Currently DJI products use an IMU (a combination of a gyro and magnetometer), GPS and a barometer to control positioning and flight. Before the flight, conscious pilots assure the IMU is calibrated properly and that there's GPS lock. It's not currently possible to calibrate the IMU around ferrous environments, something required when changing flight locale.
Using today's control systems to launch from a metal moving platform will have more issues than just the air flow.
This dude that's a publisher is pissed over getting spammed by Google and the fact that Google indexes websites that give away IP he's (or his clients) got the rights to.
So he publishes this diatribe on his website and somehow got it published here also.
The difference is the FCC doesn't require the licensee's station address and the FAA seems to think it has the right to require a home address and make it public without need.
Did you look at the picture? What crashed was nothing close to con/prosumer equipment. What crashed was significantly more expensive, had significantly more lift and better optics than the DJI Inspire. I'd have to call BS if there weren't as advanced flight control systems as well as GLONASS/GPS/IR guidance. In the event of no RF control, the copter usually toggles a return to home, dependent upon how it's programmed. It doesn't just stop flying!
That wasn't a controlled landing, my guess is a power failure or motor issue.
This is what the state of militarization of our police departments has caused. https://youtu.be/pMas0tWc0sg This alone is sufficient cause for any sane court of law to deny extradition. Additionally, it provides more than sufficient justification for US citizens to assert their second amendment rights. We are in international embarrassment.
I would venture to say that it inconveniences more than a few, the majority of whom have no idea there is an alternative. Typically Joe Sixpack is clueless a click bait victim and the bread and butter of 90% of content sellers.
Actually....the internet grew from ARPANET who's goal was to exploit new computer technologies to meet the needs of military command and control against nuclear threats, achieve survivable control of US nuclear forces, and improve military tactical and management decision making.
Dealers tend to have full disclosure of transactions. Normally there's a document called a "Due Bill" or a "We Owe" that specifically states that there are no promises or additions made or included that are not written on said document. The same document usually includes language stating no oral additions or deletions will be honored. At the point the seller transferred ownership of the purchase vehicle and the buyer transferred ownership of the trade, the transaction was complete.
Had the customer wanted to sell his trade without the markings, he should have removed them (before transferring) or had the removal listed on the due bill.
It is not reasonable to assume that the dealer would have any idea the trade would end up with an organization US traders are precluded trade with.
Regardless of how reprehensible of a situation the customer now faces, I doubt the dealer will be held liable. It's quite possible that the wholesaler that made the ultimate sale to the current owner is, or the person that transferred it to that seller is, but I would think liability issues would be the least of their concerns.
..to pay me back for my 1980 Chevette in mint condition that was stolen from downtown. I filed a police report and my claim was denied because I left the keys in the ignition.
My insurance company said they don't insure for losses caused by the insured's lack of diligence to prevent the loss.
Um, domestic use without a warrant is in no fucking way acceptable. It's a fucking crime and deserves as diligent a prosecution as they make. Licensed, authorized professionals need to be held to a higher standard or suffer stricker punishments. For shit sakes, how hard would it be to have a judge bless it, less they're just fishing.
Before calling "black-ass" best make sure your's is clean.
Their mandatory pop-over 25 second video ads are the most intrusive I've ever seen. Many times I just close the tab. I might have accepted this for other websites but Wired? The high S/N ratio these days makes me want to go back to links.
How can any sensible person agree that it is prudent to deny any constitutional right based on a list that:
#1 Is not public domain. #2 Has no real process of removal. #3 Has no real specification for entry.
I can't believe we have a president that believes the public is so stupid as to place trust into an organization that repetitively breaks the laws it was designed to uphold.
Slashdot Mirror
Currently DJI products use an IMU (a combination of a gyro and magnetometer), GPS and a barometer to control positioning and flight. Before the flight, conscious pilots assure the IMU is calibrated properly and that there's GPS lock. It's not currently possible to calibrate the IMU around ferrous environments, something required when changing flight locale.
Using today's control systems to launch from a metal moving platform will have more issues than just the air flow.
This dude that's a publisher is pissed over getting spammed by Google and the fact that Google indexes websites that give away IP he's (or his clients) got the rights to.
So he publishes this diatribe on his website and somehow got it published here also.
No nerd news here...
The difference is the FCC doesn't require the licensee's station address and the FAA seems to think it has the right to require a home address and make it public without need.
Big difference.
a theoretical physics model?
It was a quad not a hexacopter.
Did you look at the picture? What crashed was nothing close to con/prosumer equipment. What crashed was significantly more expensive, had significantly more lift and better optics than the DJI Inspire. I'd have to call BS if there weren't as advanced flight control systems as well as GLONASS/GPS/IR guidance. In the event of no RF control, the copter usually toggles a return to home, dependent upon how it's programmed. It doesn't just stop flying!
That wasn't a controlled landing, my guess is a power failure or motor issue.
No, it's a tax on people that failed math.
It was 100% orchestrated by the FBI.
This is what the state of militarization of our police departments has caused. https://youtu.be/pMas0tWc0sg
This alone is sufficient cause for any sane court of law to deny extradition. Additionally, it provides more than sufficient justification for US citizens to assert their second amendment rights. We are in international embarrassment.
Considering how none of the new "agreements" are binding, what real difference does it make? Show and no go, feel good BS.
I would venture to say that it inconveniences more than a few, the majority of whom have no idea there is an alternative. Typically Joe Sixpack is clueless a click bait victim and the bread and butter of 90% of content sellers.
Besides, Janice in accounting don't give a fuck!
Oh no. Whatever shall I do?
Just go here: http://www.arrl.org/news/fcc-p... Looks like the FCC is trying to protect operator license privacy.
Actually ....the internet grew from ARPANET who's goal was to exploit new computer technologies to meet the needs of military command and control against nuclear threats, achieve survivable control of US nuclear forces, and improve military tactical and management decision making.
Dealers tend to have full disclosure of transactions. Normally there's a document called a "Due Bill" or a "We Owe" that specifically states that there are no promises or additions made or included that are not written on said document. The same document usually includes language stating no oral additions or deletions will be honored. At the point the seller transferred ownership of the purchase vehicle and the buyer transferred ownership of the trade, the transaction was complete.
Had the customer wanted to sell his trade without the markings, he should have removed them (before transferring) or had the removal listed on the due bill.
It is not reasonable to assume that the dealer would have any idea the trade would end up with an organization US traders are precluded trade with.
Regardless of how reprehensible of a situation the customer now faces, I doubt the dealer will be held liable. It's quite possible that the wholesaler that made the ultimate sale to the current owner is, or the person that transferred it to that seller is, but I would think liability issues would be the least of their concerns.
Can someone please explain how genetic status relates to a bacterial contamination? WTF?
And what ever you do make sure you're not using bakers chocolate as the theobromide content is close to 10x more than Snickers.
..to pay me back for my 1980 Chevette in mint condition that was stolen from downtown. I filed a police report and my claim was denied because I left the keys in the ignition.
My insurance company said they don't insure for losses caused by the insured's lack of diligence to prevent the loss.
Possiby Lionsgate needs a few tigers at the gate?
' there's a degree of aceptableness. '
Um, domestic use without a warrant is in no fucking way acceptable. It's a fucking crime and deserves as diligent a prosecution as they make. Licensed, authorized professionals need to be held to a higher standard or suffer stricker punishments. For shit sakes, how hard would it be to have a judge bless it, less they're just fishing.
Before calling "black-ass" best make sure your's is clean.
Janice in accounting don't give a fuck!
" wired.com is a fraud out to make money"
Their mandatory pop-over 25 second video ads are the most intrusive I've ever seen. Many times I just close the tab. I might have accepted this for other websites but Wired? The high S/N ratio these days makes me want to go back to links.
How can any sensible person agree that it is prudent to deny any constitutional right based on a list that:
#1 Is not public domain.
#2 Has no real process of removal.
#3 Has no real specification for entry.
I can't believe we have a president that believes the public is so stupid as to place trust into an organization that repetitively breaks the laws it was designed to uphold.
" Every year 384,032 persons are injured and 4,789 persons killed through wet roads" should read:
Every year 384,032 persons are injured and 4,789 persons killed through wet roads and their inability to grasp the concepts of friction and velocity.
Or: ...are killed because of their piss poor driving skills.
Surely we can't trust someone who directly profited from the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, basically wrecking our economy.
Just say no to Billary...
I would trust there's an intelligence agency that's highly functional with the "real data", and tends to have very successful executions.
The same people that did Iraq https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
There's better eyes and ears than ours (as far as that threat is concerned).
what Ads Disabled means?
or does it mean I need an ad blocker here too?