Do you want to know the best way for an executive to give an out of touch presentation?
Don't use your own product.
What this guy does isn't a huge deal, but if he had personal trouble with the linux desktop, perhaps he or most likely one of the developers under his influence would scratch that itch for all of us. Leadership is a tough thing when you don't live by example.
Do you have a factual basis for thinking DACA would survive in court? Because there is a lot of evidence to say you are wrong.
Look at what happened to DAPA (the parent act similar to DACA). The whole reason DACA is in the news today is because the same group of attorneys who took DAPA through the courts was preparing the same exercise on DACA.
"At the end of the 19th century, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that congress has “plenary power” (meaning full and complete) to regulate immigration. Derived from Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, the doctrine is based on the concept that immigration is a question of national sovereignty, relating to a nation’s right to define its own borders and restrict entrance therein."
The linked opinion piece (the words of lawyers are always "opinion") cites many Supreme Court decisions, including why the argument of prosecutorial discretion does not apply to a class of 800,000 people.
Wow, the amount of red tape you propose is absurd and your wrong understanding of twitter while spouting such a thing is disturbing. Anybody can read public tweets, even blocked accounts.
The story summary talks all about the costs and nothing about the benefits. Less data to be served for high quality output could very well be worth the higher encoding cost.
One benefit of having a President who watches the news is that he becomes aware of issues that his white house staff filters out as not important. He did the right thing by stepping in to help these young engineers out.
I'm sure this has nothing to do with Let's Encrypt and Domain Validated Certificates being passed out for free. The market is changing and Symantec is looking for a sucker with a billion dollars.
In a small way, Thompson is correct. But a modern web developer wouldn't view source, they would right-click Inspect the element.
There are many reasons for this but the most basic thing a novice (or out of date old-timer) should understand is that the code you see through View Source is not necessarily what you are seeing on the rendered version.
This is due to several reasons but the most obvious are CSS and Javascript. CSS can modify the positioning, colors, size, and general layout parameters of an item. Javascript can modify the DOM, which in plain English means it has modified the original HTML file. These modifications may well include inserting or removing parts of the original HTML document.
The browser dev tools show how things are, not how they came across the wire. It's a major mindset change from the 1990's web.
Not only did President Trump get us out of an expensive yet worthless non-binding global agreement, he also got a commitment from nearly 350 local mayors to keep their carbon reduction goals and has made France step up their reduction in emissions. Liberals will refuse to admit it but President Trump has been one of the most effective leaders of reduced global fossil fuel emissions.
That is misleading because illegal border crossings are down 73% so there is less low hanging fruit to deport. Interior enforcement has to increase to maintain the deportation numbers.
As someone with no hotel brand allegiance, I'd rather earn my points through hotels.com than a single chain. This allows me to get the best location at an amenity tier that fits my trip. Sometimes I want cheap and sometimes I will pamper myself. When locked into a single hotel brand, it makes it harder to fit those needs.
And I usually check the hotel website directly prior to booking to make sure I'm not getting screwed on price. Almost always the price is the same which validates my decision to keep racking up points with hotels.com.
Plus there are stupid aspects to a lot of the hotel chain programs. I was traveling to Las Vegas a lot so I took the MGM "mlife" points card. Your benefits improve as you move up the 5 tiers. (cheaper booking, express checkin lines, etc) As I was approaching Gold (tier 3), they reset all of my accumulated points and tier down to zero. I called up the support number to ask if there was a mistake. They informed me that on your membership anniversary date, they take away all of your levels and rewards. (It's in the fine print) So fuck them. I actually book, eat, gamble more at the Caeasars chain of properties now just because I'm bitter about that. MGM really screwed themselves.
Of course web pages need to be cross browser. But if you were around in the IE6 days, you know that microsofties are the absolute worst at making cross browser pages. No way in hell would going back to those days be desirable.
Well, then, I suppose you're also going to contradict me that what I hear and read in the news, about not only voters but members of Congress not being terribly happy, is just 'fake news'
If you are getting your "news" from the same sources who said Hillary had a 98% chance of winning, what do you expect?
When you don't balance your liberal news sources with a conservative view like Breitbart, you're not getting the whole picture.
Right now it sounds like you live in a special "Pauline Kael" kind of world where you don't know anyone happy with President Trump.
Congress might say they are watching but are they going to do anything about it?
I severely doubt it. Too many donors.
Why are they comparing 2017 to 2015? Did anyone else notice they skipped 2016?
I guess someone read the how to lie with statistics book.
This is what democrat politicians are especially bad at - foresight.
They want all of these regulatory bureaucracies but never think about when the pendulum swings and the other party is in charge.
Obama and his pen are another great example. How is that legacy working out for him?
Do you want to know the best way for an executive to give an out of touch presentation?
Don't use your own product.
What this guy does isn't a huge deal, but if he had personal trouble with the linux desktop, perhaps he or most likely one of the developers under his influence would scratch that itch for all of us. Leadership is a tough thing when you don't live by example.
The Ukraine and Saudis were rooting for Hillary to win. Mexico was certainly anti Trump and may have tried to sway the election away from him too.
Is Facebook going to share that information or conveniently not mention it.
"It probably would have survived in court"
Do you have a factual basis for thinking DACA would survive in court? Because there is a lot of evidence to say you are wrong.
Look at what happened to DAPA (the parent act similar to DACA). The whole reason DACA is in the news today is because the same group of attorneys who took DAPA through the courts was preparing the same exercise on DACA.
You might put your fingers in your ears and shake in a tantrum, but this piece at Fox answers all of your questions:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion...
Here is the immediate quote:
"At the end of the 19th century, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that congress has “plenary power” (meaning full and complete) to regulate immigration. Derived from Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, the doctrine is based on the concept that immigration is a question of national sovereignty, relating to a nation’s right to define its own borders and restrict entrance therein."
The linked opinion piece (the words of lawyers are always "opinion") cites many Supreme Court decisions, including why the argument of prosecutorial discretion does not apply to a class of 800,000 people.
Wow, the amount of red tape you propose is absurd and your wrong understanding of twitter while spouting such a thing is disturbing. Anybody can read public tweets, even blocked accounts.
The story summary talks all about the costs and nothing about the benefits. Less data to be served for high quality output could very well be worth the higher encoding cost.
One benefit of having a President who watches the news is that he becomes aware of issues that his white house staff filters out as not important. He did the right thing by stepping in to help these young engineers out.
Thank you President Trump!
I'm sure this has nothing to do with Let's Encrypt and Domain Validated Certificates being passed out for free. The market is changing and Symantec is looking for a sucker with a billion dollars.
In a small way, Thompson is correct. But a modern web developer wouldn't view source, they would right-click Inspect the element.
There are many reasons for this but the most basic thing a novice (or out of date old-timer) should understand is that the code you see through View Source is not necessarily what you are seeing on the rendered version.
This is due to several reasons but the most obvious are CSS and Javascript. CSS can modify the positioning, colors, size, and general layout parameters of an item. Javascript can modify the DOM, which in plain English means it has modified the original HTML file. These modifications may well include inserting or removing parts of the original HTML document.
The browser dev tools show how things are, not how they came across the wire. It's a major mindset change from the 1990's web.
Especially since all techno sounds the same anyway.
And if they bring in new, upcoming artists, that benefits everyone except the entrenched record labels. (boo-hoo)
Not only did President Trump get us out of an expensive yet worthless non-binding global agreement, he also got a commitment from nearly 350 local mayors to keep their carbon reduction goals and has made France step up their reduction in emissions. Liberals will refuse to admit it but President Trump has been one of the most effective leaders of reduced global fossil fuel emissions.
Thank you President Trump!
That is misleading because illegal border crossings are down 73% so there is less low hanging fruit to deport. Interior enforcement has to increase to maintain the deportation numbers.
Or as those of us in Arizona call it... Summer.
As someone with no hotel brand allegiance, I'd rather earn my points through hotels.com than a single chain. This allows me to get the best location at an amenity tier that fits my trip. Sometimes I want cheap and sometimes I will pamper myself. When locked into a single hotel brand, it makes it harder to fit those needs.
And I usually check the hotel website directly prior to booking to make sure I'm not getting screwed on price. Almost always the price is the same which validates my decision to keep racking up points with hotels.com.
Plus there are stupid aspects to a lot of the hotel chain programs. I was traveling to Las Vegas a lot so I took the MGM "mlife" points card. Your benefits improve as you move up the 5 tiers. (cheaper booking, express checkin lines, etc) As I was approaching Gold (tier 3), they reset all of my accumulated points and tier down to zero. I called up the support number to ask if there was a mistake. They informed me that on your membership anniversary date, they take away all of your levels and rewards. (It's in the fine print) So fuck them. I actually book, eat, gamble more at the Caeasars chain of properties now just because I'm bitter about that. MGM really screwed themselves.
People will be locked into IE.
Microsoft has confirmed that it will reject all alternative browsers by store policy.
http://www.zdnet.com/article/g...
You may not be aware but web browsers are banned on Windows 10S:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/g...
Of course web pages need to be cross browser. But if you were around in the IE6 days, you know that microsofties are the absolute worst at making cross browser pages. No way in hell would going back to those days be desirable.
What do you think the mass production of bones meant?
> They need to have strong evidence of this fantastic claim.
You must be new to climate science.
There is a really easy answer. I hire all men but on the EO report I write that half are identified as women. 13% identify as black and 12% hispanic.
This keeps the Rachel Dolezal types happy and we move on to more important issues, like getting shit done.
That's why President Trump got my vote.
Anything that looks like Rosie O'Donnell needs to be removed from existence.
I thought they meant it as in Clayton Bigsby, the black white supremacist from the Dave Chapelle show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Well, then, I suppose you're also going to contradict me that what I hear and read in the news, about not only voters but members of Congress not being terribly happy, is just 'fake news'
If you are getting your "news" from the same sources who said Hillary had a 98% chance of winning, what do you expect?
When you don't balance your liberal news sources with a conservative view like Breitbart, you're not getting the whole picture.
Right now it sounds like you live in a special "Pauline Kael" kind of world where you don't know anyone happy with President Trump.