Everyone knows the truth will out in the end, just as it has before, troll away. Who really cares, the US will go on killing, to generate more war profits. WMDs anyone, seriously, WMDs and still the lies continue and to challenge is to be a troll. WMDs WMDs WMDs, trolll away.
Now that I can understand and appreciate that attitude, I just hugely dislike the deceit, pretending to be one thing whilst being another. Pretending to be all chaste to lock in a relationship whilst being a massive cheater, not that I have ever been affected by it but I find the trail of children of divorce as a result of faithlessness to be disturbing. Plus of course the whole idea of non-reproductive mutual masturbation to be something special, even with zero emotional connection all because it sells product to be more than just a little shallow. Also especially annoying is the slander and abuse when you just couldn't be fucked (tee hee) playing the silly game, somehow you are a failure if you do not fuck everything that moves. Wow the rage when you start sticking it back.
I refereed to the only one that provided any statics about the outcome of the attacks, so oh yeah I'm a Russian spy. I suppose you are OK with the US killing more than ten million people all over the globe without any world war. How about reporting on Mosul, how about Lybia, how about Ukraine, how about where ever the else the US military has been murdering people with one excuse after another to pave the way for the American century where they parasite the rest of the world.
The indications are that in European history, was where a powerful phobia of consuming human flesh grew. Taking into account human propaganda to make killing humans more acceptable, likely the target of that prohibition were the Neanderthals. That whole ice giant exaggeration and the more northern Europe base for the legend tend to indicate, the whole thing was about the purposeful genocidal eradication of Neanderthals and the stories to excuse it plus the inevitable rape, abuse and slavery that likely accompanied that slaughter, along with the fabrication of heroes and stories about those heroes.
The further south from Europe the less binding that prohibition about consuming human flesh, in history.
Since when is male or female, just female. Be a whorish as you want, why would you think I care. I just am sick of the bullshit, either no one should care about the photos as it is accepted normal behaviour or they freak out about the photos because they want to keep the behaviour secret but go ahead wedge ignore the quite specific male or female because you are all wedged up. Make up your mind, you confused morons either the behaviour is normal and you should not give a crap about the photos or ohh ahh you are all freaked out about being exposed. I hold with the idea that no difference between slutty behaviour male or female, although technically in terms of disease, the female will always get an infection and the male will only sometimes get infected, so in the sexual diseases market, females seem to be disadvantaged. What ever the fuck you do with you non reproductive mutual masturbation does not concern me one iota as long as force or minors are not involved, every possible combination as often as possible fine, not my concern, I am just really sick of hearing about all the nonsense and the political correct bullshit and seriously why don't you just go fuck off.
Now reading from RT https://www.rt.com/news/383807.... The US managed to kill 2 civilians, three soldiers and injure seven others (so obviously the Syrians were fully aware of the attack and it looks like one of the missiles went a little astray), with a claim of 59 tomahawk cruise missiles fired, with an approximate cost of $1.59 million each https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., excluding firing costs, for a total cost of $93.81 million, excluding firing costs, operation of vessels and crew, which could really blow that figure out, likely double. So who was punishing whom for what is looking like a false flag gas attack (did the US government just roundly punish US taxpayers), although people really did die but it is looking like they were kidnap victims from pro-Syrian government villages who were murdered. So all in all, just what the fuck is going on, this is looking all sorts of crazy. A profitable day for Raytheon McDonald Douglas but it makes the US look like a pack of idiots. So panic of the Obama spying on Trump disclosures, the Clintons are feeling prosecutorial heat, Trump has been set up for impeachment with an attack upon another country without Congressional or US approval or Raytheon McDonald Douglas, were bitching because profits for this quarter are a little low and demanded expenditure. Make no mistake, the attack was clearly rushed because the false flag story was falling apart and now the evidence will expose Uncle Toms Obama's Syrian rape brigades as the actual culprits and Trump will be blamed for acting with congressional approval, what a stupid debacle. It seems very much like the US spent more money than the damage they caused, especially when the US government values foreign people with brown skins at $2,500 per https://www.theguardian.com/wo....
Erm, so why the fuck is everyone so embarrassed about the photos. You can not have it both ways, I am utterly neutral, completely ambivalent but the craziness, oh no dirty photos, seriously what the fuck do you morons find so destructive about normal sexual behaviour and yet point that out and get attacked. If it is normal behaviour the photos should cause no problem if it is considered abnormal behaviour the photos cause a problem, make up your fucking minds. I was quite clear, I give not one crap about male or female whorish behaviour, it is you idiots who have a problem with those photos of what is meant to be normal human sexuality, so from my viewpoint, you can all quite simply fuck off with your confusion. If it is normal accepted behaviour than the photos should cause no problem, none what so ever, yet you fuckers (snicker snicker) carry on about, make up your fucking minds.
Either that or Uber just happened to coincide with a general switch from alchohol as the intoxicant of choice to marijuana. So it switch from drivers driving to fast, to drivers driving to slow (those slow drivers not being in accidents so much as triggering them, when they set off a alchohol fuelled driver). It would be interesting to see how stoned drivers perform on a racetrack with very safe vehicles of course, how fast could they actually go before panicking and giving up.
Problem with you B$, just because you have insurance, does not mean, you will receive a benefit. The insurance company want so take in as much premiums as possible, pay as little cost as possible to collect those premiums and then pay out as little as possible by denial of payment, for as long as possible. A copayment is the most extreme corrupt form of denial of health cover "It must be paid before any policy benefit is payable by an insurance", company.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copayment ie you get sick, lose you job, you can not pay the copayment and they just laugh at you and say die fucker we don't have to pay one cent. Now that doesn't ever cover treating one condition as multiple conditions and demanding repeat copayments and then there is coinsurance claims and of course, temporary denial, sufficient that you die before you can claim payment for treatment and on it goes. Having insurance is meaningless in today's corrupt corporate controlled society, they might pay, it is never they will pay.
That additional stress, does great harm to your recovery, if you even get treatment, that constant fear of termination of insurance as termination of life but in America greed is God, it says so on your money, right there on your money and that is not by accident, they are laughing at your gullibility right to your face.
In a school environment, I am surprised you did not pursue this dysfunction against Apple as hard as possible, collectively across as many schools as possible. Clearly this failure by Apple should have been broadcast loud and wide, to protect others and seek a more reasonable outcome for yourselves.
What is interesting it the foolish choice of langauge, they are making a recommendation 'anything that serves to recommend a person or thing, or induce acceptance or favour.', http://www.dictionary.com/brow.... They are recommending a product or service based upon their reputation and no longer broadcaster of advertisements. They are taking on legal liability for the quality of that product or service, as Facebook has now publicly stated it is a recommendation. So Facebook, you recommended a product, I bought i based upon that recommendation and it turned out to be shit, so you will be hearing from my lawyer.
It even brings to mind that whole thing about targeted advertisements, they are targeting you with the promotion of a specific product, basically presenting it qualities as promoted as being real and truth and targeted at you specifically. So they have analysed the product, analysed you and matched that product to you, to get you to buy it, so what happens when it turns out to be shite, how are they not liable for that targeted manipulation and false claims presented with regard to that product. Keep in mind it was specifically targeted at you, not a random ad, but a targeted, as it turned out scam, that targeting makes them liable.
You can not do it fraudulently. You can not claim to support free speech and they secret deny it, in order to fraudulently misrepresent yourself to retain end users. So news service can not claim to be fair and balanced if they are not, they can not censor one side, whilst promoting another and then claim fair and balanced to promote a lie. Once you claim to be a public service you are bound by that claim and can not censor. Telecommunications companies can not claim their service as private and censor anyone they disagree with whilst claiming it is a public service. So no, censorship is not a right, that goes right along apartheid, where citizens for what ever reason were censored from participation in society by other citizens, collectively. Once you are open to the public, you are bound by the rules and regulation of that public and the provision of a public service, no censorship of legal content no exclusion of individuals. Otherwise declare it as a private members only service.
We you say you will sell thirty percent, you will sell thirty percent. When you say you 'PLAN' to sell thirty percent, you well sell just as much as you fucking can as fast as you fucking can, well, duh, you simply revised your plan. Using that word 'plan' is a red flag for much greater sales, say the plan is to bail on Twitter.
Don't think of it as breaking into some ones house. Think of it as spraying over someone's extremely reflective walls and roof blinding everyone around them with glare.
So what you are saying limiting by number of views does not really do anything other than reduce accounting costs. So 1,000 views should be a more reasonable limit and to kerb cheats, payments should be delayed to allow the content to be contested prior to payment, say between 30 and 90 days. If youtube was serious about better control of up loaders they should allow end users to block you tubers they do not want to see or bother to try to remember not to see and keep statistics of the blocked youtubers ie make it worth while to register. There is a whole bunch of crappy up loaders I want to block, fake thumbnails, bullshit titles, scraped content, photos as videos, machine voices, crap reviewers, propagandists, government agents, corporate junk, ads masquerading as content, VEVO (heh heh, although I can quite readily remember to avoid that one). Allow blocking of uploaders you bloody fucknuckles, grrr!
There is a contract law that covers this situation. Basically if a contract is bad enough, they grab it, rip in into a thousand tiny pieces and bin it, figuratively speaking. Then the court works through proper remuneration for the service provided, generally speaking this will go against those who produced the contract. Similarly ambiguous or contradictory contact conditions are always meant to go against those who produced the contract, their contract, their responsibility for failure. However US courts are quite corrupt and anything can happen and unfortunately taking to the high court will mean loss against a major corporation no matter how fanciful the interpretation has to be by the high court (even to the point of adding whole clauses that do not exist, laughably corrupt) ie the constitution only applies to the actions of the federal government and major corporations are allowed to do what ever they want, now that's stupidly corrupt because that is on display to the rest of the world.
Don't act like a whore and you will have nothing to be embarrassed by, male or female. Act like a whore and it is better for your future victims to know in advance who you really are, so they can avoid becoming victims and we all know the kind of males and females that we are discussing, it's kind of better for every one else if they just prey upon each other and leave the majority out of the manipulations and deceits.
Yep, y sturdy fuking englis or fuking histry, nuffing to lern their. Filosofizing shit, why, thunk abut thunkin. Smart is stoopid. Follow greed becum an overseer and slave master, thats where its at, fuk the workers and fuk em hard.
The lesson in stupidity brought to you, well, by stupidity.
I wonder if company employees will purposefully code in bugs, so they can share the money with the people who find those bugs, a new kind of insider trading;).
I prefer sitting in a theatre fuming after watching the first fifteen minutes of a movie where the trailers were the best part and the rest of the movie is utter shite. Trapped, not wanting the abandon the money spent, but really wanting to leave. Now that is what killed the cinema experience for me. That at it is political incorrect to fund the arse holes because in their insane greed they purposefully corrupt democracy via the sick entertainments of corrupt politicians (you fund main stream media and you pay to corrupt your politicians, don't fund main stream media and they can not buy your politicians or provide sick expensive 'entertainments', pizzagate, ugh).
There is something to be said about buying it again and again and again and off into infinity. Easiest example, making coffee. You do not buy a coffee making machine just once but have to keep buying it, whether it drips or spurts, it is only going to last a wee bit longer than it's warranty, down to as low as 90 days and you will be buying it again. This versus say buying a French press https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., which until you physically break it, will not need replacing. Yet the French press makes much better coffee than an automated machine because you can readily adjust the coffee to your mood, quick brew, slow brew, a bit more or less coffee. So not only get worse coffee but you have to keep buying the device when it breaks.
Home automation a never ending repair headache, the more you automate the more the home will demand you maintain it, repair it and when automation fails it does not mean you can go back to manual, it means zero function until it is repaired, the joys of a couple of hundred dollars an hour call outs and skipping work all day because shift service is the corporate standard, extremely shit service (expecting to be on hold for hours is the new norm, or call backs, where the fuckers put you on hold again).
Totally incorrect. In by far the majority of locations around the globe, the only conditions of sale applicable are those on 'actual' display at the point of sale and they must be clearly visible. Only a few corrupt countries ie the US allow post purchase conditions of contract, which is wildly corrupt and implies no cost of purchasing for the consumer (time and cost, go to store, buy, install, un-install, return costs that are often many multiplies of the software purchased and the end user in entitled to that reimbursement should the product fail its advertised claims which of course is reality with EULAs not matching advertising) because screw the consumer.
It has become pretty obvious after the last Wikileaks that scanning your smart phone or laptops et al is not the goal installing spyware on them is https://www.theregister.co.uk/.... This has for more to do with total control over all politicians and political activists as well as anybody in media, than it has to do with security, and driven more by the Corporate contractors out of NATO (North American Territorial Occupation farce), so it includes insider trading scams and industrial espionage (insider trading, for those who don't get it, hack financial information and executive communications, of publicly traded companies prior to public release to earn billions). Entirely corrupt to go with the country with the entirely meaningless constitution which can quite readily be interpreted in the most fanciful corrupt ways, by corrupt jobs for life high court (so how the fuck come, those arseholes get a job for life, that's fucking communist).
To be fair, the Samsung OS comes, sort of free with the device, all they can see is Android. M$ well it comes out crap on purpose so they can sell it again and again, only this time more secure and more stable and more reliable versus prior products original release, the new wrinkle is of course far more privacy invasive and they are now selling you. The next big thing will of course be the Google vs Apple vs M$ VPN wars (M$ is kind of screwed right from the outset, impossible for them to sell privacy now, who would be gullible enough to believe it, they now sit alongside the slime of the US Senate and Congress and it's corrupt sick incumbent privacy invasive telecoms, it is going to get real ugly now). Imagine M$ securing PCs from the invasiveness of ISPs because scarcity is profit in capitalism, so your private data is more profitable if M$ blocks access to it, hence the VPN wars.
Of course once competent companies become incompetent when blinded by greed, imagine super hackable products and potentially exploding batteries, what a combination.
Why not. Any half way mature writer should know, 'they made me do it', is the excuse of a child. Face it, the internet is opening up content competition to a much broader field. Even bad amateurs can produce good work sometimes. The biggest threat to writers, the creators of canned content is interactive content, it sucks in huge amounts of end users time and cuts out canned content. Most of my time viewing idiot box content is as background to interactive internet content. I struggle to watch retreads on their own, they simply are not that interesting or good.
So canned content writers are competing for fewer spaces in the market and that is with many more writers entering the market. Try self publishing, modern computer animation, combining graphic artists with writers to cut out all the middle men (those useless products of nepotism creating crap retreads).
The reality is, if you do not self publish, then you will be screwed over by the publishers and that is that. Now take into account securing writers from all over the globe to supply content to all over the globe and face it content creators working for publishers are fucked. They will squeeze you dry, blame it on pirates and toss you out (every now and again trotting you out on camera to cry about people who infringe copyright, reality is, it is the publishers who are the pirates, raping and pillaging content creators).
Slashdot Mirror
Everyone knows the truth will out in the end, just as it has before, troll away. Who really cares, the US will go on killing, to generate more war profits. WMDs anyone, seriously, WMDs and still the lies continue and to challenge is to be a troll. WMDs WMDs WMDs, trolll away.
Now that I can understand and appreciate that attitude, I just hugely dislike the deceit, pretending to be one thing whilst being another. Pretending to be all chaste to lock in a relationship whilst being a massive cheater, not that I have ever been affected by it but I find the trail of children of divorce as a result of faithlessness to be disturbing. Plus of course the whole idea of non-reproductive mutual masturbation to be something special, even with zero emotional connection all because it sells product to be more than just a little shallow. Also especially annoying is the slander and abuse when you just couldn't be fucked (tee hee) playing the silly game, somehow you are a failure if you do not fuck everything that moves. Wow the rage when you start sticking it back.
I refereed to the only one that provided any statics about the outcome of the attacks, so oh yeah I'm a Russian spy. I suppose you are OK with the US killing more than ten million people all over the globe without any world war. How about reporting on Mosul, how about Lybia, how about Ukraine, how about where ever the else the US military has been murdering people with one excuse after another to pave the way for the American century where they parasite the rest of the world.
The indications are that in European history, was where a powerful phobia of consuming human flesh grew. Taking into account human propaganda to make killing humans more acceptable, likely the target of that prohibition were the Neanderthals. That whole ice giant exaggeration and the more northern Europe base for the legend tend to indicate, the whole thing was about the purposeful genocidal eradication of Neanderthals and the stories to excuse it plus the inevitable rape, abuse and slavery that likely accompanied that slaughter, along with the fabrication of heroes and stories about those heroes.
The further south from Europe the less binding that prohibition about consuming human flesh, in history.
Since when is male or female, just female. Be a whorish as you want, why would you think I care. I just am sick of the bullshit, either no one should care about the photos as it is accepted normal behaviour or they freak out about the photos because they want to keep the behaviour secret but go ahead wedge ignore the quite specific male or female because you are all wedged up. Make up your mind, you confused morons either the behaviour is normal and you should not give a crap about the photos or ohh ahh you are all freaked out about being exposed. I hold with the idea that no difference between slutty behaviour male or female, although technically in terms of disease, the female will always get an infection and the male will only sometimes get infected, so in the sexual diseases market, females seem to be disadvantaged. What ever the fuck you do with you non reproductive mutual masturbation does not concern me one iota as long as force or minors are not involved, every possible combination as often as possible fine, not my concern, I am just really sick of hearing about all the nonsense and the political correct bullshit and seriously why don't you just go fuck off.
Now reading from RT https://www.rt.com/news/383807.... The US managed to kill 2 civilians, three soldiers and injure seven others (so obviously the Syrians were fully aware of the attack and it looks like one of the missiles went a little astray), with a claim of 59 tomahawk cruise missiles fired, with an approximate cost of $1.59 million each https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., excluding firing costs, for a total cost of $93.81 million, excluding firing costs, operation of vessels and crew, which could really blow that figure out, likely double. So who was punishing whom for what is looking like a false flag gas attack (did the US government just roundly punish US taxpayers), although people really did die but it is looking like they were kidnap victims from pro-Syrian government villages who were murdered. So all in all, just what the fuck is going on, this is looking all sorts of crazy. A profitable day for Raytheon McDonald Douglas but it makes the US look like a pack of idiots. So panic of the Obama spying on Trump disclosures, the Clintons are feeling prosecutorial heat, Trump has been set up for impeachment with an attack upon another country without Congressional or US approval or Raytheon McDonald Douglas, were bitching because profits for this quarter are a little low and demanded expenditure. Make no mistake, the attack was clearly rushed because the false flag story was falling apart and now the evidence will expose Uncle Toms Obama's Syrian rape brigades as the actual culprits and Trump will be blamed for acting with congressional approval, what a stupid debacle. It seems very much like the US spent more money than the damage they caused, especially when the US government values foreign people with brown skins at $2,500 per https://www.theguardian.com/wo....
Erm, so why the fuck is everyone so embarrassed about the photos. You can not have it both ways, I am utterly neutral, completely ambivalent but the craziness, oh no dirty photos, seriously what the fuck do you morons find so destructive about normal sexual behaviour and yet point that out and get attacked. If it is normal behaviour the photos should cause no problem if it is considered abnormal behaviour the photos cause a problem, make up your fucking minds. I was quite clear, I give not one crap about male or female whorish behaviour, it is you idiots who have a problem with those photos of what is meant to be normal human sexuality, so from my viewpoint, you can all quite simply fuck off with your confusion. If it is normal accepted behaviour than the photos should cause no problem, none what so ever, yet you fuckers (snicker snicker) carry on about, make up your fucking minds.
Either that or Uber just happened to coincide with a general switch from alchohol as the intoxicant of choice to marijuana. So it switch from drivers driving to fast, to drivers driving to slow (those slow drivers not being in accidents so much as triggering them, when they set off a alchohol fuelled driver). It would be interesting to see how stoned drivers perform on a racetrack with very safe vehicles of course, how fast could they actually go before panicking and giving up.
Problem with you B$, just because you have insurance, does not mean, you will receive a benefit. The insurance company want so take in as much premiums as possible, pay as little cost as possible to collect those premiums and then pay out as little as possible by denial of payment, for as long as possible. A copayment is the most extreme corrupt form of denial of health cover "It must be paid before any policy benefit is payable by an insurance", company.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copayment ie you get sick, lose you job, you can not pay the copayment and they just laugh at you and say die fucker we don't have to pay one cent. Now that doesn't ever cover treating one condition as multiple conditions and demanding repeat copayments and then there is coinsurance claims and of course, temporary denial, sufficient that you die before you can claim payment for treatment and on it goes. Having insurance is meaningless in today's corrupt corporate controlled society, they might pay, it is never they will pay.
That additional stress, does great harm to your recovery, if you even get treatment, that constant fear of termination of insurance as termination of life but in America greed is God, it says so on your money, right there on your money and that is not by accident, they are laughing at your gullibility right to your face.
In a school environment, I am surprised you did not pursue this dysfunction against Apple as hard as possible, collectively across as many schools as possible. Clearly this failure by Apple should have been broadcast loud and wide, to protect others and seek a more reasonable outcome for yourselves.
What is interesting it the foolish choice of langauge, they are making a recommendation 'anything that serves to recommend a person or thing, or induce acceptance or favour.', http://www.dictionary.com/brow.... They are recommending a product or service based upon their reputation and no longer broadcaster of advertisements. They are taking on legal liability for the quality of that product or service, as Facebook has now publicly stated it is a recommendation. So Facebook, you recommended a product, I bought i based upon that recommendation and it turned out to be shit, so you will be hearing from my lawyer.
It even brings to mind that whole thing about targeted advertisements, they are targeting you with the promotion of a specific product, basically presenting it qualities as promoted as being real and truth and targeted at you specifically. So they have analysed the product, analysed you and matched that product to you, to get you to buy it, so what happens when it turns out to be shite, how are they not liable for that targeted manipulation and false claims presented with regard to that product. Keep in mind it was specifically targeted at you, not a random ad, but a targeted, as it turned out scam, that targeting makes them liable.
You can not do it fraudulently. You can not claim to support free speech and they secret deny it, in order to fraudulently misrepresent yourself to retain end users. So news service can not claim to be fair and balanced if they are not, they can not censor one side, whilst promoting another and then claim fair and balanced to promote a lie. Once you claim to be a public service you are bound by that claim and can not censor. Telecommunications companies can not claim their service as private and censor anyone they disagree with whilst claiming it is a public service. So no, censorship is not a right, that goes right along apartheid, where citizens for what ever reason were censored from participation in society by other citizens, collectively. Once you are open to the public, you are bound by the rules and regulation of that public and the provision of a public service, no censorship of legal content no exclusion of individuals. Otherwise declare it as a private members only service.
We you say you will sell thirty percent, you will sell thirty percent. When you say you 'PLAN' to sell thirty percent, you well sell just as much as you fucking can as fast as you fucking can, well, duh, you simply revised your plan. Using that word 'plan' is a red flag for much greater sales, say the plan is to bail on Twitter.
Don't think of it as breaking into some ones house. Think of it as spraying over someone's extremely reflective walls and roof blinding everyone around them with glare.
So what you are saying limiting by number of views does not really do anything other than reduce accounting costs. So 1,000 views should be a more reasonable limit and to kerb cheats, payments should be delayed to allow the content to be contested prior to payment, say between 30 and 90 days. If youtube was serious about better control of up loaders they should allow end users to block you tubers they do not want to see or bother to try to remember not to see and keep statistics of the blocked youtubers ie make it worth while to register. There is a whole bunch of crappy up loaders I want to block, fake thumbnails, bullshit titles, scraped content, photos as videos, machine voices, crap reviewers, propagandists, government agents, corporate junk, ads masquerading as content, VEVO (heh heh, although I can quite readily remember to avoid that one). Allow blocking of uploaders you bloody fucknuckles, grrr!
There is a contract law that covers this situation. Basically if a contract is bad enough, they grab it, rip in into a thousand tiny pieces and bin it, figuratively speaking. Then the court works through proper remuneration for the service provided, generally speaking this will go against those who produced the contract. Similarly ambiguous or contradictory contact conditions are always meant to go against those who produced the contract, their contract, their responsibility for failure. However US courts are quite corrupt and anything can happen and unfortunately taking to the high court will mean loss against a major corporation no matter how fanciful the interpretation has to be by the high court (even to the point of adding whole clauses that do not exist, laughably corrupt) ie the constitution only applies to the actions of the federal government and major corporations are allowed to do what ever they want, now that's stupidly corrupt because that is on display to the rest of the world.
Don't act like a whore and you will have nothing to be embarrassed by, male or female. Act like a whore and it is better for your future victims to know in advance who you really are, so they can avoid becoming victims and we all know the kind of males and females that we are discussing, it's kind of better for every one else if they just prey upon each other and leave the majority out of the manipulations and deceits.
Yep, y sturdy fuking englis or fuking histry, nuffing to lern their. Filosofizing shit, why, thunk abut thunkin. Smart is stoopid. Follow greed becum an overseer and slave master, thats where its at, fuk the workers and fuk em hard.
The lesson in stupidity brought to you, well, by stupidity.
I wonder if company employees will purposefully code in bugs, so they can share the money with the people who find those bugs, a new kind of insider trading ;).
I prefer sitting in a theatre fuming after watching the first fifteen minutes of a movie where the trailers were the best part and the rest of the movie is utter shite. Trapped, not wanting the abandon the money spent, but really wanting to leave. Now that is what killed the cinema experience for me. That at it is political incorrect to fund the arse holes because in their insane greed they purposefully corrupt democracy via the sick entertainments of corrupt politicians (you fund main stream media and you pay to corrupt your politicians, don't fund main stream media and they can not buy your politicians or provide sick expensive 'entertainments', pizzagate, ugh).
There is something to be said about buying it again and again and again and off into infinity. Easiest example, making coffee. You do not buy a coffee making machine just once but have to keep buying it, whether it drips or spurts, it is only going to last a wee bit longer than it's warranty, down to as low as 90 days and you will be buying it again. This versus say buying a French press https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., which until you physically break it, will not need replacing. Yet the French press makes much better coffee than an automated machine because you can readily adjust the coffee to your mood, quick brew, slow brew, a bit more or less coffee. So not only get worse coffee but you have to keep buying the device when it breaks.
Home automation a never ending repair headache, the more you automate the more the home will demand you maintain it, repair it and when automation fails it does not mean you can go back to manual, it means zero function until it is repaired, the joys of a couple of hundred dollars an hour call outs and skipping work all day because shift service is the corporate standard, extremely shit service (expecting to be on hold for hours is the new norm, or call backs, where the fuckers put you on hold again).
Totally incorrect. In by far the majority of locations around the globe, the only conditions of sale applicable are those on 'actual' display at the point of sale and they must be clearly visible. Only a few corrupt countries ie the US allow post purchase conditions of contract, which is wildly corrupt and implies no cost of purchasing for the consumer (time and cost, go to store, buy, install, un-install, return costs that are often many multiplies of the software purchased and the end user in entitled to that reimbursement should the product fail its advertised claims which of course is reality with EULAs not matching advertising) because screw the consumer.
It has become pretty obvious after the last Wikileaks that scanning your smart phone or laptops et al is not the goal installing spyware on them is https://www.theregister.co.uk/.... This has for more to do with total control over all politicians and political activists as well as anybody in media, than it has to do with security, and driven more by the Corporate contractors out of NATO (North American Territorial Occupation farce), so it includes insider trading scams and industrial espionage (insider trading, for those who don't get it, hack financial information and executive communications, of publicly traded companies prior to public release to earn billions). Entirely corrupt to go with the country with the entirely meaningless constitution which can quite readily be interpreted in the most fanciful corrupt ways, by corrupt jobs for life high court (so how the fuck come, those arseholes get a job for life, that's fucking communist).
To be fair, the Samsung OS comes, sort of free with the device, all they can see is Android. M$ well it comes out crap on purpose so they can sell it again and again, only this time more secure and more stable and more reliable versus prior products original release, the new wrinkle is of course far more privacy invasive and they are now selling you. The next big thing will of course be the Google vs Apple vs M$ VPN wars (M$ is kind of screwed right from the outset, impossible for them to sell privacy now, who would be gullible enough to believe it, they now sit alongside the slime of the US Senate and Congress and it's corrupt sick incumbent privacy invasive telecoms, it is going to get real ugly now). Imagine M$ securing PCs from the invasiveness of ISPs because scarcity is profit in capitalism, so your private data is more profitable if M$ blocks access to it, hence the VPN wars.
Of course once competent companies become incompetent when blinded by greed, imagine super hackable products and potentially exploding batteries, what a combination.
Why not. Any half way mature writer should know, 'they made me do it', is the excuse of a child. Face it, the internet is opening up content competition to a much broader field. Even bad amateurs can produce good work sometimes. The biggest threat to writers, the creators of canned content is interactive content, it sucks in huge amounts of end users time and cuts out canned content. Most of my time viewing idiot box content is as background to interactive internet content. I struggle to watch retreads on their own, they simply are not that interesting or good.
So canned content writers are competing for fewer spaces in the market and that is with many more writers entering the market. Try self publishing, modern computer animation, combining graphic artists with writers to cut out all the middle men (those useless products of nepotism creating crap retreads).
The reality is, if you do not self publish, then you will be screwed over by the publishers and that is that. Now take into account securing writers from all over the globe to supply content to all over the globe and face it content creators working for publishers are fucked. They will squeeze you dry, blame it on pirates and toss you out (every now and again trotting you out on camera to cry about people who infringe copyright, reality is, it is the publishers who are the pirates, raping and pillaging content creators).