Consumption tax is plain retarded. For example, someone like Warren Buffet, who has billions in cash, almost never buy anything expensive. He lives in a $36000 house he bought over 40 years ago, drive a $3000 used car. If consumption tax is implemented, he would pay almost no tax at all, compare to the hundreds of million dollars he's paying now each year.
plus, wikipedia search can just adopt the google algorithm, good information usually get more traffic and sites/pages with good traffic level rank on top.
I hate the deletionists, I had to fight them for almost every article I wanted to create. I don't know how they became dominant on almost all wikipedias
that just means people are over-paying for their iPhones, which is pretty much the same for all other over-priced apple products too, good thing only 2.5% of the market likes to buy over-priced products.
No you are wrong, the handset price will drop instead of rise, because of competition, they will sell for very little profit and thus benefiting consumers.
Um no, some of the people he stole from were charities who provide assistance to children and seniors, there are people who are starving now and some are homeless because of Madoff.
The clients of Madoff kinda deserved it due to their greed. A lot of his clients knew the returns can't possibly be real, but still went along with it, some clients even withdrew everything before the scam came to light (they now have to pay back part of their gains). It is like those HYIP on the internet, everyone know it is a scam, but they still buy into it hoping it last long enough to make a lot of money and withdraw everything before it goes bust.
65B is worth a lot of human life, you can hire thugs to kill someone for you for a couple thousand dollars Or if you want to hire high end professional hitman, it cost about $100k per kill. You can conquer a small country with 65B worth of hired mercenaries.
Um no, the rich buy more expensive things, therefore pay more in taxes. The poor person buy $1000 used cars, the rich buy $50000+ sport cars, how is that regressive?
Exactly, the popularity of Firefox has shown us that if you build a better product, people will switch. Firefox is now near 20% market share and continue to gain market share every month.
Yep, NEVER ship to Italy. You'll ALWAYS get burned
it's easier to spoof a MAC than IP
Actually IBM has shipped almost all their engineering jobs overseas to India and China.
eBay and their subsidiary paypal is likely the most evil companies I've ever dealt with.
Everything in the universe can be broken down to binary data.
Consumption tax is plain retarded. For example, someone like Warren Buffet, who has billions in cash, almost never buy anything expensive. He lives in a $36000 house he bought over 40 years ago, drive a $3000 used car. If consumption tax is implemented, he would pay almost no tax at all, compare to the hundreds of million dollars he's paying now each year.
If history taught us anything, it is that professional armies almost always wins. THIS IS SPARTA!
Actually cancer would kill all humans if the other 75% didn't develop a fatal disease before cancer had a chance.
plus, wikipedia search can just adopt the google algorithm, good information usually get more traffic and sites/pages with good traffic level rank on top.
I hate the deletionists, I had to fight them for almost every article I wanted to create. I don't know how they became dominant on almost all wikipedias
They already have sites like that, facebook imitators are prospering in China. Facebook is just trying to get a piece of the pie.
that just means people are over-paying for their iPhones, which is pretty much the same for all other over-priced apple products too, good thing only 2.5% of the market likes to buy over-priced products.
Half-life has OpenGL mode
Well Yahoo is using Bing's engine now anyway, so it's ok.
Why is it a crime to modify something you purchased and will enjoy in the privacy of your own home?
No you are wrong, the handset price will drop instead of rise, because of competition, they will sell for very little profit and thus benefiting consumers.
Um no, some of the people he stole from were charities who provide assistance to children and seniors, there are people who are starving now and some are homeless because of Madoff.
The clients of Madoff kinda deserved it due to their greed. A lot of his clients knew the returns can't possibly be real, but still went along with it, some clients even withdrew everything before the scam came to light (they now have to pay back part of their gains). It is like those HYIP on the internet, everyone know it is a scam, but they still buy into it hoping it last long enough to make a lot of money and withdraw everything before it goes bust.
65B is worth a lot of human life, you can hire thugs to kill someone for you for a couple thousand dollars Or if you want to hire high end professional hitman, it cost about $100k per kill. You can conquer a small country with 65B worth of hired mercenaries.
NEW HAMPSHIRE, it is the most free place on earth.
oh I'm sure no one ever backup their 1.5 GB photo collection on another drive.
Um no, the rich buy more expensive things, therefore pay more in taxes. The poor person buy $1000 used cars, the rich buy $50000+ sport cars, how is that regressive?
Why would you not show your ID when asked by the police, unless you have something to hide.
Yes I'm sure the entire world model their OS market share data based on your tech conference observations.
Exactly, the popularity of Firefox has shown us that if you build a better product, people will switch. Firefox is now near 20% market share and continue to gain market share every month.