I don't think TFA is claiming that sugar is actually toxic, merely that it should be thought of as toxic in large quantities like anything else that is bad for you. I wouldn't drop sugar altogether, there's nothing wrong with having some now and then, naturally occurring and otherwise.
A label is a label of course and ultimately it should be up to the individual if they want to get really fat or not.
I have to agree. The only reason I have not purchased this game is because I have been waiting for it to go on sale. I've tried the demo, it was an ok, clever puzzle game, but not worth $20...to me anyway. Especially since a lot of the distribution and production costs are next to nothing for a digital download.
This 90% piracy figure is artificially skewed by the fact that if this game was cheaper, a lot more people would have purchased it. When such a high percentage of people feel entitled to enjoy this game without paying is another matter entirely.
What you just described sounds mind-numbingly boring to me. I don't play games to compete with egos, I play games to escape and challenge my mind. I can't recall how many hours I've put into Baldur's gate 1 + 2 back in the day, but it would have been quite a long time. More recently, I've been playing "uplink" by introversion and it totally consumed me for a week or two and it is almost 10 years old. Point being that if I want to interact with people or compete and have fun, I can do that in the real world.
That could be said vice-versa to console games as well. Personally, I can't stand FPS's, RTS's, MMORPG's or RPG's on consoles. Nintendo has that niche which neither PS3 or Xbox360 can fulfil either at least until playstation move and microsoft kinect come out. I liken it to the old pong consoles of the late seventies. It did one thing well and that was pong. Sure Nintendo has their popular IP's, but that's about it aside from party games. PC's on the other hand have the potential to do everything and are only limited by what is developed for it. As soon as my PC can play Wii sports, I will officially have no use for that thing.
Obviously this tied selling scam originated within the retailer, whether at the salesman or managerial levels, we have no idea. Considering though that commission on accessories are a salesman's best friend and the profit margin on marked up accessories are very lucrative for retailers, both would benefit from this policy. However, since tied selling in instances like this is generally illegal, I doubt the retailer as an entity would ever approve a policy like this. Most likely, this idea was hatched from a greedy little salesman or department manager so they could afford new spoilers for their shitty tuner cars.
I haven't paid for cable since 1998 or so and have been quite happy with my setup. Though I actually just took the plunge about a month or so ago and signed back up at $10 a month for a year as part of some promotion. I was hoping that the technology had matured enough to meet my expectations, but sadly I was mistaken. Glitchy hardware, static, repetitive programming and overall poor quality of content is an absolute deal-breaker for me. I will be canceling fairly soon I think, as even $10 a month is not worth the headaches of this system.
This isn't as black and white as it might seem. Had the cheques that were deposited in your brother's account cleared through the other bank? Are there any limitations in the amounts he can deposit?
There are restrictions in place in most banks to prevent fraud. I'm sure the vast majority of people are trustworthy enough to handle themselves without limitation. Except what happens when the cheque you deposit is fraudulent and the other bank refuses to put it through and you've already spent all that money? That's right, unlimited liability for unlimited transactional freedom...except that (at least in Canada) the bank is primarily responsible for negative account balances where credit isn't signed for. The bank has no recourse but to file legal charges and it really doesn't end well for anybody.
As for the fees, banks are always looking to increase their profits. However, there are ways around paying any fees (visa for day to day transactions not using the teller etc.), you just have to be smart about it and devise a workable strategy within the banks line of products. If they can't offer you anything feasible, be a good consumer and refuse to bank there. You may even get fees waived for a year.
There is also the factor of poor weather and crop yield creating a necessity to import grapes in order to actually have production at all. It is misleading, but a fair argument against prejudice towards region.
BTW, it's Okanagan...we aren't known for our oak trees or casks.
I agree, he seems very disingenuous. He has all these plans, but no way to implement them. It's like the election is one big ego trip for him. Harper was just at the right place at the right time. The economy would have done well with or without him, simply because none of the other candidates have the gumption to change the status quo. While Elizabeth May does talk out of her ass every now and then, she does have a freshness to her that is a nice change from the rotting bucket of chum everyone else can claim to reside in.
Sony really hasn't learnt it's lesson with the minidisc. It was prohibitively priced as well, lacked selection and was hard to justify switching to with the alternatives available.
Just this weekend, I was trying to find season 4 of "Kenny vs Spenny" at HMV, it was only available on DVD. I checked out the Bluray selection, all they had that piqued my interest was "Planet Earth" which was $90 CAD. I thought maybe one day, but not today. I bought my regular old DVD and left the store in the hopes that one day I will have enough disposable income to justify the purchase later on.
For as much as Sony and other electronics manufacturers want us to embrace and upgrade to bluray, they sure do make it a difficult transition. And of course the catch 22 is that costs will remain high if production isn't ramped up and production won't be ramped up unless there is demand for it and there won't be demand unless the price goes down.
The people with the problem of charging for incoming texts are mainly the ones without a contract and pay as they go. I think the telecom's strategy here isn't simply to charge more fees, but to entice the pay as you go customers to actually get into a contract as a solution to avoid paying the fees. It is interesting that all the CDMA carriers have gone ahead with this initiative while the sole GSM carrier Rogers/Fido hasn't. This would indicate that there is a collusive anti-competitive agreement between telus and bell and that in order to switch to rogers the customer will have to buy a new phone.
Thankfully, there was a spectrum auction a little while back and there is more competition on the way. Once these new upstarts get going, I am going to switch without hesitation and hope that telus, bell and rogers learn something about customer retention.
Ummm, you do realize that the existence and acceptance of capital punishment in your country is the same as saying it is OK. I'd say the facts are as straight as they get.
I left just after the credits started. Thankfully, I suppose, after reading your reaction. I only really noticed a couple of products featured throughout namely LG and Audi, though I wasn't put off by them as intruding.
I always thought he made a better composer than lyricist. I find however, that good music often gets burdened with insipid, uninspired lyrics. That's why pop tends to do best at shallow depths I suppose.
I think you nailed it on the head there. People generally don't want to have to research things in order to accomplish simple tasks on their computer. I know I got pretty fed up trying to get my second video signal out to my TV, I can only imagine if someone is simply trying to play an mp3 and they are having a hard time. In the end, that person would wonder if the time and aggravation is worth a free OS.
This brings up a good point. Being from Canada my government is currently working to get the government in Afghanistan on its feet using tax dollars and our military. If this is the sort of thing that passes for government(at least the senate anyway) there then I believe we have no business working to give them more power. I'm sure the alternative is a little more barbaric, but at least it isn't masquerading as a civilized democracy.
If my government wants to help out a nation working to get similar ideals as our own, then I would have no problem with it. This is just completely counter-productive to our interests in a humanitarian capacity. Though I can't speak for our political or strategic interests.
Chuck Norris has already won and now owns Penguin. The string of fate flows through his third eye thus making him omnipotent. Any thought, action or desire is his simply by willing it. Chuck Norris will pile-drive you into a human fence post surrounding his expansive fortress in the north pole if you don't agree.
Slashdot Mirror
Way to generalize things. To be fair, judging by this post I have to assume you are american because only they can be this badly misinformed.
I don't think TFA is claiming that sugar is actually toxic, merely that it should be thought of as toxic in large quantities like anything else that is bad for you. I wouldn't drop sugar altogether, there's nothing wrong with having some now and then, naturally occurring and otherwise.
A label is a label of course and ultimately it should be up to the individual if they want to get really fat or not.
I have to agree. The only reason I have not purchased this game is because I have been waiting for it to go on sale. I've tried the demo, it was an ok, clever puzzle game, but not worth $20...to me anyway. Especially since a lot of the distribution and production costs are next to nothing for a digital download.
This 90% piracy figure is artificially skewed by the fact that if this game was cheaper, a lot more people would have purchased it. When such a high percentage of people feel entitled to enjoy this game without paying is another matter entirely.
What you just described sounds mind-numbingly boring to me. I don't play games to compete with egos, I play games to escape and challenge my mind. I can't recall how many hours I've put into Baldur's gate 1 + 2 back in the day, but it would have been quite a long time. More recently, I've been playing "uplink" by introversion and it totally consumed me for a week or two and it is almost 10 years old. Point being that if I want to interact with people or compete and have fun, I can do that in the real world.
Oh yeah, I completely forgot about that. Probably because I never played a MW2 LAN session. So many regrets...
I didn't know Mechwarrior 2 had multiplayer.
That could be said vice-versa to console games as well. Personally, I can't stand FPS's, RTS's, MMORPG's or RPG's on consoles. Nintendo has that niche which neither PS3 or Xbox360 can fulfil either at least until playstation move and microsoft kinect come out. I liken it to the old pong consoles of the late seventies. It did one thing well and that was pong. Sure Nintendo has their popular IP's, but that's about it aside from party games. PC's on the other hand have the potential to do everything and are only limited by what is developed for it. As soon as my PC can play Wii sports, I will officially have no use for that thing.
Obviously this tied selling scam originated within the retailer, whether at the salesman or managerial levels, we have no idea. Considering though that commission on accessories are a salesman's best friend and the profit margin on marked up accessories are very lucrative for retailers, both would benefit from this policy. However, since tied selling in instances like this is generally illegal, I doubt the retailer as an entity would ever approve a policy like this. Most likely, this idea was hatched from a greedy little salesman or department manager so they could afford new spoilers for their shitty tuner cars.
I haven't paid for cable since 1998 or so and have been quite happy with my setup. Though I actually just took the plunge about a month or so ago and signed back up at $10 a month for a year as part of some promotion. I was hoping that the technology had matured enough to meet my expectations, but sadly I was mistaken. Glitchy hardware, static, repetitive programming and overall poor quality of content is an absolute deal-breaker for me. I will be canceling fairly soon I think, as even $10 a month is not worth the headaches of this system.
This isn't as black and white as it might seem. Had the cheques that were deposited in your brother's account cleared through the other bank? Are there any limitations in the amounts he can deposit? There are restrictions in place in most banks to prevent fraud. I'm sure the vast majority of people are trustworthy enough to handle themselves without limitation. Except what happens when the cheque you deposit is fraudulent and the other bank refuses to put it through and you've already spent all that money? That's right, unlimited liability for unlimited transactional freedom...except that (at least in Canada) the bank is primarily responsible for negative account balances where credit isn't signed for. The bank has no recourse but to file legal charges and it really doesn't end well for anybody. As for the fees, banks are always looking to increase their profits. However, there are ways around paying any fees (visa for day to day transactions not using the teller etc.), you just have to be smart about it and devise a workable strategy within the banks line of products. If they can't offer you anything feasible, be a good consumer and refuse to bank there. You may even get fees waived for a year.
There is also the factor of poor weather and crop yield creating a necessity to import grapes in order to actually have production at all. It is misleading, but a fair argument against prejudice towards region.
BTW, it's Okanagan...we aren't known for our oak trees or casks.
There is No "one" point where the body stops working.
Actually, I believe its called death.
I agree, he seems very disingenuous. He has all these plans, but no way to implement them. It's like the election is one big ego trip for him. Harper was just at the right place at the right time. The economy would have done well with or without him, simply because none of the other candidates have the gumption to change the status quo. While Elizabeth May does talk out of her ass every now and then, she does have a freshness to her that is a nice change from the rotting bucket of chum everyone else can claim to reside in.
Sony really hasn't learnt it's lesson with the minidisc. It was prohibitively priced as well, lacked selection and was hard to justify switching to with the alternatives available.
Just this weekend, I was trying to find season 4 of "Kenny vs Spenny" at HMV, it was only available on DVD. I checked out the Bluray selection, all they had that piqued my interest was "Planet Earth" which was $90 CAD. I thought maybe one day, but not today. I bought my regular old DVD and left the store in the hopes that one day I will have enough disposable income to justify the purchase later on.
For as much as Sony and other electronics manufacturers want us to embrace and upgrade to bluray, they sure do make it a difficult transition. And of course the catch 22 is that costs will remain high if production isn't ramped up and production won't be ramped up unless there is demand for it and there won't be demand unless the price goes down.
The people with the problem of charging for incoming texts are mainly the ones without a contract and pay as they go. I think the telecom's strategy here isn't simply to charge more fees, but to entice the pay as you go customers to actually get into a contract as a solution to avoid paying the fees. It is interesting that all the CDMA carriers have gone ahead with this initiative while the sole GSM carrier Rogers/Fido hasn't. This would indicate that there is a collusive anti-competitive agreement between telus and bell and that in order to switch to rogers the customer will have to buy a new phone.
Thankfully, there was a spectrum auction a little while back and there is more competition on the way. Once these new upstarts get going, I am going to switch without hesitation and hope that telus, bell and rogers learn something about customer retention.
Ummm, you do realize that the existence and acceptance of capital punishment in your country is the same as saying it is OK.
I'd say the facts are as straight as they get.
I tried leaving a little comment, but it appears to be broken or non-supportive of firefox. Oddly enough his blog is supportive of IE. Oh the irony!
I left just after the credits started. Thankfully, I suppose, after reading your reaction. I only really noticed a couple of products featured throughout namely LG and Audi, though I wasn't put off by them as intruding.
I always thought he made a better composer than lyricist. I find however, that good music often gets burdened with insipid, uninspired lyrics. That's why pop tends to do best at shallow depths I suppose.
Johnny 5 IS alive!
I think you nailed it on the head there. People generally don't want to have to research things in order to accomplish simple tasks on their computer. I know I got pretty fed up trying to get my second video signal out to my TV, I can only imagine if someone is simply trying to play an mp3 and they are having a hard time. In the end, that person would wonder if the time and aggravation is worth a free OS.
I only wish the major labels would get some talent to make this service worthwhile.
The whole point was to produce the batteries cheaply...
This brings up a good point. Being from Canada my government is currently working to get the government in Afghanistan on its feet using tax dollars and our military. If this is the sort of thing that passes for government(at least the senate anyway) there then I believe we have no business working to give them more power. I'm sure the alternative is a little more barbaric, but at least it isn't masquerading as a civilized democracy. If my government wants to help out a nation working to get similar ideals as our own, then I would have no problem with it. This is just completely counter-productive to our interests in a humanitarian capacity. Though I can't speak for our political or strategic interests.
Chuck Norris has already won and now owns Penguin. The string of fate flows through his third eye thus making him omnipotent. Any thought, action or desire is his simply by willing it. Chuck Norris will pile-drive you into a human fence post surrounding his expansive fortress in the north pole if you don't agree.