Slashdot Mirror


'Extreme Vetting' Would Require Visitors To US To Share Contacts, Passwords (theguardian.com)

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is considering whether or not to deploy "extreme vetting" practices at airports around the world, which could force tourists from Britain and other countries visiting the U.S. to reveal their mobile phone contacts, social media passwords and financial data. "Travelers who want to enter the U.S. could also face questioning over their ideology, as Washington moves away from a default position of allowing people in to a more skeptical approach to visitors," reports The Guardian. From the report: Trump made the "extreme vetting" of foreign nationals to combat terrorism a major theme of his presidential election campaign. But his executive order imposing a travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries has twice been blocked in court. Media reports suggest it has already hurt the tourism industry. The changes might include visitors from the 38 countries -- the UK, France, Australia and Japan among them -- that participate in the visa waiver program, which requires adherence to strict U.S. standards in data sharing, passport control and other factors, one senior official told the Journal. This could require people to hand over their phones so officials can study their stored contacts and possibly other information. The aim is to "figure out who you are communicating with," a senior Department of Homeland Security official was quoted as saying. "What you can get on the average person's phone can be invaluable." A second change would ask applicants for their social media handles and passwords, so that officials could see information posted privately in addition to public posts, the Journal said. The Journal report said the DHS official working on the review said questions under consideration included whether visa applicants believe in so-called honor killings, how they view the treatment of women in society, whether they value the "sanctity of human life" and who they view as a legitimate target in a military operation.

505 comments

  1. Total madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many more agents to do this job? Where do you hold a planeload of passengers waiting their turn? Meanwhile their baggage remains unclaimed.

    Totally insane idea.

    1. Re:Total madness by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      You only have to check the ones with brown skin or funny names, so it should be easy-peasy...

    2. Re:Total madness by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      I presume it will either be part of the ESTA or they'll extend pre-clearance across more of Europe, so checks are done before you board the plane.

    3. Re:Total madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see ransomware like: "Send us 10 Bitcoins or we'll add your account to terrorist groups on social media and get your butt kicked out of the country. You have 12 hours remaining..."

  2. The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The USA has lost its damn mind.

    1. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolutely the case

    2. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It took THIS for you to come to that conclusion?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The USA has lost its damn mind.

      We lost it about a decade ago, when we elected the Junior senator for Illinois president, largely because of his skin color. You remember him, the guy who got the Nobel prize his first year in office?

      We seem to be getting it back since January 20th, though pockets of craziness still remain.

    4. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know some like to present the US as a fascist boogieman, however many nations wishing to preserve their sovereignty take similar measures. If you have had the pleasure of traveling from the US to Canada you will know what I mean. Those that haven't, spend 20 minutes and take in the reality TV show Border Security Canada's Front Line. You will discover CA is very protective of their social services and want to make sure their system is not burdened.

      BTW those looking to escape the US following the election, make sure to have your work permit and or educational visa in order because guess what... they don't let everyone in.

    5. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Our glorious leader never had a mind.

    6. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know some like to present the US as a fascist boogieman, however many nations wishing to preserve their sovereignty take similar measures

      You haven't done much international travel have you?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    7. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      The world is MUCH MUCH bigger than Canada.

      Getting into Europe, the UK, Asia has been a much more pleasant experience over the last couple of years.

      Tourism is exactly the same a shopping, if the Hassle in one store/country becomes too high, you vote with your wallet and go elsewhere.

      And that is what people are doing, going elsewhere, taking their tourist $ to other countries. And thats what my family and I are doing too.

    8. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you say. According to Trump it's just #winning #somuchwinning #toomuchwinning #MAGA

      Let's sit back, roll out the popcorn and watch what happens when an orange baboon takes control of the train and pretends this will not end in a total wreck.

    9. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is enough to genuinely stop me from travelling to or via the US. I doubt I'm alone.

      Also, there is only one other country in the world that does this currently, and this isn't hyperbole, that country is North Korea.

      People in the US voted for Trump because they were desperate for change, but the reality is that they're merely voting to speed up America's fall. America is teetering on the brink with it's phenomenal debt and that has to be managed careful, sending a bull into the china shop who is willing to satisfy petty nationalism at the cost of economic health.

      The West has gained an entitlement culture fed by decades of economic growth and time at the top. When that ground to a halt in 2007 people decided they still wanted more and have turned to the extremes who promise them more (but can't provide it). What people don't consider is that despite the slow down, things were probably about as good as they get. The result? The far right and far left populist extremes, the Farages, the Trumps, the Corbyns, the Le Penns make wonderful claims, but inevitably they can't deliver, people accept racism, xenophobia, hatred, in return for the promise of that continued rapid growth in living standards they've seen since World War II, and then seem surprised when it isn't delivered, and all they're left with is the hatred, without the promised gain, except, the hatred has a cost, so not only do they not gain, they outright lose.

      That's what's happening here, people accepted hatred for the promise of gain, but the gain ain't happening, and the hatred has the cost of drastically cutting back tourism income.

      People need to learn to accept reduced increases in wealth for a while, and to stop being so greedy and entitled until tweaks in the existing complex system that is the global economy filter through and correct. If they don't, the hatred will grow, and history has shown us time and time again that that never ends well.

    10. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asia?

      Except China you mean where I had a 7 week wait for a visa and it took 2 hours to go through security in Beijing to get out of the airport.

    11. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you mention Obama as an extreme populist who made promises he couldn't keep?

      "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" and it'll be cheaper, too!

      Socialism doesn't work at larger scales.

    12. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by uohcicds · · Score: 5, Informative

      Realy? For around 70 years, Europe would beg to disagree, with largely social democratic governments and social policy: socialised education, healthcare, economic development. The EU is an essentially social democratic institution. And quite a lot of the British electorate think that what's going on here is almost as batshit as what's going on in the States. Incidentally, there's a reason Breaking Bad is set in America. Here, he'd just get the treatment, without the threat of destitution

      "Obama as an extreme populist" - boy, this tells you exactly how much the political life of the US has been polluted in the last thirty years. Mainstream US politics and media have totally lost their minds. And the world is looking at the US like it's off its tits on PCP. Which of course it is. You do realise we are not looking it you in admiration or respect. We're actually either laughing at you, or crying at how tragic it all is.

      --
      It's not you: I'm just this horrifically socially awkward with everybody.
    13. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we're waiting, your dramatic pause has us all on the end of our seats. Are you going to share your experience??

    14. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      The USA has lost its damn mind.

      Has not. Non American citizens are not guaranteed the same rights as American citizens. Always been that way across the world. Take a vacation to North Korea or Iran and see if you get the same rights as in your own country and report back.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    15. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The USA has lost its damn mind.

      Has not. Non American citizens are not guaranteed the same rights as American citizens. Always been that way across the world. Take a vacation to North Korea or Iran and see if you get the same rights as in your own country and report back.

      I think that using the argument that the US is only doing the same thing as the insane dictatorship that is North Korea is not a good way of proving your country's sanity.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would usually happen in scenarios like this is that there will be 2 categories of people in the world (outside the US). One will recognize it as the US taking legitimate steps to protect itself from terror attacks, and even cultural balkanization down the road (like UK, France, Sweden, Netherlands and much of Europe). The other will see it as the US being its imperialist/racist self and making life difficult for brown people.

      The first category will comply with the requirements, and probably have little trouble getting in, aside from the hassle. The latter will voluntarily stay out, thereby achieving the presidents goal - to only allow in people who love the country.

    17. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      A seven week wait for a visa is manageable for a tourist.
      Two hours to get through security is still far far quicker than last time I flew into DFW. Literally half the time.

      That's before they add further stupidity!

    18. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And quite a lot of the British electorate think that what's going on here is almost as batshit as what's going on in the States

      And I'm sure "quite a lot" of the German population wasn't too thrilled about Hitler either. But in a democracy it's irrelevant what a minority thinks. A majority of British voters voted for Brexit; it's that simple.

      You do realise we are not looking it you in admiration or respect. We're actually either laughing at you

      Maybe you should look in the mirror first before laughing at us. You're the ones who voted for Brexit. It's not just the US that's nuts.

    19. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by wwphx · · Score: 1

      My wife and I flew to/from Germany two years ago for a river cruise from Prague to Berlin, taking a train to Prague. It was MUCH easier getting in/out of Germany and absolutely no problem crossing the border in to Czechoslovakia (only had to present our train ticket) than it was returning to the USA via the New Jersey hellhole Newark. If I had any choice where I retire, I wouldn't hesitate to choose Berlin or Dresden. Housing in Bad Schandau seemed quite affordable and it was a very pretty place.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    20. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Cool, so we're not worse than North Korea or Iran? Great! I guess everything's hunky-dory then.

    21. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goal is to bring the USA down a notch, equal to life in Russia. It's pretty obvious. Lets just move on.

      IQ points are taking a big hit already, more pesticides into the environment, cut healthcare, restrict immigration, the list is endless. Doing it's job. Have to tip your hat to Putin, he pulled it off. He really did. Even my commie friends are saying it. "It's so OBVIOUS!, did you guys not see it?"

    22. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe's bill is starting to come due -- just ask Greece, Portugal, Italy, Spain, ...

    23. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1
      "Incidentally, there's a reason Breaking Bad is set in America. Here, he'd just get the treatment, without the threat of destitution"

      I know this is a minor point, but if you actually watch Breaking Bad, they make it clear early on that his cancer is inoperable. He is making meth to provide for his family after he dies, not to pay for treatment.

    24. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that not even Iran will force you to unlock your phone and social accounts for them at the border. Dunno about North Korea.

    25. Re:The USA has lost its damn mind. by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Has not. Non American citizens are not guaranteed the same rights as American citizens. Always been that way across the world. Take a vacation to North Korea or Iran and see if you get the same rights as in your own country and report back.

      I think that using the argument that the US is only doing the same thing as the insane dictatorship that is North Korea is not a good way of proving your country's sanity.

      You're missing the point because you have your rose-colored liberal glasses on. The United States is no more obligated to do anything for North Korea than North Korea is obligated to do for us. No country is obligated to do anything for any other country except by agreements such as treaties and for members of the United Nations, they've agreed to abide by specific agreed upon rules by every member of that organization. There is no world government which is what people like you seem to want. There is no world governing body other than organizations like the United Nations, NATO, WTO, etc. that establish rules and this is certainly not covered under any of their jurisdictions that I'm aware of.

      Your liberal idealism is admirable in that you envision a better future world where it might not look like it does today. However, at some point though, you need to stop living in fantasy and come into reality with the rest of us. If you want to make a difference in the world, it doesn't happen by projecting fantasy, it happens by hard work and persistence. It's not for the lazy. If you're not willing to do that, you're not really interested in real change. Talk is cheap.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    26. Re: The USA has lost its damn mind. by uohcicds · · Score: 1

      "But in a democracy it's irrelevant what a minority thinks. A majority of British voters voted for Brexit; it's that simple."

      Yup, true. No diagreeing from me. Those of us who didn't couldn't win the argument. So we're stuck with the resulting clusterfuck, unless we get out (under consideration). That said, one of the amazing things about democracy is just how fickle the people can be. The mobilis vulgaris can change their collective mind about things very quickly. I think the next two years may concentrate some minds quite intensely as they realise what they were promised simply isn't going to happen without them personally suffering quite a lot of pain as a result. A deeply cynical part of me is half convinced that this is actually May's tactic - to make the Brexit process so utterly awful it forces public opinion to flip

      "You're the ones who voted for Brexit. It's not just the US that's nuts."

      Yes, Spot on. I agree with you. But it doesn't stop us laughing at the tangerine ballsack.

      --
      It's not you: I'm just this horrifically socially awkward with everybody.
  3. First Post - or everyone got smart!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, article been up for several minutes and nobody wants to comment. Perhaps everyone is getting smart and have deleted their Facebook and Internets?

    1. Re:First Post - or everyone got smart!? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      Yep, I have a lousy connection too.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  4. Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could just ship their phones through a shipping company before coming to the US.

    1. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think they will let you in if you claim you have no phone?

    2. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same. "Sorry sir, I left my phone in my own country, I have 0 social media accounts. You're welcome to view my comments on /. Since that's the only online presence I have". Prove me wrong.

    3. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome to view my comments on /.

      ... and since I only ever post as Anonymous Coward, that is not going to go well.

    4. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      "Prove me wrong."

      Uh, dude... you're the one asking to come to America. Immigration don't have to prove you wrong. They just have to say 'entry denied, get on the next plane home.'

      And, don't forget, lying on an immigration form can get you immediate deportation and a lifetime ban.

    5. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Counter question: Why would I bring my phone to the US? It most likely won't work considering that you're using a different frequency spectrum than Europe does (at least afaik). Not to mention that I'd be paying through the nose for roaming. If I really needed a phone in the US, the sensible thing is to buy one over here, store the contacts somewhere on a server and download them to the new phone as soon as I have it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      For what? For not participating in the mass idiocy called social media?

      I actually do not have a Facebook account. Neither do I have any videos on YouTube. I do not bring my phone along to transatlantic flights because roaming costs are prohibitively expensive, if I really stay long enough that having a cellphone becomes interesting, I can certainly find one for cheap along with a prepaid plan that will do, at least for emergencies.

      I couldn't even hand over my Slashdot account for the password for this is stored in a password save on the computer I can't even bring along because it weighs more than carry-on or checked luggage allows, and why the heck would I bring it along on a VACATION in a country I go to to actually get away from the mundane daily routine?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Or better yet buy a burner phone when they arrive in the USA.

    8. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bzzt. Access denied. Wait over there for the next plane home - at your expense.

    9. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1990 wants you back.

    10. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burner phone? That's what terrorists would use! Wait to get on the black list for immigration! LOL.

    11. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, they are not after terrorists.

    12. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize you're never going to enter the US now? Oh, wait, you're already inside, you can show how brave you are.

    13. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally that was the decade when traveling to the US was fun for the last time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by oobayly · · Score: 1

      I was going to rely with a joke about terrorists using exploding phones and not burner* ones, but then I released that was the Israelis.

      * I'm not even convinced that current terrorists in the EU/USA would know to use burner phones - they seem to be too bloody stupid. The only reason they seem to succeed is sheer luck rather than skill. The current crop also seem to be drug using, alcohol drinking rentboys.

    15. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Why would I bring my phone to the US? It most likely won't work

      Coming from the UK, not only does my phone work in the US, text messages are cheaper for me to send than back home, calls and data are 10% more expensive, and it's cheaper than most US mobiles to use. And it's good to have it, because the fraud rates on credit cards in the US are high (my card has been cloned twice out there) so my bank often flags US transactions as fraudulent and sends me an SMS to confirm them. Without my phone working, I'd have to go and look up their fraud department number and make an international call to confirm them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Yep. I did a month long road trip with a mate of mine in the mid 90s. Flew into the east coast, picked up a hire car, drove to the west. We didn't even have accommodation planned for the first night - just got in the car and drove until we found a motel.

      As I understand it now, you need to know your entire itinerary in advance.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    17. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backwoods nationalist scumbag

    18. Re: Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and add to your reasonable post the fact that bad guys would actually HAVE a fake facebook account with family pictures and kittens and such. Their videos would be recipes of apple pie.

      So you will be banning all the wrong people.
      Extreme vetting. Seriously ?

    19. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Great, so "throwaway cell phone" is going onto the list of things to get should I ever fly out to the US again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:Is that really going to catch terrorists? by wwphx · · Score: 1

      When we went to Germany two years ago, upon arrival we bought a cheap low-end smart phone for my wife and a new SIM for my iPhone 6. No big deal. In fact, I chose our first hotel partly based on proximity to a good electronics store (and equally close to the U-bahn and S-bahn). Now, I'd buy a low-end smart phone for myself, load some critical contacts and use it for a few weeks before leaving and I'd lock my iPhone in my house and leave it. Last trip I took a Chromebook instead of my MacBook Air, I'll do the same in the future.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  5. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People will just stop coming to the U.S., or doing business there. Problem solved.

  6. Where to start ... by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sharing your password is against the ToS of every single social media platform out there, including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter, every forum ever, etc. Share your password to your account when you go to the US and kiss that account goodbye.

    And that list? Yes, I believe there are honor killings (DING). I believe women need more power in society (DING from any anti-feminist) or I believe genders are not equal because each gender has strengths and weaknesses different from each other (DING from a lot of people). I do not value the "sanctity of human life" in that I believe assisted suicide, under a lot of scrutiny and supervision, should be legal - we have mortally sick pets put down to spare them the suffering, but grandma HAS to be kept alive no matter what! I also believe abortion should not be illegal, so that's TWO dings in one question.

    Just ... what are they expecting with this? HONESTY? Or a well-rehearsed regurgitation of the correct answers?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Where to start ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Following orders given by men with badges will give you a viable defense against any accusations of non-compliance with ToS. All the more so when the government in question is being very vocal about it. I'm pretty sure that losing one's Bookface account is the least of their worries.

    2. Re:Where to start ... by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      It's either that or off to the re-Neducation camps you go!

      Re-Neducation Center
      "Where the elite meet to have their spirits broken"

    3. Re:Where to start ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Believe in honor killings" means "Do you believe it is okay to resort to that"

      Of course they happen, and of course it is a grievous lack of respect of life.

    4. Re: Where to start ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sarcasm detector needs adjusting.

    5. Re:Where to start ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any ToS is going to have exceptions listed for legal requests from a government. So, if this is deemed legal, then it's moot. Furthermore, when was the last time you saw any of these services close an account for being shared?

      They're hoping to scare off idiots and appease masses. Which is actually better than nothing for society. It's not like the people making these attacks are brilliant masterminds -- they're the flunkys that got convinced that murder followed by suicide [by cop, if not their own actions] is a ticket to heaven. No, these are the idiots that will like pro-ISIS Facebook posts and Tweets.

    6. Re:Where to start ... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      re "Just ... what are they expecting with this? HONESTY?"
      People will arrive and get asked different questions.
      They have to be truthful.
      So as the questions get more complex, the lies start to add up.
      A person who could have once expected to lie or hide their past and sneak their way into the USA will find it harder.
      Social media and other accounts might give insight into support for or funding of groups the USA finds interesting. In the past a person might have been able to hide their funding or support role. New questions give the ability to detect more lies and stop that person from entering the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Where to start ... by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Sharing your password is against the ToS of every single social media platform out there, including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter, every forum ever, etc. Share your password to your account when you go to the US and kiss that account goodbye.

      Two things:

      1) How is an American company going to enforce this against non-US citizens?
      2) People do this all the time and Facebook and Twitter are none the wiser. How would you suggest that Facebook and Twitter police this with millions of users?

      Your argument is a straw man and theoretical nonsense that doesn't work in practice. Try again.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    8. Re:Where to start ... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Most ToSes break the law. The law has always held than any illegal order in a ToS contract can just be ignored.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    9. Re:Where to start ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that list? Yes, I believe there are honor killings (DING). I believe women need more power in society (DING from any anti-feminist) or I believe genders are not equal because each gender has strengths and weaknesses different from each other (DING from a lot of people). I do not value the "sanctity of human life" in that I believe assisted suicide, under a lot of scrutiny and supervision, should be legal - we have mortally sick pets put down to spare them the suffering, but grandma HAS to be kept alive no matter what! I also believe abortion should not be illegal, so that's TWO dings in one question.

      Just ... what are they expecting with this? HONESTY? Or a well-rehearsed regurgitation of the correct answers?

      You obviously didn't get the gist of the questions. The one about honor killings asked whether the applicant supported the concept. Something that Muslims routinely do, and also, something that is codified by the Pathans as 'Pashtunwali'. The one about the sanctity of human life was not so much about assisted suicides or even abortions, but plainly a question on whether the applicant believes that people should be killed for trivial reasons. The one about legitimate military targets - most terrorists draw a moral equivalence between US targeting them vs them targeting US civilians, and hence this question.

      What is expected from such questions is not honesty, per se, but rather, that if someone comes into the country and later on indulges in one of the crimes in question, like supporting an honor killing, or running over gays on the street, then legally, it will be demonstrable that he lied on his application, which would then be legitimate grounds for deportation. In other words, it sets up a framework to throw out people who fit these attributes. Right now, you have the circus of debates about illegals - whether they are legal illegals or illegal legals or illegal illegals i.e. are they just guilty of coming in without a visa, or are they guilty of running a red light or driving 90 miles per hour on a freeway, or are they guilty of shoplifting or identity theft, or rape & murder? And you have sanctuary entities fighting to keep ALL of them inside the country. With this move, a particular subset of visitors who violate such declarations can be deported for perjury, without touching or invoking other sanctuary subjects.

    10. Re:Where to start ... by coofercat · · Score: 1

      For decades the US visa forms have asked "Are you a terrorist?". Oddly, it didn't catch any real terrorists (although I imagine a few people are in jail because of it). I suspect this whole policy will be equally effective.

    11. Re:Where to start ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      1) How is an American company going to enforce this against non-US citizens?

      Same way they do it against US citizens - cancel the account. *poof*

    12. Re:Where to start ... by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      How is an American company going to enforce this against non-US citizens?

      Same way they do it against US citizens - cancel the account. *poof*

      See #2. Define the algorithm by which you can determine password sharing is occurring. Facebook would love to hear it and would probably hire you if you could.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    13. Re:Where to start ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The idea behind these questions that appear brain-dead is to get the tourist or immigrant to say something on official forms. Just lying on the forms is justification for deportation. If we ask "Are you a terrorist?" and the incoming person answers "No", then if that person is found to be a terrorist they're out of the country without the need to find a specific US law they broke.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. Extreme Vetting starts at Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We can't even get Asshole M'Gunt to share his tax returns. Fuck that guy.

  8. So the US is going to Ban Tourism now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should cut down the lines at many attractions.

    1. Re:So the US is going to Ban Tourism now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure America can fill up the space, and I don't mean with numbers.

  9. Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The United States has done off the deep end. I will never be visiting such a douche bag country that would pull this shit. If the States wants less "Terrorists" then stop pissing every one off. Stop stealing from every one and killing innocent people.

    1. Re:Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buddy, it's the Trump Revolution. You're gonna learn to love how we hate you.

      Or else.

    2. Re:Your papers please by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      Ooh yeah. Running the Iraqis out of Kuwait totally merited a 9/11. /sarc. Cunt.

    3. Re:Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the Bush voter. The one who still believes that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11.

      Have you ever heard of Osama Bin Laden, a Saudi national who was living in Pakistan?

    4. Re:Your papers please by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      The United States has done off the deep end. I will never be visiting such a douche bag country that would pull this shit. If the States wants less "Terrorists" then stop pissing every one off. Stop stealing from every one and killing innocent people.

      Obligatory Mars Attacks scene.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    5. Re:Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Someone who did 9/11 because US infidel troops were in Saudi Arabia. And why were they there? To protect Saudi Arabia from Iraq, which had tried to conquer and annex Kuwait.

    6. Re:Your papers please by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You mean the chap whose organisation mounted the attack on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and potentially a third location in 2001?

      You're right, that attack was not a response to the invasion of Iraq as it occurred prior to that invasion.

      Instead of jumping to idiotic conclusions based on poor reading comprehension, prejudice and ignorance perhaps you'd like to respond to the suggestion it was linked to the Western activities in Kuwait?

    7. Re:Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States has done off the deep end. I will never be visiting such a douche bag country that would pull this shit.

      Is it just me, or does that seem to be the end result Donald is shooting for?

    8. Re:Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lost any visiting interest many years ago. What happens now is just the inevitable conclusion of years of lies and deception.

    9. Re:Your papers please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he wanted people to stay in his hotels?

  10. Gracies Señer Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    El Americo esta muy bweno now-o.

    1. Re:Gracies Señer Trump by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      América es grande otra vez ya? O todavía tenemos que inflar el ego un poco más?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Action begats Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the new administration can't spell Reciprocity. All US Tourists strip-searched as they arrive at Heathrow? A complete lack of foreign tourists and a drop in all foreign business for US firms? High tariffs on all US goods sent to customers overseas? Since 30% of US commerce is international, that could bring the unemployment well rate over 20%, much like the Great Depression. We could see people camped out under bridges in Trumpvilles, cooking beans over small fires. The world has a way of responding in kind.

    1. Re:Action begats Reaction by Sassinak · · Score: 2

      I think that's exactly what they want.. remember.. to a paranoid's mindset.. anyone that is NOT under 24 hour watch with constant blood tests and brain drains is a risk.

      But they always forget, these actions do nothing but CREATE NEW enemies, give strength to the existing ones.. and alienate your allies.. But as I said, that's exactly what they want because in that world, they direct control.

      --
      God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
    2. Re:Action begats Reaction by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      That would likely backfire. A huge proportion of people in the US have never been outside their country's borders. This is great for the government because they have no basis for comparison other than scare stories from the media, which is largely owned by the same people that own the politicians. Reducing the number of US citizens who see other countries is unlikely to make the US a better neighbour.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  12. Re:Not surprised by jabuzz · · Score: 5, Informative

    No in the past the USA would just refuse to extradite people to face terrorist charges to European countries. I know for certain this applied to both the UK and France, and included terrorists who where Muslim.

    Heck the USA would even allow terrorist organizations to fund raise in the USA!!! When it comes to terrorists the USA can just fuck right off.

    Far more people have died in the UK from terrorists that the USA harboured and allowed to fund raise than have from any Islamist's terrorists, but don't let facts get in the way of your bigoted viewpoint.

  13. United States of Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Land of the free, home of the BRAVE"? NOT! Brave people don't fear their world, and free people don't ask others to give up their freedom...

    1. Re:United States of Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Braves are a baseball team. Yes, that's their homeland.
      It is the land of the free ... but the tenants have now been incarcerated, tagged, monitored, pushed, stamped, filed, briefed, de-briefed, and numbered.
           

  14. There will be tit for tat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooner or later, other countries, tired of having their citizens harassed, will return the compliment when visitors to the US get to their airports.

    1. Re:There will be tit for tat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they could just ask who you voted for, and harass all the Trumpsters. That would be fair.

    2. Re:There will be tit for tat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they're just as stupid. The flurry of isolationist activism makes the US unattractive for business and research. If people get harassed every time they visit, the chance of important people not attending conventions rises. Europe and Asia will gladly take your business by not alienating visitors.

    3. Re: There will be tit for tat. by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      I remember this happening to a buddy in Korea. Got off the plane watched authorities tell a black man get back on the plane and go home. Wasn't allowed in (not joking).

    4. Re:There will be tit for tat. by alexhs · · Score: 1

      It's better to not reciprocate. Lets American tourists travel unhampered: they bring money.

      There's even no need to retaliate, as it will all sort itself:

      - less tourists to America;
      - less business travels: give your e-mail credentials to the state ? No way. If you want that contract signed, you come to London/Paris/Tokyo/Beijing/...
      - to alleviate the burden of formalities, this year that international conference will be hosted in Dubai/Macau instead of Dallas.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    5. Re: There will be tit for tat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great point. I work in healthcare in the USA, and a few of the smartest and sharpest doctors in my department canceled their trips to a conference in Canada, and they were unanimous in saying "not worth the risk of fighting to get back home".

    6. Re: There will be tit for tat. by Tolkienite · · Score: 1

      Does the current administration not see the risk of a brain drain? It is a historical fact that the advantage the US/allies had in WWII was in no small part caused by the exodus of scientists/technicians/&c from Germany to the safe harbor that was the US and its academic environment.

      "Uh, excuse me, Dr. Einstein*, but I need to do a full cavity search and peruse your every photo and tweet before I let you in; or you could, you know, just board a plane to go anywhere but the US."

    7. Re: There will be tit for tat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since for folks like Einstein the alternative was a Nazi death camp, he would have not protested.

    8. Re: There will be tit for tat. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he had to go to the US to avoid the Nazis. Or Canada, South America, Russia or even the UK.

  15. Re:Not surprised by rh2600 · · Score: 0

    Why are you amazed? The whole point of the waiver program isn't to just let everyone in with no waiver - in fact it's directly the opposite, it lets people apply to be granted easier access to the US - by *declaring and presenting yourself in advance* you are then able to be further vetted by the US through whatever means they wish, and with ample time to do so. But then again, your third-world comment is particularly telling when it comes to the perspectives you hold.

  16. Re:Not surprised by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right, no more trrists for 'Murica. And by trrists, of course I mean tourists. So many nicer places to visit anyway!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  17. What is new now? by lederhosen · · Score: 0, Troll

    Most of this was already in place last year during the Obama administration. What is new now?

    1. Re:What is new now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is new now?

      Scale.

    2. Re:What is new now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. That's when it was a Bad Thing. Now it's a Good Thing.

      Well, *sigh*, more people are going to have to do the Very Difficult Thing of having decoy accounts.

    3. Re:What is new now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You libtards! What is new is Trump is taking credit for it! Don't you know anything about business? If you can't claim it kill it. Everything O did must be undone or credited to Donny. GOP 101. MAGA!

    4. Re:What is new now? by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      I think you are right, it is very few things Trump has actually done, and I can imagine that he likes to take credit for it. But is it not sloppy reporting from WSJ?

    5. Re:What is new now? by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not quite. Yes, what happened under the Obama administration involved CBP and social media, but it was significantly different.

      Last July the Obama administration proposed a voluntary disclosure of social media profile information for travelers seeking a visa waiver through the ESTA system (Electronic System for Travel Authorization). It did not include password or contact information, but was controversial nonetheless. It sent into effect in December.[

      The Trump administration is proposing significant changes to that program, requiring more information (passwords and contacts) and making it compulsory.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:What is new now? by LoginOrSignup · · Score: 1

      "how they view the treatment of women in society," This is hilarious coming from this administration.

    7. Re:What is new now? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      There's a Republican in the White House. Now whatever action the US takes is bad. And dissent is now patriotic and no longer racist.

    8. Re:What is new now? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Dissent is always patriotic. The damned country was founded based on (extreme) dissent!

      As for racist well.. if you put a racist in the White House and you dislike his racist policies then of course your dissent is unlikely to be racist. That's kind of the point.

      As for whatever action the US takes being bad well.. only the bad ones. Unfortunately with Trump that seems to be basically all of them -- his "actions" are so bloody ridiculous that even his own party is dissenting at this point.

      Its not about Trump being a republican. Its about Trump being a fricken disaster of a president in general. I'm not going to claim Hillary would have been better (I still have my doubts about that..) but I'm pretty sure she couldn't have been much worse at this point.

    9. Re:What is new now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigration into another country is not a human right. A country can impose any number of restrictions and procedures on people trying to enter that country. That is the concept of souvereignity. Once the visitors have entered the country, they have certain inalienable rights, yes, but since they can always decide not to come, they have to accept whatever rules the country imposes for entrance.

      How a souvereign nation should not be able or allowed to set whatever terms they desire for people who willingly want to go there is beyond my comprehension.

      Speaking in examples: You have 30 restaurants along a short city street. 1 of these 30 restaurants requires a painful invasive proctology exam to be performed on any client who wants go in that restaurant, for health reasons of course. You are a potential customer. Do you protest, sue, cry and debate about that 1 restaurant or do you go to the 29 other restaurants?

      You have no right to demand other people, businesses, countries to lower their requirements, prices, hurdles for cooperation unless they have a strong monopoly on something or you are otherwise forced to cooperate with them. There are several hundred countries on this planet. One of them wants to know your Facebook password before you can enter. Where's your problem in simply not going?

    10. Re:What is new now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . A country can impose any number of restrictions and procedures on people trying to enter that country.

      Many of the terrorist attacks have been from radicalized US citizens. If you actually believe this is being done for safety, you have to invade the privacy of citizens as well as noncitizens.

      After having scaled up the technology by using non-citizens as a test group, they fully intend to extend the same "hand over the phone, your passwords, and let us mirror its contents" to citizens.

      By then, it will be too late for you.

    11. Re:What is new now? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Simple. If you believe in the equality of the sexes, they stop you from coming in. If they have doubts, they ask you to grab the pussy of the closest woman in the line behind you.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  18. 2Factor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...authentication works!
    US: Give us your password!
    Me: Sure, it's 45sux
    US: Hey, it's asking for a 2nd code...
    Me: Oh, sorry, I'm on vacation, so I left my keyfob at home. No email or social media, I promised my wife. (Note: I'm in IT, and I've made that promise.)

    1. Re:2Factor... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      US: That's okay, we can ship you back or hold you in a cell at our pleasure. Tell your wife to take all the time she needs to find that fob.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:2Factor... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      In practice, it would probably be a case of "You're not getting in", or "Okay, but we'll, we'll take that phone from you" if they're feeling nice. Either way, it's expensive and inconvenient.

    3. Re:2Factor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trump did promise to fill gitmo with lots of "bad guys" (who leave their fobs at home)

  19. Trump doesn't respect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women in his own country, what chance does he respect women in different countries...

  20. Re:Body of the subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can travel without a phone and never use social media.

    Sure, but they can also turn around and send you packing if you "don't have a phone and refuse to disclose social media accounts". Unfortunately, they can escalate more than you can, once you have showed up here in person and are not a US citizen.

    US citizen here. I'd recommend going somewhere else. This place is fucked. After 9/11 it went all-in on on making sure the terrorists won by giving our authoritarians free reign to run roughshod over the culture we used to have.

    Canadians are nice. Well, mostly. You might give that a go.

  21. Goodbye Tourism Money by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tourism is a $1.5 trillion industry in the US. I don't know what exactly the split is between domestic and foreign but foreign is definitely a significant chunk (one site claimed $21 billion from foreign tourists in April 2016) and if you're worried about trade deficits then that chunk is especially important.

    There are already concerns that foreign tourism revenue is starting to dry up after Trump's election and the (attempted) Muslim bans. If it's actually put into effect this "extreme vetting" will only accelerate that process.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're not kidding, I had planned a trip to Boston this year for my 40th, was gonna see a Red Sox game, hit the pubs and hook up with a few people I know down there but after hearing the endless problems at the border for other Canadians it's not fucking worth it.

      When I was a kid we just used to drive across the Niagara Falls International Rainbow Bridge without a passport and have fun in NY. Fuckin'... those days are long gone thanks to a bunch of shivering dandies in DC

    2. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap, its just BS. My parents are unlikely to bother coming to visit us in the US on principal. As a New Zealander its almost insulting to be subjected to having your electronic devices and social media "scanned" just to get into another western country, what a joke. And thats likely how a lot of other people will also see it. No thanks.

    3. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you didn't even read the summary then...

    4. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are already concerns that foreign tourism revenue is starting to dry up after Trump's election and the (attempted) Muslim bans. If it's actually put into effect this "extreme vetting" will only accelerate that process.

      Part of the challenge is foreign tourism tends to concentrate in certain areas, such as Disney, NYC, Hawaii, etc and is not spread more evenly across the country. Thus, despite the significant impact it may have on some areas others will think it's Ok because well, Trump; proving you can't fix stupid.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    5. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      I know that skipping the article is in vogue on Slashdot as always, but did you not even read the blurb?

      "which could force tourists from Britain and other countries visiting the U.S. to reveal their mobile phone contacts, social media passwords and financial data"

      I'm hoping Mr. Anonymous Coward that you are just a troll, because i'd like to believe that the kind of jumping to conclusions triathlon you just completed doesn't actually represent the standard for intellectual rigor among people who might initially be inclined to support this bill. (I'm may be doomed to disappointment, but i can hope, right?)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    6. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid we just used to drive across the Niagara Falls International Rainbow Bridge without a passport and have fun in NY. Fuckin'... those days are long gone thanks to a bunch of shivering dandies in DC

      While I don't know what "shivering dandies" are (other than that they apparently live in DC), I totally agree with your sentiment. Coming from the other direction, I remember when traveling across the border from US to CA involved nothing more than stopping the car, saying "nope" when the border agent asked if you were carrying any guns or fireworks, and then you were on your way. No passport, no "papers please", no strip searches, nothing. Same with going back again. It was like a mildly different form of traveling to another US state, only when you got there, the flags were different and people were unnaturally preoccupied with hockey.

      It was a nice world :-/. I miss it.

    7. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by sit1963nz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too late, tourists have already been put off.

      You will soon see its become really bad when the number of flights to/from the USA each day start falling.

      Our family is unlikely to visit the USA ever again
      Work encourages us to go to conferences outside the USA
      Flights to UK/Europe are booked via HongKong, Singapore, etc etc etc in preference to going via the USA
      If you must go via the USA, work laptops/phones can not be taken with you

      USA has just become too hard, too much risk.

    8. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was going to Vegas for a mates 40th birthday celebration. That was scheduled for September, we are now going to Macau.

      This came about because one of our mates is of Indian decent and follows the Sikh religion. Apparently in LA that was indistinguishable from Islam and he spent 4 hours being questioned at length. It caused him to miss his connecting flights and he then missed his first day of the project he was to be working on.

      Their primary issue, they refused to believe that his job had him travel the amount that he does, he sets up microsoft training conferences all over the world and has previously come close to spending too long in the US and nearly qualified as a US resident for tax. So he's been there many many many times. But apparently no one needs to travel as much as he does unless you're a terrorist. WTF.

      That was his last visit.

    9. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      You and I think that sucks, but the batshit crazy poor under-educated Evangelical Christian white trash don't care.

      They can barely afford the MAGA red hat.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    10. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It has become pretty obvious after the last Wikileaks that scanning your smart phone or laptops et al is not the goal installing spyware on them is https://www.theregister.co.uk/.... This has for more to do with total control over all politicians and political activists as well as anybody in media, than it has to do with security, and driven more by the Corporate contractors out of NATO (North American Territorial Occupation farce), so it includes insider trading scams and industrial espionage (insider trading, for those who don't get it, hack financial information and executive communications, of publicly traded companies prior to public release to earn billions). Entirely corrupt to go with the country with the entirely meaningless constitution which can quite readily be interpreted in the most fanciful corrupt ways, by corrupt jobs for life high court (so how the fuck come, those arseholes get a job for life, that's fucking communist).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our family is unlikely to visit the USA ever again

      Same here. We would visit the US every 2-3 years. We've done weeks in Hawaii, NYC, LA, San Diego, Vegas & San Fran.
      The next trip was going to be a very leisurely drive up the west coast to Canada and back.
      The following trip was meant to be driving west to east coast. Somewhere in there we wanted to see Baseball, Ice Hockey, and Indycar events

      Looks like it's going to be Europe & more eastern Asia that benefits now.

    12. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegas is a sh*thole. Fly into LAX, hire a car, and drive up the coast to SanFran. There's some beautiful country in there but you won't even get to see the sky in Vegas, unless you count paintings of it on the roof :-)

    13. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That was scheduled for September, we are now going to Macau.

      Oh I can't recommend that enough. Macau is awesome. If any of you like thrills I highly recommend the bungee jump off the Macau tower as well, oh and book ahead so you don't wait in line for 4 hours.

    14. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by houghi · · Score: 1

      Joe Average in Montana is not the same as Disney in Florida. So I would not be surprised if they step in, just like they did with copyright.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      Part of the challenge is foreign tourism tends to concentrate in certain areas, such as Disney, NYC, Hawaii, etc and is not spread more evenly across the country. Thus, despite the significant impact it may have on some areas others will think it's Ok because well, Trump; proving you can't fix stupid.

      As an American, this is quite right. I actually have traveled to a lot of foreign countries because I just like traveling and sightseeing. I've been to over 14 different countries, but a few places I've been to aren't really countries so much as territories or something like that, so my actual count could be higher depending on how loose you view the definition of "countries". This makes me some kind of wild, crazy international traveler by American standards. Among my friends, it's really difficult to find anybody who's ever been outside of North America. I've got friends who have never left the USA at all. One guy I can think of went to a Mexican resort - once. Another friend has been to Canada twice in his life and for a while there he acted like he was some kind of hardcore seasoned international traveler because of that. Another friend went to somewhere in the Caribbean once because work sent him there for a conference. Another guy I knew went to the UK once and he'd love to go back, but that would require him to actually leave his house, something he rarely does (he has major issues). Honestly, I'm finding it hard in my circle of friends to find people who care at all if foreign travelers can't come to the USA or choose to avoid it. Lots of people really don't care. I'm not in favor of the US losing tourism business, but I really seem to have a minority viewpoint here. I grew up in a small town about 2 hours from our state capitol and my first post-college job was in that town. I worked with a few people who had never been to our state capitol and had never left the state and had no plans to do either. This has been going on for a long time and it's not just a Trump thing, although maybe he's bringing more of these kind of people out into the open.

    16. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      While I don't know what "shivering dandies" are (other than that they apparently live in DC)

      I think it has something to do with a small, yellow flower that's usually considered a weed, and perhaps cold temperatures. Maybe these flowers sprouted and then an unexpected cold spell hit? What that has to do with the ease of visiting the US, I have no idea. Very strange.

    17. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This came about because one of our mates is of Indian decent and follows the Sikh religion. Apparently in LA that was indistinguishable from Islam and he spent 4 hours being questioned at length.

      Their primary issue, they refused to believe that his job had him travel the amount that he does, he sets up microsoft training conferences all over the world

      Well good riddance to that guy then! We don't need him here.

    18. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by flopsquad · · Score: 1
      Man, it's even worse than you know. I've heard from some very reputable sources that:

      • - There are members of Congress, and Supreme Court justices, who are exempt from the National Fluoridated Water Mind Control Project because they're Skull & Bones Freemasons?
      • - Everyone born in the USA after 1977 can trace their mitochondrial lineage to a Russian hermaphrodite MKULTRA subject codenamed "Rosebud"?
      • - The Global Jewish Banking Cartel is behind the so-called "clean energy movement" because inhaling coal ash actually enhances the mental and physical abilities of Muslims and Christians?
      • - REDACTED
      • - Cubic Creation of 4 corner separate simultaneous 24 hour Days within 1 Earth rotation - transcends and contradicts the 1 Day rotation/1 God Creation of Christianity - and all ONEism / Singularity religions - proving them to constitute Evil on Earth for the parallel Opposites?
      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    19. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped going to that dirty, shitty, dangerous, insane stupid country a long time ago. So many fucked up superstitious gun toting maniacs, and that is just the Christians.

      American "Exceptionalism" finally appears! Exceptionally fucked up beyond recognition.

    20. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by LienRag · · Score: 1

      he sets up microsoft training conferences all over the world

      Is that allowed by the Sikh religion?
      I thought Sikhism was about "kirat karo", honest work...

    21. Re:Goodbye Tourism Money by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Lol Harsh.

      Well he certainly works hard at setting these things up! I keep telling him to not let them go to linux otherwise he will be out of a job.

  22. Great! by GoyKnows · · Score: 1

    Just like we do in Israel!

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how's that working out for you?

  23. You missed by s.petry · · Score: 0

    "According to the WSJ", not any Government policy we have seen. While Governments can, and often do, put out crap policies there are the occasional smart ones where experts have input. Most of us can come up with policies that have no requirements for passwords. Simply "add Govt Office as a friend", or "add inspector as a friend". From there, they could see all of your contacts, posts, etc..

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:You missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "According to the WSJ", not any Government policy we have seen.

      Well it's not like there were ever well-formulated and comprehensive accounts of whatever the hell "extreme vetting" is, so you're right that the media has only guesses and rumors to go on for now. All we really know is that it is "extreme", and we've been promised that somehow that will keep the terrorists out in the same way that this rock I have on my desk keeps tigers away.

    2. Re:You missed by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, it's from the slander journal?

      Ok, we can safely ignore that bullshit then, carry on.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:You missed by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      So I don't have a Secret Group in Facebook?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:You missed by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, it's from the slander journal?

      Ok, we can safely ignore that bullshit then, carry on.

      Your words, not mine. My position would be the same if it was Breitbart. Media is quite often wrong, and none of them are above inventing stories for click-bait.

      Now if they gave a link to a proposed Bill, I'd take it more seriously. Media does not create laws or regulations, Government Legislators do.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    5. Re:You missed by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's easier with Breitbart, they at least offer SO outlandish stories that it's trivial to identify them as some sort of insane ramblings of some conspiracy nut.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:You missed by Holi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well when Dept of Homeland Security Secretary says something, it's kind of unfair to claim a paper is making something up.

      https://homeland.house.gov/hea...

      http://www.npr.org/templates/t...

      But hey, I get it, media bashing, it's the new cool.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    7. Re:You missed by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not as much the new cool, more the retaliation after they started the media war.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Re:Not surprised by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah yes, but the IRA were good clean Christian terrorists, so it was totally okay to allow them to enter the US to evade arrest and raise money for the "struggle" (which amounted as often as not to blowing up informants and random people for effect).

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  25. Congratulations are in order to: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Taliban, Islamic State/Daesh, Al Shebob, Iran, etc, for achieving one of their major primary objectives: destroying American freedom. Now we're just another xenophobic shithole, like most of the rest of the world.

    Up Next: Being jailed/disappeared/killed for criticizing the government, the abolition of non-state-run media outlets, and the declaration of an official State religion (in other words, repealing the First Amendment).

    1. Re:Congratulations are in order to: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (in other words, repealing the First Amendment)

      After all, it's just a piece of paper, not like it actually means anything, right?

  26. Simple solution, vet Trump first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, let's put that guy through the wringer, see if he's qualified to enter the US.

    I'm pretty sure he wasn't born in the country. Have YOU ever seen his birth certificate?

  27. Canadians not travelling to USA.... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Informative

    More and more of my (Canadian) friends and family have made the decision to cancel discretionary trips to and through the USA in recent months.

    Most people I know who are are staying away aren't doing it because of Trump's EOs or new rules that are coming. The majority are caucasian Canadian citizens, so they'd breeze right in anyway.

    It's more that many Canadians that I've talked to feel that discretionary travel to the US is tacit support for Trump and his Republicans. We realize it's a drop in the ocean, but it's the only tool we have.

    My wife and her friends recently cancelled a 'girl's weekend' in Seattle. I have a cousin who recently made the decision to go to Cuba in May instead of the Hawaii trip she had planned. Other friends who cancelled a Disney trip. Still others who cancelled San Diego and went to Mexico.

    I also know of several people here in Vancouver who booked trips to points south and east and specifically avoided (cheaper) US carriers so they could avoid transiting the USA. They instead transited YYZ, YUL and MEX.

    None of these people are radical eco-hippie-lefties. Just average Canadians who have made the decision not the travel to or through the USA.

    I know, I know, anecdotal, we don't need you socialist commie Canadians anyway, Trump rules, America's great, don't let the door hit us on the way out, blah blah blah, but nevertheless that's tens of thousands of dollars deflected away from the USA right there in my little sphere, within the last month or two.

    1. Re: Canadians not travelling to USA.... by thundercattt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're not the first to say that. I had considered a few trips this summer to the U.S to visit friends. After all this nonsense, I decided to cancel and to exploring Europe.

    2. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      The average Canadian IS an eco-hippie-leftie. They voted for Trudeau ffs.

    3. Re: Canadians not travelling to USA.... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Good luck with all the cultural enrichment. Just be sure to look up Taharrush Gamea before you go.

    4. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The majority are caucasian Canadian citizens, so they'd breeze right in anyway.

      We had a team mate from our Canadian subsidiary , white guy, early to middle fifties, skinny balding dude, you the plain run of the mill type, get harassed at the BC/WA border. This is a crossing he makes once a month and has never has any issues.

      On his most recent trip, the border agent threatened to confiscate his company phone and laptop, along with his Canadian passport! Luckily corporate legal smooth things over.

      I as well am Canadian, with a green card, and I'm scared of leaving the country for fear of not being allowed back. And my wife and I, who is also Canadian, have been living in the US for 20 years.

      Being Canadian is no longer an advantage when crossing the border.

      Cross at your own risk.

    5. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by jonwil · · Score: 2

      Don't forget that the US now demands any carrier flying within US airspace (which would include that flight from YUL to MEX) has to hand over all sorts of crap to the US government about the passengers flying etc (and even not allow people on certain lists to fly on such flights).

      Heck, even flights close to the US that don't cross the US land mass still get hit by a bunch of rules and regulations (and the airports in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver are all close enough to the border that all flights out of them are likely affected)

    6. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American I feel pretty trapped right now. It, the USA, has never seemed smaller and the prospects for getting out have never looked bleaker (to say nothing of re-entry). The potential for hassle and conflict any non-citizen feels right now (or should feel) is only slightly different than the potential for hassle and conflict any citizen feels (or should feel). We are, as it were, nothing but a bunch of raped apes. It doesn't matter which side of the line you're on and it especially doesn't matter in the buffer zone. I only have one living great-uncle left in Canada. That's not much of a safety valve. I have relatives with dual passports but CA won't have me. Fight or flight options have just about been reduced to one. "Please step over here." "But it's just a panty liner." "Please step over here and place your arms out to the side."

    7. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Trump ... Trudeau.

      We missed it by that much.

      America should be more like Canada.

      The USA is toast and Trump is the apex asshole who's the logical trajectory of rabid batshit crazy greed.

      The amendment we need now is the fucking 2nd.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's centre of the road for Canada.

    9. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This U.S. person won't be traveling to Canada either. About 9 years ago, I got a DUI (administrative, no traffic issue)I. Canada has what is called the $5,000 turnaround where if someone in the car happened to have a DUI, they aren't admitted to the country. The carload has to turn around and return home.

      It'll get even more interesting when states start adopting a .055 BAC limit for "DUI".

      Cheers.

    10. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that there are consequences to doing stupid things? I'm pretty certain the rest of the planet learned that at the age of two or three :-)

    11. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Lucidus · · Score: 1

      I can't speak directly to what you experienced, but as a rule it does not work that way. If you have been convicted of a felony in any other country, and it is also a felony in Canada, you are not eligible for admission for 10 years. You can often get around this by making arrangements with your local Canadian consulate before starting your trip. The exclusion only applies to the individual with the criminal record - but his traveling companions would be jerks to abandon him at the border, which is generally why an entire party will turn around.

    12. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: We voted against Stephen Harper.

    13. Re: Canadians not travelling to USA.... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Still better than running a marathon in Boston, eh?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    14. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jez, mate. I'd just like to say: you're an absolutely fucking cock-womble.

    15. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Well that seems to be the only one the US government doesn't want to stamp all over. So that's something.

      Of course, it was probably more useful back when it was your musket against the other guy's musket. Now that its your hunting rifle or even assault rifle against their drone strikes.. yeah good luck there.

    16. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Canadians are "radical eco-hippie-lefties", which is why you have that scumbag Jew Trudeau in power...

    17. Re: Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      A very small chance of being harassed (by a man that you're legally allowed to punch in the face to stop him) against an almost certain chance of being harassed (by armed people able to detain you indefinitely)?

      Sounds like good odds to me.

    18. Re: Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safety first.

    19. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I as well am Canadian, with a green card, and I'm scared of leaving the country for fear of not being allowed back. And my wife and I, who is also Canadian, have been living in the US for 20 years.

      With the way things are going, why are you still here?

    20. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      It sure would help relations between Canada and the US if the Canadian tourists would tip the way Americans do.

    21. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      That's the gist of my thesis in another world: "Weapon Equity"

      Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, but they do not have the right to actually use them. ~ © 2017 CaptainDork

      As you allude, weaponry technology has changed so much since #2A was established.

      Look at protests that turn to violence: Citizens are using stone-age technology of sticks and stones and fire against helicopters, riot police, pepper spray, rubber bullets, water hoses, Tasers and firearms.

      To those who go off the rails saying we need the #2A to defend against a tyrannical government (are wrong ... it's OTHER tyrannical governments) are not right in the head.

      I can't buy grenades, rocket launchers, aircraft carriers, napalm, Predator drones and shit.

      And, while I am licensed to carry for self defense, I will be immediately arrested and subjected to due process and wit for the courts to decide if I actually, in reality, have the right to use the arm I can, by right, keep and bear.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    22. Re: Canadians not travelling to USA.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Taharrush Gamea: A mangled spelling of the Arabic phrase for "group harassment," referring to a fictional Arabic practice of organized sexual harassment and robbery, made up by the far-right. That was indeed informative.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    23. Re:Canadians not travelling to USA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proper citation please, not a news bite.

  28. Gerry Ford, 1974 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.

    And you wanted "free" stuff.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Gerry Ford, 1974 by imnotanumber · · Score: 1

      A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.

      ANY government is big enough to take from you everything you have.

      Even the ones that can't give you almost anything.

    2. Re:Gerry Ford, 1974 by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As an example, five guys with handguns are quite sufficient to take everything I have, and my only protection is the governmental legal and criminal justice system. Most countries can afford to hire five guys, give them handguns, and train them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  29. They'll implicitly target Muslims by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that's what they're expecting. All of the folks you just described will get a pass if they come from Christian countries. At least, that's the plan. Whether it'll hold up in court or not is another matter. We used to have lots of laws/rules about this sort of discrimination where everybody's doing it but it's OK because they do it with a wink and a node and a dog whistle. But we've been chipping away at those protections for about 10 years now.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      All of the folks you just described will get a pass if they come from Christian countries and have the correct skin tone and length of facial hair

      FTFY

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by jez9999 · · Score: 0

      And so they should.

      Before the West imported large numbers of Muslims, we did not have the problems of Islamization nor 95% of the terrorism we get in the West today. Screen them out and you're back to the people we had before, who were not bad enough to need extreme vetting.

    3. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by MtHuurne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you never heard of the IRA, ETA, RAF? Terrorism isn't new to Europe.

      Also, I think blaming Islam as a whole even for the Islamic terrorism is mischaracterizing the problem. If you read about the background of the terrorists, many of them are people who were violent for a long time and turned to fundamentalism as short as 1 or 2 years before they did their attack. So they're not deeply religious Muslims becoming violent, they're angry people given a cause by religious extremists.

    4. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Before the West imported large numbers of Muslims, we did not have . . . somewhere between 6 and 12% of the terrorism we get in the West today.

      I fixed that so the viewers at home could see the truth rather than a complete fabrication with no basis in reality. But by all means, don't let facts and data get in the way of a good old fashioned islamophobic blame-the-brown-people polemic.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    5. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each one of those groups was called a terrorist group and targeted for extremism until they were finally wiped out. And, guess what, people actually targeted and fought them. For instance, people recognized that the IRA was -- oh my gosh -- Irish.

      IRA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army
      ETA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETA_(separatist_group)#2011_permanent_ceasefire_and_cessation_of_armed_activity
      RAF: Backed by Eastern Germany's secret police, so not a traditional terrorist group.

      In many cases, a lot of the radical islamists were ordinary miscreants prior to being radicalized. However, what radicalized them? Hint: it's not the local petting zoo and it's seemingly not the local Synagogue, Church, or Temple. Whenever such a place does radicalize these people, then we target it and try to destroy it however we can (see Westboro Baptist Church as a prime example outside of Islam and they don't kill people).

      It's lunacy and idiocy to ignore this problem, just as it's that way to accept the Westboro Baptist Church. It will never take care of itself, especially as the source nations of these individuals continue to spin in the sands of the Middle East without improving any core infrastructure or growing businesses outside of the oil industry. What's going to happen when that industry is dramatically reduced in the years to come?

      The head-in-the-sand (pun intended) approach to ignoring Islamic Terrorism is probably one of the dumbest ideas that I have seen in my life. You can continue to feel like you're better than those of us that recognize where the problem exists: Islam. This does not mean that Muslims are bad people. Far from it in fact, I work with many great Muslims, but they're educated. When a single bad one can kill over 20 people at a time, it kind of skews things into the bad apple's favor, especially when the core of the religion is still in the dark ages.

      After all, try visiting a largely muslim populated area like Minnesota or Northern Virginia: the way that most Muslim women are treated is downright appalling. For the majority in the main stream, they literally cannot wear clothes that they want without persecution and they have been brainwashed to believe that they need to cover up while all of the men walk around in literally whatever clothes they want to wear.

    6. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain that jez9999 said "95% of the terrorism we get in the West today" (emphasis mine). Islamic terrorism certainly is a problem today. The IRA et al, not so much today.

    7. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lack of accurate public analysis of terrorism have most people believe they know who they are dealing with. Sweeping over-simplifications abound.
      If there is any chance a US visitor may have his contact list exposed, he will furnish another list, a less damaging one. So that is not going to work. Period.
      The west is dealing very fairly with adherents to the prophet of Mecca, why not ask them to reciprocate? There are at least 10 mosques in the holy city of Rome, why not insist on an equal number of cathedrals in Mecca? If they cannot accept tolerance towards western ideas, why should the west tolerate their ideas? Oil? A large "defense" expenditure?

    8. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain to me how every middle of the road Muslim doesn't want to take over the goddamn world for the shitty desert god of a child rapist?

      That is Muslims MO. All Muslims want to TAKE OVER the world and install a supreme caliphate.

      One such example.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIK8bfeLXSw
      GET WOKE bro.

    9. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely certain you should be lumping the UK air force in with groups like ETA and the IRA :-)

    10. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the West started to impose its view on the Muslim world we did not have the problems of the terrorism we get in the West today. Stop fucking them over and we may be back to the people we had before.
      Although, after the Muslim saw how easy is to bring Western government to their knees one wonders if we didn't shoot ourselves in the foot.

    11. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you never heard of the IRA, ETA, RAF? Terrorism isn't new to Europe.

      Also, I think blaming Islam as a whole even for the Islamic terrorism is mischaracterizing the problem. If you read about the background of the terrorists, many of them are people who were violent for a long time and turned to fundamentalism as short as 1 or 2 years before they did their attack. So they're not deeply religious Muslims becoming violent, they're angry people given a cause by religious extremists.

      The RAF (Royal Air Force of the United Kingdom) are terrorists???

      Hmm, maybe I could see that, if you included the USAF as well :-)

    12. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely certain you're trying to be funny or just stupid. RAF stands for Rote Armee Fraktion (Red Army Faction).

    13. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Lets have a look at Germany: The NSU (Nationalsocialist Underground) killed 10 people in Germany. The 2016 Munich shooting was perpetrated by an Aryan suprematist killing turkish looking people. The last bomb attack (Sep. 2016) in Germany was probably a right-wing group trying to blow up a mosque and the congress center in Dresden.

      It seems having a Breitbart account should be a reason not to let people into the U.S., if you want to avoid to import terrorism.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Lennie · · Score: 1

      An other tip: maybe the US should be a lot more careful with funding and giving locals military training (Al-Qaeda, ISIL).

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    15. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      So you never heard of the IRA, ETA, RAF? Terrorism isn't new to Europe.

      That's why I said 95%. Read.

      Also, I think blaming Islam as a whole even for the Islamic terrorism is mischaracterizing the problem.

      LOL. That's liberal denial if ever I've seen it!

    16. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the West started to impose its view on the Muslim world we did not have the problems of the terrorism we get in the West today.

      The USA's first foreign war was against Muslim pirates off the Barbary Coast (Libya, Syria, Algeria coastal region) and were the reason the US Marines were formed. The Marines got the moniker "leathernecks" for the high reinforced leather collars they wore as protection against beheading, as the Muslims were just as keen to behead infidels back then as today.

      The problem with Islam as opposed to Christianity is that Islam has not gone through a 'reformation' as Christian denominations have done. Christianity modernized, Islam is still operating on 7th Century morals and standards. It is as much a form of governance and political ideology like communism, socialism, or capitalism, as it is a religion. As long as this remains true, there can be no peace between Islam and any other religions or forms of government, including secular forms.

    17. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      The problem with Islam as opposed to Christianity is that Islam has not gone through a 'reformation' as Christian denominations have done.

      It has, actually. Christian 'reformation' had nothing to do with modernization, but with returning to what Christian scriptures said instead of making up lots and lots of house rules, like the Catholic church did back then.

      Islam is undergoing the same process right now; the results are groups like Salafists and Wahabites that also want to return (Islamic) faith to (Islamic) scripture.

    18. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christian 'reformation' had nothing to do with modernization, but with returning to what Christian scriptures said instead of making up lots and lots of house rules, like the Catholic church did back then.

      Islam is undergoing the same process right now; the results are groups like Salafists and Wahabites that also want to return (Islamic) faith to (Islamic) scripture.

      No, that's incorrect. Christianity started it's true reformation with the New Testament, leaving most of the fire & brimstone and holy swords of retribution stuff behind and moving to the 'love thine enemy' and 'turn the other cheek' loving-God centered theme. There has been no comparable "New Testament" reformation in Islam, but as you pointed out, they instead seek to remove any modernities that would help Islam fit into the world peacefully and instead seek to enforce and propagate by force 7th-Century middle-East morals and standards, which is why there is trouble.

    19. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we all read, and your argument still doesn't hold water. The only reason why, for example, the IRA isn't responsible for more terror in Britain than IS*/AQ this decade is because the IRA is more or less defunct.

      Even in the US, Islamic terrorists are hardly responsible for 95% of terror attacks or deaths - white supremacists - just as one example - make up a significant proportion of attacks, even today. Muslims (and non-Muslims who belong to religions involving head dresses) have also been repeatedly been the subject of terror attacks by people who think like you in the US.

      Are you going to call for white supremacists to be deported? That'd be amusing...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Actually we did have the terrorism problem. The IRA has killed orders of magnitude more people in Britain than all the muslims put together.

    21. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Munich shooting was done by an immigrant youth, born to Iranian parents. He targeted Turkish looking people because he felt bullied by Turkish people in his school and social environment. He had no connection to any right-wing organisation, which is hardly surprising given that background.

    22. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      angry people given a cause by religious extremists.

      This. You see it with non-religious movements too, like Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW). Guy who have been burned by relationships with women, found a group of people who have turned that anger into a philosophy of hatred and an entire movement, and become radicalized. If you head over to Reddit you can see them openly talking about exacting revenge on women and generally treating them like shit. Such things are hardly unique to Islam or even religion.

      Even the rise of populism, particularly Brexit and Trump, are just lesser manifestations of the same thing. Someone to blame for all your problems, some cause to join that gives you purpose and makes you feel powerful and like you are making a difference.

      The spectrum between Express/Daily Mail reader and racist thug is basically a bell curve, with the majority of people close to the passive end, but as the political climate moves slightly to the right it also slightly increases the numbers at the extremes too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      nor 95% of the terrorism we get in the West today

      Didn't the no child left behind policy also ensure people had a basic understanding of history? What the hell went wrong in your education.

    24. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Also, I think blaming Islam as a whole even for the Islamic terrorism is mischaracterizing the problem.

      It's not Islam specifically, it's all fundamentalist religion. Crack open your history book and read about the Roman Catholic Church and the Crusades or Hitler (he said very specifically what he believed in Mein Kampf) and what motivated them to do what they did. If you want to get real specific the root of the problem is "tribalism". Throughout history much tribalism has been based on religious beliefs but not all of it.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    25. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, that's the question one should be asking YOU!!!

    26. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Cederic · · Score: 1

      en Going Their Own Way (MGTOW). Guy who have been burned by relationships with women, found a group of people who have turned that anger into a philosophy of hatred and an entire movement, and become radicalized. If you head over to Reddit you can see them openly talking about exacting revenge on women and generally treating them like shit.

      Interesting, you have links? My experiences with people identifying as MGTOW is that they're just avoiding the traditional approach to relationships so that they don't get burned by the abusive family courts.

      I haven't seen any posts about revenge or treating anybody like shit, although that may be because I generally avoid reddit.

    27. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Lots of links here: http://www.wehuntedthemammoth....

      They have regular coverage of Reddit, with screenshots.

      You are right, some MGTOW do just want to live without women in their lives for whatever reason. It's a bell curve, but if you look at post histories on Reddit you can see people getting radicalized as post after post about how awful women are slowly changes them from "I had a bad experience" to "bitches are crazy".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Fucking hell, linking to a blog that "tracks and mocks the white male rage" isn't exactly providing reliable citations. You've effectively posted "here is a racist sexist site that tells you why the people it's racist and sexist towards are awful".

      It did however include a link to https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW... which I'll happily agree contains people that are every bit as bad as rabid feminists, and will condemn just as much.

      if you look at post histories on Reddit you can see people getting radicalized as post after post about how awful women are slowly changes them from "I had a bad experience" to "bitches are crazy".

      Again, parallels to feminism - except the radicalisation there occurs in universities these days.

      Luckily most people get on well with all sexes and genders, and in my circle of friends we only want to murder people that use selfie-sticks.

    29. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two shills and raw data. What sort of argument are you making here? That there is still room in your echo chamber?

    30. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Two shills and raw data. What sort of argument are you making here? That there is still room in your echo chamber?

      Broadly? That the way to support—and debunk—factual assertions is with sound data. Where's yours?

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    31. Re:They'll implicitly target Muslims by Sique · · Score: 1

      He still thought himself superior to turks, him being of aryan origin. Yes. Iranians are Aryans. That's what their name actually means: Iranian = Aryan, only in persian pronounciation. And they live closer to the Caucasus Mountains than most Caucasians. Even their language, (New) Persian, is an indogerman language.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  30. Best of all: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lot have been poking them with a stick for decades, to entirely predictable results.

    It's just not us furriners saying that either.

    1. Re:Best of all: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who the fuck forced us to do it? Your fucking US government, that's who. So shut your fucking mouth!

  31. Tourist Industry.. by lionchild · · Score: 1

    I imagine the Tourism Lobby will have a dollar or two to ..er, I mean, thing or two to say about this.

    Alternatively, can you imagine how we would react if the UK decided to do the same with US visitors?

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    1. Re:Tourist Industry.. by sit1963nz · · Score: 2

      And so they should.
      The Murder rate in the USA is huge compared to the UK (and Europe, Australia, New Zealand, etc etc etc)
      The prison population in the USA is huge compared to the UK (and Europe, Australia, New Zealand, etc etc etc)

      The "facts" prove citizens from the USA pose a significant increase in risk

    2. Re:Tourist Industry.. by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      I live in America and the people who scare me the most are the batshit crazy poor, under-educated Evangelical Christian white trash.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Tourist Industry.. by sit1963nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep you are hundreds to times more likely to be murdered by a family member, work college, neighbour , or friend than you are to be involved in a terrorist act.

      The "Scareware" terrorism has nothing to do about keeping Americans safe, it is all about removing right and freedoms.

      Scared people are only too happy for someone else to make the decisions for them if they think it will "keep them safe".

      Over the last 20 years I think more people have been killed by vending machines falling on them than by terrorists

    4. Re:Tourist Industry.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, at roughly 3 deaths per year from vending machines (https://www.quora.com/Fact-Vending-machines-kill-4-times-as-many-people-as-sharks-per-year-How-can-that-be) that doesn't quite work out, but you are definitely more likely to be killed by a vending machine than a shark!

    5. Re:Tourist Industry.. by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      The republican party uses fear as its main tactic. Whether it is fear your fellow Americans, fear another race or fear immigrants or even fear the economy falling apart, that fear is all the right wing plays upon. Reality is the enemy of the right wing.

    6. Re:Tourist Industry.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a little more context, for hilarity's sake. From the link:

      Compared to the threat posed by refugee terrorists — which the president's executive order is allegedly designed to curtail — the data suggest the typical American is:
          6 times more likely to die from a shark attack (one of the rarest forms of death on Earth)
          29 times more likely to die from a regional asteroid strike
          260 times more likely to be struck and killed by lightning
          4,700 times more likely to die in an airplane or spaceship accident
          129,000 times more likely to die in a gun assault
          407,000 times more likely to die in a motor vehicle incident
          6.9 million times more likely to die from cancer or heart disease

      However, that's just for refugee terrorists. The lifetime odds of dying from foreign-born terrorism (all forms) is 1 in 45,808. Given that "[T]he United States spends about $100 billion per year seeking to deter, disrupt, or protect against domestic terrorism," that means that in order for our spending on prevention to be proportionate to the lifetime risk of death from terrorism, we should be spending approximately $572.6 million on shark attack prevention, $14.8 billion on hornet/bee/wasp sting death prevention, $76 billion on tornado death prevention, $1.056 trillion on bicycle death prevention, and $654.4 trillion each on heart disease and cancer death prevention per year .

  32. Will have zero effect on bad guys by RockyMountain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cost to personal liberty, the flagrant unconstitutionality, and the chilling effect on US international relations and tourism aside, this is ALSO a bad idea because it will have zero effect on the real bad guys.

    If you are a bad guy, why would you bring a phone loaded with contacts? Why would you provide a real, rather than a fake social media account? For a real bad guy, it is trivially easy to circumvent this new check. For the rest of us, it's a massive inconvenience, invasion of privacy, and an almost certain invitation to both systematic abuse and abuse by bad-apple agents.

    (BTW, topic drift... I was quite surprised to see financial data disclosure requirements described as "new". Unlike the phone search and social media stuff, the financial data part is _not_ new. It's been a requirement for certain visa applicants for at least 40 years. It doesn't currently happen at the border, but rather at visa application time. Perhaps the reason it's listed as being new is because it now includes visa-waiver-program countries too?)

    1. Re:Will have zero effect on bad guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...this is ALSO a bad idea because it will have zero effect on the real bad guys.

      Yes, Americans shoot each other all the time. On my commute to work each day, I'm much more likely to be shot and killed by an American soccer mom in an SUV with a handgun in her purse in some pointless road rage incident than I am to be killed by a foreign "terrorist". If I was actually worried about some random person gunning me down then the place to start would be taking the guns away from my fellow Americans.

      In a sane world, the reason people would be concerned about foreign terrorists would be the (remote) possibility they might build a nuclear bomb and take out most of Manhattan in just a few seconds. But when/if a terrorist organization arises that has the capability to build a nuclear bomb this "extreme vetting" (looking in their phones at the border, and then possibly sending them back to their own countries for another try) just isn't going to work.

    2. Re:Will have zero effect on bad guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the reason it's listed as being new is because it now includes visa-waiver-program countries too?)

      That is exactly why it is being listed as new. All of this is new for folks coming from visa waiver program countries and misses the point of the visa waiver program. If you want all of that stuff anyway, then make them apply for a visa so it can be collected in an orderly fashion. Oh, and kiss much of what your economy makes from tourism away as well.

    3. Re:Will have zero effect on bad guys by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      re 'The cost to personal liberty, the flagrant unconstitutionality"
      A person not from the USA does not have "constitutionality" protections when entering the USA. They have some rights, protections but have to tell the truth or they get returned to their own nation.
      Re 'If you are a bad guy, why would you bring a phone loaded with contacts?
      No phone in 2017 stands out. A clean new smart phone stands out just for entering the USA. A phone with normal contacts and some account history allows links to be made. Support for interesting groups, funding of interesting groups in social media.
      Bank accounts and support for an interesting charity?
      Photo or social media images get facial recognition for interesting faces.
      Friends of friends of friends. All that can now be more considered. At the first lie, the person is told to return to they own nation.
      Re "It doesn't currently happen at the border" Thats the idea, to keep people guessing. Normal people are well funded, have a clear idea of what they are doing in the USA, why, for how long and at what locations. Interesting people might have had a simple cover story they get very confused about during the unexpected interview. One lie and they return to their own nations. The more data that can be looked at the more an interesting persons story fails and the lies start.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Will have zero effect on bad guys by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you are a bad guy, why would you bring a phone loaded with contacts?

      If there's one thing that we've learned from terrorists over the last decade or so, it's that people willing to blow themselves up for some poorly defined objective tend not to be the brightest people in the world. We stop most terrorist attempts precisely because they make stupid mistakes on a regular basis. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, western intelligence services haven't had to deal with a competent adversary.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Will have zero effect on bad guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about finding "bad guys"; it's about mass surveillance to get dirt on everyone to silence opposition.

  33. Re:Not surprised by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes. That's kind of the point.

  34. Re:Not surprised by Rei · · Score: 2
    --
    Kneel Before Christ!
  35. Trump Will Quit by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    One way or another Trump will either resign or be removed from office quickly. In the mean time we need to stop all of his executive orders, budgets and laws from being passed as well as prepare methods for quick removal of any that manage to get through the obstruction that we will impose at every turn. One difficult issue will be whether to put Trump on trial for his numerous crimes that are now being exposed. These are not the fantasy crimes such as were claimed against Obama and Clinton but real, hard core crimes that may well include treason. The economic crimes alone are enough to put him in prison for life.

    1. Re:Trump Will Quit by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      One way or another Trump will either resign or be removed from office quickly.

      You really think Pence will be any better?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Trump Will Quit by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      True story, according to credible sources.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    3. Re:Trump Will Quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lemme guess, you're going to storm the White House with team Hillary and forcibly remove Trump now?? Good luck with that.

      One way or another Trump will either resign or be removed from office quickly. In the mean time we need to stop all of his executive orders, budgets and laws from being passed as well as prepare methods for quick removal of any that manage to get through.

    4. Re:Trump Will Quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we just keep impeaching and recalling every piece of shit that seeks to sell our freedoms, privacy, integrity and environment to the highest bidder, until we have a government of good leaders who actually care about the country more than the fucking Money God.

    5. Re:Trump Will Quit by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      He's more level-headed and much more grown-up than Trump, and he has no interest in Russian appeasement. Pence wouldn't wipe his ass with American diplomatic respectability every day and twice on Sunday. He wouldn't back Russia's stance (unintentionally or intentionally) on the EU or NATO.

      On the downside, he's almost as fiscally conservative as Trump and MUCH more socially conservative. Trump's a nasty bigot but he doesn't care much about enshrining his bigotry into law outside of national security and immigration policy. Pence, on the other hand, would absolutely go to town on the LGBT community, separation of church and state, and women's rights.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Trump Will Quit by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      You left out another possible outcome.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:Trump Will Quit by wwphx · · Score: 1

      While I don't like Pence, I have to agree with you, Gameboy. He at least understands how government works. But here's the scary bit -- Paul Ryan would be promoted to Veep....

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    8. Re:Trump Will Quit by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that plan.

    9. Re:Trump Will Quit by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      We just might invalidate the election completely and ask Obama to return for one year until a real election could take place. I see no reason to allow the right wing to gain from what amounts to a treason against our nation.

    10. Re:Trump Will Quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lemme guess, you're going to storm the White House with team Hillary and forcibly remove Trump now?? Good luck with that.

      This actually happened in Ukraine, and works out quite ok. But at the cost of lives lost during the Ukrainian revolution, and many lives lost in the subsequent war in Donbass, which hasn't quite ended. But at least now, Ukraine won't have too much to worry about Lugandonsk, because Russia has to pay for all the upkeep of its new "old" territories that it invaded.

      btw, Lugandonsk is a funny name derived from the names of so-called Lugansk and Donbass "People's Republics", which are the invented pseudostates in the Donbass region. Just don't use that name in the company of Kremlin-supporting ppl, because "gandon" in the name is an impolite Russian word for 'condom'.

    11. Re:Trump Will Quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not the fantasy crimes such as were claimed against Obama and Clinton but real, hard core crimes that may well include treason.

      Quit spreading lies. The crimes against Clinton ARE VERY REAL HARD CORE CRIMES. The mishandling of classified material and accepting payoffs is serious and the crimes were committed. Just look at the piles of emails. Yes if this was anyone else they would put them in prison for life. Remember they want to hang Snowden and he also mishandled classified material so why not her?

      If you wanted the Dems to win they should have run Bernie instead of a crook. Hell I would have voted for Bernie.

      So please quit trying to cover up Clits crimes.

    12. Re:Trump Will Quit by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Who is going to remove him from office and how?

    13. Re:Trump Will Quit by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      What article of the Constitution allows that to happen?

    14. Re:Trump Will Quit by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's no automatic promotion into the Vice Presidency. In event of Trump's removal for whatever reason, Pence would nominate a Vice President for Senatorial approval. He could pick Ryan, but he wouldn't have to.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  36. One obvious question by EndlessNameless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How will this stop anyone besides the absolute dumbest terrorists? Won't they just start lying?

    Almost anyone can lie convincingly given enough practice. Look at Congress.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    1. Re:One obvious question by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You see, there's the beauty of it! The last question is, "Have you truthfully answered all the above?"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the big picture: extreme vetting. Everyone knows that's better than regular vetting!

      I don't use Facebook or other social media, so I'm wondering if they'll even believe me when I tell them I don't have any passwords to give. Same for the almost-empty contacts list on my non-email-using phone.

      Hmmm... I suppose I could give them the password to my Anonymous Coward account here.

    3. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of "extreme vetting" is to know what's in the person's heart. I don't know why they're wasting time with social media if they can know what's in a person's heart. Just look there and be done.

    4. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congress aren't "almost anyone", they're the best liars in the country, selected by one of the most ruthlessly competitive entrance exam processes of any institution. Expecting random terrorists to be able to lie at that level is setting the bar very high indeed.

    5. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TSA agents with surgical knives, how about that.

    6. Re:One obvious question by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The purpose of most of the questions on the current customs form is not that they expect you to admit them, it's that you can be deported for lying on the form and that's much easier to prove than a bunch of things that they might actually want to deport you for.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alec Baldwin knows. But he's busy with other projects at the moment.

  37. Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by MrCodswallop · · Score: 1

    Canada offers a decent alternative "Americanized tourist" experience.

    1. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      Canada offers a decent alternative "Americanized tourist" experience.

      Yup. I especially love Saskatchewan Disney...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this is supposed to be a joke, but I live in Saskatchewan.

      All we have around here is farm land. I guess riding a tractor or combine/harvester could be fun or exciting, but well, not really. While they are big, they don't go very fast or do any tricks.

    3. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't put down curling. That actually attracts a few people.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I have absolutely nothing against curling. My town hosted the Scotties Tournament of Hearts in 2015, and it was a great time.

      The parent post was talking about "Saskatchewan Disneyland" which I take as rides and fun things for children to do. Curling is not very exciting for Children.

    5. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada, The more civilised part of America.

    6. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      > I especially love Saskatchewan Disney...

      I think the best we can do is Canada's Wonderland, just north of Toronto in the province of Ontario.

      I expect it's a pale shadow of the Mouse theme parks, but there are concession stands and parks full of overpriced items, so it has that going for it.

    7. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curling is not very exciting for Children.

      Beats a cavity search and giving up your Facebook password. I'm guessing you don't have children.

    8. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't put down curling. That actually attracts a few people.

      Curling is my favorite sport. I'm Brazilian.

    9. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by ruir · · Score: 1

      So so. Maybe better than the USA, but not that much different. However, I do remember quite well I exchanged English schools because I could not stand any longer a very large ignorant Canadian English teacher know-it-all, that ridiculed what you said, even when you were right and she was wrong.
      And I was the customer there, I cant just picture what would happen if I had the misfortune to have such teacher in the public system...

    10. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this is supposed to be a joke, but I live in Saskatchewan.

      All we have around here is farm land. I guess riding a tractor or combine/harvester could be fun or exciting, but well, not really. While they are big, they don't go very fast or do any tricks.

      Yup, although I did some work there in Dec - Feb. It was a bit cold but an interesting city.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    11. Re:Great news for the Canucks tourism industry! by Talderas · · Score: 1

      All we have around here is farm land. I guess riding a tractor or combine/harvester could be fun or exciting, but well, not really. While they are big, they don't go very fast or do any tricks.

      How am I supposed to drive a Zamboni all over Saskatchewan if you don't have any?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  38. Which countries? by ukoda · · Score: 1

    It says "Tourists from Britain and other countries" then refers to paywall article. Anyone able read the full list of countries and post here?

  39. Re:This is what happens... by naubol · · Score: 2

    None of the terrorists had come from those countries. Calling those judges SJW diminishes the power of the insult. It's like calling Trump a nazi. It's soon (already?) going to only mean "people we don't agree with politically." You're also not responding to the real argument for why they issued injunctions.

    --
    Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
  40. Retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This idea is completely retarded. When did we become the Soviet Union / East Germany? Papers please!

    Mr. Trump, tear down that metaphorical wall, and join the 21st century. We don't have to live in constant fear of foreigners.
    The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

    p.s. IMO the US should return to pre-9/11 airport screening. The US learned our lesson, and nothing like 9/11 will never happen again. Pre-9/11 we all thought "just keep your head down and you'll live." Now, every able bodied man and woman in the US will be willing to risk our lives to save hundreds on board or thousands on the ground, so there's zero chance that an airplane could be hijacked today.

  41. Re:This is what happens... by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't expect judges to be Social Justice Warriors. Surely that's more of a position for Social Justice Paladins. Social Justice Warriors would be more likely in the military, or at least the police.

    Social Justice Clerics of course would be in the church. Jesuits perhaps.
    Social Justice Mages... probably researchers, working on renewable energy and the like.
    Social Justice Bards... I'd imagine that there's not enough musical work for them, but they'd probably feel at home in the media.
    Social Justice Rogues.. out on protests.
    Social Justice Barbariasn... hmm... fighting internet trolls.
    Social Justice Druids... out on some hippie commune.
    Social Justice Sorcerers.... probably in the maker community.
    Social Justice Rangers... forestry service?
    Social Justice Warlocks... members of Anonymous maybe?
    Social Justice Monks... actually, yeah, literal monks. Buddhist, not Christian.

    --
    Kneel Before Christ!
  42. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given the high number of Murders/Prison population in the USA compared to other 1st world countries it would make just as much sense to bar US citizens from travelling to those countries.

    But what is happening is that Tourists are now avoiding the USA and thats going to cost tens of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in lost income.

    Feel free to start a trade war, the US is only 4% of the worlds population and 20% of the worlds GDP.
    Asia is where all the real growth is, China is the biggest economy and growing, US firms could see themselves locked out of the Asian market. "Friends" of the USA have seen how Trump treats them, countries if they have any sense will be planning on what to do if the US is no longer there as a trading partner. Sure its going to hurt for a wee while, but everyone will recover. It will open opportunities for the likes of Airbus and Boeing gets sidelined, it will open up opportunities for EU companies to replace Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, HP, etc etc etc etc etc.

    Peak USA was the 1960/1970s , it has been slowly slipping since then. Trump will simply increase the rate of fall.

    So keep being scared, Keep being paranoid, Build your walls, alienate the rest of the world, the world will learn to get on just fine without the USA. We can go back to sane copyright laws, sane patent laws, sane gun laws , etc etc etc etc

  43. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yep, our family has written off the USA as a place to visit (I have been about 6 times, family twice)
    We are also encouraged at work not to go the Europe via the USA, or attend conferences/training in the USA, risks are too high.

    Dropping tourist numbers is already removing billions from the US economy, and the fall is only going to accelerate .

    So just remember as you shout USA first, 96% of the worlds population and 80% of the worlds GDP is saying USA last.

    The world has become a lost more accessible, countries have modernised , tourism is easier and cheaper than ever before, there are more flights to more destinations than ever before, so choosing "not the USA" is no longer a problem, people are missing out on less and less each year.

  44. Re:Not surprised by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    So ... you don't want our money?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  45. Re:Not surprised by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    But they were the good kind of terrorist, the kind that buys weapons in the Us and only blows shit up outside the US.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Re:Not surprised by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Cuba did actually improve in about the same way the US deteriorated as a vacation destination.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Re:This is what happens... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Be glad they took that bullshit down. What do you think this would have accomplished, except piss off some people? Do you really believe someone hellbent on blowing shit up can't first move to a different country before flying to the US? For real?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  48. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't expect judges to be Social Justice Warriors.

    They are Social Justice Justices of course. It is sad to see enforcing The Constitution gets you called an SJW, but that term was silly from the start. I'm surprised they didn't say these judges were virtue signalling too.

  49. Re:Not surprised by coastwalker · · Score: 2

    Well you are certainly fucking up the global elites there big boy. I don't think Disney world Florida will be doing much business in future when the tourists can't get there anymore. Perhaps we should be vetting Americans - so many of them seem to be alt-right gun nuts it is hard to tell whether they are safe. Realistically the terrorists have won, a nationalist president has gone nuclear over fucking over foreigners for votes. The free world has started to look like that dystopian police state future that American movies have been previewing for years. Call yourselves the leaders of the free world, ha, more like an evil empire. Fortunately there is plenty going on in the rest of the world, this being the Far Eastern century for a start.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  50. More lives would be saved ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    putting the effort and money into road safety or public health. A far better Return On Investment.

    1. Re:More lives would be saved ... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Actually, more Americans are killed by terrorists texting and talking on cell phones while driving.

      And not wearing seatbelts.

      Mostly in Red States, if you look at the maps.

      There is your problem.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  51. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > ...when SJW Judges prevent you from doing common sense things like prohibiting people from countries most likely to harbor those who want to harm you.

    What, like Saudi Arabia?

  52. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because its better than where they were.

    Perhaps you want to compare those figure to the millions who have recently ended up in Europe
    They would prefer to been at home, but home is full of war, death and destruction.

    We have a lot of Americans who have taken up citizenship in New Zealand, if its so good there why did they leave ?

    Now YOU dont care, but the people whose job depends on tourists do, tour guides do, hotels do, airlines do, tourist attractions do.

    Its not OUR attitude, its the US attitude that making the difference, and tourists are now voting with their wallets.

  53. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tourism from abroad isn't a big money maker in the USA... Yea we make some $$ that way, but it's not a huge part of the economy.

    Disney, for example, makes movies and has theme parks outside the USA, so the two they own in the USA might see a drop in attendance, but I'm willing to bet it won't be that much in the grand scheme of Disney's profits...

  54. "sanctity of human life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does that mean? Is it the principle of not killing or something much more? Somehow I doubt that a question related to the general appreciation of medical research using stem cells should be on the questionnaire.

  55. Australian here by caviare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was dismayed the last time I visited the United States, when after the indignity of being treated like a criminal by having my fingerprints taken for the first time, the border official said to me, "Now that wasn't such a big deal was it". Border officials have absolute power. Being on business, I was in no position to offer an alternative opinion and run the risk of being sent home.

    Your tourism industry will be suffering. I stopped travelling for pleasure to the US long ago. If I should visit Canada for a holiday you can be sure I will travel via Auckland or Asia and not LA.

    Fuck you guys, I'm tired of your shit.

    1. Re:Australian here by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Border officials have absolute power in most normal nations.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Australian here by caviare · · Score: 1

      The above is a great example of a straw man argument. A valid point that has nothing to do with the argument being made. I'm not arguing about the absolute power. I'm arguing about it's abuse. The comment from the border official is an abuse of her power. She made a comment that I did not agree with but was in no position to respond to.

      If you want to kill your tourism industry this is how to do it.

    3. Re:Australian here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you guys, I'm tired of your shit.

      Then don't come back? We won't miss you.

    4. Re:Australian here by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      That was part of caviare's point. Condescension from the stranger who has been given absolute power over you? That's just adding lemon to the salt already in the wound.

    5. Re:Australian here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, you sure will. How will things be once people stop visiting? Businesses stop selling to you? Foreign nations stop asking you to join trade deals and sign treaties. That is where isolationism will take you, and it all starts with how you treat foreign visitors. Be careful of what you sow, for one day you will reap but dust.

  56. Re:Not surprised by nightfire-unique · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With an attitude like that you wonder why we don't want you here. Just stay home. We don't care.

    Your choice of words betrays your belief that the US is still the center of the universe. It is less and less so, and that's a shame.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  57. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Probably because the US spent decades in their home countries destablizing their governments in an attempt to exert colonial control over the country's natural resources and labor.

  58. Re:Not surprised by hazardPPP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have people literally dying to come across our borders to get here. If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    You are mixing apples and oranges. The people dying to get to the US are dirt poor folk from third world countries. The US happens to be an advanced, rich, first-world country next door. You are the closest rich place. Thus they come to you. If Mexico shared a border with Canada, and not the US, Mexicans would try to illegally cross into Canada. If they shared a border with Germany, they'd try to cross over into Germany. Why aren't there a lot of Syrian asylum seekers in the US? They think the US is crap and don't want to come there? Or is it maybe because they are tens of thousands of kilometres away from the nearest US border? There do happen to be millions of them in Turkey though....I guess Turkey being next door to Syria has something to do with it.

    What GP is trying to tell you is that "extreme vetting" and the like will do little to discourage desperate illegals (one, they are desperate, two, they are already trying to cross the border without bothering with such things as visas and passports and ETAs) but will do much to annoy legitimate travellers from rich countries, coming temporarily to spend money in the US. You will soon see that yes, you indeed care (as a nation, as an economy), because you will be losing out. On tourism dollars first, and then on business opportunities and investment after that. Treat every passenger as a potential terrorist and piss them off by subjecting them to ridiculous procedures, and guess what, you'll end up pissing off the 99,999...99% of passengers that aren't terrorists. Why would I want to go to a place where I might have my phone searched at the border? Why would I want to be submitted to the humiliation of explaining what every photo in my phone is about to some stranger trained to see a potential deadly threat in every person he comes across? So I can see the Grand Canyon? I can look at pictures of the canyon instead. Better that than some inane border guard looking over all my personal pictures.

  59. If US citizens are being required, why the buzz? by rgutbrod · · Score: 1

    Look at the reports of returning US citizens being required to do so. Shouldn't any non-citizen expect the same treatment? Especially if they are applying to live in this country. Then, when they are citizens, the NSA can keep check on them all the time....LOL

  60. Re:Not surprised by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Foreign tourists spent $216B in America last year, making tourism one of our biggest "exports". This reduces our trade deficit and provides jobs for millions of Americans, maybe even some ex-coalminers. Trump should be doing everything possible to encourage more people to come here, rather than pushing them away. Sad.

  61. Even worse... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Just ... what are they expecting with this? HONESTY? Or a well-rehearsed regurgitation of the correct answers?

    Actually the problem I have is potentially worse since I cannot just give well rehearsed answers because I have no mobile phone and I do not use any social media sites, unless Slashdot counts. So I cannot give them a Facebook account or a mobile phone to scrutinize which will probably make me look extremely suspicious to them.

  62. Mine is easy by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It's case sensitive.

    Format C:||Y|Y

    See, it's working!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  63. People like to imagine this is new. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    People seem to think this is anything more than turning up the heat on the frog pot. We've been getting slowly boiled for a long, long time.

    Welcome to the United States.

    Zappa had it nailed on the jobless recovery too.

    Food Gathering in Post-Industrial America, 1992

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:People like to imagine this is new. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1
      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  64. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such things never stopped people in the past, when the rules were far more strict.

  65. Ow! Doesn't shooting your own foot hurt you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, the US economy is dependent on exports. Now, what do you export? Unfortunately the statistics I know don't declare tourism as an export article, but judging from the GDP data, we can at least start pondering

    agriculture: 1.1%
    industry: 19.4%
    services: 79.5%

    80 cents of every GDP dollar come from services. Services are now very, very hard to export. Either you have to send the person performing the service abroad, or you have to get the person using (and paying for) the service here. Since the former will probably not be taxable here, the latter is way more popular.

    That's called tourism.

    Even considering that most services are for domestic consumption, it's hard to miss that the US economy is heavily dependent on the service sector. We're talking about around 70 million tourists from abroad visiting the US. And I think it's safe to assume that few of them manage to get by on a dollar a day.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  66. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    216 billion is not chump change.
    America has become an authoritarian shit hole, land of the free and home of the brave no more.
    Land of the opressed home of the coward is far more apt for the stinking shithole the US has become.

  67. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Social Justice Monks... actually, yeah, literal monks. Buddhist, not Christian.

    Actually Catholic saints and some of the heretics to the Church are there as well.

  68. Ideology Questions by PPH · · Score: 1

    Just don't go spouting any bullshit about freedom of speech, religion, freedom from unreasonable searches, etc. Or they'll throw you out as some sort of commie subversive

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Ideology Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or taze you to death.

    2. Re:Ideology Questions by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The US has often asked questions about party membership and a persons role in war.
      People don't get to lie on entry to the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  69. I'm *AMERICAN* and same checklist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Furthermore, the last time I flew *OUT* of the US, I took all these precautions *AND* had a fresh empty hard disk in my computer in case I was stopped either on the way out or the way back. I waited until I was in the foreign country, downloaded everything over the internet, scrubbed everything before returning, and.... got shooed right through customs with nary a glance. I do not at all believe that would still be true today, so the same precautions would apply, but honestly the only trip I would take on an airline today would be to emigrate, and at that point I will probably just take a car or boat, depending which is less invasive a departure point.

    Also for the record: I wouldn't be immigrating to Canada without some serious changes in your laws. Plenty of the stupid IP laws I chafe against here are already codified up there, along with a bunch of other minor but still unpleasant laws. Get those fixed though and I will get to work on learning your anthem and this hockey game I keep hearing about :P (Sadly the rinks out here closed in the 80s or early 90s, so I didn't get to benefit. Also I knew a few people who did participate, including one who got his gut torn open with a skate.... rollerskates are unsafe enough for me, tyvm!)

    1. Re:I'm *AMERICAN* and same checklist! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Come to Europe! We sure could need a sensible person or two to immigrate here, just to dilute the unwashed masses of idiots that is doing that currently.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  70. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's amusing, because I, coming from the UK, have thought the same about the US for years. Highest tech third world country I've ever been to. Quite remarkable, but then it's a place where people often seem to be proud of their ignorance.

  71. "how they view the treatment of women in society" by Angeret · · Score: 1

    Treated as anyone should be - as equals. Oh well, that's me banned from Trumpelstiltskin's America then. Good.

  72. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA is the best country in the world slut. Deal with it. I bet you're a little bitch who comes from a country the size of one of our smaller states. When you're in trouble and threatened you turn to us first. Wimp.

  73. Re: This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Trumo had hid pants down you'd blow him.

  74. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Only in inner city ghettos where the black and brown people live or rural areas where white hillbilly Christian methheads live. If you think the USA is third world I'd encourage you to visit Mexico where many citizens live in small shacks by the roadside as soon as you get out of town. Our ghettos can be bad but not nearly that bad.

  75. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 3, Informative

    We (my family) won't be back.

    You hear about businesses talking about "transactional friction", i.e. the difficulties in doing a transaction, the lower it is the more it gets used.
    Well the "friction" for visiting the USA is simply too high, the risks for tourists too high, the risk of loosing phones and laptop too high. Where as the friction for other countries is much lower.

    Our next "big trip" (they usually are 4-8 weeks) will be into Asia in a couple of years, then back to Europe (via Asia) a few years after that, then a cruise around Australia. The USA has been removed from consideration, its too hard.

  76. Reciprocity ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... should rule the day.

    All countries should respond in kind to any vetting and any banning by the USA.

    I'm an American and not particularly proud of it.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Reciprocity ... by LienRag · · Score: 1

      I'm all in favor of harassing traveling US officials, but why do that to ordinary people?

    2. Re:Reciprocity ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Are you asking yourself the same question from the other point of view?

      Are Muslim bans and extreme vetting by Trump administration exempting ordinary citizens?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Reciprocity ... by LienRag · · Score: 1

      An eye for an eye will make the world blind.

  77. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the world will learn to get on just fine without the USA. We can go back to sane copyright laws, sane patent laws, sane gun laws , etc etc etc etc

    Without the irresistible military force of the USA you will go back to your old time feudalism and ultimately another world war.

  78. Not up to judiciary by mi · · Score: 1

    Calling those judges SJW diminishes the power of the insult

    It is not an insult — the judiciary has no say in who is allowed to cross the border. None. Zilch — it is entirely up to the Executive branch. At least, that's what we were told, when Elian Gonzalez was sent back to Cuba — in defiance of wishes of his mother, who gave up her life to get him out of there. A court refused to grant Elian a reprieve, deferring to the President, who wanted to send the boy back:

    "in no context is the executive branch entitled to more deference than in the context of foreign affairs"

    To suddenly switch for the exact opposite opinion requires utter disregard for the actual law and earlier precedents, however recent. The explanation, that the judges' motivation is some kind of "higher" justice — such as "Social" justice — is the most reasonable one...

    And, before you ask, they were talking about Federal Executive branch — not that of any of the member States (suck it up, California). It was only in 2012, that Supreme Court Justice Kennedy wrote for the court's majority against Arizona:

    The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens. This authority rests, in part, on the National Government’s constitutional power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” U. S. Const., Art. I, 8, cl. 4, and its inherent power as sovereign to control and conduct relations with foreign nations.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Not up to judiciary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parents kidnap their children all the time.
      Just because she died doesn't mean the kid can't go back.

    2. Re:Not up to judiciary by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Elian Gonzalez had one surviving parent, his father, who wanted to take him back home. How do you figure that some extended relatives should have a greater say? Just because his mother made a foolhardy trip and got killed in the process? "She gave her life!!!" Emotional arguments like this are useless.

      A bunch of people gave their lives in South America a while ago, willingly drinking poisoned Kool-Aid because their leader, Jim Jones, told them to. Does that mean they were right? Or were they just crazy and stupid?

      A bunch of ISIS fighters have given their lives fighting, frequently with suicide-bombing, to further their cause. Does that mean they're right? Or were they just stupid and crazy?

    3. Re:Not up to judiciary by mi · · Score: 1

      Elian Gonzalez had one surviving parent, his father, who wanted to take him back home.

      Irrelevant. The court didn't rule, whether Elian should stay in the US. Instead, it reaffirmed, that the decision — whatever it is — is up to the Executive Branch.

      The courts used to recognize the President's authority on matters of immigration — and some no longer do. What explains such sharp reversal away from the very recent precedents? The feeling of "Social" Justice is the most plausible explanation, which reaffirms the OP's calling them "SJW judges".

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Not up to judiciary by naubol · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I really appreciate it when someone writes a well-written, level-headed argument that I disagree with. It feels less common in slashdot these days.

      I'd first ask, do visa holders who were affected by the EO have constitutional rights, specifically the right to due process? If so, does an EO ostensibly about foreign policy render the EO unreviewable despite the clear fact that it tramples on the due process rights of visa holders?

      I believe the answer to the first question is emphatically yes and the jurisprudence I'm aware of around this question suggests that USSC has established this as precedent. For example, Zadvydas_v._Davis. As to the 2nd question, I'm not aware of anything in the constitution to suggest the president is able to override due process rights and therefore the order is reviewable in the specific. Nor is there any part of the constitution that says the president is able to label executive orders as foreign policy orders in order to escape constitutional review.

      More broadly, it seems like quite a blank check to issue to state the executive can merely ascertain on its own that its orders are about foreign policy and therefore unreviewable or that if there is a foreign policy element, as adjudicated by the courts, then other constitutional concerns are rendered irrelevant and the judiciary must consider the order unreviewable. Basically, while I agree the executive should have broad discretion with respect to foreign policy, they shouldn't be allowed to revoke visas, once given, without due process; which was the affect of the order.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
  79. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

  80. Great idea, like all the others. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will lead to the creation of a new industry: making fake online personas, and whole clouds of phony innocuous friends, who can all pretend to be yours. The Facebook pages could go back years... e-mails, shooting back and fourth, all nice, clean, and benign, and you pay someone for the fake identity, and they change all the names to yours, add pictures of you, and give you the passwords. Then you give them THOSE, and not the real ones.

    The fact that I, a random shmo, could think of that inside of 30 seconds of reading about this moronic lunacy of "EXTREME" vetting..., it's a pretty fair bet that someone nefarious, or indeed MANY such persons, have not only thought of this, but that this little business is just a-humming along.

    Nice bullshit security theater though.

  81. Re:Not surprised by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  82. What about lost accounts? by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    I've joined a variety of social groups on line and gotten bored and left, but not canceled the account. I have some google and yahoo accounts I haven't used in ages, and probably have an AOL account from 20 years ago, no idea what the password was. I don't even know my FB password, my computer auto logs in, and its in secure physical storage at home with my other passwords.

    But I can't PROVE that I've forgotten my google+ account password.

    Then again, being a middle-aged white guy, I guess I don't need to worry.

    1. Re:What about lost accounts? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Facial recognition will cover most private, public, mil and gov databases.
      The main account will be the one used on any application. For most people that might be the normal email account they use every day.
      So for most people that will not be an issue.
      A person with an almost empty, new email account, name and pw on paper just for such a question?
      The only emails been with the US gov?
      If its special just for entering the USA, why did a person create it just for their US paperwork?
      Did they track or submit their paperwork on an ISP in their own nation? Got an email account on that ISP?...
      It won't be about what a person is forgetting. It will be about what they lie about, what they thought the USA never would find or ask about.
      Their funding for, support of interesting groups. Links to other interesting people. One lie and its back to the nation of origin.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:What about lost accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I can't PROVE that I've forgotten my google+ account password.

      And what about accounts never created? I am not on Linkedin, MySpace, Twitter or any of the other large communities, but how can I prove it? (I do use Google and Yahoo for mail though.)

  83. Elian's Live Father Wanted Him Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elian's grown up now and he's happy to stay in Cuba. He completed an engineering degree last year.

  84. Pot, meet kettle! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FTS: "... questions under consideration included... how (visa applicants) view the treatment of women in society".

    Methinks VP Pence would fail that test miserably. His anti-abortion stance favours a law that would even prevent even rape victims from aborting the fetuses fathered by their rapists. He made a (thankfully unsuccessful) attempt to enact legislation forcing women to pay for funerals for the blood and tissue ejected when they miscarry. Now that's what I call a positive and respectful attitude towards women in society!

    As for the US government becoming an even creepier Peeping Tom when it comes to probing visitors' privacy, I no longer care. I was already saying "No!" when it came to visiting the States, and now I'm saying "Hell no!", so this doesn't represent a very big change. I don't know why Trump is wasting the money that US taxpayers, (not Mexico), will pay to build his damned wall. He's already erecting a pretty effective virtual wall - lots of people around the world are staying away because of the antics of the knuckle-dragging thug that runs the place. If he keeps it up, even the most desperate Mexicans may feel safer with the drug lords, corruption, and abject poverty in their native country than they would in the land of der Trumpenfuhrer.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Pot, meet kettle! by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      There is net migration from US to Mexico, not the other way around. So the wall looks more like the Berlin wall to keep people in. As I've pointed out before, losing illegal Mexican immigrants will harm the economy way more than losing tourists because we need the illegal immigrants' children (who will then be US citizens) to compensate for our own low birth rate.

    2. Re:Pot, meet kettle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prevent even rape victims from aborting the fetuses

      I gather that you feel that the resulting child should be executed as punishment for having a rapist for a father.

  85. Re:Not surprised by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Funny enough my country has people showing up literally risking death and losing limbs to get out of your country. Been happening for about 240 years now, all people seeking freedom, some literally freedom from slavery.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  86. Re:Not surprised by lhowaf · · Score: 1

    Well, if you decide to visit again when the friction gets lower, maybe you'll let me buy you a beer.

  87. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We (my family) won't be back.

    You hear about businesses talking about "transactional friction", i.e. the difficulties in doing a transaction, the lower it is the more it gets used.

    Well the "friction" for visiting the USA is simply too high, the risks for tourists too high, the risk of loosing phones and laptop too high. Where as the friction for other countries is much lower.

    Our next "big trip" (they usually are 4-8 weeks) will be into Asia in a couple of years, then back to Europe (via Asia) a few years after that, then a cruise around Australia. The USA has been removed from consideration, its too hard.

    Please consider Southern South America. You won't be disappointed, I promise.

  88. Re:Not surprised by dcollins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course you're correct about all that. But let me add some perspective to the America-firsters position, because it is, in its horrible way, at least partly consistent.

    The majority of tourism dollars and employment go to the coastal, well-to-do, cosmopolitan, educated, liberal cities. The fact that alt-right anti-visitor policies are going to cripple the tourism industry isn't a bug to our regressive political thinkers; it's a feature. The fact that the coastal cities, the educated people, the cosmopolitan culture, the LBGTQ-friendly places, the colleges that receive foreign students, will be in a shambles is expressly among the things that they desire. Arguing that fact will not dissuade them; it will actually reinforce how wonderful these policies are.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  89. trump should be killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck that piece of shit

  90. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Always happy to have a beer anywhere in the world.

    My next "must" beer trip is to Ireland and go through the Guinness factory tour. Last time I was there I simply did not get time.

    My one claim to Fame is that while I was in Detroit (30 years ago) I got smuggled into the players bar and I have had a beer with Gordie Howe the Canadian ice hockey great. Nice guy, nice beer, winning combo :-)

  91. trading places by bonedonut · · Score: 1

    slowly but surely, we are switching places with China.

  92. Why by Smiddi · · Score: 1

    Is anyone asking why put this into place?

  93. questioning over their ideology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > could also face questioning over their ideology

    During the campaign Trump stated that no one should have their religion questioned.

    This was after the Pope said that Trump wasn't really a Christian.

    One rule for Trump, another for everyone else.

    1. Re:questioning over their ideology by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      "One rule for Trump, another for everyone else."

      you misspelled politicians

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  94. Re:Not surprised by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

    Well, you're absolutely right that a lot of tourism dollars go to liberal-minded coastal places (NYC, California). However, Arizona gets a lot of tourists. Nevada too. Nashville. Memphis (I transferred at Memphis airport once - I remember all the signs being in English and Japanese). Detroit. Wyoming. Utah. Etc. It's not like only the blue states benefit.

  95. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    In the past ???

    I found it hilarious that the US government is "concerned" about possible Russian funding of Afghan terrorist groups when the US was funding those exact same groups when Russia was the occupying force.

    The USA meddles in the internal politics of other countries, funds terrorists (or freedom fighters until they change sides, then they are terrorists again), run espionage rings in other countries , Bullies other countries, etc etc etc, but they get upset when someone does it back to them.

  96. Re:Not surprised by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Probably true, right up until they get to the realisation "USA first" means "USA last" for the 96% of the worlds population (and 80% of the world GDP) who are no US citizens.

    The US has put at risk over $2 Trillion in exports. Those exports are often made by high tech, high paid workers (e.g. Boeing), what happens when Asia stick on a 30% tariff on US goods, the EU does well, the US does not. And things can be made difficult for Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, HP, Facebook, Twitter, Intel, etc etc etc etc.

    In the end it will all flow back to those American Firsters who will probably suffer the most for the longest period.

    The thing they forget is "Can the world survive without the USA", the answer is yes, if all trade with the USA stopped it would hurt for a while, but it will open up opportunities for others and within a decade or two it will be "who cares".

    The Brits are about to find this out too, Yes, its their choice to leave the EU, but if they ever want to join again it will be on the EUs terms (e.g. single currency , drive on the right, etc etc etc). Will the EU suffer, yep for a wee while, they will recover. Who knows the "divorce" may mean all the kids have to go home, UK workers require visas , work permits, etc, etc etc etc. They too have forgotten that once you are out of the game you can no longer make up the rules.

  97. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do some research, and look up the meaning of Sectarian Violence. The Troubles were catholic vs protestant at the base line.The IRA were nationalistic in that they wanted a Catholic Republic.

    I doubt, that justifies their actions, but it does make them distinctly different.

    It makes them distinctly similar. A bunch of murdering bastards.

  98. Bullshit by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    So the casual British terrorist just leaves their phone at home and claims to not have any social media accounts. Or is not having that suspicious? Does one have to have a Facebook account to enter the US? As if any of that has any impact on national security. Rather than destroy the US tourism industry Trump should focus on much stricter gun control laws. There are significantly more people getting shot in the US each year than were killed by terrorists in the last decade. He needs to get his priorities straight!

    1. Re:Bullshit by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Or is not having that suspicious?

      From all I've seen, yes. I'm screwed if I ever have to cross the border cause I just flat out don't use social media so even if I could remember my passwords to hand over, there's nothing of interest on my accounts.

      He needs to get his priorities straight!

      He has his priorities straight -- they're just not the same as your priorities.

      Trump's priority isn't to stop terrorists.. None of these schemes would do a lick to stop any but the absolute dumbest of terrorists (wait.. you could buy that second phone a month earlier and use it a bit so its not clean when you get to the border? Who would ever think of doing that?!) Trump's priority is to make newsworthy statements that make dumb people think he's doing something to stop "the terrorists." Whether any particular plan is actually effective at doing that is of secondary concern.

  99. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have any that you haven't borrowed from us in the first place, smartypants?

  100. Not going there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was planning to see some places in there but with this kind of new ruling i will now ditch that plan. Absolutely no way i don't share my passwords and contacts to anyone, i have nothing to hide but privacy is very big deal to me.

  101. More security theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So for example, an extreme radical Taoist wants a visa. In his long term preparation he creates a LinkedIn, Facebook, Google, Dice, and Monster account. On those accounts he presents a picture of devoted family man with a steady job, and interest in koi ponds as a hobby. His day job as a fishmonger is seen as ironic by the consul and embassy staff. Unbeknownst to the US staffers in one of the encrypted disk images with his secret koi food recipes and pond building design concepts, there lurks insidious radical data. It is in the free space of the encrypted disk image. It itself is encrypted. The password to the encrypted disk image is "koi". But the freespace hidden image within the image requires the use of partition map tools to get the extents of the free space, and use of dd to copy those blocks to another blank disk image created for the specific purpose each time it is used. Then the new image can be decrypted by the usual encrypted volume tools. Once used, dod wipe the freespace after the new volume of secret terrorist sauce was used. It still sits in the encrypted form in the freespace of the nominally koi drive. But odds are no border inspection has a hope of finding it. Make it more fun and force the live version of the terrorist sauce to be in memory only, never backed to the hard drive, or ssd. Another method, in a large executable have a false framework embedded that is your encrypted data. Use the debugger of your development system to copy the framework out of the executable to an in memory filesystem file. Use a playlist from your tunes library as a one bit pad. Not the best as it has definitive patterns but not to shabby either. Run the song data through AES with a key you keep in your head. Then it's a better pad. And again, the immigration agents at the border aren't going to, in all likelyhood, be able to determine the radical Taoist plans for saucing the Christmas dinners with ligonberry sauce instead of cranberry sauce, those basters. This Taoist terrorist is carp. But the border checks will only find the information he wants them to find. He'll appear a normal fishmonger with normal social accounts and emails. His dualist nature hides with his realist presence in plain sight.

  102. Screw you, USoA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you've come to your senses and removed that F*tard currently running the show, I'll start rethinking my holiday plans to include your once-great country again. Until then, there are a lot of other places I want to see in the world, especially since I've already spent as much time in the Computer History Museum as I need to :-) Oh, well, I guess the Smithsonian will have to wait. Munich, with it's brilliant Deutsche Museum, will come first.

  103. Re:"how they view the treatment of women in societ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Treated as anyone should be - as equals. Oh well, that's me banned from Trumpelstiltskin's America then. Good.

    No, no. They should be grabbed by the pussy like "any" American would do. /sarcasm

  104. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's totally a coincidence that the IRA were all Catholics. Nothing to do with religion whatsoever...

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  105. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People will just use temporary Nokia type phones with whatever limited contacts they need for the duration of their stay, zero email setup etc so as to minimise the information present.

    "Hand over your social media details!".
    Don't have any you fucktard.

    DHS are fucking morons.

  106. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irresistible military force? Like the F-35?

  107. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Tranzistors · · Score: 0

    look up the meaning of Sectarian Violence

    Looked into wikipedia and some dictionaries, and it seems that sectarianism is a broader concept than just religious hate.

  108. Re: Not surprised by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It may surprise you, but most of the world does. Well, unless you invaded them and made them pay you for it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  109. Re:Not surprised by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    A big Porsche fan was arrested last night while entering the United States.
    When asked for the reason of his visit, he said he wanted to see the new 911.

  110. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Tranzistors · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's totally a coincidence that the IRA were all Catholics. Nothing to do with religion whatsoever...

    And how many Englishmen where there in the IRA? When you have conflicts all the differences will be drawn in, be those ethnic, religious, language, colour, whatever else you can find. You might argue that maybe it wasn't a religious conflict to begin with, but now it is. However, if we look at the Good Friday agreement, it is a political one. Religion is only mentioned in so far as “lets respect each other, ok?”. Paining the IRA as a religious terrorist organization gives a false understanding on how to resolve the conflict. Yes, the fact that they were Catholics can help to mediate peace (look up work of Alec Reid), but the solution is not to convert the Queen to Catholicism.

  111. Re: Not surprised by sa1lnr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "borrowed from us in the first place"

    Like you, we all borrow from China now.

  112. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the states that aren't part of the right wing nut case shithole? Yea maybe it's time we push for calexit. Too many backwards goombas in the red States. These idiots actually believe things they read on infowars and Breitbart. Talk about the most backward asses in the world.

  113. Constitution, shmonstitution. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    the flagrant unconstitutionality

    Wasn't it already established that constitutional rights don't really apply while you're stuck in immgrations? They can search your stuff without a warrant, so why should other constitutional protections apply?

    "They are taking him nowhere, Mr. Rivers."

    1. Re:Constitution, shmonstitution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it already established that constitutional rights don't really apply while you're stuck in immgrations?

      The constitution spells out what Congress is allowed to do. So, for it not to apply, it would have to be Congress stuck in immigrations.

  114. Re:Not surprised by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    We have people literally dying to come across our borders to get here. If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    And so does Russia, resulting in millions of illegal immigrants there. Must be an awesome place to live according to your logic.

    Both are countries I won't visit again.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  115. Re:Not surprised by Kiuas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Feel free to start a trade war, the US is only 4% of the worlds population and 20% of the worlds GDP.
    Asia is where all the real growth is, China is the biggest economy and growing, US firms could see themselves locked out of the Asian market. "Friends" of the USA have seen how Trump treats them, countries if they have any sense will be planning on what to do if the US is no longer there as a trading partner. Sure its going to hurt for a wee while, but everyone will recover. It will open opportunities for the likes of Airbus and Boeing gets sidelined, it will open up opportunities for EU companies to replace Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, HP, etc etc etc etc etc.

    As a European I agree with this with one exception: it doesn't necessarily mean said companies will be 'replaced' by others. Multinational companies can re-locate themselves just as people can. If a trade war is started and Google & Co do the math and figure staying in the US will hurt their bottom line too much they'll move out and become European for example.

    This is one of the main reasons why trade wars are stupid and counter--productive in this day and age. Capital and corporations can move across borders rapidly, and they will do so the moment said trade war will start hurting them too much. Trumpsters seem to be under the illusion there's some magical property making american companies forever american. Right now they are because currently the american stock market and environment is still the best place to do business from but if that changes these guys are not going to stay because they're patriots or some such nonsense. They care about money and making it, not the color of the flag waving atop their headquarter.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  116. I guess I'm never going to the US again... by Arab · · Score: 1

    I don't mind being asked questions, but I can't remember my social media passwords...

    1. Re:I guess I'm never going to the US again... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I don't mind being asked questions, but I can't remember my social media passwords...

      That's great, too. The next plane back to where you came from leaves in six hours.

    2. Re:I guess I'm never going to the US again... by ruir · · Score: 1

      As I commented before, I do not even know my social media passwords. Random passwords+2FA

    3. Re:I guess I'm never going to the US again... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      That's still completely fine. The next plane back to where you came from leaves in five hours and fifty-five minutes.

  117. Re:Not surprised by oobayly · · Score: 1

    Well, somebody needed to pay for Black & Decker drills - the favoured power tool of the IRA.

  118. Re:Not surprised by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    "Hand over your social media details!". Don't have any you fucktard.

    "Well, unfortunately for you we can prove that you are lying. So we'll stick you in prison first and then deport you. Have a nice day!"

  119. Freedom of NON-Association solves all of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those non-muslims who wish to associate with muslims can do so, the rest of us (probably 99% of the world's non-muslim population) can just live among ourselves, and you can show us all what we're missing.

    Freedom of non-association is the most basic of all human rights.
    Who would choose to associate with a criminal? Nobody. So most crime would end, because criminals would be exiled from society, or would have to change their behaviour. etc.etc.

  120. Do the same.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Every country which is required to provide the information to enter the US should also do the exact same to people coming from the US. I'll bet a lot of US citizens will start bitching and scream that it would be ridiculous, but then just tell them, "that's exactly what our citizens have to do when they enter your country"..

    1. Re:Do the same.. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Every country which is required to provide the information to enter the US should also do the exact same to people coming from the US. I'll bet a lot of US citizens will start bitching and scream that it would be ridiculous, but then just tell them, "that's exactly what our citizens have to do when they enter your country"..

      That won't work. The people who voted for this don't travel internationally. Most of them are lucky if they ever leave their own state.

  121. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just made my day, thanks :)

  122. Extreme petting? by dhaen · · Score: 1

    Only if we can do it in private!

  123. Re:Not surprised by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    My next "must" beer trip is to Ireland and go through the Guinness factory tour. Last time I was there I simply did not get time.

    It's well worth doing, but ironically it's not a great place to drink Guinness. It needs to be left to settle for a little bit in the barrel before pouring and the bar on top of the museum (great views - do go there) doesn't leave it long enough. When I was there, the best place for guinness was a 'pre-club bar' on the river called the White Horse, but I think it's closed now. Ask a local for advice, it's well worth it!

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  124. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot. The world's population would quite literally starve without the US.

    You've posted dozens of times on this article, same stupid nonsense in every post.

    Please don't visit the US. Ever. We do not need your money. The price to deal with stupid people is too high.

  125. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Trump response at its finest: a sour smirk while rubbing a cheesegrater up and down your own cock.

  126. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the best* guinness is served in shitty "old men" bars.

    *best is relative. All guinness tastes like arse. If you want propery drink head up to bushmills and get a bottle of black label. om nom nom.

  127. Re:Not surprised by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    To be fair, UK welcomed Chechen islamists with open arms back in the 1990ies and also allowed them fund raising and still refuses to extradite them on terrorism charges. Brits really are no better in this matter.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  128. You mean, just like before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time they held my laptop for a month....

  129. Re:Not surprised by bluegutang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US is resembling Russia more and more. Once a superpower, now going gradually downhill socially and politically. Whenever anyone points this out they get huffy and isolate themselves from anyone who criticizes them in any way. Which only further contributes to their problems.

  130. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many Englishmen where there in the IRA?

    Perhaps you should do some reading on that, There were more than a few English in the IRA, every war has turncoats.

    One name you should start with is Rose Dugdale, born in Devon, stole and detonated bombs for the IRA. Next look at the attack in Kingsmill in 1976, widely believed to be an English sympathiser although never named.

    The common denominator of the IRA is that they were all catholic... and catholic on protestant violence was a bigger issue in Northern Ireland (as well as regular Ireland) than the Provincial IRA sending explosives to Whitehall. Hell, the sectarian violence is still not completely over for the Irish, even though the IRA has stopped sending bombs to Whitehall (they only send bills now). You should actually know something about the IRA and the Troubles before commenting on them.

    Posting as AC because I did mod you down and unashamed of it. Captcha: violator, seemed ironic

  131. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there were actually two factions of Irish terrorist, Republicans and Loyalists, split pretty exactly on a catholic/protestant divide, and the Loyalists in particular were 'motivated by religion', and anti-Catholicism. This specifically religious divide was also reflected culturally outside Ireland in cities with large Irish immigrant populations, like Liverpool and Glasgow.

    And, apart from the few instances we on mainland UK tend to focus on, the majority of both sides' terrorist acts were aimed at inhabitatants and natives of an island called Ireland.
    Compare that to the inter-Islamic terrorism regularly inflicted, in Islamic countries, between the Sunni and Shia, the equivalent major Islamic schisms, and no, its not distinctly different at all, not even close.

  132. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh boy have you got a surprise of basic knowledge coming:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    you can't even use the same scale for US vs others. If you group the whole EU together, well, the whole EU still has less.

    yes fuckface, the US is the center of the universe. Deal with it. Or don't. We don't give a fuck what you do or think. We do have some bullshit going on internally though, and those are our problems to deal with.

  133. Don't go to the US by sad_ · · Score: 1

    plain and simple, don't go.
    For vacation, the world is a big place, there are enough other beautiful, friendly places to visit.
    For business, make them do the trip to you.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  134. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do understand that there will be no EU in twenty years, yes? Look for Greece and Italy to be the next two out the door under the tyranny of the Euro. Pro tip: never give up your own currency. One size does not fit all. As for Germany, I can't wait for the Russians to take those motherfuckers out.

  135. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airbus is European.

  136. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you think that if there were, say, 20 million more muslims living in the USA (and doubtless in high concentrations in certain areas, as non-muslism always move away from areas which muslims move into) that there would be MORE tourism? How's Dearborn, Michigan working out for you?

  137. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got the last word! I read this out loud, and my wife left the room! Viva my debating skills! Anonymous because, couch.

  138. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you're aware of the per capita number of murderers when you distribute by race? Any comment?

  139. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boooom

  140. Re:Not surprised by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    Used to be you could pretty much trust Europeans not to come to America to blow things up or murder people. Now they've taken in so many terrists and their supporters, that's no longer the case... I'm quite amazed that Britain is still in the Visa Waiver Program, because it looks more like a third-world country every time I go there.

    Bullshit have you been to Britain. Or if you have: do you want to be more specific with your bile? Rather than just slandering an entire country, and continent?

    Seems highly unlikely you know anything about Europe.

  141. Re:Not surprised by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    We have people literally dying to come across our borders to get here.

    Man you guys really need to get your health insurance sorted out.

    If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    Because they can't get to places where they want to go. Same reason I went to Chicago last year.

  142. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by LQ · · Score: 1

    Do some research, and look up the meaning of Sectarian Violence. The Troubles were catholic vs protestant at the base line.The IRA were nationalistic in that they wanted a Catholic Republic.

    No, they were Irish and wanted a united Ireland free from foreign rule. Just like any other independence struggle. I don't condone their violence but it was not primarily a religious war.

  143. Travel phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this will do is make me get a flip phone, and a wiped laptop specifically for travel.
    I'm not going to give you my password to my real laptop.
    In any case it would be illegal for me to do so (not just against TOS).
    as for contacts, sure, they can have the three contacts I will put in my fake phone.
    And facebook is easy.
    I'll change the password to something I don't know, store it on my home computer.
    Since I won't have my real phone with me, there will be no way to obtain the password.
    Maybe do the same to all email addresses just to be safe.

  144. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

    Perhaps you'd like to tell that to your fellow Americans working in the tourist trade when they lose their jobs, see if you've still got a full set of teeth after.

  145. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is a coincidence. The England-Ireland conflict began, when both sides were still a mixture Catholics/Pagans, centuries before establishment of the Church of England.

    Cromwell's anti-Catholicism laws date to 17th century — half a millennium after the early armed invasions of England's armies into Ireland.

    Nothing to do with religion whatsoever...

    You got it.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  146. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA is now Russia's bitch. Putin has Trump in his pocket. Suck on that.

  147. Standard Procedure in "Border Security" by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if this is just codifying existing practices or what, but if you watch "Border Security" you would know that these things are pretty standard in Canada, Australia, and America.

    The first thing border agents do is to get your phone passwords.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  148. Moderation guidelines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting as AC because I did mod you down and unashamed of it

    You are a shameless asshole then. You may find GP's post disagreeable, but it certainly is not a "troll"...

    The common denominator of the IRA is that they were all catholic... and catholic on protestant violence was a bigger issue

    Bullshit. The conflict began, when England itself was (barely) Catholic, centuries before Church of England was invented.

    1. Re:Moderation guidelines by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In technical terms, the Church of England has been in existence for well over a thousand years. If you're talking about the Church becoming Protestant, it was already beginning to happen in Henry VIII's time, and it was his son, Edward VI, who formally made it a Protestant church. Mary I tried to temporarily reverse it, but Elizabeth I fixed the CofE as a Protestant institution, with a Catholic-lite variant for those that dug that long-winded mass.

      And even that era produced its own terrorists; Guy Fawkes and his gang of Catholic rebels who nearly succeeded in blowing Parliament up, and with that act the Catholics in England became the Muslims of the 17th century; distrusted, viewed as would-be traitors of dubious loyalty, with their loyalty towards Rome, practices of an alien faith, and it wasn't until the 19th century that Catholics were politically normalized again (and even then there were some rancor in some quarters about Catholic Emancipation).

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  149. Re:Not surprised by Holi · · Score: 1

    ^^^ Hear fucking hear.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  150. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, fuck this shit. I organize medical conferences for a living and it is starting to become fucking impossible to invite internationally known speakers to events here in the United States.

    They shut down the international IRS "certified acceptance agent" program as of January 1st which means it is next to impossible for even someone from Canada to apply for an Individual Taxpayer ID Number that would allow us to pay them legally as an independent contractor and avoid a 30% tax to the IRS, under a provision of the US-Canada tax treaty that allows independent contractors without a physical base of operations to work in either country without paying exorbitant taxes to the other government. The only way to do this now is to have the Canadian (or whoever) physically mail their passport to the IRS and wait months for it to be (hopefully) returned.

    Now they are going to invasively probe all the private data of anyone visiting this country? That is fucking insane and it will be next to impossible to have any presenter for any international medical or research conference do any kind of presentation here. Before you know it we will become the kind of backwater hillbilly nation that all those fucking Trump supporters always wanted us to be, because nobody in their right mind will even dream of visiting this fucked up place.

  151. for the TL;DR crowd by Holi · · Score: 1

    Pertinent quote:

    SEC JOHN KELLY: Yeah. You know, pick a country. The thing that we're looking for is when a person comes in, the State Department does these interviews. Someone comes in and says, I want to come to the United States. Then we ask them to give us a list of websites that they visit and the passwords to get on those websites to see what they're looking at. This is...

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  152. Re:Not surprised by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

    Many people in the US were raised in a time where we *were* the center of the universe. The propaganda said that was because of how great our society was. In reality, the US was the center of the universe, because we were the only country that could take on the Soviet Union's quest for world domination. That was basically a war of attrition and the Soviets bankrupted themselves first. It wasn't a victory when the Soviet Union collapsed but rather a time of fear since they were a nuclear armed state. Now the US is declining and we're also a nuclear armed state. Emotionally, though, people have been so indoctrinated that they can't adjust to the new reality very well. Similar to the Soviet decline, the US has an amazing and scary military capacity which is why the world even cares at all.

  153. Re:Not surprised by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    Also, in fairness, poor immigrants (legal or otherwise) have a disproportional negative effect on the poorer inland area. The reality is, though, that losing tourists is less of a concern than losing immigrants. All developed countries have a problem with birth rate and the US is certainly no exception. We aren't going to be able to pay for our social security system if we don't get *more* people moving here. And that will hurt the flyover country people the most as they are less likely to have private pensions / 401ks.

  154. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for yourself you fucking uneducated imbecile. I organize medical conferences for a living and inviting international speakers to speak at a conference in the United States is becoming a fucking nightmare.

  155. Re:Not surprised by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    China is still only the second-largest economy although will probably overtake the US soon. Had we not had Brexit, the EU likely would have overtaken in the next ten years. Now that may take a bit longer. China is going to have a tough time sustaining economic growth due to the dearth of accurate information needed for business planning. That should be a huge US competitive advantage but will likely be undermined due to the alternative-facts movement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  156. Sanctity of Life? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    As the US has the death penalty, I'm not sure how to answer that one.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  157. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    They were motivated by more than just nationalism.

    There have been centuries of discrimination against Irish Catholics.

    It would seem to me that the actions my government is taking with regard to muslims is only going to exacerbate a problem that could have remained a regional, political conflict.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  158. Re: Not surprised by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    "borrowed from us in the first place"

    Like you, we all borrow from China now.

    We actually borrow from the Federal Reserve System. It's the bank's money, we just get to borrow it for a while.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  159. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA is the best country in the world slut. Deal with it. I bet you're a little bitch who comes from a country the size of one of our smaller states. When you're in trouble and threatened you turn to us first. Wimp.

    Way to confirm that stereotype, Cletus.

  160. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit.

  161. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true motherfucker I organize medical conferences in the U.S. and getting speakers to travel here and give a presentation is a fucking nightmare these days

  162. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you need to escape your Muslim infested 3rd world shithole you've made for yourself, we'll consider the application, and you can thank us later for saving at least one place on the planet for you.

  163. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a moron

  164. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh I was in London 3 months ago and it looks like a fucking 3rd world shithole.

    You should get out more.

  165. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stunning rebuttal. Pure genius.

  166. Re:Body of the subject by Northdot · · Score: 1

    Canadian Customs will also go through your phone and/or computer looking to verify your story. Don't know about social media accounts.

  167. Re:Not surprised by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    Because there are worse places.

    Your question essentially amounts to "Is the US the worst place in the world?", and the answer is "No.".

  168. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all the brown people, amirite?

  169. Re:Not surprised by Sassinak · · Score: 1

    Not just that, but RECORDING the data on the phone, and doing lord knows what, because they don't do those things in FRONT of a person.. so absolutely not.. I've already advised my workers to focus on telecommuting/video conference calls, and the US has dropped from a priority country to a to be avoided country... I've encouraged my staff to if at all possible, avoid going into the US for any reason. (most have very little reason, but actions like this, again, put the US on that "do not fly into" list).

    My company used to spend about 1-2 Million USD in travel to the US annually, that's dropped to 80K.. and we continue to lower it. I'm one of about a 2 dozen firms that do similar amounts... which will be reduced.

    Enjoy your deconstruction and isolation..

    --
    God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
  170. He missed FATCA by a thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky guy.

  171. Re:Not surprised by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    Woooooosh.

    ^^ The sound of the point I made flying right over your head.

    Ah, well.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  172. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not online yet. But our 60 year old B-52s still do a pretty good job of keeping the lid on. Why won't you people acknowledge that it is the USA that keeps the world as peaceful and productive as it is today? Without them the degeneration into chaos and planetary destruction would be immediate. For the human race to survive and thrive the USA is the indispensable nation. There is no other that holds dear the sanctity of life as we do. Well, up till last year anyway. The doomsday clock has moved a lot closer to the zero hour. All because of stupid people that will dance to anything.

  173. The Tourism industry by ipb · · Score: 1

    in the rest of the world thanks us.

  174. Re:Not surprised by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    Yes. That's kind of the point.

    Kind of like the UK with Brexit.

    "This is a local country, for local people. Theres nothing for you foreigners here!"

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  175. Mirror, Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see... If there are improvements in the Star Trek Mirror universe, then you can bet, that the primary universe will simultaneously have terrible things to come. Such as, people become better people in the Mirror universe, and people becoming worse in the primary universe.

  176. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thinking that the Irish situation really had anything to do with religion is naive. It had more to do with the subjugation of the Irish by the British, forcing the Irish to abandon Gaelic, abandon their traditional games (i.e. hurling), etc... And after the Irish were essentially forced to be tenants on land they had owned for generations the British let them starve during the potato famine rather than bend their free market ideals even a little by letting them eat the wheat and other grains they were growing. Millions starved to death while grain they grew was exported for profit.

    The religion of someone in Ireland was merely a marker to indicate whether they had accepted the subjugation of England.

  177. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we borrow from china? I'm going to play it safe and just assume wherever it is you're from, the education is very poor. china is the illegal mexican immigrant getting paid scraps to bring us coffee for pennies. they're not some superpower. they're the low standard of living outsourced "do our shitwork" uneducated uncultured rice farmers.

    China has 5 times our population and half the GDP. It would be like borrowing money from the kid mowing my lawn. The money we borrow - our national debt, is owed back to ourselves, not China.

  178. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 1

    There have been centuries of discrimination against Irish Catholics.

    Yes, starting with Cromwell... England was prosecuting even the domestic Catholics — questioning their loyalty (again, on Nationalist grounds) — those of the subjugated lands stood no chance...

    It would seem to me that the actions my government is taking with regard to muslims is only going to exacerbate a problem

    If you are referring to the US government, you are quite obviously wrong. The US has not persecuted Muslims at all until 9/11 — to a fault. We walked on eggshells. For example, we didn't finish Saddam Hussein in 1992 so as not to appear to be "crusaders". And what did we get — we got 9/11 because our troops have entered, with the country's government's permission (invitation!) the "sacred lands of Saudi Arabia"!

    could have remained a regional, political conflict

    Yeah, which "region" is it, the contains the Arabian peninsula, Manhattan, and Virginia?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  179. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm European, too, posting as AC, though.

    There is currently a caveat, in that the United States is a member of NATO, and an ally to all NATO members. Primarily, it's to protect Europe from Russia. That still works.

    So, actually physically isolating the U.S. is not a good thing; yet the U.S. does a great job of it on its own.

    Very smart and reasonably big companies already have offices in strategic places around the world. If things slowly turn for the worse in the U.S., then these companies' European offices and infrastructure are more likely to expand, and American offices are then more likely to suffer layoffs, close, or relocate to better pastures (Canada as physically the closest wealthy country). At best, there would be employee movements and reassignments from the U.S to Europe and maybe Asia/Oceania, too.

    There is already a minor brain drain of the highest and best-quality American talent. Upwards of 7–9 million U.S. citizens already live outside the United States, but this is more like an accumulation. That is not a small number. Many are renouncing their citizenships because of the FATCA tax law, though most of them are probably Canadians who are accidental Americans.

  180. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    And of course you'll insist that the Gunpowder Plotters were also just coincidentally Catholic.

    I love watching the extent to which people trying to make Islam into some sort of special case will partake of special pleading to try to let Christians of similar deeds off the hook.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  181. Re:Not surprised by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    Of course absolutely nothing has actually happened - except for a media that's totally out of control throwing gasoline on every single comment made by anyone and immediately painting a horrible picture of the end of the world...

    And if you actually believe what you read in our press, please check out the comment sections, they are more rational than the crap the press writes. Seriously if you can't see what's going on over here - we don't want you to visit anyway. The press is bat-shit crazy. Many of the people on the coasts are bat-shit crazy. The rest of us - THE MAJORITY - are happy and perfectly normal and not really all the worried about Trump.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  182. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Including trying to force them to abandon, you guessed, Catholicism. Catholicism wasn't the only cause of the Troubles, but saying it wasn't a part of the issue is like claiming the US Civil War wasn't about slavery. The fact was that the Irish viewed their culture as fundamentally Catholic, and viewed the Protestants in Ulster as unwanted criminal interlopers. Every war has its team colors, and in Ireland, the team colors are Catholic and Protestant

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  183. Re:Not surprised by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Trump's game plan is to turn the United States into an autarky.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  184. Re: Not surprised by wickedwitchofwest · · Score: 2

    Funny how 'the special relationship' means the UK provides troops for US military adventures, but we have to have a visa to come to US, whereas you don't need one to come here. I think for a lot of UK tourists this will be the deal breaker. I won't be submitting to personal questions about my politics etc, even if I am a white, female 70 year old.

  185. Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " ... value 'the sanctity of human life'... " ... this from a bunch of clowns who think that health insurance, which helps to keep that sanctity intact, should just cover those whose genes and circumstances have helped to keep from really needing health insurance. Any conservative who speaks about the sanctity of life is talking out of their rear end. They don't have any concern for the children once the children are born and they have little concern for the sick or weak. 'Can't afford that operation? That's too bad, you should have been rich. Or not had that car accident that you weren't at fault for'.

    If our species or society was the kind to literally let people drop dead the moment something was drastic enough with that person's health, that would be one thing. But supposedly, life is sacred. Just not sacred enough to actually provide sufficient humane care and make it somewhere in the ballpark of affordability.

    The U.S.A. hasn't lost its mind. A large portion of it has lost any semblance of humanity.

    captcha: pathetic

  186. Re: This is what happens... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    I prefer option 3, "None of this ineffective bullshit"

  187. British irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's especially funny watching Brits try to trash the US. You voted Brexit. Half of you for very Trumpish reasons, the other half didn't even know WTF they were voting for. Have another crumpet and take a nap.

  188. Re: Not surprised by wickedwitchofwest · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Brits will remember this when US wants to borrow our infantry, who return maimed or in body bags, sometimes injured by ' friendly fire'.

  189. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 2

    And of course you'll insist that the Gunpowder Plotters

    Ok, so you surrender the previous topic and wish to change to the new one? Fine, I accept.

    Gunpowder Plotters were also just coincidentally Catholic

    England created its own "Church of England" to break away from Rome. Though ostensibly it involved religion, it was a purely political move. Catholics, who continued to divide their loyalty between their nation and the Pope (who was often directly controlled by France), were justifiably suspected. (In modern terms, the conflict was between the Euro-centrics and Euro-sceptics — and so it remains today, even if terrorism is no longer used by either side.)

    For another example, consider today's Russian-Ukrainian war — Russia is using the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate as a bulwark against Ukraine, which tries to resist with the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Kyivan Patriarchate. There are no differences in religious doctrine — none whatsoever. The sole difference is that of loyalty... Though it involves religions, the conflict is not religious in the slightest.

    I love watching the extent to which people trying to make Islam into some sort of special case

    It is a special case. Whereas Christianity "renders Cæsar's to Cæsar", Islam prescribes — in detail — how the country (the world!) ought to be governed: by Sharia, a Theocracy. You can not be a good Muslim and not fight for the establishment of it — on this Earth...

    This makes Islam not purely a religion, but also a political movement/ideology. A movement, which — like Communism, for example — should be resisted and indeed attacked.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  190. Re:Not surprised by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    We have people literally dying to come across our borders to get here. If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    Because they are idiots and are sucked in by your propaganda. Same with the UK.

    You need to turn your propaganda machine around so that it shows the world what life is really like in the USA (same for UK) so these people get a realistic impression and realize that they actually should go somewhere else.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  191. Mind the FATCA law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is also the FATCA law that you have to watch out for. A Wikipedia article about it has a good primer. If you plan to retire and keep on living in Germany, then you must consider, that most banks outside the United States won't open bank accounts to U.S. citizens because of the reporting requirements set in the FATCA law, which has been made extraterritorial (because many financial institutions do business in the U.S.). One additional way to counter that would be to renounce U.S. citizenship, but that's a lengthy and expensive process.

  192. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looked far scruffier in the 1970s believe me.

  193. Re: Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It involved slavery, but the main issue was states rights. Yes, states rights to own slaves, but still states rights. You can see the precident set by the north winning even today.

  194. Re:Not surprised by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Trump's extreme vetting decision is working very well. Canadian tourists, for example, busses with classrooms of school kids with one or more immigrant children have cancelled visits to the USA. Even Canadian born WASP are avoiding the USA. We used to camp around Lake George, around Plattsburg, and now we are visiting our own east coast provinces.

    I'm glad for Trumps actions. Our tourist dollars are remaining in Canada. And now we are looking at purchases via ALIBABA in lieu of EBAY.

     

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  195. Re:Not surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    The free world has started to look like that dystopian police state future that American movies have been previewing for years.

    I recommend "The Running Man", starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. It's really eerie, considering the movie was meant to be over-the-top and silly, not at all an accurate prediction of how things would be in the late 2010s.

  196. Not Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia aka the Soviet Union at the time was not friendly to Jews either. The main Soviet rocket scientist Korolyov spent time in the Gulags, for example, but not because Korolyov was a Jew. Discrimination of Jews was not official, but there survive many not-so-good Russian-language jokes about Jews from when Einstein lived. The UK or Canada would have been reasonably good alternatives back then. Only that the UK had the rationing system (most likely to avoid price-gouging and extreme hoarding of food to ensure equal distribution to everyone) during the war and thereafter, that lasted into the eary sixties, IIRC.

  197. Re:Not surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You obviously don't get it. Those high tech, high paid workers live in the rich, coastal cities in America, not the "flyover country" and rural places that voted for this stuff. Those people don't care about the "coastal elites", in fact they despise them. If this means the tech industry goes down the tubes and the coastal cities all turn into wastelands, they'll be *happy*. They really do think that Trump can bring back the economy of the 1950s and that old-time manufacturing is going to come back to rural America, and that they'll be able to happily discriminate against gays and minorities again. Your economic arguments are useless: these people simply do not understand modern economics.

    The same goes for the Brits who voted "leave".

  198. Your Papers Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump Facist Dream. Nuff Said.

  199. Re:Not surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    We can go back to sane copyright laws, sane patent laws, sane gun laws , etc etc etc etc

    As an American, I'd like to point out that you're perfectly free to adopt saner laws any time you like (unless maybe you're in a sorta-occupied country like Afghanistan). If you're in Western Europe, there's nothing stopping you from adopting sensible legislation other than your own internal problems. The US has a lot of problems, and some really stupid laws, but it's not to blame for your laws.

  200. Re:Not surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Trumpsters seem to be under the illusion there's some magical property making american companies forever american.

    People like you just don't get it. Trumpsters aren't simply under some illusion, they completely lack any knowledge about basic macroeconomics at all. Most of them couldn't even find China on a world map. It's really hard for educated people to comprehend the mentality of people with such a lack of education, who will happily believe anything they're told by their uneducated peers or their church pastor.

  201. Re: Not surprised by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Some of us on this side of the pond have been wondering when you folks would finally figure out what that "special relationship" is. It should have become pretty clear in 1956 with the Suez Crisis, and that was over sixty years ago.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  202. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    The US did plenty of meddling in the Middle East, including supporting Israel through pretty much everything they did. The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait was at least partly a failure of US diplomacy, in that Saddam had a very mistaken opinion on what the US would do, after asking the appropriate US diplomat.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  203. Re: Not surprised by wickedwitchofwest · · Score: 1

    Some of us worked it out decades ago, it's just our stupid Governments that when asked to jump, ask'how high'.

  204. Re:Not surprised by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Those "socialist states" comprise a large amount of the US population and economy. It would appear that your idea of a more perfect union involves less per capita income.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  205. Re:Not surprised by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    We have people literally dying to come across our borders to get here. If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    I never understood why people making the argument amounting to "at least we're not the worst" don't see the hilarity of this last refuge.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  206. Re:Not surprised by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    yes fuckface, the US is the center of the universe

    I think at least the advanced aliens would disagree. ;)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  207. Re: Not surprised by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, all the convincing authority of an AC.

  208. Still have death penalty but value human life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What sort of hypocrites are the U.S?

    They are asking people if they value human life but still have the death penalty. Oh the irony.

  209. Re: Not surprised by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Erh... The CIA disagrees.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  210. well there goes my tourist industry job FML by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

    the big tourist companies better be called the SOB in the white house and tell him to back the hell down or else..

    --
    NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
  211. Yeah rite. by Meski · · Score: 1

    If I visit, it'll be with a factory-wiped phone. In a factory case, so this looks legit. Then I logon, and redownload all my stuff after customs.

  212. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, but the IRA were good clean Christian terrorists

    Unlike Islam-motivated terrorists of today, the Irish terrorists were motivated by the sense of nationalism, not religion.

    The first terrorist attack was conducted by Jewish terrorists killing British and other citizens in an attempt to establish the Israeli state. 90 dead 45 injured.

    This contrasts your example of Irish terrorism which was religiously motivated (catholic vs protestant) with Israeli terrorism which did have a nationalist motivation to establish the Israeli state.

    If we are to have discussions about terrorism I think that understanding the history of its use helps provide context.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  213. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing. And it Fucking serves is right, ain't it?

  214. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why she faux. Haha, yours arch g such a great Wis. Very bigly good argument.

  215. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't bring your phone. Or get a travel cheapo phone. Its simple really.

  216. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

    every war has turncoats

    Let me ask then, how many Catholic converts where there in IRA? And how about David Russell, who was a protestant member of IRA?

    More importantly, you have not addressed my main point, which is that while statistically Catholics are targeting Protestants, viewing the conflict as religious is misguided, since at the root of it are national grievances. Protestants were not killed because they didn't believe in transubstantiation. They were killed because they were [at least perceived to be] loyalists that supported occupying government which was viewed as repressive.

    Posting as AC because I did mod you down and unashamed of it.

    Do you really think that I was trolling? As in, trying to upset people by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages? I'm not denying the suffering of those involved, or making fun of them. You might mod me down as “overrated” if you believe that I am wrong, but most posts in /. are misguided. Since my post by default was hidden anyway, there was no need to mod down anyhow.

  217. Re: Not surprised by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    "borrowed from us in the first place"

    Like you, we all borrow from China now.

    Who gives a shit? None of the money is real in the first place and it's literally impossible to pay it all back anyway.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  218. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    the Irish terrorists were motivated by the sense of nationalism, not religion.

    With the Irish those are two sides of the same coin. The Northern Irish at least.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  219. Re:Not surprised by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    With an attitude like that you wonder why we don't want you here. Just stay home. We don't care. We have people literally dying to come across our borders to get here. If the US is THAT bad, why are they coming?

    Yeah, and you're doing everything possible to fuck them all off as quickly as possible. Those people literally dying to get across the border aren't going to bring money in, exactly the opposite. So you just take that as evidence of your own superiority while even your companies try to get as much of their money out of america as possible.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  220. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, I am in geosciences and we see a tremendous asymmetry between our annual conference that alternates between Europe and the USA. Nearly no-one goes to the US meetings, while the European meetings are always at maximum capacity.

  221. Land of the free, home of ... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there's some lines about that in the national anthem. No longer applies.

  222. Why we can have nice things... by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    Controlling who gets in to the country is why we can have nice things like constitutional rights.

    The US under Abe Lincoln during the civil war, being a warzone had large areas where constituional rights took a backseat to military necessity.

    In the interest of keeping the US not-a-warzone, we need to prevent enemies from entering. It is better to make rights violations a condition for entering than to be forced to abandon rights at all points within the jurisdiction of the US.

    And anyway, the constitution only applies to the Jurisdiction of the United States. If you've no visa and are outside the US borders, you have precisely zero constitutional rights. There was a 1980s SCOTUS ruling about that, so it's a pretty solid foundation to base extreme vetting on.

    If you have some prior relationship with the US such as a previous visa you MIGHT be able to make a case that you are somehow under the Jurisdiction of the United States and so due constitutional rights, but that's pretty iffy.

    IMO, having read through the Koran, it seems obvious that anyone who simply does what it says would be an enemy to me personally and to the values and culture I think have been and hope will always be inherent in what it means to be American. Moderate Muslims are lying to themselves. Maybe some day they will find their way to secularity. But it's not my problem if they stay out of my country.

    The constitution was written in the absense ( to a number of decimal places ) of Islam.

    The absense of large numbers of Muslims is one of the reason we can have nice things like constitutional rights.

    We should do what we can to defend what we have inherited from the enlightenment, and preserve it for future generations.

    --
    ...
  223. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 1

    The first terrorist attack ...

    The first terrorist attack, likely, predates written history. It is only in recent decades, that we started to frown on the method as a morally unacceptable one.

    was conducted by Jewish terrorists

    Bzzz! An attempt to change subject detected — and rejected.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  224. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 1

    the Irish terrorists were motivated by the sense of nationalism, not religion.

    With the Irish those are two sides of the same coin. The Northern Irish at least.

    And yet, it is not their religion, that motivates them — indeed, fellow Catholics in France, Spain, and Italy neither sympathize with nor sponsor the activity. On contrast, even the areligious Irish sympathize with the struggle — because it is motivated by nationalism, not religion.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  225. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Owe a bank a million dollars, the bank owns you. Owe a bank a hundred million dollars, you own the bank. Same sentiment with nation's.

  226. Extreme Vetting Is Extremely Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone really serious about attacking the US can bypass extreme vetting very easily.

    Who dreamed this up? A third grader with absolutely no experience with modern technology?

  227. Korolyov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Addendum for clarity: Korolyov was not a Jew (AFAIK), but that his being in the Gulags was not predicated on his specific race, but some other ostensible fault that the Soviet found in his person (can't remember which).

  228. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    The first terrorist attack ...

    The first terrorist attack, likely, predates written history.

    and is therefore contextually irrelevant in this conversation.

    It is only in recent decades, that we started to frown on the method as a morally unacceptable one.

    I think diplomacy is the only morally acceptable method. That's what made us different from terrorists, you know dialogue.

    was conducted by Jewish terrorists

    Bzzz! An attempt to change subject detected — and rejected.

    I thought the troll mod was a little unfair. I was giving you an opportunity to re-frame your comment into a context that made more sense so you could elaborate. Looks like I was wrong and the moderation is appropriate.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  229. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 1

    and is therefore contextually irrelevant in this conversation.

    Said someone, who dragged Jews into a thread about Northern Ireland...

    I think diplomacy is the only morally acceptable method.

    Try it in Syria, post the results (hint — invest in a quality gas-mask before going there).

    I thought the troll mod was a little unfair.

    It was not "a little unfair" — it was utterly bogus. Right or wrong, it was most certainly not a "troll".

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  230. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    and is therefore contextually irrelevant in this conversation.

    Said someone, who dragged Jews into a thread about Northern Ireland...

    The thread was about terrorism. Both are terrorists.

    Try it in Syria, post the results (hint — invest in a quality gas-mask before going there).

    Diplomacy worked with the IRA.

    Right or wrong, it was most certainly not a "troll".

    Sure, you're wrong because the IRA advertised religious, not nationalist rhetoric.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  231. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by mi · · Score: 1

    The thread was about terrorism. Both are terrorists.

    Actually, that's debatable — but irrelevant. We were discussing, whether the Irish terrorists were motivated by religion or other sentiment(s).

    Out of the blue you switch the topic to Jews, claiming, incorrectly, that they were the first terrorists.

    Even stipulating for a second, that targeting an occupier's administration is still terrorism, there certainly have been acts of terrorism before that. Your claim, that the Jews, somehow, were the first, was wrong. False. Liar, liar, pants on fire. Four Pinocchios. Full Stop.

    And, of course, it was and remains off-topic. We are done here.

    Diplomacy worked with the IRA.

    Scores of people remain in prison — kept there on pain of violents.

    you're wrong because the IRA advertised religious, not nationalist rhetoric

    Now you are talking — back on topic again. Of course, you offer no citations and I'm already too tired of your lies, exaggerations, and topic-switching attempts. As I said, we are done here...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  232. Re:Nationalists, not religious fanatics by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    We were discussing, whether the Irish terrorists were motivated by religion or other sentiment(s).

    You said: Unlike Islam-motivated terrorists of today, the Irish terrorists were motivated by the sense of nationalism, not religion.

    Which is clearly wrong, the IRA advertised its motivation as religious, as opposed to...

    Out of the blue you switch the topic to Jews, claiming

    ...being nationalistically motivated, as in the case of the Irgun using terrorism to establish the Israeli state.

    there certainly have been acts of terrorism before that.

    You are free to provide any information you can find to support your claim about the IRA.

    Of course, you offer no citations

    Perhaps you were so committed to imposing your point of view that you the link I posted in my first post supporting my position. Where is your link supporting your position about the nationalistic goals of the IRA considering how long the Irish state has been established. You position is nonsensical.

    and I'm already too tired of your lies, exaggerations, and topic-switching attempts False. Liar, liar, pants on fire. Four Pinocchios. Full Stop.

    The standard reaction of an ideologue encountering counter rationalism, an emotional outburst and irrationality. You haven't supported your initial claim, which you accuse me of, despite a link being right in front of you and then try to alter reality when it is right there for anyone to read. Finally you throw tantrum because you can't afford the mental effort of defending your position.

    I guess the moderators were right.

    As I said, we are done here...

    Indeed, it is unlikely that you have anything of value to contribute.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  233. Re: Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, except the cia says in 2016 both the EU and China were ahead of the United States. I'm sure you won't let facts get in the way of your idiocy though
      https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html

  234. Wrong priorities by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Wrong priorities/targets http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

  235. Re: Nationalists, not religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You reject Muslims as "bad" or "not-true" Muslims for not believing in a literal worldwide caliphate, but would you similarly reject those Christians who believe the creation story is a metaphor, or those that ignore prohibitions on things like tattoos? I mean, kudos if the answer is "yes", because then you're at least being consistent, but even if it is "yes" that still sounds like a "no true Scotsman" fallacy.