Slashdot Mirror


Film Studios Sue Samsung Over DVD players

Lam1969 writes "The Korea Times reports that five U.S. film studios have taken Samsung to court for selling DVD players which allow users to bypass DRM features. The film companies, including Walt Disney and Time Warner, are demanding Samsung recall the players. According to a Samsung spokesman quoted in the article, the movie studios probably 'take issue' with Samsung's HD841 model, which Samsung sold in the United States for five months in 2004."

567 comments

  1. Overreaction? by svip · · Score: 1

    Seems an extremely exaggerated lawsuit, more than usual.

    --
    This is a sig. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Overreaction? by AGMW · · Score: 1
      It's be interesting to see the prices these babies might reach if the current owners were to offer them for sale on eBay! Surely that would be the "open market" approach!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    2. Re:Overreaction? by iezhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nah, MPAA would sue them too - trading non DRM-copliant devices now equals trading firearms and drugs..

    3. Re:Overreaction? by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Of course, they should all be legal.
      In the ethical sense, they have been equal for a long time.

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    4. Re:Overreaction? by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Illegal monopoly action anyone.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    5. Re:Overreaction? by GigG · · Score: 1

      trading non DRM-copliant devices now equals trading firearms and drugs.

      You do realize that in most of the 50 United States that the selling and trade of firearms is legal?

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    6. Re:Overreaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got one on eBay a few days ago for $38.99+shipping, it's refurbished, but of course you won't find any new ones anyway.

    7. Re:Overreaction? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "nah, MPAA would sue them too - trading non DRM-copliant devices now equals trading firearms and drugs.."

      What's wrong with trading firearms? Perfectly legal to do...I've bought and sold guns before with no problems. A private citizen can do this at any time...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. it's all samsung's fault! by tcjohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article: ''The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy.'' Hrm, yeah, and I bet that's all people buying dvd's from other countries and bepassing the DRM with samsung equipment. Oh, wait, wasn't that the Linux pirates last week?

    1. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by mpe · · Score: 1

      From the article: ''The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy.''

      What is this expressed as a percentage of those same companies profits?

    2. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Cause we all know it couldn't possibly be that they produce pure shit, nothing worth spending $19.95 for a DVD or spending $10 to see it in the movie theatre. I have recently been hitting the library for some nice film classics, some film noir, some Hitchcock -- that was the golden age of cinema, none of this Ben Aflec and J. Lo crap.

    3. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by iezhy · · Score: 1

      yeah, right.
      laike any of those 'pirates' would really pay money for those stupid dvds

    4. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy.

      Meanwhile, everyone else estimates that they continued to make record profits.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    5. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by OneSeventeen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From the article: ''The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy.'' Hrm, yeah, and I bet that's all people buying dvd's from other countries and bepassing the DRM with samsung equipment. Oh, wait, wasn't that the Linux pirates last week?

      Contrary to popular belief, Linux is not the only OS you can bypass DVD encryption on. However, Linux is the only OS that you need to bypass encryption in order to play DVDs.

      Personally, I would venture a guess that it was more the crap movies they produced, and the prices they charge for them. As a linux user, I've given up buying DVDs because it is illegal for me to play the DVDs I bought on my laptop, which is unacceptable. Purchasing more products from them would only encourage it.

      Out of curiosity, if you heard your DVD player was recalled because it had more features than it was supposed to, would you really respond? Personally, if I weren't a geek and didn't know what was up already, I would research why they wanted to recall it, then I would discover what the MPAA is doing, and I'd be pissed. (It's hard to tell the MPAA is screwing you until you use an OS that doesn't have a single legal on-the-shelf 3rd party DVD playing software, and the only free software is deemed illegal.)

      Personally, I'm wondering where I was when these things were being sold! A DVD player that plays DVDs! No wonder the MPAA is suing, you only leased the right to have a DVD copy of the movie, there is no implied playability unless you also purchase their decoders. Next they'll start selling descrambling glasses that you have to visit one of their eye doctors to have focused for you!

      Serves 'em right, but then again, serves us right for those who copied movies every chance they got.

      --
      "Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed." -C.S. Lewis
    6. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i don't think they can get them for DRM.. it isn't a DRM feature .. region codes have the only purpose of being used for price discrimination

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by mwheeler01 · · Score: 1

      Record profits? Really? What sources are you citing? Last I heard, ticket sales are way down, though maybe video and other sources of revenue are making up for this but record profits? I'd like to see some proof on that.

      --
      Pretty widgets? What pretty widgets?
    8. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Kombat · · Score: 1
      Meanwhile, everyone else estimates that they continued to make record profits.

      Um... what? The only thing "record breaking" about the movie industry in 2005 was that unprecended box office slump. Were you not paying attention? Remember week after week, when they kept making less money than the same weekend the previous year, for like 16 weeks in a row? You can't just say something and make it true. Overall profits were down last year:


      "The five nominated films collectively have accounted for little more than $200 million so far, barely a ripple next to Hollywood's 2005 domestic revenues of $8.95 billion, which were down sharply as audiences proved apathetic for many time-tested movie formulas." -- Delaware Online


      Go ahead and make fun of them for crying about piracy while they're still raking in billions, but don't pretend like they're making more and more money year after year. It's just not true. Profits ARE down, and rampant piracy is partially to blame.
      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    9. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1
      Next they'll start selling descrambling glasses that you have to visit one of their eye doctors to have focused for you!


      Please, please, please don't give them any more ideas...
      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    10. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Kombat · · Score: 1

      What is this expressed as a percentage of those same companies profits?

      I don't know what Hollywood's profit was last year, but the total revenues were "only" $8.95 billion. So one can safely assume that profits were substantially less than that, and thus a $5.4 billion loss due to piracy is indeed a substantial hit on their bottom line. As in, they made less than half what they could have made.

      What if your employer (assuming you're employed) told you they could only afford to pay you half of your salary? Wouldn't you feel that warranted some sort of reaction on your part? Of course! Then why is everybody so surprised that the MPAA is trying to protect their products? Why are they being made out to be the bad guy when it very clearly is a huge and real problem?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    11. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? That line of thinking ranks right up there with counting every infringing copy as a loss equal to the full retail price of a DVD.

      It ain't all black or white. Some people would buy, others wouldn't.

    12. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Funny

      Honestly, I can't wait for Star Trek replicators to get invented. How crazy would the world get if I could download mercedes.torrent, big_mac_combo.zip, and refreshing columbianblow.rar?

    13. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That analogy only makes sense if you are talking about a digital copy of a Mercedes.

    14. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

      And this record slump has nothing to do with the pure crap that Hollywood is peddling on us? They aren't losing money because of pirates, they're losing money because of the record number of shitty movies and remakes they are producing.

    15. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      The five nominated films collectively have accounted for little more than $200 million so far, barely a ripple next to Hollywood's 2005 domestic revenues of $8.95 billion

      You are wrong because: Amazingly Bad Analogy

      Yes, a mere five films in any year will make less than a reasonable yearly revenue.

    16. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're being made out to be the bad guy because there's no objective proof it is in fact a huge and real problem, and they've been given a ridculous amount of gravy by Congress in the form of extended copyright terms, Draconian copyright infringement penalties, the DMCA, mandatory 3% tax on blank music CD media, etc. The $8.95 billion they contribute to the economy doesn't come close to the costs they incur for *everyone* because of these concessions, in many peoples' opinion.

      They claim $5.4 billion in losses, but by its very nature it's a number that's more or less pulled out of the air with no means to know how that figure was determined, and thus how accurate it might be. Given that many of the individual RIAA/MPAA members have shown a propensity to mislead and cheat the public and have been held accountable by the court system for doing so, I fail to see why I should accept that their reported losses are even within an order of magnitude of any true losses they may have experienced.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    17. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by jahudabudy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then why is everybody so surprised that the MPAA is trying to protect their products?

      I don't think anyone is really surprised that the MPAA is trying to protect their products. I think what everyone is surprised/completely pissed off about is the fact that the MPAA is claiming such ridiculous losses due to piracy, and using these outrageous claims to "justify" forcing everyone to pay for their losses. The problem is, they have zero evidence to back up their numbers. I personally believe that much more of their "lost" revenue is attributable to shitty movies, ridiculous ticket prices, and more people choosing to wait and watch a movie in the comfort of their own home. Imagine if tobacco companies started suing PVC pipe manufacturers, b/c people were using their products to smoke pot, which is an illegal activity that directly cut into the sale of cigarettes. I don't see the MPAA's actions and rationalizations as being any more legitimate than that would be.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    18. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Kombat · · Score: 1

      You are wrong because: Amazingly Bad Analogy

      Yes, a mere five films in any year will make less than a reasonable yearly revenue.


      Huh??? What are you talking about? The point of the quote is to cite the total 2005 revenues, which, according to the fragment I posted, were $8.95 billion. According to TFA, the estimated loss to piracy was $5.4 billion. The point of my post was to compare $8.95 billion to $5.4 billion. How could you have missed that? The part about 5 "Best Picture" nominees making $200 million is completely irrelevant to the discussion here.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    19. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Rayaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jane and John Doe out there, who are puzzled as to how one "rips" a plastic DVD, didn't go to the movies as frequently this year. It wasn't because they have a l334 pirating station in their basement, it's just becuase there was not as many movies that they wanted to see. It's just easier for the MPAA to go after the pirate problem with lawyers rather than address the decay in creativity with good actors/writers/producers/directors.

    20. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anyone who'd download a fucking McDonald's deserves to be ignored.

    21. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      The point of my post was to compare $8.95 billion to $5.4 billion. How could you have missed that?

      Easy, you didn't use the figure of $5.4 billion at all in your post. In addition, you claim:

      Overall profits were down last year:
      Hollywood's 2005 domestic revenues of $8.95 billion


      This is a non-sequitor. You cannot draw a conclusion on profits with only the data for revenue.

    22. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Kombat · · Score: 1
      Easy, you didn't use the figure of $5.4 billion at all in your post.

      I used the same cite in two different posts and thought you were replying to the other one. You're right, the point of this little thread was to demonstrate that profits were down in 2005, proving "DangerSteven's" assertion that the studios "continued to make record profits" is false. The whole "what percent of their total revenues was that $5.4 billion loss" was another thread. Nevertheless, I'm still right in this thread. Profits are down, and my cite does confirm it.

      You cannot draw a conclusion on profits with only the data for revenue.

      Absolutely true. However, I didn't post "only the data for revenue." My quote included trending data:


      Hollywood's 2005 domestic revenues of $8.95 billion, which were down sharply
      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    23. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by visualight · · Score: 1

      They are the bad guy because the DMCA and the SBCE happened. Two laws that were the result of bribes and corruption. Because of those laws small studios and theaters are losing billions of dollars every year.

      Since these small studios cannot afford to buy a Senator of their own they've been forced into piracy to feed their kids.

      Ok, that was kind of tongue in cheek, but really, I do consider buying a movie ticket, dvd, or audio cd to be an immoral act.
      (I was being serious the first two sentences though).

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    24. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      which were down sharply

      which I doubted, but Courier Press says that apparently "Theaters in 2004 grossed a record $9.43 billion, according to Exhibitor Relations"

      slap my face and call me silly!

    25. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1
      What the MPAA means to say is that $5.4 billion in movies were pirated at the manufacturer's suggested retail price. That probably doesn't adjust for the fact that a lot of them would have sold for less than what the MPAA lists them at. It also won't admit the fact that a lot more movies are downloaded than would be bought.

      I'm not trying to justify piracy. It's wrong. I'm saying they deliberately skew the numbers to make piracy look worse than it is.

      Here's some interesting information:

      Movie ticket sales declined more in 2000 than in 2004. Online movie piracy was hardly commonplace then, yet sales declined for two years straight. 2005 showed the biggest drop in ticket sales, which might best be explained by rising ticket prices and the market penetration of large, high-definition home entertainment systems.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    26. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by nigelc · · Score: 1

      I think it was Arthur C Clarke who commented that we should devote time and energy to building a "replicator". The first one would be hideously expensive. The second one would be free.

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    27. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the movie studios also expect ticket sales to go up EVERY year and if they dont, they count that as a loss.

      It doesnt matter if the entire economy collapsed, movie studios would expect people to continue to go to the theaters.

      They are idiots and can continue to "lose" money, I honestly dont care, no one is being put out of work

    28. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like the Democrats in the 90s. "The Republicans are cutting funding to ______" when in fact the Republicans were reducing the rate of increase. It just sounds a lot more dramatic their way.

      For a lot of families, it's simple math.

      2 adult tickets at $7.50
      2 child tickets at $4.50
      1 massive popcorn barrel at $5.50
      3 drinks at $2.50 each

      Total: $37 (based on real local prices)

      Now, let's say they get a huge TV and surround sound system:
      NetZero/Blockbuster subscription: $10 a month
      Entertainment system (50+" HDTV and combo home theater system): $1,500 - $2,000, financed to around $50 a month.

      For just $23 more than a trip to the movies, you can watch a dozen movies a month at home.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    29. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1



      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

      *sigh* I've had to take out the $ signs

      If my employer said they could only afford half of my $70 million fee for Mission Impossible I guess I wouldn't be so concerned. But I suppose when they repeated it by only paying me half of my $75 million fee for MI:II I would be annoyed.

      Here's the rest :

      War of the Worlds (2005) (20% profit participation)
      The Last Samurai (2003) 25,000,000 + % of profits
      Minority Report (2002) 25,000,000+
      Vanilla Sky (2001) 20,000,000 + 30% of Profits
      Mission: Impossible II (2000) 75,000,000 (gross participation)
      Eyes Wide Shut (1999) 20,000,000
      Jerry Maguire (1996) 20,000,000 against 15%
      Mission: Impossible (1996) 70,000,000 (gross participation)
      Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles (1994) 15,000,000
      Far and Away (1992) 13,000,000
      Rain Man (1988) 3,000,000+% of gross
      Top Gun (1986) 2,000,000
      Risky Business (1983) 75,000

      That's over $250 million dollars in just over 20 years.

      Any more open DVD players and the poor lad will be on Welfare

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    30. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

      MOD UP! MOD UP!

      This hits it on the head. They are liars, cheats, thieves, monopolists, price fixers (and price gougers), bribers (lobbyists), and somehow, end up costing me more money than the total that I spend on their products through litigation and sponsored legislation.

      The RIAA lost nowhere near $5B because even if that number was CLOSE to accurate, it assumes that everyone that bought a pirated DVD would have bought a regular DVD at close to one month's wages in some countries had the pirated version not been made available to them.

      Yeah, right.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    31. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the same thing. By you taking THAT particular Mercedes, nobodsy else would have been able to legally buy it. Thats a loss for whoever you stole it from. That analogy doesnt apply to software, music, movies, etc.

    32. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Regional encoding on DVD has NOTHING to do with piracy. Regional encoding has two purposes
      1. It lets the movie companies charge one price in America and a different price in China and a third price in Mexico, a process known as price discrimination that increases the profits of the supplier
      2. It lets them release in Europe before America, or in whatever order they want.
    33. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Rufus88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      more or less pulled out of the air with no means to know how that figure was determined

      Damages are calculated by taking the number of DVD titles in existence, times the average price of a DVD, times the number of people on earth who might conceivably hear about the existence of the Samsung players and think, "Nah, I won't buy all those DVDs; I'll just find somebody with a Samsung and copy them all".

    34. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Kombat · · Score: 1

      that number [...] assumes that everyone that bought a pirated DVD would have bought a regular DVD

      Are you sure about that? Got a cite? Aren't you making assumptions about where that number comes from?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    35. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by angulion · · Score: 1

      Also something to think about;
      Maybe people didn't like this seasons movies quite as much?
      Maybe people have spent their money elsewhere - the gaming industry should probably be sued since they have made more and more money every year! I bought more games last year than before and because of that spent less on movies.

    36. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It's probably not really $5.4 billion in lost sales; it's more likely $5.4 billion in unclaimed legal penalties for unprosecuted infringements.

      Much like how someone duplicating CDs in a garage with three 52x burners is said to be duplicating with the equivalent of 156 burners. Anything to inflate the figures.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    37. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by imsoclever · · Score: 1

      How can you say that when Date Movie and Final Destination 3: This Time it's a Rollercoaster are now playing at a theatre near you?

    38. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Movie ticket sales declined more in 2000 than in 2004.

      Which year was it when they started putting brown dots in areas of high brightness to deter ticket sales^W^W digicamming?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    39. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by 6*7 · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a ST Voyager episode addressing this issue (sort of). I'm to lame to do a search for it but IIRC it was about the doctor writing a holodeck novel and evil publisher infringing ot it's copyrights.

      (the holostuff being a spinoff from the replicator technology).

    40. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by achbed · · Score: 1

      "Piracy" is the straw man here! Yes, *SOME* people download/copy movies rather than pay, even tho they can, but that's not the true story. The real story is stated above: audiences proved apathetic for many time-tested movie formulas.

      Oh, they're not falling for the same old movie script anymore. It must be Piracy! Damn those pirates! God forbid they change their playbook if the same damn run play is finally blocked - blame it on someone stealing their old playbook.

    41. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Linux is the only OS that you need to bypass encryption? Fucking typical Slashdotter.

    42. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's a reasonable assumption, though, because that's how it turns out the number has always been calculated whenever we did know.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    43. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      l334 pirating station

      You misspelled 1337.

    44. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Rayaru · · Score: 1

      1 4m t3h s0rry0rz 4b0ut th4t

    45. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      hrm, Am I the only one who thinks that Losses and lost profits are different things? Not making as many billions of dollars in profits is different from losing money.
      how about the difference between Losses and "lost projected earnings?"
      should you really be able to bitch about losing something you never had in the first place?
      If they can sue Samsung for lost projected earnings, can I sue them for lost projected dividends on my stocks? I dont fucking think so.
      Someone with a decent stake in one of the studios should cowboy up and sue their asses next time they report lower than expected earnings for lost dividends... see if we can get some precedent established that one cant "lose" something that is only "projected."
      and until then, I bid the studios a very warm, Fuck You.

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    46. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...mandatory 3% tax on blank music CD media, etc."

      Where do you live where they do this? I've never paid anything but normal sales tax for blank media I've ever bought. Hell, when ordering online, often you don't pay sales tax or shipping if you buy enough...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Man this thread is boring...I think I'll find someone with a samsung and go copy some movies...

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    48. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      archive.org man, Public Domain rocks!
      Night of the Living Dead there acutally got me to go out and buy a couple of newer releases of it. That and all the free westerns (I thought I hated them untill I realized that I could get them for free, and in high-enough quality to make dvd's out of them!)

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    49. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Considering the hoakey accounting used by the studios, I would wish that at some point Congress would do an independent audit. The movie studios are probably the biggest liars out there as far as bookkeeping, so this claim of theirs is something that I'd have to take with a kiloton of salt.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    50. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The royalties are paid to RIAA members on CDs by the manufacturers (on the customer's behalf) and (in the US) only CDs marketed for music, not data, are affected. It's interesting to note that by paying the royalty, you have in effect paid for any music you choose to download or copy from others, so it should be argued that it is legal, and suing the customer for downloading content which is burned onto the media on which royalties have been paid legally amounts to racketeering, since they're extorting money from you (the royalties) which pays for the content, and then they have the f'n nerve to tell you that you are not entitled to anything for the money you pay.

      Last time I checked, billing someone for product and/or services and then refusing to fulfill that (implied) contract amounts to fraud.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    51. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      They don't have profits. Every movie ever made in all of history has been a monumental flop from an accounting point of view. The trick is, if you are making a movie, to give yourself a huge salary after the fact. Then, after paying yourself, your movie at a loss, and you don't have to pay backeres their share of the profits, which there arn't any. After that, you apply to the government for debt relief and they pay you even more money. Sir Allec Guiness, for example, was never paid for his role in Star Wars, because his contraact specified a share of the profits. Since Star Wars was a huge flop and lost millions, he got nothing. He was pretty cheesed about it, too.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    52. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      The first DVD ROM I installed in the '90s blew me away. I couldn't believe that DVD was so crappy. It didn't even play on Windows Media Player [unless you BUY a decoder/player, WTF!], and that's the devil incarnate and should play anything you've bought.
      There are stupid warnings on MPAA DVDs now threatening you with jail if you pirate movies, and then they show the 30 year old FBI text warning not to copy the tape. You can't fast forward through the warnings, so how is that better playability than a VCR? If pirates can make a more watchable and enjoyable disc, you really have to wonder what's wrong with the movie studio goons.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    53. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by ryusen · · Score: 1

      "Why are they being made out to be the bad guy when it very clearly is a huge and real problem?"

      Because they usually are the bad guy. Look at the whole situation
      1) They have no evidence and have never provided any concrete data about how they come up with their losses. Chances are good that it is based on an estimate of the number of pirated copies in existence and all of those represent a theoretical loss. Honestly, most people who get the stuff through infringement or from Pirates would not have bought the product and especially not at the listed price.
      2) They use those jacked up numbers in order to justify new technology down our throats which sowly choke at the legitimate customer and our fair use rights. None of these anti-copying schemes actually stop pirates, they only serve to hamper the customer. They make us pay more for a less functional product that they know, doesn't do jack about saving their precious property.
      3) They not just force technology down our throats they buy laws into affect that are VERY anti-consumer. Seriously, any legitimate consumer who is NOT mad at the RIAA and MPAA, really doesn't understand what is happening.
      That sounds pretty devious and "bad" to me. I have been to the movies much less and have bought far fewer DVDs in the last couple years.. for two reason: Home Theatre and Netflix...

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    54. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      I always laugh at how they calculate these so called "losses". Its ridiculous how they try to imply everyone who's ever watched a pirated movie would have otherwise gone and brought the premium special gold edition boxed DVD at full, first day of release price.

    55. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by ryusen · · Score: 1

      Congress would not do that because it would hurt their campaign coffers...

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    56. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      No wonder the MPAA is suing, you only leased the right to have a DVD copy of the movie, there is no implied playability unless you also purchase their decoders. Next they'll start selling descrambling glasses that you have to visit one of their eye doctors to have focused for you!

      Heh. That reminds me of an old joke:

      "Seen on a menu in a small-town diner:

      Soup ......... $0.10
      With bowl ...... $6.99"

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    57. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      The problem with correlational statements like this is that they don't necessarily mean what you think. A social psych prof I once had gave this example which has always stood out clearly in my mind: there's a correlation between ice cream sales in the US and deaths in the Middle East. This doesn't mean that ice cream sales in the US cause deaths in the Middle East, but in the summertime it's hotter in both places - more people die from the heat there and more people buy ice cream here. No causal relationship at all.

      Now maybe piracy really is partly to blame for lower profits than the year before, and maybe it's not. The kinds of numbers that I've seen from the movie and music industries haven't indicated any causal relationship. It seems just as likely to me that lower box office sales are really caused by a number of other things: a more discriminating audience tired of the same old rehashed crap; frustration with dealing with crowds at the local 20+ screen movieplex; frustration with rude people rustling candy wrappers and ringing cellphones while you're trying to watch the movie; and the fact that home theaters are much more common allowing a near-comparable movie-going experience at home.

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    58. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Amen!

    59. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Profits ARE down, and rampant piracy is partially to blame.

      Right. Provide a single empirical study, published in an accredited, peer-reviewed journal conclusively connecting so-called 'piracy' to declining profits. Go ahead, I dare you to find ONE such study to back up your bullshit claim.

      Me, speaking purely on opinion and completely anecdotally, I'd say profits are down because the recent spate of movies have SUCKED. But that's just me...and everyone I know....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    60. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmm, if i worked for McDonald's, and my boss tried to pay me half wages with the reason:

      "Thousands of people are making hamburgers at home and drinking coke from the supermarket out of cups imported from China, its eating into our business... If they hadn't done this, we would have made $5bn more this year..."

      First i would laugh until i realized they were serious. Then I'd make sure they paid me what was due.

      Anyway, why aren't McDonald's suing people that cook at home with cookware made in China? Because its stupid.

      I moved to the US a year ago and have owned about 2 dozen legit (zone 4) dvd's for years. My mom who lives in England (Zone 2), sent me a monty python DVD set for my birthday that she bought legally... you think i could find a player to play these zones? No. I got it sorted eventually, but it wasnt easy. I have not even seen pirated DVD's for sale, and wouldnt know where to get them. '

      All this DRM debate isnt about piracy, its about control. The ability to sell you the same thing over and over. Buy a Cinema Ticket, 'hire a DVD rental', 'Pay per View', 'Own the DVD', 'buy the UMD', Watch it free to air (on satellite that you pay $40 a month for'), Buy the soundtrack CD, download the soundtrack on iTunes for your media player... Its essentially the same product over and over. With each of these you have certain rights, and they are being eroded.....ever so slowley. Its death by 1000 cuts you feel the occasional pinch, but you dont notice your freedom bleeding from you and pooling on the floor.

    61. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Sounds like the Democrats in the 90s. "The Republicans are cutting funding to ______" when in fact the Republicans were reducing the rate of increase. It just sounds a lot more dramatic their way."

      Technically you are correct, a decrease in the expected rate of increase is not a cut. In reality if your company said they were reducing your raise, most people would consider it a cut. Largely a matter of perception. But perception is often more important than reality.

    62. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by rockola · · Score: 1

      Which one comes with the free popcorn and drinks, Netzero/Blockbuster or the entertainment system?

      --
      Those who don't know Lisp are doomed to reimplement it.
    63. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by JMB1984 · · Score: 1

      woah woah woah there.... a dozen movies a month? Manuel Villanueva of Netflix say good luck!

    64. Re:it's all samsung's fault! by zerofret · · Score: 1

      Remember that this $5.4 Billion loss is an estimate made by the same folks who would benefit most from an exagerated perception of the problem. Scare the Congress-Critter into believing that the government is losing out on the tax revenue from that big a hunk of money and you get a vote for that new mandatory DECEITBAB law you so desperately want.

      DECEITBAB = DRM Enforcement Chip Embedded In The Brain At Birth

      Congress always likes to give new laws catchy acronyms.

  3. Come after me by abscissa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I have done for all the DVDs in my OWN collection is bypass the DRM using DVD decrypter (w00t!) because I am sick of these goddamn preveiews, menus, copyright notices, birth control notices, and other shit. DVD Shrink is a nice utility that allows you to reformat a DVD so that you can put the disc in the drive and JUST WATCH THE MOVIE. Some of these more recent DVDs that have come out require ten minutes of mandatory (e.g. you can't fast forward) viewing of SHITE before you can see WHAT YOU PAID TO WATCH. For rental DVD's, don't even bother... it's worse than the old VHS tapes, even though the retailers are PAYING LESS now to maintain their inventory!!

    1. Re:Come after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ha! You too eh.

      Ads before DVD's is *such* a scam.

      I don't believe it's all about flogging off the studios other wares either... not for a second!

      I reckon they are *deliberately* trying to degrade the viewing experience for DVDs by reverting back to the ads before the movie VCR model, so as to make it easier for them to push their next generation DVD formats such as HD-DVD and Blueray.

      They want to make DVDs seem obsolete, and equivalent to VCRs in consumers minds.

      Think about it. For most consumers the promise of high definition means jack-**** as they don't have the hardware to appreciate it, so the studios have a tough sell ahead of them.

      It's a far easier push for them to sell their DRM-ed to sh*t next gen-formats if they make the current generation look at obsolete as they can. I wouldn't even put it past them to deliberately drop the compression quality on new releases just to make the new formats look better.

      I have my tin foil hat on... I know what's going on! :c)

    2. Re:Come after me by aztektum · · Score: 1

      If you hate it so much why do you keep buying them?

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:Come after me by ben_1432 · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up. DVD Decryptor + Shrink makes retarded dvd's most convenient.

    4. Re:Come after me by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the best features of mplayer is it's no-nonsense approach to DVD playback. It just launches the movie. No menus, no FBI warnings, no ads, no crap.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:Come after me by Threni · · Score: 1

      > DVD Shrink is a nice utility that allows you to reformat a DVD so that you can
      > put the disc in the drive and JUST WATCH THE MOVIE

      Most of the disks I've tried it with don't work - something about copy protection. I don't think it's being developed any longer. Are there any other free alternatives? Perhaps a player that doesn't honour the `thou shalt not skip all the nonsense` flags?

    6. Re:Come after me by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      This has been a bug bear of mine for some time. It upsets me the most when you have a PURCHASED DVD and it forces you to sit through piracy information.. for gods sake, i'm watching a movie that I bought - stop RAMMING IT DOWN MY NECK! If I was watching a pirated DVD, that crap would have been trimmed out anyway so whats the point in making us watch it?

      The thing that I find to be the biggest irony is that the more they force previews/trailers/anti piracy crap onto us, I consider copying DVD's more than ever before. I've been a good guy and bought over 130 DVD's but the more of this crap that they add on, the more inclined I am to start getting my movies elsewhere.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    7. Re:Come after me by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If I was watching a pirated DVD, that crap would have been trimmed out anyway so whats the point in making us watch it?

      Actually, people tell me that pirated DVDs often include all the anti-piracy ads too, they just rip and dupe the whole thing. The only giveaways are the typos on the cover.

    8. Re:Come after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I haven't bought a single one before the DRM was cracked and will not ever buy HD-DVD before it's cracked either.

      And buying a non-region-free DVD drive is also out of the question.

    9. Re:Come after me by failure-man · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MPlayer is, of course, illegal in several countries (at least if you're playing encrypted DVDs, which anything with shit to be skipped will be.)

      Still, I'm hardly deterred by that. I'd like to see them try to sue someone for playing a disc that they personally own. I after all know the Kryptonite of any standard corporate lawyer-ninja squad: the jury trial. You'll be hard pressed to find a jury that will award against Joe Q. Public to a multi-billion dollar corporation for doing something that seems reasonable.

      Of course, that does nothing to shield the MPlayer dev team, who are (mostly) safe at the moment only because they live outside of US jurisdiction.

    10. Re:Come after me by abscissa · · Score: 1

      are you ripping with DVD decrypter first then opening the ISO file? labor intensive but...

    11. Re:Come after me by iroll · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude... you're anonymous... you can write out the word "shit." I don't think any children will be harmed anyway.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    12. Re:Come after me by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      One of the best features of mplayer is it's no-nonsense approach to DVD playback. It just launches the movie. No menus, no FBI warnings, no ads, no crap.

      Oh, you still get to see the ads and warnings with mplayer.

      $ mplayer dvd://1
      -- Publisher's logo

      $ mplayer dvd://2
      -- copyright warning

      $ mplayer dvd://3
      -- copyright warning, in Flemish

      $ mplayer dvd://4
      -- copyright warning, in Linear A

      $ mplayer dvd://5
      -- trailers for upcoming releases

      $ mplayer dvd://6
      -- original theatrical trailer

      $ mplayer dvd://7
      -- interview with director

      $ mplayer dvd://8
      -- interview with voice actor

      $ mplayer dvd://9
      -- interview with dub voice actor

      $ mplayer dvd://10
      -- THE FILM! YAY! AT LAST! * sits back, grabs snacks and b33r *

      ... oh, shit...

      $ mplayer dvd://10 -alang ja -slang en

      Hooray for convenience!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    13. Re:Come after me by jdogs60 · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to say that I know quite a few people who love watching the movie previews both in theatres and on DVD's. I agree 100% that it should be optional, though, and you should be able to fast forward through them all at least. Most of my DVDs are like that. You can't really go by me, though -- I haven't purchased a DVD or CD in a year or two (CD's longer) since all of this pointless litigation began.

    14. Re:Come after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my God! You said "shit"! My child was harmed. Oh fuck! I said "shit" to quote your saying "shit".

    15. Re:Come after me by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's get even more realistic.

      I have a HD display. I recompress my dvd's using the DVD drcryptor and DVD shrink dance to hold only the movie on a DISC in my Pioneer 200 Disc DVD changer. I have a high end line doubler and even after the recompress and other nasties added during the process I STILL get a fantastic picture. It's better than most CableTV HD channels because the cable company is compressing them hard now to fit more in the pipe.

      Plus dinking with HD content I can download off the internet and play with my DSM-520 off the server in the house makes any next format player 100% useless to me.

      HDDVD and BluRAY are 100% useless. you can easily fit full HD content on a regular DVD using mpeg4HD compression and it looks fantastic. They want it only because they built it with DRM from the beginning and not useability.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Come after me by wackysootroom · · Score: 1

      The only reason mplayer doesn't do menus is that dvdnav support is broken. It's a bug, not a feature.

    17. Re:Come after me by toad3k · · Score: 1

      Obviously an anime fan. I feel your pain.

      But it is infinitely preferable to sitting through the ads.

    18. Re:Come after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok.. shit.

      Shit... shit.. shit... shit... shit!

      Shit...

      [pause]

      *SHIT!*

      Ah... gawd damn... I got so excited you made me make my tin foil hat fall off.

      Shit! :c)

    19. Re:Come after me by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      That sounds rediculous, but I do fondly remember the initial days of DVD when they contained no advertisements.

    20. Re:Come after me by woolio · · Score: 1

      I have done for all the DVDs in my OWN collection is bypass the DRM using DVD decrypter (w00t!)

      What's that? You're an enemy combatant? Engaging in terrorist activity? Well, hopefully you like tropical weather and daily beatings....

      Probably should have posted as AC....

    21. Re:Come after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GW Bush is fighting hard to keep the smartcar out of the USA

      Details? Just curious.
    22. Re:Come after me by monopole · · Score: 1

      Disney is particularly atrocious in this regard. They try to force you to watch endless previews before accesing the main menu. Although recently they have added the capability to jump using the menu button. Frankly, this is the thing I particularly detest with regard to DRM on CDs.

    23. Re:Come after me by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try lsdvd or ifo_dump. Then just glance at the list and see which title has the longest run time.

    24. Re:Come after me by mallardtheduck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, we all know that the ads have the longest run-time...

    25. Re:Come after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The film studios are suing Samsung for contract breach. Samsung paid them to obtain the math necessary to play DVDs. There were conditions in that contract that Samsung broke.

      On the other hand, Mplayer didn't enter a contract with the film studios, they found someone had solved the math problem independently and used that instead.

    26. Re:Come after me by Ullteppe · · Score: 1
      This pisses me off to no end! OK, for a rental movie I could sit through a trailer or two. But when I pay full price for a movie, I do not consent to sitting through 10 minutes of commercials before I can see the damned thing.

      I shudder in horror thinking about what kind of tricks the movie industry is contemplating for BlueRay/HD-DVD...

    27. Re:Come after me by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The film studios are suing Samsung for contract breach. Samsung paid them to obtain the math necessary to play DVDs. There were conditions in that contract that Samsung broke.

      On the other hand, Mplayer didn't enter a contract with the film studios, they found someone had solved the math problem independently and used that instead.


      True, but you overlooked the part about the US and several other coutries making it a crime to do certain math, and a crime to give other people the equations or instructions for doing that math. In other words a crime to run the MPlayer software, and a crime to distribute the MPlayer software. Software is just a specific stylized version of math equation / instructions that are simple and clear enough that a computer can follow them.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    28. Re:Come after me by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them try to sue someone for playing a disc that they personally own.

      Distributing or using MPlayer is a violation of CRIMINAL law. We're not talking pesky civil lawsuits here, we're talking men with guns breaking into your home and hauling you off to a prison cell.

      Just thought I'd help clarify the issue.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    29. Re:Come after me by wandernotlost · · Score: 1

      That must be a damn fine line doubler, or your cable company is ruining your HD (or maybe you have horrible eyesight or something). While the line-doubler/scaler in my DVD player probably isn't as fancy as yours, it's decent and I notice a HUGE difference between DVD and HD content. (Are you using HDMI/DVI? That makes a pretty big difference too.) There's a huge amount of resolution difference between 480p and 720p.

      Granted, I have a projector that fills my living room wall, so I probably notice more of a difference than you if you've got a tiny 50" or so TV (tee hee). For me, though, even 720p/1080i are noticably lacking. I'm already wishing for 1080p (interlacing is just stupid anyway), so BluRay is definitely not useless!

    30. Re:Come after me by instarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Still, I'm hardly deterred by that. I'd like to see them try to sue someone for playing a disc that they personally own. I after all know the Kryptonite of any standard corporate lawyer-ninja squad: the jury trial. You'll be hard pressed to find a jury that will award against Joe Q. Public to a multi-billion dollar corporation for doing something that seems reasonable.

      Maybe that is indeed kryptonite for them, but it is way down the road. YOUR kryptonite however, is right here right now - attorney fees and defense costs. They have millions and you have your paycheck. They hire a team of lawyers and sue 100 people and it cost them almost nothing per person. You however, are totally screwed. You could easily lose everything you have before they let it get anywhere near a courtroom. What's more, even if you did happen to win, they still don't have to pay your attorney fees.

  4. VCR by mtenhagen · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard you can connect a vcr to the output and then record everything you play, I can imagine the studios are upset.

    --
    200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    1. Re:VCR by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      You can't actually, macrovision will give you a distorted picture.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    2. Re:VCR by sg_oneill · · Score: 2, Informative

      ....or you can just throw it thru a genlock to fix up the buggy colorbursts.

      This post is in violation of the DMCA, if I was american.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:VCR by Petersson · · Score: 1
      You can't actually, macrovision will give you a distorted picture.

      Not if you remove it.

      Once I needed to play DVD on really old TV without A/V inputs. The only way was to connect DVD player through VCR's A/V inputs, while the VCR was connected to TV through antenna cable.

      Such configuration couldn't play Macrovisioned DVDs normally, regardless to a fact, that VCR's tape mechanism was jammed long ago and I couldn't record the movie anyway even if I wanted to (I did not).

      The only way out was to play DVDs with macrovision protection removed.

      Is this the way the things are meant to work???

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    4. Re:VCR by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      You can't actually, macrovision will give you a distorted picture.

      Then my playstation must be broken, since for obscure reasons related to an old TV, a strange cable arrangement, and cheapness, I run the PS2 through the front AV inputs of a cheap VCR. The PS2 is my primary DVD player and I've never noticed any distorted picture...

    5. Re:VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Easy fixed, get a macrovision removal kit... (cough) sorry, "image enhancer" from a reputable outlet and go for your life. That's how I watch DVDs on my 1950s tv (mmmmmm, woodgrain finish, cloth speaker covers, hardware I can both understand and repair). Setup: dvd->[die macrovision die box #1]->vcr (can't modulate on vhf, unfortunately)->[no really macrovision, bugger off box #2]->channel 0 modulator->tv. See, easy ;)

      Seriously, though, what exactly about the above setup makes mpaa so angry (and how does it make me a pirate, matey)? Is it the non-spectacular (but still ok) picture quality ruining their precious "masterpieces"? Is it my failure to consume a new tv in favour of something with a bit of personality? Is it the monophonic sound? Or are they just control freaks?

    6. Re:VCR by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Have you tried recording it? It works by fooling the automatic gain control. Some video recorders apply the gain control to the input signal immediately, others apply it to the signal going to the record head.

    7. Re:VCR by TardyVie · · Score: 1
      You can't actually, macrovision will give you a distorted picture.

      The VCR must support macrovision for it to not work on the TV. I think it was late 80's they pretty much all did.

      On my tv with coax input only, I had to use a rf modulator. But what it also does is remove macrovision.

      That would be the analog hole?

    8. Re:VCR by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Exactly why they are pushing end to end DRM into everything from HD-DVD players to TVs and speakers to your home computer. They're pissed that we can still get any use out of the rather expensive products we buy from them. They'd much rather we buy an empty box and stare at the pictures on the cover and then tomorrow buy a new empty box and so on.. c'mon $20 is a fair price for an empty box with a pretty label isn't it? Afterall if you complain then you are just a pirate and obviously are trying to kill the entertainment industry by not giving your every bleeding cent to some filthy rich actor, musician, or executive.

      Damn you if you just want to be able to buy their products and actually use them as you see fit. You may as well be going to their homes and raping their poor little poodles. People that don't like DRM are terrorists and child pornographers and they all worship Satan and are Muslim too.

      You all go to Hell. You go to Hell and you die. Stupid homosexual movie pirates. I bet you were putting your penis in that hole in the middle of your DVD. You're all just evil.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    9. Re:VCR by ajs318 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a problem: Macrovision. They deliberately put high-voltage pulses in the vertical retrace interval of some frames to confuse the automatic gain control in the recorder. The AGC sees the spike, winds the gain down and you get a dim picture for several frames. Then it goes bright again. Then they put in another spike and it goes dim. As far as protection schemes go, this one is totally christian. You will just need a DVD player with the option to disable Macrovision; a VCR with RGB inputs; an RGB to composite encoder {NB; must be the appropriate video standard, PAL, SECAM or NTSC, for your region}; a timebase corrector; or an image stabiliser.

      One very simplistic way to defeat Macrovision is to build a simple level-limiter circuit, so the extraordinarily high voltage pulses sent in the vertical retrace interval will be clamped to peak white level {1V} before they reach the VCR. This is really nothing more than a DC-coupled, non-inverting, high-bandwidth version of a guitar distortion pedal.

      To build a more sophisticated timebase corrector, use a 1881 sync separator to get the timing signals, and some sort of bilateral switch {a 4016/4066 will sort of just about do, but look at the Maxim web site for some higher-bandwidth, lower-on-resistance ones} to switch between the existing video signal, and a locally-generated "black" signal {about 0.3 volts}. The 1881 has a composite sync output which should be used to add "clean" timing to the artificial black {just force it down to 0V when the timing signal goes low}. Be sure to use op-amps with a decent slew rate, not 358's! You will also need either a bunch of TTL ICs {if you're hard} or a microcontroller. At the beginning of each frame, switch to "artificial black" for about the first 20 lines of picture, then switch to the real picture for all but the last 20 or so lines, which should be replaced by more artificial black. You may need to experiment with the number of lines you strip out. If you are 500p3r l33t, you might even care to insert your own locally-generated Teletext information in the newly-created vertical retrace interval; but don't expect this to come out right on a VHS recorder.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    10. Re:VCR by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need that much hardware to defeat MacroVision. Two diodes, three resistors, three capacitors, two cheap IC's. One comparator to extract the sync, another to gate out the leading pulse, a 4040 counter to count up to line 255, anoher comparator to gate out the trailing pulse. ALmost a no-brainer.

    11. Re:VCR by m0nstr42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...a 4016/4066 will sort of just about do, but look at the Maxim web site for some higher-bandwidth, lower-on-resistance ones...

      Maxim has girls AND components? It truely is geek heaven.

    12. Re:VCR by pjh3000 · · Score: 1
      As far as protection schemes go, this one is totally christian.

      "christian"? I laughed so hard I nearly sprayed my coffee! I'll have to remember that one.

    13. Re:VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:VCR by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i just have a vcr without AGC it works wll

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    15. Re:VCR by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      Or are they just control freaks?

      Bingo!

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    16. Re:VCR by archen · · Score: 1

      Had EXACTLY the same problem. This was when I was just starting to get DVD's at all. I eventually found that puchasing DVD's wasn't worth it because I couldn't watch them. Renting DVDs? Pointless as well. The end result is that the only thing I would watch is anime - which for the most part never bothered with macrovision. Except Pioneer, so I stopped getting titles from them.

      Now days I just have a RF modulator to convert the signals from digital/rca connectors to coax for my TV (that's the ONLY connector it has). I used to look forward to the days when a nice new HD tv would be nice, but now I wonder if I'll be able to play anything at all.

    17. Re:VCR by gwar11d2 · · Score: 0

      I heard MacGyver defeated macrovision with a turkey baster, a roll of duct tape, and a antique iron. Seriously though, the movie companies need to produce a movie that is good.....before I'll buy it, and tell the movie theatres to stop selling commercials and charging $15 bucks for a small popcorn and 12 bucks to see the movie. Last I checked you can search the $5 bin at Wal Mart and get all the crappy movies you want.

    18. Re:VCR by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1
      As far as protection schemes go, this one is totally christian.

      I know the word "christian" has lost all meaning in this day and age, but is this some new slang I haven't heard before?

      "That's so wizard, Ani!"

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    19. Re:VCR by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      I realized that might be the why I don't have distortion a couple minutes after I posted-- I'll try recording later on and see.

    20. Re:VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as protection schemes go, this one is totally christian.

      I thought it was totally nigger. Or Muslim. Or...

      Oh wait, this is Slashdot.

    21. Re:VCR by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Christian ..... as in "christian rock music". Characterised by the absence of what is usually considered to be the defining element of a kind of thing, and therefore acceptable only to one who is utterly deluded.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    22. Re:VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlkess the DVD player is progressive scan. Macrovision does not work on a progressive scan DVD player.

    23. Re:VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, another christian who got pussy hurt. boo hoo, it must be so tough being a christian in this day and age: The Age of Reason.

    24. Re:VCR by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Also, if it's an old VCR, it might not be susceptible to Macrovision. Macrovision only worked on some VCRs, until Congress mandated that all VCRs make themselves actively detect it (and pay royalties to Macrovision for the privilege, since it is patented - you also have to pay royalties to Macrovision to turn on the bit on the DVD you're producing that tells the DVD player to turn on the Macrovision circuits, which, of course, had royalties paid by the player's manufacturer). Isn't it great to have Congress rescue your unreliable protection scheme by legislating that it WILL in fact work, and now (since it WORKS SO WELL) everyone must use it? Microsoft patenting zero has nothing on it!

    25. Re:VCR by THE+ROCK · · Score: 1

      I thought it was totally nigger. Or Muslim. Or...

      No, VCRs that employ MUSLIM copy protection have a different behavior:

      When they detect a protected signal, they will start screaming, run around the room a couple times, and then explode...hopefully taking some of the pirate infidels with them.

      Its the VCR that Mohammad would use!

    26. Re:VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You will also need either a bunch of TTL ICs {if you're hard}
      Well, I wasn't until I read your post. Now I am.
  5. typical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    so where can I get one of these players? ... hmm time to do a search on Ebay.

    1. Re:typical.. by CuteGeekChick · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're in the bay area, this guy has heaps of them second hand (and in excellent condition) for around the $35 mark.

    2. Re:typical.. by CuteGeekChick · · Score: 1

      omg, wrong window - how do I edit or delete my post? :o

    3. Re:typical.. by CuteGeekChick · · Score: 1

      Anyone? please??? I get the feeling this is going to be the shortest lived Slashdot account ever :-(

    4. Re:typical.. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry, seems the mods have got to it.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    5. Re:typical.. by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they don't block you, just mod your post into obscurity.
      You have nothing to worry about though, cause you have the words Cute and Chick in your name (I am sure the Geek part doesn't hurt either). I would guess most of your posts will get modded up because of this

    6. Re:typical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good thing is, nobody really cares. You're not going to get your account banned, that doesn't even happen to people who link to lemonparty or goatse.

      You're likely to get modded funny. :)

      And the world is wondering... Did you order the Cyberskin Dream?

  6. kvcd by jlebrech · · Score: 3, Insightful
    my dvd player plays kvcd's

    sue them

  7. Ebay by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, prices for Samsung's HD841 DVD player skyrocket on EBay.

    1. Re:Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the DVD-HD850's? Do they do the same thing? The 850's are still being sold in the US.

  8. CPRM is like JEDEC by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Samsung is the bad guy here. Well, insofar as Rambus was the bad guy in JEDEC. Everyone who was involved in the creation of the DVD standard agreed to a certain set of rules that they would abide by, but Samsung (like Rambus) flagrantly violated those rules and put other members of the association at risk.

    Now, DRM and especially things like region locks are really terrible for the consumer, but that's not the issue here. If there were a non-DRM standard for DVD, Samsung could manufacture players for that standard all they like. The fact is that they agreed to a set of rules which included not making non-DRM players, and they decided to go ahead and make a player that is for all intents and purposes non-DRM.

    They will be hit with a penalty, no doubt.

    1. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by Oersoep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Everyone who was involved in the creation of the DVD standard agreed to a certain set of rules that they would abide by"

      But what about CD's then?

      Ever noticed how many CD's in the record stores do NOT have de CompactDisk-icon anymore? That's because the copy protection (sabotage) violates the CD standard. And that's why some car-stereo's don't play them.

      Who's going to sue the record stores for selling non-CD's calling them CD's?

    2. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by ultranova · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Samsung is the bad guy here. Well, insofar as Rambus was the bad guy in JEDEC. Everyone who was involved in the creation of the DVD standard agreed to a certain set of rules that they would abide by, but Samsung (like Rambus) flagrantly violated those rules and put other members of the association at risk.

      Yeah, a bad guy like Robin Hood or George Washington - they too violated the commonly agreed rule to lube their backsides and take it nice and quiet. And now Samsung has joined these horrible villains in their infamy. Oh, the humanity.

      Now, DRM and especially things like region locks are really terrible for the consumer, but that's not the issue here.

      Actually, it is. Samsung realized that they could make a product that's better for their customers than what was being manufactured previously, and took the opportunity to do so. That's all there is to it, really.

      The fact is that they agreed to a set of rules which included not making non-DRM players, and they decided to go ahead and make a player that is for all intents and purposes non-DRM.

      If one of the Prince John's tax collectors decides to let some poor peasant keep his money and buy food for his children instead of doing his "duty" by taking every last penny and leaving the peasant to watch his children starve to death, is he a bad guy for breaking the rules ?

      They will be hit with a penalty, no doubt.

      Sure, the Sheriff of Nottingham must deliver the taxes to Prince John, after all.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Very good point! I guess they can afford keeping up the double morale much easier than Joe Doe who bought these "crippled" cds though.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Everyone who was involved in the creation of the DVD standard agreed to a certain set of rules that they would abide by, but Samsung (like Rambus) flagrantly violated those rules and put other members of the association at risk.

      But it's all a matter of how you present it. Under a different spin, the movie industry cartel applied monopolisitic pressure on the electronics industry insisting on features that are inconvenient to the consumer. Samsung merely produced a piece of equipment that there was market demand for.

    5. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easily fixed with a s/Robin Hood/Batman/g :)

    6. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about region coding here? I thought it was about skipping "non-skippable" parts? Samsung calls it "Q-Play" or something... Yeah.... Consumer who (thinks that he) bought a DVD disk skipping the part accusing him of being a pirate... well, that sure puts industry at risk.

    7. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Sure, the Sheriff of Nottingham must deliver the taxes to Prince John, after all.

      The Sheriff of Nottingham and Prince John get an unfairly bad press. Yes, taxes were absurdly high. Yes, they dropped once King Richard got back from the Crusades. Yes, the two events were related. But not in the way Disney will have you believe.

      King Richard was taken prisoner on his way home from the Crusade. His captors demanded a king's ransom for his release. There's a reason why 'a king's ransom' has become a byword for a ridiculously large amount of money. John was forced to raise this massive sum from taxation on England. It took a long time. It would have taken a whole lot less time if some ponce in a green hat hadn't kept robbing the money...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Say what you will about how wonderful democracy is and how backward British monarchy was, but at least King Richard WENT to the Crusades.

      Yes, I'm talking to YOU, "King" George W Bush the Chicken-Hearted. Why aren't YOU in Iraq?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    9. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

      I have a Toshiba M-1212 DVD player I bpught for my PC back in 1999. No built in region code. I don't think adding a region code is a requirement, it's more to keep the studios from bitching, because a lot of DVD drives made that this time don't have hardware region code settings.

      I've been looking for another one, but it can wait, since I have a Philips DVP 642 and can change it's identity to a euro version of the device...

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    10. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by stalebread · · Score: 1

      Samsung realized that they could make a product that's better for their customers than what was being manufactured previously, and took the opportunity to do so. That's all there is to it, really.

      I doubt that was Samsung's motivation. In fact, I doubt there was even a motivation. It was probably just a glich in the DVD player. Samsung took the DVD player off the market about a year ago when they were told that "sophisticated users" can bypass the DRM. Saying that Samsung is like a modern day Robin Hood gives them way too much credit.

    11. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by Ullteppe · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Everybody did this. I personally have a high-end older Sony model that is totally region free. The clerk did a few behind-the-counter moves on the remote when i bought it and *presto* no region control. Funny, with Sony owning film studios and all. For all I know right now, it may be the last legacy of a Sony where the HW guys could use their common sense.

    12. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The Sheriff of Nottingham and Prince John get an unfairly bad press...
      King Richard was taken prisoner on his way home from the Crusade. His captors demanded a king's ransom for his release... John was forced to raise this massive sum from taxation on England. It took a long time. It would have taken a whole lot less time if some ponce in a green hat hadn't kept robbing the money.


      Wow, have you considered applying for a job with the xxAA? They have been getting a lot of "unfairly bad press" lately and I think maybe you can help.

      Lets see if I have the story right:
      The MPAA is the Sheriff of Nottingham;
      The copyrighted movies are King Richard;
      The copyright pirates are the villans who kidnapped the King Richard;
      Ordinary people (aka consumers) are the peasants of Sherwood forest;
      DVDJon and his DeCSS are RobinHood;
      The increasingly oppressive DRM systems from the MPAA are the increasingly oppressive taxes.

      It would have taken a whole lot less time if some ponce in a green hat hadn't kept robbing the money...

      So if I follow the story right, DVDJon is the ponce who's to blame for the increasingly oppressive DRM.

      But who's Maid Marion? Does DVDJon have a girlfriend? And if so, why is she being held captive in MPAA headquarters?

      Chuckle.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:CPRM is like JEDEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says England needed to pay the ransom to get back King Richard?
      Let the fucker rot for all I care. I assume you have a point. Not.

  9. Obligatory reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MPAA: "I find your lack of DRM Disturbing..."

  10. More/Better Links by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Engadget has a slightly more information.

    And ultimately, Google News will provide all the stories you could want

    To summarize the facts:
    1. Samsung stopped producing this drive a year and a half ago
    2. The 'features' were unlockable through remote control key combos
    3. "The DVD-HD841 DVD-player can allow region encoding and high-bandwidth digital-content protection (HDCP) bypassing, provided a code is entered by remote control. Although pulled off shelves, its genes appear to have been transmitted to the DVD-HD747 and DVD-HD941." reference here

    HDCP Bypassing!!
    Weren't we just complaining about HDCP a day or two ago?

    Run, don't walk, to eBay and get one of these players before Samsung pulls 'em.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:More/Better Links by Kjella · · Score: 1

      3. "The DVD-HD841 DVD-player can allow region encoding and high-bandwidth digital-content protection (HDCP) bypassing, provided a code is entered by remote control.

      The first is nothing new, but as far as HDCP is concerned... This isn't a HD/Blu-Ray player, so whate is the big deal? Are we talking about upscaled DVDs here? I notice they use high-bandwidth rather than high definition in perfect doublespeak. Upscaled DVDs is something anyone with a computer can do easily anyway.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:More/Better Links by io-waiter · · Score: 1

      I think its more about the player being able to bypass HDCP and to send upscaled over analog, it seems as the movie industry are dead set on makeing sure that disabling hdcp wont be as easy as bypassing Region coding.
      Bypassing the region codes can be done with a standard remote on a lot of players, other require a special "service" remote, if that became reality with HDCP...

      Wonder why samsung doesnt just play along, they probably get to sell some more expensive HDCP compatible TVs.

    3. Re:More/Better Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact most DVD players region encoding can be bypassed. I picked up a huge list for less than £1.00 on ebay, identified my model, entered the code and now I can play dvd's from anywhere.

      Great.

    4. Re:More/Better Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe because players with known 'tricks' to bypass DRM crap sell like hotcakes?

      Back when I was in the market for standalone DVD player, savy customers asked for one thing - 'how easy is this to mod region free/macrovision free?'. After that was settled, then discussion turned into the other features.

      In other words, at least over here, high end DVD player market was one where not-easily-moddable devices were DOA at retail. nobody wanted them.

      Yes, uneducated masses bought crap from chain stores at low prices with no such care (tho even those players were often unlockable with remote control keycodes), but at high end, it was the first feature people would ask from the salespeople.

      Samsung is not stupid. They want to produce consumer electronics that SELL. This model probably sold a lot better than crippled ones. In fact, some manufacturers seem to be engaged in 'shell game' regarding this - they put out player model, then 'leak' the unlock info, and when MPAA cries foul, they have already a new model ready to replace the old one.

      This time it's different in that, 1. HDCP was involved and 2. I think MPAA wants to set an example to the 'consumer-licking nogood electronics manufacturers'...

      IMHO Samsung should flip the middle finger to the MPAA.

    5. Re:More/Better Links by albino+eatpod · · Score: 1

      My Samsung HD950 upscales via HDMI natively, but through the remote key combo it allows upscaled 720p and 1080i to be output on the analogue component connectors. I believe this is the same for the 850 model too. I don't believe, however, that it disables the copy protection.

    6. Re:More/Better Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case anyone doubts the real villians here -- it's not just the movie studios. Good old Intel (the people who used to make CPUs and other useful electronics but now make digital handcuffs) is behind HDCP... developed it, they are primary movers behind the scheme and all the pressure, because they own the IP.

    7. Re:More/Better Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My Samsung HD950 upscales via HDMI natively, but through the remote key combo it allows upscaled 720p and 1080i to be output on the analogue component connectors. I believe this is the same for the 850 model too. I don't believe, however, that it disables the copy protection."

      Hey, but if so it's halfway there to full functionality, which is great: you can play YOUR purchased content on YOUR TV at the full resolution. My main complaint about copy protection isn't about the "copying", so much as the illegitimate implication that merely piping the signal through a non-HDCP-enabled video or stereo component automatically implies you must be doing something prohibited. If this avoids that, I am so *there* when it comes to purchasing one of these things.

      Thanks for the first-hand info.

      [from the original article]
      "The studios know that there is going to be a significant spike in demand for next-generation players that can bypass HDCP over the next few years."

      HA! Yeah, trust those crazy consumers to want to play the content they paid for at full resolution on other equipment they already own. The nerve. And the nerve of manufacturers to actually try to meet consumer demand -- it's unprecidented!

      Product recall would be a joke. I get the feeling that Samsung might concede, carry out the recall, but only a trickle of players will ever be returned.

    8. Re:More/Better Links by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Product recall would be a joke. I get the feeling that Samsung might concede, carry out the recall, but only a trickle of players will ever be returned.

      What, you wouldn't return yours if you got a notice like this:

      *** RECALL NOTICE ***

      It has come to our attention that your Samsung DVD Player suffers from a defect. This defect results in the failure of your DVD Player to properly prevent you from copying protected DVD videos, playing DVD videos from other regions, and fast-forward through copyright notices. Please return it to Samsung at your earliest convenience so that we may replace it with a model that correctly enforces your obedience to the copyright cartels.

      Thank You for your compliance,
      Your comrades at Samsung

      *** END RECALL NOTICE ***

      Of course, you only get this notice in the event you're foolish enough to send in the warranty registration card - and in that case, you might be dumb enough to send it back.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    9. Re:More/Better Links by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I did buy one of these about two months ago, and yes, you can turn off the HDCP. When you do, you also get the upconverted HD video output over component - the reason I bought the thing.

      I really didn't want to drop $1000+ on a receiver that can switch HDMI when I have a perfectly adequate one that does component video.

      A simple remote code, and I was in business. Now I just need to figure out how to kill the damn region coding, as I have a LEGALLY PURCHASED region 3 DVD that I can't watch legally due to the fucking DMCA.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:More/Better Links by postsingularity · · Score: 1

      HDCP is required to be included in any upconverted DVD output according to the DVD license. In other words, upconverted analog output is not allowed. It is a contract issue and not a copyright or DMCA issue. There were similar lawsuits about a year ago where some manufacturers made DVD players with upconverted analog outputs.

    11. Re:More/Better Links by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 1
      2. The 'features' were unlockable through remote control key combos
      It was Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Start
    12. Re:More/Better Links by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      It was Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Start

      Dammit, I just tried that and my DVD player exploded!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    13. Re:More/Better Links by alexo · · Score: 1


      > It was Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right [...]

      No, no, this is the solution for Rubic's cube.

    14. Re:More/Better Links by m00j · · Score: 1

      Try the codes here

      I have a HD-747 and I found the unlock code worked on mine, they should have the same circuitry inside them. I also got this for the upscaled output, I was originally annoyed about having to find and get a 10m DVI-HDMI cable for my projector but the HDCP fix has removed that problem, 1080i over component video now!

      Also means I can use the amp to switch component inputs for dvd and set top box rather than waiting for the projector to start up and changing the input on it (which cannot really be automated into one button press).

  11. Deeper investigation reveals... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that the sellers are mostly front-men for Samsung. (-:

    It's a pity that they couldn't actually do that, because it'd probably come close to paying their legal costs for warding off greedy corporate control-freaks.

    Speaking of which, how are Samsung themselves in the GCCF department? I haven't heard anything bad about them on that front.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Deeper investigation reveals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You asked.

  12. But I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...DRM was there to protect me from illegal content that could get me in trouble. Which is good and all, but what happens when I put my home made DVDs in and it refuses to play them? What happens when I put my backup DVD instead of my original one? Or is there a program/service I can pay for that will replace my damaged DVD's free of charge or even with a small fee? I'm just an average consumer that does not own a DRM nfested player yet and am afraid of the future...

  13. Raise your hand... by Deathbane27 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The film companies, including Walt Disney and Time Warner, are demanding Samsung recall the players.

    Raise your hand if you're going to return your player if/when it's recalled. =P

    --
    If it ain't broke, it needs more features!
    1. Re:Raise your hand... by elFisico · · Score: 1
      Raise your hand if you're going to return your player if/when it's recalled.

      depends on how much they are willing to pay... :o)

    2. Re:Raise your hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the movie studios guys look pretty stupid with this recall request. But they look stupid anyway, trying to patch their sinking boat over and over again...

    3. Re:Raise your hand... by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

      Raise your hand if you're going to return your player if/when it's recalled.

      Does one finger count?

    4. Re:Raise your hand... by courtarro · · Score: 1
      It's interesting to imagine what this recall statement from Samsung might look like...

      "A fault has been found in the DVD-HD841 which allows it to work with older TVs and causes users to be able to view DVDs from outside the United States. This results in a dangerous situation in which users will experience less than the minimum annoyance-hassle amount legally required by the MPAA. Please return your DVD player as soon as possible and you will be furnished a free replacement of lesser value."

    5. Re:Raise your hand... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      I'd send them the box back, postage due... with a few pissed-off feral cats inside.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  14. They should try air freight. by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Sure it's more expensive, but being boarded and pillaged in flight is still a fairly rare thing for commercial jets.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:They should try air freight. by typical · · Score: 1

      Fairly rare, yes.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  15. Don't buy players from big companies by skinfitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I always recommend avoiding DVD players badged by large companies.

    Large companies have more to lose if they don't toe the MPAA line (I'm seriously wondering how long it will be until players refuse to play a movie more than once a week or so).

    Buy cheap players packed with features from middle east companies that may not even exist - much harder to threaten a company like that and features sell those sort of players and fierce competition keeps prices low.

    1. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kind of frightening how one might consider the middle east someplace where one can retain freedom and rights. How backwards our little country named the United States is slowly becoming.

    2. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure about the middle east. As far as I know, the cheap ones are coming out of China.

      And yes, all my recent players were cheapo ones from Tesco and Asda in the UK, and nearly all are a doddle to change region codes with a remote hack.

    3. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by halo1982 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Large companies have more to lose if they don't toe the MPAA line (I'm seriously wondering how long it will be until players refuse to play a movie more than once a week or so).

      They already tried this in 1998. Perhaps it was just a bit before it's time?

    4. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Bah! This isn't about "rights" at all, it's about being a shady and liquid enough company that you can't be sued for violating contracts and local laws.

      Besides, this is about fair-use of copyright material, not a right by any stretch of the imagination. And, although nobody will say it, the thing to do is boycott DVDs if you feel your rights have been violated (and that doesn't imply downloading movies from the net). That's been the issue from the very beginning, and people everywhere, including /.ers decided to buy DVDs anyways. It is a problem with a VERY simple solution, if people had any dicipline or self control at all.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      BINGO.
      At the end of the day, capitalism means a win for the consumer. For every giant manufacturer that buys a chunk of the DoJ or lobbyists to pass ridiculous legislation, there is simply more incentive for the black market to address the demands (legal or illegal) of customers.

      As one stout-hearted princess almost put it, "the more you tighten your grip, the more DVD viewers will slip through your fingers".

      Yay Taiwan!

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Honestly cheap players are usually the best.

      A friend of mine is the uber eliete videophile and has a $5000.000 denon DVD player that will not play most burned DVD's it's based on really old tech because denon took forever to get the damned thing out. Compared the video to a $99.00 cheapie into his system and nither of us can tell the difference in video. Yes even using his test refrence disc we can not tell.

      Technology is at a point that only fools buy the high end versions of general commodity equipment. Line doublers and scan converters are worth buying high end. DVD and PLasma HD displays are not. eio has a HD plasma that makes his marantz look like utter crap and is less than a 5th of the price he paid.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared the video to a $99.00 cheapie...

      $99 is a lot of money to pay for a DVD player these days. We paid $20 for ours.

      I used to say, "either get a very high end or a very low end DVD player". Thanks to your info, we can dispense with that.

    8. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I always recommend avoiding DVD players badged by large companies.

      Large companies have more to lose if they don't toe the MPAA line (I'm seriously wondering how long it will be until players refuse to play a movie more than once a week or so).

      Buy cheap players packed with features from middle east companies that may not even exist - much harder to threaten a company like that and features sell those sort of players and fierce competition keeps prices low.


      Yeah but I heard if you try to play Danish cartoons on it... it blows up.

    9. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      he wanted one with HDMI out on it. the $20.00 cheapies dont have that gee-wiz interface that 80% of the users will not use nor have a desire to.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it DOES include downloading movies from the net. It DOES including buying crackable equipment over uncrackable equipment.

      I'm sorry, but it IS about the rights of the people, and the large corporations that want to destroy them.

      And the best way to fight that isn't to sit at home and stare at your navel - it's to do something about it.

      PIRATE THAT MOVIE!

    11. Re:Don't buy players from big companies by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      People have been boycotting DVDs. Maybe not in an organised sense, but a lot of people (myself included) have simply not been buying them, because we feel that they don't offer value commensurate with their cost. Guess what happened? The studios profits went down. Did they say 'oh, our business practices are pissing off our customers, I guess we should change?' No, they said 'The evil pirates are ruining our business! Quick! Buy more laws!'

      What a wonderful world.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  16. why only samsung by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    why are they singling out samsung? there are quite a few models made by quite a few manfacturers that are unlockable via codes. are they trying to scare the industry into making sure that such work-arounds are not going to be in future hardware like blu-ray and hd-dvd?

    1. Re:why only samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true...i mean like other asian countries like china for example, sell modified dvd machines that can play just about anything and bypass anything...why single out samsung?

    2. Re:why only samsung by tosspot1 · · Score: 1

      Good point.. But it isn't just a few other models - almost every DVD player I have ever seen has unlock codes via the remote control. If the shop doesn't give you a piece of paper with the unlock codes on it, then you just go to the various sites on the net and look them up. I won't buy a DVD player unless it has the ability to be unlocked - why would I buy something that ends up being limited in that it can't play the discs that I bought when I was living (quite legally) in other countries? Am I expected to buy a new DVD player in each region at the behest of the MPAA? I don't think so...

  17. Re:Good Marketing for Resale by anagama · · Score: 1

    Holy Moly -- I do have this model. Now to find a link to the remote control key sequence. ;-)

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  18. My local kebab shop doesn't sue me... by leonbrooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if I "reformat" one of their falafel rolls before eating it, so why should a content provider have any say in how you view their content?

    To be certain, it's nice for them to be able to ensure that the original content is high-quality and in a certain order and all, but I should be the one to decide whether I want to watch ads and splash-screens, or even more pointedly whether my kids watch the entire movie or just the 98% of it that isn't offensive.

    Would they care if I piped it into the 320x200 monochrome screen on my mobile 'phone to watch? Or watched it through a filter that corrected for colour blindness? Or just colour-inverted it? Or played it at 120% of realtime? Or toneshifted the soundtrack? Or karaoke style? If so, why?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:My local kebab shop doesn't sue me... by R.D.Olivaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      because you are supposed to buy seperate versions of the same movie for you DVD player and for your mobile and you i-pod and your PSP and any future gadget capable of playing movies that you might buy in the future.

    2. Re:My local kebab shop doesn't sue me... by GoMMiX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, and you will not be allowed to make backups of any of those movies and the disks will be designed in such a way that they will fail after being used x amount of times.

      Ohh wait.

    3. Re:My local kebab shop doesn't sue me... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      And kick in a few bucks each time you watch it ..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:My local kebab shop doesn't sue me... by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? You never actually bought the movie. You only licensed it, and thus you don't get to do anything you want with it. The fact that you are never really told that you haven't actually bought the movie is just a negligible detail.

    5. Re:My local kebab shop doesn't sue me... by mrops · · Score: 1

      You are so naive, don't you know ripping CDs for your iPod is not fair use.

      Same applies to DVDs.

      for those slower than a speeding bullet, Disclaimer: The above comment is sarcasm, and so is the disclaimer.

  19. A glimpse of the future? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I can't recall any special successful lawsuits over DVD region coding bypassing through a remote control lately, if they sent any lawsuits at all about this. This despite it being pretty common. Would a company producing DVD / HD-DVD drives really violate anything like the DMCA if they had all protective features like HDCP intact, but let the user manually disable them via techniques hushed about and leaked from unofficial souces, a bit like I believe it works today with regular DVD drives and zone check disabling? I have local video stores that can take a drive they sell and "fix" it so it's region free if a user wants it.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  20. hm..?? by daddyrief · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is there is barely even an article here? No one even knows which particular models of DVD players the MPAA are bitching about/want recalled. Obviously, they can't mean all of Samsung's players...

    Hm...they are the RIAA though...

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:hm..?? by mooglez · · Score: 1

      Atleat here in Europe, the following Samsung models allow you to turn HDCP off from the remote controller:

      Samsung HD950
      Samsung HD945
      Samsung HD850

      From www.videohelp.com (great source for DVD player specs and unlock codes)

      1. HDCP-Free: Requires only DVD Remote.
      2. Power On DVD player, wait until "no disk" display
      3. Press "Angle"
      4. then number on the remote "4", "3", "2", "7"
      5. TV Screen displays "HDCP Free"
      6. Press "Angle" to turn off the "HDCP Free" display
      7. Try 1 more time from step 1-6 (HDCP Free will display)

      Removing the HDCP also turn the DVD-HD950 into region free player
      HDCP Off will enable you to use the component with adjustable resolution to it's capabiltiy (480P, 720P, 768P & 1080i.

  21. movie industry list $5.4bn? by linuxhansl · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy.

    $5.400.000.000?! I sure would like to see the math behind this estimation. It's probably the old non-sensical #copied movie * $$/movie. Let's say the average DVD price is around $20, that means 270.000.000 movies have been copied? Yeah right!

    And it assumes:

    1. All of the people who pirated a movie would have bought otherwise.
    2. None of the people who pirated later went and bought the movie.

    I'm getting quite tired of these MPAA calculations.

    The opposed feature in these players is most likely the ability to disable the country-code in these players (via a hidden menu) so that non-US DVDs - in fact all DVDs - can be played in the players. I for one never understood why I shouldn't be able to watch DVDs that I bought in Europe because I *cannot* get them here.

    Oh well... In the end the MPAA will succeed convincing enough politicians who will pass more and more stringent laws, copyright will be extended to 500 years, and in a decade or so the movie industry will be facing bancruptcy and wondering why nobody is buying their super-duper-extra-high-definition-drm-secured-DVDs -of-dumb-holywood-crap anymore.

    As I mentioned somewhere before: Instead of land-owners and peasants without rights and property we'll have information-owners and rightless masses of consumers... Information-Feudalism.

    1. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by trezor · · Score: 1

      $5.400.000.000?! ...snip... politicians who will pass more and more stringent laws, copyright will be extended to 500 years

      When copyright is extended to 5 times todays "limited period", expect to see that number turn into $27,000,000,000 + inflation.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    2. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by naich · · Score: 1
      I'm getting quite tired of these MPAA calculations.

      Reminds me of the BSA piracy calculator, which go something like: $a = A wild guess of how many computers there are in the UK $b = No. of licences sold by microsoft $c = Cost of license. Cost of piracy = ($a - $b) * $c There are lies, damn lies, statistics and piracy estimates.

    3. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I for one never understood why I shouldn't be able to watch DVDs that I bought in Europe because I *cannot* get them here.

      It is your patriotic duty to support your poor suffering film industry.

    4. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      I'd guess their estimates are more like: if over-hyped stupid action flick with tons of special effects cost $150 million, expect box office of $400 million. When it flops, blame the pirates, rather than the suckiness of the flick.

    5. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      It is more like assume that every person in the US copies at least one DVD a year - dvd cost $20 - total cost 270,000,000 x 20 = 5.4 billion.

      there is logic for ya...

    6. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget they have to spend a lot of money as advertisement against piracy, and they have to pay their lawyers in cases like this one.
      Poor RIAA!

    7. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      You forgot to factor in that each broadband movie download counts as 2000 downloads, because it's 2000 times as fast as a 1200 baud modem dialup download.

      For anyone who didn't catch the referrence, clicky clicky.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:movie industry list $5.4bn? by wandernotlost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I for one never understood why I shouldn't be able to watch DVDs that I bought in Europe because I *cannot* get them here.

      That's easy! By denying you the ability to watch films from other countries, the members of the MPAA cartel encourage you to get your media fix by spending your money on their own films. As a fringe benefit, since you won't be exposed to other films, you won't even realize how bad their schlock is, nor will you be aware that their increasing influence over American politics is creating a more restrictive environment than that found in countries over which America has traditionally touted its freedom!

      Good times here in America.

  22. Wonderful by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm really looking forward to the day when I can get sued for just owning a DVD player that allows me to bypass commercials, inane FBI warnings, and ads for studios and technologies like THX.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    1. Re:Wonderful by Alsee · · Score: 1

      You're looking forward to 1998?

      P.S.
      It's not about getting sued. That would be a civil issue. As of 1998 the DMCA says it is a violation of CRIMINAL law for you to use such a player, and that it is a violation of criminal law for anyone to provide you with such a player, even criminal for anyone to give you the mere instructions for such a player on a computer.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. Even better by typical · · Score: 1

    What I have done for all the DVDs in my OWN collection is bypass the DRM using DVD decrypter (w00t!) because I am sick of these goddamn preveiews, menus, copyright notices, birth control notices, and other shit.

    I have a secondhand Linux box with mplayer, a DVD drive and TV out hooked up to the TV. Unskippable previews? I think not.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  24. Evidence by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Is there any evidence that the encryption actually reduces piracy, in other words, increases sales? Is there any evidence that zoning on DVDs increases sales?

    To what extent does zoning reduce sales? For instance, holidaymakers and businessmen not being able to purchase DVDs in the countries they visit due to zoning? Have the film studios researched this? Anyone know of any relevant market research?

    1. Re:Evidence by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      For instance, holidaymakers and businessmen not being able to purchase DVDs in the countries they visit due to zoning?

      Yes, they've researched this.I think perhaps you misunderstand. It is this sort of behavior that region coding is overtly supposed to cause. It's very raison d'etre.

      They aren't interested in maximizing sales, they're intested in maximizing profits. Region coding allows them to artificially manipulate markets. A lost sale here and there is nothing compared to this.

      KFG

    2. Re:Evidence by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Is there any evidence that zoning on DVDs increases sales?

      That's not what zoning is about.

      The idea behind zoning is to prevent Europeans from getting hold of the American DVD release while the movie's still showing in their cinemas - and thereby to protect cinema revenues. Otherwise they'd have to release movies simultaneously in both areas, which messes up their marketing.

      It's also important to help them squeeze cash out of poorer countries. The typical Indian or Chinese can't afford to pay as much for a DVD as the typical Canadian or German. Region coding allows the studios to sell the exact same product in India for far less than they sell it in Germany, and not have to worry about those dastardly Germans buying mail-order from India instead of paying their own vastly inflated rates.

      It's not about increasing sales, so much as profits. Region coding allows them to get away with rip-offs that would otherwise be impossible.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Evidence by gnarlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found this lecture rather interesting.
      Professor Koleman Strumpf: "The Effect of File Sharing on the Sale of Entertainment Products: The Case of Recorded Music and Movies"
      Warning: This is a realmedia stream! If anyone knows how to download it and convert it please tell me, I would love to have a copy of it localy.

      --
      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
    4. Re:Evidence by pubjames · · Score: 1

      A lost sale here and there is nothing compared to this.

      But what I'm asking is, are these assumptions true? Is it really just a "lost sale here and there"? Airports, for instance, do amazing amounts of trade - I believe retail space in Heathrow airport for instance is some of the most profitable in the UK - I can't believe that zoning doesn't hurt sales there significantly. And if it is the case, why doesn't the same thing happen with music? I never see "grey" music imports for instance. Why isn't music "zoned"?

      Is it all just about cinema attendance, i.e. not wanting Europeans to get their hands on USA DVDs before a US film is released at cinemas in Europe. If that is the case I cannot believe that zoning generates more revenue than it costs in lost sales.

    5. Re:Evidence by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Region coding allows the studios to sell the exact same product in India for far less than they sell it in Germany, and not have to worry about those dastardly Germans buying mail-order from India instead of paying their own vastly inflated rates.

      When an industry sells products in foreign countries cheaper than in their home market, it is called dumping, and trade sanctions usually result. Why has this not happened to the MPAA?

    6. Re:Evidence by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative
      Is it all just about cinema attendance, i.e. not wanting Europeans to get their hands on USA DVDs before a US film is released at cinemas in Europe. If that is the case I cannot believe that zoning generates more revenue than it costs in lost sales.

      It does make far more money. There are several reasons why the industry might want to release at different times in different areas. Film reels are very expensive and the reels from e.g. the US opening weekend will get sent on to Europe for showing there. Remember that most boxoffice sales are in the first couple of weeks from the opening, after that the number of screens showing the movie drops considerably.

      Another thought is promotion. At the simplest level, the money made from the US weekend can go into advertising elsewhere. If the film flops in the US, it might not even get released elsewhere. Also, the stars of the film tend to go on TV to promote the movie. They can only be in one country at a time.

      I was an early DVD adopter and there was a period when I was importing US disks several weeks before cinematic release over here. This happened mostly because of the aforementioned release stagger, but also because DVD releases were out sooner to promote the format early on. It's not so common now.

      Recently a movie was released in DVD retail and the box office on the same day; a possible sign of things changing. Unfortunately the cinemas went apeshit at this possible attack on their business model and many refused to show it over this simple issue.

    7. Re:Evidence by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When an industry sells products in foreign countries cheaper than in their home market, it is called dumping, and trade sanctions usually result. Why has this not happened to the MPAA?

      I think dumping is only when you sell a product at below cost. Since the cost physically to produce a DVD is effectively nil, they aren't dumping. They're just adding on whatever mark-up the market will bear, which is rather less in, say, Thailand than it is in Japan. Then they're using the region coding to try to prevent the cheap discs here from migrating to the rich countries here...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Evidence by ghostdancer · · Score: 1

      Use mplayer, with -dumpstream.

      --
      I rather be free in hell than a slave in heaven.
    9. Re:Evidence by Crspe · · Score: 1

      The main reason for region codes is to increase profits by ripping us off. They prevent people importing DVDs (legally!) from other countries where they are cheaper, and re-selling them in other countries where they are more expensive.

      If it was really just for the staggered movie releases then why is it that DVD releases of old movies are always region coded? Why is Matrix region coded - they had a simultaneous worldwide release!

      It is also cr&* that the region codes are for copy protection - you dont need to decrypt the disk to copy it.

      Conclusion - region codes are there so that studios can have different prices in different countries. Pure profit, with the customers losing out.

    10. Re:Evidence by andrewweb · · Score: 1

      mplayer -dumpstream -dumpfile professor.rm rtsp://152.3.208.146:80/spring06 /cspd/01232006.rm?cloakport=80,554,7070

      (mplayer is available in a win32 binary if you're not on linux)

      Works every time.. :)

    11. Re:Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I've never figured out is why the law doesn't allow for reimportation of goods, so that people could purchase in a cheaper market and export back to a more expensive market. If globalization is good for the company, it must be good for the consumer too! (Or doesn't our government believe in free markets?)

    12. Re:Evidence by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      What I've never figured out is why the law doesn't allow for reimportation of goods, so that people could purchase in a cheaper market and export back to a more expensive market. If globalization is good for the company, it must be good for the consumer too!

      In small quantities and for personal use, I think you can reimport whatever you please. Hence the rush towards DRM and region coding: if they can't do you for illegal importing, they'll jolly well do you for violating the DMCA.

      However, this kind of thinking is beginning to cause legal troubles in Europe. Consider the European Union. In this corner, we have the UK. Extremely rich. In this corner, we have Slovenia. Relatively impoverished. Now, RecordCartel USA would like to sell music downloads in the EU. They'd prefer to charge British customers a hell of a lot more than Slovenians, because they can afford to pay more. Again we have the quirk of information commerce that it costs nothing to create a new mp3 file, so its cost is solely determined by what people in a particular marker are prepared to pay.

      However, these two countries, very different in per-capita wealth, are both part of a single market. European law is very firm about the single market: the EU is a free trade zone. Thus I can import anything I like from any member state (subject to legality from state to state - there are things I'd like to import from the Netherlands which I can't because they're illegal here) and pay no duties, levies or taxes on them.

      (Yes, fellow British /.'ers: there is NO legal limit on the amount of booze and fags you can bring back from Calais. But if you bring back so much that Customs think you intend to sell 'em, you'll have trouble convincing them otherwise...)

      Hence, any media cartel that means to do business across Europe cannot play this game of manipulating markets. Well, they can - sort of... most people will use the website in their native language, after all. But it's looking a lot like they won't be able to play the Intellectual Property card to try to restrict free trade, as they normally like to do. The Single Market treaties are a pretty high-value trump card in the game of European Law.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    13. Re:Evidence by kfg · · Score: 1

      Conclusion - region codes are there so that studios can have different prices in different countries. Pure profit, with the customers losing out.

      Bingo!

      DVDs are not priced by what they need to make a reasonable profit. They are priced by what the market will bear. In rich countries people will pay $20-$30 for a DVD. In poor countries they cannot so the price of a legitimate DVD is set significantly lower.

      Only region coding allows them to do this, because without it any sharp cookie could just start importing boatloads of $5 DVDs from India and selling them on the US/European market for $10 and make a nice profit by undercutting the standard distribution chain.

      The $15 dollar difference in price per disc is essentially free money to the studios and far more than offsets the occasional lost sale made at a low profit margin.

      And the game is profits, not sales.

      KFG

    14. Re:Evidence by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Dumping is when you sell a product at a loss in foriegn markets, but not at home. Selling at a loss is legal, so long as you do it everywhere, as with videogame consoles. What you can't do is sell at a loss in some foriegn country to try and drive their companies out of business, while selling for a profit at home to keep themselves in business. The Japanese were famous for it when they stared competing with US electronics.

    15. Re:Evidence by NereusRen · · Score: 1

      If anyone knows how to download it and convert it please tell me, I would love to have a copy of it localy.

      It should be trivial in mplayer, although I'm not at home so I can't try it with your particular stream. I just recently did the same thing with another realmedia stream. You need a *little* command-line knowledge though. Get mplayer for your platform (Windows, Linux etc.), and also download the "essential codec pack" for your system [warning: not legal in many countries, since it includes binary codecs for real player and other proprietary formats]. Once you have done that, so it is capable of decoding realmedia streams, enter at the command line one of the following.

      To output a realmedia stream to the current directory:
      mplayer -dumpstream "http://[address]"

      To output an uncompressed WAV file [warning: very large] to the current directory, for easier converting to mp3 or format of choice:
      mplayer -ao pcm "http://[address]"
      (You can also do this command to the saved realplayer stream with mplayer -ao pcm [stream_filename]).

      If it can't connect to the stream, try saving the .rm file to disk and viewing it as text, and copy the rtsp://[address] link from the file to use directly on the command line instead of the other http:/// address. In your case, the link is "rtsp://152.3.208.146:554/spring06/cspd/01232006.r m?cloakport=80,554,7070".

      If mplayer can play it, then it can save it. There are even mplayer plugins for Firefox that will play streaming media in-browser and also automatically save it all for you, although I haven't had the best of luck configuring those properly on my Linux system, and I am content doing it manually using the command-line method above.

    16. Re:Evidence by LadyLucky · · Score: 1

      You know, every player is unlockable somehow. In New Zealand all players are region free - no messing around with zones. The retailers open them up and fix them before selling them.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    17. Re:Evidence by nasch · · Score: 1
      Dumping is when you sell a product at a loss in foriegn markets, but not at home.

      That depends on where you get your definition of dumping.

  25. CPRM by dartarrow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Content Protection for Recordable Media (CPRM) is THE thing used to enforce DRM in DVD players and are burnt in during production of the players. However it is AFAIK only mandatory in US, meaning u could get a player without CPRM keys that can play (and write) pirated DVDs in South American and Asian COuntries (except Japan and maybe a few other countries). Got a friend in Singapore? He could get you a good player

    XD

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
    1. Re:CPRM by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Of course with that imported dvd player you are will also want a voltage converter so you can plug it into the wall and a format converter so you can watch a pal movie on an ntsc tv.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    2. Re:CPRM by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Firstly, just use a fully-wired SCART cable and plug it into the first AV input on the telly. That will get neatly around the NTSC/PAL issue; since the red, green, blue and timing signals are carried on separate wires. The timing is close enough {625 lines @ 25 fps = 15625 lines/sec; 525 lines @ 30 fps = 15750 lines/sec} that any set modern enough to have SCART sockets will sync straight to it. As for the mains voltage and frequency issue, most modern electronic devices have switched mode power supplies that will work quite happily off anything from about 90 to 300V, DC to 200Hz.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:CPRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like Samsung did included the "feature" of DRM for the movie studios fully on and enabled. I'd love to see the anti-competitive contract that says Samsung's player is somehow liable if the end-user turns it off/is able to turn it off. Now that stinks to high heaven. Where are our representatives in Congress making sure the laws quash this anti-competitive behavior? Where are the United States prosecutors in the executive branch making sure these laws are enforced to keep corporations from colluding to rip-off the marketplace?

    4. Re:CPRM by postsingularity · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, SCART sockets aren't found on US TVs. There may be some PAL/NTSC compatible TVs out there but most aren't to my knowledge. THe power issue is much easier since there are converters available even if the power supply is not switchable.

    5. Re:CPRM by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      No SCART socket? Then what do you use to connect the RGB output {almost straight to the electron guns, no loss of quality as you might experience through a Y-C or Y-U-V matrix} from your DVD player or games console to your TV?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  26. Huh? Wow, you're bought & paid for. by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The fact is that they agreed to a set of rules which included not making non-DRM players, and they decided to go ahead and make a player that is for all intents and purposes non-DRM."

    Um, by definition this makes them the good guy.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Huh? Wow, you're bought & paid for. by westlake · · Score: 1
      Um, by definition this makes them the good guy.

      only in the sense that Hot Coffee was good for the video game industry, Take Two's shareholders and distributers like Walmart.

      you have a successful voluntary rule-making system in place, you don't break it in a way that invites government intervention, product recalls, etc.

    2. Re:Huh? Wow, you're bought & paid for. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      a successful voluntary rule-making system

      Excuse me, but a cartel absuing monopoly power over one industry in order to exert monopoly control over a second unwilling industry is not exactly a "a successful voluntary rule-making system".

      Normally that is the sort of thing we normally punish under anti-trust laws. The movie studios were smacked down hard by the courts for their criminal activities in trying to impose mononopoly control over the hardware player market for theater projectors years ago. They should damn well get smaked down hard for their current identical criminal activities trying to impose the same sort of monopoly control over the hardware player market for DVDs today. Their copyright monopoly is not and cannot be a monopoly over hardware markets.

      Unless you'd like to explain how movie studios attempting to impose monopoly control over the DVD player hardware market is any different than those same studios imposing monopoly control over projectors.

      I would agree to your "voluntary market" assumption if in fact there were a voluntary market. If in fact independant DVD hardware makers WERE free to independantly compete. If there were a free market for them to manufacture ordinary DVD players that could play international DVDs and which did not lock out the fast forward button, etc.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Huh? Wow, you're bought & paid for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, by definition this makes them the good guy

      how long did it take you to figure that one out? boy, you are a real genius. einstein.

  27. This isn't about a recall, it's a warning by 99luftballon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Samsung stopped making this particular player nearly two years ago and the lawsuit looks more like a warning to other manufacturers.

    Any recall would be useless - if someone has one of these players and wants to keep it they'll just say it broke and they binned it. This wouldn't be impossible since a quick skim thought online forums indicates build quality on this particular model wasn't up to much.

    Instead the studios are sending a message to all DVD manufacturers to beef up their future models so this kind of thing can't be done in the first place. If they don't they too can expect a legal fight.

    Personally I think they are on to a loser - studios have very little pull over hardware manufacturers and if there's strong demand for an open player they will build it.

    1. Re:This isn't about a recall, it's a warning by DennyK · · Score: 1

      A person who has one of these players wouldn't have to say anything. Product recalls are strictly voluntary for consumers. That, of course, makes this lawsuit completely useless in terms of getting unlocked players out of the public's hands, since anyone who knew enough to unlock their player sure as hell isn't going to send it back for a refund because it can bypass DRM. This lawsuit is most likely a warning, as you said, and an attempt to establish precedent for future cases against any next-gen HD media player manufacturers who release similar unlockable products.

    2. Re:This isn't about a recall, it's a warning by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Any recall would be useless - if someone has one of these players and wants to keep it they'll just say it broke and they binned it.

      I'd just LOVE to read in the paper about people being tracked down through their purchases of these players and forced, with/without compensation, to hand them over. American's determined to hold onto their guns is becoming smaller but damn you if you try to steal some urbanite's DVD player. Of course, it'd get played down or barely mention and what kind of American actually reads the paper or the news these days?

      What a fantastic world I'm growing up in.

    3. Re:This isn't about a recall, it's a warning by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      Any recall would be useless - if someone has one of these players and wants to keep it they'll just say it broke and they binned it.

      Actually, this whole lawsuit is a farce. Let's assume that the MPAA wins, and this model of Samsung DVD player gets pulled off store shelves. With this model being a year or two old, how many of these DVD players will still be on store shelves? Essentially, Samsung has already made their profit off of this model; in today's "newer is better" consumer technology market, older models remaining on the shelves will either not sell or have been relegated to the bargain bin.

      Additionally, there's no way that the MPAA can force consumers who have already purchased the product to return it. While Samsung may have violated an agreement, the consumer has done nothing wrong, and the ownership of this model of DVD player is not illegal. Conversely, with all the hooferah created by the lawsuit, Joe Sixpack will end up realizing what a great deal they got when they purchased their DVD player. They will either keep it for their own use or sell it for an insane profit on EBay.

      So what will this gain the MPAA? Samsung won't lose a lot of money through a recall, although they will have to spend some money on lawyers. Consumers who didn't know that their DVD player could be unlocked through hidden menus will now be informed. In reality, the average consumer will become more informed as to the problems with DRM, and more people will seek out ways of circumventing it. Not much of a warning or deterrent, is it?

    4. Re:This isn't about a recall, it's a warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert conspiracy theory about Samsung agreeing to lose the lawsuit deliberately in order to produce an effective warning that doesn't actually lose Samsung more than a small amount.]

  28. the forgot DRM feature by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1, Funny

    they forgot to mention that samsung also broke a key DRM feature. you know, the one that erases your memory of the movie so you dont describe what happens, to other people.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  29. Go Samsung! by ettlz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am starting to turn into a Samsung fanboy, and everything I've bought from them of late works with Linux. At last there is a company that appears to manufacture electronic products the way consumers want.

    1. Re:Go Samsung! by dww · · Score: 1

      Me too!
      Samsung screen and printer here - the CLP-510 colour laser that does Duplex printing costs a fraction of any other duplex printer. And yes, it does have Linux drivers too.

      "America - where guns are legal but playing music is a crime".

    2. Re:Go Samsung! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I am starting to turn into a Samsung fanboy,

      If I didn't have to RMA so much of their stuff, I might be too.

      I heard about their ultra-quiet DVD-ROMs, so I bought a couple 16X drives for my DVR. One was defective right-off-the-bat and couldn't read anything. After an RMA, I sure was stunned how quiet they were... for about the first 3 months. After which, they're ear-piercing half the time. What's worse, you can't use hdparm (or anything else) to lower the drive speed from 16X, so you can't do anything about the buzz-saw effect, other than buying something else. Then another dead drive, just outside of warranty, but I guess it's all the same.

      More recently, I've been hearing about their super-quiet hard drives... Deja Vu. I'll pass, thanks. At least when a DVD drive dies, you don't actually have any data on the drive itself.

      I know this is just anecdotal, but I've owned several other Samsung products, from CRT monitors to RAM, and none of them have lasted more than 2 years. With odds of 0 for 10, I don't just consider it an isolated case of bad luck.

      and everything I've bought from them of late works with Linux.

      What have you bought from them? Linux hardware support continues to improve, and except in the fringes (eg. capture cards and video cards), it has nothing to do with the manufacturer.

      At last there is a company that appears to manufacture electronic products the way consumers want.

      One errant DVD player that doesn't quite include all the restrictions it should, isn't exactly convincing. What else you got?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Go Samsung! by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      I used to work for samsung. In their monitor plant. Repairing the monitors as they came down the production line. Did you know that a large percentage of the control boards that went into these monitors that we built were the ones that during building failed the initial test and were repaired (badly it appeared) which I ended up having to fix at one point the number of failures in one batch was as high as %40. At this point I started sending them back to the goods in and telling them to ship them back to korea. At this point all the other repair techs started doing the same. When we explained our actions (and I was labelled as a trouble maker)the boards disapeared and all of a sudden we started getting better boards. Shortly after we started producing them ourselves and the failure rate plumeted to the point were they could reduce the number of repair techs on the line. DOH! I quit that job after that.

    4. Re: Go Samsung! by gidds · · Score: 1
      They've still got a way to go, though. My Samsung phone (E350) doesn't work on Mac OS X...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    5. Re:Go Samsung! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put an MP3 player in your rifle stock or grip. Then they can't take it from you, except from your cold, dead hands.

  30. What region codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this region code stuff is silly. You can go and buy a dvd player that allows ALL REGION CODES to play right now. How is BYPASSING the region codes any different to a player that plays them all anyway? It's all a wank, made by wankers, pure and simple!

  31. Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by daBass · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My brother was recently forced to copy a DVD. It was a very cheap children's DVD his son loves. The problem? There was a 2 and a half minute non-skipable copyright notice before the main feature.

    You try explaining that one to a 2 year old...

    1. Re:Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by flewp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shouldn't be too hard, since I bet most of the people responsible for such things have the mental capacity of a 2 year old...

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    2. Re:Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1, Troll

      There was a 2 and a half minute non-skipable copyright notice before the main feature.
      You try explaining that one to a 2 year old...


      Ok, the texts are annoying, and I just whined a bit about that myself further down, but come on. A two year old, just play a bit with him as the texts roll by. Make funny faces, toss a ball, tickle him.

      If waiting 2,5 minutes for a film to start seems unbearable to him, should he even be watching TV?

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    3. Re:Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If waiting 2,5 minutes for a film to start seems unbearable to him, should he even be watching TV?

      Do you have any children? My 1 year old was screeeeaaaaaming at 1am a few nights ago because she was sick and had thrown up. Nothing would calm her down so we threw in a DVD with children singing songs and voila, she sniffled up a bit and looked over at the TV and started dancing with the kids on the DVD. Is that wrong to let her watch a DVD to calm her down? I don't think so. Now, thankfully my DVD changer remembers where it left off and will queue up the DVD to the same spot where it left off when you stopped it, but if it hadn't we would've had to sit through 3-4 minutes of commercials and stupid animated logos for the studio. For another example of that, watch a Baby Einstein video sometime. You have to watch all the god damn Disney crap first then the little animated logos, then you get to a menu, THEN you can play it, then you get more logos and so on. I just want to put it in and the content should start playing. I shouldn't have to violate the law to do that with a DVD I purchased.

    4. Re:Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't be too hard, since I bet most of the people responsible for such things have the mental capacity of a 2 year old...

      Man, now you're just insulting 2-year-olds.

    5. Re:Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by evil_tandem · · Score: 1
      i dvd shrink everything so i don't have to sit through all that beginning nonsense.

      it might not even be so bad if after the warning the movie woudl just start playing. but no then it plays previews, and then i get a menu that requires me to interact with it again. just play the @#$#@@ movie. 9 out of 10 times i don't want a menu, i don't want previews, i just want the movie to start. is that so much to ask?

      i swear everything that is given to the right holders at this point is used to bludgeon the customer over the head...

    6. Re:Explaining DRM to a 2 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't stop there. I've learned my lesson; I know what I get when I buy the DVD; I know I'm going to make a copy.
      So if I'm going to copy it anyway, I might as well just copy it without buying it. It's easier to just download a copy off the net than buying it and ripping it myself.

  32. A recall? by TintinX · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The film companies, including Walt Disney and Time Warner, are demanding Samsung recall the players."

    Erm, how could Samsung make a recall on these players? They can't force people to give them back.

    Recalls are only for products that are faulty, when the purchaser gladly and willingly returns them.

    1. Re:A recall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Samsung has to do is make up a defect:

      "Faulty power line in the DVD Player, your house may burn down"

      Probably what the FucktardAAs want to force them to do anyway.

    2. Re:A recall? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Erm, how could Samsung make a recall on these players? They can't force people to give them back.

      Well, there's probably a few suckers that mailed in that product support card, and a few more that took the extended warranty from Best Buy, Circuit City, etc. Those would be easy pickings. For the rest, they'd be matching till receipts with credit card slips...

      Isn't it an accepted practice that simply publishing a notice in a particular newspaper is sufficient to cover a manufacturer's liability?? I suppose the MPAA would prefer Samsung to post a notice like "These players have been known to catch fire" in order to get people's attention. I wonder if they could *stop* Samsung from publishing a notice like this: "We accidentally made it possible for users of these players to skip the ads by doing X, Y & Z on the remote. The MPAA don't like that, so please send them back for replacement with a crippled player."

  33. What DRM features? by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DVD players don't contain any DRM. Region coding isn't DRM. Region coding doesn't stop me from ripping as many copies of a disc as I want. DRM doesn't stop the large scale pirates making verbatim copies of that disc (though usually with the region encoding removed).

    1. Re:What DRM features? by grimJester · · Score: 1

      DVD players don't contain any DRM. Region coding isn't DRM. Region coding doesn't stop me from ripping as many copies of a disc as I want.

      DVD players contain DRM that forces you to watch warnings and ads every time you see a movie. The DRM in DVD players does nothing to prevent you from copying. Every minute's use of your eyeballs is worth money and allowing ads and "Piracy is theft"-propaganda to be bypassed is the same as stealing your eyeballs from their rightful owner!

      Which is, of course, the MPAA.

    2. Re:What DRM features? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Region coding is DRM. Locking out the menu/FF/next track buttons is DRM. And, of course, CSS is DRM as well.

      The thing is, DRM is not about preventing illegal copying. It's about controlling the consumer. Copy prevention is just the scapegoat that the media industry uses to get Congress and the electronics industry to force DRM down our throats.

    3. Re:What DRM features? by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      This player is capable of bypassing HDCP protection. HDCP is definately DRM.

  34. Re:I'll stick with DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure you want a young, skinny Korean woman, not an old, fat one. Friends and relatives that have traveled to Korea on business have noticed there are only young, skinny women and old, fat women. Their theory is that the old, fat women have eaten the young, skinny ones.

  35. where can i get one? by marafa · · Score: 1

    i want one of those samsung dvd players!

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    1. Re:where can i get one? by christian.elliott · · Score: 1

      Right here.

  36. I hate the non-skippable DVDs by mochan_s · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I watch DVDs on my computer. I "upgraded" my DVD-player software and it wouldn't let me skip sections that the DVD says can't skip.

    I was watching Voyager DVDs and every episode starts with a non-skippable 10s clip of Voyager powering up and moving across the sreen. Even though it was only for 10s, after 3-4 episodes I was really really hating that clip.

    Anyway, I feel that now a pirate DVD is more valueable than a real DVD since pirate DVDs remove all skip codes and DRM and makes for more pleasant viewing.

    1. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Anyway, I feel that now a pirate DVD is more valueable than a real DVD since pirate DVDs remove all skip codes and DRM and makes for more pleasant viewing.

      We are damn lucky not to have to do this with CD's.

    2. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
      I was watching Voyager DVDs and every episode starts with a non-skippable 10s clip of Voyager powering up and moving across the sreen. Even though it was only for 10s, after 3-4 episodes I was really really hating that clip.

      I had a similar reaction, except that after 3-4 episodes I was really really hating Voyager. :-)

    3. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      LOL, you made my day, pal!

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    4. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You suck.

    5. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      Use VLC. IIRC it doesn't obey any 'user prohibited actions'.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    6. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by thegnu · · Score: 1

      We are damn lucky not to have to do this with CD's.
      SHHHHH!! Don't give them any ideas! I am NEVER taking you to a party.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    7. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is Voyager. Deep Space Nine and most of The Next Generation are better. Watch those instead.

    8. Re:I hate the non-skippable DVDs by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Forget 3-4 anything... the very first time I heard the Enterprise opening credits song I wanted to puke.

      The episodes themselves where not bad. Not great, but not bad. But every time I heard that opening song... oh god I wanted to hurl.

      There is one cardinal rule in Sci Fi theme music... it Must basically be some varient of Classical. Look at the teme music for the original Star Trek, and for Star Wars, and for Battlestar Galactica, and Star Trek TNG and Deep Space Nine and Voyager, and for Babylon 5, and on and on. All classical. Not that I'm any particular fan of classical music, but science fiction themesongs must be timeless. The only way to get "timeless" is to go classical. Imagine some 70's Sci Fi with a disco theme song. Imagine some 90's Sci Fi with a gangsta rap theme song.

      And as if it weren't bad enough that they broke the Sci Fi cardinal rule of classical theme music, they broke the rule to go for a putrid drippy yodeling that would have made me puke even if it *weren't* slapped onto a Sci Fi show.

      It's been a long road, yodel-lee-hee-hooo.
      Gettin from there to here, yodel-lee-hee-hooo.
      It's been a long time, yodel-lee-hee-hooo.
      But my time is finally here, yodel-lee-hee-hooo.
      'Cause I've got faith of the heart, yodel-lee-hee-hooo!
      I'm going where my heart will take me, yodel-lee-hee-hooo!
      I've got faith to believe! Yodel-lee-hee-hooo!
      I can do anything! Yodel-lee-hee-hooo!
      I've got strength of the soul! Yodel-lee-hee-hooo!


      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  37. What about current models? by Munchr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why sue over a player that hasn't been comercially available for over a year? If they're going to sue over an unlockable player, why not sue Philips over the DVP642 which is still on the market and is region and macrovision unlockable through hidden menus. Or sue a company like Apex which has consistantly released an unlockable model, quickly followed by a "corrected" player, over and over again?

    1. Re:What about current models? by elFisico · · Score: 1

      Why sue over a player that hasn't been comercially available for over a year? If they're going to sue over an unlockable player, why not sue Philips over the DVP642 which is still on the market and is region and macrovision unlockable through hidden menus. Or sue a company like Apex which has consistantly released an unlockable model, quickly followed by a "corrected" player, over and over again?

      Pssssst!!! Will you PLEASE shut up?! Don't give them ideas...
      Seriously, that's why I prefer not to buy big-brand products. The cheap ones from taiwan or china have much better features like no region code or skipable intros...

    2. Re:What about current models? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Every player on the market can be made region-free
      You couldn't sell them in Europe otherwise

    3. Re:What about current models? by Ashyukun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The player in question is unique in being one of the only upscaling DVD players that would output the pseudo-HD DVD picture over analog outputs and was not limited to the DRM-infected digital ports- that's what this is all about. The studios think everyone with a HD set without digital inputs is a potential pirate and as such wants to lock us out from being able to watch HD movies on our non-DRM'd HDTVs (or at least that's the message they seem to be sending).

    4. Re:What about current models? by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      Err, Philips isn't a 'big brand' product? Philips is a multinational conglomerate with their hands in just about every form of technology from lightbulbs to aerospace. Did I read your post right?

      That said, I've had a DVP-642 for about two years, and while the firmware is a bit buggy (sometimes you need to power-off when changing formats, or the player will refuse to read the disc), this player is like a dream come true. It will play just about any format, from any media you throw at it. And they can be had new for around $65.

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    5. Re:What about current models? by Whyzzi · · Score: 1

      Yep. Got me one of those. Not cheap when I bought it (99$cdn Walmart special) three years ago, and no WMA format (8.3 dos name MP3 though), PAL & NTSC remote button switchable. But There has yet to be a movie comercial or ad or warning that I couldn't skip over. It is the Audiologic 850 (I know there are letters in there somewheres). Plays DVDs way better than the samsung 611 I bought in 1999. Now if only it only was ffmpeg/divx compatible...

      --
      "BSD is about people pissing each other.." (Moid Vallat)
    6. Re:What about current models? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just do this: buy an xbox, buy an xecuter3, ???xboxmediacentermodguide??, PROFIT! or do this to support new h.264 mkv's: wait on xbox360 modchip, buy xbox360, buy xbox360 modchip, ??xbox360modchippingguide??, PROFIT! my modded xbox has become THE media center of my home. way better than using a computer for playback.

    7. Re:What about current models? by elFisico · · Score: 1

      Didn't know about the Philips capabilities, I only know about Panasonic, Sony, JVC etc. and these are overpriced and have some customer-unfriendly details. The last DVD-Player was a 39 EUR no-name product, region-code free and everything skipable.

    8. Re:What about current models? by Buran · · Score: 1

      Ah? I want an upscaling DVD player but I'm hearing-impaired so I need closed captioning. I ordered one of these from Amazon.com after seeing this story, since it was cheap (just under $60) and seems well-suited to my goals. I want a high-res picture that will show captions and it's good to know that it's quite likely that I did the right thing while buying while I could.

      If the captions don't show over DVI/HDMI (my set can do both, as well as HDCP) then they should show up fine over S-Video, if you're correct.

      Great news.

      Anyone know if closed captions are likely to work over the DVI connection?

    9. Re:What about current models? by baka_vic · · Score: 1

      I don't know if upscaling dvd subtitles will improve their quality. This is because the subtitles are not generated by the player itself; but rather, they're images which are "overlayed" onto the movie. From the HD-sets I saw at an electronics store, the results are not pretty - The movie looks beautiful, but the subtitles looked jagged.

    10. Re:What about current models? by Buran · · Score: 1

      Closed captions aren't the same thing as subtitles -- they're generated by the television via the use of a special decoding chip, and the font is built into the TV, and the characters aren't actually image layers that are pre-rendered.

  38. Re:typical.. buggy hardware by nut · · Score: 1

    Google for samsung hd841 and the first page you get is a forum full of complaints. You might not want one anyway...

    --
    Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
  39. hackers? samsung! by mennucc1 · · Score: 1

    every time we talk of DRM, someone (rightly) notices that, in the past, each and any protection scheme was defeated; (and indeed C Doctorow of EFF claims that the failure of DRM is inevitable); the common say is "some clever hacker in a garage will find a way 'round it".
    And then... Samsung... ?!? This is really funny! LOL! ()
    Of all the places and ways to defeat DRM... Samsung !?! (me is rolling and laughing)

  40. Hardly by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    A world where everyone is allowed to do what he thinks is right is a world without laws.

    1. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A world where people deliberately violate laws they consider to be morally wrong, is a world where such laws can eventually be repealed, and ultimately, a better world.

    2. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't aware that contract law was a morally ambiguous area of the system.

    3. Re:Hardly by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
      Sure, and still many (maybe most) increases in civil rights comes from people violating bad laws.

      I personally have refused the draft on the basis of it being applied to only about 1/3 of the population. I expected to go to jail for it, and the clearly most convenient thing for me would have been to enter the military (free food, new experiences, etc). However, I won't support slavery, *even if not supporting slavery is illegal and inconvenient*.

      And yes, I think refusing to support slavery makes me a "good guy", at least on that issue.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    4. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is voluntary participation in a closed-to-the-public group illegal? Is the manufacture of non-DRM devices illegal? I don't think anyone anywhere said anything about Samsung doing anything illegal.

      What they did do, is violate the rules to which they agreed when they became a member of the CPRM group. They were granted certain rights and access to IP under that agreement, and they are now subject to litigation for violating their agreement.

      You may see them as the good guys because they do what you like, but that doesn't mean that their actions are good, in the grand scheme of things. They are convenient for you, this time. However, if we hold no one to their contracts because of the benefits to some parties, then what is the point of having standards organizations at all? What is the purpose of having IP, or any, laws at all?

    5. Re:Hardly by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      The very concept of "intellectual property" is a direct threat to our freedom and must be brought to an end by any means necessary.

      In the 1990s, the slogan of the Direct Action movement was "Do no harm to life, only property". In the 21st century, a new Direct Action movement is arising under the slogan "Do no harm to life or tangible property, only false 'intellectual property'". It's not a case of the end justifying the means; all means to the same end are equally valid, and the corollary is: means which are not equally valid serve different ends.

      Ultimately, every one of us has a choice. If you're a film star and you don't like the idea of acting in a film and not getting paid every single time somebody watches it, then don't act in films! When you're earning more in a year than some people will see in a lifetime, you have no right to complain that it could be more. It could be less. Be thankful for what you've got.

      The poor will never get richer unless the rich first get a little poorer.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then have I got a contract for you!

      It's actually a pretty clear one:

      I hereby agree to transfer to you, AC, the sum of $10 in American money. I reserve the right to alter this contract at any time without notice.

      X__________________________________________

    7. Re:Hardly by evil_tandem · · Score: 1
      did you ever hear the story of why hollywood ended up in california? to avoid the patent holder (thomas edison) of all the early movie tech at the time the studios moved out to a place where the patent holders would have a difficult time enforcing their rights.

      that's right, the movie business we all know and love is founded on the exact type of disobedience that we are all so horrified by today. can you imagine the uproar if someone moved their dvd-player production plants to a place that allowed them to do what they wanted without paying the patent holders a penny, and just doing what they wanted? it'd be a blood-letting.

      despite your narrow-minded view on the topic, most of human history is filled with such examples. the act of creating the united states was treason! doing things because the law says you should is a really poor reason. especially since i'm sure you selectively choose which laws you break based on some bizarre moral code you've ascribed to yourself (ever speed?).

      wake up. the world isn't black and white as you try to make it sound. breaking some laws does not mean the entire world falls apart. because some laws are unjust does not mean all laws are unjust. we as citizens pass judgement on the laws around us every day, why should copyright laws get this magical free-pass from critical analyzation in your mind?

      and more importantly what law has been broken? from reading the article i'm assuming this is more like a contract dispute. i don't believe there is a law requiring dvd-players enforce region coding.

    8. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, sorry. Their actions are good, in the grand scheme of things.

      And please stop using "IP" to refer to the stupid, misguided concept of "intellectual property" - it means internet protocol.

  41. Next thing they'll disable forward by noidentity · · Score: 2

    Next thing you know and they'll disable the fast-forward and skip buttons when you put in a DVD.

    Oh, wait, they already do. Thank you, Digital Restrictions Management (DRM). <sarcasm>

    Seriously, I don't give a fuck about what they want to impose on me. I'll use a restriction-free DVD player just so I can watch the damn movie when I insert it instead of having to wait a minute for all the mandatory crap to play.

    1. Re:Next thing they'll disable forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which has absolutely nothing to do with DRM and is in fact part of the DVD specification. A fully compliant DVD is required to have at least one chapter that is unskippable.

  42. What was the "glitch"? by (Score.5,+Interestin · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what this player did that pissed Hollywood off so much? I can't see anything there that other players don't do as well. Or are they trying to make an example of Samsung for some reason?

    1. Re:What was the "glitch"? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I have a HD-841 player.

      I would imagine the MPAA is pissed about the exact reason I bought it - the ability to enter a sequence on the remote control to disable the HDCP encoding of upconverted HD video, and allow the upconverted stream to play out the analog component video outputs.

      HDCP is how they plan on preventing copying of high resolution digital video streams on HDMI - and this player has a software switch to just disable it.

      I just wanted upconverted video without buying a $1200+ HDMI-switching receiver so I could have a home theater setup that my girlfriend can understand and use.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  43. That silly phrase :) by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So they basically put this number out of their *ss, and whip it out every time things get rough for them :) This is so amazing!

    Samsung: That's it, we're releasing the DVD-s as is.

    MPAA: No! You can't!

    Samsung: WTF?

    MPAA: "The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy."

    Samsung: What are those estimates based on, not on Samusng DVD players right?

    MPAA: Can't you read man, come on, SHOCK! See: "The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy."

    People: MPAA you're suing your users and manifacturers and keep pulling those numbers out of your *ss and applying silly DRM restriction so people don't buy your production, what did you expect?

    MPAA: And you'll all be sued!!! You know why!? "The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost friggin $5.4 billion last year due to friggin piracy."!!! Estimate=Fact! Estimate=fact!! Don't question us or you be sued!!! Arghh..

  44. Drop it. DVD Region coding is dead. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    All but one of my friends has a player that's been adapted by chipping or remote hacks to be multiregion. The all defeat RCE discs.

    It's time to just ditch it. Get together and agree that it's an idea that's past, and quit forcing your customers to waste their time with finding codes on the net.

    You aren't cutting sales of R1 discs to the UK.

    1. Re:Drop it. DVD Region coding is dead. by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      You aren't cutting sales of R1 discs to the UK.

      That's what gets me! The word "sales". i.e. People are buying commercial copies of DVDs and bringing/shipping them to other countries that are technically different region codes. So why is the MPAA insisting on region coding in the first place? People are buying your product, generating cash flow for you, not pirating! So what's the point of region coding, exactly, except to annoy the consumer?

    2. Re:Drop it. DVD Region coding is dead. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      It's an attempt to charge different prices for different markets.

      Someone in Thailand won't pay £15 for a DVD, which either means charging £4 globally and making less in Europe, or charging £15 and losing Thailand.

      So, region coding was invented, the idea being that you could sell a DVD to Thailand for £4 and one to the west for £15 and maximise profits.

      Lots of people in the UK buy from abroad now. There are specialists who cater to the UK market on the web (they aren't allowed to sell here for licensing reasons) selling discs from all over. It's not just a geek thing. My plumber buys films because he can often get the DVD from the USA at the same time as a film comes out at the cinema. There's even a multiregion price check site, allowing me to check global prices for ordering.

    3. Re:Drop it. DVD Region coding is dead. by mttlg · · Score: 1

      So, region coding was invented, the idea being that you could sell a DVD to Thailand for £4 and one to the west for £15 and maximise profits.

      There's a little more to it than that. Quite often, different companies will have the rights to distribute a film in different regions. A technical limitation that keeps other distributors' versions of a film from running in your region makes the distribution deal more valuable, thus making more money for the studio. And of course in countries like the UK, it allows for delayed releases to be coordinated with the theater release schedule, creating the illusion of geographic separation in an increasingly connected world. The studio spin is that this allows content to be made available to people who might not have been able to afford it otherwise. Can you imagine what it would be like to go through life without Adam Sandler movies?

      Different versions for different regions might also have different content, so extra features on the region 1 DVD might not be included on the region 2 DVD. The studios will spin this by making it sound like region coding protects you from "accidentally" purchasing an inferior product, but in reality they don't want you to have the choice of not paying extra for content that someone decided that your market could bear. The primary belief in all of this is that consumers are stupid and wouldn't be able to tell the difference between different versions of the same movie. The possibility that someone might want an "inferior" version or different content like Portuguese subtitles is not a consideration.

    4. Re:Drop it. DVD Region coding is dead. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I once bought a R1 DVD because the R2 had had the title song resung by some people from Steps (rubbish UK pop band), presumably as a publicity thing. The R1 had the original title song left intact.

      Also, Shrek 2 had some voices changed for the R2 version.

      We also get movies butchered by the board of censorship, where the chief censor gets his knickers in a twist about something. A whole scene of Enter the Dragon was taken out because it had nunchukas in it (a change in the chief censor brought an end to that). It's illegal to sell a non-certified disc in the UK, but it's legal to import a disc (the laws on what's legal to own are different from the laws on what's legal to buy).

  45. MPAA designing DVD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the MPAA realise that with the amount of attention this law suite is generating that they are effectively advertising a list of 'features' to be included in future DVD players (well at least to those from small companies in China/Middle East).

  46. a recall, sure that makes sense by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course we all know a recall would get nearly 100% of these offending boxes. I know I certainly would return my box, particularly if I really had DVDs with different region codes and the box could play them all, or if I knew I could use the box to othherwise get around DRM. Heck, who wouldn't want to rush to send back their recalled player for one that was hobbled? Of course, the more cynical might say that the only boxes they would get back on a recall would be those that have already died or those used by people who would never use the device to get around DRM anyway, and that a recall would only serve to alert consumers that this model has a feature they might want and find hard to get. It will be interesting to see how this works out.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:a recall, sure that makes sense by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      This is how it'll work out.

      More than 99% customers simply don't pirate movies.

      Several pirate groups acquire a player like that and use it to pirate any movie they feel like. They don't even need to invent anything - it's already done for them. Then they can distribute pirated HD movies over the internet.

      Piracy remains completely unaffected, while customers keep suffering from higher and higher restrictions.

      *sigh*

  47. Re:Good Marketing for Resale by thedletterman · · Score: 1

    Xbox Media Center (XBMC) automatically can turn the power light off on your xbox when it's playing a movie. Not to mention it supports SMB shared drives, and plays just about every video format you can imagine. Just hack out an xbox (Get em while supplies last) and have a killer media center PC for cheap.

    --
    Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  48. What's the Big Deal ? by a_peckover · · Score: 1

    It can resize 480p DVDs to 720p. Big deal, so can any PC DVD playback software. All it's doing is resizing an image. Play a DVD in a screen res higher than 720x480 and you've acheived the same effect.

  49. Large losses = tax breaks = MPAA FRAUD by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I personally made a $12 million dollar loss because my startup didnt work, wheres my tax breaks and discounts?

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Large losses = tax breaks = MPAA FRAUD by gnarlin · · Score: 2

      I'm so sick and tired of reading about how the poor and defenseless multinational conglomorates aren't making as much money as they had decided that they should have been making!
      These companies don't have a guarantee that they should earn such and such amount per year. How many companies and start-ups go bust every year because there business plans are obsolete? If they can't make money, tough!

      --
      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
  50. Re:Good Marketing for Resale by thelonestranger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here ya go,
    http://www.videohelp.com/dvdhacks.php?dvdplayer=Sa msung+HD841&hits=50&Search=Search

    Seriously why is the fact that a dvd player can be unlocked such a suprise to some people? Walmart in England has been selling one for a number of months that plays off the shelf not only all regions, copies, divx and xvid but also plays them off of data cards as well. All this for £35.

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  51. Use commas ;) by Tranvisor · · Score: 0, Troll

    Commas are used as decimal separators in the English language. Periods are used over in Europe.

    Ex. 15 million = 15,000,000 not 15.000.000 :)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma_(punctuation)#N umbers

    1. Re:Use commas ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, commas are used in the AMERICAN LANGUAGE. In English, 15 million is just 15000000.

  52. And for all those who already have one: by thelonestranger · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  53. To change region and/or remove HDCP. by thelonestranger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Region
    1. Turn on player with no disc in the tray. "No disk" appears on screen.
    2. Press the "Repeat" key on the remote.
    3. Press "57538" on the remote. A number should appear on screen, indicating your player's current region (e.g. "2").
    4. Press the number for your required region (e.g. "1") or "9" for region-free/all-regions. The number will appear on screen, replacing the previous number (from step 3).
    5. Press "Open/Close Tray" and leave the tray open for a few seconds.
    6. Press "Power On/Off". The tray closes automatically and the player turns off. Next time you turn it on, it is region free (or whatever Region you selected in step 4).

    HDCP
    1. Turn your television ON
    2. Turn the DVD Player ON
    (You should see the Samsung screen saver appear on the TV)
    3. Ensure the DVD tray is EMPTY and CLOSED
    4. Wait for the message 'NO DISC' to appear
    5. Press the ANGLE button
    6. Press the numbers 4, 3, 2, 7
    (You should see the message 'HDCP Free' appear in the upper
    left hand corner of your television screen)
    7. Press the OPEN/CLOSE button to open the disc tray Your DVD player is now region-free and HDCP-free.

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
    1. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wanted to point out that "region free" mode will prevent some American DVDs from playing. Hollywood got angry a few years ago that people in Europe and other parts of the world could buy and play our DVDs on region free machines, so they put a nasty little trick in to prevent that. I have forgotten what they call it. Here is a simplified version of how DVD players normally work in region free mode:

      Normal DVD talks to DVD player: My region is region 1. What region are you?
      DVD player: I'm region 0. That means region free. I can play you.
      Normal DVD: Go ahead and play me.

      However, with some American DVDs, the conversation goes like this:
      DVD talks to DVD player: My region is region 2. What region are you?
      DVD player: I'm region 0. That means region free. I can play you.
      DVD: I lied! I'm really region 1. Since you can play me as a region 2 disc but I am supposed to be sold only in region 1, that means you are region free. I won't play on you.

      I don't remember the studios that do this except for Paramount, but for these discs, it is necessary to switch the DVD player back to region 1 to play the discs.

    2. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I believe the "Some American DVDs" work a little more like this:
      DVD talks to DVD player: My region is region 0. What region are you?
      DVD player: I'm region 0, too. That means region free. I can play you.
      DVD: OK, sure thing. But I only have one frame to play. Read and weep.

      If the player reported region 1, though, the programming would "find" the whole movie to play. To get around this, follow the previous posted instructions and set the region code on the player to the region of the DVD, which will be 1 for most or all of the DVDs with this trick.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Um, come on, the DVD manufacturers should each have a slightly different method like these just for the video game generation. I mean come on who would figure taht out? Only the guys that would spend the time actually trying to learn hidden game codes. ;)

    4. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by Jack+Tanner · · Score: 1

      Description of how to do the same off of Amazon... before Amazon pulls it.

      --

      I researched many upscaling players--including others from Samsung, including the 841 and 950--and decided on the HD941. I've only had the player for a few weeks now, but am very impressed and happy with it. PQ is excellent, even on an HDTV that supposedly does its own upscaling (the Samsung HL-P5063W).

      A bonus was being able to make the player region-free using (sometimes conflicting) experiences found elsewhere on the Internet and some of my own ingenuity. I'm posting my detailed experiences here so that others can make their player region-free. The steps may appear long and complicated, but they took less than five minutes to peform.

      The most-recent experiences indicate that an Aiwa remote is required to make the 941 region-free. That worked for me! I would love to know why an Aiwa remote is able to do this and how anyone could have stumbled upon this discovery!

      Actually, I programmed my Harmony 676 remote to *emulate* the Aiwa remote and then used the Harmony to make my 941 region-free. Talk about multiple levels of indirection!

      The Harmony requires the model number of a *device*, not a remote. Not knowing which Aiwa device(s) use the RC-6AS14 remote, I Google'd for "Aiwa RC-6AS14 remote control". One of the hits took me to http://www.dvdremotecontrols.com/Mfrs/Aiwa/AiwaAud ioDVD/RC-6AS14.htm--which not only provided a screen shot of the remote, but also listed the Aiwa devices that the remote actually controls!

      I programmatically added the first Aiwa device (the CX-NA10--a "Mini System (DVD)") to my Harmony, and then I performed the following steps:

      Note: Make sure the 941 is off. Make sure there is no DVD in the drive.

      Using the 941 remote:
      1. Turn the player on.
      2. Press the OPEN/CLOSE button. The drive door will open.

      Using the Harmony remote:
      3. Press the DEVICE button.
      4. Press the NEXT button until the "Mini System (DVD)" device appears next to one of the soft buttons.
      5. Press the "Mini System (DVD)" soft button.
      6. Press the NEXT button until "Repeat" appears next to one of the soft buttons. (I had to press the NEXT button seven times to cycle through the choices.)
      7. Press the "Repeat" soft button.
      8. Press the NEXT button until "Program" appears next to one of the soft buttons. (I had to press the NEXT button eight times to cycle through the choices.)
      9. Press the "Program" soft button.
      10. Press the NEXT button until "Clock" appears next to one of the soft buttons. (I had to press the NEXT button three times to cycle through the choices.)
      11. Press the "Clock" soft button.

      The player's LCD will display "ADJUST". There was also a brief mention of something about a 'servo adjustment complete' on the TV.

      I used the 941's remote to press "9" (as others have instructed), but this didn't have a visible effect. The drive door did not close. Doesn't hurt to do it, I suppose.

      12. Using the buttons on the player, close the drive door and power it down.

      Upon powering up the 941, I could play other regions' DVDs. I also double-checked that my own region's DVDs still played ok.

      I added the 941 to my Harmony remote and both it and the player itself have been working great!

      Notes:
      -I just purchased my 941 from Amazon.com; not sure which firmware version I have, but I assume it's a relatively current one.

      -Other people's experiences said I would need to press a SHIFT button on the Aiwa remote prior to pressing the Repeat, Program, and Clock button--in order to generate the appropriate signals. Since the Harmony emulated the *functions* of the Aiwa remote and not the actual *buttons*, I did not need to emulate or press a SHIFT key.

    5. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should seek professional help if you are hearing your DVD player and DVDs speaking to each other. I hear they can do remarkable things with pharmaceuticals these days.

    6. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by n8_f · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is called "Region Code Enhancement", or RCE, and it works basically the way you have described. I would just note that as you implied, the difference is that region code checking is done in hardware, while RCE is done in software. So with normal region codes, the DVD player is supposed to check the region of the disc and not play if it doesn't support that region. Region-free DVD players just skip that check. WIth RCE, the software on the disc, the code that drives menus and whatnot, checks for the region code.

    7. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by greed · · Score: 1

      ...and thus was born a generation of RCE-immune region-free players.

      At least, the region free firmware for my Apex 1500 doesn't interfere with any RCE discs, and works just fine with all my imported discs. (And it does Macrovision-disable, so I got one for my Mom to hook to her old TV through her old VCR.)

      My super-cheap-and-crappy region-free Nova player doesn't have any trouble with RCE discs either. Though it gets a bit snarky about some of my home-burned DVDs (that I made from my old VHS tapes, haven't really tried dups of real DVDs on it).

    8. Re:To change region and/or remove HDCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardware/software will always beat out the read-only DVD!

      DVD talks to DVD player: My region is region 2. What region are you?
      DVD player: I'm region 0. That means region free. I can play you.
      DVD: I lied! I'm really region 1. Since you can play me as a region 2 disc but I am supposed to be sold only in region 1, that means you are region free. I won't play on you.


      DVD player: I can't play you? I lied too: I'm really region 1.
      ...
      DVD player: I can't play you? I'm really region 2.
      ...
      DVD player: I can't play you? I'm really region 3.
      ...
      etc.

  54. 2.5 minutes is *forever* by Otto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If waiting 2,5 minutes for a film to start seems unbearable to him, should he even be watching TV?

    2.5 minutes. That's 150 seconds. Try something: Sit there and count off 150 seconds. That's rather a long freakin' time to be waiting for a video to start, no? It takes less time to make a bag of microwave popcorn.

    Really, waiting 2.5 minutes isn't the problem, it's waiting 2.5 minutes when you know that it's totally pointless that's really annoying.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by NekoXP · · Score: 1
      2.5 minutes. That's 150 seconds. Try something: Sit there and count off 150 seconds. That's rather a long freakin' time to be waiting for a video to start, no? It takes less time to make a bag of microwave popcorn.

      So sit your kid down, have him watch the copyright notices, and make him popcorn for when the movie starts?

      People can't spend 3 minutes with their children these days with their hectic lives, in order not to have to watch the previews etc.?

      I think this is getting pretty sick. I agree throwing them in front of the TV is a great tactic. But 3 minutes effort entertaining them for the beauty of 3 hours (again! again!) of howling at Toy Story 2 for the 18th time.. while you do other stuff. That's almost priceless.

    2. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      2.5 minutes. That's 150 seconds. Try something: Sit there and count off 150 seconds. That's rather a long freakin' time to be waiting for a video to start, no? It takes less time to make a bag of microwave popcorn.

      I agree, that is annoying. But I think that sort of validates my point too - these 150 seconds only feel unbearably long if you sit there passively and stare at the screen. If you pop the film in and then play with the kid for little while, that time will fly by.

      (What was up with the troll modifyer btw? Really grouchy moderator.)

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    3. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Jarlsberg · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The point is not spending three minutes with your kids, it's the wasted time. When you want to watch a movie, you don't want to pop in the DVD and then wait for several minutes before you can push play.

      It's even worse when you have these kids DVDs that show the loud "you're a thief"-commercial in the beginning. (You wouldn't steal a car blah blah blah). The noise and the imagery is actually quite scary for kids. I'm forced to "pirate" this movie to remove the fricking anti-piracy message from these movies (along with several minutes of commercials -- some Disney movies have 10-15 minutes of non-skippable commercials before the menu starts).

    4. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      If you pop the film in and then play with the kid for little while, that time will fly by.
      When and for how long you play with your kid should not be dictated by movie studios. If I've been playing with my nieces for a couple of hours, and they want to watch a movie or I want to go do something else, I don't want to have to worry about putting the disc in 2 minutes in advance, or finding something to do that exactly fills that time slot. Also it's mainly the principle that winds me up. Along with making a backup (because the 2.5-year-old insists on putting the disc in herself, fingers everywhere) it's just one more reason to clone the disc.
    5. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by daBass · · Score: 3, Informative
      When and for how long you play with your kid should not be dictated by movie studios.

      That is a very good point. Besides, the guy blindly criticising my brother's parenting skill obvioulsy has no idea what kind of parent my brother is.

      He's spends a *lot* of time playing (and educating) his son, but he is also a geek, and if it can be hacked to make it better, it must be done! :)

    6. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by TheSloth2001ca · · Score: 1

      Now imagine trying to do that as a 2 year old... and some kids DVDs have over 10 minutes of crap you have to watch EVERY time you wanna watch the movie, and most kids have an attention span of less than 10 mins. It does not take a genius to know that this is a problem.

      --
      Just another crappy blog
    7. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by daBass · · Score: 1

      Troll is a bit harsh, I agree. But you do make it sound like my brother is one of those no-time-for-the-kids-make-them-watch-movies-instea d parents. Which, of course, could not be further from the truth.

      He's a geek, remember; turing a screaming couple of pounds of flesh into an intelligent well behaved human being is the ultimate hack that must be persued at all cost.

      I haven't seen the DVD in question, but knowing my brother, I seriously doubt they are episodes Terminate Death Kill Autobots cartoons! ;-)

    8. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by dwandy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      People can't spend 3 minutes with their children these days with their hectic lives, in order not to have to watch the previews etc.? I think this is getting pretty sick.
      If you think watching an unskippable FBI warning or other crap is quality time with your children then I think you need to re-evaluate...

      For me, the point isn't about 60seconds, or 120 seconds. It's my media. I bought it. I should be able to use it as I see fit, not as they see fit.
      How about from now on, whenever you start your car, it won't move for 3 minutes. You must be buckled in your seat ('cause after the ~3-minutes are up, it starts to move w/o further warning) and on the windshield a video message is displayed about how you need to change your oil to keep the warranty. ...tell me you'd tolerate that from a car manufacturer.

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    9. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      For all those who say play with the kids for three minutes...

      Why?

      Why should the DVD makers decide when you play with the kids?
      You might have already been playing with them for hours when they ask you if they can watch a film.

      The DVD makers are hindering your ability to use your time as you see fit. Period. It doesn't matter whether it's two minutes or two hours: it's your time and it's up to you alone to judge what is or what isn't too long.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    10. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      Yeah just buy the pirated version, it doesn't have the annoying piracy is a crime rubbish.

    11. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      But you do make it sound like my brother is one of those no-time-for-the-kids-make-them-watch-movies-instea d parents.

      Yes, I realise that, and I do apologize. As someone who doesn't have kids of his own, it is easy to come with neatly wrapped solutions.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    12. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Heh - when was the last time you managed to get a 2-year old to sit still for 2.5 minutes, without entertainment/distractions?

    13. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't steal a car blah blah blah

      I play GTA, you insensitive clod!

    14. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car makers *ARE* doing that. Almost all cars now come with an alarm that sounds off loudly and clearly if you aren't buckled up as you drive from your mailbox to your garage. It's the most annoying thing ever (next to previews and FBI warnings in different languages on DVDs, of course)

    15. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by bfree · · Score: 1

      I always thought those "do no steal" ads were incredibly odd in the cinema , now you mention them on DVD. Imagine every time you go to Windows Update you were made to sit through a one minute "ad" telling you not to pirate Windows? Perfectly acceptable imho if your computer is only showing it to you because it knows your Windows is not genuine, but if it knows your Windows is genuine/legal/legit then it would just be pissing off your paying customers. Now imagine you have just bought a cinema ticket and had people check it to let you in to watch a film, or you have bought/hired a DVD and you are told "don't be a thief". It doesn't show much respect for your paying customers.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    16. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'I'm forced to "pirate" this movie to remove the fricking anti-piracy message'

      Don't fall into their verbal hole. You did NOT pirate the movie. Modifying content you PAID for is NOT pirating. Part of the whole problem with dealing with the media companies is keeping straight what is being addressed, by allowing them to redefine terms, we lose.

      Taking another's content and selling it for profit is pirating.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    17. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you DRIVE from your mailbox to your garage then you're obviously a fat, lazy cunt.

    18. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Haha. That's actually rather funny.

    19. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by sstation · · Score: 1

      yes, but you can still drive while this alarm is going off. It doesn't halt the car's progress. Plus you can always blast your music to ignore it (which a friend of mine does) ;). Also with cars there is normally an alternative choice of car that most likely does not have this feature..with dvds you are stuck with two choices (widescreen/fullscreen..if they are not on the same disc) and both force you to sit through a bunch of crap in order to get what you want. Besides, in most places wearing your seatbelt is the law..last time i checked watching commercials for things is not.

    20. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by hrrY · · Score: 1
      2.5 minutes. That's 150 seconds. Try something: Sit there and count off 150 seconds. That's rather a long freakin' time to be waiting for a video to start, no? It takes less time to make a bag of microwave popcorn.
      I think there's a conspiracy involving orville reddenbocker, could it be him thats running the show(no pun intended)
    21. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by squoozer · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in your comment about the cinema ticket. Cinemas on US side of the pond must work differently. Over here in the UK they do check the ticket before you can go into the movie. There is a good reason though. The ticket desks are in an open foyer area where anyone can go with or without a ticket. I actualy find that it's quite a nice relaxed way to do things.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    22. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by squoozer · · Score: 1

      If you disabled the warning alarm you wouldn't be breaking the law unlike if you disable the content protection on a DVD. Further more it is easy to argue that the warning is helping you where as the adverts aren't.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    23. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by SoCalChris · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be more correct...

      It's copyright infringement.

      Piracy is defined as "an act of robbery esp. on the high seas; specifically : an illegal act of violence, detention, or plunder committed for private ends by crew or passengers of a private ship or aircraft against another ship or aircraft on the high seas or in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state"

    24. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by angulion · · Score: 1

      Yes and this is a big part of the problem in my opinion...
      The more the try to thighten their stranglehold, the more the alienate customers/conumers..

    25. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      I have nothing to say about your point but

      "2.5 minutes.. ..It takes less time to make a bag of microwave popcorn"

      If you put a bag of popcorn in a 1000w microwave it takes _at least_ 4 minutes till the kernels stop popping. any less and you are really wasting kernels. you can probably see a bunch at the bottom of the bag. i would make a poit of checking next time.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    26. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Taking another's content and selling it for profit is
      pirating.


      No it isn't. That would be a copyright violation.

      Piracy requires a boat, and a large body of water; and possibly a parrot and a wooden leg.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    27. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Otto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I really don't know what he's talking about either. In the USA, usually you buy your ticket and then somebody checks it and possibly rips it in half before you go and sit down in the theater. Depends on the theater, I suppose, and on low traffic days I've been to places that don't have ushers ripping tickets, but usually checking the ticket is the case here too.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    28. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Copyright infringment isn't "piracy" either. In fact, the only thing that is piracy involves illegally boarding a ship and robbing/raping/kidnapping the people on it. So really, calling editing out the commercials "piracy" is just as accurate as anything else the RIAA/MPAA define it as.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    29. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      It's a SHIP, not a boat...
      Funniest post I've seen today!

    30. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      Oh! Oh! Star Wars quote time:
      "The more you tighten your grip, Govenor Tarkin, the more systems will slip through your fingers."

      (Not sure if it was "Govenor" or something else though, correct me if Im wrong.)

    31. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I only download movies while on the high seas using a packet radio, while performing cruel things to hampsters

    32. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by jr-slash · · Score: 1

      and if it can be hacked to make it better, it must be done! :)
      Maybe we should go one step further and hack the following menu into the DVD player:

      - noskip setting-

      (On) obey the MPAA
      (Off) ignore the MPAA
      (Reverse) automatically skip everything marked unskipable

    33. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought his use of the word pirate was perfect.

      He put it in scare quotes, and the rest of his post made it abundantly clear that he was doing absolutely nothing wrong. His use of the word piracy made the very powerful point that the use of the word piracy against the circumvention is wrong and unreasonable. The powerful point that any person trying to use the word piracy to attack and smear the circumventing/removing of DRM, that that person is wrong and unreasonable.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    34. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Alsee · · Score: 1

      So sit your kid down, have him watch the copyright notices

      Wow. There is something seriously wrong with you. What sick twisted person thinks that parents should force their toddlers to sit staring at that stupid, boring, and incomprehensible screen? You presumably want it in service of some Holy Crusade against the Dread Pirate Roberts.

      When you read your toddler a bedtime story from a book (god forbid you ever do raise a toddler), do you forcibly strap him down in bed and first spend time forcing him to listen to you read him the copyright notice and publisher information and the thirteen digit ISN International Standard Book Number and other crap printed on the first or second page inside the cover?

      And do you forcw him to lay there listening to you read that same crap over and over each betime, night after night after night after night? Oh that's right... according to you reading the copyright notices to the kid is a small price to pay for the beauty of that story in that book. Never mind the fact that the parent already paid a CASH price to buy that book. No, reading the copyright notice to the kid each night is a small price that should be paid ON TOP of the real cash price paid for that priceless bedtime story.

      And when he gets old enough to read for himself, to you force him to sit there first reading that crap in each and every book, over and over any time he picks up any book?

      No Johnny, you can't look that word up in the dictionary until you first read all of the copyright and publication information at the front. Yes yes, I know you read it 20 minutes ago when you looked up that other word, but you're opening the dictionary again. That means you must read all of the copyright and other publication information again.

      Remember Johnny, don't be a pirate. Only pirates skip reading the copyright notices at the front of books.

      People can't spend 3 minutes with their children these days with their hectic lives, in order not to have to watch the previews etc.?

      What are you going to do? The kid wants to watch the movie NOW... you pop the disk in and then spend 150 seconds playing Candyland?

      How about the kid wants to watch a movie NOW, you pop it in and it immediately plays, it ends three minutes sooner, and THEN you pull out and play Candyland together?

      So sit your kid down, have him watch the copyright notices

      Wow. Just.... wow.

      I think this is getting pretty sick.

      Well we agree on something at least.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    35. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by Spectrum_Leap · · Score: 1

      Imagine if you had to wait 2.5 minutes every time you wanted to drive your car ...

    36. Re:2.5 minutes is *forever* by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      I think it was admiral

  55. Re:Good Marketing for Resale by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I'd love for a lot of electronics to learn to be dark. What is the freaking obsession with covering them with bright lights. These things sit in my bedroom and make the room a technocolor light show when I'm trying to sleep. Many of them turn more lights on when you turn them off! Brilliant design decision there and if you turn them off by cutting the power to them they lose your settings.

    C'mon you crappy consumer hardware designers. If you must make your gizmos glow like a radioactive wasteland then make the lights go off when the power is off and make the lights dim when not being interacted with. And make the g'dam settings persistant even if the power to the device is shut off. How much memory can these settings possibly take? I can buy 32MB of flash memory for under $10 retail. Certainly a big electronics company could afford to put the memory and small amount of control logic in their device for a couple dollars. Frickin morons will waste a lot of money implementing DRM that customers don't want but not a couple bucks to make smart lights that dim as needed and settings that don't get lost all the damn time.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  56. scroo em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    screw em. we don't need their stinking DVDs http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-352937521 0704959792

  57. Uh, fast forward? by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    Shrek also had unskippable previews, but you can always just fast forward through them and if you pin the fast forward it only takes a few seconds to reach the menu. So, all those previews, notices and warnings can be fast forwarded through but, yes are still incredibly annoying.

    There are a few movies though where I was quite surprised that the movie just started with out all the bullshit. The Smallville DVDs are like that in that they do not display the FBI warning and go directly to the main menu. VLC and Mplayer ignore the PUO codes so you can skip everything, but I prefer to re-author the movie only to DVD-R using DVD Shrink and keep that in a case beside the TV while the originals sit in a nice display stand. When friends come over to watch a movie they appreciate that the movie just starts and so do I.

    1. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, all those previews, notices and warnings can be fast forwarded through but, yes are still incredibly annoying.

      No, not all of them. A DVD author can disable your fast forward button for certain sections of video, just like he can disable your next/previous and menu buttons. That questionable part of the DVD spec is called "prohibited user operations".

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    2. Re:Uh, fast forward? by SaDan · · Score: 1

      I haven't come across a DVD that I couldn't fast forward at any point with my older Panasonic DVD player. Must only be the newer players that have this "feature".

    3. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell the MPAA goons, but I have a Sampo player with hacked firmware that lets me fast forward anytime. (Also turns off MacroVision, and is region free)

    4. Re:Uh, fast forward? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, not all of them. A DVD author can disable your fast forward button for certain sections of video, just like he can disable your next/previous and menu buttons. That questionable part of the DVD spec is called "prohibited user operations".

      Yes, but that was intended for the mandatory copyright notice, NOT for several minutes of mandatory previews and ads.

      As usual, the media companies are grossly abusing the feature.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Minwee · · Score: 1
      "I haven't come across a DVD that I couldn't fast forward at any point with my older Panasonic DVD player."

      Clearly you have a defective DVD player. I suggest that you demand a replacement and also report Panasonic to the MPAA for stealing millions of dollars in advertising revenue with these criminally broken players.

      Thank you, citizen, for your assistance.

    6. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's abusive even for copyright notices. If you buy a DVD, you have the right to watch the video thereon in any order you want; your DVD player shouldn't be telling you what to watch.

      The only time when P-UOPs can really be used legitimately is when allowing the viewer to change course at a certain point would break the disc's navigation (by leaving registers in an inconsistent state, etc.). Even then, there are usually better ways to solve the problem.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    7. Re:Uh, fast forward? by greed · · Score: 1
      Some of the earlier decks did, indeed, fail to completely obey the UOP specification.

      In fact, early decks had a handy Stop-Play trick: insert the disc, hit STOP while it was deciding if it was a DVD or CD, then hit Play and it would start playing at Chapter 1. (Or you could hit the chapter button and go anywhere you wanted.)

      I really should un-hack my Panasonic A300, that's still a nice deck.

    8. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      The MPAA figure the only way it has any chance of winning the battle over control is if they can control what you can do with the media. That is why even the UOP features are important. However, the sort of control they actually need in order to preserve the status-quo profit margins they've become addicted to, is to control the channel, they're just thrashing around trying to control the media thinking that's the control they've lost. But it's not control over the media that's their big problem, control over the channel is, and DRM snd UOP and DMCA are just pathetic attempts to get the horses to go back into the barn. That's where their revenue stream went, and even if they could figure out how to keep stuff encrypted 'til it gets to your eyeballs, that isn't going to get it back for them.

    9. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The fact that it was "intended" for copyright notices and "not intended" for advertizing is irrelevant. Trying to enforce such a system at all is wrong in the first place.

      It doesn't matter if it is an opening copyright notice or some advertizement "preview", the issue is that it is unjust and intolerable that it is currently CRIMINAL for me to DO that fast forwarding.

      It doesn't matter if it is an opening copyright notice or some advertizement "preview", the issue is that it is unjust and intolerable that it is currently CRIMINAL for anyone to manufacture a DVD player that CAN do that fast forwarding.

      It doesn't matter if it is an opening copyright notice or some advertizement "preview", the issue is that it is unjust and intolerable that it is currently CRIMINAL for anyone to buy a DVD player and modify it so that it CAN do that fast forwarding.

      The solution is to pass the DMCRA to ammenda the DMCA. The DMCRA simply says that noninfringing people shall not go to prison under the DMCA. Simple as that. It does not change the law in any way in relation to copyright enforcement or copyright infringers. It merely says innocent noninfringing people don't go to prison.

      Of course to be fair, certain people are fiercely opposed to the DMCRA doing that. Feircely opposed because it would have the side effect of making DRM worthless.

      That is the conflict. There is no way to have (semi) effective DRM without or innocent noninfringing people face prison and legitimate noninfringing products being criminal. The conflict is those who expect and demand that DRM work at any price, and those who do not think you cannot criminalize noninfringing people and criminalize legitimate products in some horribly misguided attempt to get DRM to actually "work".

      The fact that this feature was "not intened" to enforce preview advertizments is irrelevant. It is the legal basis being used to enforce this feature that is invalid and at fault.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:Uh, fast forward? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      The fact that it was "intended" for copyright notices and "not intended" for advertizing is irrelevant. Trying to enforce such a system at all is wrong in the first place.

      It doesn't matter if it is an opening copyright notice or some advertizement "preview", the issue is that it is unjust and intolerable that it is currently CRIMINAL for me to DO that fast forwarding.

      I'm not advocating the mandatory bits you can't fast-forward through. I hate it just as much as everyone else. I hate it even more when a company like Di$ney puts 15 minutes of previews using it.

      But, when the DVD format was coming no line, the content producers basically said they would never put stuff into the format if they didn't get the mandatory section for copyright. As far as I recall, they forced it to be in the spec, or they would simply withold their titles from ever being on DVD, and that would have killed the format from day 1.

      Predictably, it is now being abused by those very same companies.

      Don't winge at me for it, I was merely pointing out to the parent poster why it was there in the first place. I'm just as likely to take my (legally bought) DVDs and remove this as the next guy. I find it really obnoxious too, but I remember why it was supposedly there in the first place. And as someone who has owned a DVD player since '99, I've watched it get steadily worse.

      Just because I can rationally explain how it got into the spec, doesn't mean I advocate it. Nor does my post suggest that I was doing so.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:Uh, fast forward? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The movie studios imposed it by engaging in a non-compete consipracy. They conspired to use their collective monopoly power to control the hardware market.

      But fundamentally the problem is a bad law that gave them the power to actually enforce control over the hardware market. The DMCA makes it criminal to play a movie with an unapproved player, and makes it criminal to manufacture an unapproved player.

      There's a bill floating around congress to fix the problem, the DMCRA, but not enough congress critters have signed on board yet, and the publishing industry is violently opposed to it. And of course the publishing industry's pet congressmen are ranting and railing against it when it comes up in committee.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  58. You can't by Wee · · Score: 1
    You can't edit or delete a post. No avatars (thank the maker) or bbcode nonsense either.

    May I suggest the use of the Preview button?

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  59. And for the Mac users by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use "Mac the Ripper" (yes it really is called that) and Popcorn (by Roxio).

  60. Brainwashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, sit him down and have him watch the copyright notices, and he can grow up thinking he doesn't have any rights at all. That would, of course, be exactly what they want.

  61. Thanks MPAA! by TPS+Report · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know, I had (honestly) forgotten all about "region free" DVD players, etc. But all the MPAA's fuss, and this associated Slashdot article about it, has reminded me that I do want a more capable DVD player. A while back, I had wanted a player that did DivX, so I could fit two or three of my movies onto a DVD for the little ones to destroy (instead of damaging the original $$ DVDs). At that time, the DivX playback on the units pretty much sucked, so I let it go and forgot about it.

    Anyway, this article reminded me that there are really good DVD players out there that support region-free, HDCP-free, high-resolution playback at a reasonable price.... and they play back DivX as well. I think I will order one right now, in fact.

    How's that for blowing up in your face, MPAA? I'm sure I'm not the only one that is now thinking, "yes, actually, thats exactly what I want. Thanks for the reminder."

    --
    I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven...
    1. Re:Thanks MPAA! by rikkards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disclaimer: Satisfied customer
      If I was to plug a DVD player it would definitely be mine. When I got my HDTV, I also ordered the Oppo OPV971 for the following reasons:
      - DVI output
      - Upscaling to 720p or 1080i (through DVI)
      - DivX/Xvid support
      - Firmware upgradable.

      Something I didn't know before but do now is their support is impecable. I emailed them last Saturday night at 8:00pm while watching a movie to ask about the angle icon appearing. I had a response by 9:30PM. I also have emailed comments before and they have got back within a day or two (more like day and a half).

    2. Re:Thanks MPAA! by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      To heap more praise on Samsung, remember that they also promise that all their LCD panels, including TVs, are dead-pixel free. I like what samsung are doing as of late, and hope they don't screw it up.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:Thanks MPAA! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The Oppo 971H doesn't encrypt its DVI output. Some people might find that to be a distinct advantage.

      It's my understanding that the DVD-Audio license requires some sort of SPDIF down-sampling to 48 KHz. But the Oppo will output up to 192 Khz. I haven't investigated this in any great detail. I have only a few discs, and most of them don't have high resolution stereo tracks--6 channel stereo is far more common. As the spdif output is two channel only, there's little point.

      Some say that that the only real advantage of 96/24 or 192/24 is the 24 bits of resolution. My receiver doesn't display this information, so I don't know if the spdif interface is carrying those extra 8 bits.

    4. Re:Thanks MPAA! by Buran · · Score: 1

      Oppo responded quickly to my e-mail as well ... ... to tell me that their DVD player "doesn't support closed captioning due to an engineer oversight". They lost the sale.

      I just saved a lot of money (not on car insurance!) by spending about $60 on this Samsung, since I was in the market for a DVD player and Amazon.com had several refurbs available for a good price.

      Plus, I have actually heard of Samsung, while I've never heard of Oppo ... so if this player doesn't work out, so what? I didn't lose much.

    5. Re:Thanks MPAA! by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Understandable as I assume cc is something you really want. For me it wasn't. I already had a decent dvd player (Panasonic DV-232 (or something like that)) and wanted a huge upgrade and the price of it was not even 10% of what I was paying for my tv so I was willing to shell it out. The fact that they threw in both a DVI and DVI-HDMI cable for free was icing on the cake.

    6. Re:Thanks MPAA! by Buran · · Score: 1

      I have a Pioneer DV-250, got a HDTV, and wanted a better player even though the TV does have what LG calls the "xD Engine" that does some upsampling on its own. The only gripe is that it doesn't show closed captions if you're using the component inputs so I'm hoping that this one will output captions over the DVI/HDMI port or that the upsampled picture (it apparently will send it over the analog ports also) will work on outputs other than the component ports.

      If it doesn't ... $60 for a refurb, and now that my "old" (it's not that old) CRT TV is in the bedroom, I can move one of the DVD players back there for watching DVDs while being lazy.

      It's ridiculous to make a player these days that doesn't do closed captioning AT ALL, though! And they don't offer ANY other players ... which is too bad given the good reviews that one got. Too bad its one flaw is a fatal one.

    7. Re:Thanks MPAA! by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Actually, I had never tried subtitles and lo and behold it worked on my Oppo. That was tested using closed captioning on the new Doom DVD. Not sure exactly what the whole thing about closed captioning but maybe it was an earlier release version.

  62. Samsung? Sony? Toshiba? by layer3switch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Samsang DVD player doesn't have DRM.
    Tochiba flat screen TV let me watch whatever I want.
    Suny MP3 player let me listen to whatever MP3 files.

    I have no clue what Samsung, Toshiba, Sony make. Are they big companies like Samsang, Tochiba and Suny?

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Re:I'll stick with DRM by psychosquee · · Score: 1

    Nah... the young, skinny women stay that way for approximately 40-50 years, and... BAM! One day they wake up, and they're old, and fat. It is really weird.

    --
    Meow what do we have here?
  65. Where to get one: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a very well known brand of player that plays anything (any region, divx, mpeg's, hdcd, etc..), I bought it in spain, and it deals with ntsc and pal as well, so works anywhere around the world.
    Whenever I visit gibraltar (which is about once a month) I have to buy 10 region free dvd players for my friend who owns a DVD rental store. He cant get enough of them, but there are only so many I can carry at once over the border, so he has to deal with it.

  66. The Phantom Menace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not about Samsung. It's not even about DVD players, or DVD copying, which as others have pointed out, it a million times easier with a cheap DVD-R drive and free software. It's about sending a shot across the bow to the hardware manufacturers, warning them to not allow any DRM-breaking back doors in upcoming Blu-Ray/HD-DVD hardware.

    The Hollywood goons know the cat is out of the bag for old-style DVDs. This is about maintaining control over the next generation.

  67. Recalls are for protecting consumers by dk90406 · · Score: 1

    Factory recalls are in place to protect consumers from paying from defective devices.
    The Samsung device is not broken from the consumer PoV. Quite the contrary.
    Actually Samsung and others should sue MPAA and fore them to recall their defective discs (forwarding past adds don't work) - or better yet suing RIAA: many CDs are not able to play on DVD recorders. Those disks are *really* defective from the consumer PoV.

  68. Open letter to Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Samsung,

    Please buy at least one of these movie studios, and stop using DRM on all your models so that we consumers can watch the movies from that studio the way we like - hit play and watch the movie we bought. You will scare the other studios, and the people will love you.

    Cheers,
    Anonymous Coward Consumer

    PS: Make it easy to preset the default spoken language, and fall back to subtitles if no alternative spoken language is available.

  69. Major miscalculation by dtsazza · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the movie industry lost $5.4 billion last year due to piracy.
    More accurately, the MPAA estimates that the retail value of pirated films, etc, was $5.4bn. Now I'm not advocating piracy, but when I was a student a couple of years ago I would download albums and films, and I can personally guarantee that it did not cost the industry any money - simply because as a poor student I couldn't afford to buy them. If I hadn't downloaded them, I just wouldn't have seen them, and that's that.

    The MPAA seems to think there's a dichotomy of pirating films or purchasing them, and by extension that if we make pirating impossible, then every pirate will go out and purchase everything that they would otherwise have pirated. And that, my friends, is a rather baseless claim (even if you're completely unaware of the animosity towards studios in general).
    --
    My, that was a yummy potato!
    1. Re:Major miscalculation by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      I don't have any mod points today. If I did, dtsazza would get another (+1 Insightful), because he nails it.

      I agree with this post 100%.

    2. Re:Major miscalculation by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      i agree with you, however the MPAA feels that if the content was something you found real interest in, you could in theory devote some of the money toward the movies that you would plan to spend in other areas, such as ...er... hmm... food. they claim piracy is stealing their room to grow [read: potential to convince you to spend more money on the movies and less on video games or something less simple to pirate]

      [please read the read of this comment with a dose of irony and sarcasm]

      the problem is, 50% of the content people download is stuff they are just curious about and are only downloading because it is free. the freedom to download something and try it out w/o possibly wasting your money blindly is what drives piracy. it seems like no one gets that fact. a large portion of data downloaded just gets deleted eventually. data storage is cheaper than ever, but it is still costly no matter how you cut it. do they really think that every single movie or show downloaded winds up burned to a dvd? stuff sits on a server for a few months, then on someones harddrive where it will stay until they run out of space and need to delete it, or the drive crashes. only a fraction of movies downloaded ever wind up on dvds, and even less wind up being resold as bootleg copies.

      example: if i like a single on the radio, and i download the album illegally. i may find that i hate the cd. i promptly delete it. in my mind, i just saved myself $10-15. to me, piracy is a good deal and saved my wallet.

      on the other hand, if i download the album and find out that i love it, ill keep it around for a while until i run out of harddrive space. in the interim, im going to publicize how good the album is with a few friends or they might get interested in the band if they hear me play it. i may find myself buying their previous works, or maybe going to their concerts. the whole time i am providing evangelical service for the band.

      both of these would be illegal in the eyes of the MPAA. the difference is one stance can turn piracy into a profit, and the other will be a big waste of time for everyone involved. the answer? make better products!

    3. Re:Major miscalculation by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I can personally guarantee that it did not cost the industry any money - simply because as a poor student I couldn't afford to buy them. I - if I produced content that you didn't pay for but downloaded and used anyway, I wouldn't care that you are a poor student, I would have sued your ass. But that's just me and I have this weird principle, that you shouldn't get to use my work without my consent.

    4. Re:Major miscalculation by cojerk · · Score: 1
      I would download albums and films, and I can personally guarantee that it did not cost the industry any money - simply because as a poor student I couldn't afford to buy them. If I hadn't downloaded them, I just wouldn't have seen them, and that's that.


      That doesn't make any sense. It doesn't matter whether you can afford it or not. You're still viewing a movie for free, yet you're getting something out of it (whatever "something" is, it's being stored in your memory -- it's an experience).

      And does that mean you would buy all the movies you downloaded once you did come in to the money? If it ever came to the point where you could afford to buy the movies you downloaded, and you don't buy them, the industry does lose money.

      By you're logic, someone who can't afford to get in to a non-sold out rock concert should be able to get in for free because they wouldn't be able to get in otherwise. Sounds like BS to me.
    5. Re:Major miscalculation by boomfart · · Score: 1

      You seem to be missing the point, He is pointing out that the RIAA like to quote the biggest figures possible and claim it as a loss. Someone who earns 20K and downloads 200K worth of music has not cost the RIAA 200K cos they never could have spent that much the most the RIAA could have lost from that customer is 20K minus living costs. Unlike taking a physical object the act of downloading costs the owner nothing - no CD burning, no printing, no shipping the only loss is the sale that may or may not have occured and in the case where the downloader clearly could not have paid to claim a loss at full retail price is only inflating the figures artificially. It does not make illegal downloads right but over stating your losses is not right either.

    6. Re:Major miscalculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It does not make illegal downloads right..."

      Stop assuming that downloading is illegal or wrong. You've already fallen for the MPAA/RIAA propaganda by taking their assumptions as a given. Just because they go around SAYING that it's illegal in their stupid commercials doesn't mean there is any legal precedent supporting them. Companies often try to scare consumers with bullshit legal arguments. The fact is they don't have a leg to stand on and would be laughed out of court by any jury. Let's see them sue me for downloading. Let's see them sue me for or copying rentals.

      The whole copyright system is a racket and a sham. It benefits a tiny minority of people, at the expense of everyone else. There shouldn't be any type of IP rights at all. If companies want to build DRM, they should have to build the players to support it - not bribe politicians to force hardware makers to comply. The MPAA and RIAA are nothing but fascists. SCREW THEM. RIP THEIR DVDS AND SHARE THEM WITH ALL YOUR FRIENDS. Nobody should have the right to a monopoly on information. No business should be entitled to government protection.

      They talk about the free market. Well, the free market doesn't have such a thing as intellectual property. It's every man for himself, and anything goes. If you want to push DRM on people, you're gonna have to persuade them to buy it. You'll have a hard time, since DRM offers no benefits to users - only restrictions. No person in their right mind would use DRM, even if it was free. Because it's just another method of CONTROLLING people and HOOKING them. Once they get you paying every time you watch or listen or read something, you're finished.

    7. Re:Major miscalculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still viewing a movie for free, yet you're getting something out of it

      Kinda like watching Lord of the Rings at my friend's house.

      Uh-oh. Better post as a AC, so the MPAA doesn't come after us.

  70. yes by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only disks it won't copy are a few recent Sony ones (and we fcking *hate* Sony right now, yes?). These generate a CRC failure on read and the first few you meet you'd probably put down to scratches on the disk.
    For those small number that don't copy (assuming you're using Windows), use DVD Decrypter and then burn the result with any CD burning program.
    Or, use DVD43 and leave it running in your systray at all times. It'll strip out this protection on the fly, allowing DVDshrink to do its thing.

  71. The cat's *totally* out of the bag by wheany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reminds me of what has lately become one of my favorite quotes from The Insider.

    Movies released on DVD have been available in the internet in very good quality since DeCSS. And even before that professional pirates could make a bit-for-bit copy of any DVD that worked just like the original. One DVD player model that made it possible to circumvent DRM does not have any effect on international piratism. Not one fucking bit.

    That cat's totally out of the bag.

    1. Re:The cat's *totally* out of the bag by qmVSE*w!7e,QF(, · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One DVD player model that made it possible to circumvent DRM does not have any effect on international piratism.


      No, but scaring manufacturers into making damn sure that they comply with DRM requirements on upcoming HD and/or Blu-Ray players might.
    2. Re:The cat's *totally* out of the bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or international piracy even.

    3. Re:The cat's *totally* out of the bag by rworne · · Score: 1
      That cat's totally out of the bag.


      I prefer my term:

      "They're trying to stuff the shit back into the donkey."

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    4. Re:The cat's *totally* out of the bag by wheany · · Score: 1

      That too.

  72. What has a Player to do with Piracy? by oshy · · Score: 1

    This unit is a DVD Player.

    How can they say it causes priacy?

    It does not copy DVDs

    It lets you jump past the messages for 'do not pirate this CD', which is all over the box, and the adverts (adverts have nothing to do with piracy).

    It also lets you play originals from another region. That has nothing to do with copies either.

    How does this unit cause piracy?

  73. Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please!

  74. Samsung should just do the recall by jridley · · Score: 1

    They should issue a release stating that these models had this feature inadvertently included which should not have been there. Anyone having this model player who wants this feature removed should return the unit to Samsung for reflashing.

    To be safe, they should include instructions on how to turn the feature on, just so people can be sure that they have an affected unit.

  75. Macrovision by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, it's not "high voltage pulses". Macrovision has evolved past the stage where you could remove it with a "couple of passives and a one-shot" bypass circuit. Now, they mess with the level (and position, I belive) of the HSYNC pulse in a pseudorandom way. You need to work a bit harder to remove it, but I believe it's still possible with enough effort.

    Ever try bringing your DVD player to a rental home where they have an old, RF-input only TV? Even with a video modulator, you're out of luck on a rainy day. Ask me how I know this.

    Rather than try to remove Macrovision, I've taken the MythTV route. I replaced my Panasonic VHS recorder with a $150 PIII-900 class machine, a $80 200G hard drive and a $150 PVR-250 NTSC receiver card. For about $400 (and hours of fun for the idle mind setting it up!), I have my own, DRM-free, time-shifting PVR, DVD-player and -ripper, and video/audio archive. I can rip DVDs, record shows, skip commercials and transfer any of it to iPods or PCs. www.mysettopbox.tv will help you do it, too.

    1. Re:Macrovision by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on building a MythTV system! I was going to do likewise, but I chickened out and bought a stand-alone, "under-the-set" DVD recorder which uses +R and +RW discs. {And it's at this point that we begin to drift off-topic.}

      I have a numbered re-recordable disc for every day of the month, which I simply rotate between. {I figured that anything I haven't watched after a month, I'm never going to watch.} When I get a real "keeper", I can copy an entire disc from +RW to +R very easily using K3B {the first time -- I would just type the growisofs command shown in the debugging output into an xterm, if I wanted to make another copy!}. However, this means I sometimes end up with just 1 or 2 hours of recording on a disc which will hold 4 hours {or 6 with some noticeable quality loss.} Do you know if there is some way to copy individual shows from the +RW disc to HDD or +R disc? With the recorder, each programme you record goes into its own title, with a chapter mark every 5 mins or as you press the "edit" key on the remote; but the files you see when doing ls on the disc do not seem to correspond to recorded shows.

      BTW, I'm running Debian Etch, with the odd package compiled from Sarge or Sid sources.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:Macrovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, what DVD recorder do you use?

      And what would you buy now if you were on the market?

      I just bought a Philips DVP-642 that I am reasonably happy with, but it is a player only...

    3. Re:Macrovision by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Originally a Philips DVDR-70; replaced that with a Daewoo DVQ-1000R when it gave up the ghost. Interestingly the drive mechanism on the Philips is not a standard IDE unit but has a custom interface. The motherboard has space for a 40-pin IDE connector and features a Philips-made RISC processor. I haven't opened the Daewoo, but it obviously uses Philips internals too; aside from some obvious similarities in the menus, if you do strings /dev/scd1 |grep -i philips with one of its recorded discs in your computer {change the device to suit if it's not the second SCSI CD/DVD drive}, you will see the word "Philips" appear several times.

      The recorder has two fully wired SCARTs, one with RGB in for a satellite RX and one with RGB out for the TV. There are also front-panel camcorder sockets including S-VHS. That's the minimum amount of connectivity I would touch nowadays. I haven't got a 5.1 channel amplifier; I still prefer my 2-channel amp which dates from the days when transistors still had something to prove.

      If I was buying again now, I would probably choose another Philips or Daewoo, because many of the cheaper machines that use the "plus" format seem to be brands I've never heard of. Some of the latest generation of machines seem to be able to use both "plus" and "minus" discs {perhaps for recording things you don't want to watch ever again?} I would definitely pick one with an internal HDD this time around. I would also get a 3- or maybe 5-year extended warranty; if the store wouldn't even offer that, then I would steer clear as they obviously lack confidence that it will last any longer than that.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  76. Go Fuck Yourself by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    No Consumer(the people that pay both companies) wants DRM. Samsung is meeting that demand. Companies that don't follow that rule of nature are monopolies. Don't lecture us on who the bad guy is. If law is what you're after, then your opinion sways with a whores touch. If justice is what you're after, then you should back a market that has the greatest efficiency and openness.

  77. My next purchase by stavromueller · · Score: 0

    Well! I guess I know what DVD player to buy now.

    --
    I kill harmless processes for sport
  78. Risk of *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but Samsung (like Rambus) flagrantly violated those rules and put other members of the association at risk."

    At risk of what?

    You don't make any sense. Samsung violated an agreement and in doing so, they put...Sony at risk?

    And Samsung violated it because they giving consumers what they want. How terrible. And how screwed up are you that you make "pro-consumer" seem like being the bad guy.

    You almost sound like an MPAA shill, frankly.

  79. Re:Just like the RIAA by Psykechan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would you need to make backups when replacements are readily available at affordable prices?

  80. A contract breaker is not ipso facto the Bad Guy by abb3w · · Score: 1
    The fact is that they agreed to a set of rules which included not making non-DRM players, and they decided to go ahead and make a player that is for all intents and purposes non-DRM. They will be hit with a penalty, no doubt.

    Well, not much doubt. Conceivably they might get lucky with a "No judge or jury would ever convict me!" situation. A more interesting question is whether the region coding agreement was legal, or whether the scheme (as some hotheads have muttered) constitutes an anti-trust violation. If the underlying agreement is illegal, the doctrine of unclean hands says that the other companies can't go to the courts to enforce it. It's the same principle that keeps you from suing the hitman you hired to kill your wife to try and get your money back if he doesn't do it, or the hooker you refused to pay afterwards from suing you. (Disclaimer: IAmNotALawyer.) I don't know if Samsung will have the nerve to raise this at trial; they would be more likely during settlement talks to threaten to open the issue in court, in hopes that the other players would decide they'd rather have that can of worms left unopened.

    But it's never a certainty until all of the appeals are over...

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  81. And the laws mean nothing? by Kombat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    These companies don't have a guarantee that they should earn such and such amount per year.

    There are laws in place that they have to play by, and when their competition/customers ignore those laws, it's not a fair playing field. Of course they have a right to complain.

    How many companies and start-ups go bust every year because there business plans are obsolete?

    We're not talking about obsolete business plans. We're talking about massive amounts of potential customers taking your product without paying for it. Illegally.

    If they can't make money, tough!

    So I guess they should have chosen to product a tangible product that is harder to steal, than creative works that are trivial to acquire without paying? That's a great position to take. If everyone here hates paying for products that contain real value, and everyone hates big successful companies that are good at what they do, then maybe Microsoft, the MPAA, and the RIAA should all just go to hell, we'll just download all their products for free, and in a couple of years when there's no one left making movies/software/music, we can rejoice that our radio waves and movie theatres are no longer filled with crap!

    Indeed, they won't be filled with anything at all.

    Great thinking there, genius.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    1. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We're talking about massive amounts of potential customers taking your product without paying for it.

      You are wrong because: arguement by bizzare definition

      Take (n): To get into one's possession by force, skill, or artifice, especially: To capture physically; seize

      Even in the most egregious case, where I sneak into the RIAA president's house, boot his computer and pirate his entire collection of music, the property has not actually been taken. It's still there. Except I have my own copy now.

      Star Trek calls this technology a "replicator"

    2. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Take (n): To get into one's possession by force, skill, or artifice, especially: To capture physically; seize

      OK, sure, my definition is bizarre. Whatever. Your definition seems to think "take" is a noun. Good job there, Webster. Now which one of us was making up definitions?

      "Take" can refer to intangibles. On your way out of class, the professor might ask you, "And what did you take away from that lecture?" In boxing, one can "take a dive" without any actual physical property changing hands. In...

      Oh screw it, you're so far off you're not even worth the typing.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    3. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Your definition seems to think "take" is a noun

      Meh, that part got cut off on the copy/paste, so I typed in it by hand quick. Nice catch :)

    4. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have sounded like less of an ass (v) had you not replied (adj).

    5. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by doughrama · · Score: 1

      "then maybe Microsoft, the MPAA, and the RIAA should all just go to hell"

      HA HA! Sorry, I just had to chuckle at that comment given your audience.

    6. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In boxing, one can "take a dive" without any actual physical property changing hands

      Maybe not in the ring, but surely there's some cash changing hands outside of it

    7. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      So by your argument, anyone that makes a free copy of some code you may have written is not stealing from you. Hmmm,I wonder how the programmers here on /. would feel knowing that their "jobs" are actually pro bono shareware.

      --
      We are all just people.
    8. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      That's right, they're not stealing money from the company. Because the company never had that money in the first place.

      There's a huge difference between profit and potential profit, which an above poster already argued.

    9. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by angulion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm slightly more sympathetic to the movie industry, since making a movie costs considerably more and is hard to replicate (acting, scripting, filming).

      Now, on the other hand, I do not have much sympathy for the recording industry, who charges way to much. If there were natural competition the situation would likely be totally different, my suggestion would be:
      Music artists should be able to go and record their songs to more than one of the studios and the studios would need to compete *against* each other, perhaps adding something along with the CD to increase the value or just not do as well as the next studio. What's wrong with that?
      So, first change: No exclusive contracts.

      I seriously believe this would benefit both the artist and the consumer, ofcourse the studios couldn't have their ridiculous cuts/profits anymore since there would be real competition.

    10. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      There are laws in place that they have to play by, and when their competition/customers ignore those laws, it's not a fair playing field. Of course they have a right to complain.

      They bought those laws. When we don't ignore the laws, it's not a fair playing field for us.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      There are laws in place that they have to play by, and when their competition/customers ignore those laws, it's not a fair playing field. Of course they have a right to complain.
      Not when they got those laws through illegal bribery, they don't!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Taevin · · Score: 1

      I think you are forgetting that there is a large community of open source supporters here on Slashdot. I support open source software myself and I make my living as a programmer. I code for work during the day, and I write open source software in my free time.

      As for how I feel about that, I feel great. Most of the software I write in my free time is for my own personal satisfaction and usually helps me solve some problem or simply keeps my skills sharp. By releasing the source code for my applications, I can possibly do the same for others at no extra cost to myself. How great is that?

      As far as work goes, the software I write is for internal use (and I suspect this is the case for a large number if not majority of programmers out there). While the company I work for does not release my software under an open source license (well, technically they don't release it at all but whatever), would they really lose anything by doing so? Either way they need my software to solve an internal issue.

      In the cases of both my personal projects and work projects, no one would have robbed me of anything by making a copy of my code. As has to be repeated ad infinitum around here, the only thing that I could even possibly have lost is potential profits were I to be selling my software.

    13. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      Open source software is great, thank you for sharing the apps you write. When you are writing them, you know that you are doing so for your own enjoyment and the common good, you don't expect to get paid. Much like a talented musician practicing in a park. When a commercial album is produced them people working on it expect to get paid, much like you expect to get paid for your efforts at your job. The MPAA and RIAA might be bloated dinosaurs. If you don't want to support them, fine. Support independent labels and indie films. Don't try to use that as some excuse to not pay for things. It is the same as if your employers said "We know that some of the programs you have written are freely shared, so we have decided that you have just freely shared everything you have written in the last month, thanks. Oh you want paid? But you were just gonna go program at home, it's not like you lost anything." The deep down fact of the matter is that when you take a "free" copy of something intended to sold, you are stealing. The GP was advocating piracy, not back-ups or the ability skip previews. Fair-use is being eroded because it is being abused on the users end.

      --
      We are all just people.
    14. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      They are stealing product. There is also a huge difference between rightfully yours and I-can't-afford-it-but-I-want-it-so-I'll-just-take- it.

      --
      We are all just people.
    15. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by ryusen · · Score: 1

      But just mow much of the film costs is to pay overinflated sallaries?

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    16. Re:And the laws mean nothing? by ryusen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are laws in place that they have to play by, and when their competition/customers ignore those laws, it's not a fair playing field. Of course they have a right to complain.
      Most of those laws are bought and paid for by the industry to further their own needs. Who do you think lobbied and gave campaign contriobutions to have Copyrights extended from 14 years to the life of the artist PLUS 70 years? Who do you think paid to have the DMCA passed? The PIRATE and INDUCE acts? If you think an industry buying laws to protect it's own interests is the American way and truly a fair market, i disagree.

      We're not talking about obsolete business plans. We're talking about massive amounts of potential customers taking your product without paying for it. Illegally.
      We ARE talking about an obselete business plan. Even as deplorable as pirated DVDs are, from a purely economic point of view, even ilegal competition is still competition. When someone is undercutting your prices and you are selling a ludicrously over priced product, you should drop your prices to compete, then make it up in volume. That's High School economics.
      Also consider that someone commiting copyright infringement is NOT neccessarily a loss for the industry, since many of them would not have bought the product anyway.
      They are also producing a LOT of crap. If you look at certain movies, they rake in huge numbers and other... just aren't worth the inflated prices to watch.
      Lastly, they ARE dealing with an obselete business model. In the past, the AA's had a great monopoly on the industry, simply because startup costs were so great that no one else could truly compete. Now that is getting less and less. They are also facing other competition that never truly matter years ago. VIdeo games are geting huge. The bigger video games get, the smaller the % of people's incomes will be spent on Music and Movies.

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
  82. What's so evil about HDCP? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm not understanding this correctly. If I burn a DVD of some home movies and put it in a standard DVD player connected to an HDCP-compliant TV, will it not play at 720p (or some other upscaled resolution) because it doesn't have CSS? I'm confused.

    What I'm saying is, in what situation (copying commerical DVDs, home-made DVDs, etc) would HDCP prevent me from doing activity $FOO? What is the problem? It sounds like if you have an HDCP dvd player and an HDCP tv, it'll play anything you throw at it in high(er) def.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:What's so evil about HDCP? by rpresser · · Score: 1

      The evilness lies in the requirement that you have so casually tossed off in your last line: "if you have an HDCP dvd player and an HDCP tv". You have tacitly accepted what they want you to have accepted: high definition video == HDCP video. And any other manufacturer who doesn't want to play by their DRM rules isn't going to get an HDCP licence or private key.

    2. Re:What's so evil about HDCP? by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      If I burn a DVD of some home movies and put it in a standard DVD player connected to an HDCP-compliant TV, will it not play at 720p (or some other upscaled resolution) because it doesn't have CSS?

      In the ideal world, HDCP is supposed to only disable the high-resolution output for protected media. I somehow doubt that it's going to work that way in the real world - the DVD players will more likely refuse to output anything above 480p on ANY media unless the TV supports HDCP.

      What I'm saying is, in what situation would HDCP prevent me from doing activity $FOO? It sounds like if you have an HDCP dvd player and an HDCP tv, it'll play anything you throw at it....

      The idea of HDCP isn't to prevent you from playing a copied DVD. It's to prevent you from using the HDMI output of the player to make a digital copy. If the device attached to that output hasn't been approved by the HDCP Nazis, then it's "No HD for you!". Oh, and you won't be able to get HD off the analog outputs either, just in case someone tries to build an HD recorder with analog component video input.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    3. Re:What's so evil about HDCP? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Ah, that makes more sense. I keep thinking "with CSS broken, who the hell would want to have a copy of anything from a video stream? You can just decode the DVD on your computer without playing it!"

      Then I realized that the next gen of discs that comes out will not use CSS, and may not be able to be decoded.

      Well, so long as I can play non-CSS, current-gen DVDs at upscaled resolution I'm happy (for now).

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  83. And those players' EBay value just TRIPLED! by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just a paranoid cynic, but I wonder if a movie studio executive doesn't have a truckload of those players parked somewhere...

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  84. Borrowing from a Library? Red scum... by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I have recently been hitting the library for some nice film classics, some film noir, some Hitchcock -- that was the golden age of cinema, none of this Ben Aflec and J. Lo crap.
    You filthy communist pinko! Don't you know that this country was founded upon the American populace supporting businesses by being happy little consumers? People like you make me sick... I bet you listen to music on the radio without buying the CDs first too!

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  85. du glaubst wohl jede liberale scheisspropaganda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wie dumm kann man nur sein...

  86. Whoops! by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
    I read this on Engadget yesterday.

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/20/samsung-sued-ov er-dvd-duping-by-discontinued-player/

    Turns out you have to drop to the service menu to disable the copyright protection, and that this player has been discontinued for a while. Thanks for the studios for making this knowledge public!

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  87. HA! by MaxPowerDJ · · Score: 1

    They just made me buy one of those babies! Gotta get them while they're cheap!

    --
    --MaxPowerDJ
  88. I don't want this to be flamebait, but... by rcs1000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I wrote this about my "right" to run OS X on whatever hardware I liked, I'd be kicked to the ground, and then people would get "+5, insightfuls" for saying that Apple has the right to restrict how its software is run. (After all, you agreed to the EULA...)

    Presumably the logic is simple: Apple restrics rights, fine; Microsoft, the MPAA or anyone else restricts right, treason!

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
    1. Re:I don't want this to be flamebait, but... by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      If I wrote this about my "right" to run OS X on whatever hardware I liked, I'd be kicked to the ground, and then people would get "+5, insightfuls" for saying that Apple has the right to restrict how its software is run. (After all, you agreed to the EULA...)

      If you'll excuse the pun, you're comparing apples and oranges.

      Apple is not actively lobbying congress to create laws specifically designed to prevent you from using your copy of OS X in ways that you see to be reasonable. They do not purposefully add code to their operating system which is specifically designed to take control away from you. Their EULA specifies that you should only run OS X on Apple hardware, but if you choose not to, the only thing you lose is the warranty. You are free, by law, to take your copy of OS X and attempt to install it on your toaster if you like (iToaster?). You paid for it, and you can do anything you want with it, short of selling copies to other people, which is Apple's exclusive right under copyright law.

      They DO have the right to void your warrantee if you don't abide by the contract you have with them (EULA), but the warrantee is a service they offer; they have the right to withdraw that service at any time based on conditions they set in the contract. They do not have the right to abridge the rights you as a consumer are given under copyright law, and that includes fair use and noncommercial personal use.

      The other thing I notice is that Apple doesn't really care WHAT you do with the products you buy from them, as long as you don't violate copyright law. You will notice that Apple is not addressing the issue of Linux on iPod--they are simply letting it exist as a hobbyist project. In this litigious day in age, to not condemn a project like that is to give it your implicit support. After all, they are still selling iPods.

      Of course, I also agree that you would be modded into oblivion if you dared to utter such a thing on the Apple-friendly Slashdot. What the Slashbots must remember is that just because a company generally does good things (like Apple and Google) does not mean we have to become apologists to compensate for the things they do that we don't like. We are free to question their decisions without attacking their mission as a whole, *especially* for companies we like: we want to make them even better.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    2. Re:I don't want this to be flamebait, but... by Buran · · Score: 1

      You get that sort of thing no matter what the topic is. Now, what's really tiring are the people who mistake copyright infringement for theft.

    3. Re:I don't want this to be flamebait, but... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if you don't abide by the contract you have with them (EULA)

      Just a sidenote, but EULAs aren't contracts. EULAs have unclear status - if the EULA is found to be unenforcable (as they have been in multiple cases), the software is limited to the protection offered by copyright law.

      Note that you are correct that they can void your warranty.

      They do not purposefully add code to their operating system which is specifically designed to take control away from you.

      Not the case at all. OS X for Intel has substantial and increasing hardware-lockouts, ensuring that you can only run the software on Apple-approved hardware. How does that not take control away from the user?

      You are free, by law, to take your copy of OS X and attempt to install it on your toaster if you like (iToaster?)

      Yes, you are. The problem is that Apple doesn't seem to think so - and they have threatened legal action against websites that so much as link to information on how to circumvent the hardware lockout.

      The other thing I notice is that Apple doesn't really care WHAT you do with the products you buy from them, as long as you don't violate copyright law.

      Not the case either. Apple has clearly stated that they do care what you do with their products, and they have threatened legal action against a number of parties who have attempted to circumvent their hardware locks.

      Previously, my plan was to buy a copy of Mac OS X for Intel when it becomes available at retail. I already have a nice notebook, don't have $2000 for a MacBook, and want to be able to run Windows on my system as well. I wasn't expecting Apple to make it easy and wasn't expecting any support at all. Now, however, with the actions that Apple has been taking, I don't think that I can buy any Apple products at all.

      At least Windows Vista will run on my hardware.

    4. Re:I don't want this to be flamebait, but... by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Just a sidenote, but EULAs aren't contracts. EULAs have unclear status - if the EULA is found to be unenforcable (as they have been in multiple cases), the software is limited to the protection offered by copyright law.

      You're right that EULA's have an unclear status, but that unclear status means some judges have ruled that they ARE indeed contracts. There are some interesting tidbits about EULAs and contract law here and here. I think the general consensus is that barring various types of contract fraud (changing contract provisions after the agreement, not allowing the purchaser to decline, etc.), EULAs are indeed contracts, and will be treated as such in a court of law. I think the biggest issue with EULA law right now is the "open software" problem, where the EULA is printed on material inside the box, and stores will not let you return open software. Thus, the purchaser does not have an ability to decline the offer based on the terms of the contract and receive a full refund. Companies that did this would likely have the contract invalidated if it were to be challenged in court.

      Back to the point about EULAs, though: the most a company can due for breach of contract is to withdraw any services being offered. They could probably try to file a civil suit, but in the case of someone modding OS X to run on your own non-Apple hardware, I'm not sure how much in damages they could claim. Perhaps if you started "how-to-mod-osx-to-run-on-a-dell.com", they could claim lost hardware sales. I'm not sure about that, so any lawyers are welcome to chime in here.

      Not the case at all. OS X for Intel has substantial and increasing hardware-lockouts, ensuring that you can only run the software on Apple-approved hardware. How does that not take control away from the user?

      I was not aware. I always just thought that Apple designed their software to run on Apple hardware, without aiding or hindering anyone trying to get it to work on other hardware. Since Apple hardware used to be very specific, rewriting OS X to run on other hardware would have been a daunting task indeed. It does not surprise me that they are taking precautions, but it does disappoint me a little.

      Not the case either. Apple has clearly stated that they do care what you do with their products, and they have threatened legal action against a number of parties who have attempted to circumvent their hardware locks.

      This gets tricky, as far as their basis for filing suit. Can a hardware + software combination be copyrighted, and thus covered under the DMCA? The software can certainly be copyrighted, and locked down with encryption, but bypassing that encryption would be for purposes of interoperability with hardware, not access to copyrighted information. I'm not sure how a court would rule on that. Again, it would be nice to hear from a lawyer on this.

      But I think the larger issue here is not the fact that companies who lock consumers into or out of hardware (Apple, or the more on-topic Members of the MPAA) are violating consumer's rights, because they clearly are not. It is very legal to offer a product for sale on your own terms, and the consumer has the option of buying the product, and thereby accepting the terms of the sale, or not buying the product, and effectively declining the terms. There is no option for "the seller is required to change the terms to suit the buyer." It's a yes-or-no proposition on the buyer's part. The larger issue is that offering one-sided terms such as the MPAA member companies are doing, which takes control of the product away from the consumer, is just poor customer service. Telling your customers what they CAN'T do with your product is the best way to boost your competition's sales. In the coming decades, consumers will start to turn away from the larger companie

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  89. It is not piracy. It is peeping. by jetxee · · Score: 1

    Piracy is an anauthorized act of robbery on high seas. I assume, it is closely related to extreme violance, mass assasinations, slavery and sunken ships.

    Peacfully watching anything, even without a given permision, is just peeping. Not piracy! It does not stand even close to violance, robbery and assasination.

    Authorized (by a government) sea robbers were called privateers. Not much different from pirates, really. Those MPAA and RIAA (and the similar institutions) were authorized to enforse those, who are weaker, with severe punishment, for the private benefit of these agencies and, probably, minor benefit of a government. They are real pirates.

  90. You are wrong by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    Because you're a moron who doesn't read for meaning.

    Read it again. Then read it again. Then get someone smarter than you, and have them read it VERY S-L-O-W-L-Y to you.

    The quote was discussing 2005 revenues. It ALSO discussed nominated films, whic if you'd been paying attention, WASN'T THE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION. There was NO ANALOGY AT ALL, just you reading part of a quote and thinking (erroneously) that you were reading the part that mattered.

    You weren't.

    So top being such a dick, especially when you've made such a silly mistake.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  91. Or, just do what I do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a very old top-loader VCR that doesn't know what Macrovision is, and records everything anyway. I doubt it has anything so complex built into it like what you are describing. I don't know why it works, but it does! It copies things that new VCR's can't. Old technology r0x0rZ.

  92. Samsung is not stupid... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "DRM" (Fair-Use Circumvention Kit) features the MPAA would like to see in the player are not legal everywhere, and where they are, turning them off frequently is not illegal. Further, it's a widely held belief that one day the consumer or the powers that be might realize that people are getting the proverbial shaft and ultimately take a more sensible tack that obviates (or at least, no longer mandates) the need for such measures.

    Samsung is simply building a player where the anti-consumer features can be made as consumer-friendly (or hostile) as the prevailing market conditions permit. This saves them effort of hardwiring different rules and functionality for each and every market or whenever there's been changes to local laws or customs.

    Lets face it -- a minority have the player, and there's no tangible effect on the MPAA, since professional pirates wouldn't use a player like this to make bootlegs; heck, most amateur pirates would just as well rip the DVD.

  93. Well... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    ogle and vlc support DVD nav, and you can jump to the root menu at any time (or start at any title).

    Contrast this with, say, PowerDVD or some other Windows/MAC DVD player which makes you sit through the parts you don't want to.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  94. they SHOULD issue the recall by enjahova · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They could just put out a press release along the lines:

    Samsung is issuing a recall for all model HD841 because it easily allows users to strip DRM and other content control measures from DVDS. Please return your model and we will replace it with a more restrictive one.

    --
    "how can they call it a MINE if everything here is THEIRS?!?!" -Straight Jacket
  95. "Adblock" for dvd(nav?) would be cool by henni16 · · Score: 1

    A nice feature for dvd software players (maybe in dvdnav?) I would like to see:

    A blacklist with movie hashsums.
    Most DVDs I own have the same "copying is stealing" spot before the disc menu.

    Everytime your player encounters a "blacklisted" movie it would skip that title and play the next one.
    Maybe add a context menu entry "[un]block this title" for ease of use.

    Or a simpler version: since some program (I guess xine) already creates a ~/dvdcss/ dir with data for each disc (probably a css key cache) one could simply add a property: "start playback for this disc title/menu number X".
    Add a "define as default title" context menu entry and say byebye to the annoying crap.

  96. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Ironically, if I had one of these DRM-bypassing DVD players I could stop ripping all the DVDs I rent. See, I do this because I hate ads and I'd rather spend 40 minutes pirating the movie (and stripping DRM in the process) than put the DVD on and go do something else for the 10 minutes' worth of commercials. Just my way of saying "fuck you, MPAA!" for doing it in the first place.

    Hey, MPAA, when are you cocksmokers going to sue me for linking to DeCSS for several years like you threatened to? I keep emailing you and you keep hiding from me. You pussies.

  97. Spinpoint Drives by thegnu · · Score: 1
    The Samsung Spinpoints are really great drives. I've installed at least 10 Spinpoints over the past 2 years, and there have been no failures, to my knowledge. And they certainly ARE silent.

    On the optical drives, I always bought Lite-On CD burners, and all was well. Bought a DVD burner and it died. Bought a BenQ burner and it died. Everywhere I see, there are great reviews for these drives, but I just bad ones. I would specifically wonder if you didn't get two drives from the same run. I know that doesn't make it any less appalling that two consecutive drives crap out, but still.

    I've owned several other Samsung products, from CRT monitors to RAM, and none of them have lasted more than 2 years.


    I'll let you know about the drives... ;-)

    Linux hardware support continues to improve, and except in the fringes (eg. capture cards and video cards), it has nothing to do with the manufacturer.


    Ack, not quite. The choice of chipsets is very important. Not all chipsets are well supported under Linux, and you could be stuck running X with the vesa driver rather than an actual driver. There are plenty of laptops with corrupt VGA BIOS that the Windows drivers bypass, but since there are no released specs for the card, the Linux driver can't get around the error. I think it's the i845, which is in SO many laptops.
    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  98. I Have One by dafz1 · · Score: 1

    I own one of these DVD players.

    Yes, we are talking about upscaled DVDs. The HD841 will upsample a 480P DVD to 720P and 1080i, but only through it's DVI connection, to a HDCP-compatible display(without the hack). I didn't know that when I bought it, which was a problem because the projector I had, an Infocus ScreenPlay 4800(which has since been sold and replaced with a ScreenPlay 4805 which is HDCP compatible), wasn't HDCP compatible. However, even with the hacks(which I haven't tried yet), I don't think it will be able to upsample to an analog output(component video). The upsampling button, which is on the remote, is called DVI Select, which makes me think it's DVI-out only.

  99. Come after me-Time Travel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I reckon they are *deliberately* trying to degrade the viewing experience for DVDs by reverting back to the ads before the movie VCR model, so as to make it easier for them to push their next generation DVD formats such as HD-DVD and Blueray."

    One flaw in your conspiracy argument (most conspiracy theories do). Ads on DVDs predate HD-DVD and Blu-ray. As for the "skip" feature. That's inconsistent on various players. Some can skip, some can't. Even on the same brand.

  100. This is a blessing for many owners... by jdepew · · Score: 1

    This is a blessing for many owners who bought the player because of its DVI output and upconversion properties, only to find out outside the 30 day return policy, short 3 month on-market time, or 1 year warranty period that the player is terrible. Start up is ridiculously slow, the transport mechanism frequently freezes, 4:3 content is never shown correctly, menus are very slow, very poor IR reception and a very bright annoying blue light. The chance at replacing a product that should never have been released due to quality control issues is a very welcome offer.

    Regarding the Region Free 'hack' - I have never needed it, but it is enabled and I believe you should be able to view your content as you see fit.

    I for one welcome our new recalled DVD players. Mine is just sitting in the rack, waiting to be replaced, or eBay'd.

    --
    http://www.linksysinfo.org - WRT54G Firmware Hacks and Linksys Support
  101. Simple: Old VCRs didn't have those AGC settings by Slayer · · Score: 1

    Macrovision only works if your VCR has special AGC settings. Ancient VCRs had different AGC time constants and were therefore able to record anything. Eventually, producers were forced to stop making them, and all legal new VCRs have to use a predefined AGC algorithm/behavior which bails out on Macrovision signals.

    Since only these particular AGC settings make Macrovision copy protection work, old players may play and record Macrovision protected stuff just fine ...

  102. Pirating by ShavenYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Taking another's content and selling it for profit is pirating.

    No, boarding a ship and stealing its cargo on the open sea is piracy. Doubly so if you make the ship's captain walk the plank. ARGH!

    What you're talking about is COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. No matter how many times the ??AA tell you it's theft or piracy, it is NOT. They have not been deprived of property; they have been deprived of potential revenue. If we let them define the language of the debate, then the terrorists have already won. Or something.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    1. Re:Pirating by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! Pirates say "Arrr," not "Argh!" "Argh!" is what people say when they don't know what the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow is. Now get it right, or I shall be forced to taunt you a second time!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  103. Tired of rebuying movies..music... by sperm · · Score: 1

    How many times have they (specially Disney) have had us rebuy movies or music? I have drawers fulls of VHS and same DVDs for the kids... How many of us have gone from vinyls to CDs? Now they want us to buy DVD-Audio 96... And they still dont know how to turn a profit? Are they surprised we dont want to buy again? And frankly CloneDVD removes all these annoying ads and "dont-skip" crap they force down on us. No, I dont buy DVDs or CDs anymore, why would I? What is my incentive? Its actually quite the reverse with all the crap they put on it. Same thing with watching live TV...why? When I can watch a TV show in 20 or 40 mins...even faster if I skip part I dont care... On demand has arrived, and has been around for awhile (just in the background), get with the program or be left in the dust... This whole DRM-thing and adding crapolos to CDs and DVDs, wheres the value? I'd rather not touch them period. I dont care if Disney or Hollywod productions go busts...I dont even watch them anymore, with Netflix I can watch all the Japanese films I have ever wanted. I had to blow up eventually. FU DRM!

    1. Re:Tired of rebuying movies..music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's holding a gun to your head? Listen to your vinyls and play your VHS tapes to your hearts content.

  104. Oppo! by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I reckon the Oppo DV971H should be on every Slashdot reader's wish list.

    http://meta.ath0.com/articles/2006/01/09/dvd-playe r-review-oppo-opdv971h

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  105. 720p/1080i over component enabled by TheGSRGuy · · Score: 1

    The hidden unlock feature on the Samsung allows for 720p/1080i over component, a feature you otherwise had to use a DVI cable for. This is great since my TV came out just before DVI.

  106. "I could have sold $5B in movies!" by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

    "I could have sold FIVE BILLION DOLLARS worth of movies last year!"

    "And I would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn't been for Samsung... and you meddling kids!"

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
  107. It's about the HDCP disable by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Informative

    All the things you mention above are true - they don't have anything to do with piracy (except that they will argue about the region coding bullshit)

    No, they're pissed about the ability to disable the HDCP encoding of the upconverted output on this player.

    HDCP is DRM, and disabling it does help with copyright violation.

    (I have one of these players, and I recommend getting one specifically for the reason I did - disable the HDCP and have upconverted HD video over component outputs)

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:It's about the HDCP disable by makomk · · Score: 1

      HDCP is DRM, and disabling it does help with copyright violation.

      Surely a pirate would want the non-scaled version (particularly if they were planning to distribute it on the Internet, file size worries being what they are)? After all, they could just upscale it themselves - the only people the copy protection affects will be those with old high-definition TVs that don't support HDCP.

  108. Hacks For the HD841 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one of these players and think it is kind of flaky. But if I'm not suppose to have it I guess I'll have to keep it now.

    I was wondering what hacks you could do to the player and what the benafit would be. The link below shows how to bypass the region code, which is useful for international users, and can be done to pretty much and player. I don't think it add much benafit to the US user. You can also disable HDCP when sending video out the DVI port. I don't know what benafit this would be. The player support standard DVDs and up converts to 1080i. While this is nice while watching on a big screen TV, disabling HDCP means you could copy it from the DVI port to a PC. I don't know of any DVI or HDMI capture cards. If there are some I bet they are expensive. Besides if I wanted to up convert a DVD to 1080i, I would rip it to the hard drive and use the PC to create an up converted version. Even then all I could do is play it from my PC.

    Am I missing something? What is the point of the studios doing this other than to create a false problem for publicity.

    http://www.videohelp.com/dvdhacks.php?select=Samsu ng+DVD-HD841

  109. How does the MPAA come up with its numbers? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to jump to any conclusions, but how could the movie industries claim to know how much money they lose due to piracy? To me, it's very similar to the music industries. What's to stop them from claiming that they lost a boatload due to piracy when in fact they just made shitty product during the fiscal year? And who is to say that everyone downloading movies or music online is pirating? If I bought a CD, leave it at home with my family while I go to school, and download the same songs, would it be considered "stealing," even though I own the CD and could rip the music onto my computer had I not left the CD at home so the CD itself doesn't get stolen?

  110. SBCE? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    They are the bad guy because the DMCA and the SBCE happened.

    The Society for Better Computing Ethics?

    Oh, you must mean the SBCTEA, the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  111. You can still buy the players, new and refurbished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  112. Piracy != illegal activity. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you are hitting on why they said "5.4 billion last year due to piracy." and not due to Copyright infringement. They consider any manner of watching a movie other than as intended as piracy, and that piracy removed a opertunity cost whos value is = to that of a sale. Becasue of the lack of a legal definition of piracy, this is valid in thier eyes.
    Since they don't care for replay TV, DVD rental, Tivo, etc, etc. they must claim all use of these devices as piracy.

    I do the same as the G.P. with tivo on pay per view, and mencoder on rental DVD's. In that I save a "portion" of the movie rental until I am done enjoying the movie. The movie studios clearly call that piracy, because you get most of the benefits of owning, without a full purchase price. I violated no law that I know of, and their is no clear copyright violation, but this failure of DRM to stop me cost them a sale opertunity ie "Piracy"

  113. We ARE talking about business plans/models by epp_b · · Score: 1

    We're not talking about obsolete business plans.

    That's exactly what we're talking about. **AA's business models would have worked in the 1950s, 60s, and maybe 70s when people were only buying records and there was no known consumer technology to easily and quickly duplicate them. But technological innovation has changed that and **AA would like to kick innovation in the face so that it can keep running it's jurassic business. Any legitimate business running this way would have rightly died years ago. But legimate businesses doesn't have pet politicians.

    Seriously Kombat, how much is MPAA paying for doing damage control? Because you're not doing a very good job.

  114. Re:You can still buy the players, new and refurbis by OregonComputerSoluti · · Score: 1

    Umm, you may not have to hunt around for this specific model -- my combo DVD-VRC player (a cheap-ass one I by Minntek or some similar name that got on sale at Fry's about 9 months ago for less than $40.00) already does this!!

    When I first bought my player, I thought it had a manufacturing defect because when you pop movies into it, they just PLAY -- they don't go to the menu, previews, FBI warning, etc!! You can get to the menu, previews, etc. if you want to, but it is not FORCED on you.

    I just got used to my "crappy" DVD player just doing this until I played some DVD's at my aunts house -- having to go through the FBI warning, previews, etc. DROVE ME NUTZ!! We should NOT have to put up with this crap!!

    This cheap ass combo DVD player does not care if you output to another VCR to record, and there is NOTHING that you cannot skip/ffwd, etc!! I guess that sometimes it pays to buy the cheapest possible player instead of the expensive ones!

  115. Yes it is! by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    You think that attacking other people's ships, stealing their cargo, and making people walk the plank is legal?

    Well, OK, maybe if you are in the tax-free wonderland of Somalia. But not around here. Around here PIRACY IS NOT LEGAL!

    So stop saying "Piracy!=illegal activity", or I'll have to send Mr. Woodes Rogers of the Department of Homeland Security down to see you.

    1. Re:Yes it is! by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is only one known recorded case of real pirates making anyone walk the plank. The only reason it has become so associated with pirates is that it was in Peter Pan.

    2. Re:Yes it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness that you've enlightened us... I guess now all we have to do is go check the sources you've cited... oh wait.

      Fine, I suppose I'll just take it on faith that some random slashdotter knows all.

  116. Article lies, as usual by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what really annoys me? It's how these articles always lie to me because they're just parroting what the MPAA said: ...avoid encryption features that prevent unauthorized duplication... That's a bald faced lie. The Samsung players allowed users to bypass region coding, which has absolutely nothing to do with encryption or unauthorized duplication. Rather, the players allow you to play movies you bought in other countries. That's it. The MPAA has to lie about this because if they told the public what they were really mad about, they would get no sympathy at all from the public (But we want to charge more in Europe! Just because we can! Why are these pirates ruining the game for us?!?).

    It's no wonder the average person turns on them when they finally learn the truth. You can't keep lying to people and expect them to trust you.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Article lies, as usual by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      "It's no wonder the average person turns on them when they finally learn the truth. You can't keep lying to people and expect them to trust you."

      I was right with you up until this comment.

      The average person has no fucking clue. If you TELL them how badly they're being lied to, they'll rationalise it to themselves by assuming that you're stretching the truth, or that the companies aren't really THAT bad, or that there's nothing they can do.

      The average person is wilfully blind, retarded, and damned near too lazy to breathe. Most corporations operate on that principle.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Article lies, as usual by Forbman · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the people who really matter in the US, aren't you or me or Joe Sixpack, but our 541 honorable and esteemable representatives and senators, their staffs, their lobbyists, and various other rulemakers, policy deciders, advisors, etc. throughout the rest of the executive branch offices that could have an effect on the MPAA, but instead like the "IOC Board Member" treatment they get under the covers from the MPAA and RIAA.

    3. Re:Article lies, as usual by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Most people aren't stupid, just ignorant. If you sit down and explain the situation to them they'll almost always come around.

      The problem is: Who do they currently learn about this from, if at all? From the very media companies that have the most to lose if they learn the truth. That's why these press releases are always worded this way, which was my original complaint.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Article lies, as usual by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree with that. Individually, people may be ignorant. Collectively, they become stupid.
      You can explain something to a person, and they'll actually understand--it's really quite wonderful! If left to their own devices though, they'll revert back to their 'pre-enlightened' behaviour, but with more knowledge.

      In the USA, the backers of the Republican party plotted to bring Bush into power, for the sole purpose of invading Iraq as a pretext for eventually establishing control over the entire middle-east. Bush lied about WMD, lied about links between the Hussein family and bin Laden, lied about links between his own family's links to Hussein, and when a large amount of the population was told about it, what did they do? They voted him back in! The media and the political groups can and do lie with impunity, even when the truth is readily available, because people want to believe the authorities, even when they know better. If you tell the truth to people, they'll clamp their hands over their ears and start yelling, "I'm not listening!!!"

      How many people actually refuse to buy from a company after hearing about some horrible behaviour (Coke, Pepsi, Nike, Sony, Halliburton, etc.?) Probably less than a tenth of a percent. So when only 0.1% of the people who actually know the truth don't act on it, how much potential danger is there in lying to the population? If a huge scandal breaks and the populace actually gets outraged (very rare indeed), then in a month they'll have forgotten about it anyways, and things will be back to business as usual.

      People are wilfully ignorant, and will happily replace their blinders after they've been ripped off. That, in my mind, is stupidity.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  117. HDCP hack also works with HD-850! by Niebieski · · Score: 1

    I have a Samsung HD-850 and I just tried to make it region free and to remove HDCP protection.

    Region hack doesn't work, but the the HDCP one does! And the HD-850 is still for sale pretty much everywhere (bought it last week) :)

  118. Re:Just like the RIAA by Dillusionary · · Score: 1

    Man that article hits it right on. Lets not backup there severs because how many times do you actually need to do DR? I mean serious why do you need backups at all. Anyone know their IT department?

  119. Re:A contract breaker is not ipso facto the Bad Gu by nasch · · Score: 1

    Dang, and I believed her when she said she would take me to court. Have to remember that next time...

  120. Better still, get a DVD player without Macrovision by RDW · · Score: 1

    Of course the best solution of all is to get a DVD player that can be set up to switch off the Macrovision pulses altogether. Oddly enough, Samsung also used to make a player, the venerable DVD-709, that could be made both multi-region and 'VCR-friendly' with a simple remote hack. Even if you're not part of an International Analogue Piracy Gang, switching off this dreadful system can be very useful when you have an old TV with limited (or just co-axial) inputs and multiple devices to connect to it - Macrovision blocks the obvious solution of routing the DVD player through the VCR, since it messes up the 'live' signal as well as degrading recordings. Unfortunately, Macrovision-free players are becoming harder to find here in the UK, even though multi-region hacks are more common than ever (even mainstream shops now sell pre-hacked region-free players).

  121. Popcorn timing by Otto · · Score: 1

    If you put a bag of popcorn in a 1000w microwave it takes _at least_ 4 minutes till the kernels stop popping. any less and you are really wasting kernels. you can probably see a bunch at the bottom of the bag. i would make a poit of checking next time.

    The popcorn button on my microwave ends up putting a time on the display of about 1:40 or so, and I usually get very, very few unpopped kernels, on the close order of 20, I think.

    I don't know the wattage offhand, but there's no need to check the bag; I dump the contents into a bowl for subsequent consumption. :)

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  122. You must have crappy cable provider--demand more by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    My cable provider (comcast) provides HD quality that's just as good as OTA and much better than the alleged HD programming proved by Directv. Even upscaled original (i.e. non-shrinked) DVDs though my line doubler don't look at good as quality HD signals (although some DVD transfers do come close). I'd complain to your cable company although we all know that seldom helps.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  123. Re:A contract breaker is not ipso facto the Bad Gu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah, but "unclean hands" doesn't stop her pimp from breaking your legs if you don't pay, so you're probably well off. It also is more difficult with an "escort service", where the nominal service is legal, but the "extras" aren't.

    How do I know about that? Err... mind your own damn business.

  124. Is region encoding still a big deal? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    In the US, you can easaily buy a DVD player for $30-40. If someone in Europe wanted to view US movies, it seems they could easily and cheaply buy a US DVD player and watch all they want. I'm sure they could buy a new one off ebay and have it shipped for $50. They could also have a euro DVD player for playing DVDs from their region. For such a small price and effort, is banning DVD region free player be worth the effort?

    If I were Disney or a major content owner, I'd be more concerned with bitorrent and other file sharing sites.

    1. Re:Is region encoding still a big deal? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If someone in Europe wanted to view US movies, it seems they could easily and cheaply buy a US DVD player and watch all they want.

      But why should they?

      I can walk into any consumer electronics shop and get me a region free/selectable region player (usually with the possibility to disable macrovision and the like as well, at times with alternative firmware).

      Those players will have the advantage of playing both pal and ntsc content, being able to play both on the typical pal tv set people have here, has a scart connector so I can use a rgb connection to my TV etc..

      Oh, and I don't get the bother of having to find me a 110V outlet or converter.

      Usually such players start at around 30 euro (new)

      So, no there is no reason for people in Europe to buy a DVD player from the USA, rather, there are lots of reasons to not do so.

  125. Oppo? by alexo · · Score: 1


    >I reckon the Oppo DV971H should be on every Slashdot reader's wish list.

    Hmmm... HDCP/HDMI?
    Isn't it the epitome for "DRM encumbered"?

    1. Re:Oppo? by hashts · · Score: 1

      Just head over to their site http://oppodigital.com/ and you can get all the info. Amazon carries it as well last I checked. BTW, the model is Oppo OPDV971H, place that in any search and you will find nothing but RAVE reviews for this player. Also, check out the Home Theater Hifi DVD player benchmark (also on Oppo's site). I have one and totally dig it. Awesome player!

    2. Re:Oppo? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      avsforum has a truly massive thread on the Oppo DV971H. Do note throughout that thread's existence, Oppo has updated the firmware several times (you can download and burn an .iso, and update the dvd player from that). It has also replaced the old remote, which was apparently rather horrid, with a newer more functional design.

    3. Re:Oppo? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      It has HDMI, but I don't know about HDCP. I do know it works with my TV that has HDMI, plays DVDs from all regions and all standards on it once you enter a code on the remote (yes, PAL and NTSC), and also plays MPEG-1 and MPEG-4 TV shows I've downloaded.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:Oppo? by alexo · · Score: 1


      Does it do HD over Component?
      According to the specs, it does not.

    5. Re:Oppo? by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Yeah it was a pretty rough remote. My first email to them (which was responded to in 2 days) was just a comment on what I liked and dis-liked. They told me that they replaced it after I bought mine and I could get a new one for free from their website. I just had to plunk in my serial number. A week later I had the new one which is a lot better.

      My comments then were:
      Everything is awesome except:
      - Disc tray is really skinny (due to low profile design) and I am always afraid to drop the dvd in.
      - Disc tray comes out 90% but you have to put the dvd in at an angle as there is a little bit that is covered by the upper lip of the player body. (even then it is a minor annoyance)
      - Hitting power on the DVD Player will not automatically close drive before powering off (it will work though if you do it through the remote and they are looking into incorporating into their next release)

    6. Re:Oppo? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      No idea, I'm afraid. I connect it to the TV via HDMI.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  126. Oppo? by demonbug · · Score: 1

    Where can one find info about the Oppo OPV971? I googled it (and tried yahoo and msn), and came up with exactly one hit, to AVS Forum, which had zero information. Does this actually exist, and if so, where might I find one?

  127. Hehe by apankrat · · Score: 1

    How crazy would the world get if I could download mercedes.torrent, big_mac_combo.zip, and refreshing columbianblow.rar? .. INFECTED big_mac_combo.zip .. that'd be fun for the whole family :)

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  128. Benign DVD players by alexo · · Score: 2, Interesting


    There must be other players that allow that.

    Can anyone post their recommendations for "benign" DVD players that:
    - Allow one to play DVDs from all regions,
    - Allow skipping offensive content (e.g., FBI warnings),
    - Allow bypassing Macrovision,

    and, most importantly:
    - Bypass HDCP/HDMI DRM crap by allowing full resolution (or upconverted) HD video output over component.

    1. Re:Benign DVD players by StarTux · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of them out there as I am finding. My DVD player I got from Wal-Mart now is set to region 0. MPAA can take a walk, unless they want to release a region 1 version of It Ain't Half Hot Mum and a load of other titles from the UK. I'm sure I'm not alone...

      Check the make and model of each DVD player and simply search for the codes, some work and some do not.

      StarTux

  129. I know this has to be redundant in this thread by thewise1 · · Score: 1

    but I hope that the MPAA and RIAA die in a fire.

  130. Re:Just like the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nuts. Honestly, what are they selling? Is there any other product that has such strict rules regarding it's use? I can't think of any precedent for this, and it's hard to believe they would be allowed to make one now. It'd be simple, just don't watch any new movies/dvds for a couple months, don't let your kids, encourage others to do the same. People used to do this to show their distaste in a companies practices, and it would get the point across. Just boycott them until they come back into the realm of actual fair use. I'm not for pirating, but once you buy something, you should be allowed to view it however you like.

  131. Nida Nida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have known Geeks do not like DRM.
    And most of people in Slashdot sticks up for Samsung.

    But Thiniking deeply, please.
    Have you thought about Korean mentality?

    They do not mind any copy rights. also copy left.

  132. A funny side effect by Ullteppe · · Score: 1
    A funny side effect of this if the MPAA gets their way is that this could increase the sales of cheap far-eastern players even more (and decrease the sales of the big-name players). A lot of cheap DVD-player manufacturer don't even pay the DVD licensing fees ($5 in licensing costs on a player that is sold for $60 retails does not make much sense).

    Why buy big-name players with region-coding when you can buy cheap players without region coding for less?

  133. I bought an hd841 off ebay. by bpevansncsu · · Score: 1

    I bought one on eBay last week. Refurbished HD841 and it looks like they've blocked the HDCP Hack as part of being refurbished. :-( That's the only reason why I bought the HD841 anyway.

  134. Re:Oppo? (DRM) by TPS+Report · · Score: 2, Informative
    Oppo OPDV971H:

    MAKE REGION FREE:
    The latest shipment of units are not region free. To change to region free mode do this:

    1. Press Setup on remote control to access the setup page
    3. A secret menu will pop up
    2. Enter 9210 on the remote
    5. Press Setup on remote again to exit
    4. Select 0 to 6 in region code (0 is region free)

    NOTE: This document utilizes TPS REPORT encryption. Breaking or attempting to reverse-engineer this encryption is a violation of the DMCA.


    USE WITH HDCP:

    1. No HDCP issues as there isn't any HDCP!

    Thanks to all the previous posters regarding this player. I did not know this product existed, and it seems to do pretty much everything I want it to do. Thanks again.
    --
    I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven...
  135. Summary judgment by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    I after all know the Kryptonite of any standard corporate lawyer-ninja squad: the jury trial. You'll be hard pressed to find a jury that will award against Joe Q. Public to a multi-billion dollar corporation for doing something that seems reasonable.

    Which is why big-shot corporate attorneys will do their damnedest to get a summary judgment. This means that the presiding judge rules that even if the facts are exactly as the alleged infringer states them, what he or she did still violates law. In the United States, juries are said to try the facts, not the law.

  136. Logic analyzer owner == insane? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should seek professional help if you are hearing your DVD player and DVDs speaking to each other.

    That's exactly what an MPAA studio would say, to try to convince the sheeple that owners of logic analyzers necessarily need professional help.

  137. Re:Just like the RIAA by Alsee · · Score: 1

    P.S.
    There is a new line of MPAA approved automobiles where it is criminal to crack the lock on the hood under any circumstances.

    There is no need for it to be non-criminal for the owner of the car or a mechanic to open the hood for repairs because replacement cars are readily available at affordable prices.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  138. Here we go, 'truth' time... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    "Cutting the rate of increase to a point below the rate of inflation is a decrease in actual spending power of that budget. This is not "playing with words", this is the truth."

    Ah yes, the elusive 'truth'.

    I KNEW someone was going to take that bait... Ok, I'll buy in too.

    At a time when Republicans actually gave a shit about cutting spending (as opposed to now), cuts were made across the board - approved by our esteemed President Clinton. ALL agencies were biting the bullet back then but what was worse than that was the irresponsible hysterics from the Lefties in response to cuts in their favorite programs like school lunch.

    There were some GREAT lines like these: "They're starving the CHILDREN!" and "What about the CHILDREN?!" How Feinstein and Boxer continue to get reelected befuddles me, you'd think their screeching alone would be enough for most voter's heads to explode. I'd like to think that most of us out East just shake our heads in disbelief, but then there's Massachusetts to consider...

    Nevertheless, keep in mind that previous increases under the (D) Congress were well over inflationary figures because they had been grandfathered in due to higher inflation in the past (remember the Carter years?) - especially in programs like school lunch. In short, they got less because they got more before. It's not so much 'them that got, get', it's more like, 'them that got, got fair'. In any case, their overreaction was a quite melodramic and little more than hot soundbites for the press. This is especially true in light of the obesity stats of our 'starving children', but I digress. In *most* cases, spending was held to inflationary levels - and no more.

    But you tell me what's likely to resonate more with the public: "They're STARVING the CHILDREN!" or a page and a half dedicated to calmly and fully explaining the situation. Once again, hysterics won the day and the nasty-wasty greedy Republicans were again villified by the liberal press. If there's any major difference between Republicans then and now, it's that they've learned how to spin as well as the Dems.

    As I recall, a certain president Clinton took pride in the fact that the budget was balanced during his administration. Balanced no doubt on the backs of the working poor and the children, right? Goddamn Republicans again! Go Clinton, go!

    Now back to the subject at hand - the RIAA/MPAA screaming and crying about piracy and lost revenue. It's all for the press - these people continue to be profitable even as they DRM us to death and work like machines to take away what little fair use we have left. I think the analogy of 90's lib Dems is probably on target - it's a stunt designed to get press, only I'd feel more sorry for our fat children than either of these monopolistic organizations...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh but they do give a shit cutting spending..in America. Iraq gets as much as it needs, but over here the levies in Louisiana still won't get fixed. It's absolutely amazing that Bush will spend any amount on Iraq, but will tell the people of New Orleans to go fuck themselves at the same time.

    2. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nice work on the "truth" pal. Now explain the following Republican creations: "Death Tax" and "Partial Birth Abortion".

      k,thx,bye.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    3. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      "There were some GREAT lines like these: "They're starving the CHILDREN!" and "What about the CHILDREN?!" How Feinstein and Boxer continue to get reelected befuddles me, you'd think their screeching alone would be enough for most voter's heads to explode. I'd like to think that most of us out East just shake our heads in disbelief, but then there's Massachusetts to consider..."

      Concern for the children. What an awful concept. There ought to be a law against that, darn it.

      We'll call it:
      The Jonathan Swift - No, Seriously Amendment.
      or
      The "Let Them Eat Cake" Act.

      Better yet, considering who we have in office now, let's call it the "But if we think of the children, how will United Airlines eat?" Act or the "Forget the Children, What About BOEING?" Act?

      Oh, I know. I have a better name for what your Republican pals espouse:

      They've given America the landmark "Forget the children, Leave No Investor Behind!" Act.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    4. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      Honest concern for the children is one thing, melodramatic statements made to sway the weak minded (or inattentive) is another. The reality of the situation is that we have heavier kids than ever now - half-starved waifs are the kind of thing you'd think we'd be seeing out there. Well, statistically we're not.

      As for your 'considering who we have in office now..." comment: get fucking real. CONGRESS approved the UA deal as much as the president did - and guess what? There was PLENTY of Dem support for it as well (HINT: Unions). Of course, I saw nothing of that in the Slate article. Wonder why? Couldn't be their obvious minority view liberal slant, could it? Nahhh... Just keep in mind that yours is the minority view my friend - that's why we have a Rep congress and president. Do me a favor and don't change your tack - keep vilifying Bush and trying to convince the majority that voted them in that they're idiots - it's making lots of friends and working wonders for the election cycles.

      The Boeing article depends on your point of view. If you feel it is in our national interest to have our own aircraft industry that is cutting edge and provide military aircraft we can count on, then yes, gov't support is necessary. There is simply no way Boeing (or any other aircraft company) could do the kind of R&D they do without that support anymore than Airbus has with their recent aircraft. By referring to this article you make it sound like the Bush administration somehow invented this concept of gov't and private industry scratching a common itch. Uh, it's been done for years and in this particular industry the rewards to the general public have more than justified the cost.

      Again, why is it evil for Boeing to take what they've learned in military orders and apply it to commercial applications? The work still had to be done for the military, one way or the other. Why does it make some sort of 'sense' to you to throw all of that knowledge away? Or is it that your obvious socialist agenda somehow demands that companies be punished for being too 'kapitalistic' and working directly with our military?

      By the way, I think you'll find an equal number of Dems supporting Boeing, if for no other reason than the unions that work for them.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    5. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by Travoltus · · Score: 1
      Honest concern for the children is one thing, melodramatic statements made to sway the weak minded (or inattentive) is another. The reality of the situation is that we have heavier kids than ever now - half-starved waifs are the kind of thing you'd think we'd be seeing out there. Well, statistically we're not.

      Yes, but their health care options are dwindling, and there are a lot of homeless children out there. The "poor and fat" ones can't afford healthy food which costs more than a $.99 cheese burger. Kids need better options for nutrition.

      Just keep in mind that yours is the minority view my friend - that's why we have a Rep congress and president. Do me a favor and don't change your tack - keep vilifying Bush and trying to convince the majority that voted them in that they're idiots - it's making lots of friends and working wonders for the election cycles.

      Tell that to Ahhhhnuld. I believe the election year of 2005 showed Democrats aren't in the minority any more. There are 57 million of us very angry Kerry voters, and we want blood. That's why we brought Ahhhhnuld to his knees before us. And take note that the losses of support have been entirely for the pro-Bush camp as of late, not for liberals who oppose him. Ever notice how his own party faithful have problems with him now? The liberals don't have that problem; to say that our 57 million people are galvanized, is putting it lightly. You've almost COMPLETELY lost the independent vote.

      And half of these Republicans you talk about, appear to be on their way to prison or buried in crippling scandals. By the time the next election cycle comes along, how many of them will even be walking free?

      Now, let us demonstrate how thoroughly wrong you are. A recent February 9, 2006 poll found that 42% of Americans believe that Democrats should win the 2006 elections, compared to 34% of Republicans. Where did I get this? A left wing blog? Uh, no. It was a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll that said this. Here's the proof from the right wing horse's mouth itself: http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/poll_020906.pd f

      If you can't even get Fox News to say the Republicans are favored by most Americans, you know the Republicans are screwed and that your comments were unsalvageably wrong. Democrats are NOT going to be the minority after November, and we're certainly not the minority in America.

      Now as for the Dem/union support, yes, it's true, there's corruption in the Democratic party, and we certainly need intervention to keep our aerospace industry competitive. But hey, wait a minute, man, aren't you a Republican? Don't you oppose Government intervention in the market? Oh yeah, that's right, you oppose it only when it benefits us regular citizens and not some super wealthy hyperbillionaire and his world spanning corporation. Thank you very much for admitting you are a Corporate Socialist.

      Oh and you and your Corporate Socialism won't last very long with all that offshoring that companies are doing. What good is it to research the latest military technology when you turn right around and have it constructed in factories in places like China? Boeing's offshoring efforts threaten to facilitate the existing pandemic of foreign and industrial espionage, seeing as its China and Moscow facilities are inherently sitting next to the home nests of some of the world's biggest scofflaws - the Chinese Government and the Russian Mafia.

      Here's an idea for you. The only way you're going to see Boeing or anyone else win the economic game is to ensure that the middle class continues to grow. That might be why the Democrats support Boeing and their unions: the Democrats know better than to wipe out middle class jobs. Bush doesn't get it.

      That's probably why Fox News now says the American people want to replace the Republicans in office with Democrats.
      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    6. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by nursedave · · Score: 1
      Nice work on the "truth" pal. Now explain the following Republican creations: "Death Tax" and "Partial Birth Abortion".


      Ok, I'll bite.

      "Death Tax": After earnings have already been taxed, if the earner dies and leaves behind assets willed to another, then those assets, the money used to buy them having already been taxed, is taxed again. It is a tax imposed upon a person's assets after they have died; hence, "death tax." This type of tax was designed by the Democrats to 'punish' the wealthy scion families. People like Ted "Wanna come for a ride in my Olds" Kennedy supported this tax. Why would someone who obviously falls under the wealthy scion family heading support something like this? Because his wealth, none of it earned by him but by his father, is structured into tax dodges, such as his Arctic Oil company, which is structured into royalty trusts and he avoids paying taxes on its earnings. Pretty slick, eh?

      "Partial Birth Abortion": This is a little easier to describe. The procedure is called "intact dilation and extraction" by those who want a nice fluffy name for it. It is literally the instigation of a breech presentation *and* delivery of the baby, with only the head still within the birth canal, followed by piercing the area under the occipital notch of the cranium with scissors and introduction of a long suction catheter to suction the brains out of the living infant, then the head is allowed to deliver. When delivering a breech presentation where you actually want the baby to, you know, *live*, if the head gets hung up (because of the angles of the mother's pelvis), you have to insert the fingers in a 'V' around the face and nose to allow the infant, whose head is constricting the umbilical cord at this point, to breathe. At any rate, since the infant is 'partially delivered' then 'aborted', the term 'partial birth abortion' is a fairly accurate name for the procedure.

      Glad I could be of help.
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    7. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Clearly you have poor reading comprehension. The point of my post is to show (in response of the previous poster) how the Repubs use word games to twist the truth. There's no such thing as a "death tax". It's called estate taxes. They've existed since time immemorial. They used the word "death" to make it sound really bad so that people would support it. After all, it's so mean to tax the dead! rofl We wouldn't want poor Biff to only get 30 million in inheritance when he can get 40 million. Imagine his suffering!

      There is NO SUCH THING AS PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION. It's a made up phrase. Look it up goober.

      Finally, I'm not a democrat so feel free to insult them all you like. I don't give a shit because I don't like them anymore than I like braindead and brainwashed replublicans (such as yourself).

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    8. Re:Here we go, 'truth' time... by nursedave · · Score: 1

      Sorry, 'pard, you seem to be the one with the reading comprehension. Your silly 'refutation', which I am sure you think was quite witty, actually did nothing but say, "Uh-huh, is so!" You did not address the well thought out and presented information I had in my post. Typical.

      Look it up goober? Indeed, someone here does need to be looking it up, and since I presented exactly what a Partial Birth Abortion (or ID&E) is, I feel no need to do it again when I can simply refer you to my original and completey unrefuted post. The same goes for the information on the Death Tax that I posted.

      I am also impressed by your claim to not be a Democrat so I can make fun of them all I want; I presume you are referring to my tagline. Your claim doesn't hold much water, since you then attempt to insult me as a 'brainwashed republican.' I don't believe myself to be brainwashed, as I examine the information, seek out new information if what I find doesn't satisfy me, and *then* make my decision and opinion, as opposed to people who claim the most bizarro things about Bush and Republicans (such as the claim that they are brainwashed).

      Point 15, love, my favor.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

  139. just remember... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    ...the MPAA defines "piracy" along these lines: "you fucking serfs watch what we tell you to watch, and when, and you'll goddamn well like it and ask for more! Anyone who dares to disagree with us, their proper overlords, should be put up against a wall and shot!"

    Remember, this is about control, not money. They could easily change their business model and make huge, unprecedented profits, but in order to do that they'd have to cede the control they've had over the viewing public for more than a half-century. And they'll NEVER do that. They'd rather go down in flames (and take you with them) than even consider the notion.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  140. Re:Just like the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the recent Volvo 'designed for women'. /seemed so udderly sexist.

  141. Did you read your own quote? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    "which were down sharply as audiences proved apathetic for many time-tested movie formulas."

    OK, audiences aren't willing to shell out big bones to see crap. They aren't buying pirate copies, they're just not watching crap.

  142. Major miscalculation-"Side Rule". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "More accurately, the MPAA estimates that the retail value of pirated films, etc, was $5.4bn. Now I'm not advocating piracy, but when I was a student a couple of years ago I would download albums and films, and I can personally guarantee that it did not cost the industry any money - simply because as a poor student I couldn't afford to buy them. If I hadn't downloaded them, I just wouldn't have seen them, and that's that."

    Of course poor students were simply out of luck before the Internet made it possible to sample the goods in their entirity. And the invention of businesses like Netflix and Blockbuster didn't change that fact.

    "The MPAA seems to think there's a dichotomy of pirating films or purchasing them, and by extension that if we make pirating impossible, then every pirate will go out and purchase everything that they would otherwise have pirated. And that, my friends, is a rather baseless claim (even if you're completely unaware of the animosity towards studios in general)."

    No more a "baseless claim" than "My pirating is helping the artist through free advertising". The dichotomy is that neither side wants to admit that they play fast and loose with the truth to bolster their arguments.

  143. Strange - by Geminii · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to buy ANY player with DRM on it? That'd be like buying a car I could only drive by cramming myself into the glovebox.

  144. Nah, I watched Johnny Dep do it as well by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    no text

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  145. Thanks; by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    it seems that they're into stock swindles but not into attacking their own customers. Half marks, I guess.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  146. SMTPE? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Geeze I hope you are a member of SMPTE

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  147. Eveen better, play divx by upgrading the firmware by Krono5 · · Score: 1

    The HD745 Firmware Hack gives your Samsung HD841 DivX playback, MP3 DVD and HDCP Free (1080i via Component Input). Section 1: Go to (and join) - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZoranDVD > Files (Samsung HD841 Firmware) Read - DivX_update_manual.pdf (How to create firmware update CD) Download Firmware - 745ver2for841.zip Download and read - 745to841HowTo.zip (Firmware modification instructions) Make your Firmware Update Disc and follow the update instructions. Section 2: After the update your DVD paler will default to PAL video. To change it back to NTSC do the following: Start from power off and no disc. 1. Power on and give it a few seconds to power up 2. Press Menu. The selected menu is not correct, so... 3. Up Arrow ONCE puts you at setup. 4. Right Arrow goes into setup. 5. Down Arrow TWICE to highlight Display. 6. Right Arrow to select Display settings. 7. Down Arrow FOUR (4) times to get to PAL/NTSC. 8. Right Arrow changes from PAL to NTSC (and pushing again changes back to PAL). Section 3: If you're *not* using the HDMI/DVI output skip this section. DO THIS WITH THE TRAY EMPTY (no disc). The HD745 Firmware update does not default to P-SCAN&DVI output. To put it back into P-SCAN&DVI press the VIDEO SEL button on your remote, slowly (about every 10/15 seconds), until your picture comes back. Make sure you to this slowly because once you land on the right selection it will take your display a few seconds to detect the output from your DVD player and display it on the screen. Section 4: After the update your DVD player will default to region 2. To make your DVD player Region Free (Region 9, ALL REGIONS) do the following (this only works after the HD745 Firmware update): 1. Turn on player with no disc in the tray. "No disk" appears on screen. 2. Press the "Repeat" key on the remote. 3. Press "57538" on the remote. A number should appear on screen, indicating your player's current region (e.g. "2"). 4. Press the number for your required region (e.g. "1") or "9" for region-free/all-regions. The number will appear on screen, replacing the previous number (from step 3). 5. Press "Open/Close Tray" and leave the tray open for a few seconds. 6. Press "Power On/Off". The tray closes automatically and the player turns off. Next time you turn it on, it is region free (or whatever Region you selected in step 4). That's it, you're done! Now got through you're setup for audio and video and you're done. - Enjoy

  148. Sound Blaster Live/Audigy hype? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I've got to say, the Live thing catched me and backfired to me in double. While it does send out 'surround" the signal needs to be redirected from digital-to-spdif or it won't work. The digital out supports only 2 speakers and a subwoofer ; eventually a middle speaker if you are lucky depending on the equipment you use.

    I have bought myself a BlueGears HDA Digital X-Mystique 7.1, which has not only a Dolby Live surround output; supporting REAL 5.1 instead of the "thruput" Creative Labs solution; but it also costs half the price.

    Therefor I think the live/audigy cards are not the real (good/best) thing(tm) for home-theater-systems; which is suggested by the site you have given.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  149. Subtitles aren't closed captions! by Buran · · Score: 1

    But are you using the DVD's subtitle option or the remote's "subtitle" button? Again, this IS NOT the same thing as closed captioning. Closed captions are activated using the TV (set to CC1) and are decoded and displayed by the TV.

    1. Re:Subtitles aren't closed captions! by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I was using the subtitle option on the remote for my DVD player. After reading your post, I went into my tv to turn on Closed Captioning and there is no option for CC on the DVI input (haven't checked the HDMI but I suspect it is missing there as well) so it seems that the TV I have doesn't do CC over DVI.

      Could it be that other than Analog stream based sources, they are trying to offload Closed Captioning to the source and inserting the text into the video stream before it gets to the TV? I don't know a lot about the intricacies of CC as I have been fortunate to have never needed it.