That's how money is handled too. If human beings didn't discount long term rewards, we would have likely gone extinct. Immediate benefits have the distinction of being fulfilled without risk. Future benefits can always evaporate overnight if you die.
That system is based on trust between parties. This leads to large inefficiencies, long clearing times, and expensive transfers. Crypto solves many of the problems of banking and remittance in a better way than the existing system.
Apples and oranges. The stores are the primary (or only in many cases) channel for software on mobile platforms. MS's store is for Windows, and it's competing with all the other software channels available (and traditional) on Windows. It's closer to the Mac app store, but even then Windows has a vastly larger and more diverse software ecosystem.
I'm not sure that's true. Our data resolution becomes worse the farther back you go. We're more likely to miss large, temporary shifts. It stands to reason that might also lead to trouble detecting how sharp a shift is the farther back you go.
Just because Mr. Science Man says we have never seen this type of shift in the record, does not mean he is saying the record shows there has never been such a shift.
Not necessarily. Treaties and a general good relationship with the EU means they could have US courts enforce judgment. Currently, the US is not under treaty to enforce the GDPR, but that could easily change.
Broken promises that lead to bigger gains for early whale investors is the whole problem crypto was invented to address. Funny how almost every new altcoin project seems to rediscover all the problems of traditional financial industry, without providing anything not already offerered by existing tokens.
Is there any evidence Qualcomm made such a promise? Sounds more like a butt-hurt Apple trying to get out of paying prices the market bears. Apple isn't being forced to buy from Qualcomm. They decided many years ago to go down the path of being dependent on Qualcomm and it has earned them billions of dollars saving time and development. Now they don't want to pay their fair share.
If you haven't delved into it, try learning more about functional programming. In my experience, most devs haven't really built anything using FP, and it can be illuminating. react.js is a pretty good example of a system that works well with FP.
That depends on which government you recognize. The entire point of the civil war is there are large swaths of Syria that do not recognize Assad's government.
We're there to fight ISIL? ISIL is pretty much where we want them: out of Iraq and focused on Assad. Sunni extremists attacking our Shia allie in Iraq? Terrorists. Sunni extremists attacking Alawites in Syria? Freedom fighters.
I've dropped my wired Internet with the local AT&T monopoly and switched entirely to mobile Internet. It's expensive as fuck, but at least my dollars are no longer propping up the monopolistic cable/DSL/fiber regimes. And it keeps getting cheaper. By the time 5g hits, we'll all be able to do the same thing and we can finally bury the corpses of Comcast et al.
Professional matchmakers have always existed for the wealthy. To me, the news is that these services are moving downmarket. Dating apps make it easy to automate much of the time that used to go into building (real life) social networks, keeping in touch with a stable of clients or opportunities from both sides, etc. Now it's just one dude with mad texting skills taking on ten clients in an hour. The price point has dramatically changed.
Too many people like to write code. The code left unwritten is often the best code, and you won't know that you're writing good code if you never stop coding to take a look, or - at the very least - you're ripping out stuff as you go.
There's something to be said for working code, but the long term viability of well structured, documented, broken code beats thrown together working code any day.
Most "senior" developers understand how to develop class hierarchies using design patterns, if you're lucky. Algorithms are something one downloads or reads about, not something one develops.
You're a moron if you think home ownership is always financially responsible. In many of the most expensive places in the country, your money is much better spent investing in stocks or even bonds than it is paying the ownership premium.
In this context, I believe "quietly" means: "we're just hearing about this because our news organization is too focused on sensational headlines to follow what actually goes on in the world."
Generally speaking, security inside a corporate office is handled privately. The police don't guard buildings. Similar roles apply here. Unless Atlanta is handling DOD information or some such thing, it's not really the feds role to secure that. It's like the FBI looking into a robbery. Doesn't happen unless there's a federal angle.
Slashdot Mirror
That's how money is handled too. If human beings didn't discount long term rewards, we would have likely gone extinct. Immediate benefits have the distinction of being fulfilled without risk. Future benefits can always evaporate overnight if you die.
That system is based on trust between parties. This leads to large inefficiencies, long clearing times, and expensive transfers. Crypto solves many of the problems of banking and remittance in a better way than the existing system.
Apples and oranges. The stores are the primary (or only in many cases) channel for software on mobile platforms. MS's store is for Windows, and it's competing with all the other software channels available (and traditional) on Windows. It's closer to the Mac app store, but even then Windows has a vastly larger and more diverse software ecosystem.
I'm not sure that's true. Our data resolution becomes worse the farther back you go. We're more likely to miss large, temporary shifts. It stands to reason that might also lead to trouble detecting how sharp a shift is the farther back you go.
Just because Mr. Science Man says we have never seen this type of shift in the record, does not mean he is saying the record shows there has never been such a shift.
Not necessarily. Treaties and a general good relationship with the EU means they could have US courts enforce judgment. Currently, the US is not under treaty to enforce the GDPR, but that could easily change.
Broken promises that lead to bigger gains for early whale investors is the whole problem crypto was invented to address. Funny how almost every new altcoin project seems to rediscover all the problems of traditional financial industry, without providing anything not already offerered by existing tokens.
Is there any evidence Qualcomm made such a promise? Sounds more like a butt-hurt Apple trying to get out of paying prices the market bears. Apple isn't being forced to buy from Qualcomm. They decided many years ago to go down the path of being dependent on Qualcomm and it has earned them billions of dollars saving time and development. Now they don't want to pay their fair share.
"Nazism is just a method of social order. It is amoral, neither good nor evil."
Yup, that's how your dumb-ass sounds.
If you haven't delved into it, try learning more about functional programming. In my experience, most devs haven't really built anything using FP, and it can be illuminating. react.js is a pretty good example of a system that works well with FP.
This probably seems reasonable to someone with no experience delivering video over the Internet. The real world is way more complicated.
If you're looking for a pre-industrial baseline for plastics, no research is necessary. The baseline is zero.
So, you're saying you accept pronouns from the 16th century, but those from the 19th century are beneath you?
That depends on which government you recognize. The entire point of the civil war is there are large swaths of Syria that do not recognize Assad's government.
We're there to fight ISIL? ISIL is pretty much where we want them: out of Iraq and focused on Assad. Sunni extremists attacking our Shia allie in Iraq? Terrorists. Sunni extremists attacking Alawites in Syria? Freedom fighters.
I've dropped my wired Internet with the local AT&T monopoly and switched entirely to mobile Internet. It's expensive as fuck, but at least my dollars are no longer propping up the monopolistic cable/DSL/fiber regimes. And it keeps getting cheaper. By the time 5g hits, we'll all be able to do the same thing and we can finally bury the corpses of Comcast et al.
Professional matchmakers have always existed for the wealthy. To me, the news is that these services are moving downmarket. Dating apps make it easy to automate much of the time that used to go into building (real life) social networks, keeping in touch with a stable of clients or opportunities from both sides, etc. Now it's just one dude with mad texting skills taking on ten clients in an hour. The price point has dramatically changed.
Too many people like to write code. The code left unwritten is often the best code, and you won't know that you're writing good code if you never stop coding to take a look, or - at the very least - you're ripping out stuff as you go.
There's something to be said for working code, but the long term viability of well structured, documented, broken code beats thrown together working code any day.
Most "senior" developers understand how to develop class hierarchies using design patterns, if you're lucky. Algorithms are something one downloads or reads about, not something one develops.
You're a moron if you think home ownership is always financially responsible. In many of the most expensive places in the country, your money is much better spent investing in stocks or even bonds than it is paying the ownership premium.
Let's all thank China for introducing this dystopian idea to the world, thus teaching everyone how dystopic this idea is.
If Apple had come up with this idea, we'd be fucked.
In this context, I believe "quietly" means: "we're just hearing about this because our news organization is too focused on sensational headlines to follow what actually goes on in the world."
Generally speaking, security inside a corporate office is handled privately. The police don't guard buildings. Similar roles apply here. Unless Atlanta is handling DOD information or some such thing, it's not really the feds role to secure that. It's like the FBI looking into a robbery. Doesn't happen unless there's a federal angle.
If I payed taxes to Atlanta, I'd probaly be miffed. But since I don't, I commend them for telling the hackers to fuck off.
Yeah, because the team designing wallpapers is definitely the people who should be fixing the bugs the engineers haven't gotten to.
Facebook's business model is selling your data. MS's business model is figuring out new ways to charge for Office.