Slashdot Mirror


The Pornographers vs. The Pirates

conq writes "BusinessWeek has a piece on how pornography is again leading the way and showing Holywood how to fight back against piracy. From the article: 'Some producers of porn are starting to share revenues from online movies with the distributors of their DVDs, who might otherwise feel endangered by digital distribution online. Bolder yet, one large studio is allowing fans who buy movies online to burn them from their computers onto DVDs, with some protections included, of course.'"

275 comments

  1. So this is how it turns out by Svippy · · Score: 5, Funny

    And you thought it was just pirates vs. ninjas?

    --
    Clicked pie.
    1. Re:So this is how it turns out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apartently, it's pirates vs. naked ninjas.

    2. Re:So this is how it turns out by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      And the Ninjas rule with an iron fist!

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    3. Re:So this is how it turns out by cfuse · · Score: 1
      And you thought it was just pirates vs. ninjas?

      It is pirates vs. ninjas, but they're sexy ninjas!

  2. The naked truth... by jkrise · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People who love porn would not mind DRM or any other restrictive technology - most porn lovers don't wish to have their names advertised, and a bit of money is not an issue.

    Not so with what the RIAA calls Pirates.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:The naked truth... by BrynM · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People who love porn would not mind DRM or any other restrictive technology

      I wouldn't go that far. Remember that there are quite a few porn sites that will happily embed a trojan (the malware not the condoms) into their website. The machines that I've cleaned for friends who like porn are some of the biggest messes I've seen. They all now know that if they want me to clean out their machine, I'll wipe the drives first thing unless they take precautions (anti-virus, firewall, rent their porn rather than download it).

      (oh, the inuendo for this article)
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:The naked truth... by scrabbleguy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't everybody love porn?

    3. Re:The naked truth... by Trigun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've noticed that the more blatant you are about porn, the less likely you are to run into trouble. I know of one manager who loves porn, and is so blatant about it that he doesn't worry about going to the big names (playboy, penthouse, hustler, etc.). The other ones at that office are always so worried about it that they end up going to the out of the way corners of the Internet, and get infected.

    4. Re:The naked truth... by mindwhip · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    5. Re:The naked truth... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Well I certainly wouldn't mess with it on my work machine, but the safest method is to just get AVI's /MPG's off of eMule or Bittorrent. Less sifting & much less worry about pop-ups or viruses.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:The naked truth... by Hillie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry but I have to disagree, whether it be porn or anything else DRM leaves you feeling cheap and used.

      Now nevermind the thousands of inuendos and puns that statement may suggest. The fact is that no one wants to pay any amount of money per month on some site that lets you download content, if the content is going to stop working when you quit paying that site money.

      Whether that content is porn or music. There are millions of people who would pay a $3.95 trial to buy the ONE song they've been lookin for but unable to find elsewhere or that video they got spammed with that peaked their interest.

      With the DRM ripoff schemes of RIAA and some porn sites this is not possible. So let's say you were a member of any music/porn site that used DRM on their files. Restrictive DRM.. you paid a total of maybe $200 to them and you decide you don't want the service anymore, but you do like what you've gotten so far. You quit you're screwed.. so you're telling me I gotta keep paying to keep what I ALREADY PAID FOR?

      No thanks. *gives RIAA the finger*

      --
      - Alex
    7. Re:The naked truth... by Wylfing · · Score: 1
      People who love porn would not mind DRM or any other restrictive technology - most porn lovers don't wish to have their names advertised, and a bit of money is not an issue.

      I dispute the premise that shame is a bigger driver than good old customer satisfaction, unless you are talking about unusual proclivities. Going by observable evidence, I perceive that embarrassment about mainstream porn is relatively low. Yes, there are some demographic and geographic areas where this is untrue, but blue-staters under 40 (and certainly under 30) seem to be pretty calm about it.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    8. Re:The naked truth... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      whether it be porn or anything else DRM leaves you feeling cheap and used.

      Well, I for one do not care about feeling used by Jeena Haze even if it is by a CD where she is =o). Imagine being able to brag to your friends "hey lads, I was used by Jeena Jameson"

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    9. Re:The naked truth... by SkyDude · · Score: 1
      Now nevermind the thousands of inuendos and puns that statement may suggest. The fact is that no one wants to pay any amount of money per month on some site that lets you download content, if the content is going to stop working when you quit paying that site money.


      I don't know about that. I've owned a number of cars from Detroit, Tokyo and at least one unknown country and when I finished paying for them, they stopped working.
      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    10. Re:The naked truth... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      People who love porn would not mind DRM or any other restrictive technology

      Hardly, "discrete brown packaging" and "dial-home DRM" are mutually exclusive. Most pr0n fans prefer anonyminity. Would you want DRM Barnyard Antics showing up on your account as a daily viewing?

    11. Re:The naked truth... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Heh. Had a boss that liked it when we found a nice piece of porn and forwarded it to him.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:The naked truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, there are some demographic and geographic areas where this is untrue, but blue-staters under 40 (and certainly under 30) seem to be pretty calm about it.

      They're calm until their mommy finds out. Speaking of which, won't this dissuade a large market of porn watchers (kids 16-22)? I know lots of kids don't get credit cards until they're out of college and having to steal their parent's credit card more than once seems like a major turn off.(hur) I mean, technically these kids probably shouldn't be watching in the first place, but the companies surely know that they do and that that means more money for them.
    13. Re:The naked truth... by tirefire · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      And people wonder why I use a Mac.

    14. Re:The naked truth... by drew · · Score: 1
      The fact is that no one wants to pay any amount of money per month on some site that lets you download content, if the content is going to stop working when you quit paying that site money.


      I wouldn't be so sure about that. I (and many, many others) pay NetFlix $10 per month, and when I stop paying them I will no longer be able to watch the movies. From that point of view, a subscription music service isn't necessarily any different.

      In fact, I probably would be willing to pay $10 per month for a subscription music service if there were any that would work with my mp3 player. I know I would be much more likely to do that than to pay $1 per song on the other music services. The way I see it, a subscription music service offers me an option I don't really have otherwise. But, at the current price at least, the regular music services do not, regardless of DRM. If I am going to pay $1 per song, I'd rather buy a real CD and get the higher quality and a physical object to own, and evetually resell if I so choose.
      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    15. Re:The naked truth... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      But there's a huge difference between physical items and digital items. If you rip DVDs from Netflix, they don't magically delete themselve off your computer when you return the DVD or cease your subscription with them.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    16. Re:The naked truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't everybody love porn?

      No. Hentai doesn't count, right?

    17. Re:The naked truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, I probably would be willing to pay $10 per month for a subscription music service if there were any that would work with my mp3 player.

      What's wrong with emusic then?

    18. Re:The naked truth... by drew · · Score: 1

      Well, I was thinking something more along the lines of Rhapsody- $10 a month for unlimited songs. Emusic is $10 per month for 40 songs and you get to keep them when you cancel, so it's closer to the iTunes model (although substantially cheaper) than what I was thinking of as a subscription model.

      That said, I've looked into eMusic, and the biggest reason I haven't signed up is because (last I looked, at least) you can't really see a list of what songs or artists they offer without signing up. Their selection appears to be mostly limited to independant or older artists, which isn't necessarily what I am looking for.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    19. Re:The naked truth... by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      Yeah...seriously...why would you use a mac?

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    20. Re:The naked truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can if you click "log in", although since they don't indicate anywhere that you can do that, they're still trying to get people to sing up without seeing what they have available,

    21. Re:The naked truth... by drew · · Score: 1

      True, but the same is also true if you "rip" the audio from your subscription music service. If you use NetFlix like you are intended to, then it is no different than a subscription music service. Likewise if you cheat the system to gain something for yourself that you are not paying for, then the only difference between NetFlix and a subscription music service is the ease of ripping the content.

      Anyway, it's arguments like yours which are why media companies are pushing for such restrictive DRM in the first place.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  3. In the porn CEO's mouth by LoonyMike · · Score: 0, Funny
    "I'm gonna fucking kill these pirates!"

    Come on, you were expecting something else in his mouth, weren't ya?

    1. Re:In the porn CEO's mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, you were expecting something else in his mouth, weren't ya?

      No; despite the general taste of the Slashdot-collective, there are still people out there who like their porn hetero, as god intended it.

  4. Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by demongeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Pornographers versus The Pirates!

    Pirate: Arr! Bend over me matey while I prepare the long guns to pilage that booty!
    Porn Star: Oh! Don't pilage MY booty, at least not until my sorority girlfriends come over to help me repel borders! Oh!

    1. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How is it that taking ass-to-mouths and getting bukkake facials qualifies these people as "Stars"?

      The kid that cleans up at the stables isn't called the "Barn Star".

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      The kid that cleans up at the stables isn't called the "Barn Star".

      Tell him to get a camera and sell thousands of copies of the movie and he'll be whatever star he wants to be.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

      I think this http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0477457/ (not safe for work, maybe) is what you're looking for. Some day I will figure out this HTML malarkey.

    4. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      plastic tits and quite boring but the hd-wmv version is cool and shows what future is possible (imagine zooming in to interesting parts)

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    5. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Review of Zenra Ballet 2 (not safe for work)

      "You have not lived until you have seen a Japanese pirate rip a boner out of his leotard and plunge it into the waiting food-hole of a sassy ballerina."

    6. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I-dunno-bout-you-sir but in my opinion Pirates and Pornographers get along togheter very very well.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by Skroggtar · · Score: 1

      Well, think of Star Wars Kid. He's a star, and you know why? Because thousands of people masturbate to his videos on the internet.

      (or at least I hope I'm not alone)

    8. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      A wee bit too much info there.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    9. Re:Now there is a porn video I'd watch... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Lower Res for your iPod..
      http://www.empornium.us/details.php?id=94224

      or so I've heard.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  5. It isn't needed. by Lave · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I doubt there is anything with a higher pirated/legit ratio than porn.

    I know no-one who has bought porn - but everyone has watched it.

    Why hasn't porn gone bust like the movie and music industries say will happen to them?

    If a legitimate market can keep porn afloat an inherently embarrassing purchase - then everything else doesn't need to worry

    --
    http://skeptobot.blogspot.com/ - A site for the Renaissance man and woman
    1. Re:It isn't needed. by vinsanity1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I know no-one who has bought porn yeah, but i know no-one who has masturbated. "there are those who do, and there's those who lie about it".

    2. Re:It isn't needed. by LoonyMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SPAM also has a low clicks/emails rate (I think), but the few clicks are enough to make it profitable.
      Low-budget porn movies might also need a relatively small number of sales to make money, even if they are massively pirated.

    3. Re:It isn't needed. by new_breed · · Score: 1

      You could also argue that the fact it's an "inherently embarrassing purchase" what makes it so succesful on the internet ;)

    4. Re:It isn't needed. by Jakob777 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I happen to run "Adult Book Stores" (porn shacks) and I have seen only a increase in sales due to the Internet, they bait them with a 10 second clip maybe the get a membership to the site then they are in my store buying up all of that actress that makes there mind go wild and POW I have cash in hand. The same works for the most part with me and my friends, we get the cams of new movies or the new album, and we are out buying it or sitting in a cola covered seat with that crying baby to go see the real thing.

      I think this will make all the profit margins for the adult industry go up, and the RIAA should look into not being such raging pricks but nice calm porn CEO's :)

      --
      if you are what you eat , then I could be you by tomorrow.
    5. Re:It isn't needed. by just_forget_it · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm surprised no one has brought this us even. The Porn industry is one of the richest in this country, and they are also the most heavily pirated. Kind of destroys the "Piracy hurts record sales" argument.

    6. Re:It isn't needed. by Eivind · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You mean you know noone who will admit to having bougth porn.... Not the same thing.

      Besides, porn movies are embarassingly low-budget. What counts as a "high budget" porn-movie doesn't even show up on the radar for budgeting normal movies. And some of the low-budget porn-movies have budgets down in the 4-digits range.

      You don't need to sell an awful lot to make a profit if your total budget is less than a years salary.

    7. Re:It isn't needed. by ronanbear · · Score: 1
      I don't know. Most people I know would be much more comfortable lending/burning a DVD, CD game etc. than sharing the intimate details of their porn collection.

      Sure its an embarrassing purchase but the industry has been able to keep it an essentially private matter. It'd be more embarrassing to get caught sharing porn than normal DVDs.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    8. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why hasn't porn gone bust like the movie and music industries say will happen to them?
      Because the 'artists' are even more exploited in the porn world than in movies or music? You don't need a lot of money to stay afloat in the porn world.
    9. Re:It isn't needed. by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, uhm. ok.

      I have a stash of 32 gigabytes of porn. But I have never bought porn.

      Why the fuck would I admit to having porn if I'm "embarrased" of having bought it?

    10. Re:It isn't needed. by Jakob777 · · Score: 0

      I believe that the average person that buys porn these days isn't ashamed at all of what hes doing, the only time they even dubble think themselves is pulling into the parking lot of a store. Once that is over come they walk in and spend their money, that is why when the bars close there is a great increase in sales at all of my stores.

      So in other words all the Internet is doing for the industry as a whole is over coming the social stigma of the city they live in.

      --
      if you are what you eat , then I could be you by tomorrow.
    11. Re:It isn't needed. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Probably because porn stars don't rake in billions for crappy performance.

      Also, porn movies rarely need a good script. Then again, so do Hollywood movies.

      Maybe it is because they don't have to advertize and hype their movies like the "normal" movies. I mean, hey, with porn, you pretty much know what to expect. It doesn't need to be hyped simply because, well, people actually WANT to see it already.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:It isn't needed. by SlashDread · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why hasn't porn gone bust"

      Because people who buy porn dont tell you. But the amount of money spend on online porn is huge. Its a matter of ease of use, and the instant "gratification" (scuse the pun), and online downloads/streams WILL sell.
      Regular content industrie is just, uhm, backwards really.

    13. Re:It isn't needed. by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll quite happly wath the low budget films from the 70s so why are modern movie budgets so high? Maybe the movie industry should sort out their cost problems first if the're having problems making a profit.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    14. Re:It isn't needed. by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Ain't saying everyone is like that. I'm saying that porn is one area where the actual sales, and the sales you'd guess if you surveyed 1000 people on the street and multiplied by the population would be very different. (actual sales would be much higher than your survey would lead you to believe, because many people will say they don't buy porn, when infact they do, or they'll underreport their buying)

      This is pretty much so for everything people perceive as negative.

    15. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIUI, the porn industry is dependent on a smallish portion of their customers who are, for all intents and purposes, addicted to it.

    16. Re:It isn't needed. by garcia · · Score: 1

      Not only that but look at all the free sites offering porn (sublimedirectory, elephantlist, thehun, etc, etc, etc). Porno sites want you to see their stuff and then get you more and more interested to buy. I *have* bought porn, looked at plenty of free porn, and even use empornium to get more porn.

      Looks like that tactic worked for me.

    17. Re:It isn't needed. by Jakob777 · · Score: 1

      On what part? That I run adult book stores? No been doing it for over 6 years now, that the internet boosts my sales?? Not really my sales figures are still climbing and according to the spread sheets I get each month its on the DVD sales area. So good sir where do I lie, or to quote you, where and I "Full of shit"?

      --
      if you are what you eat , then I could be you by tomorrow.
    18. Re:It isn't needed. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that amature porn is often done entirely at the expense of the porn stars themselves, with no cost in overhead. so while there are a lot of 'free' porn sites, and few people will admit to 'having bought porn' I know quite a few people who won't admit to it who have bought porn. and even more who've rented it.

      As for major films that were done 'on a budget' clerks and the blair witch project come to mind. They show the low budget nature, but they're still good movie storylines. which is why unlike the thousands of movies you've never heard of they actually made nationwide releases.

      of course we have independant film festivals and all that to help these kinda gems and the creative talent behind them to make it to hollywood.

    19. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is simple, the porn industry runs off of seamen

    20. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, youre wrong, I am not lying when i say there is enough 'free' and 'googled' porn to pretty much satisfy anybody. If free-porn disappeared completely i still wouldn't purchase it.

      There are those who tell the truth, and there are those who are too messed up to believe people.

      and im 24, its probably much easier for me to get laid than Vinsanity here.

    21. Re:It isn't needed. by YukiKotetsu · · Score: 1

      I worked in an "adult book store" for three years, until Oct 2003, and let me tell you, there are plenty of people who buy porn.

      I figured we had net income (not gross) of 20K a month.

      Nothing like 1000% markup on things.

    22. Re:It isn't needed. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      There is no need for such rediculous budgets on "normal" movies, especially with the "revelation" that our desktop pc can render HD on the fly now (see XBOX 360)

      star wreck anyone?

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    23. Re:It isn't needed. by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Unions makes things extremely hard. Try firing a teacher at a public school to save money. Try to get anything accomplished involving labour in the automotive manufacturing industry. Hollywood has been infested by unions (actors, camera workers, directors, grips, etc. etc.). These make big cost problems that you can't really do anything about (try to get a fair director and actors with a budget less then 5 million - it will only happen if you have an extremely small cast or your entire cast is straight out of acting school).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    24. Re:It isn't needed. by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      The bigger issue is the fraudulent way they report profits vs costs.

      They get to say "we made x amount" to the public, but when it comes to taxes they get to say "oh but it cost this much" then next week when the profit went up, "oh it really cost this much"

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    25. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Porn industry is one of the richest in this country, and they are also the most heavily pirated. Kind of destroys the "Piracy hurts record sales" argument.

      Perhaps no one brought it up because it's a lousy argument. Isn't it possible that they are a successful industry *and* are hurt by piracy. I don't see them as mutually exclusive.

    26. Re:It isn't needed. by Eivind · · Score: 1
      I agree. I don't think it's nessecarily a disaster, or even a negative thing, if King Kong budget kind of movies in the future become harder to finance, we'll make do, quite possibly with larger variation and more good movies by spreading the same sum on dozens of cheaper movies.

    27. Re:It isn't needed. by ShibaInu · · Score: 1

      I'm married, but I openly purchase porn and even go to strip clubs. Believe it or not, liking pictures and movies of naked ladies is not something I'm embarassed about. Believe it or not, you can like porn and still get laid.

      Furthermore, most folks must pay for at least some of their porn, otherwise there wouldn't be a thriving porn industry.

    28. Re:It isn't needed. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      While I largely agree that movies at the high-end of the budgetary scale are ridiculously expensive, HD resolution on a cinema screen simply isn't going to cut it.

    29. Re:It isn't needed. by SoulRider · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, thanks for the laugh.

    30. Re:It isn't needed. by pedalman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why hasn't porn gone bust like the movie and music industries say will happen to them?
      Because porn; like booze, is one of those recession-proof products that never seems to lose demand. It doesn't matter what the economy is doing. It will always thrive.
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    31. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may have a point, I mean Reservoir Dogs had a budget of 1.5 million - and that was Quentin's first real film, he acted in it and directed it (saving cost of another actor) and most of the actors accepted lower pay then they normally received.

    32. Re:It isn't needed. by penultimatepost · · Score: 1

      Without getting into a 'religious' debate about the MPAA et al, Hollywood movies on average cost A LOT more to produce than a porn feature, thus the margins for Tinseltown movies are a lot less. Furthermore, a large portion of Hollywood's fare revenue comes from showing the movie in theaters, and as we all know porn is mostly sold on DVDs and on the web.

      People have been paying/pirating porn since the days of the BBS and online movie delivery is nothing but a logical progression, given the widespread availability of broadband.

      In my opinion you can't compare Hollywood and the porn industry.

    33. Re:It isn't needed. by Dread_ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Why hasn't porn gone bust like the movie and music industries say will happen to them? "

      The main difference I see is that porn is an addictive substance. Don't you remember the playground pushers motto, "The first one is always free"?

      Many people would not buy porn their first time out. They have to "acquire the taste" first before they will go and spend cash on it. What better way to expose people to it than to make it free and obscenely easy to access?

      Most consumers of porn are feshitists of some kind. They enjoy seeing activity "x" over seeing position "y", etc. This selectivity leads to the consumer model of porn. Cater to the individual tastes. Then, if you make it they will come. Sometimes on your face. But invariably they will come and buy it. Not all of them, but enough of them to pay the bills and make it worthwhile.

      Even those who never pay for pornographic material help the ponographers consumer model by showing it to others. It spreads through people in an almost a viral way: some are immune, some have it but it is dormant, some are carriers, and some are just plain sick.

      So to put it in analogy format: free pirated porn on the internet is to porn sales as FM radio is to album sales. The mechanisms of interest and addiction are different, but the result is similar. Show people something that they want and some of them will spend cash on it.

      However, the price of "buying" a new customer for porn is a bit higher than music because the pornograpther is fighting religious conditioning, social stigma, even secular morality in an attempt to gain a new customer. This dosen't even consider the fact of restricted access and delivery methods. Fortunately for those pandering porn they have the biology of the body on their side. From endorphins and adrenaline to sensory neurons and autonomic responses we are hard-wired into sexual desire. All they have to do is pit the body against the inhibitions enough times through repeated exposure and they have a new client, probably for life.

      Repeated exposure...Hmmm. Remind you of anything? How about how radio stations play the same song over and over.

      Coincidence?

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    34. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when I read about some celebrity being paid $10-20 million for a crappy movie (i.e. Tom Hanks in Da Vinci Code) it is the fault of a union? Thanks for clearing that up.

    35. Re:It isn't needed. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Based on the huge amount of porn available out there I'd say the number of people who have bought it is only slightly higher than the number of people who have appeared in it.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    36. Re:It isn't needed. by inKubus · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who worked in the payments section of a (large adult site) and his job was to manually review payment requests as they come through. They do this because they don't want women's card names (hi fraud rate), bad info, etc. and they want to grant access fast (faster than a bank could process the payment). Anyway, he was part of a team of 6 working 24 hours a day and each person did at least 1 transaction a second. These were for pay by the minute sites also, so it was big money.

      As far as feature porno movies, they use the same publishing model everyone else does. The people who actually are in the "trenches" (heh) making them aren't the Jackie Treehorns of the world who do the publishing (mostly). Publishing is always lucrative. That's how Microsoft got rich, that's how the big record companies, time warner, etc. got rich. Guess what, if you pay a fixed cost to make something and then sell COPIES of it (which cost practically nothing), you are going to make a fortune.

      Most people don't know how to pirate stuff, and most of the people who get porn are middle aged guys with plenty of money and no sex life. They aren't looking to break the law; they pay for it. So you have content that appeals to the very basest of human emotions that costs almost nothing to make and it's easy to distribute. The internet has probably increased porn sales 10 fold because people can get it immediately, not have to make an embarrassing trip down to the local smutty.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    37. Re:It isn't needed. by menace3society · · Score: 1

      But that's not how Capitalism works! Everybody knows that under Capitalism, you're entitled to make more money every year, even if no one wants the product or service you provide anymore. Just ask the content consortia.

    38. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just ignore the troll

    39. Re:It isn't needed. by Danga · · Score: 1

      I am not against all "piracy", in fact I am quite pissed over how our fair use rights are being trampled here in the US, but I wanted to mention one thing in regard to your comment: Kind of destroys the "Piracy hurts record sales" argument.

      I think a big difference between a feature film and a porn film is the price to produce them. A feature film usually costs tens of millions of dollars while a porn, even with some well known porn stars most likely will cost orders of magnitudes less (I wouldn't be suprised if the average was well under $100,000). The point I am getting at is there will always be people who will be complete freeloaders even if the material is available at fair prices so piracy probably has some negative impact on sales yet it is much easier for a porn producer to make a profit since his initial cost to produce the movie was so much lower (plus being able to anonymously order porn over the internet and have it arrive in an unmarked box is a big thing for people who have issues with going into a porn store).

      Another reason I think porns sales are less affected by piracy is it is a lot more fun to go to a porn store (especially with your significant other) and pick up some things than always download the videos off the internet.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    40. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you make it they will come"

      Yes...yes they will.

    41. Re:It isn't needed. by gnarlin · · Score: 1
      Well, I know how to cut costs of hollywood movies down by 70%! Don't hire Tom Cruise!

      Seriously, paying one or two people several millions dollars when there is no shortage of fresh talent banging on the doors is just stupid. The very least they could do would be to insinuate that unless these "stars" lowered their saleries they would just hire someone else for a fraction of the price.

      An example of good but cheap movie would be Primer. It cost around $7000 to make.
      I think there is way too much money wasted in Hollywood simply because they haven't yet been pushed to get more creative with the budget and what they spend it on. This is one of the reasons that these producers want to keep the old distribution system of total control; producing these movies that costs 100-200 million dollars means that they have to have a very high return of investment. However if the costs could be kept at least a little bit reasonable then sharing these movies might not be perceived as such a threat to their investment.

      I also think that there is a wasted opportunity regarding fan-filmmaking due to too strick and long lasting copyright laws. Like any other group of works, there is a large pile of terrible, a somewhat big pile of average and a small pile of brilliant ones. If only they could sell them without the cloud of damaging lawsuits hanging over them due to their work being "derivative" from the original.
      Star Wars fanfilms are a good example of this. I think that copyright lasts way to long and that if it would lasts maybe 5-10 years we would have a much stronger and industrius film industry.

      Oh, and pr0n rulez ;-)
      Thank you.

      --
      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
    42. Re:It isn't needed. by foamrotreturns · · Score: 1
      You mean you know noone who will admit to having bougth porn.... Not the same thing.

      What's the difference? Are you suggesting that someone would admit to watching porn but NOT admit to having paid for it? Once you've admitted to watching, what's the incentive to lie and say you didn't pay for it?
    43. Re:It isn't needed. by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      It hasn't gone bust because porn is cheap to make. The sex workers don't cost much with some recruited right off the streets. The equipment is off the shelf video camera along wih lighting. I would be surprise if they all have pro-video editing tools from Apple or the like. With a web camera and good-looking girl, you could start you own porn website with little investment and rake in the cash.

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    44. Re:It isn't needed. by pthisis · · Score: 1

      While I largely agree that movies at the high-end of the budgetary scale are ridiculously expensive, HD resolution on a cinema screen simply isn't going to cut it.

      Once Upon a Time In Mexico looked pretty darned good on the big screen. There were some small artifacts in very bright spots if you looked for them, but the overall image was great. Certainly good enough image-wise to "cut it" with the general viewing audience.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    45. Re:It isn't needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell did you get to union bashing? Have you been saving this up?

    46. Re:It isn't needed. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Seriously, paying one or two people several millions dollars when there is no shortage of fresh talent banging on the doors is just stupid.

      Right. Because the movie-going public really wants to gamble with their ticket money on unknowns when they could, for the same amount of money, see a big star whose other movies they have enjoyed.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    47. Re:It isn't needed. by Joebert · · Score: 1
      Probably because porn stars don't rake in billions for crappy performance.

      That really depends on how you're using the word "crappy".
      I hear Broke Back Mountain was pretty popular.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    48. Re:It isn't needed. by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

      Like it or not, full length videos and clips are downloadable from the net for free. Anyone can fill up their hard disk with them in a matter of days.

    49. Re:It isn't needed. by halfcuban · · Score: 1
      Are you serious? Do you even know the numbers and the details of the agreement between SAG and the studios? Because if you did you wouldn't be accusing the unions of "demanding more money" when its not the union, but INDIVIDUAL ACTORS, who make demands above and beyond the SAG minimum wage. The SAG contracts merely stipulate a minimum amount of pay and a minimum precentage of royalty payments depending on the role played, screen time, and number of days worked. While it is true that the minimum rate for an actor who plays a leading part in a 30 minute TV show (and this doesn't even mean a big time show on a major network) is roughly about 2300 bucks a day plus a pretty good chunk of royalties for the show if it goes into syndication, the chances of you getting that part as a working actor is pretty damn slim. More than likely most of your career will consist of stage and commercial work, with MAYBE the occasional day job on a TV show or movie, which are far smaller in pay than an actual main part. Most actors may not be starving day laborers but they also aren't all loaded to the gills with cash.

      Also, SAG HAS worked with independent film producers, crafting special agreements to help out lower budget films while retaining the protection actors deserve even when they are not Brad Pitt or Julia Roberts. But at the end of the day actors can demand what they want and if you don't want to pay them that, well, you can find someone else.

    50. Re:It isn't needed. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Costs are so high becasue thety don't want to pay taxes.

      Accounting is one of the most creative things in hollywood! Ba-dup-boom.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    51. Re:It isn't needed. by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't compare Charlie Chaplin's acting with Tom Cruise's. You get what you pay for, and I think we're all happy with the turdfest that Tom Cruise can spew.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    52. Re:It isn't needed. by c_forq · · Score: 1

      is roughly about 2300 bucks a day plus a pretty good chunk of royalties for the show if it goes into syndication

      Are you sure about that, that seems real low when the minimum for a union production is $1,620 per week (-1.85%, which goes to the union).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    53. Re:It isn't needed. by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      That would explain why all this new pop music sounds like bad porn.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    54. Re:It isn't needed. by rtechie · · Score: 4, Informative

      The main difference I see is that porn is an addictive substance. Don't you remember the playground pushers motto, "The first one is always free"?

      You have a pretty strange definition of "addictive". I'd call it "flamebait".

      Most consumers of porn are feshitists of some kind. They enjoy seeing activity "x" over seeing position "y", etc. This selectivity leads to the consumer model of porn. Cater to the individual tastes. Then, if you make it they will come. Sometimes on your face.

      A fetishist can't achieve orgasm without their particular fetish, a porn fetishist could ONLY climax when watching porn. What you're referring to is called "asthetics". Different people have different tastes in food, clothing, entertainment, and yes, in sex. Since "pornography", despite all the bullshit out there, is simply visual depictions of sexual activity, it shouldn't be suprising that it reflects a broad range of sexual interests. If you do a little research you'll find this has been the case since the beginning. The oldest artistic/religious artifacts discovered, over 100,000 years old, are sexual in nature.

      If you hate sex so much go join a monastary, start prostrating yourself, and leave the rest of us alone.

    55. Re:It isn't needed. by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      First let me start by saying that my post was written a bit tongue in cheek. If you took it to be an attack on sex and pornography I think that you might be reading too much into it or you might be too close to the subject to evaluate what you are reading without taking dammage to your shields. I guess I did go a bit far when I compared the RIAA's practices to the porn industry's practices. That wasn't fair to the porn industry and I can see how they would see that as insensitive and insulting. My apologies to Ron and Seymoure.

      My personal opinion about the addictive qualities of pronography is based on my understanding of the physical reactions to sexual content and my observations of myself and others in reaction to pornography. If you want to call that flame bait, so be it. However, the fact remains that the porn industry works off of what I describe. Maybe it is not addictive in your sense of the word, but I don't see you clarifying that issue at all or providing any input to repudiate my claim.

      As for your second point, you are taking a narrow view of the word fetishist. In fact, the context I put the word in is explicitly reflected in the second sentence you quote. A fetish can refert to a fixation or an interest in addition to what you discribe. Maybe the word is a bit loaded to someone who has a fetish but that would just be hypersensitivity on their part. If you check webster you might get a better understanding of the full definition of the word.

      As for ancient religions and sexual activity I know the subject well. Certain worship has long included sexual activity as a basic tennent of and expression of the religion. In ancient times this included group sex, homosexuality, bestiality, pederasty, and forcing virgins to make thir first act of sex as a prostitute for the Goddess. The ones that wouldn't comply? Ever heard of virgin sacrifice? There are even references to certain worship practices where parents would, after a progression of more desperate measures to achieve the orgasmic state, put their children into ovens shaped like the god they were worshiping and engage in ritual group sex. The screams of their own progeny being burned alive in sacrifice to their god were supposed to be exceptionally gratifying to those who were ready.

      Maybe that is not exactly what you were referring to, but it is an actual researched and documented fact. I bring it up because it shows just a little of what I am trying to mention. My point is not that sex is bad. I personally enjoy it (insert joke about how much your mom enjoys it with me, blah blah blah) quite a bit. But it is subject to abuses and manipulation. I have an aversion to manipulation and I see it as an impingement on my free operation and thought. Basically, any time I feel like people are designing something to heavily influence my behavior without telling me the whole story I get riled up. Whether that means walking in to the grocery store and being bombarded by scientifically designed graphics and colors or clicking on a seemingly innocuous link and being bombarded with images of a three way with a midget, a dolphin, and a baloney sandwich it still pisses me off.

      And as for prostrating, you and I both do it every day. Usually during sex. Look it up.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    56. Re:It isn't needed. by sjames · · Score: 1

      These make big cost problems that you can't really do anything about (try to get a fair director and actors with a budget less then 5 million - it will only happen if you have an extremely small cast or your entire cast is straight out of acting school).

      I'll bet if Hollywood made nothing but low budget movies for a year, the out of work 'big names' would start accepting paycuts (though they would reasonably expect to retain their percentages). Some of the most enduring (and profitable) films were low budget and the big budget films have their share of total flops.

      Hollywood is concerned because they spend scads of cash on expensive high res CGI and effects, then shrink and compress them down to DVD quality only to have people transcode that even smaller so they can download it. Perhaps they should target the resolution and packaging (lower than they use now and NONE respectively) people find acceptable in the first place and save some bucks. If they pass some of that savings on, they'll have less problems.

      I'm not saying there's no room at the top for massive CG efforts, just that most movies don't actually benefit. If they did benefit, piracy wouldn't be a problem at all since everyone would insist on seeing it on the big screen. Is there really any reason the summer teen slasher and related can't be 'filmed' in someone's back yard using a handycam?

      The most interesting part of the MPAA's arguments is a simple fact. The profits they're screeming about losing come entirely from the very technology they wanted dead in the '70 and '80. Before that, Movies made their big money (IF they made money) in the box office and then residual profit trickled in from television. Now, VHS and DVD release have been known to bring in more than the box office. Perhaps they'd like to just forget all about those profits and turn back time (yeah, sure!). The only reason they have all of those profits is because the courts said more or less "The VCR is here to stay, deal with it!". So they started selling tapes. Some people still recorded the network broadcast instead, but plenty paid for the tapes instead.

      The really sad part of the whole thing is all of the money being spent to plug the trickle of 'losses' from individual copying and sharing while doing nothing about professional operations that run off thousands of counterfit DVDs an hour.

      I wouldn't be terribly surprised to learn that they've spent more on lobbying and coercion (including lawsuits) than filesharing has actually cost them.

      The real reason for shrinking profits probably has more to do with failing to produce the products that consumers want at the maximally profitable price point.

    57. Re:It isn't needed. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Right. Because the movie-going public really wants to gamble with their ticket money on unknowns when they could, for the same amount of money, see a big star whose other movies they have enjoyed.

      Not having big names WILL reduce the turnout for the first weekend, but IF (and that's a big if these days) the movie is really any good, those who do see it will rave about it at work or school on Monday. Those who see it the second weekend aren't taking much risk since people with similar taste have already recommended it. If it's the average somewhat entertaining but somehow mildly disappointing average movie these days, they will need the big name so they can make the cost back before word of mouth kills it off. Name recognition need not be restricted to actors. There are a few writers or directors whose name will also draw a big crowd.

    58. Re:It isn't needed. by rtechie · · Score: 1

      My personal opinion about the addictive qualities of pronography is based on my understanding of the physical reactions to sexual content and my observations of myself and others in reaction to pornography. If you want to call that flame bait, so be it. However, the fact remains that the porn industry works off of what I describe. Maybe it is not addictive in your sense of the word, but I don't see you clarifying that issue at all or providing any input to repudiate my claim.

      Sure. Addiction, which is related to substance abuse, results in serious dependency, and physical withdrawal symptoms. Alcohol is addictive. Opiates are addictive. Advertising is not addictive. Neither is porn. Neither is popular entertainment in general.

  6. Delivery by download not new by dk-software-engineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Downloading a paid product is not a new thing. It has worked for software in years. I don't see why it shouldn't work for other kinds of data like movieclips and images.

    Of course it's easier to share it with a few thousand closest friends on Internet when you don't have to rip it first. But is it really the ripping part that is hard? Isn't that the easiest part? Why is that so bold, as the summary says?

    1. Re:Delivery by download not new by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course paid downloading isn't new and I wouldn't exactly say porn is leading the way (though I would agree porn had done a lot for the internet as well as VHS). I've been using iTunes for some time now, and I've never owned an iPod. It's such a convienance, with one gripe, only 30 secs of a song can be previewed. Anyways, I just spent $5 on iTunes a weekago. I had 5 singles I enjoyed listening too and I downloaded them, burned them to a CD, ripped them back into MP3, put them on my PSP to work out with (yeah, I use it more of a MP3 player than a video or game player. Saddly, that beautiful screen isn't used much, much to my dismay.)

      That same purchase would have costed me between $60-$100 to buy the 5 CD's that each had one of those songs on them. Of course, I would have gotten much more music, but it wasn't the music I was willing to buy. It would be like going to a fast-food restaurant and being forced to only get the combo meal when all you wanted was a small fry.

      I use to work at Wal-Mart and that is when I realized that I no longer wanted to buy CD's. Wal-Mart, the self proclaimed "low price leader", bought their CD's for like $3 and turned around and sold them for $15-20. I wasn't about to participate in that kind of money hording. I'll just keep listening to the radio and downloading the song I want.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  7. Protections? by shellbeach · · Score: 4, Funny
    with some protections included, of course

    Well, it's good to see the pr0n industry finally taking safe sex seriously ...
    1. Re:Protections? by blank101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As "funny" as that may be, I'd bet the porn industry was wary of sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancy far before the general public. I imagine it was a much more immediate matter of survival for them, in addition to being a more rapidly obvious problem.

    2. Re:Protections? by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      As "funny" as that may be, I'd bet the porn industry was wary of sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancy far before the general public. I imagine it was a much more immediate matter of survival for them, in addition to being a more rapidly obvious problem.

      Actually, that's not the case - or at least, I recall there being a news item about a year ago about HIV running rampant in the porn industry, solely because of the lack of safe sex practises. I'd do a google search for the story if I wasn't at work, but it shouldn't be too hard to find ...
  8. Coz They Cant Lobby by ikejam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it has more to do with the fact that since no politican can afford to be seen lobbied by a porn cartel, they have to come up with fairer solutions...

    1. Re:Coz They Cant Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lobbied by a porn cartel

      I've still got a copy of that if you want to borrow it,

    2. Re:Coz They Cant Lobby by dsgitl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite a few politicians -- on both sides -- receive money from whomever it is that owns SpectraVision and other hotel services. While Congressmen might not get contributions directly from porn, they do receive monies, ha ha, on the back end.

      If you're looking for a source, I can offer you the Al Franken show. That's where I heard this information. He was ralling against John McCain for taking contributions from the porn, but that seemed to be a bit of a, ha ha gain, stretch.

    3. Re:Coz They Cant Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast, TimeWarner, and AT&T (when they owned all those cable companies and now as a large internet provider) all make good money off porn, and do plenty of lobbying.

    4. Re:Coz They Cant Lobby by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Political cartel and a porn cartel are both in the bussiness of screwing people. The only difference is that porn cartel want to have the screwing recorded on video.

    5. Re:Coz They Cant Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA :)))))

  9. The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is that porn movies are better acted, the dialog is more natural and they feature less contrived and often more thought provoking plots than most over-hyped 'blockbusters'. That and more titty ;-)

    1. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I haven't seen such movies.

      Please give examples. And a link to the torrent.

    2. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      NOW I know why porn is so frowned upon by politicians and bible fanatics alike.

      It's thought provoking. Yeah, that's it!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      No wonder guys are often accused of thinking with the wrong head ... it's all 'cause of porn

    4. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I watch porn I have the urge to read news sites and /. So maybe you're right

      Anonymous coward so no one knows I have a slashdot fetish!

    5. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Tom · · Score: 1

      Actually, parent is both funny and spot on. Most porn movies "plot" can be summed up in about 3 sentences - and so can the plot of many Hollywood action movies. Mostly it's one for those who want to look at fucking and the other for those who want to have explosions.

      And despite 99,99% being total crap as far as acting, story, etc. is, there are a couple porn movies which really shine. I know I have one sitting on my drive where I've always planned to shorten (but not cut out entirely) the fucking scenes, because if they weren't overly long, it would actually make a pretty decent movie, including special effects, a nice story and passable acting.

      Though for all I know, quality peaked in the 90s or so, when there was much more money in porn than today, and style actually sold and was in demand, in contrast to todays silly records and bukkake orgies.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I've read it. Both, pre and past Jesus. Cool books, really funky story. Sex, crime, lots of war, blood and gore, and God is by far no pansy, that guy knows how to rock a world, and he's far from "just" or "holy". In fact, he can be a real bastard at times, really cool.

      I just wouldn't make a religion outta it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the difference between Hollywood movies and porn movies is that you at least get to see the titties and whatnot in porn. With today's Hollywood movies, they're all basically super-softcore porn anyhow (plot et al.).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    8. Re:The REAL scary truth for hollywood... by RobbieGee · · Score: 1

      Eyh, quit holding out on us. What's it called? I want to... buy... it.

      --
      If you get this, we're 10 of a kind.
  10. Link to article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Submitter forgot to include link to article http://www.digg.com/movies/The_Pornographers_vs._T he_Pirates

    1. Re:Link to article by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That is sad.
      Digg is doing do poorly they need to astroturf slashdot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Pornstars Of The Carribean by colonslashslash · · Score: 1

    Coming to a XXX shop near you. :)

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    1. Re:Pornstars Of The Carribean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Pornstars Of The Carribean by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I was going to reply to the original poster here that it probably does exist... but you'd found it already.

  12. Will they really tell you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you think your father will openly tell you that just last week he purchased a subscription to this fantastic bondage porno site? Do you think your boss will tell you that ten minutes ago, between meetings with clients, he spent $19.95 for the "Girls Gone Crazy: Kansas City!" and "Eugenia's Booby Paradise" video combo he saw advertised on TV last night? Do you think that the Republican senator who just rallied against sexuality in video games, and who also just bought some photos of girls fellating horses, will let you know? Probably not.

    Then again, you likely don't understand the true size of the market. Even if they have a 99% piracy rate, that 1% of sales is so much that they're all very well off.

    1. Re:Will they really tell you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Eugenia's Booby Paradise"...

      Shudder....

  13. The real technique they're using... by terrahertz · · Score: 1

    ...is called "Making so much money it don't mean a damn thing if piracy happens."

    Seriously, free porn has been electronically available since the 80s for anyone with a minute amount of knowledge and dedication. Who are the authors fooling?

    --
    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    1. Re:The real technique they're using... by jamesh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Free porn has been available since the invention of alcohol and anyone with enough nerve to nod suggestively at a lady. That is, free-as-in-"give her a"-beer :)

      (I've been waiting a long time for the appropriate place to use that line!)

    2. Re:The real technique they're using... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Seriously, free porn has been electronically available since the 80s for anyone with a minute amount of knowledge and dedication. Who are the authors fooling?

      Staring at ANSI BBS p0rn in the basement listening to Flock of Seagulls doesn't hold a candle to the high definition p0rn of today. Whos fooling who? :)

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:The real technique they're using... by vishbar · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      ...anyone with enough nerve to nod suggestively at a lady.

      You must be new here.

      With a 5-digit uid, I would think you would know better...

      --
      Ride the skies
    4. Re:The real technique they're using... by Deep+Fried+Geekboy · · Score: 1

      I love that the parent was modded 'informative'.

      Legions of slashdotters staring at the monitor, their eyes widening in a moment of epiphany. "Beer... women... REALLY??"

      --

      I'm not wrong. You haven't thought about it hard enough.

    5. Re:The real technique they're using... by terrahertz · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. That's why I was staring at 256-color GIFs, listening to Van Halen circa 1989, although the GIF format debuted around 1987 AFAIK.

      You have my sympathies. ;)

      --
      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
  14. Holywood? by obli · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Holywood" - is that some sort of nasty pun aiming at a profitable male porn star or just a typo?

    1. Re:Holywood? by odourpreventer · · Score: 1

      Well, someone spoke about inuendo. "The Holy Wood" fits the theme.

    2. Re:Holywood? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like a Christian porn movie.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Holywood? by drspliff · · Score: 0

      Jesus H and the Pussyfiction starring 'Innocent Mary'.

      Please, stop me from typing before I offend somebody!

    4. Re:Holywood? by malf-uk · · Score: 1

      Storyline:

      The woman can't afford to pay the plumber.

      She asks if there's any other way she can pay.

      A few months after getting engaged they get married.

      They finally have sex...with the lights off.

      (camera isn't night vision equipped)

      --
      R Tape loading error, 0:1
    5. Re:Holywood? by Jeian · · Score: 1

      Strangely, it's actually the name of a Marilyn Manson album. o_O

  15. Intentional purchases? by telchine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do people intentionally buy porn? I assumed the whole industry was funded by IE users accidentally installing premium rate dialers. I guess now that broadband is so popular the porographers need to find another revenue stream.

  16. Bigger Business by pianoman113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pornography has always been a huge business, and they have always been on the bleeding edge of technology. Look at the internet. Long before their was the World Wide Web there were dial-in BBS's where people could download pornography. When VCRs came out, pornography was almost immediately available on video cassettes.
    The pornography business' profit margin is much higher and that allows them much more freedom to innovate in their distribution. That, and they have no doubt that people will continue to consume their product.
    I doubt they'll ever eliminate the pirates, but they will lead the way technologically for flexible video distribution.

    --

    Free as in speech, free as in beer, or free as in lunch?
    1. Re:Bigger Business by PhiltheeG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Add to the above the fact that pornographic material is easily reusable and can be repackaged numerous ways at a low cost. Pornography also lends itself very well to the type of on-demand, pick-what-you-want Internet mentality. Theoretically a studio can sign a group of performers to a contract to shoot a set number of scenes, distribute those scenes in DVD format in full-length movies, repackage the scenes later as a "best-of performer" then redistrbute, slice and repackage the individual scenes the redistribute them by genre, etc. etc. It is still all the same stuff, simply packaged differently and offered in a way a consumer would like. Also, think of the possibilities for repackaging "classic" movies and redistributing of billions of hours of material.

      --
      -Phil
      Shoot questions, first ask later...
    2. Re:Bigger Business by dajak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think so. It's a cottage industry. Look up reports and numbers for publicly listed porn empires like Private or Beate Uhse. Income is low compared to the normal media, profit margins are in the normal range, and the retailers keep most of the money. The more likely explanation is that these companies have few 'intangible assets' in the form of goodwill, lobbying power in politics, or longterm relationships with partners in related industries anyway, and therefore have little reason to try to resist change.

    3. Re:Bigger Business by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      It's not a theory, that's what they do.

      A few days of shooting translates into enough material for many DVDs/videos.

      Studios will keep selling music from dead rappers and video of 'retired' porn starlets for as long as it makes money.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Bigger Business by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      So ... it's like the music industry more than anything?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    5. Re:Bigger Business by geekoid · · Score: 1

      All tyour examples are of the porn industry using technologies developed by someone else.
      Early adopter? sure, but hardly technology creators.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. World peace by Roy+van+Rijn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest advances in internet technology are made because of porn, file-sharing, P2P, search engines, image formats (more porn per mb), movie encryption etc.

    But there is one thing I don't believe, Porn isn't going to stop piracy, it created it! (One of the best things on the web!)
    If porn proves to be the key in stopping piracy, then I truly think porn will create world peace...

    And... why burn on DVD for personal use...???
    Isn't porn something you only watch once, you know the whole story and get bored? Isn't that the whole reason we watch porn, because the same woman every night bores us!?

    1. Re:World peace by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
      If porn proves to be the key in stopping piracy, then I truly think porn will create world peace...

      Well, if more people were at home beating off to porn, there'd be fewer people fighting.

      Much like a porn star, if you give me an opening like that ...

    2. Re:World peace by frickendevil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You cant stop piracy, period. You can however slow it down, and the porn industry has taken the first step towards this. I believe you missed the point that porn dvds are being sold on the web and being delivered via digital means instead of buying a hard copy, this tactic has worked brilliantly with mp3 downloads, as long as they are reasonably priced, people will pay for the convenience. If the movie industry followed suit of the porn industry, they too will be able to "keep on top" of piracy (for lack of a better saying, pun intended)

      As for burning it onto a DVD, there are thousands of reasons. Including:
      1. Getting tips from a pro - If you watch a world cup soccer match, it doesnt make you a world cup soccer player. But it can give you ideas on how to better yourself, and if you watch it over and over, you understand how it works, then you can just go practice it.

      2. Some full length porn features are really long, especially the ones without stories. So it could take you a while to get through it, having convenience on DVD.

      3. Save space on your computer.

      4. Easier to put a DVD into a dvd player then it is to drag a laptop or a monitor over towards your bed to watch it with your girl/boy/trannyfriend.

      5. Label it family photos and the kids will never touch it.

      6. Easier to share with friends.

      7. A particular porn star might just tickle your fancy, so you watch it for them, instead of the movie itself.

      8. Being able to give a physical size to your collection, giving you bragging rights "Mine is bigger then yours!"

      9. If your computer breaks down, and you need to take it to a techie, they wont find your stash after you have already burnt and deleted it.

      10. Same reason anyone buys any movies on DVD or VHS for that matter, after 5 years you forgotten the nitty gritty parts and you can rewatch and learn.

      BTW just because you don't share your porn with a kinky significant other (if you have one that is) doesn't mean other people don't. I would prefer my porn in DVD format.

    3. Re:World peace by Roy+van+Rijn · · Score: 1

      OMG.. lol, that really made my day :)

    4. Re:World peace by Talla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Isn't that the whole reason we watch porn, because the same woman every night bores us!?

      You're on Slashdot, you insensitive clod. It's because no woman any night bores us.

    5. Re:World peace by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 1
      1. Getting tips from a pro - If you watch a world cup soccer match, it doesnt make you a world cup soccer player. But it can give you ideas on how to better yourself, and if you watch it over and over, you understand how it works, then you can just go practice it.
      Claiming to have learned useful sex techniques from a porn movie:
      On Slashdot: +4 interesting.
      For the nice girl at the party: -1 not even funny.
    6. Re:World peace by BobBobBobBobBob · · Score: 1
      Getting tips from a pro - If you watch a world cup soccer match, it doesnt make you a world cup soccer player. But it can give you ideas on how to better yourself, and if you watch it over and over, you understand how it works, then you can just go practice it.

      That's just scary.

      Porn is sex for the camera. It's sex displayed to arouse the viewer (aka, you), not to pleasure the other participants in the act. Sure, male performers will achieve orgasm, but generally it's not women who watch porn for pointers on how to pleasure their man. If a man is watching porn to figure out how to please a woman, he's got more problems than just that. And he won't even be able to correct that first problem.

    7. Re:World peace by drsmithy · · Score: 0, Troll
      For the nice girl at the party: -1 not even funny.

      For the bad girl you actually want to have sex with: +1 Kinky.

      For the fat chick you'll probably end up scoring with: +1 Arsehole.

    8. Re:World peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting tips from a pro - If you watch a world cup soccer match, it doesnt make you a world cup soccer player. But it can give you ideas on how to better yourself, and if you watch it over and over, you understand how it works, then you can just go practice it.

      Given the amount of bad acting/faking in porn (ie, the women who are all like "every touch is orgasmic"), I feel sorry for you and the huge letdown you'll experience if you ever get to sleep with anyone. Porn is no substitute for experience, and alters your expectations. That's not to say that porn is necessarily bad, but it's not going to help you in that department.

    9. Re:World peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...because the same woman every night bores us!?

      What is this "woman" thing of which you speak?

  18. ofcourse a Yugoslav mobster helps too by Raindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Guy I know used to have a well known server with free illegit porn. This server got to be quite well known around the world. One of the reasons he stopped was that a Yugoslav guy with some Yugo-mob connections came to his door to politely request the removal of content that the Yugo considered to be his copyrighted works.

    Now the RIAA and MPAA have done some nefarious things to convince people to stop sharing music and movies, but getting the mob involved.. I haven't heard that one yet. Even when they get Uncle Sam involved, there is a chance of due course.

    1. Re:ofcourse a Yugoslav mobster helps too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The **AAs aren't part of the mafia? It's so hard to tell these days...

    2. Re:ofcourse a Yugoslav mobster helps too by shreevatsa · · Score: 0

      Of course they are: http://mafiaa.org/.

    3. Re:ofcourse a Yugoslav mobster helps too by SpecBear · · Score: 1

      OK, this is really really sad.

      The mob, an organization known for its brutal criminality, sent a guy to politely request the removal of infringing material. No federal marshals, no team of lawyers, no guns drawn, no confiscation of property, not even a little extortion.

      All you guys who compared the RIAA and MPAA to organized crime syndicates owe the mob an apology.

    4. Re:ofcourse a Yugoslav mobster helps too by jZnat · · Score: 1
      Now the RIAA and MPAA have done some nefarious things to convince people to stop sharing music and movies, but getting the mob involved.. I haven't heard that one yet. Even when they get Uncle Sam involved, there is a chance of due course.
      That's because **AA is the mob; they don't need to hire more mobs to do their job.
      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    5. Re:ofcourse a Yugoslav mobster helps too by jon287 · · Score: 0

      The mob has a limited number of thugs with guns. Uncle Sam? Not so much.

      --
      To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  19. What is this world coming to? by EdMack · · Score: 2, Funny

    `buy movies online to burn them from their computers onto DVDs, with some protections included, of course.'

    I need to use protection for (ahem) solo-sex now? Oh god! What if it's too late?

    --
    puts ("Python r0cks\n");
    1. Re:What is this world coming to? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
      I need to use protection for (ahem) solo-sex now? Oh god! What if it's too late?

      "In fact, I'm not jerking off any more! ... I don't know where I've been!"

      George Carlin

    2. Re:What is this world coming to? by ajs318 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't know about anyone else, but I actually quite enjoy having a wank into a johnny.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  20. Pornography wants to be free! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

    My C:\Porn directory is well over 90GB and I have never paid to d/l porno.

    That's kind of the beauty of the whole thing. For each person who pays a site membership, there will be hundreds who get to leech. And who is going to go to court and say that they feel violated because someone ripped off a copy of a video of them actually being violated.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  21. Hollywood should copying by houghi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They should start copying what the porn movies are doing. First look at the stories. Pornmovies have better stories 9 times out of 10.
    Next you hear all these Oscar winners that lovescenes are the most difficult to play. If that is the case, start giving Ron Jerremy a life-time achievement accadamy award.
    Also note that in porn movies all nudity is functional.

    I still think it is strange that you are not allowed to see two people having sex, yet it is normal to see people get killed in movies.

    If people know that Kill Bill is not real, They might recognise that Deep Throaght is also just a movie.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Hollywood should copying by damienl451 · · Score: 0

      There is a major difference though : in a violent movie, the guy who gets killed does not get shot at FOR REAL and does not die FOR REAL. In a porn movie, they REALLY have sexual intercourse. What exactly is fake in porn movies ? A better question to ponder : if I were to hire a few girls to have sex with men and profited from it, I'd probably be charged with pandering. But if I became a porn-film director, I'd get rich and nobody could prosecute me.

    2. Re:Hollywood should copying by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Funny
      What exactly is fake in porn movies ?


      Tits, orgasms, enjoyment, cum, ...

      --
      Free as in mason.
  22. The always underestimated porn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without the porn industry we would use Betamax instead of the internet and have bad sex with computers, buy Blu-Ray players and our children would get pregnant by _not_ going to church.

    You have to pay some respect to them for keping this world in the shape we like.

    Damn, can you even imagine how much music would suck without the nvention of decent porn?

    Me neither..

    1. Re:The always underestimated porn... by Jakob777 · · Score: 0

      If you also look at the state of DVD that we have today. The only industry to really use the second camera angle function, it is rumored to be the porn industry that actually lobbied the original standard makers for the dvd players to add in this feature.

      --
      if you are what you eat , then I could be you by tomorrow.
  23. I Don't Get It by wickedj · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "Bolder yet, one large studio is allowing fans who buy movies online to burn them from their computers onto DVDs, with some protections included, of course." Why would you need condoms with your porn???

  24. No chance for support from Uncle Sam by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uncle Sam would have to admit that he cared for porn, doubt that will happen soon.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:No chance for support from Uncle Sam by Raindeer · · Score: 1

      they referred to RIAA and MPAA

  25. I learned my lesson. by Killshot · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I first got into the adult industry, I fought really hard to "protect" my copyrights. Any time I found my photos elsewhere on the internet I would have my lawyer send out threatening letters, I would try to sue people. I would get peoples websites shut down.. it cost a lot of time and money and mostly I just pissed people off.

    Eventually I figured out that in most cases when people copied my photos and shared them.. it increased revenue because people would come to my site looking for more. I then restricted any lawsuits to people who would charge money to access content they stole from me.

    I think the music and movie industry could learn the same lesson.

    1. Re:I learned my lesson. by castlec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where do you operate from? I've been kinda thinking about starting a side business here in the Czech Republic. The women are plentiful and inexpensive but I really don't know what the sales value of a set are. Care to comment? You can contact me through email if you like.

      --
      When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
    2. Re:I learned my lesson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easiest way to find out would be to join one of the content trading groups and try to buy a few sets yourself.

    3. Re:I learned my lesson. by TwistedEvo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Simple question.

      How many of you just couldn't resist clicking on the parent's home page?

    4. Re:I learned my lesson. by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I couldn't.

      (Where's my damn mod points when I want them? You need a Funny!)

    5. Re:I learned my lesson. by cgreuter · · Score: 4, Funny

      How many of you just couldn't resist clicking on the parent's home page?]

      I admit, I took a look.

      But only to read the articles.

    6. Re:I learned my lesson. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      At least you didn't start off by saying you were operating out of Nigeria.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:I learned my lesson. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      If people were "borrowing" your content and using it to advertise your site for them, they were being stupid. Charging to access your content should be something you try to go after.

      But what I think would be worse would be using your content to advertise their pay site.

    8. Re:I learned my lesson. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I admit, I took a look. But only to read the articles.

      Read the articles? You must be new here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. What does it say about the human race by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when all our advances in technology can be linked to porn or the military?

    1. Re:What does it say about the human race by Obi-w00t · · Score: 1

      What does it say about the human race when all our advances in technology can be linked to porn or the military?

      That, despite what we may think, we are all, actually, apes with less hair. Not that that is a bad thing of course...

    2. Re:What does it say about the human race by Tolleman · · Score: 1

      That about 50% of us are men. All non technological advances are related to cleaning, nagging and drapes.

    3. Re:What does it say about the human race by Suicide+Machine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That we are the result of evolution.

      -jijin

    4. Re:What does it say about the human race by arakon · · Score: 1

      It says those are our favorite pass-times, fuckin and killin. My aren't we enlightened.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    5. Re:What does it say about the human race by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't mess with us, or we'll Whip you and THEN Screw you! :)

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    6. Re:What does it say about the human race by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're abstracts of every other living entity's desire to reproduce and willingness to kill to do so and survive? Just my $0.02.

    7. Re:What does it say about the human race by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      I guess it says that we're just like every other life form in the universe.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    8. Re:What does it say about the human race by thethibs · · Score: 1

      That sex and competition are what make human evolution run.

      Liberal attitudes toward porn and conflict are what, thankfully, will ultimately relegate liberal-socialist ideas to the trashbins of history.

      --
      I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
    9. Re:What does it say about the human race by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      First, our technologies is linked to far more then mere porn and the little military sector.

      Second, ease sexual repression, introduce rationality with sexuality and the problem solves itself : porn is just a byproduct of repressive behavior, fears and poor social skills. Porn doesn't cause porn, repression and unfulfilled legitimate fantasies do.

      Third, in order to ease violent behavior one have to shown the product of rationality and the product of violence: rational behavior leads human to harness the good of the world and reduce the damages , violence can only escalate up to the point nobody is alive to continue the spiral ; sometime the effects are delayed , but they always betray the fears and ignorance that generated them.

      The great enemies are ignorance (meaning not knowing) and fear and their byproducts, like delusional toughts.

    10. Re:What does it say about the human race by doubtless · · Score: 1

      yah, pretty much every advancement can be attributed to reproduction and fighting for survival.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
  27. Is it a fair fight? by SnuffySmith · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What about pornographers versus ninjas?

  28. Hypocrites by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

    It is interesting to me that pornographers like to peddle their wares, even when flying in the face of a morality question. A whole thread discussion could be started just talking about that, but this isn't my point.

    My point is, that many would argue that is it immoral to steal. Many would consider pirating a movie, no matter its content, to be immoral. I just think it's interesting to point out that the pornographers want their cake and eat too, by combating piracy, since what they do is considered immoral also.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:Hypocrites by tweek · · Score: 1

      There's a difference. Stealing a movie is a crime. Pure and simple. The morality aspect never comes into it.

      Making adult movies and posing for photographs in the nude is NOT a crime.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:Hypocrites by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      I never mentioned anything about the legality of pornography. We all know its legal to create/distribute/consume porn. I'm not debating that. Nor am I advocating a particular point concerning its legal status. Just because there isn't a law written for/against pornography does not make a significant bit of difference as to its morality or immorality. However, on its base level, it is a question of morality, an issue that both stealing and pornography share.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    3. Re:Hypocrites by jamstigator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, I never understood the concept of immorality with porn. It's moral to HAVE sex, but it's immoral to WATCH sex? Even some of the laws are ridiculous. For example, in the state where I live, you can legally have sex with someone for four years, enough time to generate five batches of children, before you can legally WATCH sex. In other words, you can be legally giving blowjobs left and right for 4 years, but during that time you are not allowed to watch any type of instructional video on how to give a GOOD blowjob. That just seems like a waste to me. ;)

    4. Re:Hypocrites by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      That depends on your definition of stealing, really. There are some who would say that refusal to share is a form of stealing in its own right. E.G. if I have a lit candle, and I let you light an unlit candle from it, my room doesn't get any darker but you do get some light. By some definitions, it would be wrong for me not to let you light your candle from mine, since it would positively benefit someone while causing no loss or damage to me. {Unless you regard having light while others are in darkness as a form of power over them, which would be "lost" if they had light}.

      Sex is just something people do; whether it's heterosexual two-person sex, gay two-person sex, multi-person sex or straightforward one-person sex. And there's nothing wrong with it. You can't even say it's a waste of sperm, since a maximum of one sperm per ejaculation will ever make it to fertilise an egg and most men don't ejaculate as many times in a lifetime as they produce sperm in a single ejaculation.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:Hypocrites by someone300 · · Score: 1

      The people watching porn probably don't really think it's particularly immoral (despite what they might say in public).

    6. Re:Hypocrites by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Same with participating. In many places in the US you can legally have sex for several years before anybody can legally film you having sex (or even nude). I'm not sure if one should age should be lowered or the other raised (or maybe both to average it out), but I certainly think that they should be the same (along with the drinking age, driving age, voting age, and age at which you can be tried as an adult).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:Hypocrites by tweek · · Score: 1

      The point I was making is that there is nothing hypocritical (in terms of morality) about an adult entertainment company being concerned about piracy. Now if this were a software company that writes its software on a pirated copy VS.NET then I would agree. If this company were stealing other footage and selling it and then bitching about piracy I would agree.

      I get REAL itchy when people try to cast a specific morality on the legal system. Specifics of morality differ from person to person:

      Person A thinks it is perfectly moral to steal food to feed his starving children
      Person B thinks it is perfectly moral to kill a non-believer of his faith because his holy book says so.
      Person C thinks it is perfectly moral to have sex with a child for whatever reason.

      I happen to think all three of those things are wrong. I like to work of a few pithy quotes when determining if something is justfied as "enforced morality" or not. This is the main one:

      "it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson

      Your morality can say alot of things (based on your personal religious beliefs or self-concocted thought stream whatever) but it can't be forced on someone else. You stole a loaf of bread from me. It was not yours. You attempted to have sex with a 3 year old child (even your own). You can't do that because we have determined (however arbitrary in nature) that there is an age of consent.

      It wasn't a personal attack but I honestly didn't see anything contrary about someone being upset that someone stole something they created. That's all.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    8. Re:Hypocrites by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Remember that your definitions of "porn" may be a little weak. OK a blowjob video is pretty tame. How about a nice video of a girl being raped to death by a bull? What about an instructional video on the finer points of asphyxiation and how it enhances sexual pleasure?

      What passes for porn these days can make even the above seem tame.

  29. All I have to say... by omega9 · · Score: 1
    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:All I have to say... by Hairball6494 · · Score: 0

      I'm a bit apprehensive to click on any links from this article while at work... are these okay for viewing in public?

      --
      I think people use 'Ubuntu' in their posts to sound cool.
    2. Re:All I have to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll also want to check-out http://www.empornium.us/

      They're safe if you consider nude pictures in the descriptions safe. Just a warning about them, all three sites have Puritanical rules and are very politically correct! As an example, on adultsins.net even though I was a top 10 uploader I was banned after making the comment that I preferred videos with white and asian girls. According to their very PC rules there, that is an instant ban. On empornium.us despite having uploaded over 2TB (2,000,000 MBytes!) I was banned after posting some nudist pictures. The jerk-off that runs that site even contacted my ISP and local police to try to have me arrested. My ISP laughed at them and the local police laughed even harder. They're ok sites, but just don't expect anything that's not mainstream porn there. They're very Puritanical and PC. I'm still looking for a more open Bit Torrent trading site.

    3. Re:All I have to say... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      When you rip off Mitch Hedberg for your sig, the least you could do is admit it.

  30. Fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I see this argument again and AGAIN on /., that porn is the bleeding edge of technology but this is fantasy. There is no evidence to corroborate this except the memories of people obsessed with getting porn in new formats. Seriously, where are the data and studies that show pornography pioneers new communications technologies?

    Porn capitalizes on the advent of new technologies, sure, but this is quite different than saying porn substantially (or singhandedly) advances it.

    1. Re:Fuck off by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Porn capitalizes on the advent of new technologies, sure, but this is quite different than saying porn substantially (or singhandedly) advances it.

      Yeah, watching porn won't get you any Tang.

      (Sorry, I just couldn't resist.)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  31. The Industry by MerrickStar · · Score: 0

    This being one of the few articles you can encounter where no one comments with an inside point of view because they work in the industry.

    1. Re:The Industry by Killshot · · Score: 1
  32. protection by boiledsoybeans · · Score: 0

    finally porn videos are starting to use protection ;)

  33. Obligatory joke. by Virak · · Score: 1
    People who love porn would not mind DRM or any other restrictive technology

    What?! But I thought most slashdotters were against DRM!
    1. Re:Obligatory joke. by Moqui · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quite the connundrum then. The vigilant distrust for all things DRM-related, or the satisfaction of midget on midget fetish porn, with ponies.

      Sometimes the Internet isn't all it was cracked up to be -- with moral decisions such as that. :)

    2. Re:Obligatory joke. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      With midget ponies?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  34. When will these people face reality! by l0rd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What are these people bitching about? It's ridiculous to see 100% of pircacy as lost revenue.

    Newsflash: Most people don't pay for porn. Most people don't need that much porn. Most people aren't your target market.

    The way I see this is that a (relative) minority of people actually pay for porn. Everyone else just gets it from P2P and that ain't gonna change.

    1. Re:When will these people face reality! by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: Most people don't pay for porn. Most people don't need that much porn. Most people aren't your target market.

      The way I see this is that a (relative) minority of people actually pay for porn. Everyone else just gets it from P2P and that ain't gonna change.


      There is a flaw in your logic. I had a similar discussion with some frinends in University, I started saying something like:

      "Those people who BUY porn are surely really bad [crazy], I would never get into the point of PAYING for porn"

      To what a friend of mine answered something really insightful:
      "Doh!, thats stupid, you do not PAY for porn because you DOWNLOAD it from internet"

      From this, I believe your "newsflash" is a bit wrong. One of the main battles of the pornographic industry has been to "authenticate" (sorry can not think of the exact word) the adult entertainment industry, the problem they have (in USA, the biggest market) is the "morality" issue. You would be surprised about the number of people that DO watch some kind of porn. And, you would be more surprised to know that if the "OMG-think-of-the -Children" hundred year ol "sex-is-wrong" TABOO from USA dissappeared, almost everyone would rent/buy pronographic movies quite regularly.

      Secondly, as my friend said, a lot of people that watch porn do not buy it, but the only reason is because they ILEGALLY find a way to get it, it is the same as with non pornographic movies.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:When will these people face reality! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Your point goes back to the 80s as well. Even back then people would lend movies back and forth, with maybe 3 people in a group of 50 actually buying anything, even if the whole group were to chip in.

      If that ain't P2P (person to person) I don't know what is.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    3. Re:When will these people face reality! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      One of the main battles of the pornographic industry has been to "authenticate" (sorry can not think of the exact word)

      The word is "legitimize".

      And, you would be more surprised to know that if the "OMG-think-of-the -Children" hundred year ol "sex-is-wrong" TABOO from USA dissappeared, almost everyone would rent/buy pronographic movies quite regularly.

      No, YOU would be surprised to know that if the taboo disappeared, the porn industry would end immediately. A 30-minute porn movie costs 4X what a 2-hour Hollywood movie would, because of it being taboo. If it wasn't, nobody would pay. In fact, once it's not taboo, you'll see (high budget) porn in R-rated Hollywood movies, just because it wouldn't be an issue.

      In any case, the porn industry would be dead. They want enough legitimacy to spread without fear of arrest, and to raise their profile, but enough taboo that they can charge insane prices, and be a "naughty" temptation, instead of being seen as a low-budget film with ugly actresses.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:When will these people face reality! by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      A 30-minute porn movie costs 4X what a 2-hour Hollywood movie would, because of it being taboo.

      OTOH, a porn flick - even at the high end - probably only costs 1/10th as much to make. There's a lot of room to move in profit margins like that.

      The porn industry will never die. At *worst* it would become "mainstream" and the profit margins would drop. Hollywood could not meet the sheer volume - let alone variety - that pornography consumers demand.

    5. Re:When will these people face reality! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Everyone else just gets it from P2P and that ain't gonna change.

      Or just doesn't go near it in the first place.

      There are more people in that demographic than you think, despite what pop culture tells you.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    6. Re:When will these people face reality! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      20 Billion dollar industry. I sense that more then a few people pay for porn.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. How long do you think... by stubear · · Score: 1

    "Bolder yet, one large studio is allowing fans who buy movies online to burn them from their computers onto DVDs, with some protections included, of course." ...for someone to crack the protections on a blockbuster DVD and redistribiute that file on teh internet? The whole online copyright debate has always been about getting shit for free and forcing content creators to look elsewhere for money because consumers are no longer a good source. All it takes is one person to whine that the donloadable version of Rocky XVII is too expensive and how they would pay for it if it were half that price (half seems to be the magical price point people are willing to pay for anything - "cd's $10", "I'd pay half that", "OK, cd's $5", "I'd pay half that", etc.) and in the meantime they are going to pirate the movie. It's a never-ending, viscious cycle that is only going to be broken when content simply becomes too expensive to create or becomes too crappy due to all the product placement that people are no longer willing to pay to see Rocky "Pepsi-Cola" Balboa in Rocky XXVII. I like Jeep (I own a Liberyty, really want a Commander) and I like Tomb Raider but I thought the blatant product placement of the Jeep Commanders in Tomb Raider: Legend was really tasteless. Jeep also made a huge deal about the modified Jeep Wrangler in Tomb Raider: Cradle of Life (big coup since the vehicle Lara Croft used in the first Tomb Raider movie was a Land Rover).

    1. Re:How long do you think... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Looking at online content sales, I would say that most people do buy their music when it is reasonably priced. Reasonably priced determined by price point.

      If it was only about getting stuff for free, iTunes wouldn't be selling anything.

      If p2p was going to destroy the music industry, it already wuold have.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. Pornographers and Ninjas find common cause! by TempeTerra · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is terrible news! If Pirates are now fighting Pornographers as well as their age-old enemies the Ninjas global temperatures will be sure to rise even further! My advice: buy land in Alaska.

    Furthermore, Pornographers are well known for their ability to quickly subvert any new technology for pornographic ends. This suggests that the Robots will soon be enslaved, forming a fearsome Robot Ninja Pornographer alliance! What hope is there now for the noble Pirates? The monkeys certainly won't be any help. How could a mere monkey hope to oppose a Robot Ninja Pornographer?

    --
    .evom ton seod gis eht
    1. Re:Pornographers and Ninjas find common cause! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wouldnt have to, Im not sure there would be much of a market for 2 ( or more ) toasters ingaging in sexual congress.

  37. The only "protection" content needs... by csoto · · Score: 1

    ...is in the form of customer approval. They will approve of easy and affordable methods of obtaining licensed content, and will thereby protect the bottom lines of the content providers. They will shun pirated media in favor of supporting the people who give them the good stuff, they way they like it, pr0n or otherwise.

    I bet you thought I would say something else about "protection." I thought about it, but you know...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:The only "protection" content needs... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Wrong. As long as piracy is rampant and without consequence the quality will improve to be equal that of "offical" products. The pirates will win if we do not stop them. Winning means official products disappear or are replaced by hobbist created stuff. The "profession" of making music or movies will end just like the many other professions have disappeared.

  38. My theory... by Net_fiend · · Score: 0, Troll

    Porn is like crack. You hand it out freely to people, then those who really like it but too 'right' to just take it will buy it. Just like those 'tards who steal to buy/get crack. There a ton of people addicted to porn. The porn industry is able to stay afloat because they keep their product out in the open (even if people are embarrased to buy them) to download, watch, burn, etc. VHS is dead and I don't think will be coming back so DVD & downloading are the only alternatives. HD-DVD and Blue Ray are due out soon as well. I'm guessing they'll end up backing both formats so as to reap more profits.

    On a side note...I can guess that porn stars don't get nearly as much pay as a Hollywood star. With that said I don't see a porn star living like crap either... So it begs to reason wtf Hollywood stars think they deserve to get paid an ever increasing amount of $$ because a movie that was written by someone we will probably never remember(or know) was a huge hit. IMO the movie stories and ALL the people involved make a great film, not just one crappy actor. Example: MI3...was good, not because of Cruise, but because the movie was put together well (very action packed), the plot twists also helped. Screw Cruise.

    --
    "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
    1. Re:My theory... by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I can think of many women (not as many as a few years ago though) what would love to help you with that last part you said. Just wait: you'll see a bunch of them holding placards saying "Screw Cruise, Please!"

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  39. That's right! Clean up the web. by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1

    So, like, they don't know about USENET, right?

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:That's right! Clean up the web. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh ! They're listening.

    2. Re:That's right! Clean up the web. by Greatmoose · · Score: 0

      YOU FORGOT THE FIRST RULE OF USENET 1) You do not talk about usenet 2) Ever

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
  40. Hollywood has the same problem as games though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood has the same problem that the games industry has -- people have come to expect Teh Shiny, and Shiny is too expensive.

    If you try to make a summer-blockbuster action movie with less than a $50,000,000 budget, the mainstream audience will ignore it with one big "meh".

    Besides, the economics of theatres have shifted over the last 20-30 years. It used to be the cinema made a fair chunk of the profit from ticket sales (like 50%). That's down to less than 10%, or in a lot of cases *nothing* in the crucial first weeks. Theatres make ALL their profit from the "food" they sell, which is why you can buy a tiny tray of stale Nachos for six dollars and a half litre of Pepsi for four dollars and fifty cents.

    For movies AND games, I wish the content-producers would spend more of their budget on making engrossing content and less of it on Shiny and special effects. But that's life.

  41. And more interesting... by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is the fact that one is incredibly well funded for research of new technologies, while the other gets no funding.

    Yet both groups manage to come up with advances.

  42. The things I have seen... by hrrY · · Score: 1

    The porn industry is truly amazing in many rights in regards to the way it's content is protected. It's almost a self-policing industry. Everybody pretty much know's who's is what in regards to content, especially niche content(insert_niche_here). The air is thin at the top. Don't be surprised to see "Barry the one-legged albanian pimp" show up at your door with something semi-automatic(although concealed) if you poach his content; seriously.

    1. Re:The things I have seen... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Don't be surprised to see "Barry the one-legged albanian pimp" show up at your door
      Now that's what I call service!
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:The things I have seen... by hrrY · · Score: 1

      When Barry paid us a visit, he was fairly mild-mannered, but all the same; made no reservations or kept any secrets about the severity of our situation. It turned out, that some marketing dude that used to be there(wonder where he is now...)had the *bright idea* of using stock photo's. They were taken down from the mainsite, as some of our *clients* were a little shall we say; jealous. No big deal, took the photo's down, but what we didn't realize, was that in replicating, re-replicating, and tweaking the site was that they were at least 4 other sites hosted with different names and templates that we didn't update STILL HOSTING THESE PICS. No one thought anything of it, as it was good material to try new stuff on...until...some weird looking australian chick came by the office wanting all kinds of shit, like $2 a click(???)and to be able to put MORE girls up there(????)we were like, "Ok...um...who are you?!" She replied that the pictures that were using were actually pictures of "some of her girl's" and that not only were we to pay for the cost of leasing that content that was already up, but to generate more clicks on it AND then charge us a "discounted" rate to add more. Where this other dude got these pic's I don't know. What I do know was that my boss at the time was psycho(I miss him)and he freaked out on this little australian chick something fierce. The next day we met "Barry"...They worked out a *deal* and I quit a month later, the business was sold 5 months later...

  43. The industry is funded the wrong way by polar_cap_miner · · Score: 0

    The simple way to eliminate piracy is to get everyone to pre-buy copies of a film before it even gets made. If not enough tickets are sold, then the film is not made and everyone gets their money back.

    All the investors get a DVD and the right to download the film. They can share the film if they want because they invested in its creation.

    This will also elimate financial flops because it all works on pre-sales. No pre-sales no films.

    Currently production companies raise money for films by pre-selling to the distributors. So why not take this one step further and pre-sell to the consumer.

    All you need is a product pitch and a delivery date. It could cost $10 per share. People already buy product online so why not extend this to reversing the entire film making/funding/selling process.

    This could extend to TV as well.

    People who think they would then just sit back and wait for others to invest would find that no films get made. So if they want stuff they will have to invest in it.

    These investors do not receive profit, but rather user rights or copy rights. The production company can still sell TV / Cable and other Rights to profiteer off their work and fund the product pitch for the next project.

  44. Porn On The Cutting Edge of Technology?!?! by DbZeroOne · · Score: 1

    So the porn industry has concepts and technology way ahead of the curve? THAT'S never happened before. (That dripping sound is sarcasm)

    1. Re:Porn On The Cutting Edge of Technology?!?! by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      That dripping sound is sarcasm
      Fnarr fnarr.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Porn On The Cutting Edge of Technology?!?! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That dripping sound is not sarcasm, no matter what the producer old you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Porn On The Cutting Edge of Technology?!?! by DbZeroOne · · Score: 1

      Ok, no pun intended there, but kudos to all those who MADE it a pun. It's a good one!

  45. But don't they ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. In the spirit of mimicking porno... by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't they act *more* like raging pricks?

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  47. DVD Protections? by AB2RC · · Score: 1

    " allowing fans who buy movies online to burn them from their computers onto DVDs, with some protections included, of course.'"

    'Protections included' -- Does that mean the dvd's come wrapped in condoms?

  48. To quote George Carlin by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    When Jesus said "Let the children come unto me" this is NOT what he had in mind.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:To quote George Carlin by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That kinda porn is illegal! If you're interested in that kinda shit, go talk with your priest, maybe he can help you with that problem...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  49. CAPITALISM AT IT'S BEST: Supply and Demand by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The demand for the products that the pr0n industry produces far dwarfs the demand for the crap that the (MP|RI)AA -- (Note how cool it is that I used a RegEx and actually used MORE characters instead of less to say the same thing. I am 1337, bow down.) put out. Basically if you've got everyone chomping at the bit for your product and you know they're going to sell hard and fast, then you're not going to be averse to letting a little product slip through your fingers. Especially if youre product is cheap. Unlike Hollywood, the porn industry puts out "first run" movies for about $40 and then progressively drops the price the older the product is. If you're a smart porn conneseur, you can buy movies that are one or two years old for only $10. Let's see Hollywood do THAT. It'll never happen. And you know why? Because the music and movie industries KNOW that their product is total crap in terms of demand. Yeah, some morons want the pap, but they don't want to pay outrageous prices for it. And based on the fact that both the RIAA and the MPAA are looking to outlaw the sale of used product more than twice (meaning you can't sell beyond one person) beyond the original sale, I'd say that there's going to be a whole lotta thievin' goin' on... Have a nice day chumps.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  50. Until now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have not watched porn before. So this article doesn't bother me.

  51. F5 by sr180 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I keep pressing F5 to see the porn on this page, but its not loading. What am I doing wrong?

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  52. Excluding windows specific stuff by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    I'd say Elli (NSFW!) has it done right. But that's just my opinion. Elli and her ilk could dominate the rest of the commercial industry. And god bless 'em.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  53. I'm sorry, pirates win by kimvette · · Score: 1

    http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&wo rd1=pornographers&word2=pirates

    Not even a contest.

    As an aside: I thought pornographers embraced piracy for viral marketing and uploaded the "pirated" content themselves? "Hey, this DivX is crap. I want to see Jenna's boobs in high resolution! Where can I buy the DVD?"

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:I'm sorry, pirates win by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  54. Misleading title. by matek · · Score: 1

    The Pornographers vs. The Pirates.. I don't really understand the "VS" part. I mean, the only reason why there is content-piracy is the high-prices and ease of use of the unofficial (read: p2p) distribution channels - it's not like the "Pirates" want to fight the "Pornographers" (or any other content-producers) - they just want to have access to content without paying unreasonable prices (and YES, i know that this is a very subjective thing - when are the prices low enough for users and high enough for content producers).

    So please, not "The Pornographers vs. The Pirates", but "The Pornographers For Innovative Content Distribution".

    Cheers.

  55. Won't happen by Bostik · · Score: 1

    ...share revenues ... with distributors ...

    Nah.

    --
    There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.
  56. As the saying goes by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

    There are two types of people in the world - those who like porn, and those who pretend they don't.

  57. Immorality by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Realistically speaking, pornography is only considered immoral by a small, highly vocal minority of crackpots. Not unlike the small, highly vocal minority of crackpots that consider copyright violation to be immoral. Of course, you have clearly placed yourself in both groups by your statements. Particularly, confusing THEFT (taking something away from someone else, so that you have it and they don't) with COPYRIGHT VIOLATION (a form of sharing that hasn't been approved by some particular third party). From that, I surmise that you are American, very likely a fundamentalist christian (that is, a christian who completely ignores the new testament), and probably opposed to any kind of individual freedom whatsoever.

  58. Why is this considered current news? by BigVig209 · · Score: 1

    Regina Lynn from Wired.com, http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,70547-0.html, reported on the adult film industry's efforts to develop new DRM programs that users wouldn't find too objectionable almost three months ago.

    The adult film industry has pretty much lead the way in American entertainment in regards to online distribution and DVD innovation.

    It's not surprising that Hollywood is sitting back and letting the little guys go through all of the development costs in order to harvest the more refined product later on.
  59. More Pink Cow! by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    What could be a better deal?

    --
    C|N>K
  60. A small plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for my current fave pr0n site - bog standard DRM-free QuickTime. Disclaimer, I have nothing whatever to do with them except that they're the first and so far only site that's been good enough for me to plonk down some real folding money for.

  61. Screaming teens by DrYak · · Score: 1
    Well, I know how to cut costs of hollywood movies down by 70%! Don't hire Tom Cruise!


    Then you'll also lost a very huge proportion of fans, mostly screaming teenage girls that came in only because there's Tommy on the movie poster...
    Holywood keeps hiring ultra-expensive actors because, no matters how much their performance sucks, they sell movies.

    Both inventive and cheap movie could be done by hiring talented new comers, but nobody is going to see them, appart from a few intellectuals who still have taste, and maybe also from oversea marketing (here in europe people tend to still be able to enjoy a movie based on its artistic value and not on who's name is on the poster).

    Holywood has got old and is easily frightened by risk-taking, So it sticks to known value.
    Celebrity actors, popular book, or ridiculously high budget (or any combination of those) is all you're going to get.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  62. Sigh by Trogre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...pornography is again leading the way

    Yes, that's right:

    Pornography made VCRs popular, jump-started the Internet, invented the light bulb and put man on the moon.

    *rolls eyes*

    It's amazing what lengths people will go to in order to legitimize their dirty little pasttimes.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  63. The internet was made for porn by next2you · · Score: 1

    very nice song/movie :-) http://youtube.com/watch?v=fe-Rv7iL6Sg

  64. Pay for Porn? You've gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paying for porn, the pure thought repulses me.
    Anyone with a bit of selfrespect would never pay for pornography.
    I mean it's even worse than buying a prostitute, it probably means you're even too unattractive even to the prostitutes.

    The best porn/sex is FREE!

  65. How could a mere monkey oppose a Robot Ninja? by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

    Banana in exhaust pipe.*

    Dowload the torrent at 11.

    * - only vs combustion powered robot types.

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  66. Can we stop pretending by philipkd · · Score: 1

    Can we stop pretending that these changes are positive? Who the hell cares about corporations? Why must we keep making compromises for them? If we banned DRM, threw out copyright laws, yes, really expensive-to-produce content will appear less frequently. So what? We're moving to a world where culture comes from the bottom-up, not the top-down. From wikipedia to Torrents. It's a paradigm shift. And if we want to stop the RIAA from suing grandmas, we have to be willing to accept a world without copyright.

  67. Futurama by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 1

    How is it that taking ass-to-mouths and getting bukkake facials qualifies these people as "Stars"?

    Well, according to Futurama the order of respect that "Stars" get is:

    "Movie Stars" "B-Movie Stars", "Porn Stars", then "TV Stars"

    Do you consider TV actors to be stars?

    But what do I care, I am oblivious to popular culture, including porn.

    --
    I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
    If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
    Courage.