Learn chemistry smacktard. I get the joke you're going for but H20 would just be DiHydrogenOxide. No need for the mono in this case. And even if mono were necessary here, it's never MonoOxide, it would be Monoxide.
CNN is not a bastion for the left. Depending on the specific show and the issue I've seen them range from mildly left to moderately right. There was no fucking vacuum and the mainstream media has never, ever been fucking liberal. Fox news was created because a Murdoch decided that reality wasn't his cup of tea and wanted someplace where his brand of crackpot pseudo-fascism would be taken as gospel.CNN only appears left-wing because anything short of state media from the mouth of a fascist police state looks liberal by comparison to that steaming pile of feces masquerading as a news source.
Most big stations are to the right of center, at least slightly, because they're owned by big multi-nationals and conservatism is in their ultimate interest.
Just to let you all know:
Pounds are Weight in standard
Newtons are Weight in metric (technically force, but weight is just force towards the massive body you're on at the time)
Kilograms are mass in metric
Slugs are mass in standard
Mass is How much shit there
Weight is how much force is exerted on that shit by gravity. This is determined by the formula
G*m1*m2
-------
r^2
Hell, I know that indy concerts can be popular. Be hard not to when Grassroots (the festival, not the term for an independent movement) happens right down the road from me:D.
Every species IS A FUCKING "mid-form". You stupid AC Son of a bitch. A species is what it is at any given time and with each offspring born changes incrementally towards something that's different. When given geological or environmental factors to separate a species into 2 different species then at some pint in the future you'll have two species that can't interbreed.
And for the fucking record scientists have found plenty of transitional skeletons with inbetween features like you're asking for. Just because you're to fucking lazy to look them up doesn't mean the don't exist.
Macroevolution IS STILL HAPPENING YOU STUPID SACK OF CRAP.
It takes A LONG FUCKING TIME to evolve radical changes so of course you're not going to observe it right now. We haven't had written records long enough for us to be able to reasonably say "Well look at that, this species forked into a couple of different ones from x time to y time and we have all the physical and anitomical changes written down in these convient biology text-books from various points along the time it occured". Maybe if we can avoid letting fucktards like you into positions of power we'll keep up civilization long enough to have those records and our ancestors in the distant future will be able to construct an evolutionary timeline for a species with firsthand data for various points along the way.
You're right they would've died out if they couldn't see well enough to eat. But when their squid buddies can see better than they can they will die out to the ones with good eyesight.
I didn't explain the mechanism of evolution because I didn't feel like expending extra effort, but I don't have anything else to do for a while so I might as well now.
Evolution is not "mystical". It works on simple principals. Traits are stored in genes. They are stored in cells. When cells divide they duplicate the genes. This includes the cell division for making sperm and eggs. Sometimes the copying doesn't work perfectly and an error is created. The error is either beneficial, harmful or doesn't affect the creatures functioning at all. When the error is beneficial the animal stands a better chance of living and passing it down to it's children. Eventually enough beneficial copying errors pile up so that the offspring produced are a different animal entirely. Harsh environments force better characteristics for portions of creatures that their harshness affects because those creatures who aren't up to snuff die alot faster and only those who are lucky enough to have inherited beneficial traits survive well. Squid and octopi need really good eyes for their dark environment. The creatures that had miswired eyes all got outcompeted by the ones with mutations promoting better eyesight (survival of the fittest you know) and so they starved to death because they were down there bumping into walls while all the ones with good eyesight could see their way to octo-mcdonalds or whatever just fine. We kept that because our flawed vision is "good enough" for the higher light environment we evolved in. The squid didn't just "evolve themselves" anything. The ones that had good eyes got all the food and so lived long enough to get all the nookie too and the ones that had bad eyes starved to death. Now it wasn't as sudden as that of course. Evolution is slow, so really it was the ones with slightly better eyes ate slightly better and so were better able to reproduce and made slightly more babies, and benefical mutations kept piling up untill some ancient cephalopod had a really good set of "peepers".
Now go light your bible on fire and shove it up your ass you stupid sack of crap.
Yes I can believe it wasn't designed by someone who knew anything at all about optics. We have a blind spot wich the brain fills in. This is because part of optic nerve is in front of the retina. This would be like putting the wiring for a ccd between it and the lens in a camera. As such, any 'intelligent' designer is a total junkslut who had to ride the short bus to diety school or we evloved, where some ancestor of ours had the miswired eye and kept passing it on because it was "good enough" which is the driving pricipal behind evolution. Hell, you can even see it in squids/octopuses, they need to see in dim light and so the mis-wired eye wasn't "good enough" so they evolved an eye that was properly wired and could see better in the conditions they faced. If there was a designer this makes then they are obviously a posterchild for post-natal abortion because it'd be about the stupidest thing I've ever heard of to design a proper eye for cephalopods and then, remember by christian mythology (you're not fooling anyone with the abstract "designer" you know) animals were made first, go and design a flawed eye for people.
Well certainly, there are alot of possibilities but the best geuss for life so far is carbon based, and any planet that'll support that has a good chance of showing up as having alot of the right stuff for life through a spectroscope.
Anyway, look at it like this. We know carbon based life works, and we know it works reasonably well. That I'm typing this post proves that much. We know that alot of the reactions needed by an ecosystem we'd recognize need a certain temperature band to occcur. Now certainly, life could exist in other forms (different chemical chain, different temperature band, different anything you'd care to name), but we have no way of knowing how it'd be different so our only choice is to look for what we know, IE: signs of familiar life. I mean, if you take bob the silicon based beastie and make 5 billion of him and stick him on a rock rich in the things he needs to thrive and then take joe astronomer and have him look right at the ligt coming off that planet trough his spectroscope he'll see all the compounds that bob and his kin produce through living but won't be able to see that there's life there because his biologist friend who gave him a list of chemicals to look for as life indicators has never met bob and as such doesn't know what chemicals he gives off on a day to day basis. So the only life we _can_ find this way is gonna be similar to us at some level by default, because we wouldn't be able to tell that we were seing stuff from living creatures otherwise.
Sorry about the uber-paragraph -_-;;.
Seriously, just build more nuke plants and use them for electrolyosis. They're safe, clean and very effiecent. If we can get fusion plants all the better, then we can get rid of a good deal of radioactive waste as well.
Here's the thing, you're a fucking idiot...
CNN,ABC,CBS and NBC certainly aren't free of bias, but to say they are to fox as ultraviolet is to infrared is completely fallacious. If they were they'd be out there falsifying stories about how George Bush can only orgasm if he kills a puppy or some shit. Seriously. All the people on the right wing wacko sites get chubbies for death because they can always find a way to blame it on the "eVuHUL LIEberals1oneshiftelventyoneoneshift1!!" You never see crap like that on CNN or ABC or any of those other networks. Certainly they'll criticize bush, but they're also often critical of liberals, and they will often praise bush. Beyond that, their criticisms usually make sense and factually check out when verified through independent sources. Which your little "EPA's FAULT, NUKE THE WHALES, BURN LEADED GAS, PISS ON SOME BABY SEALS!!!" argument has failed to do. Maybe you should consider suicide now and do the world a favor. Remember, it's up the highway, not across the street.
Ok stupid, The products don't need to be monitored for that time, that's the whole point of building the containers like that. Secondly, Cold Fusion is absolute BS. Why does everyone love cold fusion so much anyway? Whats wrong with regular fusion? Is it like the whole 'extreme sports' thing where regular just isn't good enough?
That was the stupidest thing I've read in a while. I don't know if that was a troll, sarcasm or terminal stupidity but whatever it was you need to stop. If it was sarcasm, learn to convey that better, if it's a troll stop because no one likes you and you'll die lonely if you don't get off the computer and if that was sincere then I suggest sitting down, taking a razor blade, and slitting your wrists. Remember, up the road, not across the street. It's for the good of the gene pool man!!!
No smacknuts. There's a thing called a deadman's switch. And Chernobyl didn't have one because it was a cheap soviet piece of shit. Look at what happened at Three Mile Island. Place suffers failure, and the safetys mean that there aren't any casualties. Then there's the 12 feet of reinforced concrete around the reactor dome. And the real reason you don't see nuke plants is because of the fucking luddites in green peace who run around screaming "YOU CAN'T HUG WITH NUCLEAR ARMS!!!" whenever someone tries to build one. And just the fence line? Hah. Fire doesn't stop at fences and all the wishing in the world won't make it. Oh and because of all those regulations nuclear plants are alot less likely to fail then coal fired plants. So go stuff it monkey fucker.
Slashdot Mirror
AMD doesn't make video cards you smacktard. ATI is the company that says "fuck you" and releases shitty video card drivers for Linux.
Sorry for bitching you out. I got yelled at for calling it that so I kinda started doing it to others. Learn something new every day...
And iRan, iRan so far away...
Learn chemistry smacktard. I get the joke you're going for but H20 would just be DiHydrogenOxide. No need for the mono in this case. And even if mono were necessary here, it's never MonoOxide, it would be Monoxide.
CNN is not a bastion for the left. Depending on the specific show and the issue I've seen them range from mildly left to moderately right. There was no fucking vacuum and the mainstream media has never, ever been fucking liberal. Fox news was created because a Murdoch decided that reality wasn't his cup of tea and wanted someplace where his brand of crackpot pseudo-fascism would be taken as gospel.CNN only appears left-wing because anything short of state media from the mouth of a fascist police state looks liberal by comparison to that steaming pile of feces masquerading as a news source. Most big stations are to the right of center, at least slightly, because they're owned by big multi-nationals and conservatism is in their ultimate interest.
Just to let you all know: Pounds are Weight in standard Newtons are Weight in metric (technically force, but weight is just force towards the massive body you're on at the time) Kilograms are mass in metric Slugs are mass in standard Mass is How much shit there Weight is how much force is exerted on that shit by gravity. This is determined by the formula G*m1*m2 ------- r^2
Hell, I know that indy concerts can be popular. Be hard not to when Grassroots (the festival, not the term for an independent movement) happens right down the road from me :D.
See this is why Utah is on my list of states to avoid like the fucking plague.
Holy shit! That rocks! The tune definitely works too.
Every species IS A FUCKING "mid-form". You stupid AC Son of a bitch. A species is what it is at any given time and with each offspring born changes incrementally towards something that's different. When given geological or environmental factors to separate a species into 2 different species then at some pint in the future you'll have two species that can't interbreed. And for the fucking record scientists have found plenty of transitional skeletons with inbetween features like you're asking for. Just because you're to fucking lazy to look them up doesn't mean the don't exist.
Macroevolution IS STILL HAPPENING YOU STUPID SACK OF CRAP. It takes A LONG FUCKING TIME to evolve radical changes so of course you're not going to observe it right now. We haven't had written records long enough for us to be able to reasonably say "Well look at that, this species forked into a couple of different ones from x time to y time and we have all the physical and anitomical changes written down in these convient biology text-books from various points along the time it occured". Maybe if we can avoid letting fucktards like you into positions of power we'll keep up civilization long enough to have those records and our ancestors in the distant future will be able to construct an evolutionary timeline for a species with firsthand data for various points along the way.
It was indeed revealed as a pupeteer plot. I think it was in the 2nd or 3rd book.
You're right they would've died out if they couldn't see well enough to eat. But when their squid buddies can see better than they can they will die out to the ones with good eyesight.
I didn't explain the mechanism of evolution because I didn't feel like expending extra effort, but I don't have anything else to do for a while so I might as well now. Evolution is not "mystical". It works on simple principals. Traits are stored in genes. They are stored in cells. When cells divide they duplicate the genes. This includes the cell division for making sperm and eggs. Sometimes the copying doesn't work perfectly and an error is created. The error is either beneficial, harmful or doesn't affect the creatures functioning at all. When the error is beneficial the animal stands a better chance of living and passing it down to it's children. Eventually enough beneficial copying errors pile up so that the offspring produced are a different animal entirely. Harsh environments force better characteristics for portions of creatures that their harshness affects because those creatures who aren't up to snuff die alot faster and only those who are lucky enough to have inherited beneficial traits survive well. Squid and octopi need really good eyes for their dark environment. The creatures that had miswired eyes all got outcompeted by the ones with mutations promoting better eyesight (survival of the fittest you know) and so they starved to death because they were down there bumping into walls while all the ones with good eyesight could see their way to octo-mcdonalds or whatever just fine. We kept that because our flawed vision is "good enough" for the higher light environment we evolved in. The squid didn't just "evolve themselves" anything. The ones that had good eyes got all the food and so lived long enough to get all the nookie too and the ones that had bad eyes starved to death. Now it wasn't as sudden as that of course. Evolution is slow, so really it was the ones with slightly better eyes ate slightly better and so were better able to reproduce and made slightly more babies, and benefical mutations kept piling up untill some ancient cephalopod had a really good set of "peepers". Now go light your bible on fire and shove it up your ass you stupid sack of crap.
Yes I can believe it wasn't designed by someone who knew anything at all about optics. We have a blind spot wich the brain fills in. This is because part of optic nerve is in front of the retina. This would be like putting the wiring for a ccd between it and the lens in a camera. As such, any 'intelligent' designer is a total junkslut who had to ride the short bus to diety school or we evloved, where some ancestor of ours had the miswired eye and kept passing it on because it was "good enough" which is the driving pricipal behind evolution. Hell, you can even see it in squids/octopuses, they need to see in dim light and so the mis-wired eye wasn't "good enough" so they evolved an eye that was properly wired and could see better in the conditions they faced. If there was a designer this makes then they are obviously a posterchild for post-natal abortion because it'd be about the stupidest thing I've ever heard of to design a proper eye for cephalopods and then, remember by christian mythology (you're not fooling anyone with the abstract "designer" you know) animals were made first, go and design a flawed eye for people.
If you run for president in 08 I will vote for you. Because I think you've just solved our energy crisis.
Well certainly, there are alot of possibilities but the best geuss for life so far is carbon based, and any planet that'll support that has a good chance of showing up as having alot of the right stuff for life through a spectroscope. Anyway, look at it like this. We know carbon based life works, and we know it works reasonably well. That I'm typing this post proves that much. We know that alot of the reactions needed by an ecosystem we'd recognize need a certain temperature band to occcur. Now certainly, life could exist in other forms (different chemical chain, different temperature band, different anything you'd care to name), but we have no way of knowing how it'd be different so our only choice is to look for what we know, IE: signs of familiar life. I mean, if you take bob the silicon based beastie and make 5 billion of him and stick him on a rock rich in the things he needs to thrive and then take joe astronomer and have him look right at the ligt coming off that planet trough his spectroscope he'll see all the compounds that bob and his kin produce through living but won't be able to see that there's life there because his biologist friend who gave him a list of chemicals to look for as life indicators has never met bob and as such doesn't know what chemicals he gives off on a day to day basis. So the only life we _can_ find this way is gonna be similar to us at some level by default, because we wouldn't be able to tell that we were seing stuff from living creatures otherwise. Sorry about the uber-paragraph -_-;;.
Seriously, just build more nuke plants and use them for electrolyosis. They're safe, clean and very effiecent. If we can get fusion plants all the better, then we can get rid of a good deal of radioactive waste as well.
Here's the thing, you're a fucking idiot... CNN,ABC,CBS and NBC certainly aren't free of bias, but to say they are to fox as ultraviolet is to infrared is completely fallacious. If they were they'd be out there falsifying stories about how George Bush can only orgasm if he kills a puppy or some shit. Seriously. All the people on the right wing wacko sites get chubbies for death because they can always find a way to blame it on the "eVuHUL LIEberals1oneshiftelventyoneoneshift1!!" You never see crap like that on CNN or ABC or any of those other networks. Certainly they'll criticize bush, but they're also often critical of liberals, and they will often praise bush. Beyond that, their criticisms usually make sense and factually check out when verified through independent sources. Which your little "EPA's FAULT, NUKE THE WHALES, BURN LEADED GAS, PISS ON SOME BABY SEALS!!!" argument has failed to do. Maybe you should consider suicide now and do the world a favor. Remember, it's up the highway, not across the street.
The planes that hit the WTC were 767s you dumbass.
Ok stupid, The products don't need to be monitored for that time, that's the whole point of building the containers like that. Secondly, Cold Fusion is absolute BS. Why does everyone love cold fusion so much anyway? Whats wrong with regular fusion? Is it like the whole 'extreme sports' thing where regular just isn't good enough?
That was the stupidest thing I've read in a while. I don't know if that was a troll, sarcasm or terminal stupidity but whatever it was you need to stop. If it was sarcasm, learn to convey that better, if it's a troll stop because no one likes you and you'll die lonely if you don't get off the computer and if that was sincere then I suggest sitting down, taking a razor blade, and slitting your wrists. Remember, up the road, not across the street. It's for the good of the gene pool man!!!
No smacknuts. There's a thing called a deadman's switch. And Chernobyl didn't have one because it was a cheap soviet piece of shit. Look at what happened at Three Mile Island. Place suffers failure, and the safetys mean that there aren't any casualties. Then there's the 12 feet of reinforced concrete around the reactor dome. And the real reason you don't see nuke plants is because of the fucking luddites in green peace who run around screaming "YOU CAN'T HUG WITH NUCLEAR ARMS!!!" whenever someone tries to build one. And just the fence line? Hah. Fire doesn't stop at fences and all the wishing in the world won't make it. Oh and because of all those regulations nuclear plants are alot less likely to fail then coal fired plants. So go stuff it monkey fucker.
Better yet, KGSirc
You should work for NASA. They appearantly don't have anyone capable of spotting errors when dealing with both metric and standard units.