Slashdot Mirror


Gmail Mis.delivered?

An anonymous reader writes "Google doesn't make many mistakes but when it does, boy, are they doozies! The latest is that Gmail doesn't care about periods in usernames. So mail sent to anonymous.coward@gmail.com is also delivered to anonymouscoward@gmail.com, even though these are two separate mail accounts. Google admits Gmail doesn't see periods, but no word on a fix yet." Update: As may users have pointed out Ars has since corrected the story, stating that the original submitter was mistaken and the email was just improperly addressed.

321 comments

  1. Google is Sexist! by biocute · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe Google is disrespecting users with periods.

    Since there is no word on a fix yet, it would be interesting if Microsoft rolls out a 3rd party patch which warns Gmail users when the recipient email address has periods in it.

    1. Re:Google is Sexist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since there is no word on a fix yet, it would be interesting if Microsoft rolls out a 3rd party patch which warns Gmail users when the recipient email address has periods in it.

      There is no word for a fix, because there is no problem. The story is utter bunk, and has been updated to show that.

      As for Microsoft rolling out a third party patch - yeah right - Microsoft aren't capable of rolling out their own patches quickly enough - I doubt they would be able to move as quickly as google in the event of a real vulnerability.

    2. Re:Google is Sexist! by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1
      Since there is no word on a fix yet, it would be interesting if Microsoft rolls out a 3rd party patch which warns Gmail users when the recipient email address has periods in it.

      I've said this before on /., but perhaps you should really put down the bong. Nobody really needs periods in their email address if they can fill out an SMTP "From" line properly. Your period-less email address can be the hash key and the plaintext value you put in quotes before the address would be the value. So nobody who didn't want to send you email would care (because they could see your real name), and those who did could just hit reply.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    3. Re:Google is Sexist! by iwsnet · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long GMail will stay in Beta. It's been almost 2 years since it was introduced and still not open to all, unless you have a cell phone or get referred.

    4. Re:Google is Sexist! by abandonment · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good to see that you're the end-all-be-all to game reviewing.

      If you don't like the game, don't click the link or play it. Simple enough. There are enough PC games out there to satisfy even the most jaded gamers, and yet there never seems to be any shortage of this kind of 'your game sucks' comments.

      Ever tried to make a game? Lets see your game and then we'll decide whether or not to rip you a new one as a result.

      I mean seriously - how is a link in a signature something that is SOOO offensive that you decide to slam someone's hard work, no matter what quality you feel that it is.

    5. Re:Google is Sexist! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      What does Google being the sexiest search engine have to do with Gmail? Oh, I kinda mis.read that.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    6. Re:Google is Sexist! by darmey · · Score: 0

      Probably when it is going to be as sophisticated as google's search is? You know, as for me I've experienced troubles with lost emails on Gmail untill recently. My father even told me that "G" before "mail" is abbreviation for "govno", that is "shit" in Russian.

    7. Re:Google is Sexist! by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Look, I respect the effort, and recognize that the current result is leaps and bounds beyond anything I'm capable of producing at this time, both in terms of know-how and determination, but - and this was the entire point - the game is not yet ready. Not for beta, not for less. Also, mind you, the last time I tried it, it was much worse. I clicked it again after posting my message, and it has improved significantly... but it's still not ready. Maybe I'm just an idiot, I don't know, but the game I saw there the previous time let you progress only by sticking around long enough and collecting the daily bonus twenty dollars for voting for the game again and again. With anything else - the more you toiled, the worse off you were.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    8. Re:Google is Sexist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't find the game so I can't comment, but I just notice from your site a quote:

      "It certainly doesn't explain what's coming to us unbidden in roadside "Erotic Empire" billboards, bus-shelter underwear posters, fashion-cum-kiddie porn ads, commercials for erectile dysfunction cures, and the fetid currents wafting suddenly through our homes at prime-time."

      What does "fashion-cum-kiddie porn adds" refer to?

    9. Re:Google is Sexist! by abandonment · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what the author was meaning by this - but have you not been out of the house recently perhaps? The average 3 story billboard for 'insert company here' seems to be getting closer and closer to this description with every new ad campaign. Models keep getting younger and younger and the ads get sleezier and sleezier.

      Most of the time it is almost impossible to tell what is being sold by 'x' ad in the first place - jean companies with ads that have no jeans in them at all (perhaps in a pile on the floor) among other things.

      There was an interesting blog about this subject recently:

      http://www.skidmore.edu/salmagundi/148-149/Sleeper .htm

  2. Shame really by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This couldv been a really neat feature.
    I could signup a generic slashdot@gmail.com type account and then pass around multiple variations to different sites.
    Depending upon the variation received I could determine which site leaked my mail.

    I think the only way to rectify this is to start accounting for the period.
    The cat is out of the bag so to speak.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Shame really by StonedRat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gmail already has this feature if you own slashdot@gmail.com you can also use slashdot+anything@gmail.com

      --
      "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    2. Re:Shame really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can already do filtering like that with plus-addressing. For example, slashdot@gmail.com, slashdot+spam@gmail.com, slashdot+lists@gmail.com all get sent to the same account.

    3. Re:Shame really by MooUK · · Score: 1

      This is already a feature, as remrked above. Also, this is available elsewhere, most notably by using spamgourmet. (www.spamgourmet.com)

      I find it very useful.

    4. Re:Shame really by thsths · · Score: 1

      > if you own slashdot@gmail.com you can also use slashdot+anything@gmail.com

      Sure, sendmail style subaddressing. This can be convenient for mailing lists, but you have to watch the discrepancy between your Sender address and the subscribed address.

      On the plus side (however you see it), most Microsoft products seem to be unable to handle the + in email addresses. So you wont get many emails from Microsoft systems. (I wonder whether that also goes for SPAM?)

    5. Re:Shame really by sampowers · · Score: 0

      Normally this exact thing you want to do is done with a '+' character, which is allowed for by the RFC.

      The '.' character in an email address violates RFC, but no one seems to really care.

    6. Re:Shame really by comcn · · Score: 4, Informative
      The '.' character in an email address violates RFC, but no one seems to really care.

      er, no. Only that if you want to begin or end the local part with a ".", then you have to quote the local part. i.e. some.body@domain.example is fine, but .somebody@domain.example must be stated as ".somebody"@domain.example

      RFC 2822, 3.4.1 "Addr-spec specification" (italics mine):

      An addr-spec is a specific Internet identifier that contains a locally interpreted string followed by the at-sign character ("@", ASCII value 64) followed by an Internet domain. The locally interpreted string is either a quoted-string or a dot-atom. If the string can be represented as a dot-atom (that is, it contains no characters other than atext characters or "." surrounded by atext characters), then the dot-atom form SHOULD be used and the quoted-string form SHOULD NOT be used. Comments and folding white space SHOULD NOT be used around the "@" in the addr-spec.
    7. Re:Shame really by AngryNick · · Score: 1
      I could signup a generic slashdot@gmail.com type account and then pass around multiple variations to different sites. Depending upon the variation received I could determine which site leaked my mail.

      I'm off topic, but several years ago a friend setup a catch all for my domain name so that "anything@mydomain.com" comes to the same address.

      I've been doing what you described and have made one major observation: my friends and family are spreading my email address more than any of the websites I sign up with. People get infected and send my email address to other people, who then get infected and send my address to blah, blah blah.

      The only other major sources of spam are my Whois entries (tons from this one), the vendors that scanned my badge at MS TechEd 2001 (that address gets numerous solicitations for drugs that promise to correct male "software" problems), and a religious conference (they're email db appears to have been hacked by very dedicated phishers who favor CitiBank and SunTrust.) The catch all is also handy for controlling access to your online banking and vendor accounts; I use a dedicated address for each bank or merchant and can easily tell from the TO: address when something isn't right.

    8. Re:Shame really by daikokatana · · Score: 1
      my friends and family are spreading my email address more than any of the websites I sign up with

      I've noticed this myself. A lot of people I know come to me to get their computers cleaned (spyware, adware, you name it) and see me as some sort of helpdesk.

      They send me an email, asking me for help, and when I reply they put me on their "send funny mails to" list, thinking they are doing me a favor.

      So one helpful mail from me, and I am getting emails from all over the place. That'll teach me.

      Nowadays, I just use a Yahoo! account for those mails, so my main inbox remains clean.

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    9. Re:Shame really by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      This couldv been a really neat feature.
      I could signup a generic slashdot@gmail.com type account and then pass around multiple variations to different sites.
      Depending upon the variation received I could determine which site leaked my mail.


      I see it more as a huge security flaw. If I knew someone with a gmail address I could spy on them by signing up for an account with the same username with a period in it. All mail sent to them would come to me too.

    10. Re:Shame really by SteveAyre · · Score: 1

      No. It's strips all email addresses of periods *then* checks whether it exists/which inbox to route mail to.

      If something@gmail.com you can't create some.thing@gmail.com to spy on them because it strips it of periods and then finds the email address already exists.

    11. Re:Shame really by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      It's a very handy feature - plus-addressing is supported by several UNIX MTAs and MDAs, and has been for some time. I've been using it with Cyrus IMAPd at work rather heavily. Google has just adopted a little known but common mail feature, which is nice.

      The utility of plus-addressing is limited by the fact that many list managers and other tools don't understand that username+mailbox@blah is the same user as user@blah , and most MUAs don't let you add an abitrary plus-addressed part to your From: address. Even so, plus-addressing combined with Sieve filtering is very handy for temporary addresses.

    12. Re:Shame really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, now all that the spammer has to do is:
      spamList.append(s.substring(0, s.indexOf("+"))+"@gmail.com")

      Hmm, this is really going to work.

      Yahoo! Mail does it right. E.g. if you have foo@yahoo.com, you can reserve a basename ("bar") to generate fake email addresses ("bar-slashdot@yahoo.com", "bar-pornsite@yahoo.com", etc.) If someone tries to spam "bar@yahoo.com" it doesn't get delivered because that's not a real email address.

    13. Re:Shame really by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Google is only missing a dot, you seem to be missing a lot more punctuation.

      Seriously, I had to read that sentence a few times before I understood what you meant (or what I think you meant).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    14. Re:Shame really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violating an RFC is like violating the GPL or a farm animal.
      No one really cares.

    15. Re:Shame really by Varun+Soundararajan · · Score: 1

      I had this problem... one guy added my email to his google group. my name was with periods (like a.coward@gmail.com), but he had added my email without period, which was some other name(acoward@gmail.com). I cudnt unsubscribe, when i login to google groups, it wud login as a.coward@gmail.com and i see a link to join the group. :(
      I asked the owner of the group to unsubscribe me. He was kind enough to unsubscribe me. I thought that was something weird, but now i know its a bug. :)

          Do they give a google T-Shirt for those who find bugs?
      =======
      [It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time. - K & R

    16. Re:Shame really by bram · · Score: 1

      That's easy to do in gmail if you have to register a new account.

      Just take whatever@gmail.com and create a filter that redirects all mail to whatever@gmail.com to your spam folder.

      And then subscribe accounts in the form of whatever+bugtraq@gmail.com and whatever+optinpr0n@gmail.com.

      --
      People using html in email should be shot.
    17. Re:Shame really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do they give a google T-Shirt for those who find bugs?"

      Nah - they'll kill you slowly when the time comes...

  3. Not two accounts by rritterson · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I understand, it's not two seperate accounts (i.e. ab@gmail.com and a.b@gmail.com are only one account and you can't register both, and you get mail that comes to either).

    In addition, you can use it as a feature to filter mail. (i.e. if I'm abcdefg@gmail.com I can give out abcd.efg@gmail.com to friends and abc.defg@gmail.com to random websites, then filter the incoming mail automatically).

    Feature, not a bug, in my opinion.

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    1. Re:Not two accounts by qbwiz · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's the way it is now, but you used to be able to register both at the same time. I guess they fixed it now. I know that this is a problem, as I'm getting email for someone else who's got my email address without the dot in it.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    2. Re:Not two accounts by Thats_Pipe · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is a bug because you can log into a.b@gmail.com but not ab@gmail.com (assuming they were created seperately and with different passwords.) It seems like the login server checks for the dots but the email sorting aspect of the servcie ignores the dots. Poor engineering on the part of Google.

      --
      "You see them trees out back, I take care of them. I'm a tree, I'm a tree wizard." - Crazy Homeless Guy
    3. Re:Not two accounts by Vicsun · · Score: 0

      From what I understand, it's not two seperate accounts (i.e. ab@gmail.com and a.b@gmail.com are only one account and you can't register both, and you get mail that comes to either).

      You don't understand :) You can indeed register both. For example if there was a person called firstname.lastname@gmail.com whose emails I'd want to read, I would be able to register firstnamelastname@gmail.com and receive every single email he receives. It's a neat and handy feature, though not for the poor sap whose email is being read. It actually kind of sucks for him.

    4. Re:Not two accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I just tried to register the "other" account (ie. the ab@gmail.com for my a.b@gmail.com) and it came up as taken. So it's not a vulnerability of any kind as far as I can see.

    5. Re:Not two accounts by iphayd · · Score: 1

      You can already use randomwebsitename+abcdefg@gmail.com. The plus sign is a deliminator that allows anything before it. You can then add rules based on plus sign included emails.

    6. Re:Not two accounts by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      No, to do that, they have a separate feature.
      youremail+123@gmail.com will deliver to youremail@gmail.com.
      I think it allows up to three or five letters.

    7. Re:Not two accounts by bearclaw · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a period in my gmail email address and I just confirmed this. However, when you log into gmail, you still need to use the account with the period. I could not log into the non-period account with my period-account's password.

      If that makes any sense.

      --
      -- bearclaw
    8. Re:Not two accounts by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It's abcdefg+randomwebsitename@gmail.com where your mailbox is abcdefg@gmail.com. I've used that when signing up to some things, although it breaks some site's software.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:Not two accounts by Quino · · Score: 1

      No, they are definitely two separate accounts. I have a user.name@gmail account, and receive e-mail meant for the username@gmail account that someone else is using and sending e-mail from.

      In fact, I originally wanted username@gmail, but that was taken so gmail suggested user.name which I took.

      The weird thing is that I'm pretty sure I'm not receiving all of this guy's e-mail, since he runs a business and keeps an apparently loooong contact list of people he e-mails, and yet I receive e-mails obviously addressed to him 2 or 3 times a week only. I expect he actually receives many times this number of business-related e-mail.

      I wonder how many of my e-mails he's received and read? hmmm this is scary, as I do receive bank statements, password change notifications to my bank, etc.

      This is actually a pretty big deal, in fact! I wish it was as you describe (not separate accounts) since then it wouldn't matter much -- but I'm afraid this is sort of a big screwup on Google's part (and I just finished getting all inspired by that BBC clip on Google!)

    10. Re:Not two accounts by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Now we know why it's marked a beta. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    11. Re:Not two accounts by Orkie · · Score: 1

      I wonder if mail that is sent to the no-dot one is also sent to the dotted one. I seem to have got a bit of SPAM recently, but I don't think I've given out my e-mail address to anywhere new.

    12. Re:Not two accounts by non0score · · Score: 1

      Yep. Just sent a piece of e-mail to my own gmail account, but without the period. I didn't get my own letter. I think Google basically patched the registration process after they found out about the bug, but not before some "duplicate" (identical accounts discounting the period) accounts were already made.

    13. Re:Not two accounts by Phylter · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. As long as you can't sign up for a similar account with periods (and you can't) then there is no problem and it can be convenient.

    14. Re:Not two accounts by zhenga · · Score: 1

      Say my email address I registered was hello.world@gmail.com. I indeed get the mail if it was sent to helloworld@gmail.com (without the dots). But the mail is put in the "All Mail" box, and doesnt show up in the "inbox".

      Is there any way to automatically show it in the inbox or do I have to create filters for each possible combination?

    15. Re:Not two accounts by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      This seems to be very inconsistent. Last night I sent an email to the non-period-dileneated version of my account, and I got it (i.e. I sent it to firstnamelastname and got it at firstname.lastname). I tried creating an account using the name without the period, and couldn't- which means Google's either fixed the security hole, or someone else grabbed the account. I haven't recieved anyone else's mail, but that doesn't mean anything. I really would like to know which it is.

      Is it just the earliest Gmail users who can have overlapping logins? My account is only a year old.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    16. Re:Not two accounts by warrior_s · · Score: 1

      >I know that this is a problem, as I'm getting email for someone else who's got my email address without the dot in it. Hmmm.. so you are the one having a dot in email address? That means all your mail is also being delivered to the other person who do not have dot in the address.

    17. Re:Not two accounts by syukton · · Score: 1

      Ok, I just asked a friend of mine who uses gmail and this is the conversation:

      me: you use gmail, right?
      her: yep
      me: is there a dot in the left half of your address?
      her: yes
      her: and i have had problems with that particular dot.
      me: what kind of problems?
      her: getting mail that is meant for someone with the same gmail address, only minus the dot
      her: because apparently, when you create the account, and log in thereafter, gmail distinguishes between dot and no-dot
      me: yeah, it seems to be a widespread problem.
      her: but when it's actually directing mail, it does NOT distinguish.
      her: which makes no goddamn sense
      me: yeah, well. it is still in "beta"
      her: well isn't that kindof a basic kind of thing? email getting to the proper address?....
      me: dots aren't technically supported in the email specification.
      her: well then why let two separate addresses be created, one with and one without a dot?
      me: that's an excellent question. They don't appear to allow it anymore, but they may have at one point.

      So the story may have been corrected, but the plot still thickens...

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    18. Re:Not two accounts by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      It also makes it really easy to automaticly prune off the spamtag when selling it on lists of emails. Only good for honest uses like mailinglists.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    19. Re:Not two accounts by profesor · · Score: 1

      I thought this was happening to me, but now I think they are two separate accounts. I have 'matt.lastname@gmail.com'. I think the other person has 'matthewlastname@gmail.com', and some of his acquaintances occasionally send mail to 'mattlastname@gmail.com' instead of 'matthewlastname@gmail.com'.

    20. Re:Not two accounts by jrockway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I get plenty of spam to the subaddresses (like "jon-nospam@jrock.us"). I've never gotten any SPAM in my main mailbox, though, so I don't think anyone's doing this yet. I have seen a few people send SPAM to "jon-@jrock.us" or "nospam@jrock.us", but that's fine since those aliases have no legitimate use. I auto-blacklist any senders to those addresses, as well as auto-reporting the SPAM to spamcop. Seems to be working fairly well.

      --
      My other car is first.
    21. Re:Not two accounts by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

      I believe I have the same problem, but it is hard to figure on, since it could easily be a case of mistyped/written address.
      I registered an address with a period, and I just sent an email to the same address with no period to see if I get a response.

      --


      -------
      Incite and flee.
    22. Re:Not two accounts by tommertron · · Score: 1
      I think they used to allow usernames that differed in dots only as well. This happened to me, where I sent someone an email, but someone else got it, and their address differed only by a dot. Except that I know that I had the address correct (it was added when I invited him) so they must have allowed usernames differing by dots at one point. They only option I thought of is is my friend's account expired...

      Contact me (tommertron at the mail service in question) if you want to collaborate on an answer. Maybe we could get a blog post resolving this up somewhere.

      --
      Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
    23. Re:Not two accounts by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

      The way you use Gmail for filtering out spam and stuff is already there, and it isn't a period.

      You just add a +whatever to your email address (catcher80+spam@gmail.com for example). it still goes to catcher80, but now I can add a filter that deletes mail sent to catcher80+spam@. It is a VERY good feature, I haven't tried it at yahoo or other places, but combined with Gmail's filter+labeling+archive system, it's very very VERY useful.

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    24. Re:Not two accounts by volvolus · · Score: 1
      You can already use randomwebsitename+abcdefg@gmail.com. The plus sign is a deliminator that allows anything before it. You can then add rules based on plus sign included emails.

      Is this a bug or a technical feature allowing google.com to use these accounts to distribute targeted advertising?

    25. Re:Not two accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I get email for about 4 different people, some of whom use my exact email address to make their online purchases. I know that they enter my address into foreign systems because the email address is also used as the login. I had to log into a bunch of accounts to get contact information for someone who kept using my address for purchases and accounts. She never did return my call but she did stop....

    26. Re:Not two accounts by intelliot · · Score: 1

      Since this has already been clarified in other comments, I hesitate to reply. But since the post was rated "Score:5, Informative", I feel an obligation to point out that it is COMPLETELY WRONG. This has been a feature of Gmail since April 2004, and it was worked as intended.

      If you get email for someone else, it is not because there is a problem. It is due to an unrelated issue, most likely simple human error (a typo in the email address). To be clear, THERE IS NO TECHNICAL PROBLEM, no has there ever been. This story is completely false.

  4. True!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe this is true, and they've done nothing about it!! I've had a couple of e-mails about jobs or something, addressed to someone with my name but no dot!! Unfortunately they're nothing interesting though ;-).

    1. Re:True!! by Chimera252 · · Score: 1

      Same here. I just assumed it was some new spam trick.....

  5. Re:What's wrong? by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

    cmdr.taco@gmail.com

    c.m.d.r.t.a.c.o@gmail.com

    cm.dr.taco@gmail.com

    I think you get it.

  6. What date is it? by Incadenza · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bloopers like this make me check the calender, sounds like perfect April 1st Slashdot news.

    1. Re:What date is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it is a not bug - it's feature. It was discribed on GMail's Wikipedia entry even like one year ago. And it's nice feature...

    2. Re:What date is it? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except this one was actually believed for longer than 2.38 seconds.

  7. Yep by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 4, Informative
    I addressed this w/Gmail a long time ago. I have two first names (e.g. Mike Roger) and mikeroger@gmail.com was taken. . . so I grabbed mike.roger@gmail.com

    It's a damn shame mikeroger doesn't have a racier life, it would be awesome.

    Google's response, btw, was that I'd secured both mikeroger@gmail.com and mike.roger@gmail.com and could switch between the two as I wanted. Obviously, this is incorrect.

    The bright side is I seem to have blown the original email user away w/volume; he used to receive about 1 email every 3 days as opposed to my 20-30 (not including spam).

    The down-side is he subscribed to XM ENTERTAINMENT's porn newsletter.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:Yep by bfdhud · · Score: 2, Funny

      so uhm BaD. Can I have my email address back? I miss my newsletter.

    2. Re:Yep by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Heck of a way to meet new people! :)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    3. Re:Yep by strobexii · · Score: 5, Funny

      The down-side is he subscribed to XM ENTERTAINMENT's porn newsletter.

      Don't worry, I just got him back big time! I subscribed you to about a dozen porn newsletters. He'll be completely inundated with porn spam in no time! No need to thank me, helping other people is its own reward.

    4. Re:Yep by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing the issue slightly.
      Read the problem carefully:

      You managed to register a dotted variation after being informed the nodot version wasn't available.

      The article says that mail sent to any gmail account with dots is sent to the undotted version.
      The fact you also get the mail is a coincidence.

      You were only getting mails intended for the other person simply because the mailing user mistyped his address.
      All mail sent to your dotted address is also going to his address, so the other mike was still getting mail and quite unaware of the problem.

      The downside to this is you just admitted to slashdot that it was you (or someone sending it for you specifically) who signed up for XM's porn newsletter ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The down-side is he subscribed to XM ENTERTAINMENT's porn newsletter.

      Sounds like he's on /. as well, I would make moves to protect your userID. Downside?

    6. Re:Yep by Vicsun · · Score: 1

      You are a filthy liar, sir.

      Either that or Gmail behaves differently with me. I had originally registered firstname.lastname@gmail.com but when I just tried registering firstnamelastname@gmail.com, fir.stnamelastname@gmail.com, and firstnamelast.name@gmail.com, it gave me an 'address already registered' error. Try it out for yourself.

      I guess it's also possible that Google has recently corrected the flaw and it was indeed possible to register both firstnamelastname and firstname.lastname at some point. I want to believe though, so for now I'll just suspend my belief in your posts' veracity.

    7. Re:Yep by elmegil · · Score: 3, Informative
      I guess it's also possible that Google has recently corrected the flaw

      From what others have said here that seems the most likely circumstance.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or someone else already took those accounts, right? :) your innability to register those names (esp. when it's due to the accounts already being taken) does *not* prove what you think it does. :)

    9. Re:Yep by starwed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, look at this blog post about the issue. It's from a while ago, and describes the behavior people are discussing. It's not a recent fix, it's been this way all along! (In other words, the "controversy" here is completely bogus.)

    10. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soo, now that the cat's out of the bag... this XM Entertainment subscriber... is you? =D

    11. Re:Yep by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep. Verified this myself. my podcast e-mail address has dots in it. Sent one to it without the dots and it came to the one with the dots. Tried to sign in to the accounts without using the .'s and it did not work. Google need sot fix this. The story may have a correction, but it DOES happen.

      --

      Gorkman

    12. Re:Yep by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      It could be worse. You could travel to New York on business a lot. THere could be another person with the same name but without the dots. That person lives in new york, and has lots of friends visiting him.

      Of course, theyre all talking about how they can't wait to hook up.

      More power too him, except I don't swing that way. They're all guys, I'm into girls. Should be fun explaining that to the wife. I've replied to the first few that there seems to be a mistake but not sure what they think, because they won't respond. I've just started deleting them.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    13. Re:Yep by piano-in-a-box · · Score: 0

      That may not necessarily be true. I have an account without dots (and one where no reasonable person would have ever created with dots). I've tried at least t.e.n possi.ble va.ria.tions on it, and they all came to me. I haven't had any noted instance of lost mail to anyone else. I still can't SIGN IN to one with dots in it, nor can I register them. Because GMail is designed to disregard dots, how can you verify, unless you're constantly recieving someone else's mail, that you're not legitimately getting your own mail when you send it to the one without dots? The flaw is not that it disregards them, but that once upon a time, the signing up form DID NOT.

  8. Clarification, if you would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean that anyone who creates a gmail account that is essentially the same as mine, save for a period placed somewhere in the username would be able to read my mail?

    *panicks*

  9. Awesome, I can steal email by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

    Just create an account with dots in with the same letters as the account you want to spy on and you will get all their email.

    1. Re:Awesome, I can steal email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man you are the fucking leetest!!!! omgwtflol!!!

    2. Re:Awesome, I can steal email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you can't. Read comments above. If idiotslashdotposter@gmail.com is registered you cannot register idiot.slashdot.poster@gmail.com

    3. Re:Awesome, I can steal email by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot sarcasm doesn't translate on the internet. Nice language by the way.

  10. Update? by Parham · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is an update at the top of the article:

    Update: Ryan Coleman has since admitted he was mistaken, and that the e-mails he received addressed to ryancolemand@gmail.com were misaddressed.

    1. Re:Update? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      So basicly, never mind? Nothing to see here, move along?

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:Update? by earnest+murderer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In other news, a gentleman by the name of Due Diligence was found dead on a downtown street, apparently trampled to death.

      When asked about it Angry Mob (currently confined at digg.com) replied "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story".

      Seriously, this was a pretty big fuckup regurgitating some random assholes blog entry without checking *anything*. I expect this at digg.com where inflamitory and baseless rule the day. Slashdot can claim to merely be a discussion of "news" and not necessarily journalism itself. Ars, I expected more.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    3. Re:Update? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least the thing about "bla.bla" being the same as "blabla" is true, I just confirmed it with my account.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Update? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, "Ars doesn't make many mistakes but when it does, boy, are they doozies!"

  11. Identity theft? by SuperDuG · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Since in its infinite wisdom most webservices allow password resets to happen via email. Wouldn't it just be a matter of time to find out soemone's email address and then have the "oops I lost my password" feature on a number of websites utilized?

    I wonder how many slashdot accounts, internet domains, and amazon accounts are linked via an @gmail.com address.

    This is most certainly not a "little" problem by any means...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Identity theft? by pinano · · Score: 1

      What about wholesale account stealing? Apparently there is a feature where you can change the periods in your name to look however you wanted them... I will be back in about 10 minutes with further research results.

    2. Re:Identity theft? by pinano · · Score: 1

      I have pinano@gmail.com as one of my e-mail addresses; I attempted to register pi.na.no@gmail.com and it told me it was not available. Apparently this problem has either been resolved, or it is intermittent.

    3. Re:Identity theft? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Already has happened. Two days ago, I got a set of username/password combos for a CHILDCARE website that isn't mine. I have xxx.yyy@gmail.com, it was sent to xxxyyy@gmail.com (addresses changed to protect the innocent.) This login information can be used to access billing information (according to the email.) If I was dishonest, I could do some VERY bad things with this info.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  12. Old news! by travail_jgd · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has been known for a while in the user community. In fact, this tutorial is 18 months old, and demonstrates the "feature".

  13. Re:What's wrong? by Skater · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a friend from college that I met through a mistakenly delivered email. She was trying to send to someone with the email address like "rjm987@someotherschool.edu", but she accidentally put a space between the "m" and the "9", so the system delived it to one of my class accounts with the username "rjm". We became good friends and still email each other now and then, a decade later.

    So, it can be a great way to meet new people!

  14. It's a feature, not a bug (No, really) by njord · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't see the problem with that, I thought it was common knowledge. The way I see it, how often is a period essential, or dangerous? I don't think there are many domains with say, joesmith@domain.com and joe.smith@domain.com pointing to different people. I see the period as a way of reducing typing errors.

    Also, you can do things like this:

    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answe r=12096&topic=1564

    I don't want to sound trollish, but this hardly sounds like story material to me.

    njord

    1. Re:It's a feature, not a bug (No, really) by Hillman · · Score: 1

      Is there a (simple) way to configure my mail server to do the same thing? I wouldn't have to configure aliases each time I want a throwaway email address...

    2. Re:It's a feature, not a bug (No, really) by comcn · · Score: 1

      Depends what mail server you use... I have configured exim so that it will accept suffixes on e-mail addresses, provided that the folder exists already. That way to create a xxx-YYY@domain suffix, I just create the YYY folder in my maildir. Works nicely.

    3. Re:It's a feature, not a bug (No, really) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it, how often is a period essential, or dangerous?

      rm -rf ./
      or
      rm -rf /

      which sounds like the worse idea?

    4. Re:It's a feature, not a bug (No, really) by michaelconnor · · Score: 1

      For about 4 months, I regularly received mail from students of a German Professor at a state school. The gmail adress was *.*@gmail. I would have let them know about the glitch sooner, but it I'll admit it was much too entertaining watching several of the students do their best to kiss up to the Prof every week or so. For some weird reason, it would just sort of brighten my day :)

  15. Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Funny
    I was wondering why I get so much spam. My email address is *.*@gmail.com.

    :-P

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  16. my email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please stop posting my email address on Slashdot. Think of all the evil spammers!

    Thanks,
    A.C.

    1. Re:my email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argh! They posted MY email address too!

  17. Old news by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has been the case since day 1. The only problem is if Google has been allowing people to register addresses that differ only because of the position of periods. Certainly they generally don't - I've tried to register several variations of my gmail address without success. It looks like the case discussed in this article is a isolated incident.

    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1
      The only problem is if Google has been allowing people to register addresses that differ only because of the position of periods.


      They have. I have the address prius.driver@gmail.com, and someone else has priusdriver@gmail.com. I get some spam that is sent to 'priusdriver@gmail.com', and have once gotten legitimate messages (billing messages, with credit card information in them!)

      Obviously, I don't use mine for sensitive information. But the other guy still does. (I have sent him/her/whatever messages warning him, but just yesterday I got an email with username/password combos for some secure website of his.

      (The reason I'm posting my email address is so that if he's choosing to ignore my warnings, and he reads Slashdot, maybe he'll be more cautious now.)
      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    2. Re:Old news by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I have the address prius.driver@gmail.com, and someone else has priusdriver@gmail.com.

      Are you sure that someone else has this "other" address? From this discussion it looks like Gmail maps them to the same account. Getting spam is hardly surprising, especially with such a dictionary-attack bait as your addresses; the "legitimate messages" you got could well be phishing attempts, or simply e-mail addresses gotten wrong

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:Old news by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure. They're sent to 'Dave'. I'm not Dave. There is obvious direct email to 'Dave', repeatedly. It's not a boo-boo from the sender. It's email going to the wrong place. I have yet to see one that is in reply to one Dave sent, so replies must go only to the right place.

      It includes confidential information (web site admin usernames and passwords, in non-form-letters sent to 'Dave'.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    4. Re:Old news by Quino · · Score: 1

      to back you up, I'm in the exact same boat -- and of course I checked the "sent to" address carefully.

      I have user.name@gmail, and receive e-mails sent to some other guy with the username@gmail account. It's not a typo, right there in the "to" field is the other e-mail address (without the period) and yet I'm receiving it.

      The really weird thing is that it certainly appears that I'm not receiving all of his e-mail, just on occassion and sporadically.

    5. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. I'm surprised one person would admit to driving a Prius, let alone two.

  18. This is all wrong by Lanzaa · · Score: 5, Informative

    The person made a mistake. He was getting someone elses mail for a different reason. You cannot make two account that are the same.

    Here is his blog post saying he made the mistake.
    http://fitrans.blogspot.com/2006/01/oops-formerly- found-in-my-inbox-odd.html

    1. Re:This is all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not surprising that the fuckup came from ScuttleMonkey. Disney buys Pixar? Hello, talk about misleading titles. They haven't yet. Articles from ScuttleMonkey have had a high rate of problems.

  19. Fixed? by broothal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uhm... I just tried this. It doesn't work - you can't register username if user.name is taken, nor can you register user.name if username is taken.

    1. Re:Fixed? by MooUK · · Score: 2, Informative

      You cannot now. Apparently, it used to be possible. Presumably they got wind of what was happening and actually did something to prevent it getting worse.

    2. Re:Fixed? by cookedchicken · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, that may be the case NOW, but for a long time after gmail FIRST opened, like the first few months, a person could register blah@gmail.com while another seperate person could register bla.h@gmail.com. When bla.h@gmail.com could send out e-mail, reply's would go to blah@gmail. Account's created during this time period that had this problem have never been fixed -- and this situation has never been addressed by Google.

    3. Re:Fixed? by gabe824 · · Score: 1

      This has been fixed for at least the last 8 months. I noticed emails were arriving in my inbox from friends who had forgotten the period last May and did some playing around at that time, including trying to sign up for an account without the period and I couldn't. So that part has been fixed for some time. Apperently the question is whether accounts that were set up at the very beginning, where distinct acount exist with and without the dot have been dealt with.

    4. Re:Fixed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, I did it about two years ago. firstlast@gmail.com was taken and I registered first.last@gmail.com, also I've never recieved anyone elses e-mail's.

  20. It's beta? by Lispy · · Score: 0

    Come on. GMail is a public beta. I fully understand that this is a stupid bug but then again, who is using gmail to send critical mail? I must say that this somehow makes me feel ok for my first mailserver that treated Upper and lowercase adresses different. It took my a few days to find the proper setting in Cyrus.

    It's kinda embarassing for a company like Google but still, that's what betas are for.

    1. Re:It's beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truely spoken like someone who bought a bunch of overpriced google stock...

    2. Re:It's beta? by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh please, it's rare that Google ever move from a beta version to a gold version.

      Granted, officially it's a public beta, sadly very few treat it that way and rely on it for their primary email contact.

    3. Re:It's beta? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      I saw a link to Google Gulp in "The World According to Google" thread, but when I read the FAQ, I thought their answer explains why they stay Beta

      http://www.google.com/googlegulp/faq.html#11
      11. When will you take Google Gulp out of beta?

      Man, if you pressure us, you just drive us away. We'll commit when we're ready, okay? Besides, what's so great about taking things out of beta? It ruins all the romance, the challenge, the possibilities, the right to explore. Carpe diem, ya know? Maybe we're jaded, but we've seen all these other companies leap headlong into 1.0, thinking their product is exactly what they've been dreaming of all their lives, that everything is perfect and hunky-dory - and the next thing you know some vanilla copycat release from Redmond is kicking their butt, the Board is holding emergency meetings and the CEO is on CNBC blathering sweatily about "a new direction" and "getting back to basics." No thanks, man. We like our freedom.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:It's beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but then again, who is using gmail to send critical mail?

      A certain Chicagland area gold-loving "I've-run-a-business-doing-everything-imaginable-u nder-the-sun" security-minded consultant entrepreneur friend of ours has stated on several occasions that he's helping businesses save hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in Exchange licensing costs by moving them all over to gMail. Whoops! : p

    5. Re:It's beta? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      He is braindead, right? Without even mentioning the lack of groupware functionality that Exchange has and even ignoring all the opensource alternatives out there why whould any company want to send and receive mail with a lame @gmail.com? They pay money for their webpresence, right? Amazing with what some smart-asses get away with. Please tell me he's not rich or successful in his filed of "expertise".

    6. Re:It's beta? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Either he is not alone or I've met that friend of yours. In a previous /. discussion some guy claimed to have started a business around moving companies to Gmail. We promptly pointed out that such a business would be a major violation of Google's terms of use (you know, the one stating Gmail is for personal use only) and thus a lawsuit waiting to happen. Still havn't heard back from him...

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    7. Re:It's beta? by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      You are free to change your product after a final release, its called version 2.0.

      The goal of a Beta test is to let users discover all the final annoying little bugs out there before they put out a final release. Keeping something in Beta indefinitely defeats the point of Beta testing.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    8. Re:It's beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh trust me, he's no friend of mine. I was referring to "ours" in the royal slashdot sort of way.

  21. aha! by bazorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    they turned evil! It had to happen!

  22. Google is teh Sexist! by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny
    can't believe Google is disrespecting users with periods.
    Women have been disrespected for thousands of years.

    Just the other day, I was overjoyed that Google was fighting for my rights, now I'm dissapointed to learn that they're not fighting for women's rights too.

    I can only imagine what Condoleezza Rice & Hillary Clinton will have to say about this.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's a common misconception that women have been mistreated throughout history. A large number of civilizations revered them.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by cp.tar · · Score: 0

      Was the immaculate conception a misconception too?

      Get a humour detector.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    3. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can only imagine what Condoleezza Rice & Hillary Clinton will have to say about this.

      Why do they care? They don't have periods.

    4. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing, because they're both, in fact, men.

    5. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by windex · · Score: 1

      Oddly, they were not the ones who won throughout history.

      I think the women are plotting something.

    6. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary says Google is being run like a plantation, and you know what that means.

    7. Re:Google is teh Sexist! by McPierce · · Score: 1
      Women have been disrespected for thousands of years.


      It was John Lennon who said Woman Is The Nigger Of The World.
      --
      Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
  23. That explains it by dg41 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've been wondering why I've been getting mail for some guy in Australia with the same name, yet when I looked at the To: line, it has a dot in the username.

  24. Wow. by LeeTax0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This explains why I've been getting email from some guy telling me I'm his lab partner in some class and that I need to contact him to get info on the final assignment. I wrote to him, "Who do you think I am and what class are you talking about?". He says, "I'm Quincy. I set next to you in IST 326. We have an assignment due soon!" I say, "Uh. I don't think so, since I'm not in any IST program. Are you sure you have the right email?" The guy: "Yes, daviddunlap@gmail.com, right?" Me: "No, not at all. david.dunlap@gmail.com." I thought all this time that the guy just didn't know how to use email. Boy, was I wrong.

    1. Re:Wow. by caffeination · · Score: 1

      These cases are so isolated compared to the overwhelming anecdotal evidence that this is a feature, as Google claims, that I'm pretty convinced that cases like yours are down to a mistake on the part of people emailing you. I'm even prepared to believe that more than one person could screw up over some email addresses, based on deep psychologically provoked typos.
      This is mostly because I rely heavily on Gmail and I am desperately trying not to have a heart attack. For what it's worth, the moment I learned of this, I tried the potential "attack" on my most uniquely named account: caffeination.net@gmail.com, which I knew was unoccupied in any other form, and was blocked.
      Where the uncertainty comes in is in the claims that in the early stages, this safeguard didnt work properly. I'm not an early-adopter... thank Intelligent Designer...

    2. Re:Wow. by svanstrom · · Score: 1

      People get e-mailaddresses wrong, that's just life...

      I've got a 3 character username @ hotmail.com (and msn), I get A LOT of e-mails simply because people make misstakes; not as many misstakes as spam, but still, misstakes have been made.

      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    3. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're a lot nicer than I am. At the very least, I would've told the guy what a hot ass he has, and about my huge crush on him, and then asked that he start emailing me at my other account.

    4. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are those misstakes juicy ?

    5. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bullshit. Check your inbox.

    6. Re:Wow. by MedManDC · · Score: 1

      This has been happening to me, as well. I am j.y@gmail.com (not really) and someone else has jy@gmail.com. I occasionally get mail for him and I'm hoping is isn't getting my mail.

  25. When Ryan Coleman makes a mistake, it's a doozy by toby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not much better place to embarrass yourself than on the front page of /. ... :)

    --
    you had me at #!
  26. Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Headline here should be corrected; this isn't a huge gmail flaw; seasoned users know it as a feature.

    Secret gmail feature #1: you can add and remove periods from your username with no change in mail routing. There is no collision with other accounts since only one account (stripped of periods) is allowed to exist.

    Scret gmail feature #2: you can append a plus and any string to your account name and it will still be routed to you. Try creating filters by giving out your address this way: eg example+spam@gmail.com will be delivered to username 'example'

    1. Re:Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      I wonder: the author of the source article, the editor of Ars Technica, the Slashdot editor who posted this... have any of them actually USED Gmail?

      I can only assume the answer is no.

    2. Re:Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by wenchmagnet · · Score: 1

      Right on... I've been using the "." feature for over a year now.

      And I use the username+mailinglistname@gmail.com feature to subscribe to different lists and make it simpler to make filters though not all lists accept email addresses with a + in them.

      Question is, if an account named username@gmail.com already exists, can you create an account named user.name@gmail.com ?

    3. Re:Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    4. Re:Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by Honig+the+Apothecary · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Question is, if an account named username@gmail.com already exists, can you create an account named user.name@gmail.com ?

      No you cannot. And vise versa. You cannot create an account someuser@gmail.com if someone already has some.user@gmail.com. It seems to retire all dot variations of a name when you register the nondotted basename. I personally registered a firstname.lastname@gmail.com account. When I send mail to firstnamelastname@gmail.com it comes to the registered account with the dot in it.

      This is a non-issue. Chicken.Little@gmail.com, the sky is not falling and some l33t hacker is not reading your mail because they own chickenlittle@gmail.com, you own chickenlittle@gmail.com, you jackass.

    5. Re:Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by DanaGoyette · · Score: 1

      Everywhere I've tried the plus, it's said IINVALID ADDRESS (on ATI's contest, dealnews, and other such public things)

    6. Re:Sigh... This really is a FEATURE by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      There is no collision with other accounts since only one account (stripped of periods) is allowed to exist.
      Then please explain why I constantly get mail to my my.name@gmail.com account which was sent to myname@gmail.com... which is owned by someone else who shares my name? It is absolutely a problem.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  27. This is not news and not rocket science by jbarr · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is absolutely not mis-delivery or a mistake on Google's part!

    See Gmail's Help page on this at:

    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answe r=10313&query=dot&topic=0&type=f

    (You may need to be logged into Gmail account to see this.)

    Simply put, the period only matters when logging in. Gmail considers some.user@gmail.com and somuser@gmail.com as the same when delivering email, but if the account was oopened as some.user, then you have to use some.user as the login--someuser will not work. Send an email to some.user@gmail.com, somuser@gmail.com, or so.me.us.er@gmail.com, and it'll get delivered to the same account, but you will only be able to login as some.user@gmail.com

    Google's intent was to cut down on addressing mistakes as well as spam.

    From the user's perspective, actually a good thing because it means that you "lock in" similar addresses so some.user and someuser aren't two different accounts. It also means that the actual number of accounts is less because of this.

    -Jim

    http://gmailtips.com/

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by LeeTax0r · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think the mistake is letting multiple uses register those names. Say, I sign up as joe.smith@gmail.com and it allows someone else to sign up as joesmith@gmail.com. This user can now read my mail. That's a huge problem. If Google is planning on including this "feature" then they need to not allow users to register joesmith@gmail.com after joe.smith@gmail.com has be registered, and vice versa.

    2. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      You cannot create a joesmith@gmail.com and a joe.smith@gmail.com account. Gmail was setup like this from the beginning. Those who report misaddressing are most likely wrong in identifying the source of misaddressing. For example, I am sure that what happens is that a user Joe joe.smith@gmail.com receives somebody else's emails . Joe investigates it and the sender of the emails tells him that he intended to send the emails to joesmith@gmail.com. Joe tells him that I am not joesmith, I am joe.smith! and thinks that the problem is solved. What really happened however, is that the sender should have simply addressed thes email to jo.smith@gmail.com or josmith@gmail.com. Just a typo, independent of the dot issue.

    3. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Gmail considers some.user@gmail.com and somuser@gmail.com as the same when delivering email,

      I understand the period thing, but why would Google want to eliminate the letter 'e'? That truly is evil. 'e' is a nice, friendly letter, that has never hurt anyone. What did 'e' do to Google to deserve this.

      WAKE UP! DO NOT ALLOW GOOGLE TO COMMIT E-NOCIDE

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by orkysoft · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Except not conforming to the W3C standards, having a crappy implementation of CSS, and presenting a huge security risk for millions of computers worldwide, well, nothing much, really.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply put, the period only matters when ...

      Actually, that was quite complicated.

    6. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      Thanks man. I am one of the people who have a period in their email address and I didn't even realize Google did this.

    7. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by jbarr · · Score: 1

      You are correct. If you signed up as "joe.smith", then no other iteration of that will be assigned to another user.

      In fact, this is a benefit to the user. If you sign up as joe.smith@gmail.com, and your friend doesn't remember the period and sends it to joesmith@gmail.com, you will still receive it--not so with most other email providers.

      -Jim
      http://gmailtips.com/

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    8. Re:This is not news and not rocket science by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I just tried it. My gmail address has a period in it, and I was able to login with and without the period.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  28. Re:Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

    You get mail? I've signed up for tons of stuff and nobody sends anything to my $sys$@gmail.com account.

    For the life of me, I can't figure out why.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  29. Now my t-shirt makes sense! by rfernand79 · · Score: 4, Funny
  30. I am a liar. by Vicsun · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I said above is a complete and total lie. Instead of going by what other slashdot posters had posted (lies as well, apparently - who would've guessed?), I actually tried it out and it didn't work. The grandparent was correct. I couldn't register firstnamelastname@gmail.com when firstname.lastname@gmail.com was already registered.

    I guess I should actually put a little effort in research before spouting unsubstantiated bullshit. Or I can just take note from the editors of a certain tech-oriented website and continue on my merry, non-reaserching way :)

    1. Re:I am a liar. by Ruleke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, but some experimenting also revealed that the google help entry seems incorrect : when dropping the period from my username, the mail did not arrive in the mailbox of my account that contains the period.

      Kinda makes me wonder if someone else now received my test mails :/

    2. Re:I am a liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't that just mean that someone beat you in registering firstnamelastname@gmail.com? ;) 0

    3. Re:I am a liar. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had an address in the form xxx.yyy@gmail.com for a long time. I picked it because I liked the separation. I don't even know if xxxyyy@gmail.com was taken before I registered. But I know that someone else (named Dave) has xxxyyy@gmail.com, because i receive his messages, including ones with private information, like web site admin login/password combos, which would give me access to billing information.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    4. Re:I am a liar. by plumby · · Score: 1

      Don't know whether they've changed the registration or not, but I've just tried registering with hobart.prof and hobartprof - when I first went to register, it told me both were still available. I then registered one of them, went back to register the other, and it told me it had been taken. So presumably it is now preventing ab and a.b both being taken.

    5. Re:I am a liar. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Informative

      It only works one way round tho, if you register 'richard.price' then 'richardprice' will forward mail to you as well if it isnt already registered, but if you register 'richardprice' you DONT get 'richard.price' to use. I tried this ages ago when this was first mentioned.

    6. Re:I am a liar. by cookedchicken · · Score: 0

      Well, that may be the case NOW, but if you would do some research you would also realize that this wasn't always the case! For a long time after gmail FIRST opened, like the first few months, a person could register blah@gmail.com while another person could register bla.h@gmail.com Google has NEVER admitted this error.

    7. Re:I am a liar. by typical · · Score: 1

      Or I can just take note from the editors of a certain tech-oriented website and continue on my merry, non-reaserching way :)

      You know, if there's actually *demand* for validation, it would be *really easy* to "wrap" Slashdot. Create a website called ValidatedSlash or something like that, and keep a list of links to Slashdot stories that you've personally validated.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    8. Re:I am a liar. by ScottyUK · · Score: 1

      The exact same thing just happened to me. I tried to send an email to myself, without using the period I have in my username, and with extra periods. None of them arrived in my inbox.

      Recently I've been recieving emails not intended for me, from Transport for London regarding Tube outages and Oyster cards, addressed to someone without the period in their username but arriving in my inbox. I've also recieved password reminders and ticket booking confirmations from West Ham FC...useless to me, since I live in Scotland and I hate football.

      --
      Nice weather for penguins...
    9. Re:I am a liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only works one way round tho, if you register 'richard.price' then 'richardprice' will forward mail to you as well if it isnt already registered, but if you register 'richardprice' you DONT get 'richard.price' to use. I tried this ages ago when this was first mentioned.

      Wrong. You get any combination of periods in the address. This could be ric.h.a.r.d.pri.c.e and you would still get it. Do not test it from within gmail though (send from a different email address) because for some strange reason google hides the incoming email sent by you to you.

    10. Re:I am a liar. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Sorry Anonymous Coward, it is you who is wrong. The period thing only works if the origional email address has periods in it, all other variations are forwarded to one without periods in. If the origional doesnt have periods in, this is not setup and you only have the one email address.

      No email to richard.price@gmail.com comes to me, but I pity the person who just had a barrage of testing emails sent to him.

      If this acts differently for some people, perhaps its something google initiated only for certain groups or at certain signup stages, so not everyone got it.

    11. Re:I am a liar. by Ruleke · · Score: 1

      It seems it is impossible to test this functionality from the email account itself. I just tested this from a second gmail address, and this seems to work. Doesn't directly make sense to me why it wouldn't work from the address itself, but there you go.

      conclusion : functionality seems to be as documented in gmail help, for me at least

    12. Re:I am a liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry wrong
      I just tested it. I have (as an example) myemail@gmail.com and I sent an email from my hotmail account to my.email@gmail.com and recieved it.

    13. Re:I am a liar. by wenchmagnet · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      If you have username@gmail.com you will get email sent to user.name@gmail.com

      I've been using it for quite a long time now.

    14. Re:I am a liar. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Whoopy Do, so it works for you. It doesnt work for me, so how am I wrong? Just because some people can do it doesnt mean everyone can - Google has often rolled out features to some gmail users and withheld it from others, so how would this be any different?

    15. Re:I am a liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I should actually put a little effort in research before spouting unsubstantiated bullshit.

      Why bother? Nobody else does.

    16. Re:I am a liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a second. You said he was wrong because it didn't work for him, but when he said it did work that way for him and called you wrong, suddenly it's not cool to say that someone is wrong? Too bad you weren't a little more open minded before you called him wrong. Then I might listen to what you had to say. Now I just think you're a dick.

  31. hahahaha my first post got modded to +4 by Vicsun · · Score: 0, Troll

    good to see moderators are as lazy as I am

  32. Actually, you're not a liar. Just behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It used to be possible to register both a no-dot and a dot name as two separate accounts, and the mail did mingle. Now it is no longer possible to register both (but mail going to a dot name will go to the no-dot name).

  33. Does it work both ways? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For example, can I create g.oogle@gmail.com and get a copy of all email sent to google@gmail.com?

    1. Re:Does it work both ways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. As the account is infact assigned to the same mailbox, it can only be signed up for once (i.e., Google considers the account g.oogle@gmail.com to be the same as google@gmail.com at registration).

      The summary is somewhat misleading - 'doozey' - as this isn't a problem with relation to personal security.

  34. Re:What's wrong? by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1

    We've known about this since Gmail started. It's actually a VERY USEFUL FEATURE. I don't believe that there is any mis-delivery going on, because from memory you can't register cmdr.taco@gmail.com if cmdrtaco@gmail.com has already been used. So no one is going to be reading your mail.

  35. Well, that explains a lot. by ral8158 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone must have a version of my G-Mail account with a period in it. Apparently, they're very into penis enlargement...

  36. Your neighbour got mail, huh? by ceeam · · Score: 1

    Well, I suppose this is what "BETA" in Gmail logo stands for. Good thing all current Gmail users are hence beta-testers, otherwise they would've had a serious reason to complain.

    1. Re:Your neighbour got mail, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? There's no issue here. There is absolutely nothing wrong, in fact they planned it this way as a feature (hence why it's in the fscking knowledge base). They are not "two separate accounts," it's the same one.

      This is not at all newsworthy, everyone already knows about it, and it's not a problem.

  37. New Guy here.. by danee+boy · · Score: 1

    This is news? I've known about this since I've been using G Mail It's a feature not a bug. If my email addy was johnsmith@gmail.com I could give everyone the address john.smith@gmail.com and I'd still get it. It also cuts down on imposters someone cannot register your name with just a period added, and trick people into thinking they're you.

  38. is the other guy an idiot maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure the other mike roger isn't just an idiot and thinks it's his but it's not?

    I've had a yahoo mail address since they began giving them out, so it's my first initial, last name @ yahoo.com.

    Somehow over the years no less than 20 people have decided it's their email address and subscribed it to lists, used it to order products, etc. I think they asked for it, and said "flast@yahoo.com is unavailable, how about flast543@yahoo.com" and they said yes, but continued to use flast@yahoo.com.

    It's amazing, I get people's CC #'s mailed to me, their logins to secure shopping sites, etc.

    1. Re:is the other guy an idiot maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my first name in my hotmail and gmail addresses, and I receive lots of such e-mails (from banks, site registrations etc).

  39. More bad news for Sean Penn by bk4u · · Score: 1
    Guess he also can't take the email Sean.Penn@gmail.com

    Sean Penn Demands To Know What Asshole Took SeanPenn@gmail.com

    --
    Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
  40. ohhhhh SHIT!!!! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
    I use my first name, a period, then last name.

    Oh well - if someone has the other one, they are getting a LOT of email (I'm on a lot of listservs)

    --
    This space available.
  41. It's not a period... by bdwoolman · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a G spot.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
    1. Re:It's not a period... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      It's not a period...
      It is a G spot.

      Son, they may be located in similar places, but they are not to be confused!

      Now go upstairs and tell your mother it's time for that talk she's been meaning to have with you. =)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  42. I wonder... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All this week I have been receiving mail from a nice young lady in Naples about rental accomodation there. This wasnt spam, not in the slightest, it was most definately proper email about a rental enquiry made to her.

    So after I got a few, I emailed her back and informed her I had no idea who she was, what these rentals were for and where did she get my information.

    It turns out that she IS talking to another 'Richard Price', who had given her this email address and she was most confused. She was talking to this guy via his cell phone, had sent to and received physical mail from a mailing address fine but all his emails were coming to me.

    I wonder if this was why.

  43. Inaccurate Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As usual, Slashdot demonstrates its commitment to quality "journalism" by believing anything someone submits without doing basic checking.

    This is a feature, not a bug (Really!). Furthermore, there will be no collisions. If you have gmail address, with or without periods, any variations on that with more or less periods cannot be registered and all email will be delivered to you regardless.

    This is a non-story and a pathetic one at that.

    Slashdot owes Google an apology.

    1. Re:Inaccurate Story by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      /. owes every site we've ever ruined (except fopr the few that deserved it), our mothers for letting us stay in the basement, all the animals used to test vaseline and hand lotion, Natalie Portman, the USA, all of Europe, the Amish, Linux developers, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, Great Cthulhu, and the RIAA/MPAA great, big, apologies. Who am I forgetting?

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
  44. Google Makes Plenty of Mikstakes by PingXao · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just me but the regular, good ol' Google web search engine seems to be getting a little punchy lately. There are at least a dozen searches a day that return useless hits or links to cache pages that return an error when clicked on. Not surprising that they are making other mistakes as well.

  45. Not good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap. One of my gmail accounts is american.communist.party@gmail.com.

  46. Mod Slashdot -1 Flame by null+etc. · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remove this story, as it's total b.s. BTW it was posted on digg 3 days ago, by which time it had been identified as b.s. Way to go slashdot!

  47. This is redundant, but the story is JUST NOT TRUE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story has been recanted already in the link posted and the kid's blog where he first posted it, but people haven't caught on yet: there is just about no way for someone to get your mail. Don't worry. If you don't believe it, register lkfgsjadjskfjsdfgkljhkfjhgakfhg and lkfgsjadj.skfjsdfgkljhkfjhgakfhg and see that both can't exist. It actually is a cool FEATURE, no insecurity present.

  48. It is not a bug. It is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine you need to give your gmail address to your favourite insurance salesman. Your address is AnonymousCowardAtSlashdot@gmail.com

    You give him address
    Anonymous.CowardAtSlashdot@gmail.com
    All mail gets delivered into your mailbox.
    When you find out your mailbox is being abused by said salesman, you just filter out all mails addressed to Anonymous.CowardAtSlashdot

    Cool. Isnt't it?

    1. Re:It is not a bug. It is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there's a better way to achieve that... use +whatever after your account and before the @

      E.g. AnonymousCoward+insurancespam@gmail.com

      This is great for mailing lists and other spam signup forms if they support having a + in the address

  49. WRONG by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    I just sent myself a test email without my usual period between my first and last names, and it never arrived back.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:WRONG by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried it first as one message to two recipients, and it didn't work either.

      Try sending it from an email account other that your gmail account, and don't send to both addresses from the same message (i.e. two recipients.) I send one message from my university account to first.last@gmail.com then a second separate message to firstlast@gmail.com and both arrived.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    2. Re:WRONG by Ruleke · · Score: 1

      Tank you very much. This explains the tests I did which got me worried... you need to test from an external account (tested myself with a second gmail one).

  50. That explains a lot... by ErnieD · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I had gotten a few strange non-spam emails on one of my gmail accounts, and basically wrote back to the person explaining that I'm not who they thought I was.

    But now that I look back on those emails, I notice that they were addressed to firstname.lastname@gmail.com, while my address is firstnamelastname@gmail.com.

    Doh.

  51. Need new moderation tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite we've needed this for a while, this article highlights the fact we need it.

    We need a 'Blatant Lier'

    The article was completely bogus, and look at all the responses backing it up. Liers.

    BTW- interesting that the security word image I needed to type to post this comment was 'pretend'.

    1. Re:Need new moderation tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats a Lier?

    2. Re:Need new moderation tag by xMonkey · · Score: 1

      OP AC was me.

      A lier is one who lies.

      Heres a merriam Webster reference. Towards the bottom the have an audio pronounciation for you as well.

    3. Re:Need new moderation tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The page you cited was actually for the word "lie". The correct word is "liar".

      -Your Friendly English 101 Instructor

    4. Re:Need new moderation tag by xMonkey · · Score: 1

      You are correct, Good Job, thanks. The word is liar.

    5. Re:Need new moderation tag by chaves · · Score: 1

      However 'lier' does exist ("the one who lies down"):

      http://www.answers.com/lier

    6. Re:Need new moderation tag by Onuma · · Score: 1

      A lier is one who lies.

      How tautologically spoken.

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  52. Not a bug - you can't register the duplicates by SquareOfS · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know what this story is talking about, but the dot-ignoring delivery has been publicly known from day 1, and I just conducted the experiment of attempting to register a whole bunch of stupidly dotted variations on my username, and Gmail wouldn't let me register them.

    So apparently they're doing the smart thing, and not including the dots when they do a uniqueness test on new usernames.

    Maybe once upon a time in the very beginning they didn't, but I don't think that's the case now.

  53. Not a mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I signed up, my full name without a period was unavailable...so I used the first.last form. I just went back and sent an email to the address without a period and I received it.

    Wow...that was the most I've freaked out in a while - glad it turned out to be nothing. We're safe!

  54. Experts Exchange.. by mikael · · Score: 1

    Reading about this makes me really glad I don't have the gmail account: experts.exchange.gmail.com

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Experts Exchange.. by Hymer · · Score: 1

      Well... It wouldn't work... there is no @ in it and some RFC (822 if I remember right) clearly states the form of an address as someone@somedomain with no spaces.
      --
      This space is pwnd by... My wife!

  55. A bad idea by cookedchicken · · Score: 0, Troll

    When gmail first opened I registered the address blah@gmail.com About a year later, I started to receive all these strange e-mails that were obviously not addressed to me. I come to find out that someone had registered the address bla.h@gmail.com. They would send out e-mails to folks, and when they responded the e-mail went to my account and not to bla.h's account. I've also heard that Gmail's developers had the bright idea of trying to eliminate the concept of "bounced" mail. They believed they could build a system that could accurately guess, based on algarithums and patterns, the address the e-mail was intended to if a person typed in the wrong address. I think they have actually played around with this a bit... for a while I could send an e-mail to blahz@gmail.com or blahs@gmail and it would "guess" that the e-mail was actually meant for blah@gmail.com. It was guessing what the real intended address was to auto-deliver e-mail's with typos. A kind of "Did You Mean?" feature for e-mail. In my humble opinion, Google needs to fix these problems if they want their e-mail service to be taken serious.

  56. Re:Nope by mlewan · · Score: 1
    Either you did that quite some time ago, or you are wrong. My gmail account is 2x5y)hp1 and I tried to greate a new one with 2x.5y)hp1, but gmail wouldn't let me. There is a validation that two users don't get the same account.

    For anyone who wants to mail me, my mail address is not 2x5y)hp1 at all, but it could have been. Follow the url to my home page instead.

  57. Please explain by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google doesn't make many mistakes but when it does, boy, are they doozies

    I'm not American and I'm not sure I understand. What is a "doozy" and should I be worried if I have one? I'm hoping it isn't the kind of thing I can catch just from using the internet.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
    1. Re:Please explain by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

      It's a STD. Google it.

      --
      SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    2. Re:Please explain by eyepeepackets · · Score: 1

      Let me esplain: Doozy is a bit like floozy, cept that floozy makes you oozy while doozy makes you woozy. And if you don like this, you much too choosey.

      Thanks to Fezzik and Ingo from "The Princess Bride" movie for such excellent inspiration.

      Hope this helps. *chuckle*

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    3. Re:Please explain by Itanshi · · Score: 1

      silly people, refers to a doozenburg car

    4. Re:Please explain by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Doozy - noun - Of, or pertaining to dooz.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Please explain by HairyCanary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Congratulations on being mostly correct. Now if you could just spell it right when you pass along the name: Duesenberg.

  58. Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who finds a whole ton of duplicate stories between digg and slashdot now? It's almost like I could get any story I wanted published on slashdot - just rip off a story from digg.

    I'm slightly dissappointed that slashdot is becoming a digg aggregator...

    1. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think Digg gets its stories from?

  59. Beta by Heembo · · Score: 1

    Google *very responsibly* referes to a great deal of their software as Beta. Because it is still in Beta. You can read more about the concept of Beta *testing* at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_stage - again, Google, unlike most software companies, takes this concept seriously.

    From Wiki: "beta build ... is tested through a limited roll-out to a production environment using live data and real users. The beta test is closely monitored by the software testers."

    It's right on the GMail logo. http://mail.google.com/mail/help/images/logo.gif They take the concept of Beta very seriously. How many Beta products has M$ released and charged out out the nose for it? *all of em*.

    --
    Horns are really just a broken halo.
    1. Re:Beta by Brianech · · Score: 1

      heh I didn't have to pay for Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition Beta 2 So they do provide atleast 1 beta for free, and I am sure there are others.

    2. Re:Beta by smash · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but you still need to pay for Windows 95, 98, 2000, XP, etc

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Beta by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Yea, but what I mean is - Google calls a Beta product a Beta product. You're MS product that is in Beta is more like an early Alpha release. For example, Google News was in Beta for three years before they released it. http://news.com.com/2061-10812_3-6030207.html?part =rss&tag=6030207&subj=news

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    4. Re:Beta by Brianech · · Score: 1

      heh if you want to keep breaking it down, you could claim that you need to buy hardware to run any beta, thus nothing is free... Actually I didn't technically pay for WinXP. I got a free copy of XP Pro when I took my Operating Systems course in CSc(I doubt the course fees had anything to do with it, considering all 3rd/4th year courses are a flat fee)

  60. Just tried a few things... by non0score · · Score: 1

    Such as sending to (substitute user.name with my real e-mail address, of course) user.name@gmail.com, u.s.e.r.n.a.m.e@gmail.com, u.s.e..r.na.m.e@gmail.com, and username@gmail.com, when my real e-mail address was user.name@gmail.com. None of them worked except for user.name@gmail.com. So it seems like any e-mail other than the exact login name will not get forwarded to you. Of course, this could also be an exception case if there are more than one login name whose non-period versions map to the same name (for example, maybe before google patched their registration process, someone already registered username@gmail.com, as I never tried username@gmail.com to begin with, so I wouldn't know if that's been taken).

  61. This is a FEATURE... by ares284 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh, as long as I've had Gmail (a few months since it came out), I have known about this, and it was said to be a FEATURE. You want to know how? Well, I created a filter that sends all email TO: firstlast@gmail.com to a spam label, and this way only people who email first.last@gmail.com (notice the period) will go to my inbox. It's a feature, much like the firstlast+tag@gmail.com. Some sites don't accept the +tag part though. So, in other words, sign up to websites that may spam you by using firstlast@gmail.com and it will be filtered to a spam label (if you set it up that way) but tell your friends your address is first.last@gmail.com. You could also do it vice-versa. Accept email only as firstlast@gmail.com but if an address has first.last@gmail.com, it is then marked as spam. If they "fix" this, I will be quite upset. I've been using it extensively. -Ares

    1. Re:This is a FEATURE... by texaport · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And people can filter by sometimes using fubar@googlemail.com vs fubar@gmail.com

  62. Why leave this article? by angryLNX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is this article being left on the front page? It has been seen to be completely invalid, and is giving people the wrong idea. Great, you put a correction up, but the correction negates everything the article contains. Get rid of it.

    1. Re:Why leave this article? by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Two Words - Ad Impressions.

      It's really that simple. Even a total troll story lik this will generate them. Maybe even more since it's not true.

    2. Re:Why leave this article? by Radak · · Score: 1

      Because some of us who rarely read comments (this obviously is an exception) would like to know the article was wrong. I usually read only the front page, and only look at comments on stories that particularly interest me.

      The bolded Update let me know the original story was wrong, whereas had the blurb merely disappeared, I would not have noticed and may have continued the Digg/Slashdot/now Ars too (?) tradition of spouting unsubstantiated bullshit to anyone who would listen.

    3. Re:Why leave this article? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      What, and lose all this sparkling repartee? Killjoy.

    4. Re:Why leave this article? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      And so are the people who had seen the untouched story then supposed to look through the front page, see that the story isn't there anymore and then just assume the story has been invalidated?

  63. Ars technica doesn't make many mistakes by dangitman · · Score: 1

    But when they do, it's a doozy!

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  64. '.' character in local part does NOT violate RFC by e_AltF4 · · Score: 1

    > The '.' character in an email address violates RFC,
    > but no one seems to really care.

    Nobody cares, probably because it doesn't violate the RFC.
    Don't put it as first or last character and rfc2822 is your friend.

    [...]
    Some of the structured header field bodies also allow the period
    character (".", ASCII value 46) within runs of atext. An additional
    "dot-atom" token is defined for those purposes.
    [...]

  65. Google replies by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny
    Please stop posting my email address on Slashdot. Think of all the evil spammers!

    What is this "Slashdot" you speak of? We only see a site called "Slash"

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  66. OLD NEWS! by digiital · · Score: 1

    This is old news. I reported this to Google/Gmail back in August/2005. Here is a screen capture from the forum where I posted about this issue. http://putfile.com.nyud.net:8090/pic.php?pic=1/211 5353137.jpg&s=x4 Orginal post: http://www.thecomputermechanics.com/forums/showthr ead.php?t=2334

  67. But there is ANOTHER dot problem... by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anything sent to my email address with dots added NEVER gets to me.

    My wife too. We both have very early gmail accounts (within the first month or so). Back in the early days, were different people allowed to sign up for different dot-variation names? If so, the obvious fix would have been to remove the dot functionality on those combinations to avoid having email sent to the wrong accounts. Which may be what happened with our accounts. That would suck if true, as missing this functionality is a big loss.

  68. Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't a bug like this, a major security risk for people who have online accounts linked to their gmail? Could a person request that anomynous coward's password be email to anonymouscoward@gmail.com account and pick it at anonymous.coward@gmail.com.

  69. Or someone else already registered it by PsyckBoy · · Score: 1

    ya know?

  70. Re:What's wrong? by The+Ilia · · Score: 0

    Yes, you are correct. This whole thing must be a mistake. They even point this out on the sign up page.

    --
    All of the brightest boys, To play with the biggest toys - More than they bargained for...
  71. Way to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As may users have pointed out Ars has since corrected the story, stating that the original submitter was mistaken and the email was just improperly addressed.

    That's what happens when you take "news" from some dumbass' blog.

  72. erm, no by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    Perhaps I explained poorly.
    I receive email addressed to mikerobert@gmail.com as well as email correctly addressed to mike.robert@gmail.com.
    For obvious reasons, I'm unsure if he receives my e-mail.

    And as a final P.S., I used e.g. correctly, as my name is neither Mike nor Robert. (It's Speedy Gonzales)

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  73. *rolls eyes* by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    Yes, I made up a complete fabrication to improve on my already excellent karma. Soon I will have more points than the rest of you losers! Take that, nerds!

    I may be a filthy liar, but it ain't for this post. You should read my status reports. Then you'll know filthy lying.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  74. So it was just a mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can only wish Windows security problems could be solved this easily.

  75. I get these by dotjerky · · Score: 1

    My austin.taylor address gets emails on occasion that have nothing to do with me, and that are addressed to austintaylor@gmail. I do believe it's a bug.

    1. Re:I get these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if you get email from real people sent to you.jerky!

  76. Online Dating Service victim by Shemus+Lowrie · · Score: 3, Funny

    I experienced this first-hand. I was surprised to see a registration confirmation in my inbox for Lavalife when I have never even been to the site and already have a girlfriend. Awkward, to say the least. It let me log on to his acccount information, and it turns out he's a married guy in Australia looking for a little "fun" on the side. If I were as sneaky as him, he'd be in the doghouse for a few months...

  77. Oh by Life700MB · · Score: 1


    Google Makes Plenty of Mikstakes

    Oh, the irony...

    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

  78. Well, SOMETHIG strange is going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have x.lastname@gmail.com. I routinely get email for xlastname@gmail.com, it evens says so in the email (which leads me to believe it's not a misspell on the part of the sender).

    Here's a sample from the top of the email, which I assume reflects what the sender entered as the email address:

    BroadbandCompany Support broadbandcompany@support.broadbandcompany.net - to xlastname

    It then goes on to tell me important information about the person's account, including the password and a link to view more account information. I have recieved password retrieval emails, etc in the past as well for various other sites. It happens often enough that I doubt it's a human mistake. But I could be wrong.

    Oh, I can log in as x.lastname@gmail.com but not xlastname@gmail.com, I just checked, so I have no idea what is up with this "feature".

    x

  79. Re:What's wrong? by daikokatana · · Score: 2, Funny
    So, it can be a great way to meet new people!

    So very true. In fact, this is the real reason why spammers do what they do - send out as much mails to as much people they can reach, in the hope to find that one true person in their life.

    They even offer rewards in their emails! Such good people...

    --
    http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
  80. I am so pissed at Google right now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is insane. I've been using GMail for over a year, but the idea that some of my emails might have been redirected to someone else just so pisses me off. Fuck you Google, and this is from the bottom of a geek heart. It will hurt. I am not going to try or recommend ANY Google product from now on. Take your shit and go home.

  81. Holy shit! by Hooya · · Score: 1

    you are not from around here, are you? how dare you retract your statement. it's Un-Everything (TM). i don't mean that as a cynical/satarical compliment. i literally mean what i said. largely on the off chance that your post may set a precedent and the rest of us actually have to follow in your Un-Everything (TM) ways of having to stand accountable.

    naah, who am i kidding.

  82. It seems that this *IS* an issue for some people.. by lordsegan · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are saying this isnt an issue, but it sounds as if several people here are saying they DO get email intended for others. Does that suggest that at one point (or even now?) Google let people sign up both john.smith@ and johnsmith@ as different accounts?

  83. Gmail name change? by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 1

    On a slightly related note, did anyone notice that Monday or Tuesday morning (EST) the "Gmail" in the logo changed to "Google Mail"?
    Apparently this is what Gmail is called in the UK, for one reason or another, but I've never seen it in the US.

  84. No need for talk by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Stole my wife's Cosmo. Always thought Google's G naming thing was a bit risky.

    G. spot

    G. string

    G. Gordon Liddy http://www.liddyshow.us/ Etc

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  85. Re:Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

    "I've signed up for tons of stuff and nobody sends anything to my $sys$@gmail.com account."

    At the risk of sounding like a total dumb ass, what does $sys$ mean?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  86. hahahahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Update: As may users have pointed out Ars has since corrected the story, stating that the original submitter was mistaken and the email was just improperly addressed.

    hahahahahahhahhahah oh man. i think i peed.

  87. I just did some tests on GMail...my observations: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did some basic tests on GMail...my observations:

    - If someone registers john.smith@gmail.com*, then johnsmith@gmail.com becomes immediately unavailable.

    - mail sent to johnsmith@gmail.com would get delivered to john.smith@gmail.com. Sometime it shows up in the Inbox, while at other times it will show up in "All Mail"

    - this is consistent with the Google policy that dot is ignored.

    - Why have some people then received email intended for others ? This is a very serious question, and I hope we can get some answers on it before we trust Google again.

    NOTE (*) - I used a weird combination of letters instead of plain johnsmith.

  88. A note on e-mailing yourself by Temporal · · Score: 1

    For those of you who are trying to "test" this by e-mailing yourself: That may not work.

    GMail attempts to remove duplicate e-mails in your mail box. This is very useful, for instance, with mailing lists: You don't want to receive a copy of the e-mail you sent, since GMail is already smart enough to aggregate the sent copy with the rest of the "conversation". Also, when people use "reply-all" to reply to both you and to the mailing list, you probably would rather not receive two copies of the reply, so again, GMail removes the duplicate.

    As a result of all this, if you e-mail yourself, GMail will treat it as a duplicate and toss it, so you'll only see the e-mail in your sent mail. I think they made a specific hack that tries to check for mail sent to yourself to put it in your inbox too, but there are lots of ways to make it not work. Long story.

    Also, if you address an e-mail to both ab@gmail.com and a.b@gmail.com, ab will only get one copy of the e-mail since the second will be removed as a dupe.

    1. Re:A note on e-mailing yourself by enrgeeman · · Score: 1

      wtf are you smoking? I send emails to myself while at school(they block gmail.com, but mail.google.com is fine) and they always show up in both the inbox and the sent mail.

      --
      sent from my slashdot browser.
    2. Re:A note on e-mailing yourself by Temporal · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      In most cases, if an e-mail you sent ends up returning to you, it will be ignored as a dupe and not placed in your inbox.

      The one exception is when the address you send the e-mail to exactly matches your username. This is a hack which was put in to allow you to e-mail yourself, since people seem to do this a lot.

      Note that if you insert a dot into the target address, even though the target is still you, it is not an exact match, and so it will never hit your inbox. Try it: If your address is yourself@gmail.com, try sending an e-mail to your.self@gmail.com. If you send it from the same account, it will never hit your inbox. If you send it from some other e-mail address, it will.

  89. Doh! by davidmcg · · Score: 1

    mole.station@gmail.com

  90. Delete a pointless story? by toby · · Score: 1

    You're new around here, aren't you...

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Delete a pointless story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, Sir, Are An Idiot.

  91. this is new? by TimeSpeak · · Score: 1

    deja vu ...... yeah I remember people raving about this when gmail first came about...... I noticed I was getting emails that were addressed to someone with just the first 3 letters of my address.

    --
    Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
  92. Re:Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by cobbaut · · Score: 1

    I've signed up for tons of stuff and nobody sends anything to my $sys$@gmail.com account."

    > At the risk of sounding like a total dumb ass, what does $sys$ mean?

    $sys$ was used by the Sony rootkit to hide files.

    --
    European Linux user, living in Antwerp
  93. Re:Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by aaza · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hate to point this out to you, but you need a username before the "@" symbol. That could be why no one is sending anything. Hope this helps.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, however, there is.
  94. Only 1/2 fixed... by sjmacko29 · · Score: 1

    I am a "non-period username" gmail account holder (not the one I post to Slashdot with). As of 1/17, I am still receiving e-mail for the addressee who has the period in his address. It's nice... He's a real estate agent who communicates with his clients via e-mail. I'm sure they don't mind me reading all of their financial statements. Google may have fixed the initial account creation issue, but there is still an issue with delivery to previously created accounts. I have been doing what I think is the nice thing, and replying to the senders whose mail I mistakenly receive. I copy and paste the Google explanation, and further explain that I am not the intended recipient. This is an issue. I understand that Google is BETA, but I will only use that account for trivial stuff from here on out. I will never trust it beyond that. Hmmm.... Maybe I'll start posting to Slashdot with it. Can't get much more trivial than that. ;-) Steve

  95. Gmail has been around how long? by nmaster64 · · Score: 1
    Pretty sure if this had been really happening, someone would have noticed it maybe a bit sooner...

    I seriously doubt someone just now realized they were getting someone elses mail for the past year...

  96. Where are we going! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't believe slashd.. oh wait, yes i can, nevermind.

  97. problems do exist though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have a period in my gmail account (between my first and last name). occasionally i recieve email addressed to a user account that is the same as mine without the period. it is not a regular occurance but sometimes its mail from his family and other times its mail from his employer!

    1. Re:problems do exist though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no problem. You cannot register both variations of a name with and without a period as seperate accounts on gmail. Whoever is sending you stuff is obviously very off on whatever it is they are trying to send.

    2. Re:problems do exist though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I registered my Gmail account through an invite, firstnamelastname@gmail.com was taken and I had to register firstname.lastname@gmail.com. I think it is an issue for accounts registered very early on. If not, did Google go in an close one of the accounts? I just tested it and email sent from my school account to firstnamelastname@gmail.com was not delivered to firstname.lastname@gmail.com.

  98. Microsoft patching by Z34107 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [...]Microsoft aren't capable of rolling out their own patches quickly enough[...]

    Firstly, the grammar nazi in me will let this one slide. Anyone who finds what I'm so tempted to complain about get a cookie.

    Secondly, Microsoft patches take a while to roll out because of testing. The patches must work perfectly and they must work perfectly on all systems. Open source fixes, although faster, don't have to go through as rigorous of testing, and should a patch cause further problems, there is no liability for lost profits and the like.

    I doubt they would be able to move as quickly as google in the event of a real vulnerability.

    Patching an e-mail system to avoid overlooking periods (the little dot at the end of sentences, sheesh) is a lot simpler than fixing the abuse of an originally innocuous function created over a decade ago in an obsolete image format. Google works with a rather nifty database program; Microsoft works with million-line operating systems under constant attack by every hacker on the internet.

    So, yea, Google could probably get a patch off faster - the difference is between the misdelivery of e-mail and the crashing of the internet. (Slammer, anyone?)

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
    1. Re:Microsoft patching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are supposed to work perfectly, but it's microsoft so that, of course, doesn't really happen. Ever.

    2. Re:Microsoft patching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're thinking that Microsoft is singular, requiring isn't instead of aren't, you might be wrong. The correct form depends on where you live.

  99. D'oh! by Caesar · · Score: 2, Informative

    We did confirm it, or so we thought we did. The e-mail delivery problem is there, if you choose to call it a problem. Mail sent to JoeSixpack will arrive at Joe.Sixpack, provided that those two GAs are not 2004-era accounts registered to different people. Some people think it's a feature, some don't.

    As for the accounts mix-up, it looks as though it matters when you registered your account. As you can see from the /. discussion, a number of people ran in to GA accounts when the service was still young. Now it won't let you register accounts with only a "." as a differentiator. It appears Google has fixed that aspect, but they are still delivering e-mail with the periods stipped out, which is how this was noticed in the first place.

    1. Re:D'oh! by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      The e-mail delivery problem is there, if you choose to call it a problem. Mail sent to JoeSixpack will arrive at Joe.Sixpack, provided that those two GAs are not 2004-era accounts registered to different people.
      I own my.name@gmail.com, and have since about day 15 of gmail's existence. I did not register myname@gmail. That was taken shortly thereafter by someone else who shares my name. I get his mail all the damn time. It's not a myth, it's not been disproved, it is absolutely a very real problem.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  100. yeah, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been the case ever since GMail was launched. The "pick a username" page when it first started even said so explicitly, saying that "jsmith@gmail.com" was the same as "j.smith@gmail.com"!

  101. Another doozie by alleycat0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Google doesn't make many mistakes..."

    Well, see what Google suggests ("Did you mean...?") when you search on "landlords required to give heat" ;)

    --
    I am not a number - I am a free man!
  102. Tested it by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    I sent myself a few emails from another account. My gmail account doesn't include any periods in the username, as you may see in the spam-filtered version in this message header: the username is a single word. I sent a few test messages, throwing a period into some random spot in the name, and all test messages reached me. So that part's certainly broken. However, as some have pointed out, that's potentially a feature not a bug, as I was able to see on the receiving end, which period permutation the message had been addressed to. This is useful for figuring out who gave your email address to a spammer. Just throw in a few periods when you're signing up somewhere, note down the particular combo you used, and when/if you start getting new spam, you'll be able to see if it came out of the particular variation you used on that site. I just might use that 'bug' intentionally at some point and I actually hope they don't fix it, so that it will work when I expect it to.

  103. I get other's email all the time. by ayeco · · Score: 1

    Over the past 2 weeks I've been getting email for someone else. I don't have a '.' but I guess the other guy does. So either all his family are idiots, he sent them the wrong address (mine) or this is a true story after all.

  104. Grammar nazi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>If you're thinking that Microsoft is singular, requiring isn't instead of aren't, you might be wrong.

    If he is thinking that, he is wrong. A group of people (plural) can be idetified with a name, and still can be addressed as 'more than one'.

    >>The correct form depends on where you live.

    Nope. This usage is universal(!) in US English as well as English English.

    1. Re:Grammar nazi? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      How do you call the Borg? Plural or Singular?
      I never saw any episode on star trek TNG referring to the Borg as singular (or for that matter Plural).

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  105. Re:What's wrong? by darmey · · Score: 0

    Mod this up. Made me laugh aloud! =)

  106. how does crap like this make the front page? by halo112358 · · Score: 1

    scuttlemonkey for teh lose.

  107. MOD PARENT UP! by dafing · · Score: 1

    OH GOD! if only I still had a mod point, its the thought that counts right?

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  108. gmail invitaion by codepunk · · Score: 1

    BTW who would like to throw a fellow slashdotter a gmail invitation.? I tried today getting one with the sms phone thingy but never got the invitation message.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:gmail invitaion by VxJasonxV · · Score: 1

      Message me @jabber.org (hopefully you're keen enough to figure the rest out?) and gimme an e-mail address.
      I'll shoot you an invite.

  109. THIS IS DEFINETELY A BUG by aashah40 · · Score: 1

    Try this simple test and you will understand the bug Send email to yourself by replacing username below with your email username and see how many emails you get in your INBox. You will find that some emails do get deliver but some don't. if Gmail ignores dot in the username then why don't you get all the following emails sent to your Inbox? THIS IS DEFINETELY A BUG 1. username@gmail.com 2. user.name@gmail.com 3. u.s.e.r.n.a.m.e@gmail.com 4. us.er.na.me@gmail.com 5. use.rna.me@gmail.com

    1. Re:THIS IS DEFINETELY A BUG by VxJasonxV · · Score: 1

      ^ this is definately a bug. Just confirmed it with my own account.

      PEBKAC to confirmed to PEBKAC back to confirmed? Geez.

  110. Been there, done that. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    Many years ago, I got handed a client who was hopping mad that we had misdelivered her most recent bill to her best friend. She wanted all sorts of things to cover the slight -- including a refund. I couldn't figure out how this could have possibly happened given what I knew of the system. Finally, I got the friend's phone number and called.

    I got the friend to forward me the misdirected message and -- sure enough -- the customer had forwarded the bill to her friend as part of a test message.

    This news only got the irate customer more irate. She accused me of incompetence, and lying to her and all sorts of other things. She still wanted a refund.

    In the end, I told her I was passing her back to a Customer Support supervisor (I was a senior analyst, not a Customer Support geek, but I helped the second tier CS geeks with the serious problems).

    She wanted me to say that it had been a pleasure dealing with her. I declined.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  111. Gmail period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesnt this also mean that you could create an account of a friend email alias with some random period in there, and boom you get all of there email or what.

  112. Re:Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by dascandy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gmail requires 6 characters before the @-symbol, so that's a lie.

    The idea is nice however, I've been thinking about it for a while:

    Most people nowadays prefix their email address with "SPAM". They consider it safer because spambots aren't that smart. Now, spambots auto-delete "spam" when it's in an email address.

    So, what if you registered dascandyspam@gmail.com (for me) as normal email addy with dascandy@gmail.com as spam address?

  113. Someone's seen the new t-shirts, right? by Wee · · Score: 1
    You're wearing one of those new black ones with the big white G on the front, I bet...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  114. Oof! Full contact politics. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    That's gonna leave a mark. I can't wait to see the replay on ESPN.

  115. Having a secret life by bjoeg · · Score: 1

    Wow, that explains why since I registered my Gmail account I could follow another guys life about his move to Norway, confirmation on his DSL line, his parents visiting him and that there were no new CPR courses until 2006.

    But hey, Gmail still carries the BETA tag.

  116. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy PEBKAC, Batman!

  117. old news by miro+f · · Score: 1

    Everyone in gmail knows this. They said so themselves back when it started 2 years ago

    --
    being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  118. Officially confused by TintinX · · Score: 1

    I don't get it.
    My gmail address is first.last@gmail.com. I can only assume that someone else has registered firstlast@gmail.com because if I send an email to that account it never gets to me.
    I tried logging into Gmail with firstlast@ and my password but it was invalid.
    Surely this can only mean that someone else has access to it. I'm now concerned that mistyped emails will find thier way to my period-less doppleganger.
    Anyone else got a similar experience?

  119. Re:Crap... Wildcards are a problem, too... by Gleng · · Score: 1

    I always wished that *@*.* would work. :(

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  120. That explains... by Jesrad · · Score: 1

    ... why I've gotten those emails intended for Jessica Radaelli (jes.rad) in my GMail account (jesrad).

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  121. So *that's* what they've been doing to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering where my spam was coming from.... Turns out it's all from firstlast@gmail.com when I only own first.last@gmail.com. Puh-lease. I could deal without a delete button, but this is stupid.

  122. Not a feature at all ... It's even more weird by rawwa.venoise · · Score: 1

    This is not necessarly true. I have an account f.myname@gmail.com and because someone registered fmyname@gmail.com (which appens to be a guy from my family) and i don't recieve his email and he dosent receives mine. Somehow the server must recognize this as different accounts so the fuzzy match only takes place if the names is not associated with some account first. And yes, our address where registered almost on the beginning of Gmail ...

    1. Re:Not a feature at all ... It's even more weird by Myen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, back when I signed up (some time during the invite period), IIRC, there was something about the dots not mattering.

      Strangely though I just got a mail addressed to oobarf@gmail even though my account is foobar@gmail - basically, one letter was moved from one end to the other. And yes, I checked the message headers and everything; the To: address is wrong, and there are no BCC fields (which I assume would show up if it's BCCing me), and it's a text/plain only message that isn't advertising anything, so I don't think it's spam...

      Of course, whois says the sender IP was from Shanghai Telecom and the from address ends in .no, so it's probably just clever but pointless spam :p

  123. what kind of dumbass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...has login credentials emailed to a web-based email account?!?!

  124. Old news by diemuzi · · Score: 1

    This is such old news. Myself and co-workers had discovered this months ago on accident. I'm suprised how long it took others to finally speak up about it.

  125. This has always been the case. by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    Google stated that periods would be ignored when you first created your username, way back in beta testing days...

  126. Can you log in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you log in to your Gmail account using username with dots added/removed?

  127. Another bug in gmail by Ogotai · · Score: 1

    Another delivery bug in gmail. My gmail account address is ogotai@gmail.com. Yesterday a received a message destined to hogota@gmail.com...

    X-Gmail-Received: f04f4ab75270aa01a00783765ea527a82d46ea0b Delivered-To: ogotai@gmail.com Received: by 10.65.213.8 with SMTP id p8cs51050qbq; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.81.7 with SMTP id e7mr2902403nzb; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:41:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from 72C5F94 ([58.35.64.158]) by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id 19si4073559nzp.2006.01.22.03.41.08; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 58.35.64.158 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of Timmons1Hollingsworth@masterhelicopteros.com.br) Message-ID: From: "Willard H. Vann" Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:39:26 -0500 Sender: Timmons1Hollingsworth@masterhelicopteros.com.br To: hogota@gmail.com X-Responder-ID: 03 Subject: U free tomorrow Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;

  128. MOD PARENT UP! by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Why.... thanks. d:-b ruce

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  129. Someone's seen the new t-shirts, right? by bdwoolman · · Score: 1
    Nope... No tee shirt sadly. Case of parallel evolution it seems.

    d:-b ruce

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy