto to wealthiest area in Providence. Yeeeeahhhh, right!

    22. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey try to use your brain when commenting ok? China has a history of 5000 years at least compared to what did you say, 300 years? So do not write stuff like "it's easy when you start from nothing". More things have been taken away from China, its people and its culture than ever existed in your town!

    23. Re:Existing infrastructure by terber · · Score: 1
      Please get the facts right before you post such a humbug:

      > Large portions of Western Europe were bombed
      > to the stone age during WWII
      Mostly correct. Germany was (rightfully) hit most far and away.

      > and have been able to build more modern
      > cities from scratch.
      Wrong. Look at a map af nearly any city in Germany: you will find basically the same layout as hundreds of years before (sometimes up to two milleniums back to the Romans).

      > The US has cities that date back to the
      > original colonies and their infrastructure
      > is just about as old.
      So what? Conclusions?
      In most parts of Europe most parts of the infrastructure is older.

      > Mix in the problem that we are, as a Federal
      > Republic and Federal laws are limited due to
      > State's Rights
      Once more - conclusions? Germany is a federal state too (as opposed eg. to highly centralized France).

      > you have one big catch-22 that makes
      > progress difficult.
      As demonstrated obviously wrong.

    24. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But keep in mind that a lot of Western Europe (Germany especially) got reduced to rubble during WWII, everything had to be rebuilt from the ground-up. In Eastern Germany especially, they're still repairing damage from 1945, so it would make sense that as long as you're rebuilding the telephone system, that you might as well rebuild it with the latest hardware.

      Well, the destructions were surely quite devastating, but surely not everything had to be "rebuild from the ground up". Nevertheless a lot had to be rebuild. But still I don't really see why having to rebuild a lot 50 years ago explains a (claimed) faster adoption of technology today. A valid example is surely the East German phone network which was heavily rebuild (and digitalised) after unification (but that was necessary more due to 50 years of neglect than WWII), resulting in a more modern network in the east than in the west for some time, until the west cached up.

    25. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try living outside of the U.S with non Americans and you will see that every Country has similar problems and struggles.

      Aside from a thinly veiled attempt at an anti-US tirade, wtf was your point again? Oh yeah, you really didn't have one.

    26. Re:Existing infrastructure by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely it, sir.

      As much as you might not like it, authoritarian governments basically without budgets to balance can (not that they always do) do a few things very well, and infrastructure is one of them. I live in Romania, the former charge of one of the most insane leaders in history, and although things mostly went to hell, there are a few truly excellent byproducts. For one, there is a wonderfully-functioning cheap subway (not as extensive as one would like, but in the '70s when it was built, it was top-notch) with armed guards in every few cars. Totally automated at around $0.10/ride. An increasing number of traffic lights have the countdown technology, many of which were installed under Ceausescu. Schools function wonderfully (nice buildings) with built-in incentives (each child gets 210 000 lei per month as motivation to attend), universities are plentiful and cheap for Romanians.

      So yes, things did go to hell. But Communism also brought some good. Not all innovation is due to the fact that people had to start at zero - some is actually due to those whom we credit with completely ruining things.

    27. Re:Existing infrastructure by urutora90 · · Score: 1

      Trust me - the german trains do not run on time... I mean, ok, if one said an average delay of 15 minutes is on time, then probably...

    28. Re:Existing infrastructure by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      You've also got about 3,000,000 people in London vs 590,000 in Boston to spread the cost of upgrading to.

      Your population figures are apples and oranges. The City of London has a population of what, 12? But everyone knows that's not London. If you count Boston, count the suburbs to the same degree of de-urbanization.

      How much of the UK's infrastructre was rebuilt after the bombings 1940's?

      How many of Boston's phone exchanges were in service in 1944?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    29. Re:Existing infrastructure by soliptic · · Score: 1
      LOL - indeed.

      My city, for example, got going somewhere in the eleventh century, which makes it a good 600 years older than the USA!

      I'm no expert on Chinese history, but I imagine they can easily trace some of their population centres back centuries before that.

    30. Re:Existing infrastructure by JRIsidore · · Score: 1

      Those bombed-to-stone-age cities you speak of I've never seen (in Germany). Many were heavily bombarded and largely destroyed, yes, but they were not completely wiped out. And people tend to rebuild the cities, not start new ones from scratch. For the age, there are lot of cities which already existed when the American continent has not even been discovered. I myself grew up in a one that can be dated back to the 8th century and it's just a regular (and small) city.

      --
      :w!q
    31. Re:Existing infrastructure by Harassed · · Score: 1



      I'm afraid I have to disagree. Any country which can elect Bush *must* have a very dense population indeed...

    32. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try millenia earlier(~5,000 B.C.). The only older "civilization" would be the Australian aboriginals(~60,000 B.C.).

      Anyhow the US has older infrastructure because we didn't have a silly war where we blew every f*cking thing up(WWII).

    33. Re:Existing infrastructure by Harassed · · Score: 1

      [Large portions of Western Europe were bombed to the stone age during WWII]

      Large portions? I don't think so. Even Germany which was particularly badly hit has a wealth of historic cities.

      [The US has cities that date back to the original colonies and their infrastructure is just about as old]

      Most US cities were developed into their current guise during the 1950s with the invention of the motor car and the simultaneous distruction of the public transport infrastructure by the wholesale asset stripping by companies such as Ford and GM.

      [Add that to the fact that we have laws which protect history to the detriment of progress in some cases]

      There are more historic (say 200 year old +)buildings in the average English town than in the entire USA! And despite our best efforts through the 60's and 70's, legislation exists which protect these buildings (See here)

    34. Re:Existing infrastructure by Harassed · · Score: 1

      I take it you've never been to Europe? We may have had a "silly" war in the 1940's but the vast majority of Europe survived relatively unscathed. My local pub for instance has existed around twice as long as the USA.

    35. Re:Existing infrastructure by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      Exactly ;)

      The aquiantance of mine owns apartment building in the center of Cracow/Poland which was built in 16th century, and it's no big deal.

      Go, find such buildings in USA ;)

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    36. Re:Existing infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to piss Americans off, you should tell them you have hedges older than their country.

      However, they can reply that with the exception of England they have the oldest democracy in the world.

    37. Re:Existing infrastructure by Epcoatl · · Score: 1

      yeah, whatever those guys above said. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were actually saved to be bombed when the Manhattan Project started. Kyoto and uh...I forgot but one other city was on that very short list. Everything else got flattened. As far as I'm concerned, the Japanese were paid in full for what they did to others in World War II.

    38. Re:Existing infrastructure by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      Try upgrading 300 year old streets, sewers and other infrastructure in cobblestone historic districts in Boston, MA, or Providence, RI, and its a different story.

      Wait a minute, 300 years is old? My home town (Split/Croatia) is 1700 years old. The whole city (some 250000 people) gets water from a water system built by the Romans (no shit). And we still get DSL. :-) At exorbitant prices, but that's a different story.

      Dude, USA is a very young country, a toddler practically.

  4. Parking, Transit Debit, Lights that Blink--In MN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the Twin Cities.....

    We have parking status as you enter downtown, accessible also via a web page. Traffic cameras blanket the freeway system, also via web page.

    In St. Paul a lot of the traffic lights have countdown timers.

    They are also close to have the debit cars for our new light rail line.

  5. China will be the next big innovator by hsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just watch.

    The USA refuses to adopt alternative fuels and prices are rising as fuel needs go up. Watch for china to lead the way in alternative fuel development and be the sole leader in the world. They need a cheap fuel soure to reach their goals of being a (or the) superpower.

    Our dependency because we are lapdogs of Saudi Arabia is going to bite us in the ass. We will be the ones buying the technology from the Chinese.

    1. Re:China will be the next big innovator by corexian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That and the Chinese have a certain mindset that isn't present here in the US. It has something to do with getting the job done well, quickly. The trend here seems cheaper and faster. The last point in the article points this out well by mentioning how well the customer was served at a clothing store.

      --
      So much room for sigs, so few sigs worthy of it.
    2. Re:China will be the next big innovator by drmike0099 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They already have a cheap fuel source, it's called coal. And they have no qualms about working with some of the "less savory" countries to get the oil that they need (i.e. Iran).

      Now, there's only so long they'll be able to run on coal (basically til everyone starts keeling over from black lung) but that point is probably a decade or two off. Your point about the USA going backwards is entirely accurate, though, and this election confirmed that Americans are really not that concerned with the vested oil interest or the environment, though, so China may beat us, although it won't be from their innovation, but from our lack of foresight.

    3. Re:China will be the next big innovator by DelawareBoy · · Score: 1

      That is because of America's Pride issue..

      But I'll betcha once China makes a breakthrough the Bush Administration (or whomever) will try to create a Manhattan Project-ish endevour to beat the Chinese. Not because of an energy need, only because we're America, and we need to be ahead in everything..

    4. Re:China will be the next big innovator by slashhax0r · · Score: 0

      The USA has anti-innovative things in place.. them DMCA comes to mind, and all this suing over IP...

    5. Re:China will be the next big innovator by DaddyDonMynack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      China's innovation relies mostly upon remaking things already patented in the West, just doing it cheaper by not paying the patent rights on it. This could be huge problem in the future, as many nations will require that they start honoring these agreements. I once worked with a client who did some of his manufacturing in China (toys, mostly) - he was stunned how quickly their products would turn up as black market ripoffs once they manufactured there - the plant managers typically run a shift a day making your stuff for you, then a shift at night making your stuff for them. They pulled their manufacturing from China after that. Also, I don't see China being much of a leader in alternative fuels - they are cutting deals with the Iranian mullahs now to become their primary oil supplier, and have much looser pollution standards that the U.S. or Europe (in fact, they use the U.S. pollution standards from the 1980's for their cars now). China will probably start making more alt fuel cars when the west demands it - meaning for export, not for domestic use. If you want to talk Asian innovators, Japan is still way, way ahead of China.

    6. Re:China will be the next big innovator by hey · · Score: 0, Troll

      Now the US has declared itself as a purtianical Christian country where you are free as long as you aren't gay, etc. I think the US can now excel unhindered in the Christian sciences. Such has mining the bible for info on the age of the earth.
      I say: look out world here comes the *new* USA.

    7. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      When I studied in Beijing, a coal furnace was directly out my dorm window. I was sick the entire time that I was there.

    8. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it, dropped my scorecard. So Iran is an enemy of America now? We really need a colour-coded alert system to notify everyone of these constant changes.

    9. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I was trying to figure out how a superiour service-culture would tie into a Chinese dominance over the US and the rest of the world, and then I realized - they were getting hemmed in.

    10. Re:China will be the next big innovator by FencingGerbil · · Score: 3, Informative
      China does love its coal. They have more than half of the top ten most polluted cities in the world. I've been through their coal country and coughed up stuff I never knew could fit in my repiratory tract in either direction.

      They are going to make the shift to nookular and hydro power much more smoothly than us. This is because:

      • They have less infrastructure to scrap than we do by abandoning coal and fossil fuels
      • They don't care so much about safety and accidents that kill a few hundred people (plenty more where those came from )
      • They don't care so much about environmental impacts of huge damns

      Couple all of that with the world's largest cheap labor force and you have something that will definitely be more than competitive with the US and the EU.


      I'd also say that China and the US are just as unsavory as Iran. It all just depends on from whence you're doing the observing.

    11. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying people 10 cents an hour and working them 18 hours a day doesn't hurt either.

    12. Re:China will be the next big innovator by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      many nations will require that they start honoring these agreements.

      This is highly unlikely. We are far too reliant on their manufacturing capabilities to make unreasonable demands like this. This is especially true of American pressure. We are far too dependent on foreign currency holdings to prop up the value of the USD.

      Far more likely are the scenarios that either companies who own patents will negotiate very nominal payments for use of their patents or that the First World will simply learn to use the Developing World's lack of IP respect as a way of "routing around" the damage in the free market.

      --
      That is all.
    13. Re:China will be the next big innovator by andy1307 · · Score: 1
      just doing it cheaper by not paying the patent rights on it.

      And how much did the west pay for gunpowder or paper?

    14. Re:China will be the next big innovator by FerociousFerret · · Score: 1

      The last point in the article points this out well by mentioning how well the customer was served at a clothing store.

      Yea, that's why the USA is outsourcing our customer support jobs to India

    15. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      and have much looser pollution standards that the U.S

      When I was vacationing near Beijing, the moon was red. It was not due to an eclipse, but factory pollution.

    16. Re:China will be the next big innovator by julesh · · Score: 1

      China's innovation relies mostly upon remaking things already patented in the West, just doing it cheaper by not paying the patent rights on it. This could be huge problem in the future, as many nations will require that they start honoring these agreements.

      What agreements? Patents don't work like that. Unless a nation has signed a specific patent-sharing treaty (and I don't believe China has), then it does not have to honour any other country's patents. If you want to protect an invention globally, you have to file for patents in all of the countries you consider important. There are some exceptions, e.g. the EU Patent Office can grant a patent that applies to all EU countries, but they are few and far between.

      (IANAL, etc.)

    17. Re:China will be the next big innovator by clem9796 · · Score: 1

      http://www.illwillpress.com/tech.html

      This says it all. :-)

      --
      IANALOOA
    18. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they have no qualms about working with some of the "less savory" countries to get the oil that they need (i.e. Iran).

      As I recall, the US had no qualms about working with Iraq for quite a while either, even as Saddam was murdering his people.

    19. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Informative
      China's innovation relies mostly upon remaking things already patented in the West

      I think America ignored European patents in the 18th and 19th century.

    20. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

      Your observation stating that the US is going entirely, accurately backwards is just not true. There are plenty of trials, solutions, and research already in use and at hand in regular society to clearly indicate an interest in the markets and in the minds of consumers to improve and solve the problems of our gas guzzling economy. Could we do more? Of course, I would say we can never do enough.

      But to blame the election for this topic is also a case in point of it not being that simple. Clearly, this election will go down in history as being one of more a security issue or moral interest than a technological or environmental concern. Granted, those ideologies are generally described as more "conservative" doctrines - which would lead you to believe there is a degeneration going on (wars for oil, overturning roe vs. wade, etc), but I guess I just give the US more credit knowing we will achieve those energy goals because the future cannot be and is not ignored here in our country - it just takes some time. That is something that is clearly evident, especially here on /..

      --


      --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
    21. Re:China will be the next big innovator by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Patents last for 20 years (in the US) I think gunpowder and paper were both common knowledge across China, and for more than 20 years before it became common in the west. Place your straw man elsewhere.

    22. Re:China will be the next big innovator by jeanlo · · Score: 1

      China's innovation relies mostly upon remaking things already patented in the West

      I understand that's exactly what Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan were doing at first. Copying things western countries made. Then they were making them faster, cheaper, smaller. So I don't see China copying and acquiring some know how as a problem to China's development.

    23. Re:China will be the next big innovator by ColdZero · · Score: 0

      Didn't the egyptians use papyrus first?

    24. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're propping up the value of the USD in order to keep their currencies weak so we can keep buying their stuff.

      We're getting tons of goods from them, and sending paper in return which they "loan" back to us to buy more stuff.

    25. Re:China will be the next big innovator by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Right, becuase China has not been mass importing oil and building oil and coal power plants at a faster rate then anywher else in the world, or anything like that. No clearly their policy shows they are headed for alternative fules. I don't know what you all are smokeing but it must be good stuff, I want some.

      The facts are clear, China is growing very fast because its not hard to grow from manual laybor to mechanized. Its especially easy when you do it with decades and certuries old tech from other places. China is paying no development costs. They are not even getting envolved with technologies still expensive to produce and use. They are just doing more of it faster. We have all these technologies mentioned in the article in the use for 20 years and more now. Just not in the same place and not as broadly deployed. Becase there has never been any reason too. They stuff from 40 years ago has been "good enough" such that this tech only got used to replace whats broken and in new installations. Now tech newer and better then that is being put in those places. Do you fools really think that China is gonna scrap these smart lights for city wide traffic control systems accross their entire nations as soon as one is developed, not likely they will live with this stuff longe then we would. They only reason that backwards commie government is doing it now is they finally reached a point where they need to do something in those areas and even they are not stupid enough not to pick the state of the art.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    26. Re:China will be the next big innovator by Epcoatl · · Score: 1

      Or working with Saudi Arabia right now (not exactly the hotspot for liberal democracy in the world)

    27. Re:China will be the next big innovator by mt-biker · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Here's a couple of thoughts coming together:

      1 - China has a big advantage in cheap labour, and not just in the direction of service, like is suggested in the article, but also because the cost of goods is also mostly labour. I'm thinking about things like houses, cars, shirts, computers, etc. There's labour in the manufacture, and labour in the design.

      So it makes sense for China to want to do as much as they can themselves - it's going to be cheaper to buy a shirt made in China, than one made in the US. Avoid imports. But there are still things they have to import, and energy is one of them. I guess they're not happy about that.

      2 - I'm distinctly unamerican in that I believe the answer to the energy crisis is to use less, rather than produce more. I don't think we need to find an infinite source of clean energy - even if we had this technology, it would not solve all our energy problems (BTW, the same goes for other resources: Food, water, etc.). To me, "produce more", and "consume more" seems like a western disease that China is perhaps immune to? Could they have an edge here too?

      So yeah, I can see that China could have both the incentive and the ability to come up with some innovations in the direction of energy.

      Would we have to buy it from the Chinese? Probably not, given how happy the chinese are to steal technology (i.e. intellectual property) from us. We'd probably refuse to recognise any chinese rights to the technology.

      Oops, I forgot. This is slashdot, and IP can't be stolen. Sorry about that. :)

  6. Re:First post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3rd post from the top!

    YAY

  7. Slashdotting iminent by GatorMan · · Score: 1

    Their image server still has some catching-up to do...

    1. Re:Slashdotting iminent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Their image server still has some catching-up to do...

      Don't you mean caching up?

  8. A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Yesterday, a policy analyst formerly employed at the State Department gave a talk at my university. He noted that the Chinese have moved 150,000 soldiers to the North Korean border to warn the Americans that if they attempt to obliterate any weapons of mass destruction in North Korea, then the Chinese will intervene.

    China is a huge threat in the region. China is best understood as a society with deadly, ultra-modern weapons coupled with a barbaric, medieval mindset. It is an ogre in the 21st century.

    The Chinese routinely rape and kill Tibetan nuns and children. The Chinese routinely abort female fetuses, producing a skewed ratio of male babies to female babies. There is currently a deficit of about 15% (!) in the female baby population.

    By the way, you can listen to radio station that streams Fox News Radio for free to anyone on the Internet.

    1. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Interesting
      • China is a huge threat in the region. China is best understood as a society with deadly, ultra-modern weapons coupled with a barbaric, medieval mindset. It is an ogre in the 21st century.
      Actually the same could be said of the US, a lot of our foriegn policies of late have been decidely midieval, notably the "you're with us or you're against us" black and white take on things. Not to say China's not a potential problem, but this is not sound reasoning as to why it's a problem.
      • The Chinese routinely rape and kill Tibetan nuns and children. The Chinese routinely abort female fetuses, producing a skewed ratio of male babies to female babies. There is currently a deficit of about 15% (!) in the female baby population.
      I'll decline to comment on the Tibetian bit except to point out the link you provide is decidely not an impartial one. They may be 100% accurate, but they have a vested interest in taking the Tibetian's side so it's hard to tell.

      As far as the female babies being aborted, yes it happens, but it's not a government policy. It's a side-effect of the one child, one family policy and traditions. Many Chinese feel they must have a male child to support them when they're elderly so they will have female babies aborted. Actually I'm not entirely sure the process is legal. Given the government's nationalistic leanings, I suspect that something will be done about this, they won't want to rely on Chinese marrying women of other ancestries in order to reproduce.

    2. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      China is a huge threat in the region. China is best understood as a society with deadly, ultra-modern weapons coupled with a barbaric, medieval mindset. It is an ogre in the 21st century.

      And the best way to deal with that is too hold their society back?

      So long as they are a nation of farmers with no communication besides government controlled TV and Radio, there is little hope for advancment. Modern communication infrastructures, hope for economic advancement, development of an educated populace neccessary to build and operate the technology; these are the things that will help.

    3. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Given the government's nationalistic leanings, I suspect that something will be done about this, they won't want to rely on Chinese marrying women of other ancestries in order to reproduce.

      On the other hand, it could be the best thing that ever happened to china... let's hope they don't notice, because the interbreeding could be seriously good for them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by evil_one666 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please, please, please RTFA you ignorant yank!

      They have are more sophisticated comunication network that you. That is the point of this thread. Now go and read the article, shoo, shoo go on, shoooo

    5. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical slashdot mindset. OP posts China upgrades tech infrastructure, reports how great this is for the people, and gets +5 insightful. Next poster posts links to History of human rights abuses towards Tibet, and gets -1 troll. I can't remeber, where is Tienenman Square again ? Who was it that set tanks upon its own people (students, no less) ?

    6. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, please, please RTFA you ignorant yank!

      Yank this, bitch!

    7. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aborting female babies is not an official policy of the Chinese government, but then again neither is repression certain christian churches in China or a second party, its just the consequence of the Chinese political system. Female babies are not aborted, as most Chinese don't have access to medical facilities capable of telling them the gender of the baby before it is born, they are drowned or they are given up for adoption. It has been reported by Amnesty International (and of course you can take that with a grain of salt) that local government officials have forced women to abort babies if they get pregnant for a second time. There is no government policy forcing them to do this, but there have been documented incidents where this has occured.

    8. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      Given the government's nationalistic leanings, I suspect that something will be done about this, they won't want to rely on Chinese marrying women of other ancestries in order to reproduce.

      I doubt it, since the whole point of the one child, one family policy was to reduce the population. Seems like removing the breeders is a darn good way to bring this about, eh?

      Incidentally, I think that law or a variation thereof should have made this top 10 list, as it is one way China is ahead of the US. I think the US is headed for the same population trouble, and limiting an individual's reproductive freedom to replacement only (2 children per family) is a likely scenario at some future point (barring major military deaths, of course).

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    9. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has started to incentivize having female children in order to improve the gender ratio. They want to keep population growth under control, but a large departure from 50/50 male/female ratio is not seen as desirable at all. It leads to other problems.

    10. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that most of the press that comes out of China is little more than government propaganda, right? You shouldn't believe everything that you read.

    11. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      That aspect I did not know, but really it won't be too terribly effective since only a male child carries the family name...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    12. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      The U.S. Birth rate is actually not much higher then the replacement rate all the expected population growth projections are largely due to naturalizing new citizens from elsewhere. Closeing the boarders is a much more likely senerio then limmiting current citizens right to have children. It should also be noted that one of the reasons our economy and other pay as you go systems work, such as social security operate only because the population always grows. Infact becase the population has not grown enough is why SS is in such trouble. More then 60% percent of the inhabitable space here in the US is still green field. We don't have any popualtion issues and won't for a long time. Especially if we start to limit imegration. I more fear the reverse, you need only look Germany's economic forcasts to see what could happen to a nation with a similar social-economic system if the population grows to slow or ages to much.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    13. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where was Waco again? Waco was much worse than Tienanmen, when considered as deaths-per-capita. Waco was also much worse in terms of the pain inflicted: I would much rather be killed instantly by a bullet than be burned to death, slowly and extremely painfully.

    14. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by dajak · · Score: 1

      Actually the same could be said of the US, a lot of our foriegn policies of late have been decidely midieval, notably the "you're with us or you're against us" black and white take on things. Not to say China's not a potential problem, but this is not sound reasoning as to why it's a problem.

      The foreign policy of China has actually been much more civilized than the foreign policy of the US over the last years. China's statements in the UN are sometimes even sentimental. They are trying to connect to "old Europe" and improve their image in the world.

      China-Taiwan relations are a different story, of course.

    15. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Tailstuxtophat · · Score: 1

      Kudos for giving a civil reply to a obviously demented individual. I was all ready to flame him and to hell with karma.

      That said, bloated or not, the US population is... un-sheeplike... to the point where you'd never be able to get that sort of policy down their throats. At least not any current generation. We'd make it a national priority to colonise the moon and mars before we'd accept 'limits on reproductive rights'.

      Sheesh...

      --
      Methinks thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee.
    16. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Epcoatl · · Score: 1

      Actually, Tiananmen square happened not because the students were protesting, and not even because the world press made it into the story of the year, but because the movement looked to be a genuine mass movement. Teachers, professionals, journalists, party members, and most threatening of all, urban laborers were beginning to join the protests. The students were just a bunch of kids that when left to their own devices, set up a "democracy" that hardly differed from the communist party heirarchy. It was everybody else that got the government worried enough to roll out its tanks...

    17. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      "Obviously demented"? No. I just don't share your views, that's all. No need to flame. And as far as the US population being sheeple or not, I think as long as the masses have beer and football they would sit passively through nearly any legislation. Ask your average person here what DRM or the Patriot act is, and they have no clue.

      Besides, one more point to consider: most of the "successful" segment of the US population stops at about 2 kids anyway. The bulk of the families with more than 2 seem to be getting some form of governemnt aid (not all of them, but enough). One thing I love about my country is that money talks, and if the population can save money by enacting some unpalatable legislation it has a much better chance of getting passed.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    18. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      I think the borders will be closing at some point in my life anyway, and I have no doubt it will happen before the scenario I discussed.

      Social Security has already failed, the corpse just hasn't been removed yet. I know any money I put into it is long gone, it's literally just another tax to me. That 60% is where food comes from. We can pack people in like sardines, but if we cannot feed them it's irrelevant. When the average person can no longer get a steak because cattle take up too much room, when food is rationed, when "treat" foods are eliminated to support basic nutrition for an overabundance of people, when those things happen you'll certainly see an outcry. Stomachs and wallets are big motivators here.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    19. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Tailstuxtophat · · Score: 1
      Ask your average person here what DRM or the Patriot act is, and they have no clue.

      Touche.(Just imagine that the accent is where it belongs)

      I still don't think we're that close to being sheeple, but we are getting closer. The difference between Democracy and Communism may be shown to be about two hundred and fifty years.

      And we're getting less creative - or rather the masses are less imaginitive, now that they can just watch TV - so maybe the moon will be turned into a national park instead of a housing tract.

      How depressing

      --
      Methinks thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee.
    20. Re:A Modernizing China is a Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really think that Waco was worse? So a nut stockpiling weapons and brainwashing people who set the place on fire is the fault of the US? I don't know where you live, but it's clear that you hate the US. If you live here, you should move.

      And get a goddamn education, moron.

  9. Re:Paid for by US Traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hey, isn't the whole US economic-religion based on competition above all else? How come when you start losing you turn into communists?

  10. Wow, by Bulldozer2003 · · Score: 1

    I am very stunned, I've always considered moving to Asia, but whats always plagued me was the difference in idealogies considering privacy. Maybe if they get a constitution with a bill of rights.
    then again, our countries going to h3ll lately, maybe in 10 years we'll be equal socially with Asia

    1. Re:Wow, by Lally+Singh · · Score: 2, Funny

      They can just take ours, we're not using it anymore...

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  11. use of technology by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must say they have adopted better uses for the technology. Technology is supposed to make your life easier and that is somethign they are doing that western culture isn't.

    China has something western society should model after. It kills me how often I hear, "We have always done it that way, why change"

    1. Re:use of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the West, technology is not to make life easier, but to make life richer. Unfortuntely, richer only applies to the patent owner, manufacturer or reseller - everyone else is simply another mark whose sole purpose in life is to buy this shit and crap the cash.

  12. But by cubicledrone · · Score: 3, Funny



    We're installing breakfast nooks and berber carpeting all on credit at 28% interest compounded daily! We have Disney trademark paint color choices at Home Repo! We're modern too!

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  13. Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've known of one traffic death from a yellow before green in Europe way back. Giving someone a accurate way of determining when they can be moving the microsecond the light turns green is bad given that people have incoporated not just the delayed green but the delayed start after green in their calculations of how late they can run a red light.

    1. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • I've known of one traffic death from a yellow before green in Europe way back. Giving someone a accurate way of determining when they can be moving the microsecond the light turns green is bad given that people have incoporated not just the delayed green but the delayed start after green in their calculations of how late they can run a red light.
      It should be trivial to factor that in and have the countdown be slightly off. Make it where the delay is variable between lights and drivers won't know that they can safely go right before it changes. It will still provide the benefits of having an idea of how long it will be till it changes, so you can brake if you're getting close. (Or even check the map while it's red.)
    2. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the olympics came through Salt Lake city, we got lots of new nifty traffic lights that give a countdown (numerically). I wish all trafic signals had that.

    3. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      If you're relying on the lights to know when it's safe to cross the road in urban China, you're not going to live long anyway.
      As far as I could see, traffic lights were taken as a kind of "advisory" that you might want to think about slowing down a bit: fortunately there was a traffic cop at every major junction to prevent total chaos.

    4. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      The opposite is true, too, however. I went to a certain country a while ago, and there, the lights run from green, blinking green, to yellow, to red. Red goes to Yellow and Red, and then green again. So people waiting for the light to turn green know when the red switches to yellow and red, it's nearly time to go (and many drivers 'jump the green' at this point).

      Guess what? EVERYONE in that country STOPS at yellow lights. No one, and I mean NO ONE floors it to 'make' a yellow light.

      So I guess it works both ways.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    5. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I've known of one traffic death from a yellow before green in Europe way back. Giving someone a accurate way of determining when they can be moving the microsecond the light turns green is bad given that people have incoporated not just the delayed green but the delayed start after green in their calculations of how late they can run a red light.

      I'd go so far as to say that every official in Britain (and the handful of other countries stupid enough to do yellow-before-green) who has any responsibility for this system or allowing it to continue is a murderer, plain and simple.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    6. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by tirloni · · Score: 1

      Here in Maringá, Brazil all the city has those kinds of traffic lights. They've a green column with 5-6 green lights, a yellow light and then a red column with another 5-6 red lights.

      When it's open to pass the top green light stays on and the last light too. The light keeps dropping until it reaches the bottom light. Control then pass to the yellow light and then to the red column (like the green one).

      There is some time when the traffic lights are red for every street of the avenue. Some people have learnt that and sometimes they move when the last red light is still on but, for their safety, no car should be crossing (all streets already closed).

      AFAIK people like it. One street here or there has those old traffic lights (3 lights) and people get anxious because they don't know when it's going to open or close.

    7. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      We already have yellow lights for the end of greens, and you know what happens with those. Stoplight timers would make waiting at stoplights into a game. Even if you tried to randomize the timers, people would try to "beat" the system by guessing, and occasionally they would guess wrong. Plus, they would be staring at the timer instead of the road. "Oh, that light's almost done, maybe I can make it through without hitting the brake!" Splat. "Oops."

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    8. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by Morky · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I lived in Moscow for awhile, and the cars are generally at full speed the instant the light turns green. Very dangerous for pedestrians.

    9. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by mikefe · · Score: 1

      I don't know what country you're talking about, but when I visited Peubla in Mexico they had blinking green, yellow and then red lights.

      Even a simple thing like blinking green would be a great improvement in the USA, and there is little physical infrastructure that whould beed changing outside of the wiring box.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    10. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by Gimble · · Score: 1

      The majority of vehicles in the UK have manual gear boxes (stickshift), and any reasonable driver will take it out of gear while waiting at the red light.

      The amber warning allows you time to select first gear and prepare to move off.

    11. Re:Count down traffic lights are a really bad idea by raju1kabir · · Score: 0, Troll
      The majority of vehicles in the UK have manual gear boxes (stickshift), and any reasonable driver will take it out of gear while waiting at the red light.

      I used to live in London (and I was a pedestrian). 75% of drivers start moving on the yellow light.

      So your statement is still correct, but "any reasonable driver" doesn't necessary describe a lot of people.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  14. Superior to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow I actually RTFA and found out that China has superior technology to *Canada*? Who would have thought that Canada wasn't the technology capital of the world!

  15. Cell Phones vs. Landlines by Thu25245 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost every developing nation has a higher rate of cell-phone coverage than the US (and many other "western" nations.)

    The Bell System and the various state-owned monopolies built reliable, universal landline networks across these countries almost a century ago. Since the majority of the infrastructure has already been made and paid off decades ago, use of these networks today is commonplace (and very affordable.) The technology is often proven, well tested, and reliable (often regulated.) Cell phones, on the other hand, are more expensive and less reliable.

    In developing nations, the landline systems are often unreliable and not much cheaper (if at all) than mobile systems. Users in these countries have every reason to invest in mobile phones. I wonder if this will continue to be the case with the deployment of VoIP systems.

    1. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Cell phones, on the other hand, are more expensive and less reliable.

      Hmm, well I'll give you the reliable part, but the reason I do not have a land-line is because it was more expensive than a cell phone. That is because the monopolies, once privatized, gouge you for as much as possible without having to worry about competition. Just watch as the U.S. falls further behind in broadband, cell phone coverage, wireless internet access, power generation/distribution, and other technologies as the result of these policies. If only we citizens could band together and give politicians large amounts of money, so that they would work in our best interests.

    2. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by ajayvb · · Score: 1

      If you compare the services available to say a Japanese cellphone user compared to the average US one, your logic fails. The US cellphone industry is still in the old static voice environment, where they are trying to make their money by a plan offering you buckets of minutes, and not much of anything else (how well-advertised are data services on any cellphones today?)

      Japan, Europe, and other countries (even ones with highly developed landline infrastructures) have moved on to very good wireless data services which is still really an under-serviced market in the US.

    3. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhhhh, that century old infrastructure has been replaced multiple times over with new tech, from microwave to fiber to new copper. "Decade's old" infrastructure is no longer in use.

    4. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by shawb · · Score: 1

      If only we citizens could band together and give politicians large amounts of money, so that they would work in our best interests.

      Nah. The politicians would see throught that and realize that the companies have deeper pockets. A better idea would be to band together and take that money to start a service which is better than the existing monopolies. Then you could get that money back and invest it into more services.

      Yeah, eventually the company will grow large and corrupt, becoming part of the old guard. That's when a new generation of idealists has to come in and start the process over. Hmm... reminds me of Joesph Campbel's "Hero of a Thousand Faces" only in terms of economics.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    5. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by mzwaterski · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely sure that more cell phone coverage is better. Frankly, people don't need to be talking on their cell phone in the elevator. If its so important, wait and talk before you get in the elevator, so I don't have to listen to a story about how your cat did the cutest thing!

    6. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Almost every developing nation has a higher rate of cell-phone coverage than the US (and many other "western" nations.)

      Almost every developing nation is 1/50th the size of the US as well. Why not compare state by state cell phone coverage?

    7. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on where you live.. The areas that have been upgraded to fiber are more populous, and also have excellent cell coverage.

      The rural areas, like where my parents live, has crappy cell coverage - because the cell companies don't see enough financial benefit to deploy there. Their only option is land-line, which is definitely not fiber. It's old copper, which is prone to static, and can do a maximum of 16-20kbps modem connections.

      But, I was a bit surprised that the cable company recently ran coaxial cable out to them. So, they actually have 3Mbps internet access now.

    8. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by SarifDragon · · Score: 1

      If only we citizens could band together and give politicians large amounts of money, so that they would work in our best interests.

      We've already got that. They call it taxes. Doesn't seem to work too well, sadly.

    9. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by Tom · · Score: 1

      The Bell System and the various state-owned monopolies built reliable, universal landline networks across these countries almost a century ago.

      But they've been sleeping ever since.

      When ISDN started out in Europe, nothing happened in the US.

      Now Europe has DSL everywhere. And I don't mean 768 KBit. I've seen 6 MBit offers, and my company will be rolling out 8 MBit ADSL early next year. Meanwhile you guys have what? Shared cable?

      The US hasn't been innovative for at least 15-20 years. There are still frontier sciences, and many breakthroughs are researched in the US. However, due to the insane patent system, constant danger of litigation etc. - many things developed in the US have never seen the mainstream market there.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    10. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      "Decade's old" infrastructure is no longer in use.

      False. My parent's house (the house I grew up in) was built in 1975. Today it still uses the same buried copper telephone cable out to the street that was laid when it was first made.

      Replacing the major trunk lines is easy and has been done. It's that last little bit that goes to people's houses that's still unchanged.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    11. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by mjfrazer · · Score: 1

      You are aware that this infrastructure includes all the buried conduits, concrete pads for outdoor huts, tunnels under the city streets, getting power to those places, etc.

      A large portion of the money spent on setting up a communications network is not spent on high tech stuff. Digging n thousand km of trenches takes a lot longer than installing the switches.

    12. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by Harassed · · Score: 1

      Erm. Where did you get that from?

      The top 10 largest countries by land mass are:

      Russia 17,075,400 sq km, (6,592,846 sq miles)
      Canada 9,330,970 sq km, (3,602,707 sq miles)
      China 9,326,410 sq km, (3,600,947 sq miles)
      United States 9.166,600 sq km, (3,539,242 sq miles)
      Brazil 8,456,510 sq km, (3,265,075 sq miles)
      Australia 7,617,930 sq km, (2,941,283 sq miles)
      India 2,973,190 sq km, (1,147,949 sq miles)
      Argentina 2,736,690 sq km, (1,056,636 sq miles)
      Kazakhstan 2,717,300 sq km, (1,049,150 sq miles)
      Sudan 2,376,000 sq km, (917,374 sq miles)

      Of this list, I'd say all but Australia, Canada and the US could arguably be considered "developing" countries.

      (Source)

    13. Re:Cell Phones vs. Landlines by athanis · · Score: 1

      I would like to re-emphasize that laying out Access points to cover a wide area is much cheaper than laying landlines across thousands of kilometers. In large developing countries in particular (China, perhaps some parts of russia as well), it is simply cheaper to set up access points along a route. From the point of view of a new development project, starting from scratch, a landline has no observable advantages. Cellphone reliability has been steadily improving and I hardly experience disconnections, even in elevators. Further, with the merging of cellphones/PDA's, we will being to see many more applications.

  16. WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wish I lived in China for the neat cell phone coverage. As long as I didn't value my fucking freedom more than a flimflam trinket, that would be swell!

    Let's all go to China! I love political repression and torture! Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

    1. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with the PATRIOT Act and related quickly sapping american civil liberties living in the good ol USA is sooo much better.

      At least the chinese government are upfront about censorship and the like, instead of still claiming they are the "land of the free"

    2. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two word reality check: Guantanamo Bay

    3. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Considering 50% of your population voted for a president that is stripping away your rights, your statement makes the US different how?

    4. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as well you live in the good ol' USA where political repression and torture can be swept under the carpet.

    5. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guantanamo is so much closer anyway. Better beaches too.

    6. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micheal Moore is eating a cheeseburger as we speak. In China he'd be sitting in a cell,.

    7. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sums it up for me: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/041 104/cx_rrogers_umedia/20040411

    8. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh? Guantanamo Bay, where the US government is holding terrorists captured on the battlefield, somehow makes the US the same as communist China?

      One word: perspective..

    9. Re:WOW YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sums it up for me. (sorry for the malformed url)

  17. Over here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, this is really what we should be trying to do. Better living through technology. If the Chinese can do it, there's no reason why we can't too.

  18. Paradise! by Rocko's+Modurn+Life · · Score: 1

    Isn't the grass always greener on the other side? I mean sure all of that is nice but what about the bad? I would think that's only fair after all.

    And the existing infrastructure guys are right too.

  19. Pants Hemming by glowimperial · · Score: 3, Funny

    Although not a technilogical breakthrough, I am super jealous that you can get pants hemmed in-store, in minutes. I am 5' 3" and I have to have all of my pants hemmed. I have a sewing machine, and can do this myslef, but I hate doing it. Either start doing this or I'm moving to China, Dammit!

    1. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of stores in Sweden do that too...

    2. Re:Pants Hemming by thrillseeker · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I am super jealous that you can get pants hemmed in-store, in minutes.

      That's what happens when there is no such thing as minimum wage and the concept of work or starve is the norm.

    3. Re:Pants Hemming by glowimperial · · Score: 1

      As the other poster said, this is a service that is available in Sweeden. I feel comfortable saying that Sweeden has good working wages, relative to both the U.S. and China. I don't think it has anthing to do with the cheapness of wages in China, it has more to do with their desire to be competitive as business by providing good service. In the states, retail businesses are staffed by undertrained, underpaid employees, and service and personal attention seems not to be a priority.

    4. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on your answer, the way this country is going this service should soon be available in the US.

    5. Re:Pants Hemming by Zerbey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They used too, ask your Parents and Grandparents. It was stopped, like many other services. Remember when you didn't have to get out of your car to get the tank filled (*I'm assuming you don't live in a state where it's illegal to fill your own tank, such as New Jersey*), a nice attendant did it for you. In the better petrol stations he washed your windows and checked your oil as well. This still happened when I was a kid, and I'm only 26. I'd happily pay extra for this convenience. [1]

      These excellent services stopped being provided in the name of cutting costs. It's far cheaper to have you hem your own pants or charge you $10 (which I think is quite cheap) than to pay 3 people to do it for you.

      [1] Get out of car, get toddler out of car seat, take irritated toddler, who I just woke up, into petrol station. Apologise to other customers about the screaming child. Pre-pay for petrol (since my local station is pre-pay only now). Put toddler back in car seat, this pisses him off even more. Fill car. Get back in car. Spend next 30 minutes with a screaming child in the back seat because he had his sleep interrupted. :-)

    6. Re:Pants Hemming by topham · · Score: 1

      I laughed when I made it to that part of the article.

      I buy dress pants from a place that does almost the same thing. If your there on the right day they ask you to come back in 20 minutes. If your not there on the right day you have to pick them up another day, but it is NOT a hassle in any way. The sales clerk will chalk the pants and you just have to pick them up when they are done.

      Never had a problem, never had to try the pants on twice, if I buy multiple pairs of the same style they use the size of one for the others.

    7. Re:Pants Hemming by RandoX · · Score: 1

      The Red Apple gas station chain in Pennsylvania still has full service for the same price. Not only that, they have a frequent fueller card that gets a $2.00 discount after 10 fuel purchases.

    8. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 'Sweden'.

    9. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pay with a credit card at the pump. It would make your life quite a bit easier.

    10. Re:Pants Hemming by tech49er · · Score: 2, Informative

      I worked in Nordstrom a while ago. As far as I remember, they'd do this.

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    11. Re:Pants Hemming by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      [1] Use a freaking debit card or credit card to pay at the pump. Or get a Marathon SpeedPass.

    12. Re:Pants Hemming by beerits · · Score: 1

      1] Get out of car, get toddler out of car seat, take irritated toddler, who I just woke up, into petrol station. Apologise to other customers about the screaming child. Pre-pay for petrol (since my local station is pre-pay only now). Put toddler back in car seat, this pisses him off even more. Fill car. Get back in car. Spend next 30 minutes with a screaming child in the back seat because he had his sleep interrupted. :-)

      Or you could let your kid sleep and pay at the pump with a debit or credit card.

    13. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I bought my suit at a Men's store in a mall in Bismarck, ND, they hemmed my pants right there too. No cost above buying the suit.

    14. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Sweden the taxes are so high you don't have to make much money but you still get health care, good public transporation, low cost housing, etc. Oh... did I mention the Swedish Full Release Massages? Or the Swedish Bikini Team?

    15. Re:Pants Hemming by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands hemming is done at no extra cost in the somewhat more expensive stores (where they actually have personel capable of doing this, not some random 18y old) You might need to come back in 20 minutes, but I always use the service.
      (

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    16. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I am 5' 3"...

      I shall call him... Mini-me

    17. Re:Pants Hemming by white_wolf21 · · Score: 1

      Clothes stores in Malaysia also hem your purchases for free. I had my jeans altered instore in one of a chain of jeans stores, in a large, modern shopping centre, where I'm sure the sales staff are not anywhere near starving.

    18. Re:Pants Hemming by furball · · Score: 1

      Any quality clothing store will do this. The move towards discount stores have resulted in the death of customer service.

      When I go to the Ferragamo boutique to get my shoes, the sales guy don't take me to the cash register. He rings up the sale, walks over to me, presents me with the total, I hand him my credit card, he walks to the cash register and processes the transaction, comes back with the receipt and a clipboard to get my signature. I sign and he hands me back my credit card in a credit card sized envelope. While waiting for the entire thing from start to finish, I sat on a very comfortable chair.

      Service isn't dead in America. It's just doesn't exist at the discount level. Hell, the guys there will know my taste and actually sends me a card when stuff I like comes in.

    19. Re:Pants Hemming by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      or you could stay for a while, get your kid high on petrol fumes to shut it up.

    20. Re:Pants Hemming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy pants at Target and hem them myself if necessary. Yeah, it takes a few extra minutes, but it's not all that hard. Plus, nothing impresses chicks like sewing skills. :-)

    21. Re:Pants Hemming by quenda · · Score: 1

      > [1] Get out of car, get toddler out of car seat, take irritated toddler, who I just woke up, into petrol

      Um, WHY do you take the toddler inside? Doesn't your car have child-locks to stop him wandering off?
      Or door-locks to keep the kidnapping bogey-men out? What do you fear?

      And I seem to remember plenty of full-service stations in the US. Or was that just Canada?

  20. "Beware ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...of the Yellow Dragon when it awakens" -Napoleon

    I'd think it's time to say: "Good Morning, Yellow Dragon" :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:"Beware ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [My english is better than most other people's german, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]

      Ihre Englisch ist scheisse. Danke schon.

      Ich hore gern popmusik!

    2. Re:"Beware ... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I fear that we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve" -Admiral Yamamoto, after Pearl Harbor.

      There are probably quotes like this for every country in the world.

    3. Re:"Beware ... by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      I for one, welcome our new Yellow Dragon masters.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    4. Re:"Beware ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right. Having a button on the table to notify the waiter, rather than having to wave, is really going to help China take over the world.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:"Beware ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I think his english is quite good. Polite, too.

  21. Advanced traffic lights? by cswiii · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they seeing the same ones that I saw when I was there? ;).

    1. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are so cool looking.

    2. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is strange. What were people doing at that light, stopping or going?

    3. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes

    4. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by The+Wookie · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would explain the driver's manual that says "The green and red light to be going and stopping when lighted."

    5. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going, but they keep their foot on the brake just in case.

    6. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very funny mod parent up

    7. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by mikael · · Score: 1

      You can do that with a long-exposure photograph. Take a regular photograph for your background. Then take the long exposure (30 to 90 seconds) to get all the lamps of the traffic lights lit up. Now composite the long exposure photograph of the lights onto the background.

      Though you might want to avoid this traffic light and this set. Actually they're both the same set, but have different backgrounds.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Advanced traffic lights? by cswiii · · Score: 1

      This wasn't done with a long exposure photograph, however. I was actually going to try to get a neat photo of the series of signs over there on the left, when we stopped at that light. The green one then came on, but the red never turned off.

      After a bit of head-scratching, we finally figured it was safe to go, and drove off.

  22. Superior? by ralejs · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was a bit disappointed with these ten points. I live in Sweden and compared to our standards this list isn't that impressive. Our mobilephones work everywhere and they cost you 10 cents to buy (honestly!). We have computer seating maps in the theaters and movie theaters. And parking signs contain the number of free spaces.
    Sure, we don't have everything on the list though. I'd love to have those intelligent stop lights for instance.
    I guess the bottom line is that Canada is pretty far behind.

    1. Re:Superior? by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sad.

      You live in Sweden and have been too busy playing with gadgets to notice hot blondes everywhere

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    2. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phones never really cost 1SEK, there are always strings attached and you end up paying the full price anyway before the 12 or 24 months you sign up for are over, and by then you've probably bought a new phone...

      I agree with the rest of you comment though. Sure, a few clever ideas but is "cell phones work in elevators" supposed to be somehow impressive?

      I don't think I've ever been without coverage anywhere except inside a train in the middle of nowhere...

    3. Re:Superior? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      damn, I hate it here in the US, but then I probably could not get a job is Sweden.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point of the article was that many people (especially Americans!) think China is a backward, undeveloped, third-world country. While that might be true of some of the rural areas, the metropolitan parts of China are every bit as advanced as the west and Japan. Besides, many rural parts of the US are pretty backward as well.

    5. Re:Superior? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      The article list is prettey much BS. Most of things you listed can be found in the Czech Republic, as well as others which the article mentioned: cell phone coverage is about 98%, small things like tickets are often delivered for free, a computer company will deliver you almost anything for $3, same day. Taxis print out receipts with time, milage, and other info. Transit debit cards? I've seen these in almost every country I visited. Computer Seating Maps in theaters? Same thing applies. Anti-theft slipcovers?? WTF does that have to do with technology?! Saw these 'intelligent' LED stop lights in Kiev, Ukraine.

    6. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, everyone is seriously not getting the significance of this. China has one of the largest populations in the world, one of the largest landmasses in the world, replete with natural resources (granted, not as much as say, america or siberia), and a nation of people who are willing to set aside almost anything to act as one. This rapid spread of technology across a hugely vast nation within a few years, and have it be adopted by the people so readily is quite frankly frightening. Think if Japan was ten times the size, in all respects. With the same acceleration of modernization. Remeber the 80's? Think of that times a lot. That's why we should fear China.

    7. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a European but lived a few (too many) years in NY and am glad to be back. Although I live now in Germany, points like excellent cell phone coverage, service in restaurant, and city wide signs stating the number of available parking spots all over are pretty standard. To take a bit further I was recently in a mall in Austria that actually has small Red or green LEDS over every spot. when the spot is free the light is green, as soon as your pull into the spot the LED turns red. it makes manovering the rows of cars much easier as a quick glance at the row shows you any available spots.
      If anything, these elections have proved Americans simply don't want better things. Especially when they come from abroad.

    8. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not fair to compare Sweden's and China's mobile coverage. China is much larger and has very remote areas (like Tibet, mentioned in the article). I know some Europeans like to believe 500km is a long distance, though :D
      And no, I wouldn't say that Canada is *that* much behind. I'd say Sweden is a leading country (let's see the yanks choke on that heh).
      I was astonished by buses requiring exact change in Canada, though, I'm in the so-called 3rd world and that's not a problem for us.

    9. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article doesn't say it's high tech, it just talks about proper use of technology. So what if you can send a man to the moon? I'm more worried about heating in winter.
      Oh, and the article was quite clear that the comparison is with *Canada* (they seem to have a very inconvinient public transport system, at least when it comes to paying!).

    10. Re:Superior? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      > This rapid spread of technology across a hugely vast nation ...

      Except that's not true. It IS true in the large cities, but not rural areas (the majority of the landmass). There's actually a bit of a culture war going on in China where the rural areas are feeling quite left out of all this advancement.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    11. Re:Superior? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Some of us prefer brunettes.

      Of course, some of us prefer gadgets too, but they're weird.

    12. Re:Superior? by Rahga · · Score: 1

      And yet, there's been no mention hot sweedish blondes that prefer gadgets...

      I learned everything I know about Sweeden from the Internet.

    13. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian's have those parking lights, my cell phone is super cheap. and I have fancy DSL (americans always comment about it when they are looking to switch isps) we have seating maps for airplanes and the like, including theathres (through the company's webpages. we have pedestrian countdowns (like the article states) but they are more and more common, and very accurate ( I use them for what he describes)

      i think we advanced while he was in china, oh yeah i am actually very pro-china.

      zai jian!

    14. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You poor deprived soul. It's not that we don't notice, it's just that remarking on the fact would be like remarking on all the air we have. Women that would stop traffic in America are as common as autumn leaves. We shuffle through them on the way to the car.

    15. Re:Superior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was in Sweden, the stoplights had the usual Green->Yellow->Red system but they also had the Red->Yellow->Green system... which I like to take as: On your marks, Get set, GO!!!

    16. Re:Superior? by flabbergast · · Score: 1

      I think you could find each of these ten things somewhere in some country. Each point on the list highlights something cool, somewhere. Transit debit cards in Shanghai, Beijing has adult outdoor playgrounds, etc, etc. So, besides the informative stoplights, which I know would confuse the hell out of my mom, you could find just about all those things somewhere in your country, except the cell phone coverage in the US (but Verizon is pretty close for me)

    17. Re:Superior? by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      No shit, the rural residents are treated like foreigners in their own country since they need GOVERMENT PERMISSION to move to the cities to try and excape their crushing pverty. So you have a hundreds of millions of people living in cities illegaly. Its insane.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    18. Re:Superior? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      I beg your pardon? I live in sweden too and the only place our cellphones work is pretty much around interstate highways and capital cities in the south. In the north the range is terrible. Not to mention our cellphone companies who wont invest a dime in cellular data traffic anywhere outside the three biggest cities. China seems miles ahead of our crappy Sweden. To bad our school mostly did contain brainwash about how great of a nation we are. We suck on most things and are on the brink of total bancruptcy, wee how fun!

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    19. Re:Superior? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Noone can get a job in sweden right now. Yould blend in just nicely with the rest of us!

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    20. Re:Superior? by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      Guess what, Swedish brunettes are EVEN HOTTER than the blondes. Scary...

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    21. Re:Superior? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      There's actually a bit of a culture war going on in China where the rural areas are feeling quite left out of all this advancement.

      How's this different than the US? Didn't you watch the election results?

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    22. Re:Superior? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Interstate highways? Does Sweden have states?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    23. Re:Superior? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for everyone in saying, "Congratulations, you bastard."

      --Tom Tucker, Family Guy

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    24. Re:Superior? by mynickwastaken · · Score: 1

      Cell-phones with "groove coverage"?! I think in some places of China they can grill monkey brain without fire if they are near to a big cell antena. Yeap! This is really technology... I saw thoose kind of "intelligent" stop lights in my homeland, Romania... More precise in Bucharest... They where pretty intelligent when they counted down. But where only placed for pedestrians, wich anyway, didn't care about the traffic lights at all :D

    25. Re:Superior? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      No not states but i wanted to give a picture of how big roads im talking about. The bigger roads interconnecting sweden is usually covered but the second you leave them upnorth you really ned a pigeon to communicate.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
  23. Phones in China by Opalima · · Score: 1

    It's interesting how pervasive cellphones have become in China and how they've displaced regular phone lines.

    This trend is slowly evolving in North America (my room mate among many other people I know, have cell phones as their only means of personal phone communication) but I'm not certain if it will take root the same way it has with our Chinese neighbors, but it would be neat to see.

    1. Re:Phones in China by emmaussmith · · Score: 1

      In my experience, it seems that places in the US are beginning to realize that mobile phones are becoming more prevelant. For example, I work in the RBC Center (Arena in NC) and within the last month, BTI has pulled all of their pay telephones out of the building. There were more than 50 telephones in the building, which included a card reader for credit and calling cards, and all provided a jack for notebook computer users.

  24. Or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a lot of things that foster innovation. One of them is culture and China may have a problem here. Confucian ideals do not foster innovation and those ideals are quite common in China. It takes a long time for people to get that kind of thing out of their bones.

    Right now, the US of A is the best environment in which to innovate. In fact it is our only advantage. If we manage to kill innovation, we are toast. DMCA, Patriot Act and software patents come to mind in this regard.

    About Jan Wong: She used to write a column called 'Lunch With Jan'. She would interview people and then trash them in print. She could pick up on the slightest thing; anything the victim said or did could be twisted and used to mock them. Naturally, she ran out of people stupid or desperate enough to have lunch with her. She even trashed her own family; grandmother, aunts etc.

    1. Re:Or not by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I actually cancelled my subscription to the Globe and Mail for sponsoring her articles about 7 years ago. Mean and vindictive, she had no place in journalism. She's a shrew and a thoroughly despicable person. Although it might be only me, I remember getting the impression that she was a bit of a Chinese communist sympathiser, so her writing an article on the technology 'innovations' of China does not surprise me.

      Regarding innovation, you are 100% correct -- that is the US' prime advantage. That plus abundant natural resources which can be exported, or at least support self-sufficiency. Even regarding oil, I believe the US only gets 30% of its supply from OPEC.

      Fortunately China is beholden to the US still in many regards. Its needs the US markets to sell products too; it relies upon the US currency to supply economic stability and prevent inflation in China while they go through this boom; and they need North America to provide raw materials and resources. We're a long way from the sunsetting of the American empire, but the US will be facing a new world power as a competitor (if its not already).

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Or not by narsiman · · Score: 1

      This is not just a chinese problem but pretty much universal. The concept of branding and franchising has rendered all new (no more developing) nations to adopt 'american' strucutres. It is cool to be american - still dont know what that means to americans but thats how it is viewed in every other corner of this planet.

      In response to the parent of this post, every nation will wait for the US to ubiqitize alternative fuel technology. Unless it is established well in the US nobody will adopt it for the long term. Most of the foreign investors need to understand the impact of a fuel technology. The only way they will believe is if the US uses it !!

    3. Re:Or not by maxume · · Score: 1

      France runs it electric grid on nuclear power. That's pretty alternative.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Or not by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Even regarding oil, I believe the US only gets 30% of its supply from OPEC.

      Now that's just completely wrong.

      You could have said 50%, and I wouldn't have contradicted you, because those numbers are only a few years old. But right now, the number is over 60%. That's right, you're 100% off.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Or not by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      would be happy to admit my mistake, although i'd request an authenticating source for your numbers?

      i might have confused "middle east oil" with "OPEC" oil for starters.

      Quick google finds this article that suggests "The U.S. consumes over 25 percent of all oil currently produced globally, imports over half of the oil it now consumes...". This would imply that the US imports no more than say 60% of its oil currently. Given that non-OPEC countries like Canada and Russia and numerous Nordic countries are contributing to the US' supply I think I can stand by my original statement.

      US imports more oil than it produces domestically -- yes.
      US imports of OPEC oil is about 30% of its dependency -- yes. This was my point.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    6. Re:Or not by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia is the largest supplier of crude oil to the USA Here is the reference http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/quickfacts/quickoil.ht ml If you click on the litle "?" by each line in the table you will see that OPEC and Non-OPEC are almost equal in what they supply. Of the Non-OPEC nations Mexico supplies the most Crude. Canda supplies the most amount of petro products overall (oil, gas, distillates, etc.).

  25. Cool stuff by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have some cool ideas in China. The Styrofoam in the super markets might not work in the US because people might find it unsanitary. I like the traffic light idea and I've always thought about the system of identifying free parking spots every time I'm hunting for one in a large, crowded lot.

    However, some of these seem great because they didn't have to replace old technology. They mentioned how landlines were never popular, so they went from no phones straight to cell phones. The US had to piggy back the new system on the old system.

    So in 20 years, will they still be cutting edge, or will they be surpassed by other countries that either are just technologically developing or have been developed for a while and are "upgrading".

    1. Re:Cool stuff by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      in 20 - 30 years when Africa finally joins the developed world, China will seem like a technological back water to Nigeria.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Cool stuff by iroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They use the styrofoam to fan-dry the residual mop water, which, in the US, is allowed to evaporate. That means they don't have to leave the little warning signs out about 'slippery conditions.' If anything, this would be more sanitary, since you're not leaving moisture on the ground to breed mold and stuff.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  26. Well sure, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... you'll still be hungry again in half an hour! (Trolling off-topic, I know -- but it was worth it.)

  27. No need to worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're only comparing to Canada!

  28. Re:Paid for by US Traitors by cubicledrone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, isn't the whole US economic-religion based on competition above all else?

    No. In each industry there are only a few companies. The economy is based on 40000% markups, a regular campaign of vigorous layoffs, and constant blatantly manipulative advertising.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  29. Flash! China beats US at own game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GE can forget about China buying millions of refrigerators; the lie that has driven US foreign policy towards China since Nixon. China is going to buy millions of *their* refrigerators.

    Addendum for the ignorant:

    Piety != Morals

  30. Great... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another topic where half the posts will be comments that contain nothing but jingoism and nationalist comments rather than examine China's genuine potential for growth.

    Remember people, this is the world's biggest nation (by population), with the real potential to be the world's biggest manufacturer and the world's biggest marketplace. And, remember, that that potential is starting to be realised: China already has a import surplus of billions with most Western countries, including the US, and China is now starting to become a real consumer culture in its own right.

    They may have given everyone else a head-start but then so did Japan and Germany post-WWII, and look at how powerful their economies have become.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Great... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 4, Funny

      until the Chinese start spending money that they don't have, then they will not be able to rival the USA for consumerism.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Great... by HyperHyper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agree with you on that 100%.

      China is indeed on the move as you can see with one of their major comapanie's bid for Noranda.

      http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTG AM .20041104.wnorand1105/BNStory/Business/

      Sweet sweet raw materials will aid them on their bid to become a materialistic society like ours. It's too bad that the North American society is what people aspire too. We give up our family and health so we can have material items while other less fortunate nations focus on family (i.e. Laos).

      North America has grown fat and drunk in it's luxury and our time will pass onto someone else. No civilization has ever stood the test of time: Britain, Rome, Egypt, Persia.. they were all once the "King of the Hill" and with the recent selection of US presidents, history will repeat itself again because people did not think long term again. My only hope is that the US government doesn't start a nuclear war when they realize they will be #2 in about 20 years from now.

      my 2 cents.. a bit pessimitic but after what I saw in the US election, I fear the message that has been sent to the world (i.e. We love our warmongering prez!)

    3. Re:Great... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that a lot of the trade surplus is simple protectionism and, as another poster pointed out, ignoring intellectual property issues.

    4. Re:Great... by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Interesting
      until the Chinese start spending money that they don't have, then they will not be able to rival the USA for consumerism.

      They built a maglev train to Shanghai airport. Nuff said.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    5. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your kidding right? Many chinese companies are supported by the government, they're already spending money they don't have.

    6. Re:Great... by 808140 · · Score: 1

      It's actually to Pudong International Airport, which is one of the two airports in Shanghai (the other being Hongqiao, which while smaller and serving fewer international flights, is an international airport).

      As an aside, I love the thing. It costs 50 RMB (40 RMB with a plane ticket) -- that's $6.25 USD, roughly -- and it gets you from the Long Yang Lu subway station to the airport in 8 minutes. For comparison, the 12 RMB bus that does the same route (without stopping) takes 45 minutes or more. But then, 431 kmph will do that.

      While faster, it isn't as smooth as the TGV. Sadly. Those germans, you know (they designed the maglev). They build great, fast trains, but just can't do the comfort thing the way the French do. Just look at the ICE. Technically, it can go faster than the TGV (if only they'd lay proper rails), but it just shakes around and isn't fun at all.

      The TGV, well, it usually doesn't cruise at more than 320 kmph, but it feels like you're floating. Mmm. SNCF baby, I love you!

      Amtrak, well.... Let's not go there.

  31. gotta admire that forced prison labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't admire countries that throw people in prison for simply disagreeing with the political system. If we were "at their level" about 48% of us would be in jail right now.

    1. Re:gotta admire that forced prison labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't admire countries that throw people in prison for simply disagreeing with the political system.

      They don't throw people in jail for disagreeing with them. They throw them in jail for saying it out loud...

      If we were "at their level" about 48% of us would be in jail right now.

      No, you'd learn to keep your mouths shut if that happened. As you will at some point in the future if the US keeps heading in the direction it is heading.

    2. Re:gotta admire that forced prison labor... by shawb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ahem. United states has almost six times the proportion of people in prison as China. Now, it is possible that China is simply not reporting many of the imprisoned people, or that the simply use alternative methods which we may find less savory than imprisonment, but...

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:gotta admire that forced prison labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah. What about the prisoners China DOESN'T tell anyone about? Do they send them off to labor camps or kill them?

    4. Re:gotta admire that forced prison labor... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Just think about the population difference in the US and China. They have 1.3 BILLION people, we have 290 MILLION. So they have 4-5 times our population. Plus in China the only ones called prisoners are the actual criminals. The rest are being re-educated. Since groups like Amnesty, the International Red Cross and other fact finding groups are banned from fact finding missions in China we really don't know the TRUE statistics, only what the Gov't tells us they are. We found out that the former Soviet Union had extremely under reported the full extent of the Gulags and other types of political imprisonment. Why would China be any different? Many church missionaries have reported that what the Chinese Gov't tells us is grossly exaggerated to thier benefit, in other words its propoganda. In the USA our prisoners don't work to produce exportable products, about the most they do is make license plates or maybe grow some crops, or pickup litter, clean right of ways and maybe build a few roads. Big differences exist, you are comparing Apples and Grapefruits.

    5. Re:gotta admire that forced prison labor... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they just shoot people instead of locking them up. (and send the bill for the bullits to their families)

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  32. Re:Superior Technologies?? by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    They're not just gadgets in testing, or used in a small part. They're rolled out everywhere, and span every corner of the country.

    So when you consider that, it's the proliferation of these 'gadgets' that makes them superior- after all, technology is defined as "The application of science".

  33. cuntry side is vacant? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    No its not, thats why there's so many Chinese!!

    [/funny]

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  34. this isn't superior technology by xutopia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it is superior use of existing technology and better organization. Sadly we're far behind in many aspects. Hopefully we can catch up.

  35. Such a noble country! by satanicbyte · · Score: 0, Troll

    All fine and dandy unless you believe in freedom of speech in which case you end up in a prison camp giving labor to Nike for the profit of the Chinese "Communist" government.

    1. Re:Such a noble country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of privatized prisons with work programs in the good ol' US of A? What makes you think our corporate overlords aren't drooling at the same prospect? (Break a law that steals a dollar from a US corporation, and you'll be doing telemarketing indentured servitude from Leavenworth)

    2. Re:Such a noble country! by satanicbyte · · Score: 0

      So because the "U S of A" does something that makes it ok for China? Wrong is wrong in any country my friend. I also think you will find Chinese prisons to be quite a bit worse than American prisons especially when you consider political and religous views (as long as they aren't violent) aren't a prisonable offense in the "U S of A". So let me get this straight, if I don't say something in support of the "Slashdot Agenda" I get called a troll?

  36. I must admit by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    that some of these 'technologies' are interesting, I just wonder what effect hindsight had on the improvement of some of them.

    For instance, the traffic light is new. However, there version could be viewed as an improvement. BUT, they had something to build on. I'm sure that in other countries, different and better (than what those countries currently use) traffic lights have been invented. But, there is a standard already in place - one that must be changed slowly due to it's nature.

    This is not to say China does not have better tech, just wondering what the impact is of having a different starting point, etc.

    1. Re:I must admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romania had the count down timers on the traffic lights when I was there last year.

    2. Re:I must admit by white_wolf21 · · Score: 1

      The countdown on traffic lights isn't new; it's quite prevalent throughout Asia.

  37. population density is key by sczimme · · Score: 1


    A lot of smaller countries tend to have population densities that are noticeably highter than in the US. The higher density makes new technologies (like wireless) easier to deploy because more people can take advantage of the service, distributing the overhead cost over a greater number of people. The following list was copied from here.

    Population density of the continents:

    * North America - 32 people/mi2
    * South America - 73 people/mi2
    * Europe - 134 people/mi2
    * Asia - 203 people/mi2
    * Africa - 65 people/mi2
    * Australia and Oceania - 9 people/mi2

    Countries with large surface areas like the US also tend to have population hotspots (like New York and Los Angeles) mixed with relatively low-pop-density areas like Nebraska and Montana.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:population density is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of us don't like you, don't belive you and don't want to hear from you.

      Not that big of a majority.

      And frankly, given the way we're being treated right now, don't expect us to be very sympathetic once we're in power.

    2. Re:population density is key by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      * North America - 32 people/mi2
      * South America - 73 people/mi2
      * Europe - 134 people/mi2
      * Asia - 203 people/mi2
      * Africa - 65 people/mi2
      * Australia and Oceania - 9 people/mi2

      Which just goes to show how useless statistics can be sometimes.

      Australia is one of the most urbanized countries on earth. The mean population density across the entire continent is very low because nobody lives in the desert. Your reference should be reporting the mean density within a fixed radius of each head of population.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  38. Let's not forget by winkydink · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can't drink the water from the tap

    Hocking loogies in public seems to be a national pastime

    Air pollution so bad that on some days it looks foggy

    Diseases like malaria and dengue fever (more a 3rd world than 1st world problem)

    China may have cool tech, but the basic infrastructure sucks.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Let's not forget by dapyx · · Score: 1
      Actually, there are western countries with tap water much worse than China. Belgium, for example (that's what UNESCO says)


      Malaria can be a problem only in rural areas of tropical provinces, such as Hainan and Yunnan.


      As for air pollution... have you ever heard of a city called Los Angeles ?

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    2. Re:Let's not forget by dapyx · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    3. Re:Let's not forget by winkydink · · Score: 1

      I have spent tim in both Beijing and Los Angeles. Beijing is an order of magnitude worse.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:Let's not forget by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles has smog.

      In Beijing, if you park a car outside overnight you'll find it covered in coal dust and soot in the morning.

      You don't know what air pollution is until you see China.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hocking loogies in public seems to be a national pastime
      Air pollution so bad that on some days it looks foggy


      You haven't been to New York City huh?
    6. Re:Let's not forget by winkydink · · Score: 1

      I have spent a lot of time in NYC, but I can see you haven't time in China. [note to other poster... I've lived in many parts of the country, including upstate NY. The term "hocking loogies" is not peculiar to that region]

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    7. Re:Let's not forget by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      It wasn't until your fourth bullet point that I realized you were talking about China and not New York City.

    8. Re:Let's not forget by winkydink · · Score: 1

      NYC tap water may not be palatable, but China's tap water can give you dysentery.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:Let's not forget by Spytap · · Score: 1

      If you replace "malaria" with "west nile" then I have all that right here in LA. The water tastes like shit and by all accounts can make you very sick (bottle water isn't just a fad, it's a necessity here), hocking loogies, ditto. Airpollution? Two weeks ago there was less than a quarter mile visibility in downtown.
      Welcome to progress, don't let the nationalism (either one) hit you on the ass on your way down.

    10. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The water may not taste good but I laugh at your notion that it is less sanitary than bottled water.

    11. Re:Let's not forget by moonbender · · Score: 1

      From the source NewScientist article: "The water quality index scores countries according to the cleanliness of their rivers and underground water, the amount of treatment that they give to sewage and the way they enforce anti-pollution laws."

      So this is unpleasent, but unrelated. Germany scores terribly, too - 57 out of 122 - and the tap water here is excellent. The US are 12th, and the tap water I've had there is not so excellent (unless you like chlorine), although it's been a while and I am sure quality varies from state to state. General water quality of course depends on many factors, and I doubt it's a coincidence that the top three countries ("Finland, Canada and New Zealand") all have a fairly low population density: it's not too hard to keep your water clean-ish if every resident has the equivalent of an own lake! Of course that doesn't mean that Belgium and Germany shouldn't try and increase water quality.

      PS: Oh well, I checked again and I noticed I was wrong, the article does, in fact, link to the relevant UNESCO pages. But now it's too late and I can't be assed to rewrite my post. If you want to find out whether my guess is right or not, you're welcome to do so!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    12. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in china, I got bottled water for less than 20c NZ (right now 1NZD = .7something USD) - anyway, there ain't many countries where you can happily drink the 'tasty water' [nz style].

      "Hoiking loogies"... yea, that was kind of weird. You see some nasty sick ones.

      Air pollution - depends where your'e at and time of year. But hey, can't expect a rapid enviro-freindly industrial revolutuion of sorts.
      BTW The US is probably churning out tons more pollution per capita.

      Mozzie diseases... I guess theyre a problem if you live in a swamp. The US dosen't have swamps, theyre all covered by concrete [cheap shot, hehe].

      Oh yea, infastructure is pretty bad at places. Saw quite a few intersections without traffic lights but saw all these bloody 'fancy' payphones EVERYWHERE. The budget spending baffles me...

    13. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? LA tap water is the best tap water I've ever tasted. And the air pollution is nothing compared to Beijing or LA before air quality standards.

    14. Re:Let's not forget by ColdZero · · Score: 0

      Actually NYC's water is pretty good. Yonkers, right above NYC has been rated best tap water a few times now.

    15. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hocking loogies in public seems to be a national pastime


      Beats having the Red Socks win ours...

    16. Re:Let's not forget by lazy_playboy · · Score: 0

      In some US regions the piped water is undrinkable.

    17. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # You can't drink the water from the tap
      Ever drank the tap water in L.A.?
      # Hocking loogies in public seems to be a national pastime
      OK i'll give you that one. but let's think about the public in rural alabama
      # Air pollution so bad that on some days it looks foggy
      See, houston, LA, and Denver for pollution.
      # Diseases like malaria and dengue fever (more a 3rd world than 1st world problem)
      You may want to check stats on this.
      China may have cool tech, but the basic infrastructure sucks.
      One thing you should keep in mind is their infrastructure has to accomodate 1.5 BILLION people. The US and Canada doesn't even come close in terms of population. Factor it in before you start making assumptions.

    18. Re:Let's not forget by winkydink · · Score: 1
      I've never heard of people getting dysentery from drinking LA water.

      Trust me, there's no place in the US that compares to China for hocking loogies.

      China's infrastructure has to accomodate the east coast. While it is densly populated, it's not 1.5bln people and the geographic challenges are muche easier than doing the entire country.

      I'm not making assumptions. My company has a large business presence there and I travel there many times each year. I'm speaking from experience, not from surfing a few web sites.

      Oh, did i mention inter-country internet connectivity? Can you say 600-1500msec latencies? Some technological marvel.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    19. Re:Let's not forget by Bonkers54 · · Score: 1

      That is if you ignore the fact that NYC has some of the purest tap water in the country.

    20. Re:Let's not forget by Epona · · Score: 1
      You can't drink the water from the tap


      I live in Washington DC and you can't drink the tap water here either- the lead content is at record-high-lethal levels, as it has been since I was very young (I drink it anyway I figure I'm already contaminated).


      Hocking loogies in public seems to be a national pastime

      Isn't it the national pastime of the United States, too? :)


      Diseases like malaria and dengue fever (more a 3rd world than 1st world problem)

      Dengue Fever isn't really a serious problem- it is a disease found in warm climates (ergo not in the United States or most of Europe). I actually got Dengue Fever when I went to Central America, and while I was layed up for a few days, it didn't require any meds or hospital visits.


      That said, I have never been to China, so I can't claim to know too much about either their infrastructure or the general state of cleanliness in the cities- but it seems to me that if you *don't* want to be a 3rd world country, you have to start somewhere.


      --
      No heaven can heaven be, if my horse isn't there to welcome me.
    21. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Hocking loogies in public seems to be a national pastime
      3. Air pollution so bad that on some days it looks foggy


      The two are probably directly related, if you had all that air pollution in your lungs, you'd want to cough it up and spit it out too.

  39. It's not really that great... by Southpaw018 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone commenting seems to be all hyped up at the technology. Remember, China's one of the poorest, most overpopulated countries on this Earth in per capita terms. The elite, Party members, and other favored citizens may have access to all this wonderful stuff, but with an average GDP per capita below 5000 USD (as compared to about 38000 USD in the US) the vast majority -- if not most -- of the country has no access to any of the "technology" mentioned.

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:It's not really that great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but a meal at a restraunt is probably less that ten bucks a head.

    2. Re:It's not really that great... by khallow · · Score: 1

      At a per capita GDP of below 5000 USD, China is doing pretty well particularly given the cost of labor. That certainly doesn't make it one of the "poorest" countries in the world. And the trend is up.

    3. Re:It's not really that great... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, but the incredible thing is that even if only a relatively small percentage of the population does have access to modern technology, it is still works out to a huge market. 1.2 billion is a *lot* of people.

    4. Re:It's not really that great... by bhv · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You gotta be kidding right? Who do you think owns a good chunk of the US debt? China is fast becomming the next world military superpower, Little articles like this show they have the inclination. In fact they may well be already. We are just to stupid to see it.

      Look at the big picture. Large country, large population, technical savy, individually not wealthy but as a country very wealthy, and most importantly very secretive. Not much news gets in our out that they that the gov. doesn't control. Even internet access is managed.

      They could kick a little US ass without blinking an eye. They could lose an entire US population worth of soldiers and still come out smiling.

      Look at the N. Korea issue. US didn't have to deal with it, just nicely asked China to speak with them. After some humming and hawing China sends over a low level Gov. official and N. Korea goes quiet. Like the freakin mofia.

      Scares the crap outa me when I think about it to hard. I have to stop now.

      lalala.....flowers and trees....lalala.....

    5. Re:It's not really that great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone commenting seems to be all hyped up at the technology.

      'cause thats the "topic" of the "article", dipshit.

      What did you do? Scan the title for keywords?

    6. Re:It's not really that great... by jmh_az · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I love it when people post things that clearly indicate that they have never been to the place in question and experienced it for themselves, but feel compelled to express a cliched opinion.

      I've been there, and not just to the big tourist-friendly places like Beijing, but to the interior as well. Everywhere you look you see forward progress, even in the rural areas. Many of the things the article mentions aren't just for the party elite, they're widespread. Sure, it's a centralized Communist government, but in reality it has a lot in common with the type of government China has known for the past 2000 years--central authority, distribution of authority to outlying cities and provinces, and a system of reporting back to HQ how things are going in the rest of the country. Add to that the Chinese cultural emphasis on unity and harmony, and you have a system that works relatively well (at least nowadays) for them. The Chinese government wants to modernize, and they know that they must modernize to be a player on the world stage, but they want to do so in a way that will not result in discord in their culture.

      But, politics aside, to make the claim that "the vast majority" of the country doesn't have access to this "technology" is ludicrous. Almost all of the examples mentioned were public technologies. Everyone can benefit from smart traffic lights, and it's true that cellphones are almost everywhere (I once saw a fellow sitting on his ancient motorized tricycle thing with a huge stack of what looked like sticks, talking on his cellphone way out in the countryside). China is awash in cybercafes, television is ubiquitous, and even the bus system actually works like a bus system is supposed to--for everyone.

      The statement about per capita income is also specious, at best, since everything in China costs less than here in the US. You can (and I have) hired a car with a driver for something like $30US a day, and we wandered all over the place. Food is cheaper, rent is way cheaper, utilities are cheaper. So to try and say that because the per capita incoming is below $5000US a year is an indicator of major poverty just demonstrates some major ignorance. In China, you can definately get by on $5000US a year, and even less depending on location.

      If they hold their present course it's just a matter of time (and not that long) until the Chinese will be trully able to stand with the US and Europe as an economic and political power to be reckoned with. The real question is how we're going to deal with that--as ideological adversaries, or friendly competitors.

    7. Re:It's not really that great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's it, mods. Ignore the moderator guidelines that say you should concentrate on modding up, not down. Use that overrated label. Show everyone you're the alpha male since you can't get modded up. You're real men.

      Morons.

    8. Re:It's not really that great... by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      What does overpopulated mean in per capita terms?

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    9. Re:It's not really that great... by evangellydonut · · Score: 1

      according to CIA's numbers , US has 12% Population below poverty line and China has 10%. I guess part of that is due to the fact that the lowest paid 10% of the population earns 33% more than the same segment in the US...

    10. Re:It's not really that great... by goon · · Score: 1

      The article comes across as a bit of a puff peice. Expect more of these as the *olympics* draws near.

      Before we rejoice the *technical prowess* of China it help to consider how China addresses problems that will cripple any attempts to modernise.

      • Rural poverty: '... sixty million Chinese living in rural and remote areas eke out a miserable existence on a meagre $90 a year ...' (China - Black River: 11/6/1996 Reporter: Jane Hutcheon)
      • Pollution: '... total destruction of the Huai river - around which 1/10th of China's population live ... Seven million tonnes of untreated affluent are dumped into it every year. A sludge so toxic that it is not merely entering the food chain - it is killing aquatic life and crops outright ...' (China - Qinghai Province 7/7/1998 Reporter: Jane Hutcheon)
      • Human rights: (China - China Workers: 15/07/2003 Reporter: Eric Campbell)'...It wasn't so long ago that the West saw Communist China as a brutal, cold war adversary.... The Communists have wholeheartedly embraced capitalism. Last November, China even joined the global capitalist club, the World Trade Organisation.... But what's often been ignored in the rush to do business with China is the price being paid by many farmers and State workers. ... Untold millions have lost their livelihood as officials, and factory managers have grown rich from corruption. Any attempt by workers to form trade unions to defend their rights has been crushed without mercy. ...'
      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  40. Superior != New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of the posters just don't seem to be getting it.

    Superior technology dosn't mean new technology. Better applications of new OR old materials and devices is superior.

    The ability to adopt superior technology due to lack of infrastructure is indeed an explanation for why China had less trouble introducing some things. However, it doesn't mitigate the fact that the use of technology is still superior.

  41. Great...but... by urbaneassault · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have most of that, with the exception of the stoplights with countdowns.
    Most large theatres today, whether live or movie, offer online and in person sales with displays of seat availability.
    Most traffic lights in the "almost large" cities that are below the fold of Chicago, LA, and NY, have timers on the crosswalks that effectivily give you the countdowns to a red or green light.
    Tailors (which doesn't exactly count as tech, unless it's 1750) are available at just about every large, expensive retailer at your local mall.
    All the examples he sites seem to be more a criticism of Canada than a boost to China. Then again, I live in the US, i can't speak for Canada.
    The only ubiquitous use of tech that China has that is effectivly used (and not for show like the flat screens throughout Shanghai and the tech areas of Beijing) is cell usage. This was out of necessity, and I wish we had the same coverage and plans. However, I can get a land line with no problems, just about anywhere in the US. Slightly more troublesome in most of China outside the large pop centers.
    (not a slam against China, just don't like seeing the status quo bumped up to hero status just because there's a flat screen involved)

    1. Re:Great...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we don't have most of that everywhere. That's a big difference.

      Going to a tailor is different from having hemming provided as a service gratis and on grounds. That's a big difference.

    2. Re:Great...but... by urbaneassault · · Score: 1

      True, but the article mentions tailoring provided for free at one of the most expensive (shanghai is the next hk) department stores in shanghai. If you go to the equivelent in the US, they'll take care of you as well.

    3. Re:Great...but... by sapped · · Score: 1

      Most large theatres today, whether live or movie, offer online and in person sales with displays of seat availability.

      Which part of the country do you live in? I have been to movies in 4 states and have not had that facility yet. Compare this with me growing up in a 3rd world country ten years ago where I did have that facility. I am talking specifically about the ability to purchase a ticket to a numbered seat so that I don't have to fight off people 30 minutes prior to the start of the movie just to get a decent seat.

      Many days it seems insane to me to call the US a 1st world country.

    4. Re:Great...but... by urbaneassault · · Score: 1

      I was speaking about live theatres for online seat reservations (much like sporting venues), and online general admission ticket purchases for movie theatres.
      That would be nice though, I would like to see AMC implement something like this.

  42. Article summary by RealAlaskan · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I think we can summarize the article like this:

    China has dirt-cheap labor (which stinks if you're Chinese).

    Since all China's infrastructure is new, it's more modern than our 20 to 30 year-old stuff.

    The article was written by a woman (item 10: ``Will you be wearing these with high heels or flats?'').

  43. Re:Parking, Transit Debit, Lights that Blink--In M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were true there'd be links. And he wouldn't be an A.C.

    just kidding.

  44. Bells etc. by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1


    Between this and the shortage of strippers, er er er exotic dancers, I don't know how you get by.

    In China, the bicycles have bells.
    I don't know about Canada, but in most of USA the a$$hole cyclists will speed by a pedestrians shoulder either with no warning or a shout of 'on your left' at the same instant he makes his startling appearance. Good thing they wait till the last moment too. Because fully 20+% of them don't know which side is left!

    Solutions such as theft resistant covers for restautant patrons say a lot...

    As for the poor Canadians. In the USA...

    1)Cellphone ubiquity rivals China.

    2)Stoplights give warning but only to the clever.

    (hint, watch the walk signal)

    3)Taxi's take charge cards, busses and trains take debit cards.

    4)No free exercise machines, but planty of parks, jogging trails, and those exercise stations wit chinup bars, etc.

    5)Anti-theft slip covers. There is generally no need. Some restaurants do have hooks for bags under the table. Others have plenty of chewing gm to stick your bag to. Seriously, there's no need to worry for your items, if checked.

    6)Daily banking? 7/24 by machine, internet, or telephone.

    7)Some of the restaurants I patronize offer these. It's pretty neat. Others have such attentive waiters that there is no need for bells. Others actually have hand operated bells.

    8)parking data? "lot full" is pretty damn clear and on busy days the competing lots generally have a guy screaming, "park here".

    9)Computer seating maps? These are not 'new'. Heck, ticketron and local symphony hall have them for a decade and tickets may be pruchased on line. Even the airlines have seating maps!

    10)Free hemming. I have yet to purchase trousers that did not include any required alteration. Sure, sometimes they want $5 or $10 but I've yet to see this charge dropped when I reply with, "If you are going to charge, I'll just purchase my trousers at ."

    Poor Canadians ;-)

    I smile because it is much easier to find fresh beaver up your way...

    1. Re:Bells etc. by Ralconte · · Score: 1

      Well yeah all this stuff is innovative in lage Chinese cities -- they're not building on and upgrading old infrastructure. Cell phones, for example, are so common because land lines have never been installed, even in major cities.

    2. Re:Bells etc. by Vraeden · · Score: 1

      As a commuting cyclist, I come across so many headphoned and/or deaf pedestrians that I've just about given up on any kind of audible warning signal. I just make sure I'm careful and slow down when approaching pedestrians, even the ones in the bicycle lane. The key thing to remember is safety for all involved, the cars, the pedestrians, and the cyclists. If all of them take time to consider each other and follow the rules, there aren't many problems.

    3. Re:Bells etc. by drasfr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm.... you musn't live in New York then or a living in an ideal city because:

      1- Cell phone coverage sucks... no matter who you are using noone has coverage in the subway, nor in the elevator of my buildings, or even very bad coverage where some friends live.

      2- yea, warning, that is different from a countdown. Do you know exactly how many seconds are left between red and green? Nope? Well in china you do...

      3- Again, I live in NY and although taxis should have that (I do take taxis at least 3 or 4 times/week), I almost never take any that do accept. What they are talking about in China is the same card used for everything.

      4- Park!=different from exercise machine. They have parks in China, AND exercise machines. You just don't do the same thing on those 2 things.

      5- Do you live in the city with no thiefs? Lucky you... I have yet to see restaurants with hooks under the table, maybe the 2 or 3 times a week I go out to different places are not sufficient. Oh and by the way,all the places tell you that they are not responsible in case of lost item left to them.

      6- They didn't say they don't have internet/phone access, I am sure they do as well... But it is in addition, because sometime it is just nice to be able to go to a Branch and have a live person.

      7- Again, refer to 5, I have never seen that in NY.

      8- yes, but they refer to in advance of going to the parkings. They have signs that tell you which parkings are full, how many spots left, BEFORE you even go near. How neat!

      9- seating maps, I would agreed can be found at _some_ places, but can you reserve your seat in the movie theater? Haven't seen that...

      10- hemming... What a pain in the neck... Buying something at Bloomingdale. "How's wednesday next week would be for you?" and that is on a Thursday... I would gladly wait 10mn to have it same day.

      Poor you...

    4. Re:Bells etc. by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I would be one of those "on your left" a$$hole cyclists. I admit have scared the shit out of more than a few people. They jump when I yell "on your left", maybe 70% of the time they jump to the right, the other 30% of the time I go right instead.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    5. Re:Bells etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the silent approach is that slower traffic behaves erratic from the point of view of faster traffic. Pedestrians can take a step to the side much faster than a cyclist can react. Cyclists can swerve much faster than a motorist can react.

      I've also mostly stopped ringing the bell before overtaking pedestrians, not because I'm an asshole but because when you ring it, pedestrians have a much higher chance of making sudden sideward moves when you're close, and when you ring from a safe distance, they don't hear it or, instead of making a step to the side and walking on, they stop and give you that reproachful look, like you've just asked a completely unreasonable favor of them. You just can't win. Slowing down to a safe speed and silently overtaking with as much space between you and the pedestrian seems to be the best compromise.

    6. Re:Bells etc. by clem9796 · · Score: 1

      "I don't know about Canada, but in most of USA the a$$hole cyclists will speed by a pedestrians shoulder either with no warning or a shout of 'on your left' at the same instant he makes his startling appearance. Good thing they wait till the last moment too. Because fully 20+% of them don't know which side is left!"

      A city bylaw In Edmonton, AB. requires you to have either a whistle or bell with you while riding your bike in order to warn pedestrians that you're coming up on them.

      --
      IANALOOA
    7. Re:Bells etc. by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't know about Canada, but in most of USA the a$$hole cyclists will speed by a pedestrians shoulder either with no warning or a shout of 'on your left' at the same instant he makes his startling appearance. Good thing they wait till the last moment too. Because fully 20+% of them don't know which side is left!

      I don't give a warning, because I find that no matter what I say and how far in advance I say it (or ring my bell) there is a 50% chance that the pedestrian will react at the last minute by jumping into my path, thereby dramatically increasing the chance of an accident.

      I have commuted by bicycle in large and small cities in north America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, pretty much daily for the past 30 years, and I've never hit a pedestrian yet. But I have a whole lot fewer close calls when I sneak up on them. So I'm going to keep doing it, for their own safety. Better surprised than smacked into the pavement.

      parking data? "lot full" is pretty damn clear and on busy days the competing lots generally have a guy screaming, "park here".

      Yes, but the signs in Europe and Asia tell you, before you enter a neighborhood, which lots are full and how many spots are left in the others. This saves driving around looking at all those "lot full" signs.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    8. Re:Bells etc. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Cell phone coverage sucks... no matter who you are using noone has coverage in the subway, nor in the elevator of my buildings, or even very bad coverage where some friends live.

      You live in an urban area and you are bitching about cellphone coverage? I live in upstate New York and my cell phone still works in almost 80% of the places I go to -- even the rural off the beaten path areas. I've received calls while hiking gorges outside of Ithaca or in the middle of the Catskill Mountains. Perhaps you need a more powerful phone or a different service provider?

      Yea, warning, that is different from a countdown. Do you know exactly how many seconds are left between red and green? Nope? Well in china you do...

      I'll grant you that one -- that's pretty neat. But traffic lights are controlled by your local village/town/city or state Government depending on the road. Write them a letter and suggest adoption of these methods in the future.

      Again, I live in NY and although taxis should have that (I do take taxis at least 3 or 4 times/week), I almost never take any that do accept. What they are talking about in China is the same card used for everything.

      You live in NYC right? Your MTA card works on the bus and on the subway. If you want it to work in the Taxis then suggest NYC ditch private taxies and bring them under the umbrella of the MTA -- though I doubt you'd find many supporters for that.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Bells etc. by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

      What town in NY do you live in? Sounds like a redneck backwater.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    10. Re:Bells etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1)Cellphone ubiquity rivals China.

      I'd like to agree with you, however I'm afraid your claim is blatantly false. Where did you get this data? Because "I made it up" isn't a reliable source. Seeing as how virtually every one of your points trashes either China or Canada, I'll make the bold assumption that you're american and speak more slowly.

      As someone who has worked for a cell phone company, I can attest to the fact that North America seriously lags other parts of the world when it comes to mobile sophistocation. The networks here don't hold a candle to those in Europe and Asia. Coverage is unsurpassed there, and the cellphones are years ahead of what they are here. I believe it's now something like 2 - 4 years after a new mobile technology hits China/Europe that it starts appearing over here. For example, the Japanese were the first to implement a fully standards-compliant 3G-GSM network.

    11. Re:Bells etc. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Don't pray for any of these features to come to the U.S. We are taxed trillions of dollars and our soldiers can't even afford bulletproof vests in Iraq. We have no money for these kinds of innovations. Ever heard of the BREAD and GUNS economics theory. All economies have enough money to buy one or the other. U.S spent way too much on firepower.

      In places like Japan the lifestyle is superiorly advanced compared to the average Americans. I have traveled there and seen with my own eyes. Hong Kong is on par with U.S, and China will leap ahead in 10 years. I literally using NYC as the U.S standard to compare.

    12. Re:Bells etc. by drasfr · · Score: 1

      Sure, cell phone coverage is much easier outdoor than indoors and around building... One cell phone tower at the top of a mountain and you got a big area covered, a few miles... In city like NYC, big concrete walls, metal, etc, WILL prevent in some cases cell phones to work. In anyways, cell phones not working in subways is more of a political decision than a technical difficulty.

      Yes, my MTA card works in the subways AND buses, but not in cabs. It would be great if it could work there as well, no more headache to find change and all. If only they could give as well a clear receipt with their medallion number, maybe I could have recovered the 2 cell phones plus the digital camera I lost in a cab. (Okay I recovered 1 cell phone, but it was because of someone called me with it).

  45. It had to be said. by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll take my basic freedoms and liberty any day over technology.

    Seriously. Don't you think there's a cost to all this? Do you really think a republic like the US could do something like this?

    The fact is -- it would be easier for us to modernize Iraq than it would be to modernize the US. Authoritarian control makes everything a ton easier for the government at the expense of the people.

    Pick your poison.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:It had to be said. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      I'll take my basic freedoms and liberty any day over technology.

      Really? So do you consider yourself a liberal?

    2. Re:It had to be said. by Dread_ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with your comments completely, however something intriguing and a bit frightening occurred to me while reading this article.

      Imagine a society with wonderfully advanced and ubiquitously implemented technology that makes life easy, entertaining, and enjoyable. Now imagine that there are severe restrictions on personal liberty and privacy and that the society is kept viable by extreme taxation.

      Would that society be haing too much fun to decry the unfair treatment?

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    3. Re:It had to be said. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Seriously. Don't you think there's a cost to all this? Do you really think a republic like the US could do something like this?

      Are you really saying that most of these technologies are there because the govenment has forced them? I doubt it. There are many other countries with these techologies. Don't forget, China seens to embracing capitalism at the moment. This is why many of these things exist. Their economy is picking up.

      The reasons for why these technologies exist or not is more to do with demand, population, density, etc. Not authoritive goverments.

    4. Re:It had to be said. by torqer · · Score: 1

      "I'll take my basic freedoms and liberty any day over technology. Seriously. Don't you think there's a cost to all this? Do you really think a republic like the US could do something like this?" Um... Yeah. You'd lose your freedom if you had a button in a restaurant to let the waitstaff know that you needed something, or Outdoors Gyms so you could spend more that the 30 minutes daily you normally spend out of doors... Liberty would be jeopardized if you had computerized seating maps, and parking lots that displayed relative information. What are you talking about?

    5. Re:It had to be said. by Hieronymous+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      How do you correlate "enjoyable" and "entertaining" with lack of personal liberty and privacy? IMO, such a society would not be entertaining and enjoyable, and could not be made so without liberty and privacy.

    6. Re:It had to be said. by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'll take my basic freedoms and liberty any day over technology."

      Then I hope you are not a resident of US

    7. Re:It had to be said. by real+gumby · · Score: 1
      I'll take my basic freedoms and liberty any day...
      ...and luckily for you Mr Ashcroft is doing it for you!
  46. Waitasec, being in China... by Moken · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was in China earlier this summer and despite their "genius traffic lights" and cellphone coverage, you can still walk behind the internet bars and savvy shopping marts and find dirt roads, people living on other's garbage and sewage in the streets.

    The modernization of Chinese technology is less important than the quality of life of its people. In my opinion, they need to focus less on getting every single person in their country internet and more on getting every single person in their country fed and clean.

    1. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • I was in China earlier this summer and despite their "genius traffic lights" and cellphone coverage, you can still walk behind the internet bars and savvy shopping marts and find dirt roads, people living on other's garbage and sewage in the streets.
      With the exception of dirt streets you can find all that in most American cities too. Granted the sewage in the streets is mainly from homeless people just going wherever it's convenient but it's there.

      You'll also find plenty of dirt roads (and gravel roads) throughout the US, not everywhere is a major city.

      • The modernization of Chinese technology is less important than the quality of life of its people. In my opinion, they need to focus less on getting every single person in their country internet and more on getting every single person in their country fed and clean.
      The same could be said for the US. We tend to focus on stuff like how many homes have Internet, or how many homes have cable instead of talking about ways to help the homeless and poor. While China's certainly not perfect, neither is any other country. All of them have problems hidden under the surface.
    2. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by philipgar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, we have our homeless, and we have our poor. The difference is how many people live like that? As far as I know its very few. Even driving around the poor parts of town i see direct TV dishes up on houses, cars in peoples driveways etc. Not to say that there aren't some people starving to death, but the amount is relatively small.

      As far as the homeless, or dare I refer to them as bums without offending someone, well most of them tend to choose that sort of life. Some people are always going to want to avoid society, avoid responsibility, and avoid work. To some the choice of living a poor life with a shorter life expectancy etc is their choice.

      Also, how do you compare the US where these things are rare with a country where it is common. If the newspaper runs a story on one of these people in the US people are lining up to help them out and get their live straightened out. If this happened all the time this just simply wouldn't be the case. You can easily drive around our cities and not see these side effects. . .and we don't even have a government thats trying to hide these simple facts.

      Ah how good it is to live here. Proud to be an american where our cell coverage doesn't go coast to coast, but I can drive 20 miles from the city and be out in the middle of empty forests or fields where no one is around. Its wonderful to have open space, and more importantly freedom.

      Phil

    3. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      With the exception of dirt streets you can find all that in most American cities too. Granted the sewage in the streets is mainly from homeless people just going wherever it's convenient but it's there.

      Hardly. The problem is much worse compared to the US or any 1st world country.

      We tend to focus on stuff like how many homes have Internet, or how many homes have cable instead of talking about ways to help the homeless and poor.

      Who's we? I think you'll find the US gov is still more interested in getting people into homes than making sure everyone has a net connection. And the reason people focus on net connections is because pretty much everyone already has basic housing etc. Unlike in China, who's situation is obviously worse.

    4. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Ah how good it is to live here. Proud to be an american where our cell coverage doesn't go coast to coast, but I can drive 20 miles from the city and be out in the middle of empty forests or fields where no one is around.

      You can do that in China too. It's not like there are hundreds of people living under every tree.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    5. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by ReconRich · · Score: 1

      As far as the homeless, or dare I refer to them as bums without offending someone, well most of them tend to choose that sort of life. Some people are always going to want to avoid society, avoid responsibility, and avoid work. To some the choice of living a poor life with a shorter life expectancy etc is their choice.

      Hardly. I spent a few months homeless back in the 80's - trust me, anyone who can get out of that lifestyle will. The people who are chronically homeless are almost universally mentally ill, substance dependent, or both. These are people who are too fucked up to choose anything.

      -- Rich

      --
      Free your mind and your Ass will follow -- George Clinton
    6. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I see the same thing in Philadelphia. ..soon to be the first major free, wireless city.

    7. Re:Waitasec, being in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Ah how good it is to live here. Proud to be an american where our cell coverage doesn't go coast to coast, but I can drive 20 miles from the city and be out in the middle of empty forests or fields where no one is around. Its wonderful to have open space, and more importantly freedom.


      You know, there is a LOT more open space in China than there is in the USA. The majority of people in China live in the super-cities. If you go out into the mountain regions of China, you'll see that the land there is about as barren as the Yukon territory.

  47. Parking lot displays by tsangc · · Score: 1

    They have parking lot displays all over. Toronto's new airport parking structure has them, they've had it in Copenhagen for a while now.

  48. Re:Government of the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They certainly don't mind a corporatist one.

  49. Free hemming not a result of cheap labor? by pantoniades · · Score: 2, Insightful

    10. Free hemming This doesn't count as cheap labour because only three people service an entire department store. Hm. So all a US Department store would need to do is hire 3 people (US$32,760 salary, plus FICA, etc) per location from the profit on pants....

  50. compiled by someone from china by roror · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one to notice the name of the compiler is Jan Wong? By no means I discredit the article completely, but, add salt to your taste ;)

    1. Re:compiled by someone from china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one to notice the name of the compiler is Jan Wong? By no means I discredit the article completely, but, add salt to your taste

      Right, 'cuz ethnic Chinese are one homogenous entity with identical idiological mindsets, and none of them are ever born or educated in the west...

    2. Re:compiled by someone from china by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      Jan Wong is a well-known columnist for the Globe and Mail. But anyone familiar with mandarin would spot her as a Westerner at once. These are the giveaways:

      (1) Neither "Jan" nor "Wong" are standard English spellings of Chinese characters. They come from early Western attempts to represent Chinese phonetics using the alphabet. Mainlanders would use standard pinyin, which is probably "Zhan" and "Wang".

      (2) Note that the family name is written LAST rather than FIRST. Few Chinese will do this unless they're trying to break into Western markets ("Jet Li", "Fay Wang", "Jackie Chan", etc).

      I know the comment was meant in jest, but it still comes across as somewhat racist.

  51. /.ers are getting Lame by korbin_dallas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lamers.

    The important part is that China has cellphones with out 2 year plans, credit hassles, or idiot vendors.

    The man got 2 pairs of pants, measured, trimmed, hemmed and pressed in under 3 minutes.

    Signs tell drivers which lots HAVE open spaces and how many are left.

    Its not technology, its SERVICE.

    How hard is it to put a call button on a restuarant table?

    --
    They Live, We Sleep
    1. Re:/.ers are getting Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only service but a little common sense...hooks under the tables seems like a no brainer

    2. Re:/.ers are getting Lame by Inda · · Score: 1

      We've had electronic signs that tell you if there are free spaces in the multi-story carparks for over 20 years. This is in the good old UK, in a small town at that.

      It's no big deal.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:/.ers are getting Lame by Wolfier · · Score: 1
      /.ers are getting Lame

      Welcome to 5 years ago!
  52. Re:Yeah, but... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    I thought they rode yaks. You know the RCMYM.

  53. here we go again... by evil_one666 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its always amazing how awe-struck north americans are by mobile phone technology in other countries.

    OK- here's the skinny: You yanks have got a looong way to go with your mobile network. It is inferior to most of the rest of the world by any measure you care to apply (cost, coverage, cool sms services and payment systems).

    So please, lets stop gaping in amazment at the technology available in supposedly "backwards" countries- its old news for those of us that actually live there.

  54. Re:Paid for by US Traitors by kabocox · · Score: 1

    No. In each industry there are only a few companies. The economy is based on 40000% markups, a regular campaign of vigorous layoffs, and constant blatantly manipulative advertising.

    Don't give away those last few trade secrets we still have!

  55. Re:Parking, Transit Debit, Lights that Blink--In M by Life2Short · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, but it's not as easy to get Chinese food...

  56. Still.. Re:this isn't superior technology by deadmongrel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    we are free to make mistakes and that is more important that having all the technology in the world. I would rather have Freedom of speech than a fancy parking monitor.

    1. Re:Still.. Re:this isn't superior technology by Calroth · · Score: 1

      "I would rather have Freedom of speech than a fancy parking monitor."

      Why not have both? They're not mutually exclusive, you don't need to have a totalitarian government to set up parking monitors.

  57. Free hemming.. and more by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    I like the part about free hemming. It beats me why stores in the United States do not offer free length alterations when you buy a pair of pants. Since I am not too tall, it is almost impossible for me to find jeans that fit my length - chopping off a couple of inches would make all the difference. In India where I now buy all my jeans, the alteration comes free with the jeans - out here, the stores do not even know where I could get that done... a blank stare is all I get when I ask them about suggesting a place where I can get the length altered.

    Now I just tear off the end of the jeans and walk hippie style. :-)

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    1. Re:Free hemming.. and more by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      It beats me why stores in the United States do not offer free length alterations when you buy a pair of pants. Since I am not too tall, it is almost impossible for me to find jeans that fit my length - chopping off a couple of inches would make all the difference.

      I really doubt any store in the US will start chopping bits off their customers to make the clothes fit. There just *HAS* to be a libility issue in there somewhere.

      I'm curious. Would you chop off a couple inches from your head or your feet?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Free hemming.. and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it is 'head', which head?

  58. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me you're joking.... our police officers do NOT use elk for transport. They use cars. The same cars they have in the USA. In fact, most of our technology is similar to the stuff in the USA. We might very well be behind Europe though, for all I know.

  59. Much cultural, much done before... by fideaux · · Score: 1

    OK, first of all, much of this is cultural
    Second, this is "new development"
    Third, this is not pervasive. This is like talking about new services in some of the biggest coastal cities (the gold coast).

    Having lived in Asia, I found myself saying "Hmm, I've seen a lot of this before elsewhere".

    I would break the article down into these areas:
    Parts 1 (Cell phones), 7 (Wireless service bells), 8 (Parking data)
    These are new developments, allowed by the jump allowed by not having an infrastructure. They are being done elsewhere, but it's a "wow, we hopped by the stuff over there"

    Parts 2, 3, 9, 10
    These I know I have seen in Hong Kong and Singapore, to name some places. They styles may be new, but timed lights are nothing, really.
    Seating in Asian theaters has often been by row and seat number, and I have used touch screen theater seating (even self serve) way back in 1998 in Singapore.

    Parts 4 5
    These are cultural. Shoot, there's a park near my house that has exercise path. That's not so uncommon. As for a place for people to congregate, that's also because there's not a lot of privacy living in a multigenerational house.
    Anti-theft slipcovers. Nice touch, but cultural and talks about the problems due to the range of incomes there.

    All and all, this smells like someone who is either bragging or suffering some "culture shock" that China isn't the backward place so often projected in the west.

  60. Nice. Completely wrong, but nice anyhow.... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Well, completely wrong is perhaps a bit harsh: ownership of mobile phones is lower in the US than it is in many developing world nations, precisely because a mobile phone is preferable to landline for the reasons that you give but you miss the point that the ownership of mobile phones is far lower in the US than most other developed world nations too.

    And it's not all about natural geography or lack of an existing landline infrastructure: mobile phone usage in Scandinavian countries such as Finland and Sweden is fantastic. In fact, if I remember correctly, in Finland over 90 percent of the people have a mobile phone.

    As for mobile phones being expensive, well, that's free market capitalism working for you. In Britain, where caller party pays like almost everywhere else (ie, if you call me then you foot the bill and it doesn't cost me a thing), I have a pay as you go mobile phone that cost me £35 (~$75) to buy, and which costs me pennies a day to use and with no contract whatsoever. And it's as reliable as anything else, plus it's portable. (Of course, if I wanted to use my mobile phone more extensively, then I have a range of options available to me from the various UK operators.)

    From the anecdotal evidence that keeps cropping up on Slashdot and elsewhere, it very much seems to me that mobile phone ownership being synonymous with costing heaven and earth is an American phenomenon.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Nice. Completely wrong, but nice anyhow.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My phone (which sucks - Siemens S80) was free, and I pay $40/mo for no long distance, 300 SMS, no roaming charges, and 400 minutes. If I used the phone a lot it would be a bad deal, but the land line it replaced was costing me $45/mo with long distance charges. It just made more sense to ditch the land line and go to cellular - and this is in the US.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Nice. Completely wrong, but nice anyhow.... by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I was making some historical generalizations regarding the initial deployment of the various technologies. Mobile phone service is now fairly affordable everywhere in the world, and becoming more affordable and universal as we speak. (The US mobile phone operators don't charge too much more for airtme than the UK ones do, from what I can see.)

  61. Re:Paid for by US Traitors by narsiman · · Score: 1

    And we happily sell these concepts to every developed/developing/under developed nation whose salivating industries emulate and tailor them for regional needs.

  62. Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, we solve it pretty easily by not jaywalking if there's a bunch of cars waiting to get past the zebra crossing. Honestly, society can't protect idiots form themselves.

  63. Re:Government of the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks for the false dilemma. Either we accept corporate hegemony and end-times theocracy or we accept godless Communism? How about freedom, which resembles neither?

  64. Been there... by Olmy's+Jart · · Score: 1

    Been in Beijing and Tianjin and Xi'an. I love the traffic lights. The moving bar style are great but I would be concerned about anyone who might be color blind (the red and green occupy the same bar space so you can't judge by "what's on top"). And you very rarely see any accidents, even where four lane roads intersect WITHOUT lights, even densely packed with traffic. There's a difference in attitude on the roads, too. Everyone keeps moving. Horns are not an act of agression, as they are here in the US. Horns are an audio location system, like bats. Toot, toot, I'm here. Toot, toot, in your blind spot. Toot toot, clear to move... Beat's the hell out of the road rage'n rednecks on the loose on our highways.

    1. Re:Been there... by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      My first few days in Kunming (Yunnan province) were terrifying until I got used to the way they drive over there. The mixture of old and new was strange too: taxi drivers doing 60mph swerving round donkey-pulled carts full of live chickens is a strange sight.

    2. Re:Been there... by HikeFanatic · · Score: 0

      Having visited Shanghai last December, I can definitely say that the list in the article is very accurate.

      Asian countries in general are literally years ahead of us on cellular technology - I loved the cell phone coverage, had only one dead zone and that was in an area with concrete around me, which I pretty much expected. Nothing like that here in the US, which is crappy at best.

      The transit cards were great. No fumbling around with different tickets for train, bus, etc. like over here.

      Interesting about tailoring - I got a custom fit tuxedo from a department store for $450US, including paying extra for the "good" fabric. They handled all of the tailoring for free, as a couple of changes were needed after it was done. It was done very quickly, too.

      We could learn a lot from other countries.

    3. Re:Been there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Horns are an audio location system, like bats.

      My car has a bat in it for my self-defence :-).

  65. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are horses, not elks! I have a feeling that you are probably part of the 50% of americans who beleive that canadians live in igloos! Not your fault, I guess... US leaders did a really good job of making sure that the majority of its population stays poor, uneducated, misinformed and scared.

  66. Top down change by SupremeChalupa · · Score: 1

    Yet another societal difference that drives a ot of these "innovatins" is top down government central control. The Chinese have the ability to say "You will!". Where in the US there is a lot more "Will you?". (political rhetoric aside) This allows for a much less decentralized and chaotic implementation of a lot of initiatives.. like cell phones. Who owns thier network? Gov't. Who controls all the phones? Gov't Who says you can't call the anti-party groups? Gov't. Socialistic values do some things very well in this manner... and yet they can't breathe and drink the water because of the same system.

  67. Did anybody else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...read "Adult Playgrounds" and then reach for their passports?

  68. No. 11 by bluprint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you protest the government, they imprison you, or just gun you down on the spot, free! No more paying for Dr. Kevorkian's euthanasia services. Yeah!

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
    1. Re:No. 11 by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • If you protest the government, they imprison you, or just gun you down on the spot, free!
      We're getting there, maybe not to gunning you down on the spot, but being arrested for protesting the government, or just refusing to go to a designated 'protest zone' at a Bush campaign rally. (Ironicallly I could only find a link from a paper outside the US on that. There were many occurrences similar to it throughout Bush's campaign.)

      So give it time, I'm sure we'll have the gunning down protestors legalized eventually. (And no I don't think that's a good thing.)

  69. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haw haw haw!

    You made a funny about Canada! They don't REALLY ride elk do they? I thought the mounted police rode horses! You are funny!

  70. Mostly, it still boils down to cheap labor. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Cheap labor makes it cost-effective to do all these wonderful things, which all boil down to nothing more than convenience. Things were similar during the turn of the last century, when children worked in factories and even middle class families had servants. Perhaps this is China's "gilded age".

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  71. Another famous picture of Chinese technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's some more of that wonderful Chinese technology in action:

    Click

    Forest for the trees, people.

  72. Hemming pants... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    It seems like people just are not aware that you can go to pretty much any clothing store and ask for your clothes to be tailored for free.

    Yes, free. If you are paying then you are a sucker. Demand that the clothing you buy fits. Why else are you buying it? Go to a different store and ask up front if they offer free tailoring, if not tell them thanks but no thanks and see how quickly they will point you in the direction of their free tailoring service.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Hemming pants... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • It seems like people just are not aware that you can go to pretty much any clothing store and ask for your clothes to be tailored for free.
      Umm in what reality? Here where I live the only places that even have staff to do alterations are the stores selling suits, and they all charge extra for it. Apparently the logic is that they discount the suits so you have to pay extra for things like alterations.

      Overlooking that most people buy clothes at the Mall or Wal-mart. Go ahead and see if they do alterations at all, much less free. And good luck with it, as I've yet to see a single store in any Mall do alterations (at any price) and Wal-mart sure as hell doesn't.

      If you're really able to get alterations done for free where you are, consider yourself very lucky, most people don't have that option.

    2. Re:Hemming pants... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      Most department stores in the U.S. (excluding Wal-mart, as well as discount 'outlet' stores) have tailoring, and most of the ones I go to have free tailoring.

      This is in the Chicagoland area.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:Hemming pants... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Fact is, you won't get those pants for less than US$8.

      I got such a pair, with free hemming (by hand, not with a machine), in a department store in Shanghai.

      They were crap quality though - they fell apart within a year, but I've seen similar quality sold here in Oz (made in China too) for over US$20 and no free hemming either.

      The other problem with pants sold in China is you don't usually get a separate change pocket - they use notes down to such small denominations that people don't carry much change. So when I brought them back to Australia where we have $1 and $2 coins, the pockets wore through.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    4. Re:Hemming pants... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      My Fiancee worked for Nordstroms for 3 years, Macy's for 1 year... sorry, I wouldn't call Wal-Mart a clothing store to say the least and this story doesn't mentioned going into a cut-rate department store.

      I wouldn't expect to get a pair of $20 pants hemmed or tailored but if you are paying $50 or more you should expect to get it done for free. If you haven't ever asked then it's your own fault.

      Also if you're only shopping discount I wouldn't assume a great level of service. You get what you pay for.

      If the places that do have an alteration service are charging for it, I would ask for it free of charge or simply walk away. If they can get you to pay they will. Just try it, you'd be surprised what people will do if they think they're losing a sale.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  73. Re:Yeah, but... by mrn121 · · Score: 1

    yes, that was intended entirely as a joke. i hope my neighbors to the north can forgive me.

  74. Umm, aren't we already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the electronics I ever buy anymore are made in China!

  75. Re:Government of the people? by Flamingcheeze · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!

    --
    The Philosophy of Liberty | lewrockwell.com
  76. The article doesn't mention... by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...if they have reservation touch screens for their Falon Gong Reeducation Centers? Can I denounce someone to the secret police by reporting their reactionary bourgeois activities with a camera cell phone?

    What about coffins and death beds? If I want to die in China of some easily preventable disease, black lung, or speaking my mind, can I reserve my place a head of time with a cell phone?

  77. Some cheaper more eco-friendly packaging by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I got a package of PC speakers designed for Dell LCD displays which origininated in China. The cardboard speaker boxes were bound together with something that resembled a 3 foot long strip of papyrus with a papyrus bow on top. I was able to remove all the speaker boxes from the larger shipping box easily by lifting from the bow, as the papyrus-like material was very strong. It made me think about the plastic that they could have used but didn't. I was impressed.

    1. Re:Some cheaper more eco-friendly packaging by Spazmogazm · · Score: 1

      That wasn't papyrus silly, that was a strip of skin peeled from the back of an eight year old factory worker.

  78. A government for the people? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The People's Republic of China is run by one of the most corrupt regimes on the planet.

    They use torture, rape, and intimidation on a massive, systemic scale.

    They are introducing capitalism, but not human rights. The economy is still largely managed top-down.

    Saying they are upgrading faster than Western countries is like saying you want to go to Antarctica because it's springtime there, and you like warm weather.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:A government for the people? by Conor+Turton · · Score: 1, Troll
      The People's Republic of China is run by one of the most corrupt regimes on the planet. They use torture, rape, and intimidation on a massive, systemic scale.

      I take it you've seen for yourself or are you just repeating what the good lord Geedubya told you?

      --
      Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
    2. Re:A government for the people? by Nurseman · · Score: 1
      take it you've seen for yourself or are you just repeating what the good lord Geedubya told you?

      i think he read it in that ultra right wing publication called AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL see this link for some facts :
      Here Sorry to get in the way of your W bashing

      --
      Save a Life. Donate Blood. Please.
    3. Re:A government for the people? by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The United States executes juveniles and the retarded. We detain Muslims. We invade countries then torture their populace.

      Why is that insightful?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    4. Re:A government for the people? by middlemen · · Score: 1

      How biased can one be sometimes... sigh!

    5. Re:A government for the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mr programmer.. one could say exactly the same for the USA.
      didnt think of that, did ya?

    6. Re:A government for the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use torture, rape, and intimidation on a massive, systemic scale.

      Sort of like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, eh?

    7. Re:A government for the people? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      Huh? Did the President say something about that? Oh, he did mention the systematic suppression of the freedom of religion through arrest and torture of Christians, but what's a little torture compared to high-tech traffic signals? That's what they deserve for believing the wrong things, after all.

      Here's a link to the Human Rights in China site. They aren't President Bush.

      I suppose I should mention Human Rights Watch, another group not affiliated with President Bush or the U.S. Government. They aren't happy with China's approach to human rights, which is to propagandize about how wonderful things are in China.

      Amnesty International, a group critical of the Bush Administration, thinks even less of PRChina.

      I've never been to China. Have you?

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    8. Re:A government for the people? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      We only execute them if there's a reasonable expectation that they knew what they did was wrong before they did it. I know it's the current fashion to rip on the big bad USA, but at least get a fucking clue.
      Bad things happen. People do the wrong things for what they feel is the right reason. Our task is to deal with it. It happens everywhere, though. We detain SOME Muslims. Some Muslims kidnap and kill Americans. Does that mean that Muslims are bad?
      Rhetoric is wonderful, isn't it kids...

    9. Re:A government for the people? by Ba3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      we also elect retards

    10. Re:A government for the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is that insightful?"
      Because it's not (Score:5,Funny)

    11. Re:A government for the people? by pantoniades · · Score: 1
      The United States executes juveniles and the retarded. We detain Muslims. We invade countries then torture their populace. Why is that insightful?
      Well, for one because you can be certain that the government, even if the current regime gets considerably more brash than it has been, will not punish you in any way for your statement - the whole free press/speach thing really goes a long way, and I'm not aware of anyone who enjoies quite the same level of protection.

      Do we throw our weight around as a superpower? Sure, way too much. Historically speaking, though, barely at all. [Mom, why does so much of the world speak English, French and Spanish?]
    12. Re:A government for the people? by tloh · · Score: 1
      I know it's the current fashion to rip on the big bad USA

      As opposed to the current fashion being to rip on the big bad red commies?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    13. Re:A government for the people? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      The United States executes juveniles and the retarded.

      Juvenile and retarded CONVICTED MURDERERS, and even then, only if we can prove they understood what they were doing was wrong, and did it anyway.

      We detain Muslims.

      We detain Christians and Jews, also. So what? The reason there are a lot of muslims in Gitmo is because most of the terrorists fighting us are Islamic.

      We invade countries then torture their populace.

      As a general rule, we sure as shit do not do that. Some fucktards working for us did do that and are paying the price. Also, "torture," I think not. Humiliated some prisoners, absolutely. That doesn't qualify as torture. If you want to talk about torture, you'll have to talk about what Saddam Hussein did to his people, what China does to its dissidents.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    14. Re:A government for the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha.. that made my day

    15. Re:A government for the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...If you want to talk about torture, you'll have to talk about what Saddam Hussein did to his people, what China does to its dissidents..."

      So, now, when will you people start your invasion of China, N Korea, (insert random non-currently-friendly-to-USA country) ...??

  79. Uhh, we don't build gulags for "incorrect thought" by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is that different enough for you?

  80. Some things we already have by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    By any standard you can think of -- coverage, price, ubiquity -- China's cellphone practices beat ours.
    Okay, it's a Canadian article, but already I can hear the gasps of amazement from US-based ./ers that they don't have the best cellphone service in the world. But anybody from just about any other industrialised country that moves to the US always ends up disappointed with the service. I was used to being able to use SMS with all my friends - not anymore. Hell, my service is so unreliable there's a 50% chance of any of my texts getting through. And about 50% of my calls get dropped - something that never happened in the UK unless I was going into a tunnel.
    During a red light, you know whether you have time to check that map; on a green light, you know whether to start braking a block away -- or to stomp on the accelerator, as though you were a Toronto or Montreal driver. (That's probably why Montreal has a few lights with countdown seconds for pedestrians.)
    Countdown timers for pedestrians are all over San Francisco, but countdown timers for drivers is a great idea.
    Wouldn't it be great to have a single debit card for buses, subways -- and taxis?
    Sounds a bit like a sophisticated version of the travel passes you can buy in London that work on all the buses, trains and in the tube.
    In China, roadside electronic billboards not only give directions to nearby lots and garages, they crucially reveal how many empty spaces are left.
    Some English cities have these. I saw them in Manchester years ago.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  81. Not surprised by Luveno · · Score: 1

    It is always easier to implement something new and fresh than have to have a transparent upgrade. The US implemented traffic signals long ago and is now straddled with that system.

    See the power grid and telephone system for other examples.

  82. USA: Capitalism powerhouse by Raedwald · · Score: 1

    In most European countries, TV ratings are measured using a set-top box, which determines what is being viewed second-by-second. The measurements are downloaded by modem and TV ratings are available for a program the morning after the broadcast. Urban China likewise. And Romania. And Uzbekistan.

    But in the US, TV ratings rely on people filling in diaries once a month, to a precision of 15 minutes.
    Yes, the country in the world most associated with capitalism and TV advertising has the most primitive system for TV ratings.

    The reason? In the US, TV ratings are measured by a company that has an effective monopoly, which uses patents to prevent competition.

    --
    Ne mæg werig mod wyrde wiðstondan, ne se hreo hyge helpe gefremman.
  83. Re:"Beware ..., to be exact by GrAfFiT · · Score: 3, Informative

    To be exact, he said : "Quand la Chine s'éveillera, le monde tremblera", which translates into : "when Chine will awake, the world will tremble".

  84. Well... by Zrech · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Our North American infrastructure is very outdated and we are constatly running into problems with it... this article is probably writen from a skewed perspective, but anyone who has payed any attention to the technological advances that China has been doing could say this was a long time comming and will only continue to happen at an ever quickening pace. It might turn out good for us over here.... or it might cause a sort of hyperinflation in our dollars as the yuan is worth 6.87 to 1 Canadian (8.28 to 1 American) and the Hong Kong buck is 7.78 to 1 USD or 6.45 to one Loonie (www.xe.com.)

    The only current setback I see for China, Beijing in particular, is air pollution. Although I'm sure they'll have a way to clean it all figured out and implemented well before the Olympics in 4 years if they want the athletes to be able to breathe normally when they are competing. And I'm sure the 20 new Candu reactors that we (Canada) are supplying them will help to combat that instead of burning coal like the places they are replacing.

    Now, dont get me wrong, I'm not saying that their current political system is good... its not. Its horrid in the fact corruption is running un-checked through it (ever heard of Payola? Government officials expect it). Its just, with an ever modernizing infrastructure they are going to quickly become a world super power with the ability to use national economies as a weapon against whomever they want (go check and see what you have thats made in china lol). Although, all this assuming and all the articles out could be pre-emptive and their economy and infrastructure could fall flat on its face.... but its intersting nonetheless.

  85. driving force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main thing about all these technologys is that most people would not be willing to pay extra for them, so in capitalist nations there is no drive to implement them, whereas in china they do because they can. If a city decided to replace thier traffic lights with smart traffic light, but said they had to raise local taxes to pay for them voters would not be pleased, and if a mobile company decided to have coverage everywhere but you had to pay twice as much as other networks, they wouldnt last 5 minites. You could have all that technology if people were willing to pay for it, of course the chinese people do pay for it, but dont realise it, because of the way thier system works.

  86. How do we even live? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And yet, somehow, life in the old USA goes on.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  87. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me tell you- stereotypical Canadian jokes are just HALRAIOUS- and they never get old- ever. Also, while i was rebooting my 286 because to froze again due to the winter cold (you know how those igloos can get), I came to the conclusion that no matter what my countries police force uses for transportation, I prefer them to any other police force which acts like human rights and freedom of speech are silly privileges.

  88. Propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A rep from the state dept? I'd take anything spewed out from the "Ministry of Propoganda" with a grain of salt. They have troops massed on the border? How come this hasn't been stated anywhere else? Even by the president? Maybe it is because China has had troops there since the Korean War cease fire JUST LIKE WE DO. Why wouldn't China be concerned about the US attacking without provacation a nation on their border? We'd do the same thing if it was Mexico.

    China has a medevial mindset? How so? The US has the mindset of 16th century Christian fundamentalists, how are we superior?

    Funny, for such a big bad ogre of a nation we have no problem tying our economy tightly with theirs.

    The fact that you promote Fox News marks you as a tool of the democracy and freedom hating far right.

  89. What a laod of... by greywar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been to Chain. Shanghai to be specific. What awe inspiring technology I saw. A sewage system that was obviously not functioning great. Water that you could not drink. Traffic which was...unbeleivably bad. People living on sidewalks. Oh yeah. nice technology. I've seen far superior technology in both Canada and the US. Its easy to find 10 things better - but honestly this guy had to reach.

    1. Re:What a laod of... by Esperi · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the first time I saw Union Street in San Francisco.

  90. Not too worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging from the last census, Canada is well on its way to being a majority Asian (esp. Chinese) country over the next 50 years or so (already more people identified themselves as Chinese than as Canadian in some of Canada's major cities. It is a good bet that they will bring their best ideas with them when they come...

  91. Closer to home by Dizzutch · · Score: 1

    You don't even have to travel as far as China to see some of these 'differences' Western Europe supports a lot of things we here in the northern US long for or only dream of. The road side parking information was installed in 1999 in the Netherlands, the same year that cell-phones became the biggest fad. They even had a massive game being played on cell-phones, where a user would sign up, get a cryptic direction every week and whoever followed the directions closest (throughout the entire country) found the location of a prize. The rest of the items are sometimes small, courteous things, that we just don't think of, or our culture is not used to, like the hooks under the tables. Which, once again, in Europe they use in bars, for your coat, so you don't have to wrinkle your jacket by sitting ontop of it on the barstool.

  92. Re:Or not...not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Jan Wong rocks! "Lunch with..." used to be my favourite feature in the Globe, her catty comments were priceless!

    You would have freaked at last Saturday's Globe, where this piece originated, because the whole edition was on China, with several articles by JW. This particular article was a fluff piece tucked in a corner, but the rest of the edition was quite insightful.

    As for Jan being a "bit" of a communist sympathiser - you should check out _Red China Blues_ sometime. It's her very-readable account of how she left Canada as an impressionable little proto-Maoist university student to study in Beijing, her subsequent disillusionment during the Cultural Revolution, and her return to China during the late 1980s, where she wound up reporting on the events in Tiananmen Square. Good stuff...

  93. Is this all a joke? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    Nice to see the EU is pushing back the boundaries of grand unified theories of which sitcom or reality show is the the most popular. I'll bet CERN is involved with those high precision set-top timewasting detecto-widgets, eh? Hey, maybe the ESA can stop that useless science exploration and launch a quantum satellite that will link every teevee together in the EU and provide INSTANT FEEDBACK as to how many people are watching the World Wrestling Federation on TNT-Europe before the show actually airs! Now that's progress, people!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  94. Underwhelmed by cmacb · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm
    I was underwhelmed.

    While I like the idea of a transit debt card. Don't you just KNOW that if that were implemented nationwide by any North American government there would be outrage from "privacy" advocates. The Washington DC system is in fact going to something like this, using a single debit card. Having the technology to do something (which we do in this case) doesn't necessarily make it an idea worth throwing everything else out for...

    China isn't the first to bypass land line phones for cell phones. Countries in Africa have been doing it for years. If you don't have trenches dug all over your country for telephone wires, a nationwide cellular system makes a lot of sense. On the other hand if you dug your trenches in the 50's why not use them? You are not going to implement broadband Internet, cable TV , especially movies on-demand over a cellular phone system. China, African countries, and others when they have such services will dig holes and run wires, probably fiber-optic ones at which point wired phones in the home (probably VOIP-like) will make perfect sense. We'll end up there too. In our case we have to get to the point of justifying the replacement of something that "just works" whereas countries running "behind" us will be adding a new service and doing it a better way from the beginning. Being in the forefront is not the most cost-effective way to use technology. That rule applies to countries just as it does in our personal lives.

    1. Re:Underwhelmed by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      China isn't the first to bypass land line phones for cell phones. Countries in Africa have been doing it for years. If you don't have trenches dug all over your country for telephone wires, a nationwide cellular system makes a lot of sense. On the other hand if you dug your trenches in the 50's why not use them? You are not going to implement broadband Internet, cable TV , especially movies on-demand over a cellular phone system. China, African countries, and others when they have such services will dig holes and run wires, probably fiber-optic ones at which point wired phones in the home (probably VOIP-like) will make perfect sense.

      512/128K DSL in China costs US$10/month and they are rolling out one million (yes, ONE MILLION) installs every month.

      Of course flat-rate GPRS (cell phone data) is only $20/month.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  95. Dark Ages by Bigbutt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i'm kinda jealous

    Reminds me of people who say they would have liked to live in the dark ages with the famous artists and musicians, great castles and famous writers.

    My response was always that you'd most likely be a peasant or slave considering there wasn't much, if any middle class.

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  96. You kidding me? by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "Yet who would have thought that, after a millennium of poverty, they'd already do so many things better than we?"

    A millenium? Maybe a century at worst. Historically, China has always been at the fore front of technology, power, and culture. The last few centuries, especially the 20th, was more of an exception than the rule. Three centuries of being behind might seem pretty bad but when you consider that the Chinese civilization has been around for 3,000 years, that's not too bad.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  97. Verizon by outriding9800 · · Score: 1

    Can you hear me now ?

  98. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada seems to be a little behind more countries than China in some ways. Specifically 3, 8, 9 och most likely 1. I can't remember when I last ordered seats in any other way than picking from a map of free seats over the Internet.

  99. canada = west? by natedubbya · · Score: 1

    When you actually read the article, it's quickly apparent that it compares China to Canada and not "the west". While Canada is indeed in the west, only Canadians would include "free hemming of pants" in a list of top 10 technologies. And of course the fact that you actually care that China is better in the hemming department...boy what will the Chinese think of next!

  100. Amazing by jhuggart · · Score: 1

    I hope that it does not take the U.S. too long to catch up to China. The Metro Card in NY is pretty close to the Debit card for public transit in China, but you still have to stand in line to get the Metro Card.

    1. Re:Amazing by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I hope that it does not take the U.S. too long to catch up to China. The Metro Card in NY is pretty close to the Debit card for public transit in China

      Nope, in Shanghai it's a prox card - you can just wave to pay, and it works in taxis. Can't even use the MetroCard on MetroNorth or LIRR for some stupid reason.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  101. Don't know about you by krwren · · Score: 1

    Don't know about you, but I would reather have our freedom them a better light or cell phone coverage.

    1. Re:Don't know about you by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Well, that's true. But I don't think you have to give up freedom to get some of the things on the list. The in-store hemming of clothes to get the length just right seems like a kind of no-brainer why don't our stores do that kind of idea. It's just customer service, and doesn't require a totalitarian regime to implement it.

      Truth is, a lot of the ideas in that article are fairly cheap, and things I've wondered about before. Why *don't* traffic lights give you an indication of how much longer you have, either to go or to stop? (Well, that might be because public safety officials fear that will just encourage people to gun their engines the second the light turns green lol).

      As far as cell phone coverage, well that's a much more difficult issue. US is a very large landmass, and has, on average, fewer people per-square mile than China. Couple that with the fact that cell phone technologies are still evolving and changing all the time, it makes it very economically infeasible to get the kind of coverage that China has, right off the bat. Maybe someday, once the technology has matured to the point where major new cell phone transmission technologies aren't being implemented every few years, we might get there.

      A lot of the other ideas will probably soon be coming to the US and Canada, because they aren't incredibly expensive or difficult. If it's good customer service, and fairly cheap to implement, *some* company will probably do it sooner or later. And, if it's appreciated by consumers, pretty soon they will all do it (unless, of course, it's patented lol).

    2. Re:Don't know about you by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      Re: In store hemming...

      A Tailor is skilled labor. Some stores still offer in store tailoring but thats the kind of place where $150 shirts are the norm. I doubt you'll find a tailor for your $20 shirt at Old Navy. Most places make things simple and just offer enough sizes to cover *most* people and they send the rest to Big and Tall (or Plus Size) stores. Your average store clerk probably makes close to minimum wage and has no sewing skills whatsoever.

    3. Re:Don't know about you by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, hemming is skilled labor. But, as the article pointed out, it only takes like 2 people per shift to cover the entire store. The cost, per customer, can be reduced down to a reasonable level with enough customers, to the point where you don't have to buy a $150 shirt just to offset the cost (from the store's perspective) of having that person or 2 there hemming.

  102. this is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    get away from the cities and see how advanced China is. The Countryside is where the vast majority of the population still lives, and it isn't a technological nirvana....

  103. Jesus will save us!! by gosand · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Your point about the USA going backwards is entirely accurate, though, and this election confirmed that Americans are really not that concerned with the vested oil interest or the environment...

    Right. We are waiting for Jesus to tell Dubya how to lead the country.

    What an embarassing disgrace.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  104. Rebuttal by igny · · Score: 1

    Cellphone ubiquity rivals China.
    It could be true in big cities (5mln+), but it is not so in general. Do you people hike at all?

    Daily banking? 7/24 by machine, internet, or telephone.
    Same is true for most of western countries, Japan and China, but it can't rival with open branches on weekends. Didn't you notice the long lines?

    No free exercise machines, but planty of parks, jogging trails, and those exercise stations wit chinup bars, etc.
    So? Are you claiming that Canada or China lack parks?

    I have yet to purchase trousers that did not include any required alteration.
    Apparently you are of very common size. Have you ever shopped for a petite size? Those 0-1 size or XS or petite are for some reason long enough for a 6'2'' person.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  105. genius traffic lights? Naw.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need a "genius" traffic light. Just one that knows which side actaully has cars waiting. I hate getting stuck at a light when there is no traffic coming from the other direction.

    Would one of you uber geeks get on this problem please?

    Thanks.

  106. About this article by userw014 · · Score: 1
    Although the article clearly comes from the Globe and Mail, when I tried to find the article on that site, I was prompted for registration, etc.

    Unfortunately, the article isn't available under their free registration process, and I'm too cheap to pay for an online paper when there's so much available for free.

    Moreover, the web-posting of this article is clearly in violation of the Terms of the Globe and Mail site.

    As we trust copyright laws to preserve the freedom of open-source software and the like, so should we respect copyright when the copyright holder doesn't wish to be so open. I think this story should be closed and removed.

    1. Re:About this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So exactly what part of

      "© The Globe and Mail. Republished with permission. All Rights Reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced or republished or redistributed without the prior written consent of the copyright holder." (emphasis added)

      didn't you understand?

      Did you RTFA?

      HIBT?

  107. I got news for ya... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    The whole world is moving to an average as we globalsize. That means freer countries become more represseive an jobs go overseas. The plus side is the repressive countries become a little freer, and plenty of jobs for low-wage countries.

    Ah, well, at least their situation is improving.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  108. where are you from? by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Where are you from?

    I only hear "hocking loogies" around here... (Western NY State)

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:where are you from? by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

      I only hear "hocking loogies" around here... (Western NY State)

      If you lived on an island, I would say you're suffering from Island syndrome.

      No, "hocking loogies" isn't specific to Western NY State.

  109. no big surprise by Wansu · · Score: 1


    Nobody ought to be surprised by this. China is a first world country. The US is rapidly becoming a third world country.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:no big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the most ridiculous thing i've read in a long time. China is still one of the poorest nations on earth. A majority of the population dont have education and health care, The economy is third rate. By every measure, China is a poor developing nation. Thanks for the laugh though

  110. Yes, china is dangerous. by mowler2 · · Score: 1

    China is aware of the problems with oil + coal, and one of them being that oil leads to dependence on other countries. China also has a accelerating power requirement, so what is the solution? Burn more coal? (A side note: there are huge natural underground coal-burning going on in China, and afaik they contribute more to global warming than any non-natural coal burning in china).

    Well, currently they are starting up 2 new nuclear reactors every year and 30 new nuclear reactors are planned until 2020. They are also planning to massproduce a new kind of safer reactors - pebble bed reactors (see this article for more information about this development). The pebble bed reactor in question is designed in china, with focus on safety and cheap mass production, and can be said to be an "chinese innovation". In the article they are talking about the chinese leadership planning 300 GW of nuclear reactors until 2050, amongst others for generating hydrogen for future hydrogen powered cars. (300 GW requires more than a thousand of these 200 MW pebble bed reactors! :). (on a side note, the newly elected President of China is a former engineer).

    SO am pretty confident that china will use innovation and in the future beat us all..

  111. got some of that by tech49er · · Score: 1

    Even the Kip that I live in (Ireland) has got some of that stuff: Good cellphone coverage (well dear tho there is pay as u go), informative traffic-lights (in Dublin anyway), Parking data (Dublin again), and erm, that's about it then. DSL and anything telecom related's feckin dear though - twice the price (at least) of Northern Ireland. and groceries. And going out for a few pints. Actually feck it. Its just a kip.

    --
    "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    1. Re:got some of that by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm American. I get English English, but I'm guessing "well dear" is "very expensive". What the the feck is a kip?

    2. Re:got some of that by tech49er · · Score: 1

      A kip is something like that country you live in. I'm not just USA-bashing, went there, worked for a while, hated it, came back. Yes, I'd prefer to be in Ireland thanks very much. Less language fascists here. And oh, you're american, you dont speak english english, you speak american english - which I could speak (or type even) too should I want people to think I'm a total Amadan hoor.

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    3. Re:got some of that by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Man, I was joking. I didn't mean any offense to you. By 'english english', I meant real english. And yes, I speak that american english, what with its checks and honors and colors and shit.

    4. Re:got some of that by tech49er · · Score: 1

      Okay. Humour can get lost in the translation to text. Beware the ambiguity of inferrence. Good luck.

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
  112. Rich girl's problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah. This sounds like an article bemoaning the fact that the gap between the rich and poor isn't greater in the west. Statements about the advantages of cheep labor ignore the fact that it is easy to get people to do what you want if by cutting off their paycheck they literally starve to death. The author of the article is talking about massages and the best department store in the city! If only the rich got richer and poor got poorer I'm sure we could catch up with china in no time.
    points 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 are all easily attributed to the greater gap in wealth. She is simply getting a higher level of service because she is comparatively much wealthier in china than in Canada. As for me, I like it that things are closed on holidays and Sundays, and wish more things would be. People have no business ruining the lives of wage slaves just because they can't rent 'It's a wonderful life' the day BEFORE Christmas. sheash.

    1. Re:Rich girl's problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only the rich got richer and poor got poorer I'm sure we could catch up with china in no time.

      Well, considering who's gonna be in the White House until January of 2009, I'd say the US is going to have a pretty good go at proving you right.

  113. Re:Uhh, we don't build gulags for "incorrect thoug by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Technically correct. But we allow others to.

    Just you wait, the Bush's mandate given to him by his 3% victory, I bet you will see government support for some such "ministry".

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  114. Left out of top ten... by Leadhyena · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I seriously thought that China's well developed firewall technology would have made top ten easily.

  115. Article seems promising...is it true? by Lord_MiL · · Score: 1

    Hmm, a very interesting article. However, I've come away with two questions: 1) Where is all the money for this coming from? Socialist or not you can't just go from 3rd world to hightech overnight. 2) How wide spread are most of these technologies? There weren't any details given as to what % of the chinese population ever actually gets to see these technologies. No matter how fast China is growing there is no way that anyone can honestly believe that these technologies are widespread throughout the country. If these techs are available to as few people as some of you say then unfortunately the article is somewhat less impressive. Yes they've come up with some great ways to use tech (I'd love to have some of those traffic lights that count down, etc.) but it doesn't really indicate how China as a whole is evolving. For example, if someone were to come to America and to my university they may think that every University in America has fiber Gb to every computer on campus, 802.11g covers the whole campus and part of the city, online registration, people riding Segways, etc. When in reality we've just blown all our cash on such things rather than good professors :-)

  116. How strange! by RadRafe · · Score: 1
    Remember when you didn't have to get out of your car to get the tank filled, a nice attendant did it for you. In the better petrol stations he washed your windows and checked your oil as well. This still happened when I was a kid, and I'm only 26. I'd happily pay extra for this convenience.

    These excellent services stopped being provided in the name of cutting costs.

    You don't have full-service stations in the States? How strange! Here in Canada, there are self-serves and full-serves almost everywhere. You have a choice: the full-serves are about a couple cents per litre more expensive, but of course you get the service.

    I worked at a full-service station for two months this summer. Here's how I served people:



    Vehicle pulls up; driver rolls down window.

    RAFE: Good morning!
    CUSTOMER: Hi, twenty bucks regular please.
    RAFE: Twenty regular. How's everything under the hood?
    CUSTOMER: Just fine.
    RAFE: Okay.

    I preset pump to $20 and start it, then squeegee the windshield. If there are a lot of bug guts, I spray the windshield with a citrus solution first to loosen the guts. If there is time after the windshield, I squeegee the back window too. When the pump goes off I hang it up, then go to the customer.

    RAFE: That'll be twenty dollars.

    Customer hands me a credit card. I go into the store, hand the card to the guy at the till and tell him what pump it's from. He performs the transaction and I clip the card and receipts to the little clipboard. I go out to the vehicle. The customer signs our receipt and takes his own and the card.

    RAFE: Have a good day!

  117. Oh really? by billsf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, please note the author is Chinese. Jan, I guess is Janet, a female, very concerned with purses. I agree, China treats its visitors well. Funny, though, they asked me why I was leaving. Fortunately "work ended" is a valid reason.

    Agreed, GSM cellular is far, FAR cheaper call for call than landline. It __WONT__ give you 10Mbit/s Internet though, something to think about. GSM service in Canada is quite impressive, possibly rivaling Europe. I had continueous service between Toronto and Montreal last summer.

    Germany is quite ahead on the informative stoplights. They don't do it here (in Holland) because of the fear of drag racing.

    Transit debit cards -- YES. Even got Europe on that one! I loved the Hong Kong system with the contactloos card system. You could brush against the sensor and not even take out your wallet. We better get that in Europe soon! Canada should consider also.

    We have plenty adult playgrounds in Europe. Everybody in Europe is jealous of Canada for its great outdoors. Who needs 'adult playgrounds' when most of your country is one?

    Anti-theft devices? Europe is quite good with public safety as well as Canada. Every place has another method. I'd suggest Jan (and anybody) to stay out of the USA however.

    Wireless gizmos? Well anything you want! That's my claim to fame.

    Parking data. Universal in Europe. Also I noticed it was all over Toronto. Janet, where are you from?

    Computer seating? Even lame Windows can do that. Get real!

    Oops. "Free" hemming. Jan, didn't you say at the start that you weren't going to mention the things cheap labour brings?

    I am very happy I'm free to live in either Europe or Canada! The news is absolute DIRT in China. It is obviously not a free place. These are little things that mean alot to Europeans and Canadians!

    Why am I wasting my time with this?

    1. Re:Oh really? by sandbenders · · Score: 1

      Anti-theft devices? Europe is quite good with public safety as well as Canada. Every place has another method. I'd suggest Jan (and anybody) to stay out of the USA however.

      Ugh. I'm not all into the nationalist fervor, but this kind of comment, tossed off so casually, really rubs me the wrong way. I have spent 29 years in the US, living in a farm town for about 10 years, Chicago for another 10, and small cities for the rest. I have NEVER had any kind of physical confrontation (apart from a few schoolyard tussles when I was less than 10 years old). Never been robbed. I have never had my property stolen or defaced. I have never been mugged. Except twice in London. In the same week. It just doesn't make any sense to me when people say things like this.

      --
      Eagles may fly, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
    2. Re:Oh really? by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      The author is Canadian -- born and raised -- even though she bears a Chinese ancestral name. She is (or, at least, was) a columnist with the Globe and Mail, Canada's national newspaper and was based in Toronto, so I should think she knows a thing or two about conditions there.

      Here's an article which relates a bit about her and her weekly feature in the Globe.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    3. Re:Oh really? by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      (Whoops - I lied. She was apparently born in Vietnam. RTFA)

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    4. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I had continueous service between Toronto and Montreal last summer.
      That's supposed to be impressive? Finland has had 100% GSM coverage since approximately the last millennium. Our population density is lower than that of the USA (and quite probably lower than that of the Toronto-Montreal corridor), so don't argue. :-)

      I loved the Hong Kong system with the contactloos card system. You could brush against the sensor and not even take out your wallet. We better get that in Europe soon!
      We have that in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Works like a charm. Huge cost savings (manpower), time savings when you don't need to buy a ticket every time separately etc.

      In a nutshell, all of the things the article talks about are already pretty much reality in Europe (or at least Finland). China ought to concentrate on improving the quality of life for their people instead of trying to impress foreigners with technology they've already had for decades.

      If Americans are impressed with that technology but discouraged by the fact that China has immense political problems (not unlike USA ;-), just move to Finland.

    5. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Anti-theft devices? Europe is quite good with public safety as well as Canada. Every place has another method. I'd suggest Jan (and anybody) to stay out of the USA however.

      Look up your statistics. Theft (especially pickpocketing) is more common in Europe than the US. I know, I know, you've all been taught to believe that the US is the land of massive crime.

      Here's some statistics on per captia crime:

      1. Dominica 112.79 per 1000 people
      2. New Zealand 108.12 per 1000 people
      3. Finland 102.15 per 1000 people
      4. Denmark 93.64 per 1000 people
      5. Chile 90.00 per 1000 people
      6. United Kingdom 86.04 per 1000 people
      7. Montserrat 83.49 per 1000 people
      8. United States 81.55 per 1000 people
      9. Netherlands 80.84 per 1000 people
      10. South Africa 80.02 per 1000 people
      11. Canada 76.89 per 1000 people
      12. Germany 76.02 per 1000 people
      13. Norway 72.60 per 1000 people
      14. France 62.67 per 1000 people
      15. Seychelles 53.39 per 1000 people
      16. Hungary 44.80 per 1000 people
      17. Estonia 41.03 per 1000 people
      18. Czech Republic 38.19 per 1000 people
      19. Italy 38.03 per 1000 people
      20. Switzerland 37.02 per 1000 people

      http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/cri_tot_cri_ ca p

    6. Re:Oh really? by Epcoatl · · Score: 1

      I really do think that you're missing the point of all this. The fact that China has been able to do this in !ten to twenty! years is the real story. Almost no other country in the world has modernized this quickly, and considering China's size and intractable poverty when it came out of the 70's, all of this really is a goddamn miracle. I mean, it took the Japanese 20 years to rebuild, and that's when they had massive American aid and a skilled labor force to work with. China didn't have either; it managed to suck (or sucker) in huge amounts of foreign investment all by itself, and after the seventies when even the schools were shut down because of the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, they are starting to graduate more trained engineers than the US. I mean, let's give credit where credit is due here folks.

  118. Cell phones vs. internet access by Kid+Brother+of+St.+A · · Score: 2

    My wife and I were in China last month to adopt our daughter. We were in Beijing for three days and Guangzhou (the fifth largest city in China) for seven - so both are big cities. I was amazed at two aspects of technology in each place: * Cell phone coverage is AMAZING. We had a cell phone and no matter where we went, even if it was the bowels of the hotel we were in, we never had less than full tower coverage. There was a telecom engineer traveling with us and he commented on the sheer number of cell phone transmitters, seemingly everywhere in Guangzhou, even the desperately poverty-stricken areas. * Computer access in general, and internet connections in particular, were at best average and were usually terrible. We hunted all over Guangzhou for a decently-fast broadband connection for sending digital photos back home and the fastest we found (at Blenz Coffeehouse on Shamian Island) was about the speed of the old Earthlink dialup we had 3 years ago. And despite the number of westerners in Guangzhou who are there to process their adoption of Chinese children, internet connections are few and far between - most are in the back rooms of shady-looking tourist shops and consist of circa-1995 pentiums with lots of duct tape. Our theory was that the cell phone was the only way that the Chinese could acquire personal space; which would explain why the cell phone is really a way of life in China from what we could tell.

  119. How about this, Something CHINA doesnt have!!!!!! by hecklin · · Score: 0

    FREEDOM!

  120. Canada's Viewpoint On China... by beejay54 · · Score: 1

    aka Jan Wong. I really love her reporting style. I've written quite a few papers in school based heavily on her excellent coverage on issues within China. It is nice to see however that she's reporting a somewhat positive message on China, so much of it had been depressing in previous years. I don't think I was the only one to be shocked that Beijing is hosting the Olympics in the near future. Things seem to be slowly turning around for the better. In the words of my college bretherin, I say Giver' China!

    --

    -- Bored? Check out my Portfolio
  121. Arrogant Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Our country is so arrogant to acknowledge that we are the infant in the world and we reinvent and claim the technology that's invented by other nations all the time (90% of the scientist in the US are not born US citizen), to say that any other nation are just reinventing the technology in US is like saying Bill Gates invented GUI OS. Until we realize this and put down our ego, we will continue to slow down in advance as a nation.

  122. Re:Oh really? Really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, please note the author is Chinese.

    I think you mis-spelled "Canadian", eh?

    Rest of ranting ignored...

  123. Wow... what a tradeoff... by bokmann · · Score: 1

    Wow... the department stores hem your pants for FREE? AND they have a button at the table that summons over your waiter?

    What marvelous advances... and so worth giving up things like freedom of speech, uncensored access to the internet, political dissent. And hey... the chineese government hasn't massacred their citizens for peacefully demonstrating for something like 15 years now. Sounds like a real great place!

  124. Transportation by amightywind · · Score: 1

    They neglected to mention China's perfection of the rickshaw and the ox cart.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  125. Low-Tech/Human-Powered Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I visited Beijing and Shanghai during the period of Christmas through the New Year (not the Chinese New Year) at the time of the "first" millennium celebration, Y2K. I was absolutely shocked at the differences between ultra-modern Shanghai and the extremely polluted run down Beijing. It was like Manhatten vs. Tijuana, Mexico. An amusing thing about the article in the link: Absolutely NO ONE obeys the traffic signals anyway! This was true in Shanghai and Beijing. However, Shanghai is a place I could actually live in if I had the inclination. People in the U.S. haven't the slightest idea of what really happens outside our borders, and guess I blame our narrow view media and our government for propagating outdated views of our neighbors. There is just as much propaganda that comes out of our gov't as the Chinese gov't. But the people of China were very kind. I would recommend traveling to Asia for anyone with an open mind and a willingness to see things from a different perspective.

  126. Comparison doesn't count by bitswapper · · Score: 0, Troll

    Because it compares Canada and China. Canada's not even a real country, anyway.
    Blame Canada!

  127. Ever been there yourself? by gwait · · Score: 0

    I don't doubt there is some percentage of truth
    in what you're saying, but the image of chinese laborers cowering in their factories as the armies goose-step by does not at all match with my personal experiences last year in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzou, Souzho and Beijing.

    Western propaganda had me fully expecting a dreary third world experience in mainland China, so I was very surprised that what I saw was without exception a happy population in cities that make Vancouver look dingy and behind the times. Teens in modern clothing with cellphones hanging out at Pizza Hut and KFC, Skyscrapers going up everywhere, road rebuilding all over, shiny new European cars all over the place, and an incredible freindly population.

    The electronics engineers I met (thru the work I was doing there) were very friendly and obviously happy with the new prosperity they were experiencing.
    Now, granted I have heard that the non-coastal areas are where you'd find the real problems of poverty and environmental disasters etc. but not having seen that personally I'm not going to pretend to know how it really is, and I don't automatically trust the broadcast media to give an honest portrayal of what it's really like.

    My personal opinion is that China has realized that they can not raise their country out of poverty without shifting to a market economy, and
    they are proceeding to do just that, probably making lots of mistakes along the way that none of us would agree with.
    How do you suggest they pull 1.3 billion people from the dark ages into the modern world?

    --
    Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  128. Credit Cards by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    9/10 times I use my credit card before anyone else flames me :P Not all stations have pay at the pump, or more importantly one that works 100% of the time (I really wish they'd solve this).

  129. "Let a thousand flowers bloom," Historical Backgrd by katharsis83 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Let a thousand flowers bloom," is an interesting quote. This comment was made by Chairman Mao in the 1970's to see who really opposed his policies by letting everyine express themselves. There was a period of free speech and outpourings of democratic writings, especially on college Campuses, that was followed by brutal repression and jailings of many university students and professors when Mao felt like it had run it's course.

    "Let a thousand flowers bloom," was more or less a political tactic by Mao to exterminate his enemies in the Communist Party. Not sure what this has to do with economic policy and such.

  130. Re:Government of the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't live in the United States, do you?

  131. Re:Oh really? Really! by billsf · · Score: 1

    I think you mis-spelled "Canadian", eh?

    Looked that one up. Looks fine to me. Granted not all Canada is Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver. Where are you from, coward? Sure, there are some really 'out back' areas in Canada, but I don't have to live there.

  132. Cell phone coverage by HexRei · · Score: 1

    "You can use them in elevators, subways and parking garages."

    So, is the author claiming that China's cell technology is so awesome that it has overcome interference? Because I'm better that there are indeed elevators and parking garages, likely cased in concrete, steel, etc. wherein those cell phones indeed do not work.

    "It's a cheap, pay-as-you-go system, with no stupid monthly contracts or credit checks. The phones are so cheap -- even sidewalk cabbage vendors have them -- that China is now the biggest cellphone market in the world."

    America has pay-as-you-go cellphones. not sure if canada does, though.
    The cheapness is likely due to the fact that the conversion of american money to chinese money is something like 8:1. Of course it's cheap- manufacturing there is cheap, labor is cheap. Almost everything is cheaper there.

    "In Tianjin, a city of 13 million people, traffic lights display red or green signals in a rectangle that rhythmically shrinks down as the time remaining evaporates. In Beijing, some traffic lights offer a countdown clock for both green and red signals."

    Although this is admittedly uncommon, there are lights in america that count down the wait time as well. The only kind I have seen here are audio cues though, with a voice counting down the time.

    "Wouldn't it be great to have a single debit card for buses, subways -- and taxis? That's how it works in Shanghai. Passengers don't have to fumble for exact change on buses and subways, or line up to buy tokens or tickets. Taxi drivers don't have to make change, or get ripped off by counterfeit bills, a real plague in China. And they aren't loaded down with cash, which would make them tempting targets for robbery.

    (In another transit plus, forget those illegible handwritten taxi receipts we get in Canada. China's taxis automatically print out receipts with date, mileage, taxi medallion number, even the start and end times of the ride. That certainly would help you recover the Stradivarius you inadvertently left in the back seat.)"

    Nice idea. Much easier to implement when you have a totalitarian capitalist/communist (it's gonna stuck halfway right now, with gov't still very communist but the people engaging in rampant capitalism) government.

    "Adult playgrounds"

    Once again, much easier to implement in a totalitarian system. Just tell the people you're installing them, and then make them pay for it.

    "Anti-theft slipcovers"

    WHOA! CHINA REALLY IS SUPERIOR TO US FOOLISH AMERICANS!
    But seriously... how did this make the list?

    " Daily banking"

    I'd love to see this happen in the US. Once again, much easier to do when the gov't can force banks to do it.

    "Wireless service bells"

    Having trouble getting enthused about this. Might be convenient, I suppose.

    The rest aren't even worth commenting on for me.
    The crux of the matter seems to be that a lot of these depend on the gov't being able to organize all the different service providers into doing the same thing, and that's a product of the huge amount of power their gov't has over the everyday lives of their citizens.

    But is it worth the tradeoff, when, for example, they have to obtain the government's permission to move to a new area of the country, and their government actively filters everyone's internet connections?

  133. lesson of Japan's stagnation by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the 1960s and 1970s Japan was growing leaps and bounds from a completely destroyed country at the end of the world war to nearly the level of US economy. The label "Made in Japan" changed from a denigration to a status symbol. But Japan was unable to go past the US economy. Perhaps capitalism can only so far at a given time. Or else Japan's local characteristics of capitalism- more cronyism, more conglomeration, face-saving hiding of problems, etc.- keeps it at its level.

    It will be interesting to see if China also stagnates when it approaches the US per-capita level, or can exceed the US. China may have its own intrinsic issues. But China will rapidly close gap. And will be an interesting sight to watch.

    1. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by MetalShard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Japan's economy stagnated because they don't have a large enough workforce and enough natural resources to sustain the growth rate. China has neither of these problems.

    2. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually Japan collapsed for another reason.

      Though part of it is what you are talking about.

      Their research isn't progressing where it needs to yet. Their country devoted itself singlemindedly to the war, then to industrial and economic growth, now they feel they are better than everyone else so they are essentially wanking.

      If you go for a haircut there will be 6 haircutters, people sweep the streets in business suits. Basically their entire economy went from manufacturing to service in a generation.

      Service economies are total bullshit, guess what YOU CAN DO IT YOURSELF!

      The U.S. went from a manufacturing economy in the 50's to a pure greed mentality in the 80's to a purely consumer driven society in the 90's. It's amazing how changes like this can sweep a whole nation.

      Unfortunatly all these trends are negative, it's just the ignorant bouncing around. The people really gettting work done just say, hey there's this thing, might be worth doing, let's do it.

    3. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by vakuona · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The one thing I like about Japan's stagnation is that there is no poverty there. It is amazing that in a country as rich as the USA, 12% of the people there live in poverty. Guess what, that is the same as in China.

      In USA when the economy suffers, it is mostly the poor on whom it is taken out on. They lose insurance, they lose their jobs and so on. In Japan, they stop growing but guess what, they are not really sweating it. They value different things. Americans value riches and expensive cars. The Japanese actually do get by with Toyotas. Witness how the Lexus brand ws only recently introduced in Japan after being in USA and Europe for the past 20 odd years. And it is owned wholly by a Japanese company. Because the Japanese do not have such big brand mentality, they will be buy a Toyota for the equivalent of $80,000. Americans will have none of that.

      USAs GPD per Capita is inflated by the very rich. Japan has one of the smallest, if not the smallest Gini coefficients in the world. There is much more even wealth distribution than in USA. The USA is a country full of individuals, but Japan is more of a community.

      In many ways Japan is far ahead of the USA. They still produce higher quality goods than USA and indeed just about every other country.

    4. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      It is amazing that in a country as rich as the USA, 12% of the people there live in poverty. Guess what, that is the same as in China

      Yeah ... except being poor in China means you farm rice for 12 hours a day. Being poor in the US means you can't afford a paint-job for your car and you sometimes have to decide between booze and smokes, or protein for your kids.

    5. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America used to be capable of this hard work.
      America used to be afraid of having nothing.
      Just look at the working conditions at Hoover dam when it was built. People died to build this thing. People drove trucks backwards with standing on their seat, shoe off one foot, their toes on the steering wheel so they could look behind them. When someone fell hundreds of feet to their death and people gathered around in shock, a supervisor chided them BACK TO WORK.
      Could this be done today? Yes. Will it ever be matched in America? Will we need another depression to realize the gift of a hard days work?
      I've seen my parents and my peers tell me politics does not matter because there's no choice about who is on the ballot. Do they try to do anything about it? No. Why? Well they think we are somehow immune to what caused the great depression in the first place. We're in the year 2000 after all... how could we have a depression? We're always moving foreword not backwards.
      While I was once on food stamps and state sponsored medical insurance, I am now a productive business person. I appreciate what it is like to have nothing. I am willing to work my ass off to gain something. I know I could end up there once again.
      How many Americans can say this? How many Americans do nothing... nothing productive... and continue to be protected by money and privilege?
      America still does not get it. I have worked 14 hour days for the past 12 years, I am unable to afford a home in my middle-class home town. I work for local government. I realize saving money is my job. Can I ask for a raise if I save the city a million dollars? No. Do I think I should get a raise? No.
      I can't help but think, if this were in the middle of the great depression 1930s, and I was able to work my tail off and save large amounts of money, I would be appreciated more than I am today in modern day America 2004.
      How many baby boomer jaded employees do you see that are ready for retirement that are just "biding their time" and not interested in working hard during their final months of employment? Would this happen in the 1930s? Would this happen in China?
      American rhetoric pundits spouting the wonderful word "Freedom" rarely realize this includes the freedom to fail.
      Those that do not study history are doomed to repeat it. America has not been studying. Their public schools have lost the ability to discipline their pupils, (a good thing) but they failed to replace this control (a bad thing.) What are we left with? Government funded daycare.
      I heard from a reliable source, American Education is the largest industry in the world. I believe it is possible that more money goes into this industry than anything. Teachers get paid, but to do what? Everything is negotiable at every school in the united states except for one universal thing: Taking Attendance. Schools can fail at everything else, including failing to teach a student to read, and graduating them from high school, and they still get paid. If they fail to take attendance... they don't get paid. It should be called daycare.
      America is home to Hollywood but we don't see the power of entertaining education. Is physics fun? If you have a talented instructor. Those who can't do teach. Can you imagine Stephen Spielberg teaching? Not enough money. Instead every American knows "ET Phone Home" but not necessarily how to read.
      What will the future hold for America? Will people talk about America's ego and America's spoiled child attitude? Will America do the math about the amount of people who died in the WTC in NYC vs. the amount of civilian people who died in the Iraq invasion?
      Will America remember the richest people in America are no smarter, and no more important than the poorest people in China?
      Will America remember their own history?
      By God, I sure hope so, but I can't honestly say "yes."
      If I could, I would not be working for local government. I would be making real money.

    6. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      China isn't bound by capitalism or democracy the way the U.S. and Japan were.

      I think making assumptions about a parrelel problem are premature.

    7. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Japan collapsed...blah...blah...blah...

      Hmmm...he's smart. He makes things go.

      blah...blah...blah...

      He can make us smart.

    8. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Japan collapsed for another reason.

      Though part of it is what you are talking about.

      Their research isn't progressing where it needs to yet. Their country devoted itself singlemindedly to the war, then to industrial and economic growth, now they feel they are better than everyone else so they are essentially wanking.

      If you go for a haircut there will be 6 haircutters, people sweep the streets in business suits. Basically their entire economy went from manufacturing to service in a generation.

      Service economies are total bullshit, guess what YOU CAN DO IT YOURSELF!

      The U.S. went from a manufacturing economy in the 50's to a pure greed mentality in the 80's to a purely consumer driven society in the 90's. It's amazing how changes like this can sweep a whole nation.

      Unfortunatly all these trends are negative, it's just the ignorant bouncing around. The people really gettting work done just say, hey there's this thing, might be worth doing, let's do it.


      You Sir, understand neither economics nor society.

    9. Re:lesson of Japan's stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one thing I like about Japan's stagnation is that there is no poverty there. It is amazing that in a country as rich as the USA, 12% of the people there live in poverty. Guess what, that is the same as in China.

      In USA when the economy suffers, it is mostly the poor on whom it is taken out on. They lose insurance, they lose their jobs and so on. In Japan, they stop growing but guess what, they are not really sweating it. They value different things. Americans value riches and expensive cars. The Japanese actually do get by with Toyotas. Witness how the Lexus brand ws only recently introduced in Japan after being in USA and Europe for the past 20 odd years. And it is owned wholly by a Japanese company. Because the Japanese do not have such big brand mentality, they will be buy a Toyota for the equivalent of $80,000. Americans will have none of that.

      USAs GPD per Capita is inflated by the very rich. Japan has one of the smallest, if not the smallest Gini coefficients in the world. There is much more even wealth distribution than in USA. The USA is a country full of individuals, but Japan is more of a community.

      In many ways Japan is far ahead of the USA. They still produce higher quality goods than USA and indeed just about every other country.


      --

      I have been to Japan recently, and I must say I wholeheartedly agree with you: In many ways Japan is far ahead of the USA. And I think perhaps precisely because they value different things.

  134. Stop Lights with Timers by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

    I come from Ahmedabad, India and we had that since last 7 years.

  135. Convenience vs Profit by code+addict · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a major issue that arises in Capitalist countries is that profit is the main (only?) motivator for most technologies. In other words, if it isn't going to sell more copies, or reap more profit it's not worth doing. Many of the items mentioned in the article would have existed long ago in other countries had it been profitable to do so. Unfortunately, modern capitalism seems to trend towards maximizes proft, and minimizing cost (for both the businesses and consumers). This means that most people will suffer incoveniences to benefit from lower prices.

    Supermarkets and other retail outlets are perfect examples of this. It's the classic service vs. price.

    Even the stop lights in the article are an example of this. Most citizens would rather have dumb traffic lights and lower taxes than smart ones and higher taxes. Unfortunately this leads to a lifestyle that is filled with minor incoveniences.

    A sad indicator of this is how surprised we are when someone gives us good service without charging us an extra fee.

    1. Re:Convenience vs Profit by js7a · · Score: 1

      When I was in Beijing, about half of the stoplights were just turned off, not being used

  136. Ya, they got technology all right... by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

    1. Dr Martin Cooper, Motorola, Cell phone inventor (United States) 2. Isaac M. Singer, inventor of sewing machine (United States) 3. Garret Morgan, Stoplight inventor (United States) 4. Don Wetzel, inventor of debit card. (United States) 5. First internet bank (no need to go to bank) (United States) 6. Arthur Jones, inventor of commercial exercise machine (United States) 7. The Lumiere brothers, inventors of the cinema and film. (France) 8. Henry Ford, inventor of mass produced car. (United States) Ok, they have us on the slip cover thing....

  137. Out of those 10 things, only two have a good case for your point: Free hemming and daily banking. The rest don't really have anything to do with cheap labour.

    1. Re:No. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      The rest don't really have anything to do with cheap labour.

      Oh, really? Who is going to replace every traffic light with ones like those described? Who will set up more cell towers, even in rural areas? Who is going to build all those "adult playgrounds" spoken of? How many bank tellers are you going to hire to keep banks open longer hours -- even on holidays? Who is going to install all the roadside billboards showing available parking and the underlying systems to keep track of that information, and the people to maintain them, and count cars?

      A LOT of that stuff can happen when you've got a HUGE labor force available that works for peanuts.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    2. Re:No. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Unless you want to get really techical and bring in facts and figures and give details of each of these infrastructures and companies, then what you are saying makes no sence.

      Don't people in America have to build and maintain traffic lights, cellphone towers. Don't they have billboards and signs over there? Build gyms? Don't some Americans also work on holidays?

      How do these things get build in other countries? Are you saying that all countries than have these technologies are under state communism or something?

      Please put down the crack pipe.

    3. Re:No. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      "Crack pipe"? Why do you have to be such an ass about it?

      Most of what China is building is new. It's easy to put in new technology where none already existed. OTOH, it is expensive to replace millions of existing systems with new ones. Sure, some countries might spend the money to do this. And we might spend the money to do this when it's feasible. Usually, however, it isn't.

      The author of the article tried to argue that cheap labor didn't account for the existence of all the new technology. All I'm saying is that, comparatively speaking, it's way cheaper to do all of this in China precisely because of cheap labor.

      I think what I'm saying makes plenty of sense. It's simple economics.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
  138. could kick a little US ass without blinking an eye by dpilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget that.

    To end the Cold War, the US didn't duke it out with the USSR using weapons - we spent them into the ground. Even at that, with the deficits involved, we darned near spent ourselves into the ground, at the same time.

    Right now China is heavily dependent on exporting the US, and it's helping to fuel their growth. I would expect that within 10-20 years their own economy and consumer base will be sufficiently developed that they won't need us, any more. I've already heard (unsubstantiated) that China could absorb *every* job in the US, and still have unemployment.

    IMHO, by the year 2050, China will be able to spend the US into the ground, just like we did in the 1980's with the USSR.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  139. and we have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    abu-gharaib.
    We even export our human rights violations.

    1. Re:and we have... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You moron... that happens with every country whenver there is a war. There are obviously going to be some small groups of soliders who would like to get back at the cowards also known as terrorists, despite that it goes against orders. The terrorists are running around capturing innocent people and beheading them, how ridiculous is that? The people that were abused (although some may not have been guilty, many were shown to be involved) deserved every ounce of it. They should have gotten treated worse. Anyway... practices like this are nothing new, in fact what happened here is much better. In previous wars, it was typically a symbol of honor to cut off some part of an enemy that you killed or tortured and wear it or keep it like a trophy. And both sides routinely did that.
      Regards,
      Steve

    2. Re:and we have... by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1
      In previous wars, it was typically a symbol of honor to cut off some part of an enemy that you killed or tortured and wear it or keep it like a trophy.

      I always wondered why my Dad kept that pickled Nazi penis! Thanks for clearing that mystery up for me...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    3. Re:and we have... by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a silly thing to say.

      Abu-gharaib was a travesty that is ending with the guilty being brought to justice...well, at least some of them. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that all the criminals have been captured. But as least the rats are scurrying for cover.

      The human rights violations in China result in public acclomation and promotions.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    4. Re:and we have... by digital+photo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That goes right up there with the Vietnam vets coming back with ears strung on a rope?

      Being guilty of a crime is no excuse for inhumane acts against another person. NO ONE DESERVES ABUSE. Your argument is similar to that of husbands who batter their housewives. "Because they deserved it." or worse yet, the rhetoric of the world wars of "They are the cause of our problems.", "These are the unclean peoples within our communities".

      In the eyes of every nation and people who committed attrocities on another group of people, the excuse has always been "they deserved it".

      That is utter nonsense.

      According to the Nazis, the Jews had it coming and they deserved it.

      According to the Military of the Japanese, Pearl Harbor had it coming to them. They deserved it.

      To the American people who sent the Japanese Americans to concentration camps, they deserved it. Same for the American Indians. They had it coming. Don't forget the African Americans who got lynched, they sure had it coming to them.

      How dated does that excuse sound? How immoral and wrong does it appear to you?

      A war is no excuse for abusing another human being. Fear is no excuse for abusing another human being. Boredom is no excuse. Self doubt is no excuse. Hatred is no excuse.

      Small group or nationwide, the fact that these things happened in the past does not make them right. NO ONE DESERVES TO BE ABUSED.

      There is no honour in cutting off the body part of a person and keeping it with your person. There may have been a sick psychological issue at work thanks to trauma, but there is certainly no honour in it.

      To say that it has happened, is happening, and will likely continue to happen and that it is okay is to say that it is right and that you agree with it. That it's okay with you. That put in a similar situation, you would probably not mind doing it to another person or having it done to you.

      That still does not make it right, honourable, or condonable.

    5. Re:and we have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it seems to me that human rights violations in the US result in re-election...

  140. The Fattening before the Slaughter by adam31 · · Score: 1
    But that's missing the point. The president had to convince 50% of the people that he's actually on their side. To some extent he has to make decisions that can at least be spun to be 'for the people'.

    China has no such nuisance for their leaders. They can make decisions totally independent of the happiness or the will of the people. They can keep their people disproportionately poor by keeping their currency down, and eat off the fat of America.

    So China can plan for the best long-term strategies while America has to make the most people happy in the short term. America just has to promise that the long-term will be fine...
    Oh, yeah, Social Security? It'll be fine.
    Jobs'll come back!
    The federal deficit will heal itself!
    The trade deficit? Who cares!
    Our currency is propped up by $1.8 billion foreign investment every day? Well, why should they ever stop!
    Our federally-insured pension programs are doomed to spectacular collapse? Shhhhh!
    Oil production will peak in the next decade? I said SHHHHH!
    And natural gas-- SHUT UP!

  141. hemming.. by doowy · · Score: 1

    This author is a wee-bit off of his rocker. I'm in Canada, and I'm not sure how hemming is handled in his neck of the woods (Toronto I presume), but whereever I've lived in Canada sounds fairly close to China's hemming system.

    I can't think of a department store in my home city that doesn't offer hemming services.. when in the fitting rooms, I'll inquire about having the pants hemmed, she'll pin/mark them and although I can't recall anything as speedy as 3 minutes, I can usually pick them up in-a-bit (let's suppose 20 or so minutes).

    20 minutes isn't so inconvenient.. I can continue shopping during that time.

    Also, most malls in my area have hemming shops so when you buy clothes at any of the stores in the mall, they can be brought there for alterations. Some stores reimburse you, but most don't - it's only a few bucks at these little hemming shops in the malls and usually a similar 20min or so wait (depending on how busy they are of course).

    Also, offering in-store hemming has nothing to do with technology. It's just a choice of the store - do they need to offer that level of SERVICE (or want to)? There is a cost to offering such a service, and if it gives them no competitive edge, why bother.

    This isn't like there's no stores in Canada doing this (see above), it's not a question of technology at all.

    --
    ..mork
  142. Hong Kong is far ahead here. by fussili · · Score: 1

    Come on guys!

    1) Cellphones

    Hong Kong had a massive Cellphone penetration when they were still bricks. Late 80's, Early 90's Hong Kongers either had a cellphone or were busy making fun of someone who did.

    2) Informative Stop Lights

    Ok we've only had these a few years in Hong Kong. For Prior art see Los Angeles 3rd Street Promenade.

    3) Transit Debit Cards

    Boo yah, we've had these for years now, ours are called "Octopus" and they're far more than just transit debit cards. You can buy your groceries, a Starbucks latte, pay for your taxi fares, buy from 7-11 and Circle-k with them and that's just the tip of the iceberg. In fact just about anywhere where there's a transaction for less than $400 HK Dollars you'll find an Octopus Card reader.

    4) Adult Playgrounds

    Ok we don't have these. I don't consider it a substantial loss as compared to a right to vote or freedom of speech.

    5) Anti-Theft Slipcovers

    See. I prefer "being able to go to a restaurant without substantial fear that your wallet or purse will be stolen" as a solution.

    6) Daily Banking

    Just about the only time anything in Hong Kong is closed is over Chinese New Year.

    7) Wireless Service Bells

    Call me old fashioned but these seem rather impersonal and tacky. I wouldn't want to go to a restaurant where I pushed a button to call a waiter - it's just a step up from slotting in your coin at the automat.

    8) Parking Data

    Got it, we can pay for all our carparks using our Octopus cards too.

    9) Computer seating maps

    Got them and we can choose our seats when we book online for the theatre and cinema.

    10) Cheap Hemming

    Ok, first of all that has about as much to do with Technology as the PRC has to do with the term "electoral mandate". Second of all Hong Kong has for years been the domain of cheap tailors, cobblers and just about any other trade you can carry out from a small store or a market stall.

    I don't care if I can get it done in a department store or not. Have you been in a Chinese department store? It's like Triple Blue Cross Closing down sales in there every day!

    In conclusion:

    1) Hong Kong rules all and if Canada can't compete with China then it doth verily suck.

    2) Life in china is great if you're an elite party member or a successful entrepreneur. For everyone else it's pretty appalling. No number of slip on umbrella covers (also something that Hong Kong has had for years) is going to make up for a meagre salary, a total lack of electoral power and the prospect of a forced labour camp as payment for dissent. Try finding most of the things on that list in Nanking.

    Oh yeah and that Maglev train HAHAHAH! I'm glad you guys in Canada don't have it, it's an ATROCIOUS waste of public money that is hardly used and will never break into profit.

  143. Superior? Maybe compared to Canada... by fupeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Miss Wong is clearly comparing China to Canada. Her article failed to impress me with China, just made me glad I'm in Silicon Valley, not in Canada. Let's take a look at her list :
    1. Cellphones
    My cellphone works in elevators, subways, and parking garages too. The no cell phones in hospitals is a safety issue, not an issue of technology. And doctors here break the rule all the time, too. The docotor who delivered my son got a call from his wife (she was going to Taco Bell and wanted to know if he wanted anything) right in the middle of delivery.
    2. Informative stop lights
    As others have alrady pointed out, this is not the safest thing to do for cars. Most crosswalks where I live do the same thing, except they actually count down the number of seconds (how novel.)
    3. Transit debit cards
    This is a trivial (though very convenient) "innovation." It's really a product of government. When you have a centralized government that controls everything, you can standardize everything. When you have more freedoms, then different municipalities will do things differently.
    4. Adult playgrounds
    This is just another product of socialization, and has nothing to do with technologies.
    5. Anti-theft slipcovers
    A useful innovation when you have problems with crime.
    6. Daily banking
    My bank is open six days a week. If people demanded it be open seven, it would be open seven so that it could do more business and make more money. This has nothing to do with technology, and is simply an example of free people choosing how businesses operate via a free market vs. a government mandating how businesses operate.
    7. Wireless service bells
    This has little to do with technology and is much more a cultural issues. This would NOT be desirable at most upscale resteraunts in the west, where good service is expected and rewarded. Now it might be desireable at low-end resteraunts, but in the west, you get what you pay for.
    8. Parking data
    This is interesting. Do you really need to know how many empty spots there are? Isn't it really just a boolean, i.e. there is at least one empty spot or there are no empty spots? Any paid parking lot is going to keep track of this, and is also going to advertise so that you can find it. So I guess this is talking about free lots. Again it's a function of a free market vs. socialism.
    9. Computer seating maps
    When I buy tickets to a SF Giants game, I have this exact kind of technology. I don't have this for movies, but movie theaters here are not assigned seating.
    10. Free hemming
    Again, not technology, but cultural.

    1. Re:Superior? Maybe compared to Canada... by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Now, I spent a large amount of my life in Silicon Valley and now live in Shanghai. I will admit that Jan Wong is being selective in her praise; she talks about a lot of good stuff and ignores the bad (and there's a lot of bad).

      But I hate to tell you this, pretty much everything she said really is better here. Since I lived in Palo Alto for 15 years, I think I should be pretty qualified to make the comparison.

      You seem to discount a lot of the ways that China is better by simply saying "That's a function of Free Market vs. Socialism". This tells me two things: one, you aren't aware of how extremely the free market influences things here (hint, in a place like Shanghai it's comparable to the US) and two, you seem to assume that "Free Market > Socialism, therefore if a benefit is derived from a Socialist system, it must be inferior to the one derived from the Free Market system, even if that is demonstratably false."

      Let's take your transit debit card thing. Now, ignoring for a moment that public transportation is publicly subsidized in Silicon Valley, and thus not substantially different from the Chinese case (except that I can't use my Bus Flash Pass on Caltrain, or vice versa), having a "transit card" is demonstratably more convenient than not having one.

      Now, to refute your socialism comment, consider: we have social public transportation in the US (with the admitted exception of taxis, but then those companies are private in China too, surprise, surprise) and yet we have no public transport cards, though it would be easy to do and convenient to boot (at least, there are none in Silicon Valley, but I can't speak for the rest of the US). Furthermore, Hong Kong, which is not socialist by any stretch of the imagination (it is, essentially, a purely libertarian city-state, or was) has transit debit cards (the octopus card).

      And your comment about "good service" in the states is just laughable. As any non-American who has been to the states (or any American who has spent much time abroad) will tell you, it is simply amazing what low standards of service Americans put up with (with the notable exception of extremely upscale places, where you pay through the nose for the privilege.)

      In China, the smallest restaurant's waiters are polite, attentive (some Americans find them too attentive, but that's cultural) and don't expect to be tipped. Contrast that to the average American diner, where the waitress spills your coffee and gives you some napkins to clean it up yourself, doesn't appologize, and expects a tip no matter what (yeah, I know everyone says, if the service is bad, don't tip, but most people tip no matter what -- it's even included in the price in some restaurants -- and so theirs no actual negative feedback, it's just imagined).

      And your cellphone coverage comment is just laughable. I mean, REALLY. I have never, ever had my cellphone cut out here, and I've been out in the boondocks. It works absolutely everywhere I go.

      I mean, comparing the US to China in this respect is folly and you only look like an idiot when you do it.

      Seriously, go to China. Or shut up, take your pick.

    2. Re:Superior? Maybe compared to Canada... by fupeg · · Score: 1
      you seem to assume that "Free Market > Socialism, therefore if a benefit is derived from a Socialist system, it must be inferior to the one derived from the Free Market system, even if that is demonstratably false.
      Quite to the contrary. I (unlike you and the article's author) am not passing judgement, merely stating the reason for the difference. I am not saying one way is better than the other, just explaining the reason for the difference since the reason is NOT (purely) a function of techniological advancement.
      Now, to refute your socialism comment, consider: we have social public transportation in the US (with the admitted exception of taxis, but then those companies are private in China too, surprise, surprise) and yet we have no public transport cards, though it would be easy to do and convenient to boot (at least, there are none in Silicon Valley, but I can't speak for the rest of the US)
      Here you show your ignorace of history and economic theory. The reason your flash pass does not work on Caltrain is because Caltrain and your bus are not run by the same organization. We have a history in America of giving power and control to local government, not ruling with a central government. So the state of California provides Caltrain, but not your bus. That is provided by your county (either San Mateo or Santa Clara depending on where you live.) Of course a place like Hong Kong would have a unified system since it is a single municipality. And of course China would have a unified system, because everything is run by a central government.
    3. Re:Superior? Maybe compared to Canada... by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      6. Daily banking My bank is open six days a week. If people demanded it be open seven, it would be open seven so that it could do more business and make more money. This has nothing to do with technology, and is simply an example of free people choosing how businesses operate via a free market vs. a government mandating how businesses operate.

      Perhaps you should come to Australia and see how our banks operate in a free market. Our banks (not just one or two of them, I'm talking about all of them) open 10am-4pm, Monday through Friday. Need to do banking after hours or on a weekend? Too bad, use net or phone banking. Fine for a geek like me, but for old people, or those who don't have internet access?

      Not to mention the fees. Our ATM network is centralised, your card will work in pretty much any ATM. However, most banks will charge you $1.50 AUD for the convenience of using another bank's ATM. That's every time you withdraw money, whether from an ATM or an EFTPOS terminal.

      Want to get a bank cheque? $15 service fee.
      Want to open an account? $10 account opening fee.
      Want to close an account? $25 account closing fee.
      Want to have the "privilege" of having a bank account? $5 per month "account keeping" fee.

      Banking in Australia sucks, because the goverment refuses to do anything about it. My point is that you shouldn't assume corporations (especially banks) will do whatever the people demand. They'll do whatever fits their best interest and your worst interest, while telling you you're getting a great deal and if you don't like it, keep your money in a shoebox under the bed.

      /rant

  144. Lets mention what they forgot about China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just note I have nothing against chinese people.

    1. Greatest abuser of human rights anywhere

    2. Greatest polluter anywhere

    3. Oppressive government

    4. Features the most inefficient use of resources and human labour

    5. Is home to some of the most poorly made products ever, some are good but most are horribly made

    6. Most unbalanced economy in the world, some are very wealthy others extremely poor

    7. Hell bent on destroying Taiwan

    China has a great history and is a beautiful place, but if we wish to keep it that way we must stop the government. The western world needs to say no to these abuses. Trade agreements need to specify environmental standards, human rights standards, it is time for not only free trade but fair trade. Let the markets do their work but only after a set of rules for the game is established.

  145. High heels or Flats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that is a new one for me, when i purchase a pair of pants i already have my wingtips on, getting asked if i'll be wearing high heels or flats, would be odd wouldn't it?

    xie xie

  146. Equal-punishment lights by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    When I lived in Houston, there was an area that had what I call "Equal Punishment Lights." You'd be approaching the light, and as you near it, it goes from green to yellow to red. There'd be no traffic on the cross street. You'd sit and wait and wait, and then you'd see a car approach the intersection. The light goes yellow, then red for him, he stops, and I get the green.

    It takes talent to time the lights that well.

    --Joe
  147. Outsider's point of view by ion_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An alien reading TFA would probably find this quote amusing and/or pathetic: (emphasis mine)

    First they invent gunpowder and a few other essentials of modern civilization.

  148. You're simply ignorant by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "Also, I don't see China being much of a leader in alternative fuels"

    http://www.thunder-sky.com/en/index.htm

    An innovative technology and an order of magnitude cheaper lithium ion batteries than you're likely to be able to get your hands on.

    --
    Deleted
  149. Would it be stupid of me.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To list the things that you find in the U.S. v. China, or in Europe v. China, that I find superior in U.S., or Europe, or Japan, or wherever?

    But those are First World countries! They should be superior in EVERY WAY!

    Nonsense. This First World/Third World delineation is extremely rough, at best.

    China is a rapidly developing country. While there are factors which still relegate it status to 'third' world, they have come a long way, and will make it to first world soon.

    The thing is, you don't always get optimum deployment of technology in a wealthier society, and this has little to do with the economic system (Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, Anythingism).

    In a nutshell: The economic system determines who has the power to allocate wealth/resources.

    Then, this decision maker decides how much of societies resources should be spent on what developments.

    If 'smart' stoplights are not a high priority, even if 'dumb' ones are an annoyance, you won't get them, period. Even in Utopia.

    In China, government decision makers simply implemenent whatever policy they feel is appropriate.

    In the U.S., popular demand determines the allocation of wealth and resources. Don't think that I am naive enough to not realize that large companies&governments are capable of influencing this demand. Still, by deciding how much you are willing to pay for a certain service, or expressing your political preference by voting, you contribute to averaged indicators that establish this allocation.

    In the U.S., people are willing to spend less of the adjusted per capita wealth on cell phones than are people living in Europe, or Japan.

    As such, our cell service is crappier. Sure, there are geeks like you (slashdot reader) & me who want better service. But the Jane Doe's of the U.S. bring the average down.

    The same thing probably happens with regards to Jane Doe's preferences. I might not be interested in what she wants, and as such, I bring the average allocation down with regards to her preferences.

    You see clear, similar trends with regards to broadband service. Price is simply more important that quality of service/performance, and as such, as a society we allocate less towards our Broadband, and we have crappier service.

    Now that you are conceptualizing resource allocation as I have described, the effects of government become clearer.

    In much of the rest of the world, governments have 'kickstarted' demand by providing for an initial investments in broadband, cell service, and other 'public' goods.

    You get better service, but the costs involved in the government 'kickstarting' necessairly come from somewhere else.

    This government influence necessairly introduces economic inefficeny.

    Not that that is always bad, mind you. I certainly accept that economic inefficency is necessary such that our resource allocation is not totally mindless/mob oriented.

    But we need to consider that it is a spectrum. Somewhere between total government control of everything economic allocation, and total free market laissez faire absurditiy, is the world where I want to live.

    Wow. This has been rather long winded. In sum, and in short, all I'm really trying to say is that a certain country not having, or having, various technology improvements does not mean that country is doing worse, or better, than other nations. Specific aspects of resource allocation are not a good way to summarize notions of wealth.

    They are more important indicators. Not that the U.S. is doing particularly well in these other indicators. But we aren't doing so badly, and I feel that discussions of these indicators are far more important that discussions of anti-theft slip covers, or smart traffic lights.

    Just my 20000000 cents.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:Would it be stupid of me.... by X_Bones · · Score: 2, Funny

      you know, it's ok if your paragraphs are more than two sentences long. Really. People do it all the time.

    2. Re:Would it be stupid of me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a rapidly developing country. While there are factors which still relegate it status to 'third' world, they have come a long way, and will make it to first world soon.

      No, it won't. Their new economy is utterly reliant on: a) unsustainable American spending, and b) a huge investment bubble.

      China's economy is going to crash hard. Their fundamentals of political organization, civic spirit, and business culture are still bad. Their current success is based on foreign capital, foreign management, and incredibly cheap labor. Essentially, it's Slave Pen 1 for the transnationals.

      Eventually, China's creaky old communist dictatorship is going to get cocky, decide they've sucked up enough foreign investment, and nationalize all foreign property in China. Then they'll piss it away as communists always do. ...and that's assuming the inevitable crash doesn't come first.

    3. Re:Would it be stupid of me.... by Jacques+Chester · · Score: 1

      According to the old "three worlds" typology, China is in fact part of the Second World, being a (nominally) Communist state. As soon as they ditch that, they'll graduate to First World.

      --

      Classical Liberalism: All your base are belong to you.

    4. Re:Would it be stupid of me.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but nobody bothers with the Second World anymore.

      China, IIRC, was third world, and did not graduate to the second world when the nationalist lost power.

      Too backwards.

      At least, most of the literature I've read lately refers to them as such. I'd be happy to call them Second World, except that I really think that the typology is a bit silly, and although there are significant poor populations in China, the country is developing rapidly, regardless of whether or not that is sustainable.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  150. Re:Government of the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "end times theocracy"? nice, its that attitude that lost you the election.

  151. Eye for an Eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I say that we start raising kids in religious schools, teaching them only enough to carry a bomb into a resturant or a school filled with children. Start kidnapping truck drivers and tourists, and slit their necks on the 6 pm news. (think of the ratings!)

    1. Re:Eye for an Eye by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1
      I say that we start raising kids in religious schools, teaching them only enough to carry a bomb into a resturant or a school filled with children. Start kidnapping truck drivers and tourists, and slit their necks on the 6 pm news. (think of the ratings!)

      Well I suppose that it would be cheaper than spending billions of dollars to bomb the crap out of them with fire-and-forget smart bombs.

  152. Artificially depressed exchange rate by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The exchange rate is set by the govt in China. They only appear not to have money. It's set to flood business into the country, and out of the rest of the world. Just you wait till it's allowed to float on the market...

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Artificially depressed exchange rate by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I was talking about buying on credit the way American consumers do.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  153. What goes around comes around by Squashee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is entirely your own fault. USA have screwed over a lot of nations and making life har in others. One year you help and arm the muslims, the other one you withdraw your support and watch them die. Just look at the whichunt for communism. You can do whatever you want in your country, but that wasn't enough. You simply felt the urge to stop the spread of an ideology that didn't suit you, and did this by killing countless people around the world. This also happened in countries where the ideologies worked and people actually had chosen them. You supported the murderous contras, red khemers and other death squads around the world. When you inflict so much suffering, is it so strange that people strike back? Currently USA tries to enforce the acceptance of genetically manipulated food in the EU. The majority don't want your gm crops, but you simply cannot accept that, so you force the issue. And no, we cannot make the consumer choise of not bying it, because one of the things the US trade oppose is the special labeling of gm foodstuff. To top this of you go and kill a couple of hundred thousand innocent civilians in Irak and support the state-terrorism currently occuring in Israel. Get a fucking clue: what goes around comes around. I as everybody else am apalled by what the terrorist do, but i am also apalled of the actions the US takes and has taken historically. You need to se the coneqences of your own actions. By electing Bush and continuing with the current policies you only make matters worse. This is not something you can solve with brute force, you need some brains.

    --
    When in doubt, act determined. Business 101
    1. Re:What goes around comes around by PitaBred · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Get a clue" from the guy who can't spell "labelling" or "Iraq". You're just taken by the rhetoric.
      And FYI, when someone lies to you repeatedly, you eventually stop caring what they say. Brute force is sometimes the only language people understand. And forcing GM food to be accepted in the EU? Hah. Right. Don't buy it then. Oh, you guys can't grow your own? It sounds like you're trying to force the USA to do something that you want, by making us grow non-GM food, when it's more economical for us to grow the modified beans. Huh. It's funny when you look at BOTH sides of the argument, eh?
      Perhaps you need to get out a little more before you start accusing other people of not having brains.

    2. Re:What goes around comes around by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Don't buy it then.

      That's what the US is trying to force the EU to do. If the US has its way, they only way to buy GM free foods will be on a personal level; to stop eating out, stop eating processed foods, and only buy food from specialist shops where the provenance of the food can be guaranteed (as was common in the 1950s, but people these days want to have both the convenience of supermarkets and the knowledge that their food is what they expect it to be), instead of on a collective level. Jose Bove might be fine with following that but I am not.

      You can't say "it's your choice to buy it or not" and then sue us in the WTO to make it not our choice. Americans are a bunch of hypocrits when it comes to enforcing things on others that they would never submit to themselves. e.g. I didn't see you buying a lot of our BSE contaminated beef.

    3. Re:What goes around comes around by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      As far as your "beef", BSE is a fatal disease (I'm not too sure about the science of "prions" that supposedly cause it) and ANY country has a right to protect the health & safety of it's citizens. The EU wouldn't let some US Chicken Products in a few years ago after an outbreak of a disease killed some chickens in the general area where the banned products were from. Perfectly legit in my opinion. No use taking chances.

      However, GM foods have been shown to be quite safe, but if you prefer you can always grow your own food and that way you are sure it is OK. But don't come asking Uncle Sam for a handout of grain to your country when you starve from that type of agriculture. Everything in life is a choice, but whatever choice you make has consequences you should weigh before making that choice!

    4. Re:What goes around comes around by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1, Informative

      The poster you replied to made some pretty reasonably points though that you didn't address. The US did make Usama Bin Laden who he is now. The US have supplied Saddam when it suited them. The US supported the government hit squads that murdered civilians in El Salvador. I'm not saying that other Western countries that haven't persued similarly evil foriegn policies, but you can't be blind to your own country's wrong-doing whilst trying to 'correct' the wrong-doings of other countries.

    5. Re:What goes around comes around by 808140 · · Score: 1
      "Get a clue" from the guy who can't spell "labelling" or "Iraq".

      I would wager, sir, that he speaks your language considerably better than you speak his.

      Do you even speak another language?

      Didn't think so.

    6. Re:What goes around comes around by The_Hun · · Score: 1

      "You supported the murderous contras, red khemers and other death squads around the world."
      I thought, that red khmers were communists themselves. It made me curious, could someone show me a link to the story, that the USA supported the extreme nazi-communist Pol Pot-ists? I suspect a misinformation here...

      --
      Sig. under reconstruction.
    7. Re:What goes around comes around by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Shown to be safe by whom? Since companies have been known to lie about test results with drugs, why should they be trusted with food?
      (See Vioxx).

      If a food is shown to be unsafe several years down the road, the potential number of people affected could be enormous.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  154. Re:Paid for by US Traitors by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe if you'd change your shitty attitude, you wouldn't have so many problems keeping a job. I'm sure you're very intelligent and your technical skills are probably above average. If you constantly act like an arrogant know-it-all and have no tact when dealing with people, nobody will want you around no matter how smart you are, even if you are right. I've seen your previous posts, and apparently you've been through a few layoffs.

    Honestly, I'm not trying to flame; I think you should take this seriously. You'll be much happier if you aren't constantly butting heads with people. Yes, there are moronic managers out there. The sooner you learn to make politics work to your advantage instead of against you every time, the better off your career will be.

  155. China is a fad by Thomas+Hawk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hate to tell you all this but this whole China thing that you keep reading about everywhere is basically just a fad. Trust me, it won't be around 2 years from now. It's like oh it's great, Webvan can bring me my groceries... this is really cool... it's the future... China? Same basic thing. But there will be a lot of dumb angry men over there ready to fight when they realize that there are a lot more men in the population than women and only the smartest, richest, most succesful and best looking get women. Just what you want, an entire population filled with your least attractive mating candidates in the evolution pool angy, pissed off and ready to kick the shit out of someone.

  156. Simple explanation by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I'm sure the reason for this is they have a more advanced system that ourselves - currently lots of people run red lights in the US. But, when is it safe to do so?

    Enter the Red-Red/Red-Green light. Now the light just stays red all the time, since you're going to run it anyway - but the green light tells you when it's safe to run, and the second red tells you when it's safe to stop!

    Taking away the yellow makes it a simple state transition that reduces incidences of people speeding up for a light. And both directions change instantly, making it far more efficient as you never have an awkward moment when cars are not going through an intersection.

    Yes sir, that is is traffic light of the future.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Simple explanation by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      As for the traffic light of the future, why aren't we trying to get rid our future of traffic lights?

      Imagine an intersection reservation system like this one. Yumm

      http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kdresner/2004aamas/

  157. Capitalism by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Capitalism is based on... Capital. So, inorder to Compete you must have capital. That is the overiding theme. If you don't have capital, you really only have one option. You must trick someone else into using theirs to get some for yourself. This usually accomplished through employment. However, as you stated it can be very difficult to do. Raw capitalism, which we seem to have formed, can be very cruel. The great challenge of this centry will be to see how we can keep most of the efficencies of capitalism, while introducing some of our values into the decision making process.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Capitalism by nester · · Score: 1

      this country is far from raw capitalism. subsities are given out to many industries (at the expense of everyone else).

      how is hiring someone "tricking" them? do you not work? if you do, why did you allow yourself to be "tricked" then? what would you suggest people do, instead of working for a living? steal? live off of welfare?

  158. I'm not the slightest bit jealous. by hai.uchida · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A great amount of China's technological advances come from the government's desire to keep constant surveillance over it's people.

    --
    my password is private, but unchanged.
    1. Re:I'm not the slightest bit jealous. by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

      Thanks for modding me troll. I'm sure my mother's parents- who are in China and I have no way of contacting- would be very proud.

      --
      my password is private, but unchanged.
  159. Homeless choose to be homeless? by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

    Amen amen--in Oregon, the homeless rate increased as mental health services decreased.

  160. Billboards by NekoXP · · Score: 1


    We have Number 8 (roadside electronic billboards not only give directions to nearby lots and garages, they crucially reveal how many empty spaces are left) in the UK.

    Also most banks open on Saturdays. Sundays well.. people need days off :)

    Isn't this a "American sucks and is clinging to 1930's technology" more than "China rules"?

  161. The grass is always greener elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China you can get stuck in intersection for hours because everybody insisted on going first.

  162. Re:genius traffic lights? Naw.... by Hieronymous+Cowherd · · Score: 1

    Already exists, of course, just costs a bit to put the sensors in, and a bit for maintenance and sensor tuning so the sensors don't leave people on motorcycles sitting forever. Most places in the US and Europe should already have at least some of these installed, I assume Asia does as well, but I've not been there, just Europe and the US. In fact, I'd bet that the larger cities in the more advanced African and South American countries have them. Where are you that you don't have any sensor traffic lights installed, and have never seen/heard of them?

  163. The Caveat by Hershmire · · Score: 2, Funny

    How good is cell phone reception inside a political prison?

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  164. Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You live in Sweden and have been too busy playing with gadgets to notice hot blondes everywhere

    I am an American student, fluent enough in Swedish, working on a degree in Sweden. I can tell you as an insider that they are neither hot nor blonde--anymore. Those women went extinct in the Eighties. Right now, they are my professors and bosses--not my peers. A list of grievences:

    1. Your typical Swedish girl is now fairly pudgy. Yeah, American girls are usually fatter (Swedes will usually counter with that statement when you start ranting about their women), but if one is comparing ones country's women to ours, then there must be a problem.
    2. They use rediculous amounts of make-up. If they do eventually get fatter than American women, I will be studying in a country of Mimi Bobecks. And it's not just the quantity--it's how they use it. Even if they used a 1/20 as much, they would still look like Cirque de Soulei. Make Sweden beautiful: Shoot a make-up counter clerk.
    3. Clothes. I am no fashion mongol, but I am morally appauled at how bad these people dress. They look like they have resurrected all the bad things of the 80's and put them on a 70's disco dance floor.
      100% dead-serious: At our student union building, we have an annual Bad Taste Party, where one dresses in bad taste, naturally. I could not tell--I honesty sat through a half-hour of our pre-party without noticing that was the theme.
    4. Attitude. Even before you speak, whatever the context, they are impatiently waiting for you to finish. They know that they are a well-known brand-name commodity (all name, no commodity) and act like it, too.
    5. Culture. Sweden is a progressive society--it's been that way for a very long time. As such, feminists have had a lot of success here. Economic equality, paternal leave laws, men pushing carriges nearly as often as women, and gaudy machismo is at an alltime low. Now the women are terrified to find that they got what they wished for and that they might have to have sex with men who not only possess an egalitarian outlook but *GASP* possibly make less money than them. While the money thing is a loss, they have fixed the other half of their problems by all learning Italian and going south fishing for boorish senoritos. Leaving the men of Sweden with an awful lot of Southeast Asian and Eastern European wives.


    In conclusion, if you are coming to Sweden to have good-looking lovers, only do so if you are a gay man--you'll save yourself a lot of disappointment.
    1. Re:Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by wattersa · · Score: 1

      I agree with pretty much everything you wrote. I was very disappointed when I went there. Thinking they can all be actresses or models, the hot ones move to more exciting places :-/

    2. Re:Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      I agree with pretty much everything you wrote. I was very disappointed when I went there. Thinking they can all be actresses or models, the hot ones move to more exciting places :-/

      I forgot to add one thing. The mullet is all the rage--FOR WOMEN!

    3. Re:Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by M_de_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. check
      2. check
      3. check
      4. check
      5. check

      Hmmm. Are you sure you're not in Canada?

    4. Re:Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am no fashion mongol, but I am morally appauled at how bad these people dress.

      I don't come from Mongolia either, but I am morally appauled at your rediculous spelling. This has been a public-service announcement from the CNSPSG (Committee of National Socialists for Proper Spelling and Grammar).

    5. Re:Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I don't know where you're living, but from my experience you're dead wrong.

    6. Re:Absolutely untrue myth about Sweden by Neduz · · Score: 1

      In conclusion, if you are coming to Sweden to have good-looking lovers, only do so if you are a gay man--you'll save yourself a lot of disappointment.

      If I was ever to go to Sweden, it would be for the cheap 10 or 100Mbps internet connections.

      --
      This is one lame signature, please read the message above instead.
  165. Re:Paid for by US Traitors by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you'd change your shitty attitude, you wouldn't have so many problems keeping a job.

    Oh, I haven't always had a shitty attitude. It took years of being pissed on, fucked over, cheated and lied to in order to have a really shitty attitude. My chance to own a home, and to have the things I earned by getting an education and putting in years of solid, hard work were submerged in wet shit by liars so they could make a better business case for some half-assed "enterprise paradigm."

    I'm probably unemployable in a cubicle now, since I can smell the fragrant horseshit beginning with the smug, arrogant ass-molded phone-flipping hairpiece in the interview. They're only looking for a reason to disqualify candidates, and even if I get hired, what do I have? Nothing, since I can be laid off for no reason any fucking time some asscrack middle manager decides his spreadshit isn't going to stuff his pockets fast enough.

    Every single promise I was made in school has turned out to be bullshit. My education is worthless in the workplace. My experience is worthless in the workplace. My skills are worthless in the workplace. Why? Because the middle managers are in control and they say so.

    and apparently you've been through a few layoffs.

    I've been through layoffs that would make people want to drop to one knee and weep into their hands. I have been lied to and cheated so many times it became funny. The bald-faced rotten craven lying bastards I have worked with and for would truly amaze most people. The financial and emotional horrors they visited upon my co-workers were some of the most repulsive and disgusting things I have ever seen. I watched them happily destroy careers by the dozens, and my company isn't the only place this has happened.

    You'll be much happier if you aren't constantly butting heads with people.

    I agree. I'm much happier because I don't work in a cubicle job any more. I don't have any office politics and I don't have to work with lying cheat middle managers.

    The sooner you learn to make politics work to your advantage instead of against you every time, the better off your career will be.

    The only way I can make office politics work to my advantage is to become a lying cheat bastard like the people who set out to destroy mine and several of my friends' and co-workers' careers.

    People who take the initiative and actually deliver a good job, like those I worked with, automatically find themselves at a disadvantage in office politics because instead of griping to the lying cheat middle manager in the break room, they are actually doing their job. Competent, qualified, hard-working people are not welcome in the modern workplace, and because of that, our society is destroying the educations of millions of people.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  166. New Zealand by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    It seems they couldn't be bothered making a file for New Zealand. Do they think our government is too lazy to abuse human rights our something? There must be something they can criticise!

    For example there are still some disputes about sorting out some stuff that happened in the 1860s that violated the treaty of 1840.

    1. Re:New Zealand by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Could be they are overlooked. New Zealand is know as the land of the totaly middle class. Sort of a giant or maybe not so giant suburb where eveyone does okay and everyone lives in peace and harmony. I was supprised that Sweden had a listing as did the Swiss.

      From what I hear it is next to impossible to emingrate to New Zealand but I guess they go not consider that a human rights issue. But that is just what I have heard.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:New Zealand by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      From what I hear it is next to impossible to emingrate to New Zealand but I guess they go not consider that a human rights issue.

      I doubt many would consider this a human rights issue - no-one has the right to emigrate to a country in which they were either not born nor have no relational ties to.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:New Zealand by dajak · · Score: 1

      Same here. The Netherlands is not listed anymore.

      A few years ago we were listed for human rights violations in Koraalspecht prison in the Netherlands Antilles, but apparently that isn't a problem anymore since the government renamed the prison.

      Maybe my government is filtering the entry for the Netherlands from this list? Please correct me if the Netherlands is on it.

    4. Re:New Zealand by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "I doubt many would consider this a human rights issue - no-one has the right to emigrate to a country in which they were either not born nor have no relational ties to."
      Many people in the US would tend to disagree. I am not saying that you are wrong and many in the US would agree with you as well. I how ever welcome the people that decide to make their life here. I find they bring a lot to this country.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:New Zealand by div_B · · Score: 1

      Could be they are overlooked. New Zealand is know as the land of the totaly middle class. Sort of a giant or maybe not so giant suburb where eveyone does okay and everyone lives in peace and harmony.

      Sort of. We still have poverty and race relations problems here, but it's a lot less punishing place to live on a low income, welfare or whatever, and murders still make the evening news. It's no utopia, but it's a pretty relaxed place to live.

      From what I hear it is next to impossible to emingrate to New Zealand but I guess they go not consider that a human rights issue. But that is just what I have heard.

      It is a lengthy process, but probably not as hard to get into as you think. Certainly if you have enough money there will be no problem with you buying a ridiculously large area of our land ;)
      You might have heard bad things about the immigration process because this Algerian fellow tried to immigrate here a year or two (?) ago, and having been labelled a terrorist by american intelligence has been detained since he landed. He's had alot of legal battles just to get our intelligence agency to tell what the evidence they supposedly have consists of. Not knowing makes it pretty hard to refute. However he may well be a terrorist for all I know, it just doesn't seem likely given the lack of apparent evidence.

    6. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There must be something they can criticise!
      I daresay sir, that you've been to the wrong organisation's website. You perhaps would like to go to the PETA.org.nz website to read up on sheep rights abuse.
    7. Re:New Zealand by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      I thought it would be piss-easy to immigrate to NZ. Either:
      1. Be born in the South Pacific.
      2. Have a reasonable amount of money (enough to buy a small flat in London or New York) and offer to set up a business there, especially in a rural area.
      3. Have a relationship with a kiwi of either gender (supporting documentation is required if your country does not support gay marriage yet).
      4. Go on the points system, which changes each year according to demand. Try to speak English, have a degree, be youngish, and have a useful skill.

      Over the past few decades net immigration has been pretty much zero (as many going out as coming in) so it hasn't been that hard. What people (on both sides of the Tasman) get annoyed at is people getting NZ citizenship and then pissing off to Australia the first chance they get.

  167. Tianijn's traffic lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a Tianjin native, I am quite pleased to see something related to it makes No. 2 on the list. Actually, the traffic lights described in the article have been used for more than 10 years there. Some where in the early 1990s, all in a sudden Tianjin transportation authority started testing all kinds of different traffic lights. Some in rows, some in columns, some have digital display, some use graphics effect, some, some use green, some use blue. Not to say that all the different shapes of the light. You could use your imaginations. A 35 minutes bicycle ride would take you passing 10 crossings, and with 10 totally different traffic lights systems, no 2 of them would look alike. It caused great mess and confusing for the time. Now the system is rather mature after years of intense evolutions.
    Another nice thingy: a few years ago, some bus routes in Beijing have GPS tracker installed on all their buses. When you are waiting for bus, you can actually see from the sign where all those buses are, and have an estimation of how long you will wait.

  168. Whence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "whence" == "from where".
    "from whence" == "from from where".

    HTH.

  169. INDIA by sbeashwar · · Score: 1

    India too pretty much has all these technological advancements. Plus the biggie - the largest democracy in the world !

    1. Re:INDIA by fuzzykitty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it's a republic and republics arn't all they're cracked up to be. Just look at the US, for example. Bush should have been booted but the fact that American politcs has been turned into a sporting event means that the electorate collective IQ has dropped exponentially. People forget that human lives are at stake when they elect somebody who cannot own up to the fact they have really screwed up. Americans seem to have decided that the truth doesn't matter either with respect to Iraq.

      As an American I see in this society a low level hatred of Muslims and general xenophobia. I see a significant group of people who believe that what makes a great civilization is people screaming "God Bless America" and running around with a flag. When the citizens of a country take their government seriously, hold it accountable, and refuse to allow themselves to be herded in to two rival camps then a Republic is a good idea. When people treat it like a game of baseball, these people no longer have any business voting. That is the point at which their government should be taken away from them.

      In many ways I think China is better of then the so called "free world". The Chinese civil service, a large part of the government, is very efficient and relatively impartial. For example, I know people who have adopted children from China. In that case the trouble wasn't getting the children out of China, it was getting the children into the US. The Chinese agency handling adoption was very efficient and the path to adoption and removing the children from the country clearly laid out. The US INS does not have a clear cut set of rules on how to get an adopted child into the country. The job of aproving the children is left up to the assigned case worker and that person is under no obligation to follow any seblence of a proceedure in a given period of time. Put simply they were at the mercy of the whims of the INS, not an established legal proceeding. They are not alone in that regard as many other couples attempting the same thing have run afoul of the US INS, an institution of a so called "democracy".

      Another good example comes from my own experiances in China. Visas are very easy to get and aproval can be obtained for a nominal fee in 24hrs. The reverse for Chinese can take months because of the ineptitude of the US government.

      China may not have a so called "democracy" politically, but I believe this is an advantage. By not holding popular elections, nut cases like Bush are not elected. Instead stable and moderate people are put into power. Change is controlled and radical political factions are subdued. I also recognize China has had its share of nut case leaders, however these were largely reactionary due to western interference (and yes the US is partly to blame for this).

      The Chinese may not have a TV in every room or a three car garage, but they are more focused than the US and have a much larger and more diverse intelligencia. You should not be so quick to treat world governments like a sporting event.

    2. Re:INDIA by sbeashwar · · Score: 1

      ok, it's a democratic republic. The president plays a rather ceremonial role, while, the prime minister holds the executive powers. Unlike the US there are more than 2 large parties that compete to form the government. The point I was trying to drive was that the technological advancement that it boasts of are not that distinct that it makes china stand out. It is also available in a country like India which, has always been regarded as technologically behind when compared to other developing countries. Bush turning out to a bad choice, yes, it is highly subjective and debatable, but majority of the people in the US didn't feel it that way. It could be due to various reasons. People did not know republican's mandate. People attach more weightage to counter terrorism issues than to economic reforms. People are confused; loss of jobs, economic slow down and terrorist threats. Which is important ? India has it's problems in electing a representative. There is high level of corruption and bureaucracy no matter which party comes into power. The only difference is that people have a lot of options to choose and pick. It is quite a task to oraganise the elections in country with more than a billion people. The fact that such state/federal structure has been existing for 50 years despite the vast diversity itself is something commendable. China; yes it has it pluses. I admit that communism and socialism is something that has it advantages and disadvantages. The right mix of both is required, a completely democratic decentralized environment becomes very difficult to handle, particularly the law and order aspects. India a communist party can be democratically elected. Nothing wrong in adopting communist ideology but people should be able to interfere when things get out of hand. China imposes Martial Law as it pleases. It's good when used in situations when law and order deteriorates. But we should not forget how it has been exploited. China is undoubtedy the world's largest totalitarian regime, a regime that has presided over the genocide of Tibet, a regime that, according to Amnesty International, executes 2,000 of its citizens annually, a regime that threatens to invade the democratic sovereign state of Taiwan. China executes more of its citizens than the rest of the world combined. President Hu Jintao was communist party secretary in Tibet when martial law was imposed there in 1989. From the time its troops swarmed into Tibet on October 7, 1950 the Chinese government began the systematic genocide of the Tibetan people. Chinese terror in Tibet reached its peak during the cultural revolution when all religious institutions were banned, temples demolished and monks and nuns murdered. China is readying itself for a surprise attack against Taiwan that would aim to be so short and sharp the US would not even have a chance to intervene, warns the US Department of Defence in its annual review of China's military capacity, released in August 2003. China has claimed Taiwan as its territory and threatens to take it by force if Taipei declares independence. This is an amazing propaganda spin by the Chinese. Taiwan is an independent sovereign state with a democratically elected government while China is a one-party totalitarian regime. The notion of "free world" is not imaginary it is very much true. Imagine if such a totalitarian regime fall into wrong hands. Is there a provision for representation? and calling the world for help would cause mmore destruction. Chinese visa processing is quick, so what ? what's the kind of traffic are we talking here. It is only recently that we seeing an increase in chinese immigration. US has a lot of stuff at stake ? terrosism being the major issue they are becoming paranoid on every aspect of immigration. It's living under fear, fear which demands strict and stringent immigration policies. I am sure couple of terrorist attacks on china and china will vritually shut its doors to the world. We can debate about this for ages and get nowhere. The bottom line China is no better than India and I don't know much to comment about the US - from what I've seen, american policts/policies = Corporate Lobbying.

  170. Spitting by potat0man · · Score: 1

    Take the amount of times you hear someone spit in NYC, multiply it by about 70, and that's how often you'll hear it in China.

    Vile people, believe me.

  171. Re:Government of the people? by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1

    That would be calld a social democracy.

    Share, collectively run the nation. Help everyone.

    Look up Sweden if you care to.

  172. Stoplights by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    The stoplights are wonderful. I visited Shanghai, Beijing and Qingdao (home of Tsingtao beer -- and damned fine beer, I might add) a couple of years ago, and the timed stoplights should be that way everywhere. When I was there, Shanghai didn't have the timers, and Beijing still had no lights at some major intersections, but Qingdao had the timed lights on every corner.

    The trouble was that such lights are wasted on drivers in Qingdao. Let me tell you about the cab ride that went 65 mph going the wrong way down a one-way residential street. At the intersections, the stoplights were completely ignored. It doesn't matter if you know how long until the light changes if everyone goes through whenever they want to anyway!

    At the lightless intersection in Beijing, it was interesting that in the absence of any overt management, people did a great job of communicating and sharing the road so that everyone was able to get to where they needed to without anyone hitting anyone else. In that light, I think they actually did better than they would have with a stoplight in place.

    Now a careful reader might suspect that the organization I experienced at the un-lighted intersection in Beijing explains why the people in Qingdao ignored the stoplight. However, people who've been to Qingdao know better. Qingdao drivers are a different breed of animal from Beijing. If I had to pick the animal, I'd say a cat. Being chased. By a toddler with a water hose. After a direct hit.

    Don't let that keep you out of Qingdao, though. Go in the Fall for the seafood and the beer. Oh, and the women (their bodies, not their accents).

    Man, I need to get back there sometime...

  173. Side Effect of One Child Policy? Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The male-to-female ratios of babies in South Korea and India are also lopsided in "favor" of the males.

    The ratios in Vietnam, USA, and Japan are normal.

    The problem is not the government in the case of the ratios. The problem is the barbarism of Chinese culture.

  174. Re:Parking, Transit Debit, Lights that Blink--In M by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    The Villiage Wok, Campus Villiage, on University next to the Big 10, you are buying.

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  175. American's Know VERY Little About Today's China by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Very few Americans know much at all about China.

    People THINK they do but to someone like me (i.e. a white guy who spends months at a time each year in China, is married to a Chinese woman, is well versed in China's history both recent and ancient and speaks Mandarin), listening to American folks discuss China is almost always very frustrating.

    The country is not nearly as oppressive as some of you seem to think. Communism is really just a WORD over there... not an ideology... not anymore. Yes the government has it's problems and for the most part are not too well liked but daily life in China (well, for city dwelling, college educated people anyway) is little different from life here. People own pets, they don't eat them, they have cars, cell phones, high speed internet, live (and thus, not so controlled by the government) news on TV, they go shopping, walk in the park, meet friends for coffee, hit the clubs on Friday and Saturday night or go see a soccer match, whatever.

    Many places in China would strike the most ardent neo-conservative as the very height of capitalism. Contrary to what one person posted you CAN talk about/criticise/make fun of the government. I have talked with so very many Chinese about their government and they are usually quite frank. No one is hiding behind their hand whispering, no one is "disappeared". Last time I was there (May-August 2004) there were even some fairly large labor protests in a nortern city. Protests that were not crushed, put down, blocked. We just don't hear about this sort of stuff in the states. Viewed objectively (my wife, a professor of communications, has done much research in the area of media coverage between China and the USA), our government's opinions regarding China, the average citizens beliefs on China and the stories we get about China from our media leave us with a general impression that is, quite simply, wrong and negatively biased.Statistically about equal to the bias you would find in the Chinese press about the USA.

    Technologically, China IS rapidly pulling ahead of the U.S.A. in many areas (cell phone technology and IT in particular) and China has it's "Microsofts" waiting in the wings eyeing the world market (the Lenovo Group (formerly known as Legend Group) in particular). Bottom line is, most Americans don't know enough about China to make any sort of accurate commentary regarding it. Yes there are many problems in China and with it's government but it is much closer to life here (once again, in the cities, not the countryside) than you probably think.

    1. Re:American's Know VERY Little About Today's China by einar2 · · Score: 1

      My father is Austrian, my mother is German, myself I got Swiss citzenship. My wife is Belgian but part of her family lives in France.

      Do you think I met Americans knowing a lot about any of these countries?

      Well, on the other hand, what do I know about Kentucky?

    2. Re:American's Know VERY Little About Today's China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more! Seeing is believing.

  176. Re:Oh really? Really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? The grandparent post was pointing out (in a joking way) that you said she was Chinese (and based many of your arguments on that), when in fact she's Canadian.

    What do parts of Canada have to do with anything?

  177. Local optimum by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
    Although free markets are great from the point of view of moving quickly to a local optimum in resource utilization, their coverage and consistency are spotty.

    I agree. And you get full marks for understanding that the optimum reached by capitalism is usually local, not global.

    For those who are wondering what the difference is, here's an example. If you're on top of Pike's Peak, you are standing on a local optimum in terms of elevation above sea level. You are on an optimum because you would be going downhill as soon as you moved away from the peak, no matter which direction you took. However, the optimum is local, not global, because Pike's Peak is not the highest mountain in the world, not even close. If your metric is elevation above sea level, the global optimum is far away, on the top of Mt. Everest.

    A capitalistic corporation tends to be short-sighted: it tends to take whichever course is immediately most advantageous. In terms of the hill-climbing analogy, the corporation is always walking upwards in whichever direction seems steepest at the moment. Thus it tends to end up at a local optimum: on top of Pike's Peak, or if it is shortsighted enough, on top of the nearest dunghill. And there it will be stuck. This is why the parent poster says that capitalism tends to find the local optimum, not the global one.

  178. Chinese Tech or Korean/Japanese Tech???? by CuriouserAndCuriouse · · Score: 1

    I think you mean Japanese and Korean technology. The article even says Samsung. Sorry dude but that's a Korean Company. China is just leveraging off the tech advances in both these countries. I think your also forgetting the extreme use of very, very cheap labour in asian in general. This wealth gap produces severe abuses in every aspect of life. Technology can be an aid to a better life - but can't replace being a thinking, empathic human being. Just my two cents. ;)

  179. There's some impressive stuff in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some of that stuff only works because they keep their population in line. Too much individualism, and too little conformatism, for a few of those things to work over here.

    In the Land of China, you get your ass beat when you step out of the Volkswagon bus at the protest.

    In the Land of China, the tanks just start shooting in Berkeley Square and let Allah sort all the treehuggers out.

    In the Land of China, you get your ass shot for snorting cocaine and shooting PCP then driving down the freeway at 100mph.

    In the Land of China, they also shoot the guy with the video camera, who was filming the shooting of the druggie.

    In the Land of China, whether the gloves fit or not, he'd get shot and his entire family in prison for 5 years for raising such a worthless bastard.

  180. China bashing at it's best by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    Start talking about technology and end up stating all the negative points (rightly or wrongly) about the country. Guess what? The media has you fools brainwashed into hating on China at every opportunity.

    Wouldn't it be funny to start a thread on some interesting technology in New York and have the thread end up talking about crime, pollution, overcrowding, etc...?

    "Yes, they may have found a way to cure cancer, but their streets stink like garbage!"

  181. Re:Government of the people? by hmniq · · Score: 0

    What is this freedom word you throw around? Have you taken into consideration what freedom actually means? Sure it sounds good; it's a warm fuzzy word. But please please don't tout it as if we are the only nation who has it and we are the only ones who have perfected it. And what good is freedom if we are two-faced about it?

  182. Advanced? really, smells of poo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advanced? If a country doesn't have sense enough to disregard its own feces.. Having been to Shanghai in the past 6 months.. all I can say is, nice people, friendly, city smells of shit.. and you can't drink the water (even people who live there, as evidenced by the water coolers in all the office buildings) so if cell phone coverage or the number of fab plants and computer manufacturers impress you more than being able to open your mouth in the shower, or walk down the street without a whiff of bowel in the air, by all means they are advanced

  183. Re:Parking, Transit Debit, Lights that Blink--In M by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing traffic light countdown clocks in Melbourne as a kid, circa 1970.

  184. Re:"Let a thousand flowers bloom," Historical Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mao, 1970s...well, at least you had the right person, right country. Wrong era.

    Hope you didn't pay too much for your Cracker Jacks education.

  185. Immigration information by brianmy · · Score: 1

    >> From what I hear it is next to impossible to emingrate to New Zealand

    I didn't find it difficult - but judge for yourself : http://www.immigration.govt.nz/

  186. Re:Pants Hemming: Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to Japan, here it's free and done everywhere. ;)

  187. Examination of Fallacies. by fluppy88 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been living in China for over 2 years, and have travelled extensively there. I hate crap articles that for the most part aren't true. I'll take this one step by step:

    intro:

    supermarket spills - alas, they don't bother to disenfect anything at the average supermarket. Some recent imports, Carefour etc., might do better, but simply moving the spill around with water and then drying it might not seem hygenic to some.

    free head-and-shoulder massages w/ haircut: this is true. And it's an excellent service. But I usually cut my own hair cause I don't want it to look jacked. You can also get handjobs and blowjobs for 30-100 yuan more. Great services. The Chinese are way ahead of us here.

    free movie ticket couriers: true. All couriers for services are free in my experience. Currently their online stores also use these couriers. You order online and a guy comes on a bike with your books and you pay him. quite nice.

    duvet covers (even in rural china): yes. it's true. but, if they are freshly laundered, why do they smell so bad? Most of the time you feel like the blankets have been sitting in a smelly closet for weeks, not like they just came in off the line.

    automated lockers: they're starting to use them in some stores. Most have places where you check your bag with a person.

    taxis, subways, etc with panels and tv: true for about 1% of all taxis (if that much) the buses with tv are pretty annoying but they are thankfully few and far between (there are many more buses with wooden floors with holes where you can see the road)

    electronic fly swatter: this is so cool! some are shaped like a small tennis racket. you push a little button and electricity runs through the wire strings. great fun killing bugs and for using on friends when they're drunk.

    magnetic-levitation train: it's amazing. so is there space program. So is the realization that they are doing this despite the fact that so many of their people live in complete poverty and would love to have a better life.

    1) Cellphones: coverage is extensive. prices aren't that cheap, but it is pay as you go. You pay for incoming and outgoing calls (the same for each)/ SMS messages (cheaper for incoming). on an average month I'll spend about 150-200RMB which works out to 20-25USD.(I like to SMS a lot and don't like using talking on the phone much--most of the time other people call me) It doesn't seem that much cheaper to me. Might have something to do with the Monopoly that is China Mobile.

    2)Traffic Lights: this is true, and they are using them more and more. Beijing's use of them is pretty light (no more than 5% of all ligths-a VERY generous estimate as I've only seen 2 or 3), but in Southern cities like Guangzhou or Guilin, most traffic lights are of this type. Unfortunately in China red light means, "I can still go through the extension for the next five seconds."

    3)transit debit cards: I haven't been to shanghai in a while, so I'll assume this is true. They do give a lot of nice things to Shanghai (they being the communist party). Taxi receipts are printed. One of the main reason is so that you can report a taxi driver who took you for a ride.

    4)Adult playgrounds: true (at least for Beijing--I haven't seen them in small cities; a small city in china is still over 1million people). They also have an occasional program on TV on how to use these machinese. They range from things where you swing your legs and arms like a floating cross trainer, to weight lifting contraptions, to pull up bars, to ping pong tables in some places. And Chinese old people are more active than their western counterparts. But I'd hardly call the air fresh.

    5)anti-theft slipcovers: ?????? this is to prevent theft? I never knew it was such a problem. I thought it was so that your clothes don't smell like smoke or get food on them. It's a nice touch. I like them. not in the average rundown restaurant. please note: this doesn't keep wait staff from stealing your cellphones off the table when you

  188. Flu? by ghoul · · Score: 1

    When 500 people die of SARS in China its news. When 50000 die of the freaking flu in the US every year its not news. Wonder why so many people live in China and India. Maybe its just because those areas of the world have always been more geologically stable with a stable climate and fertile land which can support the population. I was going over the US map and trying to find a place which is not hit by hurricanes,forest fires,earthquakes or ice storms and i frankly could not come up with anything other than las Vegas and that is a desert. The US is a wasteland made livable by technology. Now imagine what happens when you apply the same technology to a part of the world which was strong enough to support half of humanity without the tech?

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  189. JAPAN!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan had all of these things years before the Chinese. The only exception is the purse cover things. But Japan has all these services across the entire country, not just a few cities.

  190. Re:Government of the people? by Tailstuxtophat · · Score: 1
    Freedom?

    Hmm... I always thought we were under a combination of corporate hegemony and end-times theocracy.

    That's Republicans and Democrats, right? ::Sarcasm Alert::

    --
    Methinks thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee.
  191. One thing China desperately needs... by laing · · Score: 1

    Is CLEAN RESTROOMS. I spent last month in Dalian (north eastern "bit port" city) and was impressed by all the new technology (I was there 3 years ago), but disgusted by the same lack of basic hygene that is common throughout the country.

    I swear that the Chinese as a race must have diminished olfactory receptors. (The average Chinese proboscis is indeed smaller than the average European one). There is sewage in the streets and filth everywhere you go.

    Another thing the Chinese are renowned for is POLLUTION. They haven't seem to have yet figured out that they have to live on the planet they are rapidly destroying. There are no environmental restrictions on business. Enforcement of what little rules they have is selective and corrupt.

    Another thing China seriously lacks is SAFETY. They haven't figured this out yet either. Nobody wears seat belts. Anything with a motor is allowed on the roads. Pedestrians had better look both ways and run out of the way because they have no rights whatsoever. Construction sites leave dangerous holes in the middle of the sidewalk with no warning barrier. You really need to keep on your toes at all times.

    My last rant is about the Chinese cultural aversion to MAKING AN ORDERLY LINE. There's no such thing as a line in China, it's everyone for themselves. It shows up everwhere from customers at a street vendor's cart to the downtown automobile traffic. There is no logic to the rules of the road, it's a constant game of "chicken".

    --
    This space for rent.

  192. When my parents visited the greate Wall ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... two years ago they just had to give me a call on their cell phone because they thought it was so cool that they could.

    I was less thrilled just taking a shower. I guess it could have been worse i.e. in the middle of the night.

  193. too crazy... by torrents · · Score: 1

    a communist country with cutting edge technology, a booming economy, massive censorship, and a constantly expanding middle class... something is really messed up in that country... at what point do they have to let the whole communist thing go and aknowledge that the gov can't run the whole show?

    --
    Get your torrents...
  194. Many of those things are in Japan too by mattr · · Score: 1

    Many of the things sighed about are in Japan too, though I don't know where they originated. Best new idea I saw was city-supplied free exercise machinery located outdoors nearby. You could tell a lot about the character of a city about what they look like too - I'd like to think New York would do a good job on it but they would probably be made of massive, grungy steel tubing and molded plastic seats, so you couldn't hijack if you wanted to, like the inside of NYC subways. Japanese ones would probably have too many lcd gadgets and might run an electrical current through your buns to check your body fat level. Article makes me want to go check it out in China myself though!

  195. Give credit where it is due by weijiao · · Score: 1

    The article is basically correct.
    It would be an error to say that the whole of China has these advances, but the developing areas are very large. The combined pupulation of Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin is over 30 million. Add Chonqing and you have another 30 million.
    Those figures leave out the whole of the Pearl River Delta so the real numbers are much larger.

    China has its black spots, but there are many aspects of its service economy that are astoundingly good. Give credit where credit is due.

  196. In all honesty, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    the "article" itself is flamebait.
    How this was even put up on /. is beyond me.

  197. Review of the article by tek314159 · · Score: 1

    I love how someone can write an article like this, and everyone in the States who's never been to China takes it all as gospel. I'm not really criticizing it, since the article is mostly accurate in my experience, but there're some things that have to be seen in context. (Once again, let me preface by saying I'm an American living in Shanghai, and have been living in China for over 3 years now.) 1. Cellphones - No annoying contracts, that's true. But cell phones are EXPENSIVE. In America, we're used to paying between $0 and $150 for a cell phone. The cheapest, oldest, black-and-white cell phone here is $100 because of that freedom from contracts. I've always been amazed that the Chinese, despite their much lower income, probably outspend Americans on cell phones by 3:1. 3. Transit debit cards - I love these things, and I don't understand why it hasn't rated an article in itself on slashdot. Here's an example of one city that is slowly moving away from cash, and no one even notices. The transportation cards are incredibly convenient, work on almost all public transportation, all taxis, and even quite a lot of convenience stores and McDonalds. I wish they had a set monthly 'unlimited' transit option, but... They are quite cool. 5. Anti-theft slipcovers - Only in nice restaurants, where you're probably not that worried about thieves, anyway. Also points to how much petty theft there is in this country. My girlfriend's purse was stolen from the chair next to her last week. 6. Daily Banking - Yeah. I love being able to visit the bank and post offices on any day of the week. You don't appreciate it until you have it. 7. Wireless service bells - I've never seen these before in my life. Maybe only in Beijing? Service in restaurants here is far worse than in America. The waitresses all use a patented method of surveying a room while carefully ignoring anyone who wants their attention. It takes forever to get something you need, and no waitress EVER asks you if you're okay, or if you need anything. The writer mentioned flat-screen video on buses. This is slowly killing me, I swear. Every time you take a bus, it's a constant barrage of advertising from the moment you step on to the moment you step off. Forget about listening to your own music - whatever comes through your headphones is drowned out by the bus's speaker. Forget about reading a book - it's pretty tough to concentrate while someone's shouting at you to buy beef jerky. This would, I hope, be considered unacceptable in America, and I wish it were the same here. One last thing, that the article didn't mention - I don't understand why the air conditioner technology here in China is so much better than in America. While Americans still fill one window with an air conditioner, they mount the machine on the wall outside, with a tube that comes in, leading to an electronically-controlled vent mounted near the ceiling. Everyone's air conditioner has a remote control, and it leaves the window open. The article also didn't mention the complete lack of indoor central heating in most of China. They've got it in the north, where it snows every year, but not here in Shanghai, even though it's frequently below 0C in the winter. I'd give up expensive cell phones, daily banking, chair slipcovers, parking guides, traffic lights with timers, and everything else mentioned here for WARM HOMES in the winter. tek.

    1. Re:Review of the article by tek314159 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry. With paragraphing:

      I love how someone can write an article like this, and everyone in the States who's never been to China takes it all as gospel. I'm not really criticizing it, since the article is mostly accurate in my experience, but there're some things that have to be seen in context. (Once again, let me preface by saying I'm an American living in Shanghai, and have been living in China for over 3 years now.)

      1. Cellphones - No annoying contracts, that's true. But cell phones are EXPENSIVE. In America, we're used to paying between $0 and $150 for a cell phone. The cheapest, oldest, black-and-white cell phone here is $100 because of that freedom from contracts. I've always been amazed that the Chinese, despite their much lower income, probably outspend Americans on cell phones by 3:1.

      3. Transit debit cards - I love these things, and I don't understand why it hasn't rated an article in itself on slashdot. Here's an example of one city that is slowly moving away from cash, and no one even notices. The transportation cards are incredibly convenient, work on almost all public transportation, all taxis, and even quite a lot of convenience stores and McDonalds. I wish they had a set monthly 'unlimited' transit option, but... They are quite cool.

      5. Anti-theft slipcovers - Only in nice restaurants, where you're probably not that worried about thieves, anyway. Also points to how much petty theft there is in this country. My girlfriend's purse was stolen from the chair next to her last week.

      6. Daily Banking - Yeah. I love being able to visit the bank and post offices on any day of the week. You don't appreciate it until you have it.

      7. Wireless service bells - I've never seen these before in my life. Maybe only in Beijing? Service in restaurants here is far worse than in America. The waitresses all use a patented method of surveying a room while carefully ignoring anyone who wants their attention. It takes forever to get something you need, and no waitress EVER asks you if you're okay, or if you need anything.

      The writer mentioned flat-screen video on buses. This is slowly killing me, I swear. Every time you take a bus, it's a constant barrage of advertising from the moment you step on to the moment you step off. Forget about listening to your own music - whatever comes through your headphones is drowned out by the bus's speaker. Forget about reading a book - it's pretty tough to concentrate while someone's shouting at you to buy beef jerky. This would, I hope, be considered unacceptable in America, and I wish it were the same here.

      One last thing, that the article didn't mention - I don't understand why the air conditioner technology here in China is so much better than in America. While Americans still fill one window with an air conditioner, they mount the machine on the wall outside, with a tube that comes in, leading to an electronically-controlled vent mounted near the ceiling. Everyone's air conditioner has a remote control, and it leaves the window open.

      The article also didn't mention the complete lack of indoor central heating in most of China. They've got it in the north, where it snows every year, but not here in Shanghai, even though it's frequently below 0C in the winter. I'd give up expensive cell phones, daily banking, chair slipcovers, parking guides, traffic lights with timers, and everything else mentioned here for WARM HOMES in the winter.

      tek.

  198. Not just China. by skeletonliar · · Score: 1

    The author makes it sound like China is the only place where these technologies exist. Except for 5 & 6, I've all of the things on that list in Japan as well. And should 5 even be counted as a good thing? Crime is so bad that your stuff is stolen while you are eating in a restaurant?!

    --
    "Watching Access Hollywood is like driving 10 SUVs!" -- Al Sharpton
  199. ....result in public acclomation and promotions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point was China doesn't seem to do it on a large scale in other countries. They could be doing it I guess, but it sure seems like they mainly worry about their own. Hell, if we were China, Taiwan would have been *invaded* at this point. If we invaded on some shadowy suspicions about wmd's, then we would definitely take back a territory we thought was ours. And China only stops because the world says no? That didn't stop us. Personally, I think, even just considering Guantanamo and Iraq, we're a lot worse to the people of other countries then China is.

    And with so few people convicted at this point, and not one a miltary intelligence officer (who were the ones, by all accounts I've read, giving the orders) even charged, I'd say there was very little justice, and probably even a few promotions.

  200. a what you don't get by parasite · · Score: 0


    Never mind the fact that about half of the items on this list appear in ONE small up-scale region of one of the top 3 cities in the country -- none of the more ubiquitous items will mean JACK to you when you realize:

    1. Frequent power black-outs will constantly cause you to lose whatever work you were doing on your computer. Have a UPS ? Good for you -- you can save your work, and then find something else to do while you wait 10 hours for the power to come back on.

    2. Hot water-- something I never thought twice about in my life. Even in my parent's entire lives it was never a consideration. But in China you should consider yourself quite blessed if you live in a dorm offering two one-hour periods of hot water per day. Most normal Chinese have to go to a bathhouse. Don't multiply it now -- but if a family of ONE went to the bathhouse on a daily basis, it would consume more than 50% of their monthly salary. Thank god Asians aren't know for producing strong BO.

    3. You can surf the internet and send instant messages over your cell phone in safety knowing the Chinese government's automatic filters are scanning your every message for keywords -- just to make sure you don't find any information that could be harmful to you. Oh -- and some more mundane things as well. For example, don't bother trying to read the newsgroup for learning Chinese (or anything else for that matter) at groups.google.com inside of China.

    4. If you are a college student in China you can look forward to living claustrophobically with 8 roommates, wooden board "mattresses" on the beds, no electrical outlets whatsoever (forget about studying with your laptop), and no heat in the winter. (That's why all the Chinese students prefer to study in an empty classroom.)

    Even if you are wealthy enough to afford your own luxury (ie with heat) apartment instead of the dorm -- you can expect that the university will coerce you to live in their accomodations.

  201. hyginene by parasite · · Score: 0

    "Even remote rural hotels in China, not previously known for world-beating hygiene"

    I can tell you a little something about hygiene in a small town in China -- a small town of only a million or so... I went there for my friend's wedding -- we went to one of the fanciest restaurants in hotel for the wedding dinner.

    If you eat in Beijing at a Chinese style restaurant with several items in the center of the table to be shared by everyone -- often they are on a circular rotatable piece of glass. You'll be given a small plate to serve the food to yourself on, and every once in a while the waiter will come to give you a fresh plate so that you don't get too many different types of food (and garbage like fat hunks and bones etc.. ) mixed together...

    Well as for my friend's wedding, I really lost my appetite when they collected all of the plates from everyone at the table -- took them to the corner of the room, rubed the excess food garbage off with a dirty napkin, and then stacked the plates back up and redistributed them to everyone so they could continue eating (from a random other person's dirty plate). It makes me wonder if they aren't doing the same thing in Beijing, but simply wiping the plates off in another room instead of in the corner of the room.

  202. Bullshit by theolein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've had two Swedish girlfriends (and I've never even lived in Sweden), both of whom were not in any way fat, neither of whom dressed weirdly and neither of whom had any of the attitude that you describe.

    I hate to say this, and I haven't seen an image of you, but my guess is that the key to your problems stares at you in the mirror every morning when you wake up. The crap you just regurgitated is an old cliche that's been bounding around since the 80's in Scandinavia. I live in Switzerland and have met many an expat American who complains about crap just like you do.

    Generally, women like a guy who knows what he wants in life (i.e. will not leave the family in times of need), is happy with himself, has a little more than vapid crap between his ears, and a sense of humour. Do you?

    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, just take it from this guy, he's never been to Sweden before!

  203. NOT 1970s by r6144 · · Score: 1

    The quote was made in 1956, while the period of free speech and the subsequent crackdown was in 1957.

  204. OT: Traffic light joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day, a hitch hiker gets a ride from Billy Bob. They come to an intersection with a stoplight. The light showed red. Billy Bob went right through the red light. The passenger looked at Billy Bob and screamed, "What the heck are you doing? You're going to get us killed!"

    Billy Bob responded, "Don't worry, my momma always drives like this."

    So later on, the two guys came to another stoplight and that too was red. Billy Bob sped right through the light. Again the passenger looked at the driver and said, "I thought I told you, you're gonna get us killed! Would you please stop this nonsense!"

    Billy Bob looked at the passenger and responded, "All right! I get it, but I told you my momma drives like this all the time!"

    Soon, the two guys ran into another light. This time it was green. Billy Bob slammed on his brakes and the truck skidded to a stop.

    "What the hell are you doing?" The passenger screamed. "This is the third time you almost got us killed. Why did you stop at a green light?"

    "Well," said Billy Bob, "my momma might be coming the other way!"

  205. Population sizes tell it all duh... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    They have many more people then western countries, their population is over a billion so of course they are going to advance faster then nations with less people and hence less talent and economic power. People are the engines of the economy, assuming you have enough landmass and resources to support such populations and the infrastructure of those economies.

    Like "No shit!", they have they practically have a billion people more then the united states and canada combined. They're geniuses really, they are outbreeding us all!

    "Hail to our new Chinese overlords!" :P

  206. Technology in the first world by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    I hate to rub it in, but the situation described there in China applys to many (all?) Western European countries and has done so for some time.

    At least that seems to be the case for 8 of the 10 items. I'm not sure of merits of anti-theft slip covers, but free hemming would be an excellent addition.

    I've brought up realtime parking signs before. Each lot feeds the number of vacancies to network which aggregates the data so that you can quickly find your way to lots with space. Key intersections have signs showing the number of free spaces in each direction and, as you get closer to the lots, individual lots. No excuse for either cities in the U.S. or Canada not to have this, especially in the U.S. where mass transit is non-existent except for a few places.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  207. Count down traffic lights in Japan by Krokosaur · · Score: 1

    There are countdown traffic lights in Japan -- I've seen them -- in Kobe by example ... BUT for the crosswalk, for the pedestrians. I agree it's a dangerous thing for cars.

  208. AI report on China by raspubejo · · Score: 1

    "Can the people in China read the report on China?"

    "The answer to that would be no. I just tried, and I'm posting from China."

    China - Amnesty International

    Despite a few positive steps, no attempt was made to introduce the fundamental legal and institutional reforms necessary to bring an end to serious human rights violations. Tens of thousands of people continued to be detained or imprisoned in violation of their rights to freedom of expression and association, and were at serious risk of torture or ill-treatment. Thousands of people were sentenced to death or executed. Restrictions increased on the cultural and religious rights of the mainly Muslim Uighur community in Xinjiang, where thousands of people have been detained or imprisoned for so-called "separatist" or "terrorist" offences. In Tibet and other ethnic Tibetan areas, freedom of expression and religion continued to be severely restricted. China continued to use the international "war against terrorism" as a pretext for cracking down on peaceful dissent.

    Background

    A new administration headed by President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao took office in March and introduced a few positive reforms, including the abolition of the "custody and repatriation" system of administrative detention (see below). However, no significant attempt was made to address underlying legal and institutional weaknesses that allow human rights violations to be perpetrated with impunity.

    The outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in February became the first major test for the new leadership. After months of attempting to conceal vital information about the spread of the disease, the authorities eventually began to respond to international pressure for greater accountability and transparency. The World Health Organization announced that the outbreak was under control in June.

    In July, a senior Chinese leader, Luo Gan, called for a continuation of the "strike hard" campaign against crime, which led to a rapid rise in the number of death sentences and executions after its initiation in April 2001, raising fears that this would continue to result in curtailed trial procedures, the use of torture and ill-treatment to obtain "confessions" and imposition of the death penalty without due process.

    In August delegates to the Ninth National Women's Congress reportedly discussed a survey that showed that domestic violence had occurred in a third of all Chinese families. Increased media reporting on this issue appeared to indicate a growing willingness to tackle this entrenched and widespread abuse.

    China strengthened its ties with neighbouring countries, including Central Asian countries under the auspices of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, as well as India, Nepal and Pakistan. One motive appeared to be the forcible return of Chinese nationals, particularly Uighur asylum-seekers and refugees branded as "separatists" or "terrorists" by the Chinese authorities.

    There were concerns that the international community was taking a "softer" line on China by confining its human rights concerns to private dialogue sessions rather than public scrutiny. These were borne out when for the second year running the UN Commission on Human Rights failed to propose a motion criticizing China's human rights record. Nevertheless, the UN Special Rapporteur on education delivered a highly critical assessment of China's education policies following her visit to Beijing in September.

    Violations in the context of economic reform

    The authorities took an increasingly hard line against people protesting against house demolitions and evictions, particularly in large cities such as Shanghai and Beijing, where demolitions of old homes were accelerated by Beijing's preparations for hosting the Olympics in 2008. Scores of peaceful protesters were detained and lawyers assisting in such cases were at risk of arrest or intimidation.

    The rights of freedom of expression and association of workers' representativ

  209. Well, I guess "tricking" them isn't quite the correct word. You'll have to forgive me, I was on a roll. You have to convince them that you will increase their capital more than you will remove through your salary. It has to be a mutually benificial.

    Its not that far form raw capitalism over all, however there are a few industries that are far from it.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  210. The only downside to intersection reservation by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ...is that it would probably be owned and operated by Ticketmaster. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley