Slashdot Mirror


A Case For Why Movie-Theater Experience Is Still Worth the Effort (theverge.com)

It's all but confirmed that major Hollywood studios are chalking out plans to make movies available in the home mere weeks after their theatrical debuts. Some director and producers, including Christopher Nolan of Inception, The Dark Knight, The Prestige and Interstellar fame are seemingly opposed to the idea, urging people to watch movies at the theaters for "best experience." The Verge has an article today in which it lists 10 reasons it thinks people should not stop going to the cinema halls. From the article, condensed for space:
1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.
2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.
3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."
4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.
5. A massive speaker system.
6. Previews.
7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.
8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.
9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.
10. Bragging rights.

370 comments

  1. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But is it worth my the effort?

    1. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if you eat all of that popcorn and soda, you may get diabetes and qualify for disability after both legs are amputated.

      And who wouldn't want free money?

    2. Re:Yes by goombah99 · · Score: 2

      But is it worth my the effort?

      Perhaps more effort on typing?
      It's about the focus. You paid to get in so you give it your full attention. And the reward for you is when you do give something your full attention your mind dives deep. It's a wonderful sensation. And when you get out of it you want to talk about it with the people you shared it with. In your own house there's always something else to do next. the mind moves on.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original title of the article was "....is still worth your the effort" ....

    4. Re:Yes by knightghost · · Score: 1

      How does it get your full attention after a half hour of commercials and a disruptive rude audience? Not to mention poor quality movies the last couple years.

    5. Re: Yes by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

      2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

      3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

      4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

      5. A massive speaker system.

      6. Previews.

      7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

      8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

      10. Bragging rights.

      1. Well, most movie theaters, except for IMAX, have screens MUCH smaller than they used to, certainly not 3 stories. I have 60+ inch Plasma and OLED tvs (4k the latter)...and from my viewing distance, it is quite large. I have had projectors in the past which worked out great, but my current abode really doesn't work for that, but honestly, with the quality sets I have, I don't miss them.

      2. People Everywhere - That's PRECISELY the PROBLEM. I dunno exactly when it happened, but general public civility and manners has long since disappeared from the populace. You have parents bringing in kids too young for some movies or just dropping them off and letting them run wild in a theater. Then, there's the "adults", constantly texting, talking on phone, being rude in general. And hey, of late, there's even those that want to storm into a crowded theater and start shooting people. No thanks. At home, I can invite people I want over, and have them leave if they act an ass.

      3. Focus - Ok, maybe. I personally don't have a problem turning things off and paying full attention to something for a couple hours. I guess it comes from my background in getting lost in books. I can readily disappear into a good story. Unless it is an emergency or I take a break to pee, eat or mix a cocktail...I can safely ignore the real world for a period of time even while at home.

      4. Those important periods are NOT when I hit pause....in between those bits is when I pause for a pit stop or make a drink (having bar that is stocked and free to use at anytime is a major plus of home theater).

      5. I got that covered...100% Klipsch surround, KlipschHorns in front, Cornwalls in back, 17" 800W sub, and good center channel (soon to replace that with a single heresy speaker from klipsch)...and I recently got a new Marantz AV processor. One of the last times I was in a movie theater, they barely had the sound on. I've gone to THX theaters especially for the sound, only to have to get up numerous times and ask them to turn the damned sound ON. Sorry, theater lose there. They might have better equipment at some places, but it does not good at all if not used. Hell, I watch the Flintstones cartoons at concert level....

      6. Ok, I'll give them this one...ever since I was a kid, I LOVED the previews. I don't, however, appreciate the multitude of commercials they've been putting there last years...ugh. I paid...quit selling me stuff!!

      7. See #2...in a theater these days, it is the f

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re: Yes by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 1

      Well said. That is all

      --
      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
    7. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5.a) At home I get to *control* the sound. Chase scene too loud? I turn it down. Romantic scene too quiet - I turn it up.

    8. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all.

      My rebuttal to TFA:
      1. Compete with a Vive... now compete with the same thing in a year, two years, and five years. GLWT.
      2. People suck. Sorry, but you all do. So do I. None of us should have to be sociable just to go somewhere where we're expected to not socialize during the presentation. That's just POHR.
      3. Those people are the annoying ones that socialize during a movie and ruin it for everyone else anyway. They're just cancer upon the entire experience no matter where it occurs.
      4. I hate thrillers, personally. I won't go watch them. Suspense is annoying. Tell the damned story and stop playing with my emotions. There are even movies where I go into "robot mode" just to avoid this feeling. It gets me to stare at the sticky floors faster than anything. Stop trying to do this. JUST. STOP.
      5. I have one of those at home.
      6. Fuck previews.
      7. And all of those are essentially the same thing.
      8. I never did it when I was young, so it's not cherished or a pastime. The whole experience can go directly to hell without passing Go, for all I care.
      9. 32 ounces of overpriced cola in the dark. FTFY. Or I can have it at a normal price and in any quantity I want at home. It's not like there isn't soda in every grocery store or anything. Also, I don't have to interact with other annoying people to get the soda.
      10. Keep 'em. It's not a competition. Tell your story and STFU, movie-boy.

    9. Re: Yes by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The one thing that is better in the cinema is the 3D. You can have as big a screen as you want, but when it comes to 3D it's not field of view that counts, but distance to the screen. Good 3D is pretty much the only reason I go to the cinema, and there's the rub: not many movies get 3D right. Cameron is pretty good at it; Sanctum worked well in 3D and Avatar was spot on (even though it was a pretty average movie otherwise), but other than that there's only a few 3D movies worth watching.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re: Yes by sehlat · · Score: 0

      The one thing that is better in the cinema is the 3D.

      3D? ROFLMAO I tried it. I paid an extra three dollars for the glasses, and some extra bucks for painkillers to deal with the migraine.

    11. Re: Yes by TWX · · Score: 1

      I ended up with a video projector back in 2001 when the company I worked for closed and couldn't pay the vacation time they owed me. It was only 800x600 and 300 ANSI lumens (required almost pitch-dark room to use) but it was AWESOME to have. I've had projectors ever since. 100" screen, for all intents and purposes it's as big as the cinema based on viewing distance. My furniture is much nicer. I control the air conditioning. I don't have a sound system as sophisticated as yours (6 way surround, don't have a subwoofer) but since I'm sitting in the sweet-spot it's probably as good as what I'd get in any random seat in the movie theatre. I don't pay $20 for food for two people, or if I do it's because I grilled steaks and opened a bottle of wine, rather than "nachos" with cheese-based food product and poorly-mixed soda.

      I can back-up the video if I missed dialogue, or if I want to see a really cool action scene again. I can pause if we need to stop for a moment.

      If I want the "shared experience" that point 1 discusses, I call my friends and we make a movie night of it. Even if a dozen people come over we have room and we can then share in the experience without having to include people that won't get off the phone.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re: Yes by cmorgan503 · · Score: 1

      All that plus 30 bucks to see a newly released movie at home? Depending on the number of people watching, it's still cheaper than getting the experience at a theater. The things I'll not miss watching these at home vs going to the theater...

      1: Waiting in line to fork over my money for tickets

      2: Waiting in line to fork over money for soda and popcorn

      3: Waiting in line to take a piss while missing out on the action (due to soda from #2).

      Last time we took ourselves and 2 kids, the experience costed us more than 50 bucks. Thanks, Hollywood, I think I'll take the rent it from RedBox when it's out on DVD/BD over the 30 bucks watch it at home, which I'd take over the 50 bucks and the 'holy shit you want how much for a small popcorn!?' theater experience.

    13. Re: Yes by nwf · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure on the 3D. All the 3D theaters new me have those lame Sony 4K projectors. They are far too dim for an enjoyable experience. I have a 3D TV at home and it looks MUCH better, although I do sit back 15 feet or so.

      As for sound, 3 of the last 4 movies I've seen had some issue with the center channel speaker. It sounded distorted and lower in volume. When dialog moved from the center to the rear, it got louder and more clear.

      As far as I'm concerned, seeing a movie in a theater is a negative in every respect. I have a decent surround system, 4K TV and the ability to pause when I want more popcorn or use the facilities. Plus for the price for three of us to see a movie, I can own it on blu-ray 4K and eat like 20 bags of popcorn and a case of coke.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    14. Re: Yes by cmorgan503 · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention the crappy subtitle options I have to choose when I go. Regal's big ass glasses tends to not work at the start, requiring me to go to the front desk to get it reset, resulting in me missing out on the start of the movie. Ugg.

      Cinemark's Box on a stick is even worst. At least with the Regal glasses, if I'm looking around the screen, the subtitle is still visible. On the plus side, I've never missed out the opening due to the subtitle not working with Cinemark. Then again, I've only used Cinemark's caption system a few times.

      At least at home, I can ensure the damn subtitle works when starting up the movie, which is why I'd most likely just wait for the DVD/BR to become available at RedBox. I have no idea if the 30 bucks watch it at home option would include subtitles.

    15. Re: Yes by cmorgan503 · · Score: 1

      Nipples!? Rewind to confirm. Nope. Moving on. (while ignoring intense glare from wife)

    16. Re: Yes by ezelkow1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      many home projectors have 3d, the 1080p one Ive used for years has 3d, and its a much better effect than seeing it in a theater

      Once you own a 1080/4k+3d projector at home with a good 5.1-7.1 sound setup, there is absolutely no reason to ever go to a theater ever again

    17. Re: Yes by Zumbs · · Score: 2

      6. Previews.

      6. Ok, I'll give them this one...ever since I was a kid, I LOVED the previews. I don't, however, appreciate the multitude of commercials they've been putting there last years...ugh. I paid...quit selling me stuff!!

      Previews and commercials are probably the main drawback of the theatre experience for me. Just goes to show how different people can be, and that there is no way to please everyone.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    18. Re: Yes by ozduo · · Score: 1

      (2 waiting in line to take a piss) Busted you are a girl

      --
      I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
    19. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one thing that is better in the cinema is the 3D.

      Not for long. I have VR.

    20. Re: Yes by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      3D...ugh

      A crap movie in 3D is not made better because all the effort went into the 3D effects which are so grossly overdone it makes it worse not better

      A GOOD movie, with a good plot, good flow and is engaging is still good without 3D, the fact there is no 3D may reduce the distraction for the pretty special effects and actually improve the movie.

    21. Re: Yes by cmorgan503 · · Score: 1

      Nope. I was even surprised about waiting in line for the men's room that night.

    22. Re: Yes by interkin3tic · · Score: 0

      People Everywhere - That's PRECISELY the PROBLEM. I dunno exactly when it happened, but general public civility and manners has long since disappeared from the populace.

      Citation needed. The best quantifiable proxy for "general public civility" I can think of would be violent crime. Anyone not drinking fox-news koolaid should know, violent crime is way down.

      Making up some idiotic mythical past when everything was much better, on the other hand, seems to be at an all time high.

      I'd offer two non-mutually exclusive alternative explanations. 1: You're less impressed with the big screen because your smaller screen is a lot better than it was in the past. 2: You're older and grumpier.

      People have always been annoying at movie theaters. Possibly more annoying since they evidently were more likely to attack you. You just notice it more now and don't have any numbers to disprove your opinion.

    23. Re:Yes by Immerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >It's about the focus.

      Yes it is. Which is why I prefer to see movies in a quiet, comfortable setting without the numerous visual and auditory distractions of a theater. Badly placed safety lights, "ergonomic" chairs, other people who can't shut up or stay off their phones for a couple hours. None of those are present in my living room.

      If you can't focus without paying for the privilege, I would suggest you take up meditation or other form of focus exercise for a while - a little mental discipline goes a long way. You might also consider talking to a psychologist to see if they have any ideas why your ability focus is so badly handicapped.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    24. Re:Yes by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In your own house there's always something else to do next. the mind moves on.

      This would be the case at home or at the cinema, with the exception that you have the drive home to talk about the movie... unless you're at a mall, where being in a giant building expressly designed to distract the hell out of you (so they can sell you stuff) would tend to get in the way of any serious discussions about the movie you just saw. Or, if traffic gets ugly on the way home. Or, well, at least one person in the car has to focus on the road, and not the soul-tingling implications of what he or she just saw...

      Then again, after a good flick on TV at home, the missus and I can yap about it all we want while having a smoke on the back porch, or whatever. ;)

      Unless you're seriously knee-deep in ADD/ADHD, the mind moves on when you want it to.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    25. Re: Yes by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      I think #10, bragging rights, is the main reason people I know go to movies. They want to be the first to see it no matter what it costs or what efforts they have to endure.

      I just don't get it. When I see people lined up around the corner to see a movie on opening night, I'm always tempted to shout at them, "Hey, they're going to be showing it tomorrow, too!" Fools.

    26. Re: Yes by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you wait until the movie is finished and then go back and check she's more likely to laugh at you than get mad. Just an idea.

    27. Re:Yes by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In your own house there's always something else to do next. the mind moves on.

      This should serve as an indication that the selected media is boring and such a waste of time that not even you find it interesting.

      What an awful sort of existence where you have to pretend it is fun just to excuse the fact that it doesn't interest you.

      The fact is that many of the movies available are so boring, if I put it on a screen at home I'd be more likely to sit on the kitchen floor re-reading soup labels than to actually watch it. The answer isn't to watch it where there is nothing to read, the answer is to turn off the screen and do something else.

    28. Re:Yes by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Unless you're seriously knee-deep in ADD/ADHD, the mind moves on when you want it to.

      It seems a lot more likely that I'd get distracted on the way to the mall/theater than just turning on a screen and watching the movie.

      For an ADD child it makes sense, not because they get some benefit from watching the movie but because it just might be easier for the parent to finish the movie in the theater.

      Keep in mind that most ADD people can hyper-focus on things they find interesting. They are more likely than average to be able to sit through a 5 hour movie if they really find it interesting, or binge-watch 40 hours of a TV show in a week. It is the routine/boring stuff that they have trouble staying focused on. If they're distracted watching a movie at home, they probably also don't really care what happened in that movie.

      So a person with serious ADD/ADHD who has to watch a movie in order to write a review of it, maybe they should watch it in the theater. Otherwise, probably not useful to them.

    29. Re: Yes by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Regal's big ass glasses tends to not work at the start

      Are the glasses only supplied and/or needed for those with big asses, or do you get different sizes for those with smaller behinds?

      How are ass glasses supposed to work anyway?!

      Oh... anyway, obligatory XKCD.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    30. Re: Yes by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      2: Waiting in line to fork over money for soda and popcorn

      3: Waiting in line to take a piss while missing out on the action (due to soda from #2).

      I never had to wait in line, but I *was* very reluctant to visit the toilets (also for reason #2 above) in case I missed anything important despite the fact that what I was watching was endless, tedious CGI shoot-'em-up nonsense.

      I wondered if the film had been as disappointing as I'd thought or if it was just my discomfort that put me off.

      Having seen it a second time, I realised that (a) No, The Matrix Revolutions really *was* that bad and (b) I needed my head examined for having gone to see The Matrix Revolutions *twice*! :-O

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    31. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a really nice set up at my last place; 5.1 surround, 1080p 3D 104" screen and a reeealy comfy sofa. It was a bitch to get everything set up just right, but since then every movie theatre has sucked. Worse picture, worse sound, random strangers on their phones, ruinously expensive food and drink, can't pause for the loo...

      I used to get a bunch of mates round every week to watch a movie. Instead of paying $200 to see the latest release whilst eating stale popcorn, we'd spend $100 on pizzas to watch some old classic from our combined collections. After a while, only the most anticipated new movies were "cinema-worthy"; for everything else, we preferred to wait for the blue-ray.

      I had to move somewhere without the space, and now every time I watch TV or go to the cinema I miss my old place.

    32. Re: Yes by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Nope. I was even surprised about waiting in line for the men's room that night.

      What, you mean the sinks were all full too...?!?!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re: Yes by darnok · · Score: 1

      Not sure what the current "theatre experience" is like in the US - it's been a while since I've visited - but here in Australia things have changed a lot over the past few years:

      1. Better, bigger, reclining seats = less people in a given size of cinema. I'd guess that my local multiplex now holds 1/2 the number of people it used to per cinema, in cinemas that are the same size as they've always been. Pretty sure this has led to less noise in the cinemas - with people no longer sitting where they can whisper/yell in each other's ears, there seems to be a tendency for people to shut up as soon as the movie starts playing. And leg room, my god the leg room... - there's no way I can even touch the row in front with my feet even if I try now, whereas I used to have my knees jammed up under my chin

      2. Food has gone decidedly upmarket. Yep, it's still ridiculously expensive and I normally make a quick run by the supermarket for supplies rather than spending 2 weeks' salary on a drink

      3. New release movies seem to have blanket screenings, while slightly older movies linger for longer than before but generally only for 1-2 screenings per day. At any time, there's probably 3-5 new movies showing in 20+ screenings per day at a single multiplex and maybe 10 other slightly older movies doing 1-2 screenings per day. That's a change from maybe 10 newish movies showing maybe ~10 screenings per day, and nothing else. Used to be that if you missed the start of a movie's screening time by a few weeks, you'd missed your chance to see it in a cinema; currently "Rogue One" is still showing daily and it's already on DVD/BlueRay

      4. Used to be that every multiplex in a chain got all the same movies at the same time; now there seems to have been a demographic shift such that "old people" locations get more "old people movie" times, and inner city gets a lot more foreign films

    34. Re: Yes by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      Many theaters here have adopted the larger reclining seats, and they are nice. But they've also added stupidity.

      Now they have assigned seating. And people have learned a neat trick. Say you go to the theater, buy your tickets, spend your $60+ dollars. Go sit down.

      Then, the smart couple shows up at the theater. They buy two seats and don't care where. They go in JUST before the movie starts and find a single open seat in the middle of the theater. They look at you, sitting in the seat you bought, and tell you that you are in the wrong seat just as the lights go down.

      Now you're screwed. Oh, you can argue - as the lights are down and the movie is starting. Everyone around you won't care whose seat it really is, and will hate you. Your day is ruined. The movie is ruined. Good luck.

      It's happened twice to me know in two different theaters. It's a scam people have figured out so that they can sit where-ever they like. And the theater? Fucking worthless. Oh, you can go find an attendant, but they won't ruin the movie for everyone else. They'll offer a refund, or a free movie later. But you're already fucked.

      The food here still sucks. Stale hot pretzels. Half-assed broken popcorn. Some places now have a 'bar'. But what the fuck is the point really? Can't take the liquor into most of the theaters.

      Theaters are fucked.

    35. Re: Yes by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      haha!!! That's what got me to stop going to the movies!

      In Norway, it used to be English or Norwegian Dub

      Now, it's Norwegian 3d Dub, Norwegian 2d Dub, English 3d.... there's no frigging English 2d most of the time...

      Of course this is just animated films.... but I didn't go to the movies without the kids. So, I've been to an average of one movie a year since 3d came out.

      Here's the thing, Interpupillary distance... it makes 3D REALLY REALLY suck. Add to that the distance from the screen and 3d there are maybe 4 seats in the entire theater that doesn't make 3d so bad it's completely unwatchable.

      If you want 3d, play a video game on Oculus, at least there, they can rerender the entire scene for your eyes.

    36. Re: Yes by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I am typing this on a 5 year old 720p laser/led projector running at 1920x1080 and I can tell you there's no reason to go to the theater.

    37. Re: Yes by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      $50!!!! Are you frigging kidding me, tickets and snack store costs at least $110 here for 2 adults and 2 munchkins

    38. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think #10, bragging rights, is the main reason people I know go to movies. They want to be the first to see it no matter what it costs or what efforts they have to endure.

      Only if your local theater has it on premiere night. Otherwise, those who pirate will have seen the movie weeks ago.

    39. Re: Yes by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If I want the "shared experience" that point 1 discusses, I call my friends and we make a movie night of it. Even if a dozen people come over we have room and we can then share in the experience without having to include people that won't get off the phone.

      Even better - they bring the beer. I started doing this back when I was a student. They'd all bring about half the cost of a cinema ticket's worth of food / beer and we'd have a much better time than if we'd gone to the cinema. I've got a better projector since then (I bought my first one jointly with my housemates and within a year it had cost less than the amount that we'd been spending on cinemas). I don't see films right after they come out, but since I stopped watching ads on TV and in the cinema, I've started caring about that a whole lot less.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re: Yes by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Explain that directors and film editors ALWAYS put Easter Eggs in those scenes. Also swap(1,6)

    41. Re: Yes by HumanWiki · · Score: 1

      Someone get the lights. We're done here.

      Great reply to the points. Couldn't habe said it better

    42. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, piss off. People like you are about the kind I have regularly removed by ushers for being insufferable.

    43. Re: Yes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Depends on the wife. The best strategy is to find this out about her *before* you get married; if she's jealous about you looking at women in a movie, don't marry her. (It's also not a bad idea to just not get married in the first place.)

    44. Re: Yes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Avatar had fantastic 3D and visuals. Plot-wise, it was ok. But it was absolutely worth seeing in the theater (or at least a really good 3D home-theater screen) just because of the 3D.

      However, that was in 2009. I don't think there's been any movies like that since, just a whole bunch of lousy movies with lousy 3D.

    45. Re: Yes by sh00z · · Score: 1

      I think #10, bragging rights, is the main reason people I know go to movies. They want to be the first to see it no matter what it costs or what efforts they have to endure.

      Except The Verge has no concept of bragging rights...

      Bragging rights. Tell me which one sounds better: “When I saw A New Hope at midnight at the drive-in” vs. “When I watched A New Hope on VHS in 1982.” There’s no question, okay? That was just a rhetorical exercise.

      Good. Because anyone bragging about seeing something called "A New Hope" is three years late for any credibility.

    46. Re: Yes by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'm picturing an old neckbeard dude saying "Usher, please remove this man, he cited a gallup poll!"

      Where are you going that they still have ushers you can find BTW?

    47. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      You have a legitimate high end sound system that can compete with the best of theater sound setups. The only thing you don't yet have is elevated surrounds for Dolby Atmos, and there aren't many films that take advantage of that yet. And your 4K OLED screen produces a better image than any current theater technology. Most people don't have equipment like that, so a well equipped theater is likely to have an edge.

      The one thing you can't compete with, aside from the dubious advantage of the crowd, is sheer size. You can fill your vision as thoroughly with your OLED screen by sitting at an appropriate distance. But the bigness of the theater screen has an impact on the brain that is not just about filling your visual field, and you can't duplicate that in a living room.

      Most movie previews are available on YouTube. If you want previews with your movie, put together a suitable playlist and watch them first.

      Theaters around here have been adding real bars; they can match or exceed your at-home drink selection unless you have a really well equipped bar. But your home bar is much more affordable, and it has your favorite brands even if they are obscure.

      The bragging rights thing is mostly about seeing it first. If we get same-day home viewing that will largely go away. But I suspect that the Thursday night preview showings will remain a theater thing for now; same-day will probably mean that the viewing window will open at noon on Friday.

      A final question remains for this at-home thing: how good an image will they offer? If they want to match the quality of the theater image they're going to have to deliver a BIG file - perhaps 100GB or more. (It won't have to be as big as the DCP because the data compression used in that format is inefficient by current standards.) If they stick to the data rates that are currently being used for 4K streaming (15-25 Mbps, which adds up to a bit over 20GB for a two hour movie) you're going to see more compression artifacts than you see in the theater.

    48. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The Sony 4K projectors are excellent for 2D movies. They're better to my eyes than the equipment that is currently in most IMAX theaters. (The few with the frickin' laser beams are the exception.) But they are marginal for 3D because they don't put out enough light.

    49. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Hugo. That's another movie that got 3D right. And it's also a wonderful film.

      Computer animated films always do 3D well, which isn't surprising since they're made from 3D data models. But Up is the only one I've seen where watching in 3D added much to the experience.

      I rather liked how the 3D in Tim Burton's take on Alice in Wonderland worked out. That was a conversion from 2D, and in the live action scenes in the real world it looked unconvincing. But in Wonderland, where all the backgrounds were computer generated, it worked really well. It had the paradoxical result that Wonderland looked more real than the real world did, which was effective in the context of the film.

      That's all I've got. 3D can enhance a film if it's done well and if the film is something that calls for it. Otherwise it's mostly a waste of time. It's not going to bring much to the table if you're making a character-driven film; what would be the point of making Moonlight or Manchester by the Sea in 3D?

    50. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Whether you can take the drinks into the theater depends on local law. Around here you can certainly bring in your beer or wine; haven't tried it with the spirits.

    51. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Digital projection has allowed theaters to adopt much more flexible screening times. I have seen cases where each of the four or five screening times is a different film. Once you have loaded all the films and their associated decryption keys into the server, it's just a matter of pushing one button to make the system show another movie.

      You also had that back in the days of multiple reels that were actively changed by projectionists. But it was lost in the era of gigantic platters that hold an entire film. Most theaters with platter systems only had one platter per screen, so once it was set up that screen was going to be showing nothing but that one film for a week. Some fancier theaters had two platters so it was possible to switch between the two films, so you might get something family friendly for the matinees and an R-rated film for the late shows.

      Setting up those platters was a lot of work. The films weren't shipped that way; you still got them on individual reels. All those reels had to be transferred to the platter and spliced together, and when the run was over you had to take the film back apart and put it back on the reels before returning it. Transferring a DCP file to a server is much easier.

    52. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      I won't go find an attendant. I'll just refuse to move. THEY can go find an attendant and miss the first ten minutes of the movie. But I admit that I don't care if the people around me hate me; I'm RIGHT after all.

    53. Re: Yes by Derwood5555 · · Score: 1

      Wish I could upvote you. Haven't been in a theater since 2012 and I doubt I'll ever go back. People is the problem. They're on their phones, they get up to go get snacks, drinks, or go to the bathroom. They talk incessantly. In addition, when I watch a movie in my home, there are no commercials. I'm forced to watch them in the theater.

    54. Re: Yes by nwf · · Score: 1

      The Sony 4K ones in the theaters new me don't seem to have very good contrast or dynamic range, in my opinion. Perhaps my theaters use cheap(er) ones.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    55. Re: Yes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I didn't see those movies so I'll grant you those, but it sounds like basically after at least 8 years of the modern wave of 3D movies, we have 4 that are worth watching in a theater. That's really not very good economics, and not enough to make a convincing case that theaters are worth patronizing, and to keep those theaters in business.

      Speaking of keeping them in business, I keep seeing articles about certain parties trying to brainwash us into going back to the theater, so I'm really curious: are there are hard numbers about how the cinema business is doing these days? Are they just whining, or are they really in danger of going under as an industry? Maybe I'm being forgetful or missing something, but I never seem to see this part of the story. I do see stories regularly about how Macy's and Sears are closing stores and Kmart is shutting down and various other retailers have folded, but I haven't seen anything about theater chains like AMC shutting down hundreds of locations.

    56. Re: Yes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're not that different. You both hate the commercials, he just likes the previews. Personally, I mostly agree with him; I like being able to see previews too, for movies I'm interested in. However, it'd be better with a "skip" function if the movie is obviously crap. But the previews are really not a complaint of mine with theaters; I have far bigger complaints about them (volume, other patrons, no rewind/pause, sticky floors, high prices, no good food, etc.).

      There's no way to please everyone 100% all the time, that's true, but it's possible to come to workable compromises and not worry about small details. But theaters aren't doing anything to address all these other complaints which many other people have.

    57. Re: Yes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's a certain group of people who think there's some kind of prestige in being first to see/hear something. I knew a guy in my dorm in college who thought he was somehow getting bragging rights because he picked up a copy of REM's "Automatic for the People" album when it was just released. Whoopee, that's nice. These are people who chase the new shiny, and have little appreciation for quality, or ability to discern it.

    58. Re: Yes by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Gravity was good in 3d.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    59. Re: Yes by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're stopping it to check for nipples while watching with other people that is pretty weird and selfish behavior. So I don't see any reason why I'd presume there is anything wrong with her response, or that she's jealous. I mean, even a person who is feeling jealous, they would like be even more upset at the asshole behavior. To not even be bothered by the anti-social part, and then also get jealous about screen-people, yeah, hopefully a person would notice that sort of problem at the dating stage. But then it that case they're both so useless that maybe they should stick it out.

    60. Re: Yes by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      There are probably half a dozen more that I haven't seen. I'd like to see the technology survive for the sake of the films where it really adds something.

      I also saw the three Hobbit films in HFR (high frame rate) 3D. (Like Avatar and Hugo, they were filmed natively in 3D.) I didn't cite them as examples because I'm not in love with them as films. Jackson tried to do too much with too little source material, he completely changed the tone of what is supposed to be a charming children's story, and he committed the cardinal sin of not trusting his audience when he decided to end part 2 with a cliffhanger. (Trying to make sure people came back for part 3 is the only justification for ending it in the middle of a battle rather than ending part 2 at the end of the battle, which would have been much more natural. If I were ever to show the trilogy at home I would fix that; I'd splice the battle scene together to run as a unit at the end of part 2 and take the bathroom and snack break after it was over.) But the 3D was effective at immersing you in the environment; it's a showcase for what the technology can do.

      HFR and 3D are a synergistic combination; each enhances the sense of realism of the other. That was perhaps the reason that some people reacted so negatively to its use in The Hobbit. They don't want to be immersed quite that thoroughly in a movie experience, they prefer a bit of separation from it. Virtual reality movies, should they ever appear, will be a tough sell to people who feel that way.

    61. Re: Yes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Personally I only saw the first Hobbit movie, and was rather unimpressed, not only by the story but also the FX. It looked really fake in many places. The 3D and HFR was technically impressive, but I didn't think it was really great overall. It is weird how different those movies were from the LotR movies. Are we sure they were made by the same Peter Jackson? Maybe the real one was killed and he was replaced by an evil clone. That would explain it. Or perhaps he has an evil twin brother who knocked him off.

      Anyway, the problem I see is that even if there's 20 worthwhile movies, that's still only about 2.5 per year. That just doesn't seem like enough to keep very many theaters going, maybe not even any. However, that brings me back to my prior post: what are the box-office sales really like? Well, according to this doom-and-gloom article, plus these domestic ticket sales numbers from 1995 to now, it's really not that bad. Just in the US, the number of tickets sold seems to really have been rather constant since 1995: it was 1.33B (billion!) tickets in 2016, up from 1.22B in '95. Of course, most years in between '97--'15 were higher, but not that much. 2010 and 2011 were even worse, as was 2014. But overall, these numbers look fairly constant to me. So even with all the "theaters suck!" comments here, obviously someone's buying these tickets, and it makes sense since so many anti-theater comments are complaining about the other patrons. Now if you look at these numbers on a per-capita basis, it doesn't look so great since the population has grown since '95, but still, it sure doesn't look like the theaters are in danger of losing all their viewers any time soon. If they can't figure out how to stay in the black and keep their doors open with all these willing theater-goers, then they're doing something else very wrong. Honestly, this sounds to me like an industry that's whining and moaning because they think they're entitled to constant growth, and they're no longer getting it, but this is nothing new: theaters used to be a LOT more popular (per capita) way back before the color TV became commonplace, or before TVs became affordable.

  2. Main reason not to go by al0ha · · Score: 2

    Main reason not to go, in Los Angeles at least, are disruptive, annoying and inconsiderate people.

    Once only studio execs had bitchin' screening rooms at home; now thanks to technology we all do, and besides, free beer at home!

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    1. Re:Main reason not to go by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That was one thing I loved about living near an Alamo Cinema and Drafthouse. They were hardcore relentless about tossing out anyone who was disruptive or used their phones. One warning, and then out they go, no refunds. That, and having a nice selection of beers on tap that they would bring to your seat (along with food/other drinks/etc) during the film was great too.

    2. Re:Main reason not to go by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      This depends on the movie. A crapshow like "Catwoman" is only redeemed by watching it in a ghetto theater.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Main reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one thing I loved about living near an Alamo Cinema and Drafthouse. They were hardcore relentless about tossing out anyone who was disruptive or used their phones. One warning, and then out they go, no refunds. That, and having a nice selection of beers on tap that they would bring to your seat (along with food/other drinks/etc) during the film was great too.

      So anyone who used their phones was disruptive but the people next to me that eat during the film are not ?
      You go to the cinema to enjoy the film , not to eat, not to hear the guy next to you eat a steak or drink a glass of wine with all the asoreted noises that entails. Alamo Drafthouse are just hypocrits, they don't give a shit about the movie experience.

    4. Re:Main reason not to go by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I prefer eating noises while eating something nice myself, over idiots arguing on a cell phone or to each other, texting, or being otherwise disruptive. You'd visit a regular cinema with the expectation of watching a movie in peace (which often won't be the case). You'd visit an Alamo cinema with the expectation of having chow & beers with your movie, with the inevitable mild noise that comes with eating and serving meals. Your choice, nothing hypocritical about that.

      I'd go watch movies there if we had one of those, by the way. We used to have something similar but it closed down years ago.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Main reason not to go by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      and besides, free beer at home!

      Damnit! My house didn't come with free beer. I have to go to the grocery store and buy mine. That's the last straw, I'm selling my house and moving to one that has free beer.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Main reason not to go by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      So anyone who used their phones was disruptive but the people next to me that eat during the film are not ?

      I've never been to an Alamo but I wondered about exactly that issue.

      I just figured most people ate during the trailers (fine) and then just sipped drinks during the movie (also fine).

      Even kinfe/fork on plate noises would still seem to be better than talking though, and not as visibly distracting as a cell phone screen.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Main reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep (but not just LA). I actually (used to) love going to the movies but gave up when the smartphone became widespread. It was already becoming unbearable with imbeciles who can't shut the fsck up for more than 5 minutes, but too many inconsiderate jerks with bright, distracting screens screwing up the experience for everyone else was the last straw.

    8. Re:Main reason not to go by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      We don't have an "Alamo", but we do have a "Movie Tavern". The food isn't going to win any awards, but it's of chain quality (TGI Fridays, Chiles, etc). More importantly, they have draft beer. The seats are these big, cushy recliners with massive amounts of space between them. Honestly I never noticed sounds of people around me - I'll try to pay more attention. I suspect the increased distance plus the high volume of the movie makes it less noticeable. Not sure a burger would be louder than popcorn in any case.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Main reason not to go by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Probably part of my problem with eating at the theater is that it sets my GF off. On my own, it might not bug me as much. But the phones lighting up like those "Winky-Blinky" lights they used to have at the circus DO bug me.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:Main reason not to go by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I find the loudest, most disruptive thing in there are the waitresses themselves. Hard to concentrate on the screen when they're ducking in front of you and taking the order of the guy next to you.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    11. Re:Main reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but what about those of us who don't want to visit the fag-pr0n house and take it up the ass from a junkie? What is there for us?

    12. Re:Main reason not to go by mattyj · · Score: 3, Funny

      I initially read that as "... gets my GF off" and I was thinking 'so, the problem is ...?'

    13. Re:Main reason not to go by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      I never really noticed, at least at the one I went to. The wait staff ducking in the aisle in front of you were usually below the height of the counter space in front of you, and for order taking, you'd simply write down what you wanted on a pad of paper, which got stuck in a slot in front of you, so they could see there was an order up. It worked pretty well, at least there - not sure how other places do it.

    14. Re:Main reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to an Alamo Drafthouse and don't know what the fuck you're talking about. And the food and drink is not disruptive at all. Cell phones however are extremely disruptive and annoying to most everyone. AD is not at all hypocritical and it's hilarious to see someone get thrown out. Fuckers deserve it or getting their phones jammed up their ass.

    15. Re:Main reason not to go by blackprint · · Score: 1

      Big time Alamo Drafthouse guy here, and most of the foods don't really require fork/knife action so that kind of noise is atypical. Pizzas, burgers, wings, wraps, fish 'n chips -- a lot of food you eat with your hands, and some stuff you eat with a fork like salads, cheese fries, etc. And I have that whole misophonia thing going, so I definitely notice when it does happen. To your point though, I prefer that over a talker, though they're both distracting to me personally at least if someone is talking at an Alamo there's a decent chance that they'll get a warning or ejected, it's not a sure bet as the staff drops the ball from time to time, but it's a helluva lot better than a typical chain.

    16. Re:Main reason not to go by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      We have multiple local places like this, it is very popular. Kicking people out who are disruptive is as a big a selling point as the beer service. The reality is that people are mostly eating during the start of the movie, or just snacking. And people are more likely to buy a burger or pizza or finger food, I'm not sure why people presume it would be a bunch of knives and forks clinking away like a steak house. Surely somebody is eating the steak, but they most likely ordered it before the movie started and they're not eating it the whole time. Most of what is ordered after the movie starts is snacks.

      People who think drinking wine would be noisy probably didn't understand that the TV show they were watching with wine snobs making funny noises was actually just a low-brow comedy program.

      I really don't understand why stuffing your face with popcorn and sucking soda through a straw would be presumed to make less noise than eating a burger. I do guarantee that the decibels saved by kicking out assholes is a larger number than the decibels generated by knife clinking.

      People go for the first time, and then the whole next week they're telling all their friends how much nicer it is and how much quieter it is. It is obvious what the answer is, and the answer is it is quieter. ;)

    17. Re:Main reason not to go by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Bad news, the house with the free beer comes with his mom, too.

    18. Re:Main reason not to go by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I prefer sitting in a theatre fuming after watching the first fifteen minutes of a movie where the trailers were the best part and the rest of the movie is utter shite. Trapped, not wanting the abandon the money spent, but really wanting to leave. Now that is what killed the cinema experience for me. That at it is political incorrect to fund the arse holes because in their insane greed they purposefully corrupt democracy via the sick entertainments of corrupt politicians (you fund main stream media and you pay to corrupt your politicians, don't fund main stream media and they can not buy your politicians or provide sick expensive 'entertainments', pizzagate, ugh).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:Main reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what

    20. Re:Main reason not to go by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That might not be bad news. Depends on the mom.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    21. Re:Main reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free Beer"

      Like, from the faucet?

  3. What a title. by Glarimore · · Score: 0

    "A Case For Why Movie-Theater Experience Is Still Worth Your the Effort"

    Good job, guys.

  4. Nonsense by TempusMagus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The modern movie-going experience is horrible. Bad food at a high-price, noisy patrons and then finally when you get situated you are bombarded with obnoxious advertising. Seriously? I'll take a home experience any day of the week than be stuck in some dark TGIFridays-like tacky environment.

    --
    -_-
    1. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie theaters are not even that dark these days. Too many lawsuits I guess. It drives me nuts having the walls all lit up so people don't trip down the stairs.

    2. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I only go for the commercials.

    3. Re:Nonsense by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The "modern" theater experience does need to die. The theater business does not necessarily need to die along with it, but it does need to contract/re-balance somewhat. Having first-run movies available at home should give the mainstream public an alternative to showing up at the theater. Decreased theater demand should then lead to lower prices, which inevitably will lead to fewer theaters. However, I believe there will always be people who want to see "Theater Movies" in an actual theater, and there will be businesses who can provide that service to those people profitably, but not the insane levels of profit that the major studios are raking in today.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    4. Re:Nonsense by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't lump your local cinema in with "modern movie-going experience".

      The modern experience is great. Assigned seating so you can get there late and still have great seats. No need to see a single advertisement that way. You can grab reasonably priced beer at the entrance. If you want to make a night of it go into an upper class cinema and order yourself a nice 3 course meal to be brought in to you during the movie. Noisy patrons ... wait is that a thing? Maybe you are just surrounded by obnoxious arseholes and should find a cinema with normal movie goers who a dead silent like ... well normal movie goers.

      I love going to the cinema. Do it at least once a week.

    5. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think you'll be able to escape the advertising at home? DRM will ensure you'll continue to get the "best experience" - ads first, movie later.

    6. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't agree more. Way overpriced popcorn, soda, even bottled water.

    7. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I haven't noticed many noisy patrons. Maybe a few idiots who block the view, think they own the arm rests, or are constantly getting up and returning to their seats. Little kids who don't know better may talk over the film, but I rarely miss much of the movie dialog. The real noise is usually the ridiculously/painfully loud soundtrack. If there are parts of the dialog that I didn't get, it's usually so slurred/mumbled that 8 channel digital sound can't seem to make it any easier to understand.

            When I was younger, movies used to have an emotional impact on me regardless of whether I was watching them on vhs, in an old run down theater with bad audio, or in a fancy new cineplex. Nowadays, they're so formulaic and vapid that that only thing that stays with me shortly after the film is the ringing in my ears from the soundtrack and the effects of all that salt in the popcorn. Going to the cineplex is just one of those obligatory things you do to pass the time when some over-hyped blockbluster comes out, you want to get out of the house, and you can't think of anywhere else to go.

    8. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it needs to die per se. There are some classics that benefit from being shown on a huge screen, something you can't rent out or afford to replicate in your living room. But most theaters nowadays are modeled around the films that the studios are trying to sell, with pervasive CGI, more emphasis on post-production than on direction/casting/scripts/plot, product placements, marketing to children/tweens/teens/young adults/young single women/young men/blacks/overseas (ie Chinese market), blah. That's just how things are going to be until the bubble bursts and cineplexes go the way of the shopping mall. But then I've noticed that even now, theaters are looking for alternatives to the current crop of films to fill seats and provide something to show. They usually start the film 15 minutes late anyway to fill up empty seats and sell advertising time.

    9. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so right. Four years ago I had my last theater visit. Being forced to watch ads after I paid a lot of money to get in just warps my brain. Remembering it still makes me mad.

    10. Re:Nonsense by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      There's a basic problem tho.

      Land gets more expensive all the time. And you have to pay the bill on that land.

      The gas stations in the city center charge $2.45 a gallon while the gas stations (same brand) in less premium locations under 20 miles away are charging $1.95.

      Similarly for a movie theater. The land it's on may be worth more than keeping the theater going.

      OTH, with malls dying that might be reversing a bit.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  5. My speakers are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a ridiculous set of Tannoys in 5.1 setup at home. The movie theater only wishes it had my speakers :-)

    1. Re:My speakers are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5.1... we have moved to atmos

  6. they forgot a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    11. The assholes in front of you holding up their bright cellphones to record or take pictures.

    12. The assholes behind you talking through the movie.

    13. The price for 4 tickets plus snacks would buy a year of Netflix.

    1. Re:they forgot a few by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Go on a Friday night, then it would be two people, one big popcorn, two sodas and Nachos. That would probably exceed Netflix for a year.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  7. Stop Advertising for Hollywood, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the poisoner is getting less business, that's a good thing.

  8. Buggy whip salesman by avandesande · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Movie theaters were successful because people had no option to view a movie otherwise. Sorry guys but theaters are going the way of the dodo bird. If anything enthusiasts will start clubs with small projectors etc but there will be no demand for what we have now.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Buggy whip salesman by mattyj · · Score: 1

      Except that HBO has been around since the 70's, plus video rental, now on-demand, and hey, guess what, the box office has been up over the past few years. Way up thanks to Star Wars and China.

      Your reporting of the death of the movie theater industry is wildly, wildly premature.

    2. Re:Buggy whip salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that very much. VCRs, DVDs and Bluray have been available collectively covering the last nearly 40 years. Setting up a decent home theatre isn't that expensive and can be done incrementally as you get the money.

      The fact is that there's enough people out there willing to put up with the cost and inconvenience to see the movies on the big screen that they don't just stay in business, but actually build new screens to screen the films.

      If anything ever manages to displace it, my guess would be VR technology where you can project a huge screen in front of you and use 3D audio technology to get the sound as well. Assuming that the eye problems can ever be satisfactorily resolved, that's the main thing that's likely to kill the theatre experience.

    3. Re:Buggy whip salesman by avandesande · · Score: 1

      You are equating watching a VHS tape on a 480p interlaced device anything close to a movie screen? A parity home experience at reasonable cost has only been available the last 4 or 5 years.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    4. Re:Buggy whip salesman by avandesande · · Score: 1

      You are equating watching a VHS tape or cable on a 480p interlaced device anything close to a movie screen? A parity home experience at reasonable cost has only been available the last 4 or 5 years.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  9. lol wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Teenagers on their phones are 10x more distracting than anything in my living room. Who the hell stopped watching a movie to pay the electric bill?! This list is full of shit.

    I can pause the movie to go piss.

    I can go make popcorn and buy candy at a fraction of the price.

    I can sit and rip on my bong at any time I like.

    You can keep the theaters. Hasn't been anything worth that kind of money in over a decade, anyway.

    1. Re:lol wat by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      . Who the hell stopped watching a movie to pay the electric bill?!

      Anyone who was watching "Howard The Duck" and had an electric bill due in the next month.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. Debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. The big screen. - My poor neck.

    2. People everywhere. - Making noise, talking on their phone, a baby crying in a R rated movie...

    3. Focus. - Painfully holding in my piss.

    4. Relentlessness. - Still painfully holding in my piss.

    5. A massive speaker system. - My poor ears, no volume control.

    6. Previews. - Ads.

    7. Disruption. - Um, disruption is a bad thing.

    8. Alone time. - I'm with people who the fuck wrote this.

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. - Diabetes woooo!

    10. Bragging rights. - People brag about going to the movies? How sad.

    1. Re:Debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, thank you! I was waiting for someone to respond to each of the ten items. I agree with you. For #3 I'd add that focus is interrupted by others' bright cell phone screens. For #9 I'd add "overpriced" cola.

    2. Re:Debunked by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      My poor neck.

      For the first rebooting of Star Trek I came too late. I was stuck in the front row. Being just a few feet form the 3 story screen, I spent the entire movie half out of my seat contorted, trying to see what was going on. I wanted to lay on the floor, but was too embarrassed to try that position.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The big screen. - My poor neck.

      You're sitting in the wrong seat, or need to go to a different cinema with decent seating.

      2. People everywhere. - Making noise, talking on their phone, a baby crying in a R rated movie...

      Always hear this from people in the US yet I never have this problem in the UK. At worst there's someone coughing, but I can ignore them pretty easily. If the film's any good.

      3. Focus. - Painfully holding in my piss.
      4. Relentlessness. - Still painfully holding in my piss.

      Go before you go in and maybe skip the 32 ounces of coke? Seriously, you should be able to last a couple of hours.

      5. A massive speaker system. - My poor ears, no volume control.

      Again, find yourself a decent cinema.

      6. Previews. - Ads.

      Not sure how it works in the US but in the UK they show ads then previews then the film. You can time it to walk in after the ads and catch the previews which you might actually be interested in. Or just skip the ads entirely. My cinema lets me book my seat so I don't lose out on the best seat by doing so. (Which is dead centre to the screen - see neck).

      7. Disruption. - Um, disruption is a bad thing.

      Not always. What they mean is shaking up your routine and making the movie an event. There is a BIG difference between inviting a date to watch a DVD at home and taking them out to the cinema.

      8. Alone time. - I'm with people who the fuck wrote this.

      Ok, with you on that one.

      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. - Diabetes woooo!

      Optional. I'm much happier with a bag of chocolates.

      10. Bragging rights. - People brag about going to the movies? How sad.

      With you on that one. Can see a 'not being left out of the conversation on Monday' argument, but that's still not something that'd bother me.

    4. Re:Debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably would have caught Staph had you done so... Even the big fancy theaters around my locale would look like a Jackson Pollock painting under a black light.

    5. Re:Debunked by clovis · · Score: 1

      My poor neck.

      For the first rebooting of Star Trek I came too late. I was stuck in the front row. Being just a few feet form the 3 story screen, I spent the entire movie half out of my seat contorted, trying to see what was going on. I wanted to lay on the floor, but was too embarrassed to try that position.

      I had a similar experience sitting on the front row of a packed theatre, but the movie was "The Exorcist"
      That was really something to see from the front row with the speakers almost right in front of me so it seemed like 120+ decibels. What was actually right in front of me was an air conditioning vent, so from time to time there was a blast of ice cold air, and it always seemed to happen during an intense moment.
      There's no way to have that experience from home.

    6. Re:Debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. You didn't miss much. Watch it on video and tell me I'm wrong.

    7. Re:Debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget ...
      4.5 Desperation - Difficulty of getting to the john in time (or the jane, for the ladies).
        9.5 Adhesion - trying to leave your seat where the previous moviegoer left half a 32 oz drink on the seat or the floor

    8. Re:Debunked by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Adding my perspective:

      1. The big screen. - My poor neck.

      I have a 1080p projector and a dark room. $600.

      2. People everywhere. - Making noise, talking on their phone, a baby crying in a R rated movie...

      I also have two little girls. Granted they go to bed earlier so that's a controllable problem.

      3. Focus. - Painfully holding in my piss.

      Depends on how hyped up the girls are. Sometimes we can quietly watch a movie, other times its a dance-off.

      4. Relentlessness. - Still painfully holding in my piss.

      With two little ones, DO NOT WANT. Granted we only really pause for something we haven't all seen before, otherwise they can take it elsewhere.

      5. A massive speaker system. - My poor ears, no volume control.

      I've long had a home theater system, at first it was used only for computer games, then video games. Still $600.

      6. Previews. - Ads.

      Still happen on disks (whose idiot decision was it to make unskippable ads on blu-ray and DVD?). We typically buy the 3-pack of movies, BD/DVD/Digital. Then watch the digital, which never has previews.

      7. Disruption. - Um, disruption is a bad thing.

      When we want movie time, we get movie time. When we want to have background noise, we have background noise. Don't tell me how to watch your crap.

      8. Alone time. - I'm with people who the fuck wrote this.

      I for one like curling up with the family and taking in a good movie. I'm not so into the sweaty hoss with the 64 oz of diabetes shoveling butter and chocolate into their noise-tube.

      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. - Diabetes woooo!

      I almost never buy concessions in a theater anyway. At home, I'll grab whatever I feel like drinking or snacking on.

      10. Bragging rights. - People brag about going to the movies? How sad.

      I guess I've been bragging about my setup... but at $1200 for a 104 inch 1080p screen with surround sound, that's less a lot of TV's out there. Some might end up spending more for some black-out shades for mid-day movie-going, but even that won't cost an arm and a leg.

  11. Camp by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best reason to go see a film in a theater is because it's a camp film.

    For example: Snakes on a Plane is much better in a theater than at home. It's something about the vibe in the theater during those films. It's kind of like a live action MST3K.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Camp by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I'll give you this one. Rocky Horror Picture Show sucks at home.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Camp by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Nothing like the experience of having a Rocky Horror fan dumping water on my head. I would cheerfully have punched the jerk if I could have identified him.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or throwing things at the screen. One of the small theatres around here has special screenings where you're both allowed and encouraged to throw things at the screen. They charge an extra fee for those performances, but that's something that really does require a theatre to work.

    4. Re:Camp by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to use a squirtgun, not a bucket/cup of water.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  12. umm by zlives · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. The big screen. Have a big screen at home, all THX like and stuff
    2. People everywhere. find them annoying so not a plus
    3. Focus. if the movie sucks enough that paying bills is a valid option... its a valid option
    4. Relentlessness. right... oops i dropped that popcorn down (or whatever) ... what did they say ?
    5. A massive speaker system. got it
    6. Previews. you mean advertising? not missing it
    7. Disruption. you are doing it wrong
    8. Alone time. its a cherished time for me at home too
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. and thats a PLUS?
    10. Bragging rights. about what? wtf

    1. Re:umm by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      1. The big screen. Have a big screen at home, all THX like and stuff

      radical man!

    2. Re:umm by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Plus, as in size. As in, I'm not fat I've got big bones.

      It is presented as a plus because they presume we're all sugar addicts keeping it in the closet, and so it is a major convenience to be able to scarf 5000 calories in the dark where nobody gives you funny looks. They're assuming you already don't care about diabetes, early death, or smelling "that way."

      To understand bragging rights, come to terms with the assumptions above. Then it makes sense. "Bragging rights" as in, "oh yes, I saw that awful campy movie 27 times while it was in the theater and now if you try to watch it in front of me I'll say all the lines 3 seconds before the actor does. And if you make a reference to the movie, I will regurgitate all the dialog from that scene, followed by the dialog from 3 other scenes that I like better." Surely you've met this guy? Look to your left, look to your right, this is slashdot and at least one of the people sitting next to you is a neckbeard.

  13. Needs an asterisk. by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 0

    Ed. Note: This list not valid in Aurora, Colorado.

    --
    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
  14. Brewvies by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2

    IMO (and the consensus in the comments on the last story): the only theaters worth going to are Drafthouse-style restaurant/bar theaters. In which case you're basically paying for a night out with friends at a bar and the movie itself is almost a secondary draw.

  15. 10 Reasons Not To Go.. by ottawanker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    10 Reasons Not To Go:

    1. The big screen. You can barely see the whole thing without turning your head, especially if you get stuck near the front.
    2. People everywhere. They spend all movie talking and kicking your seat.
    3. Focus. Because most movies have boring parts.
    4. Relentlessness.Because 2 hours is a long time to go without using the toilet.
    5. A massive speaker system. Louder isn't always better, and it still isn't loud enough to drown out cell phones.
    6. Previews. What a waste of time, watching all the best parts of movies I don't even want to see.
    7. Disruption. Pizza is here!
    8. Alone time. Even in a dim movie theater it's hard to get off.
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. At least my floors at home aren't sticky.
    10. Bragging rights.

    1. Re:10 Reasons Not To Go.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like #9 is in direct conflict with #8. I mean... DIRECT CONFLICT!

    2. Re:10 Reasons Not To Go.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The big screen. - I have a big screen, and I like mine with my sound system.
      2. People everywhere. - This is the biggest issue, too many fing people everywhere. Some dont stfu during a movie.
      3. Focus - Sounds like personal issue if you cant focus. I can focus if its on my 24" monitor or on my 52" TV.
      4. Relentlessness. - WTF does this have to do going to a movie theater?
      5. A massive speaker system. - Check! Got my own sound system that is perfectly fine.
      6. Previews. - F the previews, I got youtube and imdb.
      7. Disruption. - Close the fing door..... or hit pause.. Does movie theater have a pause button? Nope!
      8. Alone time - And being at my house away from everyone is not alone time? Every heard of netflix and chill?
      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. - And I dont have any coke with large cups at my house? What about cheaper drinks and snacks?
      10. Bragging rights. - To spend more money than I want too on snacks and a movie ticket.

    3. Re:10 Reasons Not To Go.. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      11. Only one armrest if theater is crowded.

    4. Re:10 Reasons Not To Go.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12. Exposure to a multitude of viruses and bacteria you would otherwise avoid.
      13. Bed bugs and lice.

    5. Re:10 Reasons Not To Go.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is true that in math, 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. However, that does not mean that 1/2 of an armrest + 1/2 of an armrest means you get to use one armrest!

      And if somebody did let you have one of them, be thankful. It was not any mathematical certainty!

  16. Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, doesn't everybody just love price-gouging at its most absurd? Not sure if it's that or not allowing outside food into the theater that I like the most about the "experience".

  17. Counterpoints by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. The big screen.

    A projector gives you the same field of view at home and with better control of your height in relation to the screen.

    2. People everywhere.

    As my rapid breathing on reading this can attest, this is a huge NEGATIVE for many people.

    3. Focus.

    Do most movies DESERVE your full focus? At home the degree of focus you give an be proportionate to the amount the movie deserves.

    I have no trouble fully focusing on GOOD movies at home, you just need to darken the room well.

    4. Relentlessness.

    That one aspect I will give you, though even the most modest level of self control can put down the remote for a whole movie no matter what.

    5. A massive speaker system. ... that sucks balls. Seriously you could spend $100-$200 and have better sound than most theaters offer, with much greater control over OMG BASE levels.

    6. Previews.

    trailers.apple.com. But seriously after you've seen trailers once if you go to ANY more movies you are watching the same trailers over and over and over again, for well over a half hour before the actual movie starts. A massive waste of time.

    7. Disruption.

    Again, dim the room. You can easily create a special space around movie watching.

    8. Alone time.

    Hey what happened to the value of #2? That's right, even the list writer admits that PEOPLE SUCK.

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    Home can be dark too, and you can have a lot more (or less) than 32oz of... WHATEVER YOU DESIRE.

    10. Bragging rights.

    *rolling eyes now*

    If you mean that you've seen a movie when most others have not, bravo. That puts you right up there with every torrent user on earth. You want to brag about being on-par with heavy torrent users, really?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Counterpoints by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Geez... Whoever wrote this article is an idiot.. Number 2 and 8 conflict.. I get some nice "alone time" or have close friends over to watch a movie here at home.. Fuck the noisy punks, sticky floors, high snack prices at theaters.. I don't do theaters, just like I don't do Windows anymore...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:Counterpoints by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      I was going to post counterpoints, but you beat me to it. However, my counterpoints complement yours rather that just repeat them.

      1. The big screen.

      TV's are large enough and cheap enough that I can have a screen as large as I want, and no larger. My home TV sizes are perfect for my environment. At the theater, the screen is either too big (front row seats), too small (back row seats), or not much larger than my living room TV (center seats). This is a non-issue.

      2. People everywhere.

      This is a good reason to stay home. People have different ways of keeping themselves entertained during a movie, with many of them directly opposing my way of staying entertained during a movie. I can customize my experience at home.

      3. Focus.

      If the movie is good, it keeps my focus. Screen size doesn't matter like it did 15 years ago, when theater screens were impressive.

      4. Relentlessness.

      If I'm hungry, thirsty, or have to pee, the theater movie goes on. In the 80's, theaters still had intermission to allow movie-goers to expel that huge bucket of soda that they sucked down in the first half of the movie. We've been without this courtesy for decades now, making this point a HUGE drawback.

      5. A massive speaker system.

      This is one of my go-to reasons for staying home. I would like to still have my hearing when I'm old, and theaters are hell-bent on destroying it. The massive speaker system is a HUGE drawback.

      6. Previews.

      This is much like paying for Cable TV while being forced to watch commercials. If I want to watch commercials, I'll watch them on YouTube. When I go to the theater at 6:00pm, I want the movie to start an 6:00pm; not at 6:30pm - 6:45pm. Saying that paying to watch commercials is somehow a plus is just moronic.

      7. Disruption.

      Shit happens in life, especially when you have kids. If I want to stop the movie to tend to other things, then I can do that at home without much hassle. I can pause the movie, do what needs to be done, then come back and unpause it when it suits me. That's a huge benefit of watching movies at home.

      8. Alone time.

      Until my kids are older, this is a non-starter. But when they're old enough, they can go keep themselves entertained for a couple hours while my wife and I watch a movie. Or, when they're old enough, they can watch the movie with us. The theater doesn't allow the freedom to adapt to changing circumstances. It's all or nothing, most of the time.

      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

      This is a benefit to the theater owner, not to the movie-goer.

      10. Bragging rights.

      Bragging about what? "I got ripped off big time by the theater! Look at me! I'm awesome!"
      The last time I took my family out to watch a movie (which I hadn't done in years), it cost me nearly $60. That's ridiculous, and my wife and I both revolted against the idea of doing that again anytime soon. I can buy the DVD (I won't buy Blu-Ray), load up on home concessions and watch the movie in the comfort of my own home for half that (in principle. In reality we usually watch during or after dinner, so movie food is usually a non-issue). Then, when we want to watch the movie again in a few months, we can do it for next to nothing.

      If this is the case for going to the theater, then they deserve to die off. It has little to no appeal.

    3. Re:Counterpoints by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That is a great point about the "relentlessness" being a huge drawback in relation to physical needs, especially as movie lengths draw out... because theater previews are so long to start with, there have been times when I've eaten a lot of my food and consumed most of my drink before a movie even began. I have a pretty decent holding capacity bladder wise but there have been a few movies where by the end I was anxious to get out and it was really detracting from my enjoyment of the movie by the end, not to mention simply distracting.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree! A couple more points. At home I can pause the movie to use my nice CLEAN bathroom, and walk back to my CLEAN couch or chair without sticking to the floor with every step! I don't have to fight traffic, and pay far too much for snacks and drinks, there are no squalling brats running around my living room, no one calling/texting/answering their phone. If I get a call, I can pause the movie. I can skip any previews, that crap is just a waste of my time. I control the volume, and can tailor the bass/midrange/treble levels to suit the room and my taste! And alone time with my significant other is better spent at home with just the two of us watching a movie (or whatever else we want to do)!

    5. Re:Counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all points have to apply everyone. Someone may need that alone time in theater whereas someone else may want to fool himself being in crowd.

  18. Seen another way by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    1. Nice, but still easily enjoyable on a regular TV

    2. Loud, crowded, if you need to go to the bathroom you have to move in front of people or, if you sit on the end, people are always disturbing you.

    3. If you lose focus at home, just rewind

    4. At home you can rewatch a particularly enjoyable/tense/scary scene

    5. That is usually too loud

    6. Unskippable ads

    7. What's more disrupting than missing part of the movie to get a refill, go to the bathroom, or have other people distracting you?

    8. How do you have quality alone time in a room full of people?

    9. Or go to the store and get a 2-liter for half the price of theater drinks, not to mention whatever food/snack you like

    10. Who gives a shit?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  19. Unless its a Warren Screening Room... by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen. - I have one at home... with 7.1 sound.
    2. People everywhere. - Kicking my chair.... coughing, using cell phones.... etc... ruins the movie.
    3. Focus. - People walking in the isles, I cant pause, see #2
    4. Relentlessness. - I do not want to be trapped in my seat, thanks though...
    5. A massive speaker system. - I have one
    6. Previews. - You tube
    7. Disruption - See #2
    8. Alone time. - Even better at home on the couch.
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark - Really?
    10. Bragging rights - can still have them by watching at home.

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
  20. 4K by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Ok I'm not a theater person but I did see the last Star Trek movie in XD (4K 3d). The 3d effect was alright but seeing 4K on a big screen was incredible. Every detail was in focus, you could make out the text on displays all around the ship.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:4K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4K on a big screen was incredible. Every detail was in focus

      I've not seen the movie myself, but if I'm understanding correctly, that has nothing to do with the resolution so much as the aperture on the lens. I've always seen filmmakers use depth of field and explicit focus points to drive the story. Sound like they threw that out for this one?

    2. Re:4K by zlives · · Score: 1

      i was pretty sure there wasn't anything like 4k 3D, also the last ST was in UHD not true 4k anyway. but just wondering if XD = 4k3d

      source appreciated.

    3. Re:4K by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      According to Cinemark they have Barco 4K projectors. If the movie was indeed natively 4K I don't know.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  21. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    I have a large screen and projector.

    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    I don't like a lot of people. The ones I do are welcome to my house any time to watch a movie.

    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    Already paid the electric bill, that's why my projector is running.

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    You have the same option to turn away from the worst in theatre, its just that you don't get a refund.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    Got it.

    6. Previews.

    I can always pause my add blocker.

    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

    Hmm Adventure Time is in theatre? At least if I get stoned and watch it at home I know I won't get arrested for public intox.

    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    How is this alone time?

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    I'll pass on the diabetes thanks. But if I wanted it I could have a whole 10 gallons of it for the same price.

    10. Bragging rights.

    You mean I can finally feel like a big boy if I go to the theatre?

  22. None of that sounds appealing as an adult by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    32 oz of soda? That much sugar and caffeine are probably a big reason why people like going to the movies, who wouldn't feel good after absorbing that much calories and caffeine. No thanks.
     
    If you live in/near a major city the theater is a goddamn trainwreck; the theater experience is nice if you live in/near a rich suburb. That's it. I just make a mental note to check if a movie is out for rental a couple months after release... If I remember.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:None of that sounds appealing as an adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      32 oz of soda? .

      It was probably originally "getting a blowjob from your date" but hastily edited when somone complained.

    2. Re:None of that sounds appealing as an adult by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      At home, I drink less than half that during a typical movie (12 oz can). And it tastes better than the ice-watered down stuff at the theater. Plus, a better chance of sitting through the whole thing, and if I don't, I can pause the movie while I get rid of what I drank.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:None of that sounds appealing as an adult by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you're a teenager, that's a plus, but adults can just watch the movie and do that when they get home.

  23. the duplication is delicious by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Didn't we do this last week?!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. My friends big screen allows me to see the pores on the actors faces.
    2. Annoying shits who should just go somewhere else.
    3. I never pay bills while watching a movie, unless it's a really crappy movie.
    4. I can pee when I need to and not miss anything.
    5. Have you seen my friends surround system? I need earplugs!
    6. That's what "swipe right" is for.
    7. Hmm, I thought we were watching a movie. I don't know anybody who surfs channels while watching a movie at the same time.
    8. Um, friends and family sitting next to me without wondering if we'll all be mowed down in our seats.
    9. A nice HOT cup of tea thank you.
    10. Loser.

  25. Alamo Drafthouse by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

    Reasons to only go to the Alamo Drafthouse 1. Beer. Full bar. 2. Pretty good menu. 3. PSA's that are legendary. https://youtu.be/1L3eeC2lJZs 4. Nice big seats, lots of room.

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:Alamo Drafthouse by rockmuelle · · Score: 1

      Was just coming to post the reasons to go to the Alamo as really the only reasons to go to a theater.

      You left off my personal favorite: fried pickles

      (in general, their food sucks, but there are a few bright spots on the menu).

      Fried pickles, beer, and the great pre-preview content (including the PSAs) are what keep me going there.

    2. Re:Alamo Drafthouse by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Magnited States of America!

  26. Wonder who paid Verge (and how much)... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    I wonder who paid Verge to run this stupid article, and how much they got paid... I won two $10 giftcards for a large movie theater chain from a raffle and peddled them off on Craigslist for face value.. If/when a movie comes out I actually *want* to see, I wait till its on Redbox, rent it for the day, pop it in my DVD drive on the computer, rip it to my Plex media server and watch it from there on my bigscreen tv.. Haven't been in a theater in close to ten years and not planning on that changing.. Waiting now for Rogue One to hit Redbox (I understand April 11 is the date)...

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  27. Reasons Not To Care by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    1. Large screens are fairly affordable at home. In fact, with the shorter viewing distance, the screen may fill more of your field of vision.

    2. Other theater-goers are more likely to be a distraction than a benefit, based on my experiences.

    3. Failing to focus on the movie is a personal issue. Understandably, this can be a problem for parents---but you can have someone watch the kids whether you go out or stay in.

    4. I don't know anyone this applies to. I haven't seen anyone do this as far as I remember. Seems like they're stretching.

    5. It is not difficult or expensive to setup a home audio system. This one might apply to someone who views relatively few movies and doesn't want to invest in a sound system.

    6. Are they seriously selling commercials as a benefit? I can find those same previews on Youtube 99% of the time, and at home I can decide whether I want to watch them.

    7. This is basically the same as #3. They are padding the list.

    8. The social aspects of going to the theater are available for movie nights at home---or any number of other activities, like bars and hobbyist clubs.

    9. Unhealthy eating habits are a bonus now? If you're an adult, I don't understand the special appeal of drinking soda in the theater. You can buy and drink enough soda to kill yourself if you want, and no one has the authority to stop you.

    10. If paying $10-$15 for a 2-hour show is something you brag about, you need to reexamine your life. Exception for enthusiastic fans---if you simply can't wait another day to see that movie, it's worth some pocket change to scratch that itch.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  28. Cola in the dark by XXongo · · Score: 1
    Actually, the item "32 ounces of cola in the dark" is a reason to watch movies at home, since when you're at home, you can pause the movie when you suddenly have a desperate need to take the break to dispose of that cola, while in a movie theatre, not only won't they pause the movie for you, you will annoy all the other watchers as you say "Excuse me" and slide out (and risk missing the big scene).

    (I've learned to not take that 32-ounce cola into a film, for just that reason).

    1. Re:Cola in the dark by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yet another variation of Murphy's Law: You'll have to pee during the only good part of the whole movie.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  29. OMGLOLWTFBBQ by sootman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Holy fucking fuck, what a bullshit article. Did movie studios pay for that? How can ANYONE possibly believe the BULLSHIT they wrote?

    A mere 20 comments here so far and already 5 people have demolished the list in much the same way. Allow me to pic ONE point from TFA itself:

    Focus... In the movie theater, all you have is your chair, any snacks you brought or bought, and the movie youâ(TM)re there to watch.

    ARE YOU FUCKING HIGH? What planet do you watch movies on? Fucking LIAR! Yeah, there are no distractions in the theater... except for idiots talking, and idiots who bring kids and babies to loud-ass grown-up movies late at night, and people using their phones, and people going in and out in front of you, and the doors in the back opening and letting in light and sound, and people messing with their leg position in the newly-installed powered recliners, and...

    Fuck you, The Verge. That article is thoroughly dishonest and does not deserve to be called journalism. As an opinion piece, it is EASILY picked apart. As anything else, it doesn't even qualify.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:OMGLOLWTFBBQ by pseudofrog · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to relax. May I suggest a trip to your local cinema to unwind?

    2. Re:OMGLOLWTFBBQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just Slashdot fulfilling its blog of the year spam quota. For ages it was New Scientist. Currently it's The Verge. That is all. You can safely ignore all The Verge spam posts on Slashdot.

    3. Re:OMGLOLWTFBBQ by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Planet Payola.

      Pro tip: Not everybody writing words for a living is a journalist. Many of them are copywriters. Even at a traditional newspaper they employ more copywriters than journalists! According to wikipedia, they're a product database and review site that also does podcasts and internet TV shows. They also republish content from SB Nation, which is a sports journalism site.

      Pre-internet this sort of content would just be a "magazine," it would not be categorized with news. It is just entertainment.

    4. Re:OMGLOLWTFBBQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, how do pick apart an opinion piece? It's someone's opinion. You can't disprove someone's opinion.

    5. Re:OMGLOLWTFBBQ by sootman · · Score: 1

      Opinion pieces can contain things that are supposedly facts, eg., the "fact" in this case that there are no distractions in a theater.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  30. No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a clickbait listicle. I actually hope that the verge has some kind of revenue sharing or other deal with slashdot now, because this is ridiculously stupid.

  31. Yes, these are also my reasons as well by justthinkit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, these are also my reasons for not wanting to go to a movie theater.

    1. The big screen.

    There is nothing like watching something awful on a REALLY big screen.

    2. People everywhere.

    Right, a major bummer. Could even be #1.

    3. Focus.

    A complete lack of focus is pretty much a certainty in a stinky, noisy, blurry-screen theater.

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you...

    Yes, a big screen and (5) below will intensify the worst parts of the average garbage movie.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    No one in their right mind wants this. And after I was assaulted (damaging my hearing), I want this much much less than the average person.

    6. Previews.

    Spoilers.

    7. Disruption.

    Disruption.

    8. Alone time.

    Did you mean this in the Pee Wee Herman sense of the phrase?

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    In a dark suit?

    32 ounces of diabetes is not my idea of fun.

    10. Bragging rights.

    Stupid brags as stupid does.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      Concession Prices

      As Steven Wright said, "Last time I went to the movies I was thrown out for bringing my own food. My argument was that the concession stand prices are outrageous. Besides, I haven't had a barbecue in a long time."

      And, more seriously, one or two previews are a "pro", seven or eight are not.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot... and you also have the intellect of a six year old.

    3. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like some pathetic advertisement attempt for movie theaters.

      Honestly, unless I'm: out of town, very bored, and lacking access to a decent TV (which is rarely the case these three items simultaneously align)... the theater is essentially a money suck for entertainment I'd rather avoid at all costs. I'd much rather go to a live performance / play / broadway style show if I'm going to go out. Don't try to herd me into a room to show something I can literally watch on my phone with headphones in better quality if I so desired (excluding bass vibrational effects).

      Other than the quality of the deadly buttery popcorn being semi-difficult (not impossible) to replicate at home (which I shouldn't be eating anyways), there's really nothing I miss about movie theaters.

    4. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you seen a movie in a theater following the new trend of limited, reserved seating in recliners? I saw Ghost in the Shell this weekend (certainly worth seeing for fans of the franchise). Modern digital projection, very few people in the theater, none of whom were disruptive. No problem with cleanliness at all. Lots of space between the rows of seats, so you're not disrupted when someone needs to get out.

      So, yeah, (some) movie theaters are fixing their shit, making the experience good again. Show up 20 minutes late to skip the ads. And if you're bother by garbage movies - have you tried finding an internet movie reviewer who will help you avoid those? There are lots these days, easy to find one who gives useful information given your personal tastes.

      Really, your post reads like someone complaining about their girlfriend dragging them to chick flicks, except, well, this is Slashdot.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by magarity · · Score: 2

      Concession Prices

      That's the only way the theater operator makes any money. Of a $12-$15 first run ticket the theater gets 25 cents and the rest goes to the studio that made the movie.

    6. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. But There is indeed a case to be made for movie theaters because we are social beings. I have a fancy espresso machine at home but I still stop by a coffee house every once in a while because of this social aspect.
      So when it comes to movie theaters they can be a plus but they have to know their place and care about their audience. We have one theater I like which is in the more upscale area where people are also more educated and polite. They have big comfy seats with huge arm supports which make everyone sit far away from their neighbor, reducing chatter. The rooms are small and big seats eat into it even further, again reducing chatter. They police cell phones well. They are clean and they are punctual about taking about 10 minutes for previews so I can go in late and be sure to just see the movie.
      If I want social interaction with friends I will watch at home. But then someone will get up to pee, someone will take a call etc. If I want social but polite and fully focused on the movie then I will go to the movie theater (but you have to know which one is good for this purpose because most can diaf, not literally).

    7. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by edx93 · · Score: 2
      Adding to parent's response:

      1. The big screen.

      If a movie is only good because it's on a big-screen, then it's likely a shite movie to begin with. I watched avatar at home (on my computer) and realized that it was a piece of trash. Utterly boring with only cinematics that's actually worth anything, and even so.... I was soooooo glad I didn't have to pay $20 to see THAT! piece of crap.

      2. People everywhere.

      Yeah, nothing better than: 1) watching someone look at their cell phones with a screen bright enough to rival the bat signal or 2) hearing people chatting about whatever the fuck they need to talk about mid movie. Yeah, gonna miss that.

      3. Focus.

      Right...see my rebuttal to #2.

      4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you...

      If, like parent said, the movie is any good. I don't want boredom or stupidity (again, Avatar) enhanced. Home viewing was bad enough.

      5. A massive speaker system.

      Huh!? How's that any good? Get a decent sound system (a couple hundred bucks should do just fine) with bluetooth headphone compatibility and you have the cinema beat. Cheaper in the LR, too.

      6. Previews.

      OK, ok. I love previews - but not $20 worth. Also NO ADS at home, right!?

      7. Disruption.

      Disruption (no change there)

      8. Alone time.

      huh!? what about #2? You know: 'people everywhere'? If you're lonely surrounded by lots of people, you have bigger issues than where to watch a movie (I know -- I've been through that).

      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

      Last I checked (2+ years ago), a soda and popcorn was cost as much as the already over-priced movie. No thanks.

      10. Bragging rights.

      This is just dumb

      So there you have it: 10 reasons why the movie experience is over-rated (and over priced)

    8. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Concession Prices

      Heh! Once I told a friend, in a fit of "moral superiority" that I never pirated software. Unfortunately, he remembered, and threw in my face, several occasions when I snuck coke & snacks into the theater.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like something that's firmly in the "somebody else's problem besides me" camp.

    10. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      11. For the price of 2 Movie tickets I can BUY the DVD/Blueray and watch it as many times as I like. I can still haul out the entire star wars set when the grandkids come over, the entire Terminator movies and still have the option of Finding Nemo for the younger ones on a different TV.

      ALL without paying another cent.

      Better yet, about 1/2 my DVDs ( I have hundreds) are from 2nd hand shops, so I typically get 6-8 DVDs for the price of ONE movie ticket.

      Thanks, but until I am being paid millions, I will watch my pennies my way, and that includes not paying for grossly over priced cinema tickets just so the actors and directors can make millions of dollars.

    11. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of a $12-$15 first run ticket the theater gets 25 cents and the rest goes to the studio that made the movie

      Actually, more like $3 in the opening weeks, rising after that. But the point stands that the bulk of theatre profits are from concession sales.

    12. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I recently went to one similar to that - no proper recliners, but the seats all leaned back a fair bit. And the movie even started almost perfectly on time - you have to show up early to see the previews (and get the best seats).

      Unfortunately the seats were "ergonomic" - which as best I can tell is Latin for: this would be really comfortable for some hypothetical average person, but *you* can get ready suffer a couple hours of bending in completely unnatural places.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    13. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by mattyj · · Score: 1

      Your pessimism about the apparent low quality of the movies doesn't change when you're watching at home. You just sound like an agoraphobic.

    14. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I can see the argument where coffee is concerned - coffee houses have traditionally been social locations where people get together to talk about whatever interests them. Like bars for sober people.

      A movie theater though? You're sitting in the dark, watching a (hopefully engrossing) movie in a situation where courtesy demands that you refrain from any form of conversation. How exactly is that social? At best it offers a common experience that can then serve as a focal point for conversation afterwards. But then, so does actually *doing* something together.

      About the only form of socializing it encourages is making out when on a date, and even then it's really only an expensive third-rate alternative to going someplace more private and comfortable. (unless, I suppose, you don't actually trust your date enough to go someplace more private with them)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    15. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      certainly worth seeing for fans of the franchise

      Giving money to that abomination of an adaptation shows that you aren't a fan of the franchise.

    16. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And for the things that aren't worth watching more than once, a subscription to a DVD rental service will give you as many films as you can watch for less than the price of two cinema tickets a month (closer to the cost of one now).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the only form of socializing it encourages is making out when on a date

      I believe you overlook the importance of a neutral and interesting space for getting acquainted with the other person before getting to the making out part. Impressive as home cinema setups can be, inviting a new acquaintance to watch a film together at the cinema is more likely to work as a way of socialising than to invite to someone's man-cave.

      (Posting AC to keep moderation points given)

    18. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      10. Bragging rights.

      OP forgot:

      11. Chance to use that body armor you got for christmas!

      Seriously, I have about as much desire to go to the movies as to travel by airplane (and get raped by the TSA). The experience has so many downsides these days that it's easy to decide to just do something else rather than put up with all the expense and hassle.

      Not all of the problems are new: concession food has always been outrageously expensive (but we always knew that was how the theatre made it's money). But cell phones, obnoxious patrons, night vision equipped theater employees, small screens, and automatic weapons fire... those are mostly new inventions. Seriously, with the big flat screen TV and nice sound system I have, the home experience as a whole is better than the theater experience as a whole. And the difference in price? $5 on Amazon streaming vs $50 or more to go to the theater. Really, they've made it a very easy decision.

      But harder to make an excuse to the wife for needing to wear that new body armor!

    19. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by lgw · · Score: 1

      Giving money to that abomination of an adaptation shows that you aren't a fan of the franchise.

      It was better than the second animated movie - at least this had a plot. The visuals were great. The only complaint seems to be waaaaah it wasn't like the booooooks.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Yes, these are also my reasons as well by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      That's why movies have been a popular destination for teens for many years. Private enough for making out, not private enough for going all the way, and there is an easy escape if things go wrong. (If the making out thing just isn't working for the two of you you can watch the movie, and if you have to escape from a situation where you are being uncomfortably pressured you can get up and go to the lobby.) They're still learning about their sexuality; they don't trust their dates or themselves enough to go to a more private place, and rightly so.

      A movie could also be a suitable destination for a first or second date for adults for the same reasons.

      Also, teens often don't have access to those more private and comfortable places. They still live with parents, and not all parents are understanding about having a date visit. They can't afford hotel rooms, even if they can find one that will take cash rather than insisting on a credit card. Making out in a car has its own discomforts, and urban teens may not even have access to a car.

  32. Kid free screenings on opening weekend by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    If theaters want people to come back, they need to have 21+ only screenings of PG-13 and R movies on opening weekend.

    Obnoxious kids and crying babies in theaters is what drives people away. And since most of the money for a theater is made on opening weekend, that would be the time to not drive paying customers away.

    Those people can still come, but those people who don't want to deal with them, need that option.

    1. Re:Kid free screenings on opening weekend by ninthbit · · Score: 1

      AMC has their "Cinema Suites". They're reserved seating (recliners) with food service and are 18+ only. Theaters are learning. One mom-pop operation near me even has a child-care option for the younger families.

  33. Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5. A massive speaker system.

    The quiet scenes are too low, and the loud scenes are too high. Modern sound engineers are terrible.

  34. Proliferation of ads... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    So not only is half of my screen presently covered with previously absent ads when I read /., but now the stories themselves are also thinly veiled advertisements, this one for going to the movie theater of all things.

    What the hell guys?

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    1. Re:Proliferation of ads... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Hey new guy: Never click on the story. If you think the summary is [redacted], the story is guaranteed to be worse!

  35. Poor Reasons by Da+Cheez · · Score: 1

    1. In some cases, but perceived screen size is relative to your distance from it. A medium-sized TV can sufficiently fill my visual field as long as I'm not sitting clear across the room from it. Maybe not quite the same, but close enough for me. Bonus: My sofa's comfier than most theater chairs - and less sticky - and no tall people ever sit in front of me at home and block a corner of the screen (except the cat sometimes).

    2. I don't need a group of people telling me when to laugh, thank you very much. My own emotional acuity is perfectly adequate for my enjoyment. When I do want company for a movie, friends and family make for a much more enjoyable shared experience than the random crowds of strangers at the theater.

    3. I honestly can't relate to this issue. If you can't ignore your electronics long enough to watch a two or three hour movie, you may need to disconnect for a while.

    4. Also can't relate, although I know there are many people like that. But even in the theater you can close your eyes and plug your ears to avoid the scary (my wife does this). Bonus: Watching at home is less relentless in bad ways; in a theater you can't pause to use the restroom or rewind to catch important missed dialog.

    5. Theather-quality home speaker systems can be prohibitively expensive, but you can still get good quality for the price even on a budget. I'm not much of an audiophile, though, and am reasonably content with a $100 2.1 sound bar. YMMV.

    6. Previews? Ick. I deliberately arrive a couple minutes late to avoid previews. If you like them so much, watch the ones you want on YouTube, not the limited selection they offer before your movie. I don't like paying to be advertised to.

    7. Again, can't really relate. I can see how that would affect some people, but I don't watch a lot on the TV so sitting down to a movie really does feel like a time that's set apart. YMMV.

    8. TRUE alone time at home, with your significant other, is also a cherished pastime and WITHOUT all those annoying "other people." Not everyone likes crowds - in fact, some of us *hate* them and go out of our way to avoid them.

    9. Why not 32 ounces of diabet... er... cola in the dark that I don't have to pay $10 for? At home I can have full access to all my favorite snacks, on the cheap, no smuggling required.

    10. Huh? Do you also brag that you wandered Walmart for 30 minutes trying to decide on a nice pillow to buy, instead of just getting one on Amazon in 5 minutes? Unless it's a premier showing of Star Wars, Star Trek, or some other suitably awesome movie, there are no bragging rights attached to watching a movie in the theater. And even then it's negligible.

  36. Case to skip it all together by Eosi · · Score: 1

    Wow. If they want me to go see movies more, then make the cost be reasonable and less confusing for people to pick where to go.

    For example, in my area, there are 5 AMC theaters close by. Each one has at least 4 ways to see movies, some have 6. On their site, its hard to tell sometimes what the difference is, other than 2 are for 3D movies and 2 are for "regular" (or 3 and 3 for the 6 theater). So I decide I want to see the noon showing of movie X. That used to be a lower cost. Nope, not anymore that is now $10 for cheap / lowest end viewing. You want Atmos (spelling?) sound, that is $15. IMAX is $17. Real 3D is $17.50 and IMAX 3D is $18.50. This does not cound the new GDX or 4K that they are offering....

    Oh you want a 32 oz drink, that is $10....

    So for me to see the cheap movie X, I am out $25 right off the bat. Oh but wait, you have a new fee (they did get new reserved seating) which is $1.50 per seat, and you have to pay 9% tax on all three items (movie, drink, and seat fee), since the local market hits you with 2% more for "entertainment" and "food". So its almost $30.

    Easier to wait, and go big, buying the Bluray/DVD/Digital copy, and still save money.

    Last year, before all the theaters upgraded, we were able to see a movie for $5, and get a soda for $5 (still a little high, but that is at least bearable).

  37. Desperation by jargonburn · · Score: 1

    Anybody else feel like The Verge should have stopped at 7 reasons?

    1. Re:Desperation by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Surely it would be an improvement over 10, but I think maybe they overran the boundary when they hit 1.

    2. Re:Desperation by jargonburn · · Score: 1
      Oh, definitely! The premise is a crock!

      I just meant it felt like they were pushing really hard to reach that "Top 10 Reasons..." clickbait-level...

  38. Watching at home wins because.... by hoffmanjon · · Score: 1

    I can pause the movie whenever I want to go to the bathroom or get another drink/snack.

  39. Hypocrits by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    Once only studio execs had bitchin' screening rooms at home; now thanks to technology we all do

    You mean the same execs that are now telling us that we should watch films at the cinema and not at home? I suspect the only experience they are worried we might miss is the one which involves a large transfer of money from us to them and personally I think that's an experience I am happy to miss out on.

  40. Movie Projectors by future+assassin · · Score: 0, Troll

    I haven't built my screen yet but I got myself an Epsom HD740 refurbished for $400. https://epson.ca/Clearance-Cen...

    After hooking it up and just testing on a wall with a 120"+ diagonal display and at about 12 feet way I got the same movie theater feeling watching when testing with The Matrix

    Things I can do at home while watching a movie

    Fuck my wife on the couch while watching the movie.
    Smoke all the weed we want.
    Do some rails
    Trip on shrooms in a safe familiar place
    Drink beer
    Fuck some more on the couch
    Cheap munchies
    Watch the movie with my cats and dogs.

    I personally don't give a flying fuck about movie theaters, just give me the movie/dvd/BR on release day for $25.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Movie Projectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, don't cut yourself on all that edge.

    2. Re:Movie Projectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are the coolest middle aged nerd who is still into weed that I know!

    3. Re:Movie Projectors by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      What no comments on the cats and dogs? I have 7 cats and two dogs.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  41. If those are the best arguments... by dbrueck · · Score: 1

    ... then they are screwed.

    We still go to the theater occasionally - it's kinda fun if done once in awhile and the theaters near me don't tend to have the "problem people", and I like movie theater popcorn - but watching from the convenience and comfort of my home is just really, really tough to beat.

    The weakness of this list is itself a testament to why people like to watch stuff at home.

    1. Re:If those are the best arguments... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's a romantic list. They're having a romantic fantasy about the good old days of the cinema.

    2. Re:If those are the best arguments... by dbrueck · · Score: 1

      Hey, I think you're right. They should add:

      #11. A night at the cinema is a fun time for the ladies to put on their best dresses and for the men to don their most dapper suits and ties.

  42. Ummmm... no by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Some of these are a little valid but more are BS:

    1) Sort of valid but then big screens are available at home these days. It is all about size vs distance, you don't need as big a screen if you are close.

    2) Can be nice but can be hell. Yes watching movies with friends is nice (can do that at home) but other people are often inconsiderate.

    3) ...what? You can be as focused, or not, as you want at home or at the theater.

    4) This is just dumb.

    5) This is not an advantage IMO. Not because I dislike good sound, but I have a big system at home that'll do THX reference (105dB SPL) levels. Thing is, my system is properly calibrated and set at the right level. Theaters, IMAX in particular, like to turn it up too loud. There is, in fact, a "right" level for movies they are encoded with absolute sound level data.

    6) Fuck you.

    7) I have less distributions at home. I can focus in on the movie with nobody else bothering me. At the theater, other people control how much focus I can have.

    8) Wait, what? I'm not even sure what they are arguing. Also I'd say you get better quality time with a friend/loved one at home than in a theater.

    9) I'm not sure if he's aware, but all major soda vendors sell their products at all major retailers. It proves to be very easy to get whatever brand of cola you like at home. 32oz cups are easy to buy as well.

    10) Again, fuck you.

    If these are the 10 best reasons, then theaters are doomed.

  43. Why did /. put this story up? by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    Is the news so slow today that they must fall back to this waste of time? Or was this an attempt to show more advertisements on the website by trolling the readers with stupid claims to get them to go to the comments page?

  44. theaters need to man UP and quiet assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the negs come from the theater letting assholes shit on the pussies. (looking at you)
    I live in Florida where asshole theater patrons HAVE been shot!
    The theater owners need to return to controlling this.
    It is still a community activity.
    It gives you something to talk about with your friends in family, that does not include work or housework.

  45. Year of the Home Theater by corychristison · · Score: 1

    Took my family to see the new Power Rangers movie yesterday at my local Cineplex Movie Theater. Haven't been there in almost a year.

    There was a grand total of 6 people in there, including my family of 4.

    1. Re:Year of the Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Power Rangers. What did you expect?

    2. Re:Year of the Home Theater by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Have you seen it? I was quite surprised to find that it wasn't absolute garbage. There was an actual story, with suspense and sans cheesy tights.

      It has a 7/10 on IMDB, and a 78% Audience Score on Rotten Tomatoes.

    3. Re:Year of the Home Theater by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Took my family to see the new Power Rangers movie yesterday at my local Cineplex Movie Theater. Haven't been there in almost a year.

      There was a grand total of 6 people in there, including my family of 4.

      I remember when I was in 5th grade and Power Rangers came out on TV. In 6th grade I read in the newspaper that elementary school violence increased [some large percentage] following the start of the show. Not surprising; the one time I watched it, they seemed to just be attacking anybody that was on the wrong team, I couldn't even tell who the "good guys" were supposed to be!

      I'm 40 years old now. I'm totally not surprised there was "nobody" there to watch that movie. I would also expect a Gummy Bears movie to flop. Interesting, but not timeless like the smurfs. Transformers have a unique shtick, so they can do it easy. When kids play with transformers toys, the role-playing makes use of this transformation capability. It makes the experience feel unique, and creates depth and attachment to the story. When kids play with Power Rangers toys, it is the same as playing with GI Joe: it is just a generic action figure, and you role play any sort of action-movie type scene. So they grow up, and they remember playing with their Power Rangers toys, but there isn't the same personal fondness.

      What I remember about GI Joe from when I was a kid: They're fun to use with firecrackers! You can blow off a leg and usually reattach it, and if not, nobody is crying over it. If you blew up your brothers GI Joe, you just give one of yours and he's happy. No character attachment at all. Power Rangers are the same.

    4. Re:Year of the Home Theater by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Some movies are surprisingly good. I really liked the first live-action Scooby-Doo movie (although it should be watched at home, to see the deleted scenes). When my son was young, we found the Pokemon movies to be pretty good. Shame about Yu-gi-oh, though.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  46. I can list one reason why not... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... stupid people and their smartphones. You can list all the reasons in favor that you want, but more often than not, somewhere during the movie, someone thinks that whatever is going on on his/her smartphone is so important that the entire theater should be interrupted from their enjoyment of the movie.

  47. Verge = Shill for movie companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is the Verge shilling for Movie Theaters/companies? I know why I still go to see movie's in theaters and I don't need the Verge to tell me, though maybe the Movie companies could do a better job of this themselves. More to the point though, if they want my money, especially at the exorbitant prices they charge for popcorn, coke etc. is 'make a good movie & stop recycling old fodder/making endless sequels'...

  48. 32 ounces of cola? by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    I thought that was 10 ounces of ice, 20 ounces of water and 2 ounce of normal strength cola. Better known as badly flavored water. All for only $4.
    Or we could just pick up a 32 ounces of actual normal strength cola from the store for maybe $1.25 to drink at home. Maybe even get another 64 ounces for still less than the price you will pay at the theater.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  49. That list really isn't selling it. by rundgong · · Score: 1

    People everywhere

    Sometimes this is a plus, but 9 times out of ten it is just annoying.

    Focus

    Speaking of focus. Occasionally the picture is slightly out of focus. Annoying as hell.

    A massive speaker system

    This is usually a positive, but sometimes they turn it up too loud. That does not make a pleasant experience at all, and this just doesn't happen at home.

    Previews

    How about starting the movie at the advertised time instead?

    Disruption

    Was this not covered by Focus? Not once have disruptions been a worse problem at home than at the theater...

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. 10. Bragging rights.

    Who the hell are they trying to sell this to?

    I still enjoy going to the movies, but those reasons just suck.
    Take an afternoon off from work if you can, and go to the afternoon show. 500 seats and 27 people. That is how you get a good movie experience.

  50. #1 reason not to go: Previews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'm paying a premium to see the movie, you could at least have the courtesy of not showing 15 minutes of advertisements that completely spoil the next 5 movies. Movie theaters, limit yourself to 10 seconds per trailer for 3 trailers max, and I might be willing to go to theaters more often.

    If you show me a 2 minute preview, I will wait at least 5 years to see your movie, so that I'll have time to forget the spoilers you showed me.

  51. Reason not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The person upwind of you believes bathing in perfume negates the need to bath in water.

  52. Everyone? by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

    I think not, a decent Home Theater Room will still set you back 20-40K and require you dedicate space in your home to said HT. Even at $12 a pop 20K will pay for a hell of a lot of movie tickets,

    4K Projector 10K
    Good 120" screen 1K
    HT receiver ATMOS Capable 2K
    Speaker System 3K
    Subwoofer 1K
    Installation costs 5-10K

    Those are mid-range HT parts. It goes up from there. And damn the 2yr old HT receiver doesn't support HDR pass-through, now you need a new receiver.

    A 65" screen with a soundbar does not equal a Home Theater.

    1. Re:Everyone? by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A 65" screen with a soundbar does not equal a Home Theater.

      There's no spec sheet for a home theater, it's whatever someone is happy with. My 65" TV and 2.1 soundbar are more than adequate.

    2. Re:Everyone? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I think not, a decent Home Theater Room will still set you back 20-40K and require you dedicate space in your home to said HT. Even at $12 a pop 20K will pay for a hell of a lot of movie tickets,

      4K Projector 10K
      Good 120" screen 1K
      HT receiver ATMOS Capable 2K
      Speaker System 3K
      Subwoofer 1K
      Installation costs 5-10K

      Those are mid-range HT parts. It goes up from there. And damn the 2yr old HT receiver doesn't support HDR pass-through, now you need a new receiver.

      You underestimated the prices. A low end Atmos receiver is $1k, a midrange is $2k, and a high end one starts at $5k for the receiver, and $3k for the amps to pair it with (and if you want Trinnov, they start at $30k).

      Good speakers are expensive. And they should be the most expensive part of the audio system - a low end LCR set will be $1k, but expect to spend more like $5K for the LCRs. Surrounds will be cheaper speakers, so you can budget $250-500 for those, and ceiling (for Atmos/DTS:X) are another $1000 total (4 channel).

      And that's just the electronics. You want to toss any old ratty couch in there? You'd want a nice couch or HT seating which runs $2K for a couch to $20K for a couple of rows of HT seats with recline and everything.

      And then you'd want to do sound insulation, if nothing more than to keep your neighbours (even across the road) from knocking on your door.

      You can get a basic home theatre set up for $1K, cheap TV, cheap HTIB system. Home cinemas start creeping up from $20K to $200K. Projectors are expensive, they can cost more than a big OLED screen TV.

      Finally, there's also this whole "wife" or "significant other" thing...

    3. Re:Everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently haven't build a home theater before. Your prices and specs are WAY over the top.
      4k projector? Not needed on that large of a screen. 1080P is fine and a good one is less that $2000.
      My excellent 120" screen was about $350
      A really good Yamaha 7.2 system is ~$600 and you can usually get an older model for less. 2K for a receiver is NOT mid-range.
      3K speaker system without a sub? Don't forget the Monster cables!
      1K for a sub. You're doing it wrong.
      Installation can be done by yourself depending on what you are trying to achieve. Hanging a projector and screen are easy. You might need an electrician to run an outlet to the ceiling, but that shouldn't cost more that a couple hundred dollars.
      A quality home theater can be done for less that $5K easily!

    4. Re:Everyone? by PIBM · · Score: 1

      You certainly have your budget priorities backward. 11K for the video part and 5-10K for installing stuff, with only 4K for the audio part ? (2K for receiver is not set on either side). I'd go with a large OLED screen before any kind of projector, sorry. Lets start with the 65" LG C7P (yes, it's big enough. Just get closer, beside your rear speakers will have better results) at only 5K. Get 2 SVS subs for another 5K, then that 2K receiver should be able to balance out the issues with 3K worth of speakers for your atmos setup. Maybe a few hundred bucks of cables / adapter, and less than .5k on the blu ray player will give you a much better experience than at the cinema (I'm considering you already have better seating options)

    5. Re:Everyone? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      This! By no possible stretch could my 32" tube be called a "Home Theater", but it works for me. What it lacks in picture/sound, it more than makes up for in control, price, lack of distractions, lack of ads, etc.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Everyone? by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      I certainly wasn't trying to actually spec out any kind of an HT. Those are numbers for some common pieces that illustrate contrary to al0ha's opinion HT is within reach of anyone.

      65" OLED screen is fine for a 2-4 person room but for a 10 person HT it won't cut it.

      Audio could run you 50K or more if you want to go with the "good" stuff.

      $500 bucks for one of the 2 or 3 available UHD BlueRay players is about right.

      DYI costs vary immensely and yeah 50K for the room and prep after buying electronics isn't uncommon.

      I personally do not have an HT room as my tastes run to fast cars but a couple of buddies are always dropping cash on this or that upgrade for theirs.

    7. Re:Everyone? by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Settle for a 1080p projector, a 100" screen, a mid-range speaker system, install everything yourself (5-10K installation -- WTF, what are you building there?), and throw in a couple of powered leather recliners, and you can have the whole thing for about $3000.

      It won't satisfy the very picky, sure, but it's a damn good, and I'm still impressed that I can have all that at my own home these days. Considering the other advantages of being in your home, it's a way better experience than most movie theater visits.

      If I didn't have Alamo to go to for good food & drinks along with a movie, which is harder to replicate at home (the part where someone else makes it for you and brings it to you :) ), I'd likely avoid the theaters altogether.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    8. Re:Everyone? by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      3K isn't going to give you much at all and 5-10K is modifying an existing room with speakers in the ceiling, adding sound deadening and lighting.

    9. Re:Everyone? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I've got a set of 5.1, THX certified PC speakers that cost a couple hundred bucks. Wouldn't fill a theater sized space, but are far louder than needed to fill my living room, and the sound quality easily surpasses anything I've heard outside the narrow "sweet spot" in a theater with a really good sound system.

      And a decent 4K TV can be had for under a grand - not 100", but sitting closer has pretty much the same effect. I fail to see the point of having a huge TV just so that you can sit at the opposite end of the room, unless you're in the habit of having dozens of friends over to watch a movie. Personally it's usually just me and my girlfriend, and *maybe* a couple other friends.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:Everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that modified room is still giving me a better experience than going to the cinema. Heck, in most cases i would prefer just using the crap speakers in the flatscreen TV ...
      Myself i have a setup in my livingroom for around £4500-5500 (Use it also for music) Panasonic 65" 4k (TX-65DX902B), Marantz receiver, QLN speakers (made before they moved production to china) and a KEF sub.. Did install blackout curtains, but that was not mainly for this... I would classify this as a mid-range setup for home-use... What you talk about is low to mid-range for cinemas..
      If i had a room to spare for a HT it could easily be built by myself for another £1-2k.. possibly £3-4k if i had to hire someone to do it following my design. (have all the furniture i would like already)

      A 8-12 person HT can be made on the cheap (£4-8k in total(!) depending on wanted quality-level and having a suitable room, and this is including sound-system and TV/Projector) and you get something that will beat a livingroom with a HT system by a huge margin...
      Most people don't need the "perfect" sound or "perfect" image but they want something that is good enough and be available whenever they want to use it to see a good story..... No need for booking tickets or making sure you are there in time and spending a hour or more getting to and from the place.. If i feel like start watching a movie at 9 i can be done by 11 and could be in bed by 11.05.

      And it does not matter how much money a cinema has spent on their projectors and sound-system... It does not remove the light that pops up all the time when people check their phones and it does not remove the noise from someone munching down a bag of crisps.... Or magically improve your experience when there are no good seats available in the sweet-spot in the middle, like when you failed to book the tickets more than 4 days in advance..

      For 99% of all movies i will have a better experience watching them on my *livingroom* setup over going to the cinema...

    11. Re:Everyone? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      You'll never get good sound without superconductor speaker cables and a continuous supply of liquid nitrogen to keep then working. Don't forget the extra virgin olive oil to keep the electrons lubricated.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    12. Re:Everyone? by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      +1

      My system was all in about that range
      ~2k for 1080p+3d projector
      300 for 100in motorized screen
      350 for pioneer 7.1 receiver (woot refurb of a 600$ one)
      350 for pioneer 5.1 system (i suppose you could count it as 500 since thats the normal price of that speaker set, just caught it on amazon during BF)

      Thats 3k for audio and video done. You dont need some ridiculous speaker setup to rival a movie theater when you're talking about a ~20x20ft room, you just need some good clarity and separation. You dont need a 10k$ projector when ones in the 2k-4k range work just fine. So much of this stuff is just epeen and for custom installers to be able to over charge clients who happen to be rich. Good on them for having that much and shelling out to have it all installed and setup right but you dont really need it to have a better than a theater experience

    13. Re:Everyone? by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      part of the point of having your own setup in a normal family room environment is you dont need all that ridiculous expensive stuff just to make it better than a theater. You dont need sound deadening, you dont have other loud ass theaters right next to your family room, if someone else in your house has shit blaring them tell them to turn it down, otherwise for a family of 2-4 its not even a problem unless you have neighbors who are constantly doing construction in which case you have other problems

      Lighting, turn off your lights and just have dark enough shades to make the room black, you dont need theater lighting

      Seats, just get the most comfortable couch you can, you dont need recliners and to replicate the experience when you have a couch that 3 people can fully lay down on comfortably, much rather have that than separate recliners.

      Speakers, you dont need them mounted inside the ceiling, this is your own house. You can get 2 front facing towers and a center. Then either some speaker stands or wall/ceiling mounts/hangers for all the rears.

      You most definitely can get a home theater experience that beats a movie theater in 3-5k easily. Your estimates and advice seem based on those that must have an entirely dedicated and replicated theater experience in a separate room of their house, but you really dont need all of that.

    14. Re:Everyone? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      So, about 5k on audio/video gear, and a few times that much in audiophile nonsense, and some home remodeling thrown in because, golly, dunno.

      Turn off the lights while you watch the movie and you won't even know if the speakers are built-in or freestanding.

    15. Re:Everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think not, a decent Home Theater Room will still set you back 20-40K and require you dedicate space in your home to said HT. Even at $12 a pop 20K will pay for a hell of a lot of movie tickets,

      4K Projector 10K Good 120" screen 1K HT receiver ATMOS Capable 2K Speaker System 3K Subwoofer 1K Installation costs 5-10K

      Those are mid-range HT parts. It goes up from there. And damn the 2yr old HT receiver doesn't support HDR pass-through, now you need a new receiver.

      A 65" screen with a soundbar does not equal a Home Theater.

      Personally, I would rather play a decent story driven game (Action/Adventure or RPG) on my PS4 using a 7.1 Surround sound headset and a nice IPS monitor. Total cost under $600 USD and I don't have to passively watch a movie or TV show so my family can watch whatever they want in the lounge room. I even have access to Netflix if I want to watch a movie.

      BTW: OK I do have to purchase the game but depending on the game you can get many tens even hundreds of hours of active enjoyment compared to maybe 85 to 150 minutes of passive entertainments since there is little if any replay value for a movie.

      Sorry, I am posting as an AC since I am currently moderating.

    16. Re:Everyone? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you want to go for the high-end everything. I recently replaced an ageing (12 year old, on its second bulb) projector with a newer one for £200. It's only 720p, but for most of the things I watch the limiting factor is the source quality, not the projector. I project onto a painted white wall, no screen. My sound system is one I bought for about £100 around 15 years ago. It only does 5.1 sound, but the quality is fine and (unlike several cinemas I've been to) correctly adjusted so that I don't get distortions (which break immersion for me faster than anything else) when the sound is loud. Total cost is around £300 (actually, the most expensive part was the comfy reclining sofa, but I haven't included that in the price because we use that a lot even when not watching anything). My local cinema costs around £10/ticket (closer to £12 at peak times, to £9 for matinees), so for two of us that works out at 15 trips to the cinema. Assuming that we didn't eat or drink anything, then it's a little over one trip a year for the cinema to cost more, and by watching at home we get a more comfy seat, the ability to eat and drink whatever we want (try getting good wine or beer in our local cinema!), can pause if we need a bathroom break, can have friends join in for no extra cost, and so on.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:Everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice, bright, and clear 1080P projector - $1500
      More than adequate 120" fixed screen - $500
      Home built HTPC - $300
      Blu Ray player - $50
      Receiver (not Atmos yet, but still 7.1 and well above adequate) - $500
      7 Speaker set, including subwoofers (purchased incrementally over the last 18 years) - $3000
      Installation costs - You pay someone to hook your gear up? - $200 worth of cabling

      I"m looking at $6k, with some parts accumulated over 15 years or so but projector and screen were added nearly 4 years ago. It gets used for pretty much every TV show or movie we watch at home, which for us is around 8-10 hours per week. If I think about that usage across 4 of the years, that's $3/hour of entertainment value.

      It's still more than capable of impressing the living hell out of any guests on movie nights.

      A $10,000 4K projector does not equal a mid-range home theater. Your need to be on the bleeding edge is your own problem.

    18. Re:Everyone? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The ones inside the ceiling are the elevation speakers for Atmos and DTS:X. If you don't have a high ceiling room that's the only way to get them in the right place.

  53. 11. Your wife can't hit pause. by pecosdave · · Score: 2

    (My wife has a serious pause button abuse issue)

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  54. personal choice by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    We're not going to vote on whether or not I go to the movie theater. I really don't give a shit why other people like it or don't.

    --
    -Dave
  55. And if it weren't only movies...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting to see other content on all those digital screens. Sports, concerts... Netflix and HBO series!
    Studios shorten release windows or do simultaneous releases, which is fine, but do undermine theater's businesses. And theaters stick to only (mostly) movie content? I must be missing something...

  56. EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by gosand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    6. Previews.

    Spoilers.

    Ads. Ads. ADS. ADS. The only time I went to the theater to see a movie in the last 5 years was recently to see Logan. Mainly because I had the day off, the kids were in school, and my wife and I went together. It was the opening show, by total chance because we went on a whim. Luckily it was at 11AM and the local theater had $5 movies before noon, so it was a great start.

    We got there right at 11, it wasn't crowded so we found good seats, and the lights came down.

    After watching advertisement after advertisement, from car dealerships to restaurants, and two from the movie theater chain itself, they started in on the previews. I don't usually mind them, and they weren't that annoying. Then MORE ads, including YET ANOTHER one for the movie theater chain. Not just a simple logo or slogan, but a minute or two advertisement for their great movie experience. It had been about 25 minutes and I was almost ready to walk out I was so pissed.

     

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is my biggest issue with the entire ordeal as well. By the time the movie itself actually starts I've been lulled into a trance of "Screw this place, I'm going home."

      That and people who can't keep their mouths shut, who then also become agitated because someone tells them to shut up. I paid to watch a movie, not listen to your bullshit conversation.

    2. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      ^^^ If I had mod points. Had the same experience. I thought it was funny in a "can you believe this?" way at first, but was clearly in the realm of anger by the time the movie started. It 30 minutes in my case.

    3. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Striikerr · · Score: 1

      Sorry but the previews are one thing which ruins going to the movies for me. The movie is slated to start at 10 but that's when the ads / previews start. TWENTY minutes later the movie finally rolls. In the before time, sure I loved the previews. Now, with the internet, if I want to watch a preview, I can view it online. It may be more palatable if they ran 3 previews but it feels like it never stops. This whole aspect of the movie theatre experience was even parodied on The Simpsons where Homer got mad and went crazy at the theatre because of the excessive ads.

    4. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I particularly enjoy the anti-piracy ads they sometimes like to run in theaters. I mean, I paid to watch this IN A THEATER, why do you need to tell me how bad watching a movie without their permission is? A minute of "FBI Warning: Watching this theater print at home is illegal" will be next.

    5. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Absolutely this!! There are a number of reasons I don't go to the theater anymore, but that was the deathknell. And my ad tolerance was much higher then than it is now, after 15 years getting used to a DVR. Now they'd probably turn me into an insane shooter!!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. Though I will say that I finally went to the new independent theater in town the other day, and was a pleasantly surprised to discover that they started the previews well beforehand, before the seats were even half filled, so that the movie itself started almost perfectly on time (3 minutes late, I won't sweat those details). So, there are definitely exceptions out there.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It had been about 25 minutes and I was almost ready to walk out I was so pissed.

      So by your own admission you never go to the cinema and don't know how they work. I never see ads in the cinema. The doors are open, you're more than welcome to buy your ticket 20 minutes after the starting time and walk in like many people do.

    8. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      By the time the movie itself actually starts I've been lulled into a trance of "Screw this place, I'm going home."

      Why not just show up 20min later instead of letting the process piss you off?

    9. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Altus · · Score: 1

      One major advantage of assigned seating theaters is that I don't have to show up early and watch a bunch of commercials just to get a decent seat.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    10. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Because by then all the good seats have been taken?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It mostly serves as a reminder, "If the movie is good, remember to be cool and tell your friends to download it."

      Like those "D.A.R.E. to keep kids off drugs" shirts. Which kids wear them? If you have 10 kids wearing the shirt, 2 of them are wearing it because they got in trouble for drugs and are forced to publicly repent. 2 wear it because their older sibling does drugs and isn't nice anymore. And the other 6 are high as a kite and think the shirt is the funniest thing in the world. When I was in school, all the "stoners" had the DARE stickers and the fried egg T-shirts. "This is your brain on drugs" "heh heh look my brain has the munchies, bad!"

    12. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, I had a friend in HS who cut the DON'T off his DON'T DO DRUGS bumper sticker.

    13. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      6. Previews.

      Spoilers.

      Ads. Ads. ADS. ADS.

      This, a thousand times this.

      I like going to see movies on the big screen despite the fact the projector is operated by min wage slaves and the sound is turned up so loud it's blown half the speakers (which almost never get replaced), I can even get over the uncleanliness of the theatre itself (hey, try getting an apathetic teenage wage slave to run a vacuum) but what really turns me off theatres are 1. the ads and 2. the prices.

      US$5.00 is sheer luxury, wanton extravagance. The cheapest I've seen a cinema ticket here in merry old England is £9, usually they're upwards of 11 squid. I also would complain about the snack bar prices (I like cinema popcorn) but I know why that is and it's not the cinema's fault. Your ticket barely covers the cost of the film royalties, snacks are how they pay for staff, rents, rent seekers, power, water, lawsuits from the people who got diabeetus from the massive soft drinks.

      I lament the loss of cinemas, but its inevitable until movie studios change their pricing models to allow cinemas to make a profit. More people would come to the cinema if there were less ads and snacks were cheaper, even at current ticket prices.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I didn't mind 10 minutes of trailers, but when it became 15 minutes of ads followed by 15 minutes of trailers, on top of the extortionate ticket price (and extortionate food / drinks price for really bad food / drinks), I gave up on the whole thing. I have a big screen at home - a half decent projector costs about the same over two years as two people going to the cinema once a month, and a decent sound system (now almost 10 years old and still working fine).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What kind of raggedy shit cinema do you go to where it's first in best dressed. I haven't seen that crap since 1997 when the last cinema in my city switched to assigned seating.

      Hell I'm going to see Logan tomorrow. I bought my ticket this morning already. I have the 2 very most middle seats in the cinema and I will continue to have those when I show up 20min late.

    16. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      I have never seen a movie theater with assigned seating.

      That must suck.

      If it needs assigned seating, it's probably going to be too crowded and you'll have people telling other people "you're in my seat".

      OTOH, the last movie I saw in the theater was Shaft. I ain't saying if it was the original or the remake, but Richard Roundtree was in it.

      And yes, I Know Richard Roundtree was in both.

    17. Re:EXACLTY.. but let me expand on one.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That must suck.

      Yeah. It was only the single best thing introduced.

      If it needs assigned seating, it's probably going to be too crowded

      To be clear you're saying that magically assigned seating put more people into cinemas than there was previously seats for? That doesn't make much sense.
      However nonsense aside it actually had the opposite effect. By introducing assigned seating they could make it tiered. There are now less seats in a typical cinema as the premium seats (not worth the money IMO) have firstly cut the number of places due to their larger size, and reduced movie goers (they put in too many premium seats so less people want to pay $2 extra).

      Also you know what else isn't crowded? The cinema lobby. If people have their tickets and seating assigned in advance there's no reason to queue.

      and you'll have people telling other people "you're in my seat".

      I have seen that once in the past 10 years and I go to the cinema probably around 40 times a year. People typically don't put effort in creating conflict for no good reason, and in general it's pretty easy to read your ticket and match it to a seat number. That one guy in my seat did spend way to long apologising though.

      I ain't saying if it was the original or the remake, but Richard Roundtree was in it.

      ;-) clever.

      Also as a complete aside I didn't see Logan. Turns out there was a football game at the stadium next to the cinema, something I forgot to check. Anyway the cinema was kind enough to refund my ticket after I couldn't get a park. That exposed the one downside to the pre-booked ticket + assigned seating thing, I couldn't just drive to another cinema.

  57. Movie theaters are where cultures clash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some cultural communities consume entertainment differently than do others: some talk back to the screen, interact with the story line with a constant stream of utterances, talking amongst themselves, talking on cell phones.

    Some cultural communities have a small translating the entire movie, line by line, for a group of adults.

  58. There is ONE reason to go to the theater by netsavior · · Score: 1

    The only real reason is because movies come out there first.

    If you care about movies, your home setup is probably more comfortable and customized and to your liking than a theater anyway. And if you don't care that much, then you probably don't care how much better a theater is either.

    You can posture all you want, but we watched Blockbuster, an empire rise and fall on the backs of people willing to watch ~333 pixel tall half-worn-out VHS tapes every damn weekend.

    4k digital cinemas have almost no resolution gap with a 4k tv, and 2k digital cinemas are barely higher resolution than 1080p... Compare that to the gap between a 35mm cinema and a VHS tape.

    1. Re:There is ONE reason to go to the theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only real reason is because movies come out there first.

      If you were more knowledgable, you'd know that the above reason is not even true.

    2. Re:There is ONE reason to go to the theater by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The only real reason is because movies come out there first.

      If you were more knowledgable, you'd know that the above reason is not even true.

      If you were more knowledgeable, you'd have reasons to believe you know whatever you think you know. But, you don't.

  59. Id rather watch at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen. Yeah, my 72" screen at 6 foot takes up the same amount or MORE of my visual space than that 120ft screen at 50ft. 4k projectors are getting cheaper, and I'm more than happy with 1080p.
      2. People everywhere. - This isn't a positive. They talk, use their phones, get up and block my view, etc..
      3. Focus. If the movie is worth paying attention to, I've never had this problem. And I suffer from ADD - squirrel!
      4. Relentlessness. Yeah , not a problem.
    5. A massive speaker system. 5.1 or 7.1 surround sound at 100+db is louder than the movie theatre, and actually give just as good separation..
      6. Previews. - worst part about going to a movie
      7. Disruption. Good thing, your kid starts screaming, and you don't have to miss part of the movie. You don't have to deal with other people in the theatre to distract you and disrupt your experience.
      8. Alone time. So by alone time, you mean not spending your time alone?.
      9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. - I have 32 oz cups, and they don't look at me weird when I bring a six pack at home...
      10. Bragging rights. - who brags about seeing things in the theatre?

  60. Cost by jediborg · · Score: 1

    It can be $24-$45 for a couple to see a movie in a theater (depending on the city/movie screen, i got these numbers by comparing movie ticket prices for 'Ghost in the Shell' in Denver for standard, 3D, and 3D+RPX movie theaters) Plus everything you can buy in terms of food at a theater STARTS at 3$. For two snacks and a drink that is AT LEAST $9 probably closer to $15.

    That comes out to $35-$60 for a couple to be entertained for at least 90 min (yeah a 90 min movie costs the same price as a 150 min movie). That is a LOT of dough for todays millennial debt-burdened customers to cough up. Yeah yeah i know the theaters and studios will talk about inflation, rising production costs, challenging economic times etc. The point is if they don't work together to reduce these costs then the dwindling audience for movies will continue to decline.

    Sadly they don't seem to be working together. The studios constantly try to push movie ticket prices up, giving less and less of a % to the theaters, while the theaters try to push the concession prices up and up to make ends meet.

  61. How much do 32 ounces cost at your cinema? by grungeman · · Score: 1

    I really want to know. Here in Berlin/Germany cinemas charge about 5€ (US$ 5.33) for one liter (I think that's the equivalent of 32 ounces) Coca Cola or Pepsi.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  62. A massive speaker system by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    The last time I went to a movie I brought earplugs (and could still hear everything perfectly). This is a major reason I avoid theaters.

  63. Personal Countercase by sehlat · · Score: 2

    1. The big screen.

    And no subtitles, or at least no subtitle system that doesn't burn up your eye muscles trying to focus at vastly different distances.

    2. People everywhere.

    Talking on their phones and to each other during the show, answering texts, spilling popcorn and soda all over the place and talking to each other during the show. and incidentally getting you charged with assault if you nudge them to call their attention to the above facts.

    3. Focus.

    Matter of pure choice on the part of the viewer.

    4. Relentlessness.

    Matter of viewer attention. See item 3.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    As if I really need more hearing damage than I have. These days theater speakers are set for rock concert volumes.

    6. Previews.

    These are nothing more than paid-for advertising which you frequently forget about by the time the movie being advertised comes out.

    7. Disruption.

    See items 3 and 4 above. Also, if a movie can't hold your attention to begin with, it's already not worth watching.

    8. Alone time.

    Huh? My family and I watch DVD movies together every weekend. We cherish it.

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    And insulin injections in the light of morning. There are very few theater snacks which aren't on my doctor's KOS list..

    10. Bragging rights.

    WTF? Just how many movies these days are worth bragging about?

  64. And, as the old saying goes... by bferrell · · Score: 1

    Follow the money. Who owns the theater chains? What do they own?

    Watch this hand... I'll be picking your pocket with the other.

  65. Avoiding Rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real reason?

    They are trying to avoid ANY political story because it will quickly become a cluster. It has been found out over the last couple days that Susan Rice, who worked on Obama's West Wing in the White House, actually did spy on the Trump administration before and after the election. All the Russian collusion stuff was a lie to justify it and distract, while Trump's wiretapping comments look like they might be completely true.

    So you will see /. avoid any story that "might" mention Trump for the next week at least. They don't want people who read /. and are not politically motivated to know how completely corrupt the DNC has become. This is literally a full Watergate level controversy and does not look good for the DNC.

    1. Re:Avoiding Rice by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      If no information about anything actually came out, and you only have one rumor, does repeating it breathlessly on cable newsvertainment really count as "found out over the last couple days?"

      If nothing happens and the story is developing over time anyways, you're probably playing the children's game "telephone" and not actually learning anything about current events.

      Nobody here cares about your blathering. Slashdot is already full of alt-wrong neckbeards and educated liberals. And guess what? No news worth arguing about happened the past week. Drink another 32oz soda and think it over.

    2. Re:Avoiding Rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with zero evidence, his claims are still more trustworthy than the claims in that top 10 list is to anyone who has been to a cinema, at least since the invention of cell phones.

  66. The Sound is The Boss of The Show by TheHawke · · Score: 3

    Went to a viewing of Rogue One and they had the volume cranked to 11, it made me miserable as hell. I left the theater with ringing ears and a massive headache.

    I could not tell where the action was at due to the muddy imaging of the sound.

    TURN IT DOWN PEOPLE!!

    I plan to watch Ghost In The Shell and take earplugs along.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:The Sound is The Boss of The Show by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      Tried these out before?
      https://www.amazon.com/ETY-Plu...

    2. Re:The Sound is The Boss of The Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, nice suggestions. I snagged some Hearos plugs to try out.

    3. Re:The Sound is The Boss of The Show by jason777 · · Score: 1

      If it's too loud, I believe that's an indicator that you're too old.

    4. Re:The Sound is The Boss of The Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I plan to watch Ghost In The Shell"

      Don't bother, it sucks.

    5. Re:The Sound is The Boss of The Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Went to a viewing of Rogue One and they had the volume cranked to 11

      In my experience, the sound systems in theaters around here doesn't even have a setting that low.

  67. My biggest complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I hate more than anything else about going to the theater is the ads and previews. When I was a kid, if the movie start time was 7:30 that meant the movie started at 7:30. You get there at 7:40 and you missed something. Now they run ads from 30 minutes before the start time to 10 minutes after. Then they pile on 6 to 8 previews. After the previews it's another ad or two, followed by an announcement to shut your phone off that everyone ignores. Last movie I saw it was 24 minutes after the start time before the movie actually started. I never arrive at a theater before the start time anymore.

  68. Large room by g01d4 · · Score: 1

    A theater size screen requires a large room which provides a physical setting/vibe you can't get at home. A computer monitor with headphones, a large screen in a home, and a movie theater can all provide the same field of view with relative comfort and good audio but the experience for each is slightly different. For increasing numbers I suppose the unique theater experience isn't really worth it, but for some it probably always will.

  69. ten reasons not to go by lophophore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. The ridiculous ticket prices, when compared to subsequent rental or blu-ray purchase.
    2. The ridiculous snack bar prices. $6.50 for 30 cents worth of popcorn? $5 for a paper cup of fizzy corn-sweetener water?
    3. The talking idiots behind you. you cannot shut them up. the theater does not care.
    4. The texting idiots in front of you. phone screen as bright at a truck headlight in a dark theater. inconsiderate wankers don't care.
    5. the uncomfortable sardine seating (in most theaters, some have better seating but for most, there is very little personal space)
    6. the box-office lines. 50 people in line and one math-challenged high-schooler making change.
    7. parking at the theater. hundreds of yards from the door at many big movie-plexes.
    8. driving to the theater. so much more time-efficient to never leave the house.
    9. the fact that at most theaters YOU CAN'T GET A BEER. (...most... not all... and when you can it is disruptive to those around you.)
    10. the fact that you cannot pause the film to answer a nature call.

    I've got a 75" TV with watts and watts of 7.1 audio. A nice comfortable recliner. Privacy to do what ever I want when the film plays. Beer, liquor, munchies, a clean bathroom just steps away. I don't know why anybody goes to the movie theater at all any more, I'd rather sit on a hill of fire ants. Movies at home are awesome.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:ten reasons not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11. NACHO FARTS
      12. Cola Burbs mixed with hot dogs

      The people are disgusting and will buy any overpriced crap food served to them

    2. Re:ten reasons not to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. parking at the theater. hundreds of yards from the door at many big movie-plexes.

      While I agree with you on most of what you said, when I read this I thought "The horror! The trauma! Walking! How could they?!" I know in America people drive everywhere, but complaining about walking hundreds of yards? And then what, you go to the gym to run for half an hour on the treadmill?

  70. A massive speaker system by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    Ah, you mean the reason I wear earplugs when I go to the movies?

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  71. Previews by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Why is it that whenever I legally watch a movie the studios shove a bunch of previews at me that I can't skip through? You go to the movies and you sit through a bunch of them. I have a bunch of DVDs that force you to watch previews and that wonderful FBI warning about privacy. It's especially bad because for that movie I bought 10 years ago I think that movie that was coming soon has already come and gone but I'm stuck watching it. (Well I would be if I hadn't ripped it onto my computer.)

    The studios attitude seems to be that whenever they have paying customers then they need to piss the customers off.

    1. Re:Previews by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I recommend using a computer to play your DVDs. Using a normal third party player, not the crapware one that came on a disk with the player.

      Then you can skip all that shit. And these days most screens support HDMI, so you don't need to watch on a different screen or a different audio system, you just run the HDMI cable from the computer to the TV or video receiver. Done.

      Even just using vlc as the player works great. They play games with the "next chapter/next title" type controls, so don't use those; just lean on the "skip forwards 30 seconds" button.

    2. Re:Previews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop ruining the movie studios' hard work to ensure that paying customers get a shitty experience and only pirates get to enjoy movies.

    3. Re:Previews by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      If I'm using my computer then I'm going to rip it to my computer so that I don't even have to play those silly games by pressing the skip 30 seconds button. Just double click the movie file and it starts playing automatically.

  72. There.. IFIFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen. If you don't have a good sized TV of your own.
    2. People everywhere. Yeah no. People can go away.
    3. Focus. If you lack an attention span.
    4. Relentlessness. If you can't turn the lights off when you watch.,
    5. A massive speaker system. Stupidly overloud effects and no volume control? no thanks!
    6. Previews. yeah no, i don't want to spend 30-45 minutes on ads and previews. that's what a fast forward button is for.
    7. Disruption. Need to pee. pause. off you go.
    8. Alone time. Yeah but you can't do it naked..
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. If you don't value your health.
    10. Bragging rights. If you're five.

  73. Might as well jump on the counter point train... by decipher_saint · · Score: 2

    1. The big screen.
    Ah yes the screen is big, but the projector is digital in most theatres. I can see jagged pixels and strangely jerky flow to action scenes. Yuck.

    2. People everywhere.
    Haha no.

    3. Focus.
    OK I see people fucking around with their phones at EVERY film, you name it, somebody has found a distraction. And their distraction becomes my distraction. At home I dim the lights (where available) and really dig into some movies. My focus at home is far more intense than in the theatre, which is why I sometimes discover a film I thought was only so-so in the theatre is actually quite brilliant when I get to really focus on it at home.

    4. Relentlessness.
    True Story: I was watching Return of the Jedi when it went to the big screen in 1997, the line "My son is with them. Are you sure? I have felt him." some jackass in the back row yelled out at top volume "THAT'S SICK!", everyone in the theatre laughed and the tension of the scene was utterly destroyed thanks to one hilarious bastard

    5. A massive speaker system.
    Great if its actually working and actually calibrated. Most theatres I've been to lately present blown-sounding subwoofers and barely audible mid-range. Again from experience when I saw the first Matrix sequel there was a significant short and all I could hear was interference, it was SO BAD I couldn't hear any of the speech The Architect character gave (upon home viewing I didn't miss anything)

    6. Previews.
    Are you for fucking real? ODDLY ENOUGH from my Star Wars Special Edition story above, one of the previews was for the original Austin Powers, the trailer made it look utterly awful, turns out it was one of the funniest films of that year. Trailers are annoying and rarely if ever represent what you'll actually get. A marketing tool that serves absolutely no functional purpose. Also let's face it if you open YouTube how many videos can you go before you are hit with some movie preview?

    7. Disruption.
    Disruption like an auditorium full of noisy easily distracted humans??

    8. Alone time.
    ????!

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.
    When I saw Titanic (man I saw a lot of movies in 1997?) I ordered the Tubb O' Pop and was happily slurping it down and literally THE SECOND the ship hit that damned iceberg I had to piss or die. I couldn't wait, the one part of the movie I'd waded through other garbage to finally see and I HAD TO GO. So I did, and tried to rush back to my seat as quickly as possible but man, so much was missed. At home I just pause if I have to (which is rare because I don't abuse myself by cramming a liter of pop into my face over the course of one movie)

    10. Bragging rights.
    Heeeeey! Look at meeeeee! I just spent $40 to sit in a smelly claustrophobic room full of noisy distracted people so I could watch 30 minutes of commercials and then a movie I couldn't properly hear the dialog to that was projected at just enough of an odd angle to make the pixels on the right hand side of the frame far more visible than the blur on the left.

    AREN'T YOU JEALOUS!?!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  74. Avoid theaters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen. 70" plasma at home seems plenty nice.
    2. People everywhere. Screaming babies. Loud children talking and running around. "Adults" on cell phones. Adults yelling at the movie (if you are in the right neighbor hood) or you get MST3K's retarded cousins thinking they are funny.
    3. Focus. #3 brought to you by Adderal, the study aid you can trust.
    4. Relentlessness. What kind of mental defectives have this problem?
    5. A massive speaker system. My cheap Costco theater system shakes my house. Do I need more than that?
    6. Commercials before the movie. Jeep and Coke ads that pay for broadcast TV, get used to abuse consumers so the theater can double dip.
    7. Disruption. Did you miss #2?
    8. Alone time. That word you keep using.. Also see #2 yet again.
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. 32oz rum and cola at home.
    10. Bragging rights. If your life has gotten to the point that a miserable theater experience entitles you to "Bragging rights" you should probably look into "Death with dignity".
    11. Overpriced. Just buy the Blu Ray and save money.
    12. Expensive garbage food. Food at home is WAY better and cheaper.
    13. The drive. Home saves gas and reduces risk.
    14. Waiting in line for tickets. You don't have that problem at home.
    15. Uncomfortable seating. Small, cattle car, kicked from behind, seats do not compare with that comfy couch at home.
    16. Roy Rogers fund raiser before feature. Do they even still have these? Home certainly doesn't.
    17. Sticky floor.. Just like home!
    18. Screen garbage. Is that reboot/sequel/piece of trash really going to be so good that you need to see it sooner rather than on Blu Ray/Netflix in a few months? So many new good stories in books and we get reboot after reboot after reboot.

    Theaters died for me when they decided to charge me for the ticket and then make me watch TV commercials so they could double dip. If they want to pay me my billing rate to watch those commercials, then we can come to an agreement.

    Sure there a few theaters who try to deal with some of these problems but home simply wins.

  75. Why I like going to the Cinema by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here are the reasons I love going to the Cinema.

    1) At home I have to worry about ruining my carpet if I spill my drink. At the cinema I can splash it around without worrying about making my floor sticky.
    2) It gets dark in the cinema so I can see my phone screen really well. This makes it great for texting or looking at the list of contacts to pick someone to call.
    3) Sometimes the movie screen makes a great photo op. I love to stand up with my budies and take a selfie.
    4) It's a great place to catch up on gossip. I can talk with my friends about who is seeing who and oh my god, what they did last weekend.
    5) You can put your feet up. The seat in front makes a great footrest.
    6) I can leave the kids at home and make out with my lover in the middle of the cinema without the kids bothering me asking for beer and crap.
    7) Or, I can take my kids, let them scream their heads off- I don't have to worry about someone complaining to the Home Owners Association about how much noise the kids are making.
    8) Watching other people's expressions when saying things like "oh my god, like, this guy on the left is about to be killed by a man who smashes through the window unexpectedly". Dropping spoilers and watching strangers get mad is like, the bomb.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  76. Um... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1
    I have a dedicated theater room in my basement with no windows, 7.2 surround, acoustic treatment, etc.

    1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    OK, my screen isn't that large, but it takes up as much, or more of my field of vision than what the comfortable viewing distance does at a commercial theater.

    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    I have enough room to seat as many people as I care to. And I can throw them out if they annoy me. Plus most of my friends are more enjoyable to watch a move with as they tend to have a similar sense of humor. Do you know how annoying it is to be at a movie and not find dick and fart jokes particularly funny, but then be the only one in the audience to notice a really funny joke?

    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    I have no lights on when watching a movie, and no easly way of doing bills. If the movie doesn't hold my attention enough that I don't feel like doing bills, it's not worth my time to watch it.

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    So it keeps your attention more when you have to miss 5 minutes of it because you need to use the bathroom? Or can't rewind it to catch something that you misunderstood?

    And hearing people slurping the last little bit of their gallon drink through a straw during those quiet emotional times really sets the mood.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    My wife couldn't care less about technology and sound, but the last time I took her to the movies, she actually complained that the sound wasn't as good as at home. That's when I knew I was done upgrading my audio. I usually watch movies with the volume at about 25% of what my system is capable of. I've had it up to 80% without any distortion, but frankly it's not comfortable after 50%. So, in my case, it's the opposite.

    6. Previews.

    Bluray discs come with previews. I watch them about half of the time when I get a new disc.

    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

    I don't typically watch TV shows in the theater room. Though I have. When the STTNG boxset was on sale for $60 I bought it. A lot of older shows that were on film, really look great on bluray.

    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    Excited audience= loud, annoying and disruptive.

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    Yes, a 1500 calorie sugar drink along with a 1000 calorie bucket of popcorn and 800 calorie nachos is just what you want while sitting on your ass for two hours in the dark. I'm pretty sure I could roll a barrel of soda into my basement if I wanted to.

    10. Bragging rights.

    Bragging rights for what? spending $50 to sit in a sticky seat surrounded by yapping teens on their cell phone while consuming enough calories for the entire day in sugar and fat? Awesome.

  77. The big screen? by lfp98 · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe once upon a time, when I was a child, and it really was The Big Screen, 30 or 40 feet wide, and a few hundred people were all there to see the same movie, it really was an event. Now there's 15 screens, each not that much bigger than one you might have at home, and you're just one in a herd of consumers being serviced. Multiplexes destroyed the moviegoing experience decades ago.

  78. The Food Makes it Gross - Nacho Farts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would go to the movies but the combination of carbonated diet coke BURPS and BELCHES mixed with hot dogs followed by NACHO FARTS from people with IQs less than the price of a movie ticket RUINS the whole experience. American movie theaters SMELL DISGUSTING as they ARE BOMBED by the FAT NACHO eating cows during the entire movie.

  79. The Big Screen by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The big screen might be OK, but the 6 dozen giant Tablet-phones of the texting teenies in my line of sight, I can do without.

  80. No. by bmk67 · · Score: 1

    1. I like my home theater just fine.
    2. Nothing like a bunch of people who can't shut their pieholes to fuck up a movie.
    3. Sounds like someone else's problem
    4. So?
    5. See #1
    6. No thanks.
    7. See #3.
    8. See #6.
    9. Diabetes in a cup.
    10. Who cares?

  81. Lousy movies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about: "don't make crap movies" (humorously: my captcha for this was "sequel" ;)

  82. Why We Should Get Our Movies From Blockbuster by lys1123 · · Score: 1

    1. The small screen. - Enjoy the experience of watching a movie in the comfort of your home

    2. People everywhere. - If you don't know what movie you want there are plenty of people happy to make recommendations. Plus all of your neighbors probably go to the same store so you get the bump into people who you know but wouldn't otherwise chose to spend time with!

    3. Focus. - The best movies are along the outer wall so you can go straight to the good stuff.

    4. Rewards - Now when you rent the new movies you want you can also get old movies you don't want for free!

    5. Cover Art - A lot of effort went into making the boxes look pretty. Don't you want to look at the pretty boxes?

    6. Previews - Conveniently located on screen above your head so you can watch them while finding your movie.

    7. Disruption - No longer do you have to go to the movie on their schedule and only see the few movies they are showing. Disrupt the movie industry and take control of your viewing!

    8. Alone time - Don't be surrounded by crowds of strangers during the movie who detract from the experience.

    9. Movie Snacks - Located conveniently by the cash register, you can get popcorn and movie candy at movie going prices for your home enjoyment

    10. Bragging rights - Be the LAST of your friends to still shop here!

  83. Movie Theater by Alexluther · · Score: 1

    In Movie theater we have to sit 2 hours continuously but in home we can watch it while laying on bed & there we can't pause or repeat any thing....

    --
    www.theReadingPoint.com
  84. buh? my turn! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    1. Big screens at home are now affordable.
    2. Ugh, people everywhere.
    3. Focus is not a problem for me. Also, bathroom breaks.
    4. Relentlessness? Whatever. Develop a spine and watch the movie.
    5. I have plenty of speaker at home. Could use a little more sub maybe. I should get on that.
    6. Previews suck balls.
    7. Disruption is what I get from dildos at the theater.
    8. Alone time is what I get at home.
    9. 32 ounces of diabeetus.
    10. Bragging rights? "I don't even watch TV." DONE AND DONE

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  85. Focus? by aktw · · Score: 1

    I can't focus when the guy next to me is woofing down an onion-covered bratwurst and draining the last bit of soda from a straw. I can't focus when someone keeps bumping the back of my seat. I can't focus when the lady to my right is struggling to open a cellophane package, and spends the next 10 minutes crinkling it every time she reaches in for a new candy. I can't focus when onion bratwurst guy farts, or when candy lady goes fishing through her purse to check her phone in hopes that maybe her date didn't suddenly cancel after all. At home, no matter what kind of weird distractions come up, I can at least pause the movie.

  86. Lame list is Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can smoke weed and watch movies on my theatre system at home. fridge full of beer and the most important of all, the pause button.

  87. Nope. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I have all but #2. and #2 is the REASON I dont go to a movie theater and spend thousands on building my own at home.
    And yes my speaker system kicks the ASS of almost all big theaters. because mine is tuned and sounds good. Theirs is abused and some snot nosed idiot kid messed with the EQ.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  88. UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you serious with this crap? The worth thing about going to the theater is all the damned people!

  89. Yep to underestimating by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

    I was using low to mid-range budget numbers just for parts, not including installation and calibration costs. Dedicating space in a home is another thing people don't think about.

    Most people have no idea how much it costs to actually build a true HT. If I had said 50K-100K slashdotters would think is was nuts.

    That 65" screen with a soundbar is plenty adequate for most people to watch on. It is for me, especially sports but don't go thinking you have a Home Theater.

    1. Re:Yep to underestimating by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Most people have no idea how much it costs to actually build a true HT. If I had said 50K-100K slashdotters would think is was nuts.

      That 65" screen with a soundbar is plenty adequate for most people to watch on. It is for me, especially sports but don't go thinking you have a Home Theater.

      You're spot on. Most people cheap out with their "Home Theaters" and don't bother spending the extra on a concession stand, multiple rows of seats or the actors required to fill them and meddle around with their smartphones and eat noisily during the most important part of the film.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  90. You missed one... in fact, you missed the only one by mark-t · · Score: 1

    #0) You want to show your support for the continuing production of certain types of movies by big movie studios by attending the ones that interest you the most.

    Now granted, Hollywood does put out a lot of trash as well, but there are usually a small handful of ones that interest me nearly every year, and I have no problem being part of the voice that tells the makers of these films to keep doing more of the same.

    There is nothing else that I want from the movie-theater experience that I could not obtain at home.

  91. one up - 64 oz of soda !!! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I went with my brother years ago. He wanted the "32oz bottomless cup of cola" for $1 more --- and managed to finish it before the previews were over. He ran out for his free refill - sat down and slowly drank it as the movie began.

    He then missed most of the second half because he kept leaving to pee.

    Lots of violations to that list: Cola in the Dark vs Focus. Plus I was disrupted and had to fill in plot details later.

  92. A Case For Why Movie-Why not to go by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    The world is changing and it is adapt or die. Movie chains and big media seem to have adopted the dying approach.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  93. Ummm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2/3 of those are reasons why I do NOT go to the movie theater.

  94. A world view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like this toxic lot to remind me why I moved to Australia. Where do I begin. Honestly who snacks between meals so why are concession prices relevant. Crowds here are very well behaved. The sound can be too loud true. Where I go I get preassigned seating and it's nice to catch an indy after a supper in the city.

  95. Speakers set to destroy volume levels are bad by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    I can't stand it when the background audio... i say background... the non-center speakers... are set so loud it starts to hurt your ears. I've had to go ask workers/managers to turn it down over and over again, sometimes to no avail. This keeps me out of the theaters more than anything.

  96. One reason why not - horrible 3D! by dczyz · · Score: 1

    Was thinking of doing the double header movie for the new Guardians of the Galaxy - but the theaters near me are only doing it in 3D.

    Who can handle wearing those horrible glasses for 4+ hours?

  97. Previews? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think they mean..ads. Is there anyone really just..clamoring to see..ads? Are we to believe that..if there are no more theaters, we will see no more..movie advertisements? Yeah..didn't think so either.

  98. NOPE by sexconker · · Score: 1

    1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    The size of the screen is about the field of view and resolvable resolution. Most people can buy easily a setup that rivals any comfortable seat in a non-IMAX theater.

    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    How is this a good thing?

    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    These sorts of people have the same problem when they go to a theater. They whip out their phones and are part of the problem with #2.

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    WTF is this shit? People who get scared of movies are children and retards. Further, even children and retards can close their eyes and cover their ears. At home or in the theater.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    How is this a plus? Many theaters have shit cranked too high. Again, people can do this pretty affordably at home, even splurging for gimmick shit like Dolby Atmos. (No, you don't need to spend thousands on a receiver and speakers to get good quality sound that is more than capable of filling up your living room.)

    6. Previews.

    Ads? We have those on BluRays. Even if you like them, any Hollywood-sponsored movies-in-the-home option will have ads around the content.

    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

    You're just repeating #3, which was bullshit on its own. Further, when was the last time an Adventure Time marathon was screened in theaters?

    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    Wait, now you want alone time? Doesn't that go against #2? And ignoring that contradiction, how does being alone in a crowd rival being alone on a couch where you can get naked and have sex if you desire?

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    I don't need that much cola, but at home I can have far more than 32 ounces, for far less money. And when I need a refill I can pause the movie! As for the dark, my lights have an off switch.

    10. Bragging rights.

    Who brags about paying way too much to see some shit? I do get the appeal of seeing something you're excited about as soon as it's available, but increasingly all the cons of the experience (the cost and the crowd and the content itself) are winning the war against that appeal. This is why ticket sales are plummeting and why Hollywood keeps teasing the idea of new releases in the home.

  99. "you should laugh, too" : are you kidding ? by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 1

    I stopped reading at point 2.

    We should follow the masses of people ? This can lead very far.
    To keep the discussion around movies, let me tell you two little stories :

    1) like millions of people, I tried to see Titanic soon after its release. I ended watching another movie because it was crowded as hell. It was supposed to be a comedy, a fun thing. It was not, it is my worst movie memory. But a lot of people, if not everybody else, was laughing. I was frightened. How the hell could they laugh at that ? So you're telling that I should have laugh because they did ? No ! Frak you !

    2) the last movie I saw in a theater is Dark Knight Rises. It was 3 or 4 month after the release. There were less than 20 or 30 people then. One guy answered his phone 3 times ! What the frak ? We're here to see a movie ? Or was he there to show that he can spend 10 € NOT to watch the movie ?

    I swore not to go to a theater any more.

    --
    Totof
  100. Re:Might as well jump on the counter point train.. by eriks · · Score: 1

    5. A massive speaker system.
    Great if its actually working and actually calibrated. Most theatres I've been to lately present blown-sounding subwoofers and barely audible mid-range.

    This. I haven't been to a theater (except for real imax) in over 20 years that had decent audio. Even supposedly "certified" or whatever theaters have crappy sound that is usually:

    1. TOO LOUD. It's not a rock concert. It's a movie. Go ahead and make it nice and loud if it's an action movie or whatever, but what is unforgivable is:

    2. Crappy and blown to all heck. Clearly clipped bass, midrange, and on at least one occasion clearly crackling high end. Leaving some dialog too muddy and distorted to hear, and any loud booming sounds painfully distorted. Like literally, fingernails on the chalkboard painful.

    Both of these (in most theaters) could be fixed by simply "calibrating" the system by having someone sit in the theater with a test loop playing, and turning the volume down until the distortion goes away, and if that happens at a level that leaves the sound too low, then someone needs to upgrade their amplifiers. Christ, I could outfit a decent sized theater myself with clean nice loud power for a few grand. It's not rocket science, and it's not even that expensive these days to buy decent gear.

    I can't figure out how people put up with such crappy sound in theaters. The sound quality in a film is actually MORE important than the visual image quality. It's almost like they don't want people to enjoy going to the theater.

    I have a 20-year old system in my living room that can get VERY loud if I want it to without clipping, so I simply don't understand why this problem exists to the extent that it does.

  101. Rebuttle by omibus · · Score: 1

    1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.
          -- not in my town
    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.
          -- this is a reason I don't. Seriously, are we on the same planet even?
    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."
          -- which is true for "no one ever"
    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.
          -- as apposed to having to explain to my wife what happened during one of her two bathroom breaks.
    5. A massive speaker system.
          -- "I already got one", Monty Python
    6. Previews.
          -- You misspelled "commercials"
    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.
          -- like anyone is doing dishes when a good movie is on.
    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.
          -- as can coming over and sitting together on a large couch. And my chairs are more comfortable than theater chairs.
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.
          -- I'd rather not pay $10 for it tho...home wins...and it is dark
    10. Bragging rights.
          -- "Who the fuck cares?" -- Harrison Ford

    --
    Bad User. No biscuit!
    1. Re:Rebuttle by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I used to be a cinema fan but watching blu-rays on my 65" 4K OLED makes even most cinema screens look pretty second rate.

      You can keep your crowds of distracting people and quadruple-priced candy/sodas thanks.

  102. #1 & #5 only please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 & #5 are the only PROS on the list. Most everyone has #1 & #5 at home these days.

  103. Viewing angles, not screen size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure a theater may have a huge screen, but unless you can sit in prime center location large TVs at home can be more immersive with better viewing angles.
    And the picture quality in the theater is usually poor because of enlargement (distance from projector to screen) and crappy projection screen. Every theater screen I've seen in the last year has had some flaw: torn/repaired patch, blemish, loose sagging spot, dark smudge on screen, etc

    With good sound system, sitting minimal distance from HD TV at home gives much better experience than the theater, except for the group-effect.

  104. Theaters are not for the Visually impaired people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm legally blind. I hate movie theaters. I watch all movies on 27 inch screen with my head for inches away. Otherwise, I just can't see what's going on. I would be willing to pay $50 to watch movies when they come out, say, on iTunes. Sometimes the sanctimoniousness of sighted people really annoys me.

  105. 10 Responses to your 10 Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen. Got a 120" projector screen at home and nice seating 15 feet away. At that distance, it's big enough to outrank most theater-going experiences.
    2. People everywhere. I believe these are called friends. Maybe you don't have any friends. If not, I recommend them. Friends are pretty cool. If you want to hang out with total strangers, just invite a few homeless people in and feed 'em too while they watch the movie with you.
    3. Focus at home. I've never had this problem. I don't know anyone else with this problem. You probably made this up.
    4. Relentlessness. I can pause in the middle for a bathroom break. My bladder can be pretty relentless too.
    5. A massive speaker system. Already got it at home. It is a surround sound setup, THX certified, and sounds better than theater speakers too. Oh, and I have a ButtKicker under my couch as well. And I've got volume control. What were you saying again?
    6. Previews. You've clearly never heard of IMDB. Let me help you out there: http://www.imdb.com/ Oh crap! People aren't going to the theater to watch trailers because they can watch the trailers online! We've got to shut this IMDB thingie down ASAP!
    7. Disruptions at home. Huh? I've never had this problem either.
    8. Alone time with significant other. It's called a babysitter, grandparents, or sending the kids to a sleepover party as someone else's house. Parents were going to have to utilize those resources anyway to be able to legally get away from the kids in the first place.
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. Diabeetus dude. Get a few pizzas for a fraction of the cost and hang out with friends that way.
    10. Bragging rights. I feel like you ran out of things to write in your top 10 reasons. I know people who brag about seeing a movie in the theater and I think to myself, "Gee, I wish I had the kind of money they have to waste on going to the movie theater, but I don't, so they're being pretty dickish right now." You brag. I think you're a jerk. That's how it works.

  106. Reasons NOT to go to the movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen not worth the cost.
    2. People everywhere, chatting, playing with their phones, and smelling like New Yorkers.
    3. Focus. Ha? What? OH well.
    4. Relentlessness. Clueless. You have NO option to say, "What did he say?" "What happened?" If you just pissed $$$ away because you missed the one and only clue to the how movie that allowed the movie to resemble some sort of sense.
    5. A massive speaker system. LOL. "massive"
    6. Previews. Really? You LIKE to sit there for 10 minutes to watch crap that you wouldn't watch on your TV in the first place? Fast forward button. Oh, you can't.

    7. Disruption. Not an issue if you have 1/3 of the grey matter working as you can turn off the phone, err, okay, you are under the age of 30 and can't cope with having the phone turned off.
    8. Alone time. Yea, We haven't noticed you getting off in the back row. Keep it up and you'll be on the next XXX film the theater runs.
    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark. Is that really cola in the cup or ?
    10. Bragging rights. ??? That you were SOOO STUPID to pay $$$ to see a piece of crap film?

  107. A world view by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

    Nothing like this toxic lot to remind me why I moved to Australia. Where do I begin. Honestly who snacks between meals so why are concession prices relevant. Crowds here are very well behaved. The sound can be too loud true. Where I go I get pre-assigned seating and it's nice to catch an indie after a supper in the city.

  108. Re:11. Your wife can't hit pause. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you let a woman touch the remote control?

    captcha: victim

  109. Response by Chas · · Score: 1

    1: Arguably, home screens in the 50+ inch category can deliver a similar experience. If not, there are still projection systems that CAN. And you don't have to sit 10-20 feet back from the screen to get the effect.

    2: Sorry, but "people everywhere" is part of the PROBLEM of big theaters. All the noise they generate. Or being crammed too close together with someone. Or if someone has foregone their "bi-annual bath". Or they eat loud *candy bag crinkle*, etc.

    3: Sorry, not an issue.

    4: Again, not an issue.

    5: High end home theater systems can deliver wonderful sound quality. And I would argue that modern theaters are, quite simply, TOO LOUD. Some films are cranked so high they cause auditory distress in the viewer.

    6: This is 2017 goddammit. Fuck previews. We can watch them on the Internet. Or they can do what they ALREADY do. Include them ahead of the movie for a specific amount of time.

    7: How is some jackass group of kids jawing away while you're trying to watch any less of a disruption? Besides, I'm single. I don't have an issue with kids screaming. Nor is my living space set up in a way that makes doing dishes while watching a movie even possible, let alone feasible. NOT AN ISSUE!

    8: And here, arguably, a home environment still delivers a superior bonding time with friends, loved ones, etc. Additional audience members are, inevitably, unwanted distractions. And the penchant of theaters moving towards assigned seating makes this even worse.

    9: At home I can curl up WITH A FUCKING TWO LITER (67.6 ounces) if I want. And it costs me under a buck. Not $6-8. Same for candy and other concession-type items. And, with the shift towards lots of theaters offering "American Grill" food? I can bring in (or have delivered, or cook) almost anything my tubby little heart (well, actually it's a digestive organ below my heart) desires!

    10: Who the fuck cares about "bragging rights"? Seriously, what mental defective gives a damn about "bragging rights" to seeing a film? Especially when it's "Well *I* saw it IN A THEATER?"

    Sorry, but the theater experience just isn't THAT special anymore. And the industry simply hasn't kept pace, while growing every more ridiculously expensive. Nowadays, the price of tickets and food (unless you either just go hungry or sneak stuff in) weighs in around $50-70 for two people. And, combined with other people's atrocious public behavior, why should anyone subject themselves to this?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  110. my list by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    1. prices (tickets)
    2. annoying assholes
    3. prices (food)
    4. no pause button to hit the bathroom
    5. prices (gas to drive there)
    6. no reachability on your cell
    Sorry but that overrides their pathetic list

  111. Slashdot is old by mattyj · · Score: 1

    I think it's hilarious that you can judge the age of Slashdot by the comments on this thread. The chief rebuttals to the list are:

    1. It's too loud!
    2. Screen is too big! Hurts my neck!
    3. Soda gives you diabetes!
    4. Candy is too expensive!
    5. I have to pee!

    Ha ha. Slashdot, underwritten by AARP. And I say this as someone whos slashdot ID is 20,000.

  112. No Way by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    First theaters have become wallet vampires. They are way too expensive. Then there is the awful popcorn and offerings at the candy counters. Gone are the days when the best popcorn came from a theater. Then there is the expense of driving, parking issues, getting robbed or in wrecks and a host of other negatives. Watch it at home, save your money, save your life, and have some decent snacks while you watch your cable TV.

  113. Wurlitzer by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    I like an old movie palace with a working pipe organ that is played before big shows. There is nothing quite like hearing the mighty wurlitzer roaring out pop tunes from the 1930s and then the latest star wars movie starts playing.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  114. Reasons *NOT* to go to theatres by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    * Spend an hour driving halfway across the city.
    * Pay insane price for parking.
    * Stand in line for 30 minutes for movie tickets.
    * Pay insane price for tickets.
    * Cramped seat.
    * Freeze in over-air-conditioned cinema.
    * 30 minutes of ads and trailers before the movie begins.
    * Movie screening starts at an inconvenient time for me.
    * Insane food prices.
    * Yakking loudmouths and screaming kids.
    * Effing * L O U D * volume to drown out all the cellphone yakkers
        and screaming kids. It literally hurts my ears.
    * Other patrons engaging in chemical warfare with strong body odour and/or horrible "perfume".
    * Cellphones beeping and screens lighting up in my field of view.
    * Feet stick to the floor.
    * Miss some action if I have to go to the bathroom.
    * Dirty bathroom.
    * Curtains occasionally blocking left or right edge of screen.
    * Scratches+artifacts on older movies.
    * Asshole kid behind you kicking the back of your chair.
    * Take 20 minutes to get out of parking lot after the movie.
    * Another hour to drive home.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  115. Into the dome, motherfucker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to believe that nobody has posted this yet. An obligatory comic about the movie theater experience:

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/movie_theater_layout

  116. TV Commercials in Theatres by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    I just saw Ghost In The Shell in from a comfy, ideally-centered seat that I reserved online, in IMAX 3D, with an incredible sound system. There is no movie experience outside of a theatre that can match that, and I am happy to make the "effort" of going.

    I also enjoy seeing trailers for upcoming movies. When I've paid good money to see a movie and inflated prices for snacks, however, it really pisses me off to be subjected to TV commercials run through a shitty little VGA projector before the show.

  117. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    Nope... a decent sized TV works just fine.

    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    Oh lord no! I like it quiet and comfy.

    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    I can focus better without people talking and kids screaming which means 2 and 3 are poor arguments.

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    Or a little self control and just watch through it while saving lots of money for tickets, snacks, etc.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    Overrated.

    6. Previews.

    I run ad blockers, paying large sums of money for tickets and snacks better not have any damn advertisements.

    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

    See self control.

    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    How on Earth am I alone with all these people around me?!

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    Can do this at home for MUCH cheaper and get something that isn't watered down.

    10. Bragging rights.

    There's something to be said for bragging that you paid to much for a movie and snacks while having a miserable time around all sorts of noisy people in a dirty theater with sticky arm rests.

  118. DVDs/Blue-Rays Suck Too by Jerrry · · Score: 1

    The whole movie theater experience sucks these days, but there are aspects of watching a movie on DVD/Blu-Ray at home that suck as well.

    How many industries threaten their customers with five years in federal prison every time they use one of their products?

    I hate previews--it's one of the things I hate most about the theater experience. More and more DVDs and Blu-Rays prevent you from skipping through previews. They force you to watch them every time you play a disc, even if you've seen them a dozen times. That sucks even more than previews in a theater.

  119. I see a small role for theaters by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    My town has a really nice art house, built and operated by our annual film festival. Outside of festival week, it's a great place to see opera simulcasts and dinner-and-movie theme evenings. For everything else, and I watch a lot of movies, there's Netflix.

  120. Noooooooo by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    None of the so-called "advantages" mentioned means anything to me.

    I'd rather relax in the comfort of my own home, free to watch at my own pace and sound level. Plus there are no dickheads talking on the phone, no screaming toddlers or obnoxious teenagers, no over-priced boxes of M&Ms, and I can drink as much as I like of whatever I want.

    Best of all, when I'm done I don't have to drive home because I'm already there.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  121. So 20th Century.. by LesserWeevil · · Score: 1

    What they mean is seeing movies the way your parents did. How are theaters going to compete when the first full-length VR/3D movies are made that require headsets consisting of a mobile phone and bits of cardboard? Theaters are the buggy whips of the 21st century.

  122. #7 by antdude · · Score: 1

    Yes, when I have to go to the restroom due to my old body!

    Also, I like to control what I am watching like rewind, fast forward (FF), skip, etc.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  123. Nope, not anymore by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    1. Theater full of people...that won't SHUT UP, or have their phones on, or just flat make noise, kick the back of your chair. 2. OVERPRICED snacks. Easier to sneak in what you want, except for a big bag of popcorn. 3. Parking halfway across a crowded lot, only to find it raining when you come out of the theater. I'd rather watch it at home, with my OWN snacks, at my OWN time...cheaper, easier. Plus, the choice of movies is pretty bad these days.

  124. PR by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    Last 3-4 days we saw posts how theater is dying and hollywood not making enough (how greedy can these people be ?) money wise, netflix and people watching stuff at home.

    Now this article... looks like PR. Hey, didn't you know ? It's cool to watch movie in theater".

    I just love how they got bashed in all the comments here.

  125. Movies are are great at Theaters at $6 to $8 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    That's what the tinseltown theater by me charges.

    The Edwards theater wants $12 for the same movie. It's just not worth it.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  126. Let's analyze it a bit by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Let's analyze this:

    >1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    Sitting 10 feet from my 75" UHDTV is just fine for me

    >2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    I don't like comedies, generally. And I don't need my mood "enhanced" by what others feel.

    >3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    Are you kidding? I don't know about most people, but I don't play games or pay bills while watching a movie at home. And I certainly don't need to be "trapped" someplace to have self-discipline.

    >4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    The only time I pause is to go to the bathroom or something. The only time I fast-forward is when the content is so BORING or STUPID that I am trying to salvage the otherwise poor content.

    >5. A massive speaker system.

    More massive than what I have in my house for my smaller area? I have a high-end amplifier and speakers and perfectly tuned and balanced surround sound system. I have yet to be in a theater that has even remotely as close a correct balance. Usually theaters are just LOUD... so loud I have to wear EARPLUGS!

    >6. Previews.

    That is an advantage? To have to get there early to get a decent seat and then be subjected to 15 to 20 MINUTES of previews, ads, and public service messages? If I want to watch previews, I can do that on my phone, tablet, computer, anytime I want, and for FREE.

    >7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable [...]

    OK, you HAVE to be kidding. People talking, chewing, walking around, crinkling food wrappers, crying, messing with phones, wearing tons of nasty perfume, yelling, tapping on my seat... what could be MORE disruption than sitting in a typical theater?

    >8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    This is about the only thing on the entire list that has some validity. But guess what? My friends can come over and watch at my home, too.

    >9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    Why would I want that? I typically drink water and I am certainly not going to pay $6 for some stupid soda worth $0.50.

    >10. Bragging rights.

    ??? Bragging about what? That I was "man enough" to fight traffic, parking, and all the above inconveniences and distractions and earplugs to have watched a movie in a theater? Wow.

  127. How to save the theatre industry: by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Bring back drive-ins. The newer generation already thinks their grandparent's stuff is cool. It would work. You could even encourage hotels or camp grounds to build them to also increase travel industry.

  128. Lets not forget downsides,,, by lapm · · Score: 1

    Not to mention 15 minutes of advertisement at beginning, people that forget to silence their smartphones, etc... We would have to go to big city to get to movie theater, so we don't do that very often. Not to mention tickets here costs so much...

  129. perspective, a matter whose by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    My screen is 204" diagonal. I can muddle through.

    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    Yes, and catch the latest airborne disease. No thank you. And just by the by, I actually do have my own reactions and am content to experience them without being sucked in by the cinematic equivalent of Stockholm syndrome.

    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    You have to be kidding me. At home, no crying babies, no cellphones going off, no ushers hassling people to put their feet down, no one getting up and down in front of you to hit the head or the snack bar... "people" screwing up my focus are the main reason why I don't go to the theater!

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    Sometimes the need for the bathroom is relentless. Given the one against the other, I'll take the pause button, thanks. Other reasons too, but that one wins every time, and theaters can't beat it, period.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    I only have 2,000 watts RMS, dual 18" subs... you get the idea. I can cripple along with it.

    6. Previews.

    You left out "local ads" and the "turn off your cellphone" schtick (which apparently a large portion of the audience is too dull to comprehend) and by the way, these previews are for movies that suck, and lastly, most disks these days do have previews, but I can skip them if they suck, which, like at the theater, they usually do. Until they bring back cartoons (hello, Scrat!), you got nuthin here. Tip: replacing cartoons with sucky local ads... not a win for the theater enterprise working to keep customers coming in.

    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

    Sounds like a (series of) personal problem(s) to me. The only disruption that matters is the one you can't control. In other words, a theater full of people whom you have no authority over. No thank you. Also, I never do any of those things. So there's that.

    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    Well, yeah, but I can have that at home, too. Nothing to see here, move along.

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    yeah, washing over your feet when the idiot behind you forgets and knocks it off the chair arm, which, by the way, there is only one of per person, unlike my actual theater seating, which is full bore, two-arm reclining awesomness x5.

    10. Bragging rights.

    I believe you misspelled "embarrassment." As in: "I spent way too much for something I only saw part of while being severely annoyed by others, paying too much for snacks of which there is a very poor selec

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  130. Who gives a shit? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    Some asshat likes the theater. Good for them, but what part of this is 1) news and 2) worth the time it would take for me to read the whole summary, let alone the article?

  131. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough with these cunts who think they should tell you what to do.
    Release in cinema. Make available at home. See who picks where. If cinema provides a plus compared to home then I guess people will go there, otherwise Deal with it.
    fuckwads

  132. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The big screen compensating for the fact that you are sitting much further away, giving you the exact same FOV as you get at home.
    2. Noisy people everywhere. A group of people laughing at completely different things distract from the experience.
    3. People using their phones to talk, SMS or pay their electricity bills.
    4. You don't have the option to pause or rewind later when you didn't understand some part the first time or when you need to go to the bathroom.
    5. A massive speaker system that you can't turn down to comfortable levels. In fact most cinemas don't even have a setting below "hearing protection required".
    6. Previews and other ads. Nobody wants to pay to watch ads.
    7. When it turns out that the movie did not live up to the expectations, you can't change the channel or do the dishes while waiting to see if it gets better later in the movie. And if you leave, you usually don't get your money back.
    8. Couples in the back enjoying "alone time" without needing to worry that their parents will suddenly burst into the bedroom.
    9. 32 ounces of cola on the dark floor, making your shoes sticky for weeks.

  133. My views by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    Here's my take on the "10" items:

    1. The big screen.
        - IMAX, yes. There are some movies that I will go to see in IMAX (Star Wars!), or at least iSense in ODEON.
        - Other movies I'm happy to see on a 'normal' cinema screen, although I find that in my local cinema these tend to be badly calibrated and slightly out of focus

    2. People everywhere.
        - this isn't always a good thing. Sometimes it's fine, but there are those people who will sit whispering to each other or chomping on popcorn... people can spoil the experience you want to enjoy, and this is generally a reason that I don't go to the cinema.

    3. Focus.
        - agreed, and this is the main reason I _do_ go to the cinema. If I'm watching a film at home, I'll inevitably take out my phone at some point. If I'm in the cinema, I never do. Some people do, but they are very few.

    4. Relentlessness.
        - Em, what now?

    5. A massive speaker system.
        - good and bad. I've a good speaker setup (5.1) at home, but the cinema setup is (and always will be) better, unless I have a few spare thousand euro to spend. And I've better things to spend that money on. But sometimes the cinema speakers can be turned up a bit too much. (that said, it might be to drown out the people whispering to each other).

    6. Previews.
        - meh. Yeah, it's an opportunity to see what's coming up. But cinemas tend to play too many of them, and too many ads. I've paid to watch the film at 8pm, so why is it now 8:20 and it hasn't started yet?
        - the only advantage to ads and previews is that most people have finished their popcorn by the time the movie starts.

    7. Disruption.
        - isn't this just point 3 again?

    8. Alone time.
        - em, what? alone time means being alone, so how does going to the cinema with friends or family mean alone time?

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.
        - Paying a fortune for getting diabetes for watching a film in a cinema...? And then needing to run to the bathroom during the best bits. No
        - I don't buy drinks or food in a cinema - far too expensive, and generally not particularly nice either. I'll eat before hand, or afterward, and I wish more people would.

    10. Bragging rights.
        - Bragging about what?

    So 2 good points, 3 ok points, and 5 that aren't actually arguments for going to the cinema at all, IMHO.

  134. Bunch of Bunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other than Points 1 and 5, the rest of the list is bunk. A dying format trying to nail the doors shut on us before we can escape. In the home is the future. As always.

  135. Reasons against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK, a single ticket may cost more than a blu ray disk, let alone digital copies. Popcorn and drinks are ~5-10x the regular price. But what really bothers me is not the price - it is that cinemas play >30min of ads before playing the films. Why add insult to injury?

  136. Here's my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hadn't been to the cinema for years, preferring to wait until the DVD/Blu-ray release and watch on my home projector setup. But a friend convinced me to go with him three times.

    - The first time, for the first 20 minutes of the film they didn't pull the curtain all the way back, resulting in the outer 15% of each side projecting onto the curtain rather than the screen

    - The second time, the left-most speaker of the centre cluster clearly wasn't working, as dialogue obviously supposed to come from the centre was coming somewhere mid-right in the 'audio space'. Trust me, sound coming out of the 'wrong' place makes a film practically unwatchable if you aren't a moron.

    - The third time there was a three foot rip in the screen. Seriously.

    All three events made me hate the experience. None of them bothered my friend.

    On top of this, in EVERY viewing, people were texting/browsing on their phones (which, for a horror film, completely ruins the atmosphere, especially when you hear a constant stream of 'ping' alerts), people were eating loudly, scrunching various wrappers throughout the whole thing. Someone actually started a phone conversation at one point. No-one in front of me could keep still, and something moving about in your lower vision completely interferes with your concentration.

    Including the cost of driving to the venue I paid more to watch each filme ONCE than owning the blu-ray/DVD forever would have cost. And what for? To half-watch (when possible) a film on broken equipment, surrounded by fuckwits who for some inexplicable reason didn't actually seem to want to even watch the film they'd paid to see. Maybe I was unlucky, but I suspect even if everything worked properly I'd still have to put up with other people and their selfishness...

  137. Kill the ADS by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    I was lucky to go to a reference theater in LA. Perfect sound, perfect picture. No sticky floors or icky seats. It can be a trip elsewhere if done right. Also, no ads before rolling the film. My problem with going to the local multiplex is this...endless ads and previews. When you need to get there a full half hour before the movie you see is rolled, and are forced to sit through loud commercials and endless previews, but hey, I paid to sit here ! Worse, each ad requires full use of the sound system and as much razzle dazzle as possible. Local movie theater ads...then the distributor's ads...then the mandatory ad reel from the studio...more movie theater ads...and then, maybe...the actual movie. Star Wars took over a half hour to get to the movie. Imagine going out to a nice dinner, but the appetizers are all lemons, a bowl of sugar, an onion, and you are forced to eat each one before the main course comes out. Wrecks the palate before you begin. I'd rather see a Blu Ray at home in most cases. It has to be something I really want to see to subject myself to the pack at the beginning of the film.

  138. I Disagree by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I do not like going to movie theaters to watch movies. Too often, you have the chatty cathy talking over the movie, or worse, playing siskel and ebert. I like being able to watch a movie in the comfort and privacy of my own home. I have a decent-sized 60" television which provides an experience that is more than adequate. I can also pause the movie to use the bathroom or fix a snack. I'm a little hard of hearing so if I miss a line, I can always rewind. Plus, prices to see movies in the theater have become really ridiculous. Between the cost of the movie and maybe some popcorn and a beverage, you are approaching the cost of eating a decent dinner out. I would rather sit and eat a relaxed dinner. There is just no compelling reason to go to see a movie in a theater anymore.

  139. Go in the morning! by 93,000 · · Score: 1

    I still like the theater on one condition: I go to morning showings. I took a few hours off work and went to Episode VII the day after it was released at a 9:30 a.m. showing. It was me and about four other people in the theater. The evening and afternoon shows were sold out for at least a week solid. (No, I'm not interested in debating the merits of Episode VII. It was one of the rare films I just wanted to see right away.)

    Eliminating the crowds eliminates 90% of the nuisances. And it's nice giving a film your full attention now and then, even if I only do it a few times a year.

  140. 9a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Figuring out when to sprint to the bathroom to excrete that soda.

  141. If someone has to explain it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... then it's probably not worth it.

  142. reflection by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    A book should serve as an ax to the frozen sea within us.
    Kafka

  143. triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too by NoSalt · · Score: 1

    What if I don't want to laugh?

    For example, when I was watching The Lord of the Rings, I believe it was The Two Towers, there was a scene where Gollum was having an argument with Smeagol. The entire theater was laughing at the back-and-forth between the two. It seemed to me that I was the only one who recognized the seriousness of the moment at hand, the severe mental illness and psychological stressors that brought about that exchange. Sometimes the rest of the audience is dumb.

  144. This is the best they could come up with? by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    1. The big screen. There's something to be said about watching visual storytelling on a three-story screen, particularly when the film really takes advantage of the format.

    If there's something to be said for it, then say it.

    2. People everywhere. A group of people laughing together simultaneously triggers a feeling that you should laugh, too; during a suspenseful moment, you can feel dozens of strangers suck in their breath together.

    A group of people talking to each other and making phone calls during the film, on the other hand...

    3. Focus. Even people who try their hardest to give a movie their undivided attention on a living-room screen have fallen victim to temptations like "Well, I'm just sitting here, I might as well pay the electric bill."

    Ah, argument by assertion. If I want to watch something, I watch it. If I don't want to watch it, I don't.

    4. Relentlessness. Part of the advantage of that kind of focus is that movies that are tense, scary, or deeply emotional can cast much more of a spell over you when you don't have the option to pause or turn away from the worst, then rewind later to catch it safely out of context.

    More argument by assertion.

    5. A massive speaker system.

    ... is an excellent reason not to go to the cinema. I might be willing to pay cash to see a film; I'm not willing to pay with my hearing.

    6. Previews.

    Oh, hey! We have ads! You can't get those at home!

    7. Disruption. A problem with watching movies at home is that it makes the film-watching experience blur into the same experience as surfing cable channels, running a Netflix comedy show in the background while you do dishes, or half-assedly watching an Adventure Time marathon while stoned.

    Assertion, assertion, assertion. Perhaps I do not do any of those things. (As it happens, I don't.)

    8. Alone time. Going to the movies with friends or your significant other can be a cherished pastime, especially when you're surrounded by an excited audience.

    Whereas I can't cherish the time I spend with friends and family at home? And - mirabile dictu - some of us don't think an audience improves things.

    9. 32 ounces of cola in the dark.

    Ugh.

    10. Bragging rights.

    What the ever-lovin' fuck? People brag about going to the movies?

    What a mind-bogglingly stupid series of arguments.

  145. Getting to see humanity's good side by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    They don't just sit there and passively let the hero walk into a trap, they'll jump right up and try to warn him. "Look out, he's behind the door! Don't go in!"
    It restores your faith in humanity, after a day of reading libertarian psychopath comments on the internet.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  146. Movie Tavern by nessman · · Score: 1

    I started going to the movies again when they opened a Movie Tavern in the area. Reserved stadium seating, large reclining chairs, waiter service to your seat with a button on the tray to summon them, decent food and BEER in a glass!! Prices aren't much higher than a regular movie theater and the food is around Applebees quality and price with a decent drink selection. Shit - the beer is cheaper than the popcorn. Score that a fucking win in my book! Living like Vincent Vega in Amsterdam.

  147. Not Compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a single one of the ten reasons is even slightly compelling. Some are actually repulsive. Theaters are still very nineteen-hundredy. Maybe movies themselves are passe. People will tolerate inconvenience to experience art. If studios produced entertainment, seats would be filled.