Slashdot Mirror


New Fatal1ty Gaming Mouse

steven williamson writes to tell us that Hexus has a quick look at Jonathan 'Fatal1ty' Wendel's approach to a new gaming mouse. At first glace it doesn't seem to have much to offer beyond your average optical mouse. A few of the features are a "four finger" setup with regards to mouse buttons, a mere 1600 DPI but that should be plenty for most, and an exchangeable weight to give it just the right heft.

240 comments

  1. Four Fingers...?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    They even upgraded the three-finger salute ("Zee bird, boss! Zee bird!"). Isn't anything sacred anymore?!

    1. Re:Four Fingers...?! by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
      They even upgraded the three-finger salute ("Zee bird, boss! Zee bird!"). Isn't anything sacred anymore?!

      Well... a few generations of procreation within your family tree may yield the ability to manipulate a 5 finger stick.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Four Fingers...?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That would explain why I'm still stuck on using an Atari joystick with one big red button.

    3. Re:Four Fingers...?! by Rebel_lord · · Score: 1

      Apparently not, even the sacred one finger salute has been upgraded to the Super Finger or Su-Fi. The Super Finger or Su-Fi (pronounced SUE-F-EYE) is a hand gesture created by Cook. It consists of raising the middle finger, ring finger, and thumb on the same hand while lowering (or curling) the pointer and pinky fingers. Cook's website explains his idea behind the Su-Fi: One night I did a bit on stage about 5 years ago at the Laugh Factory. I was talking about how the finger is lame now and it's lost its pizzazz. I said I wanted to upgrade the finger and so from now on people should use both the ring finger coupled with the middle finger. I called it the SUPERFINGER (or SU-FI).[1]

    4. Re:Four Fingers...?! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > They even upgraded the three-finger salute ("Zee bird, boss! Zee bird!"). Isn't anything sacred anymore?!
      >
      > Well... a few generations of procreation within your family tree may yield the ability to manipulate a 5 finger stick.

      I knew a guy who could manipulate five joysticks at once.

      He was born with five cocks. Not only was he a great gamer, but as a fringe benefit, he said his pants always fit like a glove.

    5. Re:Four Fingers...?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure his girlfriends were always suprised to find five roosters when he dropped his tighty whities. Ahhh... The Mystery of the Ages...

    6. Re:Four Fingers...?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His name was Chuck Norris...

  2. Looks Interesting by netkid91 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a gamer myself I can't wait to play UT with this thing, it will save me a lot of time switching weapons and I like how it looks. With the weights I can keep from jolting to fast, and the buttons allow for endless possibilites. Time to get rid of the old 3 button optical I have.

    --
    NO~, I read Slashdot because I think it's stupid.....
    1. Re:Looks Interesting by jacksonj04 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is probably /. suicide, but my IntelliMouse Optical does the job perfectly. Two side buttons, left and right click, and a clickable roller. It even works on sandwiches.

      If you find yourself needing a 6 buttoned, a 4-way roller equipped, tilt sensor loaded, dual laser surface scanning, custom weighted hand cooling mouse then you are taking it too seriously.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Looks Interesting by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How would it help you switch weapons? What endless possiblities with the buttons? By the looks of it, or what I can gleam off the weak article, it has adjustable weight (how hard is it to control a mouse, really?), a fourth button somewhere (there's a little red thing on the left side, but the article describes a button high and to the right), and a scroll wheel.

      Other than the weight changing, which I doubt is worth the high price tag that this is likely to earn, this mouse has nothing special going for it. Take the 5+ year old Intellimouse Optical that I'm using, which was one of the first optical mice that didn't require a special mousepad. It has a clicking scroll wheel, and buttons on the left and right sides which are large and easy to press. That's five buttons and a scroll. The endless possilbities!

      Honestly, I don't have a clue about what the parent is on about, or the point of this article at all.

    3. Re:Looks Interesting by Fei_Id · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen. I bought mine for like $15 new. I've never had issues with it; it feels great in my hand. And if you need a ton of buttons to click on the mouse; you need to start learning to use your LEFT hand :)

      Being ambidextrous is a big advantage in many things... though most "professional" gamers are pimply-faced 18 year old kids that weigh 120lbs with 9inch arms (though their right forearm is much larger than the left! I wonder why!??!?)

    4. Re:Looks Interesting by cakestick · · Score: 1

      How else are you going to enjoy one-armed browsing, that's immediately compatible with flight simulator 2004 soon after?

      Progress, my friend..

      --
      I'm not here. This isn't happening.
    5. Re:Looks Interesting by Wisgary · · Score: 0

      HEY! I need that little fan! I'm fat and sweaty and the mouse slips off my fingers you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Looks Interesting by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Why should i bolt for a new fancy mouse, when I can just my current one appart, and superglue a few pennys or nickels inside?

      Most standard wired mice have enough room underneith the palm side of the mouse that you can just take the one screw that holds the mouse together, and then mount a roll of coins, or weights.

      This mouse sounds nifty for the average hardcore gamer (your above average hardcore gamer will still insist on the ole personally made setup)

      I actually took my wireless Logitech mouse apart and superglued a metal tab above the double a batteries. Does me fine.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    7. Re:Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer my 12 degree of freedom setup. Two spheres that I hold in either hand. They have five buttons each as well.

    8. Re:Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I told you I was hardcore!!!!11one

    9. Re:Looks Interesting by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "If you find yourself needing a 6 buttoned, a 4-way roller equipped, tilt sensor loaded, dual laser surface scanning, custom weighted hand cooling mouse then you are taking it too seriously."

      No offense....I mean, I get your point....but at what point do you say you take it too seriously. Everybody is passionate and competitive in something, even if it isn't something you consider worthy of being passionate and competitive about.

      I mean, why buy a Ferrari when your Schwinn works just fine? THe answer: To compensate for something small and inferior.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    10. Re:Looks Interesting by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      I'm sure glad we have you around to tell people what hobbies are and are not worth taking seriously.

      --
      Moo
    11. Re:Looks Interesting by Shelled · · Score: 1

      This is probably /. suicide, but my Apple Optical does the job perfectly. One button, centre click, and a clickable scroller. It even works on sandwiches.

      If you find yourself needing a two side button, left and right click, and a clickable roller mouse then you are taking it too seriously.

    12. Re:Looks Interesting by Disposable+Rob · · Score: 1

      I would say that anything less than the above (plus a rocking scroll wheel) is not what I would consider a complete mouse. I don't even play FPSs. I just take my web browsing very seriously.

    13. Re:Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably /. suicide, but

      FINISH HIM!!!

      FATAL1TY

    14. Re:Looks Interesting by boarsai · · Score: 1

      water cooling my mouse was too much? *sad panda*

    15. Re:Looks Interesting by Soporific · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. My keyboard is watercooled.

      ~S

    16. Re:Looks Interesting by myacong · · Score: 1

      he doesnt need any fancy mouse to play. he was born with optical light on his forhead. you will never survive , fatality rocks

      --
      http://collegefreak ground of the freaks
    17. Re:Looks Interesting by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      But it's a GAMER mouse.

      Yes, my Trident 1meg works fine... for text documents. When I'm gaming, I want something tuned FOR gaming. If I'm working with Office docs, then any mouse will do.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    18. Re:Looks Interesting by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      Especially when Wendel (aka Fatal1ty) does take his computer gaming hobby so seriously it's his job.

    19. Re:Looks Interesting by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, companies laugh all the way to the bank at attitudes like yours.

      "Introducing GAMERS FAX MACHINE! Just like a regular fax machine, but DESIGNED BY GAMERS FOR GAMERS!"

      Oh well, P.T. Barnum and all...

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:Looks Interesting by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      That's a cute over generalization of products geared towards a niche enthusiast markets.

      Simply put, it has an obnoxiously high resolution, a button layout with FPSes and other games in mind, and and an adjustable weight system. Someone who was a gamer designed this mouse.

      The same thing could be said about performance auto parts, like lightweight wheels. I mean, who needs light, alloy wheels when my heavy, stock wheels can do the same job?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  3. Another mouse?? by mgranit11 · · Score: 1

    How many mice do we need? This one looks pretty cool but I'll stick to my normal old mouse.

  4. I don't get it by AutopsyReport · · Score: 5, Informative
    At first glace it doesn't seem to have much to offer beyond your average optical mouse.

    So then why is this on the frontpage of Slashdot?

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:I don't get it by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Either
      • Because at second glance it's does.
      • Because Slashdot is "Time sink for nerds; things that kill a few minutes"
    2. Re:I don't get it by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't get it

      ...You must be new here,

      Welcome to /vertisement...

    3. Re:I don't get it by bohemian72 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Heh, I have a cousin named Andy Gardner. You wouldn't happen to be an artist in New York would you? ;-)

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
    4. Re:I don't get it by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "[Newfangled mouse has four buttons]..so all four fingers have something to do."

      All four fingers? Alrighty...

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    5. Re:I don't get it by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because Steven Williamson, who writes for Hexus, submitted the story to Slashdot with a link to the ad-laden Hexus website. And, if you scroll to the bottom of the Hexus page, you'll see Slashdot listed as "friends of Hexus". I'm sure they are, given that they send a lot of ad revenue their way.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    6. Re:I don't get it by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I, and everybody I know, have four. You have more? Freakshow.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    7. Re:I don't get it by drn8 · · Score: 0

      You said it. I have a Logitech g5 laser mouse that is far superior then this looks (I haven't used it), imho of course. This is just an attempt to market a mouse using fatal1ty's increasing presence in the media. That weight design looks atrocious; and for that matter I prefer to leave the weight cartridge empty in my g5 anyway. Also I'm not sure what type of gamers can't tell the difference between 1600 and 2000 dpi, certainly not hardcore ones, I play a decent amount of online fps and I for one can tell a significant difference between the 2000dpi and 1600dpi settings(for that matter I play with the in-game sensitivity settings jacked as well), I would have to imagine fatal1ty can also tell the difference. I did a good amount of research before I decided to purchase my g5, and I think it was $50.00 very well spent, it has improved my gaming experience immeasurably.

    8. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, and everybody I know, have four. You have more?

      Well I, and everybody I know, have eight fingers.

    9. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I, and everybody I know, have four. You have more?
      Well I, and everybody I know, have eight fingers.
      Well I, and everybody I know, have ten fingers. The thumbs are fingers too. See what happens when you try to be a smart ass.
  5. Sigh... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Best joystick I ever had was an Amiga Power Stick (Atari variety) -- the ones they sold to finance the development of the chipset which eventually became the heart of the Commodore Amiga. They were the best.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Sigh... by jred · · Score: 1

      Fuck that!
      Epyx 550 XJ totally owned.

      Pshaw! "Power Stick". Loser. You probably use emacs... :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:Sigh... by karnal · · Score: 1

      You know what's awesome?

      That's the 2nd time I've seen that joystick mentioned. If I recall, I was in a computer game store - must have been 10 or so - and picked one of those up.

      I don't know why my parents bought me that, but it improved my scores in Parsec (TI99/4a) massively over the crappy standard TI joys...

      And I liked the clickety-clickety-click. Annoyed my siblings though. CLICLKLCKCIECLICKLCLIk..

      Bigger and better things now though, got the MX1000. Pining for a G5 or a G7...

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Sigh... by radish · · Score: 1

      I had one - wasn't called an "Epyx" though, can't remember who made it but it did rock.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Sigh... by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      Man I loved using that joystick! Kicking ass at Lotus Turbo Espirit!

      I still say my Amiga 500/Action Replay was the most fun I ever had with a computer.
      My latest Athlon 64 kicks ass, but it just doesn't have the "WOW... HOLY SHIT" factor as my amiga.

      I dislike fanboys... but I guess I'm a hypocrite in that respect.

      On a side note... using UAE to relive some of my great Amiga days... I noticed... was the UI always so bloody ugly?! (KS/WB 1.4) Must have the worst colour scheme ever.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    5. Re:Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah! I broke like two out of three of them over the life of my C64 and Amiga.. They outlasted most of the other sticks I had, but I was pretty violent towards controllers. These days I'm playing crap like "F.E.A.R." which oughta be called "C.L.O.N.E.D." instead. Gimme C64's Barbarian or the Amiga's Superfrog anyday. CLICKETYCLICKETYCLICKETY, bitches!

    6. Re:Sigh... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I loved Parsec. And Microsurgeon. And Moon Patrol. And Tombstone City... and... *nostalgia overload*

      Never had a fancy joystick though. Just an old Pointmaster that bounced between the TI and the Atari 2600.

    7. Re:Sigh... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      What the hell?!

      Anybody worth their Turrican and Speedball highscores knows the the only Joysticks you'd ever need were the Competition and Competition Pro (red).

      Power stick..bwhaha.. looks like it was made for the physiognomy of dr.zoidberg!

    8. Re:Sigh... by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      Yes, it was butt ugly. But it's got more charm than any OS variant available today. I love my KS/WB 1.3 (1.4 never happened - it got bumped up to 2.0) :)

      It wasn't exactly fast either. And it crashed a lot, seeing as it didn't have any memory protection.

    9. Re:Sigh... by de+Siem · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more, can't beat a micro-switched joystick. I wish they still made them like this for current machines.

      --
      Beating up people in little rooms, if you do it for a good reason you do it for a bad one.
    10. Re:Sigh... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Actually, a while back I saw PC versions offered. No idea about price and whether they're actually the same quality
      as the original. But some googling might find you that info.

    11. Re:Sigh... by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      my girlfriend has a "power stick" as well, best "joy" stick she's ever used she says. i am being replaced by technology...

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
  6. Spell checker by BertieBaggio · · Score: 5, Funny

    "At first glance, the Fatal1ty gaming mouse doesn't look too different from any pther mouse..."

    Looks like the spell checker got pwned by fatal1ty too!

    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    1. Re:Spell checker by Wisgary · · Score: 0

      lmao haha mod this funny you bastareds

    2. Re:Spell checker by Khoa · · Score: 1

      Looks like the spell checker got pwned by fatal1ty too! .... with a name like Fatal1ty, you'd think so, wouldn't you?

  7. Slashvertisment by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Seriosly what's with all the advertisments posing as stories? The admins might as well put up pop-up ads instead of having them pose as stories.

    --
    >
    1. Re:Slashvertisment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We can block popups, though.

    2. Re:Slashvertisment by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, anything that's a product must be kept off slashdot. If anyone stands to make money from the added publicity, it's more important to thwart that than to point slashdotters to a new product that might interest them.

    3. Re:Slashvertisment by Cheapy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, I agree.

      Who wants to hear news about Red Hat, SuSE, the Nintendo Revolution, various video games, new information about science (Grant money is still money!), Apple, book reviews, and music stuff anyways?

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    4. Re:Slashvertisment by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      Now if only we could block all stories, as well...

    5. Re:Slashvertisment by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, products advertise slashdot!

      No?

      I can do better

      In Soviet Russia, Yakhoff Smirnoff watches TV!!!!

      (get it, it's a meta-soviet-russia-joke hahaha)

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  8. Hold on... by Erik+Fish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article says that other mice have adjustable weights, however I was unaware of this. Can someone provide a list of mice with this feature?

    1. Re:Hold on... by tprox · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Logitech G5, for one, comes with a set of weights that you can add to your mouse to suit your needs.

    2. Re:Hold on... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, but I can tell you that Logitech just came out with an optical with switchable weights. Personally, I think this is stupid, since it's an ordinary logitech design. Their argument was that people had been opening mice and voiding their warranty. My counterargument is that base logitech optical mice are practically free. In fact, I just got one at the goodwill store, along with about 20 USGS topo maps of about 18" square, for $1. That's fifty cents for a mouse if you break it down fifty-fifty. Total damage: a slight scuff on the left side. It's even the black one.

      I have personally opened up a mouse like this and removed the weight, already. Mice don't need weight IMO. It's just more mass, meaning slower acceleration, meaning it slows you down, but the friction can do that and the friction's slowdown is controllable - if you press down harder, it's harder to move the mouse. So what's the weight supposed to buy me again?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Hold on... by Thats_Pipe · · Score: 1

      Check out the Logitech G5 or G7. A quick search on Newegg.com will find them. They are laser, with adjustable DPI from 400 to 2000, and have the interchangable weights. The mouse in the article is a joke compared to those two from Logitech.

      --
      "You see them trees out back, I take care of them. I'm a tree, I'm a tree wizard." - Crazy Homeless Guy
    4. Re:Hold on... by aaron_ds · · Score: 1

      Meh, I have a really old Logitech M-BD58. It has a weigh inside attached by a screw. It would be extraodinarily easy to replace it with a heavier or lighter weight. While the process could be made even easier, the functionality is still the same, this "feature" isn't groundbreaking.

    5. Re:Hold on... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. Why would one want to 'decrease' their mouse resolution? Or increase it for that matter? I've never used one of these high-res mice before, so I suppose I just don't know what I'm missing.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    6. Re:Hold on... by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Small error here: the G5 is a wired mouse with adjustable weights, but the G7 is a wireless mouse w/o adjustable weights, it features a pair of unloadable batteries (that you push in the batt loader e.g. you never run out of batteries)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    7. Re:Hold on... by aafiske · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Logitech G5 Gaming Mouse has this feature. I have it, it's wonderful. Nice rubberized-grip, slippy bottom, comfortable feel.

    8. Re:Hold on... by nintendo_is_a_cereal · · Score: 1

      I was over at my friends yesterday and he was showing that thing off. The concept of a mouse with weights was completely foreign to me. I am however not nearly the hardcore FPS gamer he is.

    9. Re:Hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious. Why would one want to 'decrease' their mouse resolution?

      Supposedly it makes it easier when you're sniping (in a FPS) to drop the mouse resolution. Yeah, it's niche.

    10. Re:Hold on... by Munchini · · Score: 2, Informative

      Logitech isn't the only mouse maker with adjustable weights. Razer, who makes the Copperhead mouse, also sells a kit to adjust the weight of the mouse - but its funny to see that it warns that using the kit, which is supplied by them, voids the warranty.

    11. Re:Hold on... by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

      on my G5 I find it better to go to 2000 when I am running around looking for enemies around corners/behind me/whatever. I drop to 1100 dpi for general fragging purposes then I swap to 400-800 for finer control when accuracy counts. I play Natural Selection, which is imo one of the finest mods for Half-Life. I play primarily on the nukedgames server. My handle is Pookie, say hi if you see me.

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
    12. Re:Hold on... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you typically get what you pay for.

      You don't get an obnoxious amount of buttons, nor do you get obscene resolutiosn from your mouse.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    13. Re:Hold on... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I don't seem to need either. A base optical mouse (this is the 2x scanning rate model, although probably all of them are fast now) seems to do the job just fine in any game I play. Granted, I'm not a top player at anything these days but I used to be consistently highly ranked in UT back when I played that... And I was frequently at the top of stat ladders playing mechwarrior IV but that was with a joystick :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Wish I could access the Hexus site, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    but thanks to Slashdot, they've got a server Fatal1ty.

    1. Re:Wish I could access the Hexus site, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Did you cum up with that all by yourself? J00 is teh funnies... lolololol!!!

  10. Slashvertisement extreme by tacokill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, this is just pathetic. Not only is this "review" an advertisement -- it even fucking says it right under the headline!!!!!


    Right there in a graphic "Advertisement".

    News for nerds, my ass.

    1. Re:Slashvertisement extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try looking at the webpage without adblock...

    2. Re:Slashvertisement extreme by darkmeridian · · Score: 2

      "from the product-mascot dept."

      Slashdot has jumped the shark.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:Slashvertisement extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ad is unrelated to the review. When I turned off Adblock, a Netflix ad popped up right under the text in a box. Please mod parent down, or at least switch tag to "funny".

    4. Re:Slashvertisement extreme by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Parent is incorrect. The advertisement tag is for the Netflix ad. The article itself, while most likely a press release spoon fed to them by the company, is not a paid for advertisement. If it was paid for, they are required by law to say so. Of course.....that's just if they're paid in cold hard cash. God knows how many infinite ways they have of masking that up. And I should know, I'm in advertising...*shudders*.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Slashvertisement extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that it looks like shit. >_

  11. Not to be a douchebag, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ampednews broke this story last month, and I'm sure it was submitted to Slashdot (the site owner even admits to wanting slashdot to break it).

    So why didn't Slashdot publish it then?

    1. Re:Not to be a douchebag, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted a bigger pay-off than originally offered.

  12. ugly !! by fireiceviperhotmail. · · Score: 1

    Ive seen a lot of mice in my day but this one gets the reward of being the most ugly
    mouse i have ever seen...

    Julien ^_^ http://free.hostdepartment.com/8/81fortune/

    1. Re:ugly !! by netkid91 · · Score: 0

      never judge a book by it's cover. You may be dating a fat girl but she is a sex godess, what's better, looks or "funcionality" ;)

      --
      NO~, I read Slashdot because I think it's stupid.....
    2. Re:ugly !! by fireiceviperhotmail. · · Score: 1

      You are right. maybe its the best thing since microwaves....

      Julien.http://free.hostdepartment.com/8/81fortune/

    3. Re:ugly !! by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Issue here is that this thing has neither, as far as I see not only doesn't it include any true innovation (innovation, you know, what Razer and Logitech sometimes happen to do with their mices), but it doesn't even use laser sensors (which even Microsoft finally switched to...)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    4. Re:ugly !! by SchrodingersRoot · · Score: 1

      I was going to ask if it was just me.

      On a positive note, this'll make it much easier to bludgeon people to death with your mouse than ever before, a feature that just might make up for its hideousness.

  13. Re:Underwhelming by sidmystic · · Score: 1

    You sure?

    What is different, and perhaps not in a good way, is that this is an optical mouse and not a laser mouse, so the max DPI is only 1600

  14. Who took these photos? A 6 year old? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Informative
    Could we GET any crappier photos of this thing? And that bigass 'Hexus.gaming' watermark doesn't help things.

    Oh, and please lose those mouseover keyword thingies. They come in at about a 9.5 on the Annoy-O-Meter scale

    1. Re:Who took these photos? A 6 year old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Close-ups of a dusty mouse covered in greasy fingerprints don't present very well; if Creative knew about the review beforehand, they should clue in and not let a gaming site do their marketing.

      The reflection from the camera's flash is a nice touch, too. GJ, Hexus.

    2. Re:Who took these photos? A 6 year old? by cution · · Score: 1

      Better sue. There's a law for that now.

    3. Re:Who took these photos? A 6 year old? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      Oh, and please lose those mouseover keyword thingies. They come in at about a 9.5 on the Annoy-O-Meter scale

      Block *.intellitxt.com and they go away.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:Who took these photos? A 6 year old? by gcantallopsr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Watermark? That's full color acid marking :-P

      --
      Try Ubuntu GNU/Linux, it's great!!!
    5. Re:Who took these photos? A 6 year old? by m0rm3gil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Particularly since the ad/article makes such a big deal about the button placement and then fails to supply a single photo that clearly depicts where the right side button is.

  15. Parent is wrong.. by adisakp · · Score: 1

    But sadly, it's not. It has a BALL in it you need to CLEAN because it picks up DUST?

    Did you RTFA??? It's optical. Optical doesn't have a Ball. It's not the latest generation LASER but you won't be cleaning your balls.

  16. Re:Underwhelming by WTBF · · Score: 1

    What is different, and perhaps not in a good way, is that this is an optical mouse and not a laser mouse, so the max DPI is only 1600... but that should be plenty to satisfy even the twichiest gamer.

    No, it is an optical mouse - no ball.

  17. Sucks to be left handed by Krach42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This mouse was clearly not designed to be used equally with both hands... if you're left handed, it's going to be a bitch to use. (Correction, if you use your mouse with your left hand, it's going to be a bitch to use.)

    --

    I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    1. Re:Sucks to be left handed by shdragon · · Score: 1

      This mouse was clearly not designed to be used equally with both hands... if you're left handed, it's going to be a bitch to use. (Correction, if you use your mouse with your left hand, it's going to be a bitch to use.)

      As a fellow leftie...let me just say I'm glad they decided not to compromise. Every mouse that tries to keep things left/right neutral only end up being awkward because they've had to sacrafice comfort & feel to make it "switchable".

      Any task repeated often enough comes to feel like that's the "correct" hand.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    2. Re:Sucks to be left handed by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      As a fellow leftie...

      Actually, in the grand spirit of Americans complaining about things that don't actually effect them, I am in fact a right hander. My dad is left handed though, and I've gotten comfortable enough at using a mouse left handed (because I'm too lazy to move it back to the other side) that it doesn't feel entirely weird.

      let me just say I'm glad they decided not to compromise. Every mouse that tries to keep things left/right neutral only end up being awkward because they've had to sacrafice comfort & feel to make it "switchable".

      True, unless you're going with the symetrical design to begin with, making a switchable version just doesn't work. Of course, offering a mirror-image version that would be produced in smaller quantities for left-handers that insist on having a left-handed version would be a nice consideration.

      Any task repeated often enough comes to feel like that's the "correct" hand.

      As provable by my pool game. I learned pool by emulating my dad. Now, when I start shooting people are confused and think that I'm left-handed. I didn't even think there *was* a "handed" way of playing pool.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    3. Re:Sucks to be left handed by 404notfound · · Score: 1

      Any task repeated often enough comes to feel like that's the "correct" hand.

      Gotta agree there. I'm a leftie, and I've been one my whole life, but I've always used computer mice with my right hand. I wasn't even aware that people did it the other way until several years after I was already quite comfortable with it. I've tried switching to the left hand a few times, but it just feels awkward.

    4. Re:Sucks to be left handed by Chiisu · · Score: 1

      I went w/ the MS Laser Mouse 6000. Perfect for us lefties and actually has a little weight to it, unlike most opticals I've tried

    5. Re:Sucks to be left handed by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Try the razer copperhead. It's an equal-shaped mouse for lefties or righties, comes with the same 2000dpi laser sensor as the logitech G5 and a better way of changing sensitivity on the fly (button+scroll wheel to anywhere on a 1-20 scale rather than 3 pre-defined sensitivities).

      Another nice feature is it stores up to 5 sets of settings (button mappings) in the mouse itself, so you can plug it into any machine without having to reconfigure the mouse every time.

      The 4 side buttons are equally positioned, two buttons per side, so I only tend to use 3 of the side buttons, but the big primary buttons are great.

      Overall, it's a very flexible gaming mouse for people using their left hand for mousing.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  18. MOD PARENT DOWN by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    According to the article, this is an optical mouse; it does not have a roller ball. However, it does not use a laser.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  19. Re:Underwhelming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you thought was a mouseball is actually the interchangeable weights mentioned in both the summary and the article. Nice detective work, Sherlock!

  20. Re:Underwhelming by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

    What ball? Looks like the pop out centre is the changeable weight - it specifically says in TA that it's optical...

  21. Like Golfers, fishing enthusiasts, etc... by IAAP · · Score: 1
    they're all looking for that one product to give them an edge and to compensate for any lack of skill or lack of practice.

    Pretty soon, Callaway will have a line of gaming mice. $500 mouse anyone?

    1. Re:Like Golfers, fishing enthusiasts, etc... by An+Tse · · Score: 1

      Most of the good gamers I know use pretty much run-of-the-mill mice and keyboards. Most of the poor gamers I know use things with all sorts of bells and whistles. Things like this put me in the mind of.... front wheel drive cars with huge downdraft spoilers, spinners on 1998 Saturns, giant fart-cannon mufflers, etc.

  22. Heft by DarkClown · · Score: 1

    What an underused word heft is. I got to use it talking about a chefs knofe the other day and it was the perfect word to use.
    I love this idea for mice - I wish there was a keyboard that had some kind of control over how much resistance keyboard keys offered, and even the control over the key acoustics when depressed, clicky or mushy or whatever.

    1. Re:Heft by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what you mean! The other day I was talking about cutlery, and I needed to use the word knofe.

  23. Re:Hold on... Detailing! by dada21 · · Score: 1

    I have personally opened up a mouse like this and removed the weight, already. Mice don't need weight IMO. It's just more mass, meaning slower acceleration, meaning it slows you down, but the friction can do that and the friction's slowdown is controllable - if you press down harder, it's harder to move the mouse. So what's the weight supposed to buy me again?

    Detailing.

    I find a heavy mouse the only usable mouse when I need to do something detailed (vector art, especially). It requires a little more force to get going, and a little more force to stop.

    Other users of my mouse at home and at the office complain and say I should just decrease sensitivity, but I love being able to flick quick to get across the screen (especially a large screen with a high res). A heavier mouse that is highly sensitive offers me the best of both worlds.

  24. great googily moogily by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    is it just me, or is Fatal1ty like the gayest alias in the history of gaming? for being one of the best gamers there is, he sure picked a noob of a nick.. hehe

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:great googily moogily by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well I think Gayest Faggot in the World is officially the gayest alias in the history of gaming, but Fatal1ty is a close second.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:great googily moogily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gayest? No, that implies some form of sexuality, and anybody with an alias of 'Fatal1ty' is quite clearly a virgin for life.

      PS: Dancy-jism isn't exactly cool either.

      PPS: Don't sound stupid, stop saying "like".

    3. Re:great googily moogily by Danzigism · · Score: 1

      haha Dancy Jism.. ahh.. thats great

      --
      *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    4. Re:great googily moogily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best nick in the world.....Stabby McStab Seen on Beach of RTCW

  25. lefties? by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

    I see the link's image shows the fourth button as a 'thumb button' on the side. question: is there another one on the other side for us lefties? we always get the short end of the stick when it comes to gaming mice and flight-sticks!

    1. Re:lefties? by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

      never-mind: i read the article more carefully. blah. it still seems like bad button placement, though.

  26. Can I press... by thaerin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can I press the shiny, red, candy-like button?

    --
    If big boobed women work at Hooters do one legged women work at IHOP?
  27. I think you all are missing the point... by Quaoar · · Score: 1

    The point of this story was not to highlight a brand new mouse...the point was that this is quite possibly the first product named after a professional video gamer (Although I could be wrong. If someone could provide a counter-example, please do).

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:I think you all are missing the point... by grommit · · Score: 2, Informative

      The fatality line of motherboards from Abit comes to mind.

    2. Re:I think you all are missing the point... by masklinn · · Score: 1

      You are, Creative has already released the X-Fi Fatal1ty sound card quite some time ago (which already had some kind of advertisement for this mouse and the whole "Creative Fatal1ty line of stuff" and a gay-ass statement from fatal1ty himself)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:I think you all are missing the point... by gunmod · · Score: 1

      " professional video gamer " And that is what exactly?

    4. Re:I think you all are missing the point... by radish · · Score: 1

      Well, by definition, someone who earns their living playing games. Next question?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:I think you all are missing the point... by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Fatal1ty already had a lot of licensed stuff, like motherboards and sound cards. This is just another thing.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    6. Re:I think you all are missing the point... by pnglvr · · Score: 1

      There is the high-end range of ABIT Fatal1ty motherboards for gaming PCs, Zalman released versions of the CNPS-7700Cu (CPU cooler) and VF-700Cu (video card cooler) with red heatsink and red LED fans, the Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty edition soundcard, and now this mouse from Creative. Please correct me if there is any more under the name...any more products of which I will not buy.

  28. Missing again by springbox · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen any new "gaming mice" that have any sort of vibration. I'm not giving up my Logitech iFeel mouse until it either breaks or someone puts force feedback into a new mouse. I think it's a good idea anyway.

    1. Re:Missing again by Amouth · · Score: 1

      I love the force feed back mice.. my bigest problem is i am addicted to wire less keybaords and mice.. the preformace is just fine and i don't have to mess with a cable.. sure i change the batts about every 3 months but i use rechargables.. i want nice NORMAL wireless mice.. i hate the ones that are designed to fit your hand.. i can't switch them between left and right.. i have for so long wanted a nice normal force feedback mouse that is wireless

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  29. I saw it at CES 2006 by SixDimensionalArray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *sarcasm* Wow... a fancy mouse! *sarcasm*

    I saw and touched it at the Creative booth at CES 2006. IMHO, it's just another Fatal1ty gimmick, mostly useless bells and whistles. The one touch sensitivity feature was kind of interesting, but seeing as how I only ever adjust the sensitivity ONCE in most games and don't change it much, it is not that practical. The weights might be handy if multiple people game on the same PC, but when I played with it I didn't find a reason to change the weight in the middle of my Quake 4 gaming, for example. I didn't seem to notice the extra accuracy too much. I did feel that the mouse was a little bit small though, somehow didn't have a place to really rest the hand comfortably.

    A little off-topic, but the Creative X-Fi (http://www.creative.com/products/product.asp?cate gory=1&subcategory=208&product=14000) sound system in the same booth was very powerful, and I could feel the chaingun rounds pummeling my chest!

    -6d

    1. Re:I saw it at CES 2006 by masklinn · · Score: 1

      A little off-topic, but the Creative X-Fi (http://www.creative.com/products/product.asp?cate gory=1&subcategory=208&product=14000) sound system in the same booth was very powerful, and I could feel the chaingun rounds pummeling my chest!

      That's not really helping, a sound card isn't supposed to be powerful (and isn't, really), it's supposed to

      • offer a perfect rendering of the data with as few distortion as possible
      • Suck the lowest possible level of ressources from your main CPU
      • Have additional features (high number of voice channels, effects, ...)

      Now the X-Fi line is VERY good at that (slightly lower perfs than the older Audigy lines, but much better quality, and can ramp up to 127 voice channels instead of 63 for the Audigys), but the power itself comes more from the amp and speakers than from the soundcard.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:I saw it at CES 2006 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A sensitivity toggle would be immeasurably useful for sniping.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:I saw it at CES 2006 by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " A sensitivity toggle would be immeasurably useful for sniping."

      No kidding. I play Battlefield 2 and Desert Combat as lot and while I have an optical mouse, it doesn't have as high a resolution as these new mice. When I have my sensitivity set way up high, and then go snipe, I can't move the cursor as precisely. This kind of setting would be very useful, and I can even see it being useful with vehicles or vehicle mounted guns.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:I saw it at CES 2006 by jred · · Score: 1

      A motherfucker I know (and if you've played against him, you'd call him a mofo, too) claims that's how he gets his knifes in CS:S. Normally plays w/ the dpi jacked up, but kicks it way down to knife w/o missing.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    5. Re:I saw it at CES 2006 by TheLink · · Score: 1

      For quake I use a key mapping and alias for changing my mouse sensitivity. It's fairly easy.

      You can combine the sensitivity switching with the zoom in/out keys/events.

      I'm sure you can do this with CS (since it's based on the Quake Engine - has similar console commands) and most decent FPS.

      --
  30. How to block hexus adverts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps if their bandwidth is abused without them getting paid for their spyware and crappy adverts they might seek a more worthy career

    add to your firewall:
    84.12.5.0 - 84.12.5.255
    81.19.48.0 - 81.19.54.255

  31. Why? by drix · · Score: 1

    Enlighten me.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    1. Re:Why? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Enlighten me.

      • Fit in the palm of your hand
      • Work buttons with cradle hand, move stick between forefinger and thumb of other hand
      • Minimal effort to achieve results, very responsive
      • Easily taken apart for cleaning
      • Lightweight, but tough construction
      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Why? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Apparently you've never met an old Amiga user. Don't you know *everything* was better on the Amiga?!?! Games were better, apps multi-tasked better, even food tasted better if you had an Amiga!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    3. Re:Why? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Una Amiga con beneficios?

      (I'd punctuate it correctly, but slashcode won't let me use &iquest;.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But this is pre-AmigaDOS, and for that matter, pre-Amiga-computer... To me it looks a lot like that little Epyx joystick, which was MY favorite from that era, because it had positive feedback, both audible and physical.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enlighten me too. does your name have something to do with bill the cat?

    6. Re:Why? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Was the "Epyx" one the black and red joystick that 'clicked' when you moved the stick? If so I really liked that one too.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    7. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the one. It had a long red button that wrapped around from the side towards the bottom and came in both righty and lefty versions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Why? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Positive feedback?! But that would drive your games into saturation!!!

      Then your OS would upset and you'd have to shut everything down!

      --
      It's been a long time.
  32. Is it like the motherboards? by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    Out of 3 Fatal1ty motherboards I've bought, one arrived DOA, one failed within a few days, and one remains operational. Hopefully the mice are better.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Is it like the motherboards? by AgentDib · · Score: 1

      I hope you only bought the first one and the next two were free replacements.

    2. Re:Is it like the motherboards? by Borg453b · · Score: 1

      Ive been using the Abit Fatal1ty AN8 for a while now. Had a few quirks at first, but after a bios update its been working like it should. Im quite happy about it - and despite some reluntance to utilize the guru panel at first, I must admit that I get a kick out of the LED and front jacks.

      Setup: Athlon 3800+ Venice Core, 1 GB ram (Too little), Asus Geforce N7800 GTX (yup; I am a gamer. Neither pro nor clan player through)

      I based my purchase on this: http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/05/13/life_in_the _fast_lane/page3.html

      Here is an extract from the conclusion of that toms hardware article: At the end of day, two motherboards receive our recommendation: both the Abit Fatal1ty AN8 and MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum Edition offer well-appointed and flexible boards based on top-grade components. These units shine above all through their range of functions and overclocking abilities - the wealth of experience of both manufacturers in the enthusiast market is obvious.

      --

      - Mad, ingenous - they've both left you puzzled -
  33. yeah, but: by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


    ...too bad he just got p0wned.

    ~jeff

    1. Re:yeah, but: by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 1

      Yeah, make a "Nordic" mouse and I'm in.

    2. Re:yeah, but: by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I love comments in the link you posted... saying that Fatal1ty isn't a real pro until he can whip someone in Mariokart or Bust-a-Move.. genius. Unintended comedic genius.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  34. Weight by Life700MB · · Score: 1


    Is really mouse weight that important? Any pro gamer here who cares to tell us about this?


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Superman's cape. No, it doesn't help him fly better, but he feels damn sexy when he's in it. ...

    2. Re:Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok put it this way. The mousepad has a finite amount of friction. You need x energy to break that much friction and get the mouse moving. Once you get the mousemoving it will be moving with the energy you put in multiplied by the weight of the mouse. So a heavier mouse will be moving at a larger force from a stand still. Larger forces are harder to control but provide along of swing and acceleration (i.e once it gets going its really going). So a heavier mice would say whip you around in a FPS faster than a lightermouse but it is near impossible to do pixel targeting due to the friction-force factor. That's the difference. A lighter mouse would be good for BF2 where its long range shooting targets are small and you need to move your mouse very slightly. Heavier mice are better for games like CS where its all about the twitch.

    3. Re:Weight by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Yes! Personally my wrist get tired fast without a very light weight mouse. I am currently using an optical ultra lightweight mouse, and in FPS games it has outperformed every other mouse I ever owned. Including ones with far more buttons and features.

  35. Why would anyone need more than this? by TimSlashdot · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Why would anyone need more than this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a roommate with the same mouse. That thing went through hell and back with all the beating he did to it, and you know what? It still works. I swear I heard that thing hit a desk at least 5 times a day, with a force that can only be described as "heart-wrenching."

  36. Re:Hold on... Detailing! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Some might say that if you want to do detail work and you want to be able to flick across the screen, you should turn down the sensitivity, and turn up the acceleration.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. Another way to get money from the gamer by jcgeuze · · Score: 1

    I've been a gamer since 1999, started with quake. Retired now ;) But I find all these gadgets so useless. Back in the old days we had the same things, better mouse mats etc etc. In the end the guy with alot of skills on his outdated computer with his 4 year old mouse still wins because he is better.

  38. Fatal1ty Becam3 a Stat1stic by writermike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While Fatal1ty is capitalizing on his new-found fame, it should be known that Fatal1ty recently lost his self-titled tournament at CES.

    Which begs the question: Do we really want to buy a mouse named after someone who loses games? I mean, if you really want to do that, then I will soon announce my WriterMike Mouse. From Zero-To-Throwing the Computer Out The Window in 7.5 seconds.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    1. Re:Fatal1ty Becam3 a Stat1stic by blahplusplus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Which begs the question: Do we really want to buy a mouse named after someone who loses games? "

      Everyone loses games, especially in FPS games, no one wins consistently 100% of the time. When I used to play quake and other FPS games on the ladders you had to practice all the f'n time to keep up and people traded wins back and forth when you're very competitive you'll win and lose because the competition is so good.

    2. Re:Fatal1ty Becam3 a Stat1stic by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Everyone loses games, especially in FPS games, no one wins consistently 100% of the time.

      In those aforementioned FPS games, I lose consistently 100% of the time. Therefore, if you were to play me...

      EUREKA!

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:Fatal1ty Becam3 a Stat1stic by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      'Everyone loses games, especially in FPS games, no one wins consistently 100% of the time."

      So let me pose the question that a lot of us are thinking of while we blanch in disgust of this blatent attempt to use celebrity to sell a product (one of the most pathetic ideas I've ever seen).

      "Why should I even care who he is let alone whether he's a winner or a loser. Why should that affect my mouse purchasing decision?"

      The answer? Well, I'm sure you already know that.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Fatal1ty Becam3 a Stat1stic by shark72 · · Score: 1

      This might be a reading comprehension issue. He played about 40 rounds against 40 people over three days and lost once. In sudden death mode, 5-4, to another pro gamer. I was there.

      If you think this makes him a bad player, or even an average player, or even a slighly above average player, you're mistaken.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    5. Re:Fatal1ty Becam3 a Stat1stic by CuriosityKilledWHAT · · Score: 1
      Which begs the question: Do we really want to buy a mouse named after someone who loses games?

      Sorry, can't resist:

      Begging the question

  39. I've seen many ugly things in my life by masklinn · · Score: 1

    but that mouse gets the prize, it's ugly as a sin and looks badly built...

    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  40. Who buys this? by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1

    So, I'm curious.

    I used to be a pretty hardcore gamer, but these days, my time's dominated by school and work. But I still know some really hardcare gamer types, including some competetive Quake players.

    Invariably, when I ask them about fatal1ty, the response I get is either "Who?" or along the lines of "Fuck that nob gobbler!"

    Is this the exception, or is plastering this guy's name on their products basically a waste of money? I mean, independant of the mouse itself - do they thing anyone gives a flying fuck that it says Fatal1ty on it?

    1. Re:Who buys this? by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      The people who care are those who want badly to be hardcore gamers, and think that knowing of a "celebrity" will make them fit in.

      Everyone else just plays the games that they enjoy, may watch or follow the occasional ladder for fun, and gets on with life.

    2. Re:Who buys this? by ENIGMAwastaken · · Score: 0

      Well, sort of. Most of the people who are really into the pro Quake community ( Esreality.com ) think he's a hack. He has a lot hateirs because of the way he dropped Quake 3 to play a bunch of shitty games with no competiton (Aliens vs. Predator comes to mind). Then he claims he's the best Quake 3 player ever, when really he quit before Cooller got good, never consistently beat ZeRo4 and would likely have gotten thrashed by 5 or so other players. He's not the best FPS player in the world, Cooller is, Fatal1ty is just good enough at making himself a brand. But to those people who don't really know a lot about pro-gaming, but know 'about' this Fatal1ty guy, who talks like he's the world champion of video games or something, this endorsement probably has an effect. As for the mouse, I use an MX518 (Which I got cheap) that does everything I'd want it to do. It even has a DPI changer (Though I never use it). I see no real reason to buy the mouse.

  41. Re:Hold on... Detailing! by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Actually, that is what they usually say (I just shrug them off as I've tried it). I prefer a heavier mouse.

    Really odd, thinking back, I was the first person I knew with a mouse. I had an old Compaq luggable PC (anyone remember those? keyboard in the bottom, green screen?) and the local computer store released the first Microsoft mouse. I brought it home, and had nothing to use it on, until my first HP scanner. Whoa, memories.

  42. I never buy anything Fatalonety related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... Not since that crap-ass motherboard with the extra fans that failed in like 15 minutes. seriously, just 'cause he's good at fps games does NOT necessarily mean he's good at anything else.

  43. Nostalgia by wormeyman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good to know slashdot is posting news articles days after the rest of the 'net has reported it it's so nostalgic :D

  44. or how about ... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    ... Steve Ballmer chairs?

  45. Acceleration is evil by MikkoApo · · Score: 1

    The latest Microsoft mouse drivers (IntelliPoint 5.5) have an assignable mouse function called "Precision Booster". When you click (or hold, depending on the mode) the assigned mouse button, you get 2x precision. Another fancy feature was "Gaming Toggle" which allows you to record key macro on the fly with the mouse. Haven't had the chance to try these, but the added precision will be probably used here :)

  46. My take on the G5 by GeekyMike · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife bought me a Logitech G5 mouse for Christmas. It boasts 2000 DPI sensitivity and it can change sensitivity on the fly using 2 buttons below the wheel. you can even specify sensitivity using the included software to up to 5 settings (expanding on 400/800/2000 which works even before installing drivers/software) so everyone is happy. It also includes Teflon pads to reduce friction and a weight cartridge to further customize your controls. The only drawback I can find is the price, but a little shopping around can save a few bucks even after the shipping. No, I dont work for Logitech.

    --
    Beware the fury of a patient man
    - John Dryden
    1. Re:My take on the G5 by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Wow sexy.

      I think the attitude that price is no object as long as the price is worth the added performance.

      I'll check the Logitech one out -- gets good reviews pretty consistently. Thanks!

    2. Re:My take on the G5 by drn8 · · Score: 0

      Ditto, my g5 is the best thing since sliced bread. I posted this above but perhaps I posted too soon.

  47. best joystick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NES Advantage when it first came out. It was the only controller with slow and turbo. You could even play on player 1 or 2 with it.

    1. Re:best joystick by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      NES MAX still smoked it, though.
      NES games are meant to be played with a d-pad, not a joystick.
      I had both, and the MAX is the one I've bothered to hold onto.

  48. Rollover ad for Logitech by Mo+B.+Dick · · Score: 0

    I like how when you roll your cursor over the word "gaming mouse" one of those annoying advertisments pop-up. The funny thing is that the adverstisment is for a logitech gaming mouse.

  49. Funny review by DJCater · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Sig Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  50. Nintendo Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo is making there controller go more for virtuall reality. It is a one handed 'remote'. When you turn the remote, your view moves as well. They only has two buttons ('a' and 'b') along with the 'start' and 'back' button. They are also changing it so that in some games when you are using a sword, you control your weapon with the motion sensor. You can purchase an additional and traditional thumb joystick.

  51. Why is this on slashdot? by AJH16 · · Score: 1

    This mouse looks like a rectangle brick, is really big, not very ergonomic, is only optical and every single "feature" it has is on atleast 3 other mice. Most of which are lazer mice and made by a halfway reputable mouse company, not Creative. This is what we call a marketing ploy to those who worship the ground that Fatal1ty walks on.

    --
    AJ Henderson
  52. Regarding the weight... by Quintios · · Score: 1
    I don't know if someone else has said this, but I think an interchangable weight might be quite useful in games. You wouldn't, perhaps, change the weight mid-game, but you might change it on a game-to-game basis. I could see using a different weight for say, different mods of Quake 4. Or you might change out the weight to play WoW. Or even if you are just surfing the web, you might put the lightest weight in there that you have to reduce strain. Or something.

    I wouldn't buy the mouse, but I could see that (the weight) as being a useful feature on a game-by-game basis, dontcha think?

    --
    Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
  53. Bah... trackballs are better for most gaming by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    I can't stand most games, but especially FPSes with a mouse. Too hard to pull off a lot of moves with a mouse compared to a trackball that I can just flick with my fingertips.

    Then again, I tend to reconfig the default wasd kb config to qwes because it hurts to use the default for a long period, but with the fwd and left/right keys even.. doesn't bother me at all.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    1. Re:Bah... trackballs are better for most gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a 5 button optical track ball and a left handed keyboard. The left handed keyboard is the key because the directional controls are all on the left side for my free left hand. None of that wasd shit for me.

  54. Dual optical sensors for axial rotation? by jlseagull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've thought of hacking together a mouse that had dual optical sensors for axial rotation in addition to the standard translation of a single sensor mouse. User interfaces for 3D CAD programs would benefit - twist to rotate the object. Gaming would benefit - you could circle strafe with one hand by making the twist of the mouse accelerate the strafe. OS GUIs would benefit - click on an object then turn the mouse to activate an option on the context menu.

    Good idea, or invitation for wrist-strain lawsuits?

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    1. Re:Dual optical sensors for axial rotation? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Good idea, or invitation for wrist-strain lawsuits?

      It's not that it's a bad idea, but a cheaper version of the spaceball would, I think, be substantially more useful. Why add one axis when you can add four? I mean, if you're going to get more complicated anyway.

      One reason it IS a bad idea potentially is that we don't usually move mice in a straight line, it's not something our arm really wants to do. So you'll be rotating even when you don't intend to.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Dual optical sensors for axial rotation? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are at least two Logitech mice I'm aware of that use dual sensors: mouseman dual optical and a much newer V400 laptop laser mouse. I only had a regular mouseman optical, so I never researched what could be done with two sensors. There might be a simple software hack to do what you describe... or not, and you'd have to tear apart the poor animals to get two outputs.

    3. Re:Dual optical sensors for axial rotation? by Luctius · · Score: 1

      Good Idea, but might I suggest that the rotation is not activated, unless you hold down a certain button. To prevent unwanted rotations.

    4. Re:Dual optical sensors for axial rotation? by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I'd like to see a trackball which you can also rotate around it's vertical axis.

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    5. Re:Dual optical sensors for axial rotation? by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      That wasn't the goal, but it would be cool too. The point was to have a mouse that could do x'(t) translations in a game (twisting the mouse to the left accelerates strafe or something). I've never been able to use a trackball to play a game.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
  55. "As a gamer..." by js92647 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Time to burn some karma of my own...

    I see there are quite a few "as a gamer" and "as a hardcore gamer" and even a bit of "I play games and..."

    Here's my take on it:

    I don't see a purpose to this mouse. Honestly, you can fit as many buttons in certain places as you want to, but it won't change a goddamn thing. Take a look at your Numpad. Do you honestly use those numbers while playing the game to switch between weapons or select a choice of a menu? As far as I know a lot of gamers use the keyboard. The standard is a 2 button + 1 wheel mouse, and people don't complain.

    Then you have those keyboards that are specifically made for games, like WoW, Call of Duty 2, et cetera. Once again, it's pointless. A regular keyboard does the job as well as that one. You position a few buttons elsewhere to allow leverage, but it doesn't alter the skill of the person, it simply changes the positioning of their hands; their fingers move in an almost exact way as a regular keyboard (noting WASD config).

    I expect them to come out with something like: "You'll get better if you play with this mouse!" or some advertising crap like that. I guess the proper way to put it would be: Just because it suits one person, doesn't mean it suits the rest. I'll stick with my 2 button + 1 wheel optical mouse. It does the job.

    I think fatal1ty is going way over the top with this one. The t-shirts, the accessories, now the mouse? Come on. Ah well, every dog has his day.

    I'll am awaiting someone with a bit more leverage like John Carmack, Chris Taylor or even Bruce Shelly to complain about something regarding computers... THEN I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:"As a gamer..." by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      This mouse is geared towards hardcore FPS gamers, and it has features that a hardcore FPS gamer would presumably like/appreciate, like a design that isn't supposed to hurt your wrist after several consecutive hours of gaming (helps avoid later carpal tunnel too, supposedly), and a design that lets you easily tweak your sensitivity to "just right" - which is something you have to do often at tournaments, when you're playing on a different machine every time. The variable weights are not unique to this mouse, but having it is better than not. Again, it's not supposed to necessarily make you better, it's supposed to make it easier to play longer and more to your own liking. I don't see why people have this much trouble understanding it.

      --
      Moo
  56. Fatal1ty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that pronounced "fay-tal-wun-tee"?

  57. It's just a game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be reasonable it's just a game.

  58. A poor tradesman blames his tools... by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

    Suprise, suprise a slashvertisment :)

    But seriously, why bother? Most mice in the medium price bracket are more than suitable for twitch/fps gaming. IMHO the controller is not going to make a lick of difference, but actually practicing and playing the game lots will do more for improving your performance. Plus reading up on strategy (and not necessarily game specific) also helps.

    As an example to illustrate the point, a friend of mine groks the genre of 1-on-1 fighting games (streetfighter, soul calibur, etc) and regardless of the system or controller or game, he just smashes me and all my friends, even though some of us have practiced and specialised (in characters or games), whilest he's only just seen the game. But conversly, in other types of games we get our revenge.

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  59. The .xls mouse. by youroldbuddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Im still waiting for the in-developement Fatal1ty officemouse. They say it will improve chart generationtimes by up to 10%.

  60. We sure like Hexus by quizzicus · · Score: 1

    Does someone at /. have a nephew that works at Hexus? Do the two sites have some sort of contract? Slashdot's Hexus affinity seems more than just a coincidence.

  61. optical mice for gaming? by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    I have never had much luck with optical mice for gaming; they seem to be "glued" to the desk--you need to lift them much further in order to keep them from tracking. Do other people actually use and like optical mice for gaming?

    1. Re:optical mice for gaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, I take the optical any day. Clean it regulary or glue some thin filt underneath the mouse and that problem will dissappear.

      The problem with the rubber coated ball that is in the normal mouse is that a single hair is enough to make it unresponsive. Suddenly you can not turn or aim and have to jerk the mouse like a maniac in order to survive. In a network game of Counter Strike it can be quite fatal.

      BUT; on most ball mice you can jerk left/right and lift the mouse from the table and the ball keep spinning for a while. That can be an advantage since, if you're experienced enough, you can turn with amasing precision and move about smoothly.

    2. Re:optical mice for gaming? by Divine10 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I find that ball mice are the best for gaming. Call me old-fashioned if you want, but aside from them and trackballs, I don't get the same control from mice. Opticals are very iffy when it comes to gaming, and often skip.

      Currently using a Dell Ball mouse, generic 2 button scrollwheel.

    3. Re:optical mice for gaming? by packslash · · Score: 0

      There are not top gamers using ball mice anymore period. If you think optical mice skip compared to ball mice your only experience with them must be the very first generation of opticals. Optical mice at this stage are superior in every way to ball mice. Proof is in the pudding not one quaker at the last quakecon that was a serious competitor was using a ball mouse.

  62. Awesome! by johncadengo · · Score: 1

    This will sell great in Korea...

    I mean, if you want to play Starcraft of Counter-Strike and play competitively over there, you're gonna need every advantage you can find.

    --
    My page.
  63. you're right food just isn't the same anymore by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    I used to enjoy my Amiga with some fava beans and a nice chianti.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. for some games more is better by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    a 5 button mouse can be a huge improvement. I use an older MS Intellimouse for gaming. It has the standard 2 buttons and wheel (which clicks) plus two side buttons accessible via the thumb.
    In Jedi Knight 2 and Jedi Academy you have weapon selection, force power selection, weapon activation and force power activation. With a five button mouse you can do all of these without using the keyboard.
    In MMOs I put additional things like autorun or camera rotation and reset on the mouse. I also use the thumb button for push-to-talk mode on a VOIP application for talking to clan/guild members.
    For games that have alternate weapon fire, zoom/aim and grenades (such as Call of Duty) - all of these functions can be on the mouse. I would imagine a wheel that tilted left and right would be nice for the look around corner functions as well.
    The more functions I can put on the mouse, the more I can activate without needing to stretch a finger away from the movement keys.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
    1. Re:for some games more is better by Reapy · · Score: 1

      YES!

      Though in ja i still had trouble getting the game to recognize my mouse button 3 and 4 in the key config.

      But anyway, what I keep waiting for when i see "gaming mouse" is a mouse with a lot of buttons. Why are we limited to 5 buttons? I find that i can only easily hit a few keys with my hands on asdw, even then, sometimes you can not move a certain direction and hit another key comfortably at the same time.

      I try to stretch my mouse as far as I can, often I use mouse wheel up as a button, mousewheel down as a button, click as a button, and the side buttons on some of them (current mouse only has 1 extra button :( ).

      I would love to see a mouse that is loaded down with buttons that are easy to hit. Maybe even a design that allows the main left click button to be "broken up" so to speak, where that big area is a few buttons, but out side of a game they act as though they are one... ie any buton you hit in the left click area acts like it is left click.

      I think it is definatly very possible to place lots of buttons to a mouse comfortably. Who needs mouse weight adjustments? Pft, give us some more buttons!!

  66. Fatal1ty by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

    And here I was hoping it had built in electrodes to give you a jolt when you get shot.

  67. But the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    how well does it scan?

  68. The MS Dual Strike is still better by Slugster · · Score: 1

    I'm not seeing a whole lot of innovation here.
    And I have said it before, will keep repeating it likely for a long time--the Microsoft Dual Strike game controller is the best game controller, ever. Those of you who never used one don't know what you missed. And it is useable as a regular mouse as well--for desktop-free net surfing, for example.

    It's only shortcoming was that common action games needed a couple more buttons than it had.
    ~

  69. foot pedals by melbafuckingtoast · · Score: 1

    I hacked a nostromo controller and added foot pedals to it. It's great for Battlefield 2, and the macros are useful (switch from burst to single fire when using a scope, for instance).

    I also use it with 3ds MAX.

  70. wow... by seibed · · Score: 1

    it's even got an e-stop incorporated, just in case that gaming get's the heart beating a little *too* quickly. Nice to see that it comes in that nice, OSHA approved Red.

    I wonder if it stops the game, or just shuts off the computer altogether.

  71. easy to block all stories.. by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

    Type this into your address box and hit enter..

    http:///

    --
    If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
  72. New gaming marketing mouse by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Creative: Hey Mr. Fatal1ty, can we pay you $20,000 to put your name on this average mouse?
    Fatal1ty: You betcha.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  73. Re:Underwhelming by sw96 · · Score: 0

    I like it. It's not the weight or fancy buttons that excit me, but the fact that it looks like a _BIG_ comfy optical mouse. A lot of the newer mouses are to damn small and uncomfortable. I'll stick with my MS Explorer 4 until some reviews come out, though.

  74. the internet is not the radio by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    If it was paid for, they are required by law to say so.

    You are confusing FCC regulations banning radio payola with infomercials. The mouse piece is clearly a commercial masquerading as published content. This is the second Hexus link from Slashdot this week that screams advertisement.

    Seth

  75. Logitech G5 Laser Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logitech already sells a mouse with all these things, plus it's got a frickin laser on it's forehead.

    http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/details /US/EN,CRID=2464,CONTENTID=10715

    1. Re:Logitech G5 Laser Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, that is a real gamer's mouse.

  76. Mice DPI and speed on xorg by proxima · · Score: 3, Informative

    a mere 1600 DPI but that should be plenty for most

    I'd be wary of buying such a mouse for use on a Linux/BSD system. I realize, though, that most gamers use Windows. It would seem that under many circumstances, there is no way to set the speed of a mouse in xorg/xfree86. Sure, you can set the acceleration, but if you happen to have, say, a shiny new Logitech Cordless MouseMan Optical (800dpi), the thing is so fast that you have to set the acceleration to be

    Why is losing mouse acceleration a big deal? It means that you cannot move across the screen with a quick movement while maintaining the ability to make small movements easily. It turns out that in operating system like Mac OS X, they actually "decelerate" for very slow movements - it takes a greater distance to move one pixel. I had never noticed these things before.

    This issue is already on the TODO list and in their bugzilla system submitted by someone else. The goal is eventually to have a much smarter system for mouse speed and acceleration, to suit all tastes. I hope it gets some attention (perhaps as an add-on to the new X11R7), as right now I went back to an older mouse that works with acceleration (but isn't optical).

    My mouse is simply incredibly fast (and I can't imagine another reason than the doubled dpi from most mice) - plugging it into my Mac Mini showed it was much faster than a wired Logitech optical mouse, and the discrete settings Mac OS X offered for mouse speed proved either too slow or too fast. I think the bundled Logitech software allows for finer control of mouse movement, though.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  77. Worst Review Ever??? by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    I am trying to figure out if there are technical difficulties with the website, or if the article really ends the way it does. So much for English 101.

    This comment has me really scratching my head...

    Next up are the buttons themselves... Creative say that this is a 'whole hand' mouse and where you might find a fourth button as one of a pair under your thumb on the left side or perhaps even over on the right (as with the Razer Copperhead), the Fatal1ty mouse has this button mounted on top next to the right mouse button meaning all four fingers have something to do. How this would work in non-games apps with right clicking wasn't tested by us as we were too busy taking the mouse apart to see the final feature.


    Can someone please translate?

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  78. Bill by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Enlighten me too. does your name have something to do with bill the cat?

    What do you think?

    BTW that is my old MI license plate, which I still have.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  79. $50 for this? by MortimerV · · Score: 1

    If this other article I found can be believed, the mouse is going to go for $49.

    Why that much? It does nothing new, it's not even a laser, and frankly, it just looks plain ugly. I can pick up a Logitech G5 for the same price now, and it has all the features of this Fatal1ty mouse, plus it's a laser. I own a G5 and it's accurate on any surface, and it's a noticeable improvement from my now deceased optical mouse.

    Really, I'm mystified. How do they hope to justify that price tag?

  80. I may be a little bit of a fanboy.. by tapehands · · Score: 1

    But the, "First off, we've got the whole switchable DPI thing, something RAPTOR GAMING and Logitech have been doing for a while with Razer following along too...." line irked me.

    Yes. I own a Boomslang 2000, and have since around 2000 or 2001 (I'm going senile already)..and at that point in time, the mice were already a year or more old. Saying that Razer is "following along" is tantamount to saying, "Yaknow. Rio totally road Apple's coattails on the whole MP3 player thing." I'd even say that if it wasn't for Razer, the gaming mouse market wouldn't be what it is today. That's just me being nostalgic about ball mice, though.

  81. Not buying it by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    I didn't buy Air Jordans when those were the thing, and I'm not buying a Fatal1ty mouse now. I like my Logitech.

  82. Creative??? by goarilla · · Score: 1

    Since when does creative makes mouses

    Anyway i have a logitech g5 laser mouse and it has exact the same features
    adjustable weight (cartridge) that looks way cooler then the creative's ??? whats that ...
    it seems like they made it from an old trackball
    I also have a lot of buttons and sensitivity control (dpi thing which imho is the handiest feature of them all)

    and my scroll wheel goes :
    scroll up, scroll down, scrolbutton, scrollstrafeleft, scrollstraferight (although i haven't find a good use of the last 2 in gnu/linux)

    Anyway i saw that advertisement and the mouse looked dirty, like it had been
    sitting on a dust polluted table for years But i'm very happy with my g5. It beats
    my M$ Intellimouse explorer by miles!

  83. Re:Underwhelming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My error. There are some optical mice that actually do have a ball, and the optics looks at the ball, and I thought this was one of them.

    Of course, it certainly did take 5 people to point this out.

  84. Best pad for optical rodents... by redblue · · Score: 1

    After much experimentation I found that canvas gave the best sensitivity for optical mouse. You can get them cheap at art supplies store. You use the untreated/uncoated surface. On normal pads, gunk accumulates underneath the silicone feet -- the rough surface of the canvas also provides constant cleaning action.

  85. Heh. by Lemental · · Score: 1

    Nostromo N52 and a wireless intellimouse explorer 2.0. Works for me.

  86. This is all well and good but by AkA+lexC · · Score: 0
    --
    -AlexC
  87. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of my friends seem to use their scroll-mice two fingered already (only two fingers on mouse at the same time, others off side). I think I'm the only one using three fingers and this mouse is my kind's holy grail :)

  88. Sadly, I think you are wrong. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    It has taken me many years of playing and getting my ass handed to me, but I finally understand why trackballs are inferior to mice.

    If my wife can beat me in Quake 3, there is a problem.

    It took me awhile to believe that a mouse was better than keyboard, but ultimately it was plainly freaking obvoius. It's not quite as obvious with trackball vs mouse.

    The problem is, you can only move the trackball as far as the ball can go, at which point you must take your finger off the ball, or spin it without touching it. It is a black art that can be developed, and in my prime I could pwn a server or two (if the people were sucky enough, haha).... But a mouse with a pad gives you far more room to move... In the same way that a car is easier to drive with a full steering wheel than with a ps2 controller. Can you imagine driving a real card with a ps2 controller?

    I like that I can turn my wheel about 4 feet (circumference). It gives me many many many different millimeters of choice. The PS2 controller?? gives you about 10 millimeters of choice. It is a similar concept with mouse vs trackball.

    Sadly, I mouse left-handed and use the arrow-pad right-handed. Trackballs tend to be asymmetrical (mine anyway) and sit in my lap which is very convenient considering i play in my recliner on my 36'' tv like I would any other game. Most mice are not asymmetrical.

    Consequently, switching from mouse to trackball will now mean aiming with my right-hand instead of my life, moving with my left hand instead of my right, and moving with keys on the left side of the keyboard instead of the right. It is going to be a total mindfuck to switch and I am sure it will take me months to adjust.

    But I have, finally, after 10 years, accepted the inferiority of the trackball just as I did the keyboard during the Doom2 days.

    Curious: If you play Quake3, what is your \sensitivity and \cl_mouseaccell set to?

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  89. Re:No, I'm New Here by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

    Hey, you're back! Hooray! Rock on N.H.