One self-rightious twit bitching on another self-rightious twit for blaming a third self-rightious twit for being self-rightious! Can't help joining in! If everyone's self-rightious, self-rightiousness becomes the standard. Then we can all bitch on the few who claim not to be self-rightious for being pretentious AND self-rightious!
a) Start wars to limit the production *cough-iraqwar-cough*
No, seriously:
b) Make performance the product (concerts) instead of the brochure (CD) c) Increase the value of the product (like linux distro's do) by selling life-time licenses in music stores, give a life-time guarantee on the hardware (CD), include extra "off line" art, etcetera. Just compare it to OSS. The first record company that only does special editions and doesn't whine about downloading might just sign up a few thousand of bands willing to take the risk to try to make money in a modern way.
Losing the ability to interbreed is not a genetic loss. It is a phisical incompatibility.
You logic is based on the assumption that change in genotype is wrong by definition. Change doesn't have to be wrong. Especially concerning sequences of codons. Any combination assimilates a perfectly valid proteine. Now please explain why one in a (gaziturbobilliogiga)million of those changes wouldn't have a beneficial effect on the organisms chances of survival in its current habitat instead of killing/mutilating it?
It seems to me a certain kind of pessimism is needed NOT to see evolution at work all around you. It's either pessimism or arrogance towards your fellow animal species.
It might be cool checking out. Not in space, but in the desert.
Brief both contestants seperately, lock them both up in seperate rooms, evacuate the area and monitor everything with microphones and camera's.
How on earth could a candidate protest that with "doesn't work with non-believers around"? There'd be more static from his neighbours where he's usually doing his "magic".
"Few people realize that when they buy software or music or movies, they are actually buying a license to use, watch or listen. That's why it violates copyright laws for people to sell copies of their music collection."
That's not true. If it was a license pleople would receive a new copy if it broke or be able to download it as much as they wanted for the rest of their lives. When you buy a CD you do not sign for these absurd, far fetched and schizo limitations.
The whole media industry is an impossibility that's being tolerated because nobody knows how to regulate it. And lately the industry is trying to exploit these lack of regulations by running amok claiming everything that hasn't been defined yet as THEIR right instead of the consumer's. Worst thing is: They're succeeding and everyone's letting it happen!
Free market is leaking, and there are laws that (more or less) patch the holes. They're workarounds for some fundamental problems: There isn't an auto-correcting mechanism in the system that splits up companies getting too large and too powerful.
We could abolish those laws for the principle of it but you'll have to accept the consequences.
Try lobbying up against corporations now and consider what would happen if they were even more powerful? The governments would all be on their paycheck. That would be terribly out of control because the corps would then exceed their purpose in the system: To keep people working and to fill in a demand. Making the shareholders rich is only a trick to keep them lil companies popping up.
It's one big sim and the end-game hasn't been balanced yet. MS should get a nice screen telling "Congratulations! You won! Highscore! Created by Sid Meier!" and start all over again trying to beat their previous record.
Unfortunately that's not possible so there's some harsh rules to slow the winners down. You either live with it or fix the system. Go ahead.
Who's talking about parts of embryos? The cells get multiplied and implanted. Not killed. Every single stemcell can still become a unique human being when inserted into an empty egg-cell and activated. Like dolly the sheep.
So let's completely reverse the view: One could say the "poor victim" is granted nearly eternal life, because stem cell branches will never be discarded and are preserved in a lot of people. Hell, the cells might even wander around and end up in someones testicles and reproduce.
It makes me wonder if religious fanatics just can't stand being proven wrong on a number of subjects.
Don't you all think the mother is the one who made a problem out of it?
Here's a possibility:
I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't the first time the girl got layed. It's just that her mother found out this time and a teenage girl then does what works best: Play the victim role and accuse the neighbor/teacher/boyfriend/one night stand whatever really happened. I always have my doubts in cases like this. There ARE 14 year old sluts. There's no denying it. They get their tramp stamp tattooed when they're 12 and as soon as they have it they start showing it off in malls wearing hardly anything. And when the parents find out.... they can't handle their own failure and start victimizing their poor special girls.
I'm not saying pedophiles and assholes don't exist. They do and the law is the law. But who's fault it is when a kid ends up on someones dick remains to be seen. My guess is it's mostly the parents, the kid herself and the local school culture that are to blame. And of course the owner of the dick for not checking her ID.
And indeed sueing MySpace is like seuing the police for letting everything else happen on the public street "cause they didn't do enough to prevent it". Ridiculous.
What you're describing is consumer software literate. It sure as hell is not a defenition or a context.
Save isn't always under File. The board computer of a communication satellite probably doesn't even have a GUI.
The phrase "computer litarate" is downright wrong. Maybe "Common PC operation skills" would be better. It rules out configuration, hardware maintainance, system administration, all server administration, repair etc.
Relax. On the right lane everybody's sticking to each others bumper so there's not really space to go right without breaking another rule.
Just DO go right when I'm behind you.
"Everyone who was involved in the creation of the DVD standard agreed to a certain set of rules that they would abide by"
But what about CD's then?
Ever noticed how many CD's in the record stores do NOT have de CompactDisk-icon anymore? That's because the copy protection (sabotage) violates the CD standard. And that's why some car-stereo's don't play them.
Who's going to sue the record stores for selling non-CD's calling them CD's?
Gheh!
mod parent +10 genious
One self-rightious twit bitching on another self-rightious twit for blaming a third self-rightious twit for being self-rightious!
Can't help joining in! If everyone's self-rightious, self-rightiousness becomes the standard. Then we can all bitch on the few who claim not to be self-rightious for being pretentious AND self-rightious!
(steps forward)
"No, *I* broke the dam."
a) Start wars to limit the production *cough-iraqwar-cough*
No, seriously:
b) Make performance the product (concerts) instead of the brochure (CD)
c) Increase the value of the product (like linux distro's do) by selling life-time licenses in music stores, give a life-time guarantee on the hardware (CD), include extra "off line" art, etcetera. Just compare it to OSS. The first record company that only does special editions and doesn't whine about downloading might just sign up a few thousand of bands willing to take the risk to try to make money in a modern way.
Losing the ability to interbreed is not a genetic loss. It is a phisical incompatibility.
You logic is based on the assumption that change in genotype is wrong by definition. Change doesn't have to be wrong. Especially concerning sequences of codons. Any combination assimilates a perfectly valid proteine. Now please explain why one in a (gaziturbobilliogiga)million of those changes wouldn't have a beneficial effect on the organisms chances of survival in its current habitat instead of killing/mutilating it?
It seems to me a certain kind of pessimism is needed NOT to see evolution at work all around you.
It's either pessimism or arrogance towards your fellow animal species.
Think about the extremely violent nature of humans:
Privacy might be a much bigger trait then telepathy.
Another flaw:
How do you prove that the intelligence present at the big bang had anything to do with it? Maybe it was just an observer?
It might be cool checking out. Not in space, but in the desert.
Brief both contestants seperately, lock them both up in seperate rooms, evacuate the area and monitor everything with microphones and camera's.
How on earth could a candidate protest that with "doesn't work with non-believers around"? There'd be more static from his neighbours where he's usually doing his "magic".
"Few people realize that when they buy software or music or movies, they are actually buying a license to use, watch or listen. That's why it violates copyright laws for people to sell copies of their music collection."
That's not true. If it was a license pleople would receive a new copy if it broke or be able to download it as much as they wanted for the rest of their lives. When you buy a CD you do not sign for these absurd, far fetched and schizo limitations.
The whole media industry is an impossibility that's being tolerated because nobody knows how to regulate it. And lately the industry is trying to exploit these lack of regulations by running amok claiming everything that hasn't been defined yet as THEIR right instead of the consumer's. Worst thing is: They're succeeding and everyone's letting it happen!
The OSS community would gain an army of slow working non-documenting bug writing members.
....or they could just freeze their funds instead.
I guess it's not about the turkey-slap but about the hunderds of children watching the streams when it happened :)
Forgot to mention:
Even Sid's games have mechanisms built in to slow you down at the end: global warming, terrorists, whatever.
Free market is leaking, and there are laws that (more or less) patch the holes. They're workarounds for some fundamental problems: There isn't an auto-correcting mechanism in the system that splits up companies getting too large and too powerful.
We could abolish those laws for the principle of it but you'll have to accept the consequences.
Try lobbying up against corporations now and consider what would happen if they were even more powerful?
The governments would all be on their paycheck. That would be terribly out of control because the corps would then exceed their purpose in the system: To keep people working and to fill in a demand. Making the shareholders rich is only a trick to keep them lil companies popping up.
It's one big sim and the end-game hasn't been balanced yet. MS should get a nice screen telling "Congratulations! You won! Highscore! Created by Sid Meier!" and start all over again trying to beat their previous record.
Unfortunately that's not possible so there's some harsh rules to slow the winners down. You either live with it or fix the system. Go ahead.
"Until this is resolved, we will not be able to provide tech support to our EU customers"
What the hell is this "tech support" thingie for EU customers? Never heard of it.
Does it need to be more?
Who's talking about parts of embryos?
The cells get multiplied and implanted. Not killed. Every single stemcell can still become a unique human being when inserted into an empty egg-cell and activated. Like dolly the sheep.
So let's completely reverse the view:
One could say the "poor victim" is granted nearly eternal life, because stem cell branches will never be discarded and are preserved in a lot of people. Hell, the cells might even wander around and end up in someones testicles and reproduce.
It makes me wonder if religious fanatics just can't stand being proven wrong on a number of subjects.
Don't you all think the mother is the one who made a problem out of it?
Here's a possibility:
I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't the first time the girl got layed. It's just that her mother found out this time and a teenage girl then does what works best: Play the victim role and accuse the neighbor/teacher/boyfriend/one night stand whatever really happened. I always have my doubts in cases like this. There ARE 14 year old sluts. There's no denying it. They get their tramp stamp tattooed when they're 12 and as soon as they have it they start showing it off in malls wearing hardly anything. And when the parents find out.... they can't handle their own failure and start victimizing their poor special girls.
I'm not saying pedophiles and assholes don't exist. They do and the law is the law. But who's fault it is when a kid ends up on someones dick remains to be seen. My guess is it's mostly the parents, the kid herself and the local school culture that are to blame. And of course the owner of the dick for not checking her ID.
And indeed sueing MySpace is like seuing the police for letting everything else happen on the public street "cause they didn't do enough to prevent it". Ridiculous.
Wasn't it the number of chromosomes that (partly) determines wether or not two species can interbreed? Different numbers won't mix is my guess...
What you're describing is consumer software literate.
It sure as hell is not a defenition or a context.
Save isn't always under File. The board computer of a communication satellite probably doesn't even have a GUI.
The phrase "computer litarate" is downright wrong.
Maybe "Common PC operation skills" would be better. It rules out configuration, hardware maintainance, system administration, all server administration, repair etc.
To charge the batteries electrical power is needed.
Electrical power is created by burning stuff, like oil.
Low emission cars can only be worse for the environment, because you convert energy to other energyforms much more times.
Compare:
- Oil -> Refined oil (gas) -> exothermic reaction -> movement
- Oil (or coal or garbage) [ -> Refined oil ] -> exothermic reaction -> movement -> electricity -> chemical energy (battery) -> electricity -> magnetic energy -> movement
Which one do you think will be more efficient?
Relax. On the right lane everybody's sticking to each others bumper so there's not really space to go right without breaking another rule. Just DO go right when I'm behind you.
Offer him an similar real life challange. If he does that with as much disciplin and ambition, he'll probably end up wealthy.
Bring down te price?
That can only be done by enlarging the production. South America won't have a single tree left.
"Everyone who was involved in the creation of the DVD standard agreed to a certain set of rules that they would abide by"
But what about CD's then?
Ever noticed how many CD's in the record stores do NOT have de CompactDisk-icon anymore? That's because the copy protection (sabotage) violates the CD standard. And that's why some car-stereo's don't play them.
Who's going to sue the record stores for selling non-CD's calling them CD's?
It only ends human life if all specimen are destroyed.
This is exactly how it is in the Netherlands.
Here extra taxes are charged on writable media such as blank CDs. As a result, it now is allowed to make private copies of your own music.
Which is rediculous, that's like raising taxes on cars to stop fining speeding. As long as the money sums up.
A while ago this CD-tax-mafia wanted to tax HDs and MP3 players!!! Thank god that idea was rejected...