It's far easier to use an entire a.b.c.* as a logical sub-domain than fiddling with netmasks and all that stuff so that a.b.c.1 and a.b.c.200 are on different subnets.
It's also easier to have a flat/16 where everyone's just plugged into nested switches and served off one DHCP server. But it doesn't bloody scale.
Speaking as a Brit, may I be the first to apologise for our 'crappy' accents. I have written to our prominent thinkers asking them all to pretend to be from New York when delivering speeches in future.
Thanks for drawing this shortcoming to our attention.
What id dont get is why if someone hacked my email, there is no way theyd get a penalty like that.
Unfortunately, exactly right. If you haven't lost serious money in a security breach, don't even bother ringing law enforcement. (I work in computer security, and have appeared in legal proceedings so I know whereof I speak.)
It's true; Dawkin's is a good scientist, but evolutionary theory has nothing to say on the existence of God. Personally, I don't believe in the Christian God, but science does not demonstrate his non-existence. (Yes, I am a scientist.)
I am prepared to listen to rational argument, but I don't appreciate being told I have to believe the One True Way by religious fundamentalists *or* atheistic zealots.
Gaaah! Goedel proved that no sufficiently complex system (at least integer arithmetic) could be consistent and complete. Meaning, that there would be at least one true statement which was not provable or that there would be one false statement which was provable.
It is perfectly possible to collect a set of proofs, all of which are correct and provable in a given system.
Yes, but it no-one claimed that the system would be complete, just that it would be consistent - which is perfectly possible and not really any different to the way we all do maths right now.
"In trials using 140 volunteers those told to act suspicious were detected with 'about 78% accuracy on mal-intent detection, and 80% on deception,' says a DHS spokesman."
None of that matters - what's important is the false positive rate, ie. the proportion of people with no malicious intent who get flagged up. If it's as high as 1% the system will be pretty much unworkable.
Slashdot Mirror
You work in tech support?
STARTTLS is your friend. http://www.homeport.org/~adam/starttls.html
It's also easier to have a flat /16 where everyone's just plugged into nested switches and served off one DHCP server. But it doesn't bloody scale.
sudo nmap -T insane -O 0-255.0-255.0-255.0-255
With security flaws like this! http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9954408-7.html
You could hawk penis enlargment pills by spam, but really send them cyanide. That would cut it down a bit.
M-x overthrow-government
The closest category they have is "couldn't get him for anything, but he looks a bit dodgy and his eyes are too close together."
Thanks for drawing this shortcoming to our attention.
Unfortunately, exactly right. If you haven't lost serious money in a security breach, don't even bother ringing law enforcement. (I work in computer security, and have appeared in legal proceedings so I know whereof I speak.)
I am prepared to listen to rational argument, but I don't appreciate being told I have to believe the One True Way by religious fundamentalists *or* atheistic zealots.
"A plague on both your houses" is the correct line (from Romeo and Juliet)
Because he is not a sensationalist twat (cf Richard Dawkins).
She doesn't - she prefers Manhunt 2.
Oh, shut up. Ardbeg 10 yr old is very drinkable for one.
Mod parent up. Brian Krebs is about the only journo that I trust to report security stuff accurately.
It is perfectly possible to collect a set of proofs, all of which are correct and provable in a given system.
Yes, but it no-one claimed that the system would be complete, just that it would be consistent - which is perfectly possible and not really any different to the way we all do maths right now.
It's OK - they already assume everyone who isn't white is Osama Bin Laden.
Fiber To Transfer Porn?
Because I have
a. done meaningful scientific analysis
b. used Excel
I've actually used a combination of perl, matlab, C, weka and pen and paper, so that might sound even worse, but it's not :)
I'd rather bury the head of the IOC in the sand. Will that do?
"Compiling!" http://xkcd.com/303/
No wonder most admins have given up and simply refuse to route packets to 10/8. Stop the insanity!
None of that matters - what's important is the false positive rate, ie. the proportion of people with no malicious intent who get flagged up. If it's as high as 1% the system will be pretty much unworkable.