Wouldn't a real-time system based on a RADAR detection method be much more reliable or helpful? Do systems that provide accurate surrounding information(upcoming terrain, true distance to ground, etc.) simply not exist?
The government would then only allow and control the single IPv6 address into the country... I may be unaware of part of IPv6, but my recollection is that it allows for more addresses due to a larger format. It doesn't look like that would solve this problem. The issue here lies in the very small and controlled pipe into the country, not with the network running on either side.
Others may. I seem to recall the UK being some kind of a democracy, despite still having a monarch. Social contract dictates that the majority needs to be provided for, and that "educated atheists"(meaning only that the select people you're referring to are both educated, and also putting faith in the atheist position) aren't the only ones choosing curriculum. They'd better not be.
I do feel moved to point out that there's nothing wrong with believing evolution has a long way to go, or even that it isn't valid. I feel comfortable saying there's not much difference in supporting evolution compared to supporting a creation belief, from a proof stand point. When it comes down to it, it's where you're putting your faith. Both topics require quite a bit of it. People get all pissy when I say that, but it's true. How much true evidence is there for evolution, that's not conjuncture and assumption? Science is some people's chosen faith, however unlikely it may be. Myself, I throw down behind a protestant Christian position, but I do understand the other side of the equation.
On another note, it's very interesting to me that the world society as a whole wants to cram an incorrect definition of tolerance down my throat, and then tell me that they won't truly tolerate my beliefs. Double standards are wonderful, but I knew I'd be persecuted.
Macro buttons/programs. They're either time consuming to set up(programs), or expensive, but so is all the other specialized equipment for someone that's severely(as TFA's subject) disabled.
The other answer, of course, is that these customers are a very small portion of the consumer base. While it sounds cold, it would be a bad marketing decision to hold the game back because someone couldn't play it(due to a lack of ability on their part).
Why should the cost go UP when there are more copies downloaded? That's incorrect.
Price should go down, when there's more product dispersed(in people's grubby little hands). There has to be more product, more copies have been downloaded(therefore, there should be lower demand, making the price go down so people will buy it).
Oops, forgot: We're being brainwashed into thinking that buying music electronically isn't the same thing as buying a single or a CD.
bastards.
That's pretty much a sequence of numbers, when there's no guarantee that the other person won't use it? Kinda like buying a CD-Key game with open packaging... Not something I'd recommend.
What's up with linking to an article that tries to get us to "pay for research", when I would wager that it's a 99% chance that the only "research" there is someone's opinion. If they'd like to give me an example, or an excerpt, I might try it. At this point, I can think of many other things to spend money on.
I think it's time to purchase some cans of Krylon in preparation for the release:) Maybe something to spray on the underside, for some neato "nonskid grip"
Besides, the first thing you want to do is void the warranty:)
Would be to give him a brand new, "shiny like it's right out of the box"(and it is) keyboard. Just throw the other one away, and don't mention it again.
If he presses the issue, politely present this:
What's going to cost more in the end, me spending an hour of your time cleaning the keyboard(which when you figure in travel to and from the location, time finding supplies, the supplies themselves, and putting everything away, isn't likely to be under 1 hour), or buying a new keyboard?
Or, you could just clean the keyboard, and ask for a bonus:)
Wouldn't a real-time system based on a RADAR detection method be much more reliable or helpful? Do systems that provide accurate surrounding information(upcoming terrain, true distance to ground, etc.) simply not exist?
It's the media. They don't know the tank separates and burns up on reentry.
That tank burns up during reentry, after it's t minus 9 minute separation from the shuttle. Little guy never made it to orbit.
The government would then only allow and control the single IPv6 address into the country... I may be unaware of part of IPv6, but my recollection is that it allows for more addresses due to a larger format. It doesn't look like that would solve this problem. The issue here lies in the very small and controlled pipe into the country, not with the network running on either side.
Especially when their OS runs something like 90% or more of the world computer base?
That sounds more like essential to be. Besides, figure it into the budget of their company... I would bet they see it as money well spent.
Maybe so, but how fast is your connection to the internet?
It's not likely to be faster than the working speed of either cat 5 or wireless.
That's fabulous, bravo. Pure comedic gold.
That, and pushing back/cutting things off the PS3 launch.
Halo 3 = win. That, and the PS2 controller is for carnies, along with infringing on someone else's patent. Knowingly.
Others may. I seem to recall the UK being some kind of a democracy, despite still having a monarch. Social contract dictates that the majority needs to be provided for, and that "educated atheists"(meaning only that the select people you're referring to are both educated, and also putting faith in the atheist position) aren't the only ones choosing curriculum. They'd better not be.
I do feel moved to point out that there's nothing wrong with believing evolution has a long way to go, or even that it isn't valid. I feel comfortable saying there's not much difference in supporting evolution compared to supporting a creation belief, from a proof stand point. When it comes down to it, it's where you're putting your faith. Both topics require quite a bit of it. People get all pissy when I say that, but it's true. How much true evidence is there for evolution, that's not conjuncture and assumption? Science is some people's chosen faith, however unlikely it may be. Myself, I throw down behind a protestant Christian position, but I do understand the other side of the equation.
On another note, it's very interesting to me that the world society as a whole wants to cram an incorrect definition of tolerance down my throat, and then tell me that they won't truly tolerate my beliefs. Double standards are wonderful, but I knew I'd be persecuted.
Macro buttons/programs. They're either time consuming to set up(programs), or expensive, but so is all the other specialized equipment for someone that's severely(as TFA's subject) disabled.
The other answer, of course, is that these customers are a very small portion of the consumer base. While it sounds cold, it would be a bad marketing decision to hold the game back because someone couldn't play it(due to a lack of ability on their part).
Why should the cost go UP when there are more copies downloaded? That's incorrect. Price should go down, when there's more product dispersed(in people's grubby little hands). There has to be more product, more copies have been downloaded(therefore, there should be lower demand, making the price go down so people will buy it). Oops, forgot: We're being brainwashed into thinking that buying music electronically isn't the same thing as buying a single or a CD. bastards.
A beowulf cluster of.... Wait, never mind.
That's pretty much a sequence of numbers, when there's no guarantee that the other person won't use it? Kinda like buying a CD-Key game with open packaging... Not something I'd recommend.
Heh. Nothing like telling a bunch of open source guys about a bare drive'ed dell to get them to hustle over and check it out.
the specialist dropped said cylinder on live TV, and then proceeded to swear...
Maybe there was a little goodie inside it.
A missile target by IP address, why don't you go and mess with the air force...
What's up with linking to an article that tries to get us to "pay for research", when I would wager that it's a 99% chance that the only "research" there is someone's opinion. If they'd like to give me an example, or an excerpt, I might try it. At this point, I can think of many other things to spend money on.
I think it's time to purchase some cans of Krylon in preparation for the release :) Maybe something to spray on the underside, for some neato "nonskid grip"
:)
Besides, the first thing you want to do is void the warranty
Just don't let them bunny hop to you with their box cutter.
Would be to give him a brand new, "shiny like it's right out of the box"(and it is) keyboard. Just throw the other one away, and don't mention it again.
:)
If he presses the issue, politely present this:
What's going to cost more in the end, me spending an hour of your time cleaning the keyboard(which when you figure in travel to and from the location, time finding supplies, the supplies themselves, and putting everything away, isn't likely to be under 1 hour), or buying a new keyboard?
Or, you could just clean the keyboard, and ask for a bonus
you could play quake 3 with just a keypad...
Privacy is for people who want to mind their own business, and for other people to do the same.
I'm sitting right here.
Come on... That's like asking "The planet, or Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs?" I choose the chocolate.