What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head.
-- http://www.snpp.com/episodes/2F11.html
There was time when TLD meant something. You knew a.com was a company, a.org was a non-profit,...
I have never understood this claim. RFC 1032 defined the ORG TLD in this way:
"ORG" exists as a parent to subdomains that do not clearly fall
within the other top-level domains. This may include technical-
support groups, professional societies, or similar organizations.
Is there something else that designated the.org TLD as reserved for non-profit purposes?
Get out your crystal balls. What effect do you think this will have on the share price of EBAY tomorrow? Will that constitute a buying or selling opportunity?
I think that they determined that it would take $100,000 - $250,000 for people to turn in people that they knew were spamming, but according to the article: The FTC, in a report requested by Congress, did not take a position on whether such a system was a good idea. To me, that sounds like the refrained from recommending it.
I guess it's up to us to convince them that it's a good idea.
Note: they recommend that this money come from taxpayers, but in an effort to try to cut down on that, can I suggest we find another source of it? Perhaps we need to not only look to civil penalties from the spammers, but also from the ISPs who behave negligently toward spammers.
Yeah, they have something like that in Cuba already. It's no surprise to me that people are literally jumping off that island into homemade rafts in attempt to float across shark-infested waters to Florida.
But seriously, I noticed the same think. The whole USA seems to be divided by a line that runs straight north from the most southerly point of Texas. Is that for real, or just an artifact of the image-making process?
Please stop telling people about the parts of the US west of the Mississippi River. The reason we're here is because they're not.
Be careful to not confuse "identifying yourself" with "producing government issued papers". There's a difference, and while it is subtle, it appears to be relevant here. Hiibel refused to give his name and was arrested under state law that requires it. The US Supreme Court appears to have held up that law which requires you give your name. The TSA actually asks for papers and refuses to let you travel without them.
It was bound to happen sooner or later. Another "i" in "distribution" finally succumbed to the temptation of becoming an "o". I knew that once "distri" became "distro" we were on a slippery slope to destruction. Pretty soon, all we'll have left are "dostrobutoons". Mark this day.
The domain "example.com" is reserved for exactly this purpose.
No kidding. I think that the author has confused the terms "Dummy Email Addresses" with "someone else's email address". As the owner of a domain name that is often used by inconsiderate fools like ajain, I get tons more spam than I would otherwise. The practice of filling in email addresses that don't belong to you has significantly reduced the usefulness of my domain name and those of others. The fact that you don't want email from those people with whom you do business should be enough to make you realize that I don't want it either. Do us all a favor and use an email address that either is not deliverable, such as from example.com, or use one for which you are responsible. webmaster@anuragjain.com would be a good choice for you.
If anyone wants to donate, as one of the hardware people, I'd rather see monthly recurring payments of a smaller amount than a lump sum. It makes it easier for me to try to predict what we can buy based on some moderate predictability of available funds.
Excellent idea. I didn't happen to notice a PayPal subscribe link on your fundraising page, though. I can't figure out how to make paypal send you regular amounts without one, either. Any chance you would put one up there? I could part with a fistful of USD every month or 6 for your service.
Thanks!
(PS: no, I can't edit the page with the paypal links on it myself for somewhat obvious reasons)
Slashdot Mirror
I used to do that. Now, I go over here. I'm not sure which one is more accurate and authoritative, though.
Sometime between when you receive code obfuscated by Source Guardian and when you ask Slashdot about it.
At least it's not the Gmini.
I think I'd like to put some of those up in my bedroom!
I must be new here. Is this the good kind of copyright violation, or the bad kind?
What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head.
-- http://www.snpp.com/episodes/2F11.html
That's pretty clever. You registered a creative login name so that you could respond to these comments.
Maybe you should spend a few minutes researching whether or not "Korean" is a race.
Christmux.
Time for some non-standard mischief!
c hief&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
http://www.google.com/search?q=non-standard%20mis
well, I'm out of ideas. Maybe sub-standard mischief?
Let me know how it is when you all get it compiled in a couple months!
http://www.funroll-loops.org/
Nope, those aren't nice shades at all. In fact, they look downright ridiculous.
Get out your crystal balls. What effect do you think this will have on the share price of EBAY tomorrow? Will that constitute a buying or selling opportunity?
I think that they determined that it would take $100,000 - $250,000 for people to turn in people that they knew were spamming, but according to the article: The FTC, in a report requested by Congress, did not take a position on whether such a system was a good idea. To me, that sounds like the refrained from recommending it.
I guess it's up to us to convince them that it's a good idea.
Note: they recommend that this money come from taxpayers, but in an effort to try to cut down on that, can I suggest we find another source of it? Perhaps we need to not only look to civil penalties from the spammers, but also from the ISPs who behave negligently toward spammers.
Mr. Badnarik: your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Why are you so popular?
Or, if you don't want to carry a gun on a plane, you need to show ID and sign a waiver.
The airlines aren't claiming that it's their policy, that would be reasonable, or at least legal.
It's the federal agency called the TSA that's doing this, and the airlines that are claiming that they are complying to federal statutes.
I blame your bad luck on your userid.
Yeah, they have something like that in Cuba already. It's no surprise to me that people are literally jumping off that island into homemade rafts in attempt to float across shark-infested waters to Florida.
Please stop telling people about the parts of the US west of the Mississippi River. The reason we're here is because they're not.
Thanks.
Linus doesn't seem to publish much like this annually, but the other ones are easy:
Microsoft Annual Report
Apple Annual Report (2003 doesn't seem to be available yet)
Sun annual report
FYI - they typically come out in the spring for the previous years. The SEC "encourages" that.
Be careful to not confuse "identifying yourself" with "producing government issued papers". There's a difference, and while it is subtle, it appears to be relevant here. Hiibel refused to give his name and was arrested under state law that requires it. The US Supreme Court appears to have held up that law which requires you give your name. The TSA actually asks for papers and refuses to let you travel without them.
It was bound to happen sooner or later. Another "i" in "distribution" finally succumbed to the temptation of becoming an "o". I knew that once "distri" became "distro" we were on a slippery slope to destruction. Pretty soon, all we'll have left are "dostrobutoons". Mark this day.
No kidding. I think that the author has confused the terms "Dummy Email Addresses" with "someone else's email address". As the owner of a domain name that is often used by inconsiderate fools like ajain, I get tons more spam than I would otherwise. The practice of filling in email addresses that don't belong to you has significantly reduced the usefulness of my domain name and those of others. The fact that you don't want email from those people with whom you do business should be enough to make you realize that I don't want it either. Do us all a favor and use an email address that either is not deliverable, such as from example.com, or use one for which you are responsible. webmaster@anuragjain.com would be a good choice for you.
Excellent idea. I didn't happen to notice a PayPal subscribe link on your fundraising page, though. I can't figure out how to make paypal send you regular amounts without one, either. Any chance you would put one up there? I could part with a fistful of USD every month or 6 for your service.
Thanks!
(PS: no, I can't edit the page with the paypal links on it myself for somewhat obvious reasons)