Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Linux Home Theater PC

Vic writes "If you have ever dreamed of building a home theatre PC, Extremetech has details on building a Linux-based system, and covers all the details of this epic journey. They did get the unit to run lots of features such as CDs, video, TV, weather, media libraries, guide viewing and show recording." From the article: "To paraphrase one forum quote seen during the research phase of this piece: 'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' But there is some good news here too. Getting a Linux-based HTPC has probably never been easier, though that is admittedly damning with faint praise. So here then is the tale of our ongoing adventure toward building a Linux-based HTPC."

250 comments

  1. interesting by TheScottishGuy · · Score: 1

    i might actually have to pull my finger out and actually try this one, given the number of currently unused pc's sitting around this place

    1. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes that finger was starting to get uncomfortable.

  2. Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "but the beer first, this isn't going to easy"

    1. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by jonbusby · · Score: 0

      lol. It should be... except in the morning when you try to read your code. Good luck with that.

    2. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by hobbesx · · Score: 5, Funny
      From Linux Journal:


      Windows: Where do you want to go today?

      MacOS: Where do you want to be tomorrow?

      Linux: Are you coming or what?

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    3. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Linux: Are you coming or what?

      More like:

      Linux: Hey, are you going to eat that?

    4. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be,

      Linux: I'll go anywhere you want but first you gotta figure out how to tell me.

    5. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by dsginter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd think that some bright spark would just sit down with the typical hardware - an nForce motherboard and a Hauppauge PVR250 - do all this work and then distribute an ISO of the system for people to install.

      That'd do wonders for Linux and OSS.

      --
      More
    6. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey, are you going to eat that?"

      More like :

      Hey, are you going to eat that? Because its mine and your stealing it ! you bastard

    7. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no thats apple

    8. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is based on Darwin , they stole BSD wich is OSS ...

    9. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Linux: Are you coming or what?"

      Linux: We are carbon paper's biggest competitor!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by kimanaw · · Score: 1
      "Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna easy"

      Actually, I'd think

      "Brew your own beer first, this ain't gonna easy"

      would be more appropriate ?

      --
      007: "Who are you?"
      Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
      007: "I must be dreaming..."
    11. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me how it's possible to steal that which is freely available.

    12. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, more like: Linux: Hey, where the hell does this go?

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    13. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 1

      Linux: Are you coming or what?

      "No, I always walk like this!"

      Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week...

      --
      -- Language is a virus from outer space.
    14. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by hawk · · Score: 1
      Damn iPod shuffles are everywhere!

      :)

      hawk

    15. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by AndyCap · · Score: 1

      You mean KnoppMyth right? :-)
      Knoppix optimized for mythtv.

    16. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Darby · · Score: 1

      /* Drunk. Fix later */

    17. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by jonbusby · · Score: 1

      so true.. so true.. Its the variable names I'd be worried about, lets just hope the client doesnt see our code... $pimp + $hoes = $bling; debugging that in the morning wont be fun.

    18. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Or even:

      Linux: Now with 20% more cursing in the kernel source.

    19. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 1

      They did. It's called KnoppMyth. It's aknoppix based Distro that will either install a MythTV system on your PC, or act as a MythTV Frontend.

    20. Re:Hey, that should be the new OSS slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the version in Linux Journal? I could have sworn the original goes like this:

      Windows: Where do you want to go today?

      Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?

      FreeBSD: Are you guys coming or what?

      (The whole point being, FreeBSD has a more advanced and elegant architecture than Linux and especially Windows. The joke was about architectural merit.)

  3. 'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, I thought that when it came to the GPL and FOSS that beer was supposed to be free. Where'd I go wrong?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      Where'd I go wrong?
      In between the sixth and second characters of the second line of your sig.
      You've really got to read that source code a little more closely, and compile with -WTF next time.
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately my WTF compiler burned itself into a tiny piece of blackened cinder after I accidently ran a Maureen O'Gara article through it. By the time it was cool enough to the touch some very serious guys in seriously cheap suits came and took it from me. They said that while they had the caption, the rack, and the bread, they needed something else as well.

      It wasn't until they had left that I realized my stereo was missing.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    3. Re:'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Its 'free' as in 'I need a beer'.

    4. Re:'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' by Saeger · · Score: 1
      If you want free as in speech & FREE as in beer (some people use capitalization to differentiate), then you'll just have to wait for the heretical nanotechnology which makes that possible.

      You just need four things:

      1. Energy to make the beer: from FREE solar from arrays you self-assembled from free plans.
      2. Matter which composes the object, which in this case is almost entirely recycled H2O along with the component molecules that make up the other minor ingredients (like hops); freely available in your trash, the atmosphere, and in the common earth beneath your feet.
      3. Design of your beer preference: you need to make or download a FREE/free molecular blueprint of just one representative microliter of your favorite beer (or, you can warez budweiser.3dobject.tgz if you like pisswater).
      4. Combine with Molecular Assembler not regulated by the Manufacturing Industry Association of America == MMmmmmmm... Free Beer.
      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:'Buy the beer first, this ain't gonna be easy.' by TERdON · · Score: 1
      Wait, I thought that when it came to the GPL and FOSS that beer was supposed to be free. Where'd I go wrong?

      You didn't. Almost at least. You still have to pay for the ingredients, and you'll have to wait for the brewing process a while...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  4. Get an xbox and mod it by pejo · · Score: 3, Informative

    all that and more...

    at a fraction of the price.

    1. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by TheScottishGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      don't see how that's flamebait, bit brief but not flamebait surely

    2. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by jonbusby · · Score: 1

      agreed.. but you wont be able to record tv... although, XMBC is amazing. V useful with the official xbox remote. I hardly ever use my pc to play back movies anymore. (appart from the media center pc)

    3. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldnt agree more. I've owned both the LiteOn LVD-2002 DVD player and the Philips DVP642. Both of these units play DiVX and to a degree, XViD files. While the LiteOn beats the crap out of the Philips, the Modded XBox blows them both out of the water.

      For those who dispute the claims that the LiteOn isnt as good as the Philips. Keep in mind that the Philips doesnt support as many brands of mpeg4 as the LiteOn. It doesnt support long file names, and crashes more often than the LiteOn. The only good thing about the Philips is the fact that it can actually fast forward and rewind through mpeg4 files, where as the LiteOn can only skip one minute forward or back. I actually sold my Philips less than 2 weeks after buying is last December, I was led to believe it was a great player, but thats only true if you've never owned an mpeg4 player.

      XBox Media Center, just mod your Xbox, install it and spend a month discovering all the possible uses for it. It really is a marvelous piece of software and will suprise you.

    4. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      It's not flamebait, but it's dead wrong. They spent most of that article doing MythTV. How exactly are you going to get a tuner card into an Xbox? Unless of course you use the Xbox as a frontend. But then you'd still need a PC configured as a Myth back end.

    5. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I have a modded Xbox and it is very sweet. The only thing that bugs me is that XBMC doesn't support DVD menus. This doesn't matter too much with a movie, but it's kind of annoying to have to play the individual VOBs with a DVD that has multiple episodes of a show on it. Especially as the episodes are may begin or end in the middle of a VOB.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    6. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by plover · · Score: 1

      A Hauppauge USB-PVR tuner. You did build the USB cable for your XBox, didn't you?

      --
      John
    7. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by Bachus9000 · · Score: 1

      Have you actually done this? If it could be made to record tv, I'd buy an Xbox in a heartbeat. :)

    8. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone actually done it? I was under the impression that the Xbox didn't have the horsepower. It's only a 700 MHz chip, and 64 MB of RAM. My Myth box wasn't happy until I threw at least 256 MB of RAM and a 1 GHz chip at it.

      Xboxes have been used for frontends just fine. I can't imagine it'd be any good for a back end. Plus you'd need to upgrade the hard drive anyway, 10 GB would give you maybe 2 hours of recording space after the OS and Myth install.

    9. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by plover · · Score: 1
      No, I have not done this, nor am I familiar with anyone who has tried it.

      However, I understand there are people who have built USB cables for their XBoxen. And the spex for the Hauppauge WinTV-USB external tuner do say the following:

      System Requirements

      • PC with Pentium® processor (333MHz MMX min., 733MHz min. recommended for SoftPVR(TM))
      • Microsoft® Windows® XP/Me/2000/98SE
      • USB port - 1.1 or 2.0 (performance is the same on either USB 1.1 or 2.0)
      • Sound card
      • CD-ROM drive
      To me, that says an XBox is probably just above the low edge of equipment that could successfully use this tuner. And Hauppauge is supported by MythTV. Now, you'll have to judge for yourself if you want to trust someone on Slashdot who doesn't even OWN an XBox. But if you've already got a Linux installed on your XBox, it might be worth a shot.

      P.S. Note carefully the USB 2.0 claim above: their product is only USB full speed, not USB Hi Speed. USB 1.1 is upwardly compatible with USB 2.0, but does not increase its speed just because it's connected to a faster hub.

      --
      John
    10. Re:Get an xbox and mod it by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      I'd take a look at the requirements again, especially that part saying that it needs Windows. Xbox does not run Windows.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  5. This looks good by jonbusby · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been running media centre pc 2005 on our plasma screen for a while now... and although its good at tv, its complete rubbish when it comes to web interfaces, remote control and most of all the music library! It can take over 5 minutes to load, and there no option to organise on directories instead of media tags!

  6. Sure, but... by Heliologue · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Whoa...
    • Store music, home movies, recorded TV shows, digital photos
    • Play back all these media seamlessly
    • Support a wide variety of audio and video codecs
    • Play back DVD movies, and look as good as or better than a DVD player
    • Support the playback of DRM-encoded purchased/rented movies and music
    • Serve this media up to other client machines on the home network
    • Have a simple GUI that any family member can use
    • Be rock-solid stable 24/7
    • Go in and out of sleep states with no difficulty
    • Run quietly enough so that its fan noise doesn't interfere with the enjoyment of the content it's serving up
    • Be able to handle HD music and movie formats, both present and future, with minimal upgrades (okay, maybe we're reaching a bit on this one)
    Am I the only one who thinks that this is a stretch for any OS? Getting past DRM and proprietary formats is even a pain in the ass on Windows.
    1. Re:Sure, but... by TheScottishGuy · · Score: 1

      buy an xbox, chip it and use the XBMC, not sure how well it serves media to other machines, but you could always have the media on you primary pc, on that 300Gb HD that's full of pr0n right now, (or is that just me?) with the available X3 control panel you don't even need to have a screen on the thing to use it as an audio client. cost is liable to be much lower than buying/building a pc for the purpose, although admittedly less fun.

    2. Re:Sure, but... by NETHED · · Score: 1

      I see all these home built Mediacenters, but truthfully, how many average people use these for more than one week. I can see this being a novelty, but do people actually use these for longer than one month?

      I can see the use of a TiVo being sustained, but are these homebuilt products mature enough that my mom can use this? (Mom is not very tech friendly)

      If I'm going to plop down over a grand for this little thing, (i don't have the spare computers) will i use it?

      --
      --sig fault--
    3. Re:Sure, but... by TheScottishGuy · · Score: 1

      sorry, forgot to add the need for a set top DVR unit, (got distracted by the idea of the pr0n i guess)

    4. Re:Sure, but... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, but some of that is a hardware requirement.

      Everytime a story like this comes out, the MythTV faithful sprout up, but it's hard not and a list of requirements like that shows why:

      MythTv already does:

      # Store music, home movies, recorded TV shows, digital photos
      # Play back all these media seamlessly
      # Support a wide variety of audio and video codecs
      # Play back DVD movies, and look as good as or better than a DVD player
      # Have a simple GUI that any family member can use
      # Serve this media up to other client machines on the home network
      # Be able to handle HD music and movie formats, both present and future, with minimal upgrades (okay, maybe we're reaching a bit on this one)

      This one is hardware dependent for any OS:
      # Run quietly enough so that its fan noise doesn't interfere with the enjoyment of the content it's serving up

      I have no experience with this one:

      # Go in and out of sleep states with no difficulty

      Which only leaves these two:

      # Be rock-solid stable 24/7

      Frankly speaking, MythTV isn't TiVO, and your mileage may vary. My current uptime is 18 days on my mythtv box. For my wife, a MythTV crash (frontend or backend, she can't tell) results in a computer reboot to bring it back up for her because she's willing to hit the power button but not willing to learn to restart it.

      # Support the playback of DRM-encoded purchased/rented movies and music

      For any copy protection there is a way to beat it, but what you need is specific to the system. For things like DVDs and Apple's Fairplay the solutions are known and common. For things like downloaded movie rentals, I don't know of any cracks for them, so this could conceivably be an issue.

    5. Re:Sure, but... by ouzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a stretch at all. My MythTV box does all of this, except for the last (HD) bullet - only because I don't have an HD card.

      My wife and kid use it all the time, with no difficulty. All of our home videos and digital pix are mounted via NFS and we watch them through MythTV. Ditto with our mp3s - thousands of songs on random getting played through the stereo via Myth.

      It's one of the best things I've ever built. Check out Jarod's guide for building a FC3-based MythTV system. The guide is helpful even if you're not a fan of Fedora Core.

    6. Re:Sure, but... by ouzel · · Score: 1

      We use our MythTV system every day as the primary media center in our house. It has seen constant use for the past year and a half.

    7. Re:Sure, but... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dear god yes. And you will refuse to watch live TV ever again.

      These devices change how you watch TV entirely. I only watch the shows I like, even shows I kinda like, and I watch them whenever I feel like it. I used to never watch TV because I get bored with the shows easily. Now I watch TV and fast forward through the parts that are boring. (Hint: If you watch ST:TNG you can get all the show in 30 minutes if you skip any scene involving Deanna Troi talking about people's feelings).

      I've used mine for about a year now and it's completely ingrained. While visiting my inlaws, the reflex to delete a show after it's over resulted in me turning on their DVD player several times without thinking about it.

    8. Re:Sure, but... by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      My Windows MCE 2005 box seems to do all of those nicely. It plays back all my MPEG, DivX, OGG, files (and anything with a codec) without any issues.

      The recorded TV is stored in a semi-proprietary format, which is nothing other than MPEG with some ASF framing and additional metadata, which can be stripped into a plain MPEG or converted to any other video standard.

      I'm not forced to use only DRMed content with it.

    9. Re:Sure, but... by mboverload · · Score: 1

      None of this "ease of installation" applies when you are dealing with HDTV cards. You need to a a linux whiz just to set them up.

    10. Re:Sure, but... by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see all these home built Mediacenters, but truthfully, how many average people use these for more than one week. I can see this being a novelty, but do people actually use these for longer than one month?

      Step 1: Hook up a current Mac to the HDMI or DVI input of your TV.

      Step 2: Hook up the EyeTV 500 from Elgato to your Mac via Firewire.

      Step 3: There's no step three.

      I've been using this set up for my media center for a couple months now, enjoying HDTV with PVR features, DVDs (mostly archived on my hard drives), Doctor Who rips downloaded from newsgroups, my entire music library (which I'm slowly upgrading from MP3 and/or AAC to Apple Lossless format), and World of Warcraft gaming on my 119" projector screen.

      So far, nobody can figure out the convoluted way in which I programmed my remote control except for me, but one of these rainy afternoons I might set it up in a more logical way... if I'm not too busy playing WoW or watching shows on it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Sure, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The MythTV box has had virtually daily use since I built it 6 months ago.

      I actually built it because my wife was watching anime from my computer via svideo out, and it got to the point where 2 hours each night i couldn't use my computer because she was watching Tokyo Mew Mew or whatever.

      So, yeah, the HTPC has been a blessing.

    12. Re:Sure, but... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      For "media center" use, the MythTV is going to be more robust for the simple reason that it need not depend on a wifi network connection. You can dump all of your data to it and be done with it.

      Plus, the rate of change with the commercial boxes is glacial. Sooner or later, the Gratisware competition WILL match Tivo in any respect.

      A jukebox that contains your most used DVD's and ALL of your music, plus does the VCR thing would be very handy to most people.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    13. Re:Sure, but... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      Frankly speaking, MythTV isn't TiVO, and your mileage may vary. My current uptime is 18 days on my mythtv box. For my wife, a MythTV crash (frontend or backend, she can't tell) results in a computer reboot to bring it back up for her because she's willing to hit the power button but not willing to learn to restart it.

      Not that it matters much, but your could trap something in /etc/inittab to restart mythtv...

      Of course, you probably don't really care, and I doubt your wife does either. Still, if you want for uptime this might help.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    14. Re:Sure, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a wife?

    15. Re:Sure, but... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      # Be rock-solid stable 24/

      I've had my ReplayTV crash on occassion (usually due to weirdness with one of the switches on my home network), so even off the shelf consumer PVRs aren't immune to downtime. Even without crashing, my ReplayTVs have to reboot every couple of days for software upgrades, etc., so I wouldn't be too concerned about maintaining perfect uptime. Just make sure your box doesn't go down while you're recording something or watching TV, and that should be about as much reliability as you really need.

    16. Re:Sure, but... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I've been eyeing a mac-mini for just such a purpose. Do you use Macintosh stuff, or Linux stuff on your mac to accomplish all that?

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    17. Re:Sure, but... by Apreche · · Score: 1

      DRM is ONLY a pain in the ass on Windows. That's because only windows and apple software actually pays attention to the DRM. Linux software just ignores it. If you run gentoo and turn on all the USE flags "+real +quicktime +mp3", etc. You can play any video or audio file ever with mplayer. I've never found one it couldn't handle.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    18. Re:Sure, but... by Golias · · Score: 3, Informative

      OS X, but not Tiger yet because M-Audio does not have working drivers for the Sonica with 10.4 yet, and if I can't have DTS audio, there's no point in going on with life. :)

      Word of warning if you are going to use the mini:

      The EyeTV software somehow manages to record and display HDTV signals okay on the mini, but HDTV playback via any other means (Quicktime, VLC, etc.) is damn near impossible, due to the relatively low CPU and GPU power of the mini.

      So, if you are mainly watching DVD's and using the EyeTV 500 pretty much exclusively for your HDTV, it's all fine and dandy, but if you plan on running other HD sources through the mini, you will not be happy with it.

      If you are a Linux geek and want to play back a wide variety of HD sources, you are probably better off setting up a MythTV box with a high-def video card.

      If you are not a Linux geek, I reccomend throwing money at the problem: A dual-G5 tower is a video processing god.

      For now, I'm happy enough with the mini. A year from now, when a lot more HD options are out there, I should be able to swap in something beefier (i.e. the XBox360, the next-gen PlayStation, or a newer and better Apple option) while leaving the real meat of my system, the projector and the stereo, exactly as it is.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:Sure, but... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      FWIW besides Windows MCE 2005 the other windows PVR/HTPC solutions don't have any DRM (just mpeg2 goodness)

      i.e. the free as in beer gbpvr, the not so free (except for the trial) BeyondTV, SageTV, and Meedio (there's more but i'm tired of typing in URL's already =) )

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    20. Re:Sure, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone used cards like Leadtek's WinFast PX6600 GT TDH Graphics Card with component outs (YrPrPb) on an HDTV for stuff like this?

    21. Re:Sure, but... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I have HD set up on mine. The only issue is that the HD tuner cards only go up through channels 125. I have to use my external tuner from Comcast to get to the 126-999 channels. It does have the nifty IR remote support I've been thinking of adding so it can beam the signal to switch channels straight to the receiver. I love my MythTV setup and use it every day.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    22. Re:Sure, but... by geckofiend · · Score: 1

      The two major HDTV cards for Linux both have drivers that are shipped with the kernel. How exactly is this hard? It's easier to set up HD than it is something like a PVR250.

    23. Re:Sure, but... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Even getting non-DRM open formats is a pain on Windows and OSX. These should be included in the default install, no?

    24. Re:Sure, but... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Frankly speaking, MythTV isn't TiVO, and your mileage may vary. My current uptime is 18 days on my mythtv box. For my wife, a MythTV crash (frontend or backend, she can't tell) results in a computer reboot to bring it back up for her because she's willing to hit the power button but not willing to learn to restart it.
      I take care of frontend crashes by having a X session that simply runs MythFrontEnd and nothing else. If MythFrontEnd exits for any reason the X session terminates and X brings up the login screen, which is set to log in the mythtv user automatically. Backend crashes haven't been a problem for me, though I do get occassional lockups when recording in the middle of the night.
    25. Re:Sure, but... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't give a Linux based media PC to my mother, it's not that easy to use. My wife is comfortable with finding what she wants to playback, but so far has never set up a program to record, she just leaves that up to me. Personally, I wouldn't watch TV without it.

    26. Re:Sure, but... by sarahemm · · Score: 1
      (Hint: If you watch ST:TNG you can get all the show in 30 minutes if you skip any scene involving Deanna Troi talking about people's feelings)

      Or, you could use the new feature in MythTV 0.18 (if you're using Myth, that is) which lets you speed up the show while leaving the audio pitch constant. Lets you watch a show in less time if you're rushed, without everyone sounding like chipmunks :) (also lets you watch a show slower! if you... have extra time to kill?)

    27. Re:Sure, but... by ingsocsoc · · Score: 1

      Should work good with the NVidia drivers, though fan noise will be a problem for a dedicated HTPC. Try a 6200, as it has all the great video output features and a passive heatsink. PCIE versions can steal memory from the system RAM too if you need it.

    28. Re:Sure, but... by Burz · · Score: 1

      (Hint: If you watch ST:TNG you can get all the show in 30 minutes if you skip any scene involving Deanna Troi talking about people's feelings).

      You insensitive clod.

  7. No HDTV? by Fulg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is all well and good, but until someone manages to get an HDTV-ready HTPC, it's not worth it. Get a HD-ready PVR from your local cable/satellite company, combine with Xbox Media Center, and you're all set :)

    Wasn't there an article about HTPCs a few weeks back (though it didn't specifically focus on Linux)?

    --
    gcc: no input sig
    1. Re:No HDTV? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind trying this. Except like all instructions, it's not detailed enough. To realistically build one, most people will need the instruction down to every single command to be dummy proof.

    2. Re:No HDTV? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have mod points, but I'll respond since I have a HDTV HTPC setup. It's pretty simple actually... it runs Meedio and uses the ATI dongle to output to my TV. I have a HDTV OTA capture card that I schedule programs in. Meedio imports recorded shows and I can watch them whenever I want.

      I don't, however, have the capability to do time-shifting. That's something I'll get once Meedio is done with their MeedioTV product. Also, I'll be looking into the cable card thing at some point, since I'd prefer to record from my cable service.

      The whole thing is more of a project than a product. It's something that I enjoy playing around with and it relaxes me. Anyone who just wants something that works should do exactly as you said and rent/purchase one.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    3. Re:No HDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go knock yourself out.

      http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/fcmyth.php

      Detailed instructions. Pre-compiled pre-configured everything. All you have to do is make sure you have the proper hardware and be able to download a OS off of the internet.

    4. Re:No HDTV? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      MythTV with a PCHDTV card'll do you just fine.

    5. Re:No HDTV? by chmilar · · Score: 1

      People are using MythTV to record HDTV. A number of ATSC capture cards are compatible with MythTV. (But not all capture cards; a notable exception is the ATi. Do research before purchasing.)

      The only problem is that you can only record OTA broadcast HDTV, or unencrypted cable HDTV if the cable company complies with proper QAM modulation and your capture card tunes QAM. You cannot record from DirecTV, Dish, or encrypted cable. The receivers for DirecTV, Dish, and encrypted cable are closed boxes, and it would be a violation of DMCA to try to tap into them.

      Sometime in the future, you will be able to buy an encoder card that can encode HDTV from component inputs, just like you can with NTSC signals now. Right now, the HDTV encoder cards are thousands of dollars.

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    6. Re:No HDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get one of these: http://www.digitalconnection.com/Products/Video/kd vtca3.asp

      Converts any vga signal to component

    7. Re:No HDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Get a pchdtv card. www.pchdtv.com Hurry, these cards do not come with mandated DRM stuff but that will be legally mandated in all such equipment July 1. A judge just ruled these laws unacceptable, but the RIAA types will most certainly fight that
      ruling. See http://www.iptablog.org/regulation/ for details. These cards are $169.95 and Linux specific. I just got mine yesterday. If you really want HDTV without DRM crap, buy now or cry later.
      I will be looking at TV live CD systems this weekend, including Myth TV live and other offerings such as Byzantine-OS.

    8. Re:No HDTV? by CapnGib · · Score: 1

      The whole thing is more of a project than a product. It's something that I enjoy playing around with and it relaxes me.

      (Score:5, Funny)

      --
      Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
  8. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Doing so will mean that you're going to do nothing but violate the MPAA rules. You should only use MPAA-approved viewing devices that are keyed to your genome.

  9. No HDTV ? by mybecq · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I find it interesting that very few of these articles attempt to cover HDTV or digital TV. There is more than one DTV card supported in Linux and an article containing this would prove much more valuable that just the "here's how to setup a box with a PVR-250/350" story that I seem to see everywhere.

    Where's the cutting edge stuff!?! :)

    1. Re:No HDTV ? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "I find it interesting that very few of these articles attempt to cover HDTV or digital TV. There is more than one DTV card supported in Linux and an article containing this would prove much more valuable that just the "here's how to setup a box with a PVR-250/350" story that I seem to see everywhere."

      Even though it's HDTV, the DTV cards aren't that sexy because they involved using rabbit ears and getting broadcast HDTV only. (so no DiscoveryHD or HBO HD)... it's dissapointing (unless you live in an area densely populated with DTV broadcasts, then I guess it's pretty cool).

      Before I get the nastygram replies:
      On some cable company boxes (depending on whether the HD channels you want are QAM "in the clear" you can get HDTV that way via HDTV card.

      There's also firewire transport from digital cable box, which I believe the latest mythtv release has some support for (but again I believe it depends on the roll of the dice on your cable providers settings)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:No HDTV ? by pocketfullofshells · · Score: 1

      Where's the cutting edge stuff!?! :)

      If I'm completely wrong, dont hate me, but don't you still need a HDTV ready TV even if you could get the signal processed by your linux box? This would explain your question, becase even though HDTV has been around for awhile, it is still not very popular. When I installed cable last year, I was doing maybe 1 HDTV install/upgrade a week, compared to almost 7 or 8 DVR/PVR upgrades/installs a week.

      I think HDTV is a bit more complicated than most people are aware.

    3. Re:No HDTV ? by mjh · · Score: 3, Informative
      Where's the cutting edge stuff!?! :)

      Right here.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    4. Re:No HDTV ? by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 1

      this reason you dont see HDTV tutorials is because the setup is EXACTLY the same, however here is a HDTV card w/ linux drivers http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~chrisp/Linux-DVB/DVICO/

      but the HDTV tuner cards cost a lot more so "reviewer's" usually dont spring for them for the project of the month.

      I am currently running in HDTV mode @ 720p. Cant seem to get 1080i currently (i think my 1080i mode line is wrong) however for 1080i you need a athlon 3000+ (or equiv) and a semi modern Nvidia card to have it played back full screen.

    5. Re:No HDTV ? by Golias · · Score: 1

      This is perhaps a nit-pick, but you don't use rabbit ears for over-the-air HDTV.

      Digial broadcasts are on the UHS band. Rabbit ears are for VHS reception.

      For my Mac-based HDTV PVR, I use a YAGI roof antenna.

      I have no interest in paying monthly fees of any kind just for television.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:No HDTV ? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you still connect your DVD player to a television set using a composite or even a S/Video connector, odds are that you'll see no improvement with digital television. But if you connect your DVD player up to your monitor using component video, and want your television programs to be displayed with the same level of detail and accuracy, you can buy a ATSC tuner, set it for 480i or 480p (depending on your existing set's sophistication), Connect the spdif out to a suitable input on your stereo, and enjoy "5.1" surround sound.

      Now, it won't match the detail of a 720p or 1080i set, but upgrading your display can wait, if it has to, On the other hand, if all you have is an old set with composite or RF connectors, maybe upgrading your display would be in your best interest.

      The major advantage of HDTV from a computing perspective is that it's already digital-- mpeg2 video, ac3 sound.

      Then again, I get my signals OTA, not from cable or satellite. I understand that some satellite and cable companies try to charge extra money for the benefit of a few HD channels.

    7. Re:No HDTV ? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      " This is perhaps a nit-pick, but you don't use rabbit ears for over-the-air HDTV.

      Digial broadcasts are on the UHS band. Rabbit ears are for VHS reception.

      For my Mac-based HDTV PVR, I use a YAGI roof antenna."

      You're kidding right? I meant rabbit ears somewhat euphamistically but that's essentially what they are. You *can* use a regular oldschool UHF/VHF roof antenna, if you like (and it's still installed/wired).

      VHS reception, that's a good one. *wipes tears from my eyes*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    8. Re:No HDTV ? by Golias · · Score: 1

      That was a goofy typo, but no I was not kidding. Rabbit-ear style antennae are designed for VHF reception.

      You can use the hybrid UHF/VHF roof antenna, but a dedicated UHF one is even better. There's nothing "oldschool" about the massive YAGI antenna I installed for my HD reception.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:No HDTV ? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Two points:

      You don't need to digitize or compress the video.
      The particular digital television standard varies from country to country-- an Australian tuner will not work in the US, and vice versa.

    10. Re:No HDTV ? by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Believe it or not, I've seen people pull in perfect over the air HDTV streams using nothing but a $10 pair of rabbit ears and an eyeTV 500 as a decoder.

      And this is with the rabbit ears sitting on a desk indoors in an office building with lots of metal everywhere (including the window frames).

    11. Re:No HDTV ? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure we are just talking semantics.

      You can use a UHF/VHF indoor antenna which I'm referring to as rabitt ears (even if they don't look like rabbit ears anymore).

      I'm glad you have a yogi living on your roof that tunes Broadcast DTV for you. =P

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    12. Re:No HDTV ? by Golias · · Score: 1

      You can use a UHF/VHF indoor antenna which I'm referring to as rabitt ears (even if they don't look like rabbit ears anymore).

      Yes, we are talking semantics. That's why I opened by saying I was nit-picking.

      "Rabit ears" are the ones that look kinda like rabbit ears: two long (usually extendable) poles going up and away from each other on little pivot hinges. They are designed for VHF signal reception.

      A lot of them come also with a UHF antenna attached (which usually looks like a little loop or a small grid of wire at the base of the antenna), but the term "rabbit ears" applies to the VHF part, which on its own will do very little to help you tune in HDTV (unless you are close enough to the broadcast tower that you get the signal coming in on your dental fillings.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:No HDTV ? by hawk · · Score: 1
      >Rabbit ears are for VHS reception.

      So if I get some, do I just hang the tape from one, or do I do I still need a VCR?

      :)

      hawk

    14. Re:No HDTV ? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Firewire from the cable box is a digital hole likely to be closed by the demand of the MPAA in coming months. There's a spec called "5C" which involves secure key exchange between two Firewire devices to determine whether both are compliant with a copy control flag, and a 5C-compliant device won't send to a noncompliant device. (Content encryption is involved as well.)

      http://www.dtcp.com/data/wp_spec.pdf

    15. Re:No HDTV ? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Prices listed at mythic.tv for air2pc and hd-3000 are $172.00 (currently out of stock) and $167.50 respectively.

      At pricewatch, a pvr-250 comes back with several total costs between %125 and %130. So it costs a whopping 35% more to go with an hdtv capture card than dit does a pvr-250. (pvr-350s run in the $175 per area, so approximately the same cost as a hdtv capture card.)

      For those not already insisting on getting an HDTV ready 42" plasma screen, or so, you may find a simple 19" lcd pannel for $277 (tonight on pricewatch) may provide a suitable display. Or if you are really pressed, some of the old 17" CRTs out there did do 1600x1280, though as a computer display I never enjoyed that output, it should work well for HDTV even up to 1080i.

      The other reason that a lot of the reviewers don't want to do all that much with hdtv is that you really do start needing to get really large hard disk storage capacity to do more than a couple of hours of capture with. Granted setting up an array of four 250 gig drives isn't that expensive, or hard, but it is extra work.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    16. Re:No HDTV ? by zenyu · · Score: 1


      This is perhaps a nit-pick, but you don't use rabbit ears for over-the-air HDTV.
      Digial broadcasts are on the UHS band. Rabbit ears are for VHS reception.


      Is it ok to nit-pick the nitpicker? Rabbit ears are for VHS, and most HDTV is in the UHS bands, but there are VHS HDTV channels, for instance in New York City UPN is on ch 12...

      BTW bow-ties are what you want for UHS, and hence most HDTV transmissions.

      For my Mac-based HDTV PVR, I use a YAGI roof antenna.
      You almost certainly have a "Log Periodic" antenna. Yagis are tuned to just one frequency, and in television are typically only used by cable operators who want a fix on just one channel, for rebroadcast on their systems.

  10. Linux and Video Capture by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
    On a slightly related (yet ironically slightly offtopic) note, does anyone know of a decent listing of capture hardware that runs under linux? The Video For Linux pages have a supported hardware list, but this primarily concentrates on supported chipsets, not end user devices. Obviously, it can be difficult to infer the latter from the former.

    I ask because I have projects in the works that depends on working video capture drivers, and I'd like to be able to distribute (or distribute a pointer to) a list of supported video HW under 2.4 or 2.6. What lists I have managed to find seem out either wrong or somewhat out of date. Thanx -- m

    1. Re:Linux and Video Capture by timeOday · · Score: 1

      By "projects," do you mean professional? The only high quality capture I've seen for linux is this, which is a little over $3K I think.

    2. Re:Linux and Video Capture by mickwd · · Score: 1

      I know you asked for a list, but here's one I found that actually advertises that their hardware works with Linux:

      AverMedia AVerTV DVB-T USB2.0

      I've no personal experience of how well (or not) it works under Linux, but I thought I'd share their link because it's nice to see a hardware manufacturer acknowledge that Linux even exists.

    3. Re:Linux and Video Capture by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

      No -- consumer level capture capability is fine.

  11. xbox by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just get a modded xbox. It's very easy to use and no headaches. I had it modded and the dude pre-loaded xbox media player. Plays pretty much anything. With the newer xbox 360 coming out, expect older xboxes to take a price dive around the holidays.

    1. Re:xbox by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      The problem with the XBox is the vast majority of the optical drives that come with them are incapable of reading burned CDs, or in some cases even audio CDs. Even if you get the drive that's supposed to be the most compatible, the Samsung, it still may not be able to read them (like mine).

      The XBox isn't a great solution because the drives suck. A good solution, yes, but not a great one.

    2. Re:xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you not just replace said optical drives?

    3. Re:xbox by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      does the xbox speak dvi, natively?

      (I don't own one)

      any decent home theatre setup today should have digital video. either via firewire or dvi or that new pinout that is equiv to dvi (can't think of the name but its fairly recent).

      or, am I the only one who wants to separate, as far as physically possible, the spinning drives and fan noises from the video display/speakers/viewing area?

      long cable lengths with analog _anything_ (audio or video) is a no-no. I'm hoping that that new dvi thing will be a good first step at remoting the playback hardware from the viewing hardware.

      but the xbox, no, I don't think its setup for that kind of thing. and since its not dead silent (with local drives), to me its not a good candidate for a proper solution.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:xbox by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      The High Definition AV pack gives you component 480i / 480p (if the game supports it). That's good enough for DVDs and Xvid and the like. For HDTV you're gonna need something else. My xbox is very quiet and diesn't bother me at all.

    5. Re:xbox by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      My xbox is very quiet and diesn't bother me at all.


      how do you serve content? from remote (ethernet) drives or via local storage?

      for any decent sized movie collection, you're gonna need A LOT of drives. even at today's 400gb/unit density.

      I'm saying - you need to consider the concept of 'remoting the display'. it just makes too much sense. then you can go wild with fans and drives and whatnot. just in a 'server room', which could be a spare bedroom or basement or closet. just NOT in the quiet viewing room.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Just get a modded xbox. It's very easy to use and no headaches.

      First you buy a XBox. ($)

      1. Then mod it. (+$)
      2. Replace the hard drive because 8GB is too small. (+$)
      3. Replace the CD drive because most don't play burned CDs. (+$)
      4. There's no way to add a tuner to watch or record live TV.
      5. There's no expandability.

      Aside from that, it's not a bad idea.
    7. Re:xbox by treyb · · Score: 1

      The XBox doesn't have a fast enough CPU (or enough hardware acceleration support) to handle HDTV. The XBox 360 looks like it will have the CPU power, but we'll have to wait for the first hacks to try it out.

    8. Re:xbox by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      With the newer xbox 360 coming out, expect older xboxes to take a price dive around the holidays.

      Yep. I'm expecting to spend $60 or $70 on a used Xbox in early 2006, and with GentooX and MythTV on it my digital playback needs will be covered.

      That being said, though, the Xbox is only suitable as a home theater frontend. It has no Video In or MPEG encoder, so for PVR-like functionality you'll still need a separate backend server in the other room, or at least a reliable source for TV torrents.

    9. Re:xbox by Hast · · Score: 1

      Only the first drive, from Thomson, had that problem. I haven't heard of anyone buying an XBox in the last few years that have had the problem.

    10. Re:xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's your point? You're comparing a hacked-up XBox running free software with a full-blown multimedia PC with an LCD monitor running commercial software?

      The only advantage I can see with the hacked-up XBox is that it does have support for HDTV, but then I don't have an HDTV (yet).

    11. Re:xbox by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      my rebuttle as a happy xbox media center user:

      1. you don't have to buy mod chips anymore
      2. connect to your computer with the media on it over ethernet
      3. see #2
      4. change the channel on the television, get a DVR from your cable company if they offer it
      5. add some old nintendo games to keep you or your kids busy.

      I use it primarily to play DVDs and downloaded videos and music. It also serves as a nice gaming console. I think these linux pvr solutions are overkill for what could be replaced by a tivo, xbox, and an ethernet cable. Just my two cents though.

    12. Re:xbox by Fulg · · Score: 1

      The High Definition AV pack gives you component 480i / 480p (if the game supports it). That's good enough for DVDs and Xvid and the like. For HDTV you're gonna need something else.

      Actually the Xbox High Definition AV pack gives you access to all HD resolutions; you just don't see them in games because most cannot afford the extra RAM for the larger framebuffer.

      If your Xbox is "no longer under warranty" you can try out Xbox Media Center and make it use any HD resolution you want. Mine is set up as a dashboard in 720p native and it looks quite sweet... 1080i is even better but I can't bear the interlaced display.

      Coupled with a PC over ethernet (away in another room so noise isn't an issue) I can stream all the media I want without even touching the local Xbox drives. For recording I have a dedicated PVR (sadly not a Tivo, which would fit this setup quite well).

      --
      gcc: no input sig
    13. Re:xbox by Fulg · · Score: 1

      does the xbox speak dvi, natively?

      No, it does not. I assume this is due to pressure from the MPAA and the likes (the "digital output == perfect copy" argument?).

      Google reveals at least one Xbox VGA adapter, though I have no idea if that supports HD or if you are locked to 640x480.

      --
      gcc: no input sig
    14. Re:xbox by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      That's not true. Nearly all of the current drives are unable to play CDs or in some cases any burned media. My XBox is only 5 months old, came with the supposedly "best" drive, the Samsung, and still doesn't play a variety of media. Compatibility has gotten worse, not better.

  12. Obligatory ATI warning by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 4, Informative

    We've been down this PVR road many times here on /., and I don't know that this article's really adding anything that hasn't been said multiple times in other articles, but it's worth repeating that if you're going to build a Linux-based PVR system, do not plan being bale to use your ATI AIW card.

    It just ain't going to cut it under Linux (blame about why this is goes back and forth, but the end result is that it just won't work). Instead, plan on investing in a Hauppage card. The 350 is a good place to start.

    1. Re:Obligatory ATI warning by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this is true. Even old AIW cards (like my original AIW Pro) have dodgy support, at best, and quite obivously, no mythTv support :(

      for me, getting a nice hauppage is always 2 paychecks out.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:Obligatory ATI warning by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      unfortunately you need to say away from ATI video cards too. I had to find a geforce4 440MX for my test-system because my ati 9700pro just wasnt going to work well enough.

      also the Hauppage card is a good beginner card as it has lots of documentation, however plextor has a better device http://www.plextor.com/english/products/TV402U.htm
      that "Hardware Encode to DivX, MPEG-4, MPEG-2/DVD and MPEG-1/VCD" as well as a "better" tuner.

      there are linux drivers and mythtv supports it, but not many ppl have gotten it (yet).

    3. Re:Obligatory ATI warning by leoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should also try a Plextor M402U or TV402U. It's a hardware MPEG encoder with fully open sourced drivers for Linux.

      --
      STFU about slashdot bias.
  13. A much bigger thing to express by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first paragraph of the article states:

    Linux is one of the most remarkable phenomena in the recent history of personal computing. In some ways, it's similar to the original homebrew PC movement of the late 1970s and early 80s. Equal parts cool kids club and grass roots revolution, Linux in its many different forms has proven itself a force to be reckoned with. A highly configurable OS that can both scale up to big enterprise iron and down to handheld devices, Linux can do almost anything. It even powers the most well-known PVR on the planet, TiVo.

    I think there is something bigger here that merely Linux which is, after all, just a kernel of the OS. The kernel as well as the rest of the significant components are driven to development by the will of the community that finds interest in their own ends. They don't do this to win a popularity contest. They don't do it in order to bring anyone down. Mostly, they are doing it "because they want to." (And the only way to stop that is to take away their freedoms)

    I think the project is cool and I will, one of these days, take it upon myself when I have the beer and other money to throw at it. But there is opportunity here for the entrepreneur!

    The fact is, only a tiny portion of the public will do this for themselves... the rest of us will want to BUY it...

  14. Building it is the easy part... by machinegunhand · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just wait until you try finding something decent to watch.

    1. Re:Building it is the easy part... by pocketfullofshells · · Score: 1

      cat TV | grep "decent" > goodtv

    2. Re:Building it is the easy part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, thank you...

      That summed up why I went to the trouble of setting up dxr3 on Linux to watch rented DVDs on a cheap fanless computer, while I don't own anything capable of receiving the crap from the airwaves.

      --

  15. shame you couldn't get it to work properly. by JVert · · Score: 1

    Media Portal looks real good, its windows based but seriously mythTV just seems to be a little stagnant compared to the work being done in other PVR software programs.

    1. Re:shame you couldn't get it to work properly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mythTV just seems to be a little stagnant compared to the work being done in other PVR software programs.
      Well that's what FLOSS is all about isn't it? Just work with the one you like.

  16. Too Little Too Late by BrainSurgeon · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hate to sound like a troll...but, eh

    The xbox360 is going to dominate the living room, sorry to say to all you pro-linux folks. With specs like this the Linux home system has some BIG shoes to fill.

    --
    "It's not rocket science, Smithers! It's only brain surgery!" --Mr. Burns
    1. Re:Too Little Too Late by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      That is all the XBOX 360 will be, a media center, not a gaming console. It's an easy way to get more market in the MS MCE Dept. and I'm convinced this is the only way they will be able to market the 360 as the games are quite lacking.

      Us pro-linux folks will have actual PVR media centers and you will have your XBOX 360 with its crippling DRM and MS only formats... yeah, we lose.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    2. Re:Too Little Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How's that compare to the Sony CELL based systems?

      Thought so.

      And evenmoreso, 350MHz PCs played DVDs just fine; so I don't see what's the big deal with all this hardware.

    3. Re:Too Little Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Can it play mkv files with multiple audio streams and multiple sets of subtitles? Can it use any and all video codecs that exist on any platform, even if they aren't specifically released for it? Can it handle acessing the contents of an NFS share with two 300G drives RAIDed on the other end of it?

      No?

      Then it's not useful to me. It might dominate in someone else's living room, but why would I care about that?

    4. Re:Too Little Too Late by BrainSurgeon · · Score: 0

      Did you even look at the specs??

      With a TERAFLOP of overall system perf, I think it will be a little more than a "media center". This thing could power NASA!!

      Yes, I agree, the games are lacking...because IT'S BRAND NEW!

      As for the PVR, Microsoft is already in this space and has one out with Comcast the runs on 1/4 the hardware that the 360 has. Image what you'll get with a 3 cores running at 3.2GHz!!

      DRM?? You're fooling yourself if you think the OSS community won't implement this one day. It's a dollars and sense game and big businesses are looking to get a piece of the action. DRM assists to make the technology more attractive.
      MS only file formats? At double the compression of MP3 with the same quaintly, I'll take that any day.

      So, yea, I guess you're right...you do lose. :(

      --
      "It's not rocket science, Smithers! It's only brain surgery!" --Mr. Burns
    5. Re:Too Little Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All together now, 1..2...3....ASTROTURFER!!!

    6. Re:Too Little Too Late by BrainSurgeon · · Score: 0

      DVDs??? HAHAHA, I gotta say you're living in the 90's....

      DVRs are the new thing! Static Media is a thing of the past!!

      --
      "It's not rocket science, Smithers! It's only brain surgery!" --Mr. Burns
    7. Re:Too Little Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The xbox360 is going to dominate the living room, sorry to say to all you pro-linux folks. With specs like this the Linux home system has some BIG shoes to fill.

      How fast do you think there will be a mod chip for it and someone has Linux on there? DAYS after the release, at worst. HOURS is probably more like it.

    8. Re:Too Little Too Late by BrainSurgeon · · Score: 1

      Tisk, tisk....

      In the famous words of George W. "Fool me once same on you...fool me twice...uh...ummm...don't fool me again!"

      I think lessons have been learned....

      --
      "It's not rocket science, Smithers! It's only brain surgery!" --Mr. Burns
    9. Re:Too Little Too Late by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The xbox360 is going to dominate the living room, sorry to say to all you pro-linux folks. With specs like this the Linux home system has some BIG shoes to fill."

      Those specs are overkill for a home theater system. As for whether or not the XBOX 360 dominates the living room, consider that games will drive the purchase of this machine.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Too Little Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...Yes...Yes... It's a PowerPC...
      it CAN run Linux... 64-bit Linux... :-)

      GOOOOD... I also want a TuX-box...

    11. Re:Too Little Too Late by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      No I didn't look at the specs... WTF? Run NASA??? yeah, OK.

      I have been a member of the gaming media for a very long time and am quite well versed in consoles and console hardware, the XBOX 360 does not offer much at all than any game developer cares about. Game developers are not fawning over the XBOX 360 at all! That tells you something right there. Porting is almost impossible based on their architecture and this is not what makes developers want to support a platform. Microsoft has the worst developer support because of this, they have to buy small developers to get any exclusive content such as RARE and Bungie.

      Launch titles mean everything to a system, XBOX 360 has 2 maybe 3 and none of them are killer apps. Perfect Dark Zero, cool graphically the same to current gen titles, Condemned, niche market title offering AI improvements, Kameo, bloom effect is the only new aspect to this title, Madden, the usual will buy this and it will most likely be the biggest selling launch title... not good when a sports title is the top launch title this usually spells doom.

      Microsoft HAS NO FOOTING in the PVR market, they sell Media Center Edition OS and no hardware besides the remote. A PVR running on 3 cores is the same a sa PVR running on 1 or 2, you really let the hype get to you about these three cores they mean very litle in actual game programming, the biggest advantage of the XBOX 360 you missed totally - and that is the programmable shader/vertex GPU features, and this will rarely be used because no one besides exclusive titles will utilize it. Exclusive hardware means little in consoles and if you had even a bit of a finger n the pulse of the gaming industry you would find no developers outside of the MS purchased ones are excited about the specs so far.

      And another thing, why would anyone care about DRM in the OSS community?, I would love to hear your lame-brained defense of this statement.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  17. wee by Amouth · · Score: 1

    script to script to script to script.. all existing .. just they took the time to make it work.. one something god knows it it will work for anyone else out there.. atleast not all the stuff..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  18. My Mythtv Impressons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am a happy Mythtv user.

    I watch TV much anymore, but I wanted to muck around with it, so I bought a WinPVR-250 card.

    I stuck it in my file server, and watch it on my desktop. Both are running Debian, of course.

    For debian/ubuntu users check out this line:
    #Mythtv
    deb http://dijkstra.csh.rit.edu/~mdz/debian unstable mythtv

    I am sure you know what it is for.. (minus the /. add-on bracketry)

    The only tricky part was that the guide was off by one hour (found a quick-n-easy SQL one-liner on the internet to fix that) and setting up MySQL so that it would accept remote connections (this is disabled in Debian by default).

    I found out that it will happily run in a window and is fairly desktop friendly, which I didn't know they had it setup to do. My desktop resolution is 2 monitors at 1280x1024 and I run mythtv at 800x600. Nice picture and a pleasent distraction while mucking around with work or whatnot.

    Also nice for when you want to watch TV with your laptop.

    If I had a second chance at a card (bought it a while ago) I'd get one of those plexor's that use the go7007 drivers.

    Plexor GPL'd the drivers themselves and they look nice. Much more capable then the WinPVR stuff.. Can encode in mpeg4 (divx-style) as well as mpeg2 and others, were the WinPVR can only do mpeg2.

    I may actually buy one still.

    One tip: when you find a show you want to watch, hit the 'r' button to start recording it. I find that when I let it pause for a couple hours and I come back to finish watching the show to many times I accidently change the channel and loose my buffer.

    1. Re:My Mythtv Impressons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and here are the go7007 driver page from gentoo.
      http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_go7007
      Mythtv only supports it in CVS right now.

  19. What will Microsoft's reaction be this time? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    What will Microsoft's reaction to this development be this time round? As a slashdotter and an upcoming pundit in the Computer Operating Systems' world, I am very interested. Is there an active community being built to improve this product? Hope so. Have a good weekend guys.

    1. Re:What will Microsoft's reaction be this time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mythtv has been around for a long time now. At least a couple years.

      Freevo before that.

      Microsoft released MCE to try to capture the PC dvr/time shifter market.

      Except that there isn't much of one. People get confused because they sold a few copies of it, but you have to realise that it's priced the same as regular Windows XP.

      So which would you want? Regular XP or Regular XP + MCE crap.

      Most people would be better off with a TiVo or a low-price DVR model from their Cable/whatever provider.

      It's better then MCE and aviable at a fraction of the price.

      I use Mythtv becuase I use Linux and have a PC and the card is 100 dollars and cheaper and more capable then a TiVo.

  20. As long as it passes the "wife" test by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I started a project like this last fall, but abandoned it after i determined that it wouldn't pass the most important test of all. If my wife wouldn't be able to use it, it was worthless.

    Not like she's a retarded spider monkey or anything - she's a graphic designer and uses OS X (left myself wide open for that one, i know) but if she's got to use three different remotes and a keyboard, there's no way in hell she's going to use the damn thing. I don't need her calling me at work to walk her through how to watch a DVD or listen to music.

    Plus, if it's really easy and slick, then she'll be a lot more accepting of the equipment purchases that i tell her about.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by superid · · Score: 1

      Give it a shot. The MythTV interface is really intuitive. My wife and 3 kids all picked it up in minutes with no problems.

    2. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by crow · · Score: 1

      It passed the test for my wife, and that was after she first got used to a ReplayTV, which has one of the best interfaces available.

      She *loves* having the weather module.

      Having the future recordings, and being able to tell it to avoid recording upcoming shows that we know we've seen is incredibly useful.

    3. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by clem · · Score: 0, Troll

      9 out of 10 retarded spider monkeys prefer Mac OS X to the leading consumer operating system.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    4. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if she's got to use three different remotes and a keyboard, there's no way in hell she's going to use the damn thing

      You should be able to set up MythTV to be controlled using a single remote (preferably RF instead of IR), and have it control most of your other devices using an IR blaster.

    5. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

      regardless of platform (windoze/linux) a good htpc/pvr once setup/configured shouldn't need the keyboard & mouse; just a remote control.

      It functions like a TiVo on steroids, except it's a PC (or a Mac).

      Almost everything should be taken care of via the frontend, and for everything else (occassional admin type stuff) there's SSH, VNC, etc over your network.

      *shrug*

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    6. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been running MytTV for 2 years now, and it has been very solid in our house.

      I also bought a Harmony remote and it had setting for MythTV. Now the whole family uses everything via 1 remote with no problems!

    7. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test (Score:0, Troll)

      Awww...did this hurt someone's feewings?

    8. Re:As long as it passes the "wife" test by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      Not like she's a retarded spider monkey or anything

      My retarded spider monkey takes offense at that.

  21. Where's the HTPC Distro? by cloudscout · · Score: 3, Funny

    When are we going to see a Linux distribution specifically geared toward home theater PCs?

    Sure, I probably should research this before posting, but if I did that, I wouldn't be a proper Slashdot reader, would I?

    1. Re:Where's the HTPC Distro? by y2dt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its called KnoppMyth, based off Knoppix

      http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    2. Re:Where's the HTPC Distro? by cesman · · Score: 1

      Hello KnoppMyth. Check out my URL.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    3. Re:Where's the HTPC Distro? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      there's also plutohome although it has much different goals (imho) than that of knoppmyth. I guess it depends on what you are looking for.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    4. Re:Where's the HTPC Distro? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      everyone keeps saying that, I wish they would Knopp

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After fooling around with Linux and the VDR (HD recording software for TV) since 2000 and trying PCs for home theater, I quit all this. Too much hassle, 90% fiddling aroung and less than 10% real usage.

    Now I got a MacMini here. Its small, quiet, comes with a good pre installed OS.

    30$ for a remote control (BlueTooth -> SallingClicker)
    and Im ready.

    serves video, TV, audio, Internet (without virus probs) whatever.
    Runs with or without a TV attached (use your mobile phone as a status display)

    And most of all, it works ! Easy to configure and no maintenance required. Also uses much less power (25W, 40W max)

    No real HD yet (only live via eyeTV from elGato and reduced resolution), but HD never worked flawlessly on my PC too.

    1. Re:been there by rlauzon · · Score: 1
      Been there, done it.

      My MythTV box works better than any DVR that I've seen yet (although it's a bit larger).

      It's a great DVR, MP3 player, and region-free DVD player.

      I can't say it was a snap to get all working, but it certainly was a rewarding project.

    2. Re:been there by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Don't you also need a tv tuner as well?

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:been there by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What hardware are you using to get the video on the HD? I know there are some USB2 cards out there, but do you have a recommendation? Also what software PVR package are you using? I don't think I've seen any yet for OS X, but I remember hearing that MythTV kind of runs...

    4. Re:been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.elgato.com/

      Look for the various EyeTV products (as the original poster mentioned). The 200 is your basic PVR stuff. The 500 is the HDTV version.

  23. Horrible article, here's a summary by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This really was poor, a couple Linux N00b's try to get a HTPC together based on an almost automatic install of KnoppMyth and still can't do it due to lack of knowledge of Linux and fear of illegality to play DVD's.

    Basically it is as simple as selecting the supported hardware, pop in the CD and go... these guys get tripped up tring to get a SUPPORTED remote to work and don't even know how to add two commands to the window manager so they don't have to go to the CLI to run Gedit!!! Morons.

    This article did nothing, it didn't educate, it didn't enlighten, and it actually just spread more FUD about Windows MCE being better and easier. Thanks /. for helping promote Linux by posting "news" articles written by total n00b's with no idea of what they are doing as this is even their admitted numerous attempt to do this.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it actually just spread more FUD about Windows MCE being better and easier.

      Is it really FUD if it's the truth?

      For "n00bs" at least, XP Media Center Edition really IS better and easier than trying to roll your own Linux PVR.

      And remember, MOST CONSUMERS are "n00bs". They can't all be L33T SUPAR USARS LIEK YUO!!!

    2. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what morons! All they want to do is set up a computer to watch TV, and they haven't mastered bash! Cmon, next you're gonna tell me they haven't mastered VI either!

      Cmon, if we expect regular people to use Linux, condescending attitudes towards editing archaic text files won't cut it. I hope newbs go out and buy a copy of Windows and install Media Portal, just to spite your kind.

    3. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Basically it is as simple as selecting the supported hardware, pop in the CD and go... these guys get tripped up tring to get a SUPPORTED remote to work and don't even know how to add two commands to the window manager so they don't have to go to the CLI to run Gedit!!! Morons.

      Okay, but for linux to get any marketability to the end-user, those "morons" would have to buy these products, and use them successfully.

      You try explaining CLI/Gedit/Window Manager to regular people, let alone someone who barely understands how a start button works.

    4. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Umm, this isn't roll your own, this is a freaking LiveCD basically that is preconfigured by clicking on menus. Creating your own PVR has nothing to do with Linux or mass appeal, those folks will by a TiVO or take what the sattelite/cable co. offers for $5/month.

      The above two replies also classify as moronic, even moreso than the article.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    5. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a single person "layperson" who, FROM SCRATCH, setup a Windows MCE PVR from selecting hardware, through installing the OS and connecting it all together.

    6. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      actaully, based upon the types of questions I get in the byopvr forums MCE 2005 isn't so easy to setup either unless you have all MCE certifed devices/drivers/etc... or buy it preconfigured (but that's more buy your own pvr as opposed to build)

      *shrug* just to show a different side of it.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    7. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      My initial response is "fuck you, asshole."

      But to go into a little more detail... let's list some of the things in your post that are offensive:

      1) The term "Noobs"
      2) The fact that anybody who doesn't know how to "add two commands to the window manager" (Personally, I don't even know what that means!) is a moron.
      3) The fact that MCE is better and easier (fact, buddy) is FUD. Is it spreading fear? Does it spread uncertainty? Does it spread doubt? No; it's simply better. I've used both, and I'll vouch for it personally.

      A usability problem is a usability problem. If the remote is listed as "supported," then why should they have to do *anything* to get it to work? It should just work right away. Not wanting to install DeCSS to watch DVDs is a perfectly acceptable position to take-- news flash: It IS illegal! (If you don't like it, spend money for a license and purchase rights to decode DVDs on Linux.) Why do they have to run Gedit if they're using supported hardware?

      It's not FUD if it's true. (It's also not FUD if it's a blatent lie-- the acronym seems to have lost the meaning it once had.)

    8. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you noob. You probably don't know how to add two commands to the window manager and you're vouching for a Microsoft product. Moron.

    9. Re:Horrible article, here's a summary by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      these guys get tripped up tring to get a SUPPORTED remote to work and don't even know how to add two commands to the window manager so they don't have to go to the CLI to run Gedit!!! Morons.

      So what you're effectively saying here is that these guys who tried this, guys who probably have more than average knowledge of computers compared to the rest of civilization, couldn't get this product to work right and had trouble figuring out the simplest of operations on it.

      Yeah, that seems about it. And people wonder why Linux has a reputation for being difficult to use and l33t Linux gurus with m4d sk1llz are elitist, snobbish, and generally condescending to everyone else.

      Look, folks, at some point it's not FUD anymore. I spent the better part of two weeks building my own PVR (admittedly before KnoppMyth was available, but doing it was supposedly well documented) and came away frustrated and angry. Documentation that was supposed to be complete wasn't. Facts that were supposed to be correct weren't. And software that was supposed to work with my hardware didn't.

      I finally got it to work (mostly) but I wouldn't want to wish that same experience on my worst enemy. And I've been working with computers for the better part of twenty years and working with Linux for the last ten of those years.

      Now, if I'd wanted to, I could've had Windows Media Center edition up and running in under two hours, and it would've worked right the first time. I refused to use Win MCE for a number of reasons, though mainly because it didn't allow me the unfettered access to recorded files that I really wanted (DVD archival is so choice with HDTV source material). But the point is this: the Linux solution was exponentially harder, and it was only because I absolutely demanded certain features that I went through the trouble of screwing around with it.

      You call it FUD, but those of us who don't have a Linux Religion chip on our shoulder call it reality. Is Microsoft beating Linux in the feature, security, or stability war? Absolutely not. Is it beating Linux in the ease-of-use war? It sure seems that way sometimes, and comments like yours simply reinforce the mentality that all is well in the Linux usability camp, so don't bother improving anything.

      Keep it up. I hear Bill Gates loves it when his targets are smug with self-satisfaction. It makes it easier for him to sneak up, steal all the good parts of the competition's product, and "embrace and extinguish" them to death.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  24. Linux-based PhotoBridge is much easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is easier to just buy a PhotoBridge (Linux-based) for about $300

    http://rokulabs.com/products/photobridge

    Then set up a PC in another room with a large disk drive and HDTV tuner card.

    Details here:

    http://frequal.com/pmn/TopComponents.html

  25. "Buy the beer first...", famous last words by jfb3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't they know that the difference between "Wouldn't it be cool if..." and a Darwin award is a couple of six-packs.

    1. Re:"Buy the beer first...", famous last words by jfb3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that should be: The distance between "Wouldn't it be cool if..." and a Darwin award can be measured in six-packs.

    2. Re:"Buy the beer first...", famous last words by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I always thought the difference would be between "Wouldn't be cool if . . ." and "Hold my beer and watch this . . ."

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  26. downloading movies by The+Pim · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One piece that seems to be missing is the ability to download movies from the various (legal) on-line movie rental sites (eg movielink.com). Most of them won't even let you into the site without IE. I haven't tried faking it out, because I'm afraid there will be further obstacles (for example, movielink.com requires me to install a Windows application before downloading). Are there any sites that can be made to work on a free system? And then there's the problem of playing the downloaded movies. I thought that this would be possible, but even with mplayer and the w32codecs, I had trouble with the WMV9 file from movielink.com. :-(

    Downloading movies (yes, I mean mainstream movies with restricted licenses, not the few that are free) would be one of the killer apps for a Linux HTPC, but it seems there is no way to do it, even if I am willing to pay.

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  27. I'm in! by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 2, Funny

    FINALLY...I have been waiting for something like this. I'm too cheap to buy all the things you used to need. But I have a bunch of computers I can use.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  28. Why are there not more turn-key versions of this by monkeyfarm · · Score: 1

    Is there not a viable business model (cost, profit, customer service) that takes the Tivo model to the next level by having a more general purpose computing device as a digital media center, without the outrageous "premium" that comes with MS's Media Center PC's. Can't a sub $1,000 linux based, HD, headless digital media centric PC be designed, marketed, and built so that it "Just Works?" Seriously, I'd like to buy one. just not for $2,000 There's no way I'm going to blow the type of time it would take to roll my own.

    --
    What I don't know I just fake...
  29. I agree with this post by cavemanf16 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As several other /.'ers have already mentioned, the main issue with building a Linux-based PVR/DVR/HTPC/whatever you want to call it - is: "the wife factor." In other words, the system MUST operate like most other consumer electronics - you turn it on and it *just works*. Maybe it's not 100% flawless, but it better be pretty damn close.

    For this reason, I had settled on a Windows XP install with a Hauppauge PVR-250 a while back on my old computer. The main problems I have had to date with it:
    1. The EPG guide from Zap2It is all messed up. It doesn't update each week at 3am like it's supposed to do, and the channels are flung all over the place and not in any apparent order.
    2. The hardware is too slow for GB-PVR. This software is pretty cool and works well enough, except on outdated hardware like mine. The menus are extraordinarily sluggish, sometimes with pauses of a couple minutes while the system "gets back up to speed" after sitting dormant for a while. (And this is a software issue, definitely not the hardware coming out of "sleep" mode or anything like that.)

    Admittedly, I need some new hardware. When I do get around to installing a faster motherboard, proc, and memory I am going to install Linux anyways. Unfortunately, I have a feeling that the Linux solutions out there are still too much in their infancy to pass "the wife factor" right now. My wife can't use the current system because it's too sluggish and doesn't *just work* 100% of the time. (It doesn't work at all if I don't manually update the channel listings once a week which can take 20-30 minutes!)

    My main point is: if you plan on building a Linux-based HTPC make sure that you have some pretty decent spare parts laying around, because if you don't it's probably just a lot more worth your time and money to go buy a top-of-the-line Tivo right now.
    1. Re:I agree with this post by iso · · Score: 1

      If you're not going to use Linux, go MCE2005. It's amazing, and definitely passes the "wife factor."

    2. Re:I agree with this post by iccaros · · Score: 1

      hmm.. Myhttv on the server.. modded Xbox running the front end on gentoox.. uses Xbox remote control.. no problem .. wife use the wireless Xbox controller.. as the xbox remote is slow... she also likes that she can set up tv shows with a web browser from her PC.. its not like they have ot use a command line.. move to live tv and click.. move to record and click.. wow Linux has point and click.. I even have HDTV from the Xbox.. imagian that.. things my Mythtv boox will do Tivo will not (yes I have one of those as well) MAME web serfing email secuerity camera recording web interface for show programing control local on demand weather information I use a homebuilt NAS with 4 400 gig SATA drives on a mini-ITX board (coast $2,000) that I hold all of MY DVD's on. so from anywere in the house anyone can watch tv (live or recorded) watch DVD's play CD's and it's easy enough my 3 year old can use it.

    3. Re:I agree with this post by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Can you even get an MCE2005 machine for less than $1500?

    4. Re:I agree with this post by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I am either at work or school approximately 12 hours out of the day, 5 days a week, so spending the time and money to build such an elaborate system is just not even close to an option for me right now. Yes, I'd like something that ridiculously cool in the future, but I'm 28, have a very busy life, and don't really need entertained THAT badly at home right now. Sleeping is entertainment enough for me right now.

    5. Re:I agree with this post by Flagg0204 · · Score: 1

      One thing that always pisses me off about the plethora of MythTV how-to's out there, are %99 do not cover Digital Cable box's or Dish Box's. Satellite and Digital Cable is becoming more and more popular and many times a STB is handling the channel changing NOT the internal tuner built into the PVR-250. LIRC does a fine job when receiving IR signals, but blows when dealing with the transmitting of IR signals to a STB (like Dish). No one ever touch's on this subject.

      If anyone out there wants some PVR software that has close to the stability of MythTv i would give SageTV a try. You can have a really good PVR up and running in about 15min. Thats INCLUDING IR transmission to a STB. I have been running Sage for about a year now and have had about %95 up time. They have an excellent support community and have several plugins that provide additional functionality. (webserver, comercial skip, etc)

    6. Re:I agree with this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand your complaint. AFAIK all the linux-based PVR systems are operated using a remote control and simple screen menus, just like consumer electronics. Granted, the installation takes some work, due to the wide variety of possible situations and hardware combinations, but surely you don't expect your wife to do the installation.

      Do you have a more substantial complaint than "a feeling" that things aren't quite right?

    7. Re:I agree with this post by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Not sure what digital cable box you are using, but here is a link http://www.knoppmythwiki.org/index.php?page=Motoro laDct2000 for setting up KnoppMyth to use a serial cable to control a MotorolaDct2000. For DirecTV try this link http://www.knoppmythwiki.org/index.php?page=DirecT VSetUP, or if you have the D10 receiver, have a look at http://www.knoppmythwiki.org/index.php?page=DtenSe rialControlScript.

      Now that's not to say that any of these will work for your setup. Probably not, since you indicate you are running SageTV, which I probably will not be giving a try, I have a MythTV setup that works for my needs.

      Several of the Digital Cable Boxes on the market allow themselves to be controled via firewire, which last I heard was supported under MythTV, though not yet with the stable KnoppMyth.

      I am a fan of KnoppMyth, but I don't claim that either it, or MythTV are the be all/end all, much less always the best and last word on various pvrs. What works best for me, very likely won't work best for you. For some people, perhaps a large percentage, a TiVo, or even Windows MPC may very well satisfy all your demands. I have used a DirecTiVo, FreeVo, and MythTV. Of the three I like MythTV via KnoppMyth the best.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  30. This is so easy by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

    All you need is a Tivo Series2 with JavaHMO.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    1. Re:This is so easy by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...then you loose the media center features as soon as the load on your JavaHMO server gets to high or the wifi network gets overutilized. Not that wifi is that robust to begin with. ...been there, did that. Still want to build a Myth. ...when Tivo Corp finally realizes that it's a good idea to cache all that nifty media content. Then talk.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  31. We do one better by Trigun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We have some bright sparks that set their pvr to record, automatically upload and torrent the file, and the rest of us don't have to set up all the esosteric hardware. We just have to subscribe to an rss feed and watch whatever we want, whenever we want, wherever we want.

    Right now, I'm running a via-1000 mb with Freevo, and no tuner card. Plug it right into the tv, set up NFS and SMB shares to my fileserver and just wach TV.

  32. PVR Hardware Database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the things you have to look out for when building one of these with Linux is hardware compatibility. Go to the PVR Hardware Database to see what others are running.

    Other interesting links:
    HTPCNews
    Build Your Own PVR
    AVS Forum - they have a Linux section under HTPC.

  33. Nope buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  34. Use Cases by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The hard parts of this project are mainly the packaging of all the software components, the identification of compatible (and tolerably performing) hardware, and configuration of each with the other. The more people who publish their successful paths/configs, and others who edit that research result into HW lists and .deb/RPM packages, the less beer we'll have to drink while struggling through it ourselves. And the more beer we'll have to drink while kicking back to watch the movies when it works. So try to drink only as much beer as lets you report your results.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  35. crap. by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

    no way will I have this done in time to record the Enterprise finale tonight.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:crap. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      go ahead and build it, it will be a better use of your time!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. I'm using Windows MCE because of DRM :-( by slashdot.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So they spent enormous amounts of time to build a HTPC, and what's in the list of things that don't work: CSS encrypted DVDs. Which is like every single one.

    DRM is killing me. I'd love to run something non-Microsoft, but I personally do not want to sacrifice quality. I want to be able to play the highest quality that's available.

    This means WMV9-HD @ 1080p for video and DVD-Audio for audio. (okay, I'm sure some of you will want to debate this, go ahead. Anyone that I show WMV9-HD to is simply blown away.)

    One of the most unfortunate things is that you can not run WMV9-HD without using Microsoft binaries. In theory this is something that can be solved, because if I understand it correctly, WMV9 is standardized and it should be able to implement a decoder from the specs.

    BUT, the standard most certainly does NOT cover the added DRM layer that a lot of WMV9-HD content has. And Microsoft has no intention to solve that problem. What we need is a DeCSS variant to remove the DRM from WMV9.

    I'm unaware of any DVD-Audio playback capabilities under Linux, but again, this is certainly something that's technically possible. Except for, you guessed it, DRM. At the moment there's only one combination available if you want to play DVD-Audio discs that are 'encrypted'; SoundBlaster Audigy (not the lowest end one) and Windows.

    For this one, I'm working on a solution (hardware based). The problematic thing is that the encryption scheme allows for key revokation. I think this is specifically designed as a counter act to the Xing key discovery. If they find that we discover the SoundBlaster key (or maybe find some other way to use the SoundBlaster to get the unencrypted data), then they can revoke it, making new content unplayable on the SoundBlaster. This may sound as very hard to believe (it does to me), and I may be wrong. But I don't see how else it would work.

    1. Re:I'm using Windows MCE because of DRM :-( by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      So they spent enormous amounts of time to build a HTPC, and what's in the list of things that don't work: CSS encrypted DVDs. Which is like every single one.
      OK, well we know this is trivial to overcome. They say as much in the article.
      I want to be able to play the highest quality that's available. This means WMV9-HD @ 1080p for video and DVD-Audio for audio.
      I was unaware that HDTV was being broadcast in WMV format. Point me to all those movies available in 1080p and I might start to agree with you. You're just as likely to see a lot of content in 1080p Dirac format as WMV, by the time that content starts to appear. You really think every content producer in the world is willing to align itself with Microsoft rather than use patent-encumbered, but consortium-driven, MPEG technologies?

      And on another note, I'm pleased to finally meet a guy who is interested in DVD-Audio. I was wondering who that guy was.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:I'm using Windows MCE because of DRM :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM is killing me. I'd love to run something non-Microsoft, but I personally do not want to sacrifice quality. I want to be able to play the highest quality that's available.

      I've actually had the opposite problem. I lost one of the keys that came with the WinDVD CD so now I can only watch DVDs under Linux.

    3. Re:I'm using Windows MCE because of DRM :-( by PXE+Geek · · Score: 1

      You're correct - WMV is not broadcast. I don't think you'll be convinced anytime soon, but for a ponter try this one to (all?) nearly 20 movies - http://www.wmvhd.com/ (beware thinly disguised MS hype)

  37. Can I keep it up? by bhsx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My mom washed my Linux Home Theatre PC, and it BLEW UP!
    OK, I'm done (but for how long?)

    --
    put the what in the where?
  38. www.byopvr.com by RedR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out byopvr.com yall. Tis a great site on building your own PVR with a good community to help you in selecting hardware, software, and getting it all working together. Check em out, I think you'll find the folks there are great and awesome info as well.

  39. Another so-so BYOHTPC article by SilicaiMan · · Score: 1
    What's the use of this article? Seriously, who would pay $1,020 USD for a PVR when you can buy a plug-and-play one from DishNetwork or DirecTV for under $300? Sure, you have more control over it, it has more features that you'll probably never use, and you get to brag about it. But, IMHO, it's not worth the extra cost.


    Now, HTPCs are the next big thing. Unfortunately, brewing your own is still a pain in the butt. What needs to be done to remedy this is the following:

    • An easy to install/use software. The article mentions KnoppMyth which is a great start. There should be more efforts like it. The idea is to allow anyone to salvage an old machine that has been lying in the closet for 1 year, install the software (which includes the OS) and start recording. No additional tweaking! The machine should boot to a MythTV-like menu.
    • Support for cheaper hardware. You don't really need a P4 or an Opteron processor for that.
    • Support for a remote control. NO KEYBOARD OR MOUSE.
    • Support for many peripherals like TV Tuner cards, DVD burners, hard drives, etc.
    • A cheap, good looking case. Most HTPC cases cost over $150. That is almost as expensive as the machine itself (assuming it HAS been in your closet for a year). A good, perhaps plastic, case is needed.

    I know those are not easy, and it's hard to support every combination of hardware out there. But the efforts so far are so fragmented. There is room for improvement.
  40. A better guide by AngryPuppy · · Score: 3, Informative

    If anyone is interested in a much better guide (under Fedora):

    Jarod Wilson's Fedora Myth(TV)ology

    He does a nice job of keeping this guide up to date and complete. Some people may not like the RPM he uses (Axel Thimm custom packages) but they've worked nicely for me.

    Terry

  41. I built my own Linux home theater PC... by atomm1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But then, my mom washed it, and it exploded.

    --
    Signature.
  42. How ironic... by Meumeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    An ASP web page explaining how to have a Microsoft free home...

  43. Look at this .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at this article... http://mikz.hopto.org/mikz.php

  44. no thanks by nxs212 · · Score: 1

    For $250 (for new customers) I got a DishNetwork DVR with 250GB hard drive, 2 HD satellite and 1 off-air HD tuners, two-room viewing, HDMI/DVI,etc.
    There are only several off-air HD tv channels in my area so I can't justify spending $1000 on a home-grown box that won't pick up any satellite channels.
    If you have $$$, get one of these and start hacking.
    I would love to be able to add an extra 250GB hd and make use of the USB ports (not being used for anything now)

  45. damning with faint praise by Threni · · Score: 1

    > Getting a Linux-based HTPC has probably never been easier, though that is
    > admittedly damning with faint praise.

    It's not damning with anything if you're just saying "Getting a Linux-based HTPC has probably never been easier"!

  46. How much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You talk spec , its cool , but how much for it ?

    what bundle ?

  47. Re:Why are there not more turn-key versions of thi by harryk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What would you pay for a dedicated backend/frontend system?

    Would you be willing to buy a backend/frontend combo, and then buy additional frontend systems for additional rooms?

    I'm looking for feed back, as I am working with a small group of people to develop exactly this.

    I'm interested in your feedback.

    --
    think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
  48. MPlayer plays DVDs just fine by Danuvius · · Score: 1

    So use MPlayer under linux. I am yet to experience what the big DVD-not-working-under-linux hoopla is about.

    --
    Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
  49. Read the specs? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Unlike the previous XBox, this isn't just a PC in a box. Run Linux on a custom triple-core PowerPC chip with a custom ATI graphics chipset? "Hours after release" might be expecting a little much.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Read the specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Triple core, custom GPU? It probably already runs Linux. It's getting Windows working that's the hard part...

  50. Remote control by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    From my own experience, a remote control is probably a lot cheaper than the $30 portraied there. You can get some standard IR-decoder components out there, and hook those up to the serial port. It will take you 1 universal remote, 1 ir decoder (vishay) and a few extra components to get it to work. But that's explained pretty well on the Lirc-page.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  51. MythTV/Freevo & DirecTV by numbski · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting to know this for some time...

    Do any of these software products have a way of dealing with a DirecTV tuner? I know there's no tuner card per se, but what about using an IR eye, and acting as a remote control to change channels at set times...is this possible using Myth or Freevo?

    What about listings? I have OTA HD already, and I also have HD DirecTV channels. Would be nice to just output DVI or Component to the machine, and let the machine do the heavy lifting.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  52. Media Center, Shmedia Center... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not a media center, it's just a computer with some added software to try and simplify things. The problem is that in many cases the simplification leads to an interface that is foreign to the user. It's somewhere halfway between a VCR or DVD player menu system and a GUI. Not good.

    Considering how many people these days are VERY familiar with the W.I.M.P. (Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointer) paradigm, there is no need to disguise what these boxes really are unless you are trying to create a very limited use appliance like a Tivo or iPod.

    With that in mind, my home theater PC is just a Celeron (P4 family) running Fedora Core 3, Xine (which does nearly everything) and a Hauppaugue PVR250 card (which is perfect for this sort of thing). I wrote some scripts and created some icons to match and my wife finds this WAYYYY easier than the VCR menus system, the Windows ME based system we had before and you know why? She looked at it and said, "Oh, it works like a computer. This is easy'. I've been running like this since about February. It's perfect. Click on one icon and the system becomes a "TV". Hit "Q" (thanks to Xine's extensive kb shortcuts) and you're back to the desktop. Watch a DVD? Just pop it in the drive and Fedora's MagicDev application will launch my "playdvd" script which automatically starts a fullscreen Xine session and starts playing the DVD with full menu navigation support, etc...

    Schedule a recording? Just click the scheduler icon and thanks to the magic of Gnome 2.x's Zenity add on, I have a series of nice GUI based dialog boxes that allow me to select the date and time of the recording as well as program name and recording length. It sticks all the info in cron and the show is scheduled. Pause live TV? Just click the "pausetv" icon on the button dock and Xine launches while I have a 'cat /dev/video > /mnt/video1/Pause.mpg' process running in the background. After a slight delay, Xine just starts playing the Pause.mpg file as it's being recorded. I can pause the program at any time and pick up where I left of or go back. When I exit Xine, I'm even asked if I want to rename Pause.mpg to save it for later. And ALL of the playback functions whether it's from the capture card, MPG, AVI or WMV files or a DVD can be stopped using the kb shortcuts. "Q" always gets you out of trouble by quitting Xine no matter what. Music playback and Photos are all handled by the software that comes with Fedora.

    My wife loves the new system since she feels it's the easiest I've ever set up. The real key is to put down the pretenses that this box is anything more than a computer. For my next trick, I'll be completely eliminating any TV or stereo gear from this setup. The TV gets replaced by a much higher quality display LCD computer monitor. The Yamaha 5.1 amp is getting replaced with an amp of my own design that will just be an amp leaving all the preamp features to Gnome's Mixer applet. Can't get any easier than that...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Media Center, Shmedia Center... by batobin · · Score: 1

      This sounds like it works great for you, but a lot of people like to sit down at their couch and operate the controls by remote control. By refusing an abstraction you are limiting your television experience to sitting directly in front of your screen with a mouse and keyboard.

      I see no problem with the MythTV abstraction. It's a clean front-end that works like Tivo in most respects (if you have a problem with Tivo, let's talk about that seperately). It just so happens to play DVDs and music as well. That is, instead of seeing a list of television shows, you also get a list of movies, music, etc.

      People today are very familiar with windows, icons, menus, and pointers. You are absolutely correct. But people are also familiar with Tivo-like interfaces. The latter has the benefit of easy remote-control access. Not to mention average guys like me don't need to write complicated scripts like yours.

    2. Re:Media Center, Shmedia Center... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      You have illustrated the other aspect to this: different strokes for different folks. ;) There is no one interface that wil satisfy everyone as we all know. But, I would say that far more people are familiar with WIMP than most AV equipment interfaces. So it would take less time to learn to operate such a device. And the KB/Mouse combo is handled nicely by a wireless integrated device. Even better if you had custom Xine compatible labels for each key.

      Off topic: Now as far as the complexity of the scripting goes. They're actually extremely simple. Not something the average Joe could deal with making, but certainly a web designer who can handle CGI could do it. The funny thing about that for me is that I get frightened every time I'm faced with HTML. But give me C, Perl or Bash and it's easy as pie. No one I know can comprehend that. I think it has to do with the return on the investment of time. HTML takes me hours to do successfully if I want something good looking. Tables terrify me to no end because I know I'll have massive "debugging" sessions to get them to work just right. But with an actual scripting or coding language, there is structure and form and hierarchy. Again, it's differet strokes for different folks.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  53. As one of those who has built a Linux HD-HTPC... by The+Apocalypsegoat · · Score: 1

    My problem wasn't so much getting the basic system to work, though getting the pcHDTV card working was a bit frustrating simply because a weak signal can cause the tv player software to crash...but getting seemingly simple stuff set up right has been a challenge. I have myth running under Debian on a 3Ghz P4 w a pcHDTV card. That part works fairly well, though I don't have many HD signals to choose from yet in my market. On the other hand... when I play a DVD with xine it uses my full 5.1 speaker setup and sounds great. When I play or rip DVDs through myth, it uses only the front channels. As often as not it will take play foreign language audio tracks no matter what I tell it to play. So now the simple job of ripping a DVD to the hard drive becomes trial and error and provides inferior results. I'm sure there is a simple fix for that, but I haven't found it.

  54. The OS they're talking about is Windows by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Am I the only one who thinks that this is a stretch for any OS? Getting past DRM and proprietary formats is even a pain in the ass on Windows.
    Laugh all you want, but I recently bought a new PC that came bundled with Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005. It is far (I said far) from perfect, but it pretty much does everything on the list.
    • Store music, movies, TV, photos? Check.
    • Play back all these media seamlessly? Sort of. For some reason MCE treats music and video differently, which is strange since Windows Media Player does not. For example, you can create playlists and shuffle music; you can't do the same with video.
    • Support a wide variety of codecs? Sure. Of course it doesn't support XVid or OGG Vorbis out of the box, but install the right DirectShow filters and away you go.
    • DVD Movies? Check.
    • Support DRM? You know it. Actively promote DRM is more like it.
    • Serve to other client machines? You need to buy a Media Center Extender appliance, but yes. However, the extenders don't support all content formats.
    • Simple GUI? Functions range from simple to almost aggravatingly childlike.
    • Rock solid and stable? Believe it or not, I have seen very few blue screens on XP. If you have, you've got dodgy hardware.
    • Go in and out of sleep states with no difficulty? I doubt you guys even comprehend this one. Mac OS X has a nice sleep function, but my MCE machine is pretty damn cool. You can hit a button on the remote and it will go into standby. The hard drives will spin down, the CPU goes into low-power mode, everything. But suppose you have programs queued up to record? No problem -- the machine will actually switch itself back on half way when it's time to grab those programs. The monitor doesn't even turn on. It just spins up the drive and starts capturing the TV program, then goes back into full Standby mode when it's done. Very slick.
    • Run quiet? It's not silent, but the words "whisper-quiet" definitely come to mind. Most of what you hear is the hard drives. The noise is completely negated by TV at even a moderate volume.
    • Can handle HD formats? MCE 2005 already supports current HD standards. You really think Microsoft won't be in on the party when new ones come along?
    Say what you will about Microsoft, but their track record for this stuff is pretty all right. My main gripe is that it doesn't support simultaneous "computing" and "TV watching" functions as well as maybe it could. It works, but there are aspects of "dual-mode" operation that are a little clunky. I need to use this thing as a PC -- I can't afford a $1,550 set-top box.

    P.S. The machine I bought is a Sony VAIO RA830G desktop.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  55. I did this as well by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    My Mythtv experience pretty well matched theirs and I bought hardware that was "guaranteed to work". It will NOT work with old junk hardware.
    You need a fast machine to get useful performance.

    KnoppMyth didn't work.

    I got it to work under Gentoo.

    I got the OS up using Gentoo's docs.
    The gentoo ebuilds don't work. Some don't
    compile and a couple have incompatible versions.
    The mythtv folks will not provide any support,
    write fragile code, and refused to make even
    minimal changes to the readme that might make
    a user's experience better.

    Make sure you do NOT get the latest QT lib.
    There's a bug in the latest version, or a
    bug the code relied upon in the previous version
    that isn't there now. You'll end up being an
    hour off during daylight savings time.

    You should use the virtual partition system
    because you'll want to have partition that
    span physical drives.

    Mine still doesn't play dvds, the web server
    php still errors out when trying to access
    it from the network, some of the
    remote control keys don't work, and it crashes
    if you attempt to play a second recorded shows.
    It occasionally crashes the X server when trying
    to record and play at the same time.

    I'm investigating rewriting the front end
    to use framebuffer instead of X/mythfrontend.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  56. DeCSS a thorny issue? by Henk+Postma · · Score: 1
    Excuse my ignorance, but TFA reads:

    DVD playback is a thorny issue, mostly because of the legalities revolving around DeCSS ...

    I thought this was all settled? There is no DMCA violation because it is used to for interoperability. What other legal issues are there?

    If there is no legal issue, then extremetech is just perpetuating the myth that OSS programs have all sorts of legal issues. yes I know, gif encoding, mp3 decoding aside DeCSS was one of the cases where this was not an issue.

    Anybody care to share their insight?

  57. Ironic? by Matthew+Angel · · Score: 1

    The page title:
    Microsoft-Free Home Part 4: The Linux HTPC--ExtremeTech Build It

    The page URL:
    www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1814924,00 .asp

    1. Re:Ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that ironic? Is the web server the same box that handles the PVR functions?

  58. Xine as well by phorm · · Score: 1

    It's not the program so much as the CSS libs... which are really not all that hard to find nowadays. As a media player I like Mplayer, but as a DVD player I'd probably recommmend Xine

  59. HTPC-centric distro? by dracvl · · Score: 1

    Sounds like one of the few legitimate use cases for a specialized distro left. $DEITY knows we have enough of them already, but a dedicated HTPC distro that Did Not Suck® would be interesting.

  60. Desktop ATX now HTPC... costs rise by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    I know last year I could buy an enlight atx desktop for about $50 or so. I complained that was a touch spendy for a beige in contrast to all the midtowers priced at $20 or so. But now the phrase "home theater PC" has been coined... the old style desktop case is now a "media center". Now you're lucky to find the desktop style for under $65.

    But all is not lost. The old Gateway Destination PCs are starting to hit the used market for under $75 or so. The last one I looked at could take a standard 6 slot ATX board so long as you pulled out the two bubbles the slot one retention bracket screwed into. While the original product was so underpowered it couldn't do what it was advertised to do, I have to admit the case was nice and fit in a normal stereo stack.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  61. Re:As one of those who has built a Linux HD-HTPC.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the same problems with mplayer (front chanels only, non-english default language, and getting subtitles to work) After spending 300 years studing the mplayer manual, I got it to store half decent subtitles, but didn't bother with the anti-aliasing.

    In case you're wondering, this is the command I used for play back:
    mplayer -loadidx index -vo dga -x 800 -y 600 video.avi -vobsub subtitles -vobsubid 0 -slang en

    sorry I've lost the one I used to rip the sub titles in the first place.

    I haven't started on suround sound, that'll take a little longer...

    ps. having read over what I just wrote, I conclude that mplayer has a deeply, deeply, *crap* user interface, yet that strangly makes it attractive...

  62. Re:Why are there not more turn-key versions of thi by monkeyfarm · · Score: 1

    Sure, as long as it's cheap and user friendly, or at least not user hostile. It should be priced so that your volume discount in components should offset the labor to do the system integration/assembly work so that from my stand-point I can buy a system like this for same cost (minus my time) to build it myself. Once I own it, and it works, then I can worry 'bout modify it.

    --
    What I don't know I just fake...
  63. Linux HTPC Howto by brandon · · Score: 1

    .. Always a good place to get information on Linux Home Theater PC's too..

    http://www.linuxis.us/linux/media/howto/linux-htpc /

  64. What's your time worth? Buy Windows for HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried this over the course of a few months... Lack of drivers for tv cards, lack of documentation, difficult to compile & install apps - Linux is a pain in the ass for HTPC.

    Buy Windows + Htpc software and save yourself the hassle.

  65. DVB by Ixalon · · Score: 1

    I built my own HTPC using a gutted out DVD player as the case. My recommendation to anyone doing this would be to get a DVB card (either DVB-S if you have Satellite, DVB-C if you have cable, or DVB-T for terrestrial broadcasts.) This way you can get the MPEG stream straight into your PC and onto your HDD - no horrible analog capturing and MPEG encoding to mess with! For those with a graphics card or MB with digital video output, you can cut the analog side of things all together.

    There's another option on the software side of things if you go this way too, take a look at VDR (http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/). There are no shortage of plugins, including support for using a remote copy of xine as an output device.

    More info on Digital TV under linux is available at http://www.linuxtv.org/

  66. Awesome! by orionware · · Score: 1

    Now I can record my HD shows that I tend to miss when real life gets in the way! W00t!

    Oh wait. No I can't. Not unless I am sitting right there to change the channel on the cable box.

    I guess I'll have to go the easy route and just pay the 5 bucks to comcast every month to have the ability to cue up those pay channels.

    Bummer

    --


    Karma means nothing to me, so suck it...
  67. Its rough but feasible by killercoder · · Score: 1

    I've been tweaking and updating my MythTV box for over 8 months now. Usually a tweak here, a tweak there. Would I call the process painfull? No, but then I like hobbie projects. I've played with just about everything under the sun (Windows MCE via MSDN, SageTV, MediaPortal, MythTV, Freevo etc), and Myth was by far my favourite.

    I work from home, and simply don't watch TV without it. DVD Playback is perfect (Props to Xine) with Dolby Digital Sound, DVD Imports are perfect with Dolby Digital Sound. Do you need a keyboard or mouse? NO! (USB UIRT is pretty good). Heck, I even get HDTV with Dolby Digital Sound using the PCHD3000. There are plenty of sites out there with details on setup.

    For those of you risking it PLEASE consider Gentoo - its a little more painful for setup (no GUI install), but WORKS. Knopmyth is a nitemare, Debian Sarge is worse, Fedora is out of date half the time. Take the plunge.

  68. more lame dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot: news for people who can't use google.

  69. Ogle is fine for me by r_jensen11 · · Score: 0

    An actual program dedicated for DVD's, instead of a random multi-media player that happens to play DVD's....

    1. Re:Ogle is fine for me by Danuvius · · Score: 1

      Totally off-topic... but MPlayer is hardly "a random multi-media player". It is *The Linux Multimedia Player*. Having said that, it does not display the DVD's visual menus so for this purpose a dedicated program does make sense.

      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
  70. power strip by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 0

    is there something similar to power strip in the alternate-os world? i would LOVE to convert ONE more box to the right side of the force.

  71. Displaying H/DTV on SDTV via SVideo..? by Lesson+No.+25 · · Score: 1
    If you still connect your DVD player to a television set using a composite or even a S/Video connector, odds are that you'll see no improvement with digital television. But if you connect your DVD player up to your monitor using component video, and want your television programs to be displayed with the same level of detail and accuracy, you can buy a ATSC tuner, set it for 480i or 480p (depending on your existing set's sophistication), Connect the spdif out to a suitable input on your stereo, and enjoy "5.1" surround sound.

    Now, it won't match the detail of a 720p or 1080i set, but upgrading your display can wait, if it has to, On the other hand, if all you have is an old set with composite or RF connectors, maybe upgrading your display would be in your best interest.

    I plan to build a MythTV box soon, with an HD-3000, and possibly an Air2PC card as well. Anyway, I don't plan on upgrading my TV/display for a while after that; I will connect to my SDTV via S-Video for the time being.

    Can an HDTV stream be displayed on an SDTV from a myth box via S-Video? Obviously it wouldn't be at HD resolutions, but am I correct in figuring that the quality would approximate that of a DVD player output to SDTV via S-Video (which looks quite a bit better than analog cable)? Has anyone done this? Any other special hardware requirements (aside from S-Video out, which is obvious)? Scaling or conversion (digital-->analog) issues?

    1. Re:Displaying H/DTV on SDTV via SVideo..? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "Can an HDTV stream be displayed on an SDTV from a myth box via S-Video?"

      Yes. It's a little defeatist, but sure it'll work =)

      The output via svideo can't be anything but standard defintion. You can display your "desktop" which may be 1024x780 (or what have you) via svideo on your video card but the video card will scale it down standard resolution, interlace it, etc.

      Note: you'll still need sufficient horsepower to playback the full HDTV MPEG2 stream, and it'll look good/hdtv-like on your PC monitor, but it'll come out as 480i of your svideo connector.

      Which is what you wanted to know, right? My guess is that it'll look marginally better than a regular analog cable encoded source. *shrug*

      hope that helps and good luck with your project!

      rampy

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:Displaying H/DTV on SDTV via SVideo..? by Lesson+No.+25 · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the reply. I got a kick out of your 'defeatist' comment. (Note, as I said, I plan to get an HD display at some point; s-video out is a temp solution.)

      Ah, so if I'm understanding correctly, the video card (or whatever card has the s-video out) does the scaling! Automagically, I presume?

    3. Re:Displaying H/DTV on SDTV via SVideo..? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I totally understand, I'm dying to pull the trigger on some sort of CRT HDTV set soon.

      scaling is probably technically the wrong word (I know I used it above) but yeah you've got the right idea.

      I think it's more of a "scan converting" than a scaling, but I'm talking half outa my arse at this point =P

      It's automagic...

      E.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  72. I think a Linux MediaPC is really close... by Funnky · · Score: 1

    I have been following this for awhile and waiting for Myth and Linux to be ready for primetime! I think it's really close to satisfying all of the features you listed with the new 18.1 release and the Tribune data thing (www.2CPU.com). I need to bite the bullet and build one now and see how it handles HDTV through the vidcard and compression engines. If that is a solid then this thing is about to stomp all over Windows MCE!!!!

    --
    Where are the JetCars and Teflon Suits I was promised??