Ok, you see, to me it seems to be the opposite. A 'podcaster' will not say something twenty times to make it sound right. A 'podcaster' will just say what's on his mind, without any preparation, and get it done with. Maybe cut a little here and trim a little there, but it's always going to be the same crappy quality microphone recording the same crappy voice and stupid material with his very slow and hardly understandable, localized pronounciation. I would much rather either have the material in written form, and a) Get the material onto my laptop or b) Print the material out so I can read it while I'm listening to music on my mp3 player. Without any localized accent to decipher. Without any distruptions in the flow I like to take in information. Actually, if someone cannot express himself in written form properly, they probably should not be expressing themselves at all. But whatever, I'm just old fashioned.
Also, typing on a computer allows you to edit any place in your written material at any damn time you please, so editing will be a lot faster and more correct.
Trust me on this, 'podcasts' only survive because of the hype they generate, and the people who eat up the hype. "XML Served mp3 iPod podcasts by blogger on the web 2.0"
Ok, now, it seems that you know a little bit about this 'podcasting'. So, please enlighten me - What exactly justifies "podcasting" material instead of writing an article about it? Firstly, I dont have to decode your crappy teenie voice when I read your vaguely interesting material. Second, I can understand you clearly despite what ever country you come from. And believe me, I've tried this 'podcasting' phenomena. I've tried listening to some 'podcasts' about all kinds of stuff. I could never understand half of what people said, and wished there was a transcript.
So, once more - Why cant you lazy 'podcasters' just fucking write an article instead of this 'free radio' bullshit?
No, because, you see - This fellow got 15Mbps BOTH WAYS! As in, he can download AND upload with 15Mbps. I'd take a symmetric 15Mbps over an assymetric 20Mbps any day.
As someone has vaguely mentioned, it is possible to replace Sendmail completely with Postfix or [insert any MTA here]. I've replaced Sendmail with Postfix. Replaced mbox with Maildir+courier-imap, and it all works perfectly! Read the FreeBSD Handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/h andbook/mail-changingmta.html
How about: Step 1. You submit SPAM to Spamcop, that you know 100% for sure without doubt is absolutely nothing but pure, clean and uncut SPAM?
You know, a human is much better at detecting spam than any regex is. If you dont submit non-spam emails in the first place, then you dont need step 2 and 3. And what this guy is doing (As far as I understand) is to put actual SPAM in a specific folder, and letting cron take care of the needless steps 2 and 3.
Let me stress this once more - A human brain is much better at detecting spam than ANY machine. If that were not true, we wouldnt even NEED things like SpamCop or any other spam protection, because SPAM would die out on the spot if machines were better at detecting spam than humans.
If I recieve an email telling me about penis enlargement or viagra, I will without doubt know that I have never in my life asked anybody on this planet to inform me of such products.
teamed up to honor the comic-book form -- imitation is the finest form of flattery, as they say. And what a dull imitation. I've never read anything more boring. Dont even bother reading that "comic" they've made. It could aswell be a powerpoint presentation.
Rule #1: Do not speak about dienub Rule #2: Do not speak about dienub Rule #3: Whatever it was in that cool movie Rule #4: If I dislike your behaviour on this server, I will purge your
account, and publish your entire home directory in a public IRC
channel.
This includes, nonexclusively, sending global messages, using retarded
exploits (Both against this and other servers), ban evasion, etc.
Too many faulty login attempts will get you banned by DenyHosts. Generate a fucking keypair and use it for authentication. Passwords are insecure.
I gotta wonder who'd want to use it without the alcohol support?
Certain systems have had their beer limit overflowed and then they kept sending REQUEST's despite having reached the defined BEER_LIMIT, so they are trying to avoid alcohol support untill some platform-dependant issues are resolved.
Anyway, the alcohol.h library is completely insecure and buggy. It causes my terminal to spit out it's core and terminate.
Just finished the advanced task of updating my ports tree using the tediously long and unintuitive command of "portsnap fetch update", and now upgrading my installed ports with the equally unintuitive "portupgrade -a".
But honestly, why the hell would you need the system with "Most software available"? You only need the software that you need. No more, no less. No way anybody is going to install the 14271 ports and then say "omg FreeBSD sux linux has more software". The thing is, all the popular software is already ported. It's highly unlikely that you will find an application that you need which is not ported to FreeBSD. And even if you do, installing it's dependencies is easy with the ports system:)
Oh, dude. Untill the end of December '05 I worked for this small company. My boss was one of those people who think they are absolutely never wrong, and bend their own statements if they are proved definitively wrong. He knows absolutely nothing about computers. Once, this happened:
Him: I have a virus. Why do I have virus? You're the worst IT-man this company has ever had. Me: You dont have a virus. That's impossible per definition. Wanna bet $100?/me heads over to laptop. Does a full virus scan, finds nothing. Me: So, uh. Where is the virus? Him: [enters a website URL. Clicks a link, get's a website that says "YOU HAVE A VIRUS!"/me D'ohs
The seed, in this case, only has two different ways of being agreed upon between the lock and the key. 1. Knocking (Again, I can listen to the exchange) 2. Predetermined calculation based on mutual variables - And then we're back to my point in granparent.
What methods have they developed to make the next sequence purely unpredictable? If the next knock sequence is computed from the old one, then the "listening" method is still valid. And if it isnt, one could replicate whatever variables either of the devices (Door or key) make use of to generate the next key. And then, we're back to square one. Stealing the key is just as easy as stealing todays regular lock keys.
I can imagine "hacking" it by placing a small (Transparent or barely visible) microphone on the door and listening to the knocks of the authorized user, and then feeding this data to my "Custom knock device" which can generate any knock sequence.
No, to do that, they have a separate feature. youremail+123@gmail.com will deliver to youremail@gmail.com. I think it allows up to three or five letters.
I think that one could easily create a quick app that loads a wordlist into one array, and a list of chemical compounds into an other, run to check against one another, and dump the matches into a file.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, uhm. ok.
I have a stash of 32 gigabytes of porn. But I have never bought porn.
Why the fuck would I admit to having porn if I'm "embarrased" of having bought it?
Ok, you see, to me it seems to be the opposite.
A 'podcaster' will not say something twenty times to make it sound right. A 'podcaster' will just say what's on his mind, without any preparation, and get it done with. Maybe cut a little here and trim a little there, but it's always going to be the same crappy quality microphone recording the same crappy voice and stupid material with his very slow and hardly understandable, localized pronounciation. I would much rather either have the material in written form, and
a) Get the material onto my laptop or
b) Print the material out
so I can read it while I'm listening to music on my mp3 player. Without any localized accent to decipher. Without any distruptions in the flow I like to take in information.
Actually, if someone cannot express himself in written form properly, they probably should not be expressing themselves at all. But whatever, I'm just old fashioned.
Also, typing on a computer allows you to edit any place in your written material at any damn time you please, so editing will be a lot faster and more correct.
Trust me on this, 'podcasts' only survive because of the hype they generate, and the people who eat up the hype. "XML Served mp3 iPod podcasts by blogger on the web 2.0"
Ok, now, it seems that you know a little bit about this 'podcasting'. So, please enlighten me - What exactly justifies "podcasting" material instead of writing an article about it? Firstly, I dont have to decode your crappy teenie voice when I read your vaguely interesting material. Second, I can understand you clearly despite what ever country you come from. And believe me, I've tried this 'podcasting' phenomena. I've tried listening to some 'podcasts' about all kinds of stuff. I could never understand half of what people said, and wished there was a transcript.
So, once more - Why cant you lazy 'podcasters' just fucking write an article instead of this 'free radio' bullshit?
No, because, you see - This fellow got 15Mbps BOTH WAYS! As in, he can download AND upload with 15Mbps. I'd take a symmetric 15Mbps over an assymetric 20Mbps any day.
As someone has vaguely mentioned, it is possible to replace Sendmail completely with Postfix or [insert any MTA here]. I've replaced Sendmail with Postfix. Replaced mbox with Maildir+courier-imap, and it all works perfectly!h andbook/mail-changingmta.html
Read the FreeBSD Handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/
Step 1. You submit the spam to Spamcop.
How about:
Step 1. You submit SPAM to Spamcop, that you know 100% for sure without doubt is absolutely nothing but pure, clean and uncut SPAM?
You know, a human is much better at detecting spam than any regex is. If you dont submit non-spam emails in the first place, then you dont need step 2 and 3. And what this guy is doing (As far as I understand) is to put actual SPAM in a specific folder, and letting cron take care of the needless steps 2 and 3.
Let me stress this once more - A human brain is much better at detecting spam than ANY machine. If that were not true, we wouldnt even NEED things like SpamCop or any other spam protection, because SPAM would die out on the spot if machines were better at detecting spam than humans.
If I recieve an email telling me about penis enlargement or viagra, I will without doubt know that I have never in my life asked anybody on this planet to inform me of such products.
It's funny because as I read your post I was thinking "Haha, this guy hates Windows", just untill the last point where you blame everything on Linux.
teamed up to honor the comic-book form -- imitation is the finest form of flattery, as they say.
And what a dull imitation. I've never read anything more boring.
Dont even bother reading that "comic" they've made. It could aswell be a powerpoint presentation.
Informative or flamebait? Fuck you.
What's rule 6?
Rule #1: Do not speak about dienub
Rule #2: Do not speak about dienub
Rule #3: Whatever it was in that cool movie
Rule #4: If I dislike your behaviour on this server, I will purge your
account, and publish your entire home directory in a public IRC
channel.
This includes, nonexclusively, sending global messages, using retarded
exploits (Both against this and other servers), ban evasion, etc.
Too many faulty login attempts will get you banned by DenyHosts. Generate a
fucking keypair and use it for authentication. Passwords are insecure.
Sincerely,
Your friendly BOFH.
alive@m00h alive $ man remind /usr/ports/deskutils/remind
No manual entry for remind
alive@m00h alive $ remind
bash: remind: command not found
alive@m00h alive $ uname -a
FreeBSD m00h.dienub.org 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
alive@m00h alive $ whereis remind
remind:
alive@m00h alive $
Hint: You have to install remind from ports before it's available.
I think it might have been my fault. =/
I entered "*" into the search.
Expected complimentary asslicking of grandparents post and irrelevant criticism of your opinions, avoiding the points given.
Anyway, the alcohol.h library is completely insecure and buggy. It causes my terminal to spit out it's core and terminate.
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
:)
Currently 14271 ports available, although my own system reports that it has 14285.
Just finished the advanced task of updating my ports tree using the tediously long and unintuitive command of "portsnap fetch update", and now upgrading my installed ports with the equally unintuitive "portupgrade -a".
But honestly, why the hell would you need the system with "Most software available"? You only need the software that you need. No more, no less. No way anybody is going to install the 14271 ports and then say "omg FreeBSD sux linux has more software". The thing is, all the popular software is already ported. It's highly unlikely that you will find an application that you need which is not ported to FreeBSD. And even if you do, installing it's dependencies is easy with the ports system
They said "broader appeal". Now I understand.
Oh, dude.
/me heads over to laptop. Does a full virus scan, finds nothing. /me D'ohs
Untill the end of December '05 I worked for this small company. My boss was one of those people who think they are absolutely never wrong, and bend their own statements if they are proved definitively wrong. He knows absolutely nothing about computers. Once, this happened:
Him: I have a virus. Why do I have virus? You're the worst IT-man this company has ever had.
Me: You dont have a virus. That's impossible per definition. Wanna bet $100?
Me: So, uh. Where is the virus?
Him: [enters a website URL. Clicks a link, get's a website that says "YOU HAVE A VIRUS!"
At least I got $100...
The seed, in this case, only has two different ways of being agreed upon between the lock and the key.
1. Knocking (Again, I can listen to the exchange)
2. Predetermined calculation based on mutual variables - And then we're back to my point in granparent.
Two words: Reverse engineering.
What methods have they developed to make the next sequence purely unpredictable? If the next knock sequence is computed from the old one, then the "listening" method is still valid. And if it isnt, one could replicate whatever variables either of the devices (Door or key) make use of to generate the next key.
And then, we're back to square one. Stealing the key is just as easy as stealing todays regular lock keys.
I can imagine "hacking" it by placing a small (Transparent or barely visible) microphone on the door and listening to the knocks of the authorized user, and then feeding this data to my "Custom knock device" which can generate any knock sequence.
Secure?
No, to do that, they have a separate feature.
youremail+123@gmail.com will deliver to youremail@gmail.com.
I think it allows up to three or five letters.
Or how about the fact that they've actually got loads of stuff being produced and in stores right now?
Yeah, that is what industrial designers do.
And why would they want to keep the patent on that again, for other reasons than just appearing "evil"?
Yeah, the Logitech G5.
More Logitech G-series schwag.
I think that one could easily create a quick app that loads a wordlist into one array, and a list of chemical compounds into an other, run to check against one another, and dump the matches into a file.